No preview available
cp11-28-2000 cNOVEMBER 2000 HUTCHINSON CITY CALENDAR WEEK OF SUNDAY -26- THURSDAY -30- MONDAY -27- Noon — Hutchinson Safety Council Meeting at Heritage Center 1:30 p.m. — Management Team in Main Conference Room 4:30 p.m. — Library Board Meeting at Library TUESDAY -28- 7:00 am. — Leadership Team Meeting in Main Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — Budget Workshop in Main Conference Room WEDNESDAY -29- 3:00 p.m. — Utilities Commission at Utilities Office s JJ � �Ll• 1 rf i 5:30 p.m. - City Council Meeting in Council Chambers 5:15 p.m. — Tree Board at City Center Main Conference Room III• -1- SATURDAY -2- C =Conference M = Meeting S = Seminar T = Training V =Vacation AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2000 2. INVOCATION — Pastor Greg Nelson, Bethlehem United Methodist Church PRESENTATION OF 2000 SAFETY AWARD TO HUTCHINSON WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY BY JERRY LEGARDE, CHAIR OF CENTRAL STATES WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSOCIATION 3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of November 14, 2000 Action - Motion to approve as presented 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00-286 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 3 AND 10.08 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE REGARDING TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNA (SECOND READING AND • ADOPT) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11619 — TRANSFERRING 525,000 FROM 1998 IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEBT SERVICE BONDS AND TRANSFERRING 517,700 FROM GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE HALL DEBT SERVICE FUND TO GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11620 — TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND, ECONOMIC LOAN, ENERGY LOAN, 1980, 1990 AND 1992 TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE FOR 1998, TO HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (EDA) FUND 4. RESOLUTION NO. 11621 — TRANSFERRING S200,200 FROM WATER SEWER & REFUSE FUND TO 1994 IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 1995 IMPROVEMENT BONDS AND GENERAL FUND 5. RESOLUTION NO. 11622 — TRANSFERRING $251,000 FROM LIQUOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND (c) PLANNING COMMISSION• 1. VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT FOR RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR ACCESS (216/218 5TH AVENUE NE) AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND SHIRLEY BOWEN WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11616) 2. VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN-HOME CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — NOVEMBER 28, 2000 0 (LOT 2, BLOCK 3 OF WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES) EXCEEDING 35% MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AS REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11617) 3. VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF GARAGE ADDITION (705 MAIN STREET S.) AS REQUESTED BY DARREL AND SHARON HOOSLINE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11618) 4. REZONING FROM INDUSTRIAL TO R -2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AS REQUESTED BY BARBARA AND GLEN FIELD WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00-287 AND SET SECOND READING) (d) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING /PUBLIC WORKS (e) FINANCIAL REPORT FROM FINANCE DIRECTOR (f) AUTHORIZATION FOR INVESTMENTS Action — Motion to approve consent agenda PUBLIC HEARIN G —NONE 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS - NONE 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE S. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING LICENSE FEE FOR MASSAGE SERVICES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (b) 2001 BUDGET UPDATE BY FINANCE DIRECTOR Action — (c) CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE RENEWAL AND PREMIUM INCREASE COST -SHARE PROPOSAL Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and enter into agreement (d) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve • 2 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — NOVEMBER 28. 2000 (e) PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED STORMWATER UTILITY AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Action — (f) DISCUSSION OF HOLDING DECEMBER 26, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Action - (g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF VOICE RECORDER SYSTEM FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (h) CONSIDERATION OF CIVIC ARENA HEATING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve 9. MISC L NEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS VERIFIED 10. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS 1 Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 11. ADJOURN 0 N _ _.... __. _ �. From: To: Date: Subject: 40 Marion GRAHAM MARILYN J SWANSON 11/14/00 12:56PM Marilyn, Marilyn, Please add to the agenda for the November 28th Council meeting for a 5:30 presentation if possible: Jerry LeGarde, Chair of the Central States Water Environment Association will be attending the Council Meeting On November 28th to present:The City of Hutchinson, Waste Water Treatment Facility with the 2000 Safety Award from the Minnesota Section of the Central States Water Environment Association for promoting an Active and Effective Safety Program. The award was received at the 15th Annual Conference on the Environment November 1, 2000, Bloomington MN. Marion Graham attended the conference and accepted the award on behalf of the City of Hutchinson, Wastewater Department. Randy Starke will accept the award plaque at the City Council Mtg. Randy Starke was Safety Chair for the Wastewater Dept at the time the award packet was submitted. Any further questions, please give me a call. Thanks Marion Marion Graham City of Hutchinson, WWTF 111 Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 phone: 320.234.4233 fax: 320.234.4467 email: mgraham @ci.hutchinson.mn.us CC: Brenda Ewing; Randy DEVRIES; Randy Starke is : I I I .. c� MINNf_SOTA SEC `ION ;+ # CEN RAL S fnl ES WA I ER ENVIRONMEN I ASSOCIn I :ON {k. AN 2000 � = is ` AFI= i Y AWARD � 4 PRFSWFD 7 0 C;i fY OF HU I"C` i'NSON W AS I f: Wnl - f:R I'RF:n I Mf N I* PLAN I' I OR I ROMOIING AN nCIIVF (_FFFCIIVf: SAFF "CY PROGRAM i. y t x �' • p -, A' I . R 1 p . { 4 • I I� i tt .: ..' � 1 � SJ?. �... .. ,: r i $h� ., — dJP 6Ytl1l• - f f u y - �. j, r : I I I .. c� MINNf_SOTA SEC `ION ;+ # CEN RAL S fnl ES WA I ER ENVIRONMEN I ASSOCIn I :ON {k. AN 2000 � = is ` AFI= i Y AWARD � 4 PRFSWFD 7 0 C;i fY OF HU I"C` i'NSON W AS I f: Wnl - f:R I'RF:n I Mf N I* PLAN I' I OR I ROMOIING AN nCIIVF (_FFFCIIVf: SAFF "CY PROGRAM i. y MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 1. Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jim Haugen, John Mlinar. Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg, and City Attorney Richard Schieffer. 2. Pastor Greg Nelson gave the invocation. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of October 24, 2000, special meeting of November 8, 2000 and bid openings of October 27, 2000 and November 2, 2000 were approved as presented. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT FOR OCTOBER 2000 2. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23, 2000 3. TREE BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. RESOLUTION NO. 11614 — RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5040, LETTING NO. &PROJECT NO. 00 -17 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11615 — RELEASING PLEDGED SECURITIES FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO., HUTCHINSON, MN (c) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR POLICE SERVICES TO ENTER INTO TWO CONTRACTS: 1. MULTI - JURISDICTIONAL NETWORK ORGANIZATION (MJNO) 2. GRANT CONSULTANT (d) APPOINTMENTS • GALE NELSON TO SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD (FILL UNEXPIRED TERM) • DONNA BAYSINGER TO POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (FILL UNEXPIRED TERM) (e) SHORT -TERM INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the consent agenda. Motion unanim ously carried. 5. PUBLIC HEARING — NONE • 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) PRESENTATION BY BECKY FELLING OF MCLEOD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH REGARDING NON - SMOKING ISSUE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 0 Becky Felling, McLeod County Public Health, stated she represented the community and medical profession. A few years ago she worked on the "no smoking" and tobacco program through the county. She has remained active in the promotion of smoke free environments. Jean Johnson, McLeod County Public Health, gave a presentation on the effects of second -hand smoke from cigarettes, cigars and pipes. She informed the audience that there were over 4,000 chemicals in second -hand smoke, and she gave data to confirm her statement Johnson noted that only 13% of the population smokes. The presenter stated that workers in restaurants and bars have 3% to 6% more exposure to second- hand smoke than other people. Two medical doctors and a registered nurse from the Hutchinson Medical Center acknowledged that tobacco smoke is harmful. They thought other people should not be exposed to this danger, and the government should enact regulations on smoking that is related to public health. These medical professionals cited examples of health problems their patients had as a result of smoking. The Mayor commented on his recent request for public input regarding the smoking issue. He received 221 responses in favor of an ordinance and 12 or 13 were opposed. Torgerson noted that WCCO -TV had picked up on the tobacco issue in Hutchinson and mentioned it on their program the next day after the City Council meeting. The Mayor had talked to five restaurant owners, and three were in favor of an ordinance, while two had no opinion. He thought the response was a mandate from the public to take action. Haugen stated he had talked to friends who smoke, and they would support the no smoking proposal for restaurants. Mlinar reported he had solicited responses, and the responders thought the government should not interfere. Rather, it was up to the restaurant owners to enforce a policy on smoking. Peterson noted that two Council Members supported the ordinance and two were against the government adopting a no smoking ordinance. She had no disagreement with the restaurant owners making a decision on their own. At first Hoversten did not think there was a need for more laws. After he had visited with a restaurant owner, and the individual did not express opposition, Hoversten thought it was time to pass an ordinance for no smoking. Sam Johnson, a student and bus boy at McCormick's, commented that while only 15% of the customers smoke, the smoke floats into the no smoking area. The workers go home smelling of smoke. He did not think this was acceptable to the other people in the restaurant. Adam Lane, a student, stated he was against big tobacco and believed the facts that were being presented. However, he questioned how the smokers would interpret the issue. Lane thought they would be offended by the choice of no smoking, and it should be left to the restaurants to set their own policy. It was noted that HTI provided the smokers an outside area. Bruce Santelman, Country Kitchen, stated he was being beat up as a restaurant CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 owner. He thought the government should be involved in enforcing the law, and he was in favor of a no smoking ordinance. Santelman commented it was not a good situation for the employees. He thought there would be a "smoke free" enforcement in all establishments within the next five years. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen, to ban smoking in restaurants. Motion unanimously carried. Peterson requested some options be included in the ordinance. The City Attorney was directed to prepare a draft ordinance. (b) POST OFFICE UPDATE BY CITY ATTORNEY RICHARD SCHIEFFER Schieffer presented a report on the U.S. Postal Services' recent position to keep the new postal facility in the downtown area. The City wanted to obtain inexpensive property and had used the Economic Development Authority to create an area large enough for the post office building. The Hwy. 15 South property was their first choice because it was bare land; however, the Postal Services has committed to the proposed downtown location contingent upon the land being cheaper than the acquisition of the other property and utilities. The EDA has set a public hearing on December 11 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Center Council Chambers to begin the process 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 18'x 40' ADDITION REQUESTED BY TRI- COUNTY WATER CONDITIONING INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATIONS AND WITHOUT FAVORABLE STAFF RECOMMENDATION (DEFERRED OCTOBER 24, 2000) Rodeberg stated this property had been added onto once before. He stated the issues were two -fold. First, the area requires a conditional use process and setbacks. The area being recommended for parking is in the City right-of-way, and drainage might be an issue. The building is located only 8' from the trunk highway. Second, Mn/DOT's position is to not take any stand at this time since it is not in the purchase process, but most likely they will purchase the property in the future. The current concern is that the City staff recommended denial, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of a conditional use permit. The property owner's investment is in a damaged building caused by a construction project. The building may or may not be in existence in five years. Don Hantge, property owner, commented that he had met with Mn/DOT. They were not sure of the time frame of their project, and the project might not be done in 2006 if funds were unavailable. Therefore, he was advised to proceed at his own discretion. Haugen reported that the Planning Commission looked favorably on the proposed plan. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the conditional use permit and to adopt Resolution No. 11609. Motion unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO.2 FOR COMPOST OFFICE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 (DEFERRED OCTOBER 24, 2000) Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to defer to the December 12, 2000 City Council meeting. Motion unanimously carried. 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR PURCHASE OF LOGS AND CUT WOOD TO DUANE AND SHIRLEY OTTO Motion by Haugen, second by Mlinar to approve and award the bid of $150.00 to Shirley and Duane Otto. Motion unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO HUNTER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, SECOND ADDITION Rodeberg reported the project had been delayed for a year. The sewer, water and gravel base would be installed by December 2001, and the wear course would be installed by December 2002. Motion by Peterson, second by Mlinar to approve the amendment. Motion unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF WAIVING BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIT Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve waiving the building permit fees • of $149.79 for the foundation and excavation and $100.00 for the moving fee. Motion unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNA ORDINANCE Julie Wischnack, Director of Building/Planning/Zoning, reported the revised ordinance would prohibit guy wires to be constructed. Also, a co- location requirement was added that was modeled after the League of Minnesota Cities' ordinance. The presenter noted that existing towers would be grandfathered in and normal maintenance allowed. The moratorium that had been in effect for the past six months had been recently removed. Motion by Haugen, second by Mlinar to approve fast reading of Ordinance No. 00- 286 and to set the second reading for November 28, 2000. Motion unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF PROCEEDING WITH STORM WATER UTILITY Rodeberg informed the City Council of the storm water utility time frame. He stated a mailing would be sent with the November water /sewer bills, and an open house would be held on December 7 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the City Center. Then an ordinance would be presented for first reading at the December 12 meeting. (f) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR SW BYPASS is 4 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 The City Engineer reported the City had been working with the County to obtain federal funding for the SW Bypass of Hutchinson that was proposed in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Funding will most likely be available for 80% of the construction cost within the next five years, but for the fast phase a Route Analysis and Environmental Review is needed. Rodeberg stated proposals had been received ranging from $90,000 to $150,000. He recommended that the City and County each pay one -half of the cost for the work and that the City limits its share to $50,000. The Engineer stated the City would enter into an agreement at a later time. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to approve the City's shared cost up to $50,000. Motion unanimously carried. (g) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER FOR SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 2 (LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00 -02) Rodeberg reported the contractor had requested additional compensation due to a change in conditions for the south area trunk sewer project. It was his recommendation that the City agree to pay up to $25,000 for the additional work to complete the improvement according to contract specifications. It was noted that the contractor had agreed to this proposal. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve the $25,000 change order. Motion unanimously carried. • (h) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR SECOND ADDITION TO ROLLING MEADOWS Rodeberg reported the developer would pay all the costs for improvements to serve the site with 100% assessment. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve the subdivision agreement. Motion unanimously carried. (i) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT FOR SOUTH GRADE ROAD TRUNK SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 01 -18) The City Engineer reported this project would be budgeted for 2001 and would be paid for by sewer trunk funds. He recommended awarding the consulting work to SEH at a cost not to exceed $7,430 for the preliminary report and $82,890 for completing the design, survey and plans and specifications. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve SEH as the consultant at the proposed costs. Motion unanimously carried. (j) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AIRPORT FUELING SYSTEM AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION It was reported that the current aviation gas fueling system at the airport was malfunctioning and obsolete. Therefore, it was recommended to replace the fueling system software, hardware and payment interface equipment with current technology. • Mn/DOT Aeronautics will reimburse one -half of the proposed $15,000 cost. Motion by Haugen, second by Mlinar to approve the State Aid Agreement and to CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 adopt Resolution No. 11613. Motion unanim ously carried. (k) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING AIRPORT FARM LEASE AGREEMENT FOR 93.5 TILLABLE ACRES Staff recommended to reject all the bids received and to readvertise the farmland. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to reject the bids and rebid. Motion unanimously carried. (1) CONSIDERATION OF REMOVING SILVER MAPLE TREES ON BRADFORD, RANDALL AND SHERWOOD STREETS SW City Forester Mark Schnobrich showed overheads of the area in which the Tree Board recommended removing the silver maple trees on Bradford, Randall and Sherwood Streets SW. He reported the trees were planted in the early 1970s, but they were spaced too close together. As a result, the tree branches were not spreading out, and there were surfacing root problems. The roots will cause damage to the curbs over a period of time. In addition, the maples prevent grass from growing due to the large amount of shade they provide. The Forester noted that since Sherwood Street will be reconstructed in 2001, it was recommended to remove every other tree on the boulevard. He suggested that the City begin a tree management plan by budgeting money for future replacement of all the trees. The estimated cost to remove half the trees would be $40,000 to $50,000. It was suggested that the residents in the area be invited to a public hearing regarding this issue. Rodeberg stated the residents in the area were having sanitary sewer problems, and new sanitary sewer would be installed next year. Therefore, he wanted the problem trees removed in conjunction with the improvement project. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to direct the City Forester to give a presentation to the neighborhood and bring a report back to the City Council. Motion unanimously carried. (m) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE FOR COMPOSTING FACILITY SITE WORK Tim L. Goodman, Project Manager of Earth Tech, informed the City Council that Erickson & Templin Contracting had submitted a change order in the amount of $49,813.00 related to site work at the composting site. A demolition fill site was discovered at the location of where the storm water retention pond was to be constructed. In order to meet MPCA requirements, it would be necessary to remove the debris and demolition material in this area, dispose of the material at a certified landfill, and have the contractor provide a liner in the bottom of the pond and on the side slopes. The contractor would also have to place 6 inches of topsoil on the pond side slopes and account for all pipe revisions as necessary. The City Administrator stated the cost would be a local share since the grant had a maximum ceiling. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve the change order. Motion unanimously carried. (n) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE FOR SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER, PHASE I, PROJECT NO. 00-01, LETTING NO. 01 J CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 (n) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE FOR SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER, PHASE I, PROJECT NO. 00 -01, LETTING NO. 01 It was reported that Change Order No. I was requested by the contractor to modify the piping between the lift station and Manhole 8. The staff recommended approving the change order in the total amount of $4,703.00. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to approve the change order. Motion unanimously carried. NINEF TI - 04 - 5 1 : ► • (a) COMMUNICATIONS -- NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS • "ON SALE" — SKY VENTURES, LLC • "OFF SALE" — FREEDOM VALU CENTER (ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS) Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve and issue licenses. Motion unanimously carried. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN MLINAR • Mlinar made reference to an article from a statewide magazine regarding using volunteers in parks to beautify the community. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER DUANE HOVERSTEN Hoversten complimented the City staff on getting the web page upgraded to include pertinent information. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR Plotz requested that the City Council schedule a budget workshop for 4:00 p.m. on November 28. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve a budget workshop on November 28. Motion unanimously carried. • The City Administrator reminded the Council of the ribbon cutting ceremony and open house beginning at 9:00 am. on November 15 for the McLeod County Household Hazardous Waste Facility. Plotz stated Roger Olson, representing the American Legion had contacted him. He was seeking direction from the City regarding serving liquor after midnight on New Year's Eve since it falls on a Sunday. The State Statute states that no intoxicating liquor can be served after 12:00 p.m. Following discussion, the City Attorney was 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — NOVEMBER 14, 2000 • directed to check into the issue. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR RANDY DEVRIES DeVries requested approval for out -of -state travel for Gary Plotz, Doug Johnson, and Randy DeVries. They would leave on December 5 for a four -day trip to Quebec, Canada to review marketing issues related to the bagging facility. The cost for motel, airfare and miscellaneous expenses for the three travelers was estimated at $2,500 - $3,000. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve out -of -state travel. Motion unanim ously carried. (f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Rodeberg made reference to traffic problems in the alley located behind Food -N -Fuel and the gate into the alley. He reported the alley was blocked off where the residential property turns into commercial property, but some people cut through the private property. After a survey was mailed, the responses returned were 5 to 5 for leaving the gate in place. He proposed to meet with the neighborhood and obtain a census on what action should be taken. • The City Engineer reported that after the water at the dam was lowered, the water has begun to flow over the dam. He has been consulting with the DNR and the City consultant. (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the verified claims A and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve the verified claims B and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion carried with Hoversten abstaining from voting. 11. ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, October 17, 2000 CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:32 p.m. with the following members present: Jason Olsen, Dean Kirchoff, Jim Haugen and Brandon Fraser. The following members were absent: Jeff Jones and Dave Westlund. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Building/Zoning; Holly Kreft, Planning Coordinator and Richard Schieffer, City Attorney. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Haugen moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN 18'x 40' ADDITION AS REQUESTED BY TRI- COUNTY WATER CONDITIONING INC. (325 3 RD AVE NW) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:35 p.m. with the reading of publication #8242 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 5, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request including a site plan showing the proposed addition. She added that a previous addition was done in 1997, and that this addition allowed an eight -foot setback from the right -of -way of Highway 7. She also explained that this property was in a C -5 district which had only recommended setbacks. Ms. Wischnack also added that the parking area did appear to be sufficient, but that the parking lot was paved into the right -of -way of 3r Avenue. Ms. Wischnack stated that staff did recommend denial of the permit because, with the proposed addition, nearly 80% of the lot would have an impervious surface. She added that drainage was a concern because of the property's proximity to the highway and the Crow River and Highway 7. She added that if the Planning Commission wished to approve the permit that staff would like to see condiibons attached. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if the impact of the reconstruction of Hwy 7 was discussed during the 1997 conditional use permit hearing. Donald Hantge, property owner, stated that it was, but that a timeframe had not been determined at that time. Mr. Haugen questioned if it had been determined where MNDOT would be purchasing property. Ms. Wischnack replied that it would depend on the design guidelines and the location of the building. Mr. Arndt questioned how the stormwater management would happen since there was not an area for ponding to be constructed. Ms. Wischnack replied that the drainage would need to be controlled on the site, possibly by the construction of a swale on the eastern edge of the property. Mr. Olsen questioned if the drainage had been discussed at the previous public hearing. Mr. Hantge replied that it had not since most of the water is directed to the west side of the building. Mr. Haugen questioned if there was going to be a problem removing the existing driveway from Highway 7. Mr. Hantge replied that there was not a problem, since the traffic often consisted of people using it a through street. Mr. Olsen questioned if Mr. Hantge had met with his neighbors. He replied that he had, and that they were agreeable to the project. Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the hearing at 5:47 p.m. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion to close the hearing carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the conditional use permit with staff options for conditions. Mr. Haugen moved to second the motion. The motion carried unanimously with the following conditions: 1. Removal of access from Hwy 7 West; 2. A stormwater management plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 3. An approval does not deem that there will not be a potential building impact as a result of the highway project. Minutes Planning Commission — October 17, 2000 Page 2 b) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO GRADE AND FILL IN THE FLOODPLAIN OF THE SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE VETERAN'S MEMORIAL PARK AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON (295 1 sT AVE NE) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:49 p.m. with the reading of publication #6243 as published ile the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 5, 2000. Ms. Kreft presented the request and displayed the site plan. She stated that approximately 2,000 cubic yards of fill was needed for the construction of the parking lot and concrete pad for the display tank. She added that the parking appeared to be sufficient. Mr. Arndt questioned if silt fencing was necessary since a berm would be in place. Staff replied that the sift fencing would be needed while the pond was being constructed. Mr. Haugen asked what the time frame for construction was. Staff replied that the timeframe was not yet determined. Mr. Kirchoff questioned from what location the fill was being relocated. Staff replied that there were numerous projects with excess fill available. Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the hearing at 5:53 p.m. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Olsen moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer must submit a letter documenting there is not a flood storage impact; 2. Sift fencing be present throughout construction and not be removed until vegetation has been restored: and 3. A submission from the DNR must be received. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. c) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 10' TO 0' FOR THE EXPANSION OF A PARKING LOT AS REQUESTED BY HILLYARD INC. (26 MICHIGAN ST SE) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:54 p.m. with the reading of publication #6244 as published the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 5, 2000. 6 Ms. Kreft presented the request and displayed a site plan with a rendition of the driveways and potential future building. She stated that Hillyard Inc. needed to reduce the setback in order to accommodate truck traffic for a turn around area. She added that the building had to be moved south from the original position in order to allow for an electrical easement. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if the two access points were too close together. Staff replied that the southern access would be used mainly for truck traffic. Ms. Kraft added that the southern lot would most likely have a main entrance from 2nd Avenue SE Mr. Arndt questioned if parking would be needed. Ms. Kraft replied that the existing parking did meet the requirements. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if the cost of the additional access would be paid by the southern lot. Ms. Kraft replied that currently the lot was owned by Hutchinson Community Development Corporation and that the cost would be determined by them. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Fraser seconded the motion. The motion to close the hearing carried unanimously. Mr. Fraser moved to approve the variance with the conditions recommended by staff. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion to approve, with the following conditions: 1. A joint ownership document for the stormwater pond must be executed prior to approval by the City Council, and 2. The permanent easement must include a shared driveway to act as access from Michigan Avenue for both the property in question and the property to the south, carried unanimously. d) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A MANUFACTURED HOME AS REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL (COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE — 448 CALIFORNIA ST NW — LOT 100) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:01 p.m. with the reading of publication #6245 as publisheo the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 5, 2000. Ms. Wischnack gave the history of request. She stated that the City did not required site plans as part of the manufactured home permit. She added that the neighbors had complained of the proximity of the Minutes Planning Commission — October 17, 2000 Page 3 manufactured homes to the boundary of the mobile home park. Ms. Wischnack explained that legal staff advised the City to allow the manufactured home to be placed, but that the property owner apply for a . variance. She added that the property owners attorney had sent correspondence to the City regarding Statute 462.357 which states that mobile home parks created prior to 1995 must only meet the setbacks at that time and are not subject to more stringent ordinances in effect after their creation. Staff then researched previous ordinances and determined that the 1968 ordinance did address setbacks for mobile home parks. It was also determined that the mobile home park was created after 1968. Ms. Wischnack explained that the mobile home park was surrounded by R -2 and R -3 zoning districts. She also explained that the lots were not platted lots and that the property actually consisted of 3 separate parcels. She added that staff had originally thought of changing the ordinance to exempt existing mobile home parks, but that it could not be done because of the state statute. She added that staff would like direction from the Planning Commission as how to handle future requests. Mr. Amdt question if this "lot" was the standard size. Ms. Wischnack replied that lt was. Mr. Fraser questioned if there was any jurisdiction since the lots are not platted, and if the building code setbacks and the boundary setbacks are the only ones that should be enforced. Mr. Schieffer stated that he would prefer to see the applicant apply for "blanket" variances, which would encompass all three parcels, rather that dealing with them on a case -by -case basis. Mr. Arndt questioned if the new manufactured home was larger than the previous one. Mr. Jeff Munsell, property owner, stated that it was not larger, but that it had been placed closer to the street. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if the Planning Commission should be concerned about the setbacks regulations health and safety. Ms. Wischnack replied that those were usually not a concern because they were met. Mr. Olsen questioned what other cities had for regulations. Ms. Wischnack replied that she had contacted other cities, but that they rarely had replacements of the manufactured homes. Don Holmquist, 428 Califomia St. NW, stated that he would voice his concerns at the next public • hearing. He did stated that his main concerns were refuse, pedestrian traffic and noise. He added that he would like to see a more permanent barrier such as a fence placed around the boundary of the mobile home park. Mr. Amdt questioned what -the options were for the Planning Commission. Mr. Schieffer replied that since an application had not been submitted, the applicant would need to submit an application either for this structure or for the "blanket" variances. Ms. Wischnack stated that staff would like to see either application as soon as possible since this was an enforcement action. 4. E Mr. Munsell stated that he would like to discuss the issues with his partners prior to making the application. Ms. Wischnack reminded him that the deadline is always the third Wednesday of the month. She also added that staff would like to have a boundary survey showing the end placement of the units as part of the application. Mr. Kirchoff questioned what, if anything, could be done about the screening. Ms. Wischnack stated that she was unsure as to the original intent of the Russian olive trees currently in place. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:40 p.m. Mr. unanimously. The Planning Commission reminded M r boundary survey as part of his application. NEW BUSINESS OLD BUSINESS Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion carried . Munsell that he would need to provide a a) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS REGARDING TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER AND ANTENNA (SECTIONS 3 AND 10 OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ZONING ORDINANCE) Mr. Jason Hall, zoning representative from American Tower, was present to answer questions and provide comments on the tower ordinance. He stated that he felt the ordinance was well -written and thorough. He added that he did have some suggestions for changes. These included changing Subdivision 11, subparts 1) A and B because the detailed plans are usually not available at the time of Minutes Planning Commission — Octoter 17, 2000 Page 4 application, but usually later in the process. He also added that subpart D was covered by FCC regulations, and would not necessarily be included. Mr. Schieffer questioned if the expense was too high to provide those documents at that time. Mr. H replied that usually the company would like to have an indication as to whether or not the condition use permit was going to be approved before supplying the detailed plans. He added that the genera plans would be available at the time of application. Mr. Haugen questioned if the Planning Commission should address any concerns regarding migratory birds. Mr. Hall replied that the FCC did govern tower placement as to migratory bird flight patterns. Mr. Fraser questioned what is future of the telecommunications field. Mr. Hall replied that the estimates ranged from 25 years to 500 years before satellites will replace land -based towers. He added that at this time satellite coverage was not cost effective. Mr. Haugen moved to recommend approval of the amendments to the ordinance with minor changes as provided by legal staff and suggestions by Mr. Hall. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously. 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Ms. Wischnack updated the Commission as to the status of Frank Fay annexation request. She stated that the City Council made no decision; and therefore, the petition would be sent back to the Office of Boundary Adjustments for arbitration. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mr. Kirchoff moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:33 p.m. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried. 0 PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 00-286 • AN ORDINANCE .AMENDING SECTIONS 3 AND 10.08 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE REGARDING TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNA SECTION 3 - DEFINITIONS SATELLITE ANTENNA: A device for the reception of signals from communication satellites. SECTION 10.08 - .Antennas and towers having over -all heights of 75 feet or less are a Permitted Use in all Districts and are permitted encroachments on height requirements of this Code. This includes tower of all types and antennas of all types and sizes except dish - shaped antennas having a diameter greater than 30 inches. .Antennas and dish - shaped antennas havina a diameter greater than 30 inches. Antennas and dish - shaped antennas having a diameter of 30 inches or less are exempt from any requirement for a building permit, but are subject to excavation permit requirements when applicable. Antennas and towers higher than 75 feet require a conditional use permit. .A._Vertical Antennas. The bottom of the base of a mast- or tower - mounted vertical antenna may be at a heignt of 7iD feet or less with no overall height limit for the top of the antenna. The highest point of any ground - mounted vertical antenna. however, may be no more than 75 feet. B. irectional Satellite Communications Antennas. The point at which the main boom of a directional. non-dish-type satellite communications antenna or antenna array is attached to its • support structure (tower, mast. rotator. etc.) Can be no more than 75 feet high. The uppermost part(s) of such antenna(s) can be at 100 feet. C. Height. The height of an antenna. dish antenna. or tower shall be measured from the adjacent ground elevation at the base of the antenna. dish or tower to the highest point of the antenna or tower. If the antenna or tower is mounted on a building, height is measured from the average ,grade level on which the building is constructed. D. efinitions. -_An antenna is a wire or other device that receives or transmits radio waves. - --A tower is defined as a structure to which an antenna is attached. --A directional satellite communications antenna is defined as anv directional antenna or antenna array designed to provide radio communications using satellites. manned or unmanned spacecrafts, moonbounce. tropo- scatter, meteor -trail ionization. or similar vehicles or propagation modes. An excavation permit is required for all towers and antennas for which excavation is required. Ail antennas and towers must conform to the Uniform Building Code, the National Electric Code. the City /County Airport Zoning Ordinance. and the regulations of the Federal Airways Administration (FAA) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Antennas or towers may be installed in utility easements if a waiver is obtained from the City Engineer and the Hutchinson Utilities Commission. Antennas and towers shall not be allowed (1) nearer the street than the principal building on the for and (2) nearer the rear or side lot lines than the minimum rear or side yard setback. Wire antennas are exempt from this requirement. . No part of an antenna may extend beyond the lot line over an adjoining lot without written permission from the owner or lessee of that adjoining lot. • The City reserves the right to permit antennas, in its sole discretion, on top of water towers. high rise buildings and other structures. The City, at its sole option may also require Ll Ordinance No. oo -286 Tower Regulations Page 2 a verification of approvai from the Hutchinson Community HospitaUBums Manor Nursing Home or the Municipal Airport when height limitations are of concern for helicopter and tlighr operations. SECTION 3 - DEFINTIONS AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA TOWERS: ANTENNA: Any structure or device used for the purpose of collecting or radiating electromagnetic signals including but not limited to directional antennas such as panels, microwave dishes, sateTlite jishes. and omni directional antennas such as w hip antennas. Licensed commercial wireless mo i ize radio , enhanced specialized mobilized radio , paging, and similar services that are marketed to the general public. COMMERCIAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE FACILITY: A facility that transmits an or receives electromagnetic signals. It includes antennas. microwave dishes. horiis. and other types of equipment for the transmission or receipt of such signals. telecommunication towers or similar structures supporting said equipment, equipment ui mgs, p arkin g areas, an other accessory aeve opment an re ate equipme MONOPOLE: A wireless communication facility which consists of a single unit without supporting members structure, erected on the ground to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. PRIVATE RECEIVING AND /OR TRANSMITTING ANTENNA: Any antenna erected for non- commercial use of e information. PUBLIC UTILITY: Persons. corporations. or governments supplying gas, electric, transportation, water. sewer, or land line telephone services tote general public. or tne purpose of this Ordinance. commercial wireless telecommunications service facilities snail not be considered public utility uses, and are defined separa tely. COMMUNICATION TOWER: A structure which is designed to support an antenna and all supporting l ines. cables, wires. and braces. TOWER HEIGHT The height as determined by measuring the vertical distance from the point of contact with the around to the highest point of e tower. including all an tennae or other attachments. SECTION 10.08 - TELEVISION AND RADIO ANTENNA In order to accommodate the communication needs of the the acilitate the use of wire ess communicanon services, evisuon and radio antenna. for residents. busuiess and industry ofthe City of HU[cnmson; ?) Winintize adverse effects of owers through careful design and siting standards; Avoid potential age o a latent pro es 170 ut tower or antenna failure through structural standards and setback requirements; an 3) Maximize the use of existing and approve owers and buildings to accommodate new • ire less telecommunication antennas in order to reduce the number of owers needed to serve e community. Ordinance Yo. 00 -286 Tower Regulations Page 3 • Subd. 2. Amateur Radio Antenna Towers. The constructtotverection of towers supporting amateur radio antennas shall e a permitted use m a zoning districts sumect tot the following TT require a but rear yard of residentially zoned properties. If there is property owner may apply for a conditional use permit to erect a tower in another yar ont or si e . 3) uSewers shall not exceed seventy -five (75) feet in height, except by conditional use a) uSTowers shall conform to the accessory structure setback for the district in which it is 5) fur radio antenna towers shall be installed in accordance with the instructions furnished v the manufacturer ot the tower Fn5ae on a cower may be modified an changed at any time so long as the published allowable oa on the tower is not exce Uean the structure of e tower remains in accordance with a manufacturer s specifications. 61 Suc towers shafl be exempt trom the requirements of u s. 4 thro ot this ordinance. i Neighborhood onvenience Commercial District Automotive Service Commercia Istnct Central ommercia District Fringe Commercial District ConditionaUCormercial District UC n tstna ommercia istnct Light Industrial Fark Ulstnct eaVV Industrial District tumess istnct Subd. 4. Tower Setbacks. The followine setbacks shall apply in the listed districts: I 1 . C. -_, -I - - 5. B I.C. 71 an _. The setback of the tower shall at a ratio of • one is Towers shall be required to meet Federal Aviation Administration Suhd. 3. Tower Locations. Antennas on a public structure or existing structures are allowed in High Density est enna : - 5. Mobile Home : any residential planned unit clevelopmeHE or A-1 Agricultural or - I KurarR m the Joint Planning ea: the setback to these districts shall e at a FaTi Fan—c0 one l lTT5Yt7or every one toot of et_ t of structure i .e. a Subd. 6. Co-location Re uirements. All commercial towers erected, constructed, or located within the City ot Hutchinson shall campy wl e o o requremens: Ordinance No. -286 Tower Regulations Page d I ) A proposal for a new commercial tower shall not be approved unless the applicant has provided proor that the proposed tower cannot be acco nmoclated on an existing or approve tower or out NEE Z 51 a onF iR a wart ii ra ius o t e propose 5 tower due to one or mori the toilowing reasons: a e amenna wou d exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved tower or buildule. as tiocumented by a quaiffied ancl licensed Fro — res sionai engineer, and the b) C) d) 2) A. 2) 3) the usability o: other existing a that an of the approved either by the City Co unce or City stall prior tote issuance ot me conditional use permit or bui lding permit. 4) Screening plans for accessory equipment or buildings shall be provided and include a one h undred perc o opaque barrier to be cons c e o eu er nc masonry w alls or solid wo od fencing of a height of n o les than six feet. Solid. 8. Abandoned or Unused Tower and Antennas. Abandoned or unused towers or portions of towers shall be removed as follows: abandoned or unused towers and associated facilities shall be removed within six (6) months ol essation o 1 a e see [in less a time extension is approve y t e arming Commission. In the event that a tower is not removecl wit m six mont s of cessation o operations at a see. a tower an associate ace toes may a remove y t e C ity ot Hutchinson and the costs ot removal assessed-against the property. 2) Unused portions of towers above a manufact connection shall be remo ved wit six (6) new not Commercial wireless Before the at varying heights. Solid. 7. Structural and Landsca in R uircments Proposed or modified towers and antennas s a meet [ e o owing estgn requirements: ewers an antennas shall e clesTg to blena into the surrounding environment through the Ordinance No. 00 -286 Tower Regulations Page Subd. 10. Signs and Advertising. The use of any portion of a tower for signs. ocher than • wa=s or equipment information sisns, is proht nea. Subd. 11. Additional Submittal Requirements. In addition to information listed elsewhere in is Section. con ntonal use to applications for towers shall include the to owing supp ementa m otmation: report tront a qua i ied and licensed professional engineer which Porn q r P nPnPra mwer eio r an essen me u me a cross section and elevation: C) escd nos Fie tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas it can accommodate: D) inc u es an engineer's stamp and registration number: and. additional information necessary to evaluate the request. 2) For ail commercial towers, a letter or intent Comm tttmg a tower owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use ot the tower it an additional user agrees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions tor shared use. .1 It Lhe tower exceeds 2OU feet. a letter of approval from the Federal Aviation Administration. Subd. 13. Satellite Dishes Satellite dishes greater than one (1) meter in diameter shall be use provisions for • EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE This ordinance shall take effect upon is adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this day of Attest: Gary D. Plotz P111 Marlin Torgerson. Mayor i CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. ii67g TRANSFERRING $25,000 FROM 1998 IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEBT SERVICE BONDS AND TRANSFERRING $17,700 FROM GENERAL OBLIGATION FIRE HALL DEBT SERVICE FUND TO GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $25,000 is hereby transferred from the 1998 Improvement Debt Service Fund to the Special Assessment Debt Service Funds. THAT $17,700 is hereby transferred from the General Obligation Fire Hall Debt Service Fund to the General Obligation Debt Service Funds. 0 Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of November 2000 Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. >>6zo TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND, ECONOMIC LOAN, ENERGY LOAN, 1980, 1990 and 1992 TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE FOR 1998, TO HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (EDA) FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $106,000 is hereby transferred to Hutchinson Community Development fund (EDA) from the following: General Fund $76,000 Economic Loan Fund $5,0 Energy Loan Fund $5,000 1980 Tax Increment Debt 1990 Tax Increment Debt 1992 Tax Increment Debt THAT this fund transfer is 11 10 Service Fund $17,500: Service Fund $1,500. Service Fund $1,000. . authorized for the fiscal year 2000. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of November 2000. Marlin Torgerson Mayor I_`i1 *16 Gary D. Plotz City Administrator CJ • CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 11621 TRANSFERRING $200,200 FROM WATER SEWER & REFUSE FUND TO 1994 IMPROVEMENT BONDS, 1995 IMPROVEMENT BONDS & GENERAL FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $27,600 is hereby transferred from the Water Department to the General Fund. THAT $27,600 is hereby transferred from the Wastewater Department to the General Fund. THAT $50,000 is hereby transferred from the Water Department to the 1994 Improvement Debt Service Fund. THAT $50,000 is hereby = ransferred from the Wastewater Department to the 1994 Improvement Debt Service Fund. THAT $22,500 is hereby transferred from the Water Department to the 1995 Improvement Debt Service Fund. THAT $22,500 is hereby transferred from the Wastewater • Department to the 1995 Improvement Debt Service Fund. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of November 2000 Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • CITY OF RESOLUTION NO. 1162 TRANSFERRING $251,000 FROM LIQUOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $251,000 is hereby transferred from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of November 2000 Marlin Torgerson • Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator C Hutchinson Citv Cente III Hassan Street SE Hutchinson. -\IN 55350 -2522 1 20.587- 5151/Fa: 320-Z34-4240 • • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21. 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE TO ALLOW A LOT WIDTH OF 20' (REQUIRED 70') AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND SHIRLEY BOWEN Pursuant to Section 6.04. of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On October 17, 2000. Robert and Shirley Bowen applied for a lot split and variance for width for property located at 216 and 218 5" Avenue NE. FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. '_. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on November 9. 2000 3. The proposed lot split is does not meet the minimum lot width of 70 feet on 5" Avenue. 4. The property does not currently conform with lot width. as it is 9.8' width. 5. The driveway will potentially be closed for accessing Highway 7 in the year 2006. RECOMMENDATION Plannine Commission recommends approval of the lot split and also recommends approval of the 50 foot variance from the lot width requirement based on the fact the property is making a more conforming lot. The approval would be with the following conditions: I. The property owner is responsible for changing the appropriate deeds and transfers of title. 2 The owners are aware of the potential Highwav 7 improvement project in the year 2006. 3. A driveway permit is required if the driveway is to be relocated. Respectfully submitted. Bill Arndt. Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission I cc: Robert and Shirlev Bowen. 541 Juervens Road SW. Hutchinson MN 55350 �nmeu �n rmciN paper - ; e,4 -�(2- ) —1 E I � N J • DEED DESCRIPTION PROVIDED That part of Lot Five (5) In Block Fifteen (IS) In the Townslte of Hutchinson, North Half, described as follows, to —wlt: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of sold Lot 3: thence Westerly along the North line of sold Lot 3, 132.00 feet: thence Southerly on a line 9.8 feet Easterly of, and parallel to the the West line of said Lot 3. 132.0 feet: thence Easterly on a line parallel with the North line of sold Lot 3, 129.4 feet to the East line of sold Lot 3: thence Northerly along the East line of sold Lot 3, 132.0 feet to the point of beginning. That pan of Lot Five (3) In Block Fifteen (IS) In the Townslte of Hutchinson, North Half, described as follows, fo — wit: Beginning of the Northwest Corner of sold Lot 3: thence Southerly along the West line of sold Lot 3, 282.7 test, to The Northerly right —of —way line of Minnesota State Trunk Highway No. 7; thence Northeasterly along sold right —of —way line. 178.0 feet to the East line of sold Lot 3: thence Northerly along the East line of sold Lot 3, 37.3 feet: thence Westerly on a line parallel to the North line of said Lot 3, 129.4 feet: thence Northerly on a line 9.8 lost Easterly of, and parallel to the West line of said Lot 3, 132.0 feet to the North line of sold Lot 3: and thence Westerly along sold North line 9.8 feet to the point of beginning. N SUGGESTED DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL A That part of Lot 5, Block 15, NORTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON, according to the • ecorded plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 5: thence northwesterly, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 121.93 feet to the intersection with a line parallel with and distant 20.00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 5; thence southwesterly, parallel with sold northwesterly line of Lot 5 a P distance of 132.00 feet: thence southeasterly, parallel with said northeasterly line of Lot 5 a distance of 1 19.20 feet ro the southeasterly line of said Lot 5: thence northeasterly, along said southeasterly line of Lot 5 a distance of 132.00 feet to the Point of beginning. AREA = 15914 Square Feet SUGGESTED DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL B That part of Lot 5, Block 15, NORTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 5: thence southwesterly, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 279.22 feet to the northerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 7: thence easterly, along said northerly right of way line 175.63 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 5; thence northeasterly, along said southeasterly line of Lot 5 a distance of 36.71 feet to a point distant 132.00 feet southwesterly of, as measured along said southeasterly line, the northeasterly corner of said Lot 5; thence northwesterly, parallel with the northeasterly line of said Lot 5 a distance of 1 19.20 feet to the intersection with a Ilne parallel with and distant 20.00 feet southeasterly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 5; thence northeasterly, parallel with said northwesterly line of Lot 5 a distance of 132.00 feet •o northeasterly line of said Lot 5: thence northwesterly, along said northeasterly line �f said Lot 5 a distance of 20.00 feet to the point of beginning. AREA = 15449 Square Feet • Denotes Iron monument found O Denotes iron monument der I hereby certify that this Survey, Plan or Report was pr eper ed by me or under MY dlret? supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the lore of the State of Minnesota. JMf RORousch Date: 7S ;t Llc. Ne. ar/3�9 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STA REPORT S To: Hutchinson Planning Commission • Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotr. Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock and Julie W ischnack, AICP Date: November 13, 2000 — sleeting Date: November 21, 2000 Applicant: Robert and Shirley Bowen Brief Description The applicant is requesting a lot split or an adjustment to the lot line for property located south of Fifth Avenue NE and north of State Highway 7. 'rho property was originally split into its present configuration approximately 20 years ago. 'There is no documentarian in the City files regarding the original division. The property is located in the R2 zoning district, which requires a minimum lot width of 70 fat TLe property to the south and west (Parcel B) would not conform to the lot width requirement before (9.8') nor after (20') the subdivision- Parcel A is currently far sale and the owner is attemptarg to allow enough room for a driveway to be loafed on Parcel B. Parcel A is conforming in all aspects of the zoning code. GENERAL INFORMATION _ - �ast- -- Property Location: 216/2185 Avenue NE Lot Size: After proposed division — Parcel A 15,914 and Parcel B 15,449 Existing Land Use: Residential Adjacent Land Use Residential to the east north and west. Commercial to the south. And Zoning: Comprehensive Commercial Land Use Pbm: Zoning History: NA Applicable Regulations: Section 8.05 Section 6.04 — Variance Required SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Mw driveway on Parcel B accesses State Highway 7. It is lilmly that the . planned improvement for M&MY 7 (2006) will be removing this driveway- 4 -(r) -2 Variance Bowen Lot Split and Variance Planning Commission Review — November 21, 2000 Page 2 • PCB: The parking area presents adequate pack spaces for the residences Physical Characteristics: The property is steeply sloped from State Highway 7 to the north. The area near Fifth Avenue is flat. rya: The variance would be making the non-coii&rmtmg lot width (for Parcel B) more conforming. If the driveway is moved, the increased lot width would also prevent a future variance request, because there is a 5 fom minmum setback requirement from property lines. The egg width in this area, 9.8', would prohibit any driveway to be constructed in a conforming location. The property also presents a physical hardship with respect to the steep slope. The potential removal of the Highway 7 access also farther supports granting a lot width variance on 5 Avenue. Variance Criteria- The following variance criteria should be considered: the characteristics of the subject property which prevent compliance with the said requirements of this ordinance: the minimum reduction of the requirements of this ordinance which would be necessary to permit the proposed use or construction: and the particular hardship which would result ifsaid particular requirements of the ordinance were applied to the subject property. Staff Recommendation: - — - Staff recommends approval of the lot split with the variance based on the facts contained in the analysis section of this memorandum. The approval should be with the Mowing conditions: 1. The property owner is responsible for changing the appropriate deeds and transfers of title. 2. The owners are aware of the potential Highway 7 improvement project in the year 2006. 3. A driveway permit is required if the driveway is to be relocated. Cc: Robert and Shirley Bowan, 541 Juergens Road SW, Hurtd=m MN 55350 Dave Johnston, MNDOT �t d J•T• h BLOCK �` y 15 / I / PARCEL A 3 PARCEL B., 1•�� dr Qy I _ -6 TRUNK HIGHWAY No. T MitrMNSM uu JO! N0. 00161 i w RESOLUTION NO. 11616 APPROVING A LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE TO ALLOW A LOT WIDTH OF 20' (REQUIRED 70') AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND SHIRLEY BOWEN AT 216/218 5t AVENUE NE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Robert and Shirley Bowen, property owner, have made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 6.04 and a lot split to allow for a larger frontage onto 5 'h Avenue. The property is located at the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Attached in exhibit A NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Attached in exhibit B 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands. existing an� anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect o the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The City Council that the lot would become more conforming with respect to lot width requirements. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the variance and lot split with the following conditions: 1. The property owner is responsible for changing the appropriate deeds and transfers of title. 2. The owners are aware of the potential Highway 7 improvement project in the year 2006. 3. A driveway permit is required if the driveway is to be relocated. Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of November, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor WF • Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hassan Street SE Hutchlnwn. \IN 53350 -2522 20- 557- 5151/Faz 320 - 234 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21,'_000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE FROM M% TO 31 % (FOR SOUTHERN PROPERTY) AS REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER LOCATED AT LOT 2. BLOCK 3, WALNUT RIDGE Pursuant to Section 6.04. of Zoning Ordinance No. 464. the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On October 17. 2000. Paul Betker applied for a lot split and variance for lot coverage for the twin homes located at the southwest comer of Northwoods Avenue NE and Hillcrest Road. - FINDINGS OF FACT L The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on November 9, 2000 3. The proposed lot split is in conformance with requirements. 4. The commission that the spirit and intent of the code were met, with the entire lot meeting the lot coverage provisions. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommends approval of the lot split and also recommends approval of the 2% lot coverage variance based on the fact the property as one parcel meets the lot coverage requirements. The following conditions should be attached. I. The southern lot may not add more lot coverage (structure) to the home. _. Staff also recommends approval of the lot split because it meets the minimum lot size and dimension requirements Respectfully submitted. Bill Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • cc: Paul Betker, 37 Monroe St. SE. Hutchinson. MN 55350 anniw on rt cK paper - # — (,�- ) —� , CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission • Prepared By Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheifl'er, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: November 13, 2000 — Meeting Date: November 21, 2000 Applicant: Paul Betker, Property Owner Brief Description The applicant was issued a building permit an this lot with the condition that it did not meet the minimum lot coverage :equitemams, if a split was requested at a future date. This lot was originally inmdm to serve as a single family lot and is zmed R2. The proposed lot split would divide the lots into 56.5' x 120' and 43.5' x 120', respectively. The one lot is larger to aa=nmodate the setb -A from the two streets. The northerly parcel is proposed to be 6,780 square feet and would have 30% lot coverage. The somberly lot would be 5,220 square feet and would have a 37 lot coverage. The maximum lot coverage for twin homes is 35 %. Therefore the southern lot would require a 2% lot covm a variance. The overall lot coverage as one lot equals 33%. • GENERAL INFORMATION Exia Zonmr. R2 - Residential Property Location: Lot 2, Block 3 of Waban Ridge Lot Sae: 12,000 square feet Existing Land Use: vacant Adjacent Land Use And Zomn;: R2 — Twin homes across street, single family Planned to went Comprehensive Land Use Plan: residential Zoning History: Not on this lot. Although, this aPPlicam has previcaaly requested lot coverage variances in this area. Appfic eguls Raalatio m: Section 8.05 — R2 tequirensm Section 6.04 — Variance Regmred SPECIAL INFORMATION • Analysis: As one ettae let, the mgtiremm notto excmd 35%ofthe let ooverage is met Staff has detetmined that the intent and spirit ofthe code bit been met by the appiieug Although, staff review ofthe wiance has # -(�) -2 VariancdLot Split Paul Betker Planning Commission Review — November 21, 2000 Page 2 raised a few issues. Because this area was originally planned for single family residences, services for gas, sewer, water, electricity and storm sewer were designed diffietemly than what has been Occurring. Staff has reoonimended, that instead of camste +t! rsquestmg variance reviews, the appiicam submit further information in the form of a planned unit development procedure, to address all deveioprnent issues. This procedure vmdd also address setbacJs and lot coverage issues. Staff has also determined that the code may be deficient in the application of the lot coverage requirements. Lot coverage ma� are only act fords in the shadand district and when twm homes are constructed. 'Them are no apeciSaticoa for other multiple family units; single family or developments. If the code's i,ttrmtim was to to ly regulate storm water runoff the code does not address a majority of the types of construction. Variance Criteria The following variance criteria should be considered: the char actensttcs of the subject property winch prevent compliance with the said requirements of this ordlrtance; the minimum reduction of the requirem m& of this orduxi nce which would be necessary to permit the proposed use or construction; and the particular hardship which would result ifsatd particular requirements of the ordinance were applied to the subject property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variance based on the hardship that this is a unique comer lot, which dilates larger setbacks from the street, which, in tur n, affects the id coverage calculation for each of the lots. That approval would be with the following condition: 1. The southern lot may not add more hot coverage (structure) to the home. 2. Staff also recommends approval of the lot split because it meets the mmimnm id sim and dimension requirements. Cc: Foul Betker, 37 Monroe Street SE, Hiarbmsm MN 55350 kT I LDING PERMIT SURVEY FOR BE T KER BUILDERS 2. BLOCK 3o WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES DESCRIPTION FOR NORTHERLY PARCEL Lot 2, Block 3. WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plot thereof, except the South 43.50 feet of sold Lot Z. AREA • 6732 Square Feet DESCRIPTION FOR SOUTHERLY PARCEL The South 43.50 feet of Lot 2, Block 3. WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof. AREA • 5220 Square Feet PROPOSED BUILDING FLOOR • 1079.5 (No 9oss"ntl NORTHWOODS AVENUE NE 72,01 Tm 7 e.eo 77.59 N 0 15 30 60 scale V In feet S90 I MOO L , -- x e T" \ t 7e76.Z . ti 77.5 •i T � T ,d. H \ DrM00e Nr NY/ eereel.M 761 12 T20 F� re.o rrn I sa i 7 ZL33 '•.�y 7.57 •' u 8 PROPOSED MOUSE Garage h v I m ,. na 7 7e..e mI • • c~ 4 -��) -z V ' Tots !v I o i 7 ZL33 '•.�y 7.57 •' u 8 PROPOSED MOUSE Garage h v I m ,. na 7 7e..e mI • • c~ 4 -��) -z RESOLUTION NO. 11617 APPROVING A LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE FROM 35% TO 37% (FOR SOUTHERN PROPERTY) AS REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER LOCATED AT LOT 2, BLOCK 3, WALNUT RIDGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: W12i7 NICI Paul Betker, property owner, made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 6.04 to allow for a larger amount of lot coverage than 35% after a lot split occurs at the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 3, Walnut Ridge Estates 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The City Council finds a hardship exists with the fact that applicant has met the spirit and intent of the code in that the property meets the lot coverage (33 %) as a total lot. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions: 1. The southern lot may not add more lot coverage (structure) to the home. 2. Staff also recommends approval of the lot split because it meets the minimum lot size and dimension requirements. Adopted by the City Council this 28" day of November, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor C 0 Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hassan Street SE Hutchinson. NIN 55350.2522 320.587- 5151/Fax 320-234 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21. 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Plannine Commission SUBJECT: VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED GARAGE WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS REQUESTED BY DARREL AND SHARON HOOSLINE Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464. the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On October 11. 2000. Darrel and Sharon Hoosiine submitted an application for a variance to construct an attached Mrage that was 17' 9" from the right of way. FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application was submitted and the appropnate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on November 9, 2000. 3. At the public hearing held. no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections. 4. The hardship is due to the location of the existing home and the age of the home was built prior to zoning setback requirements. The fact there was no viable alternatives. was also a consideration. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the variance with the following conditions: I. Applicant must appiv for a building permit. 2. The construction must follow the submitted site plans. Respectfully submitted. Bill Arndt Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Darrel and Sharon Hooline 705 Main Street South. Hutchinson MN 55350 0 PnnlW on recruea caper - � ) CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT n L� TJ: Hutchinson Planning Commission ?renared Bv_ Planning Staff: Brad Emans. Dick Scheiffer. Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plots Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Man Sebora, dark Schnobrich. Steve Madson, Christie Rock and Julie W isch nack..AICP Date: November 13, 2000 — Meeting Date: November 21, 2000 a oniicant: Darrel and Sharon Hoosiine Brief Description The owners are requesting a variance to construct an addition and garage. The addition is 10 x ': 5' The garage is 24' x 24'. The existing home is 17' 9" from 7 Avenue. The home also =oats on Main Street. The home is 34' 8" from that street. The required setback is 25 fees from = ..reef nant of way. GENERAL. INFORMATION Existing Zoning: Property Location: Lot Size: L:i? 705 Main Street SW 8,700 Square Feet Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Single Familv Residences Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Reudenoal Zoning History NA Applicable Regulations: Section 8.05 Section 6.04 — Variance Required SPECIAL INFORMATION C� Analy_ sis: Staff has c mms abort the proposed driveway location and would recommend that the garage doors face the alley and the entrance is from the alley. Because this property is close to a major roadway (ffghwaY 15); traffic issues are always a conoern. Consistently, staff has recommended conwhdatmg access points or not allowing additional access pomts for safety reasons. 4 - C-) -.� Variance Hoosiine Plannine Commission Review — _November 21. 2000 Page 2 Variance Criteria The followin_a variance criteria should be considered: the characteristics of the suoiecr oropern which prevent compliance wrrh the said reauirements of this. -r:nance: the minimum reduction of the requirements of this oramance which would be necessary to pertmt the proposed use or construction: and the particular hardship which would result it particular requirements of the ordinance were applied to the subject property. Staff Recommendation Staff reoaarnerids approval of the from setback variance because of the existing configuranm ofthe home and its locanea on the property. Staff would further recommend the followmg condraons: The property owner acquire a building permit for the project. The garage doors be changed to face the alley and no new access onto 7" be created. The alley would be the entrance to the garage. 3. The construction must follow the submared site plans. 1 J Cc: - Darrel and Sharon Hoosime, 705 Main Street South. H utchinson Mn 55350 0 0 I ^ r•s'r - FLOOR P LAN P war �r �wrrrr r�rrwr yrY ■wr rw `J "� ; ��Y _ � L �� » ��'f .� � � i a..._Yc_�n_... _�i[ -.. . ......nom...._ _ J: r� ^"i 3EMON 3 ­, nAux OF auILDING OR STRUCTURE ... Front Yard Setback 3""A A on drawing area b Rear Yard Setback _L O t I ' S M ? S ide Yard Setb v oi7 F4UTF Side Yard Setback SrM PIAN DRAWING: Draw shall indicate property (To b e drawn by aPPlicanE/comractor in space provided below.) try lin cu street ac mes, water will drain, and preferred l ocat i on o f electric and gas m and Proposed structures, setback dimensions, where surfa use a separate sheet of pap Relate drawing to North arrow shb below. If n ecessary , NOM No APPURTMANCESADDMO OR FACMnM SHAU BLOCK ACCESS TO UTILM METERS OR EQLTUYME•. I Poo- North Ace 4 AL - 17ION 4 AppUCAJLUN FOR NA 5 TUP-ALLGAs AND F.UL-MC S ERVICE ... (Refer 4atural Gas Service: Total BTU requirement to k�omousuoo policy book for reT=mnents) Pressure requirement if other than 7'WC. lectric Service: Size in Amperes: Voltage Requirement (cheek one): — Single Phase is 240/120 Three Phase is 208/120 / 480/277 OtAl Connected KW Total KV Demand Temporary service required? Yes No 71ON 5 - APPLICATION FOR TELEpHON C ABLE FACILM pIACEMW temporary job site t requ Yes._ No Single Family Dwelling Multi Family .................. No. of Unit Apartment Complex N of Units� Business other No. of Unit I Pre"re before sheetrock or dosing studs to be wired by ❑ Telephone Compa ❑ Electr "NIMM" L&WIMANIN caffmowd UWWUM RESOLUTION NO. 11618 APPROVING A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED GARAGE WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT AS REQUESTED BY DARREL AND SHARON HOOSLINE AT 705 MAIN STREET SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Darrel and Sharon Hooslin, property owners, made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 6.04 to construct an addition and attached garage onto their home. The addition did not meet the 25' setback requirement (the proposed addition was 17'9 "). The property is located at the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 28 in Bonniwell's Subdivision of Block 18 in Bonniwell's Second Addition to Hutchinson 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions. and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of • the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The City Council finds a hardship exists because there are not alternative locations for the placement of the structure and the home was constructed prior to zoning regulations. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions I. Applicant must apply for a building permit. 2. The construction must follow the submitted site plans. Adopted by the City Council this 28" day of November, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson :Mayor r Hutchinson Citv Center tll Hassan Street SE Hutchinson. \IN 55350 -2522 320. 587- 515LrFax 320. 233 -4240 • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21. 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM I (INDUSTRIAL) TO R -2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AS REQUESTED BY BARBARA AND GLEN FIELD Pursuant to Section 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance, Chapter l I. Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HISTORY On October 17. 2000. Barbara and Glen Field applied for a rezoning of their property located at 548 Dale Street SW. The applicants requested the rezoning because they wanted to add onto their home, which would be considered a non- conforming use within the Industrial Zoning District. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. • 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on November 9, 2000. 3. The property is currently being utilized as residential. 4. The property would have to be rezoned back to Industrial if the property were ever to be used for industrial purposes. 5. The residential zoning boundary impacts the setbacks the factory is required to be from a property line (75' from a residential zoning boundary). RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved the rezoning. Respectfully submitted. Bill Arndt. Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Glen and Barbara Field, 548 Dale Street SW, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Pnamd un rccl 'ed watt - �_(a) - �/_ CIT OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT s -0: Hutchinson Planning Commission ?reoaied Bv: Planning Staff: Brad Emans. Dick Scheiffer. Dolf Moon. Don Nelson. • Gary Plotz. Jean Ward. John Rodeherg, John Olson. John Webster, Marc Sebora. Mark Schnobrich. Steve Madson, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack. AICP Date: November 13, 2000 — Meeting Date: November 21, 2000 applicant: Barbara and Glen Field Brief Description 'he applicants are requesting a rezoning to add onto their home which is located in an I -1 Zoning Distna. A residential use is not an "allowed use' within the industrial distna. Under Section 03 of the zonmg code it states that "no such non-conforming use shall be enlarged or increased. -or extended to occupy a greater area of lano than was occupied at the effective am of adoption :r amendment of this ordinance". Staff believes that the entire block was rezoned sometime in the 1970's for the Goebel Fixture Company. Them are three homes which are located in this block. Depending on the date of the rezoning, the Citv may have, in the pam improperly issued permits for additions to homes within The I -1 Zoning District. 'Rte home is adjacent to residential zoning, but by rezoning iy if the business were to expand into this area the lot would have to be rezoned again. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: 11- Industrial Property Location: 548 Dale Street SW Existing Land Use: Residential Adjacent Land Use Goebel Fixture Company to the north and west homes to the south. east And Zoning: and du west. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Industrial Zoning History: Staff has not found data which indicates the actual date this Property was zoned I -1 Industrial Applicable Regulations: Section 4.03 Nonconforming uses; Section 8.14 Permitted uses within an I -1 District, 6.05 Rermmgs SPECIAL INFORMATION Analysis: Staff has considered the requested rezoning and determined it to be in • kaepmg with intern of the land uses in this area. Although, it is usually not recommended to locate residential and industrial in the same areas, 4 -rc) -�z Rezoning Field Planninc Commission Review — November 21. 1 -000 Page 2 • -his siruauon presents uniaue circ The rezonma to residential will not be incompatible with the neighbomood since the home has been located on the property for many years. The rezoning would not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. Staff does caution the applicants and the commission that is aiways more difficult to rezone to a higher mtensm use later i back to I -1). Other Permits Staff Recommendation: The applicants are required to submit information for a building permit. The City has received the building plans. but has not received an adequate site plan of the proposed addition onto the home in relation to all property boundaries. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning from f -1 to R2 based on the facts identified in the anaivsis section of this report. Cc: Glen and Barbara Field 548 Dale Street SW, Hutchinson NiN 55350 Paul Betker, Builder z Rob y e R-2 i�7 / II i I f � - vvY VVVtiti I �— I n_tie x L_J . •10755 � � �� ' ll I � 1069.9 I tiy i I II 74. B ..- 0 1� 1074.4 T1 614 / I f R3O 1 NOTE HOHILONTAL AND VERTICAL CONIHOI LIIRNISRLD UY L_1 10b Z , CITY OF HUTCHINSON MAP ACCURACY IS RELATED DIRECTLY IU (LIE GROUND CONIROL FURNI!i HED THIS MAP HAS BEEN DESIGNED 10 MEE I NAIIONAL MAP 1 ACCURACY STANDARDS AT ITS ORIGINAL. bASIC SCALE OF 1 "- 100' AND CONTOUR INTERVAL 01 2 FEET .� MAHnHURD'S I.IAbII_IiY FOR ANY INA (-CUHA,;IES fOUNU PRIMARY ROAD IN THIS MAP SHALL BE LIMITED TO TILE LORHECTION = _ = SECONDAHY ROAD OF ANY SUCH INACCURACIES FOUND DILL lO THE _.. _ _ _ TNAV PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PROCESS, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED BRIDGL THE CONTRACT VALUE OF THE MAP IT IS THE -F--f- RAILROAD RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAP USER TO ASCERTAIN -• —•- FENCE WHETHER OR NOT THE ABOVE SCALE, CONTOUR �' BUILDING CORPT�A�ON INTERVAL AND ACCURACY ARE SATISFACTORY FOR WALL AMSTtVANIA AVEWCSOU NIAW IS, HIAMESOTA 33426 _ WHATEVER PURPOSE THE MAP IS TO BE USED 0 • r �irl�l.6[�l AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from I (Industrial) to R2 (Medium Density Residential) as requested by Barbara and Glen Field: LEGAL, DESCRIPTION: The South 126 feet except the west 543.38 feet of Lot 73, except street, Lynn Addition, McLeod County, Minnesota 0 Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of November, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 00 -287 Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. • The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Jason Olsen, Dean Kirchoff, Jim Haugen, Jeff Jones, Dave Westlund and Brandon Fraser. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning /Building /Zoning; Evonne Schultz and Marc Sebora, City Attorney. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Olson moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARI a) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT FOR THE RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING LOTS TO PROVIDE FOR ACCESS AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND SHIRLEY BOWEN (2161218 5T„ AVENUE NE) Chairman Amdt opened the hearing at 5:32 p.m. with the reading of publication #6254 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 9, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request including a site plan showing the two houses on the property and where the present driveways are located. She explained that the driveway on lot B presently exits onto Highway 7 which is a safety concern and could be a problem in the future when Highway 7 undergoes reconstruction. Mr. Jones asked the City Attomey if the City could limit access to Highway 7. Attorney Sebora stated that Staff could require a conditional use permit. Mr. Westlund asked if the lot line could be moved. Ms. Kilian, representing the Bowens, said that the appeal of parcel A is that it is a large lot and that would be a strong selling point. Mr. Haugen asked if an easement could be made between parcels A and B. Julie stated that the property could legally be divided into three lots if requested. Connie Anderson, 465 Bluff Street, suggested that even though Bluff Street is a busy street the driveway for parcel B should access Bluff Street. She is concemed that her back yard would lose its privacy if a driveway for parcel B accessed 5'" Avenue. She is also concemed about room for snow removal. Mr. Olson questioned if both property owners would consider a privacy fence. Nadine Hawkins, 206 5 Avenue NE, questioned whether the property value of her home would be affected if there were a driveway so dose to her lot line. She presently has a day pre business and was also concerned about the safety of the children because there is a row of bushes on her lot line that would run parallel to the parcel B driveway if it were to access 5" Avenue. Marc Sebora stated that it would be difficult to predict how the proposed lot split and variance would affect property values. Janet Kilian, representing the Bowens as their realtor, stated that there are no plans now to build a driveway at this time. The Bowens feel that obtaining a variance before their property is sold would insure future owners the opportunity to change the access of their driveway from Highway 7 to 5'" Avenue if they wished. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion to close the hearing carried unanimously. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the variance with staff recommendations. 1. The property owner is responsible for changing the appropriate deeds and transfers of title. 2. The owners are aware of the potential Highway 7 improvement project in the year 2006; and 3. A driveway permit is required if the Minutes Planning Commission —October 17, 2000 Page 2 driveway is to be relocated. Mr. Haugen moved to second the motion. The motion carried unanimously. b) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWINHOMa WHICH EXCEEDS THE 35% MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE AS REQUESTED BY Paul Betker (LOT 2, BLOCK 3 OF WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:05 p.m. with the reading of publication #6252 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 9, 2000. Ms. Wischnack showed a site plan explaining where the twinhomes would be located in the lot and the condition of the lot. Mr. Jones asked if the builder could go up or under. He also asked if the planning commission has approved variances in the last six months. Ms. Wischnack stated that this is the third variance request in that time period. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:10 p.m. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve the lot split and variance with the following conditions: 1. The southern lot may not add more lot coverage (structure) to the home 2. Staff also recommends approval of the lot split because it meets the minimum lot size and dimension requirements. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. c) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 25 TO 17'9" FOR THE CONTRUCTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION AS REQUESTED BY DARREL AND SHARON HOOSLINE (705 MAIN ST S) Chairman Amdt opened the hearing at 6:14 p.m. with the reading of publication #6255 as published* the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 9, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request including a site plant showing the location of the proposed garage. She stated that staff was recommending that the access to the garage be through the alley way and not onto 7' Avenue. Because the garage will be 24'x 24' it would be a simple matter of which side to install the garage doors. Mr. Hoosline said he thought it would be easier to access the garage from 7'" Avenue because of the way the neighbor's garage sits. He was also concerned about snow removal in the alley. Mr. Arndt asked if a car parked in the driveway would be too close to the sidewalk. Mr. Fraser asked if the City plows the alleys. Ms. Wischnack stated that they do. Mr. Hoosline indicated that he would follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion to close the hearing carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the variance with the conditions recommended by staff. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion to approve, with the following conditions: 1. The property owner acquires a building permit for the project. 2. The construction must follow the sumitted site plans. Motion was carried unanimously. d) CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING FROM 1 -1 TO R -2 FOR 548 DALE STREET SW AS REQUES BY GLEN AND BARBARA FIELD Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:24 p.m. with the reading of publication #6253 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 9, 2000. Minutes Planning Commission — October 17, 2000 Page 3 Ms. Wischnack explained the request including a site plan showing Goebels industrial site and the homes in the industrial zone. She stated that if the 1 -1 zone if changed to R -1 it would be difficult to change back to 1 -1 if Goebels would ever want to expand. Paul Betker said that since Goebels owns all of the property this would be a positive addition to the area. Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the hearing at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve the rezoning with no conditions. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. Motion was carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS 5. OLD BUSINESS Country Club Terrace — Discussion CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A MANUFACTURED HOME AS REQUETED BY JEFF MUNSELL (COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE — 448 CALIFORNIA ST NW — LOT 100) The City Attorney, Planning Commission and Staff received a letter from Mr. Munsell reviewing the history of country Club Terrace. There has not been further correspondence with Mr. Munsell. There was general discussion regarding the fact that one variance would cover the entire park so individual variances would not be needed every time a new mobile home was moved into the park. 0 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mr. Jones moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:42 p.m. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion carried. 0 C • Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hassan Street SE Hutchinwn. NIN 55350.2522 320 - 587- 5151/Fac 320. 233 -4240 M E M O R A N D U M 0 C� TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Out -of -State Travel for Director of Engineering/Public Works DATE: November 20, 2000 As a member of the Minnesota Local Road Research Board I have been asked to attend the National Transportation Research Board Conference in Washington, DC in January (.6t through the 11` All costs will be paid by the Board. Primed m � 2000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 OCTOBER 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 OCTOBER REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL OCTOBER OCTOBER MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH 'BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 154,370.67 (154,370.67) 931,507.12 1,852,448.00 920,940.88 50.29% LICENSES 185.00 2,045.00 2,883.33 (838.33) 31,740.00 34,600.00 2,860.00 91.73% PERMITS AND FEES 21,377.68 16,786.81 20,516.67 (3,729.86) 281,047.74 246,200.00 (34,847.74) 114.15% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 207 ,181.72 176,146.00 207,511.08 (31,365.08) 1,377,928.76 2,490,133.00 1,112,204.24 55.34% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 39,204.99 45,150.54 96,648.42 (51,497.88) 624,983.07 1,159,781.00 534,797.93 53,89% FINES & FORFEITS 5,699.77 8,009.29 5,000.00 3,009.29 50,796.17 60,000.00 9,203.83 84.66% INTEREST 9,167.40 23,135.24 4,250.00 18,885.24 117,787.04 51,000.00 (66,787.04) 230.95% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS (3,288.66) 489.13 41.67 447.46 1,221.44 500.00 (721.44) 244.29% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 182,100.00 190,532.55 101,662.50 88,870.05 595,282.87 1,219,950.00 624,667.13 48,80% REIMBURSEMENTS (4,382.30) 442.47 9,080.42 (8,617.95) 108,925.44 108,725.00 (200.44) 100.18% SALES 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 TOTAL 457 ,245.60 462,737.03 601,944.75 (139,207.72) 4,121,219.65 7,224,837.00 3,103,617.35 57.04% m 2000 OC EXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL MAYOR 8 COUNCIL CITY ADMINISTRATOR ELECTIONS FINANCE MOTOR VEHICLE ASSESSING LEGAL PLANNING INFORMATION SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SAFETY COUNCIL FIRE DEPARTMENT PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS ENGINEERING STREETS & ALLEYS STREET MAINTENANCE A/C CITY HALL PARK/REC ADMIN. RECREATION SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER CMC ARENA PARK DEPARTMENT RECREATION BUILDING 8 POOL LIBRARY CEMETERY DEBT SERVICE AIRPORT TRANSIT UNALLOCATED TOTAL �( y `11 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 1998 2000 2000 2000 2000 OCTOBER OCTOBER OCTOBER MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED 10,482.67 2,677.58 4,983.25 (2,105.67) 45,806.94 59,799.00 13,992.06 76.60% 14,756.73 15,516.30 17,142.83 (1,626.53) 172, 145.09 205,714.00 33,568.91 83.68% 3,491.91 1,036.26 1,058.33 (22.07) 4,515.18 12,700.00 8,184.82 35.55% 20,352.54 32,845.88 28,981.17 3,864.71 280, 946.61 347,774.00 66,827.39 80.78% 10,887.60 11,643.13 12,157.75 (514.62) 118,998.31 145,893.00 26,894.69 8157% 0.00 33,062.00 2, 758.33 30, 303.67 33,06200 33,100.00 38,00 99.89% 7,212.06 15,346.58 7,708.33 7,638.25 90,801.59 92,500.00 1,698.41 9816% 9,086.34 9,969.64 10,048.58 (78.94) 105,236.30 120,583.00 15,346.70 87.27% 0.00 4,839.43 5,140.17 (300.74) 51,573.03 61,682.00 10,108.97 83.61% 139,205.38 140,879.74 139,477.67 1,402.07 1,464,611.46 1,673,732.00 209,120.54 87.51% 6,859.02 7,263.51 8,911.17 (1,647.66) 61,020.53 106,934.00 45,913.47 57.06% 10.89 11.47 333.33 (321.86) 3,880.39 4,000.00 119.61 97.01% 0.00 0.00 20.83 (20.83) 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00% 11,403.84 24,592.24 22,567.08 2,025.16 210,980.31 270,805.00 59,824.69 7791% 12,747.38 16,522.05 12,496.42 4,025.63 132,846.92 149,957.00 17,110.08 88.59% 26,746.61 32,212.35 30,291.00 1,921.35 311,949.95 363,492.00 51,54205 85.82% 56,308.40 52,209.66 55,288.67 (3,079.01) 515,784.43 663,464.00 147,679.57 77.74% 15,351.79 21,951.91 8,735.00 13,216.91 166,721.72 104,820.00 (61,901.72) 159.06% 8,932.50 10,461.95 8,909.50 1,552.45 106,740.67 106,914.00 173.33 99.84% 10,796.43 12,300.92 13,155.33 (854.41) 128,190.00 157,864.00 29,674.00 81.20% 8,129.08 10,316.75 18,371.83 (8,055.08) 183,492.19 220,462.00 36,969.81 83.23% 6,779.59 7,877.91 8,556.92 (679.01) 71,200,79 102,683.00 31,482.21 69.34% 19,060.72 22,655.03 19,950.67 2,694.36 199, 352.05 239,528.00 40,175.95 83.23% 46,399.01 52,157.92 60,051.83 (7,893.91) 632,309.13 720,622.00 88,312.87 87.74% 5,290.34 5,649.61 8,539.17 (2,689.56) 98,173.19 102,470.00 4,296.81 95,81% 2,302.48 2,225.53 9,734.67 (7,509.14) 106,953.44 116,816.00 9,862.56 91.56% 12,827.51 26,301.70 8,227.50 18,074.20 150,237.49 98,730.00 (51,507.49) 152.17% 700.00 0.00 7,806.08 (7,806.08) 81,807.41 93,673.00 11,865.59 8733% 1,077.79 4,094.89 4, 81250 (717.61) 50,789.82 57,750.00 6,960.18 87.95% 9,489.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,525.52 0.00 (32,525.52) 77,458.90 32,712.11 65,843.83 (33,131.72) 312,190.54 790,126.00 477,935.46 39.51% 554,146.51 609,734.05 602,069.75 7,664.30 5,924,843,00 7,224,837.00 1,299,994.00 82.01% 0 9 • General Govt. 85,202.35 (173,685.50) 98,888.25 38,710.50 (621,045.06) 1,186,659.00 176,833.28 85.10% 2000 170,226.51 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 5,462.51 1,873,339.61 2,205,678.00 332,338.39 OCTOBER 1999 2000 106,373.92 94,314.67 2000 994,456.10 1,131,776.00 137,319.90 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL OCTOBER OCTOBER MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE 1,660,445.00 240,774.21 MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 154,370.67 (154,370.67) 931,507.12 1,852,448.00 920,940.88 50.29% LICENSES 185.00 2,045.00 2,883.33 (838.33) 31,740.00 34,600.00 2,860.00 91.73% PERMITS AND FEES 21,377.68 16,786.81 20,516.67 (3,729.86) 281,047.74 246,200.00 (34,847.74) 114.15% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 207,181.72 176,146.00 207,511.08 (31,365.08) 1,377,928.76 2,490,133.00 1,112,204.24 55.34% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 39,204.99 45,150.54 96,648.42 (51,497.88) 624,983.07 1,159,781.00 534,797.93 53.89% FINES 8 FORFEITS 5,699.77 8,009.29 5,000.00 3,00929 50,796.17 60,000.00 9,203.83 84.66% INTEREST 9,167.40 23,135.24 4,250.00 18,885.24 117,787.04 51,000.00 (66,787.04) 230.95% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS (3,288.66) 489.13 41.67 447.46 1,721.44 500.00 (721.44) 244.29% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 182,100.00 190,532.55 101,662.50 88,870.05 595,282.87 1,219,950.00 624,667.13 48.80% REIMBURSEMENTS (4,382.30) 442.47 9,060.42 (8,617.95) 108,925.44 108,725.00 (200.44) 100.18% SALES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00% TOTAL 457,245.60 462,737.03 601,944.75 (139,207.72) 4,121,219.65 7,224,837.00 3,103,617.35 57.04% General Govt. 85,202.35 137,598.75 98,888.25 38,710.50 1,009,825.72 1,186,659.00 176,833.28 85.10% Public Safety 170,226.51 189,269.01 183,806.50 5,462.51 1,873,339.61 2,205,678.00 332,338.39 84,93% Streets 8 Alleys 98,406.80 106,373.92 94,314.67 12,059.25 994,456.10 1,131,776.00 137,319.90 87.87% Parks d Recreation 98,757.65 113,383.67 138,370.42 (24,986.75) 1,419,670.79 1,660,445.00 240,774.21 85.50% Miscep.vmus 101,553.20 63,108.70 86,669.92 (23,581.22) 627,550.78 1,040,279.00 412,728.22 60,33% TOTAL 554 ,146.51 609,734.05 602,069.75 7,664.30 5,924,843.00 7,224,837.00 1,299,994.00 82.01% T 1 m CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 22- Nov -00 October 31, 2000 Data Date Interest Of Of is Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount TREAS BONDS 644136 7.18% 12/12/91 2115!2001 364,500.00 Smith Barney FHLB 6.50% 0323 99 03 23 06 200,000.00 Smith Barney 313400 S H 7 7.17% 04/03/00 04/03/03 300,071.92 Smith Barney FHLB 6.500% 01 07 99 01 0709 750,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB 3133m2 -u3 6.245% 02 23 99 02 23 09 300,000.00 Prudential poo1336914 7.226% 1231 96 0201 2026 67,254.79 Expected fife 6.2 years Smith Barney FNMA 6.100% 01 20 98 01 2005 300,000.00 Prudentail pool 336399 7.270% 1231 96 0201 2026 88,628.10 Expected fife 4.1 years Citizens, Marquette 4.00% 0425/96 - 06101/2001 100,000.00 Frstate, First Minnesota Prudential Fed Home Leon 6.00% 01 /28199 01 2609 200,000.00 Smith Barney FNMA 6.13% 03/10/99 03/10/06 500,000.00 Smith Barney FNMA pass thru 7.50% 1220195 06/01/02 44,805.08 Prudential Fed Home Loan 6.00% 1026101 1026101 399,625.00 Bremer 90381 6.250% 10 12 00 11 1600 400,000.00 First Federal 6296 7.25% 08 15 00 11 1600 400,000.00 Prudential FHL 5.79% 11 1898 11 1805 199,750.00 Call 2118/99 and therafter Marquette 6.29% 0211 00 02 15 01 200,000.00 Smith Barney Money Market 671% 10 25 00 10 12 00 1,130,066.67 First Federal 6379 7.500% 07 28 00 0731 01 200,000.00 Marquette 1231'305 7.110% 0531 00 0531 01 400,000.00 First Federal 7.000% 09 14 00 09 17 01 1,000,000.00 Prudential 7.23% 0731 00 11 08 06 200,000.00 Marquette 1231'297 6.260% 01 2800 01 3001 1,000,000.00 Smith Barney 6.629% 11 01 00 11 1600 5,128,030.90 $13,870,732.46 4—El CITY OF HUTCHINSON MEMO Finance Department November 22, 2000 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: INVESTMENT AUTHORIZATION * To continue on a short -term investment at a good rate I would ask approval of the following: • $4,141,008.33 @ 6.605% ZEN -NOH UNICO (commercial paper) (this is all Al /P1 paper with Salomon Smith Barney) Due 11/28/00. • 0 Hutchinson City Total Tax Levy Proposed Special HRA Taxing Distric 1 $76,752 1 Revised Special HRA Taxing District 1 $69,076 1 Percentage reduction of proposed 1 10% 1 Proposed Preliminary City of Hutchinson Tax Levy 1 $3 I Revised Preliminary City of Hutchinson Tax Levy 1 $3,795,600 1 Proposed reduction of proposed 1 4.6% • s Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Brenda EwinAuman Resources Coordinator RE: Employee Health and Dental Insurance Renewal Premium Increase Cost -Share Proposal DATE: November 21, 2000 The City of Hutchinson is completing the renewal process for the employee health and dental insurance packages. After numerous discussions with our risk managers at Berkley Risk and with our providers, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Delta Dental, and Comprehensive Care Services, the City has been presented with the cost increases for continuing the current levels of coverage for the plan year 2000/2001. The Wage Committee has also had the opportunity to review the renewal figures for the i nsuran ce coverages. As you are aware, two council members, Kay Peterson and Jim Haugen, • represent the full council on this committee and have been part of their discussions. The Wage Committee has put forth a recommendation to the City Council to address the renewal cost increases. The recommendation is to consider sharing the insurance total cost increase for both plan years 1999/2000 and 2000/2001 equally between the City of Hutchinson and those employees who are enrolled in the plan(s). This proposal is illustrated on the attached page. Information is also attached regarding the cost increases for the various administrative costs associated with these plans and the renewal for the stop loss coverage. It is requested that the Council review these cost proposals and consider the following: Approve the total cost increase as proposed by our service providers (premiums, administrative and stop loss). Approve the attached cost - sharing proposal between the City and the employees enrolled in the health/dental plans. Authorize staff to enter into agreements with our providers for the insurance renewals. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Ken Merrill or myself at City Center. • Enc. �—( Monthly Health & Dental Cost History and Proposal • rledicaUHealth 1999 2000 2001 $j"k Family $1nCle Family 51 nS P F amily Net Cost of Medical $17153 5386.11 $193.66 $433.41 5219.17 5496.77 City Cost $172.53 5386.11 $17153 $386.11 $195.85 5441.44 Seeproposal Employee Cost $0.00 50.00 $21.13 $4730 523.32 555.33 below Increase over Previous Year $2113 $47.30 $25.51 56336 Total Cost Over 2 Years $46.64 S110.66 Dental 1999 2000 2001 51"Lc Family Single Family 516>Zk F amily Cost of Dental SIT01 S45.83 $18.20 $49.03 $18.75 550.50 ' - Ost $17.01 545.83 $17.01 $45.83 517.88 548.17 See proposal Employee Cost $0.00 50.00 $1.19 $3.20 $0.87 32.33 below Increase over Previous Year $1.19 $120 $0.55 $1.47 Total Cost Over 2 Years $1.74 $4.67 Cost Share Proposal (monthly) all ak Emily HealttvXledical Total Increase Over 2 Years $46.64 $110.66 Proposed 50% of Increase $2332 $55.33 Current Employee Contribution $17.01 545.83 Proposed Employee Increase $6.31 $9.50 Dental &XIsk Family Total Increase Over 2 Years $1.74 $4.67 Proposed 50% of Increase $0.87 $2.34 Current Employee Contribution $1.19 $3.20 Proposed Employee Increase -S032 -$0.87 Employee Cost Increase for Combined Monthly Premiu $5.99 $8.63 Total Employee Cost for Health/Medical $2332 $6336 Total Employee Cost for Dental $0.87 $233 Tbtal Citv Increase $24.19 $57.67 New City Rate - Health/Medical $195.85 $441.44 New Cltv Rate - Dental $17.88 548.17 ,Y- /I Administration CCS AWARE GoldNet Selectcare Agent Managed Care PEAK Year End Settlement Transplant Stop Loss Coverage Transplant @ $40,000 @ $30,000 6 @ $100,000 Calculated Funding Total From Reserve Monthly Health & Dental Cost History Administration & Stop Loss 1999 2000 2001 am9k F amily S mele Family 5.jagk F amily $13.80 513.80 $14.35 $14.35 $14.35 $14.35 $0.00 $0.00 $6.50 $6.50 $6.50 $6.50 $0.90 $0.90 $0.90 50.90 $0.90 $0.90 54.75 $4.75 $1.00 51.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $0.92 $2.15 53.43 $8.00 52.70 $8.75 1999 2000 2001 5ingl€ Family S ingle Family Sj"k F amily $33.17 577.55 $40.79 $95.12 $27.92 564.57 $14.51 $33.84 517.28 $40.30 $121.46 $292.34 $143.61 $337.75 $161.67 5380.37 $172.53 $386.11 $202.70 5442.45 5230.89 5508.49 50.00 $0.00 -$9.04 -$9.04 - $11.72 - $11.72 /J j C `I Hutchinson Citv Center i11 Hassan Simi SE Hutchimon. NIN 55350 -2522 320 - 587.5151 /Fax 320 - 234-4240 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Consultant Agreements for Engineering Services DATE: November 20. 2000 The City has completed its "Qualifications- Based" Engineering Consulting selection process and has recommended that the attached Consulting Firms be awarded General Engineering Service Contracts. Each firm shall have a general contract based on the type of work selected by the City, and shall then prepare short -form agreements for individual projects based on the general contract. The Selection/interview Committee consisted of the following: John Rodeberg Director of Engineering/Public Works Gary Plotz City Administrator • Ken Merrill Finance Director Randy DeVries Director of Water /Wastewater/Resource Recovery Cal Rice Assistant City Engineer Richard Kjonaas McLeod County Engineer Dick Nag Water Systems Supervisor (names in parenthesis here not involved in interviews) The Selection Criteria was based on the following: • Previous related corporate experience 25% • Capacity to perform work (including location, availability, staffing, etc.) 25% • Client references 20% • Approach to municipal consulting services 20% • Estimated cost of services 10% The consultants indicated as an "altemate" will not be offered a General Services Contract at this time, but will be the first considered when conditions exist that warrant requesting their services. We recommend awarding Engineering Services contracts to the attached list of primary consultants. Actual contracts will be approved under the Consent Agenda when final contracts have been completed. • attachment cc: Selection/Interview Committee r Paz Vander Veen. Marc Sebora X —� - Pnmed on rtycicd paptt - !/ Service Area l" Consultant "V Barr Engineering Company (Minneapolis) Bolton & Menk, Inc. (Mankato) Earth Tech (Minneapolis) Otto Associates (Buffalo) SE,fI Consulting (Minnetonka/St. Paul) $RF Consulting Group (Minnetonka) TKDA & Associates (St. Paul) 0 o� •� �.. ; � 7 164 1 ti Contact I Addreae/Phone I Type of W ork/Notes Marty Campion Dave Halter 6 West Division Street Buffalo, MN 55313 763- 682 -4727 Suite 5200 Minnetonka MN 55343 800- 734 -6757 (952 -912 -2601) Will continue to complete small development work (Rolling Meadows, Beau Ridge, Summerset, etc.) _ Large development projects (S. Area Drunk, 2 " Avenue S /Dale, South Grade Road Trunk). Altemate for Water /Wastewater Jamcs Dvorak (Dave Ruedel) Jerry Peterson One Carlson Parkway N Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55447 763- 475 -0010 Large development projects -- (Century /Dale/ S Grade Road, School Road, SW Bypass, Comp. 'I mi sportation plan) and trails 1500 Piper JafTrey Plaza Bob 4700 West 77" Street Includes dam work, storm water St. Paul, MN 55101 -2140 Dbenneycr Mpls, MN 55435-4803 utility /management & planning, 952- 832 -2600 Currently doing all of our work in (952- 832 -2601) this area. _ John Rippke Mankato, MN 56001 Alternate for General Municipal, 507 - 62511171 State /Federal Aid. Would utilize (507 -625 -4177) if other listed consultants could _ _ no t come worklo Scott Young 3033 Campus Drive 5 175 Trealntenl systems. Mill review Minnepolis, MN 55441 services in summer of 2001 per 800 -537 -5331 Council request. Marty Campion Dave Halter 6 West Division Street Buffalo, MN 55313 763- 682 -4727 Suite 5200 Minnetonka MN 55343 800- 734 -6757 (952 -912 -2601) Will continue to complete small development work (Rolling Meadows, Beau Ridge, Summerset, etc.) _ Large development projects (S. Area Drunk, 2 " Avenue S /Dale, South Grade Road Trunk). Altemate for Water /Wastewater Jamcs Dvorak (Dave Ruedel) Jerry Peterson One Carlson Parkway N Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55447 763- 475 -0010 Large development projects -- (Century /Dale/ S Grade Road, School Road, SW Bypass, Comp. 'I mi sportation plan) and trails 1500 Piper JafTrey Plaza Not in this Qualifications 444 Cedar Street selection process, but noted for St. Paul, MN 55101 -2140 informational purposes. All major 651- 292 -4400 (292 - 00_8_ work is con2leted__ _ q i Co 0 Hutchinson Citv Center tII Hassan Stmt �E Hutchinson. NIN 55350- 2522 320 -587- 5151/Fax 320 - 234 -3230 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Presentation of Proposed "Stormwater Utility" and Management Program DATE: November 21, 2000 Attached is a copy of a report detailing the proposed Hutchinson Stormwater Utility. The report includes a background of the utility as well as copies of the "Questions and Answers" handout to be utilized, the draft of the "Storm Water Drainage Utility" Ordinance, the presentation materials from the Council Workshop and a copy of the proposed mailing. Please review the documentation. At the Council Meeting we will ask for consideration of approving of the proceeding with initiation of the Stormwater Utility, including: t. Public Open House to be held on Thursday. December 7t from 6 to 8 p.m. 2. Mailing for the proposed Public Open House 3. Question and Answer handout for the Public Open House and Public Hearing 3. Public Hearing for proposed first reading of the "Storm Water Drainage Utility" Ordinance on Tuesday, December 12 at 6 p.m. (Second reading would be Tuesday December 26` unless the meeting is rescheduled due to the holiday). I will be making the presentation at the Council meeting. BobObermeyer of Barr Engineering and James Prosser of Ehlers & Associates will be present at both the Public Open House and the Public Hearing. It is also proposed to have City of Hutchinson engineering and finance staff available at the Public Open House to address questions. Please let me know prior to the meeting if you have additional questions or comments that I should address. P=m ,n ",ocd wm - � E, "Q t R� E Why does the City of Hutchinson need a utility? 1, I ill hl I)CColl I CS LIC\ C 10 1 X:t I. I I IC I C d IC IC%t'rr places Ibr slunnwater to seep ualurally into the ground. Rooliops. driveways, parking lots, anti streets all contribute to ,tonnwater runoff, which ma es its way into our lakes. Act lands, rivers. and -Murat sewers. As runoff increases. ,u dress Ili; and In manage it Ihut both water yu:uailt and �� nlcr quality slanJlxlint;. NcN Icdcral waicr -goalm regulalions ucuul: le Ihll the Cily of I Iutchinstm inlplenlcnl strict waterqualit) managementpmcliecsm protect the city water resources. To meet these regukltions, the City is establishing it stornnvalcr utility w prncitk aeontinuuw. dedicated source of revenue to manage, maintain, and improve the city's waterre- sources and slormwaler management systems. including lakes, w.alands. and water quantity/ quality basins. Progruns to Ix: fulukd by lltc utility in lade:: • Wellarldalh :mccmenizildmaintenance • Sire sweeping • R,;moval ofaaclunulatcd sediment liun1 hakes, water qua ri ilWilualky basins • Surlace Haler nialabwmenl pmclict:s and ordinance implemental ion and enlnrcemenl • Wention basin andstonw +aterconveyancc s)s1cm c(I lsiru :tion • In-pkkc dtaitmge s) stem maintenance and reconstruction • Sedimentation basin nmilttenance • Attention to l oc.iiizeddnliltageprubl(.ns • I)itch.uxfcuhciimainicriance u I he City of I Iulclulm)[I is holding an Ulkn I louse at the Council Chambers on Ih cembx:r 7 from 60) it) 80) p.m. I'Iclvc plan to attend ifyou bave quc5tionti or conccrits about the new stomlwalu utility. f of gIWStlolls. 0011100: higioce ing Ihpallnlent Ckyof I lulchinson I I I I lass n Street SF Hutchinson, MN 55350 - 25 12 (320) 234-42(19 L Understanding Stormwater Utility Fees 4Vlu are Me) dil 11 )t' ran dlcp What are stormwatel lltlll�)' �CCS? r1 stornlvvulcr utilitt is a linaneintt method WICd by cities to pity for sturmvnnter s; stem uraintenanecandimprovetnenls ilnprore- incnts that may not be covered by fund, gcn;,rated li"om general taxes. Who is being Gilled? A property ovNllers in the Cily oh 1 lutchinson 4vi Il be recaivin.- a storumater ulilih hill. similarlo sunilarI sewer and water utililcs, slormwalterinanaganent utility ICCS arc basal nu CUlllr ibuticnl. not by the value ofyour pioperl%. bees are ICLd (] to the:unnuul ul raiuGdl I hat drains;maay from or runs off land rather th:m soal.ing into the ground. The more nuu,ll: lhu grealCrihe impact on surirce aatcl and thcrcli,rc, the Lrcatcr the charge. Your hill vkill he himl on the litlI0lN IaCI! its: • rinww3t of I:urd vououn • 11} leufproperty (residenliaLcontmerciail. iudnsirial. publie 1 ?mount ofslornnvatci runoff ealculated to came from your property I I lc utility - Or user charge places costs on coulrihutorsofru.uotf and %> impacts on a prupoi l ional basis. A l l propert ies pac. illAidinc churches.. schools, businesses, and ho t uci m ncrs. Chun:hos. 3 G., I Buildings Parks and Golf Courses Utility Flmding • Iirosiun and scdinunl control • Conve,:mceststelnnlaiulen:mce • Mninlctilancc of watcnµlautih;yualilq basins Who else is using this approach? he utility approach has gained nceepluuee locally asecidcnccd by the ❑umber ofcor mumi- Liesalready using"Is • Apple Valley • Bloomington • Chanhassen • (Ycstal Delano 14aEv, • PdcllMairic • t.dina Rtirmont I onimmerutility. including • I_akevilla Mound Oakdale Robimmle • Rusemounl • Roseville Shakopee • Shorcnund SI. Paid Wayzal,t What will the typical monthly charges be? General Taxes 7lieC' it $'00_(D0 How will this benefit if ,+atci quality and st(irmvv ater Ittanagentcnt the community? issues are ur Ile addn ssrdproperly.'Ificnionddy lecaussoci:acd wilh Imit ling a progr:ml ollhis I lay ing it sepuraw I'uutl IN Sit)[ li tatcl size mar be: st stem maintenanceatd improvements will dIUR the (Il4' UhI 1ntCI1111SOn LO fO tIS Un ❑7ltl e timk- linnil� rc:- iJcnG;d 51 'i.lul Illm All �,hly on the riilllovving slornmaler- rrlaled l menutu.,!Irnucuu� =:. 5 3 .... " UnJnnloprl. p�trhs, roll n,nr:r< w0 h'u i,. I•:sUas: Chmr6cs, mid dcnsil� tesidrnlial Sa.l l ma, • Iiiiprnt'elliL - c Rvatei qualltP [mill homes S3S0: unit • hrctlmid proleclion ?d..... k. lu.limlion:d 1 S2.` 1;wiu • 1 11 Illo1ccliou Ilit.h "doli'm nsidrnli:d'imill'u ; ,,l S "? P ;t,!a General Taxes • Hutchinson Cit Center !11 Hassan Slmel NE Hutchinson. NIN 55350 -2322 120. 567- 5151/Fas 320 - 234-4240 Hutchinson Stormwater Utility November 28, 2000 P,,,w un rcc�: mJ oaDC( Initiation The discussion of adopting a Stormwater Utility lUtility) in the City of Hutchinson started in 1990. When interviewing fora new Public Works Director. City Council members raised concerns about financing storm sewer improvement projects. It was noted that everybody was fighting paving for improvements. People at the top of the hill said thev did not have a storm water problem, and people at the bottom of the hill said that their problem was caused by the people at the top of the hill. One response as a way to address to the problem was to adopt a Stormwater Utility_ Fund to generate dedicated funds for improvements. Since the mid 1980's many Minnesota cities have adopted a Stormwater Utility based on a Model Ordinance developed by local and state agencies. Minnesota is an acknowledged national leader in addressing stormwater management issues. A national effort has also been underway. including the publication in 1991 of " Financine Stormwater Facilities: A Utility Approach" by the American Public Works Association (APWA). Since 1990 the City has reviewed the potential for initiating a Stormwater Utility. The major delay was caused by a desire to develop the City's Geographic • Information System (GIS) first, and to clearly define the community need. The GIS program allows city staff too much more easily identify property size and use, and develop a database for property ownership. The project has accelerated since 1998, and the GIS program now allows for development of the necessary information to implement the utility. The communitv need has also been defined as other issues have generated new interest in initiating the Utility, including: • NPDES — Phase 2: The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) is entering its second phase. This requires cities over 10,000 population to develop Stormwater and Resource Management systems that provide additional testing, reporting, permitting and other efforts on each city's part. This is an "unfunded mandate" from the Federal government that will require significantly more work for local government. This program is proposed to be fully implemented by 2003 in Hutchinson. Additional consulting costs will be required as well as additional staff time for monitoring and managing the system. It is also expected that NPDES will increase infrastructure needs and costs, as the system does require more stringent pollution control measures • to be adopted. • Flood Control Issues: The City has many areas of town with significant • localized flooding during heavy rainfall events. These have occurred several times in the last 10 nears and need to be addressed. Under current fiscal constraints. it is not possible to address these issues in a reasonable time period. • Large Stormwater Project Bonding: As noted above, the City has several large stonnwater projects programmed within the next 5 to 6 years. With - nited funding availability these may not be able to be addressed without the rt of a dedicated funding source. The major projects proposed include: 0 NE Area Trunk Storm Sewer— Phase 2 (2002 or 2003) 51,042,000 Includes trunk storm sewer and ponding construction to serve the area west and north ofNorthwoods Park. This project would help correct moderate to severe localized flooding and would allow for future development of property in the area. The estimated cost does not include property acquisition © Linden Park Area Trunk Storm Sewer (2004 or 2005) $930,000 The project includes constructing storm water ponding facilities in the Park in the area currently used for softball fields. Significant localized flooding • has occurred in the area 3 times in the past 11 years. This pond would act as a storm water overflow for the area. Additional storm sewer construction may be required upstream and downstream of the proposed project. 0 Crow River Dam Reconstruction (2006 or 2007) 5100.000 Safety and environmental improvements are proposed for the dam to address its lack of appropriate capacity, gate operation issues. potential overturning issues, and the potential construction of a fish ladder or "rapids" to address safety and obstruction issues. This work is being coordinated through the Department of Natural Resources, and is proposed to be completed in conjunction with the Main Street bridge construction proposed for 2007. ® Other: Dale Street reconstruction proposed for 2004 may require an upgrade of the existing system to address flooding problems near Linden Park. The Echo Drive /Century Avenue area requires additions and revisions to the system to reduce localized flooding. • Pond Maintenance: As part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas" program, and to address sewer capacity and flood safety issues during heavy rainfalls. the City has • constructed many ponds in the iast 10 years. Each pond requires maintenance in order to work properly. It is expected that dredging of the sediment from some of the ponds may be required within the next tew }ears. This will be a continual maintenance issue. Financing Approach The utility approach is based on the concept "contributors pay ". Contribution is determined by the amount of runoff and/or pollution load contributed by a particular parcel. The actual rate structure is based on the land use, type, density, and parcel size. Credits are proposed to be given for private on -site storm water detention (ponding) that addresses both, or either. the quality and quantity of the storm water entering the public waters. See the "Question and Answer" handout or the attached draft Ordinance for more details. Advantages of a Utility Fair • Charges are based on runoff rather than property value as is the case with • general taxes. • All properties are included, including those that may be exempt from taxes. This would include the City, and other governmental agencies, public and private schools and churches. Dependable • Self Financing (does not compete with other governmental services for generaa revenues) • Provides consistent funding and is easily projected • Revenues are kept in separate. dedicated funds Simple and Flexible • Similar to water and sewer charges • Fee system is adaptable to local situations • Credits, exemptions and appeals are built -in Acceptable • Decreases the dependence on property taxes • Regular small service charge is generally much more accepted than a large one- time assessment • Benefits to the Community • • Improved Lake and River Quality Wetland Protection Enhancement of Recre -,r.i onal Opportunities Erosion and Sediment trot Flood Control Comprehensive Water Nlane?ement Planning Community Education Drainage System Maintenance _ Programs to b� Funded by Utility The fees collected can only be used for stormwater management. The dedicated funding source will allow Hutchinson to complete work in many related areas: • Repair and maintenance of existing storm sewer and ponds • Replacement of undersized pipe, repair of breaks, blockage removal • Street sweeping (reduces waste entering the storm sewer, river and lake) • Surface water quality and wetland protection measures • Flood reduction measures , • The City could issue bonds for large improvement projects with the revenue from the fees used to help with the payoff. Proposed 2001 Budget Funding: Street Sweeping and Storm Sewer System Maintenance S62.000 Resource Management administration /development/consulting S 42,000 Capital Projects tmav not all be completed in 2001) S 61,000* Estimated Total $165,000* *Any additional revenues and unspent Capital will remain in the Stormwater Utility Capital Fund for use with future projects. 0 • Attachments 1. "Hutchinson Stormwater Utility: Questions and Answers" 2. "Draft" of proposed Ordinance 3. Public Works Group presentation "Overview" • C Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hassan street 5E Hutchinson. JIN 55330 -7522 ]20- 587- 5157/Fa 320.231-4240 0 0 0 Hutchinson Sto rmwater Utili uestions Answers -Vest year the Citv of Hutchinson proposes to initiate a Stormwater Utility. The Utility would begin to charge all Hutchinson property owners a fee for stormwater management. This Q &A addresses questions about the utility, the proposed new fee, and Hutchinson 's Stormwater Management Program. Q. Why does the City of Hutchinson want to create a Stormwater Utilitv? A. The City needs a continuous. dedicated funding_ source to meet growing stormwater management needs. The City is required to address new state and federal regulations regarding protecting and improving the quality of the surface water within the City. We also need to address issues regarding existing surface water management problem areas. This dedicated revenue source will enable Hutchinson to provide improved flood protection. stormwater system maintenance. water quality protection. erosion and sediment control. improved lake water quality and wetiand/resource protection. Q. Why is more funding needed for storm sewer maintenance and improvements? A. Much of Hutchinson 's storm sewer system was omit decades ago % %nen the community was much smaller. This system is often undersized in comparison to today's standards, and does not always provide protection from large, uncommon storm events. The result has been street flooding, and some yard and basement flooding during heavy rainfalls. Q. In what areas of town is this problem occurring? A. Hutchinson has problem areas in virtually every comer of town. Some of the most noticeable problems are in the area of the Recreation Center, in the School Road north and California Street areas. and near Northwoods Park. Some of these areas have had two or three major flood events in the past 10 years. Q. How much would the Stormwater Utility fee be for a single- family home? A. Fees are not based on the value of the property. DUE instead on the amount of runoff from a property. The more runoff created by the property due to its type or size, the greater the impact on the stormwater system, and therefore the greater the charge. All single - family and two-family Hutchinson homes would pay 51.75 /month (521.00 /year). Commercial and industrial lots will pay more, due to their higher runoff rates. For a list of charges by property type, see the chart on the next page. Q. How would the rates on other properties be calculated? A. The fees are based on analysis of the amount of stormwater generated by various types of properties. For example. commercial buildings with large parking lots wiil generate more stormwater runoff than a small retail building with on- street parking. therefore it wiil pay a higher fee. Fees for non- residential properties (arid residential properties larger than a two-family) will pay a fee based on their acreage and property use. Credit is proposed to be given for properties that construct and maintain their own ponding, benefiting the Duality and/or quantity of the surface water in Hutchinson. Q. How will the fees be collected? A. The fees will be collected with your monthly, city utility bill just as your sanitary sewer and water charges are now collected. Q. What will Hutchinson do with the funds generated by the fee? A. The fees collected can only be used for stormwater management. The dedicated funding source will allow Hutchinson to complete work in many related areas: R=w u rt 'a d Daoer - • Repair and maintenance of existing storm sewer and ponds • Replacement of undersizea oioe. repair of breaks. blockage removal • Street sweeping (reduces waste entering the storm sewer, river and lake) • Surface water quality and weuand protection measures • Flood reduction measures • The Cir: could issue bonds for large improve ent projects with the revenue from the fees uso: to help with the payoff. Q. Do other cities in Minnesota have Stormwater Utilities? A. Yes. Below is a list of other cities that currently have a stormwater utility system. and the list is growing yearty. There is also a national trend for adopting a utility due to increased community needs. The ordinance that Hutchinson is using is based on the Model Ordinance used by most Minnesota cities. Other Minnesota cities using a Stormwater Utility include: *Roseville 'St. Paul 'Bloomington "Fridley •Eagan •Shakopee •Edina •Warata 'Eden Prairie 'Chanhassen •Delano *Shorewood •Robinsdale 'Apple Valley •Oakdale •Crvsiai • New Hope ' Lakin-tile • Richfield "Hound • Fairmont Q. How does the proposed Stormwater Utilitv fee for Hutchinson homeowners compare with the fee charged in other communities? A. A survey completed of a dozen Minnesota communities in 1999 noted an average fee of 523.35 per year. The fees in the survev ranged from approximately S I to almost $48 per year. Hutchins is proposing a year 2000 rate of 521.00 per year Q. Since rates vary by property type and size, how can I rind out what fee would be charged for my property? You can ask Citv staff at the Open House on Thursday, December 7th from 6 to 8 p.m. at the City Center. You may also call the Engineering Department at 2341209. Q. Will there be a Public Hearing prior to the Ordinance being considered and the rates set? AL. Yes. The Ciry Council will hold a Public Hearing at the first reguiarly scheduled City Council meeting in December. This will be at 6 p.m. on Tuesday. December 12. 2000. Q. When will property owners begin to be assessed the Stormwater Utility fee? A. It is proposed to initiate the utility on January 1, 2001. The stormwater charge will appear on utility bills issued after that date for the period starting on January 1, depending on the billing cycle. Q. What if I disagree with my property's classification, or would like more information on ponding credits or other aspects of the utility fee? A. Contact the Engineering Department at 234 -4209. Proposed Hutchinson Stormwater Utility Fees 2 Single - Family and Two - Family Residential $1.75 /unit/month 3 Public/Private Schools and Institutional Uses $2.92/acre /month 4 Multiple - Family Residential and Churches $4.14 /acre /month 5 Commericial and Industrial $7.39 /acre /month Public Open House Hutchinson City Center Council Chambers Thursdav, December 7` from 6 to 8 p.m. Meet with City staff and City Consultants informally to review the proposed Utility in detail. Staff will be able to answer questions for individual property owners on specific classification and rate issues. Public Hearin Hutchinson City Center Council Chambers Tuesday, December 12' at 6 p.m. Formal presentation to Council at regularly scheduled Council meeting. Official consideration of the Ordinance and rates would be at this meeting. This is a policy consideration meeting and will not include general discussion of individual property issues. is STORM WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY SEC. ESTABLISHMENT OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE UTILITY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Section 444.075. the Citv establishes a storm water drainage utility and authonzes the imposition of just and reasonable charges for the use and availability of storm sewer facilities. SEC. DEFINITIONS Pollutant loading — the amount of total suspended solids delivered to the storm water drainage system, measured in pounds per acre per year, that is generated from a given iand use. Total suspended solids (TSS) — the sum of all suspended matter, described by the dry weight of the suspended matter found in a specific volume of water (milligrams per liter. for example). SEC. FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS (a) In the exercise of its governmental authority and in order to promote the public health- safety. convenience and general welfare, the City has constructed. operated and maintained a storm sewer system ( "the system"). This Ordinance is adopted in the further exercise of such authonty and for the same purposes. (b) The system. as constructed. heretofore has been financed and paid for through the imposition of special assessments and ad valorem taxes. It is now necessary and desirable to provide an • alternative method of recovering some or all of the future costs of improving, maintaining and operating the system through the imposition of charges as provided in this Ordinance. (c) In imposing charges, it is necessary to establish a methodology that undertakes to make them just and equitable. Taking into account the status of completion of the system. past methods of recovenng system cost, the topography of the City and other relevant factors. it is determined that it .vould be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected volume of storm water runoff - rom the various parcels of Jana within the Citv during a standard rainfall event. For the purposes of ,his Ordinance. a standard rainfall event is defined as the one -year storm of one -day duration. In addition. it is determined that it would be just and equitable to assign responsibility for some or all of the future costs of operating, maintaining and improving the system on the basis of the expected pollutant loading from the vanous parcels of land within the City. (d) Assigning costs and making charges based upon expected typical storm water runoff volume and pollutant loading cannot be done with mathematical precision but can oniv be accomplished within reasonable and practical limits. The provisions of this Ordinance undertake to establish a reasonable and practical methodology for making such charges. SEC. RATES AND CHARGES (a) Residential equivalent factor. Rates and charges for the use and availability of the system shall be determined through the use of a "Residential Equivalent Factor" ( "REF"). A REF has been developed for the storm water runoff volume (Volume REF), the storm water runoff pollutant loading (Quality REF) and a composite that is used for the final utility fee calculation (Utility REF). For the purposes of this Ordinance, the Volume REF is defined as the ratio of the average volume of surface O DM AiPC DGCStDOCSQ 21291 t 1 water runoff coming from one acre of land subjected to a particular use, to the average voiume of runoff comma from one acre of land subjected to ryplcal single - famiiv residential use within the City durmiz a standard rainfall event. The Quality REF is defined as the ratio of the pollutant loading (measured as total suspended solids) coming from iand subjected to a particular use, to the pollutant loading come from land subject to typical sine - famiiv residential use with the City. The Utility REF is defined as the ratio of the sum of the volume and quality portions of the total annual storm water drainage utility fee for a given land use classification (as computed using the Volume REF and the Quality REF for that land use classification), to the sum of the volume and quality portions of the total annual storm water drainage utility fee for the single- family residential land use classification (as computed using the Volume REF and the Quality REF for the single family residential land use classification). The Utility REF for each of the land use classifications will be revised at such time In the future when there is a shift in the percentage of utility expenditures related to storm water runoff volume and storm water runoff quality treatment. The revision shall be determined by the Director of Public Works, who shall notify the City Council of the action. b) Storm water drainage charges. In determining charges the City Council shall by resolution .1sh a basic system rate to be charged against one acre of land having a Utility REF of one. The .:barge to be made against each parcel of land shall then be determined by multiplying the Utility REF for the parcel's land use classification times the parcel's acreage times the basic system rate. The Volume. Quality and Utility REFS for the following land uses within the City and the billing classifications for such land uses are as follows: CLASSIFI- Volume Quality Utility CATION LAND USES Ra REF REF 1 Golf Courses 0.41 0.50 0.43 2 Single - family and Duplex Residential 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 Public and Private Schools and Institutional Uses 1.36 3.05 1.67 4 Multiple- family Residential and Churches 2.18 3.21 2.37 5 Commercial and Industrial 3.79 6.10 4.22 For the purposes of calculating storm water drainage charges. all developed single- family and duplex Dar? -, s shall be considered to have an acreage of one -third (1/3) acre per unit. Double bungaiows or auplexes shall be considered to be two units. SEC. OTHER LAND USES Other land uses not listed in the foregoing table shall be classified by the Director of Public Works by assigning them to classes most nearly like the listed uses. from the standpoint of runoff volume for the standard rainfall event and the pollutant loading. An appeal from the Director of Public Works' determination of the property classification may be made to the City Council. SEC. ADIUSTMENT OF CHARGES The City Council may by resolution adopt policies providing for the adjustment of charges or credits to charges for parcels or groups of parcels. based upon land use data supplied by affected property owners, which data demonstrates a runoff volume for the standard rainfall event or a pollutant loading substantially different from that being used for the parcel or parcels. Such adjustment or credit shall be made by the Director of Public Works and shall not be made effective • :ODMATCDOCS %DOCS�221291 %I -etroacttvely. An appeai from the Director of Public Works aetermmatton may be made to the Cary • Council. SEC. PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE The City shall hold a hearing prior to determining whether to build. construct. enlarge or improve storm sewer facilities financed in whole or in part by the imposition of storm sewer drainage charges. Notice of such hearing shall be published in the official City newspaper at least ten days prior to the date of hearing. Owners of all property adjoining a proposed improvement shall be mailed or served with a notice at least ten days in advance of the hearing. However. failure to give mailed notice or anv defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. SEC. EXEMPTIONS Public street rights -0f -way, railroad rights -of -way, cemeteries and parks are exempt from storm water drainage charges. SEC. PAYMENT OF CHARGE Storm water bills shall be mailed to the owner or other account holder with their county utility statement and shall specify the charges. SEC. _ DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS (a) Payment Options. Owners and other account holders shall have the option of paying a rate . for payments made on or before the due date listed on the bill or the option of paying an extended payment rate for payments made after the due date listed on the bill. The extended payment rate shall include the rates detailed herein plus a charge of five percent (5 %) of the current bill amount that is not paid by the due date listed on the bill. The five percent (5 %) charge shall not exceed two hundred dollars (5200.00) in total for all utilities per billing account per billing penod. (b) Delinquent Storm Water Accounts. Accounts shall be considered delinquent when no oavmcnts have been received after ninety (90) days following the payment due date and no arrangements for payment have been agreed to by the owner or other account holder. It shall be the dury of the Utility Division to endeavor to promptly coilect delinquent accounts. (c) Assessment of Delinquent Accounts All delinquent accounts shall be certified to the City Assessor who shall prepare an assessment roil for each year providing for assessment of the delinquent amounts against the respective properties served. The assessment shall include the amount of the delinquent account and the administrative charge due under subdivision (d), together with interest thereon at the maximum lawful rate. This assessment roll shall be delivered to the City Council for adoption on or before October first of each year. Such action may be optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect delinquent accounts. (d) Administrative Assessment Charge. An administrative charge of $25.00 shall de.due upon the mailing of the notice of the proposed assessment. SEC. RECALCULATION OF CHARGES • If a property owner or person responsible for paying the storm water drainage charge questions the correctness of such a charge, such person may have the determination of the charge recomputed 0 DMA %PCD0CS,D0CSSU21291 \ I by written request to the Director of Public Works. Such request shail be made within thirty t =0) days of the maiiing of the oiiling to question. • SEC. _ ADJUSTMENTS AND /OR CREDITS TO THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE CHARGES (a) the municipal storm water drainage utility uses a rate structure based on the anticipated relative contribution of storm water n.::nage runoff volume and pollutant loading to the storm water drainage system. A parcel's contribution determined by that parcei's size and its land use, under the principle that more intensively developed land uses typically have a larger percentage of impervious surface and contribute a much greater volume of water to the system for the standard rainfall event of 2.3 inches in 24 hours and/or larger pollutant loading. It is recognized that some parcels. due either to their unique topographic. vegetative. geologic and other characteristics have a hydrologic response substantially different from that of similarly sized parcels of the same land use. To provide for an equitable assessment of storm water drainage charges. based on reasonably expected contribution of flows. provisions need to be made to permit adiustments to the storm water drainage charge for those parcels with unique or unusual characteristics. or credits to the storm water drainage charge for those parcels with storm water runoff volume and/or quality treatment facilities. (b) The basis of the city of Hutchinson's storm water drainage charges is the anticipated relative contribution of storm water runoff volume and pollutant loading to the storm water drainage system from a given parcel. Where unique or unusual conditions exist where the actual contributions of storm water runoff volume or pollutant loading from a given parcel is substantially different from • those anticipated by the storm water drainage rate structure, the Director of Public Works, or designee thereof, may adjust or credit the storm water drainage charge for said parcel to an appropriate level in accordance with the guidelines specified herein. The ordinance establishing the Storm Water Drainage Utility provides for the Director of Public Works to make adiustments and/or credits to the charges when (1) the property owner supplies data demonsrraune a storm water runoff volume for the standard rainfall event substantially different from that being used for the parcel. or (2) the property owner supplies data demonstrating that storm water runoff from the parcel is being treated to provide the required removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS). (c) Property Owner to Provide Detailed information It is the responsibility of the property owner or agent thereof to present to the Director of Public Works, or designee thereof, sufficient information concerning a parcel's hydrologic characteristics to permit an accurate assessment of the conditions that exist. This information may include, but is not limited to: 1) Site plan showing locations of all buildings, paved areas and other development relative to lot lines. 2) The total lot area and area of impervious surfaces, in square feet. 3) Site topography or contours of sufficient detail to ascertain flow directions, rates and volumes. ODM ATCDOCSDOCS= 1291 \I . 4) Hvdmuiic calculations spec1fvm2 outflow volumes and rates for various rainfall events. 5) Calculation of total suspended solids removal efficient of any on -site storm water runoff treatment facility. d) Adjustments Where Parcel Runoff is Significantly Different From Lana Use St Where the unit runoff generated by a parcel differs from the assigned amount for that land use category by more than 20 percent, the Director of Public Works, or designee thereof, may adjust the parcel's storm water drainage charge in accordance with the following procedure: 1) Calculation of unit runoff for the parcel shall be determined by the methods outlined in the Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Release No. 55, utilizing a one -year event of 24 -hour duration as the standard rainfall event. 2) If the calculated unit runoff is shown to differ from the assigned amount for that land use category by 20 percent or more, the volume portion of the fee for that parcel shall be adjusted by multiplying it by the ratio of the calculated unit runoff to the standard unit runoff. 3) A parcel's storm water drainage charge shall be subject to increases as well as decreases by this procedure. 4) For parcels with ponds covered by public easements, the area used for the calculation of • the charge shall be reduced by the size of the easement area. 5), Because single family and duplex fees are not based upon actual parcel acreage, no adjustments for unit runoff differences will be made for those land uses except for totally vacant unimproved fully turfed parcels. 6) Adjustments shall not be retroactive. They become effective from the date they are approved. e) Procedure for Calculation of Storm Water Detention Credits for Volume Charges A parcel may be credited for up to 31 percent of the storm water drainage charge for on -site measures which are owned and maintained by the applicant which limit storm water outflow rates from the site in accordance with the following procedure: l) 14 percent credit for parcels which limit peak outflow rates during a 5 -year. 24 -hour rainfall event to pre- developed rates. 2) 18 percent credit for parcels which limit peak outflow rates during a 10 -year, 24 -hour rainfall event to pre - deveiopment rates. 3) 24 percent credit for parcels which limit peak outflow rates during a 25 -year. 24 -hour rainfall event to pre - development rates. 4) 27 percent credit for parcels which limit peak outflow rates during a 50 -year. 24 -hour • rainfall event to pre- development rates. 0 DM A\PCDOCS\DOCS\221 a91 \I 5) 31 percent credit ror parcels which limit peak outflow rates during a 100 -year. 23 -hour rainfall event to pre - development rates. 6) No detention credits will be given for parcels which do not at least limit 5 -.ear events to pre - development rates. Runoff rates shall be determined using TR -55. Only one of the above credits (1 -6) may be applied to each parcel. Detention ponds which operate between the steps described above will receive the lower credit. Procedure for Calculation of Water Quality Treatment Credits for Quality Char¢es A parcel may be credited for up to 19 percent of the storm water drainage charge fo- on -site measures which are owned and maintained by the applicant which effectively reduce the outflow of pollutants from the site. Credit percentage shall be based on the actual percentage of total suspended solid (TSS) removal efficiency, as determined by the following procedure, except that no credit will be given for sediment removal efficiencies of less than 55 percent. The TSS removal efficiency shall be calculated using one of the following methodologies: "Methodology of Analysis of Detention Basins for Control of Urban Runoff Quality," Office of Water. Von -Point Source Division, U.S. E.P.A., September 1986. "Detpond," Robert Pitt and John Voorhees. • "P8 Urban Catchment Model," IEP. Inc.. William W. Walker, Jr. Credit shall range from 13 percent. for parcels with a water quality treatment facility Providing a TSS removal efficiency of 55 percent. to 19 percent, for parcels with a water quality treatment facility providing a TSS removal efficiency of 80 percent or greater. 31 Credits shown to (e) and (f) above ( for volume charges and quality charges, respectively), and adjustments. may be cumulative. h) City's Right to Inspect Facilities and Initiate Fee Adjustments and/or Credits The Director of Public Works, or designee thereof, reserves the right to inspect periodically all storm drainage control facilities to ascertain that they are operating properly. If such a system, due to improper maintenance or other reason, fails to detain or cleanse storm water runoff in an effective manner, the Director of Public Works, or designee thereof. may eliminate or reduce detention or water quality credits to an appropriate level. Any such facility shall not be eligible to apply for storm drainage charge adjustments and/or credits for a period of 12 months following any adjustment and/or credit. Adjustments and/or credits shall not be made retroactively. An appeal from the Director of Public Works' determination may be made to the City Council. The issuance of any building permit or other action which changes or intensifies an existing land use shall be cause for an adjustment of storm water drainage charges to an appropriate • level. - ODMMPCDOCStDOCSR 2 129 1 \ I • 1 1 1 1 Overview STORM WATER UTILITY City of Hutchinson Public Works Group Deacription of a Storm Water Utility 1 A Natlomi Approach that is commonty used in Minnesota 1 Dedicated revenues, activines, and goats, spedfic to the storm water drainage system. 1 Set up as a UtURr, much tike water, sewer & garbage. See pdf e0 A VR Ntiv� F,Eac Wor1a Arimatni (IRYA). Planning 1 Engineering I Ptarr" for future eMarrmnents to the system 1 Maintenance 1 Enamg way quaety and routine marttmari of strtrceml; 1 11161 M epuPmem used 1 Adaninisbatty 1 ACmaharg, bang, oc,niputo software & support 1 Tralrerhg tritu involved with the Storm water Utilty Storm Water Utility Goals I Ultimate goal of project i increased water quality I Adequate system maintenance I provide funding for capital needs 1 Relationship to other projects 1 Fees coiletted with water, sewer, & garbage 1 New program, not affected by General Fund 1 Timing goals I I rhstitute earty 2001 Analysis User Charges I Must depehdable & equitable approach available for hndnq I Must be fair, reafanade, a o bear a substantial relel MNNP to the cost of Movataq the service 1 Rationale 1 Sion, water 6 a man-made problem 1 Property use taraae runoff 1 R,perba amp by trfe system Doing 1 Engirrearing l csreerrtvon & remrevutaon em the ern✓. Sm„ waM Plan I flaw muceeea, rhdu&rg srrroc wdooe maamors.. 1 Me' nterlra I I Sweep aaeea, dean Gem bate: 1 papalrl epdR!smug eam water Wu=M I f Wallah equpmem IISee I AdmlydetrrtM I A®Ilhag, bNA9, axrpiov Wftw & auppat I Train" pose ewua<d wrn the smrrrr water Utility I PUbk ed l !tort E Resources Allocated 1 People 1 1.5 FTE Maintenance ODerator 1 Equipment I Street sweeper & vacuum truck 1 Support lk Outside Services 1 Engineering I Accounting 1 Computer support I Cdoital Needs Schedule for implementation 1 Fall 2000 1 Council approval 1 Define charges & daissfiatlOns 1 IdenWy affected properties 1 Relate c to properties 1 January 2001 1 Add charges to utility billing system Fees & Charges 1 Annual Cost $165,000 1 ESbffotW HmaslolW EgWvalem 5,224 1 AmW Chargm May Vary - DetW = finaNted 1 'Cost of Phase u regulaoans - apprmL $0.76 I coo. 1 Gam Fee Range (comps wan Wier dtim) 1 aralraeeneaa Still- SLlllrm 1 eaesq rro•OMO IW - $Im / rm. 1 avaaaa rrmft 10.44 ."I eat I L ianzweLftiiii2azo ldm -10_16 / ma 1 7MAL SLO- $100 /tile Procedures 1 Procedures were established in the City's Stormwater Management Plan of December, 1996 1 New procedural requirements are likely, considering EPA's Stormwater Phase II (NPDES) regulations Budget 1 Salaries & Frnge Benefit $65,845 1 Contras R� & Mair¢. $60,360 1 CWrmAng & Rarewc W $70,000 1 Repay of euupnee $15,855 1 Fuel for eamme2 L ima 1 TOTAL BUDGET $105,000 r .umrowa•a.xm.rrarrvi mtraaa.+eaaa:nar .cur fa�u /i.n n.uva 7 0 I] CITY OF HUTCHINSON POLICE SERVICES TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Steve Madson, Director of Police/Emergency Management Service DATE: November 22, 2000 RE: Voice Recorder This memorandum will serve as a request to purchase a replacement voice recording system for our communications system.. As you are aware, our current system has experienced several failures which has rendered the system as unreliable. Additionally, the current system is no longer being supported by the manufacturer due to a complete change in technology. The cost of the voice recorder system is approximately $25,000. The components are broken down as follows: Digital Recorder System $16,000 Computer Hardware $ 3,000 Time Synchronization $ 6,000 We currently have competitive quotes on the recorder system. They are as follows: Dictaphone $15,108.94 plus shipping and handling Wygant $21,935.00 We request authority to proceed with the project and purchase from Dictaphone. The computer hardware would be purchased locally and the time synchronization will be purchased upon completion of final quotes being presented. If you have any questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Akg 2000 -01 -0013 _ /T • Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: Mary Haugen — PRCE Operations Manager Date: November 21, 2000 Re: Civic Arena heating system replacement The heating systems at the Civic Arena main rink were installed when the building was built in 1977. They include two large unit heaters and three radiant systems designed to heat the lobby area and spectator seating space. The 2004 capital improvement budget includes $62,000 for replacement of these heating systems. We were hopeful that we could continue to make these units serviceable until then. During the last heating season, we have spent a considerable amount of money ($3,452) to keep them in service. Recent inspections of the units by heating contractors have revealed cracks in some of the heat exchangers, which could allow unburned gases to escape into the building atmosphere, creating potentially hazardous conditions. Contractors were asked to estimate repair costs for the units. After consideration, they recommended that the units be replaced because the cost to repair them exceeded the value of the units. Price quotations have been received from a number of contractors to remove and replace the units. The total cost of replacement is estimated to be $43,500. We recommend that these units be replaced and that the capital improvement budget be used to supply the funds. N� 1 7- y n u PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -288 AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE HOURS OF ON SALE LIQUOR SALES ON DECEMBER 31, 2000 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: WHEREAS, December 31, 2000 - New Years Eve - falls on a Sunday; and WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City ordinance prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor after 12:00 midnight on Sundays; and WHEREAS, State Statute allows intoxicating liquor to be sold until 1:00 a.m. on • 11 Mondays for Sunday liquor license holders; and WHEREAS, extending the hours for the sale of intoxicating liquor would enable Hutchinson Sunday liquor license holders to sell alcohol legally until 1:00 a.m., Monday, January 1, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Hutchinson, does hereby ordain that holders of licenses permitting the sale of intoxicating liquor on Sundays may serve intoxicating liquor until 1:00 a.m. on Monday, January 1, 2001. Adopted this day of 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin D. Torgerson City Administrator Mayor I I C 0 Scott L. Young, P.E. Earth Tech 3033 Campus Drive, Suite 175 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchhewn, MN 55350.2522 320. 587- 5151/Faz 320 - 2344240 RE: Engineering Consulting Services Dear Mr. Young: Over the past several months the City Council has become increasingly concerned about what we perceive to be a lack of commitment to completing consulting services for the City of Hutchinson. Examples of these issues include: • Lateness of completing plans and specifications and related work for the South Area Trunk Improvement. • Lateness of completing the Wastewater Rate Study • Extension of time to complete Water Treatment analysis and lack of thorough review of options • • Issues raised by HTI and 3M regarding copper have not been reviewed with MPCA or responded to. • Redesign and incomplete "designfbuild" documents for Compost Facility. Questions have also arisen on the number of Change Orders. In general, there is a perception that work on City projects is often delayed for an extended period and then hurriedly completed. There also is an apparent lack of constant personnel and internal communication. This often appears to result in a less than thorough review or product. We are reviewing our existing and potential future contracts with Earth Tech. We are requesting a meeting with Earth Tech in June of 2001 following the expected completion of the Wastewater Rate Study, Compost Facility, Water Treatment Analysis and South Area Trunk — Phase 1 improvement project to discuss the status of future work with the City of Hutchinson. We also request that you review your commitment to the City, and meet with staff to discuss these concems as soon as possible. Thank you addressing these concerns in a prompt and complete manner. Sincerely, Marlin Torgerson Gary Plotz Mayor City Administrator • cc: City Council Randy DeVries — Director of Water/Wastewater/Resource Recovery Ken Merrill — Finance Director John Rodeberg — Director of Engineering/Public Works Richard Nagy — Water Systems Supervisor Primed on recycled paper - 9 — 4 r November 28, 2000 NOU -27 -2000 14:21 651 292 0083 P.02i02 , Aky TKDA Comm. No.: Hutchinson 11253.03 Municipal AIR ,_ 3 -27- 0042 -02 SAP. 4304 -15 SDOn50r Snnnsnf c Address Date Preps= AIIRIYIII YI wuuw� City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan St SE November 10. 2000 $1.189.727 Hutchinson. MN 55350 Contracts Contract -'s u..omoxnott vases Mathiowetz Rt.2 Contracs Revised. Construction Co. Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 26 Weeks Same • P33AM r Install 10 additional aircraft tie -downs in the new apron. The additional tie -downs will allow a greater mix of aircraft to use the de-down positions, especially those closest to the entrance to the ArrivaliDeparture Building. V„ f Ooantitv/Unit Unit Price A mount Aircraft Tie -down 10 EA $430.00 $4.300.00 2. Revise the surface condition at the 45 existing tie- downs. The revision will help prevent damage to the gear and/or propellers of small aircraft taxiing across the apron. • Work Ouandtv/Unit Unit Price Amount Mobilization I LS 5750.00 $500.00 Patch existing tie -down 45 EA $55.00 S2,47 Cost: 52.975.00 Total cost of Change Order No. 3: 57.275.00 The foregoing is In accordance with your contract dated _ 4/8!99 and the aforementioned chang4 and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. APPROVED: CITY OF HUTCH NSON By— Mayor • ACCEI'1bU: Contractor By Date Title TOM KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON & ASSOC. INC. ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS By Project Engineer APFKUVI:U: mnuva U. Date Date Regional Airport Engineer Date 9 - "Y" D m • 11f. 16:06:20 RSSCKREG3 CITY OF h•NSON Coundl Check Register Pape- 1 11116/00 — 1127/00 Check # Date Announl Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Accounl No A=oun1 Descrotbn Business Unit 101108 11117/00 102218 RASKE BLDG SYSTEMS 874,464.26 COMPOST SITE #2/THRU OCT 31 3780 20001 113A 3100.7020 BUILDINGS OEA- COMPOST GRANT 614,464.26 101110 1122100 101876 AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. 595.00 PE 1028100 3788 20001121 9895.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND B1S 595.00 101111 1122100 105489 AITKIN COUNTY COURT ADMIN 500,00 BAIL-9 PLATISHA 3012 20001109 1171.4730 OTHER REVENUES POLICE ADIA MSTRATION 500.00 101112 1122100 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 86-82 PE 1028= 3795 20001121 9995.2038 ACCRUED LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL FUND BIS 86.82 101113 1122100 101844 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN 140.00 REG-JULIE KLEMP WISCFNACK 3806 20001122 1130.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE PLANNING- ADMINISTRATION 140.00 101114 1122/00 102367 BELLBOY CORP 16.57 NOVEMBER PURCHASE 3808 3239500 3000.6813 COST OF MI( 6 SOFT DRINKS LIOUOR OPERATIONS 16.57 101115 1122100 101875 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. C.O. 300.00 PE 10128100 3790 20001121 9995.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND BIS 390.00 101116 1122100 101872 HRLA.P.R. 219_.31 PE 10128100 3796 20001121 9995.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND WS 219.31 101117 1122100 101869 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 85.00 FISH 6 GAME FEES TO STATE 3784 20001121 1114.4730 OTHER REVENUES FISH 6 GAME 65.00 101118 11221170 102833 HUTGHINSON, CITY OF 1,836.91 PE 1028/00 3798 20001121 9995.2244 DUE TO EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PAYROLL FUND Sr. 1,836.91 . it 101118 11l22/OD 102835 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF R55CKREG3 LOG20DOO CITY OF HUTCHINSON 11/28t00 16:08:20 Co nr3 Check Regmter Pape - 2 11116100 – 1127100 CMck E Date Armmt Velgor E*Wnedw PO A Dec No �– Im N0 Account No Accor Descdplm Bu shy UNt - -- 122.76 —� PE lW28100 38W 20001121 9995.2244 DUE TO EMPLOYEE INSURANCE PAYROLL FUND BIS 122.76 101120 1127/) 102698 HUTCHINSON. CRY OF 61.87 LOTTERY FEES 3783 20)1 121 3000.4465 LOTTERY SALES LIQUOR OPERATIONS 61.87 101121 11/22100 102771 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF _ 9,231.94 PAYROLL 11/17/00 3785 20001120 9441.2033 ACCRUED PAYROLL LIQUOR FUND B/S 9,231.94 101122 1122!00 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 2,283.48 PE 1028100 3788 20001 1) 9995.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND BIS 2,283.46 101123 1122100 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 16.51 OCTOBER UTILITY 3816 20D01028 2810.6360 UTILITIES AIRPORT 16.51 101124 1122*) 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 925.00 BAIL MONEY-SEE ATTACHED SHEET 3813 20001113 1171.4730 OTHER REVENUES POLICE ADMINISTRATION 925.) 101125 1122100 105437 MENZE, CINDY 30.00 DESIGN 6 PRINT GRAPE VINE 3807 20001114 3000.6325 MEETINGS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 30.) 101126 1122/) 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 1 PE 10201) 3798 20001121 9895.2040 ACCRUED MAND. CHILD SUPPORT PAYROLL FUND SM 162.89 101127 1122/00 102853 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL - 1,79724 TITLE 6 REGISTRATION 3814 20001120 3400.7030 MACHINERY 8 EQUIPMENT CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 1,79724 101128 1122100 101826 MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO 2,249.00 DNR FEES TO STATE 3782 20)1 121 1111.4730 OTHER REVENUES 2,249.) 101129 112203 102649 MPCA 240.130 PERMIT APPLICATION-STORM WATER 3805 20001113 3300.6809 MISCELLANEOUS • • OUR REVENUE WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0 R55CKREG3 -JG20000 Check K Date Ao nl ACCRUED LIFE INSURANCE VenCIDr Explanatlon _ 401&1305 1450.6205 240.00 FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 3791 20001121 101130 11122100 PAYROLL FUND B5 101914 NCPERS LIFE INS. 2DD01121 3200.0311 POSTAGE 128.00 20001121 3300.6311 PE 1029100 126.00 101131 1122/00 102490 OFFICEMA% CREDIT PLAN 41. STEP FILE, PENS, BATTERIES 41.09 101132 1122/00 102658 PERA - D.C.P. 26.01 PE 1028/00 26.01 PE 1028/00 52.02 101133 1122100 101877 PRUDENTIAL 75.00 PE 1028/00 75.00 101134 1122/00 102098 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 PE 10126'00 00.00 101135 11/22100 102615 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 9,486.01 PE 1028100 11.983.30 PE 10'26 21,479.31 101136 1122100 102052 QUALITY WINE 6 SPIRITS CO. 133.13 NOVEMBER PURCHASE 20715 NOVEMBER PURCHASE 5.446.74 LIQUOR 245.27 WINE 6,03289 101137 1122/00 105268 RESERVE ACCOUNT 550.00 POSTAGESTORMW/ATER UTIL MTG 550.00 POSTAGESTORMWATER UTIL MTG 1,1KOD 101130 1122/00 1026416 SCHMELING OIL CO CITY OF, 4NSON Coenc9 Check Register 11/16/00 - 1127100 PO • Dec No Inv No 11. 0 18:05:20 Page- 3 Business Unit 3794 20001121 9995.2039 ACCRUED LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL FUND B/S 3817 401&1305 1450.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 3503 20001121 9995.2243 DUE TO PERA -D.C.P. PAYROLL FUND B/S 3804 20001121A 9995.2241 DUE TO OTHER -PERA PAYROLL FUND B/S 3791 20001121 0885.2038 ACCRUED DEFERRED COW PAYROLL FUND B5 3792 2OW1121 9995.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND BIS 3801 20001121 9995.2241 DUE TO OTHER- ERA 3902 20DO1121A 9995.2241 DUE TO OTHER-PERA 3809 899808 3000.8810 COST OF SALES -UOUOR 3810 899519 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3811 899839 3000.6810 COST OF SALES110WR 3811 899039 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3788 2DD01121 3200.0311 POSTAGE 3786 20001121 3300.6311 POSTAGE PAYROLL FUND B5 PAYROLL FUND BIS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LK3110R OPERATIONS LK]UOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS WATER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION �:d333�h =S•�<�i k k k Check A Dale Amount Vendor EKPW%d n 3815 20001122 31.82- OTHER CONTRACTUAL REFUSE & RECYCING 521.39 FUEL OIL 489.58 101139 1122100 101879 TEMPLETON INC 70. PE l0QS= 70.00 101140 1122/00 105490 UNIFORM CODE COUNCIL INC 500.00 APPLICATION FEE 500.00 101141 1122/00 101880 WADELL 6 REED 150.00 PE 10128100 150.00 Gmid Total 885.470.41 CRY OF HUTCHINSON Councll Check Register 11/16100 — 11127/00 PO f Doc No Im No 3787 10114 3787 10114 1128100 16:08:20 Pegs- 4 Account No Accou Desab Bush a Unit 99992230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE CASH COMPANY 2810.8211 MOTOR FUELS 6 LUBRICANTS AIRPORT 3793 20001121 9995.2038 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND WS 3815 20001122 3101.8305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL REFUSE & RECYCING 3797 20001121 9995.2036 ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP PAYROLL FUND B/8 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 085.470.41 Total Payments 666.470.41 • 0 MEMO TO: CITY STAFF & BANK OFFICIALS FROM: KEN MERRILL , FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DECEMBER WIRE TRANSFER The following funds need to be wired - interest payments December 1, 2000 Chase NYC ABA # 021- 000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & Co. c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Dividend Deposit Account # 066- 026776 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 13,863.75 1994 Wastewater Refunding 36,853.75 50,717.50 The following funds need to be wired - PRINCIPAL payments Chase NYC ABA # 021 - 000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & Co. c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Redemption Deposit for 12/1 City of Hutchinson, Mn, Account # 066 -027 -306 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 0.00 1994 Wastewater Refunding 0.00 0.00 (FAX of bond document must be made at same time for principal payment) l� ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS 11 /28 /00 COUNCIL MEETING LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE -OCT SALES TAX WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE -USE TAX GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE -CIVIC ARENA TAX H.A.T.S. MN DEPT OF REVENUE -FUEL TAX 20618.00 7023.00 228.00 737.80 0 • 11 Amount No Amou D escrlptlon 3200.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3300.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3200.0705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3300.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 1020.6909 MISCELLANEOUS 11,. 1 015:48:38 Page- 1 Buskmts Unit WATER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WATER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL 3450.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MNNTENANOBATS OPERATIONS 2700.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANaBBRARY 2610.6217 FOOD PRODUCTS- CONCESSON RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 2610.6217 FOOD PRODUCTS - CONCESSION RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 0 35.9_5 BOOK ORDER - 3884 20DO1122A 1130.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE PLANNING - ADMINISTRATION CITY OF.. .;HINSON 0000 R55CKREG3 101148 1128100 ' ANDERSON DOVE FRETLAND 8 VAN V CounGl Check Register 1,195.00 1128 — 1128N0 4016 Check Y Dale Am nl VrKlOr Esplarrae PO N Doc No Inv No 101142 1128 102169 1994 IMPROV BOND DEBT SERVICE 101149 1128100 50,000,00 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR TRANSFER -W1S TO 1994 DEBT SERV 4005 20001128 50,000,00 179.36 TRANSFER -W/S TO 1994 DEBT SERV 4005 20001128 175299 1453.6370 100.000.00 178.36 101143 1128100 104393 1985 IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE 101150 1128100 102789 22,500.00 TRANSFER -W/S TO 1995 DEBT SERV 4004 20001128 22,500.00 TRANSFERiWS TO 1995 DEBT SERV 4004 20001128 3400.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESCENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 45,000.00 25.00 101144 1128!00 102822 A. J. SCHAAKE CO. 1128100 105503 BARRALL. JILL 459.0 YEARS OF SERVICE AWARDS 3908 76450 459.09 101145 1128!00 102217 ALLIED SERVICES OF HUTCHINSON 65838 MATERIALS, LABOR 3883 12777 2,65859 HEAT EXCHANGER, LABOR 4015 12852 3,317.37 101146 1128100 102469 AMERICAN BOTTU14G CO. THE 189.90 POP PURCHASE 3881 808158 59.70 POP PURCHASE 4029 808278 249.60 101147 1128!00 101844 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN Amount No Amou D escrlptlon 3200.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3300.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3200.0705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 3300.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 1020.6909 MISCELLANEOUS 11,. 1 015:48:38 Page- 1 Buskmts Unit WATER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WATER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL 3450.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MNNTENANOBATS OPERATIONS 2700.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANaBBRARY 2610.6217 FOOD PRODUCTS- CONCESSON RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 2610.6217 FOOD PRODUCTS - CONCESSION RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 35.9_5 BOOK ORDER - 3884 20DO1122A 1130.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE PLANNING - ADMINISTRATION 35.95 101148 1128100 101904 ANDERSON DOVE FRETLAND 8 VAN V 1,195.00 POST OFFICE ACQUISITION 4016 24354 2950.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HCOGEDA 1,185.00 101149 1128100 102884 AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR 179.36 KEY, HINGES, LABOR 3942 175299 1453.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR & MALNTENANORRE DEPT BUILD MAINT 178.36 101150 1128100 102789 B 6 B SPORTS 25,00 BOAT MIRROR 3865 15104 3400.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESCENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 25.00 101151 1128100 105503 BARRALL. JILL R55CKREG3 LOG20DDD Checks Data Angl - Ve11e0! EvIolatbn 27.00 REFUND-LEAGUE FEE 27.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Cowxfl Check Register 1128100 - 1128/00 PO O Doc No In- No 3862 50102 11 /28100 15:48738 Pegg- 2 Account No Acccmt DesmWw Suw0eas L" 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 101152 1128/00 101925 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 830.70 ACRYUC 3943 23882 1850.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CIVIC ARENA _ 64922 POLYCARBONATE SHEET 3944 23832 1850.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CMC ARENA 1.479.92 101153 1128/00 105498 BEELER, KATHY 45.00 REFUND-LEAGUE FEE 3857 50062 2610 .4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 45.00 101154 1128/00 102357 BELLBOY CORP 1,001.50 LIQUOR 4057 20141000 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR UQUOR OPERATIONS 12.50 WINE 4057 20141000 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 83.00 NOVEMBER PURCHASE 4058 20159200 3000.0810 COST OF SALES -LQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 137.44 LIQUOR 4059 20161300 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-IJQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 131.02 MISC 4080 32940500 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 47.95 MISC 4061 3060900 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 1,413.41 101155 1128/00 102039 BENNETf OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 76.58 BLACK TONER 3907 120329 1030.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CITY ADMINISTRATOR - ADM 76.57 BLACK TONER 3907 120329 1060,6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES FINANCE - ADMINISTRATION 153.15 101158 11rWW 105WI BERG RUSSO, VICKIE 10.00 REFUND- CANCELLED WEAVING 3860 49916 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 10.00 101157 1128100 102255 BERKLEY RISK SERVICES 200.00 OCTOBER CONSULTING SERVICE 3945 NC5% 2850.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UNALLOCATED GENERAL 200.00 OCTOBER CONSULTING SERVICE 3945 NC595 90011208 DUE FROM HOSPITAL GENERAL FUND - 200.00 OCTOBER CONSULTING SERVICE 3945 NC595 9001.1209 DUE FROM BURNS MANOR GENERAL FUND 200.00 OCTOBER CONSULTING SERVICE 3915 NC595 9001.1210 DUE FROM UTILITIES GENERAL FUND 8W.00 101158 1128100 101916 BERNCICS PEPSI COLA • 79.75 POP PURCHASE 3834 56880 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 28.75 BEER 3877 56887 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LKXM OPERATIONS 30.50 - POP PURCHASE 3970 59868 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 0 RSSCKREG3 - ,120000 CITY OF h ONSON Cancel Check ReglsW 1128/00 - - 112&00 1 V 015:48:36 Page- 3 ctm* p Date Ae l Vendor EI PWWtIon PO # Doc No Im No Account No Acwun D"a"on Bu4111 Unit 8315 POP PURCHASE 3971 63037 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 28.50 BEER 3978 59869 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 28.50 BEER CREDIT 3878 63038 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 22225 101159 112800 101987 BRANDON TIRE CO 224.83 TIRES 3835 5825 3400.6232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 179.99 TIRES 3836 6248 3400.6232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 308.65 TIRES 3837 6151 3400.6232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 35.00 MOUNTMISMNT, PATCH 3842 2727 3400.6232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 77.77 TIRES 3843 2610 3400.8232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 51.03 TUBE, MOUNT/DISMNT 3844 2090 3400.6232 TIRES - CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 877.47 101160 1128/00 105513 BRASETH, SADIE 20.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE FEES 3996 20001121 1177.6908 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 20.00 101161 1128100 102015 BROWNS GREENHOUSE 12.76 MUMS 3882 21013 1825.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 12.76 101162 1128/00 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 740.30 BEER 4031 69692 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 15.90 MISC 4031 69882 3000.8813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 13.60- DEPOSITBRETURN 4031 69892 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 7,731.05 BEER 4032 70112 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 52.70 MISC 4032 70112 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 120 - DEPOSIVRETURN 4032 70112 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 6,313.60 BEER 4033 69302 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 98.20 MISC 4033 09302 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 43.60- DFPOSIVRETURN 4033 69302 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 971.85 BEER 4034 69102 30004872 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 62.80- - DEPOSITIRETURN 4034 69102 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATKNIS 5,088.10 BEER 4035 68523 3000.8812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 10.00- DEPOSITURETURN 4035 68523 3000.6615 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4,300.90 BEER 4036 68298 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 116.80 - DEPOSITURETURN 4036 68298 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 26,064.00 101163 112600 102086 CADOENGINEERING SUPPLY ;L: N 3N YCY0U:HSGf171I C heck Date Ar t OPERATING SUPPLIES v erKw E)OMMIlun 90681100 2950.6301 36.07 HCDC {DA 3976 BOND PAPER 3000.8815 CASE DEPOSITS 61.41 3977 114883 COATED BOND PAPER COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 97.48 114883 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS 101164 1128/00 104391 CENTRAL HYDRAUL= 21.37 PARTS 3.35 PARTS 24.72 101165 1128100 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 5.28 TANK RENTAL 199.00 . 204.28 CYLINDER DEPOSIT 101166 1128x00 103857 CHEMSW 159,00 SUPPORT CONTRACT 1159.0D 101167 1128100 102461 CORBYS PORTRAIT IMAGES 63.9_0 PANEL MOUNTS 63.90 101168 1128100 103166 CROW RIVER COUNTRY CLUB 639. CATER BUFFET LUNCH 639.09 101169 11128M 104044 CZMOWSKI, CHAD 32.00 - SHOP WORK 32.00 101170 112&00 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,488.05 BEER 26.40 MISC 14.48 DEPOSITIRETURN 961.00 BEER 9.60 - DEPOSITIRETURN 3,451.45 101171 11128/00 102898 DEVRIES, RANDY 1,485.78 REIMB -3 AIRLINE TICKETS • 1,485.78 CITY OF HUTCHINSON C ncll Check Register 11128100 - 11/28100 PO 4 Doc No hry No 3873 83324 4013 83111 3903 4256 3904 4229 3868 159453 3910 20001114 A ccount No Acccmt De= "m 1510.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1510.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11128/00 15:46:36 Pape- 4 Buses I1r61 CITY ENGINEER CITY ENGINEER 3400.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEMENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3400.5230 REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE9,ENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3450.6214 SHOP MATERIALS 3450.6214 SHOP MATERIALS 3919 179047 -01 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL HATS OPERATIONS HATS OPERATIONS WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3930 23425 1787.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES YOUTH TACKLE FOOTBALL 4025 90681100 2950.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HCDC {DA 4088 20001127 1900.6122 WAGES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES PARK ADMINISTRATION 3976 116393 3000.6812 COST OF SALES43EER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3976 116393 3000.BB13 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRUNKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3976 116383 3000.8815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATKNS 3977 114883 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3977 114883 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATKNS 3845 20001117 3101.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE REFUSEBRECYCING 0 R55CKREG3 _, G20000 0 CITY OF. -HINSON CourlcY Chock Regabr 1128100 - 11/28100 Check # Date Amount Vendor EXPlanatIDn PO # Doc No 1. No 101172 1188/00 102208 E 6 K ENTERPRISES INC 101173 1128/00 47925 GUN RACK A INSTALL 3870 197246 0 11.. , 15:48:38 Pepe- 5 Account No Account DeuepOon Bualneae U1n8 3400.7030 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 479.25 101173 1128/00 104415 EARTH TECH 1 ,224. 60 MCDONALD'S LIFT 3921 143403 3300.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 1,224.60 101174 11/2em 102726 ECOLAB PEST ELIM 40.79 NOVEMBER SERVICE 3949 7177194 1175.8233 BUILDING REPAIRS POLICE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 40.79 101175 11/28/00 102358 ELECTRO WATCHMAN 4.43 UPS CHARGES 3885 71086 1850.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CMC ARENA 319.50 ANNUAL MONITORING CHARGE 3946 70819 1453.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANWRE DEPT BUILD MAINT 79.88 QUARTERLY MONITORING CHARGE 3947 70198 1175.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL POLICE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 95.85 QUARTERLY MONITORING CHARGE 3948 70197 2610.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MNNTENANOECREATON BLDG. d POOL 499.66 101176 11/28110 105517 ERPELDING, BERNELLE 39,00 REFUND-LEAGUE FEE 3993 ` 93 2810.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATKJN BLDG. d POOL 39.00 101177 11/28/00 104514 EVANS, TINA 38.00 REFUND- CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS 3852 49564 2610.4730. OTHER REVENUES REGREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 38.00 101178 112880 105512 EVENSON. TRANS .. 20.00 TOBACCO COMPLLANCE FEES 3987 20001121 1177.6909 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 20.00 101179 1128100 105504 FISHER, MARK 45.00 REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 3863 49998 2610.4280 RECREATON ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 45.00 101180 1128100 102443 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE 6 RESCUE 41.00 STORZ SPANNER WRENCH 3874 7263 1451.8210 OPERATING SUPPLIES GTY FIRE 41.00 101181 1126/00 102525 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC R55CKREG3 LOG20000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Council Check Regbw 11/18/00 - 11(28/00 Check 0 Deb Kea Venda EMl KOWn PO 0 Da: No Inv No 15200 OCTOBER CALLS 4002 100388 4042 293829 4043 293830 4043 293830 4044 297072 4045 297073 4046 297071 4047 297070 4047 297070 4047 297070 4048 297074 4049 290617 4050 290016 4051 290615 4051 290615 4087 15014 1 V28tDO 15:48:38 Pap- 6 Aa l No Aa [ Desai Buslr a Ulil 3200.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL WATER 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR 152.00 3000.6870 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101182 1128M LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101874 GRIGGS 6 COOPER b CO LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3,165.10 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR 3000.8810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 719.13 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS 817.92 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR WINE 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 20.00 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE BEER 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 524.08 3000.6813 COST OF MD( d SOFT DRINKS WINE 2,101.36 WINE 4,980.43 LIQUOR 421.50 WINE 27187 MISC 2,426.66 LIQUOR 459.92 WINE 842.37 WINE 1,260.11 LIQUOR 174.20 MISC 18,186.57 101183 11118901 102959 GROEHLER. FLOYD 1,18652 REIMB- CELLULOSE INSULATION 1,188.52 101184 11128100 105505 GUTORMSON, JOHN 175.50 CIVIC ARENA WORK 175.50 101185 1128/00 105261 HABKJTATIVE SERVICES 84C 20.00 REFUND- CANCELLED FROM CPR 20.00 101186 112800 102529 HACH COMPANY 145.25 LAB SUPPLIES 179.02 LAB SUPPLIES 324.27 101187 1128/00 102528 HAGER JEWELRY INC. • 25.05 PLAQUE, ENGRAVING 25.05 4042 293829 4043 293830 4043 293830 4044 297072 4045 297073 4046 297071 4047 297070 4047 297070 4047 297070 4048 297074 4049 290617 4050 290016 4051 290615 4051 290615 4087 15014 1 V28tDO 15:48:38 Pap- 6 Aa l No Aa [ Desai Buslr a Ulil 3200.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL WATER 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6870 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MD( d SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3823 20001113 1650.6122 WAGES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES CIVIC ARENA 3850 50852 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 3872 2531552 3200.6215 CHEMICALS 8 PRODUCTS WATER 3920 2517036 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 4054 17432 2950.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES HCDCEDA CITY OF I. *SON Council Check RegIster 1126/00 - 1128,V0 CM[k 0 Dab An nt 0 RSSCKREG3 .,,120000 CITY OF I. *SON Council Check RegIster 1126/00 - 1128,V0 CM[k 0 Dab An nt Vendor E xpIstetlon PO* Doc No Im No 101188 1128100 102451 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE 101189 1125/00 809.10 BEER 3973 5203 52.50 MISC 3973 5203 13.20 - DEPOSITIRETURN 3973 5203 917.80 BEER 3974 6399 18.00 - DEPOSITIRETURN 3974 6398 1.555.60 BEER 3975 6821 960 - DEPOSIT/RETURN 3975 6621 Ill. •16:48:38 Pe9e - 7 Account No Account DescripW 3,294.20 3000.6B12 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101189 1125/00 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 105602 HANSEN. EVIE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER 10.00 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS REFUND - CANCELLED WEAVINC 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER 10.00 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101190 1126/00 102748 HARPEL BROS.INC 8.15 RESISTOR 8.15 101191 1128/00 102412 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP 567.95 HYDROFLUOS ACID 567.95 101192 11/28100 106493 HEARTLAND TIRE 6 SERVICE 930.38 TIRES 930.38 TIRES 1,860.76 101193 1128100 104883 HENKE FLOOR CARE 638.00 STRIP, SEAL B WAX FLOORING 639.00 101194 112&00 102701 HENRY&ASSOCIATES 184.11 VALVE STEM EXTENSIONS 184.11 101195 1128/00 102531 HENRYS FOODS INC 401.84 TOBACCO PURCHASE 17520 TOBACCO PURCHASE 8.04 ICE & SNOW MELTER 292.53 TOBACCO 877.61 Ill. •16:48:38 Pe9e - 7 Account No Account DescripW Buskiess UNt 3000.6B12 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3861 50923 2610,4730 OTHERREVENUES RECREATION BLDG. B POOL 3820 53887 3400.6230 REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEMENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 4027 305930 3890 29480 3831 29876 3960 1291 3871 5325 3840 1128590 3980 1132276 3981 113BS38 3981 1136538 3200.6215 CHEMICALS 8 PRODUCTS WATER 3400.6232 TIRES 3400.6232 TIRES CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3000.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MNNTENANOHWOR OPERATIONS 3200.6231 EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS UQ" OPERATIONS 3000.6873 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES LIQUOR OPERATIONS 30DO.BB13 CGST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS R55CKREG3 LOG2DDDD CITY OF HUTCHINSON Coundl Check Repl&W 1128100 - 1128/00 Check 6 Date Amount Vendor ExpWnatlm PO C D0o No hkv No 101198 1128/00 101915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 51.06 TOBACCO PURCHASE 396:1 264498 85.10 TOBACCO PURCHASE 3964 265640 5484 TOBACCO PURCHASE 3965 263435 1128100 15:48:38 Pepe- 8 AtLOWlt NO ACWUnt Deaaptlnn Buswl UMt 191.00 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS 101197 1128/00 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CAREMUTCHINSON 3889 HU490252 30.74 CLEANING SUPPLIES MOP, LINER LOVER 3890 HU484105 32.09 CLEANING SUPPLIES LINERS 4083 HU494684 40.82 SALES TAXES PAYABLE HANDLE, MOP, FRAME SET 4083 HU494694 32.09 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIET-IRE DEPT BUILD MAINT LINERS 1.32- 21.57 CLEANING SUPPLIES 155.99 101198 1128/00 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 17.47 GASKET & SEAL 17.47 101199 1128100 105329 HUTCHINSON BUMPER TO BUMPER 2129 WHEEL COVER 2129 101200 1128100 102530 HUTCHINSON CO-OP 105.47 LP GAS- BOTTLE, KEROSENE 165.47 101201 1128A10 102545 HUTCHINSON FIRE & SAFETY 119.50 EXTING INSPECT, MAINT TESTS 119.50 101202 11/28/00 102540 HUTCHINSON PLUMBING & HEATING 274.50 PARTS, LABOR 274.50 101203 1128100 102805 HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL 250.00 2000 ANNUAL TRANSFER 250.00 101204 1128M 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO • 1128100 15:48:38 Pepe- 8 AtLOWlt NO ACWUnt Deaaptlnn Buswl UMt 3000.8813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 9887 HU486255 2610.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES RECREATION BLDG. & POOL 3888 HU484113 1850.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES CIVIC ARENA 3889 HU490252 3200.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER 3890 HU484105 2610.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES RECREATION BLDG. & POOL 4083 HU494684 9999.2230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE CASH COMPANY 4083 HU494694 1453.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIET-IRE DEPT BUILD MAINT 3869 135178 3400.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:;ENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 4003 D42951 3400.8230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEMENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 38&2 200766 -1000 1850.6211 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS CIVIC ARENA 3846 16185 3450.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCMTS OPERATIONS 4052 18171 1850.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENFNONVIC ARENA 4086 20001127 1425.8809 MISCELLANEOUS SAFETY COUNCIL 0 • Check # Dale Amount vendor 700.37 362.38 382.38 362.38 91.00 1,878.51 0 R55CKREG3 )G20000 Check # Dale Amount vendor 700.37 362.38 382.38 362.38 91.00 1,878.51 101205 11 /28/00 105181 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES Acc l Descrotbn CITYOF,. _ INSON 103.43 CowwA Check Register 2.13 11 /28/W - 11/28/00 OCT UTILITY Explanation PO # Doc No Im No TELEPHONE, MOVE PHONE 3918 1425 NOVEMBER ACCESS CHARGES 3940 1409 -00306 NOVEMBER ACCESS CHARGES 3940 1409.00306 NOVEMBER ACCESS CHARGES 3940 1409 -00306 MAINTENANCE 4026 1471 101205 11 /28/00 105181 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES Acc l Descrotbn 11,327.15 OCT UTILITY 103.43 OCT UTILITY 2.13 OCT UTILITY 6.98 OCT UTILITY 1,293.20 OCT UTILITY 1.690.53 OCT UTILITY 1,166.30 OCT UTILITY 208.07 OCT UTILITY 7,173.49 OCT UTILITY 291.72 OCT UTILITY 103.98 OCT UTILITY 23,428.98 101208 11!28/00 105515 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES 3,099.17 WORK COMP ADJUSTMENT 3,099.17 101207 11/2&100 101869 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 4.00 BP915951 SURCHARGE ONLY 4.00 3833 20001115 3833 2OW1115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 3833 20001115 Accaml No Acc l Descrotbn 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 2850.6326 COMPUTER TRAINING 9001.1210 DUE FROM UTILITIES 9001.1208 DUE FROM HOSPITAL 2950.8301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1850.6380 UTILITIES 2725.6300 UTILITIES 2850.6360 UTILITIES 1420.6360 UTILITIES 1900.8380 UTILITIES 1171.8380 UTILITIES 2610.6360 UTILITIES 1675.6360 UTILITIES 1676.6360 UTILITIES 3300.6350 UTILITIES 3200.6360 UTILITIES 4022 20001025 9001.1210 DUE FROM UTILITIES 3922 20001103 1450.8909 MISCELLANEOUS 101209 11/2&/00 101809 HUTCHINSON,GTYOF 19.05 OCTOBER LODGING TAX- CAMPORND 4023 20001101 1900.4297 CAMPGROUND FEES 19.05 101209 11728410 101869 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 104.00 FISH 8 GAME FEES TO STATE 104.00 4091 20001128 1114.4730 OTHER REVENUES 11,, 15:48:38 Page - 9 Buelneaa Unti WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION UNALLOCATED GENERAL GENERALFUND GENERAL FUND HCDC -EDA CIVIC ARENA CEMETERY UNALLOCATED GENERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PARK ADMINISTRATION POLICE ADMINISTRATION RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL TRAFFIC SIGNALS STREET LIGHTS WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WATER GENERAL FUND FIRE -ADMINISTRATION PARK ADLWMSTRATION FISH 6 GAME 101210 11/211 102038 HUTCHINSON. CITY OF 27,800.00 TRANSFER -W/8 TO GENERAL FUND 4006 20001128 3200.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS WATER 27,800.00 TRANSFER -W/S TO GENERAL FUND 4006 20001128 3300.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 55.200.00 R55CKREG3 LOG20000 Check ft Dale Annlnt Valleor EW4wd- 101211 1128= 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 150.00 2001 TOBACCO LICENSE 150.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Cound Check Register 1128700 - 1128N0 PO N Doc No kry No Account N o Accost Desm#dbn 4098 20001114 3000.6911 LICENSES 101212 1128/00 102035 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 251,000.00 TRANSFER -LIQUOR TO GENERAL 251,000.00 1128= 15:48:35 Pape- 10 Buslllese UnN LIQUOR OPERATIONS 1007 20001128 3000.5705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101213 1125/90 102072 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 3.87 FLATIRON 319.00 FLATIRON, ROUND OR NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 39W RENT -1100 2810.6379 VEHICLE RENT 159.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 RENT -1100 1475.6379 VEHICLE RENT 223.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE REM 3909 RENT -1100 2725.6379 VEHICLE RENT 410.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 RENT -1100 1510.6379 VEHICLE RENT 202.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 RENT -1100 1450.6379 VEHICLE REM 3,287.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 RENT -1100 1900.6379 VEHICLE RENT 4,848.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 RENT -1100 1172.6379 VEHICLE RENT 6,660.00 NOVEMBER VEHICLE RENT 3909 REM -1100 1600.6379 VEHICLE RENT 15,088.00 101214 1128/00 102988 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 78,000.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDC {DA 4008 20001128 2850.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 5,000.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDC -EDA 4008 20001128 9114.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 5,000.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDGEDA 4008 20001128 9115.57D5 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 17, 500.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDC -EDA 4008 20001128 9225.8705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 1,500.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDC -EDA 4008 20001128 9228.6705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 1,000.00 TRANSFER-GENERAL TO HCDC -EDA 4008 20001128 9229.8705 PERMANENT TRANSFERS 106,000.00 101215 1128/00 105027 INGLE. DENNIS 13.00 REFUND- CANCELLED WEAVING 3848 49949 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 13.00 101216 1128/00 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 3.87 FLATIRON 17.82 FLATIRON, ROUND OR 21.49 101212 1128100 1D5491 JESERIT7 GENE 30.00 - REFUND BUILDING PERMIT .50 SURCHARGE 0 AIRPORT BUILDING INSPECTION CEMETERY CITY ENGINEER FIRE -ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMINISTRATION POLICE PATROL ADMIMSTRATIOI STREETS & ALLEYS UNALLOCATED GENERAL ECONOMIC DEV LOAN FUND HIS ENERGY LOAN FUND B/S 1980 TAX ING DB SERVICE 1990 TAX INC DB SERVICE 1992 TAX INC DS SERVICE RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL .3819 3943 3400.6230 REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEB:ENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 4053 1008 1900.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES'ARK ADMINISTRATION 3821 20007120 1475.4071 BUILDING PERMITS BUILDING INSPECTION 3821 20001120 1475.4891 BLDG PERMIT SURCHARGES BUILDING INSPECTION • RS5CKREG3 ,20000 Chod M . Date _ A mount COST OF SALES-LIQUOR Vella 8o Em)WWn _ 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 30.50 1162821 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 101218 1128/00 3000.6810 101938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR C.O. 1179451 3000.6810 739.50 3987 1182307 NOVEMBER PURCHASE COST OF SALES -WINE 3968 3,298.00 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE WINE 1179452 3000.8811 137.00 3990 1185274 WINE COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 3991 55.95 3000.6810 COST OF SALES - LIQUOR LKX)OR 1185115 3000.6811 3,318.00 KARL, MICHELLE LIQUOR 453.47 45.00 WINE REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 3858 796.67 WINE 2,796.00 WINE 1128100 3243.56 XILIAN, AMY LIQUOR 3.743.10 69 .01) LIQUOR REIMB-DT INSTRUCTOR UNIFORM 3876 2.502.96 WINE 21,085.21 101224 101219 1128/00 103181 102346 JOHNSON, LEONARD G. 812.76 30.00 NOVEMBER PAYMENT REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 4055 812.76 30.00 101220 1128/00 105024 JORDAHL, JIM 101225 CITY.OF F. INSON Ccundl Check ReglSW 1128/00 - 11/18/00 PO k Doc No Im No Accou No A ccent Descrlp8o 3982 1181653 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 3983 1179710 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3964 1162821 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3985 1182471 3000.6810 COST OF SALES - LIQUOR 3966 1179451 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 3987 1182307 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3968 1182472 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3989 1179452 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3990 1185274 3000.6810 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 3991 1185114 3000.6810 COST OF SALES - LIQUOR 3992 1185115 3000.6811 COST OF MES -WINE 3950 20001127 9225.7010 1768.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 2700.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES 111. •154838 Pegs - 11 Business UN1 LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LKY" OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS UQUOR OPERATIONS UQUOR OPERATIONS 19W TAX INC DB SERVICE YOUTH ACTIVITIES LIBRARY 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 1172.6213 UNIFORMS d PERSONAL EQUIP POLICE PATROL ADMINISTRATKN 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 400.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL DANCE D.J. 4058 20001122 400.00 101221 1126/00 102557 K MART 28.57 CLEANING SUPPLIES 3927 9659 28.57 101222 11 /1890 105499 KARL, MICHELLE 45.00 REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 3858 50008 45.00 101223 1128100 102997 XILIAN, AMY 69 .01) REIMB-DT INSTRUCTOR UNIFORM 3876 20001117 69.00 101224 1128/00 103181 KLASSEN, LINNEA 30.00 REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 4055 50116 30.00 101225 1128/00 105496 KOBAL GAIL 1768.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 2700.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES 111. •154838 Pegs - 11 Business UN1 LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LKY" OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS UQUOR OPERATIONS UQUOR OPERATIONS 19W TAX INC DB SERVICE YOUTH ACTIVITIES LIBRARY 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 1172.6213 UNIFORMS d PERSONAL EQUIP POLICE PATROL ADMINISTRATKN 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTIVITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL R55CKREG3 LOG20000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Coancl Chook Register 11/28= - 1128100 Checks Date Arrlault MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS Veodr E>PIanaOon 5052 1850.6211 39.00 CIVIC ARENA 3056 REFUND - CANCEL FINANCIAL FIT 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 39.00 4038 74279 3000.6812 101226 1125!00 4038 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4035 633.68 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS WASHER 4039 3963 633.68 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4040 101227 1128!00 COST OF SALES -BEER 101991 LAKES GAS CO. 74465 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS 61.24 4041 74621 FILL 5 CYL COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 61.24 74621 3000.6813 FUELS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4041 122.48 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 101228 1128/00 105497 LARSON, MICHELLE 55.00 REFUND - CANCELLED SPANISH II 55.00 101229 1128100 101974 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC 1,426,75 BEER 16.50 MISC 2.40- DEPOSIT/RETURN 1,194.70 BEER 20.00 MISC 3.60- DEPOSIT/RETURN 50.00 BEER 1,357.80 BEER 6.00. DEPOSIT/RETURN 2,329.70 BEER 52.60 MISC 490 - DEPOSITIRETURN 6,43125 101230 1128/00 1022D5 LEO'S TRANSFER 1,346.73 OCTOBER & NOVEMBER FREIGHT 1,346.73 101231 1128/00 105511 LHOTKA. MICHELLE 20,00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE FEES 20.00 101232 11728/50 102499 LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.LL.P. 1,17077 SOLID WASTE CONTRACT P O N Doc No Inv No 3655 49976 3951 1348% Acoo No Aa nt Dewblbn 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 1128/00 15:48:38 Page- 12 Busk a Unit RECREATION BLDG. &POOL 3300.7030 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3661 50830 1850.6211 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS CMC ARENA 3934 5052 1850.6211 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS CIVIC ARENA 3056 50477 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES RECREATION BLDG. &POOL 4037 74750 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4037 74750 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4037 74750 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4038 74279 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4038 74279 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4035 74279 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4039 3963 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4040 74465 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4040 74465 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4041 74621 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4041 74621 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4041 74621 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3957 20001115 3000,6816 FREIGHT LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3996 20001121 1177.0909 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 3941 208886 -W6 3101.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REFUSE & RECYCING Account No Ac tDesalp6on 11..15:48:38 Pape- 13 Bush S Unt 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER UQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS CITY OF, OINSON CASE DEPOSITS R55CKREG3 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6873 COST OF MIX d SOFT DRINKS UQUOR OPERATIONS - CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6872 COST OF SALES -BEER Camcll Check RegleteT 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 1121IA10 - 1128100 LIQUOR OPERATIONS Check A Dale Am t 3000.6815 VerMOr Explanatlon PO A Doc No Inv No LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 1.170.77 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 101233 112&00 3000.8815 101981 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER 3.052.00 3000.6013 COST OF MIX 6 SOFT DRINKS BEER 4062 16946 LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.BB12 930.30 LIQUOR OPERATIONS BEER 4063 16500 4.80 - DEPOSITIRETURN 4063 16500 5,318.30 BEER 4064 16949 49.1X1 MISC 4064 16949 19.00 - DEPOSITIRETURN 4064 16949 899.25 BEER 4065 16822 14.80 - DEPOSITIRETURN 4085 16822 300.00 BEER 4086 16631 4,624.87 BEER 4087 16635 18.10 MISC 4067 16635 15.60 - DEPOSIVRETURN 4067 16635 635.95 BEER 4068 16632 302.40 BEER 4069 16272 1,803.79 BEER 4070 16271 46.75 MISC, LESS CREDIT 4070 16271 52.06 DEPOSIT/RETURN 4070 16271 213.90 BEER 4071 15943 1,195.91 BEER 4072 10157 2,50 MISC 4072 16157 13.86 DEPOSIT/RETURN 4072 16157 5425 BEER 4073 16158 19233.37 101234 1128/00 103317 LOHRENZ, CHERYL 38.00 REFUND-LEAGUE FEE 3849 50069 36.00 101235 1128M 105510 MATHWIC, JESSE 20.DO TOBACCO COMPLIANCE FEES 3995 20001121 20.00 101236 1128100 104852 MCC INC 3,900.00 SIOSOLIDS DRYING FACILITY 4017 148 3,900.00 101237 1128100 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 35.18 OCT UTILITY 4093 20001028 Account No Ac tDesalp6on 11..15:48:38 Pape- 13 Bush S Unt 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER UQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6873 COST OF MIX d SOFT DRINKS UQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.0875 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6872 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 6 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6872 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES-BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6812 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.6013 COST OF MIX 6 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.8815 CASE DEPOSITS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3000.BB12 COST OF SALES -BEER LIQUOR OPERATIONS 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTMTY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL 1177.8908 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 3301.7030 MACHINERY R EQUIPMENT WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 2810.6360 UTILITIES AIRPORT R55CKREG3 LOG20O0O CRY OF HUTCHINSON Council Check Register 1128/00 - 1128/00 Check f Dale Amon! Vendor Emlenatlm PDX Doc No Im No A a l No At t DesffOon 51.70 OCT UTILITY 4094 200010288 2810,6360 UTILITIES 18.11 OCT UTILITY 4095 200010280 2810.6360 UTILITIES 71754 OCT UTILITY 4096 200010280 2810.6380 UTILITIES 73 T9 OCT UTILITY 4097 20001028E 2810.6360 UTILITIES 3875 20001120 1510.6216 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3912 36181 4092 20001128 3939 22073 3813 63115 3914 62695 3915 60789 3916 60785 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1111.4730 OTHER REVENUES 1128/00 15:48:38 Peye- 14 Fn - - Tmm AIRPORT AIRPORT AIRPORT AIRPORT CRY ENGINEER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION DNR REVENUE 2700.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANO®RARY 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 896.32 101238 11128M 104034 MESSNER, KEITH 60,00 REIM &SAFETY BOOTS 60.00 101239 1128/00 102967 MID CON SYSTEMS INC 174.87 GLISTEN 174.87 101240 1128!00 101826 MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO 1.280.00 DNR FEES TO STATE 1,260.00 101241 1128/00 102582 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 76.08 OCTOBER ELEVATOR SERVICE 76.08 101242 1128M 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB 8.25 LAB TESTS 156.00 LAB TESTS 71.00 LAB TESTS 382.50 LAB TESTS 597.75 101243 1128100 102568 MTI DISTIBUTING CO 77.84 FRONT CASTOR FORK 77.64 101244 1128/00 101985 NAGY, RICHARD 13.00 REFUND - CANCELLED WEAVING 13.00 101245 1128/00 102590 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. - 3,96529 NALCO 7390 CORROSION INHIB 3,965.29 3875 20001120 1510.6216 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3912 36181 4092 20001128 3939 22073 3813 63115 3914 62695 3915 60789 3916 60785 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1111.4730 OTHER REVENUES 1128/00 15:48:38 Peye- 14 Fn - - Tmm AIRPORT AIRPORT AIRPORT AIRPORT CRY ENGINEER WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION DNR REVENUE 2700.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANO®RARY 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 3800 49357 3851 50752 4028 90403526 WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3400.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEMENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 3200.6215 CHEMICALS 8 PRODUCTS RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL WATER 0 0 R55CKREG3 -20000 CITY OF T. ANSON C ncll Check Register ' 1128100 - 1128870 Chda a Dale A t Verdes Eyian PO A Doc No Iry No 101246 1128810 105516 NATIONAL MAIN STREET CENTER 15484 RESOURCE MATERIALS 4001 20001115 3911 111949 3952 50216 3953 44097 3972 20001121 3917 49029 4014 99DD4110 Aa nt N o Account DewxgY n 2950.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1900.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1050,8210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 0 11,. 15:48:38 Page - 15 Business Unit HCDC-EDA WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION PARKADMNISTRATION ELECTIONS - ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR OPERATIONS WASTEWATER ADMNISTRATON 9364.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20001MPROV CONSTRUCTION BP 3693 48652 154.84 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENiRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3894 49049 101247 1128870 3695 102650 NCL CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3896 49255 493.77 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANGENTRIL GARAGE ADMIN 3597 LAB SUPPLIES 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 493.77 101248 1128870 102487 OFFICEMAX 22.36 NKIET FILM PAPER 8.42 KRAFT ENVELOPES 30.78 101249 1128100 105509 OLSON, PHIL 5.33 REIMS -TAPE FROM 3M STORE 5.33 101250 1128 104597 OPS SYSTEMS 200.00 UPGRADE TO OPS 32 200.00 101251 1128810 102483 OTTO ASSOCIATES 229.50 ROLLING MEADOWS OBSERVATION 229.50 101252 1128100 102479 PENSKE AUTO CENTER 15.63 OIL CHANGE 15.62 OIL CHANGE 47.73 OIL CHANGE, AIR FILTER 15.60 OIL CHANGE 15.60 OIL CHANGE 110.18 101263 1128100 105506 PETERSON FURNITURE SERVICE 52_6.76 REFINISH CHAIRS E TABLE 628.76 101254 1128870 101853 PHILLIPS WINE 6 SPIRITS 3,558.25 WINE 235.30 MISC 42.00 LIQUOR 3911 111949 3952 50216 3953 44097 3972 20001121 3917 49029 4014 99DD4110 Aa nt N o Account DewxgY n 2950.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1900.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1050,8210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6305 OTHER CONTRACTUAL 0 11,. 15:48:38 Page - 15 Business Unit HCDC-EDA WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION PARKADMNISTRATION ELECTIONS - ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR OPERATIONS WASTEWATER ADMNISTRATON 9364.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20001MPROV CONSTRUCTION BP 3693 48652 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENiRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3894 49049 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3695 49200 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3896 49255 3400,6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANGENTRIL GARAGE ADMIN 3597 49029 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3832 20001122 1700.6230 REPAIR 6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I`TV HALL MAINTENANCE 4074 662940 3000.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4075 662941 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 4076 662939 3000.6810 COST OF SALES -LIQUOR LIQl1OR OPERATIONS R55CKREG3 LOG20000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Council Check Register 1128Po0 — 1128N0 Chu* t Date Arnount RECREATION ACTNITY FEES Venom Explanatio PO IN Doc No Im No BUILDINGS 103832 4,164.96 COST OF SALES -WINE — _. LIQUOR 4077 880796 FUEL 2,203.33 8.473.88 LIQUOR - 4078 665294 101259 1128/00 876.00 105500 RETZLAFF, USA WINE 4079 665295 6,00 148.50 REFUND- LEAGUE FEE WWE 4080 688316 148.50 1128/00 WINE 4081 608330 879.40 WINE 4082 8613850 232,184,75 12,250.84 101261 1128/00 104149 101255 1128/00 102597 PITNEY BOWES INC FENDER 285.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3954 717119 39.71 285.00 101262 1128100 104068 101256 1128M " 105518 PRIGGE, HEATHER REIM"EETING SUPPLIES ^ 24.0 - REFUND-LEAGUE FEE 3994 SWISS 34.42 24.00 101257 1128!00 105495 RADU47, REBECCA 38.00 REFUND-CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS 3854 50447 4019 3424 3450.6211 MOTOR FUELS 8 LUBRICANTS RATS OPERATIONS 3859 50066 38.00 RECREATION ACTNITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL. 4020 101258 1128100 BUILDINGS 103832 RCH INC COST OF SALES -WINE 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE 8,473.88 FUEL 8.473.88 101259 1128/00 105500 RETZLAFF, USA 6,00 REFUND- LEAGUE FEE 6.00 101200 1128/00 105183 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING 232,184.75 BK)SOLIDS DRYING FACIUTY 232,184,75 101261 1128/00 104149 RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS 185.81 FENDER 148,10 CREDIT MASTER CYLINDER 39.71 101262 1128100 104068 ROCK, CHRISTIE " 12,78 REIM"EETING SUPPLIES ^ 21.64 REIMS- MEETING SUPPLIES • 34.42 4019 3424 3450.6211 MOTOR FUELS 8 LUBRICANTS RATS OPERATIONS 3859 50066 2610,4280 RECREATION ACTNITY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL. 4020 20007118 3300.7020 BUILDINGS WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION A ccaml No Accanl DeScs"m 3000.8810 COST OF SALES4J000R 30W.BB10 COST OF SALES-LIQUOR 30D0.6811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3000.8811 COSTOFSALES -WINE 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE 3000.8811 COST OF SALES -WINE 1060.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANOUNANCE -ADMINISTRATION 2610.4280 RECREATION ACTNRY FEES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 2610.4700 OTHER REVENUES RECREATION BLDG. 8 POOL 112B/W 15:48:38 Page- 16 Bushn Lk18 LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3905 320299D021 3400.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPUEECENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3900 3203000007 3400.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPUESCENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3925 20001110 3925 20001110 2950.6340 PRINTING 8 PUBLISHING 2950.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES HCDC {DA HCDC-EDA 0 CITY GF , . QNSON C;ow ad Check Raplsmr 1128100 - 1125'00 PO k Doc No Inv No 4090 20001120 76.00 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS 3853 49967 0 76.00 R55CKREG3 �0020000 Check # Date Amount Ventlor Ewplar"on 101263 1128/00 102021 RODEBERG, JOHN 118.06 REIMB- MEALS, LODC 42.08 118.08 101264 1126100 105494 ROHLIK, JAMES CITY GF , . QNSON C;ow ad Check Raplsmr 1128100 - 1125'00 PO k Doc No Inv No 4090 20001120 76.00 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS 3853 49967 39211 12614 3923 6520377 3955 6520458 3956 6520459 4064 1070251 4084 1070251 3818 50 4009 00673 4010 69572 4085 320808 4085 320808 3878 50830 3879 50575 At nt No A nt Desmp8on 1510.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL( 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 1700.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1700.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3450.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 99892230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES It. 015:48:38 Pape - 17 Bealnm Unit CITY ENGINEER RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL CITY HALL MAINTENANCE WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL MANTENANCE HATS OPERATIONS CASH COMPANY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3450.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOMkTS OPERATIONS 3300.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3300.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 99992230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE 3300.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES CASH COMPANY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 1825.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1764.6210 - OPERATING SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ADAPTIVE RECREATION 76.00 101265 1125 102821 SALTMAN, THE 42.08 SOFTNER SALT 42.08 101266 1128!00 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE 5 TEA 50.60 COFFEE, HOT CHOC 119.25 COFFEE 78.00 COFFEE 247.85 101267 1128 105508 SCANSOFT INC 514 - 64.14 BB WIN NON -FOR 79.00 101268 1128/00 102806 SCHMELING OIL CO 50.05 AUTO SHUT OFF VALVE 50.05 101268 '1128100 101892 SEH 11,981.94 SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER II 8.719.31 SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER 1 20.881.25 101270 1128100 101870 SHARE CORP _ 520- 112.09 HDIC ULTRA 108.89 101271 1128/00 102808 SHOPKO - 20.14 CANDY 142.61 MUSIC CD'S 39211 12614 3923 6520377 3955 6520458 3956 6520459 4064 1070251 4084 1070251 3818 50 4009 00673 4010 69572 4085 320808 4085 320808 3878 50830 3879 50575 At nt No A nt Desmp8on 1510.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL( 2610.4730 OTHER REVENUES 1700.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3300.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1700.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3450.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES 99892230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES It. 015:48:38 Pape - 17 Bealnm Unit CITY ENGINEER RECREATION BLDG. 6 POOL CITY HALL MAINTENANCE WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL MANTENANCE HATS OPERATIONS CASH COMPANY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3450.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOMkTS OPERATIONS 3300.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 3300.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 99992230 SALES TAXES PAYABLE 3300.6212 CLEANING SUPPLIES CASH COMPANY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 1825.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1764.6210 - OPERATING SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ADAPTIVE RECREATION R55CKREG3 LOG20000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 11/28100 15:48:36 Council Check Regksler Page - 18 - 11128100 - 1128/00 Check N Dab Amount Vendo Eg4nm0o PO M D oc No knr No Ac count No Acmml Desalglon lau* a LIM - � - 10.83 AUDIO TAPES 3880 50549 1130.6205 OFFICESUPPLIES PLANNING- ADMINISTRATION 101.00 DISPOSABLE CAMERAS, JOURNAL 3931 50655 1510.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CITY ENGINEER 274.38 101272 1112800 104511 SIMONS, DAVID 17.17 REMB-MEALS 3924 20001115 3300.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 13.75 REIMS -MEALS 3924 20001115 1900.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE PARK ADMRBSTRATON 17.17 REMB -MEALS 3924 20001115 1600.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE STREETS 8 ALLEYS 48.09 101273 1128/00 105444 SMOKE -EATER 81.00 NOVEMBER PUBLICATIONS 3847 20001101 1450,6340 PRINTING 8 PUBLISHING FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 91.00 101274 1128100 101909 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 58.08 SHOP TOOLS 3808 21V/11899354 3400.6245 SMALL TOOLS CENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 59.08 101275 112&00 102611 SORENSEMS SALES 6 RENTALS 41.54 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3624 528 2725,7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY WAS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3933 505 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 109.70 101276 112800 105492 SOUTH CENTRAL TECH COLLEGE - 25.00 SEMINAR -T KALDAHL 3829 14608 1450.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE FIRE - ADMINISTRATION 25.00 101277 11/28100 102.242 SRF CONSULTING GROUP 1,979.99 SCHOOL ROAD CONST 4011 3737.6 9364.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20DO IMPROV CONSTRUCTION BA 965.15 CENTURY. DALE. SOUTH GRADE RD 4012 3142 -15 9364.6301 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2000 MPROV CONSTRLICT10N FW 2,945.14 101278 1126.80 102612 STANDARD PRINTING 104.76 LABELS 3928 45993 1825.0205 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 123.81 TAPE CASSETTES 3058 46MI 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES LIQUOR OPERATIONS 76.08 FOLDERS, ENVELOPES 3959 46110 3000.0210 OPERATING SUPPLIES LIQUOR OPERATIONS 12.35 PAPER, INK, STAMP 4024 46097 1825.6205 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 317.00 101279 1128/00 103094 SUBWAY 27.17 9 TURKEY 8 RST BEEF SANDWICHES 3929 20001017 2950.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES HCDC -EDA 0 0 0 0 CITY OF h *SON 01 11l. 5:48:38 R55CKREG3 - Council Check Register Page- 19 1128W - 1128/00 Chock N D ale Amount Vendor Explamirtlon PO k Doc No Im No Account No Accent Deaalplb Business Unit 27.17 101280 1128/00 105103 SUBWAY-SOUTH 59.11 37 PORTION PLATTER - ELECTION 3932 20001107 1050.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE ELECTIONS - ADMINISTRATION 59.11 101281 1128/00 102659 TEK MECHANICAL 11.84 PLUMBING MATERIALS 3937 1841 2810.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE9JRPORT 8.00 PLUMBING MATERIALS 3937 1641 3200.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESNATER 45.80 PLUMBING MATERIALS 3937 1641 3200.6231 EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER 17.34 PLUMBING MATERIALS 3937 1641 1900.8230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESIARK ADMINISTRATION 82.98 101262 1128= 105273 TEPLY EQUIPMENT 408.31 PARTS, LABOR 4018 20332 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 8 MAINTENANOENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 406.31 101283 1128100 102772 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 41.91 AUTO PRIMARY WIRES 3901 89886 3400 .6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESMNTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 56.83 SHOP PARTS 3902 71307 3400.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEWENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 98.74 101284 1128/00 105308 THIMBLI>3ERRIES 8 CROW RIVER GL 225,00 ADDITIONAL PAYMENT-GLASS WORK 4021 20001115 8200.6850 LOAN TIMBLELERRIES (mm"Ing grant) 225.00 101285 1128100 105519 TORGERSON, MARLIN 11.70 REIMB-MLEAGE 4089 20001122 1020.6320 TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE CITY COUNCIL 11.70 101285 1128100 103096 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEM 97.88 REGISTER ECR PAPER 3981 10630 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES LIQUOR OPERATIONS 365.04 SCANNER KIT 3962 10605 3000.7030 MACHINERY 8 EQUIPMENT LIQUOR OPERATIONS 452.92 101287 1128/00 102126 TRUE VALUE - 50.54 BRUSHES, PAINT 3822 13151000A 3200.6230 REPAIR 5 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESNATER 21.28 FLOOD BULB 3822 13151000A 2810.6230 REPAIR 8 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEWRPORT .43- SUPPLIESILESS CREDIT 3822 1315 -1000A 3300.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 195.58 GAS PIPING SUPPLIES 3822 131510DOA 1850.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CIVIC ARENA 21.30 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3822 1315 -1000A 1850.6380 RENTALS CIVIC ARENA R55CKREG3 LOG20000 Check 0 Date Amount VekWOr Exp4ration - 7.67 - _ LIPS _. 19.80 PARTS 315.74 101286 1120100 105514 TWARDY, MARK CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1128t00 15:48:36 Coma Check Ragsler Pepe - 20 11/28100 - 1120MO - PO i Doc No Im No Accomt No Acco mt DescroUon _Buskre s Unit 3822 13151000A 1850.6311 POSTAGE CIVIC ARENA 3822 1315-IOOGA 1900.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIESPARK ADMINISTRATION 0 3999 20001121 1177.6909 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 3935 51493 1900.6310 COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMINISTRATION 4000 51515 1510.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CITY ENGINEER 3825 102549 20.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE FEES CEMETERY 3828 20.00 2725.7020 101289 1126100 3827 102619 TWO WAY COMM INC 2725.7020 BUILDINGS 47.93 BATTERY 102345 2725.7020 15. BELT HOLDER 3639 14732 03.91 BUILDINGS 101290 1128100 102320 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS BUILDINGS CEMETERY 15.87 BLDRS PRIDE ADH 15525 BUILDING MATERIALS 7.00 SLIP CONNECTOR 316.42 BUILDING MATERIALS 229.41- BUILDING MATERIALS _ 137.49 LUMBER 402.62 101291 1128200 102419 VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON 4295 ROTATE TIRES 4295 101292 1128100 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 46.90 POP PURCHASE 81.38 POP PURCHASE 40.80 POP PURCHASE 15225 POP PURCHASE 321.33 101293 1128/00 101856 VOSSUGHTNG 77.90 MATERIALS 77.90 101294 1126/00 102164 WEGNER, NEIL 7.44 VIDEO TAPES 7.44 0 3999 20001121 1177.6909 MISCELLANEOUS INVESTIGATION 3935 51493 1900.6310 COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMINISTRATION 4000 51515 1510.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CITY ENGINEER 3825 102549 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3828 102541 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3827 102542 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3828 102345 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3639 14732 27257020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3938 102320 2725.7020 BUILDINGS CEMETERY 3867 CTCS117175 3400.6370 CONTRACT REPAIR 6 MAINTENANOIENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3966 6024987 3000.6813 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS UQl1OR OPERATIONS 3967 6025234 3060.8913 COST OF MIX 8 SOFT DRINKS UQUOR OPERATIONS 3966 8025335 3600.6813 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LKOUOR OPERATIONS 3969 8025480 3600.6873 COST OF MIX & SOFT DRINKS LIQUOR OPERATIONS 3886 2080169 1850.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES CIVIC ARENA 4030 20001120 3000.6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES LIQUOR OPERATIONS RSSCKREG3 .4120000 CITY OF. - HINSON Council Check Re*W 11128100 — 11128/00 Check N Dale Amaunt Vendor Explene5an PO 0 Doc No Inv No 101295 11/2800 102165 WELCOME NEIGHBOR 5000 OCTOBER LISTING 3938 20001107 60.00 101296 11Y2BI00 102083 WENDLANDT TREE SERVICE INC. 049.04 TREE REMOVAL & CLEANUP 649.64 101297 11128= 103980 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS 333.19 PARTS 561.40 SHOP PARTS 694.59 1,021.095.89 Grand TOW 3838 00-2190 3888 76920 3899 76600 Payment Inshumenl Totals Cheer Total 1,021,095.69 Total Paymems 1,021,095.69 A=unt No Aocamt Description 3300,0330 ADVERTISING .1 0 11,_ 15:48:38 Pepe - 21 Buskb Unit WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 2725.8370 CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENAIJOZEMETERY 3400.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIEMENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN 3400.6230 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:ENTRAL GARAGE ADMIN Ld ..r. a November 22, 2000 Hutchinson City Council Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan St SE Hutchinson MN 55350 FOR YOUR INFORMATION RE: Jefferson Street Task Force Meeting #1 Thursday, November 30, 2000 @ 5:30 p.m. @ City Center Dear Council Members, As noted above, our first Task Force meeting is set for Thursday, November 30, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at Hutchinson City Center. We know that some people can not attend (Julie Wischnack and Sheldon Nies), however, we would like to kick -off the Task Force, and start discussion. Attached is a draft agenda Please let me know if you would like revisions or additions. I can be reached at 234 -4208. We look forward to seeing you on the 30' a of Engineering/Public Works cc: Gary No=— City Administtstor Hutchinson City Center 111 Hama Street SE Hrtddn oo. MN 553302522 326557- 5151/Fae 3202344240 FOR YOUR INFORMAIIOIN t JEFFERSON STREET TASK FORCE Meeting #1 Agenda Thursday, November 30, 2000 @ 5:30 p.m. ♦ Hutchinson City Center 1. INTRODUCTIONS a. Membership Galen Houk: Large lot owner Krista Picha: Small lot owner Brian Burgess: alternate (lot owner) Robert Anderson: Hassan Valley Township Sheldon Nies: McLeod County Hutchinson City Council b. Resources John Rodeberg: Hutchinson Director of Engineering/Public Works Roger Berggren: McLeod County Environmentalist Julie Wischnack: Hutchinson Director of Planning Christie Rock: Hutchinson Community Development Richard Kjonaas: McLeod County Engineer 2. TASK FORCE GOAL Over the last several years, failing septic systems have prompted property owners and local governmental agencies to look at ways to feasibly and environmentally address the issue in the area. Two lots have been annexed and provided municipal sewer service, however there are significant costs involved to serving the entire area Property owners and governmental agencies are not sure of the best way to proceed. It is the goal of the Task Force to develop a recommended course of action and time line for dealing with sewer service issues to the area that also addresses the legal, environmental and financial constraints required to make the actions feasible. 3. ISSUES a. Environmental Considerations: Numerous septic system failures have been identified within the area At least two field tile systems that serve the area have been identified as having fecal coliform, indicating that septic systems are hooked up to them. Current law requires that septic systems must be upgraded or "certified" under certain conditions. Many lots require that "experimental" septic systems be installed due to space and/or soil condition limitations. These systems may have a shortened useful life, or may still not work under some conditions. Due to the number of "experimental" systems being required in the area, combined with the other known environmental issues, a thorough review of the extent of the issue needs to be completed. Municipal sanitary sewer service would be available to the area, but it would require fairly expensive construction that may also include watermain, street and storm sewer construction. b. Cost to Property Owners: A typical city project involving complete utility and street construction may cost between $ 160 and 190 /front foot of lot width. A 100' wide lot ~" would expect to pay between $16,000 and 19,000 for these improvements. Larger lots could pay significantly more. Other costs would include trunk connection fees and �P the cost to extend the utilities from the property line to the house, including relocation of lines in the basement (if required) and abandoning the septic system. . Cost to the City: The City has a policy that developing properties pay for all costs associated with providing service to them. The City also has a policy regarding newly annexed property that allows for deferments under certain conditions. The City must also follow State Statutes for assessing property that requires public hearings and allows for challenges to the special assessment. This Statute also requires that the assessment cost be related to the additional value of the property due to the provided improvements. The financial risks of providing these improvements may exceed what the City is willing to undertake without assurances or agreements, since smaller housing units are also not considered to be revenue generators for the City. 4. IDENTIFICATION OF OBSTACLES, OPPORTUNITIES & OPTIONS a. Identification of Obstacles Location of septic systems Location/use of tile lines Number of insufficient size lots Effect on large lots Cost of providing municipal infrastructure b. Consideration of Opportunities Municipal service is accessible Potential for grants for coordinated effort Coordinated improvement may help reduce costs c. Options Sewer service district 5. FUTURE STEPS FOR TASK FORCE a. Identification of costs for typical septic system b. Identification of alternate service options and potential costs for providing municipal service c. Identification of potential grants or financing options Iv. The September 21, 2000 meeting of the Pioneedand Library System Board was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Vies Chair Bob Fleegel at the Willmar Public Library Meeting Room. Rail was passed around There was a quorum of 19 signatories The agenda was changed. Al Clouse added. V. A 4. Baker & Taylor. B. will be presented by Ronan Rolland and VI. will be presented by Kathy Matson. Jeanette Buchanan motioned to approve the Sept 17, 2000 minutes. Second by Ramona Berg- Perry. Carried. AI Clouse presented for the Finance Committee. At Clouse motioned to approve the Auguat 2000 R 6 E report. Second by Art Abel. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to sign the Report of Resutte Accomplished and Expenditures of Regional Ubmy Basic System Support Grant Funds In FY 2000. Second by Ramona Bsry -Parry. Carried. AI presorted a letter to Jodi Rerg of Plum Creek Indlca i PLS support of an LSTA Grant which provides workshops available to PLS employees. All Clouse motioned to have Bob Fleegel sign the tetter. Second by Manson CanfIsK Carried. Baker 3 Taylor, our book supplier has been wed by the state for pricing Issues. PLS had previously sent Info on payments made from 19W - im. The co" Is settled and PLS will receive a distribution of abort $6,411 as a roudL ,. ` Ronan Rolland prosented for the Personnel Committee. Ronan Rolland moved to accept the proposal for RFP for Personnel Consulting Services 0114100. Second by Morlssn Canfield. Carried. The deadline for bids for to awards banquet Is the November meeting. We are also taking bldg for future years H anyone wishes to present one. Contact Ivey Vonderharr or KaCry Meteor. Pay Increases for the oaring year were proposed *0 Just a basic oat of living Increase at Jan. 1, 2001 until all the Job descriptions and cormAWV services are completed. This will be brought up for action in the October me 1 " . • Ramona Berg -Perry l: P s a led for the Technology CommWoe.The new Hardware, Software and Network policy was presorted. Marna likely to now continuous updating were Included in an appenolx so the entire policy world not have to be constantly revised to keep up-to -date. Ramona Bog -Pony motioned to approve the PLS Hardware, Software and Network Policy. Second by At Clouse. Carried. Old BusineaL Kathy Matson presented on the Strategic Plan process We still need volunteers s from marry counties. McLeod. Meeker and Swift have volunteers. Let Kathy know if you are Interested. If no more volunteers come forward, staff will be appokted. Bob Fleegel proaerted for the Executive Committee. The negative press PLS has received from the Montevideo paper and others picking up on the editorial was mentioned. Copies wiH be available after t h e n eeting for whoever wants them. Fbegel said the Exeartive Carmnittes Is beginning plans for better PR strategies to address such Issues and get a more positive PLS message to all the co m*m Theis was a suggestion that PLS use the consultant to advise an employee relations also to prevent situations like this. Also there was a question on PLS establishing a web site as other library systems have done. New Business. Kathy Matson presented the new Prairie Correctional Facility centred for Services which Is up for renewal. All Clouse motioned to accept On Prairie Correctional Facility Contract for Llbnry Services. Second by John Baler. Carried. The Library Association Caderence Is at the end of the month In our poolu t ]so sign -tom form If anyone wishes to attend. Trustees day Is Sept 29th and the event Is at the River Carter in St. Pat. Casts will be raimb reed by PLS. Soma 11mrT W man presented for the Staff Advisory Committee. Also presort was Anita Zelenka from Milan. The Staff Is also working on Job Descriptions some of which will be based on log dwxAs the librarians are keeping. They are also looking at continuing education policy with the Into t to make less vague. There will be more staff Input before upda ft this. E -Books will be presented at the next staff meeting which will help the staff keep up with new media. hoard members may attend the E -book portion of the staff meeting. Also, the lower fines are helping and feedback has been good. John Houlahan presented the directors report. New members are to meat with Kathy Matson after the meeting to set up an orientation meeting date. The Ad Hoc #1 will also meet after the meeting to set updates for their rood meetings. Houlahan presented Administration reports showing Income and expenditures for libraries by local and state and federal dollars. Members we to let him krww if this would be a useful report for them to get In future this bould be done earlier in the year to assist with budgets, goal setting eta LOWW+ I :gland motioned to adjourn. Second by Art Abel. Carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:30