Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp08-28-2001 cAGENDA
• REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2001
2. INVOCATION —Rev. Sam Grozdanov, Shalom Baptist Church
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 14, 2001
(b) BID OPENING OF AUGUST 22, 2001 FOR POLYMER FEED SYSTEM
Action - Motion to approve as presented
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES FROM JULY 5, 2001
2. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MINUTES FROM JUNE 21, 2001
3. HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JUNE 25, 2001
• 4. HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES FROM MARCH 27, 2001
5. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY
17, 2001
6. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JULY, 2001
7. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JULY, 2001
8. CITY OF HUTCHINSON REPORT ON INVESTMENTS FOR JULY, 2001
9. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JULY 17, 2001
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RESOLUTION NO. 11778 — A RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 11757
2. RESOLUTION NO. 11780 — A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING INCOME
GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
3. RESOLUTION NO. 11781 —RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED
PROPERTY
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
• 1. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK
FROM 25' TO A 0' SETBACK AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT A GARAGE LARGER THAN 1,000 SQUARE FEET AS REQUESTED
BY MICHAEL SCHLUETER, 405 MONROE ST WITH DENIAL RECOMMENDED
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — AUGUST 28, 2001
BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11775)
• 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED BOUNDARY
SETBACK FOR THE PLACEMENT OF MANUFACTURED HOMES AS
REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL, COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE, 448
CALIFORNIA STREET NW WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11774)
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT AND
SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR THE LOT -SPLIT AT PLAZA 15 AS REQUESTED BY
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11776)
(d) APPOINTMENTS TO PARK & RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION
ADVISORY BOARD
1. JAY BEYTIEN — REAPPOINTMENT TO YEAR 2004
2. BERNIE MINER — REAPPOINTMENT TO YEAR 2004
3. PEGGY WESTLUND — FILLING VACANCY TO YEAR 2004
4. CLAIRE LENZ — NEW APPOINTMENT TO YEAR 2004
(e) CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING BIDS FOR SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADES AT
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
(f) CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO VESSCO
INC. FOR PURCHASE OF POLYMER FEED SYSTEM
• Action — Motion to approve consent agenda
5. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M.
(a) REVIEW THE RE- SUBMISSION OF THE FRANKLIN-GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD
SMALL CITIES REHAB GRANT APPLICATION
Action —Motion to close hearing —Motion to reject
• u l►I 1►1 1 ► 11111 111 i 11
(a) REQUEST TO BE HEARD FROM JUDY OLSON REGARDING THE DENIAL OF THE
SALE OF EGGS TO MINORS BY LOCAL GROCERY STORES
%a
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES TO THE SALE OF THE 1975 SEAGRAVE
LADDER TRUCK
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
9
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING A 1997 MACK DUMP TRUCK
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE OF FIRE AND PUBLIC WORKS RADIO
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — AUGUST 28, 2001
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
• (c) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 11779 AWARDING BIDS FOR 2001
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -299 AMENDING CHAPTER 6, ENTITLED
"OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING" BY ADDING SECTION 6.50,
"PROHIBITING SMOKING IN RESTAURANTS AND LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENTS"
(WANE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001)
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR SALE OF
FOUR INVESSEL COMPOSTING BINS WITH SYSTEM CONTROLS
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(f) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA FOR A $1 MILLION DOLLAR GRANT FOR EVENT/COMMUNITY
CENTER
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(g) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH WOLD ARCHITECTS
• AND ENGINEERS TO SUPPLY ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR
EVENT /COMMUNITY CENTER
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(h) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -297 AMENDING SECTION 3 RELATING
TO THE DEFINITIONS OF LOT REAR AND YARD, REAR (WAIVE FIRST READING
AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR SEPTEMBER 11, 2001)
Action — Motion to rej ect — Motion to approve
(i) CONSIDERATIONOF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -298 AMENDING SECTION 8 RELATING
TO DRIVEWAY SETBACKS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY (WAIVE FIRST
READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR SEPTEMBER 11, 2001)
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(j) CONSIDERATION TO PURCHASE AIRPORT WHEEL LOADER WITH SNOW
REMOVAL EQUIPMENT FROM ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC.
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
mu 16Yy 21"q: \►1
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
WIM11131-Maw 'Me
• (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — AUGUST 28, 2001
Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims A from appropriate funds
• 11. ADJOURN
•
•
11
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2001
1. CALL TO ORDER - 5.30 P.M.
Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Councilmembers Jim Haugen, John
Mlmar, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten were present. Also present were Gary Plotz, City
Administrator, John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works and Marc Sebora, City
Attorney.
2. INVOCATION — Rev. Sam Grozdanov, Shalom Baptist Church, delivered the invocation
3. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 24, 2001
With a date change on the header information, the minutes were approved as presented.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY 2001
2. HUTCHINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY 24,
• 2001
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JULY 2001
4. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JUNE, 2001
5. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JUNE 2001
6. CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY 30, 2001
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 01 -296 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.14
RELATING TO THE SIGN REGULATIONS (GAS STATIONS) (SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 11771 — RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN A
GRANT PROCESS THROUGH THE MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
3. RESOLUTION NO. 11770 — RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JOINT AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF POLICE PERSONNEL AND
EQUIPMENT
(c) CONSIDERATION OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR JAN'S CLOSET DBA
PLUS AT A PRICE TO SELL CLOTH ING AT THE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY ON
AUGUST 15, 2001 (RECOMMEND DENIAL)
• (d) CONSIDERATION OF SHORT TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR DUCKS
UNLMTED ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2001
(e) CONSIDERATION OF RETAIL OFF -SALE NON - INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
3 (a)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 14, 2001
FOR WALMART SUPER CENTER
(f) CONSIDERATION OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR HOMIER
DISTRIBUTING, INC. TO SELL TOOLS AT THE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY ON
AUGUST 28, 2001
(g) REQUEST TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 28, 2001, TO REVIEW THE
RE- SUBMISSION OF THE FRANKLIN-GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD SMALL CITIES
REHAB GRANT APPLICATION
(h) CONSIDERATION OF OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR STEVE MADSON, CHRIS
DOBRATZ AND TOM KLOSS TO TRAVEL TO DES MOINES, IA TO MEET WITH
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE IOWA DIVISION OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
(i) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3, LETTING NO. 3,
PROJECT NO. 01 -09
Items 4(b)1 and 4(c) were pulled for further discussion.
Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen, to approve the consent agenda with the exception of
Items 4(b) I and 4(c). Motion carried unanimously.
Item 4(c) — Mayor Torgerson expplained that initially this license was recommended for a
denial. After further investigation by the Hutchinson Police Department, the recommendation
was changed to approve.
5. PUBLIC HF.A_RIN — 6:00 P.M. - NONE
IuulAl • &INN B1411i D61 1W51:1 1 _I►
(a) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE MAXIIUM CANOPY SIZE
ALLOWANCE AND A 48 SQ FT VARIANCE FROM THE MAXIMUM TOTAL SQ FT
ALLOWED IN A C -4 DISTRICT AS REQUESTED BY MURPHY OIL ( WALMART)
WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11727)
(DEFERRED FROM JULY 24, 2001)
Julie Wischnack, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building, reminded the council that staff had
recommended denial of this variance.
Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to deny the variance as requested by Murphy Oil
Motion carried unanimously.
Item 4(b)1 — Julie Wischnack proposed a new sign ordinance in relation to gas stations to the
Council. She explained that with the opening of Murphy Oil, some canopy signage issues
were raised which prompted Planning Staff to review the current sign ordinance. Ms.
Wischnack explained that the current ordinance did not address the issue as to when a
business has no building on site. The new ordinance proposed will address the small size of
building sites or no building sites at all. She further explained that Staff had done intensive
research on other cities' gas station signage ordinances which aided them in the creation of
the new ordinance. She also reminded the council that this new ordinance only pertains to
gas stations.
• The changes to the ordinance are: 1) signage on canopies shall he limited to 10% of the total
square footage of the canopy; and 2) the total square footage of the canopy and/or total gas
station signage shall not exceed 250 square feet.
3 Lc)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 14, 2001
• Ms. Wischnack also explained that this ordinance will not make the majority of other gas
stations non - conforming.
Councilmember Hoversten commented that Staff had provided pictures of various signs
throughout the community to the council for comparison. Councilmember Peterson
explained that there are gas stations throughout Minnesota that do not have any buildings and
noted that our old ordinance did not address these issues.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve the second reading of the sign ordinance.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Wischnack explained how this ordinance pertains specifically to Murphy Oil and how
their new signage will look. This does not meet all of Murphy Oil's requests, but it does
give them more flexibility.
Mr. Glenn Woelfel, Little Dukes, explained that his company does not approve of the new
ordinance. With Little Duke's property taxes being triple of Murphy Oil's, he feels that
Murphy is at an advantage. He stated that Cash Wise is a progressive and community-
oriented company and they feel that the old ordinance should remain in place.
M- 0DUTA: 7b9.191 *X9
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES TO THE SALE OF THE 1975 SEAGRAVE
LADDER TRUCK
Brad Emans, Fire Chief, noted that the new fire trucks have arrived and invited the Council,
staff and community to "check them out" after the Council meeting.
Kay Peterson abstained from this discussion.
Brad Emans explained that the fire department had brainstormed three options to sell the
1975 Seagrave ladder truck. He also explained that they had done everything they could to
sell the truck by advertising its sale. However, the highest bid they received for the truck
was $1500. Mr. Emans stated that there really is no market for a truck of this age and that
the Hutchinson Fire Department no longer has a use for it. Mr. Emans was asking for a
recommendation from the Council.
Mayor Torgerson's opinion is to sell it to a neighboring community for $100. However, he
felt there should be a stipulation that they need to retain the truck for their use and not sell
it for salvage. If they would decide to sell it, it would have to come back to the City of
Hutchinson.
Councilmember Mlinar agreed that Hutchinson has gotten their use out of the truck. He also
expressed the thought that another community may very well be able to use it. The Public
Relations is also beneficial to the community of Hutchinson. Mlinar feels that if there is an
entity out there that can use the truck, they should be able to have it without cost. This
question was brought forward to Marc Sebora, city attorney, as to whether or not we actually
had to receive payment for the truck.
Mr. Sebora stated there is no requirement to receive payment for it. However, he raised the
point as to whose responsibility it would be to make sure the truck is maintained in another
community. Mr. Emans was not concerned with this issue. Mr. Emans has been contacted
by two fire departments that are interested in the truck. If it turns out that these other two
departments are not interested, then the hi bid of $1500 should stand. Mr. Haugen stated
• that the maintenance stipulation needs to Pave an expiration date. Mayor Torgerson asked
for Mr. Emans to further research if there are communities seriously interested in the truck
3(0-)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —AUGUST 14, 2001
and bring the information back to the Council.
Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to authorize Mr. Emans to further research interested
communities and report to the Council on August 28, 2001 with his findings. Motion carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED FUNDING AGREEMENT FROM MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Motion by Mlinar, second by Hoversten to approve proposed funding agreement from
Minnesota Department of Transportation for Airport Improvement Program. Motion carried
unanimously. John Rodeberg, Director of Engmeerinp/Public Works, explained that this
parallels the federal agreement that was approved previously.
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RENEWAL OF INSURANCE POLICIES
Dennis Potter, Insurance Planners, explained that the renewals are up about 25% this year
due to more exposure, bigger budgets and the amount of property that was obtained. He
explained in detail each item and its increase.
Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the renewal of insurance policies. Motion
carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF 2001 IMPROVEMENT BONDS
Jim Prosser, Financial Consultant from Ehlers & Associates, Inc. reviewed the Bond Sale
Report. He explained that there are ten improvement projects with a total cost slightly over
• $3 million and that approval is being asked for the assessed and levied portions. This will
be a level debt service that is gradual and with a smooth transition. The call provision will
be in the year 2009 which allows for refund if interest rates are lower. The interest rates are
at 4 ' /Z% to 5% on bonds.
The issuing process would be scheduled as follows: distribute official statement week of
August 20; bond sale August 28, closing September 13, 2001.
John Rodeberg explained that the post office project was dropped and that all projects came
in appropriately in regards to cost.
Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve sale of improvement bonds. Motion
carried unanimously.
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
John Mlinar - Mr. Mlinar brought up the point that there has been discussion in regards to only
having one reading of an ordinance. He stated that it is very beneficial to have two readings of
ordinances as demonstrated with the sign ordinance.
He also reminded the community that they are invited to the City Council Workshops as they
are not only for City Council members.
Duane Hoversten — Mr. Hoversten thanked the police department for their assistance with the
National Night Out.
• Gary Plotz — Mr. Plotz pave an update as to what was discussed at the Leadership Team
Meeting that morning. Discussion occurred in regards to the following: Insurance coverage
Id
3(C�
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — AUGUST 14, 2001
changes and change of agent; fire dept finances; 2001 improvement bond financing; report on
city budget — budgets have been submitted and we are waiting on information from the state
(numbers from LGA were incorrect and have been narrowed); consideration of workshop to
discuss the budget; dates for filing of public office; information technology and telephone policy
(internal use of city computers); township action —joint annexation (Hwy 7 East) - a portion of
the area has been removed and will be coming back to the council for recommendation for a
decision; sign ordinance; update on arena operations; additional treatment at the water plant
(membrane ternat s t filtration the water treatment project; liquor store recommends pansi expansion look at
(Nash Finch unable tomeet)
so this needs to be rescheduled
Mr. Plotz asked for official action in regards to appointing a committee to create a consultant list
for the water treatment plant. Hoversten and Haugen were appointed to lead the group.
Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson, to approve a group be formed to research consultants for
the water treatment plant. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Plotz also asked for official action in regards to setting a workshop to review the 2002
budget.
Motion by Haugen, second by Mlinar, to set a Council Workshop for August 28, 2001 at 4:00
p.m. to review the 2002 budget. Motion carried unanimously.
John Rodeberg - Mr. Rodeberg explained that a bituminous overlay project will start on
School Road between State Highway 7 and the High School this Thursday. He asked the
public to please use an alternate route if travel is not required on this road. It is hoped that
. the project will be complete by the time school starts, dependant on weather and potential
conflicts during construction.
There is a second project at the intersection of School Road and South Grade Road. This project
should be completed this week.
Mayor Torgerson — reiterated that the new ladder truck and rescue truck will be outside the City
Center after the Council meeting for public viewing. He also noted that he accompanied the fire
department staff to Appleton, WI to obtain the new trucks. He commended the fire dept for their
selection of the fire trucks.
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A
With Hoversten abstaining, there was a motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson, to approve and
authorize payment of Verified Claims A from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) VERIFIED CLAIMS B
Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson, to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims
B from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously.
is With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
3Lo-)
MINUTES
BID OPENING
POLYMER FEED SYSTEM
AUGUST 22, 2001
Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Randy DeVries, Director of
Water/Wastewater, Tom Blomer, Sr. Wastewater Operator and Melissa
Starke, recorder.
Gary Plotz, City Administrator called the bid opening to order at 1:03 p.m.
Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 6630, Advertisement for Bids,
Polymer Feed System. Mr. Plotz noted that a security check and insurance certificate
were included with the bid. The following bid was opened and read:
Vessco Bid Amount
Eden Prairie, MN $60-400.00 (includes freight
10 week delivery
6 -10 weeks for shop drawings
• A representative from Vessco explained that there will not likely be a need for the shop
drawings since the specifications were so tight and they are aware of what the City
specifically needs. Therefore, the length of time for drawings will be shortened.
The bid was referred to staff for review and a recommendation. It will be before the City
Council for consideration and awarding on August 28, 2001.
The bid opening adjourned at 1:06 p.m.
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
ATTEST:
• Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
3 (bb
MINUTES
Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
. July 5, 2001
Members present: Jay Beytien, Mark Cormier, Todd Ertsgaard, John Mlinar, Dolf Moon,
Sonja Muellerleile, and Bruce Peterson.
Minutes dated June 7, 2001 approved by Bruce Peterson and seconded by Jay Beytien.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Ballpark Design Review (concept plan shown/preliminary cost estimate handed out):
Design of ballfield and pool expansion review priced at $10,000, which came out of the parkland
dedication fund. According to the cost estimate the total for the ballfield project would be
$1,360,413.97, which excludes land. This cost would come down with changes, downgrades, and
eliminations (walking path, soccer goals, etc.). John Rcdeberg is working on these numbers.
There will be discussions at future meetings on what we think the community would support.
We'll need to get endorsements from HJLB, ECFE, GSA and many other groups. Timing will be
everything with the school district planning on a $50 million bond issue. Dolf is waiting for the
pool information, which should be available for the August meeting. Cost projected at $1.2 -1.5
million. Plans will include the following: shallow depth area, water slide in main pool, outside
shower facilities, patio area, connection or adjacent to existing pool.
QUESTIONS RAISED
Question by Bruce: Is this a single stage program? Answer: It will depend on numbers.
Question by Bruce: Are there ongoing surveys in town to find out what's spent during
tournaments? We could use local names in the information about the new ballfields. Answer:
No. There's a national organization that puts out a survey. There are a few restaurants and
motels that call every year to get dates of tournaments.
Question by John: Is this the time to start tapping into corporate sponsorships?
B. Events Center (plans shown): It is still moving forward and entering into the final design
stage. The state will approve the plans one more time. Dolf has not seen the contract that
provides us with the $1 million. It should be coming soon. The space could be used for following.
1/3 for senior daily use, 1/3 for senior and/or community use, and 1/3 for community
banquet/meeting (large room can be split into 3 smaller and can seat 500 banquet style). There
is also a catering kitchen. Possible activities could be held: Ridgewater College activities, civic
music, weddings, meetings, dances, etc.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Parks Department Reorganization: John Arlt resigned to take a new position in Coon
Rapids. His last day was Friday. The following proposal will go to Council on Tuesday.
Lawrence Winter will assume some personnel, planning, developing, and budget responsibilities.
There will be up to two lead positions available to current park maintenance employees which
would include assisting in planning, purchasing, supervision, etc. An entry-level Parks
Maintenance position would be created. The position of Resource Recovery (50% compost/50%
parks) would open.
y tc,�\
MINUTES
PRCE Advisory Board
• July 5, 2001
Page Two
B. Summer Project Update:
Veteran's Memorial Park: The tank will be installed next week. Mueller Construction won the
bid for the bituminous work. There has been a large amount of donated product and people! The
goal is to be complete by Veteran's Day. Tartan Park: The grain elevator is down. With a DNR
grant work will begin on the playground, landscape, and parking. Connecticut Park: Parks
employees are currently installing a new playground. The parts are not fitting so they're waiting
for new ones to arrive and hope to complete it next week. Boy Scout Park: An Eagle Scout
collected all the donated blocks and plants. Looks nice!
C. Fairgrounds Discussion: The Fair Board is interested in leaving the management of the
facilities and only running the fair in August. Possible plans include the following. The county
would finance the operation, the city would provide management and employees, and the school
would use the commercial space for extracurricular activities. With new flooring, the commercial
building could house four basketball, volleyball, or tennis courts. if the Charter School opens in
Hutchinson, they may be interested in using the fairgrounds for their site.
D. August Meeting Moved to August 9 Karen McKay will take minutes. Sonja Muellerleile
and Bruce Peterson will be absent.
• BOARD MEMBER ITEMS is
1. Jay asked if flowers would be planted at the base of all the park signs? Dolf responded:
Yes, it's on the "to do" list and will be perennials instead of annuals.
2. Jay presented concerns from Crow River Arts.
A. When did PRCE apply for the Prairie Fire Grant through Target and who contacted
them?
B. If PRCE plans to apply again for 2002, please let them know within 2 weeks so they
can budget, as they were expecting the entire $2,000 for 2001 and only received
$1,000.
C. They feel PRCE is trying to "steal" their classes.
D. Is Crow River Arts worthwhile?
Dolf responded: He will check to see when we applied. Barb Haugen contacted them
initially. Yes, PRCE supports them. There has been no communication from them and
need to work with him to improve. Continue what the start every year and be consistent.
He will contact Dan Honsey to discuss.
• 4 8
LA L6�N
Iv•
• The June 21, 2001 meeting of the Fioneerland Library System board
was called to order at 7:38 by chair Robin deCathelineau in the
Willmar Public Library meeting room. Roll was passed around. We
have a quorum. Al Clouse added #V.A.B. Grant - Special Funds to the
agenda. Laurel Silvernale motioned to approve the agenda as
amended. Second by Jeanette Buchanan. Carried. Marleen Canfield
motioned to approve the May 17, 2001 minutes. Second by Ramona
Berg - Perry. Carried.
Al Clouse presented for the Finance Committee. V.A.1. May 2001
Financial Report. Four months of telecommunication have been paid
out of the Grants line item. Al Clouse motioned to accept the May
financial report. Second by Bob Fleegel. Carried. V.A.2. Al
Clouse motioned to accept the Bills and Registers. Second by Eric
Weiberg. Carried. V.A.3. 2001, 2002 budgets. Al Clouse motioned
to accept the 2001/2002 budgets. Second by Lowell Ueland.
Carried. V.A.4. Delivery Contract. Until state & federal money is
sorted out, the contract will be monthly for July at least. Al
Clouse motioned to accept a monthly delivery contract for July
until state and federal dollars is resolved. Second by Ramona
Berg- Perry. Carried. V.A.S. Basic System Support Grant for State
Funds. Al Clouse motioned to send off for the grant. Second by
Francis Schweiss. Carried. V.A.6. RLTA grant report to be tabled
until July. V.A.7. RLTA Grant Changes. We have about $82,000 of
the grant unspent which the state will not allow to be carried
over so PLS needs to change the RLTA grant. The plan is to
• purchase new routers. Al Clouse motioned to change the RLTA grant
to accommodate the purchase of the routers to use the dollars
left. Second by Bob Fleegel. Carried. V.A.B. Grants /Special
Funds. The Extension line has been removed from the Financial
reports and these will be put in a separate report called Grants &
Special Funds. These could be multiple year or carried over
income while the R &E report will show the year's income /expenses.
Director Houlahan will go over the line items in July.
Ivey Vonderharr presented for the Personnel Committee. V.B.1.
New Employees. Ivey Vonderharr motioned to accept the employment
of Judith Seehusen at Lake Lillian /Raymond and Belinda Hauger at
Granite Falls. Second by Al Clouse. Carried. V.B.2. Personnel
consultant report. There is a packet in our handouts to look over
regarding wage levels. The increases are already applied to the
budgets previously approved. Chair deCathelineau requested that
the approval date for the changes be moved to August so that the
board has time to consider after the consultant comes to the July
meetinc. Job descriptions and the old levels will be mailed to
board members. Sick leave donations were also discussed. Ivey
Vonderharr motioned to accept policy 1206 for Sick Leave donation.
Second by Marleen Canfield. Discussion. The word "year" needs to
be after "calendar" under Donor 92. Bob Fleegel motioned to
delete #1 under Director. Second by Al Clouse. There was
discussion on the need for administration involvement and
discretionary issues. On the 2nd motion, there were 14 for, 9
against removing the item. Carried to remove the item #1 under
• Director. Chair deCathelineau directed the Personnel Committee to
rework the proposed policy 1206. Any suggestions from the board
should be forwarded to Ivey.
y Lana
The Chair recognized and thanked Ronan Rolland for her
. contribution to the board as this is her last meeting.
Lowell Ueland presented for the Strategic Planning committee.
Phase 2, if approved by the board will meet the state requirements
thus far. It is not a full plan. In Phase 3, each library must
submit an individual plan as part of the document. Lowell Ueland
motioned to adopt Phase 2 of the plan as submitted to the board to
be forwarded to the state. Second by Herb Rotunda. Carried.
Old Business. Director Houlahan has met with various people from
Canby on the possibility of that city joining PLS. As they are a
charter city, their local library board needs to be involved.
Further meetings will be held to discuss fiscal issues.
There was no New Business.
Mary Henke, Head Librarian for Hutchinson presented for the
Advisory Council. She described the structural changes to that
committee which will now have 5 members, 3 representing libraries
of like size and 2 at large members.
Director Houlahan presented a report on storm readiness and
suggested that the board encourage all libraries to come up with a
readiness plan. Signed agreements have been received from ALL
signatories as of today.
Other. The December meeting will be moved to the 13th. Chair
• deCathelineau suggested that Harlan Madsen fill the new vacancy on
the Personnel Committee.
Gary Johnson motioned to adjourn. Second by Eric Weiberg.
Meeting adjourned at 8:50
Stacey Schuette
Secretary
u
Li Lr-�a
i
C']
•
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING
June 21, 2001
Number of signatories with appointed representatives: 25
Quorum of signatories: 13
Number of signatories present: 23
Present:
Alvin Maas
Nancy Grussing
Mark Dahl
Robin deCathelineau
Ivey Vonderharr
Stacey Schuette
Joan Reckdahl
Francis Schweiss
Gary Johnson
Herb Rotunda
Ronan Rolland
Bob Fleegel
Laurel Silvernale
Marleen Canfield
Lowell Ueland
Art Abel
Teresa Hoepner
Herman Hannemann
Roger Hibma
Lowell Broberg
Darlene Kotelnicki
Al Clouse
Bill Watson
Jim Schueller
Ramona Berg -Perry
Mary Huesing
Jeanette Buchanan
Eric Weiberg
Absent:
Jack Johnson*
Harlan Madsen*
Diane Beck*
Barb Borth*
Grant Knutson
Amy Wilde*
John Baker*
Pete Schefller
James Karels*
*Excused absence
Big Stone County
Chippewa County
Chippewa County
Kandiyohi County
Lac qui Parle County
McLeod County
Meeker County
Renville County
Yellow Medicine County
Appleton
Benson
Bird Island
Dawson
Fairfax
Glencoe
Graceville
Granite Falls
Hutchinson
Hutchinson
Kerkhoven
Litchfield
Olivia
Ortonville
Renville
Willmar
Willmar
Willmar
Willmar
Chippewa County
Kandiyohi County
Kandiyohi County
Kandiyohi County
McLeod County
Meeker County
Swift County
Yellow Medicine County
Madison
q(c�a
0
0
Jun-01
0
2001 PLS BOARD ATTENDANCE
01 -Jan 01 -Feb
01 -Mar
01 -Apr
01 -May
Maas
E
P
P
A
E
p
Grussing
p
E
A
E
p
p
J. Johnson
E
P
P
A
p
E
Dahl
E
p
A
A
E
p
Madsen
p
p
P
p
P
E
deCathelineau
p
p
E
p
p
p
Beck
P
P
E
E
E
E
Borth
P
E
P
E
P
E
Vonderharr
E
p
p
p
p
p
Schuette
p
p
p
p
p
p
Knutson
E
A
A
A
P
A
Wilde
E
P
p
P
P
E
Schweiss
A
P
P
P
P
P
Baker
P
p
p
A
P
E
ScheHler
E
P
p
A
p
A
G. Johnson
p
p
p
P
P
P
Rotunda
p
P
p
P
P
P
Rolland
p
P
P
A
P
P
Fleegel
P
E
P
A
p
p
Silvemale
E
E
p
A
p
p
Canfield
E
P
P
P
P
P
Ueland
P
P
E
P
E
p
Abel
P
P
P
P
P
P
Hoepner
E
P
P
A
E
p
Broberg
p
E
P
P
E
P
Kotelnicki
P
P
P
A
A
P
Karels
E
P
A
E
P
E
Watson
P
E
P
P
E
p
Schueller
p
A
P
p
P
P
Berg -Perry
p
P
E
E
p
P
Huesing
P
E
P
A
P
P
Buchanan
E
P
E
P
P
P
Weiberg
P
A
p
P
p
P
Reckdahl
P
p
p
p
L
Hibma
E
P
P
P
i
Hannemann
P
P
P
P
P = Present
E =
Excused absence
A =
Absent
Jun-01
0
HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES
The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on June 25, 2001, at the Hutchinson
EOC. Present at the meeting were Rick Nass, Bob Bowen, Donna Baysinger, and Chief
Steve Madson. The meeting was called to order.
The only agenda item presented was the approval of the sergeant's promotional list. Two
officers participated in the selection process with the following being certified:
Chris Dobratz
Greg Nadeau
•
•
A motion was made by Rick Nass, seconded by Donna Baysinger to approve the
sergeant's promotional list. Motion carried.
With there being no further business to discuss it was moved and seconded to adjourn the
meeting. Motion carried.
Time of adjournment was 9:30 a.m.
Donna Baysinger
y ta�3
11
HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES
The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on March 27, 2001, at the Hutchinson
Police Department. Present at the meeting were Rick Nass, Bob Bowen, Donna
Baysinger, and Chief Steve Madson. The meeting was called to order.
Chief Madson informed the commission that with the open recruiting the department was
able to put two individuals through the selection process for the communication specialist
position. Joy Wiemiller passed both the interview and written parts. She also has gone
through the background, psychological and medical exam. Patricia MacVeigh did not
achieve a 70% weighted score on the interview and written portion and therefore did not
make the eligibility roster. A motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Donna
Baysinger to hire Joy Wiemiller. Motion carried. With the hiring of Ms. Wiemiller the
department is at full strength for the communication specialist position.
Chief Madson stated that with the departure of Officer Troy Pass the sergeant promotional
roster has been depleted. He explained that in order to promote there must be a list of
individuals that have gone through the promotional examination process which includes
a written test and an interview that is conducted using chiefs and / or lieutenants from other
law enforcement agencies. The minimum requirement for sergeant is two years law
enforcement experience. The position will be posted intemally and published in the
Hutchinson Leader. A motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Rick Nass to move
forward with the promotional examination. Motion carried.
With there being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Donna Baysinger,
seconded by Rick Nass, to adjourn. Motion carried.
Time of adjournment was 8:05 a.m.
sx
Donna Baysinger
y L &�q
�J
•
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING — July 17, 2001
Hospital — Conference A/B — 5:30 PM
Present Chairperson, Bob Peterson; Vice Chairperson, Steven Snapp; Secretary; Wayne
Fortun; Duane Hoversten, Trustee; Pastor Randy Chrissis, Trustee; Paulette Slanga,
Trustee;
Absent: Dr. Jim Allen, Chief of Staff/Trustee —
Others Present Phil Graves, President; Linda Krentz, Bums Manor Nursing Home
Administrator; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support Services Division Director;
Pam Larson, Finance, Information and Material Services Division Director; Dr. Steven
Mulder, Emergency Medical Services Director; Doug Hanneman, Editor Hutchinson
Leader; David Schwebel, Plaza 15 Mall Property Manager; Rickie Ressler, Division Vice
President Regional Health Services; and Corrinne Schlueter, Recorder.
Chairperson Bob Peterson called the meeting to order at 5:35 PM.
David Schwebel was present at the meeting to provide a presentation on the operating
and capital budget for Plaza 15. Schwebel stated that this is an eight -month budget that
will coincide with the calendar year. The four major projects that Schwebel listed in the
capital budget are for Roof repairs, Parking Lot repair, Sidewalk repair, and Lighting
repair and upgrade.
• Following discussion; Slanga made a motion, seconded by Fortun, to approve
the mall budget as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried.
1. Minutes of Past Meetings The minutes of the June 19, 2001, were presented and
discussed.
• Following discussion; Snapp made a motion, seconded by Chrissis, to
approve the minutes of the June 19, 2001, meeting. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
H. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes and Credentialing Dr. Mulder reported on the
activities of the Medical Staff, including the credentialing process.
Credentialing recommendations were made for the following practitioners:
n
U
Provisional to Courtesy:
Kristin Mascotti, MD Pathology
Randolph Peterson, MD Pathology
Provisional to Allied Health - Indenendent
Mary Hall, MS, LP Mental Health
Judy Megard, MS, LADC Mental Health
Courtesy
Courtesy
Allied Health Independent
Allied Health Independent
glc)S
Board of Directors Meeting — 7/17/
• Page two
Russell Morfitt, PhD., LP
Betty Rehmann, LADC
Jane Sears, MA, RN, CS
Linda Waldstein, MS, LP
Scott Wichtermann, PsyD, LP
ReaDDOlntment
2001
Mental Health
Mental Health
Mental Health
Mental Health
Mental Health
Allied Health Independent
Allied Health Independent
Allied Health Independent
Allied Health Independent
Allied Health Independent
Elizabeth Corbid, RNP Nurse Practitioner Allied Health Independent
Linda Kelly, CRNA
Anesthesia
Allied Health Independent
Barbara Strandel, CRNA
Anesthesia
Allied Health Independent
David R. Olson, MD
Orthopedics
Courtesy
John Robinson, MD
Emergency
Courtesy
Crystal Schlosser, MD
Surgery
Active
Resi agn tion:
Betsy Ellingson, CRNA
Anesthesia
Allied Health Independent
Jennifer Ray, MD
Family Practice
Courtesy
Action needed.
• • Following discussion; Fortun made a motion, seconded by Hoversten,
to grant membership and privilege to the above listed practitioners, as
recommended by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
III. Old Business.
A. Capital Campaign Graves provided a report regarding the facility
remodeling and expansion planning process. It was his recommendation to
table the Capital Campaign proposal that was discussed at the June meeting
until such time that the 5 -year financial plan and facilities plan, to include
Bums Manor, was complete.
Following discussion; Hoversten made a motion, seconded by Fortun,
to table consideration of hiring Jackson and Associates for a Capital
fund raising campaign until such time that the facilities expansion and
remodeling project is approved. Six were in favor. Snapp abstained.
Motion carried.
B. Compliance Policies. Larson reported HAHC is developing compliance
policies to be a complete statement of the responsibilities and obligations of
•
L4 16-)
• Board of Directors Meeting — 7/17/2001
Page three
all employees regarding submissions for reimbursement to government payers for
services rendered by HAHC and any of its contractors. Larson explained in detail
the two new policies on Organizational Compliance and Sanctioned Providers.
HAW has an established process to prevent the inappropriate submission of
reimbursement claims to Federal health care programs for the services of parties
who are excluded from participation in the Federal programs.
• Following discussion; Snapp made a motion, seconded by Fortun to
adopt as presented, the "Organizational Compliance Policy" and the
policy on "Individuals and Entities Excluded from Participation in
Healthcare Programs ". All were in favor. Motion carried.
IV. New Business.
A. Hospice House. Graves reported that Linda Remucal had provided a
presentation to the Connect Care Board of Directors regarding the
construction of a Hospice House in Hutchinson. The purpose of the
residence would be for the hospice patient to spend the last days with their
family in a home like atmosphere. The goal would be to house five clients
in order to adequately staff and operate. The Connect Care Board will be
• considering this project in the future.
B. Strategic Planning Proposal. Graves presented a proposal from John
Mitchell, of Health Care Futures L. P., to assist with planning for the
Board Retreat. Mitchell will do an analysis and present information that
would be designed to spotlight the key analyses, to summarize key
conclusions and hypotheses about what is occurring and will occur in the
market and to develop planning assumptions for the next two years.
Following discussion; Fortran made a motion, seconded by Slanga, to
hire John Mitchell to assist with planning for the Board Retreat. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
C. 2 "d Quarter Strategic Plan Update The Second Quarter Strategic Plan
was presented by Graves and the Division Directors.
• Following discussion, motion was made by Slanga, seconded by
Snapp, to approve the 2 "d Quarter Strategic Plan Update as presented.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
D. 3rd Party Contract Negotiation Strategy. A report was provided on the
progress of current contract negotiations with Blue Cross and Medica.
Graves made a request of the Board to hire the firm of Health Care Futures
•
L.P. to provide assistance with the process so that HAHC can achieve a
q caps
Board of Directors Meeting — 7/17/2001
• Page four
fair increase from the payers. The assistance this firm will provide is negotiating
expertise and access to certain data that could advantage HAHC in the process.
Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Hoversten,
to hire Health Care Futures L.P. to assist with negotiations with third
party payers. All were in favor. Motion carried.
IV. Organizational Reports.
• President - Nothing further to report.
• Acute Care Programs and Services — Nothing further to report.
Care and Program Support — Nothing further to report.
Community Care Programs and Services — Nothing further to report.
• Finance, Information, and Material Services — Larson reported the
Business Office is scheduled to move to Plaza 15 on July 27
• Resident Care Report - Krentz reported the State of Minnesota came
• back for a drop -in survey and everything was corrected.
Quality Committee Report. Schermann reported that Renee Schmitz, Quality
Consultant, attended the quality committee meeting and presented an overview of bow
we are addressing changes in our Quality Improvement process. Scbermann also
provided an update on the Patient Safety Near Miss initiative.
Allina Management Report Ressler provided an update on the current activities within
Allina. She discussed the investigation by the Minnesota Attorney General, the
subsequent decisions of the Allina Board as a result of the investigation, and the changes
that Allina will undertake as it goes forward. She reported that Gordon Sprenger would
remain as the Chief Executive Officer for the hospitals and clinics organization. He was
scheduled to retire this July, but agreed to stay on with the hospitals and clinics until the
transition is completed. Mary Dehne will continue as the lead executive for the Allina
hospitals.
Accounts Payable The accounts payable and cash disbursements were presented for
payment.
Following discussion, Slanga made a motion, seconded by Snapp, to
approve the accounts payable and cash disbursements as listed in the
•
�(4�j
• Board of Directors Meeting — 7/17/2001
Page five
amount of $1,299,989.97. Five were in favor. Hoversten abstained.
Motion carried.
•
u
Statistical Report. Graves presented the statistics for the month of June 2001. Of
special mention, were the ambulance runs for the month of June. The actual was 135
versus budget of 111.
Financial Report Larson provided the financial report for the month of June 2001,
which showed a net income of $111,367 compared to a budget of $178,088.
Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes The Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes were
presented. No unusual comments were made.
Motion by Fortun, seconded by Slanga to adjourn the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Corrine Schlueter
Recorder
Wayne Fortun
Secretary
y ta) 5
•
11
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
Comparative Balance Sheet
As of July 31, 2001
ASSETS
Current Assets
1 Cash and investments - Operations
2 Cash and investments - Self- Insured
3 Subtotal cash 8 Investments
4 PatlenIbResident receivables
5 Allowances for bad debts
6 Advances and contractual allowances
7 Net patient/resident and third -party
8 payor recelvabfes
9
10 Other receivables - net
11 Inventories
12 Prepaid expenses
(A) (B) (A) - (B)
JULY JUNE JULY Change
2001 2001 2000 CY vs PY
$4,569,308 $4,176,428 $4,637,361 (68,053)
164,369 131,835 574.117 (409,748)
$4,733,677 $4,308,263 $5,211,478 (477,801)
15093 089 15,052,624 13,939,741 1,153,348
(3,180,768) (2,979,803) (3,005,694) (175,074)
(4 987 392) (5,163,705) (2 761 092) (2,226300)
$6,924,929 $8,909,116 $8,172,955 (1,248,026)
49,792 70,256 299,586 (249,794)
589,905 583,621 645,784 (55,879)
115,479 137,925 126.684 (11.205)
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Current Liabilities
Current maturities of
Long term debt
Accounts payable - trade
Estimated wntractual
settlements -net
Accrued expensas -
Salades
PTO
Interest
Self- Insured programs
Other
Deferred liabilities
Deferred revenue
13 Total Current Asses
$12,413,782
$12,009,181
$14456487
(2042705)
Total Current Liabilities
14 Board Designated/Funded Deo aviation
Investments $6,567,504
$6.555,598
$6,028.834
538,670
50,975
446,687
399,687
15 Investment in Joint Ventures
$6g,885
$69,885
$89.454
(19,569)
(1,603)
111,084
Plant Assets
83,672
27,412
(5,322)
0
(5.167)
16 Land
$165,696
$165,696
$165,696
(0)
17 Buildings
26,943,532
26,936,567
23,446,315
3,497,217
18 Accumulated depreciation
(9,89B,458)
(9,821,371)
(8,960,733)
(937.725)
Long -tens Debt (less current
19 Buildings less depredation
$17,045,074
$17,115,196
$14,485,582
2,559,492
matuffW
20 Equipment
13,503,518
13,415,475
12,724,297
779,221
21 Accumulated depreciation
(9,818,750)
(9,744,526)
(8,939,929)
(878821)
22 Equipment less depreciation
$3,684,768
$3,670,949
$3,784,368
(99,600)
23 Cash -c truclion 8, equipment
0
0
0
0
24 Construction in progress
90,283
48,371
59.337
30946
25 Total Plant Assets
$20,985,821
$21,000.212
$18,494,983
2,490,838
Fund balanca
Other Assets
26 Deferred financing costs
$92,018
$92882
$103079
(11061)
27 Total Funds
$40.129,010
$39,727,758
$39,172,837
9 56 173
Total Funds
("- Finstmnt
Pam Larson
6
(A)
JULY
JUNE
$688,311 $689,991
1,519,524 1,419,555
• 8/16/01
4,07 PM
Final
(8) (A) -(B)
JULY Change
2000 CY vs PY
$496,821 191,490
1,988848 (469,324)
916,631 972.670 921,153 (4,522)
931,212
759,818
793,598
137,614
7,123,177
1,170,045
1,043.057
80.120
152,316
294,522
101,341
50,975
446,687
399,687
512,402
(65,715)
97,089
97,520
98,692
(1,603)
111,084
106,761
83,672
27,412
(5,322)
0
(5.167)
(155)
$5,980,709 $5.850,599 $6 034 417 (53.708)
$14,039,452 $14,033,748 $14,655,495 (616,043)
$20,108,849 $19,843411 $18,482,925 1,625,924
340,129,010 339,727,758 $39,172,637 956,173
• 8/16/01
• 4'07 PM
Final
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Month and Period Ended July 31, 2001
L
r+ Fnsimnl
Pam Larson
V
CURRENTMONTH
YEAR -TO -DATE
YEAR -TO -DATE
Over (Under)
Budget
Over (Under) Budget
-
VARIANCE %
Revenue
Actual
Budget
Dollars
Percent
Actual
Budget
Dollars
Percent
July 2000
2001 vs 2000
1
In patient revenue
$2,020,516
$2,094,320
($73,804)
-3.5%
$15,150,711
515248,517
($97806)
-0.6%
$12,526,030
210%
2
Out patient revenue
2,857,237
2,793,270
63,967
2.3%
19,098,127
19,903,511
(805,384)
-4.0%
16,560,361
14.6%
3
Resident Revenue
457
480
(22,635)
-4 7%
3.263,a47
3238,619
25 228
0 8 %
3,242,619
0.7%
4
Total patienVresident revenue
$5,335,558
$5,368,030
($32,472)
-0.6%
$37,512685
$38,390,647
($877962)
-2.3%
$32429,010
157%
I un
5
Governmental B Policy Discount
2,214,718
2,189,164
25,554
12%
15,536,323
15,728,384
(192,061)
-12%
12,631,886
230%
6
Free Care
3,319
- 32,218,037
6,667
(3,348)
-502%
3,319
45.667
(43,348)
-92 9%
5,568
-40.4%
7
Total deduction from revenue
_
$2.195,831
$22 206
10%
$15,539,642
$15.775,051
i$235.409) -
-94.1%
$12,637,454
23.0%
8
Net patient/resident revenue
$3,117,521
$3,172,199
($54,678)
-1.7%
$21,973,043
$22,615596
($642,553)
-2.6%
$19,791556
110%
9
Other Operating revenues
19,497
- $3,137,018
18,649
848
4.5%
162,367
130.573
31,794
24.3%
166,264
-2.3%
10
Net operating revenue
$3 100,a48
($53,830)
-1,7%
_
$22,135,410
$22.746,169
($610,759)
.2.7%
$19,957,820
109%
Expenses
11
Salaries
$1,448,009
$1,377,533
$70,476
5.1%
$9,832,615
$9,819,748
$12867
0.1%
$8984,339
94%
12
Employee Benefits
345,765
351,520
(5,755)
-1.6%
2,507,424
2,482,572
24,852
1.0%
2,085,641
20.2%
13
Professional and Medical Fees
314,746
334,221
(19,475)
-58%
2,327,600
2302,598
25,004
1.1%
1,956,973
18.8%
14
Utilities, Mlnca Contracts B Repairs
121,198
151,418
(30220)
-20.0%
1,035,636
1,181,889
(146253)
-12,4%
968,642
6.9%
15
Food Drugs 8 Supplies
402,403
425,656
(23,253)
-5.5%
2,948,922
3,027,924
(79,002)
-2.6%
2,734,116
79%
16
Other expense
84,248
105,698
(21,450)
-20.3%
624,583
739,744
(115,161)
-15.6%
605,821
3.1%
17
Minnesota Care
28,321
27,322
999
3.7%
190,100
191,248
(1,148)
-0.6%
155,733
22,1%
18
Bad debt
57,563
54,507
3.056
5.6%
487,711
388,141
99,570
25.7%
313,737
55.5%
19
Interest
40,245
38,161
2,064
5.5%
283,975
269.026
14,949
5B%
281,306
09%
20
Depreciation
153,040
149,799
3,241
22%
1 073 377
1,079.335
(5 958)
-0.6%
1,081470
-0 7%
21
Total expenses
$2,985,538
$3,015835
($20297)
-0.7%
$21,311,943
$21,482,223
($170280)
-0.8%
$10169.778
11.2%
Excess of net operating revenue
-
22
over (under) operating expenses
$141,480
$175,013
($33,5331
-19.2%
$823,467
$1,263,946
($440 479)
34.8%
$788,042
4.5%
NonoegmUng Revenues
23
Investment Income
$41,593
$32,132
$9,461
29.4%
$341,744
$224,927
$116,817
51.9%
$293,456
16.5%
24
Other nonoperalirlg revenue (net)
(7,016)
(8587)
1.571
.18.3%
(49,708)
(61,850)
12,142
-19.6%
66,820
- 174.4%
25
Total nonoperating revenue
$34,577
$23,545
$11032
46.9%
$292,036
$163,077
$128959
79.1%
$360,276
-18.9%
26
Net Income -
$178,057
$
($22,5
-11.3%
$1,115,503
$1,427,023
(3311,520)
-21.8%
$1,148,318
-2.9%
27
Patienldays
838
792
46
5.8%
6,247
5,920
327
5.5%
5,528
13.0%
28
Resident days
3,453
3,641
(188)
-5.2%
24,460
25,089
(628)
-2.5%
24,477
-0.1%
29
Percent occupancy - budget beds - Hospital
45.1%
42.6%
2.5%
5.8%
49,1%
46.5%
2.6%
5.5%
43.3%
13.5%
30
Percent occupancy- budget beds - Nursing Home
80.6%
95.5%
-4.9%
-5.2%
93,8%
962%
-2.4%
-2.5%
93,4%
04%
31
FTE's
424.1
415.6
8,5
2.0%
416,8
415.6
1.2
0.3%
403.1
3.4%
32
Admissions (adjusted) - Hospital only
549
489
60
12.3%
3,755
3,700
54
1.5%
3 376
11.2%
33
Expenses (net) per admisslon (adjusted) - Hospital only
4.452
5,045
(593)
-11.8%
4,657
4,777
(120)
-2.5%
4,636
0.5%
34
Revenue per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only
8,823
9,928
(1,102)
-11.1%
9,067
9,436
(369)
-3.9%
8,579
5.7%
35
Net Revenue per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only
4,801
5,473
(672)
-12.3%
4,932
5,208
(276)
-5.3%
4,922
0.2%
36
Discounts as a percent of revenues
41.6%
40.9%
0.7%
1.6%
41.4%
41.1%
0.3%
0.8%
39.0%
6,3%
37
FTE's per 100 admissions (adjusted) - Hospital only
4.6
5,1
-0,5
-10.3%
4.6
47
-0.1
-22%
4S
-63%
38
Days in Net Accounts Receivable
69,5
65.0
4.5
69%
89B
-22.6%
39
Case Mix - Home only
2.69
2.58
0.11
4,3%
2,64
2.56
0.06
2.3%
2.69
-1.9%
40
Nursing Hours/ Standardized Day - Home Only
1.19
1.14
0.05
4.5%
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.3%
1,16
0.0%
L
r+ Fnsimnl
Pam Larson
V
9
0
0
2001
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
2001
JULY
2000
2001
2001
2001
2001
JULY
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL
JULY
JULY
MONTHLY OVER (UNDER)
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MONTH
MONTH
BUDGET
BUDGET
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
1,287,90429
0.00
0.00
1,257,959.20
2,502,814.00
1,244,854.80
50.26%
LICENSES
150.00
180.81
0.00
0.00
22,425.81
34,600.00
12,174.19
64.81%
PERMITS AND FEES
36 ,686.67
22,224.27
0.00
0.00
151,139.06
245,700.00
94,560.94
61.51%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1,073,711.25
1,135,375.47
0.00
0.00
1,197,580.64
2,587,814.00
1,390,233.36
46.28%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
69,215.72
67,734.69
0.00
0.00
502,194.15
1,238,080.00
735,885.85
40.56%
FINES & FORFEITS
4,934.58
12,113.44
0.00
0.00
30,819.55
60,000.00
29,180.45
51.37%
INTEREST
3,577.80
4,368.67
0.00
0.00
57,913.94
60,000.00
2,086.06
96.52%
REIMBURSEMENTS
2,873.86
41,939.62
0.00
0.00
46,675.97
129,175.00
82,499.03
36.13%
TRANSFERS
2,921.55
201,853.00
0.00
0.00
413,433.23
1,442,700.00
1,029,266.77
28.66%
SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
1,753.40
669.45
0.00
0.00
668.09
1,000.00
311.91
68.81%
IN
r
Lr
TOTAL
1,195,824.83 2,774,363.71 0.00 0.00 3,680,829.64 8,301,863.00 4,621,053.36 44.34%
0
0
0
2001
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
2001
JULY
2000
2001
2001
2001
2001
JULY
EXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL
JULY
JULY
MONTHLY OVER (UNDER)
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MONTH
MONTH
BUDGET
BUDGET
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
001 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
2,837.50
7,640.66
0.00
0.00
29,207.39
60,079.00
30,871.61
48.61%
002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR
16,265.13
25,817.01
0.00
0.00
121,938.47
216,077.00
94,138.53
56.43%
003 ELECTIONS
37.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
(4.26)
7,416.00
7,420.26
-0.06%
OO4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT
22,271.70
55,825.21
0.00
0.00
225,301.08
359,991.00
134,689.92
62.59%
005 MOTOR VECHICLE
10,536.32
23,965.25
0.00
0.00
115,369.80
192,170.00
76,800.20
60.04%
006 ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
36,000.00
36,000.00
0.00%
007 LEGAL
9,214.71
8,189.18
0.00
0.00
56,035.81
107,810.00
51,774,19
51.98%
008 PLANNING
11,912.25
24,422.78
0.00
0.00
87,022.79
151,060.00
64,037.21
57.61%
009 INFORMATION SERVICES
4,646.09
9,561.29
0.00
0.00
46,023.77
91,775.00
45,751.23
50.15%
110 POLICE DEPARTMENT
138,374.20
228,187.90
0.00
0.00
1,218,198.47
1,965,973.45
747,774.98
61.96%
111 SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
3,203.85
2,288.90
O.GO
0.00
37,157.03
119,273.00
82,115.97
31.15%
115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
109.82
3,701.65
0.00
0.00
4,415.23
4,750.00
33477
92.95%
116 SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.00%
120 FIRE DEPARTMENT
39,067.91
23,661.37
0.00
0.00
124,759.59
343,948.00
219,188.41
36.27%
130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
9,851.23
14,048.88
0.00
0.00
75,408.17
178,399.00
102,990.83
42.27%
150 ENGINEERING
33,662.95
57,922.65
0.00
0.00
257,347.22
401,578.00
144,230.78
64.08%
152 STREETS & ALLEYS
57,248.79
80,716.00
0.00
0.00
450,363.41
745,793.00
295,429.59
60.39%
153 MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT
9,334.73
9,409.15
0.00
0.00
127,488.12
281,13100
153,644.88
45.35%
160 CITY HALL BUILDING
10,419.18
18,473.11
0.00
0.00
92,741.57
122,051.00
29,309.43
75.99%
201 PARWRECREATION ADMINISTRAT
10,740.27
17,58636
0.00
0.00
108,515.93
174,549.00
66,033.07
62.17%
202 RECREATION
35,419.60
54,798.79
0.00
0.00
144,055.86
216,409.00
72,353.14
66,57%
203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
5,652.21
10,882.23
0.00
0.00
53,447.80
109,192.00
55,744.20
48.95%
204 CIVIC ARENA
13,626.71
22,664.78
0.00
0.00
167,123.62
246,587.00
79,463.38
6777%
205 PARK DEPARTMENT
70,397.33
106,368.13
0.00
0.00
461, 474.23
770,252.00
308,777.77
59.91%
206 RECREATION BUILDING & POOL
13,079.16
12,595.66
0.00
0.00
68,032.25
103,982.00
35,949.75
65.43%
207 EVENTS CENTER
0.00
11,521.00
0.00
0.00
12,543.22
37,770.00
25,226.78
33.21%
250 LIBRARY
23,376.21
3,732.70
0.00
0.00
85,435.09
123,170.00
37,734.91
69.36%
301 CEMETERY
22,961.79
19,035.08
0.00
0.00
108,831.90
100,895.00
(7,936.90)
107.87%
310 DEBT SERVICE
0.00
25,186.15
0.00
O.DO
25,186.15
27,871.00
2,684.85
90.37%
321 TRANSIT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(62,388.60)
0.00%
320 AIRPORT
4,024.43
18,055.29
0.00
0.00
62,388.60
98,669.00
#REFI
#REFI
350 UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPENS
64,740.39
171,309.71
0.00
0.00
304 ,237.05
907,011.00
602,773.95
33.54%
TOTAL
643,212.16
1,057,566.87
0.00
0.00
4,670,045.36
8,301,883.45
3,631,838.09
56.25%
L
r--
u
i
173,894.49
0.00-
•
773,636.42
1,344,429.00
570,792.58
57.54
•
271,88830
654,523.17
1,087,141.93
1,459,938.49
2,612,593.45
4,775,703.32
55.88%
100,246.47
148,047.80
2001
0.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
1,428,504.00
593,305.25
58.47%
199,277.71
JULY
2000
2001
1,015,192.91
1,658,741.00
2001
61.20%
68,764.82
237,318.93
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL
JULY
JULY
MONTHLY OVER (UNDER)
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE PERCENTAGE
1,067,566.87
MONTH
MONTH
BUDGET
BUDGET
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
1,287,904.29
0.00
0.00
1,257,959.20
2,502,814.00
1,244,854.80
50.26%
LICENSES
150.00
180.81
0.00
0.00
22,425.81
34,600.00
12,174.19
64.81%
PERMITS AND FEES
36,686.67
22,224.27
0.00
0.00
151,139.06
245,700.00
94,560.94
61.51%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1,073,711.25
1,135,375.47
0.00
0.00
1,197,580.64
2,587,814.00
1,390,233.36
46.28%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
69,215.72
67,734.69
0.00
0.00
502,194.15
1,238,080.00
735,885.85
40.56%
FINES & FORFEITS
4,934.58
12,113.44
0.00
0.00
30,819.55
60,000.00
29,180.45
51.37%
INTEREST
3,577.80
4,368.67
0.00
0.00
57,913.94
60,000.00
2,086.06
96.52%
REIMBURSEMENTS
2,873.86
41,939.62
0.00
0.00
46,675.97
129,175.00
82,499.03
36.13%
TRANSFERS
2,921.55
201,853.00
0.00
0.00
413,433.23
1,442,700.00
1,029,266.77
28.66%
SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
1,753.40
669.45
0.00
0.00
688.09
1,000.00
311.91
68.81%
TOTAL
1,195,824.83
2,774,363.71
0.00
0.00
3,680,829.64
8,301,883.00
4,621,053.36
44.34%
l✓
General Govt.
Public Safety
Streets & Alleys
Parks & Recreation
Miscellaneous
88,340.58
173,894.49
0.00-
0.00
773,636.42
1,344,429.00
570,792.58
57.54
190,607.01
271,88830
0.00
0.00
1,459,938.49
2,612,593.45
1,152,654.96
55.88%
100,246.47
148,047.80
0.00
0.00
835,198.75
1,428,504.00
593,305.25
58.47%
199,277.71
236,416.95
0.00
0.00
1,015,192.91
1,658,741.00
643,548.09
61.20%
68,764.82
237,318.93
0.00
0.00
586,078.79
1,257,616.00
#REF!
46.60%
TOTAL 647,236.59
1,067,566.87
0.00
0.00
4,670,045.36
8,301,883.45
#REFI
56.25%
23- Aug-01
•
Institution
Description
Interest
Rate
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
7/31/01
Date Data
Of Of
Purchase Maturity
Amount
US BANK
FHLB
5.52%
3/1/01
9/9/04
370,000.00
Smith Bamey
FHLB
6.50%
03 23 99
03 23 06
200,000.00
Smith Barney
313400 S H 7
7.17%
04/03100
04/03/03
300,071.92
Smith Barney
FHLB
6.500%
01 0799
01 0709
750,000.00
Smith Barney
FHLB 3133m2 -u3
6.245%
02 23 99
02 23 09
300,000.00
Prudential
pool 336914
7.226%
1231 96
0201 2026
64,586.73
Expected life 6.2 years
Smith Barney
FNMA
6.100%
012098
012005
300,000.00
Prudentail
pod 336399
7.270%
123196
02012026
83,150.83
Expected life 4.1 years
Prudential
Fed Home Leon
6.00%
01/28/99
01 2809
200,000.00
Smith Barney
FNMA
6.13%
03 /10/99
03/10/06
500,000.00
Smith Barney
FNMA pass thru
7.50%
12/20/95
06/01/02
42,635.35
Prudential
Fed Home Loan
6.00%
10/26/01
10/26/01
399,625.00
Prudential
FHL
5.79%
11 1898
11 18 05
199,750.00
Call 2/18/99 and therafter
Marquette
5.60%
02 15 01
021402
200,000.00
Smith Bamey
Money Market
3.65%
6725/01
11/15/01
767,029.12
First Federal
6379
4.600%
7/31/01
7/31/02
200,000.00
Prudential
FHLM
6.027%
020101
08 09 06
200,000.00
Marquette
1231'305
4.680%
5/31101
5131102
400,000.00
First Federal
7.000%
09 14 00
09 17 01
1,000,000.00
Marquette
1231 '297
6.260%
03 01 00
01 30 02
1,000,000.00
First Federal
5.150%
7/12/01
7/25/02
700,000.00
Marquette
4.950%
5/10/01
12/31/01
700,000.00
Marquette
6.850%
11 1700
11 2901
400,000.00
$9,276,848.95
•
Ht6�g
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, July 17, 2001
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Jason
Olson, Brandon Fraser, Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson, Dean Kirchoff, and Jeff Jones. Also present: Julie
Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning /Building /Zoning; Heather Bieniek, Planning Coordinator, and Dick
Schieffer, City Attorney.
2. CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Haugen moved to approve the minutes for the June 19, 2001 meeting as submitted. Ms. Otteson
seconded the motion. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
a.) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP PARKLAND (PLAYGROUND,
VOLLEYBALL COURT, BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL) IN AN AREA THAT IS CURRENTLY
UNDEVELOPED, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. PARKS DEPARTMENT, LOCATED
IN THE AREA OF ONTARIO ST. AND 2 AND 3 AVE.
Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:31 p.m. as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday
July 5, 2001.
Ms. Wischnack presented the request and stated that the Parks Department received a grant to regrade
and create additional park amenities for this location. She also stated the once proposed BMX track
is no longer moving forward. The reason why the applicant has to go through conditional use process
• is because of the alteration of the floodplain.
Mr. Olsen asked when the grant expires. Ms. Wischnack replied that she was unsure of the exact date
but probably in a year or two.
Mr. Arndt asked if the bike and pedestrian trail was going to be bituminous. Ms. Wischnack replied that
it was going to be. Mr. Arndt also asked if the parking along the fence was going to be eliminated. Ms.
Wischnack replied that it was going to be and there is a new proposed parking area.
Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. The motion to close
the hearing carried unanimously.
Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. Silt fencing must be installed to properly protect the area from erosion
2. The Parks Department shall provide a time line for construction, when available
Ms. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously.
b.) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 6' TO 3' AND
THE REQUIRED DRIVEWAY SETBACK FROM 5' TO 2' AS REQUESTED BY JASON RUPRECHT, 575
HASSAN ST. SE.
Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:35 p.m. as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
July 5'", 2001.
Ms. Bieniek presented the request and stated that staff recommended approval of the variance because
• of the hardship of the unique shape of the lot, location of the home, and the fact that the code requires
garage space for residential units.
Mr. Arndt asked if the curb was already cut for the driveway. Jason Ruprecht, applicant, stated that
it was.
y(0.��
Minutes
Planning Commission — July 17, 2001
Page 2
Mr. Haugen moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to close the
• hearing carried unanimously.
Mr. Haugen moved to approve the variance with the following conditions:
1.) Any relocation of utility lines are at the owners expense.
2.) The plans must follow the submitted site drawings, dated June 20, 2001.
3.) Building can not be more than 1,000 square feet.
4.) Building can not be used for commercial purposes.
5.) Building can not be pole constructed.
6.) Building may not exceed 16 feet in height (median).
Ms. Otteson seconded the motion. Motion to approve the conditional use permit carried unanimously.
c.) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PLACE A 6' PRIVACY FENCE IN THE
FRONT YARD 2' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AS REQUESTED BY MURIEL FELSKA, 103 ELKS. DR.
Chairman Amdt opened the hearing at 5:45 p.m. as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
July 5'", 2001.
Ms. Bieniek presented the request and stated that the Planning Commission has seen similar requests
like the proposed over the past couple months. The reason why staff recommended approval to have
the fence 2 feet from the property line is because the fence would be starting 68 feet from the front
property line.
Mr. Jones asked about the 25 feet code requirements for front property lines
Muriel Felska, property owner, stated that the fence would only be 24 feet long, along the north property
line. The fence will be white vinyl and the reason why he wants the fence is to shield traffic. He said
• that he tried to grow a hedge but that did not work, they just want to enjoy their backyard without the
traffic.
Ms. Otteson moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion to close
the hearing carried unanimously.
Mr. Fraser made the motion to approve the conditional use permit with staff recommendations. Mr.
Kirchoff seconded the motion.
Travis Nelson, 92 Century Ave., asked when people in the audience got a chance to speak. Mr. Arndt
apologized and stated he could come to the microphone.
Mr. Nelson stated that his biggest objection to the fence is that it blocks his view to the park from his
deck on the second story. The closer it is to the road the less he is able to see. Ms. Otteson asked how
far the park is from his deck. Mr. Nelson replied that he was unsure but probably about 200'.
Mr. Schieffer explained the conditional use process and the variance process. He also explained the
procedure for reconsideration of a motion.
Mr. Kirchoff made the motion to reconsider the motion of approving the conditional use permit. Ms.
Otteson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Jones asked Mr. Nelson how this fence would block his view. Mr. Nelson replied that in his opinion
it would block his view.
Mr. Fraser made the motion to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
• 1.) The fence has to be setback 68' from the southern property line (Elks Drive)
2.) If for any reason utilities need to be installed or altered on the property and the fence would have to
be taken down it would be at the owner's expense.
3.) The fence would be installed no higher than 6 feet.
4.) Finished side of the fence must face the exterior lot lines.
Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously.
y1a) 9
Minutes
Planning Commission — July 17, 2001
Page 3
• d.) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO RELOCATE GARY'S GARAGE TO
MCCLURES BUILDING WHICH IS ZONED 1 -1, LOCATED AT 945 5'" AVE SE, AS REQUESTED BY DICK
MCCLURE.
Chairman Arndt opened the hearings at 6:13 p.m. as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
July 5', 2001.
Mr. Kirchoff stated he would be abstaining from this request.
Ms. Wischnack explained the request and stated that one of the main concerns staff had was the
amount of outdoor storage there may be considering the current lot has an excessive amount of outdoor
storage. She also stated that one of the conditions she would like added would be to have the fence up
at the time Gary's garage would be occupying the building.
Mr. Jones asked if anywhere in the code it talks about the differences between auto repair businesses
and body shops. Ms. Wischnack replied that it does not but staff has classified it as the same type of
business because of the end result is the same.
Ms. Otteson asked what "opaque" meant. Ms. Wischnack replied that it was not see through, usually
a wood type of fence.
Gary Sauber, owner of Gary's Garage, stated that he does do some body work but no painting. He also
stated that he is gone for 4 months of the year over winter and he also does not want outdoor storage.
Mr. Sauber stated that he has 4 other buildings around the state that he does this type of work in and
he personally owns over 90 vehicles. Mr. Arndt asked if he had any other employees? Mr. Sauber
replied that he did not.
. Mr. Olson asked if the reason why he (Mr. Sauber) was moving buildings was because he needed more
space. Mr. Sauber replied that yes that was the reason.
Dean Kirchoff, 340 Michigan St., stated that Mr. McClure has really cleaned up the lot over time and he
is in favor of the conditional use permit.
Ms. Otteson moved to close the public hearing for the conditional use permit. Mr. Jones seconded the
motion. The motion to close the hearing carried unanimously.
Mr. Fraser moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The applicant/ owner must install 100% opaque fencing around the vehicle storage area
at the time Gary's Garage occupies the new building.
2. No vehicles or items in the process of repair shall be located outside the fenced area or
outside the building.
3. If violation or complaints arise regarding the use, the City ay require a hearing and
consider revocation.
4. A new drawing of the fence must be submitted to the City of Hutchinson, Planning
Department, stating how big the fence is going to be, where it is going to be located, and
what materials are going to be used before the garage may occupy the building.
Mr. Olson seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 5 -0 -1 with Mr. Kirchoff abstaining.
e.) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO PLACE AN ACCESSORY BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY
LINE NEXT TO AN UNIMPROVED ALLEY AS REQUESTED BY PAUL AND NICHOLE DIETEL, 237
COLLEGE AVE NE.
Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:35 p.m. as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
• July 5, 2001.
Ms. Otteson stated she will be abstaining from this request.
Ms. Wischnack presented the request and stated that she has talked with the applicants about the
possibility of vacating the alley and there are too many utilities in the alley to vacate it. She stated that
LA (0-� 9
Minutes
Planning Commission — July 17, 2001
Page 4
the lot is very small only 49 feet in width the average width of older lots are usually around 66 feet.
Mr. Jones asked if the proposed garage and the house would be 6' apart. Ms. Wischnack replied that
• they are not proposed to be 6' apart and will have to fireproof the garage if they do not move the building
so they are at least 6' apart. Ms. Otteson stated that one of the staff conditions was to follow the building
plans as submitted, she was wondering if they could after the condition so the garage could be moved
to meet the 6' requirement without coming back to the planning commission. Ms. Wischnack replied that
as long as they do not change any of the side yard measurements that would be fine.
Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion to close
the hearing carried unanimously.
Ms. Wischnack read the letter that was received in the office via mail, from Sheila Mogard, 209 College
Ave., in favor of the request and said that it would be an improvement to the lot.
Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the variance with the following conditions:
1. Any relocation of utility lines are at the owners expense.
2. The plans must follow the submitted site drawings, dated June 20, 2001.
3. Building can not be pole constructed.
4. Building may not exceed 16' in height.
5. Building must meet building code requirements.
Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried 5 -0 -1 with Ms. Otteson abstaining.
NEW BUSINESS
5. OLD BUSINESS
• a.) Discussion about an amendment to the gas station sign ordinance (public hearing) and decision about
the Murphy Oil sign variance.
Ms. Wischnack stated that the planning commission has to make a decision about Murphy Oil at this
meeting otherwise the City Council will not have enough time to act on the recommendation.
Ms. Wischnack than reviewed the request and went over the information that staff put together about
sign ordinances from other communities. She stated that all cites were quite different when it came to
their sign ordinance, especially the canopy section.
General discussion about the differences in the cities sign ordinance
Mr. Olson asked if Staff has heard any response from other gas stations. Ms. Wischnack replied that
Staff has not heard anything.
Mr. Jones stated as a suggestion, to allow some provisions in the ordinance. For example, maybe to
increase the amount of signage allowed on a canopy sign is the applicant has a small building or no
pylon signs.
Ms. Wischnack told the Planning Commission that at one point, Murphy Oil proposed a sign request that
met our code, so we know they are capable of doing it.
Mr. Fraser commented that he thinks a percentage of the size of the lot or canopy would be a good way
to figure out how much signage to allow.
Ms. Wischnack reminded the Board that the City will only be changing the gas station parts of the sign
• ordinance.
Mr. Jones stated that with his proposal they would be minimizing the amount of freestanding signs. Mr.
Schieffer commented that too many signs in an area may cause clutter so the signs would be worthless.
Mr. Haugen stated that with a variance request, a hardship is needed. Murphy Oil does not have a
q iL a� 9
Minutes
Planning Commission — July 17, 2001
Page 5
hardship therefore we will have to deny the request.
• Mr. Haugen made the motion to deny the variance because there is no hardship. Mr. Olson seconded
the motion. Motion to deny carried unanimously.
Mr. Jones stated that he thinks we should not penalize the applicant for having a small building
Ms. Otteson moved to close the public hearing for the sign ordinance. Mr. Jones seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Kirchoff stated that we are not addressing the pylon signs but the canopy signs.
Mr. Kirchoff made the motion to approve the change recommended by staff to increase the price or logo
signage on a canopy from a total of 9 square feet per side visible from the public right of way to 20
square feet per side visible from public right of way (Section 14, under general requirements). Mr.
Haugen seconded the motion. Motion carried 6 -1 with Mr. Fraser voting against.
Ms. Wischnack explained the next recommended change under Signs Permitted in Commercial and
Industrial Districts section 3.
Mr. Fraser asked if that includes all signage on the building. Ms. Wischnack replied that it did.
Mr. Haugen commented that with a pylon sign if the signage is the same on both sides it only counts
as one side. Mr. Fraser commented that he has a problem with freestanding signs, a canopy is already
there with gas stations why not put the signs on the canopy. Ms. Wischnack commented that she did
not think we would be able to get rid of all pylon signs.
Mr. Arndt stated that he thought 200 square feet was a lot and thought they should reduce that amount.
• Ms. Wischnack commented that City Staff just approved a gas station sign application that had a total
of 160 square feet and that seemed like a good amount.
Mr. Fraser stated that if you regulate the amount of signage by a percentage of the canopy than you are
limiting the amount overall signage allowed on the lot.
Mr. Fraser made the motion to approve section 3 with the change of total signage not exceeding 150
square feet. Ms. Otteson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
a.) Ms. Wischnack stated that the council approved the annexation with Frank Fay.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mr. Olsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Ms. Otteson
seconded the motion. Motion carried.
E
L A (G)
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Resolution No. 11778
RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 11757
WHEREAS, the Township of Hutchinson has requested amendments to City of Hutchinson
Resolution No. 11757 as follows:
A. In paragraph 4C, line 4, change the word shall to may;
B. In paragraph 11, line 4, change the numeral 9 to 8;
C. Modify Exhibits B and C such that Exhibit B contains only such properties as have
petitioned for annexation and have not subsequently withdrawn. Those properties
removed from Exhibit B shall be contained in Exhibit C.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Hutchinson, McLeod County,
Minnesota that City of Hutchinson Resolution No. 11757 be modified as requested by Hutchinson
Township.
• ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THIS 28 DAY OF
AUGUST, 2001.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
FJ
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
yl���
facilities available to the property described in Exhibit A, then all
parcels included in the property identified in Exhibit C shall be
annexed; or
C. Upon the passage of five (5) years from the date of final approval of
this Joint Resolution by each of the respective governing bodies of
the City and the Township, then all parcels included in the property
identified in Exhibit C shall may be annexed.
Upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events, the City may annex the
property described on Exhibit C by filing a duly adopted resolution in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes §414.0325. All annexations occurring
under this paragraph 4 shall be subject to and consistent with all other terms
and conditions of this Joint Resolution. In the event an annexation occurs
pursuant to the terms of this paragraph 4, the Township hereby waives its
right to object to such annexation.
5. The parties acknowledge that, while the City is authorized to provide
municipal waste water treatment services, municipal storm sewer services,
and municipal water services to the property described in Exhibit A, the
timing, design and scope of such services remains within the sole discretion
of the City.
• 6. The City and the Township agree that the Minnesota State Building Code
shall be extended to all property within Exhibit A. Prior to the
commencement of any such improvements, the owner or developer shall
make application to the City for all required permits, and shall pay all
required fees.
7. In the event the City elects to install municipal water services, including all
service lines and infrastructure, to the parcels included in the property within
Exhibit B, the owner(s) of each parcel within Exhibit B shall contract with the
City and post bond pursuant to said contract to reimburse the City for all
costs, including, without limitation, easement acquisition costs, design and
engineering costs, bidding and construction costs, interest costs,
administrative, legal and fiscal costs, and all other costs whatsoever
associated with the installation of municipal water services including the
costs of construction through or across any property not then annexed to the
City. Upon the annexation of any of the parcels included in the property
identified in Exhibit C, the City may require the improvements on said
parcels to be connected to said municipal water services, and the owner(s)
of said parcels shall be assessed such connection fees as may be
authorized by law representing the proportionate share of the costs of the
municipal water improvement. The City shall then rebate or refund to the
• then current owner(s) of the parcels in Exhibit B a share of such connection
fees which is proportionate to the share of the original water improvement
3
Ll(b)l
• such connection fees as may be authorized by law representing the
proportionate share of the costs of the municipal waste water collection
facility. The City shall then rebate or refund to the then current owner(s) of
the parcels in Exhibit B a share of such connection fees which is
proportionate to the share of the original municipal wastewater improvement
costs paid by the owners of each parcel in Exhibit B at the time of the
original municipal wastewater improvement.
11. The City covenants and agrees that it will preserve the drainage functions
of all drain tiles located within the Orderly Annexation Area by designing and
constructing a municipal storm sewer system and allocating the costs thereof
as described in paragraph 9 8 of this resolution, to the extent that the future
development of properties within the Annexation Area shall not significantly
adversely impact existing drainage in the areas of the Township outside the
orderly Annexation Area as such drainage exists at the time of the signing
of this agreement.
12. For all property annexed pursuant to this Joint Resolution, the City shall
remit to the Township, property taxes as follows:
a. Property taxes payable on the annexed area for the year in which the
annexation becomes effective shall be paid to the Township.
• Thereafter, property taxes shall be paid to the City but shall be
apportioned as listed below, and the City shall make a cash payment
to the Township yearly in the following amounts:
1. In the first year following the year in which the land was
annexed, 90% of the property taxes paid to the Township in
the year the land was annexed;
2. In the second year following the year in which the land was
annexed, 70% of the property taxes paid to the Township in
the year the land was annexed;
3. In the third year following the year in which the land was
annexed, 50% of the property taxes paid to the Township in
the year the land was annexed;
4. In the fourth year following the year in which the land was
annexed, 30% of the property taxes paid to the Township in
the year the land was annexed;
5. In the fifth year following the year in which the land was
annexed, 10% of the property taxes paid to the Township in
• the year the land was annexed.
5
ytb��
08 -10 -2001 05 :26PM FROM Couri 8 MacArthur TO
Mfchael C. Couri'
Andrrw J: MacArthur
• Robert T. Ruppe"
'Alo6 e�eelw TlErolr
- Atm &WLW im QV--o
August 10, 2003
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr:. Richard I. Sehieffer
Arnold,.Anderson.& Dove
5881 CedarLake Road
Minneapolis, MN 55416
COURT & MACARTHUR
Anorneyr at Law
7015 CeNral Av we East
PO Box 369
A Michael, MN553 76 -03 69
(763) 4971930
(763) 497 -2599 (FAX)
counandmacathw(@pobaz com
13202344240 P.02
Re: Hutchinson Township; City of Hutchinson Annexation.
•
n
U
Dear Dick:
The Hutchinson Township Board met last night to consider the orderly annexation
agreement :The Board passed the agreement, but with minor modifications as follows:
+ Change the word "shall" in the last line of paragraph 4 (c) to `nay." This change is
consistentwith the next sentence under which the City "may!annex" the property
upon bccurrence!of one of the specified events.
e In paragraph 11, change the reference from paragraph "9" to paragraph "8.
Paragraph 8 addresses cost recovery for storm water systems. The Township believes
that this was a typographical error, and that paragraph 11 should in fact reference
paragraph 8 rather than paragraph 9.
+ Modify Exhibits B and C such that Exhibit B contain only those properties which
have petitioned for annexation and have not withdrawn from that petition. Whose
properties not in Exhibit B would be shown on Exhibit C. The Township had heard
that the Schmelings and B &C Properties had withdrawn their names from the
annexation petition, and the Township does not want to immediately annex.any
properties . unless the owners petition. As you can imagine, annexation is a sensitive
issue for Township property owners, and the Township doesfnot want to force the
annexation of any landowner without their consent. If the Schmelings and B &C
Properties did withdraw their names, they would be able to annex to the City upon
request under paragraph 4(a) at any time.
9 Wb I
�C6
0
0
0
3�
U1
N
�N
C '-'
5 a
LLI
o�
Re: Hutchinson Township; City of Hutchinson Annexation.
•
n
U
Dear Dick:
The Hutchinson Township Board met last night to consider the orderly annexation
agreement :The Board passed the agreement, but with minor modifications as follows:
+ Change the word "shall" in the last line of paragraph 4 (c) to `nay." This change is
consistentwith the next sentence under which the City "may!annex" the property
upon bccurrence!of one of the specified events.
e In paragraph 11, change the reference from paragraph "9" to paragraph "8.
Paragraph 8 addresses cost recovery for storm water systems. The Township believes
that this was a typographical error, and that paragraph 11 should in fact reference
paragraph 8 rather than paragraph 9.
+ Modify Exhibits B and C such that Exhibit B contain only those properties which
have petitioned for annexation and have not withdrawn from that petition. Whose
properties not in Exhibit B would be shown on Exhibit C. The Township had heard
that the Schmelings and B &C Properties had withdrawn their names from the
annexation petition, and the Township does not want to immediately annex.any
properties . unless the owners petition. As you can imagine, annexation is a sensitive
issue for Township property owners, and the Township doesfnot want to force the
annexation of any landowner without their consent. If the Schmelings and B &C
Properties did withdraw their names, they would be able to annex to the City upon
request under paragraph 4(a) at any time.
9 Wb I
08 -10 -2001 05:26PM FROM Couri 8 MacArthur TO 13202344240 P.03
hvfr. Richard J. Schieffer
August 10, 2001
• Page 2 of 2
The Town Board also raised an issue in regard to the amount of acreage involved in
the annexation area (134 acres). If Julie could confirm that this acreage is correct I would
appreciate it. Julie requested that I fax her a copy of this letter, which I have done.
Please make. changes consistent to this agreement and send originals to the City and a
copy to trle. Please call with any questions you may have. Tharik you.
Sincerely
Michael C. Couri
Court & MacArthur'
Cc: Donna Wahl
Jon Christenson
. EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION IN SECTION 33, T.117 N., R.29 W.
That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range
29 West, McLeod County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the southerly line of MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-22, according to the
�fhereof and nort *dY of the north line of the South 50.00 feet of said South Half of
Excepting therefrom Schmeling's Subdivision, according to the recorded plat thereof
Also, that pan of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 33, lying southerly of the
soldierly line of MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT
NO. ofssaid South al of the Southeast plat thereof, westerly of off a line line of the South
as beginning at
the southwest comer of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence northerly, to the
intersection with a line 75.00 feet south and parallel with the centerline of Trunk Highway No. 7
distant 16.00 feet east, as measured along said parallel line, of the west line of said South Half of
the Southeast Quarter.
• DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION IN SECTION 32, T.117 N., R.29 W.
That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 29 West,
TRAN
McLeod SP County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the southerly line of MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
ORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-37, according to the recorded plat thereof northerly
of the north line of the South 50.00 feet of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter and easterly of a line
described as beginning at the southeast comer of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of said
Southeast Quarter thence northerly, to a point on the north line of said West Half of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant 14.50 feet west of the northeast comer of said West Half of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter.
0
ucb�i
EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTIONS FOR ANNEXATION OF PART OF THE LUCE LINE TRAIL
A 50.00 foot wide strip of land lying northerly of and adjoining the south line of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 29 West, McLeod Count) Minnesota The west line of said
strip of land being the southerly prolongation of the east line of KIMBERLYS COUNTRY ESTATES,
according to the recorded plat therof, and the east line of said strip of land being the east line of said
Southeast Quarter.
Also, a 50.00 foot wide strip of land lying northerly of and adjoining the south line of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 29 West, McLeod County, Minnesota. The west line
of said strip of land being the wrest line of said Southwest Quarter and the east line of said strip of land
being a line described as beginning at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter, thence northerly
to the intersection with a line 75.00 feet south of and parallel with the centerline of Trunk Highway No. 7
distant 16.00 feet east, as measured along said parallel line, of the east line of said Southwest Quarter.
Also, a 50.00 foot wide strip of land lying southerly of and adjoining the north line of tine No
Quarter of Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod County, Minnesota. The west line of
said strip of land being the northerly prolongation of the east line of SECOND ADDITION TO
HUTCHINSON INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, according to the recorded plat thereof, and the east line of said
strip of land being the east line of said Northeast Quarter.
Also, a 50.00 foot wide strip of lend lying southerly of and adjoining the north line of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 4, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, Mcleod County, Minnesota. The wrest line of
said strip of land being the west line of said Northwest Quarter and the east line of said strip of land
being the east line of the West 11322.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter.
r1
PAGE 3
PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING
Hutchinson MN
Job No. 01130
0
yLb� 1
. EXHIBIT C
DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION IN SECTION 32, T.117 N., R.29 W.
That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, T"nship 117 North, Range
29 West, McLeod County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest comer of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly,
along the west line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter to the centerline of Trunk Highway No. 7;
thence easterly, along said centerline 620.00 feet; thence southerty, parallel with said west line of the
South Half of the Southeast Quarter to the intersection with the southerly line of MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-37, according to the recorded
plat thereof, and the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing southerly, along
said parallel line to the intersection with the north line of KIMBERLYS COUNTRY ESTATES, according
to the recorded plat thereof; thence easterly, along said north line of KIMBERLYS COUNTY ESTATES to
the northeast comer of said KIMBERLY COUNTY ESTATES; thence southerly, along the east line of
said KIMBERLY COUNTRY ESTATES to the intersection with the north line of the South 5000 feet of
said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence easterly, along said north line of the South 50.00 feet of
the South Half of the Southeast Quarter to the intersection with a line described as "beginning at the
southeast comer of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, thence northerly, to
a point on the north line of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter distant
14.50 feet west of the northeast corner of said West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter"; thence northerly, along said previously described line to the southerly fine of said MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-37; thence westerly, along said
southerly line of MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-
37 to the point of beginning.
Also, Schraeling's Subdivision, according to the recorded plat thereof
U
yLL->� �
S
. CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 11780
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 11262 ESTABLISHING
INCOME GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR SENIOR
CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND SENIOR
CITIZENS REDUCED REFUSE RATE
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes provide tax
deferral for senior citizens, 65 years of age or older,
or a person(s) on disability as defined by the Social
Security Administration, for whom it would be a
hardship to make payments, and
WHEREAS, the home owner can make application for
deferred payment of special assessments on forms which
can be obtained from the City Administrator's office,
and
WHEREAS, the home owner /renter can make
application for reduced refuse rate on forms, which can
be obtained from the City Administrator's office;
is NOW THEREFORE, the City Council has established
the following income guidelines, asset limitations, and
verification requirement for applications of deferred
assessments and /or reduced refuse rates:
1. To be granted to person(s) with a low income
of $!8,10G.90 $20,650.00 per year for one person and
$20,79G.9 $23,600.00 per year for a married couple.
2. To be granted to person(s) with an asset
limitation of not to exceed $30,000, excluding the
homestead and automobile.
3. Deferred assessment and /or reduced refuse
requests may only be applied for if the following
documentation is submitted at the time of said
application:
A. Federal Income Tax Form 1040, 1040A,
1040EZ; or
0
y Cb� 3,
Page 2, Resolution
• Senior Citizens Reduced Refuse Rate
B. Minnesota Property Tax Refund Form M -1PR
Every two years the city can request said
information to continue reduced refuse charges;
existing reduced refuse accounts shall submit the same
documentation to continue the reduced charges.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of
August 2001.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
H, xao
Marlin Torgerson,
Mayor
yLlc;) a
RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE/ SELL AT AUCTION
UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
Resolution No. ivai
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Department has accumulated various
unclaimed items.
AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70,
Subdivision 2, Paragraph C for the appropriation and sale at auction of unclaimed
property.
AND WHEREAS, the unclaimed property has been in the possession of the
police department for more than sixty (60) days;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of
• unclaimed items identified on Attachment A.
Adopted by the City Council this day of August, 2001.
Mayor
City Administrator
r1
I.J
q( b�
• Attachment A, Page 1
Case Number
Item Descri tiori
01 -0622
Woman's/Gray/26"/3 S eed /Mar uis
01 -0696
Men's /10 speed/Columbia Ultra Terrain
01 -0846
Boys/20"/black
01 -0890
Bo 's/Silver /Ma na Hoo
01 -0931
Woman's/26" /blue
01 -0979
Men'sl26"lblack/Hu
01 -0987
Maroon/Sport Utilit
01 -1127
Men's/blue /Redline
01 -1206
Men's /26 " /red/10 speed
01 -1258
Women's/26" /maroon /Hu Regatta
01 -1288
Men's speed/Murray
01 -1356
Men's/26
01 -1356
Men's /20" /chrome
01 -1381
Men'slred/Hu
01 -1412
Men's/Huffy Stalker
01 -1444
Huffy/purple-light blue ink
r 1
U
yC13�3
Hutchinson City Center
0
111 Hessen Slreel SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522
320 - 587- 5151/Fax 320.2344240
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 2001
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25' TO A 0 (ZERO) FOOT
SETBACK AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE LARGER
THAN 1,000 SQUARE FEET AS REQUESTED BY MICHAEL SCHLUETER, 405 MONROE ST.
Pursuant to Sections 6.04 AND 7.14 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance and a
conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On July 17, 2001, Michael Schlueter submitted an application for a variance to eliminate the front yard setback and a
conditional use permit to construct a garage larger than 1,000 square feet..
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
August 9, 2001.
3. At the public hearing, no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections.
4. Evidence established that the home occupation had produced a large, non - permitted sign.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission, on August 21', 2001 voted to recommend denial of the variance based on the fact there were
no property characteristics which presented a hardship.
Respectfully submitted,
William Arndt, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Michael Schlueter, 405 Monroe St., Hutchinson, MN 55350
0
Printed on recycled paper -
H (c� 1
0
RESOLUTION NO. 11775
RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A ZERO FOOT SETBACK AND A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR A GARAGE LARGER THAN 1,000 SQUARE FEET AS
REQUESTED BY MICHAEL SCHLUETER AT 405 MONROE ST.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Michael Schlueter, property owner, has made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section
8.05 to construct an addition to his garage with a zero front yard setback and a conditional use permit to have
a garage exceeding 1,000 square feet. The property is located at the following legal description:
Lot 10 Blk 46, South half of City, Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council hereby denies the variance and the conditional use permit based on the fact there were no
property characteristics which presented a hardship.
Adopted by the City Council this 28' day of August, 2001.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
yCC�
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
•
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Jean Ward,
John Rodeberg, John Webster, Marc Schnobrich, Lenny Rutledge,
Barry Greive, Heather Bieniek, Christie Rock, Steve Madson, Barry
Greive, Dick Schieffer, Dick Nagy and Julie Wischnack, AICP
Date: August, 2001 — Meeting Date August 21, 2001
Applicant: Michael Schlueter, Owner
Variance and Conditional Use Permit
Brief Description
The applicant is requesting a variance to eliminate the front yard setback from the required 25' to
a zero foot setback. The existing garage is 4 feet from the alley. The applicant is also requesting
a conditional use permit to have a garage larger than 1,000 square feet. The proposed project
would increase the garage from 16' x 30' to 36' x 30' (1,080 square feet).
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: R -2, Medium Family Residential
Property Location: 405 Monroe St.
Lot Size: .2 acres or 8,714 square feet
Existing Land Use: Residential
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: R -2 surrounding the area
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Low density residential
Zoning History: Platted prior to 1988
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8.05 — Setbacks in R -2 District
Section 6.04 — Variance Required
Section 7.14 -- Accessory Buildings
SPECIAL INFORMATION
0
Parking: Not Applicable
LA Ic�l
Variance
Schlueter, Michael — 405 Monroe St.
Planning Commission Review — August 21, 2001
Page 2
• Physical
Characteristics: There are currently many vehicles stored outside around the existing
garage. There is a home occupation that is operated out of the current
building and staff is concerned the new addition would contribute to the
non - conforming use. City code states that no accessory building or space
outside of the principle building shall be exclusively used for such
purposes (of a home occupation).
Analysis: The garage is located in a non - conforming location. Exacerbating the
nonconformity by adding a large addition onto the structure is not
recommended. Furthermore; the existing structure presents some
foundation deterioration. An addition to the structure; without any street
setback is problematic.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the application. Staff believes the proposed
application does not meet the hardship criteria set forth in Section 6.04 of
the Zoning Code.
The reason setbacks are required in zoning districts are multi - purpose: to
ensure no encroachments onto other properties occur; allow for adequate
room for utilities to be located; and provide adequate open space, light
. and air to neighboring properties. The proposed expansion of this
structure affects these purposes. Additionally, there are conforming
alternatives for constructing a garage.
Cc: Michael Schlueter, 405 Monroe St., Hutchinson, MN 55350
u
(ACc-) �
•
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Slreel SE
Hulchkre n, MN 55350.2522
320.587- 5151/Fax 320.2344240
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 2001
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED BOUNDARY SETBACK FOR THE PLACEMENT
OF A MANUFACTURED HOMES AS REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL, COUNTRY CLUB
TERRACE AND WILLIAM BLOCK, HUTCH INC., 448 CALIFORNIA ST NW.
Pursuant to Sections 8.08 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
HISTORY
On May 16, 2001, Jeff Munsell, applicant, and William Block, property owner, submitted an application for a variance
to decrease the boundary setbacks for Country Club Terrace mobile home park.
FINDINGS OF FACT
• 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
August 9, 2001.
3. At the public hearing held one neighbor was present who discussed the possibility of screening.
4. Hardship was found in the fact that the Manufactured Home park design was unique.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission, on August 21, 2001 voted to recommend approval of the variance with the following
conditions:
1. Any new home or accessory building may not be located closer than 5 feet from the outer
perimeter property lines.
2. No home or other structures may be places over the gas distribution line or service lines. Any
movement of these lines would require the moving expense to be paid by the owners of the park.
Respectfully submitted,
tl).ti� 1
William Arndt, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Jeff Munsell, Excelsior Homes, 1355 Hwy 7 W, Hutchinson, MN 55350
William Block, Hutch Inc., owner
is
Pnnled m 2cyded paper -
L) Cc)�
RESOLUTION NO. 11774
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED
BOUNDARY SETBACK FOR THE PLACEMENT OF MANUFACTURED HOMES AS REQUESTED BY
JEFF MUNSELL COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE AND WILLIAM BLOCK, HUTCH INC.,
• LOCATED AT 448 CALIFORNIA ST NW.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
Jeff Munsell, applicant, and William Block, property owner (Hutch Inc.), have made application to the City Council
for a Variance under Section 8.08 to place mobile homes and accessory buildings closer than the required setback to
the outside boundary lines. All new buildings and/ or structures must be at least 5 feet from the property line. The
property is located at the following legal description:
PARCEL A
TMT part p rM Sevineeei Qlsw p $eetlen S6. 7fo nellp 111 IfarM, Rang 30 Waal. MtLeae County. MelMtala, ceooD.d as Novel
caroo leacnp at The Points M DWMtdM of are Eaet M of eeld Sptalee., Qdrter and fM eenW M M Stara IIV 0, No. 7: mence
SovineeaNny A" told aetner Ella a detente of 'Mco N ter Tnetrce North" on a ell. wow eMl eald East bet o mlarlcr of
Mo.97 fear `Noce Wesfarly bllectelo Ie TM oft 90 aepeea a dIs`aroa of 60.00 feet To dM Pool of eeylnli of tM patty brain
dill o OW... C tneroa canTlnuft 114,1 y along IM lder deapDed ce to a c1mrice of 1169.74 feet'. tnTra. gor,hort, 0e9ecNng to IM
right right 90 aees 0 dotoace of 67600 Nor rMroe Easterly 0eloning to tYK rant 90 toWeee a Nonni of I30.00 her: `Mace
Savdwrl, Oof iYp to The right W depeee A dletoroe of 21.00 fee`'. Thence Eosterty aafldctlne To Ine left 90 dWeee o de`anca of
760.59 fear iMnce No"b" deflectery to TM oN 90 dePeas a distant. of 21.00 fear. tMrtce Eaetrly defocrlrp to Nn Mahn 90
dopeee a Amoco of 130.00 fear, inenc M
e SousTly denecilsp IP The right 90 de 06.00 fe
greae a ail of 4et; tlwlca Eaerarly
dedacfelp To me left 90 lei a deronce of IH.IS feet tneroe Soutierly derecling to TM right W degrees a distance of 270.00
Mt Ta TM point of Mgm11Ip.
PARCEL 9
Tract A of REWTERED LAID SURLEY W. IS. M tad Cowy. LWneaora.
PARCEL C
Than part of Lot I, 9b 2. HELIAID'S FIRST ADDMM. eacparp to The recorded alp inertial CeepDed m Wool,
COmnencYp ar dN wytfreet crlto` of SW Lot I: diorite welerly. Bang rM —M leN of Bald Lot I, a Reran 0 IMM fear T, 1M
FN1rc ey DepnlYlp of tM lend N be dloo : To C ro Itterly, WOW eltn Unit, ettet M al eclC Lei 1. a datatee of 300.46 foer.
1Mnae eoewly, (e9ecXlp la ft f1gN1 90 " 00 Alliylee a ftnom. of 1010139 /M1 To tM MYavii Ylill iM w,wly
"lortelen of Me taro' Irto el TrM A of RE019TEfaED LAID SORVEI' 1f0. 15: Nrnae eoolo erly, app aeld apTMrty eaNneta, a detaroe
of 27.00 Mt to "o rorNNeef tOIMr M ead Tract 4 f' "orly, eoutflerfy era oeewly 0" The eeufnarly gM of add Lot I, to
The porn 0 6ealdee4
• 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use
on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, the Council found there to be a hardship.
CONCLUSION
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions:
Any new home or accessory building may not be located closer than 5 feet from the outer
perimeter property lines.
No home or other structure may be placed over the gas distribution line or service lines. Any
movement of these lines would require the moving expense to be paid by the owners of the park.
is
Adopted by the City Council this 28tb day of August, 2001.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
L)(C)a
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
. To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Seheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson,
Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster,
Marc Sebora, Mark Schnobricb, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie
Rock and Julie Wischnack, AICP
Date: August 15, 2001 — Meeting Date August 21, 2001
Applicant: Jeff Munsell of Hutch Inc., applicant
Brief Description
The issue of setbacks from the exterior boundary arose in October of last year. A unit was being
placed on one of the exterior lots. The City received complaints about the location of the unit.
After staff reviewed the site and the regulations that pertain to the park (from the 1960's), it was
determined the placement of the home did not meet the setback requirement of 30 feet, but was
approximately 5 feet from the property line. Recently, the owners of Country Club Terrace
submitted a survey of the entire property and the closest units on the exterior lot lines.
Because the survey information indicates that all replacement units in the exterior boundary of the
park would be problematic; staff has recommended a total park variance be considered for the
• outer perimeter setback. Another option staff has considered is to change the ordinance for
manufactured home parks. This is not possible, because there is a state statute that prohibits cities
from adopting any regulations that are more restrictive than the current
ordinance.
•
7 at
L - ,�
-"�
T
.r
I r —
_.
:.+ I .......
I
a '
i
p I �
Variance
Hutch Inc. - Country Club Terrace
Planning Commission Review — August 21, 2001
Page 2
•
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: R -5, Mobile/Manufactured Home Park
Property Location: 448 California St. NW, Lot 100 of Country Club Terrace
Lot Size: 32.46 acres (Total Country Club Terrace area)
Existing Land Use: Manufactured home park
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: R -2 (Medium Density) Residential to east, all other areas are R -5
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Medium Density Residential
Zoning History: There is no specific documentation regarding when the manufactured
home park originated. In speaking with the owner, sometime in the
1960's is when the park first developed. In November of 1982, there
was a request to initiate phase II of the park. There was a condition
attached that required trees be placed on the westerly edge of the park.
Since the project did not begin within 6 months of the approval, another
park expansion request was considered in 1984. During this review,
There was a requirement that 10% of the land be designated for park
land.
June 1992, a conditional use permit was granted for placement of a 1970
manufactured home.
August 1992, a conditional use permit was requested by a manufactured
home owner to place a "pre- 1976" unit on a lot. This permit was
approved.
July 1996, a conditional use permit was granted for a 1978 mobile home
to be placed on lot 102.
May 1998, a conditional use permit was issued to place a 14 x 18 foot
garage on Lot 206, with the conditions that the garage be placed at the
end of the vehicle drive access; the garage be placed 6 feet from other
structures; and the garage is to be placed on a cement slab within one
year. (The staff report does not mention the 50 foot required accessory
structure setback requirement from the road.)
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8.08 — Setbacks in 8.08 District
Section 6.04 — Variance Required
• SPECLAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Access from private interior streets.
H&-) ';L-
Variance
Hutch Inc. - Country Club Terrace
Planning Commission Review — August 21, 2001
Page 3
Parking: Ordinance states that 2 spaces per lot are needed.
Physical
Characteristics: Flat lot with line of Russian olive trees delineating the boundary. Other
vegetation on north and west property lines.
Analysis: The variance request is unusual in that it is not often determined that an
entire park is not meeting a certain setback requirement. The average
setbacks of the units (excluding tool sheds) are as follows:
North — 9.8 feet
South — 5.5 feet
East — 8.35 feet
West — 2.8 feet
Staff believes that a 5 foot minimum setback for all new replacement
manufactured home units is appropriate. Staff believes that the hardship
for this variance is the park arrangement is unique. The lot arrangement
of the original manufactured home park did not meeting the standards
established in the 1960's. Manufactured homes have become longer
over the years, since the park was established. The variance should be
granted with the following conditions:
• 1. Any new home or accessory building may not be located closer than
5 feet from the outer perimeter property lines.
2. No home or other structure may be placed over the gas distribution
line or service lines. Any movement of these lines would require the
moving expense to be paid by the owners of the park.
Cc: Jeff Munsell, Excelsior Homes, 1355 Hwy 7 W, Hutchinson, MN 55350
William Block, Hutch Inc., owner
•
L-1 tc-)a
Hutchinson City Center
0
111 Hassan Street SE
Hulchire n, MN 55350-2522
320 - 587- 5151/Fax 320 - 234 -4240
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 23, 2001
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT AND SIDE YARD
SETBACK AT PLAZA 15 AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON.
Pursuant to Section 6.04 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
HISTORY
On April 18, 2001, the City of Hutchinson, property owner, submitted an application for a lot split. Following the
approval of the lot- split, it was realized that the setbacks for the split lot no longer met the code. In July 2001, the City
of Hutchinson submitted application for 2 variances. One would be for a zero lot line between buildings and the other
would be for less than the required 20 feet for the side yard.
FINDINGS OF FACT
• 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee was waived.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
August 9, 2001.
3. At the public hearing held no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission, on August 21, 2001, voted to recommend approval of both of the variances as proposed by
the City of Hutchinson. The variance will not impact the surrounding buildings or the parking. The City will continue
to own both parcels.
Respectfully submitted,
William Amdt, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
•
Pnnied o recycled papa -
yCc-�3
RESOLUTION NO. 11776
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT AND SIDE
YARD SETBACK AT PLAZA 15, AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
City of Hutchinson, property owners, have made application to the City Council for two (2) Variances under
Section 6.04, to have a zero lot line between buildings and less than the required 20 feet side yard setback
with the following legal description:
That part of Lot I, Block I, CEDAR ACRES SUBDIVISION, according to the plat
thereof on file and of record In the Office of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod
County, Mlnnesata, described as follows:
•
Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot I, thence easterly, along the north
line of said Lot I a distance of 222.71 feet: thence southerly, deflecting to the
right 89 degrees IB minutes 43 seconds 200.01 feet to the south line of the
North 200.00 feet of sold Lot I: thence westerly, along said south line of the
North 200.00 feet of Lot I a distance of 222.57 feet to the well line of sold Lot
I: thence northerly, along said west line of Lot 1 a distance of 200.02 feet to
the Point of beginMng.
The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves both variances as proposed by the City of Hutchinson. The variances
will not impact the surrounding buildings or the parking. The City will continue to own both parcels of land.
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2001.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
• City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
y �C- 3
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
• To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Jean Ward,
John Rodeberg, John Webster, Marc Schnobrich, Lenny Rutledge,
Heather Bienlek, Christie Rock, Steve Madson, Barry Greive, Dick
Schieffer, Dick Nagy and Julie Wischnack, AICP
Date: August, 2001 — Meeting Date August 21, 2001
Applicant: City of Hutchinson
Variance
Brief Description
This property was split 2 months ago. The split created a zero lot line between the buildings and less than
the required 20 foot side yard requirements on the south line. Because the City owned both parcels and
was creating the lot division for a grant agreement, staff did not pursue the variance from the southern and
eastern setback requirements of 20 feet. Staff is now proposing a variance be issued for these two setbacks
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: C-4, Fringe Commercial
. Property Location: 1005 Hwy 15 South
Lot Size: I acre
Existing Land Use: Commercial
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: Residential to the West and Commercial to the North, South and East
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Commercial
Zoning History: Lot Split - 2001
Applicable
Regulations: Section 6.04 — Variance Required
=X01I 11121`T1i1- 95I1ul141Z
Parking: Parking would continue as it exists.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed by the City of
Hutchinson. The variance would not impact the surrounding buildings or the
• parking. Furthermore; the City will continue to own both parcels.
y �c�
Hutchinson Area Health Care
to Hutchinson Community Hospital
Bunrs Manor Nnrsinx Home • Dassef Medical Center
1095 Highway 15 South Hutdiicson. MN 55350 (320) 234-5000
August 21, 2001
The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and
Members of the City Council
Hutchinson City Center
11 1 Hassan. Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 5535(
Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members:
The Board of Directors of Hutchinson Area Health Care (HAHC), as part of their regular meeting on
August 21, 2001, received a report and recommendations for physical plant security upgrades. The
following is an excerpt from the minutes of that meeting:
" Security System. The board was presented by Ron McKinnon a security systems consultant, a
bid summary with recommendations for a security systems upgrade for Hutchinson Community
Hospital and Bums Manor Nursing Home (see attachments). The bid packs were assembled in
• three parts: Security System Integrators, Electrical Contactors, and Door Hardware. McKinnon
reviewed with the Board the plans for the Hospital as well as the Nursing Home, He further
explained to the Board the variation among bidders and appraised the members of the areas when
contractors did not meet bid specifications.
Following discussion, motion was made by Fortun, seconded by Slanga, to recommend to
the City Council that the Security Systems Integrator bids from Ban -Ko and Simplex be
rejected for not complying with bid specifications and the bid from Videotronix be
accepted, in the amount of $305,700; that the Electrical Contractor bid from Advanced be
rejected for not complying with bid specifications and the next lowest, Willmar Electric, be
accepted the amount of $70,357.00; that the Door Hardware bid in the amount of $40,582
be accepted from the low bidder, Oison Locksmithing. All were in favor. Motion carried."
Thank you, in advance, for consideration of this request. Duane Hoversten will be able to address
questions you may have regarding this item at your meeting on Tuesday.
Sincerely,
HU _ HINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
� � r
Philip G. Graves
President
• /cs
L-) (e-)
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
INTEGRATED FACILITY PROTECTION SYSTEM
• BID SUMMARY
SECURITY SYSTEM INTEGRATORS
BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies ($20,000), 4 video monitors ($2,000), and they
proposed a 16 channel video storage unit rather than the specified 32 channel unit ($10,000).
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment ($10,000).
' BAN -KO and Simplex hourly service rates are highest proposed.
Experience; BAN -KO proposed specified Kalatel video equipment and Integral video storage,
however, they have no installations, experience or technical training with this equipment.
Simplex did not propose specified equipment called out in the bid specification, nor did they
request pre - approval for non - specified equipment as required in the bid specification. Proposed
BAN -KO and Simplex card access systems do not have web server capabilities as called out in
the bid specification..
5 As noted under Omitted Equipment, BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies, 4 video
monitors, and they specified a 16 channel video storage unit rather than a 32 channel unit.
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment.
6 As noted under Omitted Equipment, BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies, 4 video
monitors, and they specified a 16 channel video storage unit rather than a 32 channel unit.
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment.
As stated under experience, BAN -KO does not carry Kalatel or Intragal as a standard product
line. Access to new and replacement equipment could be an issue unless they become a dealer.
yCe-)
BAN -KO
SIMPLEX
VIDEOTRONIX
Total Bid Price
$246,399.00
$266,950.00
$290,700.00
Extended Price
$29
$20 9 000.00
$15
r Omitted Equipment
*$32
*$10 9 000.00
N/A
Estimated Total Cost
$307,967.00
$296 9 950.00
$305
2 Hourly Rates
*$99.00
*$100.00
$65.00
3 Reputation/Experience
Good/ *Poor
Good/Good
Good /Good
Service
Good
Good
Good
Past Performance
Good
Good
Good
Size/Location of Supplier
Good
Good
Good
4 Owner Needs/Requirements
Good
*Poor
Good
5 Quantity of Merchandise
*Incomplete
*Incomplete
Complete
G Completeness of Bid
*Incomplete
*Incomplete
Complete
Delivery/Stock
*Average
Good
Good
RECOMMENDATION
2ND Choice
3RD Choice
1ST Choice
BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies ($20,000), 4 video monitors ($2,000), and they
proposed a 16 channel video storage unit rather than the specified 32 channel unit ($10,000).
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment ($10,000).
' BAN -KO and Simplex hourly service rates are highest proposed.
Experience; BAN -KO proposed specified Kalatel video equipment and Integral video storage,
however, they have no installations, experience or technical training with this equipment.
Simplex did not propose specified equipment called out in the bid specification, nor did they
request pre - approval for non - specified equipment as required in the bid specification. Proposed
BAN -KO and Simplex card access systems do not have web server capabilities as called out in
the bid specification..
5 As noted under Omitted Equipment, BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies, 4 video
monitors, and they specified a 16 channel video storage unit rather than a 32 channel unit.
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment.
6 As noted under Omitted Equipment, BAN -KO failed to include lock power supplies, 4 video
monitors, and they specified a 16 channel video storage unit rather than a 32 channel unit.
Simplex failed to include a security console to store the CCTV equipment.
As stated under experience, BAN -KO does not carry Kalatel or Intragal as a standard product
line. Access to new and replacement equipment could be an issue unless they become a dealer.
yCe-)
. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
INTEGRATED FACILITY PROTECTION SYSTEM
BID SUMMARY
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
B Advanced references were good, however, this is a new company with short term experience.
9 Advanced has no prior work history with consultant or Hutchinson Area Health Care.
70 Bid specification required point -to -point cable termination. Upon review of their bid, Advanced
stated their proposal did not include complete point -to -point cable installation.
"As stated under Owners Needs/Requirements, Advanced did not include the cost for complete
point -to -point cable installation as called out in the bid specification.
`-j te)
ADVANCED
WILLMAR
BRANDT
Total Bid Price
$46,599.00
$70,357.00
$106,000 (VTI)
$110,000 (Simplex)
$118,000 (Ban -Ko)
Estimated Total Cost
$46,599.00
$70
$106,000 (VTI)
$110,000 (Simplex)
$118,000 (Ban -Ko)
e Reputation/Experience
Good / *Average
Good /Good
Good /Good
Service
Good
Good
Good
Past Performance
*Unknown
Good
Good
Size/Location of Supplier
Good
Good
Good
10 OwnerNeeds/Requireme
*Poor
Good
Good
Quantity of Merchandise
Complete
Complete
Complete
11 Completeness of Bid
*Incomplete
Complete
Complete
RECOMMENDATION
3RD Choice
1ST Choice
2ND Choice
B Advanced references were good, however, this is a new company with short term experience.
9 Advanced has no prior work history with consultant or Hutchinson Area Health Care.
70 Bid specification required point -to -point cable termination. Upon review of their bid, Advanced
stated their proposal did not include complete point -to -point cable installation.
"As stated under Owners Needs/Requirements, Advanced did not include the cost for complete
point -to -point cable installation as called out in the bid specification.
`-j te)
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
INTEGRATED FACILITY PROTECTION SYSTEM
BID SUMMARY
0
DOOR HARDWARE
12 Primary difference in bid was the use of electrified cylindrical door hardware by Olson
Locksmithing verus electrified strikes and panic devices by Midwest Lock and Safe. Extensive
research and comparison between door hardware products determined that the use of electrified
cylindrical devices would be applicaple and most cost effective for this project.
r-
OLSON
LOCKSMITHING
MIDWEST LOCK
& SAFE
Total Bid Price
$40,582.00
$66,550.00
Estimated Total Cost
$40
$66,550.00
Reputation/Experience
Good /Good
Good /Good
Service
Good
Good
Past Performance
Good
Good
Owner Requirements
Good
Good
12 Owner Product Experience
*Unknown
Good
Size/Location of Supplier
Good
Good
Quantity of Merchandise
Complete
Complete
Completeness of Bid
Complete
Complete
Delivery/Stocking Requirements
Good
Good
RECOMMENDATION
1ST Choice
2ND Choice
12 Primary difference in bid was the use of electrified cylindrical door hardware by Olson
Locksmithing verus electrified strikes and panic devices by Midwest Lock and Safe. Extensive
research and comparison between door hardware products determined that the use of electrified
cylindrical devices would be applicaple and most cost effective for this project.
r-
Memoran cit l
7 11"
P =;u � 7
To: Mayor and City Council Water,fWastewater Department
1300 Adams Street South
From: Randy Devries, Utility Director Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dote: 08/22/01 Phone: 320 - 234 -4233
Fax 320-234-7485
Re: Polymer Feed System Bid
The City of Hutchinson received bids on Wednesday August 22, 2001 for the purchase
of a polymer feed system, for the Wastewater Treatment Facility. This unit replaces the
feed system that is thirteen years old, and needs constant repair.
The supplier included the 5% cashier's check for the bid as security and proof of
insurance. There was one supplier, because we specked only one brand of feed
system, and they are the local representative.
The price of the bid was $60, 400 with installation and training. The Wastewater Staff
has reviewed this equipment at other locations, and are very satisfied with them.
$60,000 was budgeted in the Wastewater fund for 2001, and I recommend approval.
•
y(0
Small Cities Develop mentPro gram
Application
Revl. 16/Il101
•
L
Local Government Resolution FP -12
Applicant Name: City of Hutchinson
RESOLUTION OF APPLICANT.
Applica mast adopt and submit the i following resolut ion. Thu es
resolution must be ado ied prior to subn te e.
tssion of the for packag
TT
Huc3nonf g spons BE RESOLVED that act as the legal for contai ned in the Business and
(Appllram)
Community Development Application to be submitted on Sept. 28 2001 and that the Mayor
Cit Administrator (n•v� Wo ,h, rrn') (rid, o Firzr AYrhontrd OJf1CWJ
and Y are hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Trade and Economic Development
(Till, of Slrnn A.rb d O o' r7 r ([''
for funding of this project on half of hhFAI'
(n °g�e ) City of
BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that H„ f r 1 i n G n„ has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance,
rapphmnp
and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate construction, operas ion, maintenance and
replacement of the proposed project for its design life.
fih git of
BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that u c in on has not violated any Federal, State, or local laws
( A phcwr)
pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, lack�acks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice.
the City of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, Hutchinson may
enter into City of Hutchinson
o
(Apphl.a U
certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreemmms and described in the
Compliances Section of the Business and Community Development Application.
NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED dim the Mayor and
the City Administratorare hereby au &rized to execute agreements, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to
( me oJ Serond Aurharizrd Ugnaq
implement the projects) on behalf of the applicant
1 CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council
(Govemrng Bo of tpp(icanr.)
of the City of Hutchinson _ on August 28, 2001
(Apph,am) (Dine)
SIGNED:
(Firzr Aurhoriz afryriap
fIND ••
(S,rond Awho,iud a imp
City Administrator
rte
C JtQ17LYd7193
(Sis.mm)
5 (G)
V
V
iL
August 16, 2001
City of Hutchinson
Engineering/Public Works
Maintenance Operations
1400 Adams St SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone(320)234-4287 Fax(320)234 -6971
To: Mayor & City Council
From: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir.
CC: Ken Merrill, Finance Director
Subject: Replacement of Dump Truck
This request is for a replacement for a 1978 Mack tandem -axle dump truck (STRT- 053 -HTK).
• Based on the analysis and budget restrictions of $50,000, I recommend purchasing a 1997
Mack RD690S chassis, with new dump box for $49,203.00 from Mankato Mack.
We reviewed three options. We looked at a used dump truck, a used chassis with a new dump
box, and a new dump truck.
1) The used dump truck we were able to find locally was priced at about $32,500, and we
expected to put in approximately $5,500 into repairs for the truck, resulting in a cost of about
$36,000 for the truck. Assuming we would be able to use this truck for 10 years, our annual
ownership cost would have been $3,600.
2) We also looked at an option involving a used chassis and new dump box. This option would
cost about $49,200. Considering the condition of the vehicle, we would anticipate no
additional repairs necessary to place the vehicle in service. Again, based on the condition of
the truck, we are assuming being able to use this truck for 15 years, which places our annual
ownership cost at about $3,280.
3) We considered purchasing a new tandem -axle dump truck. This option would be
approximately $68,600. We would expect to use a new tandem -axle dump truck for about 20
years, which places annual ownership cost at about $3,430.
With minor operational changes, we are able to trade in three trucks on this one truck, leaving one
general purpose single -axle dump truck and the replacement tandem axle dump truck. Increased
• utilization of contracted hauling has allowed Public Works departments to shift use from four
trucks to two trucks without significantly affecting productivity.
0
•
L]
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Steve Madson, Director of Police /Emergency Management Service
DATE: August 22, 2001
RE: Fire and Public Works Radio Communications Systems
Sometime ago, I outlined the need to upgrade the radio communications systems for the
fire and public works departments. We have devoted an extensive amount of time and
effort in our attempt to identify systems which meet the goals of being usable, obtainable,
affordable and provide the measure of safety which these systems demand while also
providing the interoperability necessary for emergency management purposes. After
nearly a year long endeavor, we believe we have put together a system which will meet the
aforementioned goals.
I will not attempt to list all of the issues that are confronting the employees using the
current systems. I will enumerate the major issues; however, I will be present at the
August 28 Council meeting at which time I will deliver a formal presentation regarding the
problems and proposed solutions to these issues.
The Hutchinson Fire Department has operated on a simplex radio system since the first
installation of mobile radio communications in its' vehicles. Since that time, handheld
radios have been added to enhance fire- ground tactical capabilities. This system was
adequate at the time because there was little radio frequency interference and little usage
of the existing radio frequency. This now, of course, has drastically changed. With the
proliferation of wireless communications, more powerful base stations and greater demand
for radio frequencies, we can no longer rely upon the simplex radio system to provide safe,
reliable radio communications. Therefore, we are proposing to update the current system
to a repeater system which will allow our fire service personnel to talk hand held to hand
held anywhere within the fire protection district. The estimated cost is X80. * A0 0 .
The Hutchinson Public Works area; comprised of engineering, parks, planning, building,
water, wastewater, composting, recreation, streets, forestry and zoning, have been utilizing
a simplex radio system since implementation of mobile radio communications. The current
system is inadequate for the same reason as the fire department plus there are too many
users on the single frequency. Since the availability of VHF frequencies is next to nothing,
we are proposing to move public works from the VHF band to UHF band where there are
available frequencies. Additionally, we are proposing that the City of Hutchinson enter into
a partnership agreement with Alpha Wireless Communications for the purpose of sharing
$c b)
• Mayor and Council
August 22, 2001
Page 2
a UHF infrastructure which is currently operating on the north water tower. Alpha Wireless
has been operating a UHF business band radio system for many years in the Hutchinson
area. They have invested a significant amount of money on this infrastructure and are
willing to partner with the city. In return for the partnership, the city would allow Alpha
Wireless to remain on the north water tower. Alpha Wireless would contribute $26,100 in
infrastructure (base station repeater and antenna system) and the city would contribute
$9,180 (base station repeater and interops bridge). This arrangement will accommodate
radio frequencies for all users, which will allow for individual work groups among all of the
public works components. Additionally, we will also be able to bring Hutchinson Utilities
into this system which will afford for improved communications during emergency
conditions.
As previously stated, I will be present at the August 28 Council meeting to deliver a power -
point presentation which I hope will help to understand these rather complex issues. It will
be necessary to accomplish the following tasks on the 28"':
• Approve or reject the purchase and installation of the fire department radio system.
• Approve or reject a contract with Alpha Wireless for system integration for the fire
• department system.
• Approve or reject the purchase and installation of the public;works radio system.
• Approve or reject the Site Partnerlfechnology Partnership Agreement with Alpha
Wireless.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time
/Ikg
2001 -01 -0008
•
$(b)
• SYSTEM INTEGRATOR AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made this day of , 2001, between City of
Hutchinson, hereinafter referred to as "Client ", and Alpha Wireless Communications Co.,
1115 Cross ST, North Mankato, MN, hereinafter referred to as "Integrator."
WHEREAS, Client wishes to retain Integrator to assist in the improvement of its
Fire Communications and related Law Enforcement systems located at the South Park
Water Tower.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, it is
agreed between the parties hereto as follows:
1. DURATION OF AGREEMENT: This agreement will continue in effect until
acceptance by client of the final phase of the specific project objectives, as set forth in
Exhibit A unless terminated earlier under paragraph 2 below.
2. EARLY TERMINATION: This agreement shall terminate automatically on the
occurrence of any of the following events:
a. Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party
• b. Sale of business of either party
c. Failure of client to pay Integrator within thirty (30) days from the date
payment is due, all or any part of compensation as set forth in Exhibit A.
d. Upon 30 day written notice by either party. (Services performed prior to
contract termination will be billed at standard hourly rate of $150 /hour).
3. DUTIES OF INTEGRATOR: Integrator agrees to provide services per attached
Exhibit A. Integrator will determine the method, details and means of performing the
specified services.
4. STAFF /ASSOCIATES: Integrator, at its own expense, may employ such assistants
deemed necessary to perform the services specified. Integrator assumes full and sole
responsibility for the payment of all compensation and expenses of any assistants and for
all state and federal income tax, unemployment insurance, social security, disability
insurance and other applicable withholdings.
5. EXPENSES: Integrator shall be responsible for its own cost of doing business and
for all cost and incidentals required to perform the services for client.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: It is understood by both parties that Integrator
is an independent contractor and not an employee, agent, joint venture, or partner of
client. Integrator will carry all necessary worker's compensation insurance for
• employees and agents and agrees to hold client harmless and indemnify client for any and
$ t V:!,)
all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of Integrators employees or
• agents.
7. COOPERATION: Client agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Integrator
necessary to the performance of Integrator's duties under this agreement.
8. ASSIGNMENT: Neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this
agreement may be assigned by client without the prior written consent of Integrator.
Likewise, neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this agreement nor
any duties or obligations under this agreement may be assigned by Integrator without the
prior written consent of client.
9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This agreement supersedes any and all agreement, either
oral or written between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by
Integrator for client, and contains all covenants and agreements between the parties with
respect to the rendering of such services. Each party to the Agreement acknowledges that
no representations, inducements, promise or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been
made by either party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied
herein, and that no other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this
Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any modifications of this Agreement will be
effective only if it is in writing and signed by both parties.
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and first
above written.
City of Hutchinson
By_
Title
Alph ireless munications Co.
Title-
0
$ C b)
• EXHIBIT A
SYSTEM INTEGRATION SERVICES
Scone of services
Alpha Wireless will assist the City in the effective design, procurement, installation and
optimization of a new Fire Repeater, the combining of existing law enforcement
transmitters and the improvement of RF isolation at the South Park Water Tower.
Specific Services
• Review and analysis of existing communications systems and alternative sites
• Perform site compatibility studies for proposed sites
• Present options and recommendations for alternative sites
• Assist in site selection
• Assist in frequency selection
• Conduct coverage test to determine acceptable coverage
• Prepare FCC license and submittal to frequency coordination
• Frequency coordination fees to modify existing license
• • Monitor frequency for selection of CTCS tone
• Design system using existing antennae
• Prepare equipment list of required radio equipment
• Receive equipment at our facility
• "Stage" equipment prior to field installation, test and acceptance
• Programming of duplexer to final frequency choice
• Programming of multicoupler
• Programming of receiver for Statewide Mutual Aid
• Reconfigure antenna cabling to allow state fire to utilize same antenna as
MINSEF/PT to Pt transmitter and PD Simplex
• System installation and optimization.
• Reprogramming of console at Hutchinson PD to accept and control system changes
• Coordinate work required by subcontractor such as Telephone company or
electrician
• Provide operator training, proof of performance testing, minor adjustments as needed.
• Any and all additional services required to make system operational and acceptable to
customer expectations
Amount of Reimbursement for services
• Upon completion Client shall pay Alpha five thousand dollars ( $5000.00)
gLb�
• Specific equipment, parts, or items provided
Cabling, connectors, and wiring to connect communications equipment
Power cables and line transformers
Power grounding
Any miscellaneous items necessary for a operating system
Additional Parts/ Services not part of this contract
Console Programming of McLeod County Console in Glencoe ..............$800.00
Programming of subscriber units .................... ............................... 20.00 each
Furnish battery box and battery for standby power ..... .........................100.00
11
0
$ ( h)
• SITE PARTNERITECHNOLOGY PARTNER AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made this _day of 2001, by and between Site Partner City of
Hutchinson, MN (" Hutch "), a Minnesota City, and Technology Partner Alpha Wireless Communications
Co ( "AWCC "), a Minnesota Corporation d.b.a. Mankato Mobile Radio, in Mankato, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, Hutch has a site, specifically a water tower located at the junction of School and Golf Course
Rd in the city of Hutchinson, MN. and
WHEREAS, AWCC has technological expertise in designing, building, and operating UHF LTR Trunking
systems, and has constructed a YG Trunked Industrial system under call sign WPPG768 at the above
referenced site, and
WHEREAS, Hutch is interested in operating a communication system for its public works and utilities
departments which utilizes UHF LTR trunking technology,
NOW, THEREFORE, Hutch and Alpha agree to work together to further the interest of respective parties
as follows:
AWCC has installed and agrees to continue operating an UHF LTR Trunking system and has constructed
an equipment enclosure within the base of the water tower. The system installed is valued at nineteen
thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500.00) and consists of the following:
(1) UHF dual feed antenna
(2)
7/8" transmission feed lines with connectors and in line lightning arrestors
(1)
Grounding hardware
• (1)
Transmitter Combiner and cabling
(1)
Receiver multicoupler with cabling
(2)
Equipment Racks
(1)
8'x10' secured equipment enclosure
(2)
Telephone line and equipment
AWCC will continue to repair and keep all equipment in proper working condition as long as this
agreement is in effect. AWCC shall be responsible for insuring all equipment against loss by theft,
lightning, storm damage, or any other incident that could render the equipment unusable.
AWCC will construct one channel of UHF LTR Trunking on a frequency obtained by Hutch and for
Hutch's use and provide all repairs necessary for proper operation. The cost basis of this equipment will be
sixty six hundred dollars ($6600.00)
Hutch will provide tower space and electrical needs in exchange for the use of AWCC's antenna system
and AWCC's providing one channel of UHF LTR Trunking as long as this agreement is in force. Should
Hutch decide to terminate this agreement, AWCC agrees to sell the UHF antenna system as listed above for
nineteen thousand five hundred dollars ($19,500.00) less 10% per year depreciation for each year this
agreement is in force but not less than 50% of the original cost. AWCC agrees to sell the one channel of
UHF LTR Trunking for sixty six hundred dollars ($6600.00) or a price as agreed upon by both parties.
Hutch will construct one channel of UHF LTR Trunking on a frequency obtained by Hutch and for Hutch's
use at a cost of sixty six hundred dollars ($6600.00) and reimburse AWCC for service and repair of
equipment at a rate of thirty-five dollars ($35.00) per month. Hutch will be responsible for insuring all
equipment against loss by theft, lightning, storm damage, or any other incident that renders the equipment
unusable.
•
V b)
• AWCC will assist Hutch in obtaining two (2) UHF repeater pairs within the FCC YW service code suitable
for operation as UHF LTR Trunking channels. Any FCC and frequency coordination fees shall be
responsibility of Hutch.
Should Hutch usage require additional channels, AWCC agrees to provide additional equipment at the
same price as outlined in this agreement.
AWCC will construct an " interops" channel, which connects the UHF LTR Trunking system and Hutch's
existing VHF frequency at a cost to Hutch of twenty one hundred dollars ($2100.00). This option will
consist of a control station interfaced to the communications console and an UHF LTR/ VHF transceiver
system located at the existing VHF system tower and utilizing Hutch's existing VHF antenna system.
Hutch will be responsible for all repairs and failures to the equipment such as loss by theft, lightning, storm
damage, or any other incident that could render the equipment unusable.
AWCC will "manage" the UHF LTR system. "Manage" shall include system diagnostics, system
programming, system optimization, interference isolation, activations, deactivations, and system usage
reports.
IN WITNESS WHEROF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the Date first
above written.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• ALPHA WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CO.
Paul HOefs
•
g (b)
Initial Alpha Wireless Investment
Antenna System. Building
Combiners, Couplers, Racks
Misc hardware 19500
Repeater m/ UHF Controller
for City use 0600
TOTAL
Ongoing Alpha yNondhk/
Service on Antenna System 150
Service onRepeater 35
Total ^`
Initial Hutchinson Investment
Repeater w/ UHF Controller
for City use 6600
|nieropnChanne| 2100
FCC License Coord 480
Total .'-9180
Ongoing Hutch Monthly
Service nnRepeater 35
Total
���
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MEMO
Finance Department
August 23, 2001
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 2001 GO Improvement Bond Sale
On Tuesday August 28, 2001, bids will be opened for the sale of
$2,205,000 GO Improvement Bonds. Steve Apfelbacher and Jim Prosser
will be presenting the results of that opening.
• Moody's, this past Thursday, reaffirmed the City's A3 Bond rating
for this issue. A copy of their faxed report is attached.
Assuming all is in order, the council will be asked to approve the
sale by adopting the resolution (part of which is included in the
packet) awarding the sale of the bonds.
•
glcl
• Councilmember introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent:
RESOLUTION NO. 11779
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,205,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2001; AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND
DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND LEVYING AD
VALOREM TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
(the City), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
1.01. Authorization This Council has heretofore ordered various local
improvement projects designated as School Road South, Block 13 Alley, Block 26 Alley, Shady
Ridge Circle, Griffen Avenue, Century Avenue, Roberts Park Storm Sewer, Century Avenue SE
Trail, Century Avenue SW Sidewalk, TH 15 South Trail, Grove Street, Thomas Avenue,
Sherwood Street SE, Water Street NW, Post Office Utility Relocate, South Grade Road Trunk
SS & WM, Rolling Meadows P, School Road NW and Street Lights (the Improvements), to be
constructed within the City under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The present
estimated total cost of the Improvements is as follows:
Project Costs $2,151,664
Discount 22,050
Contingency 786
Cost of Issuance 30.500
TOTAL $2.205.000
This Council has previously determined to issue and sell $2,205,000 principal amount of General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2001, of the City (the Bonds) to defray a portion of the
expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the Improvements,
including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, and
$22,050 representing interest as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. The remaining
costs of the Improvements will be paid from City funds and from interest earnings on proceeds
of the Bonds.
1.02. Sale of Bonds The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an
independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The
Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph
(9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60,
Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, sealed bids
for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids.
(C)
• The bids have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest
rates and net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable
proposal received is that of , of ,
(the Purchaser), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , the Bonds
to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the
Mayor and the City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the
part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the
unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith.
1.03. Issuance of Bonds All acts, conditions and things required by the
Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be
performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds have been done, do exist, have happened, and have
been performed, wherefore it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of
the Bonds, to provide for the security thereof, and to issue the Bonds forthwith.
1.04. Maturities This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the
Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the
assessments and ad valorem taxes to he levied for the cost of the Improvements.
1.05. Consolidation of Improvements Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
435.56, the Improvements are hereby consolidated and joined as one project.
Section 2. Form of Bonds The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the
• following form:
I *
2
9(c)
• made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation
or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the
City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule;
(ii) this Section 8 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of
paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any
change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect
and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the
primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the
interests of the Bondowners under the Rule.
If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide,
contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for
the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or
operating data being provided hereunder.
(3) This Section 7 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of
the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the
Rule.
Section 8. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds
The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the
payment of issuance expenses to Resource Bank & Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on
the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers &
• Associates, Inc.
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
•
20
g (c�
08/2312001 15:04 ET REF: N0004005.0000 FCOMY5 I9:.RP[,144z4U raga a ai c
ATTN: Kenneth B. Merrill
City of Hutchinson
• MOODY'S ASSIGNS A3 RATING TO HUTCHINSON (MN'S) SERIES 2001
$36 MILLION DEBT AFFECTED
Hutchinson (City of) MN
Municipality
Minnesota
Moody's Rating
Issue Rating
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2001 A3
Sale Amount $2,205,000
Expected Sale Date 08/28/01
Rating Description General Obligaition Unlimited Tax
NEW YORK, August 23, 2001 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A3
rating, with a stable outlook, to Hutchinson, Minnesota's $2,205,000 General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2001. In addition, Moody's affirms the A3
rating on the city's outstanding $33.96 million in general obligation bonds.
Proceeds from the bonds, all secured by the city's general obligation
unlimited tax pledge, will be used to finance the improvement of various
street projects. The A3 rating reflects the city's continuous tax base growth
- despite cutbacks at a major local employer, satisfactory financial position
- including maintenance of favorable reserves, and an above average, but
0 a nageable debt burden receiving significant support from non -levy sources.
MOODY'S EXPECTS CONTINUED TAX BASE GROWTH AS ANNEXED LAND DEVELOPS; RECENT
CUTBACK BY LARGEST EMPLOYER NOT EXPECTED TO HAMPER OVERALL GROWTH
Moody's expects continued tax base growth related to ongoing development of
land annexed over the past several years, as well as continued economic
stability due to its capacity as a small, regional economic hub. Steady and
significant growth in the city's $640 million tax base, averaging 10% growth
annually over the last four years, reflects residential and commercial
development as well as property appreciation. Additional commercial
development is expected south of a Super Wal -Mart store on newly annexed land.
The city is also experiencing housing growth which includes assisted living
units as well as single and multifamily housing. The city's local economy
includes two relatively large employers, Hutchinson Technology, Inc. (HTI) and
3M, which comprise almost 9% of the city's valuation. Approximately 600
employees were recently released from HTI and the impact remains unclear.
Moody's will continue to monitor the effects on employment and enterprise
revenues. However, city officials anticipate minimal impact as an extremely
tight labor market is expected to absorb most of the employees who choose to
stay in the community. Wealth indices for the city are moderately below state
averages.
SATISFACTORY FINANCIAL POSITION
Moody's expects the city to maintain a satisfactory financial position. The
fiscal 2000 General Fund balance exceeded $2.1 million, or 32.6% of General
nd revenues; fiscal 1999 also recorded an operating surplus of $197,000.
ngoing transfers from the self- supporting enterprise funds continue to
provide support, approximately $807,000 in fiscal 2000, to the city's general
fund operations. Officials project a slight operating surplus for fiscal 2001.
,�tc�
08/23/2001 15:04 ti ktr: mwwwo.uwu runuuun :v:acu941racyu rayu c up c
I
ABOVE AVERAGE DEBT BURDEN HAS SIGNIFICANT SUPPORT FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
• irect and Overall Debt burden, at 4.9% and 7 %, respectively, are above
average given the infrastructure needs associated with a growing local
economy. However, Moody's believes debt levels remain manageable given that in
recent years tax base growth has outpaced additions to debt, and debt burden
has actually declined from 9.1% in 1997. Additionally, the use of non - property
tax revenues such as water and sewer revenues, hospital revenues, and special
assessments for almost 83% of all general obligation debt mitigates the impact
upon the city -wide tax base. Moody's expects the city -owned 66 -bed hospital to
continue supporting hospital general obligation debt due to demonstrated
market demand and the hospital's alliance with Allina Health System, a major
multi- hospital system located in the Twin Cities. While debt service claims,
nearly a third of the operating budget, this is partially due to rapid
amortization, which pays 76% of the principal within ten years. It is expected
that the city will issue approximately $7 million in general obligation debt
for a hospital expansion in the next few years. This, however, is subject to
voter approval. Additionally, an expansion and improvement to the utility's
pipeline and water plant may require approximately $14 million in borrowing of
a $17 million project. Both projects would receive support from enterprises
that have historically been self- supporting, potentially mitigating the impact
on the general levy.
KEY STATISTICS:
2001 estimated population: 13,080
2001 full valuation: $ 640,446 million
*001 estimated full value per capita: $48,964
5 /01 unemployment (McLeod County): 3.4%
Direct Debt Burden: 4.9%
Debt burden: 7.0%
Payout of principal (10 years): 76%
FY00 General Fund balance: $2.125 million (32.6% of General Fund revenues)
ANALYSTS:
Yasmine Mandavi, Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service
Jonathan North, Backup Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors
Service
Nicole Johnson, Senior Credit Officer, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors
Service
CONTACTS:
Journalista: (212)
Research Clients:
•
553 -0376
(212) 553 -1625
CCU
•
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320.587- 515VFm 320 - 2344240
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Follow -up on Smoking Ordinance Restrictions
DATE: August 24, 2001
The City Attorney, Marc Sebora, was directed earlier this year (spring) to prepare an ordinance
on smoking restrictions in restaurants (excluding clubs). The Council decided to delay
consideration of any ordinance until more research was completed.
• The City conducted a survey among restaurant owners resulting in a wide -range of varying
opinions. Additionally, there was legal research done on whether or not an ordinance can be
placed on the ballot either as an advisory vote or for outright ordinance adoption/rejection.
Based on research, neither of these options are legal. The Council must first approve or
disapprove an ordinance, then the public can initiate a community-wide vote. Please review the
attached research.
In the event the community wants to vote on adopted ordinances, they certainly can do this. A
petition consisting of 20% of the number that voted in the last mayoral election is needed. This
is the only legal way under state law and city charter to vote on this question.
Regarding the upcoming November election, the petition must have verified signatures and be
forwarded from the city to the County Auditor by September 18 (49 days before the election).
•
primed on recycled paper -
1:9 (J)
•
•
•
10. Establishment of a merit system. Minn. Star. 44.02.
l 1. Amendment to merit system. Minn. Stat. 44.03.
12 Approval of use of excess revenue obtained from a
municipal liquor store. M Stat. 426 -19, subrl. 2.
13. Approval of some special laws when required- Minn.
Stat. 645,021, subd- 2.
Method C
A special election under this method is similar to
method B in that Minn. Stat. 205.10 subd. 1 does not
apply because the voters only have the authority to Pass
judgment on the types of questions within a specific
tirrie period after a city council action. The time period
Will vary depending on the issue and is established by the
statutes which govern the particular situation.
For a special election to be called under this his Mel
the voters m nt have a petition signed by rind aft
er of voters wi
numbihtu the allotted time Pe
passage and publication of the city council; action 0 '
number of signatures that are necessary
different questions. The city council bas no authorih to
call a spec ial election without a sufficient petition on f
this method- The majority which is necessary for the
question to pass will be set out in the par state
p
which govern the question.
2. Approval of purchase of real property by contract for
deed or personal property by conditional sales contract
when the price exceeds 0.24177 percen Soothe market
value of the city. Minn. Suit. 412.221,
3. Certificates of indebtedness for the purchase of
equipment. Minn. Stat. 412.301.
4, Fundinglrefunding bonds. Minn. Stat. 47558, subd. 2-
5. Increase in tax le Stat _ y 69 nni ubeve development
authority. Minn_
6. Increase in tax levy for port authority. Minn. Scat.
469- 053,subd. 5.
7, Continuation of municipal liquor store. Minn. Star
340A.60
Advisory Elections
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in Muehring v.
School District No. 31 of Stearns County, 224 Minn. 432
28 N w.2d 655 (1948), that if there is "no statutory
authorization for submission of a question to the voters
for their decision, such a su bmission t by 2psu w autho
clothed with power with respect the q e a delegated
^
constitutes is un at l tomey g re has ruled chat it would
power. Also the atorney
be an invalid expenditure for a city o hold an advisory Costs to the muWci
election regardless ere o be par d the
by donations- A•G.
pality even if they C 180J' See also A.G.
op. 185 -B -2, August 22. 1961, LM29'
Op. 64 -0, September 27, 1972, LM C 180' op.
D-15, February 15. 1954, LM of A.G. Op. A.G. . op.
January 19. 1956, L.MC 180j. For both of these reasons
advisory elections may no t be held unless they are
specifically, authorized by statute.
'nn. S2. b 12 3 is the only statute
which au orues an advisory election Under that
provision, if the city council has sole, authority to decide
the question, they tray submit to the voters the question
O f whether the city should join a special district or similar
independent govemtrierital body having taxing Powers
within the city. The results of the election are advisory
only and have no binding eff ect upon the cotroctl's
decision Minn. Stat. 412.221, subd33. Arry other
advisory elections held by the city 6 a
An example of a situation which may require a
special election under this methods t When ci t he ount 1
passes an ordinance which Chang
municipal general election under Minn. Stab. 205.0
After passage and publication of the ordinance the votew
have six months to generate a petition signed by eligible
voters equal in number to 10 percent of the votes cast in
the last municipal general election.
If a sufficient petition is filed with the clerk within
the required six months, then the Ordinance w of the
become effective until it is approved by maj
voters voting on the question The special election must
be held within 60 days after submission of the petition
and if the petition is filed the city council may reconsider
u action. Minn. Star. 205 -07, subd. 3,
ether questions that may be submitted to the voters
at a special election under this method include the
f
1. Consolidation with another city-
81 1L9'd
Election Requirements
Minn. Scat. 414.041.
Generally, special elections an coo du t i
same manner as the municipal g ene r al
election officials for special elections will be the same as
those for the last municipal genera] election. Minn Stab.
205.10,subd. 1.
b1:S1 1002 –T2 — one
53I l I J NW ��
g (d)
ORDINANCE NO. 01 -299
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AMENDING CHAPTER 6,
ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING" BY ADDING
SECTION 6.50, "PROHIBITING SMOKING IN RESTAURANTS AND LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENTS"
Section 1. Hutchinson City Code Chapter 6, entitled "Other Business Regulation and
Licensing ", Section 6.50 entitled "Prohibiting Smoking in Restaurants and Liquor Establishments"
is hereby adopted to read in its entirety as follows:
SECTION 6.50. SMOKING IN RESTAURANTS AND LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENTS - PROHIBITED:
Subd. 1. Findings of Fact and Purpose: The City Council finds that
the presence of secondhand tobacco smoke in restaurants and liquor
establishments is a serious health risk for persons exposed to secondhand smoke
and that it effectively deprives many nonsmokers of their use and enjoyment to said
premises. Specifically, the City Council notes that numerous studies have found
that tobacco smoke is a major contributor to indoor air pollution and is a Class A
carcinogen responsible for the deaths of thousands of nonsmoking Americans each
• year; and that breathing secondhand smoke is a cause of disease, including lung
cancer and bronchitis in nonsmokers; and that at special risk are children, elderly
people, and those individuals with cardiovascular disease; and that current
methods of separating designated smoking areas and nonsmoking areas in
restaurants do not adequately protect nonsmokers. The City Council further finds
that smoking contributes to litter, increases the danger of fire in both indoor and
outdoor spaces, and constitutes a potential future source of liability to those
restaurants and liquor establishments allowing smoking and is a danger to those
who work in such environments.
Accordingly, the City Council finds and declares that the purposes of this Section
are to protect the public health and welfare by prohibiting smoking in restaurants
and liquor establishments and to insure the ability of nonsmokers to breath smoke -
free air and to recognize that the need to breath smoke -free air shall have a priority
over the desire to smoke.
Subd. 2. Definitions:
(a) "Restaurant" means any eating establishment, including without limitation, any
bakery, coffee shop, cafeteria, cafe, sandwich shop, delicatessen, or any other
establishment serving food to members of the public, except that the term
"restaurant" shall not include a "club" as defined in Section 5.01 of the Hutchinson
Is City Code.
g tai
(b) "Liquor Establishment" means any establishment that has a non -sale 3.2
percent liquor license issued pursuant to Minnesota Statute §340A.403 or an on-
sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to Minnesota Statute §340A.404
except that "Liquor Establishment" shall not include a "club" as defined in Section
5.01 of the Hutchinson City Code.
(c) "Smoking" means the inhaling, exhaling or combustion of any cigar, cigarette,
pipe, tobacco product , weed, plant or any other similar article.
(d) "Tobacco Products" means any substance containing tobacco leaf, including
but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco.
Subd. 3. Smoking in Restaurants and Liquor Establishments is
hereby prohibited in all restaurants and liquor establishments in the City of
Hutchinson.
Subd. 4. Signs Required. Wherever this Section prohibits
smoking, conspicuous signs shall be posted so stating, containing all capital letters
not less than one inch in height on a contrasting background. Signs of a similar
size containing the international "no smoking" symbol consisting of a pictorial
representation of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across
it may be used in addition to or in lieu of any signs required hereunder. Such signs
• shall be placed by the owner, operator, manager, or other persons having control
of a restaurant or liquor establishment where smoking is prohibited. In addition,
signs shall be placed at or near the entrance to each building in which smoking is
prohibited.
Subd. 5. Retaliation Prohibited. No person or employer shall
discharge, refuse to hire or any manner retaliate against any employee, applicant
for employment, or customer because such employee applicant or customer
exercises any right to a smoke -free environment afforded by this Section.
Subd. 6. Other Applicable Laws. This Section is intended to
compliment the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, Minnesota Statute §144.411 to
144.417. This Section shall not be interpreted or construed to permit smoking
where it is otherwise restricted by this or other applicable laws.
Section 2. Responsibilities of Proprietors. The proprietor, owner, manager, or other person in
charge of a restaurant or liquor establishment shall:
(a) insure that ashtrays, lighters, and matches are not provided to patrons; and
(b) ask any person smoking in the restaurant or liquor establishment to refrain from
• smoking and if a person does not refrain from smoking after being asked to do so,
ask the person to leave the establishment; and
S (a)
• (c) inform employees about the requirements of this Ordinance.
Section 3. Violations and Penalties.
LJ
Subd. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person who owns, manages,
operates or otherwise controls the use of any premises subject to regulation under
this Section to fail to comply with any of its provisions.
Subd. 2. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke in any area
where smoking is prohibited by the provisions of this Ordinance.
Subd. 3. Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance
shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor.
Subd. 4. Any person who violates any provision of this Ordinance
within one year of a prior violation of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on October 1, 2001.
Adopted this day of 1 2001
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Marlin Torgerson
Its Mayor
Un
•
IvwftY limit
Gary Plotz
Its Administrator
g td)
•
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320 - 597- 5151/Fm 320. 2344240
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Lawrence Winter, Resource Recovery Coordinator
Doug Johnson, Compost Manager
Randy DeVries, Utility Director
SUBJECT: Liquidation of Used Nature -Tech Bins (4), Blowers, Control System, etc.
DATE: August 24, 2001
The City has 16 stainless -steel composting bins that are currently being utilized to their potential.
We fill one bin per day and the organics cook for 14 -20 days. We are seeing solid participation
numbers and we anticipate the need for more capacity. The current infra - structure (blower,
electric panels, computer controls, software) can accommodate 24 bins without additional cost.
• We have the old Nature -Tech system of four bins with controls and fans and their own software.
The fan, electrical panels, dampers, piping and software can = be tied into our existing process
control systems.
The four Nature -Tech bins are showing rust and are not in the best of condition. The covers are
bent and the spray -on exterior insulation is not in good condition. The containers are not
insulated on the top or bottom, and have a tendency to freeze up.
It is our recommendation to put the existing bins and process system out for public sale/bid, with
a minimum bid requirement of $80,000 (equipment sold "as is condition ").
n
LJ
Printed on recycled paper -
g Le)
�J
C
Parks, Recreation & Community Education
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
320- 587- 2975/Fax 320 - 234 -4243
MEMORANDUM
•
LI
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director PRCE
DATE: August 22, 2001
RE: Event/Community Center Grant
The long awaited State of Minnesota grant has arrived. The grant
provides $1 million dollars for renovation of 22,300 square feet of
space located within the Plaza Mall. Previous council action allows
Mayor Marlin Torgerson and City Administrator Gary Plotz to sign
the agreement on the city's behalf.
Rintcd on recycled Paper -
gcV)
I
Parks, Recreation & Co mmunity Education
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
320 - 587- 2975/Fax 320 - 234 -4243
MEMORANDUM
n
U
•
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director PRCE
DATE: August 22, 2001
RE: Wold Contract
Based on the committee review of the Events /Community Center
design proposals, it is recommended that the City Council enter into
agreement with:
Wold Architects and Engineers
305 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
The $75,000 fee for services is $42,000 less than the proposal
submitted by GLT Architects of St. Cloud. I would recommend
entering into the agreement.
Primed on recycled paper -
8C�)
r._
•
DATE: August 23, 2001
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hacsen Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320- 587.5151/Fm 320.2344240
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING
THE DEFINITIONS OF LOT REAR AND YARD, REAR (SECTION 3)
Pursuant to Section 6.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request to amend City
Zoning Ordinance Section 3.
HISTORY
On August 21, 2001, Hutchinson Planning Staff requested an amendment to the City Code Chapter 11,
Section 3 of the Zoning Ordinance, regarding the definitions of Lot Rear and Yard, Rear.
• FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the Ordinance have been complied with.
2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 9, 2001.
The hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 21, 2001, at
which time there was no one present objecting to the request.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request to amend the
Ordinance be approved as set forth.
Respectfully submitted,
W "" if -�
William Arndt, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
•
Printed on recycled paper -
g C ►,)
• Hutchinson City Code
Chapter 11
Section 3
Definitions
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 01 -297
Ordinance Amending Section 3 Relating To The Definitions of Lot Rear and Yard, Rear
SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS
LOT FRONT: That portion of a lot abutting a public street. If a lot abuts two public streets, the lot
front is the narrower of the two lot edges.
LOT REAR: That portion of a lot directly parallel with the front property line, but on irregular
lots see sketch Appendix "A" of Section 3. On corner lots, the rear shall be considered as
parallel to the street upon which the lot has its least dimension.
YARD, FRONT: A yard extending across the entire front of the lot and measured between the front
line of the lot and the front line of the building, or any projection thereof other than steps, balconies,
paved terraces, open decks, or bay windows.
• YARD, REAR: A yard extending across the entire rear of a lot and measured between the rear lot
line and the rear of the building, or any projection thereof other than steps, balconies, paved
terraces, porches or bay windows. On corner lots, the rear shall be considered as parallel to the
street upon which the lot has its least dimension.
h II n a ll saser he a t the o site eR of the lot f.e Fp the 40111 . aFd
EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council this day of 2001
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
is Amendment to the definition of Lot rear and Yard, Rear
City Council
August 28, 2001 - Page 1
S( k)
Hutchinson City Center
r�
�J
DATE: August 23, 2001
111 Hassan Stmt SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320 - 587 -515 VF" 320.2344240
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING
DRIVEWAY SETBACKS FOR OLDER HOMES IN RESIDENTIAL LOTS. (SECTION
8)
Pursuant to Section 6.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request to amend City
Zoning Ordinance Section 8.
HISTORY
• On August 21, 2001, Hutchinson Planning Staff requested an amendment to the City Code Chapter 11,
Section 8 of the Zoning Ordinance, regarding driveway setbacks for older homes In residential lots.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the Ordinance have been complied with.
2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 9, 2001.
The hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 21, 2001, at
which time there was no one present objecting to the request.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request to amend the
Ordinance be approved as set forth.
Respectfully submitted,
William Arndt, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
0
Premed on recycled paper -
SG)
PUBLICATION NO.
•
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 01-298
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8 RELATING TO DRIVEWAY SETBACKS
FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY
3) Setbacks, Yards, and Heights:
All residential districts shall require new driveways to be setback 5 feet from the side and rear
property lines If the driveway is being replaced, repaved, or reconstructed and the driveway is
located less than 5 feet but 3 feet or more from the property line, the driveway permit may be
issued with out a variance. The apron and curb cut shall be hard surfaced.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council this
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
day of 2001
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
z6)
city 0 F
August 23, 2001
To: Mayor & City Council
City of Hutchinson
Engineering/Public Works
Maintenance Operations
1400 Adams St SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234 -4287 Fax (320) 234 -6971
From: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir.
CC: Ken Merrill, Finance Director
Subject: Airport Wheel Loader w/ snow removal equipment
This request is for a 2001 Case 621 C wheel loader, w/ snow removal equipment. Based on the
analysis, I recommend purchasing a 2001 Case 621C wheel loader, with snow removal
equipment from St Joseph Equipment, Inc.
Funding the purchase:
is Case 621C wheel loader, with snow equipment = $120,184.00
Less: trade of 1988 IME sludge spreader: ( 14,500.00)
Taxes; 6,869.46
Total: $112,553.46
Funded by FAA Airport Improvement Plan grant: $101,298.11
Funded by City of Hutchinson: $ 11,255.35
Total: $112,553.46
We reviewed three options. We looked at Caterpillar, John Deere, and Case wheel loaders. The
Caterpillar was the most expensive wheel loader; the John Deere wheel loader was also more expensive
than the Case. The Case 621C is available from the State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Venture
( "State Bid "), matches our existing fleet, and is compatible with all implements we already own.
The primary function of this wheel loader will be snow removal at the airport. Considering this
use, and the fact fuel and indoor, heated storage are available at the airport, I would expect this
unit to serve for 20 years. Using this piece of equipment will allow one individual to complete
snow removal operations at the airport in time to accept routine air traffic, which typically begins
at 7:00 am.
The trade -in value of the 1988 IME sludge spreader is a contribution to the Central Garage. The
contribution will be applied to the purchase price of the tandem -axle dump truck, which is often
used by the Wastewater Department
• I am excited about this purchase, especially considering the value the City of Hutchinson receives
from an investment of only $11,255.
gc_�
I '
LJ
IMMEDIATE PAYS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
R55APPYREG
AP Payme nt Register
9999.102
8/23/2001
8/23/2001
11:11:33
Check Dat
Type
Vendor
Name
Amount
8/23/2001
105938
'
102541
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO
158.20
8/23/2001
105939
101869
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
373.00
8/23/2001
105940
102573
MCLEOD COOP POWER
694.89
8/23/2001
105941
101942
MDRA
20.00
6/23/2001
105942
110351
MGGA
20.00
8/23/2001
105943
110348
MIINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
40.00
8/23/2001
105944
101826
MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO
212.00
8/23/2001
105945
104787
MNAPA 1
160.00
8/23/2001
105946
102052
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
7,117.21
8/23/2001
105947
110350
RIDGEWATER COLLEGE
35.00
8/23/2001
105948
105011
SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION
30.00
8/23/2001
105949
102736
SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA EMS CORP
100.00
8/23/2001
105950
102132
VIKING COCA COLA 1
322.11
8/23/2001
105951
105354
WRIGHT COUNTY COURT ADMIN
500.00
Pa ent Type Total
9,782.41
Report Totals
9,782.41
IMMEDIATE PAYS
R55APPYREG 1-0320000
Void Amount Payment Type •
9999.1015
Check Payment
4,426.62
•
46,947.10
Check Date
Type
Check #
815101
Plc
105936
8/15!01
PK
105937
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AP Payment Register
8!15101 8116/01
VerKior Name
102633 HUTCHINSON. CITY OF
102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
Payment Type Tole]
Report Totals
823101 11:11:17
Page -
Amount
Void Amount Payment Type •
42,520.48
Check Payment
4,426.62
Check Payment
46,947.10
46,947.10
IMMEDIATE PAYS
0
Skip in Check Sequence or Duplicate Check
= Vold
• ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
8/28/01
H.A.T.S. FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -FUEL TAX 867.20
WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX 7418.00
GNRL FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -ARENA SALES TAX 1311.00
LIQUOR FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE- LIQUOR SALES TAX 3818.00-JUNE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE- LIQUOR SALES TAX 28266.00-JULY
E
MEMO
08/22/01 •
TO: CITY STAFF & BANK OFFICIALS
FROM: KEN MERRILL , FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER WIRE TRANSFER
The following funds need to be wired - interest payments
September 1, 2001
Chase NYC ABA # 021 - 000 -021 to credit the account of Cede &
Co, c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Dividend Deposit
Account # 066 - 026776 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950
1993 G O Water Revenue Bonds 9,183.75
1992 G O Refunding Recreation Bonds 1,372.50
10,556.25
The following funds need to be wired - PRINCIPAL payments
Chase NYC ABA # 021 -000 -021 to credit the account of Cede &
Co. Go THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Redemption Deposit
Account # 066- 027 -306 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950
1993 G O Water Revenue Bonds 35,000.00
35,000.00
(FAX of bond document must be made at same time for principal payment)
14:41:19
1
Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check
Vow
'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
828/01
5APPYREG
LOG20000
AP Payment Replster
Pape -
9.1015
8128/01 8!28101
.
Check Date
Type
Check ;V
Vendo
Name
Amount
Void Amount Paymem Type
628101
PK
105952'
101876
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO.
740.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
105953
101827
AG SYSTEMS
44.21
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
105954
110356
AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
514.66
Check Payment
828101
PK
105955
110188
ALDEN POOL 8 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
2,928.87
Check Payment
6128/01
PK
105956
101852
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN
16.18
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105957
101972
ARNDT, WILLIAM
100.00
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105958
110362
AVON GRINDING SERVICES, INC.
6,455.35
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105959
109203
AWWA- MINNESOTA SECTION
350.00
Check Payment
812 8/01
PK
105960
102969
BARKEIM, ELDEN
60.00
Check Payment
8128
PK
105961
102943
BAUERLY COMPANIES
160.78
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
105962
104758
BCA/CJDN CONFERENCE
50.00
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
105963
102367
BELLBOY CORP
1,743.12
Check Payment
8/28/01
PK
105964
110266
SEMBOOMS FENCE
933.73
Check Payment
828101
PK
105965
102039
BENNETT OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES
3,912.90
Check Payment
82901
PK
105966
102255
BERKLEY RISK SERVICES
800.00
Check Payment
8!28101
PK
105967
101916
BERNICIPS PEPSI COLA
596.60
Check Payment
8128101
PK
105968
104990
BLUHM, MARGIE
50.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
105969
101987
BRANDON TIRE CO
542.24
Check Payment
828/01
PK
105970
102752
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP
922.50
Check Payment
8/213/01
PK
105971
102456
C 8 L DISTRIBUTING
45,427.80
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105972
102083
CAMERA SHOP
23.26
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105973
102253
CENTRAL MCGOWAN
48.94
Check Payment
8/28/01
PK
105974
102432
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
316.22
Chalk Payment
8/28
PK
105975
101954
CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT
420.44
Check Payment
PK
105976
102050
CROW RIVER AUTO
738.76
Check Payment
• 8128101
8/28107
PK
105977
102220
CROW RIVER PRESS INC
1,277.67
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
105978
110370
CROW WING COUNTY COURT ADMIN
250.00
Check Payment
82 &01
PK
105979
102488
DAY DISTRIBUTING
6.580.75
Check Payment
6/18101
PK
105980
102261
DISPLAY SALES
449.44
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
105981
104084
DONOHUE 8 ASSOC
1,500.00
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
105982
103753
DUBOIS CHEMICALS
1,758.44
Check Payment
312 13101
PK
105983
102236
DUININCK BROS INC.
120,620.07
Check Payment
812 13101
PK
105984
107541
DURABLE COMPONENT TECH
179.56
Check Payment
812 8/01
PK
105985
102647
DYNA SYSTEMS
767.39
Check Payment
8/2 8/01
PK
105986
104415
EARTH TECH
8,307.00
Check Payment
6128101
PK
105987
102356
ELECTRO WATCHMAN
175.73
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
105988
105529
ENDRES, JIM
272.00
Check Payment
812 8/01
PK
105989
102689
ERLANDSON, DAVID
171.84
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
105990
102223
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT
1,071.58
Check Payment
8t28101
PK
105991
104137
FASTENAL COMPANY
36.85
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
105992
102094
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
113.63
Check Payment
W28/01
PK
105993
103340
GEB ELECTRICAL INC
219.75
Check Payment
812 8/01
PK
105994
102525
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC
161.60
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
105995
101893
GRAHAM, MARION
220.58
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
105996
102087
GRAINGER PARTS OPERATIONS
337.28
Check Payment
8128101
PK
105997
105562
GRANIT BRONZ
80.94
Check Payment
82901
PK
105998
101875
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
300.00
Check Payment
8/1 8101
PK
105999
101874
GRIGGS 8 COOPER 8 CO
19,821.95
Check Payment
828101
PK
106000
108668
GRUFRUFF DESIGN
1,231.25
Check Payment
828101
PK
108001
101872
H.R.L.A.P.R.
247.79
Check Payment
14:41:19
1
Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check
Vow
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
828!01 14:41:19
R55APPYREG
LOG20DDO
AP Payment RegWer
Pape - 2
8999.1015
BY1 8101 828101
Check Date
Type
Check tt
Vendor
Name
Amount
Vold Amount Payment Type •
828/01
PK
106002
102528
HAGER JEWELRY INC.
11.98
Check Payment
828/01
PK
106003
102730
HALI -BRITE INC
359.36
Check Payment
828tt11
PK
106004
102451
HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
3,602.90
Check Payment
828!01
PK
106005
102089
HANSEN GRAVEL
2,026.17
Check Payment
828101
PK
106006
104756
HARMON AUTOGLASS
374.94
Check Payment
828101
PK
106007
102401
HART'S AUTO SUPPLY
213.09
Check Payment
828101
PK
106008
102412
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
677.87
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106009
102546
HCVN -TV
9,860.15
Check Payment
828!01
PK
106010
105493
HEARTLAND TIRE 8 SERVICE
205.29
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105011
102701
HENRY B ASSOCIATES
225.13
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106012
102531
HENRYS FOODS INC
1,233.00
Check Payment
82&01
PK
106013
101915
HERMEL WHOLESALE
247.22
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106014
102518
HILLYARD FLOOR CAREJHUTCHINSON
717.78
Check Payment
828/01
PK
106015
105080
HIRSHFIELUS DECORATING CENTER
60.67
Check Payment
828101
PK
106016
109744
HOERNEMANN, WARREN
48.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106017
102961
HRA
783.99
Check Payment
828101
PK
105018
102534
HUTCH AUTO BODY
3,293.42
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106019
102139
HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COM
80.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
105020
102319
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
1,512.40
Check Payment
828101
PK
105021
102530
HUTCHINSON CO-OP
38.17
Check Payment
828101
PK
106022
102537
HUTCHINSON LEADER
222.08
Check Payment
828/01
PK
106023
102540
HUTCHINSON PLUMBING 8 HEATING
6728
Check Payment
828/01
PK
106024
102541
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO
1,087.14
Check Payment
8126101
PK
106025
105161
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
17,924.91
Check Payment
8128
PK
106026
101869
HUTCHINSON. CITY OF
141.33
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
106027
101869
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
502.00
Check Payment
•
828/01
PK
106028
102072
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
23,657.09
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
105029
102633
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
2,298.91
Check Payment
828/01
PK
106030
102635
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
96.35
Check Payment
&28101
PK
106031
102771
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
11,462.91
Check Payment
828101
PK
106032
103099
HUTCHINSON. CITY OF
539.75
Check Payment
828101
PK
106033
110268
I.T.L. PATCH COMPANY, INC.
475.10
Check Payment
828101
PK
106034
101873
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
2,523.46
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106035
103171
IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES
290.85
Check Paymenl
8128
PK
106036
102272
INDIANHEAD SPECIALTY CO
199.50
Check Payment
828101
PK
106037
102551
INSURANCE PLANNERS
8,092.05
Check Payment
828101
PK
106038
103520
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
219.18
Check Payment
628/01
PK
106039
102082
JACKS UNIFORMS 8 EQUIPMENT
6.71
Check Payment
828101
PK
106040
102208
JEFFS ELECTRIC
1,253.81
Check Payment
828101
PK
106041
101938
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
12,705.64
Check Payment
&28101
PK
106042
102346
JOHNSON, LEONARD G.
812.76
Check Payment
828101
PK
106043
105521
KINNEY 8 LANGE
35.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106044
102239
KLEESPIE
213.85
Check Payment
828101
PK
106045
105245
KLEMP WISCHNACK, JULIE
128.64
Check Payment
8120/01
PK
106046
104416
KOHLS SWEEPING SERVICE
1,612.50
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106047
104949
KOSEK, RICHARD
60.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106048
102561
L 8 P SUPPLY CO
979.08
Check Payment
828101
PK
106049
101976
LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORP
1,669.00
Check Payment
8
PK
106050
102006
LAMPLIGHTER II
59.05
Check Payment
8/28101
PK
106051
105525
LAND EQUIPMENT OF NORWOOD
9.28
Check Payment
' • Skip In Check Sequence
a Duplicate Check
I •
V = Void
CITY OF HUTCHINSON 828101 14'41:19
5APPYREG LOG20000
AP Payment Register Pape - 3
19.1015
B28Po1 8/28101
•
Check Date
Type
Check 4
Venda
Name
Amount
Void Amwnt Payment Type
828/01
PK
106052
110267
LEADERS DISTRIBUTING
67.89
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106053
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES - INSURANCE
234.02
Check Payment
82 8/01
PK
106054
101974
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
5,308.60
Check Payment
8128
PK
106055
103151
LITTLE CROW ARCHERY CLUB
373.24
Check Payment
812&
PK
106056
101964
LOCHER BROTHERS INC
33,174.47
Check Payment
828J01
PK
106057
102145
M -RSIGN
926.29
Check Payment
828101
PK
106058
104936
MACA
65.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106059
102571
MACOUEEN EQUIP INC
409.33
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
106060
102572
MANKATO MOBILE RADIO
6,910.80
Check Payment
828101
PK
106061
102573
MCLEOD COOP POWER
4,000.00
Check Payment
828!01
PK
106062
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
188.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106063
101831
MCLEOD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
108.60
Check Payment
82 &01
PK
106064
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
780.00
Check Payment
8
PK
106065
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
5,822.96
Check Payment
828101
PK
108066
102131
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
359.71
Check Payment
828101
PK
106067
101889
MID - MINNESOTA HOTMI %INC
770.34
Check Payment
828101
PK
106068
102425
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
1,056.40
Check Payment
828101
PK
106069
102449
MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN
175.81
Check Payment
828101
PK
106070
103119
MINNESOTA DEPT OF EMPLOYEE REL
50.00
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106071
101947
MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR & INDU
20.00
Check Payment
&28101
PK
106072
101626
MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO
182.00
Chekik Payment
82&01
PK
106073
102582
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
78.59
Check Payment
82&01
PK
106074
105157
MINNESOTA SHREDDING
109.90
Check Payment
828101
PK
105075
102583
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
692.60
Check Payment
PK
106076
110363
NASH FINCH COMPANY
2,070.78
Check Payment
• 828/01
82&01
PK
106077
110369
NAUSTDAL CONSTRUCTION
140.82
Check Payment
M8101
PK
106078
102650
NCL
515.87
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
106079
101914
NCPERS LIFE INS.
12.00
Check Payment
W8101
PK
106080
110264
NORTHERN PIPELINE CONSTR
4,580.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106081
102180
NORTHERN SAFETY CO
111.41
Check Payment
8
PK
106082
102591
NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC
534.70
Check Payment
828101
PK
106083
102487
OFFICEMAX
96.84
Check Payment
828101
PK
106084
110357
OLSON, KAREN
20.00
Check Payment
828101
PK
106085
110353
P.F. PETTIBONE & CO.
304.95
Check Payment
828101
PK
106086
108859
PARTS ASSOCIATES INC
75.30
Check Payment
8/215101
PK
106087
102479
PENSKE AUTO CENTER
299.77
Check Payment
8126/01
PK
106008
102658
PERA- D.C.P.
52.02
Check Payment
812&
PK
106089
105407
PETTET, RICH
32.00
Check Payment
812&01
PK
106090
101853
PHILLIPS WINE &SPIRITS
5,025.35
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
106091
102491
PINKERTON SYSTEM INTERGRATION
2,854.07
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106092
102656
PIONEER
457.95
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
106093
105428
PIZZA HUTISKY VENTURES LLC
27.19
Check Payment
828101
PK
106094
101877
PRUDENTIAL
75.00
Check Payment
&28101
PK
106095
102096
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
30.00
Check Payment
8/2 8/01
PK
106096
102615
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
19,395.31
Check Payment
828101
PK
106097
102598
OUADE ELECTRIC
1,886.73
Check Payment
82&01
PK
106098
102212
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
5,276.23
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106099
102052
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
2,857.44
Check Payment
828101
PK
106100
102205
R.C. TRANSFER
1,290.97
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
106101
102384
ROD EQUIPMENT
43.50
Check Payment
• Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check
= Void
CITY OF HUTCHINSON 8/28/01 14:41:19
R55APPYREG LOG2D000
AP Payment Register Pape - 4
9999.1015
8f28!01 828Po1
Check bete
Type
Check q
Vendk
Name
Amount
Vold Amount Payment Type I •
8/28/01
PK
106102
104149
RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS
77.49
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106103
102021
RODEBERG, JOHN
64.96
Check Payment
8
PK
106104
110265
SANCO CLEANING SUPPLIES
242.01
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106105
102436
SARA LEE COFFEE 6 TEA
163.60
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106106
102506
SCHMELING OIL CO
188.81
Check Payment
8@ &01
PK
106107
109801
SCOTTS WINDOWS
42.60
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106108
109794
SEARS
47924
Check Payment
&28101
PK
106109
109216
SEELY PLASTICS INC
241.76
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106110
101892
SEH
9,472.77
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106111
102749
SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY BOARD
170.00
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106112
102637
SEVEN WEST WASH 8 DRY
25.29
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106113
110262
SHAKOPEE, CITY OF
8,400.00
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106114
102609
SHOPKO
172.00
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106115
107543
SIGN SHOP, THE
93.28
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106116
102610
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
471.74
Check Payment
8/18101
PK
106117
101909
SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
86.39
Check Payment
Bn&ol
PK
106118
102611
SORENSEN'S SALES 8 RENTALS
431.34
Check Payment
&28101
PK
105119
102242
SRF CONSULTING GROUP
12,722.97
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
106120
102747
ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC
315.88
Check Payment
8
PK
106121
102612
STANDARD PRINTING
419.71
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106122
110358
STEWART, BARRY 8 LYNDA
10.00
Check Payment
8/1&01
PK
106123
102617
STREICHERS
143.81
Check Payment
8728101
PK
106124
103055
SUPERIOR FORD INC
43,164.00
Check Payment
812&01
PK
106125
102659
TEK MECHANICAL
184.93
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106126
101879
TEMPLETON INC
369.95
Check Payment I
9/28101
PK
106127
102772
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
110.23
Check Payment
•
&28/01
PK
106128
103250
TILTON. DAVID
216.00
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106129
102454
TRI- COUNTY BEVERAGE 6 SUPPLY
353.15
Check Payment
812 8/01
PK
106130
102126
TRUE VALUE
207.76
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
106131
109290
TURJA, JASEN
140.00
Check Payment
8128/01
PK
105132
102619
TWO WAY COMM INC
42.61
Check Payment
8/2&01
PK
106133
102058
U.S. CAVALRY
199.99
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
106134
102201
UHL CO.
412.16
Check Payment
8/2 8/01
PK
106135
102624
UNITED BUILDING CENTERS
131.33
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
106136
102435
US OFFICE PRODUCTS
97.01
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106137
102419
VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON
798.19
Check Payment
82 &01
PK
106138
102132
VIKING COCA COLA
306.45
Check Payment
82 8101
PK
106139
110354
VORBECK, ORVILLE 8 LOIS
70.00
Check Payment
8728101
PK
106140
101880
WADELL 8 REED
150.00
Check Payment
8/2 &01
PK
106141
103342
WAHL REBUILD 8 REPAIR INC
100.00
Check Payment
8/2 8/01
PK
106142
108598
WAL -MART
7.96
Check Payment
B128101
PK
106143
102165
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
60.00
Check Payment
842 15/01
PK
106144
102641
WELDERS SUPPLY CO
34.30
Check Payment
812 8101
PK
106145
110359
WOLFF, AUDREY
23.00
Check Payment
812 13/01
PK
106146
103068
WRIGHT, LEE
300.00
Check Payment
8128101
PK
106147
102632
XEROXCORP
835.36
Check Payment
6Y28/01
PK
108148
105318
XPECT FIRST AID
99.22
Check Payment
8/2 8101
PK
106149
105571
ZEP MANUFACTURING CO
178.19
Check Payment
Payment Type Total 541,924.50
' = Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check I
V =Vold
SAPPYREG LOG20000
19.1015
• Check Pate Type
•
Check# Vendor Name
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AP Payment Register
8/28/01 828101
Amount
Report Totals 541,924.50
812&01 14:41:19
Page - 5
Void Amount Payment Type
= Skip in Check Sequence or Duplicate Check
= Vold
•
•
8 -14 -01 CounciL
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
8/21/2001
9:24:10
R55APPYREG
AP Pa ment Register
Page -
1
9999.102
8/14/2001
8/14/2001
Check Dat
Type
Vendor
Name
Amount
8/14/2001
105567
102136
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
1,551.56
8/14/2001
105568
101876
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO.
740.00
8/14/2001
105569
101827
AG SYSTEMS
127.19
8/14/2001
105570
110188
ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
1,101.95
8/14/2001
105571
101835
ALLEN PRECISION 1
68.00
8/14/2001
105572
102217
ALLIED SERVICES OF HUTCHINSON
65.75
8/14/2001
105573
101919
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
86.82
8/14/2001
105574
101852
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN
390.82
8/14/2001
105575
102430
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL
173.26
8/14/2001
105576
101904
ANDERSON DOVE FRETLAND & VAN V
7,467.50
811412001
105577
101897
ANDERSON'S DECORATING CENTER
172.62
8/14/2001
105578
110201
AQUARIA PETS & FW ROOFING AND
3,700.00
8/14/2001
105579
110179
AQUARIA PETS & PLBG -HTG BY CRA
58.55
8/14/2001
105580
103032
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO
85.31
8/14/2001
1055811
110205
BAKKEN JANET 1
25.00
8/14/2001
105582
109638
BARRETH TRUCKING
1,613.00
8/14/2001
105583
109678
BAUCKHAM MELISSA
23.00
8/14/2001
105584
102943
BAUERLY COMPANIES
297.48
8/14/2001
105585
102039
BENNETT OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES
5,062.93
8/14/2001
105586
110197
BERGERON ROBIN
7.94
8/14/2001
105587
104722
BERGLUND JAY
252.00
8/14/2001
105588
101916
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA
869.44
8/14/2001
1055891
102837
BIOCYCLE
113,00
8/14/2001
1055901
109291
BLAKE TONY
96.00
8/14/2001
1055911
110187
BOECKERS DENNIS
120.00
8/14/2001
105592
102729
BOLTON & MENK INC.
55,782.17
8/14/2001
105593
110182
BOMSTAD CHRISTINE
34.00
8/14/2001
105594
101987
BRANDON TIRE CO 1
3,824.89
8/14/2001
105595
102856
BREEZY POINT RESORT
196.89
8/14/2001
105596
101928
BREMIX CONCRETE CO
33.43
8/14/2001
105597
110178
BRIGGS CAROL 1
22.00
8/14/2001
105598
102015
BROWNS GREENHOUSE
84.77
8/14/2001
1055991
104728
BRY -AIR 1
2,279.57
8/14/2001
1056001
110184
BULLERT DOROTHY
45.00
8/14/2001
1056011
102456
C & L DISTRIBUTING
32,153.20
8/14/2001
1056021
102117
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
20.32
8/1412001
105603
1031001
CARTER RON
60.00
8/14/2001
105604
105373
CCS CONTRACTING
4,687.54
8/14/2001
105605
103014
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
609.55
8/14/2001
105606
104391
CENTRAL HYDRAULICS
365.54
8/14/2001
105607
102253
CENTRAL MCGOWAN
89.80
8/14/2001
105608
101840
CENTURY LABS 1
178.59
8/14/2001
105609
104163
CHIEF SUPPLY CORP
150.12
8/14/20011
105610
105423
CINDY'S HOUSE OF FLORAL DESIGN
26.63
8/14/2001
105611
104784
CMI INC
20,49
8 -14 -01 CounciL
8/14/2001
105612
102741
COBORN'S INCORPORATED
255.78
8/14/2001
105613
102432
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
374.90
8/14/20011
105614
102048
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
141.94
8/14/2001
105615
102892
CROW RIVER ARTS
66.00
8/14/2001
105616
104879
CROW RIVER TITLE
39.67
8/14/2001
105617
102121
CROW RIVER VET CLINIC
521.55
8/14/2001
105618
110214
CT FARM & COUNTRY
372.74
8/14/2001
105619
101864
DAAK REFRIGERATION
38.00
8/1412001
105620
102678
DAGGETT DORIS 1
225.00
8114/2001
105621
108869
DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN
2,525.35
8114/2001
105622
102721
DASCHER DUANE
80.00
8/1412001
105623
102488
DAY DISTRIBUTING
4,639.10
8/14/2001
105624
110199
DEMARS JO
9.69
8/14/2001
105625
102698
DEVRIES RANDY
938.87
6/14/2001
1056261
102393
DON HUME
166.86
8/14/2001
105627
102275
DPC INDUSTRIES INC
2,062.09
8/14/2001
105628
102236
DUININCK BROS INC.
84,699.27
8/14/2001
105629
102647
DYNA SYSTEMS
480.09
8/14/2001
105630
102343
E & T CONTRACTING
21,223.86
8/1412001
105631
104415
EARTH TECH
1
9,585.00
8/14/2001
105632
102726
ECOLAB PEST ELIM
1
42.60
8/14/2001
105633
102354
ECONOFOODS
1
444.45
8/14/2001
105634
102326
ELECTRIC MOTOR CO
9.05
8/14/2001
105635
105115
ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAIN
5,424.92
8/14/2001
105636
102473
ELEMENT K
49.00
8/14/2001
105637
101898
EMANS BRAD
149.77
8/14/2001
105638
105323
EQUIFAX CITY DIRECTORY
568.71
8/14/2001
105639
102223
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT
5,033.42
8/14/2001
105640
110211
FENRICH DALE
75.00
8/14/2001
1056411
110185
FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC
149.10
8/14/2001
1056421
102094
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
351.59
8/14/2001
1056431
103583
FIX -IT PLUS LLP
600.00
8/14/2001
1056441
110180
FLEMMING JUDY
20.70
8/14/2001
1056451
102030
FORBES AUTO
19.16
8/14/2001
1056461
102636
FORTIS BENEFITS
2,364.37
8/14/2001
1056471
105596
FRANKE PUBLICITY INC
1,200.00
8/14/2001
1056481
102526
G & K SERVICES
2,149.49
8114/2001
1056491
101945
GALL'S INC
46.98
8/14/2001
1056501
103340
GEB ELECTRICAL INC
393.00
8/14/2001
1056511
110200
GEHRKE ACCOUNTING
11.23
8/14/2001
1056521
109726
GLENCOE-HUTCH AGRONOMY J/V
1,634.02
8/14/2001
1056531
102525
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC
227.20
8/14/2001
1056541
101893
GRAHAM MARION 1
237.15
8/14/2001
1056551
101875
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
300.00
8/14/2001
1056561
101874
GRIGGS & COOPER & CO
12,038.74
8114/2001
1056571
101872
H.R.L.A.P.R.
247.79
8/14/2001
105658
102529
HACH COMPANY
298.02
8/14/2001
105659
105004
HACKER'S APPRAISAL SERVICES IN
2,750.00
8/14/2001
105660
110215
HALBACH ANGELA 1
225.30
8/14/2001
105661
102451 IHANSEN
DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
2,265.60
8/14/2001
105662
102089
HANSEN GRAVEL
1
193.86
8/14/2001
105663
104756
HARMON AUTOGLASS
310.09
•
•
9
87/14/2001
105664
109799
HARRIS COMPANIES
3,038.79
8/14/2001
105665
110208
HAWKEYE ENTERPRISES INC
197,722.70
8/14/2001
105666
102412
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
364.42
8/14/2001
105667
102546
HCVN -TV I 1
6.00
8/14/2001
105668
105493
HEARTLAND TIRE & SERVICE
459.31
8/14/2001
105669
105341
HEIKES GLORIANN
13.00
8/14/2001
105670
103240
HEMMAH KATHY
21.55
8/14/20011
105671
103059
HEMMAH LLOYD
268.00
8/14/2001
105672
102701
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
571.07
8/14/2001
105673
102531
HENRYS FOODS INC
1,758.90
8/14/2001
105674
101915
HERMEL WHOLESALE
194.59
8/14/2001
105675
102518
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
1,697.23
8/14/2001
105676
105080
HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER
101.12
8/14/2001
105677
110183
HOOPER CARLA 1
45.00
8/14/2001
1056781
110177
HOUSENICK TERESA
24.00
8/14/2001
1056791
102961
HRA
1 1
4,700.00
8/14/2001
1056801
102885
HUTCH BOWL 1
1,497.50
8/14/2001
1056811
102319
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
19.50
8/14/2001
1056821
108389
HUTCHINSON AUTO CENTER
408.34
8/14/2001
1056831
102530
HUTCHINSON CO -OP
195.90
8/14/2001
105684
102533
HUTCHINSON CONVENTION & VISITO
6,644.83
8/14/20D1
105685
102537
HUTCHINSON LEADER
2,592.49
8/14/2001
105686
102540
HUTCHINSON PLUMBING & HEATING
65.00
8/14/2001
105687
102541
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO
10,792.69
8/14/2001
105688
102542
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
39,522.17
8/14/2001
105689
102543
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
1,370.95
8/14/2001
105690
101869
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
327.00
8/14/2001
1057481
1027711
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
10,824.02
8/14/2001
105749
103099
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
532.88
8/1412001
105750
103246
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
18,100.41
811412001
105751
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
343.06
8/14/2001
105752
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
644.53
8/14/2001
105753
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
475.22
8/14/2001
105754
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
394.78
8/14/2001
105755
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
154.41
8/14/2001
105756
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
1,214.70
8/14/2001
1057571
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
15.60
8/14/2001
1057581
1051601
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
6,101.76
6/14/2001
1057591
1051601
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
2,744.19
8/14/2001
1057601
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
6,014.66
8/14/2001
1057611
1051 60
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
8,446.63
8/14/2001
1057621
1051601
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
239.40
8/14/2001
105763
105160
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
3,208.68
8/14/20011
1057641
1051601
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
305.23
8/14/20011
1057651
101873 ICMA
RETIREMENT TRUST
2,523.46
8/14/20011
1057661
1031711 IMPERIAL
PORTA THRONES
74.30
8/14/2001
1057671
102272 INDIANHEAD
SPECIALTY CO
8,20
8/14/2001
105768
101851 INTOXIMETERS
INC
106.50
8/14/2001
105769
102062 JACK'S
UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT
47.70
8/14/2001
1057701
110175 JELKIN
TAMARA
10.00
8/14/2001
105771
102652 JERRYS
TRANSMISSION
1,983.72
8/14/2001
1057721
102556 JOES
SPORT SHOP 1
524.40
8/14/2001
105773
101938
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
8,549.11
8/14/2001
105774
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
30.00
8/14/2001
105775
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
117.00
8/14/2001
105776
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
1,801.50
8/14/2001
105777
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
1,804.00
8/14/2001
105778
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
117.00
8/14/2001
105779
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
110.00
8114/2001
1057801
102557
K MART
122.13
8/14/2001
1057811
110209
K.E.E.P.R.S. INC
65.00
8114/2001
1057821
103269
KELLY LEROY
100.00
8/14/2001
1057831
105245
KLEMP W ISCHNACK JULIE
72.04
8/14/2001
1057841
110176
KRIPPNER JENNI
1
88.00
8/14/2001
1057851
102123
KRISHNAMOORTHI CHITRA
12.01
8/14/2001
1057861
102561
L 8 P SUPPLY CO 1
1,317.44
8/14/2001
105787
104259
LANG'S OLD FASHIONED MEAT MARK
217.83
8/14/2001
105788
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES - INSURANCE
6,805.25
8/14/2001
105789
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES - INSURANCE
2,365.28
8/14/2001
105790
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES - INSURANCE
79.13
8114/2001
105791
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES- INSURANCE
153.85
8/14/2001
105792
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES- INSURANCE
287.30
8/14/2001
105793
102560
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES- INSURANCE
1,351.19
8/14/2001
1057941
101974
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
3,966.30
8/14/2001
105795
110173
LINDO MEXICO RESTAURANT
400.00
8/14/2001
105796
101984
LOCHER BROTHERS INC
17,718.40
8/14/2001
105797
109380
M SHANKEN
20.00
8/14/2001
105798
102145
M -R SIGN
344.39
8/14/2001
105799
102571
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
114.05
8/14/2001
105800
102572
MANKATO MOBILE RADIO
539.74
8/14/2001
105801
102781
MCDONALD SALES 8 SERVICE
717.50
8/14/2001
1058021
110210
MCLEOD COUNTY C.A.R.E. COUNCIL
30.00
8/14/2001
105803
102166
MCLEOD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH NU
790.00
8/14/2001
105804
101831
MCLEOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
39.00
8/14/2001
105805
101831
MCLEOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
224.39
8/14/2001
105806
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
500.00
8/14/2001
105807
102131
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
3,459.65
811412001
105808
101889
MID - MINNESOTA HOTMIX INC
2,698.67
8/14/2001
105809
104830
MIDWEST FORENSIC PATHOLOGY
100.00
8/14/2001
1058101
102575
MINI BIFF 1 1
87.86
811412001
105811
105274
MINN BLUE DIGITAL IMAGING
12.14
8/14/2001
105812
103121
MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE
240.00
8/14/2001
105813
102449
MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN
175.81
8/14/2001
105814
103070
MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS
300.00
8/14/2001
105815
108770
MINNESOTA DEPT OF ADMIN INTERT
127.56
8/14/2001
105816
101826
MINNESOTA DEPT OF NATURAL RESO
254.00
8/14/2001
105817
102582
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
78.59
8114/2001
1058181
102569
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE
827.40
8114/2001
105819
102580
MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
279.74
8/14/2001
105820
105157
MINNESOTA SHREDDING
164.85
8/14/2001
105821
102570
MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION
100.00
8/14/2001
105822
102840
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION ALLIA I
265.00
8/14/2001
105823
102583
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
799.75
8/14/2001
105824
104247
MINNESOTA WASTE WISE
200.00
a
•
Cj
8/14/2001
105825
104787
MNAPA
320.00
8/14/2001
105826
102655
MODERN MAZDA
157.17
8/14/2001
105827
102650
NCL
484.76
8/14/2001
105828
101914
NCPERS LIFE INS.
312.00
8/14/2001
105829 108397
NEILS FRANZ CHIRHART
5.00
8/14/2001
105830 110186
NIELSEN TRACY
44.00
8/14/2001
105831 105204
NORTH STAR ICE 1
96.00
8/14/2001
105832 105384
1 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO
24,691.36
8/14/2001
105833 102591
NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC
45.40
8/14/2001
105834 102487
OFFICEMAX
1,074.34
8/14/2001
105835 102592
OLSON'S LOCKSMITH
376.52
8/14/2001
105836 110194
OLSON BRAD
200.00
8/14/2001
105837
110174
ONDEO NALCO CO
3,965.29
8/14/2001
105838
102483
OTTO ASSOCIATES
2,438.00
8/14/2001
105839
102947
PARSONS EBBA
45.00
8/14/2001
105840
102187
PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO
357.16
8/14/2001
105841
15,932
PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING
1,770.00
8/14/2001
105842
102479
PENSKE AUTO CENTER
347,06
8/14/2001
105843
102658
PERA- D.C.P.
250.02
8/14/2001
105844
110196
PETERSON CHRISTINE
29.99
8/14/2001
105845
102923
PETERSON JEAN
45.00
8/14/2001
105846
105407
PETTET RICH
64.001
8/14/2001
105847
101853
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
7,060.33
8/14/2001
105848
102446
PINKERTON SERVICES GROUP
192.00
8/14/2001
105849
102373
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
779.51
8/1412001
105850
105428
PIZZA HUT /SKY VENTURES LLC
69.14
8/14/2001
105851
103432
PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE
136.75
8/14/2001
105852
102232
PRAIRIE RESTORATION
297.30
8/14/2001
105853
104065
PREMIER CROWN CORP
449
8/14/2001
105854
102493
PREMIER TECH PACKAGING
2,174
8/14/2001
105855
102899
PRIEVE LANDSCAPING
106.50
8/14/2001
105856
101877
PRUDENTIAL
75.00
8/14/2001
105857
102096
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
30.00
8/14/2001
105858
102615
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
18,998 97
8/14/2001
105859
102598
QUADE ELECTRIC I I
884 73
8/14/2001
105860
102052
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
1,071.20
8/14/2001
105861
102628
QW EST 1
177 64
8/14/2001
105862
102398
R & R EXCAVATING
156,399.36
8/14/2001
105863
102398
R & R EXCAVATING
70,369.54
8/14/2001
105864
102398
R & R EXCAVATING
96,809.75
8/14/2001
105865
102604
R & R SPECIALTIES INC
132.00
8/14/2001
105866
105547
R L LARSON EXCAVATING INC
7,481.25
8/14/2001
105867
103832
RCH INC 1
9,612.69
8/14/200
5 681
102384
RDO EQ UIPMENT
23.21
8/14/2001
105869
102478
REINER CONTRACTING
7,639.71
8/14/2001
105870
102395
REINER IRRIGATION & SEPTIC
71.90
8/14/2001
105871
101962
REINER LANDSCAPING
93.68
8/14/2001
105872
110216
REMAX REALTY & LARAWAY ROOFING
18,500.00
8/14/2001
105873
109308
RICE STEVE
96.00
8/14/2001
105874
110181 RIPP
RESTRAINTS INC
150.00
8/14/2001
105875
1046681 ROCK
CHRISTIE
136.76
8/14/2001
105876
102225 RUNNING'S
SUPPLY
1,559.87
8/14/2001
105877
105081
I RUTLEDGE LENNY I
344.84
8/14/2001
105878
104748
S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
490.62
8/14/2001
105879
102436
SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
331.46
8/14/2001
105880
104746
SCAN AIR FILTER
141.32
8/14/2001
105881
110207
SCHMIT BECKY
1
15.00
8/14/2001
105882
109801
SCOTT'S WINDOWS1
42.60
8/14/2001
105883
109794
SEARS 1
1
425.93
18/14/20011
1058841
102749
SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY BOARD
170.00
18/14/20011
105885
102044
SERVOCAL INSTRUMENTS INC
840.00
8/14/2001
105886
102609
SHOPKO 1 1
135.20
8/14/2001
8/14/2001
105887
105888
102610
104096
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
SLABJACKING SPECIALITIES
2,327.65
250.00
8/14/2001
105889
102611
SORENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS
106.50
8/14/2001
105890
105064
SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL
26,030.56
8/14/2001
105891
103363
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY
689.72
8/14/20011
1058921
110195
STAMER JILL 1
45.00
8/14/20011
105893
102612
STANDARD PRINTING
931.63
.8/14/20011
105894
102584
STAR TRIBUNE 1
27.95
8/14/20011
105895
102613
STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CO
76.05
8/14/20011
105896
103062
STEPP MFG CO INC
290.11
8/14/20011
105897
110206
STILLE TERESA
9.60
8/14/2001
105898
103094
SUBWAY
0.50
8/14/2001
105899
103220
SWANSON MARILYN M.
.50
8/14/2001
105900
105550
TARGET
WTOUR427.35
.81
8/14/2001
105901
110203
TAYLORS FALLS HISTOR:BOAT
.00
8/14/2001
105902
110204
TAYLORS FALLS SCENIC
8/14/2001
105903
1 02659
TEK ECHANICAL
. 55
8/14/2001
105904
103290
TELECKY MATT
60.00
8/14/2001
105905
101879
TEMPLETON INC
509.83
8/14/2001
105906
101879
TEMPLETON INC
369.95
8/14/2001
105907
104589
THOVSON GAIL
87.00
8/14/2001
105908
103250
TILTON DAVID
240.00
8/14/2001
105909
105519
TORGERSON MARLIN
155.60
8/14/2001
105910
102618
TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE
71.00
8/14/2001
105911
102620
TRI CO WATER
440.86
8/14/2001
8/14/2001
105912
105913
102126
109290
TRUE VALUE
TURJAJASEN 1
1,881.22
.00
8/14/2001
105914
1026191
WAY COMM INC
.61
8/14/2001
105915
102058
U.S. CAVALRY
.98
8/14/2001
105916
102201
UHL CO.
.71
D3,046.11
8/1412001
105917
110212
ULI -THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
.95
8/14/2001
/2001
105918
105919
102427
102624
UNISOURCE
UNITED BUILDING CENTERS
.45
8/14/2001
8/14/2001
105920
105921
102626
102435
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
US OFFICE PRODUCTS
2,284.00
327.95
18/14/20011
105922
104397
VACUUM GALLERY
19.12
8/14/2001
105923
102132
VIKING COCA COLA
66.00
8/14/20011
1059241
101857
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
322.11
8/14/20011
105925
102642
W. D. COOLING CLINIC
93.45
8/14/2001
105926
101880
WADELL & REED
150.00
8/14/20011
1059271
103342
WAHL REBUILD & REPAIR INC
508.28
8/14/20011
1059281
105122
WASTE MANAGEMENT
41,406.02
0
0
9
