Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp09-23-2003 cAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
1. CALL TO ORDER— 5:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION — Rev. Grant Blomberg, Riverside Assembly of God Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
Action - Motion to approve as presented
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES FROM AUGUST
19, 2003
2. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROMJULY 7,
2003
• 3. HUTCHINSON AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JULY 29, 2003
4. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM AUGUST l9, 2003
5. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM AUGUST 19,
2003
6. P10NEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY 17, 2003
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 12258 — RESOLUTION DESIGNATING LOCATION OF POLLIING
PLACE FOR ALL CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 PRECINCTS AND APPOINTING
JUDGES FOR THE 2003 SPECIAL CITY AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 423
ELECTION
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
1. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON
MANUFACTURING TO CONSTRUCT A 40 X 80 POLE TYPE STORAGE BUILDING IN
THE I/C DISTRICT LOCATED AT 720 H WY 7 WEST WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 12259)
2. CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ROLLING
CI'T'Y COUNCIL AGENDA — SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
MEADOWS EAST, REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM Rl TO R3 PDD AND A
. REQUEST FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY BRUCE
NAUSTDAL, LOCATED NORTH OF HWY 7 WEST WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION
AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12260 & 12261
AND WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF
ORDINANCE NO. 03 -356 FOR OCTOBER 14, 2003)
3. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS COUNTY
FAIR MARKETPLACE THIRD ADDITION AND COUNTY FAIR MARKETPLACE
FOURTH ADDITION SUBMITTED BY RYAN COMPANIES WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 12263 & 12264)
4. CONSIDERATION OF REPLAT OF ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FOURTH ADDITION TO
ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS, SIXTH ADDITION AND AMENDMENT TO PDD SUBMITTED
BY SCENIC HOMES, INC. WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12265 & 12266)
5. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MATTHEW KUHN TO REDUCE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOF OVER A DECK 14.2 FEET FROM
FRONT PROPERTY LINE LOCATED AT 530 GROVE STREET SW WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION
• NO. 12267)
6. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE C3 DISTRICT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION
AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 03 -357 FOR OCTOBER 14, 2003)
CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE LOCATED AT 700
AIRPORT ROAD WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12268)
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF HOSPITAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
(OPERATING TABLES, MEDICAL HEADWALLS, PATIENT CARE UNITS AND
SURGICAL CABINETS)
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR STONEY POINT
LIFT STATION -• PROJECT NO. 03 -18, LETTING NO. 10
(n CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR T.A.P.
ENTERPRISES ON OCTOBER 15, 2003, AT THE BEST WESTERN VICTORIAN INN
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR CHRIS DOBRATZ
TO ATTEND TRAINING IN STERLING, VIRGINIA FROM NOVEMBER 11 — 14, 2003
Action — Motion to approve consent agenda
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
6, PUBLIC HEARINGS -NONE
7, COMMUNICATIONS REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF IMPOSING SERVICE CHARGES FOR SPECIAL, SERVICE DISTRICT
NO. 1
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DETERMINING VALIDITY OF OBJECTION TO INCLUSION IN
SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1
Action -
(b) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
ART BENJAMIN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF GARAGE, ADDITION LOCATED AT 108 GROVE
STREET SW WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
(ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12262)
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(c) FOR
CONSIDERATION APPROVAL N L F RS ARIA REIMBURSEMENT OF DUES IN FITNESS
PROGRAM
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING LOCATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL
ENGINEERS FOR PEER REVIEW OF ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL APPLICATION FOR U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS AQUATIC RESTORAGION PROGRAM (DAM RECONSTRUCTION)
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(8) CONSIDERATION AT 003, FOR APPROVAL
4:00 P.M. O DISCUSS TTIN BUDGET INFORMATIONAL MEETING FOR
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(fl MEETING DUE TO VETERANS APPROS DAYOHOLIDAYINGNOVEMBER 11, 2003, CITY COUNCIL
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA —SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
11. CLAIMS APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A
Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims A from appropriate funds
12. ADJOURN
0
0
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
1. CALL TO ORDER— 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Marlin Torgerson ea a the meeting to order. Members present were ,Tim Haugen, Duane
Hoversten, Kay Peterson and Bill Arndt. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator and John
Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works.
2. INVOCATION— Rev. Max Meyers, Riverside Assembly of God Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 26, 2003
(b) BID OPENING MINUTES FROM AUGUST 25, 2003
Minutes were approved as presented.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
iRdiifflfi7l�Cef R7 X17\; 71YuI�l�Yl1uC �] �YY0111yi�11� ]�IJIY[�I;�lltelYb�lllLe
0 2. HUTCHINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM JUNE 23, 2003
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR AUGUST 2003
4. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JULY 2003
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 03 -354 — AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING 25.86 ACRES REQUESTED
BY RODNEY RIEWER LOCATED IN HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP ALONG
JEFFERSON STREET SE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND A FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
2. ORDINANCE NO. 03-355 — AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY FROM R2 TO C4
LOCATED AT 222 5" AVENUE NW FOR OFFICE BUILDING SUBMITTED BY
STEPHEN GASSER, APPLICANT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND A
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
3- RESOLUTION NO. 12256 -- A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPONSORSHIP OF EARTHLY
DELIGIITS (STATE THEATRE PROJECT) CHALLENGE LOAN APPLICATION
THROUGH SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA '
(c) LETTING NO. 13, PROJECT NO. 02 -22 (SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER BANK
STABILIZATION) -- REJECTING BIDS ON IMPROVEMENT AND ORDERING
yC «�
CITY COUNCIL, MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
ADVERTISEMENT FOR REBID
(d) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 03 -02 (PLAZA 15 PARKING LOT) — REJECTING BIDS AND
REJECTING IMPROVEMENT
Item 5(b)l was pulled for further discussion.
Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson, to approve consent agenda with the exception of item
5(b)l. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 5(b) 1. Marc Sebora, City Attorney, stated that there may be some conflicts between the
annexed property and the compost site, wastewater facility and training center in regard to
potential high noise levels, odor and other related issues. City staff would like to have the
opportunity to notify property owners in this area of the possibility of these issues and therefore
Mr. Sebora asked that this item be tabled until that notice is able to be sent out. Mayor Torgerson
questioned whether or not additional covenants could be put in place. John Rodeberg informed
the Council that in the site plan the developers noted in writing that they are aware of these issues.
Mr. Rodeberg asked whether or not language could be placed in a development agreement
regarding the potential problems and distributed to property owners prior to developing occurring
or should it be placed in the annexation documentation. Mr. Sebora stated that it would be
sufficient to include pertinent language in the development agreement, as long as everyone is
aware upfront of the issues.
• Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, to approve Item 5(b)1. Motion carried unanimously.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M.
(a) PEACE APARTMENTS,
PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND AT C
L> OF HOUSING S ING FACILITIE REFUNDING
REVENUE BONDS
Marc Sebora explained that this authorization would allow the housing authority to refinance the
revenue bonds for the Prince of Peace Apartments at a lower rate.
A representative spoke before the Council. The representative explained that Ken Merrill, Finance
Director, had consulted with the League of Minnesota Cities and this would not effect the TIF District
that Prince of Peace is housed in.
Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten, to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson, with Haugen abstaining, to approve authorizing and
providing for the issuance and sale of housing facilities refunding revenue bonds, approving
Resolution No. 12257. Motion carried unanimously.
7. COMMUNICATIONS RE UESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION OF PICNIC SHELTER AT HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT
John Olson, Airport Manager, introduced Josh Miller to present before the Council.
Mr. Miller explained to the Council that he had constructed a picnic shelter and two picnic tables at
q t a)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
The Hutchinson Airport in order to achieve his eagle scout status. Mr. Miller explained the reasoning
for the location of the shelter and the process of building the project. Mr. Miller also identified the
donations he received to construct the shelter.
(b) ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR DOWNTOWN SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICTNO.I —STEVE
COOK
Steve Cook, 728 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Cook commented that he bad reviewed
the Downtown Master Plan and feels that there are very good ideas and projects identified in the Plan,
Mr. Cook voiced concerns over the fact that the City has a lack of participation in this project, mainly
in the funding. Mr. Cook expressed that he felt that there should be a partnership between the City
and the property owners to pay the assessments. Mr. Cook also expressed that he initially felt that
there may not be a need for a Downtown Coordinator and that maybe this position could be joined
with a current position either hold by the City or the Chamber. However, after further insight, he
realized that this will be an important position, at least at the birth of the District.
John Rodeberg did clarify that the City will be taking part in large downtown improvement projects in
the future through capital improvements.
Mr. Cook showed a visual aid illustrating the original proposal on the table to fund the Special Service
District, which totals approximately $101,000. Mr. Cook then illustrated an alternative proposal
which basically showed the City splitting the cost with the downtown property owners. The total
burden then on the property owners in the downtown district would then be reduced to approximately
$.1 Vsquare foot as opposed to the proposed $.19 /square foot. Mr. Cook stressed that he feels
everyone should work together to come to a common goal for the City and the downtown.
Mayor Torgerson reminded the public that the City has the power to establish the district, however did
not instigate the origination of it, nor will it "run it ". Mayor Torgerson noted that the City may need to
look into the legality of whether or not it can provide funding for the things required within the
District.
8, UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF GRANTING BUSINESS SUSBIDY AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH EARTHLY DELIGHTS (STATE THEATER
PROJECT)
Lisa McClure, Interim EDA Director, presented before the Council. Ms. McClure stated that this
agreement is between the City and the company that will be owning the State Theatre. This agreement
is the final piece that needs to be completed to finalrre the project. Ms. McClure informed the Council
that the business subsidy agreement, which was previously approved by the Council, is within the
redevelopment agreement. The owners of Earthly Delights intend to close on the property at the end
of the month.
Marc Sebora stated that the City is well protected and the Company meets all insurance requirements.
The City is not committed until the Company actually owns the property.
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve granting business subsidy and redevelopment
agreement with Earthly Delights for the State Theatre Renovation Project. Motion tamed
unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REMAINING VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS
John Olson, Assistant Public Works Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Olson explained
that equipment has been assigned to staff members for snow removal purposes. Due to this type of
organization, Mr. Olson is requesting that the Council approve the vehicle replacement schedule for
what is needed for this winter. The system of bidding was used for this purpose.
y(a-)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve replacing remaining fleet vebicles on replacement
schedule. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENTERING INTO CONSULTING CONTRACTS WITH
SRF CONSULTING
John Rodeberg, Director of Enginccring/Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg
explained that SRF Consulting is the City's main transportation consultant. Mr. Rodeberg is
requesting that the Council approve entering into consulting agreements with SRF for the Edmonton
Avenue project and Golf Course Road project to outline routes for these roads. These projects will be
major road finks in the future. SRF will be used for aligmn� these road connections. The total fee for
both of these projects is proposed to be $17,000. The designs will be based on current storm sewer
capacity. Mr. Arndt suggested placing a larger pi a in the Golf Course Road area near Modern Mazda
to solve flooding issues and be ready to tie into other areas. General discussion was held regarding the
storm sewer system in the Rolling Meadows East area. General discussion of underpasses was lield
and placements along Highway 7.
Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt, to approve entering into consulting contract with SRF
Consulting for Edmonton Avenue project and Golf Course Road project. Motion carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING INFORMATIONAL MEETING WITH
DOWNTOWN BUSINESS OWNERS TO DISCUSS SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1(KAY
PETERSON AND BILL ARNDT)
Bill Arndt explained that he and Kay Peterson have met with various downtown property owners and
have received several ideas regarding the downtown Special Service District. Their idea is to bring
all of the property owners together and have a facilitator bring out discussion amongst the property
owners. Mr. Arndt can sense the division on this issue amongst the property owners.
Kay Peterson explained that the action being requested is to schedule a meeting with the downtown
property owners prior to the next Council meeting. Ms. Peterson stated that no matter what happens,
her goal is to bring the downtown property owners together to use the Downtown Master Plan and
make the downtown successful. The Council would not conduct the meeting, however would be more
like observers of the meeting.
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to set informational meeting for September 17, 2003, at 7:00
p.m. at the Event Center. Motion carried unanimously.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
John Rodeberg — Mr. Rodeberg explained that the City and MnDOT are working together on the
Highway 15 Corridor regarding traffic signals, retaining walls, etc.
Mr. Rodeberg also requested that two council members sit in on a meeting September 25, 2003, at
2:00 p.m. to hear an update on an addition to the HATS facility. Feedback will need to be received to
ensure that staff is moving in the right direction with this project. Jim Haugen and Kay Peterson will
attend.
Mr. Rodeberg further stated that the City is contracting with a contractor to complete the alley project
behind the post office. Approximately $6000 -$8000 will be needed to complete the improvements.
Gary Plotz —Mr. Plotz explained that staff and the City of Minneapolis are currently working on the
language in the contract between the two entities for the hauling of Minneapolis's leaves. The City is
also conducting testing at the transfer site in Minneapolis. Bagging will also be happening at the
compost site to meet current orders.
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 9, 2003
Mr. Plotz also informed the Council that retired Rep. Ness is assisting Congressman Colin Peterson.
Mr. Plotz and Mayor Torgerson met with Mr. Ness and Mr. Peterson and discussed federal grant
opportunities.
Bill Arndt — Mr, Arndt informed the public to attend the river meeting at the event center on
September 11, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. The purpose is to discuss improving the Crow River. This meeting
will be taped.
Jim Haugend Mr. Haugen asked Mr. Rodeberg asked if there had been any feedback regarding
crossing at 2 Avenue and Lynn Road. Mr. Rodeberg stated that things have been going very well
and the remainder of the project is to be completed October 1, 2003. He thanked the residents along
this route for their patience and understanding. Mr. Rodeberg explained that new handicap ramps
have been installed due to federal regulations.
Marc Sebora — Mr. Sebora asked the Council if there is a more efficient way to address the issue of
citizens that want to be placed on the Council agenda and that do not provide much background
information as to their topic of discussion. Mayor Torgerson suggested contacting the League of
Minnesota Cities to sec what their recommendation is. He will approach them at the Mayors
Convention later this fall.
Melissa Starke, Recording Secretary, informed the Council that a gentleman had stopped in the office
earlier in the day regarding parking issues he has in his neighborhood. This gentleman lives on Prairie
View Drive and informed her that he has a neighbor that has at least three cars parked in a line on the
street, which is on a curve and makes for poor visibility. He also stated that these cars all leak a great
amount of oil and maybe damaging the road. Since there is not a current ordinance that specifically
addresses these issues, it was recommended that John Rodeberg's staff review the situation and deal
with the gentleman's concerns.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, with Hoversten abstaining, to approve and authorize payment of
Verified Claims A from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) VERIFIED CLAIMS B
Motion by Hoversten, second by Arndt, to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims B from
appropriate finds. Motion carried unanimously.
HCVN representative asked if the Council would like the informational meeting to be taped on
September 17. The Council answered in the affirmative.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
C1
Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Regular Board Meeting — August 19, 2003
Minutes
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman John Houle called the meeting to order. Members Present:
Duane Hoversten, Thor Skeie, and Becky Felling. Staff Present: Jean Ward, and Judy
Flemming.
2, MINUTES OF HRA BOARD MEETING ON JULY 15, 2003
Duane Hoversten moved to approve the Minutes as written. Thor Skeie seconded and the
motion carried unanimously.
FINANCIAL REPORTS
Duane Hoversten had a question on the Net Activity line item on the Park Towers Balance
Sheet provided from the accountant. Jean said she would ask the accountant to clarify this
total. Thor Skeie moved to approve the Financials as long as there is an explanation of the
totals on the Balance Sheet from the accountant. Duane Hoversten seconded and the motion
carried unanimously.
4. PART{ TOWERS UPDATE
Jean Ward updated the Board on the list of checks that were requested by the accountant to be
voided that was tabled for the July Board Meeting. Duane Hoversten moved to approve
Resolution #03 -06 to Officially Void List of Outstanding Checks on Park Towers Books.
. Thor Skeie seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Jean reviewed with the Board the 2004 Park Towers Budget and a memorandum that
presented the assumption used to prepare the budget including the fact that insurance
property /liability premiums had doubled. Duane suggested that the HRA get some quotes
from other insurance companies before the March renewal.
The Review of New Streamlined Small PHA Plan Update, Annual Plan for Fiscal Year 2004
and the Consideration of Approval of Annual and the Resolution of PHA Certifications of
Compliance with the PHA Plans and Related Regulations was tabled because a new
2004Capital Funds Allocation was just sent to Jean. Jean presented the Capital Fund Program
Amendment to the Board based on the 2004 capital funds allocation. Thor Skeie moved to
approve the Capital Fund Program Amendment to the Consolidated Annual Contributions
Contract. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION #03 -07 TO ADOPT THE CITY
PAY PLAN
Becky Felling moved to approve Resolution #03 -07 to adopt the City Pay Plan. Duane
Hoversten seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
6. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM UPDATE
Jean Ward presented the 2002/2003 final budget, proceeds statement, program financing
statement and the 2003/2004 Memorandum of Understanding with the School District. Becky
Felling moved to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the School District.
Duane Hoversten seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
"a («) I
Judy Flemming presented the budget and the results of the bids received for the project on 626
Harmony Lane. The HRA requested RFP's so the board awarded contracts based on
comparables. Duane Hoversten moved to award contracts to the following for the amount listed:
➢ Excavator - Juul Contracting Co. - $10,283
➢ Concrete — Students w/ Styrofoam Forms - $10,500
➢ Electrical — Bemhagen Electric - $5,414
➢ Plumbing & Heating - B &C Plumbing & Heating - $8,500
➢ Building Materials — UBC - $27,000
Thor Skeie seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Duane Hoversten moved to approve the check to the City of Hutchinson for the Building Permit
for 626 Harmony Lane. Thor Skeie seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
FRANKLIN -GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT UPDATE
Jean reviewed with the Board to the Monitoring Visit Letter from DTED's Patrick Armon from
visit on July 23'' and 24"'.
8. FYI
• Jean Ward updated the Board on the Rolling Meadows Extension. Sorensen Naustdal
Properties anticipates Zoning/Platting to be approved in October and construction to start
in the spring.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other business, Chairman John Houle declared the meeting adjourned.
10. Chairman Jobn Houle reopened the meeting so that Judy Flemming could present to the Board the
. Franklin -Grove Neighborhood SCDP Loans #8680 -04 & #8680 -05. Thor Skeie moved to
approve the Franklin -Grove Neighborhood SCDP Loans #8680 -04 & #8680 -05. Becky Felling
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other business, Chairman John Houle declared the meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director
Becky
0
MINUTES
Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
July 7, 2003
Members Present: Ralph Johnson, Mike Schiesl, Mike Cannon, Kirk Kosel, Bruce Peterson, Rev. Todd
Ertsgaard, Bernie Miner and Bill Arndt. Guest present was Bill Carlson, High School Activities Director.
Also present was Dolf Moon.
The meeting was called to order at 5:20 pm
A motion made by Ralph Johnson and seconded by Mike Scbies approved the minutes dated June 2,
2003. The motion passed unanimously
OLD BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
Middle Level Activities - Activities Director, Bill Carlson presented a plan to improve middle level
activities.
A motion was made by Jay Beylien to recommend that the Hutchinson School Board adopt the plan as
. presented by Bill Carlson. Mike Schiesl seconded the motion. The motion passed 8 -0.
Flooding — Reseeding of Veterans Memorial Field will take place in August and the Tartan Softball Field
in September.
BOARD MEMBER ITEMS
Bill Arndt asked about the Luce Line Trails status. Do] f will report at a future meeting.
AJOURNMENT
Chairman, Rev. Todd Ertsgaard, adjourned the meeting at 6:05pm.
Iq pro
.S( «)a
+HUTCHINSON AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION
July 29, 2003
• 5:30 tune
Arrival/Departure Building
Minutes
Members present: Dave Skaar, Chuck Brill, Doug McGraw, Doug Kephart
Members absent: Jeff Lux
Others Present: John Olson, City of Hutchinson
Meeting called to order at 5:30 p.m. There was a quorum of members present.
1. Reviewed Notes of February 13, 2003 meeting
No quomm of members was present at 02/13/03 meeting. Items discussed at the meeting included:
Minutes of the November 14, 2002 meeting were reviewed. Since no quorum of members was present, the minutes
were not formally approved.
TKDA Engineers made a presentation of the proposed safety improvement project. Members discussed the
potential of the project in light of significant cuts in Local Government Aid. It was decided to deter the project until
the full affect of revenue reductions were known.
Potential private hangar development lease was reviewed. Secured City Council approval to move forward with
private development. (Since that time, the private developer has removed his request to build a private hangar.)
A request from Jim & Karen Mona for the Airport Advisory Commission to grant resident status was deferred
because there was on quorum. Olson was instructed to leave the out -of -town rates in place for their hangar until the
• full Commission could act on their request.
Olson reported on snowplow damage during the winter. Olson reviewed the recent problems with REIL strobe
lights and airfield power failures. Mn/DOT is assisting with repairs. Olson requested the members present
authorize installation of a dialer system to inform staff of airfield power failures. Commissioners present granted
Olson permission to install the dialer for safety reasons.
Commissioners agreed to find out from H.T.I. what kind of sign they would like to recognize their significant
contributions to the airport.
2. Approve November 14, 2002 Minutes
Motion trade by Doug Kephart, second by Chuck Brill to approve November 14, 2002 minutes. Unanimous
approval.
3. Renaest from Ronda Crotteau, Representing Hutchinson Girl Scouts and Peacepipe Council
Commissioners reviewed letter from Rhonda Crotteau requesting permission to hold the Girl Scout Junior Event at
the airport on Sept. 23, 2003 from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
In her letter, Rhonda Crotteau informed Commissioners that the girls, no more than 150, would be working on their
Aerospace patches. They will also recognize the 100th anniversary of flight.
She requested skydivers, stunt plane, and a helicopter. A copy of her letter to has been forwarded to Skydive
Hutchinson, Joe Dooley, and Jeff Brenhaug. The responsibility for securing these assets will be hers.
A motion was made by Chuck Brill, second by Doug McGraw to allow the Girl Scout Junior Event at the
Hutchinson Airport September 23, 2003 from 1:00 p.m, to 3:00 p.m. Unanimous approval.
4, Hangar Issues
Olson reported that Hangar #9 is open. Tim Miller was next on the contact list for a hangar, and wanted the hangar
for a flying club, but he already has two enclosed hangars. Ed Klima had asked to move into Open Hangar #9, but
he was told it was taken. Dick Frecman would be the next renter on the list if Tim were denied more than two
hangars.
City policy was reviewed. According to policy, no one may have more than two hangars. The only time an
exception was allowed was to grant the FRO three hangars for a limited time during recent airport construction.
A motion was made by Chuck Brill, second by Doug Kephart to deny Tim Miller rental of Hangar #9, since he
already has two hangars. Unanimous approval.
A motion was made by Chuck Brill, second by Doug McGraw to allow Ed Klima to move to Hangar #9, leaving
Dick Freeman to rent Hangar #10. Unanimous approval.
2004 Budget — Capital Exuenditures
Olson reviewed 2004 Airport Budget proposal submitted by Engineering/Public Works Department staff. Olson
explained the budget proposal is subject to the City's normal budget process. Of note in the 2004 Airport Budget is
a transfer of $50,000 to Airport Construction funds to match the Federal ATP funding of $450,000 (2002 =
$150,000; 2003 = $150,000; 2004 = $150,000).
Olson reviewed components of deferred safety improvement project proposal from earlier in 2003. When
significant cuts in State Local Government Aid were announced, a decision was made to defer any airport capital
projects until the full ramifications of the budget cuts were known.
Review of the components of the deferred project include:
a.
NAVAID Service Roadway
b.
Apron Taxi lane — Add pavement around east end of oldest enclosed hangars and electrical improvements.
c.
Hangar Service Road — Road from entrance road to east end of oldest enclosed hangars. This component
was deleted from the original project.
d.
Fencing & Gates — Any security improvements were deferred until specific guidelines are available from
FAA, TSA or Mn/DOT Aeronautics. This component was deleted from the original project.
e.
Wetlands work — restoration of wetlands so as to gain credits, restoration of dry areas on adjacent property.
This component was added to the original project.
f
Ditch Maintenance — Clean ditch serving west side of airfield. This component was added to the original
project.
g.
Helicopter landing pad / Aircraft Maintenance pad — Helicopter landing pad on SW corner of apron,
maintenance pad for washing aircraft and containing wastewater. This component was added to the
original project.
h.
'file maintenance — Maintenance of field tile serving west side of runway. This component was added to
the original project.
Other potential improvements discussed included:
a. Aircraft sump fuel and fuel sampling collection points. Will decrease likelihood that pilots will dispose of
sample fuel by dumping directly onto the ground.
b. Collections and containment areas for agricultural aircraft. Would allow agricultural spraying aircraft to
use HCD as a home base.
c. IIangar door correction. Some hangar doors are difficult to open and close because the buildings have
settled. Doors would be shortened to restore a reasonable space between the bottom of the door and the
pavement.
• d. Hose reel with enclosure. Addition of an enclosed fuel hose reel.
e. Airfield lighting improvements component. Significant problems have been routinely occurring with
airfield lighting. There have been several incidents in the recent past whore the entire airfield was black
during the night. This is a significant safety issue.
6. New Business
5(Ci� -�
Commissioners directed Olson to pursue the following:
. a. Oct a final copy of private hangar lease agreements for Commission review before next meeting.
h. Consider establishing a "cleaning day" during which hangar tenants could dispose of junk. Discussion included
scheduling hangar inspections at the same time.
c. Establishing a set of standard keys for all aircraft hangars.
The next agenda should include:
a. Review of private hangar agreements available, discussion of private hangar policies.
b. Review of Mn/DOT hangar funding.
c. Review of proposed 2004 safety improvement project with City Engineer and Airport Engineer
At 6:55, a motion to adjourn was made by Doug Kephart, second by Doug McCrraw. Unanimous approval.
E
L J
Nc,,,13
. MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, August 19, 2003
Hutchinson City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dean Kirchoff at 5:30 p.m. with
the following members present: Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson, Farid
Currimbhoy, Robert Hantge and Chairman Kirchoff. Absent: Brandon Fraser
and Mike Flaata. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Planning Director,
and Lisa McClure, EDA Director
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) Consideration of Minutes dated July 15, 2003
Mr. Hantge moved to approve the minutes of July 15, 2003 as submitted.
Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The minutes were approved unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• a) CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION OF 25.86 ACRES REQUESTED
BY RODNEY RIEWER, PROPERTY OWNER, LOCATED IN HASSAN
VALLEY TOWNSHIP ALONG JEFFERSON STREET S.E.
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:33 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7080 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on August 7,
2003-
Ms. Wischnack stated that this is an annexation request by the property
owner. Some property in this area has already been annexed. Mr.
Riewer has asked to be annexed in the past but withdrew his application.
This property does abut city property. If the Planning Commission
annexes this property by ordinance, an unusual city boundary will be
created. Staff has recommended approval of this application. There are
come concerns about the timing of when things will take place on the
property.
Ms. Otteson asked about what the Comp Plan says. Ms. Wischnack
stated that the Comp Plan has identified this area as medium density
housing and it was slated to happen between 2000 and 2005. South of
Southwinds addition will be in the 2005 -2010 timeframe.
Mr. Haugen asked of the 25 acres proposed to be annexed, how many
• are developable acres? Ms. Wischnack did not have the most recent
5 (a) �1
Minutes
Planning Commission — August 19, 2003
Page 2
survey and stated that some of the property is in the 100 -year flood plain.
There will be limited Easterly development.
Galen Houk — property owner spoke to the Planning Commission. He
stated that he does not object to the annexation. Mr. Houk stated that he
does not want his property to be annexed by the city. He stated that 9
there were an attempt to annex his property, it would produce a hardship
for him. He asked if the city really does need this property? How do the
costs affect the city? He also stated that this is a rural area, there are
farm animals, and these are large properties. The land north of his
property is going to be subdivided into a couple of parcels. He
questioned the density. He asked if this area really should be high
density. Mr. Houk stated that this area is farm area. They will be farming
early and late, they spray the fields, kick up dusts, and there are smells
associated with farms. He hopes that property owners coming into this
area would know that and not complain about those issues. Mr. Houk
feels there is a lot of room for complaints on this issue. He stated that he
has two main points here: first, if he's surrounded, will the City just take
his land at anytime? And second, will this cause property values to go
down?
Mr. Reiwer stated that he saw the opportunity to sell his property and he
took that opportunity.
. Ms. Wischnack clarified that the city may annex Mr. Houk at any time,
since his property will now be surrounded on all sides by City property.
Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Haugen the hearing closed at 5:45 p.m. Ms. Otteson made a motion to
recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations and to
note that this project is part of the Comprehensive Plan for the City.
Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy, the motion carried unanimously. Ms.
Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent
agenda at their meeting held August 26, 2003 in the Council Chambers at
5:30 p.m.
b) CONSIDERATION TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R2 TO C4
LOCATED AT 222 -57H AVE N.W. FOR OFFICE BUILDING
SUBMITTED BY STEPHEN GASSER, APPLICANT
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7081 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on August 7,
2003.
Ms. Wischnack stated that this is a rezoning request. She showed a
picture of the property, as it exists today. This is a church in the R -2
district. Mr. Hantge asked if a new church comes into town, could they be
located in the R -1 and R -2 districts? Ms. Wischnack stated that that is
correct. It carries a commercial zoning designation.
JW L1
Minutes
Planning Commission — August 19, 2003
Page 3
Ms. Wischnack stated that at this time there are both commercial and
residential uses in this area. This would be rezoned to a C-4 zoned
property, which is a very general zoning district.
The proposal by Mr. Gasser is to use the structure as an office complex
for his business, Vivid Image, and possibly renting out office space to
other businesses. Ms. Wischnack stated that staff recommends approval.
It is adjacent to similarly zoned property. Some of the requirements
include: paving a 50x50 area along with the driveway, there will be a need
for 10 parking spaces, landscaping and other requirements will be dealt
with at the time that the permit is issued.
Mr. Haugen commented that there are many churches in town that have
had an adapted reuse of the building.
Ms. Wischnack stated that there has been one letter received opposing
this project.
Mr. Gasser stated that the office building would house seven offices for
his staff. They are a web development company with little or no traffic
coming in and out. They have plans to renovate the building.
Mr. Kirchoff asked Mr. Gasser if he understood the conditions of this
application. Mr. Gasser stated that he does.
Mr. Haugen made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Ms.
Otteson the hearing closed at 5:55 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to
recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Hantge, the motion carried unanimously. Ms.
Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent
agenda at their meeting held August 26, 2003 in the Council Chambers at
5.30 p.m.
c) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY FLORIAN THODE, PROPERTY OWNER, TO
ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE ON PROPERTY IN THE 1 -1
DISTRICT LOCATED AT 327 HWY 7 EAST
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:57 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7082 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on August 7,
2003,
Ms. Wischnack stated that this is an application for outside storage. In
the 1 -1 District it states that storage much be fenced or within a building.
There are some houses near the property. HTI, Marshall Concrete and
two residences are Mr. Thode's neighbors. Ms. Wischnack stated that
Mr. Thode has been cooperative in this matter. The fence has been
. completed on the property and there is a buffer of vegetation on the
property. Mr. Thode has removed many tires and unlicensed vehicles
l J
Minutes
Planning Commission -- August 19, 2003
Page 4
from his property. She asked the Planning Commission, how much
outside storage is acceptable?
Mr. Hantge stated he thought that all storage in the 1 -1 district should be
inside. Why does he need a conditional use permit? Ms. Wischnack
stated that sometimes there is an allowance for outside storage. In the
Industrial Park, for example, it is more acceptable to have outside
storage. City does not do regular enforcement on those properties.
Laura Wendorf, representing Delauto came to speak to the Planning
Commission. She sated that her property is leased by HTI. She asked if
there is any commercial zoned property.. Ms. Wischnack stated that
there is not in this area. Ms. Wendorf asked if there could be residential
and commercial uses in Industrial zoned land? Ms. Wischnack stated
that if it is that way now, and the use is not changed, that is acceptable.
Ms. Wendorf asked if offices are allowed in the 1 -1 district. Ms.
Wischnack stated that they are allowed.
Ms. Wendorf stated that in the 1960's, trees were planted and a fence
was put up. Currently the biggest problem on this site is the tires. The
tires tumble over onto her property. They collect water and are a haven
for mosquitoes. She asked for clarification on whether or not, because
there are trees there as a buffer, that Mr. Thode does not need a fence?
Ms. Wischnack stated that that decision is up to the Commission.
. Ms. Wendorf stated that she would be happy if Mr. Thode would keep the
tires off her property and keep his property maintained, she would be
happy. She asked if Mr. Thode charges a fee for getting rid of the tires?
Also, what type of things will be stored, tires and old cars?
Ms. Wendorf also wanted to state that she is not against the conditional
use permit, she just had questions. She also mentioned that she would
like Mr. Thode to control the weeds on his property better.
Mark Telecky came to represent his grandmother, Bernie. Mr. Telecky
asked what would be stored outside? The fencing is better, it helps the
gateway ordinance. He asked if the storage could be moved further back
on the property?
Mr. Thode addressed the Commission to answer some of the questions.
The storage will be for tires, cars, tractors, and equipment. He stated he
is trying to clean up his property. He does have a person who comes to
pick up the tires; they have not been there yet.
Mr. Kirchoff stated that he wants to make sure the property is picked up
and stays clean and if they get complaints the City will be doing
enforcement.
Ms. Qtteson asked Mr. Thode whether or not he is out of the tire
• business. Mr. Thode stated that he is. He stated that not everything will
be behind the fence. There will be some outside storage. He also stated
Minutes
Planning Commission —August 19, 2003
Page 5
that he was unaware that tires had fallen over onto Ms. Wendorf's
property.
Ms. Otteson asked what is stored in the large containers in the back of his
property. Mr. Thode stated that there is water in those containers.
Mr. Hantge asked if there are other conditional use permits issued for
outside storage. Ms. Wischnack stated that Dick McClure has one, for
example.
Ms. Otteson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Haugen the hearing closed at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to
recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Hantge, Ms. Otteson asked to add to the
recommendations. She stated that weed control should be part of the
requirements for Mr. Thode. The motion carried unanimously. Ms.
Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent
agenda at their meeting held August 26, 2003 in the Council Chambers at
5:30 p.m.
d) CONSIDERATION TO REVOKE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
GRANTED ON PROPERTIES NOT COMPLYING WITH
CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE RECORDED RESOLUTIONS
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 6:24 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7083 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on August 7,
2003.
Ms. Wischnack stated that there are some enforcement actions that need
to be taken. Five permits had fallen behind, there was a letter sent to
them from Mr. Sebora, City Attorney, to get people to take action.
First issue, 700 Airport Road. This is in progress. Ms. Wischnack stated
that there is a gas line running through the property and the meter cannot
be fenced in. This was an unknown complication. The conditional use
permit was for a car repair shop. The number of cars has been an issue.
There has been some vandalism to the cars, causing additional problems.
Julie stated that there is part of a fence up. Mr. McRaith is in the process
of finishing the fence. Ms. Wischnack stated that the Planning
Commission could wait one month and follow up on this with a letter.
Mr. Kirchoff asked if this issue can be tabled? Ms. Wischnack stated that
it can be. She also stated that this project has come a long way, it looks
very good. She made a suggestion to table this item'and check back
before the September meeting.
Mr. Kirchoff said that at least Mr. McRaith is making headway; he is doing
a good job. Mr. Hantge asked what the enforcement scenarios are. Ms.
Wischnack stated that this is it. They can have this hearing to discuss
isthis issue or charge the person with a misdemeanor. That is not the route
SCc�_)4
Minutes
Planning Commission - August 19, 2003
Page 6
. she felt the Planning Commission wanted to take. Revoking the
conditional use permit is also an option.
The Planning Commission requested that the property owner should be
present at the September meeting.
Mr. Hantge made a motion to table this until September. Ms. Otteson
seconded, the motion carried unanimously.
Second, Mr. Rolf is requesting to pave over the property line. In the C -5
there are recommended setbacks from property lines. Ms. Wischnack
stated that they should provide an allowance to pave over the property
line. This property needs to have a paved surface. It should have been
completed by June 15, it is not.
Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Haugen, the hearing closed at 6:40 p.m. Ms. Otteson made a motion to
recommend approval of the request to amend the conditional use permit
to pave over the property line. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy, the motion
carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the
City Council agenda at their meeting held August 26, 2003 in the Council
Chambers at 5:30 p.m.
4. NEW BUSINESS
a) PRESENTATION OF UPDATED HWY 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT
ORDINANCE BY CINDY CARLSSON, MNDOT
Ms. Wischnack introduced Cindy Carlsson representing the
Highway 7 Coalition. The ordinance presented by Ms. Carlsson is
a cohesive access management ordinance for highway 7 between
St. Bonifacius and Hutchinson. This will need to be adopted by
McLeod County and the City of Hutchinson. This is a partnership of
MNDOT, County, Cities, and Townships. Ms. Carlsson presented
the ordinance and gave examples to the Planning Commission of
how this can be used. She stated that this ordinance is needed
and the partnerships are needed, because it is the local
government units that deal with land use issues. MNDOT does not
deal with land use issues; they deal with transportation issues. Ms.
Wischnack stated that the Planning Commission would go over this
ordinance at the September meeting.
b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN OF REPLAT OF ISLAND
VIEW HEIGHTS 5T" ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK
Ms. Wischnack stated that she did receive a sketch of what Mr. Gilk
would like to do. Staff has indicated that they approve of the plan,
but there are some sewer issues that need to be addressed. This
5 CC�-) q
•
•
•
Minutes
Planning Commission — August 19, 2003
Page 7
likely will come before the Planning Commission in September for
the replat.
c) PRESENTATION OF THE DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
BY MR. BOB CLAYBAUGH
Ms. Wischnack introduced Mr. Bob Claybaugh and Mr. Pete Musty. Mr.
Claybaugh and Mr. Musty presented the Downtown Design Guidelines to
the Planning Commission. It was stated that these guidelines were
developed out of the Downtown Revitalization Master Plan, The Planning
Commission will look through and discuss the information presented and
then discuss the guidelines in more detail at the October meeting.
5. OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Hantge asked Ms. Wischnack about Arby's plans. She stated that the
plan was on the City Council agenda on August 12. The reason it was on the
regular agenda, and not the consent agenda, was because staff disagreed
with the Planning Commission's decision.
Ms. Otteson asked about the Dog Kennel ordinance. Ms. Wischnack stated
that the City Council overturned the decision and is now looking at a nuisance
ordinance.
6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Ms. Wischnack invited the Planning Commissioners to the State Planning
Conference in Alexandria in September. She stated that she has more
information if anyone would like to see a brochure.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
5C,�-yi
11
0
•
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING — August 19, 2003
Hospital — Conference Room A/B
Members present were: Chairperson, Steve Snapp; Vice Chairperson; John Houle,
Secretary; Wayne Fortun, Trustee; Sherry Ristau, Trustee; Duane Hoversten, Trustee;
and Pastor Randy Chrissis, Trustee.
Absent: Dr. Cate McGinnis, Chief of Staff.
Others present were: Philip Graves, President; Pam Larson, Finance, Information, and
Material Services Division Director; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support
Services Division Director; Dr. Steven Mulder, Director of Medical Affairs; Pat
Halverson, Community Care Programs and Services Division Director; Linda Krentz,
Elaine Schermann, Quality Representative; Doug Hanneman, Hutchinson Leader, and
Corrinne Schlueter, Recorder.
Chairperson Snapp called the meeting to order at 5:30 PM.
1. Minutes of Last Meeting. The minutes of the July 15, 2003, meeting were
presented and discussed.
Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Ristau, to
approve the minutes of the July 15, 2003, meeting. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
II. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes and Credentialin . Dr. Mulder provided a
report on the recent Medical Executive Committee Meeting. The following
practitioners were recommended for membership to the Medical Staff.
Advancement from Provisional.
Laurie Kersten- Ulmen, CRNA Anesthesia
Brian Pollman, DO
Reanuointments.
Brian Bonne, DO
Sara Fischer, MD
Bruce Homa, MD
Jyothi Kesha, MB, BS
Thomas Kleinkauf, MD
Thomas Lyke, DDS
Yelena Usmanova, MD
Resignations.
Kory Albert, CRNA
David Olson, MD
llmer Salovich, MD
John Robinson, MD
Family Practice
Family Practice
Family Practice
Family Practice
Urology
Family Practice
Dentistry
Neurology
Anesthesia
Orthopedics
Orthopedics
Emergency Medicine
Allied Health — Ind.
Active
Active
Active
Active
Courtesy
Active
Allied Health-find.
Active
Allied Health -Ind.
Courtesy
Courtesy
Courtesy
0
Board of Directors
Page two
August 19, 2003
Leslie Johnson, OPA -C
Additional Privileees.
Michael Merck, MD
Orthopedics Allied Health- Dependent
Endoscopic Cyclophotoagulation
Miscellaneous.
Julie Krenik MD and Cate McGinnis, MD have been removed from HAHC's
liability insurance policy because they have current coverage through the HMC
policy.
Following discussion, Ristau made a motion, seconded by Hoversten, to
grant membership and privilege to the above listed practitioners as
recommended by the Medical Executive Committee. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
III. New Business.
A. Construction Update. Graves reported on the current construction
schedule. The contractors are generally working on the new construction
however some remodeling is started in the lower level and in the area of
surgery.
B. Vulnerable Adult. Krentz provided the annual Vulnerable Adult report
which is required by the State Department of Health. For the past year,
there were eighteen total reports called in as potential maltreatment. None
were substantiated.
There were thirteen reports on the Bums Manor campus
Six were external reports of alleged self - neglect,
financial exploitation, or physical abuse.
Seven reports were internal reports of alleged; boundary issue,
positioning issue, bump on head, bruise of unknown origin, fall
with injury x 2, and elopement.
Five reports were on the hospital campus
- All were of alleged self - neglect, verbal or physical abuse at
home.
Following discussion, Houle made a motion, seconded by Ristau to
approve the Vulnerable Adult report as presented. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
C. Safety Report. Halverson reported on the Lxecutive Summary which
was prepared for the second quarter 2003. The following was presented:
Board of Directors
. Page three
August 19, 2003
•
All HAHC facilities participated in a statewide tornado drill on
April 10, 2003. The evaluation scores were: Bums Manor —
99.7% and the Hospital — 99 %.
Staff is also working with other hospitals in the area for emergency
preparedness.
In working toward the goal of reducing mercury waste, the next
step will be to survey service areas to determine what products that
are used contain mercury. As previously reported, preliminary
work has already been done to determine status of mercury based
thermometers and blood pressure cuffs, two of the more widely
known products that contain mercury.
The Safety Officer and the Facilities Manager spoke on fire safety
at the April Burns Manor Nursing Home Family Council meeting.
The presentation was prompted by the recent nursing home fire in
Connecticut where ten people died. It is believed the Connecticut
fire was intentionally set by one of the residents.
Following discussion, Hoversten made a motion, seconded by
Fortun to accept the 2nd Quarter Safety report as presented. All
were in favor. Motion carried,
IV. Organizational Reports.
A. President.
Senior Care
Graves reported Jay Christensen, from Faegre & Benson, is the attorney assigned
to work on the Senior Care project. In a recent meeting held at Faegre's office,
several items were discussed regarding the potential partnership arrangement.
The attorney will develop a Memorandum of Understanding in order to define and
document the parameters of the new relationship.
The intent will be to establish a private not for profit company consisting of two
partners. Two sites being considered for development of the new campus
arrangement. One is southwest of Hutchinson and the other is physically attached
to the hospital. In order to keep on task with the project, Presbyterian Homes has
engaged the services of three- experienced Senior living architectural firms. It is
the intent to pay each firm a couple thousand dollars each to present an innovative
design to representatives of the new company that would fit on either campus.
HAHC and Presbyterian Homes will each pay 50% of all fees ( planning,
financial, marketing, legal, architectural etc.) that are associated with the
development of the new company.
Graves asked for a couple board members assist with a review of the campus
layouts during a presentation by the architectural firms to be held on September
23. Board members were requested to advise Steve Snapp of their interest.
5(0.!5
•
r�
�J
0
Board of Directors
Page four
August 19, 2003
Radiologv
Dr. Ibach and Tim Signorelli, Administrator from Consulting Radiology, and
Graves recently met to discuss future equipment needs in Radiology. Agreement
was reached on the desire to develop digital capability with all imaging equipment
in order to arcbive as well as view and transmit images. The plan is to attend the
RSNA Conference in Chicago this fall, and then develop a plan to achieve the
equipment upgrades.
B. Acute Care Programs and Services. Lien reported the excitement was 54 births
in July, which is an all time record. September, October, and November have
volumes in the mid 40's to high 40's to 50's. Acute Care services have been busy
during the month.
C. Care and Program Support Services. Erickson reported on the following:
- A new Work Force Relationship Team.
- The HPD security program is one hear old.
A point of service charge system is being installed in the dining room at
the hospital.
- An employee called to active military duty this spring has since returned.
- The Plaza 15 sign will be installed soon over the mental health outpatient
offices.
D. Community Care Programs & Services. Halverson gave thanks to the board and
Graves for the new clinic in the Plaza. She stated the clinic has wonderful space
and the move was huge. She stated we had the support of all the division directors
through the months of planning. We did not shut down service, and saw some
patients while we were moving and then were ready to begin operations on
Monday.
Additionally, we have three Psychiatrists that we will be interviewing for one
position opening.
E. Finance, Information & Material Services. Nothing further to report.
F. Senior Care. Krentz reminded us to tune in KARE 11 on September 3, 2003, at
9:00 PM, and watch Bernie Telecky receive her award.
Cosmos Nursing Home is anticipated to close October 201h. We have received a
couple of referrals. Nine of the residents are from McLeod County.
G. Medical Director Report. Mulder reported on the two recent physician
additions to the staff: Dr. Mayland and Dr. Mike McNelis. They are very
clinically competent and excellent practitioners.
(a)-5
Board of Directors
. Page five
August 19, 2003
Patient Safety and Performance Improvement Committee. Schermann reported on the
new JCAHO goals and the work effort that will be required to achieve and maintain
compliance.
Accounts Payable. The accounts payable and cash disbursements for July 2003 were
presented for payment.
Following discussion, Chrissis made a motion, seconded by Houle, to
approve the accounts payable and cash disbursements as listed, in the
amount of $6,014,589.33. Five were in favor. Hoversten abstained.
Motion carried.
Statistical Report. Graves presented the statistical report for the month of July 2003.
Financial Report. Larson provided the financials for the month of July 2003, which
showed a net income of $234,518, compared to a budget of $200,214.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. The Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes were presented.
No unusual comments were made.
. Adiournment. There being no further business, Chrissis made a motion, seconded by
Ristau, to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 PM. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Following adjournment, Board members were invited to tour the new Mental Health
Outpatient Clinic in the Plaza 15 Mall.
Respectfully submitted,
Corrinne Schlueter
Recorder
John Houle
Secretary
G �
' -�q` 5
IV.
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING
THURSDAY, .JULY 17,200 AT 7.30 P.M.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Pioneerland Library System Board called to order at
7:30 P -m. by Chair John Baker on Thursday, July 17, 2003 in the Willmar Public Library Building Multipurpose Room,
Willmar, MN- Roll call was taken and the Chair announced a quorum was present-
Chair Baker opened the meeting with the announcement that Jim Baker of Ortonvil le, MN would be their new
representative replacing Allen Houser.
Chair Baker requested approval of the agenda subject to additions/deletions: Board members requested the following
additions: V- Committee Reports: A. Finance: NASAGrant for the Olivia Public Library. Clouse motioned approval of
the agenda as presented with amended additions, seconded by Reigstad. Motion carried.
Board member Silvernale moved for the approval of the June 19, 2003 minutes, seconded by Reckdahl. Motion
carried.
Chair Baker moved to committee reports
Finance Committee Treasurer Clouse presented for the Finance Committee, Motion by Clouse to accept the June 2003
Financial Report, seconded by Reigstad. Motion carried- Clouse moved to accept the Bills and Check Registers as
presented, seconded by Ueland. Motion carried. Clouse acknowledged communications from the Cities of Clara City,
Dawson and Madison referencing "Automation Costs". Clouse moved to authorize a grant application [with signatures]
for a NASA Exhibit at the Olivia Public Library, seconded by Dille. Motion carried.
Chair Baker moved to the Personnel Committee. Chair Vonderharr presented a new employee. She questioned hiring
with pending city/county cutbacks. The board discussed. The City of Dawson representative Vern Silvernale explained
- that this was a summer seasonal employee. Vonderharr moved to approve the hiring of Amada Jenson for the Dawson
Public Library, seconded by Ueland- Motion carried
Chair John Baker moved to the Negotiations Committee and turned the meeting over to Lead Negotiator Ueland
Ueland referred the board to the "Agreement between PIONEERLAND REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL -CIO LOCAL UNION
NO- 1826 (January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003)" [contained in the mail out packet]. He explained that the
Union agreed to virtually all ofthe significant items that were suggested as language changes from the attorney- Further,
Ueland stressed the need to establish a "negotiating policy" for the future. He informed the PLS Board that the State of
Minnesota -- Bureau of Mediation Services coupled with the A F -S- C.M.E. Union Local #1826 did not support taking
the Negotiating Committee authority away and modifying the agreement after the fact - The board held discussion on the
various points brought up.
A motion was made by Ueland to approve the "Agreement between PIONEERLAND REGIONAL LIBRARY
SYSTEM and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL -CIO
LOCAL UNION NO. 1826 (January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003)" as presented with authorization for
signatures, seconded by Silvernale. Motion carried.
Ueland went back to the discussion on a policy for future negotiations. Board member Hale moved to direct the PLS
Policy Committee to prepare a "Negotiation Policy" which would be in the form of a resolution and would include
definitions for the various "roles" and "responsibilities" such as lead negotiator, negotiator, library board director,
library board, negotiation attorney, the process to be utilized, and the requirements for payment of authorized expenses,
seconded by Vonderharr. Motion carried.
Chair Baker highlighted the fact that this matter would be drafted by the "Policy Committee" in the form of a resolution -
Further consideration of this matter would be completed before the start of the next contract negotiation.
Lead Negotiator Ueland went on to inform the board that they would need to consider moving the "Head Librarians"
one step on the new contract pay ranges for 2003
c� / C�J `f h
0
CJ
11
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING
July 17, 2003
Number of signatories with appointed representatives: 27
Quorum of signatories: 14
Signatories present: 19
Present:
Jeffrey Lopez
Dean Shuck
Diane Beck
Ivey Vonderharr
Stacey Schuette
Grant Knutson
Amy Wilde
Joan Reckdahl
Paul Setzepfandt
John Baker
Gary Johnson
Allen Gislason
Vern Silvernale
Lowell Ucland
Julia Jury
Sarah Groves- Speece
Herman Harmemann
Lowell Broberg
Pam Dille
Garrison Hale.
Al Clouse
Jim Schueller
Mary Huesing
Daniel Reigstad
Absent:
Alvin Maas*
Jack Johnson*
Barb Borth
Stacy Grothem*
Herb Rotunda*
Dr. Les Potas*
Karen Roker*
Neva Kamrath*
Clyde Bratlie*
Art Abel
James Larson
Ramona Berg -Perry*
Eric Weiberg
*excused absence
Chippewa County
Kandiyohi County
Kandiyohi County
Lac qui Parle County
McLeod County
McLeod County
Meeker County
Meeker County
Renville County
Swill County
Yellow Medicine County
Yellow Medicine County
Dawson
Glencoe
Granite Falls
Hector
Hutchinson
Kerkhoven
Litchfield
Madison
Olivia
Renville
W ilhnar
Willmar
Big Stone County
Chippewa County
Kandiyohi County
Kandiyohi County
Appleton
Benson
Bird Island
Canby
Fairfax
Graceville
Ortonville
Willmar
Willmar
RESOLUTION NO. 12258
• RESOLUTION DESIGNATING LOCATION OF POLLING PLACE FOR ALL CITY AND
SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 PRECINCTS AND APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE 2003
SPECIAL CITY AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 ELECTION
WHEREAS, Chapter 204B, Section 204B.16, Subd. 1 and Section 20413.2 1, Subd. 2 of
the Laws of Minnesota states that the governing body of any municipality, by resolution adopted
prior to the giving of notice of the election, may designate the location of polling place of all
precincts (one, two, three and four (Rural School District)) and naming of judges for the City and
School District Election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA:
That the polling place to be used during the 2003 Election for all precincts will be
in the Recreation Center located at 900 Harrington Street S.W., Hutchinson,
Minnesota.
2. That the Election Judges are hereby appointed in accordance with the attached
list.
Adopted by the City Council this 23'a day of September, 2003.
0411U1.N
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
*denotes hcad judge
r 1
Srb))
ELECTION JUDGES CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #423
.
SPECIAL ELECTION 2003
PRECINCT 1
*HARRIET SCHMIDT
587 -5466
45 SHERWOOD CIRCLE.
ROXANNE JENSEN
587 -8589
1239 BRADFORD ST SE
PATSY WRIGHT
587 -4903
1300 SHERWOOD ST SE
CLARA TEWS
587 -5235
714 JEFFERSON ST SE
ANN SCHUMANN
587 -6773
129 MORNINGSIDE DR NE
PRECINCT 2
SEDONA MILLER
587 -2205
1235 GOLFVIEW CT NW
DORIS DAGGETT
587 -2382
978 ROLLING GREENS LN
DIANNE MARQUARDT
587 -8199
234-4 TH AVE NW
*DEETTA MCLAIN
587 -6069
755 SPRUCE ST
DORI JOHNSON
587 -2985
1270 ROLLING OAKS LN
GAIL FRANSEN
587 -6720
45 11TH AVENUE NE
HARRIET BURICH
587 -5010
583 CARLISLE ST NE
PRECINCT 3
ELAINE BLACK
587 -3299
9502 ND AVENUE SW
PHYLLIS WESELOH
587 -6318
1109 LEWIS AVENUE
DEBORAH LEMKE
587 -1179
685 SOUTHVIEW DRIVE
•
MORRIS BJURLIN
587 -2753
527 JUUL ROAD
*DARLEEN KNIGGE
587 -0961
832 GREENSVIEW CT NW
ANNE HAAS
587 -3193
113 MARK DRIVE NE
BILL WEGNER
587 -9096
125 11 TH AVENUE NE
PRECINCT 4
PEARL SEALS
587 -3083
569 MILLER AVE SW
*ANNETTE KOEHLER
587 -6484
55 ORCHARD AVE SE
ROMAN HAAS
587 -3193
113 MARK DRIVE NE
DALE MCLAIN
587 -6069
755 SPRUCE ST
REGISTRATION TABLE
JUNE WICK
587 -6248
535 MAIN ST S
DOLORES BRUNNER
234 -7666
968 HAYDEN AVE SW
*denotes hcad judge
r 1
Srb))
RESOLUTION NO. 12259
. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TOM
DAGGETT, PROPERTY OWNER, TO CONSTRUCT A 40'X 80' POLE TYPE BUILDING
LOCATED AT HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING, 720 HWY 7 WEST
0
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
Mr. Tom Daggett, property owner, Hutchinson Mfg., has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 40' x 80'
addition between two existing pole type storage sheds in the I/C District at Hutchinson Manufacturing.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that part of the East 300 feet of the West 778 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section Thirty -six (36) in Township One Hundred Seventeen (117)
North of Range Thirty (30) West, as measured along or parallel with the north line of said
Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, lying Northerly of the right -of -way of the
Minneapolis Industrial Railroad (formerly Minnesota Western Railroad).
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on
the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The applicant must be aware that there will be pending landscaping and buffering
improvements to the south of the property and that cost would be assessed back to the
benefiting property owners.
2. Written verification that the storm water pond on the western portion of the property is
in working order.
3. That there be paved access to the new building when the Highway 7 improvement is
completed in the area or no later than 2007 (if the highway project does not occur).
4. Plantings/buffering shall occur on the north side of the parcel when the highway
project is completed.
5. An additional hydrant and water looping must occur when the frontage road is
constructed.
6. Building code compliance must be discussed with the building official.
7. The conditional use permit is valid for six months, unless an extension is requested or
construction of the addition has commenced
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
5(c) I
C
DATE:
TO:
September 16, 2003
Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
MEMORANDUM
Hutchinson City Center
111 Haman street SE
Hulchiu n, MN $5350.2522
320.587.5151/17ax 320.2344240
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TOM DAGGETT, PROPERTY OWNER,
TO CONSTRUCT A 40'X 80' POLE TYPE BUILDING LOCATED AT HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING, 720
HWY7W
Pursuant to Sections 6.07 and 8.13 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct an addition between two existing pole type storage sheds in the IC
district at Hutchinson Manufacturing. There have been several CUP's granted for this property. A complete list of the previous
requests are provided in the staff report written in August 2000. There were a number of conditions placed on the 2000 request which
included requiring a landscaping plan, reconstruction of the stormwater pondhtg area, replatting and rezoning. I have not found
information regarding replatting or rezoning of the property to date.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and fee were submitted.
02. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on September 4, 2003.
3. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request-
RECOMMUMATION
The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The applicant must be aware that there will be pending landscaping and buffering
improvements to the south of the property and that cost would be assessed back to the
benefiting property owners.
2. Written verification that the storm water pond on the western portion of the property is in
working order.
3. That there be paved access to the new building when the Highway 7 improvement is
completed in the area or no later than 2007 (if the highway project does not occur).
4. Plantings/buffering shall occur on the north side of the parcel when the highway project is
completed.
5. An additional hydrant and water looping must occur when the frontage road is
constructed.
6, Building code compliance must be discussed with the building official.
7. The conditional use permit is valid for six months, unless an extension is requested or
construction of the addition has commenced
cc. Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg., 720 Hwy 7 W
spectfull submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Rimed on rceyeled paper 5I C\
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By. Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, 1,isa McClure,
Jake Wegner, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P. E., John Webster, John
Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plot z, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave Erlandson, Dick
Nagy, Julie Wiscbnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: September 10, 2003 — Meeting Date September 16, 2003
Applicant: Hutchinson Manufacturing, property owner
Brief Description
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to construct an addition onto an existing pole
building, which would in effect connect two existing pole buildings. Because this area of the
property is located in an I/C District, all uses require a conditional use permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: I/C, Industrial/Commercial District and C4
the very western portion of the lot is zoned C4 (commercial) which does
not allow industrial activity. Section 8.02 provides that the Official
Zoning Map "boundaries indicated as approximately following platted
lot lines shall be construed to follow such lot lines". Staff is interpreting
that provision to mean the highlighted area is all I/C zoned property. The
applicant should replat the entire industrially used piece into one parcel,
to alleviate any confusion or create building code issues.
Property Location: 720 Ilwy 7 West
Lot Size: 10.90 acres — including all properties
'p
Conditional Use Permit
Hutchinson Manufacturing
Planning Commission Review — September 16, 2003
Page 22
Existing Land Use: Manufacturing business
Adjacent Land Use
And .Zoning: C-4 to the west, C -5 to the east and the South Fork of the Crow River to
the south, Park to the south.
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Industrial /Commercial
Zoning History: The following conditional use permits have been issued:
1984 — construct a 26' by 60' addition (Notes: Staff recommended
approval contingent upon City being granted 40' easement adjacent to
Hwy 7 and 22 for service road purposes. It was also listed on the
findings of fact letter to the Council as well as on the resolution.)
1987 — expand manufacturing business on property located at
Hutchinson Manufacturing and Sales on Hwy 7 West (Notes: Addition
size 60' X 217'.)
1989 — construct a 25' X 250' building for painting and sandblasting at
Hutchinson Manufacturing
1990 — construct a 30' X 300' building for painting and sandblasting at
Hutchinson Manufacturing (Note: Extension of CUP issued in 1989 as
well as increase in size of building.)
. 1991 — construct a 70' X 240' building for painting and sandblasting at
Hutchinson Manufacturing (Note: Again this was for a building in the
same location as granted by the two previous CUPS, but the size was
increased to 70' X 240'.)
1992 (May) — construct an office addition and saw shed (Note: Planning
Staff recommended the following conditions: I. Pond should be 100'X
100', 2. Recommend buffering plan between R -1 (park) and industrial
site and in future, between C-4 and industrial site, 3. Hard surface
parking required by ordinance, and 4. Verify with utilities location/need
of utility easements. The findings of fact recommended that the staff
recommendation be met regarding the pond, buffering, hard surfacing of
parking lot and verification of utility easement. These conditions were
not attached to the recorded order.)
1992 (September) •- construct a 40' X 80' storage rack.
1997 — construction of two pole type buildings and additions to office
and manufacturing plant located in the I/C District at Hutchinson
Manufacturing, 720 Hwy 7 W (Note: The Planning Staff recommended
the following contingencies: 1. Hutchinson Mfg. Submit a complete
landscape plan showing a screening and buffering plan, 2. Additional
parking is provided, 3. A natural gas plan is submitted to Utilities, and 4.
A "One Stop Shop" meeting is set up. The findings of fact noted that a
task force would be established to address the screening issues. No
conditions were attached to the recorded order.)
2000 — Conditional use permit to construct two pole buildings in this
same location with the following conditions: submission of a landscape
and buffering plan; submit a written statement outlining the
implementation proposal; a more detailed survey must be submitted
(expected by August 14, 2000); the storm water ponding area must be
reconstructed and a siltation buffer must he provided to prevent future
problems. This project was never constructed
5 CC_�
Conditional Use Permit
Hutchinson Manufacturing
Planning Commission Review — September 16, 2003
Page 3
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8.13 — Industrial /Commercial District
Section 6.07 — Conditional Use Permit Required
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: There are three access points to Hwy 7 West, no service road. Staff has
been discussing, with MNDOT, the ideas for the improvements to
Highway 7 (see attached plan). The City Code requires buffering and
paved access to buildings. Because of the timing of Highway 7 being
constructed in 2006/2007, staff believes this would the best time to do
some improvements in this area would be concurrent with the
reconstruction project. There would be a new service road in this area
and a driveway and/or street would be extended to the south.
Parking: The minimum parking requirements require one space per employee on a
principal shift. There are 61 paved on west side and another 8 paved on
north side. 36 unpaved north side unpaved. 96 on employees on shift.
. Physical
Characteristics: The property slopes gradually from State Highway 7 to the south. The
one hundred year flood plain is located to the south at an elevation of
1046.3. The area in question is above that elevation. There is a small
wetland to the south of the proposed addition, but not in the area of
construction.
Analysis: The past permitting history described above indicates a number of items
need to be addressed. The storm water pond, which was required as a
part of the 1992 request must be reverified. Even though this project
does not directly impact the drainage pond, this seems to be an
outstanding issue.
It also seems that landscaping and buffering is an on -going discussion.
Staff would recommend the same as what was discussed in the
Steamswood conditional use permit, which was the southerly
landscaping be completed by the City at the time the railroad property
becomes available and then we would assess back the cost of the
installation. On the northern portion of the property, the plantings and
landscaping would be concurrent with the Highway 7 project. If for
some reason, the project is not constructed, there should still be buffering
implemented, no later than 2007- Staff usually does not suggest waiting
on certain improvements. In fact, most conditions are to met as the
particular project is completed. Staff fears that whatever plantings or
improvements that are made at this time, would be destroyed with the
highway reconstruction project.
The ordinance requires hardsurfaced parking area and access to
buildings. Section 10.01, specifically states that parking areas and access
drives shall be covered with a minimum of 6 inch gravel base and 2 inch
Conditional Use Permit
Hutchinson Manufacturing
Planning Commission Review — September 16, 2003
Page 4
plant mix bituminous surface. All existing parking lots with substandard
surfaces should be allowed to remain until either the property is sold or a
building permit for addition or remodeling is required. Staff again feels
the pavement would be more readily completed in concurrence with the
highway improvement since the area in which the addition is proposed is
within their construction limits.
There are requirements for building code compliance. The applicant's
architect should be in contact with the building official regarding these
issues.
There has been discussion regarding hydrant access for this property.
Staff would recommend that the water line for this area be looped during
construction of the frontage road and an additional hydrant be installed to
better provide this property with fire protection.
Recommendation: Staff would recommend that the conditional use permit be approved
contingent on following:
1.
The applicant must be aware that there will be pending
landscaping and buffering improvements to the south of the
property and that cost would be assessed back to the benefiting
property owners.
2.
Written verification that the storm water pond on the western —
portion of the property is in working order.
3.
That there be paved access to the building constructed when the
Highway 7 improvement is completed in the area or no later than
2007 (if the highway project does not occur).
4.
Plantings/buffering shall occur on the north side of the parcel
when the highway project is completed.
5.
An additional hydrant and water looping must occur when the
frontage road is constructed.
6.
Building code compliance must be discussed with the building
official.
7.
The conditional use permit is valid for six months, unless an
extension is requested or construction of the addition has
commenced.
Cc: Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Manufacturing, 720 Hwy 7 West, Hutchinson
Lowell Flatten, MNDOT
LJ
(c)
m
in, IQ
'671010
MN
* >I-
n
ia�
1 I s.
I NiCU Ul
QPAV.
iTu
RECEIVED
A lJG' 2 0 2 G 0 3
cty or Hutthins n
ihtofP.Z. &8.
XFRD, ;116" LINE
X.C.
[RON jZj&th
LINE
in, IQ
'671010
MN
* >I-
n
ia�
1 I s.
I NiCU Ul
QPAV.
iTu
RECEIVED
A lJG' 2 0 2 G 0 3
cty or Hutthins n
ihtofP.Z. &8.
UA
P
R
4,
C£
am
AV-
` \�: ^ � �
�, \��������
9 -10 -03
Hutchinson Planning Commissioners
Re: Hutchinson Manufacturing request for Conditional Use.
Publication No. 7091
Dear Commissioners,
Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing for this conditional use request, I ask that
you include this letter as part of the public comment as you determine the conditions to attach
to this request.
I have only one concern to address regarding this business located in the I/C zoning district.
My concern is the lack of the required screening or fencing around the outdoor storage of
materials, supplies and by- products.
I believe that in the I/C district (Section 8.13) that all outdoor storage is required to be within
enclosed buildings or within the confines of a 100% opaque wall or fence no less than 6 feet
tall, or other buffering approved by the City Council.
In Section 10.0 1, Screening is addressed. Under the screening section, all commercial or
industrial buildings shall be screened from the adjacent residential zoning districts. The
• property to the south of this I/C district is the wildlife park, which is zoned residential. The
required wooden wall or fence is required to be not less than 8 feet tall. It is also required to
be set back 5 feet to allow for the planting of trees or bushes.
Also in Section 10.0 1, outdoor storage is addressed. This section requires that all outdoor
storage is required to be within enclosed buildings or within the confines of a 100% opaque
wall or fence no less than 5 feet tall, or other buffering approved by the City Council.
It is clear that the zoning ordinance requires all of the outdoor storage at this property to be
enclosed or behind a fence of some kind. The 3 different sections that refer to the fence
requirements indicate fence heights of 5 to 8 feet. While the height may be unclear, the fact
that a fence is required is very clear.
The City of Hutchinson has a very beautiful park and wildlife area adjacent to this business
and other businesses in the area. I visit these parks often and feel that it is time to address the
zoning requirements for screening that have been overlooked for years. The chemical barrels,
storage racks, pallets and noise should be screened from the public view as required by City
Ordinance.
Thank you for hearing my concerns and comments.
Mark Hensen
39 5'h Avenue NE
Hutchinson, MN
C*) )
Hutchinson
Manufacturing
Mr. Marlin Torgerson
ftCFryF
D
City of Hutchinson
S�PI
I/
111 Hassan Street
C. Z00
7t J
l
Hutchinson,, 552350
n,
fH
Luc tch
°fp
Mr. Mayor
City Council
720 Hwy 7 West
Hutchinson Manufacturing currently has a request for a conditional use permit to
P.O. Box 487 construct a storage extension ( 3200 sq ft) between two existing build Es. The
Planning Commission approved this request on Tuesday, September 16 , 2003. This
letter is to request this also be approved by the city council but with the removal of
Hutchinson, contingencies 1,2,3 and 5. Reasoning as follows.
Mn 66350 1) Item 1 is vague as to what the scope of work is and hence not defined as to
cost. Considering the distance of our south line, this could be considerable.
(320) 687 -9663 The issue needs further discussion and does not belong as a contingency for
this small project.
687 -3('70 2) The addition we are talking about has no impact on the existing storm water
pond located on the opposite side of the property. (Contingency 2)
3) The issue of paved access to and from is undefined as "to and from what ".
• The addition of the storage facility does not increase the amount of traffic on
our property. This addition will create significantly less dust and create less
design engntooring impact on visual appeal than the unpaved Les Kouba Parkway to our south.
(Contingency 3)
steel fabricating 4) We will cooperate with issue of providing an easement if required to loop the
water lines in our area if needed. I doubt if the addition of this steel storage
welding facility will necessitate an additional hydrant. (Contingency 5)
This addition to storage is a small project that will bring more of our outside storage
surface preparation under cover. It is therefore an attempt to improve the overall appearance of our
facility and land. It is however a small project and cannot be burdened by the
c,oatlag potential sizable expenses listed within contingencies currently proposed.
Thank you for you consideration.
assembly
Cc. Julie Wischnack, Planning Commission
SYnC
m Daggett
Owner
C( <) I
0
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 03 -356
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL, ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FOR A PROPERTY TO RF. REZONED FROM RI TO R3 PDD
ROLLING MEADOWS EAST
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
WHEREAS, the following described real property is hereby rezoned from R1( Single Family Residential) to
R3 PDD (Medium to high Density Residential) as requested by property owner:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Rolling Meadows East
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission and City Council have considered the effects of rezoning this piece
of property;
WHEREAS, there are certain parameters that will make this rezoning appropriate for this area;
THEREFORE; the City hereby officially rezones this property to R3 PDD and it shall take effect upon
publication of this ordinance;
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of October, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
E
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
53(01:x'
�J
RESOLUTION NO. 12260
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ROLLING MEADOWS EAST
SUBMITTED BY SORENSEN AND NAUSTDAL PROPER'T'IES
BF IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
L The property owner has submitted a 60 lot preliminary plat to be known as Rolling Meadows East. This is an
application for a preliminary plat for a property east of Rolling Meadows. The preliminary plat is in anticipation of
building construction next spring, with possible grading this fall. The preliminary plat would involve 23.25 acres and
60 lots (if the southerly area was developed into twin homes.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 30
West of the 5°i Principal Meridian, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on a line parallel with and 423.2 feet easterly of, as measured
at a right angle to, the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, said point being 240.78 feet north of the northerly right of way line of
State Iiighway No. 7, as measured along said parallel line; thence easterly,
parallel with said right of way line, 300.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with
said west line, 240.78 feet to said right of way line; thence easterly, along said
right of way line, to the intersection with a line parallel with and 777.34 feet
easterly of, as measured at a right angle to, said west line; thence northerly,
parallel with said west line, to a point 376.48 feet northerly of, as measured along
said parallel line, from the centerline of said Highway No. 7; thence easterly,
deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 200.00 feet; thence
northerly, parallel with said west line, to a point 352.44 feet northerly of said
centerline; thence easterly, deflecting to the right 86 degrees 15 minutes 44
seconds, to the west line of MUNSELL ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof; thence northerly, westerly and northerly, along said west line of
MUNSELL ADDITION, and its northerly prolongation, to the intersection with
the centerline of McLeod County Highway No. 12; thence northwesterly, along
said centerline of Highway No. 12, to the intersection with the west line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence southerly, along the last said
west line and along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, to the intersection with a line drawn parallel with the south line of said
Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter from the point of beginning; thence
easterly, along the last said parallel line, to the point of beginning.
Except that part of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, described as
follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Golf Course Road (formerly
County Highway No. 12) with the northerly prolongation of said west line of
MUNSELL ADDITION; thence northwesterly, along said centerline to the
intersection with a line parallel with and distant 20.00 feet westerly of, as
measured perpendicular to, said west line of MUNSELL ADDITION; thence
southerly, parallel with said west line of MUNSELL ADDITION 129.65 feet;
thence southeasterly, deflecting to the left 11 degrees 30 minutes 25 seconds
100.26 feet to said west line of MUNSELL ADDITION; thence northerly, along
said west line of MUNSELL ASDDITION and its northerly prolongation, to the
point of beginning.
Also, except that part of'said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and that
part of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter shown as Parcel 2 of
CITY OF 14 JTCHINSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.5, according
to the recorded plat thereof.
2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect ofthe proposed use on
the health, safety, and welfare ofthe occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3, The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
5 (01;tl
Resolution No. 12260
Bolling Meadows East
September 23, 2003
Page 2
�J
CONCLUSION-
The City Council hereby approves the preliminary plat with the following:
1. Resolution of access to on going maintenance required for the ponding areas.
2. Plans must indicate the trail and sidewalk locations.
3. If single family homes are built on the south side of the project, additional drainage and utility
casements are necessary.
4. Acknowledgement of the park issues must be submitted by the applicant.
5. A subdividers agreement will be considered prior to the final plat and then executed at the time of
final plat.
6. Drainage issues must be addressed with the property to the west.
Adopted by the City Council this 23 " day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plot?
City Administrator
L
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
6(e�
RESOLUTION NO. 12261
RESOLUTION GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER
SECTION 8.17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
TO ALLOW A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO BE
LOCATED IN ROLLING MEADOWS EAST
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Bruce Naustdal, Naustdal /Sorensen Properties LLC , has made application to the City Council
for a Planned Development district under Section 8.17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 with the following legal
description. The lowest, allowed lot width in the R3 District is 60 feet. Since this is a PUD, the lots which are
in the interior section are approximately 55 feet wide. The setbacks are proposed to be 20 feet in the front, 20
feet in the rear, 6 on the side. Accessory buildings would follow the same setback standards. The project
would be similar, with respect to what was approved in First Addition to Ravenwood .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and of
the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36,
Township 117 North, Range 30 West of the 5 Principal Meridian,
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on a line parallel with and 423.2 feet easterly
of, as measured at a right angle to, the west line of said Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, said point being 240.78 feet north
. of the northerly right of way line of State Highway No. 7, as
measured along said parallel line, thence easterly, parallel with said
right of way line, 300.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with said
west line, 240.78 feet to said right of way line; thence easterly,
along said right of way line, to the intersection with a line parallel
with and 777.34 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to, said
west line; thence northerly, parallel with said west line, to a point
376.48 feet northerly of, as measured along said parallel line, from
the centerline of said Highway No. 7; thence easterly, deflecting to
the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 200.00 feet; thence
northerly, parallel with said west line, to a oint 352.44 feet
northerly of said centerline; thence easterly, deflecting to the right
86 degrees 15 minutes 44 seconds, to the west line of MUNSELI,
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence
northerly, westerly and northerly, along said west line of
MUNSELL ADDITION, and its northerly prolongation, to the
intersection with the centerline of McLeod County Highway No. 12;
thence northwesterly, along said centerline of Highway No.12, to
the intersection with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter; thence southerly, aloe the last said west line
and along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, to the intersection with a line drawn parallel with the south
line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter from the
point of beginning; thence easterly, along the last said parallel line,
to the point of beginning.
Except that part of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter,
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Golf Course Road
. (formerly County Highway No. 12) with the northerly prolongation
of said west line of MUNSELL ADDITION; thence northwesterly,
along said centerline to the intersection with a line parallel with and
distant 20.00 feet westerly of, as measured perpendicular to, said
west line of MUNSELL ADDITION; thence southerly, parallel with
6'�Cc)�-
PDD R3 — Rolling Meadows East
September 23, 2003
Page 2
said west line of MIJNSELL ADDITION 129.65 feet; thence
southeasterly, deflecting to the left 11 degrees 30 minutes 25
seconds 100.26 feet to said west line of MUNSELL ADDITION;
thence northerly, along said west line of MUNSELL ASDDiTION
and its northerly prolongation, to the point of beginning.
Also, except that part of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter and that part of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter shown as Parcel 2 of CITY OF HUTCHINSON STREET
RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 5, according to the recorded plat
thereof
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the
effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing
and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect
of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it
seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Planned Development District for the purpose designated is granted based on the
• findings set forth above subject to the following:
1. The setbacks are deemed to be 20 feet from any street right, 6 feet on the side and 20 feet
in the rear.
2, Lots located in the interior section will be allowed with 55 foot widths.
3. Three lots in the interior section will not meet the 7200 sq. ft. lot area requirement and
will be approximately 6600 sq. ft.
Adopted by the City Council this 23d day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
0
MEMORANDUM
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hawn Snwt SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522
320.$87.5151/Fax 320. 234 -4240
DATE: September 17, 2003
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ROLLING MEADOWS
EAST, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND REZONING FROM R -1 TO R -3PDD
Pursuant to Sections 12.10, 8.17 and 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for preliminary plat,
planned development district and rezoning.
HISTORY
This is an application for a preliminary plat for a property cast of Rolling Meadows. The preliminary plat is in
anticipation of building construction next spring, with possible grading this fall. The preliminary plat would involve
23.25 acres and 60 lots (if the southerly area was developed into twin homes.
The plat would be a Planned Development District because it would be having various lot sizes and housing types. The
very interior lots would have an alley access and, in some cases, would be 55 feet wide
• The lowest, allowed lot width in the R3 District is 60 feet. Since this is a PUD, the lots which are in the interior section
are approximately 55 feet wide. The setbacks are proposed to be 20 feet in the front, 20 feet in the rear, 6 on the side.
Accessory buildings would follow the same setback standards. The project would be similar, with respect to what was
approved in First Addition to Ravenwood . The plat provides for approximately 60 total units, 50 of which would be
single family, There are some twin home units proposed in the southern area of the plat. (The southern tier of lots could
be either twins or single family.)
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and fee was submitted.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinspit on
Thursday, September 4, 2003.
3. There were no property owners present objecting to the request.
4. As with other development requests, there are various fees which apply to this plat The parkland contribution in
the R3 district is $ 135.00 per unit. SACWAC charges in 2003 are $2040.00 per unit (note this fee increases
every year). This development is not located in the electric service territory area, therefore does not have to pay
a charge of $800.00 per unit. The above costs are collected with the building permit fees. There is an additional
escrow required for tree planting. The ordinance requires the equivalent oft trees per lot be escrowed with the
City. The amount would be $19,200 if all lots were final platted at tbis time. 100% of the grading cost must be
secured by a bond or letter of credit by the developer. The remaining improvements for the project will be
completed by the City.
5. The development has a number of streets that would be constructed. The developer wishes to grade the project
this fall and the city would complete the improvements next spring and summer. The major corridor (Golf
Course Road), with its new alignment, is the most challenging with respect to timing. The project could be built
in 2004, although the city would not be committing to that time frame.
The interior streets would be 32 feet wide with 60 foot rights of way. Golf Course Road would have a larger
(90 foot) width with a "round -a- bout" at the point the road meets the existing Golf Course Road section. There
would be a need to extend Texas Avenue to meet the existing road improvements. This would require
additional easement area from E and T Contracting, which owns property to the south of Texas Avenue.
The alley would be 16 feet wide, with a 20 foot wide right of way. The fire code requires a 7 ton, 20 foot
"clearance" area for accessibility. There are a variety of ways to design the alley, but in all cases it would be
paved, with some type of curbing for drdis2agelCttrpaas here has been some discussion about plowing and the
cr
...... ........
• Finding of Fact — September 17, 2003
Naustdal — Rezone, PDD, Preliminary Plat
Page 2
priority of alleys, much like it is in other parts of the City.
Sidewalks (five feet wide) would be installed on both of the north south streets, eventually meeting at the park
property. There also would be a 10 foot trail along Texas Avenue, which would then connect into the trail
which would be built along Golf Course Road.
6. The hydrology report indicates there are three drainage areas within the development. Area 1 is 14.4 acres,
Area 2 is 2.45 arses and Area 3 is 10 acne. The ponding on the northwest side of tiro property indicates a pond
would be created with an elongated north -south configuration. There has been a concern raised by at least one
neighbor to the project within the existing Rolling Meadows Development (755 Louisiana). Staff would
recommend an on site discussion, to see if there are any additional issues.
7. Staff has not been supportive of accepting more park land in the past, since there is a lot of open space park land
(230 acres) within the City. The possible process for this development would be to accept the park land and
collect fees on the entire development. The fees would equate to approximately $8,100 ($135 per unit). This
would not alone purchase equipment for the park. Since the park would serve a greater area, perhaps some
dollars from existing park dedication (from previous surrounding developments) could be used to support the
park. This would still only buy one piece of equipment. If there is more desired, by the developer, those costs
would have to be in addition to the park fees identified above.
The PD section of the City Code requires that there is a minimum of 20% be devoted to private outdoor
recreation space_ This development has indicated one City park and three ponding areas. The pending areas
may be dedicated private pieces of property. However, the City may allow deviations from any standards of the
ordinance, if the PD shall be used to create a development having greater public benefit than would otherwise
have been possible. (Section 8.17)
Buffering from the commercial areas to the south must be considered, though is not a requirement. A possible
change to the grading plan and/or plantings may help to separate these uses. Screening is only required in
• Multiple Family, Commercial, and Industrial developments.
AFCOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat and PDD R3 with the following
recommendations:
1. Resolution of access to on going maintenance required for the ponding areas.
2. Plans must indicate the trail and sidewalk locations.
3. If single family homes are built on the south side of the project, additional drainage and utility
easements are necessary.
4. Acknowledgement of the park issues must be submitted by the applicant.
5. A subdividers agreement will be considered prior to the final plat and then executed at the
time of final plat.
6. Drainage issues must be addressed with the property to the west.
ectfully ubtnitt�
ti
Dean Kirchoff, Chair man
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Naustdal/Sorensen, 1114 Blackbird Dr. SW
Marty Campion, Otto Assoc., 9 West Division St., Buffalo MN 55313
•
Ll
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure,
Amanda Alfson, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster,
John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Steve Madson, Dick
Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: September 8, 2003 — Meeting Date September 16, 2003
Applicant: Bruce Naustdal and Diane Sorenson
Preliminary Plat - PDD " I• _'I LI
Brief Description:
This is an application for a preliminary plat for a property east of Rolling Meadows. The
preliminary plat is in anticipation of building construction next spring, with possible grading this
fall. The preliminary plat would involve 23.25 acres and 60 lots (if the southerly area was
developed into twin homes.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning:
Property Location:
Lot Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Zoning History:
Applicable
Regulations:
Transportation:
R -1 (Single Family Residential)
South of Golf Course Road
Gast of Rolling Meadows
North of State Highway 7
Approximately 25.71 Acres
Vacant
R -2 (Low Density Residential) to the West,
R4 to the southwest, and Commercial to the
south.
Traditional Residential Neighborhood
The east side of the property was platted as "Beau Ridge ", but the
developer never filed the plat.
Section 12.20 (Subdivision Regulations)
Golf Course Road, State Highway 7, Texas Avenue
Preliminary Plat — Rolling Meadows Extension
Sorenson Naustdal Properties
Planning Commission— September 16, 2003
Page 2
Parking: N/A
Plat Information
SPECIAL INFORMATION
This plat is an extension of the building better neighborhoods program
through the Greater Minnesota Housing Fund. The Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of the City has been working on a grant to
assist with the project.
The development has a number of streets that would be constructed. The
developer wishes to grade the project this fall and the city would
complete the improvements next spring and summer. The major corridor
(Golf Course Road), with its new alignment, is the most challenging with
respect to timing. The project could be built in 2004, although the city
would not be committing to that time frame.
The interior streets would be 32 feet wide with 60 foot rights of way.
Golf Course Road would have a larger (90 foot) width with a "round -a-
bout" at the point the road meets the existing Golf Course Road section.
There would be a need to extend Texas Avenue to meet the existing road
improvements. This would require additional easement area from E and
T Contracting, which owns property to the south of Texas Avenue.
The alley would be 16 feet wide, with a 20 foot wide right of way. The
fire code requires a 7 ton, 20 foot "clearance" area for accessibility.
There are a variety of ways to design the alley, but in all cases it would
be paved, with some type of curbing for drainage purposes. There has
been some discussion about plowing and the priority of alleys, much like
it is in other parts of the City.
Sidewalks (five feet wide) would be installed on both of the north south
streets, eventually meeting at the park property. There also would be a
10 foot trail along Texas Avenue, which would then connect into the trail
which would be built along Golf Course Road.
Stormwater Improvements
The hydrology report indicates there are three drainage areas within the
development. Area 1 is 14.4 acres, Area 2 is 2.45 acres and Area 3 is 10
acres. The ponding on the northwest side of the property indicates a
pond would be created with an elongated north -south configuration.
There has been a concern raised by at least one neighbor to the project
within the existing Rolling Meadows Development (755 Louisiana).
Staff would recommend an on site discussion, to see if there are any
additional issues.
Preliminary Plat — Rolling Meadows Extension
Sorenson Naustdal Properties
Planning Commission— September 16, 2003
. Page 3
Park/Open Space
Staff has not been supportive of accepting more park land in the past,
since there is a lot of open space park land (230 acres) within the City.
The possible process for this development would be to accept the park
land and collect fees on the entire development. The fees would equate
to apprnximnfely.$R,100 (,$135 per unit). This would not alone purchase
equipment for the park. Since the park would serve a greater area,
perhaps some dollars from existing park dedication (from previous
surrounding developments) could be used to support the park. This
would still only buy one piece of equipment. If there is more desired, by
the developer, those costs would have to be in addition to the park fees
identified above.
The PD section of the City Code requires that there is a minimum of 20%
be devoted to private outdoor recreation space. This development has
indicated one City park and three ponding areas. The ponding areas may
be dedicated private pieces of property. However, the City may allow
deviations from any standards of the ordinance, if the PD shall be used to
create a development having greater public benefit than would otherwise
have been possible. (Section 8.17)
Buffering from the commercial areas to the south must be considered,
though is not a requirement. A possible change to the grading plan
and/or plantings may help to separate these uses. Screening is only
required in Multiple Family, Commercial, and Industrial developments.
Rezoning /Setback Proposal
Fees
The plat would be a Planned Development District because it would be
having various lot sizes and housing types. The very interior lots would
have an alley access and, in some cases, would be 55 feet wide. Staff is
requesting that the alley not end in a "T" near the park. In fact, staff
would prefer a softer curve to the east, to help maneuvering space.
The lowest, allowed lot width in the R3 District is 60 feet. Since this is
a PUD, the lots which are in the interior section are approximately 55
feet wide. The setbacks ate proposed to be 20 feet in the front, 20 feet
in the rear, 6 on the side. Accessory buildings would follow the same
setback standards. The project would be similar, with respect to what
was approved in Ravenwood East. The plat provides for approximately
60 total units, 50 of which would be single family. There are some twin
home units proposed in the southern area of the plat_ (The southern tier
of lots could be either twins or single family.)
The parkland contribution in the R3 district is $135.00 per unit.
SAC/WAC charges in 2003 are $2040.00 per unit (note this fee increases
every year). This development is not located in the electric service
territory area, therefore does not have to pay a charge of $800.00 per
unit. The above costs are collected with the building permit fees.
')Cc-y .
Finding of Fact — May 21,2002
Naustdal — Rezone, CUP, Preliminary Plat
Page 2
priority of alleys, much like it is in other parts of the City.
Sidewalks (five feet wide) would be installed on both of the north south streets, eventually meeting at the park
property. There also would be a 10 foot trail along Texas Avenue, which would then connect into the hail
which would be built along Golf Course Road,
6. The hydrology report indicates there are three drainage areas within the development. Area 1 is 14.4 acres,
Area 2 is 2.45 acres and Area 3 is 10 acres. The ponding on the northwest side of the property indicates a pond
would be created with an elongated north -south configuration. There has been a concern wised by at least one
neighbor to the project within the existing Rolling Meadows Development (755 Louisiana). Staff would
recommend an on site discussion, to see if there are any additional issues.
7. Staff has not been supportive of accepting more park land in the past, since there is a lot ofopen space park land
(230 acres) within the City. The possible process for this development would be to accept the park land and
collect fees on the entire development. The fees would equate to approximately $8,100 ($135 per unit). This
would not alone purchase equipment for the park. Since the park would serve a greater area, perhaps some
dollars from existing park dedication (from previous surrounding developments) could be used to support the
park. This would still only buy one piece of equipment. If there is more desired, by the developer, those costs
would have to be in addition to the park fees identified above.
The PD section of the City Code requires that there is a minimum of 20% be devoted to private outdoor
recreation space. This development has indicated one City park and three ponding areas. The ponding areas
may be dedicated private pieces of property, however, the City may allow deviations from any standards ofthe
ordinance, if the PD shall be used to create a development having greater public benefit than would otherwise
have been possible. (Section 8.17)
Buffering from the commercial areas to the south must be considered, though is not a requirement. A possible
change to the grading plan and/or plantings may help to separate these uses. Screening is only required in
. Multiple Family, Commercial, and Industrial developments,
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Conunission recommends approval of the preliminary plat and PDD R3 with the following
recommendations:
1. Resolution of access to on going maintenance required for the ponding areas.
2. Plans must indicate the trail and sidewalk locations.
3. If single family homes are built on the south side of-the project, additional drainage and utility
easements are necessary.
4. Acknowledgement of the park issues must be submitted by the applicant.
5. A subdividers agreement will be considered prior to the final plat and then executed at the
time of final plat.
6. Drainage issues must be addressed with the property to the west.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chain=
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Naustdal/Sorensen, 1114 Blackbird Dr. SW
Marty Campion, Otto Assoc., 9 West Division St., Buffalo MN 55313
J(C)3,
S
r" ;se
a
ROLLING MEADOWS EAST
PRELIMINARY PLAT
s'r-p
lx� FOR p-m C).11.1t Of
of
UL 7-1* 1:T :�R� 35 w— o d. 51h Ar—" ir--
H6," awv
.6k vo vaetlH Me, Yea liw
co 2cOXo -12
"-EU
gd= ft 00 �.r,
AN 0 k"mu %mTo4 N.Ir 'IN rt UNPLATWD H. AN 'I s'd—Am. ff mw if.. 4.
o— . M v— � a a
e.w ft 5.�. 0— *— P". 0 .v—o
Z ,. , ,
N--*A if ow e—. Wad M-1, n Aqi—, w.. t 14'. nernay
2.00 0 Kmal w�
i 41 Nuftev. W Hm e WNS&L mm
WAIMM AMT
�OL —A" r� IN N� —
ik A6., I—N.
TOTAL AP4A • 9,&25 At .
lmmfLr-,u
C*IAFLr c SORDMEN NAUMAL "00f�S, LLC
K�RMK uh
PRESENT WNW t R- I (SVIGLE FAMILY RE ICENTWL m-. Kn
I
PROPOSM ZO" R-3 PL. (PLMWD 3E%U-OP*V- DUMCn
Jej
%
LOT XTA4-
Aw -
ujpLAT-E0
R-2 j
/c
8125
RESOLUTION NO. 12263
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS COUNTY
. FAIR MARKETPLACE THIRD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. The property owners are requesting a replat of existing property within the County Fair Marketplace. It involves two lots
named "2A and 2T" from the original plat for Target, Officemax and Cub. The general idea is to be able to transfer
ownership of the Officemax building and its associated parking area. 2A and 2 T would then become 4 lots, one for
Officemax and parking and three separate vacant lots.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, County Fair Marketplace Third Addition
2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on
the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the preliminary and final plat with the following conditions:
1. Although this is a confusing subdivision, it important to note the parking requirements were well
thought out with the original platting. However, in reading the OEA (operation and easement
agreements) for the properties, the legal descriptions must be changed to identify the new legal
descriptions that are being created.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of September, 2003.
AT" I'EST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
5Ccy�)
RESOLUTION NO. 12264
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT TO ICE KNOWN AS COUNTY
FAIR MARKETPLACE FOURTH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. The property owners are requesting a replat of existing property within the County Fair Marketplace. It involves two lots
named "2A and 2T" from the original plat for Target, O ftcemax and Cub. The general idea is to be able to transfer
ownership of the Officcmax building and its associated parking area. 2A and 2 T would then become 4 lots, one for
Officemax and parking and three separate vacant lots.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots I and 2, Block 1, County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition
2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Comtnission and the effect of the proposed use on
the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3, The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the preliminary and final plat with the following conditions:
. 1. Although this is a confusing subdivision, it important to note the parking requirements were well
thought out with the original platting, however, in reading the OEA (operation and easement
agreements) for the properties, the legal descriptions must be changed to identify the new legal
descriptions that are being created.
Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
5(C
DATE: September 17, 2003
TO: Hutchinson City Council
MEMORANDUM
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Strert Su
llutchinson, MN 5,5350 -2522
320.587.5151/F'ax 320-234.4240
FRt1M: Hutchinson Planning Conuuimiutl
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATS TO 13E KNOWN AS COUNTY
FAIR MARKET PLACE THIRD ADDITION AND COUNTY FAIR MARKET PLACE FOURTH
ADDITION
Pursuant to Sections 12.10 and 12.20 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for preliminary and final
plat.
HISTORY
The property owners are requesting a replat of existing property within the County Fair Marketplace. It involves two
lots named -2A and 2T' irom the original plat for Target, Officemax and Cub. The general idea is to be able to
transfer ownership of the Officemax building and its associated parking area. 2A and 2 T would then become 4 lots,
one for Officemax and parking and three separate vacant lots.
FINDINGS OF FACT
. 1. The required application was submitted and fee was submitted.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, September 4, 2003.
3. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request.
RECOMMENDATI ON
The Planning Commission recommends unanimous approval of the prelim nary and final plats with the
following recommendations:
1. Although this is a confusing subdivision, it important to note the parking requirements were
well thought out with the original platting. However, in reading the ORA (operation and
easement agreements) for the properties, the legal descriptions must be changed to identify the
new legal descriptions that are being created.
spectfully submitted,
Dean Kircboff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
ce: Ryan Companies US, Inc., Mark Kampmeyer, 50 South 10t° St., Suite 300, Mpls, MN 55403 -2012
RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd., John Dietrich, 6110 Blue Circle Dr, Suite 100, Minnetonka, Mn 55343
- Primed on recycled papa -
5 --Y--5
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF -REPORT.
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure, Jean
Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge,
Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill,
Jim Popp, Sgt. Doug Johnson, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and
Bonnie Baumetz
Date: September 10, 2003 - Meeting Date September 16, 2003
Applicant: Ryan Companies, property owner
LLtDl � 1U\t I
Brief Description The property owners are requesting a replat of existing property within the County Fair
Marketplace. It involves two lots named "2A and 2T" from the original plat for Target, Officemax and
Cub. The general idea is to be able to transfer ownership of the Officemax building and its associated
parking area. 2A and 2 T would then become 4 lots, one for Officemax and parking and three separate
vacant lots.
Zoning History: The property was developed by Ryan Companies for commercial development.
There are cross parking agreements to accommodate parking requirements for
the businesses in the development.
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8. 12, Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance
Analysis and
Recommendation: Although this is a confusing subdivision, it important to note the parking
requirements were well thought out with the original platting. However, in
reading the OFA (operation and easement agreements) for the properties, the
legal descriptions must be changed to identify the new legal descriptions that are
being created. Staff would recommend approval of the subdivision with the
condition that the City would not record the approving resolution until an
. amended OEA has been submitted.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning:
C4 (Fringe Commercial)
Property Location:
1330 Hwy 15 S
Lot Size:
The new lots would be 1.57, 1.35, .25 and .78
2 of the lots could be used for additional retail and the remaining smaller lot
would only accommodate parking.
Existing Land Use:
Vacant/retail
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Commercial
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Commercial
Zoning History: The property was developed by Ryan Companies for commercial development.
There are cross parking agreements to accommodate parking requirements for
the businesses in the development.
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8. 12, Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance
Analysis and
Recommendation: Although this is a confusing subdivision, it important to note the parking
requirements were well thought out with the original platting. However, in
reading the OFA (operation and easement agreements) for the properties, the
legal descriptions must be changed to identify the new legal descriptions that are
being created. Staff would recommend approval of the subdivision with the
condition that the City would not record the approving resolution until an
. amended OEA has been submitted.
Replat of County Fair Marketplace
Planning Commission review September 16, 2003
Ryan Companies
. Page 2
Cc: Ryan Companies, property owner
-J
0
NO3
so
a
Jr-'r&Aminary flat
c�
W 1
� I
0 V,cit4rTy MAP
SC I/-1
ECYI$N x3, To4f ttd.
R ov
—G E t
--E00 C&JNTY y- NE30?A
E)OS-MG PR RTY lXS0Wn0N r�
yT*� A rtgrtye ii
eati�e ffi �[erzt 3�J t�i'H�� � M•`� A
W F • Yr !r•aaa 4et K st,� 4e€ wv; fs ea[ i.E a W
�Fa L3 smsY Fa(p ;. Kr Ssf ; wws iisae Y
THIRD & FOURTH ADDITIC->NS
Hutchinson, Minnesota
DESCRPTKWS
■LEGEiiD _ -- -
�` •oL�••a• x¢g+wF ra ®° $+x4+t is
L,..�s6.� r Ka Nd ' � •ya cwwt
1
Yom -
f
.��
i•y +Ktixua
ax L ias. s � � R i]3 31 W 4g
i
i
Xs
I�
M
Z
w
-N,
7
i�im CATk
FAR y�y 7p 4i3d Y fEflZ: #� 3
CCKiPF= F'A14 i T3yq Ti93i t m [ o �C f O_u A43M4S
US AMW3
?V M.
ACM
SULMO AAi
C€L+ 3 = 14T 7
tom' d kII# CF13f if» FF� 3U,,y l 1 ;i $/1=
1,#Z
S we 213
€:.
47AW SF 241 aszaa IM A
5[ I"A1�iIR 1� Fwi S 1Ni31 iei >< i6Ba#uR -r yp Hka4 )€
��.F' RAEL SML 4 Ri1n1 stif.
> =M# K FKgK.i M CEi1FN ii AI# 31 +AF6� lrt36 y i RuE 9t
.11.
. 10,
�i %� SJ61 et II6'#� RI!>Q Pua[3.. fi tom'
61'My�. 'lb 3652 iSaM � SIB
#b�ri 541U![s4416[ i+/tl1 iigT
TiYf6XF6 F#7f 1i Pf.MR
RN9 F3s � M# i(1CA1m gy }1€ Alf
' 1Ja1i 96 L>E 8a ]� lstl[ AKK dLCi4f4F[
'�yIR$i'Fi1iB
€Aq w [f 65lER�
f n $ A16e7�[ 'suSk #f93
Y 12� "
IRO K isp!�{ AF 'ap[ 191 #cY'#St
e LOCAr
z
Hill
u-i
1f
IL fil
COUNTY FAIR MARKETpLACE
THIRD AD j'` T "j
-
County
577 U
5i'10`-
'
1
a
X56,36
f 6L`yO'.''C'
e�
i' Lug
JZ 1 J9Z 44
f
e
� e
�--. e4ss :.� 6tFtnaeSa 4�s!:tt � t�9p�,. si l� c 3 59f!'R Ch!4 uuggR•,} £ u.
=
3
�
SQ IR6 -
RI
KuusdaW. Lto
f`f
S-ECT 2 D' ,
CO U%!FAIR
0� itY of Hutchinson
un 'If CLe€ or
RECEIVED
AUG 2 5 L003
C# 33vtcnins6n
I
N �
2-T .J8
S89 a5'ay'w
5tJ 7
moo- a i AjooVT
`t 0'W
,
i
EXCEP�Y[ON
+a�pw •. F �1 _
tanrr txr v_ w
-
3 x2-aaryr ruBUtaof+a,eg d _ T
c
,
t
4
-. _ 55-3
iA
c
1
1
�
1
f
e msx a . te vs . as i sr r Ya F]4
Stet p-A f,' COUNTY s w YAftF i.
rzra
RLK - KuuaFMo L -a.
Project Narrative
Preliminary and Final Plats
County Fair Marketplace Third Addition
and
County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition
(Currently: Lot 2A and Lot 2T, Block 1, County Fair Marketplace)
Prepared By:
RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd.
August 20, 2003
Revised August 25, 2003
For Submission of:
Preliminary Plat and Final Plat
Introduction
On behalf of Ryan Companies US, Inc., RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. has prepared a preliminary and final plat
application for County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition to
. reconfigure the present Lot 2A and Lot 2'1', Block 1 County Fair Marketplace. The applicant is requesting
a subdivision of the property to create a separate legal description for the office supply and its parking
field. Lot 2A and Lot 2T were originally platted to correspond to the underlying abstract and torrens
property descriptions. In the original plat of County Fair Marketplace, Lot 2A and Lot 2T totaled
approximately 4.12 acres. Lot 5 has recently requested a lot subdivision of Lot 2A to expand the square
footage of Lot 5 and reduced Lot 2A's square footage, it is the applicant's understanding that the City of
Hutchinson approved the Lot 5 expansion/subdivision on August 12, 2003.
The proposed preliminary and final plat submission is essentially a lot split. However, due to the
combined abstract and torrens property descriptions, the City of Hutchinson and McLeod County have
requested separate final plats to create abstract and torrens plats for the subdivision of Lot 2A and Lot 2T.
Both preliminary and final plat applications for County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and County Fair
Marketplace Fourth Addition are being made at this time; abstract property has been included in the Third
Addition plat and torrens property is included in the Fourth Addition plat. This application package,
originally submitted on August 20, 2003 and revised on August 25, 2003, is anticipated to be heard at the
September 16, 2003 Planning Conttnission meeting and September 23, 2003 City Council meeting.
Project Request
• Approval of Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Application for County Fair Marketplace Third Addition
• Approval of Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Application for County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition
Project Narrative County Fair Marketplace Third Addition August 20, 2003
County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition Revised August 25, 2003
RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2003 -526 -M
Page 1 of 4
G �-0\ 3
0
Existing Conditions - County Fair Marketplace
County Fair Marketplace is an existing mixed -use commercial development occupying approximately 30
acres. The site is located at the southwest quadrant of Denver Avenue and Trunk Highway 15 (TH 15).
The Marketplace was developed in 1998 and the majority of the stores opened in 1999. The project
exhibited a public/private partnership with the City and developer working jointly to develop the site and
improve the infrastructure and transportation corridors of Denver Avenue, Edmonton Avenue and TH 15
to accommodate the increased traffic that would be generated by the Marketplace.
County Fair Marketplace was developed as a planned commercial center with consolidated access points
on the three roads bordering the site. All parcels within the Marketplace are subject to the Uperatton and
Easement Agreement (OEA), which specifically addresses private dedicated access routes to the public
roads and a sharing of the utility /parking system. However, according to the OEA, each lot is required to
provide parking on its own lot to service the specified building and use. Information regarding the OEA
access agreements is included in this submission. As each lot is developed, the final site/building/parking
plan(s) will be redefined.
Existing Conditions - Lot 2A and Lot 2T
Lot 2A and Lot 2T are two lots with separate descriptions based on their legal descriptions. Ryan
Companies is the current owner of Lots 2A and 2T. The original 1998 plans progTammed four retail
structures totaling 49,700 square feet and a 280± stall parking area within Lot 2A and Lot 2T. To date,
only the 24,000 square foot office supply building has been constructed within Lot 2A and Lot 2T;
however, all of the parking has been installed to support the complete build -out of the proposed building
square footage. The recently approved Conditional Use Permit and subdivision of Lot 2A for the
proposed restaurant on Lot 5 has consumed approximately .18 of an acre and 30 parking stalls from Lot
2A. There is no building currently constructed between the north wall of the office supply store and the
south wall of the former Cub Foods (retail) building.
Proposed Conditions (Preliminary/ Final Plat)
Ryan Companies/RLK- Kuusisto have prepared a preliminary site plan, preliminary plats and final plats
which will enable the 24,000 square foot office supply store and its associated parking to become a stand
alone tract with two legal descriptions to be known as Lot 1 County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and
Lot 1 County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition. The site plan and plats identify the new property lines
and resulting shape of the proposed County Fair Marketplace Third Addition Lots 1 and 2 and County
Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition Lots 1 and 2. The Third Addition and Fourth Addition plats have been
coordinated with the recently approved Lot 5 /Lot 2A subdivision.
This application proposes to only change the legal description of the two lots within County Fair
Marketplace; no physical changes are contemplated to the Third Addition or Fourth Addition at this time.
Consequently, RLK has only shown a proposed site plan; grading, utility and/or landscape plans have not
been submitted for the plat documents. Sidewalks, infrastructure, parking lots, etc. supporting the
proposed plat have already been constructed. No changes are proposed to the existing accesses to the
public roads within the plat.
Project Narrative County Fair Marketplace Third Addition
County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition
RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2003 -526 -M
August 20, 2003
Revised August 25, 2003
Page 2 of 4
5LC'\15
•
The County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition plats will
create four individual lots. County Fair Marketplace Third Addition, Lot 1 and County Fair Marketplace
Fourth Addition, Lot 1 will be identified as the legal description for the office supply building and
parking lot, while County Fair Marketplace'rhird Addition, .Lot 2 and County Fair Marketplace Fourth
Addition, Lot 2 will retrain under the control of Ryan Companies and will be able to accept up to a
23,500 square foot future retail building.
The legal description for the Third Addition and Fourth Addition plats again corresponds to the
underlying land and respect the abstract or torrens property. County Fair Marketplace Third Addition,
Lot 1 attd Cuuttty Fait Maketplaue Fourth Addition, Lot 1 will be considered one parcel and will have a
separate ownership upon the City's approval of the plat and filing with McLeod County.
Conclusion
Ryan Companies US, Inc. and RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. request the City of Hutchinson's approval of the
preliminary and final plats for County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and County Fair Marketplace
Fourth Addition. It is our understanding that this application will be heard at September 16, 2003
Planning Commission meeting and September 23, 2003 City Council.
Submittal Package
• Completed Plat Application Forms
County Fair Marketplace Third Addition
County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition)
• Application Fee ($160.00 {previously submitted $170.00 to be applied toward this application))
• Warranty Deed information
• Operation and Basement Agreement Information
Project Narrative
•
'Preliminary Site Plan (Sheet I of 1)
- 15- full -size copies - 1 -11 x 17 copy
• Preliminary Plat County Fair Marketplace Third Addition and Fourth Addition (Sheet 1 of 1)
- 15- full -si7e copies - 1 -11 x 17 copy
Final Plat County Fair Marketplace Third Addition (Sheets 1 and 2 of 2)
- 15- full -size copies - 1 -11 x 17 copy
Final Plat County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition (Sheets I and 2 of 2)
- 15- full -size copies - 1 -11 x 17 copy
Project Narrative County Fair Marketplace Third Addition August 20, 2003
County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition Revised August 25, 2003
RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2003 -526 -M
Page 3 of 4
5(C:)3
Applicant and Development Team
Owner/Applicant/Developer
Ryan Companies US, Inc. Telephone 612 - 4924297
50 South 10"Street, Suite 300 Fax 612 -492 -3297
Minneapolis, MN 55403 -2012
Mark Kampmeyer, Director of Retail Sales
and Leasing Email mark.kampmeyerArymcompanics.com
Site Plan/Surveyor
RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. 'telephone 952- 933 -0972
6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100 Fax 952 -933 -1153
Minnetonka, MN 55343
John Dietrich, Project Manager/
Principal Landscape Architect Email idietrich(c,rlk- kuusisto.com
Kurt Kisch, Principal Land Surveyor Email kkisch a) - kuusisto ;r.p,m
G: \Ryan Coutpanie \2003- 526- M \_Coffwpondmcc\City Sub 8- 254)3 \Nanative City Sub 08.25 -03.da
Project Narrative County Fair Marketplace Third Addition August 20, 2003
_ County Fair Marketplace Fourth Addition Revised August 25, 2003
RLK - Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2003 -526 -M Page 4 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. 12265
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW
HEIGHTS SIXTH ADDTION (A REPLAT OF ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FOURTH
ADDITION) SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK, SCENIC IIOMES INC.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. This would be a replat for Island View Heights, 4`h Addition. The total lots in the area is 150 on 56.77 gross
acres. The area which would be replatted, would change from twin home lots to single family lots. There would
be a public street with a cul de sac constructed in this area.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Island View Heights Sixth
Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County,
Minnesota
2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare ofthe occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan,
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the preliminary and final plat with the following conditions:
1. Resolve the outstanding issues for Island View heights 5th Addition, prior to final plat
consideration.
2. Securities must be in place prior to construction.
3. Change the setbacks in the PDD to 25' front and rear and 6' on the side (only for this
replat area).
4. Services must be abandoned/capped.
S. Subdivider's agreement must be executed prior to construction.
6. No certificates of occupancy for homes will be considered until the utility improvements
are complete and a base course of bituminous is constructed.
Adopted by the City Council this 23`d day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Crary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
5Cc���
RESOLUTION NO. 12266
• RESOLUTION GRANTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT UNDER
SECTION 8.17 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
TO ALLOW A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO BE
LOCATED IN ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS SIXTH ADDITION
0
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Bill Gilk, Scenic Homes Inc., has made application to the City Council for a Planned
Development District under Section 8.17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 with the following legal
description. The lots are fairly typical of other developments, the City has reviewed. Lots 1, 2, and 3
are very narrow at the building pad area (32'). There has to bean a- typical building plan developed
for this area to meet the setbacks that were originally established (25' in the front, 8' on the side and
25' in the rear). The developer is now requesting 6 feet of the side yard area.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, Block 1, Island View Heights
Sixth Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof,
McLeod County, Minnesota
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission
and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the
surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties
in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3, The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor
hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in
harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Planned Development District for the purpose designated is granted
based on the findings set forth above subject to the following:
Change the setbacks in the PDD to 25' front and rear and 6' on the side (only
for this replat area).
Adopted by the City Council this 23d day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor C, 0(4
•
DATE: September 17, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 553504522
320- 587.515111FM 320- 2344240
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT (A REPLAT OF ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4r"
ADDITION) TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 6TH ADDITION AND AMENDED
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Pursuant to Sections 12.10 and 8.17 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for preliminary plat and
amended planned development district,
HISTO
This would be a replat and an amendment to the PDD for Island View Heights, 4h Addition. The total lots in the area is
150 on 56.77 gross acres. The area which would be replatted, would change from twin home lots to single family lots.
There would be a public street with a cul de sac constructed in this area.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and fee was submitted.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the utehint Lead on
Thursday, September 4, 2003,
3. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request.
4. The road would have to be built to City standards, as opposed to the original private cul de sac that was
constructed. The plans have been submitted and are being reviewed by the City Engineer.
Because sewer and water stubs are located within the area already and some need to be relocated to
accommodate the new lot location, the water services must be removed and corporation stops must be turned off
at the main. The sewer services need be removed to the main and plugged.
5. The parkland contribution in the R2 district is $175.00 per unit. SAC VAC charges in 2003 arc $2040.00 per
unit (note this fee increases every year). This development is located in the electric service territory area,
therefore does have to pay a charge of $800.00 per unit. The above costs are collected with the building permit
fees.The recently adopted bonding requirements (section 12.20, subd. 1 (K)) was effective as of January 14,
2003. This requires that the developer provide a bond or letter of credit in favor of the City, in the amount
equal to 100% of the project improvements. The City also collects a 7% cash escrow from the developer prior
to construction. Both items are due prior to commencement of constmction.There is an additional escrow
required for tree planting. The ordinance requires the equivalent of 2 trees per lot be escrowed with the City.
The amount would be $7,360.
6. The lots are fairly typical of other developments, the City has reviewed. Lots 1, 2, and 3 arc very narrow at the
building pad area (32'). There has to bean a- typical building plan developed for this area to meet the setbacks
that were originally established (25' in the front, 8' on the side and 25' in the rear). The developer is now
requesting 6 feet of the side yard area.
Pdn[ d on recycled patrer -
SU) I
• Finding of Fact — September 17, 2003
Island View Heights 0 Addition — PDD and Preliminary Plat
Page 2
RECOM ATION
The Planning Commission recommends unanimous approval of the preliminary replat and amended planned
development district with the following recommendations:
1. Resolve the outstanding issues for Island View Heights 5'" Addition, prior to final plat
Consideration.
2. Securities must be in place prior to construction.
3. Change the setbacks in the PDD to 25' front and rear and 6' on the side (only for this replat
area).
4, Services must be abandoned/capped.
5. Subdivider's agreement must be executed prior to construction.
6. No certificates of occupancy for homes will be considered until the utility improvements are
complete and a base course of bituminous is constructed.
ectfully su mined,
Kirchaff, Chairmen
Hutchinson Planning Commission
L .J
CC: Bill Gilk, Scenic Homes Inc., P.O. Box 66, Hutchinson MN 55350
RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd, Steve Harvey, 6110 Blue Circle Dr., Minnetonka MN 55343
•
,j(.c]��
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
• To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
L J
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolt Moon, Don Nelson, Miles Seppelt,
Amanda Alison, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster,
John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Steve Madson, Dick
Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Raumetz
Date: September 8, 2003 —Meeting Date September 16, 2003
Applicant: Bill Gilk, Scenic Homes
PDD Amendment and Replatting
Brief Description:
This would be a replat and an amendment to the PDD for Island View Heights, 41s Addition. "rhe
total lots in the area is 150 on 56.77 gross acres. The area which would be replatted, would
change from twin home lots to single family lots. There would be a public street with a cul de sac
constructed in this area.
Existing Zoning:
Property Location:
Lot Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Zoning History:
Applicable
Regulations:
Transportation:
Parking:
GENERAL INFORMATION
t;
South of South Grade Road
30 existing twin home lots, proposed to change into 23 single family_
Vacant
R -2 (Low Density Residential)
Traditional Residential Neighborhood
This area has been discussed in the past, with respect to the type of units
to be constructed.
Section 12.20 (Subdivision Regulations)
Prairie View Drive
N/A
we
fSccyA
Preliminary Replat and PAD Amendment
Island View Heights
• Planning Commission— September 16, 2003
Page 2
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Plat Information
Roads
There is a very thorough review of the development history attached to
the staff report.
The road would have to be built to City standards, as opposed to the
original private cul de sac that was constructed. The plans have been
submitted and are being reviewed by the City Engineer.
Because sewer and water stubs are located within the area already and
some need to be relocated to accommodate the new lot location, the
water services must be removed and corporation stops must be turned off
at the main. The sewer services need be removed to the main and
plugged.
Lot Arrangement
Fees
The lots are fairly typical of other developments, the City has reviewed.
However, staff would caution the developer that lots 1, 2, and 3 are very
narrow at the building pad area (32'). There has to be an a- typical
building plan developed for this area to meet the setbacks that were
originally established (25' in the front, 8' on the side and 25' in the rear).
The developer is now requesting 6 feet of the side yard area.
There is a concern also about the responsibility of maintenance with the
ponding area. Lot number 23 seems that is has a larger responsibility to
maintain the ponding area. This may be a problem in the future.
The parkland contribution in the R2 district is $175.00 per unit.
SAGWAC charges in 2003 are $2040.00 per unit (note this fee increases
every year). This development is located in the electric service territory
area, therefore does have to pay a charge of $800.00 per unit. The above
costs are collected with the building permit fees.
The recently adopted bonding requirements (section 12.20, subd. t (K))
was effective as of January 14, 2003. This requires that the developer
provide a bond or letter of credit in favor of the City, in the amount equal
to 100% of the project improvements. The City also collects a 7% cash
escrow from the developer prior to construction. Both items are due
prior to commencement of construction.
There is an additional escrow required for tree planting. The ordinance
requires the equivalent of 2 trees per lot be escrowed with the City. The
amount would be $7,360.
Preliminary Replat and PDD Amendment
Island View Heights
Planning Commission— September 16, 2003
Page 3
Special Note
Staff has received a number of complaints about Island View Heights 5'
Addition and the lack of the final bituminous coat on the street (wear
course). Staff would recommend that the City withhold final plat
approval until that'has been completed.
Recommendation:
Staff believes the replat is appropriate for the area and the amendment to the
PDD is acceptable with the following conditions:
1. Resolve the outstanding issues for Island View Heights 5`' Addition, prior to
final plat consideration.
2. Revise lot layout or provide a building plan that works for lots 1,2, and 3.
3. Provide a more amenable maintenance resolution for the pond area, with
respect to Lot 23.
4. Securities must be in place prior to construction.
5. Change the setbacks in the PDD to 25' front and rear and 6' on the side (only
for this replat area).
6. Services must be abandoned/capped.
7. Subdivider's agreement must be executed prior to construction.
. 8. No certificates of occupancy for homes will be considered until the utility
improvements are complete and a base course of bituminous is constructed.
Cc: Bill Gilk
RLK, engineer
•
O'RA'L /I1 1NARY RL A
• � i as I ��..
L __j —� }
e i 11 e
r-
°l 1 Cam s
` ?1=
_ s e fm 3`
71� 81
z
SCENIC HOMES
Q
STING DSO --
'.> c4±di .31 pfis
THE PROPOSED PLAT OF
lc 1 -Sl ANC) Vl,=VV HE10HT
ase . aay. "i n
x1f
ik 61f
f jkii
J i
y t �
I .
t_
�d
i
� a _
,1 f
E°
yy
T
trams
U4
)IJ
e
r �
fill
Z
s
i
1 �
Z0,0 n
I
f jkii
J i
y t �
I .
t_
�d
i
� a _
,1 f
E°
yy
T
trams
U4
)IJ
e
r �
fill
Z
s
i
1 �
Z0,0 n
. ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 1
AUGUST 20, 2003
eppp
?aeM
APPLICANT
Scenic Homes, Inc.
P.O. Box 66
Hutchinson, MN 55350
REQUEST
1. Approval of amended PD and conditional use permit.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The original PD was submitted for Island View Heights Second Addition and included
170 residential lots, 3 common open space outlots and a public park in a 56.77 acres site.
Island View Heights Second was staged over time and further subdivided into Island
View Heights Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth Additions. Public improvements, private
streets and small utilities have been constructed. The actual PD was platted with fewer
lots than originally approved. Currently the PD has 157 residential lots. The amended
PD proposes a re -plat of Island View Heights Fourth Addition in order to upgrade a
private street to a public street and to replace 30 twin home lots and a private street with
23 single - family detached lots and a public street. As a result, the amended PD yields
150 residential lots, 3 common open space lots and a public park.
A. Preliminary Plat
Originally the gross site density was 2.99 units per acre. The proposed amended PD will .
result in a gross density of 2.64 units per acre. Single - family detached lots range in size
from 7066 square feet to 78,859 square feet. Average lot size, ignoring the 78, 859
square foot lot as an anomaly, is 21,532 square feet. Lots for attached single - family
housing (twin homes) are 2975 square feet each.
B. Site Plan
The number of single- family detached lots increases from 16 to 78. The number of twin
homes decreases from 154 to 72. The number of three -plex townhomes decreases to
zero- As a result, the density within the Shoreland boundary decreases- Tier I maintains
. the original density of 11, whereas all of the succeeding tier densities are reduced.
_5(0q
. The open space component of the planned development is affected by the proposed
conversion of twin homes and three -plex town home areas to single- family detached
housing. The area of open space relative to the area of multi - family housing (single -
family attached) however, remains in excess of the allowable 50% primarily due to the
large public park. The calculated open space is 68.9% of the multi - family housing area,
C. Grading,/Drainage and Erosion Cuntrul
The site was already graded for twin homes. Minimal grading will be required to
accommodate the single - family detached homes. Drainage patterns will remain
unchanged from the present condition. Hard cover will decrease by 0.45 acre. Volumes
and rates of runoff will be less as a result.
Additional silt fence will be added to supplement and reinforce the existing silt fence
remaining from previous construction. The site will be mulched with straw and seeded
immediately after grading and street widening. Dormant seeding will be done in the
event of freeze -up before the grading work is completed.
D. Service and Facilities
Existing sewer and water services are already constructed in place. Thirty service pairs
are available to serve 23 new homes in the re -plat area of Island View Heights Fourth
Addition. Two additional service pairs will be constructed in order to provide individual
house connections. A private paved cul -de -sac street is in place. The private street will
be widened and upgraded to public street standards. It will serve 14 single- family
detached homes. Five single family detached homes will front on Prairie View Drive and
on four will front on West Shore Drive.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Scenic Homes, Inc. is experiencing a shifting housing market where the demand for
single - family detached housing outweighs the demand for twin homes. The density of
residential dwelling units has been decreasing over the course of development in Island
View Heights Third, Fourth and Fifth Additions. It is now apparent that additional
single - family detached homes are needed in lieu of twin homes. Re- platting of The
Fourth Addition affords the opportunity to exchange housing types. As a result, Scenic
Homes, Inc. is willing to invest extra resources into upgrading the private street to a
public facility in order to meet the requirements for R -2 Single- family detached housing.
In the process Scenic Homes, Inc. realizes a decrease in density in order to target the
single- family market. Based on the public improvements as shown in the preliminary
engineering plans, amended density calculations and amended open space calculations
. the re -plat of the Fourth Addition as proposed is feasible and should be implemented.
��Cc)y
. SITE DATA FOR ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT No, 1
Single Family Lots
28.53 acres
Twin Home Lots
4.92 acres
Three -plex Lots
0 acres
Park
4.77 acres
Lot 19, Block 3 - Second Addition (Common Area)
7.41 acres
Lot 35, Block 4 - Second Addition (Common Area)
4.64 acres
Lot 51, Block 1 - Fourth Addition (Common Area)
4.65 acres
Streets (Right -of -Way)
6.85 acres
TOTAL AREA
56.77 acres
Number of Igts:
Single Family Lots 78
Twin Home Lots 72
Three -plex Lots 0
TOTAL LOTS 150
Density Calculations:
Allowable Density at 3.0 units per acre = 56.77 acres x 3.0 = 170
Calculated Density = 150 units / 56.77 acres = 2.64 units per acre
Open Space Calculations:
Total Area of ]sland View Heights 2nd, 3rd, 4th, & 5th 56.77 acres
Deduct Single - Family Detached Areas 28.53 acres
Deduct Public Street Rights -of -Way 6.85 acres
Total Multi- family Area 21.39 acres
Total Hard Surface Area Twin Home Lots, Private Street & Drives 6.65 acres
Total Open Space 14.74 acres
14.74 acres / 21.39 acres = 68.9% Opcn Spacc
Required Open Space at 50% of 21.39 acres = 10.70 acres
0
5(C)Lj
r�
u
RESOLUTION NO. 12267
VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MATTHEW KUHN, 530 GLEN ST. SW, TO REDUCE FRONT
YARD SETBACK FROM 25' TO 14.2' FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROOF OVER
DECK
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
Matthew Kuhn, property owner, 530 Glen St SW, is requesting a variance to reduce front yard setback from 25'
to 14.2' to construct a roof over the deck. The right of way in this block is over 80 feel and the block directly to
the south right of way is 66'. There is a deep boulevard area on this block. The property owner removed an
existing porch and is replacing it with a covered deck. The properly owner was given permission, by staff, to
construct the deck and was required to provide a survey of the lot to determine the need for a variance for the
roof. The applicant states the hardship as the house was built before the zoning regulations were in place.
Legal Description: Lot 5,Auditur's Plat of Rearrangement of Block 55 of the South Half of the City of
Hutchinson
1. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the variance based on the hardship of the large boulevard on this block
with the following condition:
The deck may not be enclosed now or in the future.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
'--ac15
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 17, 2003
Hutchinson Cit Center
Ill Hassan street SE
Hute Jl n, MN 55350.2522
320- 587- 5157/Fm 320. 234.4240
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED 13Y MATTHEW KUHN, 530 GLEN ST. SW,
TO REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A ROOF OVER A DECK
Pursuant to Section 8.05 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
H SI TORY
The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce front yard setback from 25' to 14.2' to construct a roof over the
deck. The right of way in this block is over 80 feet and the block directly to the south right of way is 66'. There is a
deep boulevard area on this block. The property owner removed an existing porch and is replacing it with a covered
deck. The property owner was given permission, by staff, to construct the deck and was required to provide a survey
of the lot to determine the need for a variance for the roof. The applicant states the hardship as the house was built
before the zoning regulations were in place.
FINDINGS OF F
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchin Lea r on
September 4, 2003,
3. At the public hearing held, no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections.
4. The hardship and unique circumstance of the lot would be the large boulevard width in this block.
RECOMMENDATIQ N
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance with the following conditions:
The deck may not be enclosed now or in the future.
espectfull"7d,
can Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
M Matthew Kulra/Michelle Rebholz, 530 Glen St SW
tainted on r�ycled paper
1jCCy3
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
• To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure,
Jake Wegner, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John
Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave Erlandson, Dick
Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Ronnie Baumetz
Date: August 2S, 2003 — Meeting Date: September 16, 2003
Applicant: Matthew Kuhn/Michell Rebholz, property owners
VARIANCE
Brief Description:
The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce front yard setback from 25' to 14.2' to construct
a roof over the deck. The right of way in this block is over 80 feet and the block directly to the
south right of way is 66'. There is a deep boulevard area on this block. The property owner
removed an existing porch and is replacing it with a covered deck. The property owner was given
permission, by staff, to construct the deck and was required to provide a survey of the lot to
• determine the need for a variance for the roof The applicant states the hardship as the house was
built before the zoning regulations were in place.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: R2 (Single and Two Family Residential)
Property Location: 530 Glen St. SW
Lot Size: 82'X 119'
Existing Land Use: Single family residential
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: R2 (Single and Two Family Residential)
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood
Zoning FBstory:
Applicable
Regulations: Section 8.05, Chapter 11, Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance 464
0 SPECLAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Glen Street SW and Division Ave SW
Parking: N/A
r, (CYO
I*
r-1
LJ
I*
Variance
Matthew Kuhn/Michelle Rebholz
Planning Commission— September 16, 2002
Page 2
Analysis and
Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance noting the hardship
being the large width of the boulevard in this block with the following
condition:
The deck may not be enclosed now or in the future.
Cc: Matthcw Kuhn/Michelle Rebhoh; 530 Glen St. SW
S CC-Y-)
r: xjsm g
Z11- House
lurb 8 guier — '
Lot 5, AUDITOR'S PLAT OF REARRANG ENT
OF BLOCK 55 OF THE SOUTH HALF O� THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSCN.
0
:7
LLI
I
CD
/0 20 40
0 Denow5
iron —i onument
found
-0 [motes
iron Mnument
set
1 hereby certify that this Survey., Plan or
Repor t was pr epor ed by -ne or under my d i r ea t
supervision and That I am a duly licensed
Land Surveyor under the laws of 'he Slate of
Minnesota.
z . '
,r
µ , .
imm
-Ile`
•
ti-
Y
k
�i
zM
Iiw
f�
i�
fa .�
4
ik
4
€
}
ar-
PITBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 03-357
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8.11 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE,
TO ADD LANGUAGE ALLOWING FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE C3
(CENTRAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT
8.11 C -3 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
1allizi G
The C -3 Central Commercial District is intended to provide an area for the grouping of general
retail sales establishments, offices and services which serve City residents and the surrounding
area. The C -3 District provisions and boundaries are intended to promote compatible land use
relationships among diverse types of uses and encourage well planned development or expansion
in accord with the approved Comprehensive Plan. Only those uses which substantially interfere
with the overall function of the general commercial area will be excluded. On -site parking is not
required in this District.
PERMITTED USES
The following uses are permitted as regulated herein, without special application
requirements or conditions attached. Similar uses may be allowed upon the
determination of the City Council.
Trade and Services:
Any retail store or personal service business subject to all regulations
and such permits and licenses as may be required by law, and further
provided that the use is not objectionable due to noise, fumes, smoke,
odor or vibration, including the following and other similar uses.
Cultural facilities
Trade and business schools
Catering establishments
Employment agencies
Game and amusement arcades
Hotels and motels
Interior decorating service and sales
Offices for corporations and professionals
Publishing, job printing and blueprinting
Post Offices and other public service operations
Restaurants
Taverns
Theaters
Commercial Parking Lots
Pawn Broker Establishments (Added 119196)
Massage service establishments(Added 6/10/96)
Upper level apartment units
c�(e
Ordinance #03-357
Section 5.11— Residential in C3 District
. October 14, 2003
Page 2
CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USES
Commercial parkin gg ramps for passenger vehicles only, provided a reservoir space
is provided within the structure for holding cars awaiting entrance, which reservoir
space shall have a capacity of no less than two vehicles.
New /used automobile sales; indoor display area only. (Amended 11112/96)
Motor fuel and service stations excluding major repair operation. (See Section
10.03)
A state licensed residential facility serving from seven through sixteen persons.
(Amended 519/95)
Group home up to 5,000 square feet. (Amended 519195)
All licensed daycare facilities which are not permitted principal uses under
Minnesota State Law. (Amended 519/95)
Single family residences ap Nina for additions, decks, garages remodeling, or other single
famil reed uses
Conditions for Aresidential facilities,= group homes, crisis shelters, and licensed
day care facilities shall not be imposed which are mor restrictive than those
imposed on conditional uses or other multi- family residential property in the same
district, unless the additional conditions are necessary to protect the health the
• safety of the residents of the residential facility. (Amended 519195)
The requirements of Section 10.01 of this Zoning Ordinance shall apply to the
conditional uses described in Section 8.11 of this zoning ordinance. (Amended
519/95)
EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect upon is adoption and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 141' day of October, 2003
Attest:
Gary D. I'lotz
r�
U
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
SCC�')('
9
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT.
•
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinwn, MN 55350 -2522
320. 587.515[ /Fax 320.234.4240
MEMORANA UM
September 17, 2003
Hutchinson City Council
Hutchinson Planning Commission
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 8.11 TO ALLOW FOR
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE C3 (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT
Pursuant to Sections 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for an amendment to the zoning ordinance.
HISTORY
Staff bas struggled with residential issues in the Downtown area over the last couple of years. The issues usually center around two topics:
1. Apartments in downtown buildings that are also occupied by commercial uses.
2. Single family dwellings that want to expand, add a deck, gauge, etc.
The first item seems fairly simple to resolve. It would be resolved by adding language into the C3 that allows apartments above commercial
uses in the Downtown. The problem with allowing apartments in basements of these buildings is usually a building code issue (egress and
other items). The other concern that the City should consider, is it probably would be unwise to allow an entire building to be just for
residential purposes because of potential conflicts with other uses.
A possible way to handle single family expansions in the C3 is allow items by conditional use permit. The theory behind not allowing single
family residences in the C3 district is that in a downtown area you often have housing that is transferring to some kind of commercial use.
Staff would suggest making single family uses and expansions a conditional use permit. Some of the other uses the City has to consider is
duplex units, multiple family structures, etc.
F INGI D S QE FA CT
1. Notice was published in the Hut hinson Leadec on September 4 and September 9, 2003
2. At the public hearing, there was no one present objecting to the request or letters written in objection.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the amendment to the ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Rioted on recycled paper
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure,
Jake Wegner, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John
Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave Erlandson, Dick
Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: September 10, 2003 — Meeting Date September 16, 2003
Re: Residential uses in the C3 District
Staff has struggled with residential issues in the Downtown area over the last couple of years.
The issues usually center around two topics:
1. Apartments in downtown buildings that are also occupied by
commercial uses.
I Single family dwellings that want to expand, add a deck, garage, etc.
The first item seems fairly simple to resolve. It would be resolved by adding language into the
C3 that allows apartments above commercial uses in the Downtown. The problem with allowing
apartments in basements of these buildings is usually a building code issue (egress and other
items). The other concern that the City should consider, is it probably would be unwise to allow
an entire building to be just for residential purposes because of potential conflicts with other uses.
A possible way to handle single family expansions in the C3 is allow items by conditional use
permit. The theory behind not allowing single family residences in the C3 district is that in a
downtown area you often have housing that is transferring to some kind of commercial use. Staff
would suggest making single family uses and expansions a conditional use permit. Some of the
other uses the City has to consider is duplex units, multiple family structures, etc.
Staff would like to amend the ordinance in some fashion. The possible amendment is attached.
5` C-N
RESOLUTION NO. 12268
. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BERNIE MCRAITH,
PROPERTY OWNER, TO AMEND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR OUTDOOR
STORAGE ON LOT LOCA'T'ED AT 700 AIRPORT ROAD
0
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Bernie McRaith, property owner, 700 Airport Rd ., has completed the fence required in the conditions of Resolution
011421. He is also requesting an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to allow for outdoor storage for construction
materials on the site. The lot is surrounded on three sides by the building or an approximate 5 foot dirt wall. The property
owner intends to screen the storage with a 4 foot berm across the east side of the area. Planning Commissioners questioned
the ability to place a berm in the area which is close to the airport runway. Staff has researched the question with John Olson,
Assistant Public Works Director. Mr. Olson stated this property is not in the runway safety area or clear zone and a berm may
be constructed at 700 Airport Rd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section Thirteen (13) Township One
Hundred Sixteen (116) North of Range Thirty (30) West, described as follows, to -wit:
Beginning at a point, said point being the intersection of the Westerly 75 foot right -of -way
line of Minnesota State Trunk Highway No. 15, with the North line of said Northeast Quarter
of Section Thirteen (13); thence Westerly along said North line ofNortheast Quarter, 1356.61
feet; thence Southerly on a line parallel with the said Westerly 75 foot right -of -way line,
208.71 feet; thence Easterly on a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter,
1147.9 feet; thence Southerly on a line parallel with the said Westerly 75 foot right -of -way
line 730.49 feet; thence Easterly on a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast
Quarter, 208.71 feet to the said Westerly 75 foot right -of -way line; thence North along said
right -of -way line, 939.2 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE
SOUTH 208.71 feet AND
That ppart of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twelve (12) in Township One
Hlmdred Sixteen (116) North of Range Thirty (30) West described as PARCEL NUMBER
FIVE (5) OF MCI.EOD COUNTY IIIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO, 26
EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion thereof included in Application to Registered Land
Document No. 145736
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The berm must be completed 30 days from the approval of the City Council.
2. Seeding must take place immediately after grading of the area.
3. Outdoor storage of construction materials will be allowed with this Conditional Use Permit.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin I). Torgerson
Mayor
C
r1
�J
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 17, 2003
TO; Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Hutchinson City Center
Ill Hessen str t SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320- 587.5151 /Fax 320-234.4240
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BEANIE MCRAITH TO AMEND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE ON LOT LOCATED AT 700 AIRPORT
RD.
Pursuant to Section 10.01 of the the Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance 464 the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request to amend a previous conditional use permit.
HISTORY
The property owner has completed the fence required in the conditions of Resolution #11421. He is also requesting an amendment to the
Conditional Use Permit to allow for outdoor storage for construction materials on the site. The lot is surrounded on three sides by the
building or an approximate 5 foot dirt wall. The property owner intends to screen the storage with a 4 foot berm across the east side of the
arcs.. Planning Commissioners questioned the ability to place a berm in the area which is close to the airport runway. Staff has researched
.the question with John Olson, Assistant Public Works Director. Mr. Olson stated this property is not in the runway safety area or clear zone
and a berm may be constructed at 700 Airport Rd.
0
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Staff was informed the berm will not affect the runway safety area.
2, Planning Commissioners discussed the maintenance of the area. The property owner stated he would plant clover or prairie
grass in the area.
3. There was no one present objecting to the request.
RE MME ATIO
The Planning Comrission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit with the following
conditions:
1. The berm must be completed 30 days from the approval of the City Council.
2. Seeding must take place immediately after grading of the area.
3- Outdoor storage of construction materials will be allowed with this Conditional Use Permit.
cc: Bernie McRaith, 600 Tyler St. SW
spectfully su miffed,
Dean Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Printed on recycled paper -
Y l6,aoC, 3
0
•
7J 6
700 6 i��d.
o-' "A :;F�
5(0-Y)
s
&vn(
v
bM 1
p f
o�'n�idt,P
L
� �i I~�Cr Y► � � .I
4o t 9
t
. 1
Hutchinson Area Health Care
Hutchinson Community Hospital
I3arr7is ,Mauor,'Vursrrr,S 1 -lonae Dassel Medical Cenler
1095 highway 15 SO kilk IIutchinson, NIN 55350 (320) 234 -5000
September 16, 2003
The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and
Members of the City Council
Hutchinson City Center
1 1 I Hassan Street SE
IIutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members:
The Board of Directors of IIutchinson Area Health Care (HAHC), as part of their regular
meeting on September 16, 2003, considered the purchase of capital expenditures, which
needs your approval.
The following are excerpts from the minutes (draft) of the meeting.
Operating Tables, The Board reviewed a capital expenditure request for the
purchase of two (2) hydraulic general surgery tables with attachments.
The tables are a part of the furniture/ fixture/ equipment budget that was
previously approved. The tables will be placed in Operating Room # 4 and Minor
Surgery Room 45. Both machines are available through the hospital group
purchasing organization, VHA, for $68,200.
• Following discussion, McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Hoversten,
to request authority from the City Council purchase two Operating Room
Tables at a cost of $68,200. All were in favor. Motion carried.
The second item for your consideration is regarding the Medical Services Expansion
Project at the hospital. The following is an excerpt from the minutes:
Medical Headwalls Patient Care Units and Surgical Cabinets. The Board
received a presentation from Andey Rasmussen, Project Manager, McGough
Construction, on proposed changes to the Medical Services Expansion project at
the hospital. Rasmussen explained the request for a change order regarding
Medical Headwalls, Patient Care Units (PCU'S) and Surgical Cabinets that will
involve several contractors. An initial budget of $225,000 for the equipment and
installation was contained within the Mechanical Contract however the equipment
was not selected at the time of contract acceptance. Some modifications were
made to the system and IIAHC utilized our tax - exempt advantage by purchasing
The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson
Page two
September 16, 2003
certain pieces of the system without going through the contractor. As a result, a
savings of, $80,772 was generated.
Following discussion, Ristau made a motion, seconded by McGinnis, to
request authority from the City Council to purchase the Medical
Headwalls, PCU's and Surgical Cabinets, as proposed, at a cost of
$144,228. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Thank you in advance, for consideration of these requests. Duane Hoversten will be
present for your regular meeting on Tuesday and will answer questions you may have
regarding these items.
Sincerely,
Philip G. Graves
President
/cs
5 (0)
r�
u
0
21 FAX 78 5812488 EARIH—TEQH
September 18, 2003
Mr. Randy DeVries
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
tdloo2
5033 C,rnr.. Drive N,,th. Suire 290, Minnaeor• 55441
Re: Change Order No. I Recomrnendation
Stoney point lift Station
Project No. 03- 18/l.etting No. 10
Dear Mr. DoVries:
per our discussions and your approval, Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $ 1,572.90 tors
been prepared and attached. One minor n,)odification is being made to the Contract by this
work dixtetive.
The nearby bridge has several pipes attached to it in order to allow them to cross the river.
These pipes are beat taped to protect them from the weather. The power feed for tha heat
tape was found in, the excavation for die Lift station. This feed was required to bo relacated
and reconnected do to the relocation of the existing transfortner by the Contract. 'Rte existing
transformer could not stay in its existing location, In addition, a modification is bcaig made
to the control panel for the heal tape controllers, A meter socket and disconnect switch are
being added. 'h,b,ese additions will 1) allow the power to be marred separately from the lift
station and 2) allow the power to be disconnected without shutting off the power to the lift
station.
Earth Tech laas reviewed and reconnnends this modificatiom
please contact out office if we can be of further assistance in [his matter.
Very truly yours,
Gartlt'pech, Inc.
George Bender, EI'T
Contract Administrator
cc: Mike Mies, City of HuMunson
He
E A R T H `) X E C H
L.lwnrkYturch \533574nrresY.:U1 Hccnrmncndntiundo'p Tyco lnfmy"m. ,e Strrlm Cv,,,ppny
rs3.ssl.lnnl
Fe Crimile
763.551.249?
,50
09/18/07 ,14:21 FAX 769551248$ _EARTH TECH— -.- Z003
0 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
0
Owner Oty ofIIvtcWAsnn_ Minr i Date September 1x.2003
Fmject Stone Point Lift Station
Owpers(:nnimct Nu. C9ntra Ctnr uoam CWtaW y] 11 _
Dutc M' C0111ract$1o( lWt(+1 ')Alll3. _. _._ 5154457.00
Ywi are direetedm make the following changes In the CmmaRD9cnmcn�a. Uwcripion:
i) lhtteud d<e existiftR heat tape power fend into the rdocoted Hutchinson Utilities trtRsfptMef at the Stoney Ytuttt Lift station site.
Putffish and install a 200 AmptvtdgTround mdc suultct with bypass swheli nmd 100 A,mp ser.iee disewmed attlle lvJdge.
]lesson for (.'bange Order:
1) The power feed to ale hest. tape on the utility pipes ;,[ached to the bridge was (mind daring the exeavnden f4t' the lift station. This
feel must bn moved to the b"sfortw w'lticlt.is hcio$ rclocnted wt the site for the purpuses of the lift a[ni]on- '1'ho power for Oteheat
tope nuw wlllbe 1»mdrorcd sepusn[ ly kl +1U die liR sutdan imica
CONTRACT rRTCH CONTRACT TIMES (Calendar Onyx)
Tosubmmscull Tufinal
enmpletian yompldion
Otig(na)' S 544J^ i7.aQ_ OriKnwl Cornplction Dute: -
pt'evioosC.O- a(ADDJD 1)UCI): $ 0100 Prnvivos C.O,s(ADD113MUCT): 0 _ 0
This C.U. (ADD): $ 1572.90 This C.O. (ADD /UTAU(T): 0 0
Contract Price with all REVISED: -
upproved Mange Drdcls: S 156.029.90
Revised Completion hate: Auxa xt3jgW_ SenL3 M03
it It agreed by the Cusmudar tbnt 0ua 01111pe Outer includes any and all costs associated with or xesd0ng from the ahnnga(s) ordered herein,
including all impact, delays, and accelam0.on cnata Other than 0m dollar nmmmt end [Ina, ellowanvelistrJ above, there shall be nn funher dme
or dollur mmpertsx6ml as* result of this Chan;c Order.
TM,9DOCI)MF-Nr SHAI,I- NRC.UMEANAMGNDMENP TOTHF: Y_)NTJ1ACT AND ALL
SArMATIONS AND COVENANTS OF T)ili�f:— ON AU7 SIIALL AFPLY HERETO,
RF:COMML+NDH17:
By: --
'k:NU1N1'S.R (Aplhorixad 5ignangk) Data
APPROVED:
By:
OWNER (Antbn{zad Slgnatuso) Dam
AGC'CFIF.P;
By:
CONTRACTOR (Anthodxcd Signature) Date
Harth Tech, Inc.
53 7 i
Fmjca (Mange
Numher Order NO
L:I e• arkVrnlnh�s !,rsrwrvr)mgt\Chmt,yaOrder No, t.dar COA,I HUTCHINSON, MN -53357
SUmey Pawl Lill Sifltlrvi �I `
09118103 14:22 FAX 7.635512498 EAU1LTEG)(—. [A 004
SEP- 18 -2 093 10,25 GUAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 329 235 6753 P.02
QUA.M CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
P.O. BOX 48, WU12AM, MINNESOTA 56201
September 18, 2003
George Bender
Earth Tech, fne,
3033 Campus Dr. N., Ste 290
Minneapolis, MN 55411
Phone (320) 235 -3344
Fax:(320)235-6753
S9WER nndWATER CONTRACTOR
BEOIAA cr PLOYER
CHANGE ORDER NO.1
Re: Stoney Point Lift Station — Hutchinson, MN
The attached invoice is for extra work requested by the City of Hutchinson on the above
mentioned lift station project. The summary of work is as follows:
1. Repair and extend the existing bridge feeder conduit and wire into the relocated
Hutchinson utilities transformer.
2, Pumish and install a 200 Amp underground meter socket with bypass switch and
100 Amp seivice disconnect at the south end of the bridge• These devices will be
mounted on the outside of the existing bridge control panel that housed the bridge
heat tape controllers.
We are requesting payment of the Quade's Inc, invoice 4.5% $ 1,572,90
CONTRACTOR: Quam Construction Co„ Inc.
By: Date: 0 q /F dam_
David J_ Quaffi,
11
5Cc
09/18/00 14:22 FAX 7035512498 _ EARTH TECH _.
ytr -15 Geei 1456 QURM CU14STRUCTION CD"3%W
Quade's Inc
. EleatdW Contractors
35 - 4th Ave NE
Hutchinson MN 55350
Office: 320 -587-3030
Fax: 320 -587 -5574
LJ
Z005
320 235 6753 F.01
i4i0i ♦tiiiiitii ♦iii ♦ +iiiiiiiii
FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
tiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiii ♦iiiiiA ♦i ♦♦
DATE:
To:
FAX_
FROM:
NUMIM.
September 15, 2003
post -ir Fax Note
7671
0
—"3
Ya
Gab),
C4 "
rtom
a r
phd r
Face 76 -
5l `�Y94
nxr 6713
Subject: Stoney Point Lift Station, Hutchinson Mrs
As per the city of [iutchiuson's request, phase find the breakdown for the additional wort,
at the Eft station. The price for the additional work is $1498.00 (One thousand four
hundred ninety eight dollars) The suwmary of the work is as follows:
1. Repair mind extend the existing bridge feeder conduit and wire into the relocated
Hutchinson utilities transformer.
2. Furnish and install a 200 Amp undergtodnd meter socket W th bypass switch and 100
Amp service disconnect at the south end of the bridge. 'these devices will be mounted
on the outside of the existing bridge control panel that houses the bridge heat tape
controllers.
If you have any question, please can.
Hard copy to follow.
Thank ou,
F-rklMllucken4
5(6
09/18/03 FAX 7615512498 EARTH TECH [d] Goo
SEP-1H -2003 10:25 QMM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 320 235 6753 P.03
QUAD" INC.
® AVENUE NE
Hl)T Cfw F11N£AN, MN!l39D
PHONE: (m)so -=0
FAX: (320)6B7.551A
r
L-
YO:
qwm Oc0 mdtlen
ADDRESS=
PO BoK42 Wi14.� MN RCi01
ATTN:
Sc•A! OIa°^
RE_
ewnev Pcdm Olt SwtM1m
DATE OF ORDER: 9/18/3000
REQUESTED BY: scup CL rod a Hueeh-
DESCRIPTION OF WORK R~Brwgoh&dta am IAet
0
QuaD- BdTing -1,X43
TOTAL, P.03
,P%
`,le
DESCRIPYION
DES
AVFERENO
FAULT
FATE
REP AMOUNT
1
MATERIAL COST
NCLUDES 6.5% SALES Y
S 440,61
2
IASOR
12.W HWP.9
46200 /HOUR
4 7".00
3
FORMAN
S
A
GENERAL FOREMAN
S
LABOR OVERTIME
6
FOREMAN OVERTIME
S
7
PROJE MANAO ME11T
S
6
LABOR INEFFICIENCY
S
9
LOST TIME
S
iv
FIELD DESIGN I DRAFTING
i
11
AS BUILT DRAWING$
S
12
DELIVERY
$
13
CLEANUP
S _
14
TESTING
S
15
WAARANTY
3.0 Ory WITFRIAI.ALABOR NEST
S 13.82
19
PARKING
S
ORYAC3E. HANOL NO CFLARGB MISC
3 -
L17
III
TEMPORARY
13
19
LARGE TOOLS d RU1 MENT W41AL
S
20
SMALL TOOLS 4. QON6UMA8
5.00 'F OPMATHRIALS LINE 1
_
03
21
TRAVEL TIME
2Z
WAGE INCReASO
3
?3
LIMITED WORKSPACE. INTERRUPTION$
S -
FA
$TOR. GE TRAILERS
S -
25
GAS AND OIL
25
UTILTTY COST
S
27
INSURANCE
s
28
3U6515TENCE
S
29
TELEPHONE
/FAX
90
DUMPSTERS
•
S
31
SA FETY
2-M %OF LABOR UNE
S 1a."
92
tRM1T$ AND INSPEGITON$
.. -.—. -,
8 27.00
33
INTEREST ON kET "TI
S _
3A
PAINTING ANOPATCHIN6
S
35
SUBTOTAL
S 1.2B3,7a
86
OVERHEAD lPROFIT
13.00 OF SUBTOTAL LINE $5
S 1q2.50
S
37
98
UNIT P Ims
= _
S 1 75.84
SUBTOTA
40
BOND
13o % OFSUBTOTAL LINE 79
S 72.1a
al
5UBCONTRACTOR3
=
92
TOTAL THIS CHANGEOROER
5 1,4A7 -BB
0
QuaD- BdTing -1,X43
TOTAL, P.03
,P%
`,le
0
•
11
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Lt. David E. Erlandson, Interim Chief of Police
FROM: Sgt. Chris Dobratz01
DATE: September 18, 2003
RE: Transient Merchant License Background
As of today's date, I have completed a background investigation on Troyce Bridger. Mr.
Bridger has applied with the City of Hutchinson for a Transient Merchant License.
During the course of conducting this background investigation, I did not discover anything
in the applicant's background that would disqualify them from obtaining this license. It
should be noted that a background investigation was completed on Mr. Bridger in February
of 2002 for the same license.
If you have any questions, or if you need any further investigation into this matter, please
contact me.
ENT BY. TTY OF HUTCHINSON; 320, 234 4240; AUG-29-03 9:06AM; PAGE 2/4
APPLICATION FOR
PEDDLERS, SOQCj'j'0RS AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS
2" x 2" Picture Required
NAME AND DRIVER'S LICENSE INFORMATION
NAME,
PERMAINENT AMISS::
'LIN
u
.Z�
<
Pf3FAIANENTTELEPHONE,
TEMPORARYLOCALADDRESS:
'TLIMPOR.ARYI"F-I.EPH(:)NE ACCESS *,
ORIVER'S LICENSE NUMB I-A (STATE).JW (NUMBFIC
HFI(AIT __ EYE f-,oLOR
—'—L
FEES & LENGTH OF PERMIT R P QUESTED
DATE(S) OF SALE .-
LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Solkitors, per day------------ ------------------- — ----------------------
Solicitors, Pur YCaT ... ---------------------- $500,00
Traiisient Mcrobmts, per day_ - --- — .. ®..._a____.._..__ — ----- .._...____ -_w --------------------- -------- $200.00
Trmsiont Merchants, per
Pod,dlm, per --------- --------------- --------------- . .......... ------ S2(91,00
Peddlers, per year_ — ---e__... ___..._.,. — ----- — --- --- ------ -------------- ..............
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISUENIFANOR, OR VIOLATION Of ANY MUNICIPAL
ORDINANCE, ()TI IER TI IAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES NO
IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND FUNISHMENTORPENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE:
DESS,C�PE IAA OF BUSNESS AND DESCRIBE ITFM(S) O1qTERED-
ENT BY: CTTY OF HtJTCHTNSON,
DESCRIBE OF DELIVERY:
320 234 4240; MhS-29-03 9:06AM; PkOr 014
DESCRIBE SOURCE OF Sk,JPVLY-,- NAME& ADDRVSS OF SXJPPLIER:
PROVIDE 2 PROPERTY OWNERS (PRHEFABLY MC. LEOD COLTNTY) FOR CHARAC'rFR RFFE"Ncj3s�
NAMf i & A DDRESS: -NAME 4 ADDRESS-.
P1 10 N B N U VVE&
STATE LAS I"CITY YOU CAIOUED ON SAME ACTTV11Y
CITY/STATE NAMF4 A
L
DATFOFACFIVITY. FROW_bc�� C TO:
I hereby oertli fs Thave completely filled oul the cntirc ahnve il-sp i ir,nflon and (hat the appl"ti-on is trap, correct and
accurate. I fully undLystand that my perSOD Who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitois, and Transient
Merchant Ordinance No,. 6173 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof AAR be pLoishcd by a, Time mA
excueding $ 1000 or by Lmprisowmnt for a period not exceeditig 90 days ox buth, plus, in either case, the wsts of
Prosecution.
Date
No application will be fbiwarded to the City Council unless received one weels prior to the reigular Council meeting
completely filled out with ti: uircd picture.
OFFICE USE
POLICP CHIEF RECOMMENDATTON:
C"
11 ") (1( .. ...... .....
tADE REFERENCES
ternational Marketing Source, Inc.
ontam Peter Song
192$ NVest Malvern AVe714u449 79CA a92833
714 -575 -6700
;yobi Amcrica Corporation
:ontaeC Jerry Wehr
5201 Pearman D tIry Road, Anderson, SC 79622
S64 -226 -6511 564 -964 -3376 fax
Dmaha Industrial Tools
Contact ' D.an Tuimo
14655 Grover Street, Omaha, NE 65144
402- 334 -5422 403 - 334.0409 fax
$ynmax Company
Contact. Jim Sy'nmax
. 7070 West 107" Street, Overland Park, KS 66212
913 - 381 -SS89 913.3St- 33S5fax
ACCOLItiTANT
Dun R Brtdstr«c Grant Thornton 516 471 -1520
0
•
sC-�
M2
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor Torgerson
Hutchinson City Council Members
FROM: Lt. David E. Erlandson /Interim Chief)0E
DATE: September 16, 2003
RE: Request for Out -of -State Travel
As many of you are aware, our agency is a satellite investigative office for the MN Internet
Crimes Against Children Task Force.
Currently, we have asked the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP) for a 5 -month extension of our grant, which will take us till the end of February
2004. To date, we still have funds available in the grant, which will cover expenses for
training as it relates to the Internet Crimes Against Children Investigations.
Over the course of the past three years, Sgt. Chris Dobratz has been our primary
investigator assigned to the Task Force. I foresee this assignment continuing in the future.
Some of his past training has included instruction in the area of EnCase Software. This is
the software used by the Task Force for conducting forensic examinations of computers.
To date, Sgt. Dobratz has attended Basic EnCase training in Iowa, and also has attended
Intermediate EnCase training in Wisconsin.
Currently, I am asking permission to send Sgt. Dobratz to the Advanced EnCase course,
which would complete his instruction in the use of this software. The closest course still
being offered in this calendar year is in Sterling, Virginia from November 11 -14"' of 2003.
It should be noted that there are sufficient funds available in the grant that would cover all
costs for this training (airfare, lodging, meals). It should also be noted that by allowing Sgt.
Dobratz to attend this course, he would then be eligible to test with Guidance Software to
become a certified forensic examiner, which would be an invaluable credential for court
purposes, as well as gaining the expertise in these types of investigations.
Therefore, I submit this memorandum to you as a request for authorization to allow Sgt.
Dobratz to travel out -of -state to attend this training in November of 2003.
• Thank you for your attention to this matter.
11--Y�
RESOLUTION NO. 12247
• RESOLUTION IMPOSING A SERVICE CHARGE
FOR SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 1
DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (the
"City "), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals: Findings.
1,01 Pursuant to Ordinance No. 03 -353, (the "Ordinance ") the City created a Special
Service District No. 1 (the "District ") for certain property located in the City's downtown area.
The properties included within this area are specifically identified in Exhibit A attached hereto
and generally depicted in the map contained in Exhibit B attached hereto.
1.02 The City has received a petition (the "Petition ") from the owners of the properties
located within the District requesting a public hearing on the imposition of Service Charges (the
"Service Charges ") within the District.
1.03 The City Council has determined each of the following:
(a) at least twenty -five percent (25 %) of the individuals or business
organizations subject to the proposed Charges have signed the Petition;
(b) only owners of property located within the District have signed the
Petition;
(c) only owners of property classified under Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.13 as commercial, industrial, or public utility purposes, or that is
vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial,
industrial, or public utility purposes, have signed the Petition; and
(d) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 428A.02, notice has been given
and a public hearing has been held on the establishment of the District.
Section 2. Imposition of Service Charge
2.01 Relationshi to District Special Services. The City may impose Service Charges
that are reasonably related to the special services provided. The Service Charges shall be as
nearly as possible proportionate to the cost of furnishing the special services. In the event that
Service Charges are imposed to finance services ordinarily provided by the City but at an
increased level, the Service Charges shall be imposed only to the extent to pay for the increased
level of service.
2.02 Multi-year Service Charge- The Service Charge imposed by this Resolution is a
charge for more than one year. The Service Charge will remain in effect for fifteen (15) years
IS commencing in the year 2004 through and including the year 2018, for taxes payable in said
years.
2.03 Properties Subject to Service Charge. All parcels within the District that meet the
• following criteria shall be subject to the Service Charge:
(a) 50 percent or more of the estimated market value the parcel of property, as
most recently certified by the county assessor, is classified under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.13 as commercial and industrial; and
(b) The parcel contains one or more structures.
2.04 Amount of Service Charge. The Service Charge shall be equal to $0.19 per
square foot of building area attributable to commercial use (the "Commercial Area ") in existence
on August 1 of each year. The Service Charge will be imposed on each parcel in the District
subject to the Service Charge as described in Section 2.03 hereof. The amount of the Service
Charge shall not exceed $0.19 per square foot of Commercial Area during the duration of the
Service Charge provided in Section 2.02 hereof. Based on the current estimated total
Commercial Area in the District, it is anticipated that the Service Charge will produce total
revenues in the amount of $108,385 in the year 2004 (the "Total Annual Revenues ") and
$1,625,775 over the term of the District (the "Total District Revenues "). The Total Annual
Revenues and Total District Revenues may increase or decrease as the total Commercial Area in
the District changes over time.
2.05 Calculation of Commercial Area, The City will use the property records of the
county assessor to determine the amount of Commercial Area in a building. The City may also
conduct physical inspections of the properties and use building permits and other available
. information to supplement the assessor's data to make Commercial Area calculations.
a. Annual Review. Prior to August 1 ofeach year, the City will determine for each
parcel in the District whether any modification to the Commercial Area calculation is required
due to such factors as a change in use, expansion or contraction of a structure, demolition of a
structure, or construction ol'new structures
b. Public Hearing. Prior to imposing the Service Charge in each calendar year, the City
shall conduct a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be provided pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 428A.03, Subdivision 1. The notice mailed to property owners shall
include the Commercial Area calculation and a description of the appeals process provided in
Section 2.06 herein.
2.06 Anneal. In any year, a property owner may appeal the City's calculation of
commercial area with respect to the property owner's parce](s). All appeals shall be submitted in
writing and shall clearly articulate (1) the reasons for the property owner's dispute with regard to
the calculation of the Commercial Area and (2) the property owner's proposed recalculation
along with the basis thereti>r. Appeals may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the public
hearing or at the public hearing, but in no event, shall any appeal be submitted after the public
hearing.
2.07 Use of Revenues. Revenues collected through the imposition of service charges
may be used by the City for any purposes authorized in the Ordinance. Exhibit C contains the
• services proposed for funding in 2004. The services and the revenues allocated to each service
are subject to change at the discretion of the City.
O' (c)
Section 3. Collection of Service Char es.
• 3.01 Collection. The Services Charges shall be payable and collected at the same time
and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes.
3.02 Penalty and Interest. Service Charges made payable in the same manner as
provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes, if not paid on or before the applicable
due date, shall be subject to the same penalty and interest as in the case of ad valorem tax
amounts not paid by the respective date.
3.03 Due Date. The due date for the Service Charge payable in the same manner as ad
valorem taxes is the due date given in law fior the real or personal property tax for the property
on which the service charge is imposed.
Section 4. Revenue Surplus. To the extent that the total of Service Charges collected
exceed the cost of services rendered within the District, at the election of the City, all or a portion
of such excess amount shall either be held as a reserve to pay the cost of future services provided
under this resolution or applied to reduce the next year's Service Charge.
Section 5. Recording. The City may record this Resolution against parcels located within
the District and subject to the Service Charge for the purpose of providing notice of the Service
Charge to prospective purchasers of such parcels.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective on the forty -fifth (45th) day
• following adoption, which effective date shall be October 10, 2003
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THIS 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
is
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
Is (a)
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Marc A. Sebora, City Attorney
DATE: September 19,2003-09-18
SUBJECT: Benefit of Objection to Special Service District No. 1
Office of the City Attornej
111 Hannan SlnYA SE
HulcWnsnn, MN 55350 -2522
320- 567.5151/Fax 320. 234.4240
Under the Minnesota Statute governing special service districts, specific property owners may
object to being included in the district if they .file an objection to being included before the
resolution formulating the district is passed. Apparently, three property owners, Dave Skoog,
Madsen Peterson Company and Faith Lutheran Church Hope Center, did file objections prior to
the creation of the district and thus it is incumbent upon the City Council to determine whether or
not they should be included in Special Service District No. 1.
Minnesota Statute 428A.02, Subd. 4 outlines three reasons which would constitute a valid
objection to being included in the special service district. They are as follows:
1. property would not receive services that are not provided throughout the City to the
same degree.
2. Objecting to the levy of a service charge on the landowner's property for the reasons
that it is exempted under the special service district statute.
3. The fact that neither the landowner's property nor its use is benefited by the proposed
special service district.
Enclosed please find the objection letters from the above - mentioned property owners explaining
the reasons why they feel they should be excluded from the district.
Should you have any questions, I will be happy to address them at the Council meeting on
September 23rd.
Fumed on recycled paper
cr (Q
r SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT POTENTIAL
SERVICE CHARGE STATEMENT
City Parcel Identification Number] 31 1 1729150550
County Parcel Identification Number: 230563370
Property Address 22 I ST AV E NE.
71
s
Lmmemial Square Footage
ILP: p5.ed -5crvicc Chcrgc Pcr ]i
N o Pi -t-
S73)
s �- % 'e PRy
Q�
/1-1L © /�' Iny
77c4CeS
August 1, 2003
2880
i5a7.2p
' 3
Ot-Uti 4�0,4f,02s
Page 125
If you have questions regardlug the commercial square footage indicated - please contact Sue Schulte,
McLeod County Assessing at 320 -864 -1255 - - -- -- -- --
Please note that if you own separate tax parcels, you will receive separate notices for each parcel.
0, (��
SEP -18 -03 09[16 AM DAVE SKOOG CONST. 320 387 3453 P.01
'?ece,vje,D 9 - i(?-e")r3
v fP
ptuOfpuf $Son
L/d f7 1 / f I A7-T '-d X�W%C
�Nro�
f �
� ny Ae,9 ib
4S r
7Z X1[1061.
cX /} r A} �� j��; /oil r• _ / u j
> rC9,t'�� ��d� G L f� C�.S%t'f TFT Ski izD L dU�i�a'J
1411 /Ny 5,4 LY°S A-/1 P ii
No
L c ra rra,� Dr/��� rv�rfi%�f �� ry► y /mss,: i . �.
/lk, /I7/4 /�P C� /FfiP�icr� D� c•U A-f n2 V/--r
p /'�lNi7(. (;�i�/ � [ Dd Nal� %JAUt' A
Ac S.
71
0
71
Faith Lutheran Church ' f`
U '1 '�.
Evangelical Lutheran Church In America i ,
335 Main Si S, Hutchloson Minnesota 55354 rn F17TH
Office 320- 587 -2093 Fax 320. 587 -2090 Web Styes: www.faithic.com www.fafhongrove.com
August 22, 2003
City Clerk / Lisa McClure, EDA Interim Director
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Faith Lutheran Church Hope Center
City Parcel Identification Number: 0611629060160
County Parcel Identification Number: 230502850
Property Address: 305 Main Street South
This request is submitted in accordance with Minnesota Statute 428A.01 Subd 4. Benefit;
objection which sets forth the criteria whereby any affected landowner may file a written
objection.
The objection is two fold as follows:
1) The inclusion of the landowner's property in the district, for the reason
that the property would not receive services that are not provided
throughout the city to the same degree;
2) the fact that neither the landowner's property nor its use is benefited by
the proposed special service.
A detailed analysis and use of the premises is included in the following.
Faith Lutheran Church Hope Center tenants include the following non - profit special
service organizations, as mission partners, along with the square footage of space and
their described purpose:
Name _S pace CXUJJJJJL I LLLWVOV
heartland Community 840 Heartland Community Action Agency, on behalf of McLeod
Action Agency, Inc. County receives and distributes funds to supplement
emergency food and shelter programs in the area, such as
fuel assistance, winterization, homeless grants and similar
kinds of assistance. In an effort to fill gaps in services, the
Hutchison Heartland representative often teams resources
with the McLeod County Food Shelf, McLeod Alliance for
Victims of Domestic Violence, the Salvation Army and
many of the Hutchinson churches.
11
2
Name
S ace
Exem t Pu ose
McLeod Alliance for
975
McLeod Alliance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Inc.
Victims of Domestic
(MAVDV) is a non - profit, grassroots organization that
Violence, Inc.
assists victims of domestic violence through support,
advocacy, intervention, and resources for safety. MAVDV
assists the community with domestic violence, education,
training and prevention.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of
165
Partners in Friendship of McLeod County is anon-profit,
Greater Twin Cities
community -based program designed as an intervention and
(Formerly Partners in
transition model for a target population of youth, ages 7 -18
Friendship)
years of age. The program is designed to interact with
troubled youth through volunteer adult mentors who serve as
advocates and role models. To further enhance the program,
a new working partnership is in progress to merge Partners
in Friendship of McLeod county with another national
federation, "Big Brothers Big Sisters of America" D
(BBBS). Referrals to the Partners in Friendship program
come from concerned parents, court systems, school, social
service agencies and concerned citizens.
Lighthouse Counseling
410
Lighthouse Counseling, Ltd. Is a privately run business that
families is
provides counseling to individuals and that
Christian based. Clients' fees are either paid personally or
through funds established through churches and other
organizations, Faith Lutheran Church has a good working
relationship with Lighthouse Counseling, both to refer
clients and to provide funding through its Christian
Counseling Fund. It is our vision, together, to add a
proactive dimension of new fhily and marriage services to
compliment the mix of agencies at the Hope Center and
Hutchinson.
Crow River Habitat for
800
Habitat for Humanity works in partnership with those in
Humanity, Inc.
need; building decent ponies in decent communities. Parents
and children in partner families gain stability and self -
respect through home ownership and are mentored
throughout the process. It is a Christian organization with an
ecumenical nature. its ultimate goal is to eliminate poverty
housing and homelessness from the face of the earth.
11
2
The following resolution :vas adapted at a : egular Faith Lutheran Church Council-
Meeting held August 19, 2003 which delegates to DuWaync Peterson the authority to act
on behalf of the congregation. "Motion was made, seconded and carried to have
DuWayne Peterson represent Faith Lutheran Church and I•lope Center on Downtown
Development Issues."
This request and objection, consisting of 4 pages is submitted August 22, 2003 on behalf
of Faith Lutheran Church.
i '�/ r
ayne T. Jerson
Faith Luther Church Member
()
Name Space Exem t Puroose
Common Cup Ministry, Inc. 180 Common Cup is a new non - profit organization derived from
No Rent the Hutchinson Ministerial, to pool resources of area
churches into one "Common cup" to provide assistance for
those who do not qualify for other assistance. Currently five
Hutchinson congregations are working together, including
Christ the King Lutheran, Oak Height Covenant, United
Church of Christ, Riverside Assembly of God, St. Anastasia
Catholic and Faith Lutheran Church. The Common Cup will
provide a connection to area service agencies for those in
need in the common goal of helping others.
Common Area 1350 Hallway, conference Room, Entry, Rest Rooms, etc.
Sub Total 4720
2200 The only commercial tenant in the building is Century 21.
Century 21
Total 6920
Special service district potential service charge statement shows commercial square
footage as 6920 with a proposed service charge per year of $ 1,314.80. A copy is
attached.
Faith Lutheran
Based on the Minnesota Statute at 428A.01 Subd. 4 Benefit: Objection,
Church hereby requests that this property not be subjected to a service charge except for
the commercial space occupied by Century 21 which is 2200 square footage at $ .19 for a
total of $ 418.
We also want to note that future use of this property is expected to be church educational
space and administrative office space. At any time there is no commercial use of the
property, real estate taxes would cease to be assessed, likewise any special service fee
would also stop.
The following resolution :vas adapted at a : egular Faith Lutheran Church Council-
Meeting held August 19, 2003 which delegates to DuWaync Peterson the authority to act
on behalf of the congregation. "Motion was made, seconded and carried to have
DuWayne Peterson represent Faith Lutheran Church and I•lope Center on Downtown
Development Issues."
This request and objection, consisting of 4 pages is submitted August 22, 2003 on behalf
of Faith Lutheran Church.
i '�/ r
ayne T. Jerson
Faith Luther Church Member
()
Howard Madsen / DuWayne Peterson
Madsen Peterson Company
135 Third Avenue SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(320)587 -2255
August 22, 2003
City Clerk / Lisa McClure, EDA Interim Director
City of Hutchinson
I 11 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Property at 135 P Avenue SE
City Parcel Identification Number: 0611629030990
County Parcel identification Number: 230502090
Property Address: 135 3rd Avenue SE
The final report of the Future Vision Revitalization Master Plan for Downtown Hutchinson as prepared for the
Hutchinson Downtown Association and the City of Hutchinson has been reviewed in depth to determine how
our property would benefit from the proposed special service district service charge.
Minnesota Statute 428A.01 Subd.4 Benefit; Objection states that:
Subd.4. Benefit; objection. Before the ordinance is adopted or at the hearing at which it is to be
adopted, any affected landowner may file a written objection with the city clerk asserting that the
landowner's property should not be included in the district or should not be subjected to a service charge
and objecting to :
(1) the inclusion of the landowner's property in the district, for the reason that the property would
not receive services that are not provided throughout the city to the same degree;
(2) the fact that neither the landowner's property nor its use is benefited by the proposed special
service.
Our building is located at the far southeast area of the district, far removed from downtown activity.
We have professional service tenants who do not have customers to sell, no walk in business such as retail
business does, the clients are served by appointment, dealing with a professional with a one on one basis.
Because there is no deemed benefit we request that this property be excluded from any assessment.
This letter is submitted this 22 day of August, 2003 on behalf of Howard Madsen and DuWayne Peterson.
Madsen Peterson Company
1 -
uWayne T. eterson, Partner
2-
V k�v
E
RESOLUTION NO. 12262
VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ART BENJAMIN, 108 GROVE ST SW,
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITION ONTO NONCONFORMING GARAGE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'rHE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
Arthur Benjamin, property owner, has applied for a variance and conditional use pemut to allow for a 30' X 23.7' addition
onto an existing nonconforming garage located on the north property line and 1.7 feet from the westerly property line, which
is right of way of Lynn Road. 1 e Conditional Use Permit is required because the addition will cause the garage to be
1149.5s q. R. The applicant states the unique circumstance of the lot is that the lot is between two streets in an older area of
the City_ The hardship is stated as being there is prohibited parking on Lynn Road and the property owner believes Grove
Street is not safe due to the volume of traffic.
Legal Description. The North 74.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 10 ,South Half of llutckinson
1. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on
the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the "Zoning
Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the variance and conditional use permit based on the hardship the lot is located
between two streets and approves the variance with the following conditions:
1. Water and sewer lines are located under the proposed addition. It may be necessary to
locate the curb stop in the driveway apron. If the curb stop does need to be located in the
driveway, the top of the curb stop must be sleeved when the new concrete is poured. if
the sewer service line would be covered and if there were any issues with it, it would have
to be replaced. Mr. Benjamin stated the sewer line does not trot in the area of the garage
addition.
2. There is a boulevard tree located in the location of the new driveway. The tree must be
moved to another location in the boulevard. Contact with the City Forester must be made
to discuss the arrangements.
3. Removal or relocation of natural gas or electric service will be at owner's expense.
4. Garage height must not be more than 16'.
5. Home occupations are not allowed in an accessory building.
6. Building code requires fire walls in structures which are located closer than 5 feet from the
property line. This requirement will be necessary for the existing and new structure on
both the North and West property line walls.
Adopted by the City Council this 23d day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz Marlin D. Torgerson
City Administrator Mayor
R(�)
r
L
C
MEMORANDUM
Hutchinson City Center
III Hataan $treet SE
Ilutchin"n, MN 55350.2522
320- 587.5151/6ax 320.234-4240
DATE: September 17, 2003
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ART BENJAMIN, 108
GROVE STREET SW, TO REDUCE SIDE AND REAR SETBACK FOR GARAGE ADDITION
WHICH WOULD CREATE A 1149 SQ. FT. GARAGE
Pursuant to Sections 8.05 and 7.14c of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance and
conditional use permit.
HISTORY
The applicant is requesting a Variance and Conditional Use Permit to allow for a 30'X 23.T addition onto an existing
nonconforming garage located on the north property line and 1.7 feet from the westerly property line, which is right of
way of Lynn Road. The Conditional Use Permit is required because the addition will cause the garage to be 1149.5 sq. R.
The applicant states the unique circumstance of the lot is that the lot is between two streets in an older area of the City.
The hardship is stated as being there is prohibited parking on Lynn Road and the property owner believes Grove Street is
not safe due to the volume of traffic.
FUDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
September 4, 2003.
3. At the public hearing held, no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections.
4. The hardship noted by staff is the unique circumstance of the lot being located between two streets.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted 6 ayes to I nay to recommend approval of the variance with the following conditions:
1. Water and sewer lines are located under the proposed addition. It may be necessary
to locate the curb stop in the driveway apron. If the curb stop does need to be located
in the driveway, the top of the curb stop must be sleeved when the new concrete is
poured. If the sewer service line would be covered and if there were any issues with
it, it would have to be replaced. Mr- Benjamin stated the sewer line does not run in
the area of the garage addition.
2. There is a boulevard tree located in the location of the new driveway. The tree must
be moved to another location in the boulevard. Contact with the City Forester must
be made to discuss the arrangements.
3. Removal or relocation of natural gas or electric service will be at owner's expense.
• 4. Garage height must not be more than 16'.
Printed on recYdcd paper - q C6)
. Finding of Fact
Art Benjamin Garage — 108 Grove St Sw
September 17, 2003
Page 2
5. Home occupations are not allowed in an accessory building.
6. Building code requires fire walls in structures which are located closer than 5 feet
from the property line. This requirement will be necessary for the existing and new
structure on both the North and West property line walls.
ectfully su tted,
Dean Kirchoff \Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
CC: Art Benjamin, 108 Grove St Sw
Atty. Ron McGraw, 102 Main St S Citizens Bank Building
E
•
4(6)
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure,
Jake Wegner, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E„ John Webster, John
Olson, ,Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc
Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave Erlandson, Dick
Nagyt.Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: August 28, 2003 — Meeting Date: September 16, 2003
Applicant: Art Benjamin, property owner
VARIANCE AND CONDTIIONAL USE PEANUT
Brief Description:
The applicant is requesting a Variance and Conditional Use Permit to allow for a 30 ` X
237 addition onto an existing nonconforming garage located on the north property line
and 1.7 feet from the westerly property line, which is right of way of Lynn Road. The
Conditional Use Permit is required because the addition will cause the garage to be
1149.5 sq. ft. The applicant states the unique circumstance of the lot is that the lot is
• between two streets in an older area of the City. The hardship is stated as being there is
prohibited parking on Lynn Road and the property owner believes Grove Street is not
safe due to the volume of traffic.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: R2 (Low to medium density residential)
Property Location: 108 Grove St. SW
Lot Size: 74'X 164'
Existing Land Ilse: Single Family
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: Single Family
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood
Zoning History: Where was a variance and conditional use permit granted in 1990 for an
addition to the existing non - conforming garage.
Applicable
. Regulations: Sections 8.05 and 7.14 c, Chapter 11, City of Hutchinson Zoning
Ordinance 464
0
Variance
Art Benjamin
Planning Commission— September 16, 2002
Page 2
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Grove St. and Lynn Rd
Parking: N/A
Analysis and
Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the request noting the hardship
being the property is in a historic part of the community and the garage
was constructed before the zoning ordinance was in effect. The unique
circumstance of the lot is the location between to streets. Staff
recommends the following conditions:
I. It appears water and sewer lines are located under the proposed
addition. It may be necessary to locate the curb stop in the driveway
apron. If the curb stop does need to be located in the driveway, the
top of the curb stop trust be sleeved when the new concrete is
poured. Additionally, the sewer service line would be covered and if
there were any issues with it, it would have to be replaced.
2. There is a boulevard tree located in the location of the new driveway.
The tree must be moved to another location in the boulevard.
Contact with the City Forester must be made to discuss the
arrangements.
3. Removal or relocation of natural gas or electric service will be at
owner's expense.
4. Garage height must not be more than 16'.
5. home occupations are not allowed in an accessory building.
6. Building code requires fire walls in structures which are located
closer than 5 feet from the property line. This requirement will be
necessary for the existing and new structure on both the North and
West property line walls-
Cc: Art Benjamin, 108 Grove St. SW
Atty. Ron McGraw, 102 Main St S, Citizens Bank Bldg
�C h�
I,
I�
i3
rora..r
sn.a
a
r�^�11 Exhtlnl G.m1.
I•
z
z
� SME}IHG
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ART BENJAMIN
3 DESCRIPTION
The North 74.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 10,
SOUTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON.
�ti I
I
I
PROPOSED
O
GARAGE
t=mRy Hnuu
a ADDITION
O�
8
SJ
r
I
IL
�
Sou. 1! m IM rbrin T..W teal of Lpt 4,'
111ca 10, SW[H H F a M HNI
1I aJ
FFI,IMa Cw.pe
1 3
0
81
I �
v
-ZI:
sum w. M 1M .. 81 IA
I
501fiH F[.LF 6 lRROYISOR �t
I
1
I
5 of
i
HIRCFQi9DlI A@I
Joe ND. Cal
F-
I.,.I
w
U)
IL
0 io zo as
r tale in leer
w
0
D..,.. Wa111M11V111M1 IWIIa
0 D.nm.s Imn mnm.nr s.t
I R.r.b: c.rtllp that 1R1s S.rr.7, Planer
R.P.rt I.. pr.Par.d b} n1. sr une.r A Urrcr
L..d rl..l.
a t amr rae u a4.ar l 7. e u eI} l rlwnare
I
vrnn .s.lG.
Jr aidizr.d,
D41.: 9-8 Aa3
w P -315 PG 9
spa•
Vill
t��W,
too
f ��� � � ��` ' - -_ 9; e t. ���Fm - t i' 2 � -,3R�• . �'� mod."
Ut `'
+ AP
NMa
E g
° 3 -
..r f Ill t
� � r _ }t ��—C:� :�{ € � i�� �ay��i�li� �sr �^� ��t �, � i ��i 3,t.�,i���lY•��.,.�
r
AIM -
r
L
Cl
IRV
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Lt. Dave Erlandson, Interim Chief
DATE: September 9, 2003
RE: Fitness Program
I would like to request authorization to include as part of our department's fitness program
the partial reimbursement of licensed officer's health club dues, both full and part time.
The overview of this request would include the following:
• Licensed Hutchinson police officer.
• Membership at a Hutchinson health club.
• Average attendance of at least three times per week.
• Successfully complete twice a year the departments physical fitness test with a
score of at least 25% above the minimum requirements.
• Reimbursement would occur at the beginning of each calendar year coinciding with
the sick leave incentive payments, usually during the month of January. This
reimbursement would be for the previous year.
• Reimbursement would be in the amount of $100.00. This amount is approximately
somewhere between 1/4 to 115 the yearly cost of a health club membership.
• The yearly cost to the city would be approximately $1,000 to $2,000.
• The reimbursement program would not take effect until January 1, 2004 and the first
payment would not occur until January 2005.
I will be present at the council meeting to provide supporting information and answer
any questions you might have.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration.
/Ikg
2003 -01 -0003
q C(�)
C
0
Hutchinson City_ Center
111 Hassan street SE
Hutchiumnn, MN 55350 -2522
320. 587.6151 /Fax 320. 234.4240
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRONT: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Resolution Establishing the Location For Traffic Control Devices
DATE: 9/16/03
The following items were removed from the previously proposed Traffic Control Resolution for
further review, based on concerns raised.
Item 1: This includes establishing a "No Parking Zone" on South Grade Road from School Road SW
to west of Lakewood Drive SW.
• This is a major route that has had significant growth in the last ten years due to development
in the area. It is currently posted at 55 mph.
• The SW Bypass from South Grade Road to State Highway 7 will be constructed next year,
also increasing traffic in this area.
• Sight lines are extremely poor at the lop of the hill (near L&P Supply), resulting in several
close calls between vehicles and pedestrians. This is an extremely significant area of concern.
• The area with curb and gutter, near Lakewood Drive, is not constructed wide enough for
parking, and is a major safety concern. Other vehicles parking on the shoulder in the area
have been the focus of many calls to the City. Due to sight and clearance issues in the area,
we believe that these concerns are valid.
• This route has been upgraded to a County State Aid Highway, and will be increasingly used
as development occurs.
• John Brunkhorst, McLeod County Engineer, has specifically requested that this area be
signed as noted in order to conform with State Aid standards and address his concerns.
Item 2: This includes establishing a "No Parking Zone" from November to April, 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. on
5t1i Avenue SW and 5a' Avenue SE from State Highway 15 (Main Street) to the alley.
Traffic congestion has increased in this area, creating traffic movement and sight problems
when vehicles are parked near the highway.
Conflicts with snow removal equipment can make the situation more of a concern.
We are proposing this less restrictive time frame initially to see if this addresses the majority
of the issues. If not, a complete parking ban may need to be considered.
We recommend that the Council approve both of these proposed traffic control revisions.
attachment
cc: John Brunkhorst —McLeod County Engineer
John Olson— Assistant Public Works Director
Pnnled nn recycled paper - 1 (d)
RESOLUTION NO. 12269
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, The Director of Engineering and the Police Chief agree that the following areas
have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locations where traffic
control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1 of the Hutchinson City
Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes the following traffic control devices:
"NO PARKING ", which shall be effective for the following locations:
ANY TIME: On South Grade Road SW (County State Aid Highway No. 115) from
Otter Lake (200 feet west of Lakewood Drive SW) to the intersection with School Road
SW (County State Aid Highway No. 7)
1 NOV 1 TO APR 1; 2 AM to 6 AM: On 5th Avenue SW and SE from the intersection
with Main Street (TH 15) to the alleys to the east and west.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of September, 2003.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
1:1Publlc WorksUResolutlonslTRAFFIC1TmfCo43 9- 23 -03.doc
qc()
C
0
F--7
LJ
R,.:r
Hutchinson City Center
111 Haman Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320.587.5151/Fax 320 - 234 -4240
.J A '�! U A
.. T 1R
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Contract with ASCE for Peer Review
DATE: 9/18/03
Attached is information related to completing a "Peer Review" by the American
Association of Civil Engineers (ASCE). I have been considering this effort as an
important tool in addressing the recent budget issues, layoffs, reorganization and
expected retirements. I have been working with the Minnesota ASCE representative
regarding this, and am excited about the potential benefits of an outside review. I have
talked with City Administrator Plotz about this, and we have both focused on this
effort as an important goal for Engineering/Public Works.
Attached is information related to the how the process works. 1 will have a contract
prepared for consideration at the Council meeting. The proposed fee (expected to be
approximately $6,000) will come our of this year's professional services budget.
We recommended approval of this contract.
cc: Gary Plotz — City Administrator
Printed on recycled piper
q (e)
X ... A,
tniz _.
Diawin on Seasoned
L.I
per,n V'i
r,�
1 .;
a, age heat to He
p ,�ip^y yp ,�+ �-+�r
t,, df 1,!"1 eL. EG.?s�.
rl
-iuf g
y
r�
x L �
d
GAY
� =C
c
T,
Jceffl�h Q Ice:,
A peer review not only helps you solve immediate issues
0001* of concern, but also helps put your department on solid
footing: for the long term. For an agency to provide high
quality engineering services consistently over time, it
must be strong in areas other than technical capability.
This is pa rticu I arly true in today's environ ni ent where
shifting priorities and changes in organizational stnicture
and staffing place extra demands on management.
Realistic goals, efficient administration, quality
assurance/quality control, public/user satisfuction, project
control, supervision of field personnel, and an overall
sense of dirprfion (ire critical to success.
N 7
V
The
The, review begins with a brief private
meeting with the engineer/director and
the ASCII peer review team. The team
coordinator discusses the peer review
process, and leads a discussirin to better
nderstand your goals and objectives for
ie review. Review team members come
prepared for this meeting by familiarizing
themselves with standard documents
provided in advance such as your mission
statement, goals, organizational chart,
policies, procedures, and technical
standards.
Since the programs goal is to improve
the quality of work performed throughout
your agency, it is irnportGnt to interview
a cross section of all levels of agency
personnel. These interviews help assess
how well your (Agency's policies and
procedures are understood and practiced
by your staff. They also will provide
insights into morale, job satisfaction,, and
perception of personnel policies.
When the review process is completed, the
1,!)eer review tearn will give as summary
report of its analysis of the organization's
strengths and weaknesses to the
engineer/director, and key staff members
as requested. This verbal report, qiv(.,-n by
the peer review tear( at the exit interview,
in be the final report. If you are in terested
in also receivinq a written report, you will
need to request it during the; early planning
stages. The written report would be
provided shortly alter 111he exit 4fti viuvv
� I
The ASCE Peer Review Program
was developed to give public
sector engineering and/or
construction agencies
opportunities to improve the
management and quality of their
engineering services and thus,
better protect the public health
and safety with which they are
eflt!Mted, Peer FeVleW is U11 eXti(A
step that can acid a measure of
increased confidence and pride in
your agency.
, .1 n,
The
For.
A
Peer
Revie
• Peer reviews meet many objectives
and can provide critical help in a
wide range of circumstances. Some
agencies schedule regular reviews
every two to five yenr.-,- If cAny of the
scenarios listed below sound familiar,
it might be time for a peer review,
• I've been transferred to head up a
new office. I need to get up to speed
quickly and assess priority issues.
• Our scope of work has shifted. I need
to assess if our current staff is
allocated properly.. to evaluate if we
have the right mix of staff in the
right disciplines.
• We've recently experienced staff
reductions. I need to assess
arqanizationcil needs,
• We're setting up centers of expertise
to retain organization- wide what
we can no longer maintain in each
office. We need to provide better
integration and management over
this broader range of staff who had
limited interaction in the post.
• We've recently eliminated several
layers of management, How do I
reward and retain top performers
when I can't promote them?
• As a now manager, I want to know
what the office thinks of the direction
of my leadership.
I've been in my position for several
years now. I think it's time for me to
take stock of the progress I've made
ari,d get a reality check on my
lendership effectiveness.
• Quality problems in a. sister agency
recently led to a project failure, How
do I ensure we won't have the carne
problem?
• From time to time I wonder if our
practices are current with the state
of practice. If they're not, how do we
get up to speed?
• I don't think our customers in
government and those who oversee
our budget understand the value we
provide, We need help getting our
message out.
• 'We've had to move to increased
out5ouicing. ITn concerned about
maintaining our quality standards.
I-low do we manage in this new
environment?
• We're due for o visit from the
inspector general next year. A peer
review would give us a heads up and
opportunity to resolve issues before
they become critical.
• I feel good about the way our agency
is running, but I'd like an objective
assessmerit to help keep us ahead of
the curve.
C1
G
AmerTcaw ¢ocbty pF Gtv7! Ehglnervs
ASCE PEER REVIEW OF PUBLIC AGENCIES
OFFICE SIZE / REVIEW EFFORT MATRIX
Number of
Employees 1 -10 11 -30 31 -75 76 -150 151 -300 301 -400 401 -600 a 600
Number of
Reviewers 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5
Number of
Days 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5
Review
Note: Number of reviewers and length of review should be decided by Engineer/Director,
Administrator, and Team Coordinator based on type of agency, breadth of practice, and details of
management.
FEESCHEDULE
2
1
Number 2 $6,000
of Days
On -site by 3
Reviewers 4
5
NUMBER OR REVIEWERS
3 4
$6,750
$7,500 $8,500
$ 10,000
(Effective October 2000)
For more information about the ASCE Peer Review Program contact:
Tom Eggum, PE, je 1,10 a - ol.com 651- 224 -8127 or
Melissa Prelewicz, PE, Manager of Professional Practice
Reggie Smith, Senior Program Coordinator
American Society of Civil Engineers
1801 Alexander Fell Drive
Reston, VA 201914400 1- 800 -548 -2723 ext. 6341 or 6158
5
$12,000 ......
$15,000
q(?)
Lessons Lrom Peer Review:
Flaw to Ensure Your Agency's Best Performance over the Long Term
Government agencies that provide engineering services at the federal, state, and local level may
well be the unsung heroes of the public sector. According to a panel of seven expert peer
reviewers trained by the American Society of Civil Engineers each with multiple peer reviews as
their experience base, these agencies typically provide excellent engineering services — very
often overcoming significant resource limitations. Despite the overall all high quality of
engineering services provided, reviewer's report that there are a few practices that can make a
world of difference in the agency's ability to continue to perform well over the long term.
Consistent long -term performance goes beyond the expertise and effectiveness of the
team in place. It requires the development and documentation of policies and procedures that
assure consistency of process across the organization and into the future. It also requires
effective communications and a feedback loop that makes sure the best ideas surface from all
levels whether staff, customer, or user. And it requires a commitment to helping employees grow
and expand their contributions to the organization.
The following check list provides a self diagnostic tool based on the experience of the
peer review panel that can help you tune up your organization to the maximize long -term
performance. Most agencies that have had peer reviews and implemented many of these
recommendations also found that they significantly improved current performance, enhanced
employee morale and customer satisfaction, and smoothed the workflow process itself.
Process Improvement
Consistent performance organization -wide begins with having clear policies and procedures and
documenting them so they can be applied throughout the organization. Counting on employees to
pass procedures by word of mouth and remember them from year to year is unrealistic. It's also
valuable to develop checklists to help employees follow procedures and ensure they don't
overlook a key step in the process.
Standardize and document procedures. Even many effective government agencies have not
documented or developed standard procedures. Sometimes those they have aren't effective.
Often the staff knows the basic system, but because it wasn't well defined each does something a
little different. Developing a written procedure manual with documented quality control
checkpoints makes a big difference. If you don't have documented procedures, you're relying on
a couple of people to know what to do. If they leave, you have a big problem. The first step in
the peer review process is for agencies pull together standard documentation. Many agencies
have reported that this one step alone was worth the resources invested in the peer review
process.
Make sure you have policies and procedures worth following. Many agencies have
policies and procedures on the books they don't follow. if you're one of those agencies, ask
yourself why. I£ they're not practical or no longer pertinent, change them. Having procedures
and policies that aren't followed affect the moral and makes it harder to get employees to
comply with procedures in the future.
a ��J
. Communication and Feedback
Communication is the lifeblood of an organization. It's how you learn from one another and
organize to achieve effective results. Communications is not a one way street, however. Effective
listening is a much a part of the process as talking. Good communications make all employees
feel involved in the process and ensures good ideas aren't overlooked. The best organizations
actively seek feedback from all levels — employees, customers and users.
• Listen to Everyone. Management doesn't have a lock on good ideas. Government agencies
typically have strong organizational structures. Communication flows well from the top
down, but feedback up the ladder is often limited. Actively seek out suggestion from all
levels of staff. Avoid the not invented here syndrome. Hold regular staff meetings to keep
staff focused on a clear vision of where they're going, otherwise people will take their
position as a routine job, rather than driving a common focus. They'll function in a cocoon —
not part of the overall plan.
• Learn from what you've done. Many agencies don't review completed projects. Croce a
project is done, they don't go back to field personnel and meet with design personnel to
discuss what went right and wrong. A follow -up review is a rich source of feedback for all
project managers and helps them build in improvements in the future.
• Strengthen communication between designer and constructor. Early communication
between those responsible for designing the project and those responsible for implementing
the design can help spot problems up front. It can even lead to a more effective construction
process. All too often these two elements have little or not opportunity to collaborate to
develop a better product. Build this feedback loop into your process.
. • Get feedback from users. Make projects customer friendly. Most agencies don't place
enough emphasis on user feedback. They don't systematically find out if the owner or user
liked what they did. Many have adopted the attitude of we know what's best for you. I£ you
build a library, ask the librarians what they liked and what they didn't. Agencies seemed
more cognizant of constituent relations — indirect users and their supervisors. They do a good
job in interacting with the legislative body that provides the funding, but feedback from users
is key to developing better projects. Pull together teams _. including interagency teams and
people from outside including a customer representative — to work on the project. Make a
commitment to format projects so clients can easily use them.
• Understand who is the customer and make sure they understand the value you provide.
This sometimes gets fuzzy and confusing. Is it the public, other agencies, private sector
clients (as in a regulatory review of private sector companies — or review of development of
new road systems to be sure they fit into the larger master plan and standards)? These are the
publics that need to understand the value of what you do. Be sure you know what the
customer wants, do it, and then make sure they know you've done it. This is the classic
definition of public relations (PR). If PR isn't in your work plan, make sure it gets there.
Your agency's funding depends on how well you get your story out. And PR is not a one-
person job. Upper management needs to inculcate it in all the staff.
q (C
. Even the best organizations have problems, but they actively seek them out and
address them. One of the ways these companies assess their effectiveness is through a
peer review_ They want to know if they're still doing well or if they've missed
something. They feel responsible to the public and want to be sure they are doing the best
they can to retain public confidence. They don't make the excuse that they don't have
time. Everyone is busy, but they see the value of taking the pulse of the organization to
see if they are where they think they are. It's an attitude like, I think 1 know where we
are, but would you please check it out for me. They want to know if the people reporting
to them are seeing it as it is. Most agencies that have a peer review find out they're a little
better than they thought and find a few things to .focus on that will make them even
better.
Peer review also points out the strengths of an organization. You get positive
reinforcement for those things you are doing well. This allows you to build on those
strengths.
What's Peer Review?
The ASCE Peer Review process is designed to help all public sector engineering
and construction agencies — from small and local autonomous agencies to branches of
larger agencies — improve the management and quality of their engineering services. Peer
Review is a structured process that helps you raise your level of technical practice by
. examining your agency's mission, objectives, policies, resource allocation, and
procedures and then investigating compliance with these policies and procedures to
determine any shortcomings. The review can be customized to focus on critical
challenges or opportunities your agency is facing. Peer Review does not analyze the
technical competence of your agency or its individuals, however, that is left to you.
The ASCE Peer Review program is designed to put you fully in control and
ensure confidentiality in helping you strengthen your performance in organizational
management, project management, emergency management procedures, technical practice, &
procedures, human resource management, financial management, and public relations practices.
To learn more about the ASCE Peer Review process or to get a copy of the ASCE Peer Review
For Public Agencies Brochure please visit the ASCE web site at:
h1T J /www.asce.or eta/ rof /alx eerv.html. You can also contact the Professional Practice
Department of ASCE Headquarters, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191 -4400 or
telephone John Segna osegna@asce.org) or Reggie Smith (rsmith @asee.org) at 800 -548 -2723.
q cep
C
P
L
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hannan Street SF
nutchiruwn, MN 55350 -2522
320�5875151/Fax 320. 234.4240
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Final Application for Aquatic Restoration Program Grant
DATE: 9/18/03
Attached please find information related to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Aquatic Restoration
. Program grant, and a cover letter /grant application form. We have been working with Barr
Engineering and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources on preparing and revising the
preliminary report that will be submitted with the grant. We have now received and updated the
report per review with the DNR and would like to officially make the application.
As noted, we plan on working with US Representative Colin Peterson on this issue, and hope to be
able to move ahead with this project in coordination with other work in the area (Highway 7 and
Highway 15 road and bridge construction).
We recommend approving the attached grant application.
ce- Dolf Moon — Director of PRCE
Rob (:ollen — DNR Regional Hydrologist
9
Printrd on rocyclyd papa -
\.J
September 18, 2003
St. Paul District Corps of Engineers
1905 1h Street East
St. Paul, MN 55101 -1638
ATTN: Joe Yanta
Dear Mr. Yanta,
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street Sri
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522
320. 587- SIS1 /F-ax 320. 234.4240
This letter is to request the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a study under
Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to determine the
feasibility of an aquatic restoration project on the South Fork of the Crow River in
Hutchinson, Minnesota.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) and the City of Hutchinson
have been reviewing the potential for the removal of the Hutchinson Dam and
replacement with a "natural' structure that addresses the safety, environmental, aesthetic
and habitat problems with the existing structure. We would like to submit a joint
application.
• The City has completed the attached Feasibility Study in order to better define the project
scope. The Study includes projected costs and drawings.
We understand that, if it were found feasible and advisable to develop an aquatic
ecosystem restoration project at the Hutchinson Dam on the South Fork of the Crow
River that the City of Hutchinson and MnDNR would be required to provide the local
cooperation and cost sharing prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.
We have the following comments:
The program requires a 35% non - Federal Sponsor match, and a joint application
between the City and MnDNR would be allowed (see attached correspondence
with the Corps). The City Council has approved making a joint application with
the MnDNR.
• As noted in the feasibility report, the estimated cost of the project is as follows (in
2002 $):
Construction: $962,000
Contingency: $192,000
Design /Inspect/Test, /etc.: $144,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $1,298,000 (2002)
Primed on recycled paper -
0
•
0
Assuming 5% inflation and work being done in 2004, this amount would be
adjusted to $1,430,000
Assuming 65% of the cost is eligible for funding through this program, the City
pays $300,000 and the DNR pays $200,000, funding would be as follows:
City of Hutchinson: $300,000
US Army Corps of Eng.: $930,000
DNR: $200,000
Thank you for your consideration in this project.
Sincerely,
John P. Rodeberg, PE
Director of Engineering/Public
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Robert Collett, PE
Works Area Hydrologist
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Department of Waters
20596 Highway 7 West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
cc: Colin Peterson - U.S Congress
Gary Plotz - City Administrator
Mayor and City Council
Craig Regalia, Jim Sehl - MnDNR
9(�)
Page 1 of 4
ARMY USACE Headquarters Mississippi Valley Division
• , , , About Us History Doing Business With Us Press Room Lmpk
I Home Offices Search Finder Questions /Con
St. Paul District
Navigation Oisasler Response Flood f)arnage Redurtlon Environment Regulatory Rer..rration
Environment
Projects & StudICS
r, Ambrough Slough I abitat
Project, Pool 10,
Wisconsin
» Awards
n Big Paint Creek
Restoration, Waukon,
I owa
» Blackhawk Park
Backwater Restoration
Project , Victory.
Wisconsin
» 0ussey Lake. Habitat
Project, Guttenberg, Iowa
» Capoli Slough Habitat
Project, Pool 9,
Wisconsin
» Cold Springs t labibA
Project, Crawford c:;ounty,
W is.
.» Conway Lake Habitat
Project, Lansing, Iowa
» EA for Modifications to
the Lansing Highwav
Bridge Dredged Material
6cneficial Use Site
» Last Channel Habitat
Project, I..a Crescent,
Minn. /Wis.
» Eau Galle Lake Habitat
Restoration, Section
1135, Wisconsin
» Endangered Species -
Conservation of Native
Mussels
» Environmental
Infrastructure Assistance
- City of Garrison and
Kathio township,
Minnesota
» I inger Lakes Habitat
Project , W abasha.
Minnesota
» Grand Marais River
Aquatic, Ecosystem
Restoration
» Guttenberg Waterfowl
Ponds Habitat Project.
Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration -
Section 206
What the Corps Can Do
Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 provides
authority for the Corps of Engineers to undertake restoration projects in
aquatic ecosystems such as rivers, lakes and wetlands. The Corps
evaluates projects that benefit the environment through restoring,
improving, or protecting aquatic habitat for plants, fish and wildlife. A
project is accepted for construction after a detailed investigation shows it
is technically feasible, environmentally acceptable, and provides cost
effective environmental benefits. Each project must be complete within
itself, not a part of a larger project.
Costs for Section 206 projects are shared between the Federal
Government (65 percent) and a non - Federal sponsor (35 percent) in
accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The
maximum Federal expenditure per project is $5 million, which includes
both planning and construction costs. Casts of lands, easements, and
project operation and maintenance are non- Federal costs. Section 206
allows the non - Federal sponsor credit for certain work -in -kind, including
design work, provision of materials, and construction activities. Work-in -
kind must be accomplished by the non - Federal sponsor. It can be
accomplished by the staff of the non - Federal sponsor or by a contract
administered by the non - Federal sponsor.
After a State or local agency requests a potential project, the Corps
conducts a preliminary study to determine if there is a Federal interest in
the problem. If the Corps headquarters office approves this effort, a
feasibility study begins at Federal expense. The feasibility study is
conducted to define the problem, identify potential solutions, analyze the
costs, benefits, and environmental impacts of the alternatives and select
a plan. In addition to the study, a draft Project Cooperation Agreement
(PCA) is drawn up by which the Federal Government and the sponsor
agree to share project costs. No more than 2 years should pass between
the start of the study and the time the project is ready for construction.
Projects with an estimated Federal cost of $300,000 or less may be
expedited, allowing for a project to be completed in 18 months or less.
Local Responsibilities
A non - Federal sponsor provides 35 percent of the costs for a Section 206
project. Sponsors must be public agencies with the legal and financial
capability to fulfill the requirements of cast sharing and local cooperation.
The sponsor generally must agree to the following:
• Provide all lands, easements, rights -of -way, relocations, and
dredged material disposal areas.
Provide any additional cash contributions needed to make the
sponsor's share of the cost 35 percent.
Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the
construction and maintenance of the Droiect. except darnaaes due
_ 'rint:tifl::
^^ c)upy
Programs
» Aquatic Lcosystem
Restoration - Scclid
» Continuing Authoriti
Program
» Environmental
Infrastructure Assist
Program: Northeast
Minnesota
» Environmental
Infrastructure Assist
Northern Wisconsin
»
Forest Management
Program
» Habitat Restoration
Section 1135
» Mississippi River
Environmental
Management Progrr
Minn/W is /Iowa
» Operations and
Maintenance (O & N
Program
» Planning Assistance
Fedr..rally Recogni7(
Indian Tribes Pmgrc
Section 22
n Planning Assistance
States Program -
Minnesota - Section
» Planning Assistance
States Program - Nr
Dakota - Section 22
» Planning Assistance
States Program -
Wisconsin - Section
» Sign standards Prof
MCX
» Support for Others
» Upper Mississippi R
Water Level Manag,
Program
Other
» Mississippi River
Environmental Paul
http : / /www.lnvp.usace.arrriy.mill environment lcicfatilt.asl)?pagcid -113 9/18/ 3
Page 2 of 4
Iowa
to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors.
News Releases
» Harpers Slough Habitat
• Provide all access routes and relocations of utilities necessary for
» 15- SEP -03
Project, Pool 9, Iowa
project construction and for operation and maintenance.
• Comply with the provisions of pertinent Federal acts in carrying out
Fall webworms are bE
Red Oak Island
• Hay Creek Aquatic
the specified non - Federal responsibilities of the project.
Ecosystem Restoration -
Contribute in cash the local share of project planning and
» 05- SEP -03
Roseau County,
Minnesota
•
construction cost.
Corps of Engineers b.
• Indian Slough Habitat
a Maintain and operate the non - Federal works after completion in
next step to save endangered Higgins',
Project, Buffalo County,
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the
mussel
Wis.
Army.
n 02- SEP -03
• Island 42 Habitat Project,
Corps of Engineers al
Wabasha County, Minn.
How to Request a Study
Wisconsin DNR start
• Lake Onalaska Habitat
An investigation under Section 206 may be initiated after receipt of a
construction of fish -frl
Project, La Crosse,
formal request from the prospective sponsoring agency. An example of
project in Spring Valle
Wisconsin
an acceptable resolution follows.
Wis.
• Lake Winneshiek Habitat
Dear Sir:
» 18- AUG -03
Project, Fenyville, Wis.
Interested in a career
» Lansing Big Lake Habitat
This letter is to request the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a
the Corps of Engineer
Project, Lansing, Iowa
study under Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of
» Long Lake Habitat
1996 to determine the feasibility of an aquatic ecosystem restoration
Project, Trampealeau.
project at (location).
Wisconsin
» Long Meadow Lake
(Briefly describe the nature of the aquatic ecosystem restoration and any
Habitat Project,
issues that might affect the acceptability of any recommended solutions,
Bloomington, Minn.
from the perspective of local government and /or the public.)
• Lower St. Anthony Falls
Rapids Restoration.
It is understood that, If it were found feasible and advisable to develop an
Mississippi River,
aquatic ecosystem restoration project at (location), the (non - Federal
Minneapolis, Minn.
sponsor) would be required to provide the local cooperation and cost
• Marsh Lake Dam, Lac
sharing prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.
Qui Parle Flood Control
Project. MN
Sincerely, (name and title of the public official authorized to request the
• Minnehaha Creek
study)
Watershed Study
For more information
» Minnesota River Basin
Tom Tom Crump
Reconnaissance Study,
290 -5284
Minnesota
thomas.I,trrumg@LL5ace.army MILI
» Mississippi River Bank
Stabilization Habitat
Related Projects and Studies:
Project, Minn/Wis /Iowa
• brand Margie River Aquatic EcosyS m Restof tiion
» Mississippi River: Lock &
CLQ Aquatic Ecosystem Resto[atLQn Roseau County
Dam 3 Navigation Safety
and Embankments
Minnesota
• Nprth Ottawa ImpourLtlment Project rant County. Minn.
Reevaluation
• Red River Fis. w s Habitat Project, Fargo North Dam
» Mud Lake Water
• Red.RZiver Fishw9 HabitaLPLo ject._Fargo South-Dam
Management
• Trout_ Lalke and Can step PIt Flood Contr to Pro1eGt, t sca CountY_
» North Ottawa
Mip!!-
Impoundment Project,
Grant County, Minn.
» Peterson Lake Habitat
Project, W abasha,
Point of contact for this page:
Minnesota
Tom Crump thomas.l.crump my 02.us ca e.army.mil
n Polander Lake Habitat
651- 290 -5284 651- 290 -5258 (fax)
Project, Winona,
Minnesota
» Pool 8 Islands Phase I
Habitat Project ,
Wisconsin
D Pool 8 Islands Phase II
Habitat Project, Stoddard,
Wis,
» Pool 8 Islands Phase III
http: / /www.mvp,usace. army. mil /enviroaTnent/default.asp ?pageid =113 q/1 /�? \
•
0
0
R55APPYRV
I
ICITY OF HUTCHINSON
Number
AP Pa ment Register with Voids
Check Dat
9/12/2003
-
Type
Check #
Vendor
Name
Amount
PK
118744
"
117539
STEVE'S PALLET SERVICE
1961
VDate
PK
118745
118912
SUMMIT BREWING CO
40
PK
118746
105258
WILKENS INDUSTRIES
9000
11001
Account —Ni
N
11001
IMMEDIATE PAYS
Void Amou
1]
E
R55APPYRV
TCHINSON
B Check Number
Re ister with Voids
"Payment
9/16/2003
-
Ck Date
T e
Check #
ame
Amount
9/16/2003
PK
118747
'
118997
AHL, TRACY E.
6956.00
9/16/2003
PK
118748
93
BRIEST, JERRY
450.00
9/16/2003
PK
118749
102961
HRA
550.00
9/16/2003
PK
118750
101869
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
584.00
9/16/2003
PK
11187511
1 101869
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
124.00
9116/2003
PK
11187521
103099
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
60.14
9/16/2003
PK
118753
101942
MDRA
80.00
9/16/2003
PK
1187541
1 101942
MDRA
20.00
9/16/2003
PK
118755
102724
MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION ASS
75.00
9/16/2003
PK
f
118756
102477
MINNESOTA FALL MAINTENANCE EXP
200.00
9/16/2003
PK
1-187571
102569
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE
957.27
9/16/2003
PK
11187581
102052
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
2220.48
9/16/2003
PK
118759
102642
W. D. COOLING CLINIC
1457.57
13744.46
Account
#
13744.46
IMMEDIATE DAYS
Void Amou
0
0
Ob
PAYROLL ACCOUNT - Payroll of September 19, 2003
Period Ending: September 13. 2003
FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY - ELECTRONIC TRANSFER
• TO STATE AND IRS
DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE
AMOUNT PEID ACCT# NAME DESCRIPTION
$17,771.23 9995.2034 WITH. TAX Employee Contnbution - Federal Tax
ACCOUNT
$9,458.32 9995.2040 Employee Contribution - Soc. Security
$2,771.90 9995.2242 Employee Contribution - Medicare
$30,001.45 Sub -Total - Employee Contribution
$9,458.32
$12,230.22
• $42,231.67
$8,286.48
$10,482.87
$12,564.05
$23,046.92
$15.86
$31.72
$23,078.64
9995.2240
9995.2242
Sub -Total - Employer Contribution
Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account
Employer Contribution - Social Security
Employer Contribution - Medicare
9995.2035 MN DEPT Or REVENUE
102615 9995.2241 PERA Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
102615 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
Sub -Total - PERA
102615 9995.2243 PERA -DCP Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
102615 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
Sub - Total - DCP
GRAND TOTAL - PERA
Finance Director Approval
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
9/23/03
WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE -USE TAX
GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX
H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE -FUEL TAX
LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE -AUG SALES TAX
8,937.00
820.00
1,011.20
33,007.00
i
•
C�
J
L�
•
R55APPYRV
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By Check Number
AP Payment Register with Voids
Check Dat
9/23/2003
-
Ck Date
Type
Check #
Vendor
Name
Amount
9/23/2003
PK
118760
" 101915
A.H. HERMEL COMPANY
38.63
9/23/2003
PK
118761
102126
ACE HARDWARE
202.80
9/23/2003
PK
118762
119073
ADAMS, KRISTI
353.30
9/23/2003
PK
118763
101827
AG SYSTEMS
149.42
9123/2003
PK
118764
119051
ALLEN, RYAN
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118765
102785
ANOKA TECHNICAL COLLEGE
375.00
9/23/2003
PK
118766
111041
ARROW TERMINAL LLC
98.46
9/23/2003
PK
118767
119069
ARTIBEE, LYNN
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118768
102480
B. W. WELDING
69.76
9/23/2003
PK
118769
119054
BARTHOLOMEW, JUSTIN
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118770
101925
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
644.33
9/23/2003
PK
118771
102255
BERKLEY RISK SERVICES
800.00
9/23/2003
PK
118772
119049
BONNIWELL, MARGO
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118773
101987
BRANDON TIRE CO
477.44
9/2312003
PK
118774
114014
BRATZ, KRYSTAL
140.00
9/2312003
PK
1 118775
1 104863
BROLL, DAVID
60.00
9/2312003
PK
118776
1 1024561C
& L DISTRIBUTING
41591.20
9/23/2003
PK
118777
1 11 6419
CBT WEAR PARTS INC
2156.63
9/23/2003
PK
118778
103014
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
79.79
9/23/2003
PK
118779
104391
CENTRAL HYDRAULICS
795.62
9/23/2003
PK
118780
102143
CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
43.00
9/23/2003
PK
118781
117879
CORNWELL TOOLS
70.45
9/2312003
PK
118782
102892
CROW RIVER ARTS
667.00
9/23/2003
PK
118783
102050
CROW RIVER AUTO
300.14
9/23/2003
PK
118784
119052
CRUSER, PRESTON
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118785
1 103815
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP
937.20
9/23/2003
PK
118786
1 1043771
CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES
4978.88
9/23/2003
PK
118787
119056
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CTR
710.00
9/23/2003
PK
118788
102488
DAY DISTRIBUTING
6058.35
9/23/2003
PK
118789
119071
DESHPANDE, PRACHEE
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118790
104084
DONOHUE & ASSOC
1132.22
9/23/2003
PK
118791
102275
DPC INDUSTRIES INC
1224.72
9/23/2003
PK
118792
102647
DYNA SYSTEMS
380.10
9/23/2003
PK
116793
102324
EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC
224.66
9/23/2003
PK
118794
119059
EBENT, MERILEE
200.00
9/23/2003
PK
118795
1 102726
ECOLAS PEST ELIM
43.67
9/23/2003
PK
118796
102356
ELECTRO WATCHMAN
680.54
9123/2003
PK
118797
109225
ELLIOTT, TIM
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118798
119072
EMME, BEV
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118799
117233
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY CONTROL
1150.00
9/23/2003
PK
118800
102689
ERLANDSON, DAVID
35.00
9/23/2003
PK
118801
104137
FASTENAL COMPANY
105.56
9/23/2003
PK 1
118802
102700
G.A.THOMPSON CO.
528.02
9/23/2003
PK
118803
101945
GALL'S INC
299.11
9/23/2003
PK
118804
103340
GEB ELECTRICAL ING
94.98
9/23/2003
PK
118805
103029
GLENCOE ENTERPRISE
120.00
9/23/2003
PK
118806
102525
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC
189.10
9/23/2003
PK
118807
11 1833
GORACKE, ANITA
30.00
J
11
L.1
9/23/2003
PK
118808
102087
GRAINGER PARTS OPERATIONS
120.87
9/23/2003
PK
118809
101874
GRIGGS & COOPER & CO
18723.48
9/23/2003
PK
118810
102528
HAGER JEWELRY INC.
89.67
9/23/2003
PK
118811
102813
HAMMOND, MICHELLE
7.75
9/23/2003
PK
118812
102451
HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
2968.60
9/23/2003
PK
118813
102089
HANSEN GRAVEL
861.28
9/23/2003
PK
118814
118818
HARRELL'S
950.00
9/23/2003
PK
118815
109799
HARRIS COMPANIES
1252.50
9/23/2003
PK
118816
103763
HAUGLAND, JOHN
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118817
103059
HEMMAH, LLOYD
160.00
9/23/2003
PK
118818
102701
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
393.39
9/23/2003
PK
118819
102531
HENRYS FOODS INC
1016.56
9/23/2003
PK
118820
102518
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
186.47
9/23/2003
PK
118821
119055
HIMLE, GLORIA
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118822
105080
HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER
346.33
9/23/2003
PK
118823
119048
HOERNEMANN, MICHELLE
200.00
9/23/2003
PK
118824
103218
HOLIDAY INN - EXPRESS
193.83
9/23/2003
PK
118825
102544
HUTCH CAFE
31.50
9/23/2003
PK
118826
102319
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
1666.55
9/23/2003
PK
118827
105329
HUTCHINSON BUMPER TO BUMPER
315.08
9/23/2003
PK
118828
102530
HUTCHINSON CO -OP
9538.53
9/23/2003
PK
1 118829
115652
HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER
80.00
9/23/2003
PK
118830
102541
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO
1457.26
9/23/2003
PK
118831
102542
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
495.00
9/2312003
PK
118832
102543
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
259.34
9/23/2003
PK
118833
101869
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
590.50
9/23/2003
PK
118834
101869
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
113.50
9/23/2003
PK
118835
102038
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
0.50
9/23/2003
PK
118836
102072
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
26401.00
9/23/2003
PK
118837
103099
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
2061.13
9/23/2003
PK
118838
103246
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
11369.05
9/23/2003
PK
118839
117136
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
25.72
9/23/2003
PK
118840
103079
ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERI
295.00
9/23/2003
PK
118841
103520
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
73.43
9/23/2003
PK
118842
111836
JACOBSEN, SEPTEMBER
28.57
9/23/2003
PK
118843
119068
JANICKE, GLORIA
9.00
9/23/2003
PK
118844
115855
JEFF MEEHAN SALES INC.
4562.37
9123/2003
PK
118845
102208
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
120.00
9/2312003
PK
118846
101938
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
12307.18
9/23/2003
PK
118847
102346
JOHNSON, LEONARD G.
812.76
9/23/2003
PK
118848
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
3087.00
9/23/2003
PK
118849
102555
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
12000.00
9/23/2003
PK
118850
1190471
KAMRATH, KEITH & CARY GLIEDEN
270.00
9/23/2003
PK
118851
119046
KARL TRUCKING
1445.00
9/23/2003
PK
1 118852
119058
KETCHUM, KATHY
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118853
105521
KINNEY & LANGE
533.88
9/23/2003
PK
118854
119044
KLIER'S NURSERY
22.63
9/23/2003
PK
118855
103114
KLOSS, TOM
23.89
9/23/2003
PK
118856
119050
KOSKI, KIM
45,00
9/23/2003
PK
118857
102561
L & P SUPPLY CO
252.25
9/23/2003
PK
118858
101946
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
163.85
9/23/2003
PK
r 118859
101974
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
2074.15
is
r1
L�
L
i
9/23/2003
PK
118860
101984
LOCHER BROTHERS INC
25155.60
9/23/2003
PK
118861
102093
MANKATO MACK SALES
574,95
9/23/2003
PK
118862
105140
MARSHALL CONCRETE PRODUCTS
1135,03
9/23/2003
PK
118863
119066
MAXWELL'S INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
148.94
9/23/2003
PK
118864
102573
MCLEOD COOP POWER
4910,73
9/23/2003
PK
118865
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118866
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
10,00
9/23/2003
PK
118867
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
60.00
9/23/2003
PK
118868
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
240,00
9/23/2003
PK
118869
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118870
103046
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118871
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
741.48
9/23/2003
PK
118872
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
5678.23
9/23/2003
PK
118873
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
345.00
9/23/2003
PK
118874
102787
MCLFOD COUNTY TREASURER
746,00
9/23/2003
PK
118875
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
143.00
9/23/2003
PK
118876
102787
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
953.00
9/23/2003
PK
118877
118072
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
640,00
9/23/2003
PK
118878
116868
MDT
450,00
9/23/2003
PK
118879
112400
MENARDS - HUTCHINSON
126.25
9/23/2003
PK
118880
102131
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
172.21
9/23/2003
PK
118881
103231
METRO SALES
115.82
9/2312003
PK
118882
109387
MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES INC.
41.35
9/23/2003
PK
118883
102425
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
1374.45
9/23/2003
PK
118884
1 104957
MIKE CHAVES TRUCKING
5479,10
9/23/2003
PK
118885
102332
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF CEMETERIES
260.00
9/23/2003
PK
118886
102668
MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI
25.00
9/23/2003
PK
118887
101992
MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
5638,50
9/23/2003
PK
118888
102582
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
86,94
9/23/2003
PK
118889
102705
MINNESOTA ICE ARENA MANAGERS A
125,00
9/23/2003
PK
118890
105157
MINNESOTA SHREDDING
109,90
9/23/2003
PK
118891
102570
MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION
112.00
9/23/2003
PK
118892
102583
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
855.75
9/23/2003
PK
118893
102919
MMBA
76.23
9/23/2003
PK
118894
102841
MRPA
600.00
9/23/2003
PK
118895
104988
NAGEL, JOSEPH
100,00
9/23/2003
PK
118896
119057
NEUBARTH, KARA
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118897
102180
NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY
144.52
9/23/2003
PK
118898
102591
NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC
11.19
9/23/2003
PK
118899
112503
NORTHLAND PALLET INC
1778.40
9/23/2003
PK
118900
104609
NOUWEN, INEZ
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118901
103756
NYGAARD ENTERPRISES, INC
984.00
9/23/2003
PK
118902
102490
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
489,71
9/23/2003
PK
118903
110174 1
ONDEO NALCO CO
6025.26
9/23/2003
PK
118904
1021871
PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO
451.00
9/23/2003
PK
118905
101932
PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING
2790.00
9/23/2003
PK
118906
101853
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
7359.66
9/23/2003
PK
118907
102373
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
599,08
9/23/2003
PK
118908
102656
PIONEER
996.84
9/23/2003
PK
118909
102167
PITNEY BOWES
126.00
9/23/2003
PK
118910
102597
PITNEY BOWES INC
6.34
9/23/2003
PK
118911
102420
PLB REPAIR & WELDING
1 1275,28
E
11
11
9123/2003
PK
118912
102593
PLOTZ, GARY D.
19.80
9/23/2003
PK
118913
102445
POSTMASTER
540.00
9/23/2003
PK
118914
119045
PRAIRIELAND SOLID WASTE MGMT
1058.40
9/23/2003
PK
118915
102493
PREMIER TECH PACKAGING
9202.61
9/23/2003
PK
118916
104378
PRIMROSE OIL CO
930.98
9/23/2003
PK
118917
102157
PRINCE OF PEACE SENIOR APT. IN
400.00
9/23/2003
PK
118918
103395
PRIOR, CINDY
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118919
102598
QUADE ELECTRIC
16.93
9/23/2003
PK
118920
102212
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
547.01
9/23/2003
PK
118921
102052
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
6247.92
9/23/2003
PK
118922
102644
QUAM CONSTRUCTION
59339.26
9/23/2003
PK
118923
102205
R.J.L. TRANSFER
161.03
9/23/2003
PK
118924
102424
RADIO SHACK
53.24
9/23/2003
PK
118925
102384
RDO EQUIPMENT
681.43
9/23/2003
PK
118926
101899
REDMAN, RANDY
125.66
9/23/2003
PK
118927
102395
REINER IRRIGATION & SEPTIC
219.16
9/23/2003
PK
118928
119070
RETTIG, KARI
13.00
9/23/2003
PK
118929
104458
RISC
74.00
9/23/2003
PK
118930
104149
RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS
173.06
9/23/2003
PK
118931
102712
RYAN, SCOTT
80.00
9/23/2003
PK
118932
113707
SAMPSON SOD FARMS
5850.00
9/23/2003
PK
118933
102436
SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
262.71
9/23/2003
PK
118934
102606
SCHMELING OIL CO
11.00
9/23/2003
PK
118935
119053
SCHMIDT, JENNIFER
15.00
9/23/2003
PK
118936
1 101940
SCHNOBRICH, MARK
115.00
9123/2003
PK
118937
117395
SCHWAGEL DIST INC
829.97
9/23/2003
PK
118938
109801
SCOTT'S WINDOWS
42.60
9/23/2003
PK
118939
102749
SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY BOARD
1332.00
9/23/2003
PK
118940
102637
SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY
324.78
9/23/2003
PK
118941
104287
SHERATON INN
223.74
9/23/2003
PK
118942
102609
SHOPKO
82.68
9/23/2003
PK
118943
1 102610
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
127.44
9/23/2003
PK
118944
1 101909
SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
86.66
9/23/2003
PK
1 118945
1022041
SOIL CONTROL LAB
135.00
9/2312003
PK
118946
105064
SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL
9921.37
9/23/2003
PK
116947
1 1027471ST.
JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC
76.68
9/23/2003
PK
118948
1 1026121
STANDARD PRINTING
165.08
9/23/2003
PK
118949
1 102584
STAR TRIBUNE
893.70
9/23/2003
PK
118950
110990
STARKE, MELISSA
20.00
9/23/2003
PK
118951
118862
STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT
97.97
9/23/2003
PK
118952
119043
THORNTON LABORATORIES, INC
735.50
9/23/2003
PK
118953
102811
THUNDERBIRD HOTEL
403.80
9/23/2003
PK
118954
119074
TRIMAX MOWING SYSTEMS INC
882.10
9/23/2003
PK
118955
102619
TWO WAY COMM INC
66.12
9/23/2003
PK
118956
118655
UNITED PACKAGING & DESIGN
6066.00
9/23/2003
PK
118957
101857
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
364.97
9/23/2003
PK
118958
102630
VIKING SIGNS
350.00
9/23/2003
PK
118959
102631
VWR SCIENTIFIC INC
436.96
9/23/2003
PK
118960
105122
WASTE MANAGEMENT
2173.49
9/23/2003
PK
118961
102165
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
60.00
9/23/2003
PK
118962
103870
WEST GROUP
77.60
9/23/2003
PK
118963
108671
WHALEN, KATHY
20.00
J
Cl
C-]
0
9/23/2003
PK
118964
118486
WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1519.98
9/23/2003
PK
118965
102452
WINE MERCHANTS ING
206.00
9/23/2003
PK
118966
101963
WITTE SANITATION
155.40
9/23/2003
PK
118967
101884
W ITTE SOD
120.00
9/23/2003
PK
118968
119067
YATES, JACK
250.00
9/23/2003
PK
118969
103849
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORP
112.85
9/23/2003
PK
118970
101876
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO.
855.00
9/23/2003
PK
118971
101919
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
137.10
9/23/2003
PK
118972
101875
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
300.00
9/23/2003
PK
118973
101872
H.R.L.A.P.R.
245.08
9/23/2003
PK
118974
102633
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
5239.69
9/23/2003
PK
118975
102635
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
529.03
9/23/2003
PK
118976
101873
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
3747.23
9/23/2003
PK
118977
102449
MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN
913.23
9/23/2003
PK
118978
1018771
PRUDENTIAL
75.00
9/23/20p3
PK
118979
102096
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
30.00
395368.17
Account N1
#
395368.17
0
0
