cp05-11-2010 cAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING — HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2010
1. CALL TO ORDER — 5 :30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION — faith Lutheran Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE,
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
5. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MFFTING OF APRIL 27, 2010
(b) SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 4, 2010
6. CONSENT AGENDA (Purpose: unlyfur items requiringgCouncil approval by external entities that would otherwise
rave gate
a eGa1e 101 e City Administrator. Tradition y, items are not discussed.)
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1, RESOLUTION NO. 13737 - RESOLUTION ESTABI,ISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES
2. ORDINANCE. NO. 10 -0547 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING REZONING RECENTLY
ANNEXED 5.6 ACRES OWNED BY HUTCHINSON EDA FROM R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) TO 1 -1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK) LOCATED EAST OF CUSTOMER
ELATIONS, 1 150 5'H AVENUE SE WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION (SECOND READING AND ADOP'T'ION)
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REQUEST FROM AIRPORT COMMISSION TO CLOSE
AIRPORT FOR AIR SHOW ON AUGUST 7, 2010
(d) APPOINTMENT OF VERNE MEYER TO POLICE COMMISSION TO MAY 2013
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPPORT OF DAIRY DAY CELEBRATION ON JUNE
11, 2010
(t) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DANCE PERMIT FOR CONNECTCARE AT THE
MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS ON OCTOBER 29, 2010
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DANCE PERMIT FOR AMERICAN LEGION POST 96
ON JUNE 19, 2010
(h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAFE AND SOBER GRANT AGREEMENT
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF MINIMUM STATE BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE
C.'ITYC:OUNCIL AGENDA —MAY 11, 2010
Q) CONSIDE'RAT'ION FOR APPROVAL OF 2010 FEE SCHEDULE REVISIONS — ENGINEERING —
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
(k) CONSIDERA'T'ION FOR APPROVAL, OF ISSUING CARNIVAL PERMIT TO J &K AMUSEMINTS
FROM JUNE 4 — JUNE 6, 2010, AT' THE HUTCIINSON MALL
(1) CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CON'T'RACT PAYMENTS
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS -6:00 Y.M.
(a) ASSFSSMENT HEARING FOR ADAMS STREET AND WASHINGTON AVENUE
RECONSTRUCTION PROJLCT - LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 10 -01 (ADOP ASSESSMENT
AND AWARDING CONTRACT)
Action -
COMMUNICATIONS RE UESTS AND PETITIONS (Purpose: to provide Council with information
necessary to cra t wise po icy. ways ou ing towar t e uture, not monitoring past)
(a) RECOGNITION OF DONATION FROM STFARNSWOOD COMPANY FOR TREE STORAGE
GRAVEL BED CONS IRUCTION
No action.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF AND UPDATE ON AMERESCO PROJECT
Action —
(b) DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE CITY CHARTER AMENDMENTS (NUMBER OF COUNCIL MEMBERS;
FOUR -YEAR TERM FOR MAYOR)
Action -
10. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SALE OF GF.,NF.RAL OBLIGATION MEDICAL FACILITIES
REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIFS 2010A AND TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION
MEDICAL FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2010B
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE HUTCIINSON HRA
ADMINISTRA'T'ION OF NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT'
PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR OWNER OCCUPIED REHAB
NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD, APPROVAL. OF CITY OF HUTCHINSON SECTION 3 PLAN
RELATING TO NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT AND APPROVAL OF EXECUTION OF
SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT CRAP -09- 0077- 0 -FY 10
Action Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(c) DISCUSSION AND REVIEW OF ORDINANCE NO. 10 -0548 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 93 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE PERTAINING TO ANIMALS
Action —
CITYCOUNCIL A(iFNDA —MAY 11, 2010
(d) CLOSET) SESSION PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTE 13D.05, SUBD. 3(C) TO DISCUSS
MN /DOT TRUNK HIGHWAY 7/15 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS (442 MAIN STREET NORTI1, 454
MAIN STREET NORT11, 466 MAIN STREET NORTH, 480 MAIN STREET NORTH, 2564 1H AVENUE
N W, 264 4" AVENUE NW, 9 4 NE, 11 4TH AVENUE NE, 13 4TH AVENUE NE, 15 4TH
AVENUE NE, 17 4TH AVENUE NE, 25 4TII AVENUE NE, 35 4TH AVENUE NE, 45 4TII AVENUE
NE & 426 PROSPECT STREET NF.)
Action -
(e) CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTE, 13D.05, SUBD. 3(C) TO DISCUSS
MONTANA STRL'E'I' NW PLAT AND POTENTIAL PROPERTY T'RANSFF.RS (620 HWY 7 WEST)
Action -
11. GOVERNANCE ( Purpose: toassesspastorganizationalperformance, developpolicyy that guides the organization and
ounci�e the logistics of the Council. May include monitoringreports, policy development and governance
Process items.)
(a) FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR APRIL 2010
(h) PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 22, 2010
(c) RESOURCE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM MAY 4, 2011
No action required for Items I I(a) — I I(c).
12. MISCELLANEOUS
13. ADJOURN
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING — 11UTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 2010
1. CALL TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Protern Bill Arndt called the meeting to order. Members present were Jim I Iaugen and Chad Czmowski.
Members absent were Steve Cook and Eric Yost. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Kent
FFxner, City Engineer, and Marc Sebora, City Attorney.
2. INVOCATION - Pastor Wayne Morrison, Seventh Day Adventist Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE, OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
5. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 13, 2010
Motion by Czmowski, second by Haugen, to approve the minutes from April 13, 2010. Motion carried
unanimously.
6. CONSENT AGENDA ( Purpose: onlyfor items requiringg Council approval by external entities that would otherwise
rive een a egader to t e (:ity Administrator. Traditiona!!y. items are not discussed)
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 10 -0544 —AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 36.8 ACRES OF
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 7, HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP (SECOND READING
AND ADOPTION)
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
1. CONSIDERA'T'ION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF "HUFCHINSON MALL PLAT
3" SUBMI'T'TED BY GUS WURDELL, CHIEF MANAGER, SOUTHERN PRAIRIE
DEVELOPMENT LLC WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
(ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13723)
2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT OF PRESENT PARKING
LOT UP TO PROPERTY LINES AT ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER INC., LOCATED AT 405
CALIFORNIA STREET NW AS REQUESTED BY DR. JOHN FRONING WITH FAVORABLE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13724)
CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF
HU1'CHINSON TO RELOCATE EXISTING LIFE LINK TRAILER AT THE I1UTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13725)
4. CONSIDERATION OF REZONING RECENTLY ANNEXED 5.6 ACRES OWNED BY
HUTCIIINSON EDA FROM R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO 11 (LIGHT
DO-
07 "YCOUNCII MINUTES APRIL 27, 2010
INDUSTRIAL PARK) LOCATED EAST OF CUSTOMER ELATIONS, 1150 5'" AVF,NUF SE
WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 13726 AND WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 10 -0547 FOR MAY 11, 2010)
(d) APPOINTMENT OF STACEY NASS TO PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD TO APRIL 2012 (FILLING
VACANCY OF YVONNF, JOHNSON)
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF I'T'EMS FOR ADAMS STREE'r AND WASHINGTON
AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 10 -01) INCLUDING A
PROJECT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
(f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVALS AND PERMITS FOR THE 67`" ANNUAL HU 1'CHINSON
JAYCEE WATER CARNIVAL FOR JUNE 14 — 20, 2010
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL Ol' ISSUING TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE TO DEAN
SCIILUETER TO OPERATE., A SEASONAL GREENHOUSE, LOCATED AT 1350 HWY 15 SOUTH
(h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUl' -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR TOM KLOSS TO ATTEND
CITY WORKS (GAS AND ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE SOFTWARE) TRAINING IN ST.
GEORGE., UTAH
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO SILVER I.AKF.,
CAPITAL PARTNERS
(j) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SE'TT1NG VARIANCE WORKSHOP PRESENTED BY THE
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ON MAY 18, 2010, AT 6:30 P.M,
(k) CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
Items 6(c)l, 6(c)2, and 6(c)3 were pulled for separate discussion,
Motion by Haugen, second by Czmowski, to approve consent agenda with the exception of the items noted
above. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 6(e)1 had further discussion. Gary Plotz, City Administrator, read comments provided by Mayor Steve
Cook in his absence. Mayor Cook expressed concern about approving the plat at this time. 'These concerns
are in the areas of increased traffic at uncontrolled entrances, insufficient information about new parking lot
in the west lot, and snow storage. Kent Exner, City Engineer, spoke about snow being stored near the
drainage ditch. The snow should not be stored in the ditch flow line. Mr. Exner also noted that a dimension
drawing has not been received yet relating to drive aisles and parking stalls.
Gus Wurdell, applicant, presented before the Council. Mr. Wurdell explained that he was not aware that the
City was requesting further information related to dimensional drawings other than what he presented at the
Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Wurdell noted that the snow will be stored /removed accordingly.
Mr. Wurdell noted the traffic concerns should be mitigated by the site plan. Mr. Exner noted that the
Drawing provided still shows parking going beyond the existing pavement, which is not allowed. Parking is
the main issue related to this plat.
Council Member Eric Yost arrived at 5:50 p.m.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Haugen, to approve Item 6(c)2 pending the receipt of dimensional
drawings from the applicant showing the parking configuration. Motion carried unanimously.
Joe Fredrichs, Bufl'alo Wild Wings, presented before the Council, Mr. Fredrichs provided a sketch drawing
CITY COUNCIL MINUTF,.S — APRIL 27. 2010
of the site
Item 6(c)2 had further discussion. Gary Plotz, City Administrator, read comments provided by Mayor Steve
Cook in his absence. Mayor Cook noted that a revised Resolution has been provided that better defines the
items of the hardship. The hardship is due to the uniqueness of the irregularly shaped lot. The footprint of
the building is not changing, the applicant did not create the hardship and the character of the neighborhood
is not being altered.
Motion by Czinowski, second by Haugen, to approve revised Resolution No. 13724. Motion carried
unanimously.
Item 6(c)3 had further discussion. Gary Plotz, City Administrator, read comments provided by Mayor Steve
Cook in his absence. Mayor Cook expressed that he feels conditions should be placed on the conditional use
including paved parking for the Life Link trailer, paved parking should be provided for the civil air patrol
trailer since their access and room will be cut off with the placement of the Life Link trailer, the property
that the Life Link trailer used to be should be restored and landscaped to original condition, a driveway must
be added to access the hangars to the south and utilities must be restored and maintained as appropriate.
John Olson, Public Works Manager, presented before the Council. Mr. Olson noted that a well /septic
system is in place for utilities service. Those services will be extended to the placement of the trailer. Mr.
Olson explained the location of the structures on the site along with parking configurations.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Yost, to approve Item 6(c)3. Motion carried unanimously.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:00 P.M.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF COMMENTS AND INPUT ON THE STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
John Paulson, Environmental Specialist, presented before the Council. Mr. Paulson explained that per the
requirements ofthe MPCA, the City must have a public hearing and consider comments on the Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Report for 2009. This regulation applies to all cities that are determined
to have and maintain a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. Mr. Paulson provided an overview of the
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System report. Mr. Paulson reviewed public education and outreach of the
program, illicit discharge detection and elimination, construction site stormwater runoff control, post
construction stormwater management, and pollution prevention/good housekeeping
Motion by Czmowski, second by Haugen, to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
No action required.
8. COMMUNICATIONS RF UES'PS AND PETITIONS (Purpose: to provide Council with irrfornrution
necessary to crq t wise po icy. ways on ing lowara [ e uture, not mortbring post)
(a) DISCUSSION OF THE KEEPING OF BEES WITIIIN HUTCHINSON CITY LIMITS
Council Member Bill Arndt noted he has received several comments on this topic. Gary Plotz, City
Administrator, read comments provided by the Mayor in his absence. Mayor Cook has expressed that he
feels raising bees should be allowed, however there should be restrictions and requirements included in the
ordinance such as having to register with a fee, direct neighbors must sign off with their permission, 80% of
neighbors within 100 feet of the property must approve, limit of two hives, yard must be fenced, hives
should be at least 15 feet from the fence, hives must be maintained, constant water source must be provided,
Flyway of at least six feet must be provided to direct bees up over people, City has to be held harmless, and
there should be a sign -off that the applicant understands that the City sprays for mosquitoes and there will be
no claims against perceived or actual harm to the hives.
Marc Sebora, City Attorney, noted that several regulations could be put in place in the current ordinance.
Mr. Sebora explained that a honeybee is considered an animal due to the product it produces, which is
considered agricultural.
5tk)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES— APRIL 27. 2010
Council Member Czmowski suggested that Attorney Sebora draft an ordinance amendment mirroring
regulations contained in the ordinances of Minneapolis and St. Paul. IIe does feel that 100% of the
neighbors within 100 feet of the property should be in agreement versus 80 %.
Dan Hatten, Chief of Police, presented before the Council. Chief Hatten asked that the Council consider
how the City will have the ability to regulate stringent controls that may be contained in a new ordinance.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CITY OF IIUTCHINSON RETIREMENT INCENTIVE
PROGRAM
Brenda Ewing, Human Resources Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Ewing explained that staff
has held informational meetings with employees pertaining to this item and a health care savings plan as
directed by the Council. Ms. Ewing explained that some feedback has been received from employees who
attended the informational meetings. Ms. Ewing reviewed the eligibility requirements for an employee to be
part of the retirement incentive program. Employees must meet age and service requirements necessary to
collect a pension benefit from PERA, have a certain number of years of service with the City (option to be
decided by Council), retire from current full time or part time employment with the City by December 31,
2010, and make a decision to accept the retirement incentive program by June 30, 2010. Ms. Ewing then
reviewed the components of the retirement incentive that were presented at the last Council meeting.
Council Member Yost asked if any computations have been configured in order to see when savings will be
had. Ms. Ewing explained that those computations really depend on when an employee quits working and is
officially off the City's payroll.
Jeremy Carter, Finance Director, spoke on the variables that will equate to dollar savings of this program.
Motion by Czrnowski, second by Haugen, to approve City of Hutchinson retirement incentive program
choosing Option #4 (15 years of service with PF.RA employers, with a minimum of 10 years service with the
City of Hutchinson). Gary Plotz, City Administrator, read comments provided by the mayor in his absence.
Mayor Cook noted that he felt there should be an established deadline when employees need to state their
intention. I Ie liked Option #3 (at least 15 years of service with the City) and he noted involuntary lay -off's
may also be a possibility. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDING PERSONNEL POLICY AND ESTABLISHING
AND ADMINISTERING A HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN WITH TIIE MINNESOTA STATE.
RETIREMENT SYSTEM (ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS 13714 AND 13715)
Brenda Ewing, Human Resources Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Ewing explained that the
consensus of those that attended the informational meetings were mainly in favor of this plan. The plan that
was proposed included a sick leave severance whereby all employees eligible for retirement severance
payments would contribute 100% of the employee sick leave retirement severance for the IICSP; a
retirement incentive severance whereby all employees eligible for a retirement incentive severance payment
would contribute 50% of employee retirement incentive severance based on years ol'service to the HCSP
and would receive 50% in cash $20,000 maximum) and 100% of the retirement severance payment in the
amount equal to six months of employer provided health and dental insurance premiums to the HCSP.
Based on feedback received from those eligible for the retirement incentive program, the proposal has been
modified as follows: a retirement incentive severance whereby all employees eligible for a retirement
incentive severance payment would contribute 25% or employee retirement incentive severance based on
years of service to the HCSP and would receive 75% in cash ($20,000 maximum) and 100% payment of
annual sick leave payout will go into IICSP. The options whereby 100% of the employee sick leave
retirement severance and 100% of the six months of employer provided health and dental insurance
premiums going to the HCSP will remain the same. The program approved will need to remain in place for
two years before any changes are made to it.
Motion by Yost, second by Czmowski, to approve amending personnel policy and establishing and
4 �J
CITY COUNCIL AHNUTF,S — APRIL 27, 2010
administering a health care savings plan, adopting Resolution Nos. 13714 and 13715, with the revisions
presented this evening. Motion carried unanimously.
10. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAI.OF PROPOSAL TO RELOCATE FARMERS MARKET TO FIRST
AVENUE SE
Miles Seppelt, EDA Director, presented before the Council, Mr, Sepppelt explained that the Farmers' Market
was held in the VFW parking lot last year after spending more than 30 years on l St Avenue SF., Due to the
pending construction at the intersection of Adams Street/Washington Avenue, a new location will need to be
sought for this year. Various locations have been reviewed. The recommendation of the Hutchinson
Downtown Association is to relocate the Market to its previous location, which is I'` Avenue SE (between
Main Street and Hassan Street).
Chief Dan Hatten presented before the Council. Chief Hatten noted that the proposal is workable with the
revision of closing the entire street and leaving no portion open (which has been proposed to give access to
the alley for delivery trucks). if any delivery vehicle would need to get to neighboring businesses, the police
department will assist with delivery vehicles.
Bryce Gnmdahl, Drop -n -Go, neighboring property, presented before the Council. Mr. Grundahl raised
concerns with closing 1 5i Avenue, especially on Wednesdays.
Judy Kopesky, Crown Financial, neighboring property, presented before the Council. Ms. Kopesky raised
concerns over the location of Farmers' Market on I" Avenue as well.
Council Member Arndt noted that since this project is that of the Hutchinson Downtown Association, they
obviously wish to keep it in the downtown area. Council Member Arndt further noted that the Council
needs to be cognizant of the business owners on Main Street.
Mike Cannon, Hutchinson Downtown Association, presented before the Council. Mr, Cannon explained the
space needs for the Farmers' Market. Visibility from Main Street is an important marketing point for the
farmers in the market.
General discussion was held regarding alley access. Various other locations for the Farmers' Market were
suggested such as Hassan Street between 1'` and 2 id Avenue, city parking lot between Citizens Bank and
Park Elementary, and I" Avenue SW.
Mark Cormier, Hutchinson Downtown Association, presented before the Council. Mr. Cormier expressed
that the Farmers' Market is very viable for the downtown area and they need to have a permanent location.
Gus Wurdell, Hutchinson Downtown Association, presented before the Council. Mr. Wurdell also
expressed the viability of the Farmers' Market to the downtown.
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner did note that the Washington/Adams
Street is a one -year project, so i I'the Council wishes, a one -year term could be placed on the new location.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Haugen, to close IS` Avenue SE completely and relocate the Farmers'
Market for one year to that location and begin to work on locating a permanent location in late 2010 /early
2011. Roll call vote: Haugen aye; Yost — nay; Czmowski — aye; Arndt -- aye. Motion carried 3 to 1.
(b) DISCUSSION OF AND UPDATE ON AMERESCO PROJECT
Motion by Czmowski, second by Yost, to table this item to May 11, 2010. Motion carried unanimously.
(c) DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE CITY CIIARTE,R AMENDMENTS (NUMBER OF COUNCIL MEMBERS;
FOUR -YEAR TERM FOR MAYOR)
Motion by Czmowski, second by Haugen, to table this item to May 11, 2010. Motion carried unanimously
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -- APRIL 27. 2010
11. GOVERNANCE ( Purpose: toassesspast organ izationalpar rmance, developpolicythatguides the organizationand
(.ouncr an manage the logistics' of the Council. May include inonitoring reports, policy development and governance
process ilems.)
(a) CITY OF IIUTCIIINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MARCII 2010
(b) CITY OF IIUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR MARCI 12010
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM MARCH 16, 2010
(d) JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 17, 2010
(e) I IUTCI IINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD MINUTES FROM MARCH
16, 2010
No action required for Items I I (a) — I I (e).
12. MISCELLANEOUS
Bill Arndt — Council Member Arndt commented on the fencing at the cemetery. Neighbors have expressed
that they would rather view the cemetery as opposed to a fence. Kent Exner will attempt to work with
property owners on this issue.
Kent F.xner — Mr. Exner explained that bids were received today on the Washington/Adams project and
came in approximately 10% less than the engineer's estimate. McLeod County is administering the
project. General discussion was held regarding construction and detour routes. Mr. Exner reviewed other
projects being conducted in the area by Mcleod County and Mn/DOT.
13. ADJOURN
Motion by Czmowski, second by Yost, to adjourn at 8:05 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
6
5 6-)
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 4, 2010 - 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER — 6:00 P.M.
Mayor Steve Cook called the meeting to order. Members present were Jim Iiaugen, Bill Arndt, Eric
Yost and Chad Czmowski. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Kent Exner, City
Engineer, and Marc Sebora, City Attorney.
2. PUBLIC HEARING
(a) SIIERWOOD STREET SE EXTENSION (LETTING NO, 2, PROJECT NO, 10 -02), TRUNK
HWY 15 WATERMAIN LINING (LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 10 -08 ) AND STREET
SEALCOATTNG (LETTING NO, 12, PROJECT NO, 10 -13) PROJECTS (ORDERING
IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS)
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner explained that the Sherwood
Street project will be assessed, however the other two projects will not be assessed. The
Sherwood Street project is estimated at $1,020,000 with $760,000 being assessable. The
remaining costs of the project will be covered with bonding and water /wastewater /stormwater
funds. General discussion was held regarding the road extension and other future roadways on
various properties in the area.
Mr. Exner then reviewed the Trunk Hwy 15 Watermain lining project. The watermain will run
from 4 Avenue South to Oakland Avenue SF, by cured- in-place -pipe liner method construction.
The estimated project cost is $524,000 with funding coming from bonding and
water /wastewater / stormwater funds.
Mr. Exner noted that the cities of Golden Valley and Fridley are instituting the same type of
pproject, so it is being proposed to bid the three cities' projects as one with an established schedule.
F,ach city would have the authority to revise their own project.
Lastly, Mr. Exner and John Olson, Public Works Manager, reviewed the street scalcoating project
The estimated total project costs are at $348,000. The identifying street segments will be
determined by the Pavement Management Program analysis and staff review. Mr. Olson reviewed
the specific streets that are proposed to be included in the sealcoating project. Mr. Olson also
reviewed the project process.
Motion by Arndt, second by I3augen, to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Yost, to approve proceeding with the projects noted above.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITII
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. FOR TRUNK HWY 15 WATERMAIN LINING
PROJECT
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner explained that since the
cured -in- place -pipe liner method of the pipe rehabilitation (or the Trunk Ilwy 15 watermain lining
project is a relatively new method, it is being proposed to utilize the services of SEH to collect
5(,6)
data, prepare bid documents, provide bidding process assistance and administer construction
services for the project. The not -to- exceed total fee amount is $68,509. Mayor Cook
recommended re- evaluating the consultant pool and trying to utilize other firms when available.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Arndt, to approve engineering services agreement with Short
Elliott Hendrickson Inc. for Trunk Hwy 15 watermain lining project. Motion carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT -OIL -STATE TRAVFL FOR KENT EXNER TO
ATTFND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC
WORKS CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION IN BOSTON, MA, FROM AUGUST 15 - 18, 2010
Mayor Cook clarified the policy on out -of -state travel being every other year.
Motion by Haupon, second by Cook, to approve out -of -state travel for Kent Exner to attend the
American Public Works Association International Public Works Congress and Exposition in
Boston, MA from August 15 - 18, 2010. Motion carried unanimously.
(c) RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY OF HUTCHINSON WEB SITE AS OFFICIAL
PUBLICATION
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner explained that the
Construction Bulletin recently closed its operation. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429
(improvement pro ects) , advertisements for bids must be placed in a trade paper, which the
Construction Bulletin was. Mr. Exner explained that according to the League of Minnesota Cities,
a city can designate their web site as the official publication in place of a trade paper.
Motion by Ilaugen, second by Arndt, approved Resolution No. 13733. Mr. Exner noted that a
notice will be sent to the City's typical contractors informing them of the new advertising
medium. Motion carried unanimously.
MISCELLANEOUS
KENT EXNER - Mr. Fxner noted that construction may begin the middle of next week on the
Washington/Adams Street.
MAYOR COOK - Mayor Cook suggested puttin together a five -year budget and making annual
adjustments as needed. The general consensus of tKe Council was to move forward with compilation
of a five -year budget.
Mayor Cook updated the Council on the status of the sales tax proposal at the legislature.
Mayor Cook also noted that Lindsay Whalen Day is Friday, May 7, 2010. Several events are being
planned at the Event Center beginning at 5:00 p.m.
4. ADJOURN
Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, to adjourn at 6:55 p.m.
�L6)
RESOLUTION NO. 13737
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, the Police Chief, City Engineer and Public Works Manager agree that the following areas
have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locates as points where traffic
control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision l of the Hutchinson City Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes the following traffic control devices shall be installed and enforced:
L Washington Ave W (Grove St W to Glen St W)
a. "NO U- TURN" on Washington Ave W between Grove St W and Glen St W.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
14UTCHINSON:
Adopted by the City Council this l Ith day of May, 2010.
Steven Cook
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clary D. Plotz
City Administrator
1, C�3)
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 10 -0547
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, TO REZONE A
5.6 ACRE PROPERTY FROM R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO I -1
(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK), REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF CUSTOMER
ELATIONS,1150- 5 AVENUE S.E.
TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was made
to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interests of the City to rezone
the property from R -1 (Single Family Residential).to 1 -1 (Light Industrial Park)
Section 2. That the property to be rezoned to I -1 (Light Industrial Park) is described as follows:
That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29 West,
McLeod County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter with the south line
of McLeod County IIighway Right of' Way Plat No. 47, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence
southerly, along said east line 565.94 feet to the northerly line or the Railroad right of way in said West
Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence westerly, along said northerly line of the Railroad right of way
445.13 feet to the centerline of Arch Street as shown on said McLeod County Highway Right of Way Plat
No. 47 (formerly the Glencoe and Hutchinson Road); thence northwesterly, along said centerline 74.78
('eel to the southeasterly corner of I lutchinson Fifth Avenue Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat
thereof; thence northerly, along the east line of said Hutchinson Fifth Avenue Industrial Park 536.25 feet
to said south line of McLeod County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 47; thence easterly, along said
south line to the point of beginning.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 11 ° ' day of May, 2010.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Steven W. Cook, Mayor
t-'�( k)a
April 26, 2010
10: Honorable Mayor & City Council
From: Airport Commission, Chuck Brill, Chair
Subject: Request to close airport For air show
HUTCH (NSON MUNICIPAL AIRPOWV
Operations & Maintenance
1400 ADAMS q'R-EET SE
1 -iUTCI IINSON, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234 -4287; Fax (320) 234 -6971
Hutchinson Aviation (320) 587 -7615
Mr. Robert Hantge, 1210 Lewis Ave SW, Hutchinson, on behalf of a group of aviators, has requested
permission to close the Hutchinson Municipal Airport from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturday August 7,
2010 in order to conduct an air show, with the rain day schedule being 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sunday
August 8, 2010.
A motion was passed unanimously at the April 22 Airport Commission meeting requesting that the City
Council grant permission for the air show.
All notification requirements to Mn /DOT, FAA and other appropriate agencies will be the responsibility of
Mr. Hantge or his employees, agents, or contractors.
We request you authorize City staff to sign a letter allowing the closure and that you adopt the following
motion at your May 11, 2010 City Council meeting.
Proposed Motion:
Permission is granted to Mr. Robert I lantge to close Hutchinson Municipal Airport between 2:00 p.m, and
5:00 p.m. on Saturday August 7, 2010, and, if necessary for weather delays, on Sunday August 8, 2010,
Mr. I lantge is responsible for fulfilling all requirements necessary for conducting these activities on a
public airport.
tit C)
May 11, 2010
Mr. Robert I lantge
1210 Lewis Ave SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350
You have been granted permission to conduct an airshow at Hutchinson Municipal Airport on Saturday
August 7, 2010 between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. and, if necessary for weather delays between 2:00 p.m.
and 4:00 p.m. on Sunday August R, 2010.
You are responsible for fulfilling all requirements and notifications necessary for conducting such
operations on a public airport and must present such notifications to the City upon request.
Sincerely,
John Olson,
Public Works Manager
Airport Manager
� hr-)
May 5, 2010
Dear City Council Members,
I would like to appoint Verne Meyer to fill the vacancy on the Police Commission. Verne's past
experience as an HR director at HTI, current work as a search consultant and his experience and
leadership on a variety of community boards makes him well qualified for this position. Verne has also
met with Chief Hatten and the Chief has stated that Verne would be a good choice.
I would appreciate your support of his appointment.
Sincerely, Mayor Steve Cook
FrIVIPA
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Chief Dan Hatten
DATE: May 4, 2010
RE: Dairy Days
I am in receipt of a letter from the Chamber CVB's Agri Business Committee in reference to
the Dairy Days Celebration on Friday, June 11, 2010. My staff and I have reviewed their
request regarding the closing of 1" Ave SE between Main St. and Hassan St. between 9:00
a.m. and 3 p.m. on June 11, 2010.
I am comfortable that the police department can safely accommodate their request.
However, it is my suggestion that 1 "Ave. be closed from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. This would
allow my department to close the street minimizing the effect to the citizens who normally
use this street on a day to day basis.
/lkg
2010 -01 -0010
c, (e)
L Moon Street tiOLIth
I Inahlnson, MN 55350
Chamber of Commerce
Convention & Visitors Bureau
April 15, 2010
Sergeant Eric Kilian
Hutchinson Police Services
10 Franklin St SW
Hutchinson. MN 55350
Dear Sergeant Kilian,
320.5!17.52 52
80(7.572.0689
Fax 520.587.4752
III fu(`)cxp l„ roh a tr hin.son.com
www.cxplor hutchin.son., oin
On behalf of the Chamber CVB's Agri- Business Committee I would like to make a
request to close First Ave SE between Main Street and Hassan Street.
'Phis request is for our annual Dairy Day Celebration on Friday, dune 11, 2010 in
Library Square. We would like to use First Ave SE for the tractor club and equipment
displays. We currently have Library Square reserved from 9:00 am until 3:00 pm. The
tractors would be brought in Friday morning after 9:00 am. The event is scheduled to run
until 1:30 pm, but we are requesting 3:00 pm to allow for clean -up.
If you have any questions, or if the committee can be of any assistance, please give me a
call at 320- 234 -0786 or email me at an�elg,(de xnlorchutchinson.com .
Thank you for your help.
Sin Wely,
AngelaBrandel
Membership Services
I�i5N
wAy ah
� fhI -5 yerhov�
khdw
fo 1G.r4
c �� O a;v y �• y 5 , �
.tr /— A V'9 v[-J' +
��C15 �C�v r 5� -
r�a JA �5
c� C�)
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Chief Dan Hatten )o
DATE: May 4, 2010
RE: Connect Care Dance
I am in receipt of a dance permit from Connect Care in reference to a dance at the McLeod
County Fair Grounds on October 29, 2010.
My staff and I have review the permit and recommend approval with the stipulation that
Connect Care contract security with the McLeod County SherrifYs Posse due to the fact
that the event will be held at the McLeod County Fairgrounds.
1lkg
2010 -01 -0009
(" (-0
Ppr 19 a010 11:4anm CITY OF HUTCHINSON
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $55.00
* 54,0 -7�
N
1! 10 ; iv-
ME
�r -f)
Jim I19I:01 I1
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Chief Dan Hatten
DATE: May 6, 2010
RE: Legion Dance
I am in receipt of a dance permit from American Legion Post 96 in reference to an outdoor
dance on June 19, 2010 from 8:00 p.m. to Midnight. The dance would be held in the back
parking lot of the American Legion.
My staff and I have review the permit and recommend approval with the stipulations that
the Legion, comply with city ordinances including but not limited to stipulations regarding
their liquor license, contract with Hutchinson Police Department for 2 officers for security.
They would also be required to in close the parking lot with adequate fencing and monitor
the fence in are in insure all alcoholic beverages remains within the approved area.
/Ikg
2010 -01 -0011
(,,1,_0
APPLICATION FOR P[JBL[C DANCE PERMIT
FEE $55.00
Si f,Applicant
I
MEMORANDUM
POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Dan Hatten, Director of Police / Emergency Management Services
DATE: May 6, 2010
RE: Consent Agenda - Safe & Sober Grant Agreement
Attached to this memorandum is the resolution authorizing this department to participate in
the Minnesota Department of Public Safety - Office of Traffic Safety project entitled Safe &
Sober. This agreement requires the authorization of the Hutchinson City Council.
This department has been a participant of the Safe & Sober projects offered by the State
over the years. If you have any questions regarding this please contact me.
/Ikg
2010 -01 -0012
(a ( 4
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
Be it resolved that Hutchinson Police Services enter into a grant Agreement(s)
with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety or the Minnesota State
Patrol for Traffic Safety Enforcement projects during the period from October 1, 2010 through
September 30, 2012,
T Sheriff of McLeod County is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and
amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of Hutchinson Police Services
and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant.
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the Hutchinson City Council
of Hutchinson, Minnesota on
SIGNED:
WITNESSETH:
(Signature) (Signature)
(Title) (Title)
(Dale)
(Date)
t'(�)
Minimum state building permit surcharge changes for a year
The Minnesota Statutes §3268.148 "SURCHARGE" has been changed for one year
effective July 1, 2010, until June 30, 2011.
The change only applies to the "Permits based on Fixed Fees, Part I" and "Permits based
on Fixed Fees, Part 2" portions of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry's
(DI,I) surcharge reporting form.
1'he minimum surcharge for a "fixed fee" permit is $5, beginning July 1, 2010
• Municipalities must begin collecting the $5 minimum surcharge fee July 1, 2010,
and continue to collect the new minimum through June 30, 2011.
• If the fee collected for the "fixed fee" permit is less than $10,010, the surcharge is
$5. Fixed fee permits with a fee of less than $10,010 are reported in "Permits
based on Fixed Fees, Part 1" of the surcharge form.
If the fee collected for the "fixed fee" permit exceeds $10,010, the fee is
multiplied by .0005 because $10,010 is the point where the surcharge would
increase to $5.01. Fixed fee permits with a fee of $10,010 or more are reported in
"Permits based on Fixed Fees, Part 2" of the surcharge form.
The remainder of the surcharge law did not change
(h ttps://www.revisor,mn.gov/st,itute s/?id= 326B. 148
The change to the surcharge law is underlined below:
Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 3266.148, subdivision I, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1, Computation. To defray the costs of administering sections
3266.101 to 326B.194, a surcharge is imposed on all permits issued by municipalities in
connection with the construction of or addition or alteration to buildings and equipment
or appurtenances alter June 30, 1971. The commissioner may use any surplus in
surcharge receipts to award grants for code research and development and education.
If the fee for the permit issued is fixed in amount the surcharge is equivalent to one -
half mill (.0005) of the fee or 50 cents, except that effec July 1, 2010, until June
30, 2011, the permit surchar to one -half mill (,0005) of t he fee or $5,
whichever amount is greater.
New surcharge forms online Aug. 2
New surcharge forms with the change will be available for reporting on the DLI Web site
Aug. 2,2010.Goto http:// www - dli.mn.gov/CCLD /Surcharge.as to access the report
firms. The current reporting lorms will be available until Aug. 2, 2010.
To complete or change a surcharge report after Aug. 2, 2010, for a month or quarter
before July 2010, contact Cindy Chapel or Eileen McNiff at (651) 284 -5411, or via e-
mail at Cvnthia.Chaoel�u)state.mn.us or Eileen.McNiff a state.mn.us
C
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
RE: Consideration of 2010 Fee Schedule Revisions — Engineering — Plans & Specs
DATE: May 11, 2010
Due to the closing of the Construction Bulletin last week, we have been researching options for advertising and
providing on -line service to perspective bidders. In addition to advertising in the Hutchinson Leader, we will
be advertising upcoming projects on the City's website, the Mn /DOT eAdvert site, and the QuestCDN.com
site. Advertising on both the cAdvert site and the QuestCDN.com site are at no charge to the City.
In addition to advertising on the QuestCDN.com site, we will be uploading our plans and specifications. This
will enable perspective bidders to download the plans and specs for a tee of $20.00. Half of the $20.00 fee
will he retained by QuestCDN.com and half will be paid to the City.
Perspective bidders will still be able to obtain a paper copy of the plans and specs through the City at a fee of
$80.00.
Therefore the proposed revisions are as follows:
Public Works
Engineering
Plans and Specifications: Download $20.00
Paper Set $80.00
We recommend approving the revisions to the 2010 Fee Schedule.
cc: Gary Plolz— City Administrator
Cit of Hutchinson, MN
Public Works Rates - 201
Indic-a#e s chan from 2000 rate :s
Indicates unknown '09 rates
Item
Final desi _
Rates
20091
0
2011
ENGINEERING
Desi review*
15%
3.0%
10%
Final desi _
6.0%
13,0%
Construction review and stakin
6.0%
6_0%
Project AdmInistration
Pre Urnin a ry de velopnie ot #
7%
I , 0%
1,0%
Cantract administration
Z0%
2.0%
Co.rnpr&hensive nn1f)-a*
'(Download Set)
per sial fee
1
Testin services
0.0
$ 20
-milljoverla of street
0 needs fund*
Hatisin
1,0%
1.01.1/0
Finance/Le
Financial services
L services
Fis-cal
3%
1.0% 1-0%
1.0% 1,070
1.0%1 1,0%1
Standard it Rate
R e cf ev e I o p mentMewl Annexed
24.0%
24,0%
New Development
25.0%
25.0%
Developer Desi & Financed Rate Unimum Rate 7.0%1 T0%
EILI g ineerin g : Plans & Specifications (Paper Set
por set too
$
$ 80.00
En Plans & Specifications
I
$ 60.00
$ .6000
'(Download Set)
per sial fee
1
$ -
0.0
$ 20
- Me City fetuinz tf7e right to en a consultant ro complete a potilon of file En and Pro Admirlistratfon. The coveloper shall nave tne
preliminar and final plat approved prior to work co m me n cin on Anal d&si Financial assurancelbodin m e b e re uired for micro vem e r) t b e dre
completed b private de velopers. The de ve toper sh au meet all desi standaras ancr finan vial suret re me n is of the Cit
TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT RATES
Total street reconstruction
Per,gusted front foot
$ W 00
$ 80.00
Partial street reconstruction
Per adjusted front foot
$ 60.00
$ .6000
Street rehabilitation
adjusted front foot
$
$ 4T50
-milljoverla of street
- Per
Per adjusted front foot
_4T50
$ 30.00
$ X00
Water service lateral
L epl a ced d u ri n _ co ast ru cV reco instruct
$ 30000000
$ 3tomoo
Sewer service lateral
replaced durin con-struct/reconstruct
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00.
Storm sewer service lateral
replaced durin con strucVreconstruct
Water service lateral - new _t; P
to 'Into e �VC water main
$ 14425.00
$ 1,425,00
Sewer service lateral - new to
tap into existin PVC sewer main
$ 2
$ 2
Storm sewer service lateral
tap into existin PVC sewer main
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
woltl►R1 »I CVA-11-mol
❑ FAIR
❑ CIRCUS
❑ SHOWS /EXHIBITIONS
❑ DF,MONSTRA'1'IONS
❑ OTHER (Describe)__
❑ CARNIVALS
[] AMUSEMENT DEVICES
AMUSEMENT RIDES /GAMES
Please complete the following information (ink or typewriter, please) and submit the appropriate fee
along with this application to the City of Hutchinson, 111 Hassan Street, SE, Hutchinson, Minnesota
55350.
Full Name of Person Filing
Middle Last
Business Name & Address: \�
Business Telephone -. °1 ��� ti Alternate Telephone: 40Q - ;9SD - b 0 e42 9 _
If business is a partnership, please provide name of officers or if corporation, please provide corporate name.
Partnership_
Corporation
Mail permit to this address:
LOCATION OF
GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: v
DATES AND HOURS OF OPERA'T'ION: ,"�k �(, ,
\ �' e— 5 10 :CID wren - li3,L J
ARE STRUCTURES TO BE ERECTED? es L]
IN
No ❑ N/A If yes, please describe:
(JP (�-)
INSURANCE: Submit proof of SPECIAL EVENTS PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE, NAMING THE
CIT, Y OF HUTC14INSON AS "ADD m
"ADDITIONAL INSURED" in amounts not less than $500,000 per person and
$1.000.000 per accident.
CLEAN UP/DAMAGE DEPOSIT (Refundable) Large Events $1,000 BOND ❑ $1,000 CASH ❑
CLEAN UP/DAMAGE DEPOSIT (Refundable) Smaller Events $250 CASH ❑
N/A ❑
INDEMNIFICATION: 1 hereby indemnify and hold harmless the municipality and the City Council from any
liability in whatsoever manner arising which may be incurred by the licensee and the municipality as the result
of the operation of amusement rides, amusement devices, carnivals, fairs or demonstrations.
DA fE: 5 I � - 11)
Signature
Office Use Only:
Fee Approved:
Insurance Police Dept
Bond Inspection
Council
License Issued
Special ConditionK It
G ( V--)
r�
# # ## # # ## # ### ####
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
R55CKREG
LOG22001VO
Counci I Check Register
Check#
Ck Date
AMOUNT
Vendor /Explanation
Account Description
159888
4/28/2010
45 -51
ALLTEL
COMMUNICATIONS
159889
4/28/2010
135 -45
ARROW TERMINAL LLC
EQUIPMENT PARTS
159891
4/28/2010
945.00
381 INTERNATIONAL
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
159892
4/28/2010
4,254.71
BRYAN STREICH TRUCKING
FREIGHT - IN
159893
4/28/2010
115,813.31
HEALTH PARTNERS
EMPL.HEALTH & INS. BENEFIT
159894
4/28/2010
2,500.00
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
MISCELLANEOUS
159895
4/28/2010
5,501.26
MARLIN LEASING
RENTALS
159896
4/28/2010
5.00
MI NNESOTA D EPT O F MOTOR VEH I CL
CENTRAL GARAG E REPAIR
159897
4/28/2010
184.00
MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMIN HEAR
MISCELLANEOUS
159898
4/28/2010
32.00
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
LICENSES & TAXES
159899
4/28/2019
275.34
SPRINT
COMMUNICATIONS
159900
4/2812010
1,920.00
STREICH TRUCKING
FREIGHT - IN
159901
4/28/2014]
22,139.05
TREBELH OR IN &ASSOC
MOTOR FUELS& LUBRICANTS
159902
4/28/2010
20,092.27
VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
159903
4/28/2010
4314
WAL -MART COMMUNITY
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159904
4/2812010
106,373 -07
WASTE MANAGEMENT- WINSTED
REFUSE - HAULING
159906
5/11/2010
543.58
ACE HARDWARE
POSTAGE
159907
5111/2010
392.07
AEM MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159908
5/11/2010
188 -40
AMERICAN BOTTLING CO
COST OF SALES -MISC
159909
1 5/11/2010
3,39810
AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING CORP
OTHER CONTRACTUAL
159910
5/11/2010
264 -91
AMERICAN MESSAGING
COMMUNICATIONS
159911
5/11/2010
550.00
APWA
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFEREN CE
159912
5/11/2010
34.63
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE
SHOP MATERIALS
159913
5/11/2910
354.88
ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE INC
COST OF SALES -MISC
159914
5/11/2010
38.81
AUTO VALUE - GLENCOE
EQU IF MENT PARTS
159915
5/11/2010
9.13
. 6 & B SPORTS
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
159916
5/11/2010
75.00
&C PLUMBING & HEATING INC
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
159917
5/11/2010
4,910.95
1 BAILEY NURSERIES
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS
159918
5/11/2010
1,870.85
1 8 EACON ATHLETICS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
# # ## # # ## # ### ####
V
i1
159919
5/11/2010
405.14
B EN N ETT MATERIAL HAN DLI NG
RECEIVIED NOT VOUCH ERED
159920
5/11/2010
2,583.69
BERNICK'S
FOOD PRODUCTS- CONCESSION
159921
5/11/2010
26.67
BLADE PHOTO IMAGING & PORTRAIT
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159922
5/11/2010
4,040.00
BRYAN STRETCH TRUCKING
FREIGHT - IN
159923
5/11/2010
2,236.13
BUS] NESSWARE SOLUTIONS
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159924
5/11/2010
890.00
BUYSSE ROOFING OF ST. CLOUD
BUILDING REPAIRS
159925
5/11/2010
40,767.25
C& L DISTRIBUTING
COST OF SALES -BEER
159926
5/11/2010
125.00
C &C MACHINE INC
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
159927
5/11/2010
231.20
CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPUE
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
159928
5/11/2010
21 -99
CARR FLOWERS
MISCELLANEOUS
159929
5/11/2010
100.00
CARTER, RON
UNIFORMS & PERSON AL EQU I
159930
5JIV2010
398.28
CENTRAL H YDRAU LICS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
159931
5/11/2010
83 -29
COLLINS BROTHE RS
COST OF SALES -MiSC
159932
5/11/2010
199 -91
COMDATA CORPORATION
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159933
5/11/2010
104.47
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
CLEANING SUPPLIES
159934
5/11/2010
45.00
COREY, NiCHOLLE
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
159935
5/11/2010
1,256 -19
CORPORATE MECHANICAL
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159936
5/11/2030
95.26
CREATIVE DETAILS UPHOLSTERY
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
159937
5/11/2010
737.49
CREEKSIDE SOILS
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159938
5/11/2010
424.64
CROW RIVER AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
159939
5/11/2010
412.63
CUMMINS NPOWER, LLC
CONTRACT REPAIR& MAINTENANCE
159940
5/11/2010
42.00
DAAK REFRIGERATION
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159941
5/11/2010
6,154.50
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF SALES -BEER
159942
5/11/2010
827.86
DETROIT INDUSTRIAL TOOL
SMALL TOOLS
159943
5/11/2010
96 -00
DOLEZAL, JANET
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159944
5/11/2010
6,759.96
DPC INDUSTRIES INC
CHEMICALS & PRODUCTS
159945
5/11/2010
2,300.00
DUANE BLOCK TRUCKING INC
FREIGHT
159946
5/11/2010
104.02
DYNA SYSTEMS
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159947
5/11/2010
368.91
E2 ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159948
5/11/2010
10.68
EBERT, PAT
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
159949
5/11/2010
125.04
ECOLAB PEST EL1M
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159950
5/11/2010
88.68
ECONO FOODS
MEETINGS
159951
1 5/11/2010
200.00
ECONOMIC D EVELOP ME NT ASSN OF M
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
159952
1 5/11/2010
124.00
FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159953
5/11/2010
592.83
FASTENAL COMPANY
SAFETY SUPPLIES
159954
5/11/2010
38.00
FIRST CHOICE FOOD & BEVERAGES
OFFICESUPPLIES
159955
5/11/2010
452.48
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159956
5/11/2D10
15,374.79
FREMONT INDUSTRIES, INC
CHEMICALS& PRODUCTS
159957
5/11/2010
365.51
FRONTIER PRECISION INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
159958
5/11/2010
47.35
G & KSERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159959
5/11/2030
44,996.36
GARICK CORPORATION
RECEIVED NOT VC) UCH ERED
159960
5/11/2010
612.05
GEECO
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159961
5/11/2010
216.86
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT
CENTRAL GARA13 E R EPAIR
159962
5/11/2010
119.95
GOEBEL, JOSH
UNIFORMS& PERSONALEQUIP
159963
5/11/2010
1,680.00
GREAT LAKES ENTERPRISES INC
FREIGHT -IN
159964
5/11/2010
99.99
GROEHLER, FLOYD
SAFETY SUPPLIES
159965
5/11/2010
775.00
HAGEN TRUC KI NG INC
FREIGHT
159966
5/11/2010
1,853 -50
HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
COST OF SALES -BEER
159967
5/11/2010
175.54
HANSEN GRAVEL
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159968
5/11/2010
8,495.75
HANSON & VASEK CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159969
5/11/2010
275.00
HARTMAN, CHARLES
VARIANCE FEES
159970
5/11/2010
203.06
HEWLETT - PACKARD CO
0FFI CE SUPPLIES
159971
5/11/2010
125.27
HILLYARD/ HUTCHINSON
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159972
5/11/2010
1,315.50
HIERPE CONTRACTING
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159973
5/11/2010
74.58
HUTCH CAFE
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159974
5/11/2010
6,681.83
HUTCH SPORT SHOP
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159975
5/11/2010
100.00
HUTCHI NSON AREA CHAM B ER OF COM
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159976
5/11/2010
2,136.38
HUTCHI NSON AREA HEALTH CARE
COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
159977
5/11/2010
882.72
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
SMALL TOOLS
159978
5/11/2010
7,077.68
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
EM PL. HEALTH & INS. BENEFIT
159979
5/11/2010
1,500.00
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
MISCELLANEOUS
159980
5/11/2010
5,389.71
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159981
5/11/2010
14.79
JENSEN, JULIE
MISCELLANEOUS
159982
5/11/2010
1,017.80
IJ TAYLOR DIST OF MN
COST OF SALES -BEER
159983
5/11/2010
523.60
IN MACHINING & REPAIR
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159984
5/11/2010
16,917.83
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
COST OF SALES -M ISC
159985
5/11/2010
1,413.60
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS W
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFER ENCE
159986
5/11/2010
150.00
JOHNSON, IULIE
RECREATION ACTI VTTY FEES
O
159987
5/11/2010
175.00
IORDAHL, MICHELLE
OTHER REVENUES
159988
5/11/2010
38.57
JUNG CLAUS IMPLEMENT INC
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
159989
5/11/2010
7,080.10
IUUL CONTRACTING CO
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
159990
5/11/2010
37.03
KNIFE RIVER
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159991
5/11/2010
100.00
KOSEK, RICHARD
UNIFORMS & PERSON AL EQUIP
159992
5/11/2010
935.00
KRISTiCO, INC
FREIGHT
159993
5/11/2010
3,211.32
L & P SUPPLY CO
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
159994
5/11/2010
52.90
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
159995
5/11/2010
638-44
LIFE INSURANCE COM PANY OF AMER
EMP L.H EALTH & €NS. BENEFIT
159996
5111/2010
20,595.48
LOCHER BROTHERS INC
COST OF SALES -BEER
159997
5/11/2010
2,772.00
LYNDE & MCLEOD INC
RECEIVED NOT VOUCH ERED
159998
5/11/2010
1,980.52
M -R SIGN
SIGNS& STRIPPING MATERIALS
159999
5/11/2010
2,993.57
MACTEK SYSTEMS INC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
160000
5/11/2010
9.62
MARQUART, TRESSA
UNIFORMS & PERSONAL EQUIP
160001
5/11/2010
178.00
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR- TREASURE
LICENSES &TAXES
160002
5/11/2010
3,357.46
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR - TREASURE
LICE NSES & TAXES
160003
5/11/2010
867.00
M CLEOD COUNTY AU DITOR-TR EASU R E
LICE NSES & TAXES
160004
S /1112010
1,835.00
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR-TREASURE
LICENSES &TAXES
160005
5/11/2010
352.00
MCI.EOD COU NTY AUDITOR- TREASURE
LICE LASES &TAXES
160006
5/11/2010
1,816.00
MCLEOD COU NTY AU DITOR TREASURE
LICENSES &TAXES
160007
5/11/2010
2,354.00
MCLEOD COU NTY AUDITO R- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160008
5/11/2010
919.00
MCLEOD COU NTY AUDITO R- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160009
5/11/2010
368.00
MCLEOD COU NTY AUDITO R- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160010
5/11/2010
420.00
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160011
5/11/2010
440.00
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160012
5/11/2010
2,423.98
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR- TREASURE
LICENSES & TAXES
160013
5/11/2010
46.00
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
MISCELLANEOUS
160014
5111/2DI0
80.50
WLEDD COUNTY RECORDER
MISCELLANEOUS
160015
5/11/2010
274.00
WLEDD CO U NTY SHE Ri FF'S OFFICE
MISCELLANEOUS
160016
5/11/2010
59 -50
MEHR, BRIAN
TRAVEL SCH 00 L CONFERENCE
160017
5/11/2010
299.11
MENARDS HUTCHINSON
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160018
5/11/2010
6.18
MESSNER, KEITH
TRAVEL SCHOOL CO N FE RENCE
160019
5/11/2010
78.05
METRO FIRE
OPERATING SUPPLIES
(60020
5/11/2011)
58.50
MIES, MIKE
TRAVEL SCHOOL CO N FE RENCE
r�
160021
5/11/2010
83.34
MINI BIFF
RENTALS
160022
5/11/2010
1,245.00
MINNESOTA CLE
T RAVEL SOHO OL CO NFEREN CE
160023
5/11/2010
14,350.00
MINNESOTA REVE N U E
PERMITS
160024
5/11/2010
149.52
MINNESOTA SHREDDING
REFUSE - RECYCLING
160025
5/11/2010
3,734.63
MINNESOTA LINE MP LOY MENT I NSU RAN
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
160026
5/1112010
2,671.40
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
OTHER CONTRACTUAL
160027
5/11 /2010
150.00
MN GIS /US CONFERENCE
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
160028
5/11/2010
85.50
MODERN TOWING
OTHER CO NTRACTUAL
160029
5/11/2010
8,347.81
NATIONAL BARK SALES
RECEIVE D NOT VOUCH E R ED
160030
5/11/2010
268.95
NORTH CE NTRAL LABORATORIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160031
5/11 /2010
125 -00
NORTH SHO R E ANALYTI CAL I N C
OTHER CONTRACTUAL
160032
5/11/2010
229.40
NORTHERN STATES SU PP LY I N C
SMALLTOOLS
160033
5/11/20101
1,917.13
NU- TELECOM
MISCELLANEOUS
160034
5/11/2010
786.69
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
160035
5/11/2010
150.49
OFFICE OF ENTE R PRI SE TECH NOLOG
COMMUNICATIONS
160036
5/11/2010
540.00
OSTLUND SUPPLY
FREIGHT
160037
5111/2010
61.83
OVERHEAD DOOR OF ST.CLOUD INC
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160038
5/11/2010
17,588.68
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF SALES -WINE
160039
5/11/2010
21.44
POSITIVE ID INC
UNIFORMS & PERSONAL EQUIP
160040
5111/20101
585.00
POST BOARD
D U ES & SUBSCR I PTION S
160041
5/1112010
1,440.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
169042
5/11/2010
50.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
160043
5/11/2610
53.44
PRIEVE LANDSCAPING & LAWN CARE
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
160044
5/11/2010
109.72
PRO AUTO &TRANSMISSION REPAIR
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
160045
5/11/2010
19.20
PRO -BUILD
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160046
5/11/2010
270.93
PROMAXX TRUCK PARTS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
160047
5/11/2010
1,500.00
QUAUTY CONTROL &INTEGRATION
PRO FESSI ONAL SERVICES
160048
5/11/2010
14,638.65
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
COST OF SALES - LIQUOR
160049
5/11/2010
817.79
RBSCOTT EQUIPMENT
RECEIV €D NOT VOU Cif ERED
160050
5/11/2030
8,492.00
READY WATT ELECTRIC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
160051
5 /12 /2010
277.98
REED BUSINESS INFORMATION
ADVERTISING
160052
5111/2010
826.08
REFLECTIVE APPAREL FACTORY INC
SAFETY SUP PUES
160053
5111/2010
18,516.43
REINER ENTERPRISES, INC
FREIGHT
360054
5/11 /2010
210.00
REINER IRRIGATION & SEPTIC INC
CONTRACT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
160055
5/11/2010
285.00
RUNKE, DOREEN
OTHER CONTRACTUAL
160056
5/11/2010
381.01
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
REPAIR & MAI NTENANCE SUP PU ES
160057
5/11/2010
60.91
SALTMAN LLC
OPERAT €NG SUPPLIES
160058
5/11 /2010
69.77
SCHMELING OIL CO
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
160059
5/11/2010
109.50
SEPPELT, M€LES
CAR ALLOWANCE - TRAVEL
160060
5/11/2010
23,258.14
SHI INTERNATIO NAL CORP
OPERATING SUPPUES
160061
5/11/2010
71.98
SHOPKO
RECEIVED NOT VOUCHERED
160062
5/11/2010
180.62
SORENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
160063
5/11/2010
609.16
SOUTHERN MINNESOTA INSPECTION
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
160064
5/11/2010
1,704.90
ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC
CENTRAL GARAGE REPAIR
160065
5/11/2010
204.74
STANDARD PRINTING
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160066
5 /11 /2010
1,031.07
STAPLES ADVANTAGE
RECEIVED NOT VOUCHERED
160067
5/11/2010
3,360.00
STREICH TRUCKING
FROG HT - €N
160068
5/11/2010
233.96
STURGES, MATT
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
160069
5/11/2010
92.72
SUBWAY WEST
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160070
5/11/2010
9,263.50
SUNCOAST GARDEN PRODUCTS, INC.
RECEIVED NOT VOU CHERED
160071
5/11/2010
2,983.23
SUPERVALU INC
REFUNDS & REI MBURSE MENTS
160072
5/11/2010
20.00
TAPS -LYLE SCHROEDER
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160073
5/11/2010
166.74
TEN MECHAWCAL
REPAIR& MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
160074
5/11/2010
1,685.55
THE HARTFORD
EM PL. HEALTH & INS. BENEFIT
160075
5/11/2010
18,867.75
THE BELHORN &ASSOC
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
160076
5/11/2010
978.56
TRICO TCWI NO, INC
EQUi PM ENT PARTS
160077
5/11/2010
3,848.00
TWIN CITY PALLETS INC.
RECEIVED NOT VOU CHERED
160078
5/11/2010
181.59
U.S. WATER SERVICES
CHEMICALS & PRODUCES
160079
5/11/2010
1,701.18
USPS- HASLER
POSTAGE
160080
5/11/2010
74.76
VERTECH SOLUTIONS & SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160081
5/11/2010
11,006.30
VIKING BEER
COST OF SALES -BEER
160082
5/11/2010
814.75
VIKING COCA COLA
COST OF SALES -MISC
160083
5 /11 /2010
411.00
VINOCOPIAINC
COST OF SALES- LIQUOR
160D84
5/11/2010
815.78
WASTE MANAG EM ENT-TC WEST
REFUSE - RECYCLING
160085
5/11/2010
833.33
WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
160086
5/11/2010
562.02
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR
OPERATING SUPPLIES
160087
5/11/2010
95.25
WINE MERCHANTS INC
COST OF SALES -WINE
160088
5/11/2010
9,446.61
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
COST OF SALES -MISC
160089
5/11/2010
6,327.20
WORK CONNECTION, THE
OTHER CONTRACTUAL
160090
5/11/2010
755.46
XEROX CORP
COPY MACHINE
160091
5/11/2010
502.31
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
CENTRAL GARAG E R E PAIR
160092
5/11/2010
273.36
ZEP MANUFACTURING CO
SHOP MATERIALS
160093
5/11/2010
63.50
ZWI LLING, TROY
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCE
160094
5/11/2010
133.01
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
ACCRUED LIFE INSURANCE
160095
5/11/2010
502.64
H.A.R.T.
ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP
160096
5/11/2010
2,216.15
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
ACCRUED DEFERRED COMP
160097
5/11/2010
1,709.60
ING LIFE &ANN CO.
ACCRUED DEFERRED COMA
160098
5/11/2010
528.00
NCPERS LIFE INS.
ACCRUED LIFE INSURANCE
752,658.38
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Tota 15
Check Total
1 752,658.38
Total Payments
752,658.38
PAYROLL DATE: 05/07!2010
Period Ending Date: 05/1/2010
FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY - ELECTRONIC TRANSFER
TO STATE AND IRS
DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PACE
AMOUNT ACCT#
$22,570.85 9995.2034
$12,453.82 9995.2240
$3,685.31 9995.2242
NAME DESCRIPTION
WITH. TAX Employee Contribution - Federal Tax
ACCOUNT
Employee Contribution - Soc. Security
Employee Contribution - Medicare
$38,709.98 Sub -Total - Employee Contribution
$12,453.82
9995.2240 Employer Contribution - Social Security
$3,685.31
9995.2242 Employer Contribution - Medicare
Per Journal
Entries
Difference
Fica
$ 24,907.64
$16,139.13
Sub -Total - Employer Contribution
Medicare
$ 7,370.62
Withholding
$ 22,570.85
$54,849.11
Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account
Total
$ 54,849.11
$0.00
$10,583.05
9995.2035 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
State Tax
$ 10,583.05
$0.00
$17,190.94
9995.2241 PERA Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
$21,809.80
9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
$39,000.74
Sub -Total - PERA
$26.01
9995.2243 PERA -DCP Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
$25.01
9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
Pera
$ 39,026.75
$52.02
Sub - Total - DCP
DCP
$ 26.01
$39,052.76
GRAND TOTAL - PERA
Total
$ 39,05178
$0.00
Finance Director Approval
cs, ( I)
r�
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Fxner, City Engineer
RE: Consideration of Assessment Hearing for Adams St. & Washington Ave.
Reconstruction Project (Letting No. 1 /Project No. 10 -01)
DATE: May 11, 2010
The McLeod County Highway Department received five (5) bids for the Adams St. & Wahsington Ave.
Reconstruction project letting that were opened on Tuesday, April 27' (see attached Bid Tabulation)- R & R
Excavating of Hutchinson, MN, submitted the apparent low bid in the amount of $4,350,145.44- This bid is
approximately 10% lower than the final Engineer's Estimate this project. Also, the total bid amount includes
the City's watermain and sanitary sewer improvements at a total construction cost of $685,536.68 (also
approximately 10% lower than estimated). Due to these lower construction costs, City staff recommends that
the assessment rates /amounts for this project be slightly lower than previously communicated estimates (see
attached Assessment Roll for recommended rates /amounts).
Based on City staffs review, the bid by R & R Excavating appears to be complete and responsive. Also, the
McLeod County Board of Commissioners has approved the award of this project at their May 4'" meeting.
Attached is the final Assessment Roll and necessary Resolutions to award this project- City staff will provide a
brief overview of the bids and project prior to the Assessment Hearing. At this time, we have received very
limited feedback or questions from adjacent property owners since the January 12' Public Hearing for this
project.
We recommend approving the attached Assessment Roll and Resolutions.
cc: Gary Hotz -City Administrator
�]c�k_)
RESOLUTION NO. 13735
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5093
LETTING NO. 1 /PROJECT NO, 10 -01
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the
proposed assessment for improvement of:
Adams St (CSAH 25) & Washington Ave Reconstruction Project by new roadway
construction and utility infrastructure installations including construction of trunk and lateral
storm sewer and treatment/drainage improvements, trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and
services, trunk and lateral watermain and services, grading, aggregate base, concrete curb
and gutter, trail /sidewalk, concrete surfacing, lighting, landscaping, streetscaping,
restoration and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract
of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period often (10)
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2011 and shall bear
interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2010, until the 31st
day of December 2011. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to
the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Finance Department, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is
paid by the 15th day of November, 2010; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Finance
Department the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31 st day of
December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or
interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County
Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and
paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 11th day of May 2010.
Mayor
City Administrator
I �-X)
RESOLUTION NO. 13736
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 1/PROJECT NO. 10.01
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the improvement of:
Adams St (CSAH 25) & Washington Ave Reconstruction project by new roadway construction
and utility infrastructure installations including construction of trunk and lateral storm sewer and
treatment/drainage improvements, trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and services, trunk and
lateral watermain and services, grading, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter,
trail /sidewalk, concrete surfacing, lighting, landscaping, streetscaping, restoration and
appurtenances; and
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with
the advertisement:
Bidder
Amount Bid
R & R Excavating Inc
$4,350,145.44
Wagner Construction Inc
$4,450,256.25
Mathiowetz Construction
$4,492,356.52
Duininck Inc
$4,588,815.13
Nodland Construction Co Inc
$4,783,971.51
and whereas, it appears that R & R Excavating Inc of Hutchinson MN is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA.
1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with R & R
Excavating Inc of Hutchinson MN in the amount of $4,350,145.44 in the name of the City of Hutchinson,
for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
2. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made
with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until
satisfactory completion of the contract.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 11th day of May 2010.
Mayor
City Administrator
9(��
D110113ELED BY: P VAnnigia vecN.
AS Adbma Sa SE
ASSESSMEUT ROLL II SM
Lai 8 &oacS SaLdh HA C , - Ningi;mn
V V KA�
COST PER FRONT FOOT OR PER EACH
so OG
it
DMPUTEDBY P VANID�R VEEN
$000
LETTING NO. 1.9110JECT NG. 1041 � j
S4,60
STAUT COU nA FAW t1;56 V
32AM-00
66JI16
S2,MAO
HiECKeD VY. K EMER
1
2 23 MA UM
26 Ma., St SE
113.50
MILLJOVER LAY 3 Of OAK AND CU 5 T PER FRONT FOOT
53.25,
54.196 m
JMDE0 OF YEARS:
10
in
A4wm 51 JG3AH 25) & Wa6hin$om Ava Earl RaG;mff trua,*A Pmpm b
Z1,420M
s1a•100
$T REET50ARE U05T PER F ROINT FOOT
37-11-9.25
3.06
S7.1
TERIEST JUTE:
HL40W" PO 455334
11.8 �a � q 10
a 23 = 700
new dq" tweLtomm IM uhik ihdrAuvucwre inmaJiafiorm mcILFU1
MCh" J A DIM L dm*omgu
VMDA�
1 -M- WATER SERVICE COST RE EAGHI
&3.39750
1
soon
5T HEARING:
01 1202610
Wco
c4?u4rwc1Hm of Itunk Md bVhmW Klmm6ewer and biwman•irara mprc%crqcMr,
SIAMOD
$2.5D0.0F
ps
Jfir WAT I- f� S F RVIC E COS I PER EACH
di t� r94
1 Adams St-SE
Hk4chmW500 MIN
40 HEARING:
Dril(l 1121,10
T40 H UChMIXiCh
Uur-K ardd Uftw* -Mrrna- am jqrorA*. j -4mN� 4g~e tie* .4§w*N cu� ma q uaw.
W-W
1.42 .0
G C
5 fiVJER SC0Fd E GOS-C PER EACH
sow
a
$000
001IPTIED:
KIM
I
MAIXI.Oc A 95,"2.m
corwism surfadi fil in Imrdscxorg, wmffmapwi -iw-.arabDn ariv appumararcc-&
F5 k
ITOTAL DE FERRIED ASS E,9,9 MEYTS-" 3 1.5,42a
'TOTAL ACTrVE A&GESSME NT: 5523,01WU
5 23 ow 14W
ITOTAILASSESSMENT AMDUL4T
U-M.81 0.4
0" PIC) NOL
"M
32;M00
KAME & AMUEn
UPGAL M-tCAMION
1
Surreal:
Assowsma
$000
MiL.Lt
M11" JL ibyx* ,A &TRE.ETS4r.AJb1E
3TREETV-41E
1-w WAUFC
6titVICS
6 . WATER
a amwA
HWraniraon MN
TDTA�
TOTAL
[
TOTAL
9
�� lbl� � &1^
PROPERTY AMIRESS
52mm
-bp� Fk0pERTy 0wpigR
ADDITKM OR 5UEO ICN
AS
M
Frafttk&i
AMEASNIIINT
Uidff
*VULAY
FROWAGE
Assa"MINT 1r*"1 Ad4
S14JPWF I
k%5ESSMUT
ii Fs
#4kS1F3M09T
sl samor-Ac,"
SERVICE
$z4Dd-%AF-x
SERMIE
%1,J2V1EAC4-,4
Chz* MCLAU Vr-W PW NW5
Aa4c$"po
*MDUhT
DKFEFd=
A615955AWW
AtTryr;
ASSESSMEN7,
59 1345 29 M M40
$ 21 aw lm
AS Adbma Sa SE
Nor 3umem
Lai 8 &oacS SaLdh HA C , - Ningi;mn
V V KA�
0.0
so OG
it
c
$000
�1.ioo 00
3000
S1.42000
32AM-00
66JI16
S2,MAO
702 1, lady; 7; R R aNW
M+1 553
2 23 MA UM
26 Ma., St SE
0.00
Lnt 7 $27-2 of " k 049ck S. swA Hvip or HwQhdam
53.25,
54.196 m
c
W.00
in
so co
Z1,420M
3C1O0
3IA2nGD
37-11-9.25
3.06
S7.1
M Amara St ,%E
HL40W" PO 455334
11.8 �a � q 10
a 23 = 700
-Ee- Aijams Sa ME
MCh" J A DIM L dm*omgu
to 11 EX UM L 5. Ell XR 115 3 @4AK d1ja M af hQIGh4mm
75.W
&3.39750
1
soon
11 WOM
U.w
Wco
som
SIAMOD
S"17.w
IMJ*
di t� r94
1 Adams St-SE
Hk4chmW500 MIN
08 1 id 29 02 0220
-4 23 OW t"—ti
IM Mams M M
T40 H UChMIXiCh
5- of uK 7, Egock is "5"h HjfCDcd HwNr"N
W-W
3;2.54250
ic
sow
a
$000
$1.59Q.4Q'
KIM
I
MAIXI.Oc A 95,"2.m
$0.0
F5 k
135 Ad&= StSE
Hwmmw, MN
5 23 ow 14W
125 Adftni a Sr rE
32 3M',7�
L 9, AkW.4 119. tOUth '40 0-4 4A *"WL14M
"M
32;M00
$000
MOD
13
$000
$1.wo.00
Wgo
51A2Q.DG mm.w
S&M
suw-ca
1' 5 Anarns &M
HWraniraon MN
21§ W am
6- 23M 1RO
115 Adaris St EE
Ralph CAmh
Lcif �. AkxK it, L-A6 400 C! Q1
r Go
52mm
t
A&M
8
$040
t13W.W
to.00,
M.A20.0c. m'slam
late
so, M.M
115 Aawm =E
Chz* MCLAU Vr-W PW NW5
I 08 1 14 24 0 0258
7 ' 1 23 OW 151,0 —
I-D5 Adams St SE
FaIGm Am&
14�. gq4F4 W& i-liff iv qfmft""
0.99
TQ00
it
sagg
M. IM.GQ
COO
61,420.0c 12,wo.oa
UiA
31
. 16718
C*rKm MN $Ux
08 116 29 m Wo
8 250# MO
243 Adamb St -SE
cksmy & Ad WA" Node"
0.00
38130
c
$0.05
0
sm
$1,W0.00
30.91)
Z1,420M
$2.31D.DQ
3D -E18
32.920.00
243 Adwrw -St U
Hgb:ilvw*q MN
08 111& 2S M Ono
9 23 M* 190
231 Aftm 51-SE
Dws* & Dwih Mmkmn
Lck 11 & Jul V2 ag LW 7, Mm* 24, 49Ah 1HgO " ft 4p
100
34
in
"M
13
sm
11 WOM
U.w
51.420.00
$7.3r&.00
AO ID
67,375.DD.
211 Adamm -M SE
hffb;+ivrl<an M11
06 29 m
116 000
10 23 0150 1%0
21SAdarm St SE
R i1b K*d LNng T(wit
215 Adams S!
Lad 0. &4k;k 24, $4ruth Half CA of R04h-nw
".00
32-97GJ30
43
Mix.
0
5000
11. wo 00
3C.00
Z-1.42-0.4O
98.8"Loa
$5,u9+0.00
F5 k
11 230501%5
205MMUSI-SE
Lc4 110. MWk 24. S" HW ON od HAVAIMW
616.0c
32 3M',7�
a
$000
31 -%xm
3C.DG
-s1.420m
tz, MM
CD
55.M.W
12 naal am
2444 lane 84 SE
ALjlnLwffr
Pan or Lou 4 5, EMw 5, SoLM HaN D1 ►IA-mrAwm
Lava 1, 2 A 3, 6, South HAIr Ca rd diLawwaom
f P**M g LA on Numb EnQ
3Z 7!:
66.DQ
:4:1
so.ix
-D
smoo
111,5ww
$c PO
41.420,00
44,"31715
WOO
54,E-03 7s
aye 'rim Sma
aA$ 2nd Arta 50
Fkactmew Mw 5&W
00 116 29 m wo
1$ 23 ON 0310
0 A*wm U &E
Chz* MCLAU Vr-W PW NW5
52.970D0 a
wbc
132
32.176,00
a
$11 A)GLOU
S25M,03
v ±�Lap
sto,79sm
"1420"
55.�" 00
247 Ft AVG BE
Hmichormw MM 55"
96 11 29 w om
14 23 OW 03AG
1 247
30 AA*" M SO
Ck� I&dLmL VFW PW M90$
Lae 4 EX 1 r ;; 34'. Ekeocit 6, -qaah Hag CA c9 Pur-mmum
{Psd*� tA SixA-h at Narlh LDtI,
"M
5
0
WAX
10
WO
3000
u 00
30.00
32-AT6.06
sa.m
$2.%74 Q0
lid A" OIE
Iivittwman PAR 55350
96 115 29 w 4050
15 2"3 = ow I
247 Ist Ava $4, 1
CAmm Mc-aL& VFW PmMA*M
L6t 5 & 1-W K 3C Of Ut 4- E[W-k 0. SaLIM HSU C49Y af Wfthff sm
M111" SM)
"M
szwmw
0
Munc
0
$0,00
$000
31.4 OD
f"Do.aD
sq.cl)
56MM 00
2 47 l ;j
r1yuhinam MM 515WA
w - 1R 20 D) 0
16 2-3 C150 ["DG
S -kmu-&m $t $c
Roggr mamin
LU 10, 6, ScAM W City cd IMLIcilinson
D 00
50.00
0
w Inc
132
SIM*
%G go
K Do
$1 AM
$3,71+6.0a
Sam
$3.73640
F a a" 105
arm M N MM?
46 1115 29 ix oil I
17 #3
130W 0F A" E
L& I A Nr of LOCI. 5MJ( 7, � HIN OV, V HdkA"&
U15
$171
8
STIMD5
3ism.611
42. um �
$1.416 00
377%00
-52. ,(Q
02"m
H&JIMM MLM 5SM
le 116 29 rD,1 OL230
18 23 OW 0610
10D Ave E
A~ & Am Eummt
WJ)Z OT OF 1 0 6 Wa;r of 1446' V Lm 9. Mock 7 S KAM C" M
144 9 C.6 Nil T
HWNr&wn M w 553-W
06114 20 w 0240
1,i N� 000529
'26MVingiar Ave E
Owdu few awk MMEMAmpub" LLO
EW. Err -Look 10. &C" 7. ; wdl Ijbir -; of JHL&GtjrH6Gr
$0.1m
$2.2' JZ
13
SoDiSC
50
go
11,420LOD
$"TO. a 6
SOX0
MLVii Locl
4M Mimr,-51 5
P 3 BaK 233
H:, r` 11�4 5535G
G GM III LED BY- P VAN DER VE EN
X5 t � 5 M E NT ROLL NO. 603
216 Adarna S L .9 E
COST PER FRONT FOOT OR PER EACH
L01 2. efixk 25, ScuM Ralf C4cy a? kdfrPmbw
C6,00
311,07000
0
[ COM FLITEDRY P DANDER VEEM
- C
LEnKG NO. 1.'PROJ ECT NO, 104H FU4 Capd
SOJ30
WM
BTAEET C09T FIER FRONT FOOT
$1.4,2000
W830.110
$&W
&5.99111 =dc
NECKED OY; K EXNER
hwb:inwLe*) J646 55350
.24
I.A.So
M LL}DVERLAY 9 13F OAK-A MD C04T PER MNT FOOF
Summ L Meac!L-ffi-glar
LW 3. Ut** 25. 5041h HIMP ca or Hu1k;hwiuW
".00
N LAM BER OF YEARS.
10
Ad&-ft S4 (C-SAH 25 & WazKn Ave 9W FtewMrw-t13w r-wopw 4
D
SIN-00
$TREETSCAPIF ZMT PER FRONT FOOT
X01)
S1.42000
S5.0-ltd- 00
$GA-b
I N V E REST RATE,
ftw rwdem AW mrr*"tWrQ jn6U"W4 dKk4N
25
M ^49
$-14- WATER �ERVKE 4-.05-t F E R EA�K
CW11S P*J[&Dr R*LKWA6tft nWM
La 4. B46:k 25. &X0 Half (Nf or jiurtct-�nLa•.
".00
$19V.00
I ST HEARING:
30.cc
c*mbuGuan d trunk and im�!raj istwm sawibr aw jwAm*nV4rana jp
M00
S240,00
16' WYAtERBEFMIC E 01ST PER E ACk
51.42D1D0
56.00-00
10.0
Kamm
ZND HEARING:
i 05F1 e2c 1 il
%m* 4n4 L"jW Y4W-r4A AIM 4 ri ds. yI arlaf , H R b:h5&j OfthCfeN CUFb and U Rrtbw.
ca lie 29 rm(;
13 050 2 1
$1 42d 00
IV SEWER SEAVIC 1: CO5 T PE R EACH
L64 1. Bkck 35, Swth KV CAv of lflutcwtwa
".w
52,970.04
0
ADOPT
E D:
0511 112{ 1 0
Itakmkirmik, ooncrew st0minip. Im
andscApin wousr-apin a fstaralwi arod ap
51.420 W
TtTtft E F F A R 1E D A 3 8 E 8
8 &$ E Y T S.
S15-420.00
TOTAL A-GTVE ASSESSMENT:
$623
-A2
TOTAL ASSESSMENT
AMOUNT
$J1,Z1,51 4 A2
Lot 2- Ek4i 35- South hwr City *F Wfthirman
CITY Pip
PRZ*�ERT't ADDRESS
KAJM A ADCOMSS
LE13AL IDE$CRIVrIGN
0
I T RE L
IYIIL� a
MIL- & OVERLAY
STREETSC4PE
YrREETICApg I-1.7AWTER
ASEWItE
f° 1NATER
ir EEWER
7 Q TAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Z5
GOUN'FY 1013 F011
32GAdwm • 4 $6
OF PROMAry CYAWFIR
ADEKTkON OR SUBDIVIS.Y"'N
d4
A85954ME67
14fiaIL7
CMENAV
FRONTAGE
ALSESSMEJO
fighwip
FFI.WCAGE
k-k&F-*!&mIj0
!&VLTF
P &S ESS PAL, P4
MMIACE
S2450IVEACm
50tVICE
AMELSbWKT
Z:fJERRED
AISJ SSIVIENT
At•rllffl,
AZ5B5M1wr
i
'3;)5 ArJorrb 515E
lis 29 Da OM
29
ps 1118 29 W, ONO
marm; $1 OC
MLW.e--;ip Pawn
Lot 4, Bk3ck 35, SaLgh Had Cit M HLkcnirAm
6649
S2.97DW
0
sbim.
0
$aw
31-5m.00
3(LOO
$1,420,01}
w.cm
sff�Bmm
rF4 61t
-13 M 25170
10" 11 2 10 Part VLOU 45- T. E A 9 a1.aww -059.376 a1cftm•
30
00061116290050
230602960
34A 8 06
6%f laahm A PA Umck
kA!5. BkwA M, SmAh Hag CA am Kutmwhum
6600
5F- .S7" :50
0
95%
a
so Do
11.5w.D4
SGOD
S1,42O.Co
I&M.00
ism Noah FRA ut sloo
449 4VfW 4- H11 32'*f VS�.&M dry, 614MA 15, SmAh M3111 CA
34 - - A - 4 w V 5 c
Kkt 1p a ^ M4 55350
31
06 116 Zp go 91 IQ
23050007`0
341 Adams St M
Trim & oa I - roft
LCK 18, fkim 319, 86uM Had C41 c9 Hutcbiffmm
c.ca
51, 1-0
D
$0.00
a
20
n ON I=
11,5 Jamermn Sksg
M W*a,-,Dl* MN W401
-
34 Ai%we� 51 SE
%Vd 55350
05 lie 29 T, 0120
23 ow 3460
$0011
E r " Sharma m mccwlk
IKI 00
30.01)
Wla-ac
=
S5.9".00
0
06 116 29 0 3 0820
111,500.04
Kon R L Omm M Gacwj4i
$1.00M
95.100.041
SGAD
16j"Ic"
335Aaa� SO SE
Hft' MN 55350
33
061115 2p 01 0130
239wam
325 Adames $1 SE
& swnw"w IkA 161"
W 8. &kXz A Uka mwf 5& of Famhcw
"-@a
52.-97050.
0
$0.00
0
168.4x5
90 Fw4pw rid mw
MIX
1F1,420m
1
S500-00
$aim
Is be
-,-4 54 sw
Hktrhwom IVIII 5&350
34
06116 29 07 G14D
23 05031W
3 A9air4 5t -5E
wharmi 493wy
ik4� ;A $Qum mof UY OT I•lufthe"
94.00
$2 -7[ 20
21
23 bw 1 10
1114d Adam■ St U
H004mmin VIN 553W
W5 & 54' *r Lat 4. Bkdk 15. !,rAA-. I w Cory c9 macamaw
71),00
$3.115090
c
30.00
a
$000
kdr-hinsm MO 55M
go
D5 116 29 01 M50
23 Gm 3110
XdAdwm At SE
Div"Al VVNtwv
IcA 10� aWotk:)&. �Mh FMK C" gd H
0.00
06 1 it, 29 0® 0070
1)
I&txa M Lodh
-D
sa x
$11 w 00
soca
S1.42CLOO
A2-0 26.61)
*GJw
117:1120.410
.117:1120.410
305 Adama Si SE
Hidrtwip PA SS _A
36
W 116 29 071 069D
436A 5t 5E
-bmw E PwAwt Jr 4 L FinrAwt
AAA .--
a -' - -- - -
1710 GhP" RK®9 Ad NIN
F- -- -- -- ..1. -
.. -- -1 -- - - .. .. - ... I
-- --
I
salm
$1 -M&GO
som
#1 AM W
$A.636.&
WAD
&5,1110.N
4 -MA Sa 31 SE
2� IM JZ10
WlEhnim MN 5=
23
2:I OSO 1*0
216 Adarna S L .9 E
Mr,-Hm A A Mu A Cia
L01 2. efixk 25, ScuM Ralf C4cy a? kdfrPmbw
C6,00
311,07000
0
$O.OG
0
SOJ30
#1,540 00
$1.4,2000
W830.110
$&W
&5.99111 =dc
16M5V3rI3 kM
hwb:inwLe*) J646 55350
.24
11 Ql
23 OW 1190
226AnImff&-St-1E
Summ L Meac!L-ffi-glar
LW 3. Ut** 25. 5041h HIMP ca or Hu1k;hwiuW
".00
l2r_07000
0
IQ.%
D
50im
4 1, 5W 0
X01)
S1.42000
S5.0-ltd- 00
$GA-b
",mm
h4tehv4w MW 5535D
25
06 115 2% 03 011100
23 M ZM
2M Anwm St SE
CW11S P*J[&Dr R*LKWA6tft nWM
La 4. B46:k 25. &X0 Half (Nf or jiurtct-�nLa•.
".00
$19V.00
a
30.cc
0
M00
11.500 00
sc,00
51.42D1D0
56.00-00
10.0
Kamm
2-V Afimu:U SE
FwitlmK116dI"I mif 55350
26
ca lie 29 rm(;
13 050 2 1
2W 3M Ave 06
Dariel R & Urk" M TvFrmr
L64 1. Bkck 35, Swth KV CAv of lflutcwtwa
".w
52,970.04
0
WAX
0
50.00
311.500 go
5c.0c)
51.420 W
ifflmi5a
95,1 ,00
%Us ag.":u aw
Hylchcmkwi MA 55350
27
05 om
Sl 6 A;IaTr so
CMr L
Lot 2- Ek4i 35- South hwr City *F Wfthirman
".w
szonw
a
sm
0
$0.1)0
11 4;W 00
:K 100
31.420.00
41SAM-00
Wco
Kmom
= 6 5#$E
mom
dkr.r.I• n5-4-4 MW SS M
Z5
06 116 29 71 am
29 M ZM
32GAdwm • 4 $6
1--L�irnn ci,c
UX � ffiNk 3,5, South Haff " ud liuk"nam
$6,m
$2.50yujoo
0
3=
0
$ODO
31-WIMUCI
SEX
S1,420M
ssmmam
W.00
15.950.80
i
'3;)5 ArJorrb 515E
7m-hrflrti mil wm
29
ps 1118 29 W, ONO
marm; $1 OC
MLW.e--;ip Pawn
Lot 4, Bk3ck 35, SaLgh Had Cit M HLkcnirAm
6649
S2.97DW
0
sbim.
0
$aw
31-5m.00
3(LOO
$1,420,01}
w.cm
sff�Bmm
rF4 61t
-13 M 25170
H Lct 1-, 11 -AI'm MIN 55m
30
00061116290050
230602960
34A 8 06
6%f laahm A PA Umck
kA!5. BkwA M, SmAh Hag CA am Kutmwhum
6600
5F- .S7" :50
0
95%
a
so Do
11.5w.D4
SGOD
S1,42O.Co
I&M.00
Sam
mumi0o
34 - - A - 4 w V 5 c
Kkt 1p a ^ M4 55350
31
06 116 Zp go 91 IQ
23050007`0
341 Adams St M
Trim & oa I - roft
LCK 18, fkim 319, 86uM Had C41 c9 Hutcbiffmm
c.ca
51, 1-0
D
$0.00
a
x20
51.1%W.DG
SdOD
61.4m.00
34 Ai%we� 51 SE
%Vd 55350
05 lie 29 T, 0120
23 ow 3460
:=AaamtsOt 5E
E r " Sharma m mccwlk
Lot 7, EbmA W. SbLdh lHaff CA of Flirt rmw
6600
32-978.30
=
$0.00
0
$030
111,500.04
$ftf*
$1.00M
95.100.041
SGAD
16j"Ic"
335Aaa� SO SE
Hft' MN 55350
33
061115 2p 01 0130
239wam
325 Adames $1 SE
& swnw"w IkA 161"
W 8. &kXz A Uka mwf 5& of Famhcw
"-@a
52.-97050.
0
$0.00
0
168.4x5
#1,x+4004
MIX
1F1,420m
1
S500-00
$aim
Is be
-,-4 54 sw
Hktrhwom IVIII 5&350
34
06116 29 07 G14D
23 05031W
3 A9air4 5t -5E
wharmi 493wy
ik4� ;A $Qum mof UY OT I•lufthe"
94.00
$2 -7[ 20
W.w
0
35,50
31.w0 00
saw
31.42DW
$8.w-lm
$090
".00.0
315 Adams S4 SE
kdr-hinsm MO 55M
35
D5 116 29 01 M50
23 Gm 3110
XdAdwm At SE
Div"Al VVNtwv
IcA 10� aWotk:)&. �Mh FMK C" gd H
0.00
$0.30
1)
sn Df,
-D
sa x
$11 w 00
soca
S1.42CLOO
A2-0 26.61)
*GJw
117:1120.410
.117:1120.410
305 Adama Si SE
Hidrtwip PA SS _A
36
W 116 29 071 069D
436A 5t 5E
-bmw E PwAwt Jr 4 L FinrAwt
Lol T. 8W 47. 51 Wh mwr c4 or -•wcKmw
a
salm
$1 -M&GO
som
#1 AM W
$A.636.&
WAD
&5,1110.N
4 -MA Sa 31 SE
2� IM JZ10
WlEhnim MN 5=
37
Q6 1 115 ZR 07j 0500
425Ad St SE
W*fthaw P; S~a Gftm"
Lt4 0, Bbck 47. &xpth Ham CA of PLAcw-*m
-".00
12.0m.%
cl
a
TD 7.9
.9
KIN
-31 15M 00
420-99
1 -0
pammaa
425 Adams :M SE
Fkftlloam Y-N 55350
23 055 31125
38
ca I 16 20 0; 0610
dit&Admm 31 V
GrLm K & Sawwi j !J.rr. sDi
415 Aaams a4 ae.
Lo. 9. 64Dck 4?. ticpj&I Kgf of iFLft tb.n&pn
".w
"070-50
$1.5m00
$000
61,42D100
1406�w
mm
l0.00
d�"
23 050 XV
KkKnmn MIT 552ti-
39
08 116.291157 0620
- GSG37j4oD
14M
405Aftm St SE
Axon j �W,.L
LC4 10. Blok 47,56kAK hx? C. M Hbmi..
0.00 ,
$4.10,
4
S0.3D,
31.50GLOD
$000
$1.42000
S-Voxa
SOAR
92,5213 W_1
Adamg $4 $4
[
*Uhwmm MR WJ%
COMMILIED BY' P VANDER
VE'- ASSESSMEWT ROLL NO. 6092
VEEN LETTING NO. VPRWEa NM 1041
10 Adams St qCrSAK 21SO A Wgumm Aom gait Prgpw c
ryearaa kww -&ucd- arid Umt!f inifraWmLwo aArIVIALan imAxIng
01 ?1 Vzol 0 MUrizcbw mA trunk and brteFal storm sewmir " tWm*f*wwq wp-cA�
05e1 1 !207 0 (Pd* WW WWaJ VQ1WrWWtft W4 -kVrkKJFb, f * blli�. pbftNge cw3i and g LAter,
. lscpm
DV1 1 MID L,&Vs�k cuncralesurFar-M, ij i lard a 3 , streAsraLavi resioraf-an arie appur.firtwe*A
COST PER FRONT FOOT 01; PER EA C H:
COWOT ED BY- P VANOER
S46.00 STRE ET COST PE R FRO NT FOOT
C14ECKED BY.- X USER
S13,50 tAIIJI-00VERLAY 3 OF OAKLAND COST PER- FRONT FOOT
NUMBER Of YEALAW
11B.00 STIR E ETSCAPIE COST PER FRO AST FOOT
11,500.0z :1 -1 12 " WATCR. SERVIC E 006 PE R EACH
4NTERE-ST RAT:.
-ST KEA III N G:
S 2,$00,0; 5- WAT E R 3 E RVIICE COST PER EACH
3 1 .420.Mf 6" &FIVE R -S ERVECE COST PER EACH
. 1
1 2 ND HEARNG.
�AD O FTED:
TOTA L DEF E RR E 0 A&SE53MEhJTS�
515,420.00 jTQTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT' S523.090.42
ITOTAL AS8ESSMENT
AMOUOrT
CITY PIDNO.
PFCPF RTY AbOM
NMF- AL ADOR"S
of: PRomwy cveNJEIR
LE,:CA,. W.5CR1FTQN
AWITIONOR SuRONIS1,C-N
ffbi&t
A:u*Lzdnm
nr
!; I K K L
� 01*4E-5:5MENT
S45:FF
M-1 a
OVEPJ.AY
F46tirAdE
Mal a UVEYdAY
A&SBUMEW
tj %AWP
�TREETSGXFE
$ 7KIFAV-Sc-RPE k55E55M.Ei%T
FRDN-,AGE $1 1prp
i d q wArrIq
SERVICE
ASSMSSMENT
e- w0kr"
39XV94
irsawLA
SEWCE
TUTA..
AMSEWWWr
TOTAL TUT
DEFE ACTNE
ASSES-SMEN' A-!S L IS S W L kr
coumw PC NO.
401
X 116 29 of 01530
my "ms St Se
CWV L K30LIM A 011wt
Lot 1. Uk" Q. 5 CJX HW cAy or h. 1,:.`r ib*n
9CO
nl)7000
No
W.015
c
sc 00
;1.5W Do
SA.00
$41.00
$1.420i0]
5s.R90 ®Q
so,vj S5.,a:W.w
44 A4wft S1 SE
23 OW 3
"Uftkwm MIA 55"
41
11E QF
23 OW WOO
dig Adawriiii. St -Se
l ainr y J & JoML WVWgw-ha
Lcil 2. 5Lw 48. 30uM Half CAY -Or Hukhriwn
".06
$2,10000
0
$GOD
1.50,30
$1,42(1
$45.8,,00
3p, 00
15.890.00
4"6 Aawn 34 3c
IVAC419MIX! M14 51`"
42
.7$ 176 2* ot OW
F - 2'30 3 f ? 0
42 A. ti S E
Andmw Fokpom
LN 3. mw 4e. zouth -wr c A y crr m6atNnf,4r'r
".C*
22A7005
t
so(v
C
WDG
5 7,500 00
UZO
Ji A20 00
iSAKda
1U-00
s5.aao,no
4 V .darns $4 M
Fmer Mg 593w
43
8 219 bf 01160
ow SP416
43r Anwm WSE
t. s C & hAreW KrmGko
4.0 4- Dhx-r 4. $wM
"lo
I S2,9 000
r
$000
0
Uw
$1-5w.00
SDJ30
41.42nOD
$5,21110-01)
QU
Ad... St SE
Hwrp-rwp 0*4 56
AA
16 29 Of OM
23 0 0 IMO
44 Adamt M SE
6pmm#f 43 clabm
Lint A. Slix-r 46- Swth -Wtr C pd kiwtvman.
96-00
52,97000
20,00
in
$ow
00
31A2G.0D_
$6,MM.06
86.00
$5.099 QG
AdzrrLL St SF,
MN N
45
lie 29 07 ow
23 " 40M
5W Adbrul SA W
D & WtrJfmd Dkg
LQt 1, Bft( $0. SKAIII -41t crly ad HiAwrilmoft
99.00
S2.971)(M
- c
f
2000
0
$Ow
$%.500.13D
Um
21.4m.w
MOWN
SIA
SUM 00
5M Adams StU
HWAL1740111 MN sm
4fi
08 110 24 dy ow
23 = 4910
-5116 Aziame. Ski 44E
Jdhw A UffW
UA 2. OW 60, p 4a" C � Hokimmm-1
G&W
-$2.97-000
t
$004
a
3000
$1,5w.00
PM
; 1.4 ; 0.0 0
M
516 Adarrts St-S[
HWAr*m PAN 5W
47
06 %14 " 0f 0?w
23 M 4920
SM Adams S1 IE
Dw tam A S milust Fam Trist
Lvt �. blov W. 5WN *W Clil -0 H1MfthVid4m
6&00
T2.970.00
0 00
0
$000
$1.500.00
KOD
S%.420.00
OW.00
35-4 .06
1-1009visco. JWN 55350
481
06 1.16 29 01' WIG
23 43110
SM Adams St SE
Pauline A Jiliman
66 -60
$21s7ow
t
logo
a
sow
S1,51M.013
SO.00
St.420.00,
55VO.G1111
3Q.M
�I
tlkaW.OG
�A Aanm 54 4
HOMWwan ININ 55350
Aa
W20
23 OW 4WO
542 Adams St 99
wawbMA HE"
Lot 5. Bib" 6D. c0JA1% ISK CNV of WifthA&W
f4m
$2.$7450O
-c
64.0
a
woo
si.Ew.cio
Vkoo
61.420,[4",
-
Ad.. St-SE
Hwaiim= UN 55350
2#mo goo
5" mama St SE,
BwmM McRaith
Lot 130 Ut 14 EX -w or LOU, %N* 60. &064h -HM C* of
HWOk
72"
U2 0Q
t
w go
0
#000
S1.500.ca
6[k00
sl.gqqzP
w1wN
Sam
oklu,w
SIM Twief IS1 SN
HAWqrmm MN
51
06 L10 $ 0'0740
2309050 0
SEA Adams St SE
Tkill'idS J & Ul%dM PeM6ek
SW co UDI 14. &A" ipo. Soulh Hal' CA or likxlhwiW6
SOLO
W.01)
a
3CU00
si.ffwoD
$0.00
61,410.00
1 ws"Ac
:94 AWN -5t $11
Hp=Uwwi MN 553W
52
06 $16 29 0' 0020
547 Adams St -SE
Hu6ld 1H & Stebe Etitratch
Lot 13, Mock 61. SotaK HiN CA of RuLthinaw
96"
$207000
is
W.00
a
$000
$1."M
sc-.00
#i1 420-w 35,M.00
i 80-0
N? Anwra St:SE
FkU*jjn44yi MN
230O 5 M
S3
0dT 11d 29 0¢0
2�11WIIW
UJI Admu St SF
EftAP1mftkjn&
L94 9. 8W,61, UUM UP UY -6f HAchm&w
a
WAY.
8
0M
K!mb 456
kw
41.420.00
Kmm
Wim
N4 Adarniii. -$4 SE
wamaw MH -9mo
54
x
fWAdarrm ST $E
Lei A a Jeft4 D -%mh
U4 10, BWk 61,SOLAh H*A Dil MM"nmm
$9,99
N.W9901
a
40.0c'
0
to 00
$1 pp.00
F{.Dr,
-$1.42°0,00
$8,fft§AX1
7&"? Ad;irns $4
23 $100
hmirt6haupri MR 5535D
55
ix 16 20 0! om
23 OW $110
SW Adairra &1.
JAmLa E & Mutm E RaLn
LC4 11. 19Wk 61. 56uth Fkkff .11 Huibctiimi.
66,00
U,979.010
a
W.1cc
.0
$000
'1104D=
Irc 00
S1.42CLW
S5,698,31)
#4e
Ji�5,B81D.00
Flvlthvltw PAM 5535D
56
a$ 1 i6 25A 4' 4060
2SM 5 20
515Ar--rs Sr Sii
Le. - 2. Back 61 - sztflt- iia,2 Ca of Hiu;tcjnwwFcm
0
SURD
3115MOD
4CAM
$1.42000
3!5 on az
*U,Ck
sa."0.00
515 Adamjp:U $I
Hutchoum MW 553W
57
73 ON 513G
$11 A4-W`4 51:5E
A 1. KV an
511 AWN 54 SE
Lot 13. ftA 51. &ROAM HOR C41Y of I-kitchWom
".w
a
30.06
0
$0J00
11 low 00
SC.00
11,4MOD
35.9*0.0b
"16
$6.Mw
KutrKnZon Mk 58360
55
0611 6 28 N ww
3 6q;' 40
SM Ad.. S4 SE
ROW A yahaln Fwwa
Lcl 14, 1811W 61. SMU Miff Ct of Nutdninaw
0.010
a
$0 cc
D
sow
111-50111131) ,
vim
$1,420 W
S7!3-10 On
S2.9210.00
513 Adams &t Se
Humfw7ban MU 55350
95 11-5 29 W OMO
WO A4&T4 -515 E
Ap--6G Llghft ww Chwch
Lot 1. Gtwk 1. U cirlmaw% Add".
".w
$2.970,00
a
30.0c
0
00
sc go
51.420_GD
sfiw-0
No
W- AdAiiiik!U SFF-
231390010
Fii"ctonw M16 ftM
Ll P16W,.r-Z1AS8E1:•%mENT NOLL AN -5fflJ L I "J916
CO UPIL ED IM P VANDER
VEEN
ASSESSMENT ROLL 40. W93
LETTING NO. IjPRDJIECT NO. 1"I
Awns k (CAAH 2f & Waarun Ave JzFt Aamnauu-ftan Pto
new raal% cAvv&UucW " uW bn1T"hnXjW4 ticia I�,QrLG _;_v"
cpnisLrLrA&an cf kmnk and Ldnmd skirm &ewacr and vc2lrnarawanap
1MkW410Qf
"risdevak, cmcrctc j6urfw_ivn1g bn W.nutsi-apinf,
'COST REIR FRONT FOOT O R P E R or A Ci-
Ca PUT E 0 UY. P VA40ER
VEEK
U6,00
07RW COWr PER FRONT FOOT
C H E CK ED E;Y- K EXWF
R
61$.50*
WULIOVERILAY 5 40 F OAK -A 4 D COST FRD K T FOOT
ISTIPMETSCAPIE COST P E P FRONT FOOT
N U ME E R 0 F YEA-RIB-
10
S16.00
- INTEREST RATE:
51 "500 -G0
1 .1 W PvokT" KKK (;O%%T POR W"
%3T HEARING'
01 el Z;f2cl 0
$2,600.6.0 6- WAY ER SERWE COST PEA EACH
M 1 ,420.0 0 6- SIEWER SERUCIE COG7 PER EACH
2ND FEAAJNG-
0511 V2C1 0
AGO Fr-ED:
13511 W2CI 0
TOTAL DEFERRED ASSESSIVIE4TS: .61 1$14218."
TOTAL ACT VE ASSESSMIEN t; ssn 99-42
TOTAL &&SESSIVIENT AMOU NT 34111.516A2
o
CrN FM NO.
PRW1qSkT'Y Ab&?ESS
KAAM & ADM-ist.
OF PROPER Cf;"ER
EGA.L DESOR09-LON
ADDIT ION OR &IJBDrVISICN
51f H
SWFF
a rte:- -S rovERIA
OVIIIIALAY UZE5451-40"
FROWADE [I a.SdfF]r
iMccx1&&A*1t
F Ft 014'!A9 9
STREET-SQLRE
AS-SE34MEP47
$1 "0
STVWqE VIVATER
E
ASSESS BFAVk�E
31, M' 5(GfEACH SZOXMLACH
W&EIjAR
61 AMSACH
IrbTALL
A:$%IV%3McNT
AWO"T
TOTAL
CUERRF-D
TOTAL
A-1
COUNTY PD #40
60'
45 116 29 10 0029
23 ISO =0
570 Adams St SIE
Vaqwma Ver*
Lot 2. Obvix 1. bWienj&Mk Addhlo
4 _00
52,978.0
c
$0.06
a
K.09
31.470.00
+�
ISAW.W
014
$!& EMLafl
5 AAWn St.SE
Hw;:Mnam MW 55350
61
D61'16 20 ow
OW Adipr4 $I -BE
Lams 3�4-5 Bk3ck i, Mattaten a jbdubm -
Z41
7
SO.W.
0
30J50
WM
$20K.to
$000
$13,3i3• so
$Do
511349.50
1470 Adqrm Zt 59
23 130 OM
PO Bw 158
hmLchmmum MW SESW
OZ
4A 1-16 2* it 000
UN AftM 5166
Fwchffam 6c-"
LcA I EX SPAY. CW&SubdMaicrhaf Lot 6, EWttk 1, Wourzam's
AM60
TO X
.1)
10111D
-
SO-OD
-
Xca
sow
so CD
11.531130
1420 Admins St SE
Za 149 OnO
F Dam 158
IlYirhnum Mk 500
63
66 11.6 29 10 Cr3dW
M Adam-no S4 M
11910-WM C4-0
1" 3_+ , Park eubovsw
0M
SOW
a
1") a:
in
Sabo
$1300 00
Sc co
51.42D 00
32-92D 0c
12,w2r, u0
142D Adtarna. _q SE
231-02 MG
p 00 DW 156
Hulrfwwo 1414 66
I&A
04 1"20 loom
WABNM lu M
Nmrwn S car lufthnLEW Me
Lcks 2-3-&S EX 6 2 Pads 514W40 LO 1. CLaft Svw- ot
L,0 6. 9106 1. M &UAW':& A44W
222.79
!910.02420
- 1
a
_6
ID
0
W
jcW
&D 00
II&M416
&b. C' t-
Jhb.bjc D
"' Adami6 & SE
23140(020
NuIpp'non PAU 5b
85
oe 116 20 10 O%e*,
643 Adurns &I a
MN MWW & 4!f
M -of L0026 S R 112 *t LQt 11. Eu*GX 2. McL'-j`k
relo
WDG
0
W cc
WW
4 1PO- OP
:9Q4
4'.42099
42,110.0
S-ICD
$4 "10
3M C~ - Wo 22,4 ON 4D
23 130 0'0?
54 Paul IWIN 55114-1DW
BB
116 25110 0150
631 Adarno S4 GE
iWN minim & im�
Lot 12 EX 5W IL L4?t 1.3. OWA2. M*rNrd44ft AddKWM
74.00
W.330.DG
0
M_
:K Go
51.420'00
49 .00
SQ ca
scufa 00
3M Car mr • OAP@ 224 S N
134 0 M
54 FW IWIN 561 IA-1 OW
67
to lie 29 IQ mco
6143 Adam& SA SE
MW uwng A My
LOt 14, OWA I- WWWWO PoNFIKA
"10
0
0
$OX*
11-sw 00
$c 00
31.420.08
35-1114.08
20.0
KA"Ah
3M C*nsw • Skig 224 SN 40
151 paw Mpq $011 &1000
68
6A 114 2� Ib 6�115
60 7 AdMETLIL 99 SE
MH mwrg 514M
Lot 15, Ok" 1. W4W"r1?@.Add99D
i4
S2.970 DO 0 Wot
0
11300,00
.5''70
SIAM.CN)
35-SK-00
Wrb
$d, 08
31% Cefftr - Bklg 224 SN 40
to F MN 531 14-JWO
E&
525 Adams kBE
MW Mining A MID
Am WA
66-00
S2,970W
0
ZDAC
$OJX
11=.00
!k 00
51-420L00
SUM.M
same
Me" co
311 C"tw - Rkig 224 E" ,n
54 l MH 551 t&i=
70
96 1116219 190230
5M Adam na St S F
Gay H & DpaP16 L Ekwn
Lot 17, 01** 2, M*fiwwm1L.Addp,*rL
&&W
12. 9 7.0 M
a
80.01
a
SOLO
U-68Q.08
W W
31.420.015
Mgbd.*D
$0.0
S5.13"'00
W AAaru il 5F
2313902%0
Huft "Iv r- Wj `15,3w
LAZY R"ve-c
71
06 119 10 CM
23138" ONO
Wt Aidanrm & So
Lat 1 1. 010* 2, MOM noft % art
71 .10 77-10
$aAta so
Mot
a
sow
315W.co
Woo,
S1,420.015
V4,3cs.su
•
$9m2 .50
1 AdW% St M
H*AINCA MLI
72
06 11629 it *M
%7 Min= 9t IE
Rty B016M Jr ik Aniria M&vwL
L0 It bkKIf 2.Jjw6n:pw14 A*km
"im
$2,4JM58
b
30 Do
51.5W.DG
saw
7
sl.4m.014
_30.00
90 44
$&B90.00
&tr Alown $t $S
2319 � V,
Acwm. rd & � -chn KTL -rac
713
45116
23 130 OC40
551 Adams St .
699 M &0 2, Mqffvw1 AAA-v
42:97030
0
9
3020
11,500.00
$affi
$1. .ix
_W!Ti.K
IP0.00
161 A*&rr14 51 Sk
1.1L19CMlkw on MR 55a50
'24
0Ed 1152# 15 IE0
1(W Adwm* 2 Sc
M"I & Lper& SF 6mbea
LN 12, Lon G -SLbdnnrdzn
0.00
W x
4AQ55
W 947.43
0
$GLW
$0 *0
$uW
30-W
M.047-43
I= Hirer 22
25 2fn 01"
F ktdhiuum MPI 55"
75,
07116 29MG010
1054 Adams Sj M
4 Lyn ow Wendiew
Ap $, fir} kx** of W 3. ku&" F4&1 R 0T -1 10.
29
O.W
235
U = .1 72.50
D
sow
$000
$=-
13j-, 2-50
s
PA71LIP
IOSO HWIN 22 u
23 2.W 0060
P 0 BOX 198
Hktchatban MM
23 205 913D
I C!V- A4 o 51 E
JAYiet W Kwmm Tmwt
Lcd 1:1 La G $L94yM"
0.00
$0.50
1 E?9ag
6',147•72
0
X70
ZD.W
Saco
$10m
$2.14,712
$Q=
&2A47.77
P 0 Do :M
Wbdiff"On Mil 55=
77
tG1 IS 2915GISO
1M5 Ad&nb & W
l Lol 14- Lc4 G 5.4AMoM
0.00
90)0,
'1 M1
32,287.04,
0
10-M
S000,
saw ,
sow:,
S2.2117.t.&
14M RArtpff Or
2S 205 014115
06n,�o* MN MM
L c.� - L7 F%Wr-P '' MWGN7 RQLL AR-*'M L I 1 " I . ADO W'iA20V- Al f I Fl 4. vt§
S.
COWMLIED M' P VMDilR
Vae"
A�5t;55MLNT ROLL 40, 5053
LETnWG NO. liPROJECT NO. I M l
Adams St (C-SAN 2ffp & Wammir Ame Ow P mmion Pp*atv
new rGa&NW c4asU=mr. arad " in.JrA*LrkrAW-* dMaWiGm jrKiJAp
tom rucai cf trur* and Wirca& Morm mwr and bmMrrwfWdrw�.m ffr6prQWrMWft.
IM% " 1MV41 W@f MMIM AFA 4MrVO;ft, 9lMdMV- 4k M&a. fbftrd� ax� MW q Lmer.
ca44Kkwak, con?ziadir zjrfacm lw-id&-;3plrV. s:J-b-;kpLqUr MADr-aLan aric apixim.-riarc-ar.
•
CO 5T PEP. FR,0ldT r-OOT OR PER EACH
CO TED BY: PVANGERVEEN
SUM 25TA E E T COST PE R F IZO NT FOOT
Sl 3Ag MIL UOV E RLAY S O OAK -AN C 05T P-FR- FROUT FC10T
C14ECIKE• BY. KIEX04,ER
MUMMER OF YEAPS.
10
513.00 STR&ETSCAPIF GOSIF Pf R FRO 47 F&DT
3 1 .500--DD 1 112 "Tifft WtVr, E CQJ$T PE R L AC H
INTEREST RATE.,
. i,ST HEARING:
,2 h 0 - i - E - A - [N G
DI tl 2j2c1 0
- 0
$1,600.001 16- ViAtER SMICIE COOT PER EACH
5 f 1 1 � C I D
$1,420.00 116" SEWER 4SERMICE
COST PER EACH
ADOfrrED:
DSM 112CI D
TDTA L DEF E RRED "Be "MMMMM
ri f 35M. 0.42
GUY Pio yo.
PROPERTY
MUM A AMMUS
QF PRWER-Y CMER
EGAL DE.SCRIPTKM
ADDITION -OR SUaDMEMN
gh%a
d6ft. r"wLA
S-T,!;E-5�MEM7
ffl S- 5,;:F
pro
F&L. a
OVEFILAY
FRO AM
mil- -a Uvotu-
ASSE32ACENT
91 16".7
STREETaGAFIE
STAAMCAP E XESESSMEW.
FRONTAGE 51 WF
1 -2- WATER
SE;c-Ace e-wArks
*ERV)47E
ASSEESMENT 51644E CH
4r Saw" YOTAL
SIMME A�
11�4MIIEACW AAMM
TOTAL 707AL
CEFERRED -k" T! 14-r-
fi�SSESSMEkl ASSELSMEWT
CIOUNTY NO No.
.713
96 1115 219 16 470
915 Adorns SL -SE
m%l m1wo 8 PAN
LCU M-OL-F 6 PV :d C. Aw:W" NO 3 1J2 SwAo;,i 0x116-29
327-90
117 Ew� 50
4 21
0
MOM00
so w
0
132
:000
32-376JO0
SOM
W.00
w.co,
Sc LX
$0.0 $4E.Si6 50
52JTE DO
sow ^ Ufi.:M&6�
SG W 92.516.0
0 C4ffrW • bft 2241 %4 40
23202 -0
St P2J M-N 55114-IOW
70
1014040
106INasr. � 4L-.m i,�ie L
4:5 mmdl ub Ave 9.
Uvvm 201 & M
DKV MDtarigs LL
LN E$ L* 7 EX NIT. Nw* 48. No-h Fbif City of Hul,;.timor.
0.m
$0co
, cS was]-.,r " E
23 ow azio
- Hqtd*~ MM 55350
80
117 2v 1$ 0572
22 OU *W -
IrWa qperbm d-LC-
Fr
LMM Wl & 2W, C4wKwwmjjm No. 4, 45 Lib?" SjWwa-, A
CAXMPMWVJM
71M
$-533.15
a
so ix
1145
321326
23;2Q59
$MC 97
32" 75
$7,15773
$J50.47
11,46316
!! WMNF A"
-HgkbWFbM MH 5535D
61
31 117 29 1$ inn
23 (54 MO
4.6 Wmhmtpm.xm E-
Lhn Am 3M &3M
lHosaft Street Ptopa" LUI
UrAs Wl A :X Q, C4ndowme M. L, 16 L&Tiiy Sima. A
G*Fg*mv4Mw6vM
11-70
0
a
*D 0c
71;N.
S212DA
L3f 35
W47-25
SM Y 6A
S2,US,37'
$Z47.�,5
$1,49012
'Z Haan Si 'g- P C IW 0
H UKALrom m4 53 4
82
�l 117 26P 1$ OM
45 wbshff Aw E,
Lmha 101 A 102
Mtbwja LmVimfiam Irv-
kir" 1101 102, CWAIMWMWD No A. dS Libra 54 A
c*n4amn"n
10-34
3465.11
10
so,ac
1p,i it
$186DA
V340.74
35$ ,17'1
6922.57
S,., HL2 27
1 7.51
W317
31.9I4,46
$1,467. m
lwj-"7vow
13 054 (1013
HLMMKWI UN 553M
-
53
--
0 %1% 29 160M
23 054 OM
jS % mhjta An E.
UMN103
Hww SVWPnvpwty LLC
"Wp PMPWIM LLG
qJrd 7 02 Ca•,3ammnkuT No A 45 Lbrm Squwv, A Condwwwm
11.-A
$51 L A
0
30.0C
4i_i0l
3wss
SWIM
$633 7 7
33W.04
32.161.02
1C HOL-An A WE, P 0 00 40
Hmc"raam MI 55350
aA
31 117 29 15058+(
23 OE6UW
3.5 1';' aahT Aye E
�Nw C9 Lg§ � A t & S.*V 91 IN54- *f L94 �. aNVA il�. NOM MV Efts
cd HL"mmm
IKM
S3,Dww
0
so fm
I".
$1. W
54.D3
SLZ-SWOD
51 .00
W)"M
Wim
15 00
35 wmmgm AA* E
HLWunw)n Mbl MM
w
3, 1 7. 7 29 15 C630
23 Me "M
25'am!,r.r kft E
WA A A MMikL QMM
c 01 Via. 01 Lgt 6. gock da mom Him RV a Fktchmbm
5&"
U=30
0
$0 oc
w
poD Dn
11.500.00
SUPD
91,4210.m
womom
#
$1-070.041
-4aY:PD 705m Am
OHL" MN 913M
31 177 29 156M
23 Md amo
j miirb 5114
01M US-VW IRO::h
10x12'gf S24' A L21 SX& 40, NUM Me k!, PI "60wwp
0.02
Mau
-D
to
m
$1476 w
X X
X00
34.00
$1.411FI.D.0
SIA76.00
30 4 Hk4c&nb& Ave
wjh4u 4N *OW
47
3111729150740
23 OW 0010
24NW&&h Aye E
ErckwWa Dhwt.4pmd
wm2w cd I. Bklak 1. HL
hkk 2 '60wroew. Dgw►Tlqwn R.q4wiwQprwLt Pw
20300
39-$35.30
0
54.00
20!
$3.404 DO
Sow
515MOD
SOM I $15,219M
p 0 Bin 355
Mmripsapcos 6A%j 5544MM6
AR
3$ 117 291-5 G761
23 07'2 fril D
�Ao* E
Owp
UnR 1, CJXd,06T.rwjm. hh. 5. Exkc4mm)L Dawmto%wn Ram-•"WmgnA
Undwinimm & Lai i EYL W2ffV. " i- Hutcrivison �kwavmm%
ReDffeeapreft Plar No 2
296,75
&1335375
Z�
$0 0c.
2iicrt
35.34 !4
$1.5M -00
&2..SMCO
S1.420 M
OCR, SrX1
IUIII"&w
Wimapcmr. Mli 554404J5,5
`TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 6093
Mi'36-D5_
3251.82224_
315RO
W.9313."
142&25
S2&.fiS1.4,%
3R9.M0 131
MQUON
399 Q0.D0
MM.610.42
lli&4aM
07,34080.42
0 V6SSEgAilEmT FtCxLjf*ftLaUDim&&amz-L i P90437Ir-73Aaa4-'ZWli67 PNXI, A+46M 0 iMb - AMP7EO MI-MD - Lb I il - P4 6 00 i
SAP 1343 -625 -021 - Projmt Bld Abalw
LETTING We. 1,YR0JrECT me. 10.01
KWY DEPT.
Project Bid Abstract
Project fie CSB.t1. Street a"
Washington Avenue 17
Client M � Hiohwv
Bid Opening: 4)2]1301010:00 LM
Contract No.:
Pf4ieCt NO.: SAPO43. 625421
Owner: McLeod CwnW Hiohvrav Oeoarlment
4127)2010
http: llmision. co. nlcleod. L us1 RIAECrRepmmkpt_ A6streccasp? Wmk0rderl D - 75&EnVneuEs-- Y&N=PerPage =4&.L. Pt Pagr35
Page 1 of 12
4,2712010
V
Prgct SAP 043-625 -021 - CSAH 251Ade Street SEy 8 Waviington Avenue E.
' Quantity
Engvleere Es tir^°.a
R &R Eresre g
Wagxr Construction Inc
IAalhrowuU Caw0uc0on
INrn No.
Item
M
US
Unil Price
Total Prior
UM Pnoe
Toad Pnce
Unit Pnm :Total Pete
Unit Price
TDW Prim
4
2021.501
MOBIUUTION
LUMP SUM
1
SIOG- 000.00
$100,000.00
$90,5013.110
$90.5DIO0
$72,000.00 $72,000.00
$248,180.53
$246,180.53
l
2031.501
FIELD OFFICE TYPE O
EACH
1
528000.00
3211,006.00
$6,500.00
$6500.00
$50000,00 35,000.00
$6.0011.00
56.DDG.W
2
2101.502
CLEARING
TREE
147
StW-W
322,1350.10
$66.85
56,]97.55
575.00 $11-25.00
$59.00
66,673.00
3
2101.507
GRUBBING
TREE
147
5150 -00
$22,050.DD
$49.00
$1,2133.130
$25.m
324.00
53,528.00;
5
2104.5M1
REMOVE WATER MlNN
.UN FT
4333
$3.00
$12,999.00
32.00
58,666.00
$2.00
$8666.80
52-0
$6,666.00
8
2104.501
REMOVE SEVkR PIPE (STORM)
UN FT
529%
$4.00 $21,164.00
$3.00
515,873.00
53.170
515073.00
$3.00
$15,873.00
9
2104.501
REMOVE SEWER PIPE {SAWARY
UN FT
4882
$3.00: S14.6
348.82
$1.00
54.882D)
$O.Ot
$48.82
1 11
2104.501
REMOVE CURBAND GUTTER
LIN FT
11355
53.00!
534,065.013,
$3-w
$94,065.00
$2-0
522,710.130
$230
528,307.50.
6
2104.501
REMOVE STEEL CASING 16'
LIN FT
120
$12.00
$6.110
$720.00
$10.00
$1200.00'
46=0
$720.00
:7
2104.501
REMOVE STEEL CASING 24'
LIN FT
30
$35.00
$1,050.00 $6.00
$180.00
$10.00
$300.001
$6.00
L780.00
10
2104.561
REMOVE RAILROAD TRACK
UN FT
100
$10.00
41,1700.00
520-0
$2,000.00
$ 10AG
51,000.00'
510=0
47,000.00
12
2104.503
REMOVE BRICK SIDEWALK
SO FT
152
42.00
$304.00
St.DDI
5152.00
63AD
$456.0
42.001
5304=0
113
2104.503
REMOVE CONCRETE WALK
SG FT
53194:
$0.75
539.895.50
$0.40
$21,277.60
;DSO
$26,597.0
$0.60=
531.916.40
18
2104506
REMOVE PAVEMENT
SO YD
46035
$230. 175.00
55.10
5234.778.50
54.50
$207,157.50
$4.5016207.167.50
14
2104.505
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SO YD
1221
$6.00
$7.326.00
55.00,
$6,105.00
S5.00
$6,105.00
$6.00
$7.326.00
15
2104506
REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRNEYlAY PAVEMENT
90 YD
260
$6.00
$1,560.00
$3.00
57811.00
32.D0
$520.00
$640
51,580.00
17
2104500
REMOVE RAILROAD TIES
UNFT
20
$50.00
51 -CWO0
$20.00
PAO-00
$10.00
$200.00
550.00
51,00000
18
2104.509
REMOVE LIGHTING UNIT
EACH
- 12
$200-0
52,400-0
$404.17
$1,855.04
$ 12D.DO
41,440.00
$127.00
51,524.00
20
2104.509
REMOVE MANHOLE ISANITARYI
EACH
10
$400.00
$COW-00
$100.00
57.000.00
5300.0)
$3,000.00
$1DO.OD
$%.DDG.00
19
2104.509
REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN
EACH
58
5250.00
$14,500.00
$100.00
$SAW -OD
$200.DD
311,600 -00
3150.00
58,70090
22
2104.509
REMOVE GATE VALVE&BOX
EACH
14
$175.00
52.450.00
$50.00
$700.00
$100.00
(1,400.00
SSO=D
3700.00
23
2104509
REMOVE HYDRANT
EACH
10
00
$3-00
$3.000.06
$50.00
5500.00
4500.001
45,000.00
$50.00
550QO0
21
2104.509
REMOVE GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE
EACH
2
5550.00
51,100.03
$350.00
$700.1301
4500.001
$1.000.001
$350.00
3700.00
26
12104.5D9
I SALVAGE SIGN TYPE C
EACH
91
556.00
$4,550.01)
$25.00
S2275.13DI
525.00 $2.275-001
525.00
62,275.00
28
J21D4.511
SAYING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH}
IUN FT
1 W4
$5.50
53.047 -OD
$1 5
$2.188.301
$4.00 32.216-001
$3.33
43,644.82
http: llmision. co. nlcleod. L us1 RIAECrRepmmkpt_ A6streccasp? Wmk0rderl D - 75&EnVneuEs-- Y&N=PerPage =4&.L. Pt Pagr35
Page 1 of 12
4,2712010
V
SAP 043-625-G2 1 - PlgecL Bid Ahsur
Pruws[ SAP 03925-021 - CSAH 254Ada n Street SE] 8'NJ Kmnaun AVeiue E. I I Enoinaers Estanate I RH R E=ava no OVa9ner Construction Inc Mat " tz Conalruc
jham No
hem
UM
Ouanlity
JMPnoe Total Pace 'Unit Pnoe
Tmal Pnoe
Une Pnce Total Pace JLW
Pnce
T" Pnce 1.
20
2104.513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH',
LIN FT
1458
53.00 $4.488.00;
$1.95
42,91720
P.00: $4,46840
51.98
$2.962.08
27
2104.523
SALVAGE BOLLARD
EACH
3
$150.00; $450.0
$75.0
5225.00
$100.00
$300.00
$250.0.
$750.00
24
2104.523
SALVAGE HYDRANT
EACH
t
$550.00, 4550.00
MOM
$500.00
$1.00.00
$1.00.0
$500.0
$500.00
25
2104.523
SALVAGE LIGHTING UNIT
EACH
13
$250.00
$3.250.00
$43838
$5.698.94
$130.00
31,690.0
$137.0
$1,78190
31
2104.603
ABANDON W SANITARY SEVER
LIN FT 60
$7.50
$450.00
$20.00
$1,20.0
570.00
MOM
320.0
$1200"00
32
2104.603
ABANDON 4 WATER MAIN
; UN FT
109
$5.25
557225
$3.50
$381.50
$690
$65440
$3.50
538%.50
33
2%04.603
ABANDON 6 WATER MAIN "LIN FT
883
$6.85
$6.08.55
$350
$3490.50
$6.00
$5298.00
$3.50
$3.090.50
34
2104,603
ABANDON B' WATER MAIN
:UN FT
94
$7.50
5705 -00
$3.50
4328.0
510.60
554090
$3.50
$329.00
35
2104.618
SALVAGE MCK PAVERS
SQ FT
896
$5.00
$4,430.00
$2.00
$1.772.00
52.00
$1.772.00
$2.00
51,772.00
36
2105.604
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V
SQ 1'D
2861.
$1.50
$4291.50
Sl.DO; $2.861.00
$2.0
55.722.D0
$1-96
$5.607.56
37
:2105.507
EXCAVATION SPECIAL
Cu YD
10i
$10.00
$1"000.00
510.0` $1.000.00
510.0
51900.00
55 -00
$50D.0
36
2]05.609
HAUL d DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED MATEF&AL
TON
20j
530.00
$6.000-1))
522.0] $4.400.00
$25.0.
55.000 -0
524.00
54.80.00
Page 2 of I2
hup.rlmision.co.Lw.leod rnn.iu+R[AECIRepor>sirp[_A6sa L. asp' WorkOrd erll- 75 &EngiaemEst= Y &NumPelPage 4 &Lir sPerPagr35 4rz717ALO
\f
SAP 643-6625 -021 - Pro}ear Brd Absu=
. 63
2503.511
27' RC PIPE SELLER CLASS III
'LIN FT
4183
540.00
$47.320.00r
$41.48
549,070.84
$42.00
549,686.006
5 %.06
546.137.00$
64
2503.511
30' RC PIPE SELLER CLASS IN
LIN FT
78
555.00,
$4,290.00
$72.13
$5, 826.14
$18.00 $3.744.50=
i4`u.00
$3,510.00
85
2503.511
42' RC PIPE SE CLASS III
LIN FT
46
570.00
$3,220,00
StOOM
$4.. 113.12
$W.00 $4.140.00
$80.50
$3.680.00
fifi
2503521
51' SPAN RC PIPE ARCH SELLER CLASS IIA
LIN FT
64
$120.00;
$7.680.00
SEW.%
$8,446.72
S1t0.00 57,040.00
5106.00_
j6.78406
79
2503.601
CONNECT TO EXI5RNG SANITARY SEWER
EACH
7
$985.00
$5,896.00
5250.00
51.750.00
3100.00 $700.00
$250 .D0'
$1 .750.OG
74
2M&6D2
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SELLER
EACH
B
$500.00
$4.W-OD
$275.00;
$2,475.00
$200.00 $1.000.00
$350.00
53,150.m
75
2503.8 02
CONNECT TO EXISTING SATARY SEVER MANQLE
W
EACH
1E
$1,850.00
L7,656.00
51,010.00
j1.01G.6D
31,500.00' $1,500.00
$1,010.00
51,010.DD
76
2503.02
�B'XB'PVC WYE
EACH
39
$1950GI
$7, 805.00
$550.001
$21,450.D0
$175.00; SSA25.00
$550.00
$21,450.00
h¢p llmislon w m leod m wRtAFC.?t ponslrpt_Ahst a t asp ^WorkOrder1Lk75&Eagbn rFs[= Y&NwnPzrPag�4 imsPuPage 35
Page 3 of i2
4.27 +2010
SAIP 043- 25+G21 - Ptoseel Bid Absizact
httpJlmisioar.. rncieadmn. usrRL9EC:' ReporLw 'ryt_AMtrattasp?N'mk0rderlf)`75 F�° nr erFs[= Y&NumPerPag�1&.LinesPzrPagz =35
Page 4 of 12
V21-L21) 10
f '
Projed: SAP 093 - 625-021 - CSAH 25 (Adams Srreat SE) & Weshiglon Avenue E.
Engine EsBmate
R 8 R 6mavaling
Wagner Canstroction
Inc 'MalBgweR Cmso-udwn
;gam �.
IGazn
Units
Quantity
UMPure !Total Puce
LAlA Puce
Total Pnm
Unrt Pn.
TD1al Pnce Lllit Pure Tola1 P nce
130
2564.662 METAL WASTE RECEPTACLE
EACH
5
S4,P26' .DD $9.000.00
$1.6W.00
$8,430.00
51,200 -W
$6.0D0.00 $2.500.0 $12,500.0
98
2564.896 4' WATERMAIN PIPE PVC C-900
LIN FT
66
$25.00: 51,fi60.00
540.00'
S2.WOA0
$20 -OD
51,320.00 540.00 #.840 -W
59
2504.6«1 f WATERMAIN PIPE PVC C-900 -LIN
FT
468
521.00 $9.828.06
$28.40
57324120
616.00,
57,488.00 528.40 513.29120
l00
2504.603 B' VYATERMAIN PIPE PVC C-900
LW FT
593,
$23.00 $13.834.1))
$19.46
541 54978:
518.00
510,674.00 519.46 111.539.78
101
2504.603 I 12' WATERMAIN PIPE PVC 0400
L1N FT
4976'
527.00 5134,352.00
$26.76
$133,157.76
$25.00
124.400.OG $28.76 $133,157.76'
%
2504.603 11 -5' COPPER SERVICE PIPE
LIN FT
2540
$18.00 545,720.00
$8 -00
520,320.00
520.00
$50.800 -Da $8-0O $20,320.00
57
2504.603 2" COPPER SERVICE PIPE
LIN FT
15
530.0 $450.00
$20 -00
$300.00
530.0
5450.00 $20 -00 5300.0
1102
2504.604
T POLYSTYRENIE INSULATION
SCI YD
846
S14M $12,267.0
$1 I.D0
$9,306.00
$15.001
$12.690.00
$11 - OD
59,306.00'
103
2504 -604
4' POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
SO Y9
14
229 -01) W6.001
#1.00
5286.00
530 -00
5420.00,
#1 -00
5294.00
:104
2564 -608
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS (COMPACT 153)
POUND
6895
$4.85 533.19825
$SB8
$27, 243.76
$5.00
534,24 M
$3.98:
527243.10
112
2506.501
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DEBIGN 4007, 8' DEEP 148' DIAMETER)
LIN FT
92A
5265.001 #4.486.00
5'162.00.
518,816 -80
5250-OD1
$23.100.001
8162.00
516376.80
113
2506.501
EXCESS MANHOLE DEPTH
•LIN FT
t3 -8
S95.GG 41311.00
565.00
5897 -OD
3lZD.DDj
$1.656.001
W.001
5847 -00
165
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN N
LW FT
101.51
5300.90 330,450.00
$111.68
611.n5.52
$130.00
$13.195-COI
5167.001
$18,950.50
106
25G6.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 454020
LIN FT
298.31
5700.6 $88,890.00
$13915
$41,259.78
$180.01
553.334 -06
$204.00
$60,445.20
107
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN W4020
LIN FT
27.1
5350.00 59,485.00
$193.51
$5, 245.75
6350.00
59.485.00
$329.6
58,915.90
108
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 724020
UN FT
17.4
$4-W 58, 980.00'
00
5247.24
54,301.98
0400.00
$8.9M.W
$373 -00
$6,490.20'
'1D9
2508.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 844020
LIN FT
8.3
$650.00' $5,395.00
$354.83
$2, 945.09
$55G.00
54.565.00.
$536.00
$4.448.80
.110
2506502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 964020
LIN FT
33.31
5700.0) $23,310.0
5390.00
$12,987.00
W-001
$21.978.131)
1 $21.811.50
111
2506502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 1061020
ILIN FT
9 -3
$1300.00 $7- 440 -06
5594.00
$5 524.20
51.400.00,
$13.020.001
3937.01
$8,114 -10
114
2506.516
CASTING ASSEMBLY
EACH
B71
W0.001 555.550.00
$585.00
549-155.00
$620.00'
$53.940.001
$625.Ml
$54,375.00
115
2506.522
ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING
EACH
1
t $300.00 $300.00
5400.00
5400-00
5500.00
$5OG-0Gj
$500.Wl
5500.00
118
2508.802
SEAL MANHDLE
EACH
1 3
$200.00
$60000
VAG
$0.00
$0.901
50.00
$Om
50.00
117
2511.501
; RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IV
CU YD
11.6
$100.00
51,160.00
59100
$522.0
$75.00
$871001
$60.00
5696.00
118
2521.501
4' CONCRETE WALK
SQ F€
92291
33.50
$323.016.50
$3 -02
$278,718.192
52.70
5244185.70
$3 -02
$278,718.82
30
2521.603
SAVSNG CONCRETE WALK
UN FT
345
$3-00
$1,035.00
$238
$924.60
$2 -00
5690.00
$268,
$924.601
,119
2521.603
SEAL CONCRETE WALK JOINTS (SILICONE)
LIN FT
we
54.00'
$2,264.00
$2.33
$1,318.78
52.50
$1,415.00.
$2.331
51.316.78
120
2521.618
4' CONCRETE WALK SPECIAL
50 FT
4676
$6.00;
#19.056.00
$4.82
322,538-32
$6 -00
#8,056.00
$4.821
#2538.32
121
2531507
CONCRETE CURB &GUTTER DESIGN 8612
LIN FT
140
575.00
52,100.06
612.04,
$1,685.60
St7.00
51,540.00
S12.D4
St,685 -60
122
2531501
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN 8618
-LIN FT
625
511.00
36.875.0
$14.55
$9.093 -75,
510.00
$8,250.00
$14.55
69.09375
123
2531.501
CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER DESIGN 8624
ILIN FT
10923
$12.00
3131,87690
$10.84
5118.405.32
510.00:$109,230.00
$10.64
3118,405.32
124
2537.501
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D418
LW FT
S 131'
$15.00
L1,965.D0
$16 -46
#,158.88
$18.011
52,358.00
$16.48
$2,156.68
125
2531.501
CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER
LIN FT
239
$20.00
$4,780.00
$19 -73
61,715.47
321.001
$5,019.00
$19.73
$4,715.47
126
2531.507
e'CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
614
$35.00
$21,480.00
331-16
519,132.24
$32.00
$79.6419.00
$31 -16
519,132.24
127
2531.507
8' CONCRETE DRNEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
1351
$40.00
$54,060.00
$36-32
$49,066.32
$42.00
558.742.00
$36-32
$49,068.32
128
2531.818
TRUNCATED DOMES
SO FT
592
$10 -00
323,fi80.00
535.88
321,122.58
534.00 526.128.00
$35.68:
$21.122.58
httpJlmisioar.. rncieadmn. usrRL9EC:' ReporLw 'ryt_AMtrattasp?N'mk0rderlf)`75 F�° nr erFs[= Y&NumPerPag�1&.LinesPzrPagz =35
Page 4 of 12
V21-L21) 10
f '
SAP 0043 -62_s-02L - Protect Bid A6skr=
httplhtviu nw.m,Imd.mn=R1AEC,'Reponshpt Absumtap! WorkOrderID- 7i&EngitwaFSr- Y&N=PerPage Pe Pag�35
Pegs ] of L2
4R 72010
' 'S
V
Prgeq: SAP 093625-021 - CSAH 25 (AOarns Skeet SE] d Washirgmn Avenue E.
ESginems Esama[e
R d R Excavating
WagnerCmsln.c0on Inc •Afshwwe2
Construrlian
![ern No.
131
129
132 :2545.511
133
!135
llt m
2540.602
25 -b'6
2545.511
2545.515
METAL BENCH
INSTALL BRICK PAVERS
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 1
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 2
LIGHT BASE DESIGN E
U&IS
EACH
50 FT
EACH
EACH
EACH
DuwUTy
4
758,
35'
12
28
Unit Pnoe Total Pnae
31,400.00 $5,600.00
54.00 33 032 -W
$2,000.00 $70,000.00
54,500.00 554, 000.00
$65GAG 578,200.00
U ,t PH.
51 %1.00
39.03,
51,472.79]
$5.119.00
$487.46
Tack Pace
Z.354.W
$6.44.]4
$51,547.65
$73,428.00
513,648.88!
Unit Prix Total Pica
51,530.00 $6.129.00
550.00! i7,560.W
51,590.00 $55.650.00
$6.375.00 376,500.06
$610.00 417 080 -00
UNU7 Film
$1.522.WI
510.00
51,821.00
56,067.0
$44700
Tout Pace
36-4196-00
57,5110.001
556,735.0
572,804.00
$12,516.00'
134
2545.515
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 3
EACH
is
$9,Doam
3144,000.0
310,099.52
5181,592. 32
570.525.6
5168,/00.00
$9, %7.00
$159,952.00
136
2545.521
2' RIGID STEEL CONDUIT
UN FT
135
$12.00
$1,620.00:
$6.14
$826,90
$15 .6
$2.025.01)
$8.07
$1,089.45
;137
2545.523
2' NON - METALLIC CONDUIT
LIN FT
589
54.01)
$3,956.00
3115
$1, 335.15
$4.00
$3,966 DO
$3.07
$3,036.23
13B
2545.531
15 DUPLEX[
LIN FT
6440
5250
$16,100.00
$120
$7,726.0
$1.70
540.998.01):
57.17
57,539.80
139
140
741
2545. 531
2560572
2554.509
I6 OUPLEX(DIRECTIONAL BORE}
HANOHOLE TYPE-PVC METAL COVER
GUIDE POST TYPES
UN FT
EACH
EACH
2496
14
1
55.00 $12.490.00
580.00 $1,720.00
4150.0 $150.0
$427
5675.67
$40.00
$10,666.46
$9,459.38
$40.00
$9 -00
5750.00
WOOD
$0.984.O0i
$10,500.00
5100.0
$6.77
5507.00:
540.0?
574,413.46
TT
W-00
142
2561601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
1
$30.00.00;
530.005.00
6t3,5D0.00
$13.500.00
313,500.00
513,500.00
513.500.00
$13,500.00
143
2564 -618
SIGN TYPE C
50 FT
4131
335.00
574.455.0
$31.50
371009.50
$32.0 313,216.00
$31.50
313.009.60
144
2564.818
SIGN TYPE D
SO FT
209
$37.00
37.733.00
532.00
166.138"D
534.00 37,106.00
$32.00
00,686.0
146
2565.602
SPLICE LOOP DETECTOR
EACH
2
5150.00
6300.00
51.33.54
$2.67.08
$120.00
$240.00
S20700
$414.0
146
2565.602
NMC LOOP DETECTOR VXF
EACH
3
515W -05
54,500.0
$565.83
$1,697.49:
$1,100.00
$3,300 -00
$917-00
$2,751.00
147
2565.603
2CS14
LIN FT
135
5200
$270.00,
$3.51
$473.85
$2.06
527690
$107
$144.45
1148
2571.501
CONIFEROUS TREE 6' HT B86
TREE
89
$360.00
$32.040.00
$133,32
$11,885.48
$165 -0
514,665.0
$164.40
$14,831.60
149
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 2' CAL B"
TREE
135
WOOD
$69,380.00
$198.73
$26,755.28
5475.90
523,800.00.
$169.76
$23.067 -36
150
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5' CAL Bd6
TREE
35
$650.00•
$22.750.00
5394.73
313,815.55
3200 -DD
57,000.00
$184,60,
$6,878 -00
751
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 3' CAL BRIM
TREE
51
$850.0 $33,150M
5279.97
$14.27847
5320.01)
516,320.00
$315.42
51 fi.F37.42
752
2577506
DECIDUOUS SHRUB NO S CONT
SHRUB
91
$83.0 $7,553.06
526.56
$2,426.06
632.00
$2,912.00
$29.681
$2,700.58
153
2572501
TEMPORARY FENCE
UN FT
500
$500•
$2.500.00
5740:
5700.00
$2.00
31,000.W
$1.75
567500
154
2572.504
SANDY LOAM FILL
CU YD
2009
1 $35.00
676.375.00
67.50
515,1)6750
520. W'
$W,180.W
$15.00
630.135.W,
155
2573.502
SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED
UN FT
3211
$2.00
564200
$1.85
$529.85
$2.00;
$642.00
$1.65
$529.65
156
2573.50.5
FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE MOVING WATER
LIN FT
60
520.00
S1,2D0.0
514.25
$855.00
$20.00
$1,2W.00
$14.25
5855.00
157
2573.530
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
EACH
174
St25.0O
$21,750.00
325.0
$4,350.00
S7 W.W
$17. 400 -00
5200170
$34,8W.W'
158
2573.550
EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR
LUMP SUM
1
$5.00.00
55,01)0.00
3500.00
$500.00
$2,5W.00
$2.5W.00
52500 -00
52,5111W
159
2573.602
TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
EACH
6
51.000.00
56,00D,W.
$300.05
61,8OO.W
51,000.00
$6.0W.131)
WO -00
41,8W.05
.160
2575.501
SEEDING
E
2.3
3700.00
3230.00
5350.00
3805.00
[150,00
5395.00
5350.00
3805.00
161
2575.502
SEEDMIXTURE110
ND
POUND
233
$2.50
$ 582.50
$0.35
$81.55
5200
$9 %.W;
50.35
$81.55
162
2575.505
SODDING TYPE LAWN
D
11299
53.00,
$33,897.00
$2A5
$27. 682.55
63-50
349,596.50
$2.45'
$27,682.55
1fi9
2575511
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 7
0.23
$120.00 WAG
52W.DO
$57.56
$200.00
546.00
$250.00
3L57.00
164
2575513
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE fi
D
12
55.00 W0 C7
$21 971
5260.4
$100.00
S1.21)).001
$42.DDI
$3014.0)
httplhtviu nw.m,Imd.mn=R1AEC,'Reponshpt Absumtap! WorkOrderID- 7i&EngitwaFSr- Y&N=PerPage Pe Pag�35
Pegs ] of L2
4R 72010
' 'S
V
SAP 043-625 -021 - Prulecl Bid Absn t
hap flmuwn m mclead.mn.usrf[t4EC'Aei ox rpt Absl 1. asp Wod.UrderID-75 &EnginurEsr -Y &Nw PzrP 4 &L1nesPerPag�35
Page 6 of 12
:872010
�J
f\
ProAa SAP 043 - 021 - CSAH 25 (Pn s SVeer SE} & Ylashingwn A... E.
i
Engineers Esdrmte
:R & R Escaraueg
Wavier Conslmc m Inc
tMarhb Cons amn
Item No.
llem
Unds
QuarmH
UM Pace
ToW Price
,Unit Pn
iToial
Mince
UnR Pars
ToW N.
Vnt Price
Total Pace
tfi5
2575.519
DISK ANCHORING
JACRE
2.3
850.00
5115.00
5150.00
3345.D0
$150.00
3345.00
315F1.u0
3
166
2575.532
FERTILIZER TYPE 1
!POUND
467
§0.50
3233.50
30.75
3350.25
$1.00
3467.00
30.75
$350.25
167
:2575.604
GEOTEXTILE VOUD BARRIER FABWC
SQ YO
94
51.50;
3141.00
$038
554.52
33-W
$282.00
$1.35
3128.90
X153
2575.604
MULCH MATERIAL FYPE SPECIAL (ROM
SQ YD
94
$15.00
$1.410.00
3&09
3780.48
342.00
33,fW8.CO
340.501
E3.607.00
hap flmuwn m mclead.mn.usrf[t4EC'Aei ox rpt Absl 1. asp Wod.UrderID-75 &EnginurEsr -Y &Nw PzrP 4 &L1nesPerPag�35
Page 6 of 12
:872010
�J
f\
SAP 013 -625 -021 - Projea Bid.4bsna
'12
2104503
REMOVE BRICK SIDEWALK
'sO FT
t52
$2m
3304.00
SS.no
37fi0.00.
52.00
5304.00'
1 13
2t04503
IREMOVE CONCRETE WALK
SO FT
SMS4
9075
$39, 895.50
50.83
$44,151.02
87.7E
$99.JA5.50
16
2104505
REMOVE PAVEMENT
SO YO
45035
$SDO
$230,175.00
$5.00
5230,175.00
$6.20
$255.417.06
14
2104.505
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
50 YO
1221
$6.D0-
$7,326.00
311.00
313,431.00
$6.20
$7.57010
15
2106.505
REMOVE ffiR]MINOIIS ORFVEWAY PAVEMENT
SO YD
260
$6.00
$'1.5/0.00
$8.00
$1,560.00
$6.20
St.6U.00
17
2104.509
REMOVE RAILROAD TIES
LIN FT
20
$50.00
31. 000.06
310.001
$200A0
$125.00
$2,500.00
18
2106.509
REMOVE LIGHTING uNIT
EACH
12,
5200.00
52.400.00
$127.00
$1.524.00
$120.00
$1,140.00
20
2104.509
REMOVE MANHOLE(&WTARY)
EACH
10
8400.00
$4,000.00
SM-00
$1 Nam
$250.00
32,500.00
1S
2104.509
REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH RASIN
EACH
58
5250.00
$14,500.D0
$100 -OD
¢
$250.00
$14,500.ODI
http:h}n•1slon.co.mclead m[ L US fRt.4EClRepDrb'rpt_Absuactasp'? W ork0rderilN758EngweaEsl =Y &NumPerPagr- i &LinzsPerPag�35
Page 7 of 12
4,27.
`1
SAP 043 -61-15 -021 - Prolen Bid Alasua0t
hap Ilrmjsjoa w.nIclwd mn u R1AEC+ReporBirpr_Ab6u= WWorkOrduID-75&agin uFs- Y &NumPerPagr•ABcl.mmPerPagr35
Page 8 of 12
4,2712010
Project: SAP L 625-021 - CSAH 25 (Adams Sheet SE) 8 WJa g[oa Awnue E.
Engine Emma
D."ck Inc.
Nodiand ^wnstructim; Co Inc
item No.
71am
Units
Ouanliry
Unit PTi I
Total Pnce
Unit Pnce
Taal Pace
Uml Pnm
Total Price
37
2105.607
EXCAVATION SPECIAL
CU YD
100
510DI)
51,009.00
320.00
$2.DOO.D0
$45.00
54500.DD
38
2105.609
NAUL $ DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL
TON
200
330.00
$6,000.00
350.00
51D.OD.0
ua-ml
$8,000.00
39
2106.607
EXCAVATION - COMMON
CU YO
25784
%.001
$154,734.00
$4.00
$103,158.00
$560
5141,636.50
41
2108.607
COMMON EMagdK 4ENT (CV)
CU YD
2350
52.001
$4,700.10
$15.00
$35,25D.D0
$5-SD
$12,925.00•
42 ;2106.607
GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CVL -CU YD
2169
$8.00
577.572 -01
$1390
328,457.00
$1 t.OD
$24,079.00
43
2106.607
SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT {CV)
iCU YD
8791
512.00
$105.452.00
613.0
$114,283.00 $11.00
396,701.00
40
21D6.607
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
CU YD
2189
38.00
$17.512.00
51.00
$2,189.00 $6.75;
$14,115.75
44
2118.502
AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5
CU YD 1
963
$22.00
II21.186.1))t
514.52
573.982.76; 516.65,
$18,033.95
45
2123.610
1.5 CU YD BACKHOE
HOUR
20
5175.00
$3.500.00=
S125.DDI
$2.500.00!
$300.0
56,000.00
46
2130.501
4'd4TER
M GALLONS
250
$35.00
59.750.00
625.131,
$6,250.00
525.00
$6,250.00
67
2131.502
CALCIUM CHLORI DE SOLUTION
GALLONS
2500
$150
$3.750.00
Sim
$3.750.00
$1.00
32,500.00
d8
Y211.503
AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5
Cu YO
8092
512.00
$176,024.00
$21.001
5169.932.00
518.65
5134.731.80
160
2311.529
REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPDXY COATED)
POUND
17400
51.70
89,580.00
$1.58
527,492 -00
51.6(1
527.640.00
49
2301.531
EXPANSION JOINTS DESIGN E1 -1
UN FT
398
$3.DD
$594.00
$2.67
5528.88
52 -70
$554.60
X50
2301531
EXPANSION JOINTS DESIGN ESS
UN FT
w
$70.0
$3,920.0
$47.60
$2,665.88
$48.00
$2.888.00
51
2301.602
1.25 - DOWEL BAR (EPDXY COATED)
EACH
2833
$10.00
828,330.0
$12.33
534,930.86
$1250
$35,412.50
52
2301 -604
CONCRETE PAVEMENT BA'
$0 YD
38685
827.0
51,01(495.00
$30.65
51,185,695.25
831 -DO
21 .i 95.235.00.
53
2380501
TYPE SP 9.5 NEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)
TON
634
$85.09i
553.890.00
$92.0
$58,328.00
$78.00
666,452.00'
54
2383.502
TYPE SP 125 NON WEAR] NG COURSE MIXTURE R,B)
ION
134
$75.00
$10.050.00
$91.00
$10,854.00 578.00
$1D,452.0'
56
2451.509
GRANULAR MATERIAL FOUNDATION [LVI
CU YD
100
825.01
R 500.00
57.00
$700.0 520.0.
B,DDO.00
56 ;2451.607
ROCK BEDDING (CV)
CU YD
150
$15.00
$22w.OD
$20.00
$3,000.00 Pam
$4,500.00
57
2501.515
2T RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1
5900.00
S".DD
5611.00
5800.00' 1500.90
5600.00
58
2502.541
4' PERF PE PIPE DRAIN
LIN FT
8618
$6.0
$51,708.00
$250
$21.545.00 65.65
$48,691.70
88
2503.511
g PVC SANITARY SEVER PIPE SOR 3519.14'
Lin FT
368
$23.00
$8.464.00;
519.00
$6.992.001
$30.00
$11,040.00
2503.511
10" PVC SANITARY SEVER PIPE SDR 35 0 -10
Lin FT
78
$33.00
$2,574.00
525.OD,
51 550.0
$31.50
$2,457.0
R 7012
2503.511
10' PVC SANITARY SEVER PIPE SDR3510 -14'
Lin FT
1 63
$3700
52.331D0
325.13;
S1 575.9
$31.50
$1,98.1.50
2503.511
12' PVC SANITARY SEVER PIPE SDR 350 -10'
Un FT
2555
50.5.00
$114,975.00
$21.00
553,656.0
$33.50
585.59250
,
250 3. 511
8' PVC SANITARY SEVER SERMCE PIPE SOR 35
Lin FT
3370
86 -50
$69,085.01
$17.00
$57.290.00
$22.60
576 -16291
.87
2503.511
W PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE SM 35 0' -10'
Lin FT
1754
$21.0
836,896.0
$19.00
$33,326.00
$30.00
552.620 -00
59
2503.511
15' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V
LIN FT
1861
S27.D0
$50,247.00
$22.00
540,942 -00
$30.00
$55.830.00'
60
2503511
18' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III
LAN FT
1230
$30.00
$3$,700.0
324.00
$30,980.00
$32.00
641,280.00
81
2501511
21' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III
UN FT
d96
$32.00
$13,952.0
$28.0
311,336.00
334.00
$14.824.OD
62
2503511
24' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III
LIN FT
973
335.00[
$34, 055.00
$31.00
$30,163.00
536.00
$35.28.00'
63
2503511
27'RC PIPE SEWER CLASS BI
LIN FT
1183
$40.00
547. 320.00
$36.50
543,179.50
342.00
549,686.0;
64
2503.511
30' RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III
,LIN FT
78
355.0
$4.290.00
$47.00
33,666.00
545.0➢
$3,510.00
hap Ilrmjsjoa w.nIclwd mn u R1AEC+ReporBirpr_Ab6u= WWorkOrduID-75&agin uFs- Y &NumPerPagr•ABcl.mmPerPagr35
Page 8 of 12
4,2712010
SAP X13- 625 -021 - Projw Bid Ahsu=
95
2504.602
Y CURB STOP & BOX
.EACH
1
5350.00
S35OA6
S: OM
$500.00
$450.00
s/ -oa
93
2501.602
12'N+ET TAP MK GATE VALVE
EACH
S
$3,700.00
$3,700.0
56,850.001
$4,850.00
$3,800.00
$3,600-UO
.81
2W4A02
6 WATERMAIN OFFSET
EACH
2
$1,850.W
53,70000
$1, 000.00
$2,000.00
$3.550.00
{7,100.00
82
2501.60]
S W TERMAIN OFFSET
EACH
1
$2.3DD-DDI
52,300.00
$1,000.00
21.000.00
$3.700.001
53,703.0
83
2506.602
tY 6'64Tmmm OFFSET
EACH
4
32,850.001
$11,400.00
$2,000.00
38.000.60
54,400.00
537,600.00
85
2504.602
S' MJ HUB HYDRANT 85 BURY
EACH
7
$2,850.00;,
318.550.00
$2,900.0
520,300.0
62.660.001
517,850.0
86
250L
10' M3 HUB HMRANT I0.P BURY
EACH
4
$3,200.00
$12,830.00
53,200.00
$12,600.00
S2.700.0al
$10,800.00
130
2504.602
MET% WASTE RECEPTACLE
EACH
51
V.&H]MI
$8.000.00
31,000.0
$5.DOO.DO
si.mo.oGI
$6,750.00
98
2504.603
4 WATERMAIN PIPE PVC C-WO
UN FT
68
$25-Ml
31.650.0
$25.00
S1,B50.00
$1&.06
$1,254.00.
httpJhn•sroaw.mc]ead.m .u'AtAY'.CIRepons�rpt_AhsttW. asp orkOrderIE)- 75&EriginmEsrY &N=Pe Ngc 4 &Lkn sPerPng 35
Page 9 o ] 2
5127 +2010
�J
SAP 043. 625 -021 - Pro7ut Bld Abstract
PR ea: SAP 043- 625-021 - DSAH 25 [Ftlam^, Street SEI81VashmgmrtArenl.e E. 1 1E°9ineers Esbnale � Duiningt, Inc. �NO01aiW CanSWa Ca Inc
i�.., .i,, o..,. Um1s Ouanhry Unh Pnre Total Pnce ;Unit Pnce Told Pnce Un1t Pnre Trial Pnce
$12.474.DD
crCEQS unuury E DEPYW I"N FT 1 13.81 S95.ODI $1.311.01 MOM $1.188.801 5156.01 $2.152.801
10.5
2506.502 !_CONSTRUCT
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN N
UN FT 1
101.5:
3300.00
$30,450.00
5230.00
523,345.00
$12600
552.788.00
106 '2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 484020 JUN
FT 1
296.3
3300.00
$88.890.00
$210.00
582,223.0
$125.0
$37.D37.50
107
2508.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60 -1020
LIN FT
27.1
2.350.00(
55.485.D0
3320.00
38.872.00
$210.00
15,887 AG
108
2506,502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE CESIGN 724020 :LIN
FT
17.4
5400.00
$6.960.00
3340.00
SS.Ht6.00
5250.0
54.350-00
109
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 84 -4020 1 1-IN
IN FT
8.3
0.00
$5,3&5.0
$440.0
53.652.00
5370.0
53,011.00
110
2506.502 ICONSTRUCT
DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 964020
LIN FT
33.3
5700.00
523,370.00
$590.00
519,647.00
$450.0
S14,985.00
111
2506.502
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 10&1 G
LIN FT
9.3
5&00.00
57,"0.00
50.90.00
$8,277.0
$675.00
$8,27].60
114
2506576 1
CASTING ASSEMEW-Y
EACH
B7
MOM
$56. 550.0;
5650.00
$56.550.00
3590.00
550.460.0:
134
2545.515
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE SPECIAL 3
EACH
16
$9,000.00
$1",000.00
S10AOO.Oj5160.000.00
$10,000.00
2.160.000.00;
138
2515.521
.2' RIGID STEEL CONDUIT
LIN FT
135
$12.DO
$1.620.00
59.0
$1.215.00
$&10
$1,093.50
137
2545.523
2' NON - METALLIC CONDUIT
LIN FT
989
$4.00
$3,0600
$4.00
$3,956.00
$3.10
53,065.90
138
12W.531
1#6 DUPLEX
LIN FT
6 "0
$2.50,
$16,100.00
5120
$7 728.00
$1.20
$7.72600
139
12545.531
INS DUPLEX (DIRECTIONAL BORE)
UN FT
2498
$5.G0
$12,490.60
$5.75
$14.35350
$6.00
$14.988.00
Pave 10011
httpPubvluon.comckodmnus+R[ AEC,' Aeporttirp[_ Abs¢ accup' W' od. 9rderl75& F. ngmeerFxt= Y&NuroPrrPagHRLulesPerPage= 35 4272030
r
SAP 043625-021- Projett Bud Abstract
http.hYn•ssmn.c0.mcle0d.mn. us'lit.4EGReponsirp[_A6s[ roc[. asp?WarkOrderli>- 75& EngmeerFsr- S ' &YuroPrrPage= +1&5.inesPerPag�35
"s
Page 11 of L2
4,:72010
ProjeU: SAP Od %25021 - CSAH 25 {R.tlams 51rer1 SE] S Washington AVen,ie E.
'cnginrtrs Estimate
Ouininrk, Ire;.
Noukantl Consrw.eori Co Inc
llem No.
Item
Units !Quamlty
UM Prire ITotal
Price -Unit
Price
Total Pnw
Unrt Pnce
Total Price
140
2550.512
FNNDHOLE TYPE.PVC METAL COVER
EACH 14
586-0
$1,121).0•
WO DO
57,003.07
5525.00
37,350.00
141
2554.509
GUIDE POST TYPE B
EACH
1
$150.00
$150.00
540.00
540.00
$75-WI
$75.00
142
2563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL .LUMPSUM
1
S30,DD0.00
338000.00
$13.507.DO
513,500.00 $13,500.-00
$13,500.00
143
2564 -618
SIGN TYPE C
DSO FT
413
$35.00
314,455.00
631.50
sls.D .50'
531.50
$73.009.50.
144
2564.648
SIGN TYPE D
SO FT
209.
$37.00
$7,733.00
S32.DD:
$6,688.00
531.50'
$6.5&3.50
145
2565.802
SPLICE LOOP DETECTOR
EACH
2_
$150.00 $300.00
$207.00;
$414.00
3210.00
$420.00
146
2568.802
NMC LOOP DETECTOR 6'X6
EACH
3:
51 ,500.00 $4,506.00
$920.00
32,760.00
$1,000.00
$3.000.30
147
2585.603
270114
UN FT
135
$2.00 S270.D0
$1.10
5148.50
$1.10
$143.50
146
2571.501
CONIFEROUS TREE 6' HT B&B
TREE
89
$380.00
$32.040.W
$182.0
$16,198.00
$165.00
$14,665.30
149
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 2' CAL B&B
TREE
136
$510.00
599,360.00
$180.00
524.480.00
$170.00
$23,126.00
150
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5' CAL 818
TREE
35
6850.00
522,700.00
52 1
310.290 -0
$195.00
56,825.00
451
2571.502
DECIDUOUS TREES' CAL B&B
TREE
51
5656.00
$33,150.001
Una O6
513,mhoo
$320.00
518,320.00
152
2571.505
DECIDUOUS SHRUB NO 5 CONT
SHRUB
t 91
583.00
$7,553.00'
W.Do
63,640.Do
SM-00
32,730.00
153
2572.501
TEMPORARY FENCE
UN FT
500
i`.m
62500.00
sl .40
37DO.OD.
$1.40
370D.DD.
154
2572.500
SANDY LOAM FILL
CU YD
2039
535.06
370,315.00
$34.00
$68,300.00'.
635.00
570,315.00.
155
2573.562
SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED
LIN FT
321
$2.130
5642.00
$1.65
$529.65
5529.65
156
2573506
FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE MOVING WATER
LIN FT
60
$20.D0
$1,200.00
574.25
W5.001
$14.251
$W5.00
157
2573530
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
EACH
174
$125.20
$21.75 1
575.01]
$13,050.00
$175.00
158
2573.550
EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR
LUMP SUM
1S
55,000.00 35.000-0
$2,500.011
$ZWO 0
520,000.00
$20.000.00
759
2573.802
TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
EACH
8
$1,000.00, $6.OWDO
$500.00
$3- o
S1 000.00
W.o30.6
160
2575.501
SEEDING
ACRE
2.3
5100.00
5230.00
$350.00
s605.00
$350.00
$W&W
161
2575.502
SEED MIXTURE 110
POUND
233
$2.50
5562.50
$0.35
58755
$0.35
$67.55
162
2575.505
SODDING TYPE LAWN
SO YD
11299
69.6
533,897 .00,
32-45
1127,682 -55
$2.45
327,662.55
163
2575.517
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1
TON
0.23
$126.00
527.60.
$250 -0
S57
SM-00
$5750
164
2575.513
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 6
CU YD
12
15.00
$60.00
$42.06
5504.00
$42 -00
$504.00
165
2575.519
DISK ANCHORING
ACRE
2.3
SM-00
$115.00
$150.00
$345.D0-
5750 -00
5345.00•
166
2575.532
FERTILIZER TYPE 1
POUND
467
0.50
3233.50
50.75
33513.25
00.75
5350.25'
167
2575"
GEOTEI(TILE IVIED BARRIER FABRIC
So YD
94
111.50
$141 AG
$2.00
$188.00
S1.35_
$126.90
.168
2575.004
MULCH MATERIAL TYPE SPECIAL {ROC K)
SO YD
94
315.00,
31,410.00
$9.501
5893.00
540.50
$3,807.0
1169
2582501
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPO1 - GROUND IN
EACH
6:
$200.00 31,600.00
$175.001
$1,400.00
$175.00
$1,100.00
2552501
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RGHT ARROWI EPDXY - GROUND IN
EACH
14
$200.00 $2- 800.00
$175.00
32450.0
$175.00
$2.450.0
2562.501
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT -THRU ARROWI EPDXY - GROUND IN
EACH
1
$250.00
5250.00
32]5.00
$275 -0
5275.00
327506
Et74
2582.007
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RIGHT-THRU ARROWI EPDXY- GROUND IN
EACH
1
$250.00
$25u.DO
$27500
527556
$275.00
3275 -0 2582.501
PAVEMENT MESSAGE (HANDICAPPED SYMBOL} EPDXY- GROUND IN
EACH
1
$4,50.00
s45D.DD
$250.00
$250.00
$250.00
3250 -0
2582.502
4 SOUD LINE WTE -EPDXY (GROUND IN}
UN FT
12978
$0.50
$5,489.00
$0 -70
69,1)84 -00
30 -70
39,064.60
http.hYn•ssmn.c0.mcle0d.mn. us'lit.4EGReponsirp[_A6s[ roc[. asp?WarkOrderli>- 75& EngmeerFsr- S ' &YuroPrrPage= +1&5.inesPerPag�35
"s
Page 11 of L2
4,:72010
SAP 043-625 -021 - Projw Bid Ab=¢=
I hereby cortify that this Is m exact reproducliun o} bids received.
Certified By:
Dale:
License No.
http. ;htvmomw.m Icad.mn.0 RtAEC/AcpG"rpt_ Abstract .up?WwLOfderID= 75&.Engm=EsL =Y3N umNrPagt 1@ uwsPuFag�35
NW 12 of I2
487;2010
J
Project: SAP 043-&25 -021 - CSA 25 [Adams SI SEF & Mstiingwn Avenue E.
Engineers Estimate
Dunne. Inc.
midland Con,rn.c0an Co W
te
Im No.
[Earn
UN'18
Ouanbty
UnR Pace
Tote1 Pace
UM Pnce jT"
stmt Pace
To1eA Price
.195
2582.502 4' SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY (GROUND IN
LIN FT
2200
50.50
$1,10090
50.71
$0.75
31,650.00;
176
2582.502 4' BROKEN LINE YE OVFEPDXY [GROUND IN}
LIN FT
8t0
30.50
M M
$0.71
$0.75
$457.50
177
2582- 502
'4' DOUBLE SCUD LINE YELLOVV.EPDXY (GROUND IN)
UN FT
41&1
31.00
$4.180 -00
$1.42
$1.45
36p61.00
178
2582502
24' SOLID LINE YELLOW -EPDXY [GROUND IM
UN FT
360
$630
$2210 -00
$8.00
$890
$2,720.170
179
2582503
CROSSWALK MARKING -EPDXY (GROUND ft
FT
2770,
$7 -00
$19,30.00;
3520
$520
$14- 404.00
_ SO
i
Totals fw Project SAP 043 - 625-021
54, 856, 006.15;
S4.588.815.131
54,783,871.51;
%of EsWate IM Project W 043.625-021
1
-5.50%
-1.48%
I hereby cortify that this Is m exact reproducliun o} bids received.
Certified By:
Dale:
License No.
http. ;htvmomw.m Icad.mn.0 RtAEC/AcpG"rpt_ Abstract .up?WwLOfderID= 75&.Engm=EsL =Y3N umNrPagt 1@ uwsPuFag�35
NW 12 of I2
487;2010
J
0
rhood Meeting Information Sheet
Letting No. 1 /Project No_ 10 -01
Washington Ave /Adams St Reconstruction
Tuesday, May I1 th, 2010 ♦ 6: 00 PM (Assessment Hearing)
City Council Chambers ♦ 111 Hassan Street SE
INTRODUCTION
The City of Hutchinson appreciates the opportunity to review the upcoming Washington Ave /Adams St
reconstruction project to be administered by McLeod County and the City. At this time, the project is
anticipated to start in the spring/summer of 2010. The intent of this meeting is to provide a general project
review and discuss the preliminary roadway corridor layout. There will be some initial information
regarding potential property assessments associated with the project provided at this meeting.
PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
The project area consists of Washington Ave (TH 15/Main St to Adams St) and Adams St/CSAH 25 (north
of Washington Ave to "3M Bridge "). This project is a direct result of McLeod County and the City
• receiving partial funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) due to this corridor
previously being Trunk Highway 22 and Mn/DOT turning back the roadways to the local agencies. The
project will consist of a full reconstruction of the roadway surface, complete utility replacements /upgrades,
signing/striping, street lighting, sidewalks /paths, downtown streetscaping, and
restoration /landscaping/plantings. Obviously, the current pavement condition is evidence that the proposed
improvements are necessary and timely. Unfortunately, the work required to accomplish this extensive
project will not be completely funded by Mn/DOT and require additional City funding. At this point, the
proposed project area has been established, but the details of the anticipated improvements are subject to
change depending on City funding limitations.
HEARINGS/PROCESS
This Neighborhood Meeting is the first step in the process. This meeting will be an informal discussion
regarding the project with City staff, to get preliminary information regarding what the project is proposed to
include and to receive a very preliminary estimate of what assessments may be. Due to the project being in a
fairly early stage, these estimates may be fairly broad. This informal discussion will allow individual
questions /comments to be heard and for a general review of the project to occur prior to the first official
hearing required by project assessment procedures.
Due to the community impacts /interest that this project entails, a Community Open House will most likely
be held sometime in late November or early December. Adjacent property owners again will be specifically
mailed a notice of this meeting beforehand. This gathering will probably not include a formal presentation,
but give individuals an opportunity to review drawings and provide comments. Prior to this open house, the
project team will potentially be meeting with specific property owners and businesses (possibly a
Business/Downtown Meeting will be initiated).
•
The first official hearing, the Public Hearing, is anticipated to occur at a City Council meeting on January
12th, 2010. All properties proposed to be assessed will receive mailed notice. This meeting will be televised
and is the formal presentation of the proposed project to the Council. Public input time is included and
welcomed at this meeting. Approval at this hearing does not mean that the project will be constructed as
?rqp)
presented. This will be the point at which a formal decision will be made by the City Council as to whether •
or not staff should continue the assessment process and move on to the next step of completing the
plans /specifications with the understanding that actual bids for completing the work will be requested.
The second official hearing, the Assessment Hearing, would be for another City Council meeting after
receiving the bids (most likely in March or April). Staff would prepare final assessment amounts for each
property, and send them out in advance of the meeting. At this hearing, property owners will then be given
the opportunity to comment on the merits of both the project and the proposed amount of the assessments.
Questions, thoughts and concerns regarding the project or associated assessments would be heard by the City
Council, and official action on whether or not to award the City's portion of the project work for construction
would be taken. To formally contest an assessment, a written/signed objection letter must be provided to the
City Administrator prior to or at the Assessment Hearing. This action then allows you, the property owner,
to appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice
of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment
(typically the Assessment Hearing date) and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after
service upon the Mayor or City Administrator.
ASSESSMENTS
As described above, this project is considered to be a full reconstruction project, thus a portion of the total
cost of these improvements will be assessed to the adjacent private properties. Similar to the TH 7
Reconstruction and TH 15 Roundabout projects, this work is being administered primarily by another
agency, but a significant portion of the overall cost is being incurred by the City. Thus, public improvement
assessments are a justifiable and fair funding alternative to accomplish the proposed work.
At this time, City staff estimates that adjacent properties' assessments will include all or a portion of the
following items:
• General Assessment - $40 to $60 ($50 avg. - $45 actual) per lineal foot of roadway frontage
• Downtown Streetscaping Assessment - $15 to $25 ($20 avg. - $18 actual) per lineal foot of frontage
• Water Service Assessment - $1000 to $2000 ($1500 avg. - $1500 actual) per service line
• Sanitary Sewer Service Assessment - $1500 to $2500 ($2000 avg. - $1420 actual) per service line
•
Commercial/Industrial Water Service Assessment - $2000 to $3000 ($2500 avg. - $2500 actual) per
line
• Mill/Overlay - $10 to $20 ($15 avg. - $13.50 actual) per lineal foot of roadway frontage
At the above estimated average rates, a typical 60' -wide residential lot would incur an assessment of about
$6500 - $5620 actual and a 80' -wide downtown - commercial lot would incur an assessment of about $9100 -
$7960 actual (potentially $2500 - $2500 actual more if a 6" water service is needed).
SCHEDULE & CONSTRUCTION ITEMS
As previously mentioned, construction is anticipated to start in the spring/summer of 2010. The project
should be substantially completed within one construction season (weather dependent) with final restoration
and landscaping potentially occurring during the following year. At this time, we encourage adjacent
property owners to begin to relocate irrigation systems, invisible dog fences, personal landscaping features,
etc. from the roadway right -of -way (typically immediately behind the existing sidewalks). Also, project staff
will be contacting specific property owners to request permission (right -of -entry form) to properly construct
a grading match to your lawns/buildings /driveways /landscaping features.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Please feel free to contact Kent Exner /City Engineer at 234 -4209 or kexner@ci.hutchinson.mn.us ci.hutchinson.mn.us if you have
any questions, comments or concerns that you would like addressed. We would be willing to meet on -site to
discuss the proposed improvements.
Thank you for your time and consideration!
0
•
0
HUTCHINSON PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Hutchinson City Center /111 Hassan St SE/Hutchinson MN 55350-2522/320-234-4209/FAX 320 - 234 -4240
ENGINEERING REPORT & FEASIBILITY STUDY
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
DATE: December 8, 2009 (revised 05/11/10)
SUBJECT: Letting No. 1 /Project No. 10 -01
I have studied the following proposed improvements and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be
constructed:
L1 /P10 -01 Adams St (CSAH 25) & Washington Ave Reconstruction Project by new roadway construction and utility
infrastructure installations including construction of trunk and lateral storm sewer and treatment/drainage
improvements, trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and services, trunk and lateral watermain and services,
grading, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, trail /sidewalk, concrete surfacing, lighting, landscaping,
streetscaping, restoration and appurtenances.
44 ✓
C
'to: Mayor & City Council
Frorn: Mark Schnobrich, City Forester
City of I lutchinson
Forestry Department
1400 Adants St SE
l lutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234 -4459
ltF: University of Minnesota Emerald Ash Rorer Grant Project
Fax (320) 234 -6971
The City of Hutchinson is participating in a University
of Minnesota Emerald Ash borer Grant Project in 2010.
The $1,500.00 grant to the city is a cooperative
endeavor between the University of Minnesota and the
City of Hutchinson. Part of this project is the
construction of 4 above ground gravel beds, used to
store bare root trees. These trees will eventually be
used to replant Hutchinson after the loss of ash trees
due to Emerald Ash Borer.
Stearnswood of Hutchinson has generously donated
and constructed all the beds as part of this project at
a value of over $300.00 dollars. The Hutchinson Tree
Board wanted to acknowledge this donation and thank
the Stearnswood Company for their generous
contribution to this project.
The University backed project also includes volunteer
training of citizens to assist us with tree identification
and tree inventorying to help us better prepare for the
consequences of the effects of Emerald Ash Borer
when it does come to Hutchinson.
Newt Potter Corey Stearns
Dale Redetzke Steve Cook
Laura Poser
985 Therms saved /yr
$2,243: Electric saved /yr based on average cost per kWh in 2009
$ 918: Nat Gas saved /yr based on average cost per therm in 2009
$3,151: Total Savingslyr
+r1H Milnw If ru 1.5' a tkt, Illr•t'I n,ahruafe of '3 If ngwj)"Wol m,Lhlrrrrl .Intl 6+h e,od ... Wh•d,' "t v:r h:+dnt1 ^f Ld5„r 4pu,q h w rnmpfwh[ar
'r,e pre /e:t't
[2 of Vhed Fiblrl YMnla F
Fn Q. .tbn Me ,d f
f *lu 6
6wmlala I
I ft- Ib C
CommlSalPrin I
IYP eh 1 E
E meerin I
I,RW 1
1y N
N
cr.4 W'.lOk L
L WWOAN i
i ]f Yn i
i I107 1
1 .n 2
21..41 2
201 3
31r]
n,xul.,wnnrw �� s.wti.. u
ul nmMU x
x reel] a
a r.WB i
i 100 r
r 1.0 s
s r20 r
r hs 0
0 1 1.174 2
221
— reo.nnn y ..-
'OI,$'t6
!'rnvrcle 01d 6,is(1 hnC :) „r]�r /Y Ic;a h)r fha hmlrllrl,.ry ur 1.1Cd,ly Lnw ;hn HnHr�y e(hnHncy nlCJSUR'S he:nq luy(allrx[7 Lvill • Ilfn, f Nor
HI J1, 1mr1 y Hnl +l q), ass Ihn M most rHCr ^nl yF•'as of mm"taly 6te; rind oivd"vay use an, '1 the IOuV I'A"?f 9:3 %evvH It Ihu :Iprltllnrl
See attached two -year base line energy use for the following seven facilities CreekSide Soils,
Hutchinson Area Transportation Services, Police Department, Library, Evergreen Dining Hall, Event
Center and the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Also attached is the most recent S3 score for all buildings, except the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The
State of Minnesota's B3 Program Manager suggested the City of Hutchinson not enter data for the
Wastewater Facility due to this skewing the City's data and reports. the benchmark Information is
included for the facility even though the benchmark calculations may not be accurate. Evergreen Senior
Dining has not been benchmarked due to Its small size (4000 (t`) and it is part of a much larger apartment
complex that Is not city owned.
Section Three — Budget
The following is a detailed budget that includes the overall cost for each improvement and a
breakdown of equipment costs and labor costs for installation. This includes any and all other
associated costs (i.e., consulting, commissioning, travel, and other related expenses).
[I oI M.Itl11nbMI F96hI�Wm!
Cr.gilu. SAar
M�w:nr AwA lrrrvy,IV ...
Ydk. 4rlwr
eve Iwn n... Ir
Crlrt CuR�
, blc.l] alnlnl
FPa CalwwRyW.I Mel re Ries FYII a`a r4[ In Comm,mnln Ao M t FA In la OPr MPUn
L M HtlrvOb L d YM F 7262 i +2Y 1 I +N i 1 AOa i �eII r 21..44 20
HmWte _ 1 28512 1 +Wa a +n 1 1,10+ "14 S 717 a RO.rar 202
b H Rmwn'�” 5 wt s ]W6 F b 1 120 i M5 Iba f ON n
In RW 1 rIn s jwt i air 1 Ve 5 20r
I I HWMI.
L 2fW i _Lev L m 5 164 5 ar S 74 a "
b aa,dt, s woo a 6w $ 5u a AA. 1 ea9 1 rw a 41q se
V�dAe A, n P•w a /f wo i aA Ina ! w ! 1—
Cry 4 a s ) W 0 up1 5 s 121
1w 1 ",n0 a %1 li w I i1d
Section Four -- Attachments
I foffuwrny Is 12 51 n/nnr try (lf fh,• firmnaClnf L:Crrnnutrrrr,'niti for the rnatrh w& bavo. lJruposed.
The City of Hutchinson has been working for a number of months with Ameresco, Inc., an independent
energy solutions provider, in the development of a Guaranteed Energy - Savings Contract (Energy Savings
Performance Contract) per MN Statute 471.345, Subd. 13, Energy Efficiency Projects. In October, 2009,
the City of Hutchinson awarded a $34,500 Project Development Agreement to Ameresco to complete a
S Ut
q u-)
10_5
y 5
.y,9
3.4
4,M
15.6
9�1
1.a
Section Four -- Attachments
I foffuwrny Is 12 51 n/nnr try (lf fh,• firmnaClnf L:Crrnnutrrrr,'niti for the rnatrh w& bavo. lJruposed.
The City of Hutchinson has been working for a number of months with Ameresco, Inc., an independent
energy solutions provider, in the development of a Guaranteed Energy - Savings Contract (Energy Savings
Performance Contract) per MN Statute 471.345, Subd. 13, Energy Efficiency Projects. In October, 2009,
the City of Hutchinson awarded a $34,500 Project Development Agreement to Ameresco to complete a
S Ut
q u-)
10_5
y 5
.y,9
3.4
4,M
15.6
9�1
1.a
Debt Issuance Services
I w
May 5, 2010
Pre -Sale Report for
$7,245,000 General Obligation Medical
Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 2010A
$800,000 Taxable General Obligation
Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Series 2010E
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
r�
v.vv (.Jh er; - ii
E H L E RS Minnesota phone 851.897.8500 3050 Centre Pointe Drive
UADEAS IN suave FINANCE of , C04 also In Wisconsin and llindi9 fax 851- 897 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1122
Y
Details of Proposed Debt
Debt Issuance; Services
Proposed Issues. $7,245,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Series 2010A
$800,000 Taxable General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2010B
Purposes The intent of the 2010A Bonds is to provide funds sufficient for an
advance refunding of the City's callable G,O. Medical Facilities Revenue
Bonds, Series 2002 (maturing February 1, 2012 through 2023). Based
on current interest rates, the estimated savings as a result of the advance
refunding is approximately $441,983, after all fees and expenses. Savings
as expressed in present value terms are equivalent to 5.1 % of the refunded
Series 2002D Bond principal.
The intent of the 2010B Bonds is to provide funds sufficient for a current
refunding of the City's callable Taxable G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 1998B (maturing February 1, 2011 through
2013). Based on current interest rates, the estimated savings as a result of
the current refunding is approximately $29,406, after all fees and expenses.
Savings as expressed in present value terms are equivalent to 3.9% of the
refunded Series 1998B Bond principal.
Authority: The 2010A and 2010B Bonds are being issued pursuant Minnesota
Statutes, Chapters 469 and 475. Although Hutchinson Area Health Center
is a separate 501(c)(3) organization, Dorsey & Whitney has confirmed that
the City may issue general obligation refunding bonds to refund the 2002
and 1998B Bonds. Bond counsel will further ensure that the refunding
bonds comply with all federal requirements of qualified 501(c)(3) bonds.
Funding Source(s)' 'The City will pay debt service on the 2010A and 2010B Bonds with
I IAHC revenues, as is the case with the existing 20020 and 1998B Bonds.
Busk Factors: None. The proposed refundings are structured to achieve interest cost
savings within the existing bond maturities, and will not increase the
City's G.O. pledge exposure.
Rating: The City has an "AA" rating from Standard & Pacts. A rating request
will be made for these issues.
Bank Qualification: The 2010A and 2010B Bonds will be designated as "bank qualified"
obligations. Bank qualified status will broaden the market for the Bonds,
which can result in lower interest rates.
{= 'rQsale Report
May 1 , 2009
Page 2
oC�)
Debt Issuance Services
- ..... . ............. ....... - .._.._.......
Call Feature The 2010A Bonds due in 2021 and later will be callable on February 1,
2020 and any date thereafter. Because of their relatively short maturity
schedule, ending February 1, 2013, the 2010B Bonds will not be subject to
prepayment.
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre -Sale Review by Council:
Distribute Official Statement:
Conference with Rating Agency
City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds
Estimated Closing pate:
Ehlers Contacts:
Financial Advisors
Bond Analysts:
Bond Sale Coordinator:
Steve Apfelbacher
Bruce Kimmel
Diana Lockard
Debbie Holmes
Alicia Aulwes
May 11, 2010
Week of May 19
Week of May 26
June 8, 2010
July I, 2010
(651)697 -8510
(651) 697 -8572
(651) 697 -8534
(651) 697 -8536
(651) 697 -8523
Fresule Report
May 7 2009
P )qe '3
CAA-)
. Debt Issuance Services
Resolution No.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$7,245,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A
$800,000 Taxable General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2010B
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it
is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $7,245,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A and $800,000 General Obligation Medical
Facilities Revenue Rel'unding Bonds, Series 2010B (the Bonds); and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its
independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, as
follows:
I. Authorization; Findings The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale
of the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening; The City Council shall meet at 5:30 p.m. on June 8, 2010, for the
Purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following Council Members voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Dated this day of
City Clerk
C) [P-)
Iola)
a b-)
Hutchinson. MN
$7,000,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002D
Prior Original Debt Service
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total Pil
Fiscal Total
O8 /O 12010
-
-
-
-
-
U2 /01/2011
-
-
201,54833
201,54833
201,54833
08/012011
-
-
151,16125
151,16125
-
02/012012
345,00000
4200%
151,16125
496,16125
64722.50
08/0112012
-
143 91625 .
143,91625
. .... ... ...............................
...
02/012013
463,00000
4200%
143,91625
608,91625
752,83250
08/012013
-
-
134,15125
134,15125
02/012014
485,000.00
4200%
134,15125
619,15125
753,70250
08/012014
-
-
123,96625
123,96625
-
02/012015
510,00000
4200%
123,96625
633,96625
757,932.50
0810112015
-
-
113,25625
113,25625
-
02/01n016
535,00000
420000.
113,25625
648,25625
76151250
08/012016
-
-
102,02125
102 02125
-
02/012017
565,00000
4.250%
102,02125
66702125
769,042 50
08/012017
-
-
')0,01500
90,015.00
-
02/012018
595,000 00
4.300%
90,015110
685,01500
775,03000
U8 /012018
-
-
77,22250
77,222.50
-
02/012019
625,000 00
4 350%
77,222.50
702,22250
779.445.0()
08/012019
-
-
63,62875
63,62873
-
02./012020
660,0()0.00
4400%
63,628.75
723,628.75
787,257 50
08/0112020
-
-
49,108.75
49,10875
-
02/01n021
700,00000
4400%
49,108.75
749,10875
799,21750
081012021
33,70875
33.7U8.75
-
02/012022
735,00000
4450%
3370875
768,70875
802,41750
08/012022
-
-
17,35500
17,35500
-
02/01/2023
780,00000
4450%
17,35500
797,35500
R14,71000
'I '91w1 57,000,000.00
- S2,4WS70.83 S9,400,570.83
Yield Statistics
Average Life
7 SO Years
Weighted Average Maturity (Par Bases)
7 865 Years
Average Cuupon
4 3605779%
Refunding Bond Information
Refundug Dated Date
6/012010
Refunding Delivery Date
6/012010
Sv, 02097M GO Mnd F. Re I SINGLE PURPOSE 18l 3/20101 7.37 AM
I D(9-)
Hutchinson. MN
Proposed Crossover Refunding of
$7,000,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002D
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total
06/01/2010
-
-
-
-
-
02/012011
-
-
12504000
125,04000
125,04000
08/012011
-
-
93,78000
9378000
-
02/012012
425,00000
0900%
91,78000
518,78000
61256000
08/012012
-
91,86750
91,86750
-
02/012013
530,00000
1200%
91,86750
621,86740
713,735.00
08/012013
-
-
88,68750
88.68750
-
02/01/2014
540,000 00
1550%
88,68750
628,687.50
717 ,37500
08/012014
-
-
84,50250
84,50250
-
02/012U15
550,000 00
1 800%
84,50250
634,50250
719,00500
08/012615
-
79,55250
79,55250
-
UZ /U 12016
56500000
2300%
79,55250
644,55250
724,10500
08/012016
-
-
73,05500
73,05500
02/012017
.585,0(X)00
2.600%
73,05500
658,05500
731,11000
08/01/2017
65,450.00
65,45000
02/012018
610,000 00
2800%
65,45000
675,45000
740900.00
08/012018
-
56,91000
56,910.00
-
02/012019
530,000 00
3100%
56,91000
686,91000
743,820.00
08N 12019
-
47,14500
47,145.013
-
02/012020
655,00000
3200%
47,14500
702,145.00
749,
08/012020
-
36,66500
36,665.00
-
02/012021
h90p0000
3300%
36,66500
726,66500
763,33000
08/012021
-
-
25.280 UO
25,28000
02/012022
715,00000
3400%
25,28000
740,28000
76556000
08/012022
-
-
13,12500
13.12500
-
02/01g023
750,000 00
3 500%
13.125.00
763,12500
77625000
'rolal $7,205,000.0 - .$1,67 $ 8,882 ,080,00
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars
$55,44000
Average Lilo
7 652 Years
Average Coupon
2 9528860%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) . .... .... ......... ..
3 1097042%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
3 1064217%
Bond Yield For Arbitrage Purposes . ........... ... ..........
2 9267724%
All Inclusive C09t(A I(;)
32026601%
IRS Form 8078
Net Interest Cost
2 9528860%
WcighW AvemRC Maturity
7 652 Years
08 rover 3er 020 $7M CO M I SINGLE PURP03E I 'n' W0 1 / J7 AM
oc')
Hutc hinson, MN
Proposed Crossover Refunding of
$7,000,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002D
Debt Service Comparison
Total $8 (7,125,040,0)
$7,201548.33 $ 8,958 .588.33 59,400570.83 S441,982W
Const Loan
Cross PV Dent service savmys ................
. 358,797.82
Date
Total P +I
Pmt
Existing DIS Net New DIS
Old Net DIS _ _
__ Savings
02101/2011
125,040.00
(7,125,04000)
7,201,54833 201,548.33
201,54833
(000)
021D 12012
612,560.00
Kefunding Dated Date
- 612,56000
647,322
34,762 40
02/018013
713,735.00
-
- 713,735.00
752.832.50
39,097.50
02/012014
717,375.00
-
- 717,37500
753,302.50
35927.50
02/012015
719,00500
-
71900500
757,932.50
38,927.50
02 /U 121/16
724,105,00
-
- 724,10.500
761,51250
37,40740
02/012017
731,11000
-
- 731,11000
769,04250
37,932.50
02iU 12018
74090000
-
- 740,900.00
77503000
34,130.00
021012019
743,82000
-
- 743,82000
77944.500
35,625.00
021012020
749 29000
-
- 749,290.00
787,257 50
37,967.50
02/01 /2021
763 330,00
-
- 763 3.3000
798,217 50
340730
02/012022
765,56000
-
- 765,56000
802;41750
36,85730
0 2/ 0 12 0 23
77625000
-
77625000
814,710.00
38,460.00
Total $8 (7,125,040,0)
$7,201548.33 $ 8,958 .588.33 59,400570.83 S441,982W
PV Analysis Summa Net to Net
Cross PV Dent service savmys ................
. 358,797.82
Net PV Cashflow Savings (]u 3.203
358,797.82
Contingency or Roundumg Amount. .............
... .... . 86248
Net Present Value Benela
5759,66030
Net PV Benefit/ $7.487,417.84 PV Refunded Debt Sem"
4 804%
Net PV Benefit / $7,000,000 Refunded Principal
... ... 5 138
Net PV Benefit/ $7,245,000 Refunding Principal
4964%
Refunding Bond Information
Kefunding Dated Date
6/012010
RA,ndino IMJwery Date
6/0121118
09 cover her rr1P $1M OO M I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 112010 1 7 37 AM
I (� tp)
Hutchinson, MN
Proposed Crossover Refunding of
$7,000,000 General Obligation Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002D
Crossover Escrow Fund Cashflow
Cash
Data Principal Rate Interest_. _Receipts Disbursements Balance
0610112010 - 052 0s2
02/012011 7,111,197 00 0290% 13,842.48 7,125,039.48 7,125,040.00 -
Total %7,111,197.00 - S13,842AS $7,125,040.00 $7,125,040.00 -
Invu6imunl Model IPV, GIC, or Sccuriticsl SCLMIIlies
Default mwsnnent yield target Bond Yield
Cash Deposit
052
Cost at Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds
7,11 1,197 00
'total Cast uflnves'tmenls
$7,111,197 52
Target Co9t Investments at bandymld
$(+,988 }53 05
Actualposiuvc or (ncgntive) arbitrage
(122,84447)
Yield to Receipt
0 2919153%
Yield for Arbitrage Puglosc.5
2.9267724%
Slate and I.ocal (3oyernment Scne%(Sl.(iS) rates for
4/272010
09 weer Ser 02D 57M GO M I SINGLE PURPOSE I ft 32010 1 7.37 AM
� ota)
J -bcA�
� C) Co--)
1 #utchinson, MN
$2,730,0001'axable G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Ser 19988
Prior Original Debt Service
Data Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fisca Total
02/012010
- -
-
-
08/012010
- -
24,937
50
24,937.50
-
02/012011
245,00000 6650%
24,937
50
269,93750
294,87$00
08 /012011
- -
16,79125
16,79115
-
02/01I2012
255.00000 6650% ..........
16,79125
......
271,79135
288,582.50
08/01/2012
- -
8,312
50
8,312 50
-
02 /01RO13
250,00000 6650%
8,31250
258,31250
266,625,00
Total $750,000,00 - 5100 SPS%Gfi2 A11 -
Average I.Ifc 1 fi73 Years
Weighted Averagc Maturity (Par Basis) I 673 Year¢
Average Coupon - - -. .. .. fi 6500000%
Refunding Bond Information
Ref'undirig Dated Dale 6/012010
Refunding Delivery Date ._ _._ „ „...r 6/012010
Ser 98862,730N TAeeale G I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5192010 1 7.58 AM
I6LQ-)
$800,000 G.O. Taxable Medical Fac Revenue Bds, Series 2010
(Proposed Current Refunding of
$2,730,000 Taxable G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Honds, Ser 1998B)
Debt Service Schedule
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total PA
Fiscal Total
06/01/2010
1 629 Years
_
_
_
_
02/0112011
280,00000
0.800
7,166.67
287,166.67
287,16667
06/012011
-
-
4,255 00
3,25500
_
02/012012
270,00000
1.300%
4,25500
274,25500
278,51000
08/012012
-
2,50000
2,500.00
-
02/012013
250,00()00
2 0
2,50000
252,500 00
2525 000 00
Total S800,000U0
- $20,676,67 5820,67667
Yield Statistics
Band Ycar Dollars
.$1,303.33
Average Lde
1 629 Years
Average Coupon
1 5864453
Nctlntcrost Cost(NIC .....
.. _ ...._ ........ ...... ...... .... . 22002560%
True Interest Cost (TI(;)
2 2 9667%
12
Band Yield thr Arht[ragc Purpnscp
15831662%
All Inclusive Cost (A IC)
3 9319691%
IRS Form 8038
Nct Interest Cost
1 5864453%
Weighted Average Maturity
1 6 29 Years
011wlof ar88892,730K I SINGLEPURPOSE I SI3w2Ur01 1:50AM
� DIP-)
Hu tchinson, MN
$800,000 G.O. Taxable Medical Fac Revenue [ads, Series 2010
(Proposed Current Refunding of
$2,730,000 Taxable G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Ser 1998B)
Debt Service Comparison
Net New
Date
Total P +1
DIS
Old Net CIS
Savings
02/012011
287,16667
287,166137
294,87500
7,70833
02/012U 12
278,51000
278,51000
288,58250
10,012511
02
255,00000
255,00000
266,62500
11,62500
Total
5820,67667
$
5850,08250
$29,405.83
PV Analysis Summa Net to Net
Gross PV Debt Service savings ...
Net PV G 3 . 0 /dA1C) ...:..
..... 28,26864
28,26864
Contingency or Roundnlg Amount.. .
Net Presenl Valoe Beneft
Net PV Benefit / $828,92134 PV Refunded Dolor Service
Net PV Benefit / $750,000 Refundod Principal ..
Net PV Benefit / $800,000 Refunding Principal
1,301.09
$29,569.73
. 3.567%
.. .. _ 3 743%
3 696%
Refunding Bond Information _
Refunding Dated Date ... .
Refundi Dclhvcry Date
6/0112010
6/012010
06 wr or Stir 98B $2,730K I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 51 W010 1 7.56 AM
� c"-�
Hutchinson. MN
$800,000 G.O. Taxable Medical Fac Revenue Bds, Series 2010
(Proposed Current Refunding of
$2,730,000'1'axable G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Set 1998B)
Current Refunding Escrow
Cash
_ Data Principal Rate Interest Receipts _ Disbursements Balance
06/012010 - - - ...091 - 0.91
07/012010 770,69800 0130% 8234 770,78034 770,78125 -
'rota) S770,69820 - 182.34 $ $ 7711,78126 -
Investment Parameters
Investment Model IPV ❑1C, or Sccunteel
Default i nvusift r it yield target . .
Cash Deposit
Cost of Illvestlnent.4 Purchased with Bond Proceeds
focal Cost oflnvestmcnta
9'arget Cast of Investments at bond yield
Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage
Yield to Receipt
V geld for Arbitrage Purposes
Local Government Series ISL(7S1 rates lur
e6cu I SINGLEPt1RPOSE 15187201➢I 7.56AM
Securities
Unrestricted
0.91
770,69800
$770,69891
$769,76902
(929 R9)
0 1282401 %
I Sflllfifi2 %�
ola�
Memo
To: Mayor and City Council
Fnartx Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director
Date: May 4, 2010 1!
Re: Consideration of Resolution to approve Hutchinson HRA administration of NE
Neighborhood SCDP, approval of Procedural Guidelines for Owner occupied
Rehab Northeast Neighborhood, approval of City of Hutchinson Section 3 Plan
relating to NE Neighborhood Project and approval of execution of Small Cities
Development Program Grant Agreement CRAP -09- 0077- 0 -FY10
The Department of Employment and Economic Development has approved our SCDP
application to rehab twenty homes in the Northeast Neighborhood of Hutchinson. In order to
proceed with the project, we need to execute the grant agreement, approve the administrative
contract between the City of Hutchinson and Hutchinson HRA, approve updated Procedural
Guidelines for the Northeast Neighborhood, and approve a Section 3 Plan relating to
implementation of SCDP Grant CDAP -09 -0077 -0-FY10. Attached for your review and
consideration is:
1. An updated administrative contract between the City of Hutchinson and the
Hutchinson HRA for administration of this grant and all program income.
2. Updated Procedural Guidelines for the NE Neighborhood
3. City of Hutchinson Section 3 Plan related to SCDP Grant #CDAP -09-0077 -0-FY10
4. The State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Small
Cities Development Program Grant Agreement # CDAP -09 -0077.0 -FY10.
S, Resolution to Approve Administrative Contract, Approve Procedural Guidelines for
owner occupied Rehab Northeast Neighborhood, approve Section 3 Plan, and execute
Grant Agreement for SCDP CDAP -094077 -0-FY10.
The next steps are to invite pre-applicants In the target area to submit a full application and
obtain project environmental clearance. Our goal is to start owner occupied rehab construction
In mid -summer. Thank you for your consideration of these Items.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 13734
APPPROVING AND AGREEING TO ENTER INTO AN ADMINISTRATIVE
CONTRACT WITII THE HUTCHINSON HRA FOR T'HL-' SCDP NORTHEAST
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECT
AND
APPROVAL OF PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR SCDP OWNER OCCUPIED
I IOUSING REHABILITAITON PROGRAM FOR THE NORTHEAST
NEIGHBORHOOD
AND
APPROVAL OF CITY OF HUTCIIINSON SECTION 3 PLAN RELATING TO THE
SCDP NE NEIGIBORHOOD PROJECT
AND
APPROVAL OF EXECUTION OF SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
GRANT AGREEMENT CDAP -09- 0077- 0-FY10
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota submitted an SCDP owner occupied rehab application on behalf
of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, which has been approved for funding;
WHEREAS, the Northeast Neighborhood Housing Rehabilitation Project will be funded
via the Small cities Development Program administered by the Minnesota Department of
Employment and Economic Development;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota hereby
approves the Administrative Contract Amendment with the HRA to administer the SCDP
NF. Neighborhood project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Tutchinson approves the Owner
Occupied Rehab Procedural Guidelines for the SCDP Northeast Neighborhood project,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson approves the City of
Hutchinson Section 3 Plan relating to the SCDP NE Neighborhood project, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson approves execution of the
Small Cities Program Grant Agreement CDAP -09- 0077- 0-FY10.
Adopted by the City Council this 11` day of May 2010.
Steve Cook
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
G. /I IRNDTED & SCDP Programs /2010 /CC Resolution for SCpP NP. Neighhurhuod I W6)
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
SCDP OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD
PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
The City of Hutchinson through the NE Neighborhood SCDP owner occupied housing
rehabilitation program will provide assistance to eligible applicants for the rehabilitation of
properties utilizing Small Cities Development Program funds. The methods of program
distribution and eligibility criteria are incorporated in this procedural guide. No person or
business will be denied participation in the rehabilitation program due to their race, color, creed,
religion, national origin, sex, marital status, reliance on public assistance, age, disability, or
familial status.
The Hutchinson IIousing and Redevelopment Authority, on behalf ol'the City of IIutchinson, has
been appointed Project Administrator.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
FEDERAL OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to provide financial assistance to
low to moderate - income individuals who reside in the target area whose homes are in
need of rehabilitation.
2. SECONDARY IMPACTS: Secondary impact is to encourage the preservation of
housing and to improve the Northeast Neighborhood.
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR: The City of Hutchinson is contracting with the
Hutchinson IIousing & Redevelopment Authority.(HRA). The Hutchinson HRA is
responsible for all phases of the administration of this Small Cities Development single
purpose program. The City of IIutchinson will be the Fiscal Agent and responsible for all
financial and progress reports. The Hutchinson HRA will have principle responsibility for
completion of the Environmental Assessment and development/submission of all
required policies and procedures prior to commencement of program delivery.
2. FIELD ADMINISTRATOR: The Hutchinson HRA will be providing the field
administration services. The Hutchinson HRA is responsible overall for program delivery
including: determination of household eligibility, application completion and loan
approval, and rehab loan administration. The Hutchinson HRA has a contract with the
City of Hutchinson Building Department for IIQS inspection services, work write -ups,
rehab project interim and final inspections. The Hutchinson HRA also has a contract
with R & S Inspection, Inc. for lead inspections or lead assessments and lead clearance
tests.
3. FEDERAL COMPLIANCE: The City and the Hutchinson HRA will share
responsibility to comply with Federal Regulations regarding the implementation and
administration of this Small Cities Development Project.
4, DATA PRIVACY: Information on program Applicants shall be gathered and released in
accordance with the Minnesota Data Practices Act. All information including names,
addresses, and the amount of assistance received are considered public data under the
Minnesota Data Practices Act. Any other information provided to the program is
considered private data. Private data may be released to the following agencies or
organizations: City Council of Hutchinson, City of I Iutchinson auditors, the Hutchinson
HRA, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Rural
Page 1 of 19 ( O (.,i ))
Development, S WMNHSP, Lending Institutions and other matching fund agencies,
DEED, and HUD. Private data cannot be released to anyone else unless a consent form is
completed granting permission.
5. EVIDENCE OF FRAUD: Any administering party participating in the Program shall
refer evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, collusion or other misconduct on the part of
the Applicant or contractors in connection with the operation of the Program to the State
of Minnesota Attorney General for investigation and possible legal action.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
1. GENERAL CONDI'T'IONS: No current or member within the last twelve months of the
governing body of the locality and no official, employee, or agent of the local
government, not the Hutchinson HRA, who exercises policy decision- making function or
responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the program shall
directly or indirectly benefit from this program with the following exception: The
authority may make a grant or loan from these funds to a member of the local governing
body or public officer of the authority who applies, if the public officer first discloses, as
part of the official minutes of a meeting of the authority, that the public officer has
applied for the funds, the public officer abstains from voting on the public officer's
application and that the City Attorney and DEED have approved an exception to the
conflict of interest rules.
This prohibition shall continue for one year after an individual's relationship with the
Local Government or the Hutchinson HRA ceases. Specific prohibitions are as follows:
a. Program Participation: No member of the governing body of the locality, no
official, employee, or agent of the local unit of government or the Hutchinson
IIRA, as defined above, shall accrue direct or indirect program benefits.
b. Contractual Relationships: No member of the governing body of the locality, no
official, employee, or agent of the local unit of government or the Hutchinson
HRA, as defined above, shall obtain direct or indirect interest in any contract,
subcontract, or agreement in any activity in this program that provides financial
compensation for services.
C. Prohibition Extensions; This prohibition extends to contracts or direct benefits
in which a spouse, minor child or business partner may have personal or financial
interest.
2. DETERMINATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST: When questions arise or a
situation is unclear an initial Opinion of Conflict of Interest shall be sought from the City
Attorney. That Attorney's Opinion will utilize the Conflict of Interest Worksheet
(Appendix A) attached to these guidelines and will outline areas that the situation is
within or outside applicable Federal Regulations 24 CFR 570, Uniform Administration
Requirements and Stale Statutes 412.311 or 471 -87 through 471.89. The Attorney's
Opinion shall be forwarded to DEED Staff, and at DEED's discretion, shall be forwarded
to the Minnesota Attorney General for the State's regal Opinion.
ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES
SCDP funds will be used to improve properties that meet the following criteria:
Page 2 of 19 1 D (i>)
The property must be located in the Northeast Neighborhood Housing Rehabilitation
Project Area. The specific project boundaries are shown in Appendix B of this procedural
Guide.
2. The property must be a homeowner occupied residential structure.
3. Owner Occupied Duplex Housing: Where SCDP funds are granted for rehabilitation of
owner occupied duplex units, funds may only be used for:
a, Rehabilitation of the structural components of the dwelling
b. The internal components of the Owner Occupied portion of the dwelling
Funds may not be used for the internal components of the non -owner occupied rental unit
of the duplex, If the rental unit is in need of rehabilitation, the owner will be referred to
the MHFA HOME Rental Rehabilitation Program or the MHFA 6% Rental
Rehabilitation Loan Program.
4. The property to be improved must be a permanent structure.
5. The property to be rehabilitated must be considered suitable for rehab under local
definition. No property deemed to be not suitable may be rehabilitated with SCDP funds.
Rehabilitation is not remodeling. Remodeling is for convenience or cosmetic purposes.
Rehabilitation deals with, in order of priority:
(1) health issues and safety issues, including identified lead hazards; and
(2) energy conservation, as well as certain long -term preservation of structures such as
siding, roofs and foundations.
Certain types of rehabilitation can be viewed as lack of maintenance or deferred
maintenance. Other types of rehabilitation needs can be viewed as items that wear out or
need replacements because of obsolescence.
Rehabilitable Building:
A building is suitable for rehabilitation when it is structurally sound. To be rehabilitable,
a building should be vertically plumb within three degrees and shall have no significant
rot on the majority of the floor joists, studs or rafters that are weight bearing.
Foundations and basement walls shall not be deteriorated to the extent or so nut of
alignment that they do not adequately support the building and can not be corrected
without complete replacement. Any proposed rehab /modifications to a pre - manufactured
home will need prior approval by the manufacturer.
If the improvement costs for a structure are 50% more than the County Assessor's Office
market value, the dwelling may be deemed not suitable for rehabilitation, at the discretion
of the City of Hutchinson Building Department and Hutchinson HRA. An unsuitable
unit is a substandard unit with serious defects and is not able to meet a majority of local
standards and rehabilitation is neither practical nor economically feasible.
Page 3 of 19 1 D(.k)
The City /IIRA would be placing the following two restrictions as to the use of SCDP
funds:
a. Maximum SCUP funding per property is $24,999.
b. The structure must be suitable for rehabilitation.
6. The property must be occupied by low /moderate income households as defined herein.
7. Property that is rehabilitated under this program will meet HQS as a minimum standard.
Rehab work will also need to meet the current State Building Code adopted by the City of
Hutchinson.
8. No property located within a floodplain will be rehabilitated under this program.
9. No property may receive SCDP rehabilitation project funds if the property has real estate
taxes due and payable.
10. No property may receive SCDP rehabilitation project funds unless the home is insured.
ELICIBIY IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements made with SCDP funds shall satisfy the following requirements:
Health and safety needs and concerns within the housing units to be rehabilitated will
always be considered the top priority for funding using SCDP funds.
2. F,ach improvement must be a permanent general improvement. Permanent general
improvements shall include alteration, renovation or repairs upon and in connection with
existing structures, which correct defects and deficiencies in the property affecting
directly the safety, habitability, energy consumption, or aesthetics of the property.
3. Upon completion of the improvements, the structure must comply with the requirements
of the current State Building Code adopted by the City of Hutchinson and HUD Section 8
Housing Quality Standards.
4. If the structure has been determined historically significant by the Minnesota Historical
Society, plans for exterior improvements to the structure must be reviewed and
commented on by the Minnesota Historical Society. Buildings participating in the
program and constructed 50 years prior to the current calendar year will be evaluated in
accordance with the guidelines received from the Minnesota Historical Society.
5. Each improvement must be made in compliance with all applicable health, fire
prevention, and building codes, provided, however, that no application shall be denied
solely because the improvement will not bring such property into full compliance with
these codes.
6. No SCDP funds shall be used in whole or in part for the purpose of refinancing or paying
off an existing indebtedness. All such funds must be used to finance improvements
begun alter program application.
Page 4 of 19
Other Eligible Project Costs
Homes built prior to 1978 are required to have a lead hazard risk assessment or lead paint
inspection at the discretion of the HRA; this cost as well as lead clearance costs are considered
eligible project costs.
INELIGIBLE COSTS
The following list of items is examples of what can not be funded with SCDP funds as part of the
rehabilitation program. Ineligible improvements include, but are not limited to:
I _ Air conditioning; except if verified by a physician ordered for a medical condition.
• Central, new installation.
• Room air conditioning.
2. Landscaping. *F..xcavation to correct drainage around the house will be considered an
eligible cost.
3. Fireplaces.
4. New construction.
S. Wind generation devices.
6. Window /Door coverings: blinds, curtains, drapes, shades.
7. Outbuildings, including sheds, utility buildings, barns, silos, new garages, etc,
8. Wood burning stoves.
9. Heat systems located outside the living space of the structure.
10. Recreational or entertainment facilities including swimming pools, tennis courts, saunas,
decks and patios.
11 Assessments for public improvements.
12. Improvements begun prior to approval of the program application.
13. Upgrades to specifications above standard grade for rehabilitation.
14. Appliances
15. Other items deemed not appropriate to the program.
ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS
Ownership Requirements: The homeowner must individually or in aggregate have a
qualifying interest in the property consisting of at least:
a. A 1/3 interest in the Fee 'title. Such interests must be subject to a mortgage, and
must demonstrate (he ability to secure the signatures off all remainder men and
spouses with interest in the property as loan guarantors and must appear on record
with McLeod County;
b. A 1/3 interest as Purchaser in a Contract 1'or Deed. Such interests must secure the
signatures of all parties and spouses that have interest in the property both as
Contract Vendor(s) and Contract Vendee(s) and must appear on record with
McLeod County;
C. A valid Life Fstate. Life Estates must appear in the records of McLeod County
with all remainder men listed. Two Thirds (2/3) of the remainder men must sign
the mortgage as loan guarantors;
Page 5 of 19 I Ul
Ownership by a Trust does not meet the ownership by an individual criteria.
2. The housing rehabilitation program is designed to be of 100 percent benefit to households
of low to moderate incomes. This will be achieved by following the gross income limits
as set by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Section 8 Existing
Housing Program. The 2009 income limits as adjusted for family size are listed below.
These limits shall be adjusted periodically upon HUD notification of income revisions.
3. Eligible recipients for housing rehab must have household incomes that do not exceed
current 80% HUD McLeod County income limits adjusted for family size, revised yearly
by I -IUD. The current income guidelines are listed below:
4. Household Size Maximum Household Income
1 $39,650
2 $45,300
3 $51,000
4 $56,650
5 $61,200
6 $65,700
7 $70,250
8 $74,800
5. Income for the purpose of this rehabilitation program shall be defined as gross annual
income projected for the next twelve months, whenever possible, including salary,
commissions, bonuses, interest, dividends, tips, capital gains or sale of securities,
annuities, pensions, IRAs, rental property income (adjusted as allowed by the IRS),
partnerships, estate or trust income, child support, alimony, social security, aid for
families with dependent children and miscellaneous income. Gross annual income from
self employment shall be deemed to be the average net profit from said self employment,
as declared by the applicant in Schedule C, F or E, Part III, as appropriate, of the United
States Internal Revenue Service Form 1040, or any other such schedule as may be
hereafter promulgated, but including all depreciation as income, for the past two years.
6. All income shall be verified in writing, The following examples listed below are
considered acceptable.
a. An income verification sheet that is signed by a third party at the source of
income. Pay stubs may be used as a back up source of verification if the third
party income verification form needs further clarification.
b. The previous two years tax returns shall be used for those applicants who are self=
employed or having variable incomes.
c. Signed third party verifications from banks, savings and loans, insurance
companies, etc.
d. There will be no asset limitation associated with the SCDP loans.
Page 6 of 19
D(16)
IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES
The main and foremost improvement priority for this rehabilitation program is directed to the
health /safety of project residents. The priorities are as follows:
Priority No I
Health and safety improvements are the primary emphasis of the rehabilitation efforts to he
conducted in the project area. As such, they are mandatory requirements. These improvements
are as follows in their sub - categorical ranking:
I, Fire detection/safe and obstructed egress
Electrical code violations
Lead based paint hazards
Surface impermeability to weather, water and rodents
Plumbing violations /deficiencies
Adequate and sanitary food preparation areas
Accessibility modifications for physically handicapped household member(s).
Prinrity No. 2
Energy improvements are also a primary improvement to be conducted in conjunction with
health and safety improvements. Improvement priorities are based upon the improvement's
estimated energy cost savings per year that will be provided to the household after rehab.
*1,
Furnace replacement
2.
Attic insulation
3.
Wall insulation
4.
Storm doors
5.
Storm Windows
6.
Rim joist insulation
7.
Door /window weather - stripping
* Furnace replacement could, very well, be placed as a No. 1 Priority depending upon the
nature and severity of the existing defects. If it is deemed to be a threat to health /safety
of the housing occupants, it will receive a No. I Priority.
Priority
Basic housing quality components are secondary improvements to be conducted after the
health/safety and energy improvements are addressed. These improvements are generally
deferred maintenance items and major improvements which will need attention in the immediate
l'uture, but which are functional at the present time. They include items such as the following:
*1 Roofing
2. Painting
3. Window replacement
* Rooting could be a No. 2 Priority depending upon the nature and severity of the project.
Page 7 of 19
OAA
APPLICATION AND APPLICATION SELECTION
The City /HRA will be approving applications from homes/homeowners, on a first come first
served basis based on the date and time an executed application is received by the HRA office.
Immediate health/safety emergency housing deficiencies determined by the Project Coordinator
may receive priority, depending upon severity of deficiency and whether the emergency can be
abated temporarily. (Failing furnace in winter, elevated blood lead levels in children etc.)
PROJECT FUNDING
LOW TO MODERATE INCOME - up to 80% of Area Median Income adjusted for family size.
70% Deferred SCDP Loan - 0% interest; 10 Year term. (10% forgiven per year)
30% owner snatch required.
Nun -SCDP financing shall be funds or financing received from private lenders,
weatherization programs, City of Hutchinson revolving rehab loan program, MHFA
rehabilitation loan program funds, community action agency funds, RD grant/loan funds,
MFIFA home improvement loan funds, matching funds through SWMNHSP, or any
combination of these and other sources of financing or funding. The use of Non -SCDP
financing will help promote the cost- effective use of SCDP City Revolving Funds.
a. Coordination of available funds will be done by the HRA.
b. The decision, as to which Non -SCDP funds may be available, will be based on
each applicant's individual financial situation and the requirements of the Non -
SCDP funding source.
2. The owner must agree to have all Non -SCDP funds I'or the rehabilitation work deposited
in an escrow account controlled by the project administrator for disbursements to the
contractor when the work is satisfactorily completed. Withdrawals can be made only
upon written authorization from both the property owner and the Project Administrator.
An exception is made if matching funds require direct disbursement to the contractor.
REPAYMENT OF SCDP FUNDS
SCDP Deferred Loan /Grants shall be secured by a Mortgage and Repayment agreement.
2. ht the case of the deferred loan/grant, all persons who signed the application for a
deferred loan/grant must enter into an agreement with the City of Hutchinson for
repayment of the loan/grant. The agreement shall provide that:
In the event that the improved property is sold, transferred or otherwise conveyed within
ton years from the date of SDCP loan closing, the recipient shall repay all or a portion of
such SCDP deferred loan /grant in accordance with the schedule below:
a. 70% Deferred SCDP Loan up to $24,999
30% Owner Match (this includes costs of all changes orders)
Page 8 of 19 �� �/
Owner responsible for project costs $25,000 and over
If the recipient sells or vacates the property, the repayment terms are as Hollows:
1) 0 •- 12 months 100% Repayment
2) 13 — 24 months 90% Repayment
3) 25 — 36 months 80% Repayment
4) 37 — 48 months 70% Repayment
5) 49 60 months 60% Repayment
6) 61 - 72 months 50% Repayment
7) 73 - 84 months 40% Repayment
8) 85 - 96 months 30% Repayment
9) 97 - 108 months 20% Repayment
10) 109 - 120 months 10% Repayment
11) 121 months forgiven
b. That deferred loan/grant funds due upon sale of the property prior to the official
close -out of the grant shall be paid directly to City of Hutchinson, to be used for
further rehabilitation projects and shall be deducted from the draw down requests
as required by DEED.
c. That deferred loan/grant funds due upon sale of property after the official closeout
of the grant shall be paid directly to the City of Hutchinson.
d. The repayment agreement shall be subordinate to funds provided by private
lending institutions and other leveraging sources.
e. That if the SCDP funds are used for purposes other than an eligible improvement
upon an eligible property, or if the application is found to contain a material
misstatement of fact, then the recipient of the deferred loan/grant shall be liable
for 100 percent repayment of the deferred loan/grant.
f. That the recipient of a deferred loan/grant shall be required to notify the City of
Hutchinson immediately upon the sale, transfer or conveyance of the improved
property.
g. That if the recipient no longer occupies the property, the recipient would be
obligated to pay the deferred loan/grant in full at that time,
3. SCDP deferred loans /grants shall be secured by a mortgage.
Page 9 of 19 I o `'--)
MARKETING
The program administrator, on behalf of the City of Hutchinson, will conduct outreach in
the targeted area and will solicit applications for the Northeast Neighborhood Housing
Rehabilitation Program utilizing the below listed methods as necessary and/or
appropriate:
a. issue press releases advertising community meetings regarding project both to
local print and broadcast media.
b. Direct mail program information to the homeowners in the target area, regarding
program availability.
c. Develop posters and brochures and post them in prominent areas in the
community.
d. Place program flyers door to door in project area.
INSPECTIONS OF PROPERTY
Process for Lead Hazard Reduction
a. At the time of the homeowner's application, each applicant must receive the lead
hazard brochure "Renovate Right" Rehabilitation files must indicate that
homeowners have received a copy of the brochure.
b. All houses built before 1978 must have a risk assessment, performed by a
certified lead risk assessor or a lead paint inspection at the discretion of the HRA.
The Risk Assessment Report or Lead Inspection will be part of the rehabilitation
project tile. The I lutchinson IIRA has contracted with R&S Inspection, Inc. to
conduct the lead risk assessments, but the 1 -IRA reserves the right to contract with
the lowest responsible provider, if the contract is terminated.
C. All homeowners must receive the HUD Notice "Summary Risk Assessment
Notice ". Rehabilitation files must show receipt of the Notice.
d. Work write ups /specifications will incorporate (or reference by addendum) the
required lead hazard reduction options identified within the Risk Assessment
Report. The write up /specification will include language on required lead safe
work practices, site preparation, prohibited practices and cleaning. This can be
accomplished in the work write -ups by reference to MN Rules 4761.1170 -1190,
Hazard Reduction Methods.
C. Owner- contractor contract language must include prohibition of use of lead -based
paint; requirement for trained workers /supervisors and conducting work by MN
Dept of Health approved training providers.
P. According to the lead paint Final Rule requirements for lead safe work practices
the following circumstances do not require occupant relocation:
1) Treatment will not disturb lead -based paint or lead contaminated dust, or
2) Treatment of the interior will be completed within one period in eight
daytime hours, the site will be contained, and the work will not create
other safety, health, or environmental hazards, or
Pale 10 of 19
3) Only the building's exterior will be treated; the windows, doors,
ventilation intakes, and other openings near the worksite are sealed during
hazard reduction activities and cleaned afterward; and a lead -free entry is
Provided, or
4) Treatment will be completed within five calendar days; the work area is
sealed; at the end of each day, the area within 10 feet of the containment
area is cleared of debris; at the end of each day, occupants have safe
access to sleeping areas, bathroom, and kitchen facilities; and treatment
does not create other safety, health, or environmental hazards.
5) The Risk Assessor will make a recommendation, based upon the above
criteria and the ages of children residing in the household, whether
temporary relocation is required.
g. Residents must receive a Hazard Reduction Completion Notice, when lead hazard
work has been carried out on the property. The rehabilitation files must show
receipt of the Notice.
h. Only licensed workers and supervisors will carry out lead hazard reduction work.
i. All units must receive clearance examination, where risk assessment was
conducted and lead hazard reduction was carried out. Trained Sampling
Technicians may conduct clearance examinations. A copy of the clearance must
be in the project file.
j. if temporary relocation is required f'or homeowner occupants, the homeowner is
asked to make arrangements to stay with family or friends. If arrangements with
family or friends are not possible, rehabilitation funds may provide for
hotel /motel stay for up to 5 nights and is paid out of the total cost of
rehabilitation. Therefore, SCDP will pay for 70% of the cost incurred. The
homeowner is limited to $100 per night for hotel/motel and mileage at the Federal
rate.
k. For emergencies whereby high levels of lead have been found or children are
contaminated, the City will provide up to $3,000 per household, using program
income, for immediate evacuation, temporary shelter, additional housing costs,
and mileage costs.
2. 1IQS inspection
Once an applicant has been determined eligible for SCDP funds:
a, The IIRA contracted Housing Inspectors will conduct the Lead Risk Assessment
and a IIousing Quality Standards (HQS) property inspection.
b. The Housing Inspectors will determine the work necessary to bring the property
into compliance with:
1) Generally Accepted Community Standards
2) Minnesota Energy Efficiency Standards as is practical
3) Other standards as required by the Grant Agreement
C. The HRA Housing Coordinator will then prepare a Scope of Work (work write -
up) that will rectify violations to the housing standards, and local codes. The
Scope of' Work shall contain the following:
Page 11 of 19
o(l)
I ) Instructions to the bidder
2) Bid proposal
3) Program warranties
4) General conditions
S) Language for the use of Lead Safe Practices
C) Special Conditions
7) Diagrams and layouts as appropriate or needed
S) Cost estimate for the file
Any ineligible cost (not stated in the Scope of Work) that is done during the rehabilitation
process shall be paid for by the owner, over and above what the SCDP funds are being
used for.
REHAB LOAN REViF,W PROCEDURE
Each individual rehabilitation project will be presented to a Representative of the HRA
Loan Review Committee for approval after eligibility requirements have been
investigated, the property has been inspected, work write -ups have been completed,
bidding process is complete, project cost has been determined and, if necessary, outside
financing for owner match secured. The IIRA Loan Review Committee will be presented
with a Project Presentation Form that will discuss the project, but not divulge any
information that would violate privacy requirements. The Project Presentation Form is
attached to the back of the procedural guide.
2. An HRA Loan Review Committee member and the HRA Executive Director will sign the
Project Presentation form, which will be presented to the HRA Board for formal loan
approval.
3. After approval by the IIRA Board, a date for loan closing shall be set. If the project fails
to meet an eligibility requirement or is not approved by the HRA Loan Review
Committee, the applicant shall be informed in writing by the Housing Rehabilitation
Loan Coordinator within ten working days and shall be informed of the appeal process.
At the time of loan closing, the owner match will be required and put into an escrow
account.
ELIGIBLE CONTRACTORS AND BIDDING PROCEDURES
1. All General Contractors must complete a Contractor's Application to participate in the
Small Cities Development Program and must furnish the IIRA with copies of. Certificate
of Insurance and Contractor's Licensing or Certificate of Exception. Upon IIRA review
and approval of the above documents, the contractor may then be awarded a contract.
2, When lead hazard reduction is required by the risk assessor, lead trained workers will be
required on the project. Certification of training must be on file at the HRA office.
3. The contract is between the applicant and the contractor. The applicant will be provided
a list of the HRA approved contractors to choose from. However, an applicant is free to
choose any licensed contractor whom the applicant may desire.
Page 12 of 19
) b b)
4. Contractors will be allowed to bid on any and all rehabilitation projects. However, no
single contractor will be allowed to work on more than three rehabilitation projects at one
time.
5. The contract shall be awarded to the lowest base bid unless one of the following
circumstances occurs:
a. The bid is determined to be unrealistically low by the HRA and the contractor
agrees to withdraw the bid.
b. The contractor has failed to follow the procedures as outlined in the instructions
to the bidders.
C. The homeowner does not want the low contractor to perform the work and agrees
to pay the difference between the lowest bid and the preferred contractor's bid,
d. There appears to have been collusion between two or more contractors in which
case all bids under question will be thrown out and different contractors solicited
for bids.
e. The contractor fails to bid according to the specifications and it proves impossible
to compare that contractor's bid with the other contractor bids.
f, if two bids are tied, preference will be given to the Section 3 Certified Contractor,
unless the homeowner refuses.
6. A minimum of two bids shall be solicited for each improvement project. Bidding shall be
done on a general contractor basis, unless under certain cases, it will be a significant cost
benefit to the homeowner to bid out the individual projects separately. The HRA
Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator will make this decision, In the event only one bidder
responds, the bid will be compared to the cost estimate to determine whether the bid is
reasonable and can be accepted. The HRA Housing Rehab Coordinator /Inspector will
make this decision on a case by case basis.
7. The HRA will periodically do press releases about the project to encourage contractor
participation. Encouragement of women and minority -owned business to participate will
be included in the press releases.
8. All portions of the work must be performed by a contractor.
RTD SUMMATION AND FINANCIAL PACKAGING
1. Rids will be presented to the property owner.
2. Upon acceptance of a bid by an applicant, the HRA will, working with the property
owner, package the project according to:
a. Eligibility of the property owner
b. Availability of Non -SCDP program funds
Page 13 of 19
Io(�)
C. Other available funds, and
d. The appropriate level of SCDP funding
3. The loan package shall include:
a.
The applicant's household composition
b.
Applicant's gross income
c.
Estimated market value of the property
d.
Property location
e.
Applicant's equity in the property
f.
Proposed rehabilitation activities
g.
SCDP funding requested
h.
Other funding to be used in the project
4. The necessary repayment agreements, mortgage and other legal necessary documentation
are prepared by the IIRA staff.
5. A mortgage shall be placed on the property for the full amount of the SCDP dollars spent
on the project. There is a limit of $25,000 of SCDP funding per project. Change orders
resulting in a project cost over $25,000 will not be covered by SCDP funds.
Homeowners will be expected to finance project costs over $25,000. The IIRA Loan
Review Committee, during review of a project, reserves the right to where appropriate,
waive the $25,000 SCDP limit, Justification will be documented in the file. Sources of
owner matches include the MHFA Deferred Loan Program, USDA Rural Development
504 Home Repair Program, Heartland Community Action Agency, Inc, Weatherization
Program, AI-IP, GMHF, City of Hutchinson Housing Rehabilitation Revolving Loan
Fund, Hutchinson HRA Deferred Rehab Loan — NE Neighborhood, MHFA CFUF and
FUF and any other leverage sources that may become available through the Southwest
Minnesota Housing Partnership. Financing packages will be assembled by the HRA
Program Coordinator based on income eligibility, financing amount available with
various sources, and financing terms. City of Hutchinson Revolving Rehabilitation loan
funds will be reserved for families between 60 -80% of AMI, because other rehab
financing sources will be used first for families at or below 60% AMI.
6. The property owner shall be responsible for paying the recording fee of the mortgage.
7. Closing will then take place with the property owner and other appropriate parties to the
closing,
8. Three days after closing the HRA will issue a Notice to Proceed to the accepted
contractor(s).
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
The Notice to Proceed allows the contractor 90 days to complete, except that weather
dependent work on projects where the notice to proceed is issued too late in the building
season will allow additional days as determined by the IIRA. Change Orders are required
to extend ALL contracts.
Change orders to the contract: \J
Page 14 of 19 I
a. Require the signatures of the:
1) Homeowner
2) Contractor
3) I -IRA Housing Program Coordinator
4) The Housing Inspector
b. Will be allowed only for the following reasons:
1) To rectify hidden deficiencies that are discovered once the work has
begun.
2) To change an approved work specification due to unforeseen difficulties
arising after the work has begun that force a delay.
3) To address a deficiency that was inadvertently dropped from the project
during project packaging.
4) The work is weather dependent and weather conditions have not allowed
the completion of the work.
5) The homeowner preferred contractor is too heavily committed to perform
the work within the allotted time and the contractor requests an extension
along with a work schedule acceptable to the homeowner and HRA.
6) Unforeseen difficulties develop with the approved work and force a delay.
C. Any additional Owner Match funds will be required to be deposited in an escrow
account.
2. Interim inspections may be performed by the IIRA or City Building Department to
monitor work progress and quality of workmanship.
3. If a dispute arises between a property owner and a contractor, the HRA Housing
Rehabilitation Coordinator will advise the properly owner and contractor to resolve the
issue according to the contract and work specifications. If a clarification of the contract
and specifications is needed, the IIRA Housing Program Coordinator will render an
opinion based on the facts presented and the contract. If a solution cannot be found,
either party may then appeal the HRA Loan Review Committee and the Project Director -
their decision will be final.
4. A contractor's contract may be terminated for any of the following reasons:
a. Poor work performance on the job site and the demonstrated inability to rectify
the poor workmanship. The cost of repairing poor workmanship shall be
deducted from any amount owed to the initial contractor for work completed.
b. Causing undue damages to a homeowner's property and the inability or
unwillingness to correct the damages. The cost of repairing the damages will be
deducted from any money owed the contractor for work already completed.
C. The contractor lacks sufficient insurance coverage.
d. The inability of the contractor to perform the work within the allotted time.
Page 15 of 19 I uh-
e. Irreconcilable and unreasonable differences between the contractor and the
property owner.
£ The contractor requests to be removed from the contract. 'There will be no
penalty associated with this request as long as the request is made within 30 days
of receiving the Notice to Proceed,
g. Contractors who are removed from a contract shall be removed from the approved
contractor's list and shall be prohibited from being awarded any contracts with
this program until such time as the problem has been corrected and HRA might
reinstate their approved status.
PAYMENT
All contractors will agree to the payment schedule contained within the contractor's
application, which is as follows:
a. No pre - payments are allowed for any reason.
h. Partial payments will be allowed only for completed portions of the project.
c. Payments will be made only after the work is completed according to the
specifications contained within the Scope of Work and meets with the approval of
the applicant and the HRA after inspection.
d. Payments will be made only upon presentation of the following documents:
Billing statement
1) Lien waiver
2) Sworn Construction statement
3) Completion Certificate
4) Lead Clearance
PROJECT FILES
The Housing Rehab Coordinator shall maintain files on each applicant throughout the duration of
the project. 'Those files shall include the following:
1. Section A - File Checklist
a. IIomeowner Application
b. Property Presentation Form /Approved by HRA Loan Review Committee
C. Application and Rehabilitation Process Form
d. Income Verification Form
1) Employment Verification
2) Second Employment Verification
3) Self - employment Income
4) Bank Verification
5) Ul /General Assistance /AFDC Grant Verification
6) Social Security Verification
Page 16 of 19
iot��
7) Pension/Retirement Verification
8) Child Support
e. Historical Society Clearance
f. Property Tax Verification
g. Title Verification Form
h. Property Insurance Verification
i. Photo Release Form
j. Lead Based Paint Statement/Lead Based Paint Assessment Requirement
k. Property Owner Conditions
1. Property Inspection Completed
m. Guidelines for Subordination Requests
n. Fair Housing Certification Form
o. Eligibility /Non - Eligibility Letter
2. Section R - File Checklist
a.
Change Orders (if applicable)
b.
Specifications E'or Rehabilitation (Notice to Rid)
C.
Notice to Proceed
d.
Contractor /Property Owner Agreement/Property Owner Conditions
e.
Contractor Award Notice
I'.
Contractor Non -Award Notice
g.
Proposal Form /Bid Specification
It.
Copies of Proposals Received
i.
Bid'fabulation
3. Section C - File Checklist
a. SCDP Deferred Loan Mortgage and Repayment Agreement
b. Documentation of Non -SCDP Finances (if applicable)
• Escrow Agreement for Owner Match
C. Notice of Right of Recission
d. 'Truth in Lending Statement
4. Section D - File Checklist
a,
Preconstruction Conference Report
b,
Notice to Proceed
C.
Contractor Payment Request
d.
Sworn Construction Statement
e.
Completion Certificate
f.
Lien Waiver
g.
Field Inspection Report
5. Section E - File Checklist
a. Owner Evaluation
b. Lead Clearance
c. Hazard Reduction Completion Notice
d. Copy of Filed Repayment Agreement
6. Copies of forms as appropriate are appended.
Page 17 of 19
7. HRA at its option may accept documentation and verification from other agencies
working with the same applicant. Other agencies at this time are:
a. MHFA
b. IIeartland
C. Rural Development
d. Southwest Minnesota Housing Partnership
APPEALS
If an applicant/property owner's application is denied for any reason or is dissatisfied
with the level of assistance received, the following procedure is to allow for a
standardized appeal /complaint process for all applicants of the Small Cities Development
Program,
2, In the event of denial or a complaint, the applicant/complaint:
a. Will be informed of the appeal process.
b. Will be given a copy of the appeal process.
C, Will be given a written notice clearly stating under what condition that the
application was denied.
3. The applicant who wishes to appeal the denial of benefits must submit their appeal within
14 days of receipt of denial either orally or in writing to the Housing Rehab Loan
Coordinator. That appeal must state:
a. The reason(s) fir the appeal.
b. Information that the applicant believes is pertinent to the appeal.
4. If the applicant is not satisfied with the decision of the Housing Rehab Coordinator, an
appeal may made in writing to the Project Director within 14 days of decision by the
Housing Rehab Coordinator. The Project Director_ shall review all written appeals with
the HRA Loan Review Committee.
5. Further appeal may be made to the HRA Loan Review Committee by appearing in person
before the committee. The Project Director shall respond to the applicant in writing
within 15 working days of appearing before the committee:
a. The results of the review
b. An explanation of the findings
C. The next step the applicant can take if not satisfied with the response
6. If the applicant is denied assistance by the IIRA Loan Review Committee; final appeal
may be made to:
Page 18 of 19
►D(JO
Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
I" National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street Suite E 200
St. Paul, MN 55101 -1351
GENERAL CONDITIONS
No project may be started until:
a. Grant dollars are made available
b. The program is officially up and running
C. The application process has been approved
d. I IRA /homeowner has issued a Notice to Proceed
Any work done on a project prior to these steps will mean that part of the project is
ineligible for funding,
3. The proceeds received from the repayment of Rehabilitation loans originated SCDP
funds will go into a revolving loan fund to provide funds for rehabilitation projects on an
ongoing basis.
AMENDMENTS
These procedural guidelines may be amended in whole or in part or supplemented by the
Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority as deemed appropriate and/or needed
and will be effective on the date of issue.
GAIRA/DTED & SCDP Programs /2010 SCDP NE Neighborhood/Proccdural Guide 2010
Page 19 of 19
oc�>
Appendix A
CONFLICT OF INTEREST WORKSHEET
Date:
Grantee Name: City of IIutchinson Grant #: CDAP -09- 0077- 0-FY10
Is the individual within the last 12 months or currently, an employee, agent, consultant, officer,
or elected official or appointed official of the state, or unit of local government, or any
designated public agencies, or sub - recipients that are receiving assistance for the SCDP
program? If No, no further action is required. If Yes, the local unit of government must provide
to DEED the following:
Describe the conflict:
• Disclosure of the nature of the conflict.
• Assurance that there has been a public disclosure of the conflict,
• Describe how the public disclosure was made.
• An opinion of the attorney for the local unit of government that the interest for which the
exception is sought would not violate State or local law.
I . Has or does this individual exercise any functions with respect to the SCDP grant? Describe.
2. Does this individual participate in the decision- making process? Ifyes, they must officially
announce that they remove themselves from the decision making process.
3. Is this individual in a position to gain inside information?
4. Does this individual have, or will obtain a financial interest or benefit from the activity?
5. Does the individual involved have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement, or
the proceeds there under for themselves, their family, or those with whom they have business
ties?
The fallowing will be completed by DEED and returned to the Grantee.
Based on all the information gathered and the answers to questions above, I recommend:
❑ Approval of the request for an exception to the conflict of interest rules.
❑ Denial of the request for an exception to the conflict of interest rules.
DEED Business and Community Development Representative Date
ulj�
2010 SCDP Target Area - NE Neighborhood
xn
" 'a w � arge A rea
,2oa x%
e s )5
195 -
vo, 9
. IB 2B 9B /B 59 99 ie ICe Ile 118 I >8 tl° 156 $IB
,5 RS 95 .S se % ]0 105 115 tYi 195 1.5 155 HO
M 3/0
YM FLLVI:NIII AVF NF
1t M 'A N IMO 166 110 Ixe lab 1.0 158 106 w 1093
WI
24 .° M 6e )e 105 n5 123 195 1.5 155 ,% r IM
' ICN)H -wL NE
9W M .. M 64 ]. 1M 110 130 M 150 100
6 1 ] 43 35 W l3
VIN I11 FVF NF.
101
� 6 680 61 eN
eev %e e%
erB " 062 eea e62 a%
eia e]e e]9 e]e 930
en e]5 en B°5
NnarHwnu05 AVE NF �% /1s 126 SSS ue 1% 1 axe eae ,� 0
° eeo 10A ew 2M eeD 1-1
s ey eae °� o eee 150 eat le e elo elo Ma e{9 ioo
e25 eaa eae ese -1 e20 exa ego r e,e elo e16 Gov a 30e 9% t5 ,eS 2.5 w5 e00 )60 l )% °10 1 16
eoe 5
_ .iHIFFIN 1F Nl
4 . )50 1
].6 U740 106 ).. 9M 310 )% iy 1]1°
/a ]. ]ae I {0 � L u fle Its )]o /M 11 )15 m 9 ]2e 2 )% ]9
]06 iO3 313 1e5 I" .% ]x0 ]36 )10 ]le no
1 01 1 FOF Ayk NF Ih 115 ]%
'its zse ]w
>M �g.
6x es] a 5{ ]21 w0
65 6e v
6 /OI an 0�3 e�2{ °36 g9° °55 111 "a ]00 � 706 fiVC NE
ON 615 10B 11 b6
TT �/
M-4 % i) 83 69 V � 690 fiP
J64 - ..._ m ... .E' 61e °55 ._ °n _—
44 31 _ 510
z5 5M e as
�] 1s
IVF 5 %
99 F 'N
3 {90
Y
! 1P
51 {5 53
1 19
— Is
Iw
J
{{
a00
01
an
saan
205n
%
0
z
22z0
xve
3
1.F �4
3
911
VF.v
5%
eae 9e ti•
t] ]0 5
a n 525 SaD
) N 501
2% 219
e q1,
215 221
I)e 2% 251
5% 2{
19{
1e1 x9l zm
t9a S) 25D 25r
t95 ao
an
92]
511 91] 21
11
r9
200 a10 Sze 532
T
t0 h 2 1
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
AND
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOROITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
THIS CONTRACT for Administrative Services is between the City of Hutchinson, MN hereinafter
referred to as the "City" and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority In and For the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "HRA ".
WITNESSETH: In consideration of the mutual convenience and agreements contained herein, the City
and the HRA agree as follows:
I. This contract will commence on May 11, 2010 and will continue until terminated by either party
according to Paragraph XVII.
TI, The HRA agrees to act as the administrative agent for the City of Hutchinson to implement the
City's Owner Occupied Housing Rehab Program for the Northeast Neighborhood funded through
the Small Cities Development Program, CDAP -09- 0077- 0-FY10. In addition, all program
income /generated income from all Housing SCDP programs will be administered by the HRA.
III. The HRA will receive financial reimbursement from the administrative fees associated with the
grant from the City of Hutchinson's Small Cities Development Program funds.
1V. As the administering agent for the above described grant, the HRA agrees to perform all tasks
enumerated below in a manner which will meet or exceed the terms and conditions imposed
upon the City in the Small Cities Development Program Grant Agreement dated the 16th of
April, 2010, copies of which are attached as Exhibit A.
A. Citizen Participation. Comply with all State and Federal participation requirements.
B. Compliance with Federal Regulations. Ensure that the following Federal acts or
regulations are complied with:
1. Title Vi of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L> 88 -352) which provides that no
person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, he
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
2. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1968 (P.L. 90 -284), known as the Fair
Housing Act of 1968, stating that it is the policy of the United States to provide, within
constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout the United States and prohibits any
person from discrimination in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, or
the provision of brokerage services, including in any way making unavailable or denying
a dwelling to any person because of race color, religion, sex or national origin.
b(o Page 1 of
C. Project Planning. Coordinate the preparation of program guidelines, contacts, budgets,
and other agreements in a manner consistent with applicable State and Federal laws and
regulations for all project activities.
D. Implementation. The HRA will implement programs authorized under the Small Cities
Development Program Grant within the respective limitations of the grant monies
provided and/or in accordance with State and Federal requirements.
Homeowner Rehabilitation Financing; Develop procedural guidelines for
homeowner rehabilitation and implement them in accordance with Federal and
State Standards. This would include, but not be limited, to determination of
eligibility, and coordination with housing partners; i.e., lenders, contractors, and
homeowners.
E. Coordination of other funding sources for the project. The HRA will coordinate other
applicable programs for the project such as, but not limited to, rehab funds from
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, Southwest
Minnesota Housing Partnership and Rural Development.
F. Compliance with Equal Opportunity Regulations. Ensure that compliance with Section 3
of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Federal Equal Employment
Opportunity Act and Executive Orders, and Civil Rights Acts of 1964 is maintained.
Also responsible for all Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity recordkeeping requirements
by the State of Minnesota.
G. Financial Recordkeeping and Control. Keep complete and accurate records of all claims
and disbursements in accordance with the following procedures:
1. The HRA will examine each claim and verify that the work has been done and /or
materials actually provided for the project.
2. Requisitions for the checks will be prepared by the HRA and submitted to the City
Finance Director for payment.
3. The City will issue all checks.
4. The HRA will submit a voucher and supporting documentation to the City
Finance Director for review who will obtain proper signatures and submit
requisitions to the State.
V. The City and HRA mutually agree that a mortgage shall be executed in the name of the City of
Hutchinson as mortgagee for each loan of monies provided under the Small Cities Development
Program to individuals for the purpose of home rehabilitation. In regard to such mortgages and
assignments, the HRA shall prepare all documents and obtain all necessary signatures required
�b
Page 2 o
for proper execution of such documents and file a secured interest with the McLeod County
Recorder's Office.
VI. For the purposed of this contract, the HRA shall be deemed an independent contractor and not an
employee of the City. Any and all employees of the HRA or other persons who engages in the
performance of any work or services required by the HRA under this contract, shall not be
considered employees of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise on be half of
said employees or other persons as a consequence of any act or admission on the part of said
employees or the HRA shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City.
V11. The HRA will subcontract with the City of Hutchinson Building Department to provide
inspections, work write -ups, and construction oversight in the implementation of the grant
program. The HRA will subcontract with R & S Inspections, Inc. for lead inspections or lead
assessment and clearances.
VIII. The HRA specifically agrees to comply with the requirements of 24 CFR 135.20 and to provide
such copies of said regulations as may be necessary for the information of parties to contracts as
required to contain the Section III clause as set forth in 24 CFR 135.20.
IX. Any alteration, variation, modification, or waiver of the provisions of this contract shall be valid
only after is has been provided in writing, duly signed by both parties, and attached to the
original of this contract.
X. The waiver of any of the rights and/or remedies arising under the terms of this contract on any
occasion by either party hereto shall not constitute a waiver of any rights and/or remedies in
respect to any subsequent breach or default of the terms of this contract. The rights and remedies
provided or referred to under the terms of this agreement are cumulative and not mutually
exclusive.
XI. This contact shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all prior
or written negotiations.
X11. The City shall have full access to all records relating to the performance of this agreement.
X111. In performing the provisions of this contract, the HRA agrees to comply with all Federal, State,
or local laws all applicable rules, regulations, or standards established by any agency of such
governmental units which are now or hereafter promulgated.
XIV. In consideration of the prompt and efficient carrying out of the above, the City agrees to
reimburse the HRA, for project administration related costs in carrying out the above activities
up to an amount not to exceed the maximum allowable as specified by the State of Minnesota,
Department of Employment and Economic Development, Community Development Division.
During the term of the contract, said monies are to come solely from the Administration funds
totally available for the administration for the City of Hutchinson's Small Cities Development
(A
Page 3 o
Program, Northeast Neighborhood Rehabilitation Project. For the purposes of this contract,
project administration related costs are defined as follows:
A. Approved project administration fee of $2,600 per owner occupied rehab project to cover
project administration duties including, but not limited to, applicant and loan file, HQS
inspection, work write -ups, construction inspection fees, bid solicitation, contract
administration, and draw requests. Lead inspection and lead clearance tests are included
in the project loan costs. After close out of the grant, project administration fees to
administer the rehab revolving loan fund, may be amended by revising the fee schedule
on a yearly basis.
XV. Should any of the above provisions be subsequently determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be in violation of any Federal or State laws or to be otherwise invalid, both parties
agree that only those provisions so adjudged shall be invalid and that the remainder of this
contract shall remain in full force and effect.
XVI. ANTITRUST. Contractor (HRA) hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for
overcharges as to goods and /or services provided in connection with this contract resulting from
antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust laws
of the State of Minnesota.
XVII. The City reserves the right to terminate this contract if the HRA inexcusably fails to perform any
of the provisions hereof. Such termination shall occur thirty (30) days after receipt by the HRA
of written notice specifying the grounds thereof, unless, prior to that date, the HRA has cured the
alleged non - performance of the provisions of this contract. The HRA may terminate this contract
with thirty (30) days written notice.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties here to have caused this contract to be duly executed.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BY:
MAYOR, CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ATTEST:
13Y
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
IM
j
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN & FOR THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN
REVI ff. RYTTO o
HRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
� b�
Page 4o
G: /HRA /DTED & SCDP Programs /2010 SCDP /ADMINCONTRA(:T
Page 5 of 5
City of Hutchinson Section 3 Plan
The City of Hutchinson, in conjunction with Small Cities Development Program Grant #CDAP-
09 -0077- 0-FY10, has the following plan to direct employment and other economic opportunities
generated by HUD financial assistance for housing and community development programs, to
the greatest extent feasible, toward low and very low income persons, particularly those who are
recipients of government assistance for housing.
Section 3 is a HUD requirement that is intended to ensure that when employment or contracting
opportunities are available on HUD funded projects, preference is given to low and very low
income persons or businesses, whenever possible.
The City of Hutchinson will attempt to recruit Section 3 Businesses and low income area
residents as new hires for the project through: signs regarding the project placed at City Center,
the Hutchinson library, Park Towers Apartments, and contact with the local workforce center.
The City of Hutchinson will require that all contracts between the homeowner and the contractor
providing rehab services will contain the following Equal Opportunity provisions:
• Equal Employment Opportunity: "The contractor shall provide equal employment
opportunity to all persons without discrimination as to race, color, creed, religion,
national origin, sex, age or disability."
• Affirmative Action: "To the extent possible and practical, the contractor will take
affirmative action to provide employment opportunities to all persons without regard to
race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or disability."
• Section 3: "1'o the extent feasible, the contractor shall provide opportunities for training
and employment to lower income residents of the area, particularly residents of public or
federally assisted housing."
The City of Hutchinson will require all contractors to complete and submit the Section 3
Business Certification Form prior to awarding contracts. While being a Section 3 business is not
required for the program, the City of'Hutchinson will give preference, whenever possible and
within the guidelines of the City of Hutchinson procurement policy to qualified, competitive
Section 3 businesses.
C) (b)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PMENT IVIS ON ENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND
Small Cities Development Program
Grant Agreement
CDAP -09- 0077 -0-FYI O
This Agreement is made on April lb, 2010 between the State of Minnesota acting through the Department of Employment
ute in hinson this
and Economic Development (hereinafter the Grantor) and the City of Hutchinson, l 11 Hassan Street t SE SE, , Hutchinson, M
55350 -2522 (hereinafter the Grantee). The city of Hutchinson will be responsible for fiduciary responsibilities
grant. Projects tunded under this grant can only come from eligible cities.
fhe Grantor has been allocated funds by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development under the
C ommu 1(2) D evel pment B l o c kG6Jn402o theGrandtor is em powered toe ter nto contracts as neces Minnesota
perform the Statutes
Commissioner's duties.
The Grantee has made application to the Grantor for the purpose of administering a Small Cities Development awarded is incorporated into this
project for the City of Hutchinson in the manner described in Grantee's "APPLICATION, " which
agreement by reference.
In consideration of mutual promises 'set forth below, the parties agree as follows:
The Grantor shall grant to the Grantee the total sum ofTWREE HUNDRED NINETY-NINE to the THOUSAND TWO Community DRED Developme t Gra t Program. The Grantee hall perform he act vities of are proposed in r he
2012 c in accordance ad further are s p e cified under Grant o di e 1 the Housing and Commun Developmentt Apt of 1974, as during the period from
amended, its implementing regulations particularly federal statutes identified in Title 24 of the Code o£ Federal
Regulations, Part 570, guidelines provided by Grantor and all other applicable state and federal laws. the t ime frames s pecified in
Grantee agrees to c the Any p change in the scope of the ect, the budget, ordthetcompletion date must be approved
e
ect in accordance with Pp
in writing by the Grantor. crises
Funds made available pursuant es and this a mentg shall be used the grant period described above. u Notwithstanding t all other provisions
accomplishing such pure
of this agreement, it is understood that any reduction or termination o f Housing and Urban Development funds provi e
to the Grantor may result in a like reduction to the Grantee.
Where provisions of the Grantee's application are inconsistent with other provisions of this agreement, the other
provisions of this agreement shall take precedence over the provisions of the application,
I 10(1)
Grant Number: CDAP -09- 0077.0 -FY
GRANT CONDITIONS
1. The following activities, goals, and budget costs are approved by the Grantor. Any modifications to the budget
must have written Grantor approval prior to implementation.
Number of
Number of LMf
households households
Fed. Activity Unit /persons /persons SCUP Other
Obj Code Activity Title Goal served served Funds Funds Total
5347,200 $148,800 $496,000
LMH 14A Res Owner Rehab 20 52,000 0 52,000
2IA Administration
Totals $399,200 $148,800 $548,000
2. Successors and Assignees The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant
contract without the prior consent of the Grantor and a fully executed grant agreement executed and approved by
the same parties whom executed and approved the grant, or their successors in office. This agreement shall be
binding upon any successors or assignees of the parties.
3. Amendments Any amendment to this grant contract, with the exception of Grant Adjustment Notices (GANs),
must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by those parties authorized by
resolution to enter into this contract, their successors and assigns, or other party authorized by the Grantee through a
formal resolution of its governing body. GANs must be approved by the Grantor in writing, and require a written
change request by the Grantee.
A GAN may be used for the purposes of transferring budget amounts between line items which do not change the
contract value, or other grant status activity. All other changes require a formal amendment as stated above.
4. Waiver If the state fails to enforce any provisions of this grant agreement that failure does not waive the provisions
or its right to enforce it.
5 Pre - Agreement Costs Grantee may incur administrative costs for this grant prior to the executed grant agreement.
This does not include the award of construction contracts prior to environmental clearance.
6. Environments Com lion e: Unless the Grantor indicates otherwise, the Grantee is required to conduct an
environmental review on project activities, to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
as amended. Disbursement of funds will not occur until Grantee has provided assurances that all NEPA
requirements will be met.
Environmental clearance must be received by the Grantor and other agencies prior to committing funds for
activities. Grantee must maintain environmental review documentation and records.
The Grantee may enter into a programmatic agreement with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office
(MnSHPO) that allows the grantee to not seek further consultation from MnSHPO on eligible properties in eligible
rehabilitation projects.
7. Timeliness The Grantor may cancel this Grant Agreement if it determines that the progress towards completion of
the activities is not reasonable.
8. Dru -free Work lace /Dru -Free Work lac Awarenes Program: The Grantee agrees to provide a drug -free
workplace by notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a
controlled substance is prohibited in the Grantee's workplace and specifying actions that will be taken against
2 1 b LV)\
ernployees for violation of such prohibition. fhe Grantee must also establish a drug -free workplace awareness
program to inform ernployees about the dangers of drug abuse, the availability of drug counseling and penalties for
violations of the drug -free workplace policy.
). Prohibition of Excessive Force Pol icy : The Grantee agrees to adopt and enforce a policy to prohibit the use of
excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent
civil rights demonstrations (P.L. 101 -144, Section 519).
10. Residential Anti -pis Iacement and Relocation Assistance Plan: The Grantee agrees to adopt, make public and
follow a "residential anti - displacement and relocation assistance plan" in accordance with Section 104(d) of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. This plan must include steps to minimize
displacement of residents caused by project activities.
[L Fair Housing Grantee agrees to abide by and promote all Fair Housing Regulations during the grant period.
Activities must be reported on forms provided by the Grantor annually.
12. Rehabilitation Policies When applicable, Grantee must approve policies and procedures which are consistent with
the grant application. In addition, all policies, procedures and forms must adhere to federal and/or state
requirements.
13. Federal Labor . tandar s: When applicable, Grantee must comply with all federal Davis Bacon and Related Act
requirements and must submit "Notice of Contract Award" required by the Grantor before using grant funds to pay
contractors or subcontractors.
14. Re rtin : Grantee shall submit reports annually during the grant period, to Grantor. All other reports must be in
accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in Minnesota Rule 4300.3200. Grantee shall use the forms
provided by the Grantor.
15. Accountin : For all expenditures of funds made pursuant to this agreement, Grantee shall keep financial records,
including invoices, contracts, receipts, vouchers, and other documents sufficient to evidence in proper detail the
nature and propriety of the expenditure. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with "The Common Rule,"
Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, at
24 CFR, Pan 85, as amended.
16. Procurement of Professional Services The Grantee must maintain documentation that shows that professional
services were procured in accordance with "The Common Rule," Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, at 24 CFR, Part 85, as amended. Services obtained
from units of government such as HRA, RDC, or for - profit and/or nonprofit organizations do not have to be
procured by competitive negotiation, but contracts for these services must only be on a cost - reimbursement basis,
accounted for in accordance with "The Common Rule."
17. Audit and Inspection The Grantee shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act Amendments of
1996 (P.L. 104 -156). Accounts and records related to the funds provided under this agreement shall be accessible to
authorized representatives of the Grantor for purposes of examination and audit. In addition, Grantee will give the
U.S. General Accounting Office, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, State of Minnesota,
Department Of Employment and Economic Development, the Legislative Auditor, and State Auditor's Office,
through any authorized representatives, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, and documents
related to the grant for a minimum of six years from the end of this Grant Agreement.
18. Liability: Grantee agrees to indemnify and save and hold Grantor, its agents and employees harmless from any and
all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of the Grant by Grantee or Grantee's agents or
employees. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies Grantee may have for the Grantor's failure
to fulfill its obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
19. Data Practices A "the Grantee shall comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13.
3 ,���
20. Conflict of Interest The Grantee shall comply with the conflict of interest provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Sections 471.87 - 471.88, and Subpart K of 24 CFR, Part 570.611 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
21, Payment/Disbursements Grantor shall disburse funds to the Grantee pursuant to this agreement, based upon a
payment request submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the Grantor. Payment requests will be
processed on a bi- weekly calendar provided by Grantor. 'the amount of grant funds requested must be two
thousand dollars ($2,000) or more (except for the final draw).
Grantor has authority to hold back administrative funds if project goals are not being completed.
22. program Program income is any income received by a grantee or a sub - recipient as a result of the activities
supported by State of Minnesota Small Cities Development Program (SCDP) funds. Program income must adhere
to the following conditions.
a) Program income can only be used for SCDP approved activities, or returned to Grantor.
b) All program income earned on the activities when the grant is open must be used on grant activities, by
subtracting the amount earned from the next disbursement.
c) Grantee agrees to have a plan on file for the use of program income earned after grant closeout.
d) After closeout, any program income and interest earned must be tracked and reported by year received on a form
. provided by the Grantor.
e) After closeout, any program income that is not used within two years from the reporting year received must be
returned to the State of Minnesota, Small Cities Development Program.
23. The Grantee must comply with Minnesota Statutes, Section 290.9705 by either:
A. Depositing with the State, eight percent of every payment made to non - Minnesota construction contractors,
where the contract exceeds $100,000; or
B. Receiving a waiver from this requirement from the Minnesota Department of Revenue.
24. Anti - Lobbying The Grantee must not use SCDP funds to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of a federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any
employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of a federal
grant, the making of a federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. If the Grantee
uses non - federal funds to conduct any of the aforementioned activities, the Grantee must complete and submit
Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying." Further the Grantee must include the language of this
provision in all contracts and subcontracts and all contractors and subcontractors must comply accordingly.
25. Goual Employment Qpportunity_ Grantee must include Executive Order 1 1246 (Standard Federal Equal
Employment Opportunity Construction Contract Specifications) in all direct Grantee bidding documents and
contract documents for which construction costs exceed $100,000.
26. Section 3 : Grantee must include the Section 3 Clause § 135.3 8, notice regarding economic opportunities for low and
very low income persons in all Grantee bidding and contract documents for which the construction costs exceed
S100,000.
27. Uniform Relocation Assistance, and Real Pro ert Acquisition Policies Act: Permanent easements of land required
for any public facilities improvement made using SCDP funds, or in conjunction with SCDP activities, must be
acquired in conformance with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
4 ��)
Policies Act of 1970, as amended (49 CFR 24). Budget modification, if necessary to achieve compliance, must be
approved in writing by the Grantor.
Unless otherwise approved in writing by Grantor, use of SCDP funds to purchase real property is limited to the
value established by appraisal(s) conducted in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended.
Reuse of real property that is acquired with SCDP funds must be approved by Grantor.
28. S ecial Assessme t : No public facilities activity funded in whole or in part with grant funds may be financed
through assessments.
29. Provision for Contract and Subcontracts: Grantee shall include in any contract or subcontract such provisions as to
assure contractor and subcontractor compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
30. Eligible Contractor .: Grantees are required to verify that all contractors, subcontractors and sub - recipients are not
listed on the Federal publication that lists debarred, suspended and ineligible contractors. Evidence of this
determination must be readily available to the Grantor throughout the life of the project.
31. Reduction in Actual sts: On projects that involve construction of public facilities or new housing, if bids are
significantly lower than estimated project costs, Grantee must contact Grantor. Grant amount may be reduced. .
32. Termination and Cancellation This Grant may be cancelled by the Grantor at any time, upon thirty (30) days
written notice to the Grantee. In the event of such cancellation, Grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on
a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed.
33. Worker's m ensatio : The grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minnesota Statute 176.181 Subd.02,
pertaining to worker's compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employers and agents will not be
considered state employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act on behalf
of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility.
34. Governing Law. lurisdicti4r and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice for law provisions, governs
this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the
appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
35. Monitoring Grantee will be monitored through an on -site visit at least once during the grant period.
The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge their assent to this agreement and agree to be bound by its terms through their
signatures entered below.
GRANTFE We have read and we agree to all of
the above provisions of this agreement.
By
Title
Date
By
Title
Date
STATE OF MINNESOTA by and through the
Department of Employment and Economic Development
By
Title DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Date
ENCUMBERED
Department of Employment and Economic Development
By
(Name)
Date Encumbered
[Individual signing certifies that funds have been
encumbered as required by Minnesota Statute 16A.]
City of Hutchinson
Grant #CDAP -09- 0077 -0 -FY 10
A.., &2010Awerdy201 UContwu.d.
6 , o(-�)
ORDINANCE NO. 10- 0548 — AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE KEEPING OF
HONEYBEES WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF HUTCHINSON
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON HEREBY ORDAINS:
§ 93.50 RULES AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE KEEPING OF
HONEYBEES
A. Permit Required
1. No person shall keep, maintain, or allowed to be any hive or other facility for the housing of
honeybees on or in any property in the City of Hutchinson without a permit.
2. The permit applicant must be the owner of or be the bona tide tenant of the real estate in
which the permit is issued.
3. The animal control unit of Hutchinson Police Services may grant an annual permit pursuant
to this section only after the applicant has met any educational requirements as established
and published by Hutchinson Police Services and has received the written consent of 100%
of the property owners and occupants within 150 feet of the applicant's real estate. In cases
where the premises sought to be permitted is leased, consent must also be obtained from the
owner of the real estate. The applicant shall cause forms giving consent fzom neighboring
landowners to be recorded in the office of the McLeod County Recorder in order to provide
notice of subsequent purchasers of neighboring property of the existence of beekeeping on
the applicant's premises. The applicant shall be responsible for all recording fees.
Occupants or owners of neighboring property may revoke their consent at any time and in
such case the affected beekeeping permit will be terminated 30 days thereafter.
Any person desiring a permit for the keeping of honeybees shall apply for such permit to the
animal control unit of Hutchinson Police Services. Approval of any application for the
keeping of'honeybees is subject to reasonable conditions prescribed by the Hutchinson
animal control unit. The authority to issue, revoke, suspend, or reinstate a permit for the
keeping of honeybees rests with the animal control unit of Iutchinson Police Services at
any time that, in the sole discretion of Hutchinson Police Services, the permitted activity
constitutes a nuisance under any city ordinance or state law
B. Beekeeping Standards of Practice.
1. In addition to any reasonable conditions placed on a permit for the keeping of honeybees by
the animal control unit of Hutchinson Police Services the minimum requirements of any
permit are as follows:
A. Only bees of the Genus and Species Apes Mellifera may be kept.
B. There shall be a maximum of one colony of bees per 4000 square feet of lot space up
to a maximum of 6 colonies. All colonies are to be kept in hives with removable
frames which shall be kept in sound and usable condition.
o (C -)
C. The permit holder shall ensure that a convenient source of water is available to the
colony prior to and so long as colonies remain active outside of the hive.
D. All bee colonies are to be located in as close to the center of the permit holder's
property as possible and in any case at a minimum distance of 25 feet from any lot
line.
E. The permit holder shall establish and maintain a flyway barrier at least b feet in
height. The flyway barrier may consist of a wall, fence, dense vegetation or
accommodation thereof to insure that as bees enter or leave the hive they assume a
vertical flight pattern.
R The permit holder shall have in force and effect at all times a policy of liability
insurance in an amount not less than $300,000 specifically insuring the beekeeping
activity on the permitted premises. The permit holder shall provide proof of this
insurance at any time it is requested by Hutchinson Police Services. A copy of such
insurance coverage is required at the time that a beekeeping permit is applied for.
C. Inspection.
1, Hutchinson Police Services is authorized to conduct such inspections as it deems necessary
to insure compliance with all provisions of this chapter, and shall have right of entry at any
reasonable hour to the bee hive for this purpose.
D. Hold Harmless.
The permit holder shall hold the City of Hutchinson harmless and shall indemnify the City
of I Iutchinson from any claims brought against the City related to the permit holder's
beekeeping activity.
Adopted by the City Council this day of
ATTEST:
Mayor Steven W. Cook Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
� O,L)
To: Citizens of the Hutchinson Fire District, Mayors, City Councils, and Town Board Supervisors
From: Brad Emans, Fire Chief
Dam: 05(03(2010
Rae Monthly Update on Activities of the Fire Department
Fire Department Response: The Fire Department responded to 34 calls for service in the month of
April.
Fire Officer Only Response: A "fire officer only" responded to 16 calls in April, saving the
Hutchinson Fire District the cost of a "general' alarm estimated at $2,848.00 for the month, and just
as important, kept our "paid -on -call' professional firefighters at their full -time employment an additional
240 hoursl
Response Time First Emergency Vehicle Out of the Door): April— 3 minutes 32 seconds
Example of a Few of the Calls:
• The FD responded to a call that a semi trailer was burning inside of a commercial building in the
southeast part of the city. The employees were able to pull the trailer out of the building and the fire
department extinguished the fire. The building suffered only minor smoke damage;
• The FD responded to a residential property in the southwest part of the city to assist with an
environmental employee safety situation for a person that had been deceased for approximately
three weeks;
• The FD responded to a vehicle rollover into a retention pond located in the northwest part of the
city. The victim was heroically removed by local citizens, then firefighters searched the vehicle for
any additional victims and then removed the vehicle from the pond;
• The FD responded to a call of a missing person. The missing elderly person was located without
harm;
• The FD responded to a call that a person was in the Crow River and now missing. The firefighters
searched the river for 90 minutes in the rescue mode before turning the situation over to the
Sheriffs Office; the Sheriff is responsible for all waterway incidents. The Sheriffs Office and Fire
Department conducted recovery operations for 5 days and a total of 220 personal hours before
recovering the missing person;
• The FD responded to a mutual aid call to Dassel when a vehicle struck and severed a high
pressure natural gas line;
1
1 t -,)
A Fire Officer responded to a recreational fire that was burning illegal material in the central part of
the city. The fire officer required the owner to extinguish the fire;
The FD responded to a mutual aid call to Cosmos FD for a three vehicle fiery crash, the crash
involved two semi tractor /trailers and a passenger vehicle resulting in a double fatal;
• The FD responded to a roof fire on a unoccupied barn in the rural fire district, the fire started from
burning brush in a field pit;
Breakdown of the Calls for the Month:
City
Type of Call
Number for the Month
Residential
3
Commercial /Industrial
0
Multi - Family
1
School
0
Grass
0
Medical _
1
CO
7
Rescue
7
Haz -Mat Leak/Spill
6
Vehicle - ..
1 - ------ ......
Sky-Warn
0
Mutual Aid
0
Total
26
Structu Flres
0
Arson
0
Rural:
T.. a of Call
Number for the Month
Residential
0
Commercial / Industrial
0
School
0
Farm Building
1
Grass
0 . --
Medical
1
co
0
Rescue
3
m _
Haz -Mat Leak/Spill
0
Vehicle
1
Mutual Aid
2
Total
Structure Fires -
8
1
Arson
0
• Page 2
LQ�
Training:
Firefighters trained on the following topics/equipment in April:
• Firefighters trained on emergency response procedures at the training site with the goal of
improving incident command, and firefighter tactics,
• Firefighters trained on wild land firefighting procedures and tactics, the training was given by the
Minnesota Department of Forestry;
• Firefighters trained on two story and basement fire attacks with the aid of the live burn trailers at the
training site,
Fire Prevention ! Public Relations / Other Information:
• Firefighters participated in the annual "We Care About Our Kids" located at the Hutchinson Mall;
• Firefighters assisted the Hutchinson Parks Department with their required native prairie restoration
bums located around the city;
• Conducted a general safety class for the Jaycee's Babysitting Clinic;
• The FO started the 2010 re- registration of all residential rental property with -in the city limits of
Hutchinson in the first week of December 2009 and finally finished the process with 100%
participation in the middle of April 2010.
Other Information:
Number of calls that required more than one engine, one IC, and four firefighters for April: 13
Estimated dollars lost to fire for the March: $45,000
Estimated dollars saved for the March: $500
• Page 3
Hutchinson Public Library Board Minutes
February 22, 2010
Present: Roger Vacek, John Paulsen, Abby Dahlquist, Guy Stone, Janet Vacek, Bev Wangerin,
Pioneerland Library System (PLS) board member, and Mary Henke, Ex- Officio
Absent: Eric Yost, Yvonne Johnson
President John Paulsen called the meeting to order. The minutes from the last meeting were
reviewed. A motion by Guy was made to approve the minutes as submitted with a second from
Abby. Minutes approved.
Report: Bev Wangerin, PLS treasurer, reported that library funding is looking good. The county's
share of library funding will be paid according to Maintenance of Efforts requirements. Mary
said the city is funding the library at the level requested. There was a discussion with Bev about
Hutchinson's unfilled position on the PLS board now that Herman Hannemann's term has
expired. Our other Hutchinson representative, Jack Sandberg's term ends in December 2010.
It was this board's recommendation that Hannemann's term remain unfilled at this time. Roger
Vacek volunteered to fill the position as needed. Mary will let Eric know. However, the final
responsibility to fill the positions lies with the City Council.
Old Business:
1. Lorna Landvik Visit on April 13 The $575 fee for her visit will be paid for by the Friends
of the Library or with a Legacy Fund grant. Mary spoke with her booking agent who ok'd
arrangements.
2. Legacy Funds program Nancy Carlson, a children's author /illustrator will be coming the
library on Saturday March 20 at 10:00 am. Mary needs help at 9:30 with set -up in the upstairs
area. The McLeod County librarians are working on a project with the McLeod Co. Museum on
a traveling trunk program that would be suitable for all ages plus a re- enactor. We will contract
with Lori Pickell- Stongel, the museum director to plan and develop this program. Several trunks
each with a different theme could circulate throughout McLeod Co. to libraries, schools, senior
centers, etc. Other possible projects are a bookbinding class sponsored in cooperation with
the Scott Miller and the Craw River Arts Center and a trip to the Benjamin Franklin exhibit at the
Minnesota History Center. McLeod County libraries get $7,000 to spend by June 30, 2010.
3. Reappointment of Abby and Guy to local li br bgord Mary has submitted the paperwork
and the City Council will deal with the appointments at a March meeting.
New Business:
1. Yvonne Johnson's rest nation Due to health reasons, Yvonne has submitted her resignation.
Mary suggested asking Yvonne if she has any recommendations to fill the position, especially
someone with Ridgewater ties. Abby suggested looking for someone with young children or in
contact with children as a good balance for our board. Names will be brought to the next
meeting. Roger volunteered to fill Yvonne's position as co- secretary.
2. Custodial position filled Mary reported the custodial position temporarily being shared by
Jerry Tews and Lee Wright has been filled. Phil Forcier has been hired to work 2 `` - hours at the
library and also at the Fire Station not to exceed 20 hours /week.
Next meeting: Monday, March 22, 2010 at 4:30 pm.
A motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Roger with a second by Guy. Motion carried
and meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Janet Vacek, Co- Secretary
1 I (��
Resource Allocation
Committee
May 4, 2010
4:00 PM
Hutchinson City Center
Attendees; Steve Cook, Bill Arndt, Gary Plotz, Jeremy Carter, Kent Exner (Committee Members)
Dolf Moon, John Olson (Contributing Participants)
Meeting Minutes
1, 2010 Project Worksheet Sherwood St Extension, Seal Coating, Plaza 15 Parking Lot, etc.
Kent E. provided and reviewed the most recent version of the 2010 Project Worksheet The focus of the discussion was identifying
projects to he constructed during 2010 along with the Adams/Washington, Sherwood and TH 15 WM Lining projects. Following
significant discussion, the RAC agreed that Seal Coating and Les Knobs, Parkway projects (Plaza 15/Parking Lot B not identified by the
RAC) should be developed and potentially administered with the bonding target being $1.5 - 1.65 M. Kent E. explained that since the
City is not allocating typical funding amounts from the Water, Wastewater or Slormwater Funds for the 2010 projects and with the
possibility of not meeting the bonding target value, the amount of Engineering fees generated might not meet the General Fund Budget
department revenues. However, Engineering staff continues to develop and deliver a significant volume of project work (while
supporting many other City departments/functions), but due to funding/prioritization unknowns, many projects are not constructed in a
timely manner and no fees arc collected within the current budget year.
2. TH 15 Watermain Lining Project — consultant proposal & City contract partnership possibility
- Kent E. reviewed the proposed consultant proposal and project partnership possibilities relative to the TH 15 Watermain Lining project.
RAC agreed that the potential cost savings and City staff learning opportunity results in the Engineering Services Agreement being
acceptable.
3. Frost Boil Repairs —review situation & determine funding source
- John O. presented information regarding the frost boil issues within several City streets. At this point, the budgeted street maintenance
funds will absorb this unforeseen cost of $68,450 and, essentially, he exhausted with the other seal coating and crack scaling work.
I Iowever, it additional unforeseen street maintenance repairs are deemed necessary during 2010, the Public Works Dept. will work with
the Finance Dept. to identify potential funding sources and /or amend the appropriate budgets.
4. Montana St NW Right-of-Way Plat — review draft plat boundaries & potential property conveyance
- Kent E. provided a brief description of a potential street right plat along the existing Montana St. NW segment south of TH 7.
This potential plat would create an outlet along the easterly side of the roadway right -of -way. the potential property conveyance of this
oullot will be discussed at an upcoming City Council closed meeting.
5. TH 7/15 Mn/DOT Properties —review property appraisals & transfer feasibility
- Kent E. reviewed the recently finalized appraisals for the TH 7115 project remnant properties. RAC Cell that acquiring these properties at
the appraised amounts would be beneficial to the City. The potential property transaction with Mn/DOT will be reviewed at an upcoming
City closed meeting.
6. 2011 2015 Public Works CiP —review draft info
- Due to time constraints, this item was not discussed and no information was distributed. This item will potentially be reviewed at the
.Tune 0 RAC meeting.
7. Other Discussion
- Kent E. described the situation of the colored and normal concrete sidewalks within the Downtown area and along TH 7/15 having some
pop -out and surface deterioration issues. City staff has acquired a quote of approximately $25,000 to administer the re- sealing of the
colored sidewalk within these areas- Steve C. stated that City shufshould work to identify a funding source to address this work.
� I (C)