cp02-22-2005 cAGENDA
. REGULAR MEETING -1-IUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2005
1. CALL TO ORAEIt - 5:30 P,M,
2. INVOCATION -Rev. Sam Grozdanov, Shalom Baptist Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 2005
(b) BID OPENING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 18, 2005
Action -Motion to approve as presented
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 18, 2004
2. PARKS, RECREATION, COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 6,
2004
3. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JANUARY 18, 2005
4, AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 14, 2004
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES FROM JANUARY 18, 2005
6. FIUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
7. CITY OF HUTCHINSON GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
8. CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
(b) RESOLUTIONS ANb ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION N0. 12644 -RESOLUTION WANING DATA FEES FOR MUNICIPALITIES
WITHIN MCLEOD COUNTY
2. RESOLUTION NO. 12649 -RESOLUTION DELEGATING FINANCE AIRECTOR TO MAKE
OFFICIAL INTENT bECLARATION5 FOR PURPOSES OF REIMBURSEMENT REGULATIONS
3. RESOLUTION NO. 12650 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MEMBERSHIP TO HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
4. RESOLUTION NO. 12651 -RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
5. RESOLUTION N0. 12652 -RESOLUTION ACCPETTNG PLEDGED SECURITIES FROM
CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO.
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -FEBRUARY 22, 2005
. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO TIIE CONDITONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND
THE AREA AT THE HUTCHINSON AIRPORT DESIGNATED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
PRIVATE STORAGE HANGARS AND ALSO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSIDERATION
TO ALLOW POLE TYPE CONSTRUCTION OF HANGARS ANp CONSIDERATION FOR
APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR A PRIVATE AIRPORT-RELATED COMPANY TO PLACE A
TEMPORARY TRAILER ON AIRPORT PROPERTY WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDA'T'ION (ADOPT RESOLUTIONNO. 12645)
2. CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT 77 MCLEOD AVENUE NE SUBMITTED BY
ART HAOEN, HAGEN BUILDERS WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12646)
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR CROW RIVER
I IABTTAT FOR HUMANITY ON AUGUST 23, 2005, AT MCLEOI) COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 3M CLUB ON
APRIL 30, 2004
(f) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 05-01 (NORTH CENTRAL TRUNK SANITARY SEWER) -
ACCPEI'TNG BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
Action -Motion to approve consent agenda
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.NI.
(a) LE'ITINGN0.8,PROJECTN0.05-10(GOLFCOURSEROADNW)-ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
. Action -Motion to close public hearing
Action -Motion to reject --Motion to approve
(b) DRIFT RIDERS PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Action -Motion to close public hearing
Action - Motion to reject -Motion to approve
7. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DONOI-IiJE
& ASSOCIATES FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM UPDATE
Action -Motion to reject -~-Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE REVISING SEWER RATES RELATED TO
BOD SURCHARGE (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. OS-0400 AND SET SECOND .
READING AND ADOPTION FOR MARCII 8, 2005)
Aotion -Motion to reject -Motion to approve
• (c) DISCUSSION OF PRIVATE HANGAR ISSUES AT' HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -FEBRUARY 11, 1005
Action --
. (d) CONSIDERATION OF DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PROPOSAL
Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHING MOTHLY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
MEETING
Action -Motion to reject --Motion to approve
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SF,TTING BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEETING FOR
MAY I9, 2005 AT 4;3U P.M.
Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAXMENT$
12. AD.IOURN
n
lJ
3
MINUTES
. REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
• RECOGNITION OF MARLIN TORGERSON DAY
Previous mayor, Marlin Torgerson, was given a shadow box and framed proclamation proclaiming February
8, 2005, as "Marlin Torgerson Day" in recognition of his years of service to the City of Hutchinson.
2. INVOCATION -Rev. Sam Grozdanov, Shalom Baptist Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 2005
(b) BID OPENING MINUTES FROM JANUARY 27, 2005
Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to approve minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
• 1. HUTCHINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 22, 2004
2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCLAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2004
3. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2004
4. BUILDING DEPARMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
5. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 12619 --FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FL);XIBLE
BENEFIT PLAN DOCUMENT
2. RESOLUTION NO. 12620 -RESOLUTION ADOPTING NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
3. RESOLUTION NO. 12621-RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
4. RESOLUTION NO. 12643 -RESOLUTION APPROVING DONATION OF REAL PROPERTY
(c) LETTING NO. 8, PROJECT NO.OS-10 (GOLF COURSE ROAD NW)
- ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT AND RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
(d) LETTING NO. 11, PROJECT N0.05-13 (WATER PLANT-FILTRATION SYSTEM
. - ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
- RECEIVING REPORT AND WANING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
~+ ~0.~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-FEBRU.9RY8, 2005
- ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
. - APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
(e) LETTING N0. 12, PROJECT N0.OS-14 (WATER PLANT -REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS)
- ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
- RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
- ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
- APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISMENT FOR BIDS
(f) LETTING N0. 13, PROJECT NO.OS-15 (WATER PLANT - WELL NO. 8)
- ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
- RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
- ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
- APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
(g) LETTING N0. 14, PROJECT NO.OS-16 WATER PLANT -GROUND STORAGE RESERVOIR)
- ORDERING PREPARATION OF RE~ORT ON IMPROVEMENT
- RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
- ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
- APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
(h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REJECTING ALL BID5 FOR 2005 FORD TRUCK CHASSIS
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHDRT-TERM 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
HUTCHINSON JAYCEES ON FEBRUARY 19 & 20, 2005, AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
(j) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR AMERICAN
LEGION POST 96 ON APRIL 9, 2005, AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
. (k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPDRARX LIQUOR LICENSE POR MCLEOD COUNTY
VOITURE 414 40 & 8 FOR APRIL 16, 2005, AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
(1) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR CROW RIVER
HAEITAT FOR HUMANITY ON AUGUST 23, 2005, AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
(m)CONSIDERATIONFQR APPROVAL 4F RENEWAL OF HUTCH BOWL SET-UP LIQUOR LICENSE
(n) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 3M CLUB ON
APRII. 30, 2004 _
(o) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH MIAWEST
WIRELE55 FOR CELL PHONE SERVICES
Item 5(b)2, 5(b)3, 5(d), 5(e), 5(1), and 5(n) were pulled for further discussion. Motion by Haugen, second by
Stotts, to approve thhe consent agenda with the exception of the above-captioned items. Motion carried
unanimously.
Item 5(b)2 was pulled for further discussion. Casey Stotts explained that the federal government is requiring
all cities that have an ewerggency plan in place attend training that complies with the National Irwident
Management System. Gary Plotz also noted that being part of NIMS compltes with receiving grant funding.
Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to approve Resolution Na. 12620. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 5(b)3 was pulled for further discussion. Councilmember Haugen inquired as to a hook lift system that
is incorporated onto this resolution for purchase. Jvhn Rodeberg explained that this is a replacement piece
of equipment and was budgeted for in 2005. Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt to approve resolution for
purchase. Motion carried unanimously.
2
~ ~a~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-FEBRUARY 8, 2005
Items 5(d) and 5(e) were pulled for Further discussion, Mayor Cook stated that in previous discussions it was
mentioned that tighter specifications be put in place for accountability and performance measures. Mayor
Cook requested that one last meeting be held with john Rodeberg, Gary Plotz, Scott Young of EarthTech
and him before the plans and specifications were ordered fur the filtration system of the water plant. Scutt
Youngg, EarthTech, presented before the Council. He stated that a meeting was held last Friday re arding
qualification issues and items from this meeting are being placed into documents and should be available by
the end of the week. Mr. Young stated that the ciualificanon measurements could be reviewed prior to the
specifications and plans being prepared and the improvement being ordered. The specification tssues are
more related to the RO system as opposed to the biofiltration system.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve Items 5(d) and 5(e) contingent upon the final specifications
being approved by senior staff and a city council member, with any revisions being made via addendum to
the contract. Morton carried unanimously.
Item 5(1) was pulled for further discussion. Mayor Cook nosed that on the gambling application a signature
was missing. He requested that the application be returned to the applicant for completion. Motion by
Arndt, second by Stotts, to return apphcatian to applicant for signature completion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Item 5(n) was pulled for further discussion. The gambling date was listed as April 30, 2004. Motion by
Peterson, second Haugen, to return application to applicant for date to be corrected. Motion carried
unanimously.
6. PUBLIC IIEARINGS - 6:00 P.M.
(a) 2Nn AVENUE SW FROM LAKE STREET SW TO DALE STREET SW -LETTING N0.7, PROJECT
NO.OS-09
John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, explained that a neighborhood meeting was held last week
• regarding this project. Mr. Rodeberg explained that the City had explained the project to the neighborhood
and they met again last night regarding some issues. These tssues include the cost and assessments that will
be incurred. Mr. Rodeberg is requesting that this public hearing be continued to March 8, 2005,
Tim Smith, 840 2"" Avenue S W, presented before the Council. Mr. Smith explained that he is speaking on
behalf of 24 residents of this area. The neighborhood is proposing that the project be delayed until after the
Hwy 7 reconstruction project, that more time and information be given to evaluate the condition of the road,
and that the assessment policy be reviewed.
John Rodeberg noted that this area ctjrrently is not a truck route and asked that the. Council approve staff
- placing "No Truck Route" signs on 2" Avenue and Lake Street. He also asked that one council member be
assigned to the meeting with the neighborhood on this project,
Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to continue the public hearing to March 8, 2005. Motion carried
unanimously.
(b) DOWNTDWN STREETSCAPE AND WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST-LETTINO N0.4, PROJECT
NOS. OS-04 & OS-DS (DEFERRED AND RESCHEDULED FROM JANUARY 25, 2005)
Miles Seppelt, EDA Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Seppelt gave an overview of the current
situation downtown which includes poor pedestrian lighting which has included safety concerns and the
possibility of the structural failure of light poles. Also, some sidewalks in a number of areas need to be
replaced, there is sign cluttering, and parking areas need to be better identified. Mr. Seppelt continued by
stating that this pri ect would include replacing all the light poles on Main Street, replace the wiring for the
light poles, add additional pedestrian-scale lighting, replace all sidewalks in the project area, reduce 8c
consolidate signage, improve signage for parking lots and add some simple landscaping elements.
. Mr. Seppelt then explained the goals ofthe project are to improve safety, add new lighting that will be more
~ l~-)
CITYC~UNCIL MINUTES-F'EBRUARYB, 2005
enemy efficient, take care of a much needed maintenance project and key element of the Downtown Master
Rev~ialization Plan, mare pedestrian-friendly downtown, help keep the downtown strong, reinforce the
hometown character of the downtown, minimize the cast for downtown property owners by sharing up to
$0% of the project costs and hopefully offset some impact of the planned 2006-2007 bridge closure.
Mr. Seppelt covered the project costs, which depend on the design option chosen. The cost of the project
will ran a from approximatel $1.6 - $2million. The project will be Financed 6y assessing the downtown
busines sowners 20% and sharing $0% of the project city-wide. The assessments would be paid over a 10-
year period and be part of the property tax bill. ~f this pro~eet is approved, the plan is that bids would be
received and awarded in May with actual construction beginning in August and completed by November.
Finally, Mr. Sep~elt shared survey results that he had received from property owners and business owners
that are located in the project area. Overall, he received favorable responses.
John Rodeberg explained that the light poles being proposed are cast iron and similar to ones that have been
put in place in other areas of town.
Discussion was held regarding signage clutter and how to best design that.
Councilmember Arndt asked if any utility work needed to be done underneath the sidewalk. John Rodeberg
explained that the infrastructure has been reviewed and no major reconstruction needs to be completed. He
further stated that with the stamped sidewalk design propose, if any minor construction would need to be
done, it would be relatively easy.
Councilmember Haugen asked if this project would not proceed, what would need to be done with the light
poles and how would that effect properly owners. Mr. Rodeberg explained that structurally the poles could
e repainted and a little more life could be gotten out of them. One of the pales has burned out and is not
able to be replaced. New light poles will not reduce the amount of money spent on electricity costs.
. Discussion was held regarding Main Street being reconstructed within the next ten years and will this project
be a waste of money right now. Mr. Rodeberg explained that the lights will not be effected and]'ust the outer
strip of sidewalk would need to be replaced. There is a risk that this will occur, but Mr. Rodeberg was not
opttmistic that MnDOT's budget will necessarily allow for it in the near future.
John Reynolds, trustee of Hassan Valley Lodge, property owner of 15 2"d Avenue 5 W, presented before the
Council, Mr. Reynolds explained that they are opposed to the project mainly because they are still paying on
the last improvement project and taxes continue to rise. Mr. Reynolds explained that his organization is
having trouble paying all taxes and this will only hurt the other organizations that they support. Details were
covered on the estimated project cost. _ _. __ _ _ _
Jill Corson, 40 Main Street South, presented before the Council. Ms. Corson opposes the project maimy
because of the rise in taxes and no increase in property value. Ms. Corson would like to wait until all
construction is completed, the economy picks up and the downtown property owners are working better
together. John Rodeberg explained that the County Assessor explained that the taxable valuation wrll not
increase, not necessarily the resale property value. Also, Mr. Rodeberg noted that items included in the
estimation were very high and staff will work on shaving off excessive costs.
Mark Cormier, 138 Main Street South, presented Before the Council. Mr. Cormier stressed that he
understands the lighting is poor and aging and feels that something needs to be done. He also expressed that
he doesn't want his taxes to increase, but he knows that this project needs to happen to keep downtown
viable.
Sharon Gruenhagen, Main Street business owner, presented before the Council Ms. Gruenhaggen cited
owners that are opposed to the improvement project, which are more than had been reported b~ staifandthe
Hutchinson Leader. Ms, Gruenhagen stated that the downtown is being divided because of thts project and
past pro osed projects that keep coming up. Ms. Gtuenhagen raised issues regarding poor business, style of
light poles, and rising taxes. s. Grue g agen is proposing to delay the project until after major construction
4
~ ~a~
CITYCDUNCILMINUTES-FEBRUARYB, 2005
is done on Main Street. Ms. Gruenhagen also stated that she does not feel her business will increase simply
because of a different sidewalk and light pole. She also stated that the Downtown Master Plan calls for this
project to occur in 2009.
Woody Lamprecht, 36 Main Street North, presented before the Council. Mr. Lamprecht stated that he is in
favor of the project, He has concerns of when the bridge is being reconstructed on Main Street and how it
will affect businesses.
Bill Corby, 44 Main Street, presented before the Council. Mr. Corby stated that he is in favor of the project.
John Schutt, Main Street business owner, presented before the Council. Mr. Schutt stated that he is in favor
of the project.
Chad Czmowski, 141 Main Street South, presented before the Council. Mr. Czmowski explained that his
business is very seasonal and he is requesting that his business not be shut down due to construction during
his busiest time. Mr. Czmowski also noted that he grew up in Redwood Falls and recalls businesses closing
after a beautification project.
Neil Jensen, 22 Main Street North, presented before the Council. Mr. Jensen stated that he is in favor of the
project. Mr. Jensen also noted that the City has assisted the downtown in several projects.
Mark 5chierman, Main Street property owner, presented before the Council. Mr. Schierman stated that he is
in favor of the project.
Gail Cox, 43 Main Street, presented before the Council. Ms. Cox expressed that she feels there are portigns
of the project that are not needed. Ms. Cox also noted concerns of light pollution with the new light poles.
Ms. Cox also expressed that more police presence is needed in the downtown. Ms. Cox also asked if
aluminum light poles could be cvns~dered. Mr. Rodeberg said that various options of light poles will be
considered urin the design phase of the project. Ms. Cox requested that if the project is done, rt is done in
the most cost-effective manner.
Councilmember Arndt asked Ms. Gruenhagen what aspects of the project would be acceptable to her. Ms.
Grnenhagen requested that the same style of lights be put in that are in now and that the project be delayed
until the construction is completed along Hwy 7.
John Reynolds presented again before the Council. Mr. Reynolds stated that he feels the project needs to be
modified and has concems that the lights may need to be taken out when Main Street is reconstructed.
Miles Seppelt explained the Downtown Association has created a downtown grant program that will be
available far very specific downtown businesses that will aid them in paying for assessments related to this
program,
Motion by Amdt, second by Peterson, to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Cook noted that he has done some of his awn surveying of the downtown area reggarding light poles,
sidewalks and funding sources. Due to various issues he is proposing that the project be delayed.
Councilmember Peterson stated that she has heard from several property owners and over halfofthem want
to proceed with this pro')'ect. She reminded the group that this item is to only proceed with the project and
prepare plans and specificanons. Another heanng ~nll be held with final assessment dollars.
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve Letting No. 4, Project Nos. OS-04 & OS-O5.
Councilmember Stotts stated that he is in favor. of the project and hopes to work with downtown
property owners so it is not a hardship an them. Mayor Cook noted that he has done some of his own
surveying of the downtown area regarding the light poles and sidewalks and what he has found indicates
that this doesn't need to be done now. In addition his financial concerns include the project cost puts the
l~ ~a~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-F~$RUARYB, 2005
city above our yearly bond target, the local cost of the Highway 7 project is still unknown, and there are
. uncertainties regarding the local impact from the state and federal budget issues. He is proposing that the
project be delayed. Mayor Cook noted that this should not be seen as a lack of support for downtown as
the city is involved in a variety of downtown projects. A roll call vote was taken: Haugen -aye, Arndt
- aye, Peterson -aye, Stotts -aye, Cook -nay. Motion carried 4 to 1.
7. COMMUNICATIONS RE VESTS AND PETITIONS
8. UNFINISHF,D BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) C~ON~ EMENT AOSSOCIATION OF MINNESQTA AUGMENTA ION LEGISLATION (INFO PRMATION
PRESENTECI AT JANUARY 25, 2005, CITY COUNCIL MEETING)
Mayor Cook stated that this action item is to enable the City and hospital to add Hutchinson's name to the
list of communities that enable PERA augmentation to employees of the hospital if the hospital ever
becomes privatized. This does not obligate the City to Follow through with privatrzation.
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve supporting pursuit of PERA augmentation legislation,
adopting Resolution No. 12642. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF 2005 RECLASSIFICATION REQUESTS
Brenda Ewing, Human Resources Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Ewing explained the
reclassification request process. She further reviewed the positions that are for consideration which include
the Information Technology Director, Computer Network Technician, Compost Site Coordinator and
Resource Recovery Coordmator (change to Sales and Marketing Coordinator).
Councilmember Stotts asked if these salary increases were budgeted For in 2005. Gary Plotz explained that
dollars are budgeted for performance increases each year.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve 2005 reclassification requests. Motion carried
unanimously.
(c) EO$T (HRA/FIRSTFTIME HOME BUYER DEVELOPMENT~EMENT FOR ROLLING MEADOWS
lean Ward, HRA Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Ward explained the Hutchinson Home
Purchase Opportunity Program (HHPOP). This program began in 1998 when the City was in need of starter
homes for low to moderate rncome buyers. Ms. Ward described the Rolling Meadows East development
program which is the second prdect related to the HHPOP program. There are currently 30 starter home
eligible lots that are available. ~s. Ward also explained the Affordability Gapp Partners which include the
MHFA, Greater Minnesota Housing Fund, the Ctty of Hutchinson and the H1tA.
The request tonight is to set the assessment rate at $76,469.48 for the new road construction in this
development area. By taking this action, the purchase price for the Building Better Neighborhoods program
can be met and an application can be submitted to agencies to acquire affordability gap funds.
Motion by Stotts, second by Haugen, to approve assessment agreement for Rolling Meadows East. Motion
carried unanimously.
(d) SERVICES FOR HUTOCHINSONVMUNIC FAL AIRPORT ~Ai°TAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GN
~~ c~~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-FEBRUARYS, 2005
John Rodeberg explained that the airport receives federal funding each year to do capital improvement
projects. Projects for 2005 include safety and maintenance improvements. TKDA is an engineenng firm
that provides design services for these projects,
Motion by Amdt, second by Stotts, to apFrove entering into contract with TKDA for design services at
Hutchinson Municipal Airport for capitall improvement project. Motion carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING JOINT MEETING WITI-I HUTCHINSON
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR MARCH 15, 2005, AT $:00 A.M,
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve setting joint meeting with HRA for March 15, 2D05, at
8:30 a.m, the City Center. Motion carried unanimously.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
1. PRESENTATION FROM IIOSPITAL RESTRUCTURING TASK FORCE MEETING - GLENCOE
REGIONAL I-IEALTH SERVICES/MORRIS MEDICAL CENTER: THE CASE FOR
PRIVATIZATION AND INTEGRATION WITH PHYSICIANS
John Braband, President/CEO of Glencoe Regional Health Services (GRHS), presented before the
Council. Mr. Braband explained the components of Glencoe Regional. Health Services. Mr.
Braband continued by giving a history of the organization which was established in October 2000 by
integrating Glencoe Area Health Center and Glencoe Medical Clinic. The hospital had been city-
owned dating back to 1941. Mr. Braband covered the reasons for the integration between the
hospital and the clinic, which included a good history of collaboration between the two and the two
organizations starting to look at each other as competitors. Also, the physicians would not consider
the potential of integrating with a public entity.
Mr. Braband expressed the differences between public and private entities, which included veterans
preference laws and pay equity/comparable worth process, public access to sensitive information,
including salary data (competitive advantages), defened comp vs. TSAs/4D3b 401 k, access to
capital, future debt obligations of private entity not obligations of City of Glencoe, PERA vs. private
program.
Mr. Braband continued by giving a history of the timeline they followed becoming private, which
took approximately four years from the first conversation. Mr. Braband explained that the benefits
to the City of Glencoe included a reduction in debt capacity, a patiendcommunity focus and not an
organization-specific focus, maintain local control, and economic development aspects. The final
deal between GRHS and the City of Glencoe included GRHS purchasing buildings and
improvements for NPV of lease payments over 30 years; separate 99-year land lease ($1/year);
separate agreement re: Board composition, right of first refusal, return of working capital upon
default, agreement on use of funded depreciation, purchase of facilities. The City of Glencoe
amended its Charter, deleting reference to Glencoe Area Health Care as an enterprise fund, the
GAHC Board and Commissioners and GAHC ceased existence as of 111/Ol and the debt was
defeased. Mr. Braband Further explained the current board's composition and the makeup of the
"buyout".
. Mr. Braband explained that since the integration the practice has grown, market share has grown and
~f ~a~
CITY CpUNCIL MINUTES -FEBRUARY 8, 2(705
a new clinic facility has been built. However, Mr. Braband did share lessons GRHS learned along
. the way. Mr. Braband then covered PERA augmentation, which is advantageous to the
organization's employees. Overall the integration cost the City of Glencoe approximately $150,000.
John Rau, Stevens Community Medical Center (SCMC), presented before the Council. Mr. Rau
gave a background of the county-owned hospital. Mr. Rau informed the Council that the chair of the
hospital at the time of privatization felt that agovernmentally-owned organization could not be
flexible enough to maintain competitive market share. The county-owned hospital at the time was
struggling financially and integrated with the. privately-owned clinic. Since the privatization in 1985,
the organization is doing very well and the business base from the immediate area has grown. The
hospital was sold for its $2 million bond debt plus $1. SCMC also now has several satellite clinics
in surrounding communities.
General discussion was held regarding retirement plans. General discussion was also held on other
models of integration.
Gary Plotz - Mr. Plotz mentioned that a special event is planning to be held March 4, 2005, in honor
of previous mayor, Marlin Torgerson, This event will be by invitation only and the cost will be born
by the attendees. Former City Attorney, Barry Anderson, will be the master of ceremonies.
Motion by Haugen, second by Amdt, to set public recognition event for Marlin Tvrgerson on March
• 4, 2D05, at the Hutchinson Event Center. Motion carried unanimously.
John Rodeberg -- Mr. Rodeberg explained that he had received a telephone call from Congressman
Collin Peterson requesting that transportation funding requests needed to be submitted by Monday
morning, February 7, 2005. Therefore, a request was submitted for an underpass at School Road and
Hwy 7 West. In addition, a funding request was submitted for the Crow River dam project.
Steve Cook -Mayor Cook noted again that he is not against the downtown streetscape project, but
just opposed to the timing of it.. _
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
Motion by Amdt, second by I-Iaugen, to approve claims, appropriations and contract payments. Motion
carried unanimously.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
~_<<a~
MINUTES
. BID OPENING
LETTING NO. 1/PROJECT NO.OS-Ol
)HEBRUARY 15,2005
Present; Gary Plotz, City Administrator, John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
and Melissa Starke, Recorder
Gary Plotz, City Administrator, called the bid opening to order at 10:00 a.m.
Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 1, Project
No. 05-O1, Mr. Plotz noted that the City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and
to waive any informalities and irregularities as signed by Gary I7. Plotz. The following
bids were opened and read:
Arcon Construction
I-Iarris, Minnesota
Barbarossa & Sons Inc.
Osseo, Mintesota
Duininck Bros Inc
Prinsburg, Minnesota
Bid Amount $1.451.805.74
Bid Amount ~1,521.$OS 79
Bid Amount $1.510.652.42
LaTour Construction, Inc.
Maple Lake, Minnesota
Rickert Excavating, Inc.
Brownton, Minnesota
SR Weidema, Inc.
Maple Grove, Minnesota
Bid Amount X1,770,893.38
Bid Amount $1.167.974.23
Bid Amount $1,458.776.53
The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation.
The bid opening adjourned at 10:10 a.m.
ATTEST:
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
Gary D. Flotz, City Administrator
~~ ~e~
The November 1 S, 2004 meeting of the Pioneedand Library System board was called to order in
. the Willmar Public Library meeting room by Chair John Baker at 7:30 pm. A tyrorum was
announced. This will he the last full board meeting for the year. Guests are Sue Hilgerk Olivia
Head Librarian, Shirley Schulte, Bird Island Head Librarian, Jean Claris for Central Processing,
Cindi Hendrixx, Appleton Head Librarian, Mary Millard from the central office, Pat Brown who will
be replacing AI Clouse representing Olivia and Ron Anthony who will be repladng Gary Johnson
representing Yellow Medicine County. There are 7 board members whose temu are up atthe end
of this year. They are Gary Johnson, Ivey Vonderharr, AI Clause, AI Maas, Jim 5chueller, Mary
Huesing and Herb Rotunda. Thanks to a0 of them for their years of service.
AI Clouse added VA.11. Canby Migration Budget and VA.12Ken Parker Donation th the agenda.
Director Houlahan added V111.E. April `05 Awards meeting. Garrison Hale motioned to approve
the agenda as amended. Second by Gary Johnson. Carried. There was a brief dscussion on
the pct. 21'04 minutes. Ivey Vonderhan motioned to approve the Oct 21, 2004 minutes.
Second by Dan Reigstad. Carried.
AI Ctcuse presented for the Fnance Committee.
Clouse motioned to approve the Oct 2004 financial Report. Second by Gary Johnson. Bdef
discussion. Carried. Clouse motioned to accept the October 2004 bills and check registers.
Second by Neva Kamrath. Carried. We are in the process of working on the Appleton Prison
Contract They must have a qualfied librarian review their services. We will charge a fee for this.
Cindi Hendrixx is working on a phased approach th the prison services from the Appleton Library
and Pioneerland. There was some discussion pn this phased approach. Phase 1 would limit ths
Prison to 1 library card with a maximum of 100 concurrent loans. ILL not th be from outside PLS.
Garrison Hale motioned to implement Phase 1 along with the director's service contract of
$500 for the year on Jan. 1, 2005 Phase 1 to run the entire yeaz of 2005. Second by Dan
Reigstad. Discussion. Carried. Director Houlahan presented information on the 2004, 2005
budgets. These will go before the ExeartivelFnance wmnirtteesforapproval in December. For
Local budget detail irrfomration, see John. He also reviewed briefly the arrhomation budget See
him with questions. There was discussion as to dispersal of $5881 extra from Granrte Fails. This
can be used toward capital expenses. These dollars are th relieve 2004 financial issues and
continue into 2005. AI Clouse motioned to accept the extra dollars from Granite Fella to be
used to be used towazd capital expenses with the offsetting dollars going toward their
operation expenses. Second by Amy Wilde. Discussion. This plan has already teen approved
by the auditors. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to approve a trial run book selDng agreemorrt
with E-t3ay. Second by Gary Johnson. Carried. AI Clouse motioned to approve the ngvr
Library Size Criteria. Second by Garrison Hale. Discussion. The new cxiteria is adjusted for
inflation and indudes combination of 2 libraries within the rziteria. Carried. Garrison Hals
motioned to deny librarians reimbursement out of Pioneerland funds for LMC meeting
milage. Second by Vern Silvernale. Discussion. Generally, in these situations, the union is
responsible for their own costs, not the employer. Carried with 15 yea, 5 no. AI Clouse
motioned to accept the entire $11,OOD SAMMIE grant for the Canby migration in one year
rather that split over 2 years. Second by Gary Johnson. Canted. AI Clouse motioned to
accept a donation from Ken Parker to the Willmar Library of $25,000 with the interest M be
used for the library needs. Second by Ivey Vonderharr. Carried. The Board also wished th
recognize Ken andfor his generosity and publish this in area papers wrth his consent.
5 ~~~
Ivey Vonderharr presented for the Personnel Commiifhae.
Vonderharr motioned to accept the new hires of Beth Selle at Brownton, Barbara FJeldatad
• ad Madison and Mary Ann Price at Hutchinson. Second by Barbara Jean Nelson. Brief
Discussion. Carried. There are no additional polices m discuss. Vonderharr recommended that
a letter be sent to Jack Johnson rerrunding him of the Board's attendance polity.
Stacey Schuette presented for the Ad Hoc EvaluatiorVGoals committee. See the Directors report
for new format including items the committee has designated as important goals to be working on.
There will be an all day meeting on Dec.10"~ ~ hear from PLS staff as to their requirements/wishes
of services that the central office should provide regardless of what type of Library sys~m we are.
Anyone who wishes to attend may do so.
We will need to replace AI Clouse on the LMC committee tonight. Hale is also considering
resignation from that committee. Hale motioned to move Paul Setzepfandt from his position
as back-up tp a committee position. Second by Dan Reigstad. Carried. Now we will need to
replace Paul and select an new negotiating team member. This will occur at the January'05
meeting.
AI Maas presented for the Nominating Committee.
The committee has come up with a list of 1 nominee for each elected position, Other nominations
will be taken at the January meeting when the elections are held.
There was no Old Business
New Business.
The Heritage Searchers agreement, an annual agreement, is up for renewal. They are responsible
for the insurance on their items in the lihrary. AI Couse motioned to approve the agreement for
2005. Second by Ivey Vonderharr. Carded.
Prior to the Automation Selection presentation, Director Houlahan presented the Director's report.
We are looking for a host for the 2005 banquet If interested, contact John 6y January. Also a
Thank You to Ivey for organiang the past banquets. Mary Millard presented information vn the
Mardag project She also presented on PL5 disaster plans which are over 10 years old and need
to be updated. Policy committee will look at this. We also need to comply with State health and
Safety regulations.
Per Ivey, there will be no Personnel meeting in Der~mber.
Beth Lunn presented information on the Automation Software selection process with the assistance
of the visiting librarians. They have a preferred software choice selected after much research.
This will go first To the December joint FnancelEuecutive(Technology meeting for approval. Then
to the full board after the new year.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 pm
Stacey Schuette
. Secretary
5(~~
MINUTES
. Forks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
December 6, 2004
Members present were: Bill Arndt, Mike Schiesl, Lora Muilenburg, and Mayor-elect Steve
Cook. Also present were Dolf Moon and Karen McKay.
The meeting was called to order at 5:15 pm.
Board members were introduced to Mayor-elect Steve Cook, along with a brief history of the
board's responsibilities.
A motion made by Bill Arndt and seconded by Lora Muilenburg approved the minutes dated
November 1, 2004. The board unanimously agreed.
OI.D BUSINESS
150`h Ce]ebration - $3S,DOD has been raised for funding the yearlong celebration through the sale
of banners. The $500 banners are sold out while one-third of the $300 banners For Highway 15
south are sold. The total cost of the banners is $7,000. Sponsors will receive their banners when
the holiday decorations go up. No city fiords will be used to finance the activities. Any funds
remaining at the end of the year will be given to the foundation.
• Some of the activities scheduled are tours of historical Hutchinson, including businesses,
educational and religious institutions and highlights of past elected leaders. The theme for the
event is focusing on the past, present and future of Hutchinson.
2005 Bud>tet -The board received a copy of the 20DS amended budget with a comparison to
2004. There has been a 1.5% increase in the budget over the past three years. One person will
be added back into the parks department. The Event Center Coordinator position, which is'/,
full time; will be full time in 'O5. The budget serves as a guide. It may be approved at the _.
December 14a' or 28a' City Council meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
Canital Improvement 2005 - Lnprovements scheduled for 2005 include: Roberts Park prairie
plantings, tennis court upgrades to the Washington Avenue site, VMP backstop and relighting in
time for the state amateur baseball tournament in'O5. The Rec Center shower valves are
wearing out, replacement costs may be eligible for an energy fund with Hutchinson Utilities.
The pool/ballfield project talks will resume in `OS; a ballfield will be eliminated in Linden Park
to provide space for a storm water retention pond,
J Ca)~
Minutes
. PRCE Advisory Board
December 6, 2004
Page two
Millers Woods -John Miller sent a letter to the City Council, Mark Schnobrich and Dolf
expressing disappointment with what is happening in Miller Woods with regard to the neighbors
using park property for personal use. There is one structure, three forts and additional trees that
have been planted, and he would like them removed by December 31". John would like a split
rail fence installed along the property line. A cost estimate for the fence is $15,000. Nigh school
ecology students, Sentence-to-serve and Cub Scout groups have been working in the park to
clean up unwanted vegetation. Dolf has met with John three times during the year; he will hold a
conference call on December 7a' to address John's concerns.
"For Profit" Activities Tn The Brochure -- In the past, the PRCE's winter/spring brochure
included a "for profit" karate business. The city receives a $1,OD0 donation to publish the
booklet three times a year from Mid Country Bank. The cost to publish the brochure is $7,500
per issue. The board agreed that the karate business should be eliminated from the booklet.
BOARD MEMBER ITEMS
Steve Cook asked about the BMX bike trail. Dolf told the board he recommended the
fairgrounds as a possible site and suggested an active association be formed to provided
leadership to set supervision and liability provisions. Jim Lobeck and his son were interested,
but nothing materialized.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 pm by a motion made by Bill Arndt and seconded by Lora
Muilenburg. The board unanimously agreed.
klm
C~
St4)~,
MINUTES
. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
Hutchinson Clty Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was tailed to order by Chairman Dean Kirohoff at 5:30 p.m. with
the following members present: Brandon Fraser, Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson,
Mike Flaata, Farid Currimbhoy, Robert Hantge and Chairman Kirchoff.
Absent: None Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Planning Director, Kent
Exner, Assistant Director of Engineering, Marc 5ebora, City Attorney and
Bonnie Baumefz, Planning Coordinator
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) Consideration of Minutes dated December 21, 2004
Mr. Hantge moved to approve the minutes of December 21, 2004 as
submitted. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy. The minutes were approved
unanimously.
r 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R2 (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO C1 (NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE
COMMERCIAL) SUBMITTED t3Y CHRIST THE KING CHURCH
LOCATED AT 1040 SOUTH GRADE RD SW
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:33 p.m. with the reading of
publication #7280 as_published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 8,
2005.
Ms. Wischnack commented on the permitted use in the C1 zoning district
in the event the church would sell a portion of the property. She stated
the Planning Commission must consider the long term effects of rezoning
and explained this is not considered spat zoning because of the 5 acre
size of the property. She commented on the following five factors
discussed 6y staff:
1. Neighborhood Commercial Zoning is the least intensive land
use.
2. There are many neighboring properties, which have a partial
home occupation or non-conforming commercial use.
3. The City has previously considered this entire area for some
type of multi-use district.
4. A church is the existing and anticipated future use of the
. property.
5~~\
Minutes
Planning Commisslon -January 18, 2005
Pape 2
5. The area is sizable, greater than 5 acres, which would remove
consideration that it would be viewed as "spot zoning",
Discussion followed on the possibility of future lot splits as was proposed
last month by Mr. Bloemke for an office building use.
Mr. Hantge questioned the parking lot on the southern portion of the
church property which extends over the property line.
John Rodeberg stated he was the building committee chairman at the
time the parking lot was constructed and explained a Conditional Use
permit was granted at the time and there was a verbal agreement with
the property owner to the south. We stated property was to be transferred
to the church. Mr. Rodeberg explained the reason for rezoning the
church property was to make the church a permitted use and future
additions would not require a Conditional Use permit. He stated tha
church does not intend to split the lot or sell the land for additional uses.
He commented on the access off the potential Cleveland Avenue and the
passibility for the church to access the property with a drive in and
another drive out.
Ms. Wischnack stated the house discussed at a previous meeting for use
as an office building has been sold and will be moved to the Ravenwond
West property for residential use.
. Mr. Exner stated a new access on to South Grade Road would be
questionable.
Mr. Flaata asked how this would affect abutting properties which could
ask to be rezoned.
Mr. Cumimbhoy questioned why the church would want to rezone when
there is no plan for the property.
1Nr. Rodeberg stated the church does have future plans to expand the
parking lot.
Mr. Fraser stated it does not seem necessary to rezone now that Mr.
Bloemke is not asking to move the house for an office. Mr. Rodeberg
stated it would 6e a permitted use if rezoned and the church would not
have to go through the Conditional Use Permit process. Mr. Fraser
stated it is hard to buy intp rezoning far flexibility.
Mr. Rodeberg stated there are already mixed uses an Dale Street and he
doesn't foresee a more intense use for the church property.
Mr. Fraser stated this does set a precedence for other properties to be
rezoned in the area. Mr. Rodeberg stated the zoning does fit with the
area.
•
~~
Minutes
Planning Commission-January 18, 2005
Page 3
Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr,
• Haugen the hearing closed at 5:50 p.m. Mr. Hantge made a motion to
recommend approval of the request with staff findings. Seconded by Ms.
Ottenson. The motion failed 3 ayes to 4 nays (Ayes: Mr. Hantge, Ms.
Otteson and Mr. Haugen Noyes: Mr. Currimbhoy, Chairman Kirchoff, Mr.
Fraser and Mr. Flaata). Mr. Fraser made a motion to deny the rezoning
due to nv substance to the changes. Seconded by Mr. Flaata. During
further discussion Mr. Currimbhoy stated •we do not know the future for
the property. The motion to deny was approved 4 ayes to 3 nays. (Roll
Call Vote -ayes: Mr. Currimbhoy, Chairman Kirchoff, Mr. Flaata and Mr.
Fraser, nays: Mr. Hantge, Mr, Haugen and Ms. Otteson) Ms. Wischnack
stated this item will be placed on the City Council regular agenda at their
meeting held January 25, 2D05 in the Council Ghambers at 5:30 p.m.
b) GONSIDERATION OF CQNDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANGE
REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF WUTCHIN$ON FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A WATER TREATMENT PLANT LOCATED BETWEEN HIGHWAY 7
AND 5T" STREET NE AND BETWEEN PROSPECT AVENUE AND
BLUFF STREET AND TREATMENT WETLAND LOCATED AT 30 AND
40 ARCH STREET NE AND 300 47N STREET NE
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:55 p.m. with the reading of
publication #7281 as published in the Hutchin~9n Leader on January 6,
2005.
• Ms. Wischnack explained the three requests individually. The first
Conditional Use Permit is necessary for the use of the proposed building
in a residential area. She stated there was a previous neighborhood
meeting which was attended by 3 neighboring property owners. She
stated there were approximately 70 notices mailed. She commented there
have been no discussions of concern by neighbors with the present
facility and she explained the site plan. The second Conditional Use
Permit is for placing a wetland in the flood plain to deal with water effluent
discharge. This pond creation would restore the wetland area, which is
-locally known as- the old bass pond". She -explained the effluent' is
created by a reverse osmosis procedure and needs to be treated prior t0
entering any public waterway. She stated the County Environmentalist
has approved the design for the wetland portion of the project. Ms.
Wischnack commented on the third request being a variance for the
setback of the reservoir structure. The setback to the Highway right-of-
way will be reduced from 30' to 0'. She explained, after the highway
construction, the sidewalk would be 60 feet from the reservoir structure.
She explained the reservoir tank will ho-d 1.5 million gallons of water and
will be partially exposed 5 feet to 8 feet.
Mr, Rodeberg stated the top of the reservoir will be at the same elevation
as Prospect Street, He explained the tank will be constructed into the hill.
Mr. Wischnack commented on the staff recommendations as follows:
•
5 [~,~
Minutes
Plannlnq Commission -January 18, 2005
Page 4
1. The parking lot areas for the new plant area must be paved prior
. to final occupancy treatment plant.
2. The plans do not indicate any significant removal of trees during
construction. The site is heavily vegetated and screened from the
surrounding neighborhood.
3. Noise from the construction of the wells, plant and reservoir shall
meet the ordinance requirement for work hours.
4. The setback variance would be approved based on the hardship
of other alternatives would have a negative impact on the
surrounding properties.
5. The floodway and wetland impact areas must be properly
controlled far erosion, during and after construction to ensure no
siltation occurs toward the river area.
6. Establishment of permanent vegetation must be complete; prior to
removal of silt control.
7. The conditional use permit shall be valid through 2006.
Ms. W ischnack explained the new well will run 24 hours per day. She
stated the location of the reservoir is the least invasive to the site and will
be placed in the "hole in the hill".
Chairman KirchofF asked if the project could be built without the reservoir.
Mr. Rodeberg stated the reservoir is part of the operation of the plant.
. Discussion followed on the process used to treat the capacity and quality
of the water.
Mr. Flaata asked ff this project will be screened the same as we direct
other projects in the City. Mr. Rodeberg stated the building will look more
architecturally like the electric plant and stated there will ba screening
from the homes. Ms. Wischnack explained the landscaping plan is not
• complete and commented on the existing trees on the property. She
stated the process for the construction of the well and reservoir must
- begin. ,- -- .- .- _ - .
Scott Young, Earth Tech, stated the reservoir is placed in the hole rather
than taking out trees.
Discussion followed on the appearance of the reservoir. Ms. Wischnack
commented on the possibility of the top being seeded with grass to serve
as a look-out area. The reservoir will be architecturally designed..
Mr. Rodeberg commented on the new wetland.
Mr. Ycung showed the Commissioners drawings of the proposed look of
the building and the reservoir and explained there will be fagade on the
tank with a terraced landscaping. Mr. Hantge asked why the reservoir
could not be placed on the north side of the property. Mr. Young
explained placing the tank on the north side would endanger wells 4 and
5.
5C~J3
Minutes
Planning Commission-January 18, 20115
Page 5
Mr, Young commented on the consideration of security for the facility
• which would account fpr visibility of the building. He explained the
finished face of the reservoir which will 6e terraced and landscaped. Mr.
Young commented on the parking and explained there will be limited
parking. The building is not staffed 24 hours and the employees will enter
from the rear or north side. The front will be off Prospect Street.
Discussion followed on the use of the generator only in emergency
situations.
Mr. Young explained a water plant is npt noisy pr odprpus. He stated
they will screen the trash container, transformer, outdoor storage, etc. He
explained they will begin construction next Fall. He explained the process
of the water movement and why the water does not freeze. He stated the
reservoir will be secure.
Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Flaata
the hearing closed at fi:25 p.m. Mr. Fraser made a motion to recommend
approval of the Conditional Use Permits with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The mptipn carried unanimously. Mr. Hantge
made a motion to recommend approval of the Variance with staff
recommendations adding number t3 to include: Special landspaping of the
reservoir tank with terracing is required for aesthetics. Also, facade
treatment of the tank is required. Seconded by Mc Flaata. Discussion
followed. Ms. Wischnack stated staff will present drawings of the
• buildings and landscaping as they are completed. Chairman Kirchoff
stated another presentation at a later date would be helpful. The motion
carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item wilt be placed on the
Gity Council regular agenda at their meeting held January 25, 2005 in the
Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m.
4. NEW BUSINESS
a) UPDATE ON POWER LINE AL-0NG LUCE LINE FRAIL
Ms. Wischnack commented an the previous Conditional Use Permit for
the powerline and stated the line must be relocated to the north.
Dave Hunstad, Hutchinspn Utilities, explained the placement of tha line
too close to the Luce Line trail. He stated they will move the line 6D feet
to the north.
Mr. Wischnack stated the approved Conditional Use Permit was for the
use. This is an update because of the line mpvemant.
Discussion followed on the DNR permits and the private easements.
Mr. Fraser stated previously there was discussion regarding the safety of
the line near the Luce Line Trail.
C~
5 (a~3
Minutes
Planning Commission-January 18, 2005
Page 6
Ms. Wischnack stated the line must be moved to make the placement
permissible 6y the DNR.
5. OLD t3USINE55
a) DISCUSSION OF. ENFORCEMENT OF GRAVEL PARKING LOT
ORDINANCE
Ms. Wischnack commented on the number of commercial, industrial and
high density residential properties with parking lots or portions of the
access. She stated there are approximately 50 parcels with this situation.
She commented on the 3 following solutions:
1. At the next realtor's information meeting; staff would provide the
ordinance data and indicate there are approximately 50 properties
in this situation.
2. Indicate the information on an assessment search as a note or an
attachment.
3. Send a specific notice to each individual property owner
explaining the requirements of the ordinance.
Mr. Fraser asked is some of the parking lots would be exceptions to the
dust and runoff issues. Chairman Kirchoff stated we did make allowances
for some parcels according to the map.
• Discussion followed on the properly owners dilemma with large parcels.
Ms. Wischnack stated staff is trying to get compliance of the ordinance.
Chairman Kirchoff stated there is some leeway to the ordinance.
b) Mr. Flaata questioned if the City has the same requirements for screening
and landscaping as other businesses. He stated he was talking about the
_.. Creekside-facility. Ms. Wischnaek explained the difference between the
I/C district and the I-2 district. She stated I-2 is the least restrictive. She
explained outdoor storage and outdoor display.
Gary Plotz, City Administrator, explained 25 acres or the main portion of
the facility is zoned properly. He commented on the blending line building
and the proposal to enclose the building. He stated most of the site is a
permitted use. The southerly portion has more restrictions.
Ms. Wischnack stated some plantings have been added.
Mr. Plotz explained the plan is to further improve the property.
6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
. a) DISCUSSION WITH MAYOR COOK REGARDING CHANGING
MEETING DAY FOR PLANNING COMMISSION
5C~~3
Minutes
Planning Commission -January 18, 2005
Raga 7
Mayor. Cook explained the need to get more City Council meeting
information to the public ahead of the meeting day.
Discussion followed on possible meeting days.
Mr. Plotz commented on the importance of the Planning Commission and
the coverage by the newspaper.
Ms. Wischnack stated the Planning Commissioners could decide next
month and staff will check deadline dates for both the and Monday of the
month or the 2'~ Thursday.
Mr. Hantge stated he would prefer Tuesday.
b) Discussion of joint meeting with the City Councl
Ms. Wischnack will discuss February 10a' for a meeting and tour with the
City Counci.
c) DISCUSSION OF ANNUAL ELECTION OF OFFICERS USUALLY MELD
IN FEBRUARY
Ms. Wischnack commented on the election of officers in February and
stated with new commissioners coming on the Commission in March It
would make more sense to move elections to March.
Mr. Hantge asked staff to research enforcement issues for Conditional
Use Permits of other communities. He also asked if the Building
Inspector checks building setbacks and parking lot setback at the time of
construction.
7. ADJOURNAIIENT
There being no further the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
51~~3
*~HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
December 14, 2004
5:30 p.m.
. Airport ArrivaUDeparlure Building
Minutes
Members present: Dave Skaar, Chuck Brill, and Doug McGraw
Members absent: Doug Kephart and 7effLux
Others Present: John Olson, City of Hutchinson; Tom Parker, Hutchinson Aviation; Karl Helsel, Aircraft
Instructor, New Ulm Airport; Joe Dooley, hangar tenant
Meeting called to order at 5:31 p.m. There was a quorum of members present
I. Annruve Minutes of October 12, 2004 meeting
Motion made by Brill, second by McGraw to approve October 12, 2004 minutes. Unanimous approval.
2. Review 2004 ~gn~trgction Proiect Status
Olson reported that the final inspection was held December 1, 2004, The contractor has taken taro of all punch-list
hems. ,
Airport staff will install a temporary light on the southeast tamer of the open hangar this year. New hangar lighting
will ba included in next year's project.
3. Revie 2005-2009 Ca ital Im rovemeot Plan
Commissioners reviewed the MtJDOT Aeronautics CIP. Olson reported the following $366,$33 in Federal AIP
. money available for Hutchinson (2003 ° $66,833; 2004 = $150,000; 2005 ~ $150,000).
Motion by Brill, second by McGraw to amend the 2005 capital improvement plan to include a proposed 2005
project with the following components:
Project Component; Cost Share (Fed/St/Local) Total Cost Local Share
Ditch cleaning 95/0/5 $ 10,000 $ 500
Jet Pueling & Dispensing 95/0/5 $150,000 $ 7,500
Hard Stand 95/0/5 $
15,000 $ 750
Helipad/Wash Station 95/0/5 _
_
$ 20,000 _
$ 1,000
New Primary Power 95/0/5 $ 25,000 $ 1,250
New REIL's & New Circuit 9S/0/5 $ 50,000 $ 2,500
EDB Modifications 95/0/5 $ S,ODO $ 250
Hangar Area Lighting 95/0/5 S 5,000 S 250
Totals
Unanimous approval.
$280,000 514,000
Discussion was held regarding the inclusion of a new hangar for the 2006 CIP.
Tentative CIP for 2007-2009 would include a snow removal equipment building and two more hangars
4. Review Existine Hangar Policv: Status of Existing Hangars
Skaar introduced Mr, Karl Helsel of Winthrop, MN. Mr. Helsel has a hangar in New Ulm, but is interested in
hangar space [o conduce a flight instruction business in the Hutchinson eras. He was interested in learning more
about the availability of publicly owned hangars in Hutchinson.
~~~~
Olson presented Commission members with the most recent hangar policy, hangar tenant list and waiting fiat.
Commissioners also informed Mr. Heisel about the possibility of constructing a private hangar.
. Commissioners discussed the need to clarify tenancy priority within the policy if hangars indicated on the CIP were
built in the future.
5. Status of Private Hanear bevelonment
Olson reported [hat there were two open inquiries from RAM Buildings, W insted and Tim Miller, Hutchinson.
There has been no activity on either request to date.
Mr. Dooley inquired regarding the process for building a private general-aviation hangar. He mentioned that his
plans to build acommercial-grade hangar had changed. He was now intending to build ageneral-aviation hangar
instead. Commissioners recommended that Dooley to meet with Olson to receive information regarding required
processes and documents. Dooley will meet with Olson during the upcoming week.
~, Review General Fund hiehlights and their affect on Airnort Onerati0ns
Olson reported that the 2005 General Fund budget would 6e approved by City Council tonight. The budget included
no significant changes for airport operations. There were no significant changes for staffing or hours available For
work at the airport. The matching funds available for airport improvements were adjusted to reflect the change in
federal funding, resulting in an overall reduction in a budget reduction.
Olson reported support from City Council For airport activities. Olson recommended that Commissioners
communicate with the new mayor, Mr. Steve Cook, about airport activities. Commissioners will consider inviting
Mr. Cook for a tour or invitation to an upcoming Airport Commission meeting.
~i Operativaallssues
5kaar reported that Ken Butler would be inducted into the Minnesota Aviation Hall of Fame in Apri12005.
2005 is Hutchinson airport's 40"' anniversary, Skaar led a discussion regarding how Commissioners would like to
celebrate the airport's 40'" year in business, possibly in conjunction with the City's sesquicentennial celebration.
At 6:35, a motion to adjourn was made by McGraw, second by Brill. Unanimous approval.
Next meeting was tentatively scheduled far April 12, 2005.
~~
SC~~U
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNUAL MEETING -January 18, 2005
. Hospital -Conference Room AB
Members present were: Wayne Fortun, Chairperson; Mike Mueller, Vice Chairperson;
Sherry Ristau, Secretary; Dr. Al Lira, Chief of Staff; Steve Snapp Trustee; Bemie
Knutson, Trustee; and Kay Peterson, Trustee.
Others present were: Philip Graves, President; Pam Larson, Finance, Information and
Material Services Division Director; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support
Services Division Director; Cary Linder, Foundation Director; Linda Krentz, Burns
Manor Nursing Home Administrator; Jane Lien, Acute Care Division Director; Pat
Halverson, Community Care Programs and Services Division Director; Brian Weinreis,
Executive Vice President Hospitals & Specialty Operations -- Allina 1-Iospitals and
Clinics; Andey Rasmussen, McGough Construction; Elaine Schennann, Quality
Representative; David Schwebel, Plaza 1 S Project Manager, Colliers & Towle Real
Estate; and Con-inne Schlueter, Recorder °
Chairperson Fortun called the meeting to order at 5:33 PM.
Consent Agenda
C~
Chairperson Fortun reviewed the following consent agenda items and asked that the
Financial Report be moved to the regular agenda for further discussion. The agenda was
as fallaws:
1. Past Meetin Minutes ecember 21 2004
2. Statistical R ort s state attachment
3. Financial R rt ecember 2004
4. Accounts Pa able and Cash disbursements ecember 2004
5. Auxili Meetin Minutes ecember 2004
Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by Snapp, to approve
the consent agenda as presented, with the exception of the Financial Report. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
I. New Business.
A. Medical Executive Committee Me ling Minutes & Credentialing. Dr. Lira
provided a report on the recent Medical Executive Committee Meeting. The
Following practitioners were recommended for membership to the Medical Staff.
Initial Appointment.
Avairs Slucis, MD Radiology Courtesy
Thomas Hennessey, MD Physicial Medicine & Courtesy
Rehabilitation
r~
~(~~ I
C~
Board of Directors Annual Meeting
Page two
January 18, 2005
Transfer from Provisional.
Dave Barlow, PA-C Physician Assistant
Eric Johnson, MD Psychiatry
Reappointment
David Krusemark, CRNA Anesthesia
Albert Lira, MD Family Practice
Allied Health Indep.
Active
Allied Health Indep.
Active
Re uest for Additional Privil
Chad Robbins, DO Open Tubal ligation
- - Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation
Postpartum Tubal Ligation
esi ation
Kurt Scheurer, MD Radiology
Thomas Kleinkauf, MD Family Practice
Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by Peterson, to
grant membership and privilege and to accept the resignation of the
above listed practitioners as recommended by the Medical Executive
Committee. Six were in favor. Lira abstained because he was being
reappointed to the staff. Motion carried.
B. Plaza 15 Bud et and Tenant Leas David Schwebel, Plaza 15 Property
Manager, from Colliers Towle, was present to explain the terms of the lease with
a new tenant, Rebound Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc..The firm will occupy 740
square feet that recently housed Allina Home Oxygen.
.-_ . .. • Following discussion, Peterson made a motion, seconded by Knutson, to
approve the Plaza 15 lease with Rebound Orkhotics & Prosthetics, Inc. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
Schwebel also reported on the 2004 major projeets-which-were-completed
• Discount 70% Off Stores expanded into 715 square feet of Bay 8.
• Allina Home Oxygen relocated to Bay 8 and 8A (storage) consisting of
3,221 square feet.
• Hutchinson Area Health Care expanded into the former Sam Gandy
location (storage).
Schwebel presented the 2005 Executive Budget Summary. Major highlights
were:
• Occupancy is assumed to be 100% by June 2005.
~a~ ~'
I ., ,
Boazd of Directors Annual Meeting
Fage three
January 18, 2005
• Budgeted income for 2005 is estimated at $463,170. This is based on
existing leases in place, rent increases and leasing assumptions.
• Anticipated escalatable expenses in 2005 are projected at $199,098.
• The taxable market value nn the property for 2004 is $1,147.000. f1AHC
is omitted from the tax roll.
• Leasing commissions costs total $25,021.
• Capital improvements total $10,314 for the new tenant assumption.
• Anticipated cash flow is $223,657.
The Athletic Club is up for renewal this year. The total income for 2004 was
$449,804 and the cash flow for 2004 was $230,051.
Schwebel advised the Governing Board of the 2005 Capital Projects. They are:
• New Parking Lot
• New Sidewalks
• New Lighting
• New Pylon Signage
Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to
approve the Plaza 15 Budget as presented. All were in favor. Motion
carried.
C. McGoueh Constructiondate. Andey Rasmussen, from McGough
Constmction, was present at the meeting and reported on the re-bid for structural
improvements for Stores #6, 7, and 13 in the Plaza 15 mall. Spectra Building
Group was the appazent low bidder in for both Bid Packages #1 and #2 with
the following bids:
Bid Package #1-Stores #6 and 7 $46,040
Bid Package #2 -Store #13 $28,770
The bid amounts are within the budget as estimated by IvlcGough based on the'"
Structural Review Outline. Mechanical and electrical work to be completed by
the firms of Augusta Electric and New Mech on a time and materials basis as
previously bid. McGough firm is proposed to be the construction manager for
this project.
• Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to
accept the low bidder, Spectra for shvctural improvement to Stores #6 a~7
in the amount of $46,040 and for Store # 13 in the amount of $28,770 and
to authorize that the project be managed by McGough Construction Co.
. All were in favor. Motion carried
~(a~ 3
Board of Directors Annual Meeting
. Page four
January 18, 2005
D. Allina Mana ement Contract 2005. Theresa Honsey, Consultant, presented the
f ndings of a survey recently completed which asked staff to quantify
management services that are currently utilized by staff as a result of the Allina
relationship. Results revealed that HAHC utilizes 74% of the services
available under Allina's Management Contract. Allina research indicates •HAHC
pays less as a % of expenses than other managed hospitals of large integrated
hospital networks.
Honsey explained the methodology that was used in obtaining and quantifying the
report which•was demonstrated through a power point presentation. The results
reveled that for every one dollar ($1.00)spent through the contactual relationship
with Allina, a return of two dollars and twelve cents ($2.12) was realized by
Hutchinson Area Health Care.
It was noted that Allina received the final contact the day of the board
meeting with recommended changes and there was not time for them to review
the document, as modified, with legal counsel.
'This item will be placed on the February agenda for a decision.
E, Audit Committee. Larson reported the Audit Committee had met and
discussed the "draft" copy of the Charity Care Policy (sec attached minutes).
Larson said staff reviewed the policies of neighboring facilities in formulating
the policy guidelines for HAHC. Larson noted that once the policy was adopted,
infornnation would also be available on the HAHC website, in registration areas,
and in a patient friendly brochure that will be developed. Larson reported there
_ _- - was discussion whether the policy should include only those individuals who are
truly uninsured or if it should be extended to include all individuals who fall
within the income and asset guidelines. It was agreed that it should be
available to all individuals meeting the income and asset guidelines test.
• Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to
approve the Charity Care Policy, as presented, effective January 1, 2005.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
~J
~(~~ ~
Board of Directors Annual Meeting
. Page five
January 18, 2005
F. Committee Board A ointments. Fortun reported on committee assignments
for 2005. It was suggested this task be considered as annual work by the Audit
and Compliance committee in future years. A recommendation was made to
create a Nominating Committee as a standing committee of the board. 'Other
changes in the committee structure were discussed. Ristau recommended these
changes be incorporated within the governing documents of a new organization if
the privatization of HAHC is authorized within the next several months. Graves
stated that a review of the by-laws is indicated based on the JCAHO visit this fall.
Following discussion, ltistau made a motion, seconded by Knutson, to
accept the committee appointments as presented. All were in favor. `
Motion carried.
G. Financi Larson presented the year end financial report utilizing a ratio
analysis. Actual net income for the month of December 2004 was
$463,300 compared to a budget of $212,78$.
• Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by Snapp, to
approve the financial report for the month of December 2004. All were in
. favor. Motion carried.
H. Other. Graves reported on the health fair which will be held on 7anuary 26,
January 27, and 7anuary 28. Governing Board Members were invited to
participate.
II. Reports:
A. Presi ent. Graves reported the City Council will pass a resolution which
will provide for PERA enabling legislation which is necessary if privatization of
HAI1C is authorized by the council. The council will forward their request
to our legislative representatives who will draft a bill to be acted upon by the
State Legislature this session. ......... ~ •....
B. Acute Carte. Lien reported on a new process the Medical Staff is working on in
developing evidenced based protocols for care for patients.
C. Care and Pro am Su ort Services. Erickson announced a Health Education
Presentation next month.
~[~.~ 5
Board of Directors Annual Meeting
Page six
January 18, 2005
17. Communi Care Pro ams & Services. Nothing further to report.
E. Finance Information & Material Services. Nothing further to report.
F. Senior Care. Krentz reported on the State Health Department recent survey and
resurvey process. Additionally she had commented a Federal k'ire Marshall
recently visited the home.
G. D'rector of Medical Affairs. Dr. Mu]der reported on an engagement with a
consultant who will be providing education in documentation and coding to the
physicians and others. 17te expected outcome will be improved documentation
with an increase in the case mix index level for HAHC. The Cost Flex
Software will be utilized soon to assist with clinical pathway development.
II. Foundation Director. Linder reported the Foundation Office has been relocated
to this campus. At this stage of the year, new fund raising initiatives are being
discussed.
I. Patient Safe & Performance Jm rovement. Schennann handed out a listing of
. " 27 Reportable Events" These are listed under Minnesota's New Adverse Health
Care Events Reporting Law.
Allina,Renort. Weinreis reported on the year end activities within Allina. Patient
census continues to be high throughout We system.
Weinreis also reported that Phil Graves and Dr. Mulder gat honorable mention at
the MHA Conference on their leadership effort with the "Leapfrog Pmject".
Congratulations to them! .
Fortun requested if additional business needed to be discussed at the meeting. Hearing
none, Mueller made a motion, seconded by Snapp, to adjourn, All were in favor. Motion
carried. ... ., . _ .
Respectfully submitted,
wt/
Corrinne Schlueter Sherry Ristau
Recorder Secretary
. .
J~~
3 Fhra1
ASSET3
Current Assals
1 Cash and hrves4nuVS - Operetlars
2 Cash and hrvesbrrBrlts • Se1FInsured
3 SuMvlel cash E trnrestorerds
4 Pa9enURestdent receivables
5 Allevrdrroes Tor bad debts
6 Advances and Conbachsf aloeaxas
7 Net pa6enVreeldent and tlrid-party
8 peyor receivables
9
f0 Olher raoelvables-rre1
11 inventories
12 Prepaid r
13 Total Current Atsels
14 board DesimwtedlF ed Deore~9on InvestrneNs
15 InveslmeM in Johd V
P1aM As
16 Land
1T Buildlrgs
18 Aocerrmlalad deproda8on
19 Bultlirga leas depreclelfan
ZO Etlupment
21 AxumWated dePreda0on
22 PAUgrmant Bass depracleBon
23 Cashconslnrc{wn 6 equipment
24 Cmstrudion in progress
25 Total PiaM Assets
Qlher Asaels
V~ 26 narerred fnara3rg Cosffi
27 Total Funds
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
Canparalive Balance Sheet
As afJanuary 31, 2005
JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY Change
2005 2004 2004 CY vs PY
56,344,455 56,292,189 ;10,111,472 {3,787,017}
_1,943,056 1,948,746 1,515.949 407109
;8,267,513
i 510240,835 571,627,421 [53,359,968]
24.251,356 22,709,417 16,446,608 5,812745
15,105,837) (5,328.989} [4,369,215] [].036.422)
f6,870,00G} [7,9482881 [6,263.022] (23889841
510,[85,711 ;9,433,070 ;7,796,372 ;2,389,339
331,153
980816
417824 329,651
941,113
365.668 262,058
725,751
297,536 49,095
224,285
120 28fi
;20.152217 521,310;137 520729140 {;5789233
;5,422,282 55,413,5]5 59.591,924 {54172,682]
_ 5990,066 5997,375 5722220 5267,849
51,019,788 51,0]9,786 S1Ai8,788 SO
I ITi AND P a~7O BA nur s
Curran! UabilBies
CurteM melWBesof
Lag Damn deb[
Aapmis payable - bade
Es9L7iated contractual
Axnred e~ensas -
Saiades
PTO
Interest
Satl-krsurad programs
CNrer
Defertad 1ed'rfbas
Deferred revenue
Tole! Garrard tia6188es
34,408,351 34,403,864 27,098,256 7,306,093
{13,632,639} {13.701297] [72494.7751 f] 33T,864Y Lora-term f3ebt !less eurrad
520,573,7]2 ;20,702,387 514,803,483 55,970229 ma~,d8.:t
16,811,833 16,792,735 [6,064,330 2,727,5013
(43,211,3151 f13,! 13 7971 (12148,9981 [1 08a 3?9]
SS,fi00,618 ;5,678,938 ;3,937,334 51,863,184
B B 0 0
3,497.534 3,453,758 8883.577 !3186413]
X30 891 552 530 854,849 ;28.214182 S4A47.370 Furl helarra
- 587,078 566131 5500345 (;13.287]
157,343,178 558.864,307 ;57.390631 (5478333 Total Funds
JANUARY DECEMBER JANUARY Chang
2005 2004 2004 CY vs P
5462,144 ;1,224,072 51,151,434 [3689,29[
2,069,027 2,471,239 1,814,868 274,159 ;
1,173,006 1,107,450 1,620,988 152,038
764,566 793,814 769,966 ]4,6]6
1,618,908 1,574,242 1,392,379 224,527
68.163 408,929 521.629 [433,668
413,586 432,057 $43,597 69,991
174,799 172,169 118,698 27,901
24,505 24,505 99,74? {75,238'
3.460 5,371 0 3,460
58.830,164 58.213,fi48 ;7261,882 (54314981
;21,019,590 521,0]3763 ;22,225468 [512058783
529.483.404 529.438 896 527,903.661 ;1,589 743
;57,343,176 5$8,664,307 ;57,390,811 {547833]
• ~ 1772005
328 PM
Final
Hl1TgiM8ON RREA HEALTH CARE
Statement of Revenues aM Expenses
6bnBr and Period Ended Jamsery3l, 2005
7 Revent>e
In patlen[ reremre
2 Out paBaru revenue
3 Resident Revenue ~ .
4 ~ Total paSerWresident revenue
D~~ I+~
5 GovemrrenSal & Po6q^-__._.
6 Free Gera
7 Tata1 deductlon from revenue
8 Nat patiealrestdmrt rareraie
. 9 Ottrer operafirg revariues ..
40 Net operaerg rererrue~-
Exoerlses
17 Salaries
12 Employee BeneUts
53 Professional and Medical Fees
74 UtliGes, Mince Contracts 6 Repairs
75 Food, Dugs 6 3vpplfes~
16 Other el~erlSe
17 Mircresota Coe
16 Bad debt
39 Interest
20 Deprecia8gn .
21 Tofa1 mrpenses
Excess of net operating revenue
22 over (order] operagrg expanses
$
R
23 Nonooera
no
evenues
trrvestinan[ fneome : ~ -
24 ONer rprropera8rg revenue (nett'
25 Plaza 75 h1.Urn8 7 (Lass]
28 Tdal rorlopera8ng revenue .
2T Net Yrwme . .
CURRE347 MOFfTH
Over Nnder} Budget
AGUai 9udget Ddlars Percent
53,422,319 53,755,170 (5332251] .6.8%
4,439,293 - 5,215,537 . {776,304] -14.9%
64t 450 682.418 (40,968] ~ 8.0%
(8,503,662 59,fi53,185 {51.749,523] ~ -71.9%
6,509,294 6,854,862 {745,511] -i5.d%
0 8,250 [6,250] -100.0%
54,109,291 54,881,142 {;751,821] -15.5%
51,394,371 54,792,073 {5397,702y ~ -6.3%
73,610 77,1 DB (3,298} -d.3%
56,468.181 54.869,161 {5401,000} •62%
52,074.032 51,975,592 5103,440 52%
495,442 '467,002 26,440 6.4%
527,674 659,663 {431,988] •20.0%
206,166 187,920 18,248 9.7%
634.459 891,302 (56.843] -82%
130,798 158,544 {25,746'] -46.6%
53,608 53,508 10l 0.2%
81,944 88,507 (6.593] -7.d%
57,858 87,439 [9,581] -142%
195,329 208,460 {11,131} -5.4%
54,462,265 54.553.937 [591,656} -2.Q%
55900 5375244 {5309.3441 X98.1%.
f21,D75 117,271 53,504 22.9%
21,881 17,471 4,410 . ~ 25.2%
7,fi5Q 3257 4,393 0.9%
550 606 537 999 512,607 .33.2%
558,506 5353,243 [5286.7371 456.0%
YEAR-T0.0ATE
Oren {Under] Btrc lAat
Actual Budges Dollars Percent
53.422,919 53,755,170 {;332,251} B.6%
4,439,293 5,215,597 [!76,306} -74-9%
861,450 682,418 (40,968} 41.9%
56,.503,682 (9,853,1&5 {54,149,523] -11.9%
VARIANCE %
January 2004 2006 vs 2004
52,981,610 16.8%
3,792,606 17.0%
655.554 •2.2%
s7AZ9,976 sas%
4,104,291 4,654.682 [[65,571} •15.4% 3,519,821 14.6%
0 6 250 !6,250} -108-0% 0 Na
;6,109291 54,861,112 [5751,8211 -115.4% 53,579,621 44.8%
;4,394,371 54,792,073 {5397,702) -B.3% 53.650.749 14,1%
73810 77108 (32961 -4.3% 80.685 -8.79'^
;4,466,161 S4.8B9,161 (5401,0081 -6.2% 53,931,044 13,7%
52,979,032 51,975,592 5103,440 52% 51,849,402 72,4%
495,442 487,902 28,440 6.1% 386,945 21.49E
527,674 659,863 (131,989} -20.0% 446,757 18.1%
206,166 187,920 18,246 9.7% 167,850 22.6%
634,459 691,362 (56,8.13} -8296 532,145 19.2%
130,798 556,546 [25,746} -18-4% t31,fi72 -6.7%
53,609 53.568 101 0.2% 44,492 Z0.5%
81,914 86,507 [6,593] •7.4% 61,745 32.7%
57,858 87,434 [9.581] -14,2% 41,260 46.2%
195329 208,666 {11,1311 -5.4% 750,231 21-9%
54 462261 54.553 937 [991.6561 -2.0% 53.824.493 78.7%
55966 5375,244. (5309,3441 AB.i% (186,521 •94.5%
521,675 517,271 53,804 22.090 517,433 20.9%
21,881 17,471 d,41D 252% 74,172 54.4%
7650 3257 4,393 0.0% 5,301 Q~0 •t
550808 537,399 512,607 33.2% ;37,906 33.5%
558,506 5353,243 {5296.737} $4A% 5144,427 ~ ~
YEAR-T60ATE
978 1
Q10 (32] -3.2% 978 1,010 {32] 3.2% 863 13.3%
°
28 PaBerrt days -
~ 595
3 ,
3
570 21 0.8% 3.591 3,570 21 0.6% 3.528 1.8
7°
2t'
30 Resident days
-
Per0ard oovrpenq- Grdget bed • Hospllel ,
52.6% ,
54.3% -1.7% -3.2% 52.6% 54.3% ~ -7.7% •32% 4fi.4X
5%
92 13.3%
7.8%
31 PeroaM oavpeng4Afdget bade - Nurslrg Rana 942% 93.6% 0.8% ~ 0.8% 94.254 93.6% 0.6%
17
7 0.8%
2
4% .
458
5 4.8%
~ ~~ 479-3 497.0 •11.7 -2.4% 479.3
628 491.0
656 .
•
(26} .
-
~
3% .
520 20.79E
33 Admissforrs {aduspaE]-Hospital oNy 828 656 {28]
196 ~.3%
1
B% 5
961 5
875 706 .
7-896 6.628
34 Expenses [net] per aamksian (a~us6edy - NospBal ordy 5,981
7 5,875: -
13
608 .
(1
1991 .
5%
41 ,
12847 ,
13,606
{1,759}
-8.596
12,964 ~ ~
35 Revenue per admission {adjusted]- Hospdal onh 52,44 , , ~
. 4 -BR01 [330] 5
2% 8287 3.4%
38 Net Revenue per adrNasfon (adjused] • F~aptlal only 6,071: 6,dOl
% (339]
2
0% d.2%
0%
~ 6,97
48
3% 50.4% •2.9% .
-4.0% 662% 0.3%
37 Discmarls as a peaeM aF ravMEles 48.3%1 50.4 -
. ~
. .
48 4
6 8
2 4
3% 5.4 •77.1%
r~3B FTE's par 790 admfssials {adjusted] • Hgspllal only 1 4.6 ~ 0.2 ~ 0.0~ 69
8 .
66
0 .
9.6 .
18.0% 83.3 49.0%
39 Days in Net Acmrmis Receivable . .
'S'
~ FMSTMNF.x~
Pnm I cram
r1
U
2005 ~-~~~ ~~~-~"'~~ ' CITY OF HUTC HIN
SON FINAN CIAL REPORT _
_ _ 20051
IJAN- UARY -^ pre/!mine 2D04 2005 _
_~__ 2005 _ _ 2006 _
_ _ 2005 JANUARY
REVENUEREPORT-GENERAL
_-~_ JANUARY JANUARY YEARTO ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGEI
a
YTD MONTH ATE ACTUAL _
BUDGET REMAININU USED
_
~__.~_ I
---- 3 818,280.00 3,818,290.00 0.00%t
LICENSES ...----___-- 1 B87.OD
__--. _...1 757.00 757.00 44,900.00
-- 44.143.00_, .._.... 1 89%
PERMITS AND FEES _ 6,558.74 23y317.14 _ 23,317.14 282,500.00 ...289 182.88 7.87%~
INTERGOVERNMENTA L REVENUE 12,022.50 13,681.13 13,881.1_3 _2 389 538.00 2,355.874,87 0.58%+
~CHARGESFORSERVICES 55,488.47 69,9D8.14 68,908.14 1,482,195.00 1412,288.88 472%~
FINES & FORFEITS
4 ____ _ _
_
_ _25.00
25.D0
88,ODO.OD
_87,975.OD 0.04%i
_ __
~ 8 _
_ ___ __OOD%
NTEREST __
~~-~~ 70$2
-6,3 _133.18 __
_ ____133_8 __
40,000,00 ,39,888.82 0.33%i
~
REIMBURSEMENTS 31,449.03 30,188.58 _ 30,18858 _ 284,083.00 253,874.42 10.83%
~,
_
--- _ ~
SURCHARGES -BLDG PERMITS .
_____ _
f 128.50
______
3 6 0_85
_
3 850 .000.00 I
154
,_ 50.0
, 850.85
21%
___
0. °~
00~,
TOTAL ~ 101803.87 141,891.02 _
141,881.02 8,745484.00 592.98
9,603 1
48%i
_,__
2005 J ~~ CiTI' OF HUTC HIN
SON FINAN CIAL REPORT ~
_ 2006)
...~
JANUARY ___
EXPENSE REPORT - GENERA
L _ 2004
JANUARY __ 20D5
JANUARY _
___ 20T
YEAR TO 2005
ADOPTED __ _
2006
6ALANCE _ JANUARY
ERCENTAGE
_ YTD MONTH ATE AGTUAL BUDGET REMAINING
I
~
-,
001 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 5,588.51 ...--- -~-7.38
_ 4,74. _ 4 747.38
_ -_,_ _58,4.1.......
0.00
-- 51,892.82
_..- __8_41%
---
~---
002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 21355.91 21,785.36 21785.36 298,571.00 278785.84 7.30%
003 ELECTIONS
~--~--~ 39.83 --~-~~ -~ ---~~_-~ ~~-
...- B,BOO.DO
-__._ .-
-__-.,.8~BD0.00 _
_ 0.00%~
__
004 FINANCE DEPAR _....-.~.. _-
TMENT __..__.._
31,405.57
28,308.59 -_. _. _-. ..
28,306.59
5D0,551.D0
472,244.41
5.88%~
005 MOTOR VEHICLE 15,885.04_ 15,438.55 ,
15,438.65 ._-._
218 628.OD 201,186.45
..-- 7.13%~
--t
_008 ASSESSIN¢ __ i - __
.
.
._. --
_ _ .0_0
46,
-
- _ 4800D_00'
7 0-00%;
-~-- ~- - --
_
..
_..._.
007 LEGAL _
--.-_
8,737.18 10,875.33
- 10,8_75-33 _
=1--- .00
184 448
•
0.87
153,7
i
8.48%
008 PLANNING 12,855.25 13,618.38
_ - 13818.38
--~--- 172,156
.00 _ 158,537.64 _ _ 7.91%
009 INFDRMATION SERVICES 10,880.55 _ _
11,166.73 11,168.73 178,288.00 18517 __ 6.33%'
110 POLICE DEPARTMENT _ - __ _190388.17 _
18_8,307.78 189,307]8, ___2158~114.OD 2,405,806.24 _ _7.28%i
_115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ___104.28 '. 13.18 13.18 12,000.00 11 886.84 0.11%~
118 SAFELY COMMITTEE 206.10 208.10 18,847.00 18,740_9D __- 1.08%
__
120 FIRE DEPARTMENT
-
--~-~- 20,281.34
~-~~--~~-~--~- 21,897.27
- - _ _
21,687.27
-~----~- 405 831.00
~ ~-- - ~-- 983,933.73
---~-~ ~~-~-- _ - 5.35%
.
130 PROTECTIVEINSPECTIO
__.. ~ NS
50 ENGINEERING Lf
~
~ 15,058_30_
3399025
~
____12,050.89
__ 42,821.48
~
___.. 12,050.89
42,821.48
228,96D,00
__ 549,137.00
_ .._
214,809.11
-- ---..
508,515.54
...._ 5,31%
_ 7;78%
1
__ _
.
52 ~~STREETS & ALLEYS _
57,038.57- I.
53~271.51 - 53,271.51 873,668.00 820,398.49 6.10%
1
80 CITY HALL BUILDING 8 176.51~~~~~~ 9,451.38 8,451_39
. 141,475_DO 132 023_81 8.60%~
201 PARK/RECREATION ADMINIST 76 D28.8 __-_
~16,328.82 _ _
1fi,328.82 __185,712.OD 168,383_38_ ____
-..--.__...8.79%1
202 RECREATION~T __
9,932_12 15,718_85 _-
15,716.65 190,838.OD _ 175,121.35, 8.24%.
203 SENTDR CITIZEN CENTER --'-_
204 CIVIC ARENA
. _.__----_
2D6 RECREATION BUILDING & POO
--- ~-~ F ^ -
207 EVENTS CENTER NT
208 EVERGREEN BUILDING
250 LIBRARY ~ ~
~ 301_ CEMETERY--._.._ . _.._ . ..--
310 DE87 SERVICE -7;936.58
38 588.08
8,580,31
-1
18,9 2.99
973.34
I 2,665.17
.-- -._6,758,10 _-_
_- 4,D84,58
33,684.1
~ 9,700.81
---
18,581.58
1 891.5
3 588.3
. _._.... 8,949.O
I
T _ 4,084 _58
.__
--- --9 7D0.81
6591.58
9 1,881.53
7 3 588.37
B~_ _._--_B,B49,09
~~~
8 -
88,82S.OO
_ _
118,417.00
_ 208-9~'~
1 14,250.00
165,546.00
i..._ -136,442-00
182,441.OD I - 82 743.44
;
. 823,429.62
09 718 39
- 1,., -_,_.___._
92 338 41
12 358.47
151,959.83
-- -131 492.91
~ 162,441.D0 8:11%
6:41%
8.12%
____ _._ . ____
7.94%
13.
2.31%
t- --- -- 5 27%
02%
---
O.DO%
~
EO G
~
3~ ~ ~ ~ ---
T~
,
_. _ _... 1TOTAL = 825 5343.17 -_844828.8 __fi44,828.95
5 9,7458484.00 9 100 855.05 6 62%
__
)1~~~
r
Lv
C~
2006
praliminery CITY OF HUTCHIN_SON_FINANCIAL REPORT ~ _
___
JANUARY __ 2004 2005 2006 2006 _ _
REVENUE REPORT -GENERAL ACTUAL JANUARY YEAR TD ADOPTED 6A4ANCE ERCENTAGE
~~~ - - -~.-~ Year to Data NILiNTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAININ4 USED
TAXES 0.00 0_OD 0.00 3,818,290.00 3 818 290.00 D:ODy.
LICENSES _ _
~~-~~~ 1,887.00
757.00. _ ___
757.00
44,800.00
44,143.00 _..
_ 1.89%
PERMITS AND FEES 8 558.74 23,317.14 . , 23,317.14 292 500.00 289,182.88 _ „_,,. 7.97%
_
MENTA
INTERGOVERN L REVENUE _
12,022.50 13,681.13 13,661.13 2,389,638.00 2,355 874.87 0.5896
_
, ...._.._.
CHARGES FCR SERVI ~..._........-
CES _-.. ...
55 488.47 _
fi8,908.14
89,908.14 , ----.._..
1,482,195.00
1,412,288.68
_ _ 4.72%
FINES & FORFEITS 0.00 25.00 __
25.00 88,000.00 87,975.00 _ 0.04%
J
1
INTEREST f
4
8 370.32)
I
133.18
_ 133.18_
58
40 000.00
39,866.82
0.33
~
%
REIMBURSEM_EN_TS
TRANSFERS __
,
_ _ -- -
_31,448.03
538.75 _. -_ 30,188_58
i
3,25D.00 _
~30,188.
~ 3,250.00 '
---------- ---284,083.00
1,546,000.00 ~
- -- -253,674.42
1,542,750.00 e~
_
_ 10.63
0.21%i
-i
~---
SURCHARGEB -BLDG PERMITS 129.50 650.85 850.85 0.00 i
~ 650.88
~ _.Z
---- .
_ .._0:00%i
..
TOTAL _
101J603.87 141,891.02 141,891.02
- 9,745 484.OD ~
- 9,803,582.88 _. 1_48%i
- - - - I
~ ~
2005 __ _.....----- --------- ----.._..... ...-- ~~ -- -
I
JANUARY 2004 2005 2005 2005 ____ 2008 JANUARY
EXPENSE REPORT -G ENERAL JANUARY JANUARY YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE
SUMMARIZED YTD MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING
'- USED
-- i
GeneralGovt. 114,914.13 1 5190_69 115,180.89 1,778,164:00, 1,863973.31 6.47%
Publlc Sat _
_ 225,809.08 __
223,275.16 _ 223,275.18 3,258,852.00 3,036,378.82 8.85%
Streets & Alle a
Parks & Recreation 91,029.82
150,317.95 85,882.97
184,889,71 __85,892.97
_ 184989.71_ 1,422,805.00
2,248,376.00 1,326 912.03
2,083,4ne_2D 8.74%
7.34%
Miacellane_ous ~ __43272.18
- 45,500.40
--- 45500.40 1 038,485.0 990,884;60_ ~ 4.39%
-____ -__ IT
OTAL 625,343.17 844,828.95 ' 644,828.95 9,745,484.00 ' 9,100,855.06 8.82%
~~ ----
~ ----------- --.. _.._ .. _..._ _....__
-
----- -......... -._.._.......-- ~---- -- -
... -
--- -~- _ --- -- - - _
__
______. ~--- ... __~.._...._. L_....__..r. t ~-- ~~.~
` Q J~
17-FetrpS
Institution
escri tion
nterest
Rate CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
January 31, 2005
Date Date
Of Of
Purchase Maturi
mount
US BANK Money Market 1.43% 1113120D4 11/19/2008 375,000.00
Smith Barney FHLMC med 4.00% 7/30/2004 7/27/2012 298,500.00
step up
Smith Barney FWLB C 4.05% 1f7/2DD4 7/30/2009 300,000.00
Smith Barney FHLB C 4.375% 9!1912001 4/11/20D5 750,000.00
Smith Barney FHLB G 4.160% 9/25/2001 4/19/2005 270,000.00
Prudential pool 336914 7.226% 12 31 96 02 D1 2026 8,118.87
Expected life 6.2 years
Smith Barney FHLM -C 4.850% 11/21/2007 5/21/2007 300,375.00
Prudentail pool 336389 7.270% 12 31 96 02 01 2026 4,438.88
Expected life 4.1 years
Prudential FHLB 5.00°h 5/22/2003 5122!2013 300,000.OD
Prudential FHLB 4.00°/0 8/12/2003 8/12/2013 300,000.00
Prudential FHLB 1.190°~ 6/26/2003 06/26/13 400,000.00
.
Wachovia FHLB 3.DD0% 7/16/2D03 7/16/2D13 200,000.00
Wachovia Money Market 3.000°k 2/9/2005 2/9/2007 825,000.00
step up
Wachovia FNMA 3.000% 8/24/2004 2/25/2008 100,OOD.00
step up
Home State Bank 3.000% 8/13/2004 8/13/2005 200,000.00
Firat Minnesota 2.670°k 11/16/04 12115/D5 400,000.00
First Minnesota 2.380% 08/17104 08/18/05 750,000.00
Wells Fargo 2.210% 07/16/04 07!21/05 750,OOp,00
Wells Fargo 2.39p% 09/16/04 09/16/05 750,000.OD
First Minnesota 2.580°k 11/15/04 11/17/05 750,000.00
$7,829,432.85
(~~~
M E M a R A N D U M
J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRAM: Tom I{loss, Director of Information Technology
RE: City/County Data Exchange
DATE: 2/22/05
On k'ebruary 8th, 2005 the McLeod County Berard of Commissioners
adopted a resolution waiving tee schedules relating to exchange
of data for Municipalities with-in McLeod County.
It is the recommendation of staff to continue strengthen the
dissemination of information. Attached is a resolution to waive
the Hutchinson Fee Schedule relating to electronic data which is
requested of any governmental agency. Staff hopes you find this
to be a positive step in providing complete customer service for
constituents throughout the County. If you have any questions,
feel free to contact•me. -
5~ ~)1
. RESOLUTION NO. G~l~~t-1~
RESOLUTION WAiViNC nATA FEES FOR
OTHER COVERNMEN'I'AL ACENCiF.B
WIIEREAS, The City of Hutchinson has compiled electronic data relating to certain real
property records and C1S data; and
WHEREAS, other Governmental agencies can benefit by the use of the data and have a
need to create efficiencies li>r those Governmental agencies; and
WHF,RF,AS, it is in the interest of good governmental relations and service to provide
data to those Govemmental agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVEll that the Cily of Hutchinson, City
Council waives lees related to providing public data to other Gnvemmental agencies
whenever deemed reasonable.
Adopted dais 22"'~ day of February, 2005.
ATTEST:
Mr. Gary Platr.
City Administrtlor
Mr. Steven W. Cook
Mayor
~(.h~ 1
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION N0. 12649
RESOLUTION DELEGATING FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE OFFICIAL INTENT
DECLARATIONS FOR PURPOSES OF REIMBURSEMENT REGULATIONS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (the "City)
as follows:
Recitals.
(a) The Internal Revenue Service has issued Section 1.150-2 of the Income Tax
Regulations (the "Regulations") dealing with the issuance of obligations, all or a portion of the
proceeds of which are to be used to reimburse the City. for project expenditures or expenditures
for purchases of capital equipment made by the City prior to the date of issuance.
(b} The Regulations generally require that the City make a prior declaration of its
official intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of a
subsequently issued borrowing no later than 60 days after payment of such expenditure, that the
borrowing occur and the reimbursement allocation be made from the proceeds of such borrowing
within eighteen months of the payment of the expenditure or, if longer, within eighteen months
of the date the project is placed in service, but in no event more than three years after the date the
original expenditure was paid and that the expenditure must either be a capital expenditure, or a
cost of issuance of the obligation.
(c) The City desires to establish certain procedures with respect to compliance with
the Regulations.
2. Official Intent Declaration: Delegation:_I?z'gced~_re_s.
(a) The Regulations, in the situations In which they apply, require the City to have
declared its official intent (the "Official Intent Declaration" or the "Declaration") to reimburse
itself fox previously paid project or equipment expenditures out of the proceeds of subsequently
issued debt. This Council hereby authorizes the Finance Director of the City to make the City's
Official Intent Declarations.
(b) The following procedures shall be observed by the Finance Director in making
Official Intent Declarations:
(i) Each Declaration shall made by the Finance Director substantially in the
farm of Exhibi attached hereto, which is hereby incorporated herein and made a part
of this Resolution.
~t~~a
CJ
Page 2
RESOLUTION N0. 12649
RESOLUTION DELEGATING FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE OFFICIAL INTENT
DECLARATIONS FOR PURPOSES OF REIMBURSEMEN'T' REGULATIONS
(ii) The Finance Director shall maintain a file in his or her office in which all
Declarations shall be kept.
(c) The Finance Director shall endeavor not to make Declarations in cases where the
City will not ultimately be issuing indebtedness to provide long-term financing for project costs,
and the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to consult with the City's bond
counsel concerning the requirements of the Regulations in general and their application in
particular circumstances.
(d) The Council shall be advised from time to time as to the Declarations made and
on the desirability and timing of the issuance of indebtedness relating to project expenditures for
which Declarations have been filed, including recommendations on the timing of the issuance of
such indebtedness so that the "reimbursement period" requirement described in the Regulations
can be met.
Adopted this 22nd day of February, 2005.
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
2
`~~
CITY OF HUTCIiINSON
• RESOLUTION NO. 12650
AUTHORIZING CITY OF HUTCIIINSON MEMBERSHIP TO
HUTCIIINSON AREA CIIAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council wants to promote the City of Hutchinson and,
WI•IEREAS, the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce does promote and advertise
the resources and advantages of the City of Hutchinson, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce has agreed to promote and
advertise the resources and advantages for the City of Hutchinson including the all City
Departments including the Hutchinson Utilities, Hutchinson EDA, and Liquor Hutch and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce has a fee structure to enable
the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce to do said promotion and,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson
approves payment to the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of February 2005.
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
ATITST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
5~~3
RESOLUTION NO. 12651
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
Contract 26,400 Biosolids Dryer W WTP Yes Scott Equipment
Operations 16 days
Bag Film 24,462 Bagging for resale Compost YES Super Group
2000 Ford 3T boom 47,925 Replacement Central XES Aspen Equipment
truck Oarage
Ford F350 28,957 Replacement Vehicle Compost YES Holt Motor
Fork Lift $23,000 Replacement Compost YE5 Sennett Material Handling
.The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM ~ COST ~ PURPOSE ~ DEPT. ~ BUDGET ~ VENDOK
Date Approved: Feb 22, 2005
Motion Made By:
Seconded By: J
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
Kenneth B. Memll
Finance Director
5 «~~1
RESOLUTION NO. 12652
• ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES
FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO.
WHEREAS, Citizens Bank & Trust Co, Hutchinson a city
depository, has requested the following security be added under the
collateral agreement with the City of Hutchinson:
FHL note 09-14-2007 cuaip 3133x82v3 $1,000,000
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Finance Director be authorized to accept the
security effective February 3, 2005.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of February 2D05.
Steven W. Coo
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
~J
~~~~
RESOLUTION NO. 12645
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO EXPAND THE AREA AT THE HUTCHINSON AIRPORT DESIGNATED
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE STORAGE HANGARS AND ALSO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSIDERATION TO ALLOW POLE TYPE
CONSTRUCTION OF HANGARS. CONSIDERATION IS ALSO BEING REQUESTED
FOR A PRIVATE AIRPORT RELATED COMPANY TO PLACE A TEMPORARY
TRAILER ON AIRPORT PROPERTY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
The City of Hutchinson Airport has submitted an amendment to Conditional Use Permit to expand the area
to allow the construction of private general aviation hangars at the airport. Conditional Use Permit
consideration would also be given to allow pole-type construction of hangars. Also included in the
Conditional Use Permit is a request for placement of a temporary construction office trailer for an aviation-
related business at the airport.
LEGAL bESCRIPTION:
Part of the Northeast Quarter (NE `b) of Southeast Quarter (SE `/.) of Section 13, Township 116 North,
Range 30 West, McLeod County, Minnesota, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at point
• on the North line of said Northeast Quarter (NE '/+) of Southeast Quarter (SE '/4), and point being the
intersection of the Westerly 75' foot right-of--way line of Minnesota State Trunk Highway No. 15 with said
North line ofNortheast Quarter (NE'/s) of Southeast Quarter (S]~'b), thence Westerly along said North line
ofNortheast Quarter (NE `/.) of Southeast Quarter (SE Y<) a distance of 1259.80 feet; thence deflect left at an
angle of 117 degrees 22 minutes a distance of 743.17 feet; thence deflect ]eft at an angle of 62 degrees 38
minutes and along a line parallel with the North line of said Northeast Quarter (NE'/a) of Soutleast Quarter
(SE'/.) a distance of 915.20 feet to the said Westerly 75 foot R.O.W. line of T.H.15; thence Northerly along
said R.O.W. 660.00 feet to the point of beginning. Tract contains 16.50 acres more or less.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties m the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The Airport Commission has control over the appearance of hangars to be
constructed and appearance of any signage. (Separate permits are required fvr
signage)
5(~~I
Resolution No. 12645
City of Hutchinson Airport
February 22, 20pS
Page 2
C~
2. Hangars must meet building codes.
4.
The area approved for general private hangars is the first mw only. Use of
subsequent rows must come back to the Planning Commission for review.
Three year limit on the property for the hangars to be constructed.
5. There is no water and sewer service to the property; thus connections into the
existing on-site systems is required.
6. The hangars are not for repair of planes.
7. The office trailer is to be temporary for a period of 18 months from the date of
approving resolution.
8. There must be emergericy service accessibility to the hangars.
9. There should be additional screening done on the property. Location and number
should be determined by the Airport Commission and John Qlson.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of February, 2005.
ATTEST:
Gaxy D. Plotz
City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
~~~~-
C
PATE: February 15, 2005
'1'U: Hutchmson Utty t;ouncll
Hutchinson Ci Center
111 Aeesaa Su~eer s6
nutcbWon, Potty 55350-zs22
320.587-515t/Fu 320.2344240
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Ilutchinson Planning Commission
SUB.TECT: CONSIDERATION OP AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE P)ERNIIT TO EXPAND THE
AREA AT THE HUTCHINSON AIRPORT DESIGNATED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PRNATE
STORAGE HANGARS AND ALSO CONDfl70NAL USE PERMIT CONSIDERATION TO ALLOW
' POLE TYPE CONSTRUCTION OF HANGARS. CONSIDERATION IS ALSO BEING REQUESTED FOR
A PRIVATE AIItPORT RELATED COMPANY TO PLACE A TEMPORARY TRAILER ON AIRPORT
PROPERTY.
Pursuant to Section ] 54.066 of the Municipal Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit
The City of Hutchinson Airport has submitted an amendment to Conditional Use Permit to expand the area to allow the
construction of private general aviation hangars at the airport Conditional Use Permit consideration would also be given to
~llow pole-type construction of hangars. Also included in the Conditional Use Permit is a request far placement of a tempotary
construction office trailer for an aviation-related business at the airport.
FINDINGS OF FAST
1. The required application was submitted and fee were submitted.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader an February 3,
2005. __ _
3. There were no neighboring property owners present at the public hearing objecting to the request
4. There shou]d be no expectation that these buildings would be used for businesses, other than what is considered airport
related and is compliant with the building code. There should be discussion on the requirement for screening. The
code allows for the Planning Commission to approve screening plans. Thus far, there is not an official landscaping
plan provided. The area is quite a distance from the State Highway and there is heavy vegetation along the property
line to the east of the proposed struchrce, It must be determined if additional requirements for screening would be
required.
5. The additional use far a temporary trailer location is an accessory use to the airport. The fact that there would be a
temporary structure on the site is always concerning, in that, there is the risk that the compatry will not build a
permanent structure. However, the company would be a least holder with the City being the property owner, thus thole
in control of the functions on the property. Additionally, the City is requesting a sewer connection foe the sttucttue, as
there would be staffmg for the building 24 hoots a day.
RE OMMENDATION
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recatmncnd approval of the conditional use permit with the following
• conditions:
rh;noea as reeyei.d ~ -
~C~~1
Finding o[ Fact
City of Hutchinson Airport
conditional IIse Permit
February15,Z005
Page 2
1. The Airport Commission has control aver the appearance of hangars to be constructed and
appearance of any signage. (Separate pernnits are required for signage)
2. Hangarr, must meet building codes.
3. The area approved for general private hangars is the first row only. Use of subsequent rows
must come back to the Planning Commission for review.
4. Three year limit an the property for the hangars to be constructed.
5. There is no water and sewer service to the property; thus connections into the existing ara-site
systems is required.
6. The hangars are not for repair of planes.
7. The office hailer is tv be temporary for a ptriod of 18 months from the date of approving
resoltttion.
8. There must be emergency service accessibility to the hangats.
9. There should be additional screening done on the property. Location and number should be
determined by the Airport Commission and John Olson.
E,~
x: John Olsen, Public Worlm Superintendent
Joe Dooley, 750 Hamwny Ln SW
Tim Mi]1cr,16852 Rum Ave.
C~
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chaizrran
Hutchinson Planning Coruuission
~~~~
DIRECTORS REPORT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
(Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold)
Fmtn: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles 5eppelt, Crystal Foust,
Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John Olson, Lenny
Rutledge,. Kyle Aimler, 7{ent Exner, Mark Schnobricb, Marc Sebora,
Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie
Wiscbnack, AICP, and Bonnie 13aumetz
bate: January 31, 2005 -Meeting Date: laebruary 15, 2005
Applicant: City of Hutehinson -Airport
CONDX'1TONAL USE PERMTl'
Brlef Description:
The City of Hutchinson Airport has submitted an amendment to Conditional Use Permit to
expand the area to allow the construction of private general aviation hangars at the airport.
Conditional Use Permit consideration would also be given to allow pole-type construction of
hangars. Also included in the Conditional Usc Permit is a request for placement of a temporary
construction office trailer for an aviation-related business at the airport. .(Attached is a memo
from john Olson, Public Works, describing the requests.)
A similar request for an area to allow private hangars at the airport was granted in 2002 which
included the following recommendations:
1. The Airport Commission has control over the appearance to hangars
to be constructed.
2. lIangars must meet building codes.
3. Three year limit on the property for the hangars to be constructed.
4. T'he Airport does not have access to City water at this time and will
continue to use the joint septic system.
5. Verification that the septic system is in compliance, must be
submitted by the County Environmentalist. ('I7»s was completed at.
the time.)
GENERAL INFORMATYON
Xxisting Zoning: LC (industrial Commercial)
Property Location: 1650 Hwy.15 South
Lot Size: Over 100 acres
Existing Land Use: Airport
Adjacent X.and Use County Agricultural and C4 (Fringe Commercial)
Aad Zoning:
~~C~
Conditional Use Permit
City of Hutcbinsop Airport
Planning Commission- February 1$, 2tlD5
Page Z
• Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Public
Zoning Ilistory: A request For Conditional Use Permit was granted on September 24,
2002 to allow construction of private hangars at the municipal airport.
Applicable
Regulations: 154.066 states "that buildings or land may be used for the following if
granted a conditional use permit and provided further that any
objectionable features normally associated these uses, such as those
deemed to be hazardous, offensive or objectionable by reason of odar,
dust, cinders, gas, fumes, noise, vibration, radiation, refuse matter ar
water carried waste, shall be ameliorated, controlled or eliminated
through design, mechanical devices, screen planting and or walls ar other
measures as specified by the Planning Commission, and authorized that
the use and its day to day activity will not be unreasonably hazardous,
noxious, or offensive;'
SPECiIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Hwy 15 South
• Parldng•. Paving is required to the doorway from the existing paved area.
Analysis and
Itecommcndation: The previous use to have commercial airport hangars on the property was
considered, by staff, to be an appropriate use of property. During staff
discussion about the use of hangars, it was mentioned that there should
be no expectation that these buildings would be used four businesses,
other than what is considered airport related and is compliant with the
- building code. Tltere should be discussion on the requirement for
screening. The code allows fox the Plarming Commission to approve
screening plans. Thus far; there is not an official landscaping plan
provided. The area is quite a distance from the State Highway and there
is heavy vegetation along the property line to the east of the proposed
stmcune. It must be detemrined if additional requirements for screening
would be required.
Also, the additional use for a temporary trailer location is an accessory
use to the airport. The fact that there would be a temporary structure on
the site is always concerning, in that, there is the risk that the company
will not build a permanent structure. However, the company would be a
]ease holder with the City being the property owner, thus more in control
of the functions on the property. Additionally, staff is requesting a sewer
connection far the structure, as there would be staffurg for the building
• 24 hours a day.
It is the consensus of staff to recommend approval of the request with
the following recommendations:
5C~-~
Conditional Use Perrnit
City of Hutchinson Airport
Planning Commission- February 15, 2005
Page 3
. 1. The Airport Commission has control over the appearance of hangars
to be constructed and appearance of any signage. (Separate permits
are required for signage)
2. Hangars must meet building codes.
3. Three year limit on the property for the hangars to be constructed.
4. There is no water and sewer service to the property; thus connections
into the existing on-site systems is required.
5. The hangars are not for repair of planes.
6. The office trailer is w be temporary for a period of 18 months from
the date of approving resolution.
7. There must be emergency service accessrbility to the hangars.
8. There should be additional screening done on the property. Location
and number should be discussed with the Planning Commission.
Cc: john Olson, Public Works Superintendent
Toe Dooley, 750 ~larmony Ln SW
Tim Miller, 16852 Rum Ave.
r 1
U
5~~~~
~ ,
^ ..
I
~~
~w
.~ _ .... ~
~-+
I q
4 1 1....,~1 ~.,,.~ap 1,..,.,. _1 F
1 I 1 I { ~ M # 1
1 I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 it 1 ~,. 1
t ~ 9 N 1 4 I d
^^^.~,-.s. f M
..I- M 1 1 N b 1 f
w- M 1 M 4 1 1 1„ ry
1 1,. pA. M 1'~ 7
p k p f qw
1 II
~A- I M. 1 1 I. ~ 1., 1'~
1 /~~ 1 1 N 1 N
H
1 ~ j. ~ p ~ V
'1 1 N
1 I M , f
R 1 I
A 6
i....~~...M i...,.` Y N
1 1
N .' ~ y5
Y7Y
1 ~..r J
q
~~,
V ~
..
~
`u.~~
W C'
~~
M1 WM M1 op
MY +d
M w
n ~
~~ y
^C fY MI w
~~~
~ nn X~ *
n,
, I wn n+ro.. nn
g ~p
~a ~ii{ ~~~iv i~ ~ ~~ Y ~~$ ~i~ ~.
~.
^~~
' y
~I
C~ R
i
~A/„' ~IF ~
C R I~
~ c~
R, J
SiF ~I
[
', ~P
~
pp
~L
pp
Ci~
@(~.
p
C
R
1
~
p
p
GO
~
p
4
p
~
p
~
g
/YN
~
r
Wlr~r
. '
p OiY qgg
Q
$
~A{~ ~g yQ
~
~iG n.w ~~ g
~M
g
Si "~~~ Ypq
,~, i
~p lT ~.
~6.A ~
p~q.
~ ~~gy
SY~ pp pp
GO oo ppyy
~.1
0
~ qp p~
J7 EU ¢~ pp
{
'
~
4 p
',,~~ ~y ~~yy
~P y~
~w~n ~ry
9 rM i~
M
~
pp# { ~y
'${
r 4
y
y
, ~ '!
7
S y^~
'" ^" I~i4 r MMMYYY M .
i la ~Ir w w sm n~M rwr u..
..
~ C£"°fit V .4M1 ~L fu?t1VM~a ' "N~}i~11h1C0M?
~~ . `~
~ ~ ^~
~ ~~, ~` ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~'Ger~raf;Ava~arA
,~ `v)
)
` ' v
,~) ,
~~
r+- ~ ~
~ ~
n^
1
1
1
r
I
^
~L~-~
Febntary 3, 2005
City of Iiutchinson
Public Works Department
Maintenance Operations
1400 Adams St SE
I•Iutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (32D) 23411219 Fax (320) 234-6971
Ta: Julie Wischnack, Dir. of Platuning~Bldg/Zoning
From: John Olsen, Public Works Supt.
CC: Airport Conunissioners
john Rodeberg, Dir. of Public Works
Subject: Development of Private Hangars
Recently, in a process involving the Charter Commission, City Council, Airpott Cotmission,
City Attorney and Public Works staff, lease documents complying with applicable state statutes
have been developed allowing private hangar development at Flutchiusvn Municipal Airport.
Then; are two kinds of private hangars; Commercial-grade hangars and General~aviatian hangar r~. R
. 1. Commercial-grade hangars are heated, have restrooms, typically include office space and
can be used to support significant aviatia~n-related businesses.
2. General~aviation hangars are for aircraft storage, may be heated, but often are not, they
do not have restrooms ox office space and can support only limited business activities.
In September 2002, the Airport was granted a conditional use permit, based upon an application
by Mr. Jce Dooley for acommercial-grade hangar. Mr. Dooley did not proceed with his plans for
a commercial-grade_hangar.
Since that time, we have heard general interest in constructing private hangars, 1n January, two
active applications for building private, general~aviation hangars were submitted. Mr. Joe Dooley
presented plans for constructing a private general aviation hangar in early January. Later, in mid-
January, Mr. Tim Miller presented plans for constructing a private general-aviation hangar.
Because these applications are both for general-aviation hangars, their location is best suited to an
area indicated on the City's Airport Layout Plan (ALP) For development ofgeneral-aviation
hangars. On the attached drawing, you will fmd the general areas for commercial-grade and
general-aviation hangars identified.
On behalf of the Airport Commission, I request the existing conditional use permit be amended to
include the area identified for general-aviation hangars.
~ J
~Cc~ 1
7ulie Wischnack, Dir. of PlanningBldg/Zoning
John Olson, Public Works Supt.
Airport Development
February 3, 2005
Page 2
As you will see in the attached drawing, an area northeast of the airport terminal building was
planned to include eight rows ofgeneral-aviation hangars, and four sites for commercial-grade
hangars.
The first hvo rows ofgeneral-aviation hangars are reserved for City-owned hangars. The
remaining six rows are available for private and/or City development.
Ivlinimum standards for aircraft hangar development, cnforoed by the Airport Commission,
include:
o Color, style, and minim~mt >qze.
o Sigps, placards and other sttucturea plaocd on the outside oFthe hangar.
o General aesthetic requirements, including restrictions on outdoor storage.
o Plaeanent oFthe hangar an the lot, including drainage ermsiderations, apron and/or approach
design standards, prescribed floor elevations, placement of utility services, and other engineering
requirements identified by the City.
a Required fire protection oonsidmationa.
All costs associated with development of a private hangar are the tenant's responsibility.
Attached for your information is a private hangar lease checklist, developed as a tool to identify
issues addressed by the lease doctttnent.
Private hangar tenants are assessed as personal property and tenants pay taxes, in additional to
lease fees, m benefit local govemmeat.
,SCc,
C
February 3,2005
City of Hutchinson
Public Works Department
Maintenance Operations
1400 Adams St S$
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234219 Fax (320) 234-6971
To: Julie Wischnack, Dir. of PlanningBldg/Zoning
From: John Olsoq, Public Works Supt
CC: Arrport Commissioners
John Rodeberg, Du. of Public Works
Subject: Request for Placement of Temporary Construction Office TY~ailer
Recently, an aviation-related business has approached us with plans to base an aircraft and pilots
at Hutchinson Municipal Airport. This is an opportunity for econonvc development, not only for
oux airport, but for our communiry as well.
During the process of establishing appropriate support facilities, the business is requesting
permissiart to place a temporary construction-type office trailer at the airport, so services
provided by the business can begin in the spring of 2005.
We would request the business place the temporary construction-type office trailer between the
electrical distribution building and the Civil Air Patrol building, so appropriate access to utilities
(telephone, electric, water and sewer) is possible.
I request appropriate zoning authority to allow placement of the temporary construction-type
office trailer for a period of 18 months, beginning upon placement of the temporary trailer, to
allow adequate time for the business to plan and build appropriate facilities to support their
business.
Please see the attached drawing for location of the hailer.
tL.J
J~~:~l
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson Municipal Airport-Ken Butler Field
. Private Hangar Tenant Checklist
GENERAL
o Lots are available for general aviation hangars or commercial-grade hangars. Lot size
determined by square outside dimensions of the hangar to the nearest foot.
o Use of airport in common with other airport users.
o Standard lease term Is 99 years.
o Lease payments are based on square feat. Standard rate per square foot is $D.D3 per
year.
CONSTRUCTION OF HANGARS
o All costs of and related to construction of a hangar are the tenant's responsibility.
o Tenant must furnish two sets of plans prior to construction.
0 1 for Building Official
0 1 set for Airport Advisory Commission and airport staff.
o Construction must be approved by the City's building official and comply with Cily codes,
requirements and regulations.
o Architectural services will likely be required.
o Structural engineering services may also be required.
v Hangars must conform to design standards described by City for:
v Color.
o Style and minimum size.
o Signs, placards and other structures placed on the outside of the hangar.
o Other aesthetic requirements Identified by the City.
. o Placement of the hangar on the IoL
o Drainage considerations.
o Apron and/or approach design standards.
o Prescribed floor elevations.
o Placement of utility services.
o Firewalls and other required fire protection systems.
o Other engineering requirements ident~ed by the City.
o Engineering review costs are the tenant's responsibility.
o Tenant must secure appropriate authority and permits from the City.
o Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ar ether appropriate zoning authorization.
o Building Permit, along with appropriate utility Inspections
a Tenant must furn(sh cost estimates and a letter of credit or other surety to the City
conditioned upon completion of and payment far constructon of the hangar.
o Certificate of Insurance must be provided to adequately protect the City during
construction of the hangar. Insurance must be obtained and kept In an amount
acceptable t0 the City.
v All construction costs and other costs related to constructing the hangar are the tenants
respansibllity. Leased property is leased in an as-is condifion. All Improvements
required to properly construct the hanger are the tenants responsibility.
o Construction must be wmpleted within 18 months, or lease can be terninatad.
r 1
5~~~
USE ANp MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE HANGARS
• o Primary use of hangar must be for storage of registered and/or leased aircraft and for
related av{atlon purposes.
o Aircraft storage, aircraft parts and supplies storage are approved uses.
o Up to three non-aircraft motorized vehicles maybe stored in the hangar.
o The Gity must approve other uses.
o General aviation hangars will generally not be approved fvr business activities, other than
very limited, minor aviation-related business uses.
o Commercial hangars need written permission for business activities, put more broad
aviation-related business uses will be allowed in commercial hangars.
o Tenants responsible for maintaining property in goad repair. If property is not propedy
maintained, tenants will receive notice from the City. If the tenant does not respond, fhe
City may maintain the properly and charge the tenant for administrative and maintenance
rvsta.
o Nothing maybe stored outside, except for those Items typically stored outside (e.g.,
garbage containers, LPG cylinder, etc.) if they are properly secured.
o The City performs general airport maintenance and those costs an: included in the lease
casts. General maintenance Includes snow removal, mowing and weed control and
pavement maintenance.
o Tenants must allow the City to Inspect hangars for the purpose of determining
compliance with agreements.
TAXES, ASSESSMENTS, AND OTHER GHARGES
o Tenant is responsible fvr taxes, assessments, licenses, fees, or other charges related to
the hangar.
o Tenants are responsible for their own utilities.
o Failure to pay Is a default.
TERMINATION OF THE LEASE
o Tenant can remove their property when the lease terminates. If not removed, the City
may case the property to be removed at the tenant's cost or the City may retain it far any
municipal purpose.
o If the premises becomes deserted, abandoned or vacated, the City may terminate the
lease.
o If the hangar Is destroyed, either party may terminate the lease upon giving written .
notice. _ _
o Defaults continuing more than 30 days after notice from the City may result in terminatkxt
of the lease.
o Shvuld the property be condemned, the tenant will be reimbursed for all lease costs and
be given time to remove the properly.
LIABILITY
o Tenant is responsible for any claims or causes of action resulting from any loss
associated with the hangar or leased premises.
o Tenant Is responsible for obtaining and keeping insurance with the City as a named
additional insured in a form and amount acceptable to the City.
o Tenant is responsible fvr obtaining and keeping all necessary licenses.
.~ ~~~ l
TRANSFERRING. SELLING, SUBLETTING
n Tenant may not transfer, sell or sublet without written consent from the City.
MISCEl.LA1VEl7U5
n Any amendment to the standard lease agreement shall be by written document signed by
all parties to the agreement.
o Tenant cannot discriminate in the use of the Hutchinson Municipal Airport.
o Tenant agrees to abide by and conform to all laws, rules and regulations, Including future
amendments.
o Agreement governed bylaws of Minnesota, venue for causes of action is McLeod
Gounty, Minnesota.
o Tenant id provide and notify of current mailing address.
C~
r1
1. J
~~~
C
February,l4`s 2005
Planning Commission
Hutchinson Cl Center
111 Aassan Street 56
Autchinsan, MN 55350.2521
320.587~151/Fex 310.1344140
R$:
In reference to the City of Hutchinson's proposed hangers to be located at the Municipal Airport.
The state of Minnesota is currently using the 2000 International Building Codes( IBC ). The
200p IBC specifically lists "Air Plane Hangers as a 5-1 Occupancy, (moderate hazard storage.)
The construction of a hanger as an 5-1 Occupancy is quite restrictive and has been a problem for
designers dealing with smaller, personal sized Aircraft storage.
The. authors of the Building codes recognized the problem and corrected it in the 2003 version
of the IBC. (Which is not yet adopted my the state of Ml~ The 2003 IBC Classifies a structure
for the purpose of storing personal use aircraft as a S-2 Structure, (low hazard storage.)
As the administrative authority, I am allowing this project to be built under thc 2003 IBC,
thus the proposed 20-foot separation between the individual hangers will be adequate. For
required separation as well as fire protection (per Brad Emans) With the understanding that
nothing more than minimum maintenance of the air craft is allowed in these hangers.
7 _ y Rutledge ' J'
B~ ju/i~l_di`n'g~/Official
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchiuson, MN 55350
USE ANVC] {)CGtgPANCY CLAtiSNt=N~I"1"tUl~t
1~-' ~r ~ ar~dl l~~r~ firsil~3ir~gs wlca ~t~t ct~~t¢aita 1`tp~are tltaty
two dwelling units, or adult grad child +care facilit~es
that prawid+e accamadatians feet five ar fewer persons
rat" stay age far less than '24 hattrs.
R-~1 l~.esidential accupanc shall inclw~de buildings arranged
fiat wcupancy as Residential Carer~A,ssiseed l..iwing
Facilities in~luding Jr9or~ tlrata fi'v~ but seat treats than Its
rar:.r.ulsastats, exa:lurvliawg ~A~1"»
~rrrrup fZ-4 occupancies shall reset the r++egquirernents
for caraytruotiats as defined fear ~Graup R-~ except fret
flee height and area limitatiany provided in ~ecaon 5~.
31p.2 lwle!'rnftiarts,'1`l~ae fallawirrg wards and terxsts shall., fdr
flee pua-posey of this sectiatt sand.. ay used elsewhere its thus
cads, haws the tnearaingy shawtt hescss,
~~A~IN~ l-lC)l_IS~. A building arranged ar used' for
lodging far coarapensatian, with or witkaattt reseals, asui na~t
oupied as a siatgle-family uttit"
l~()lR~^IxTt3RY ~ space In a budld%rrg where group sleeping
accarcaarracadataopy are provided in one roam, teat itt a series a~f
closely asssooiated txsams, feet persons ssot snerrrbr.~ra saf flee
same farrrily grasip, under jaiast accup,attcy and single trtarr-
agetnestt, as in college dtsrsttitaries ar fraternity haus~es.
T9''l+~Ll.iN~ l"~: A single ua"sit providing earnlalete, intlc»
pendent living faacilitiey far one rsr mare persotts, iaacltadrt;g
permanent pr+tivisians facer living, sleeping, eating ~coakin;g
and sanitat;irsn.
p'~`[)IV.~L CAIN SlrltYli~, "l"he came off residents who
des swat require clsrottic or convalescent medical ar naxrsing
care, l?ersvnal care involves responsitaility far the safety of
flee residcstt while isasicle ~o building.
R1~;;IDENTI,a~1F,, CARENASSCSTF~ ;l.,i"t~'lNG l»ACl1.l<-
TllrS. A building or pant thereof housing a maximum of 1
peryans, an a 24-hrrour lsasis, Z"y~ca lseca~tsc of sac, rnetll dim
ability yr rsdter mans., live ian a yupervis~ed t~sidential env%~
rantnent vrhich provides personal caarc services.. ~"he oceu-
panty arc capabl~c caf raespandistg to art ernergcrtey situata%rs
without physical assistance froth stall. TPais classifa+catits
shall include. but not. be limited.. tts, the following: rc,~identiul
board and care facilities, assisted living facilities, halfway'
houses,. group homey, congt~egate care faaoilities, yac%aq t~eltaa,-
bilitstion facilitieaw alcrshol eyed' drug a:busc Genter~ stud ctsraa-
valescent facilities» l~esi~leistial carefassisted li~~itag facilities
housing more than lb persarrs shall be cl~sified ~ to C"'arattp
I-l.
3at+ll~ Itegtsit~d drvelllstg uniak astd guesttroatts sepaarativa~
Walls and. tlaos~s separating„ dwelling units in the saa~te build-
ing, err ,guestroorns in gaup R-2 ha~tel accupasscies, shall l>re
Joao arrr~l=rr~a~araAt dust_n~tvG coQ
31tp,$ ~ 311.$
fire partitions ar harizantal assernbll as required by
Sectiosas ?fkg and 7'1Cl»
aEC'l"4t'~M 311....
STd~i,A~G~ ~Ca~l~l,IP
11.T Steerage a~raup tara,ge t"xttp S' accupasacy
includes arnaasg athery, the use of a buil,cling r~r stnactran, tar
a partiaas therersf; far storage tlta't is rocat a:lrrs,;~i~~ci ass a har-
ardaus art,upanoy.
X11." >1laderate-hazard storage, .Group 5-1. Bwtildings
occupied for storage uses which arc rucat classified ay gaup
.~ isacluding, but not limited', to st~ora~e caf the fisllawing;
Aernsnls, bevel 2 and ~~~] 3
Aircraft hangars
Bags, cloth,. laaarla~ asd Isaper
Bambaoy eyed rattan.
Baslrts
Belting, caraway aacl Icath~er
Baoky attd paper in tells ar packs
13aats and. shoes
Battens, including cloth severed, pearl rare laarae
Cardboas,d and. cardbaas~l boxes
Clatllsirrg, waalen wearing apparel
Carriage
leurzaoi~t
Bttxs
Glttes, mucilagew P~~s sane! size
gains
Hares and comby~ ether these celluloid
l.~eatlse~r
l.intaleutxt
l,ust~lacr
h^lator vehicle repair gargges cornplyistg with the
mum.. allawablt quantities of hazardtstss rnaterierls lis~rd.
in "able (1!~.?(1}. atiSee Scxtirxn ~a5.~6»~ .
Petroleum warehouses f+cat;• ytttarragc ref lttbricating sails with
a flash point, of ~ ~93°C~w or higher
l?hato engravi~
Resilient tlaoristg
Sillts
Snaps
Stttt
Tires, bulk stryragc of
Trrlaacts, cigars, eigarett ant! sssu"
~plsralytery and snsttagt~ss+es
V4ax cattdles
1l» l..ow-hazard strange, Gt~sttp 5-2. Irtclttrley. atlt-
ery, buildings used far the sttssage a~ itcsracatsrbuytilsle ts"tateraalaa
such as pt"acluets on wood. pallets or in, paper ~ a,viTh ar
withrrtrt single thickaress diwisicrtss; tar in papwr~ , Stac~kt
products may have a n~gligitsle asnautst of plastic trite sud%t
9kttabs, handles or Im wrapping. Sttsrage uses ittclude~ bsrt setts
eat lirtuted ta, ytora,ge of the fall-owing.
,...
ll'SE A~d'C] OCdG'UPP1hV'~CY' C'~.ASM~NGA7ti41~
]ln~ik~ grad. ap~rr irs rv~hx nx pe.c6s~
~3~vr~ grad ~~
l~tattasa~, %aac~aadirag c9aeaa cov~l, ~e:~xl ar bone
~aaadbv~ farad cbod bax~aa
1~aing, rNra~n ~~ a~~~+ck
C~rdis~e
~"aa'rnit-ax
furs
~itaes, ~auci;i, ~amste~ and size
C3rrsiiae
3~I~rct~ aa~ rnrab~. ~Cbex t>hr~rs ce1].uw~~ixC
r1.Saaakean~a
fir"
i~"Jtatcax I'ri~~ ute~arair,~r~axn~es cvaaaplyiroa~ ~ri.a. tla~ rr~xaaar
al~aa~ie ~araayrades ~f h~aa^~rdxrta~ ~o.nrraw~s ~~dd
"fi~bk 3C17.°~~X}~ ~~ tiara 4&~!6y6)
P~tatx, eta~ara~gs
" ReaiGdi~~t~ ~1~ . .
S
~~~
~~,"
~'ar~s~ bu1C~ ~~e
"~b1~n~~O, G~, cigarr~tte~ ~ bt~t~"
~Tphalstexy ~rrd ~xsea
Wax C~ndl.es
r!'w~- 311.3Iovti~=~ozurd~tnrnge~[',roupS~~~nc~9~d~tA,pe~ot~.
~` '~~bvaldingsLS.~7f~,rri,c~tora.ge'afaancom~.aaaarib~c~a~>r~a~,e1g
~~a ~ ~'atic~; oa a+ocrd paalCwer~ rex in ~'~i caataxaa tivili~ ~r.
itlstaut ~~r~g~~ ch.ckn~~s ~ii.~visi~ne~; carirr~C~x+++rr~appir~~.5~,ch
~ar~dncta ax9e ~r"rrnitc~d uy ~~c a rae~~~ile nrraaas~,t trf pl~ustiar
a.~ex~„ ~u~h as l~ncrl.:~, haana~9ax~ ar films vrrappi~g. karra as
• ,~ ra~]1 ii~rocludm~, ~~ not'C ~drt7i,tC~ ~~. a~a;~ of tlac f~~dGa~+'iFxa~:
Aircraft ~ .
`~ 'Asbcittas
Bcwera gccs rJ~r tca tarari firaclaadina~g ~2-pea^gt hxat in ra~~,
. `~7.~ ~~ pf C. r,,l,~ ~Cd~'tCt+hlr~1ETS .
~C1~aCrr~
~1~C 8tri~ C;"Xq~J
17ahry pxvdaact~ #~ ~ aa~d ~ra~,x ara-~iar~a~
~?x}r Pt
kcttati~4 ~~ p
1=.,1bec~.lcsl ~ `
.~arss~rky
~~
Fonda Cz« nraxac+~rta~raratibl~e cdra
F~th,frtrara nand reg~tabl~ ~~ raan~l~e~io ~~a iar~xa ,.
~i.~n f
Goa ~,x~ttCcs, ~ ax ~'dkcd ~i~ ~taoot~hvstiblr 1t~gari
Gypaa,am baw~xr9,
Cam
M.etut cnb"
. • A~:et~C d~~a<a wit~a p1ti.~ fps mad
i~,cta1 ~ ', .
~UC3 1+'V7ERNA'7~~rAL PUIt_171NG COpbP9r yC'
~il.~:~~led axed at~ex t of ~~.~xriu~r~ti~xa ~a~fa
"~x~ng g°re~„ open ~x ~nelad
Paa;i~a' a~aad~F~"
Sur+~
~.e ~rocC ~o~.~~tcrn+.s~
"~Jber~ axa.d dry[
T~I..pTY AN'D MISCELLAbYI~~I~.I~ +GR~,?L~P U
~~.~.~ C~raara~Nl.fli~11~1in~r~ ~rasir~~.u~arva+afua.m~~srsr.~rc~.atfi~
rmctex and ~,cce'Blar~r:~au 5 sbnkccwetx x~oa:~as~i~ ~n aroy ~pSl"ic
+a~~cra.p~ncy sCa,a ~~r~~rna~tcdr equid and .a~arinl~'rned k0
c~rt~ox~a r~ rht q~aiaxra~ts ~~ r~aa~ ease carraxxa~rrxa~~ wide
r~ac anr~ Cite hawed. ia7ciderxaraC tea t~ia" caceaa~r~xrcy. mauga U
~CraYl. ixacl.~adle~ Vsaat ncra be li.tltli.Ar~ rte, ~e f~llaw^a~in~.
~h~x~ctal~r"~:i b~f-dinlgs
,~1,%r~crrtft. ~an~~r~, at~s~ary t~ ~ ~naaa->~x tvv~n-ray
ari~l~~ ~»~ ~cc~ 412..3)
~aac9naz '
C?~t~s mtaxc ~~an b fveert r*~~Zq antaa} high
+Gx~.in ~alaaa, mu~~~~tray tna ~„ x+csadcaaUrrl oca«aapau~cy
{Gx~aa~~aatausaus
~.i+wc9rr~ack ~h+~1rcx~
~riv~t~ gnrngGs
9C~ et~rnixa~ rxrr~tty~
~h
5R9a1'adeas
"1"
fi ,
~ °^~
.., ..:
.,..
,..~ _~
Life link III provides emergency and critical care helicopter transportation 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Conveniently based in St. Paul and St. Cloud, Minnesota, life link III helicopters are readily available for
interfpcility fransfer and trauma an-scene response throughout Minnesota and western Wisconsin.
Helicopters are staffed by Nurse/Paramedic critical care teams, and are equipped to handle any criticalty
ill or injured patients, including those who require ventilators, invasive monitoring and advanced trauma
care. For longer distances and in specific bad weather situations, life Llnk ill can utilize dedicated fixed
wing aircraft or ground ambulance for emergency transfers. life link III provides air medical hansport to
and from any medical facility in the region.
Critical Care Equipment Eligible Patients
. Adult, pediaMc and neonatal ventilators
. Invasive monitoring equipment
. Pulse oximeters
. Transvenous pacemaker generators
• Transthoracic pacemakers _,. _ ~•
. Neonatal isolettea
. Defibrillator/monifq~s
~oppler stethoscope
0)
Aircraft
Be11 222 Helicopter ~- -_ ----- ---~•__~ ge11407 Helicopter
• Flies up to 175 m.p.h. • Flies up to 160 m.p.h.
• Y-patient capability . Single patient capability
. Up to 3 medical attendants . Up to 3 medical attendants
• Twtn engines • Dedicated medical interior
.Dedicated medical interior
. Rapid heart cath cardiac patients
. Mulfl-system hauma patients
. Spinal cord injury patients
. Newborn intensive care paflenis
• Pediatric paflents requiring ECMO
• Cardiac and pulmonary patients
• Burn pafleMs
critically III patient
To dispatch any of life link III's transport services call:
In the Twin Cities
b12-378-LINK (5465)
Toll Free
1-800-328-1377
Administrative Office:
3010 Broadway St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612-638-4900
The Life Link III Communications Center will coordinate bedside-to-bedside transport for The ppYient.
[ink 111 is a comprehensive transport system providing honspoA for patients in Mlnnesota and throughout the llnNed Stapes
vIO helicopter, airplane and ground ambulance. Ufe Llnk Ill la o non-profit consortium. Members Include:
e,.,,.....~....-
~~
* r~i„] ~~~ dons Hos 1tA1~ 'E' StCfaud Hospital
Ch't~drens. ~,~ FAtRVj~r CMC cE E~nnsysam
t~r,ia'__ xa~rn..a~.we eunK~ Nw11T.wrr Mdw ITrexans Centsr ~`
RESOLUTION NO. 1264fi
RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT 77 MCLEOD AVE. NE .
. SUBMITTED BY ART HAGEN, HAGEN BUILDERS
BE IT RESOLVED BY TIIB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Art Hagen, Hagen Builders, has submitted application fvr a lot split located at 77 McLeod Ave N.E. The split would
create 21ots firm 3 lots. The Southerly lot will be 12,670 sq. ft. and the Northerly lot 10,508.8 sq. ft. The requirement
fur lot width is 90 feet on comer lots and 70 feet on single family lots. The minimum ]ot area per dwelling unit far a
single family lot in the R2 district is 8,400 sq. ft. Both lots meet the requirements of the zoning district.
Legal Description: NORTHERLY PARCEL (628 Ash St. N.E.)
Lot 8 and the North 20.00 feet of Lot 7, all to Block 6, COLLEGE ADDITION
TO HUTCHINSON, according to the recorded plat thereof
SOUTHERLY PARCEL: (77 McLeod Ave. N.E.)
Lot 6 and Lot 7, except the North 20.00 feet of said Lot 7, all in Block b,
COLLEGE ADDITION TO HUTCHIN50N, according to the recorded plat
thereof.
2. 'The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anttctpated traffic conditions, and the effect on values ofproperties to the surrounding area and the effect of
• the use on-the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, ~f the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The Gity Council hereby approves the lot split with the following conditions:
1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense.
2. There should be an effort made to save the tree near the driveway.
3. Deeds documenting the change in property line need to be filed by the property
owners.
4. The proposed addition on the southern lot requires further building permit
approval.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of February, 2005
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
• City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
~ ~~~
r~
L
Hutchinson Ci Center
C
ru sveee sa
n~unwoa suv ssssa~.ux
ssass~-slstrr~ 3ao-zsa-ago
MEMORANATJ~1
DATE: February 15, 2005
TO: Hutchinson City Council
F1tOM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Si1B7.ECT: CONSIDERATION OF I.OT SPLIT LOCATED AT 77 MCLEOD AVE. NE
SUBMITTED BX ART HAGEN, HAGEN BUII DERS
Pursuant to Section 153.05, of the Hutchinson Municipal Code, the Hutchinson Platmittg
Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the
aforementioned request for a lot split.
'HIST~$y
The applicant has subntted application For a lot split located at 77 McLeod Ave N.E. The split
would create 2 lots from 3 lots. The Southerly lot will be 12,670 sq. ft. and the Northerly lot
10,508.8 sq. R The requirement for lot width is 90 feet on corner lots and 70 feet on single family
lots. The minimum lot area per. dwelling unit for a single family lot in the R2 district is 8,400 sq. ft.
Both lots meet the requirements of the zoning district.
FINDINGS Ol7 FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. The parcel is located in the R-2 zoning district.
3. There are no issues with this lot split in that it meets the minimum requirements for lot
width, depth and size within the R2 zoning District.
RECOMIvIENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanituously to recommend approval of the lot split with the
following recommendations:
• 1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense.
2. There should be an effort made to save the tree near the driveway.
r~ra ~ vwer -
SC~Ja,
lAt spat
. Art Hagen - 77 McLeod Ave
February 15,x005
Page 2
3.
a.
Deeds documenting the change in properly line need to be filed by
the property owners.
The proposed addition on the southern lot requires further building
permit approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean; Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Plaruling Commission
•
cc: Wesley Foss, 4235 Spruce Rd., St. Bonifacious N1N 553'75
Art Hagen, 150 Olsen Blvd, Cokato MN' 55321
~~~~~
DIRECTORS REPORT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT
To: Hutchinson Planning Commission
(Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold)
From: &ad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust,
Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John Dlson, Lenny
Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Kent Exner, Mark Schnobrlch, Marc Sebora,
Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jlttt Popp, Dan Hatters, Dick Nagy, Julie
Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: January 31, 2005 -Meeting Date: February 15, 2005
Applicant: Art Hagen and Wesley Foss, property owners
LOT SPLIT
Brief Descrlptioa
The applicant has submitted application for a lot split located at 77 McLeod Ave N.E. The split
would create 2 lots from 3 lots. The Southerly ]ot will be 12,670 sq. R ettd the Northerly lot
10,5D8.8 sq. ft. The requirement far lot width is 90 feet on comer lots and 70 feet on single
family lots. The minimum lot area per dwelling unit for a single Family lot in the R2 district is
8,400 sq. #t. Both lots meet the requiicments of the zoning district.
GFNEI2AI, INFORMATION
Existing Zoning: R2 (Medium Density Residential)
Property Locagea: 77 McLeod Ave. and 628 Ash St. N&.
Lot Saxe: .5 acres
Existing Land Use: Residential
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning: RZ
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood
Zoning History: NA
Applicable
Regulations: Section 153.05, Hutchinson Municipal Code
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation: Mcleod Ave. and Ash St.
~(cJa,
Lot Spllt
Tiagen and Foss -- 77 McLeod and 628 Ash
Planning Commission- February I5, 2005
Page Z
• parl3ng: N/A
Analysis and
Recommendation:
The sites contain two detached garages. One garage will be removed.
The remaining garage will be encompassed by the lot on Mcleod
Avenue. The existing driveway entrance onto Mcleod Avenue may nqt
be widened. The water line for the southern lot is connected to a line on
Elm Street (under the alley and to the west). It is a concern that if there
were problems in the future, there may be confusion over where the
water service is connected.
It is the consensus of staff to recommend approval of the lot split with
the following recommendations:
1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense. Staff
would further recommend that the water service be relocated to
the Ash Street portion of the property.
2. 't'here should be an effort made to save the tree near the
driveway.
3. heeds documenting the change in property line need to be filed
by the property owners.
4. The proposed addition on the southern tot requires further
. building permit approval.
Ce: Wesley Foss, 4235 $pmce ltd., St Bonifacious IvIN 55375
Art Hagen, 150 Olsen Blvd, Cokato MN 55321 '
~c~.~a.
~J
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR HAGEN BUILDERS, INC. ~~~~
2
3 BLOCK
{
~~
,~~ .,
b •r~ AS
DESCRIPTIOrI FOR iIORTFfALY PAR00.
Lat S aM she Harrh 20.00 feet of LoT T. Dn n ekck e,
COLLEGE pDDiTIOH TO HUfCNIN50R. accardny to !Ae
recorded pnr thereof.
~~ ~~e,,d k,.elJ~
/J~~ #SCRIPTI01! FOR 5011TFfALY P,4RCEL
!',~„ 7 0l F+ Bbck b, COLLEGE RDDri[f10N TO k1UTCFtlrH30f1~ Lot
xcmdlnp to the recorded plot theraai. -
W N
w I
F
rn
v
~ 1322T (eimY ~ ' ~ N
l O N~ Q 0 17 3O eD
4 ~ I ~°'~ I r .]~\~'~ p~i real• In eel
5
~O
• Deiela Yeo rwiiD
O Dries Ml eowwMl 1e1
V'
` '/
V
~ P91RQI IIID
~n~,~,o~
~._
JCe IID. 04Y71
R P3e3 K
I i.r.iv e•n lfr lin nl. e.r wf. iim er
egerl ... McPretl it ~ er weer ee alreei
iger rirlo Ytl Liu i ew . hl} Wemei
taetl Sn ryN 04r lie len H tfe ileH er
nnnu etw
.lelf~ij/e~llewei Q.- ~/s.cQp
Dei.~f~~^~ - Lle. IN. /lip/
}J{CLE4D A~NUE
To; Julie Wishnack, Director Planning & Zoning
From: Mark Schnobrich, City Forester
RE: 77 McLeod Ave NE Lot Review
I reviewed the lot on located at 77 McLeod Ave NE on 7anuary 3, 2005 and assessed the
trees I found at that location.
Only two Green Ash trees lay within the city boulevard area. It appears they will not be
affected by the proposed lot split and garage construction.
Four large shade trees, 2-Black Walnuts / 24" & IS" in diameter, 1-Silver Maple / 40 "
in diazneter, and 1-Green Ash / 24" in diameter, are of significance on the current site.
All could stay with the proposed lot split and gazage construction. The green ash in the
southeast comer of lot at 77 McLead Ave NE is not in good condition and it would be my
recommendation to consider removing it.
Two apple trees exist with one needing to be removed at 77 McLeod Ave N>?.
A row of 7- Lombardy Poplars is located on the north edge of the lot located at 77
McLeod Ave l~iE. They are currently living but due to their short life span may want to be
considered for removal soon.
Three trees are located at 628 Ash St. NE. 1- White Cedar / ~ 20" in diameter, 1-White
Pine / 18" In diameter, 1- White Spruce / 24" in diameter. The White Cedar will have to
be removed with the present proposed construction on that lot while the White Pine and
White Spruce could be le8 if proper care is taken during construction.
r~
~C~J~
l 1
~~ ~L~' Z ~ ~~~ M
;' a 41
~ .1. yH
r ro ~ ~~ ~'~
a a: ~ z ~ .. ~ ~._ ..
~~ ~
~ .~ ~-
;,
~ ~, , ~ ~4
y ~ i
y 4 ~,
~~ ~ Y ' k ~ ~
~ ~ '+ `-
_ ` k _,`, ~ , z t Nh
}~. f ~`{ ~t ill. ~, .~~ i'C'~F.
`~ by ~~L.. l[L ~~ .y~-J ..
r
~ _
~1 •~\~
t_ J
~~ ~ is 7. ` 'k ~. „
~, . ~~ ~~
~ ~ s ~ L•c a
3 , ;.._
~ F
-• ~ ~ - ~`.
~' ~" .~,.
a i * yy iti
~ .. S. a a
'ay K
~ 1 w, ~
y ~~
Nf . y.
~
y t; ~~' ~^~~ 1 r
L'~ 4
t ~
~
~ S 1.G
r xb
~ ~
"! ~' w ,, S
'
._,
~~
~ ~
~
`
, ~
. ,tit M } ~.-
' ; _ ~_
~
: ~.
` ~t
ti~
frl
~~5
}'
~:~,
,
J
. ~~ ~
.~
1
~~
f ~ ~ eA°~
.'l . ~ 4
,!
S
V
IT~~~.~
ti +~'-
3 ~ ~ '.~
>!t~ a..
Jh~ ~ ~` ~ .
y4
Y
'~ ~
~ "r
~ ,_
.~.~,;~~
~,i ,~~~
.-I r_-y~J
/~ } ~W"
y'~~
.~ ~
~. ~..
.
~
4 ~~1.l~
w'~ ,
'
~
_~,
.._ ~~~~
- '`y~
.
E _-
,;
f~ .4~
zw~T .. - tiy.
l-
c -
a
~ S" ~ .< ~4 --
~~ ".4 ~ _
~ ~~~~ 'r'
F -
t
r
]ZA ?.,
~~ ~
4:
y
i ~ "•.~ ~ t
,i
w '~
4
~. d t +,~:
{-%~ "r~
- ~ ~f
.t
;4~~. ~ :y ~;'
k 2 -e ~'~
[ t ~ i; + e x
y P Y y'
' ~ ~ ~ ~r #~
~1 .~ ~s t 1 li ~ ~h•~( f~ ~
4 `.:
f~ -. r '-.
T.
i. ,~:~~ ',~'
+ r
M
J ~ ~
S
4 ~ ~ ,
w> v~ ~
j ~
~ ~ }~ t1 ~ ~1 :'R t ~ ~.ra o-1
4 } ~A ~.- 1~.~ 1- ..
p ^ 1~ ~ «~
i R : ;9 i ~ ~~y { ~ 2 i~`r Sit r
= 1, ~r t r Y .,'~.,y f trx tity~~Fir r
k ~71; ,'~}~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~s '
'y ' . ~ k ~ fppS k T~ 1,
V t ~ fL y }
d I ~ ~~ rxY~ ~b `p•d.~.,
is f +: tyr~ .~ ~1 ~
~ 4+~ c
'! rt > ~~ r ~ f 6 ax~~.
' ' 4 t
3, i . ~,~1 ~r~f~~~r~
~' ~ ~ r ~,x
~~
`~- -a 1 ~ •~ { t
'~~r
` ~~ rr ~~fi r~9 ~' I
Y. ~~ ~ ~ ~ f T L 5~'~1
J V i !'
'~ !!11 ~ '~ ~ .:~
• its r*
~ 4. ~ ~ ,, ~~ ~ I F }~ k~~
-,++~-+dr ~ ~ ~ 4 'y .y,« i
h '.. ~ 5 1 .}~.~, Y 1 wl ~IyAr'~'~
1 ', 4 ~ '~
i ;_'~
~r
D~1 1' ~ ~~• c~. I
;~~~~
. t11n:~s~,s~~tso~meast
Huichiuson, MN 55350
(320) 587-5151/Fu: (320) 234.4240
City of Ilutclrinsun
APPLICA'T'ION P'Oli GAAIIiI.ING Db;`VICES LICENSE
In provisions of the City of Hutchinson Ordinance No. G55 and 1Vlinncsota Statutes Chapter 349
All applications must be received at least ;ip days before event in order to be considered
^ Full Year 7anuary 1 - Dcccnther 31, Pee: $100.00
`~ Year
Id Shoe Term Date(s) [l,~ / - G~ - p~ ~/,j ~ bJlrFee: $2S-DD
M.n.rh/t7m~/Ynnr- Mnrnl~ )nv/Yonr
hrt!aniaalivn lnli~rmation, ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ '•'ds; '~:;:'~ ,
c- Name ~ Phone Numb~eri-fir,,
~~Y , ~~iitJ ~-Pc"zrT ~ • ~i~, rz= /!J J v; -c NicJSo.G~ ~~ °-.~
Address where regular rneering are held City State Zip
Day and time of meetings? ,~jf ~ /}'J /~ i'~,gll' ~(/f,~t~ ~0.~7~/
[s this organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? ~ yes ^ no
Flew long has tkte organization been in existence? !/ IIow may membe in the t am ~t n? $~
What is the purpose of the organization. _Fifi ~ ~ //S~ ~iP_ 4~p~L Ni
In wha~e custody will orga/nization records e keptt?
Na(m'e Phone Number
,~ 5r /~!J/.L) .~ ~rL`% ~/•'Scr.r~' ~bz inJ~.c1 ~iJ ~JUe~35 ~
Address Cit State Zi
l~idclit Bond lnformatiort; ~ ~„~.,..,.• ,~ ~ ~, ~ ~.„~,; ~,, ~~~~~;'~~'r;i:~~;l:;i;e;.-:~~„yt,~,.~H~,?, ~,'~',
1'he fallowing information is provided concerning a fidelity hood given by the gambling manager in favor of
the organization:
company
Address of lwndutg company City
Amount of hood: Duration of frond:
Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding requirements: ^ y
State
^ no
~«~
Ciry of Hwchinson
APPhc~~iun fur Bingo Gnmhling fkvices License
Poge 2 of 3
_...
1)ulvAuthnrizedplficcrnfthcCh:evtizationInformatinn ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.'V~+~~'•~•~'• :-'.,ii'r,~,';,.,';
True Nume
Residence Address
-5~'~-
P)tnne Number
/-tG~~Crf~iy~ _ l~Y7Af
City Stare
Date of Birth: /~ / ~~ / /~~/~ Place of Birth: ~ 't'i e-
Mnnth/day/year City
Have you ever been convictat of any crime other than a traffic offense? ^ yes f~no
If yes, explain:
rc azrlurinn nr nrtiun
!'rue
Residence Address
Plwne Ntanber
Cety State
llate of Birth: / / Place of Bir[h:
MnntlJduy/year
Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than x traffic offensc7
/~Z^ipn /
mil! -
State
up
City State
^ yes ^ no
If yes, explain:
Ilow long have you been a member of the organization?
~~
u
Date(s) and/vr day(+) gambling devices will be used: ~(~ GS'7,~ _ through ~~
pM ~ AM
Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: From p~ To /~ pig
Maximum numbtYV of player:
Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? ^ money ~( merchandise -
Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? ^ yes ,S~ no
if es, will a char c be made for such refreshments? ^ es ^ na
Ga/m~e,infortna[ion, i. ., .. --- ..y;i„ t; Ma ~~;a;';!~.g;Mr'',i;9,p'"i;"~
ri/~,C~ tt7) IJU.v TY f Aft F~.~'ou.v~5 -S~' ~
G Nurrte of location where game wlll be played / Phone Number
p'00 ~r~n ~ E yu;t>y/NSosl iY]nJ ~~h~
Address of l~catlan where game will be played Ciry Stale Zip
Officers of the CN ani~ation (i necessur ,list ndditinnnl nnrnes un sa orate sheetJ~"~
, ,au' ,,, ,.. ,,. ,,~,, ~, „, ~,.,
~~'-
,ta, L--' L ~
Name -
Title
l~~a /~~s ~1~~ ~ G ~~~~ rf~u ~` .~
P Hes
lden~e Address City State Zip
I
f
V 0 F--If L-~ Vsi_E-~ 5 _ ~ /zEX'.5 IJ.~E,Lt
n Na/fine
:l ~~ r~~ C prJXl ~ ~~ /~r--~BcaLrg,rE Title
M,~
~~,~~
M Residence Address City " ~~ ~.St~~e Zip
/,~ / Name `~ / Title q~.
Residence Address Cit State
5~~~
Ciry of Hutchinson
Applicprian fur Ningn GpmLliny Devicrs Licepse
Ppge 3 of 3
C~
C~
OffiCCCS Ot' U(t]Flr Pl'I$On5 Yald for Seiviccs Info matron (i.{Here.+•spryr list addi[innul nurnes on .ve utnde skeet)%itMy;#?'~'j.
,
Name
/~ /J7 ~ S1C
~
J ~rHi.~25O~ Tit~lrety ,
//Lip ~~
.
.
/' Residence Address
~/ (Jf}R~ ~ ~ ~~ %.~'~ 7Jf3 Ciry State Zip
__ ~ /~. J~~cryoeJ ~o~? ~!y
.e4
Name ~i ~ / Titles
~ ResideneeAddress
C
'
w ~
/ City
f~~~~
~ State Zip
/Ylt~i~P
,
o
A,r_
O + .
Name rr~~ /~ //~~ ~T~iti~e/
Residence Address Cir State Zi
ChecklitiC ~~~ ~ ~~
The following items need to hu annpleted and/or attached in order for the application to be processed:
~~
~'i~of~heoY'fw~iat~esntuttonvraftTc~alacZia»designa e-gumbtttrg-m~+uge~:~C]-yew--0rto
~opy_of-iasy r~nes~N+at meetslat~xsec~itt • ~tablished in t s no
A lislvf_;dLacTtveattentbers~HN:-or$srrizati0rr.-~+3~ycs,-B-ne-~
Application fee paid in full (check or money order): ^ yes ^ no
A lication com leted in full and si ned h bath authorized officer and amblin mans er. ^ es ^ nv
e Authorized Officer yes ^ nn ~~
/ utl Initial
Have you ((;ambling Manager and Authorized Oftcer) read, and do you tltoroughly understand the provisions of all laws,
ordinances, and regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices (xs outlined in City of Hutchinson
Ordinance 1 ]4.20 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349)?
i declare drat the information I have provided on this application is tnlthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to
investigate the information submitted. Also, l have received Inns the City of Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No.
1 I4.2(1 relating to gambling and I will familiarize myself.with the contents thereof. _ _ .._ . _.
sz ~C _ IJ.u.~
Signature of aut~wrized officer of
Signature of Bumbling manager of organization
anal Use Onl ' ' " ' ' ~''
City Council ^ approved O tteniCd Notes:
/."'~"~i
Oate
Date
~~~~
1"
LJ
City of Hutchinson
FEE:,. $25.00 APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICEN5E Approved by:
Building
Fire
Application shall be submitted at Police
least/~ days prior to the Gambling occasion
N e of Autho ized 0 icer of Name of Designated Gam ing
Organization Manager
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct.
the game of gamblingin accordance with the provisions of the City of
Hutchinson Ordinance N0. 655 and M nnesota Statutes Chapter 349
for the license year ending a ,3/
Sig tunes.: - ~
~~
A horized cer f rganization esinate~ ambli Manager of
organization
A
The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer
of the organization:
1. True Name:
2.
3•
5•
(oast)
Residence Address:
(street) ~ (city) (state) (zip)
Date of Birth: ~-®T3-/sy~ _ 4. Place of Birth `.r ~, ..,.e/
(mo/day/year) (city/state)
Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic._
offense? Yes Nom. if Yes. explain
$. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manager
of organization: /
1. True Name : 7 ~~mp ~wC' L PYw~C.a/ ~ti~
(last) ~ (first) r(middle)
2. Residence Address: S .~d'~~'ZS
(street) (city) (state) /'(zip)
3. Date of Birth: ~`.T7-/9~~ 4• Place of Birth: vii s .~
(mo/day/year) (city/state)
r~
~.J
~ ~~~
5. Have you ever been ccnvicted of any crime other than a
' traffic offense? Yes No ~. If yes, explain '
6. How long have you been a mec~ber of the organization? ~~
7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action
designating you gambling manager.
C. Came Information:
1. Place where gambling devices will be used ~~'/t7 Gw~ /$f~g
2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used ~~ -
(date and/or days}
3. flours of the day gambling devices will be used: °f week)
From _~A.M. To A.M.
P.M. .r~/ P.M.
4. Maximum number of players /7~tai] ~rla~~~vr~.r ~a it ~.
5. Wi11 prizes be paid-in money or march nd~ /~e~!-el,~..,~~~
6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling
devices will be used? Yes No [ . If so, will a charge
be made for such refreshments? Yes NO ~.
D. Organization Information:
1. Address where regular meetings are held S~i so
. 2: Day and time, of meetings ~! ~ ~+7 ~ncl I~irr,f -2sE
i
d
d ~
f th
th
l
3. Is the a ze
un
er
pplicant organization organ aws o
e
e
State of Minnesota? Yes ~~ No
4. How long has the organization been in existence? ~
ka. How many members in the organization?
'S. What is the purpose of the organization? ~w• ;
6. Officers of the Organization: ~~/° ~~'
- Name -
rr~,,~o Addres
1,~..~~~-f ~.~~,~er,. Tit e`
~.,~.~,
7. Give names of"officers. or any other persons psis xor serv
to the organization:
Name ~ Address Title
r~
-..~
~[~.~
D. Organization Information: (Continued) '
8. In whose custody will organization records be kept?
Name vi ~e Address Ad!~S Sir ~O~
9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by players
while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed
premises, please state the
Name of Insurer and Policy No. F..~
1O. Have you (t+anager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws. ordinances, and
regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices?
11. Attach a list fall active members of the organization,
E. The follo 'ng information is provided concerning a fidelity
band given the gamblin anager in favor of the organization.
1. Name of b nding c any '
2. Address of on ng company
3. Amount and ation of bond
!~. Applicati is ereby made for waiver of the bonding
require nts. Y No
6
I declare that the informat n I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, 1 have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling,
and I will familiarize myself with the contents thereof.
.~igrraLUre or author ze~bi'Yxcer of organization
_ _ Date:
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public vn this day of
. 19
Signature o Notary Public
Commission expires on
Subscribed and sworn t afore a notary public on this day of
. 19
Signs of Notary Public
Commis io Aires on
Social Security Number:
PIIV Business ID Number:
5 ~~)
RESOLUTION NO. 12647
• RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT ND. 05-01
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for
the improverent nf:
North Central Trunk Sanitary Sewer from Bluff Street to the Tartan Park lift
station (4th Avenue SE) -complete replacement of an existing trunk sanitary
sewer main and installation of a new roadway by construction of sanitary sewer,
storm sewer, watermain, grading, gravel base, concrete curh and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, trail, landscaping, restoration and
appurtenances,
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received
complying with the advertisement:
Bidder Amount Bid
Rickert Excavating Inc of Brownton MN $1,167,974.23
Arcon Construction of Harris MN $1,451,805.74
S R Weidema Inc of Maple Grove MN $1,458,776.53
Duininck Bras Inc of Prinsburg MN $1,510,652.42
Barbarossa & Sons Inc of Osseo MN $1,521,805.79
LaTour Construction Inc of Maple Lake MN $1,770,893.38
and whereas, it appears that Rickert Excavating Inc of Brownton MN is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, t3E I7 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA:
1. The mayorand city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with Rickert Excavating of Brownton MN, in the amount of $1,167,974.23 in the name of the City of
Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the Director of Engineering.
2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful
bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the contract.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of February 2005.
Mayor
City Administrator
~~~
L
C~
r~
~J
City °f "~'" Hutchluson Cit Center
111 Hessen Street S6
• Autchlns°n, MN 55350-2522
310-587.5151/Fax 320.239.4240
E M t7 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
Letting Ho. 8/Prn~e t No. OS-10
RE: Golf Course Road & Std Avenue NW Neighborhood Meeting
DATE: February l7, 2005
We held a neighborhood meeting on Monday, fanuary 31°`, to discuss the proposed Golf Course Road & 5°i
Avenue NW project. Approximately 20% of the property owners that were notified attended the meeting.
A copy of the PowerPoint presentation that was reviewed at the neighborhood meeting is included in your
February 22"d City Council packet.
The majority of the discussions at this meeting focused on impacts to specific properties and anticipated
assessment amounts. Based on the feedback during the neighborhood meeting, City staff detemrined that it
would be beneficial to independently meet with the property owners that will be assessed for the proposed
improvements. These meetings are scheduled to be held at City Center on Thursday, February 17 ,and
Friday, February 18s'.
We will be available to discuss the results of the neighborhood meeting and the upcoming property owner
meetings at the Public Hearing.
Mooed m neyekd MPer -
Co C~~
{,IfII (_~f1r11'tiL° 1in~lil ~C
~sls ~VClllli' ~~~~
. ~~~
vl~ ~"l~~~c~
~} ~]~f1t~1CUVr~I~C~If'.>G~~S
~ ~ P~r~~m~lt 1'arl~l~x~~~l~
~,.
Rural de~i~rr Fvitla minima: section tl c~:r~~:~s
° • Pa~°~:rn~nr s~rrface r*aries si~mi~rrcarrtl~+
• Poc-mr rro~db~ti sanb~r~cle nails have ~cceler~t~d
deterw`c3ratioaa
• High enaunr~nance route
. « l~rc~venrive rrraintenarace trot cost-~fl`ec~ve
• E;xisaing tivaterrnain ~witin G~li. eas- t.!r
school Road
~ lnstallatron cr~"~vrrk sanitary sewer grad.
a~'at~TTraakta raCOessar'y tra ~er•A+l~e ds~velopung
areas and.. provide rapacity
N"" P"r{~~ :N~a~v~l:~
+ 1C~elertnCatizrg srrNcet, laagdr tarainrenarace
• xisxir,~ narrow, astral rcwad desi,~rr
+ Ettatttls~aYsc~ti~errtlaick,w~~srrrntsrYb~ancrs~ad
• 'l'rrwide a1cc~rFiatr've t"auare km dev~lrirr~ arms
• lrastallaticurr +af tel: s~raitarar sewer and wal~rTruaiaa
l''ral e~ra~rctiicun l~uerweeaGr ~claaal F~iuad rr,~il and
Luce &..irae trai&
n ,~ t~arn~i ~r :an~er~;c~,;t
~~~
Current ra~aclwa~+ with si~ifi~antuditclz se««F,, ,~s
* )^xisris urge .lver°t k~r~trearlr £ivlfCi~e Road
* ~`.trrb armd l tra ecnrrsrrtrered tiu contain
riradwa;~ runaff
Prepaskn ¢iu lrawer quad. end sdd kimat 1['ar
riradwa~'rulevard nrncrl~'
«^ Ska~rm sewer system irtalled ~ c~rll~ i, r crotrvey arrd
mat draiara~e ti~rarrr rpadway and adjacent prnaperues
~~ 1'rop~e~ ~a°npro~rr
tii~
. ...t
C"arrr~releryr easwrc: t crcisrirr,~ 1n~snerr~rw, °, ~ ..,.nd
rxccswrrtsrhle subgrsde ntecisrs
.~ rad~ ~ raw i:rcalt Caaa ktr9 excan
. Cr+nsn°u~t 3~" and " wide cd~,ways with lrikuaaanoxys
surfaeiac, co~~s~te c'urrr a~~r guct~:e ~dYd~ aY~rw;cR' 1i~.'h,2i~ro,~,
lncreas~r 'Ilx? trCMr S~C"6t $CCtvWS tq ~ a lttr-Gn
i o~U' w a w dCSi$11,
. irista9~ a 14' w~cl'e ~ntu~ninyrorLV rraotl alan~''khe siyirihc~ 1y ar~d
hvasSaw'ly Sti~C9 of the r~sprcFtv~ n~:,pvsriy~
w ~'crrrst~~ta~urli9ahoutll4lFe,sCGtiorlartrscpunriiotmtatG~rlr'
4~crwrsec rtoad, and. $En Aae° 1roiW
I
~~ .~ L._,
.3
'r' ~r~p~c~ T~~i~rl~~~nt
• 1_f1.z 1iL1L
Essial~ ~ l.`?' &~1'G;oata~•p's~+wertxxaiak~'~r~u~r wdR~i~Mr tlwr=
I; I} ~ ,.i ir< ~ ir~l a°'xte175i4rosx
Is.r,lJ B"`a,~d 1""'"PV~~rvarteux~a~aai~cus ti~+itksi'ns~i~a9TC"xraaw'se
n~'~,; ati~e. @~<~1°d' e. tlxe t~txlt~"t>'r~se Nt+aad exrceaxsilcavs
f~ef.in~e e?:tfil n` K4~%I',CR~a.ridB S~d5T1~$'N'~6CM1N~.p~7'C'!°14i4b 11.~MvF
up u, !3,~• prc~ptriy line
. 's,c ~slla?t~rra~~e~~e~s~Qtuxnai~wxrGl~~t,aoxaGVey+axw:l,ta~aa
~r3„~ge vn~~thln tt~ xeadwa~ rcxxaddeas
I .,
,.:
+ Ivrop~ri~y~ 4'r+rrn~r ~m~s for:
. Sa~natary srw~n- & rvattrr` ser~ric~ regxl~tearoar~nut~
. Stantt'ard reslde~tia:l stmt i~aravewracnts
. wank ~ ~ r«~x~~• ta~ia.l~ ~x sre~~
,~ 1)rain~~e utnpr+rnreRn~nks
~.. SkR,ey uac~ "Acxc~e° avusilwd' ar incNude~ wurt~ aver ""freant ~" retiaC
. 1"~CD"I'Es AM~lbOais a tests xal" assstrut srabjct ttr
clta~x~~
,:
~~ Yr+~~~~`.~.se~~at nr~~rm;t~tiaa
,..
;a'_u
Ssal7"w ill rxrors~alete tf,r prvjrct dc~,gsp, axul c ~ ~ .: r t,~~i_ :I
apf,rpwed art Public Heari~_lHCbruary2~.
A n ,a s srr s ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ A ~ ~,,1 ~_ ticr 'he 1,e1~1 alter bads, ~risn?c tsa axrrardd
of coxttrect.
Ac-foal 61.wa1 a'sseescxrexat csrsts+ ~ be cal~alatcd frxr Aussesanxent
Ileara~x~ based cwn the aekua9 tsmaject s:crstB.
t 9r[Cres t rah vwa11 be d~etersareairred by xskc t1raR eiRy x~iv~ err
Itixe pesrye~R bcxr~.a ~rr~~,~r ~.~w~~ w~ M~~ur~~ ~vc~~~d~
~:~~+'dWe Anv+d m++~nsrs6a+~e ~zwwwwyc dMe rare 4~ +m bn
a. r~rrnri ~,arYxl,
,- ^C1t}` p~y~ fdr
. ~"suskflatRl sastitaay s~~r c~ vwRttit~
~C~CYRtStt'"tLGttC3X'N.
. ttt ov^ex~ss"ziat~ (tl7icl~xess "vs+~slth~
1'r~ail nmstaTlaRar_wax ;uxufl >rtec.~r~t to-~rolx>vaxx~.
Ll01xt
star~td ~rv~~~t feat
1>>tirrwt~Ra(l crtre~tructivn~"ewst ~ 2,1CPt~;t;~f}
F::tirna[txi 1~.aperl5~s $ Ct4
Extuxxutecl 1'roj,kq-t ~twRlt ~ 2,6~Y4,QtN~
I vxsank ~atxits~ry~ evv~r ~'utrd ~ ~f10;+'
Tratxak'w~atexxstaitx Fautd ~ 1R1,tk
.3^t$t4:~ ~6~ ~k1ttG~5~7t]f t]t5(~itp~' '~ L'.,,~~,'
~ssesstrRts_ 2550"ItURJ
F.st[rrRated ~rRx~e~t Financing ,GUN,Of1~M
r~ ..~ P~~ '~'j:Yt~C7fi
.,.
kr?.
.'.. Full (a~' ~~rsfasgb'i~a5+'~ c~ri¢k,+sui u,CereiA' by ~rk~r++ea ,Y,er i ~.:,
r ftew l~sxvc7nsxbez 15Rb, tltc ~A'&ES,grn~mtx are ces~tltT~xt ~ tares, r+alls
will, in0,t
~x._sessnxn: ..n Rax roll li7 dears witlx egwal paarxepal a
decrea~io~ interest.
ue fee ,,,e e, t; ; x~ al'able 'f€sc prr~~ s~wa~esr mcakttn~ mmnr~r.
guisk iaxwes, va'Raa axe eatber rxvcr 6;~ years rld uam'sbasalrYerl.
r"
RESOLUTION NO. 12648
. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING N0.8
PROJECT NO.05-10
W HEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 8th day of February 2005, fixed a date for a
Council Hearing on the improvement of:
Golf Course RoadNW/5th Avenue NW from School Rvad NW to Kcuwe Street
NW & Golf Ccurse Road NW Extension tp TH 7 -complete street
reconstruction, new roadway construction and utility infrastructure installations
by construction of lateral storm sewer and treatment Improvements, trunk and
lateral sanitary sewer and services, trunk and lateral watermain and services,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing, trails, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESQTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted .the 8th day of
February 2005.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare
plans and specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd, day of February 2005.
Mayor
City Administrator
~~~~
Memo
Ta Mayor and Council
Fmrre Lawrence Winter, Parks coordinator
CCt
Data 2!17/2005
Rx Qrift Riders Parts Grand Application
As part of the overall park development plan The Packs department plans to commence development
of Drill Riders Parts. In order to maximize our funding possibilities we will appy for grant funding from
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation grant program. This program
requires a Council resolution and a public hearing in prder to be considered for funding.
The DrHt Ridere.Park is located on nearly five acres at 1845 west Shvre Drive in the Island View
Development on the Western boundary of the City. The property came into the park system in 1898
and was adopted by the Drift Riders Snowmobile Club in 2000. This group has so far donated both
time and cash toward the development of this parts.
The proposed development would include a loop trail, natural climbing play areas, picnk shelter, scent
overlook, native plant shoreline buffer planting and trees and shrubs to create a natural rereatlon
space with an emphasis vn fitness and exercise. The cost of this development effort is projected at
$130,000.00 With the DNR able to contribute $50,D00.00 The remainder will come in the form of
donations and in-kind march.
Tha Parka Department has had some success with these grants in the past .The nature of this project
and our previous success shoukl insure a high ranking for the limited funds available.
Thank you,
Lawrence Winter
~~~~
LJ
ITEM 9 -PUBLIC HEARING
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS -PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENT
A minimum of one public hearing must be held to obtain citizen input on this proposed
Outdoor Recreation Grant Application. A regular park board, city council, town board or county
board meeting is not considered a public hearing unless the meeting, or a portion of the meeting,
was specifically noticed and identified as a public hearing.
The hearing must be held prior to but not more then 18 months before the submission of the
application. Notice of the public hearing must follow the normal public hearing notice requirements
for your local community.
A copy of the public notice and the minutes from the hearing must be submitted with your
application. The minutes should reflect that the following information has been provided at the
hearing:
- Project scope and the type of activities involved
. -Implementation schedule
- Overall cost and the proposed financing for the project
- Costs to be assessed to community residents
- Other associated project costs such as maintenance expenses, etc.
18
c~~~~
LJ
~~
Resolution No. 12653
ITEM 7 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION
,.,- ;..
BE IT RESOLVED that Cit of Hutctiiiison ' " 'act as legal sponsor for the
IAw~)
project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Crrant Program Application to be submitted
on and that Gary A. Plotz is hereby authorized
(oq, Mamh, Yeu) (Title or Awlwnrvd Oreciel)
to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of
City of xutchinson
(APPlicanQ
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Gity of xutchinson has the legal authority
(AppGcsM) .
to apply for financial assistance, and financial capability to meet the match requirement and ensure
adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its
design life.
City of Hutchinson has not incurred
(AaW~)
any costs described on Item 5 and has not entered into a written purchase agreement for the property
described on Item 4.
BE IT FURTI-IER RESOLVED that
BE I'I' FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state,
T, City of xutchinsnn-- may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota
(AppliaM)
for the above-referenced project, and that city of xutchinson certifies that it will
(AppGe.a)
comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including
dedicating the park property for outdoor recreation uses into perpetuity.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Gary D. Plotz is hereby
(Title of Audwrittd Officwl)
authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the
applicant.
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the ___. city council
(Ciq Covnoil, cower Bond. erc.)
of, City of liuSChinaen on
(Applinnq (o.rc)
SIGNED:
WITNESSED:
(signn.e) (Si~unw)
Cayos 2/22/05 Cit Administrator 2/22/05
(rdk)' (nr.) (ride) ()7.te)
16
~~~~
r1
L J
Hutchinson Cit Center
C
11.1 Hassan street 5&
Hutchinson, MN 5535a252a
sao-ssr-5lslrtrax 3aaa34-aaao
M. F M. O R A N D [.] M:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
Randy DeVries, Director ofWater/Wastewater Operations
RE: Consideration of Engineering Services Agreement with Donohue & Associates
far the Industrial Pretreatment Program Update
BATE: February 17, 2005
Attached is an Engineering Services Agreement for an industrial Pretreatment Program Update fivm
Donohue & Associates of Sheboygen,Wisconsin. The person completing the work is lames Hagley,
who helped the City of Iutchinson develop the original industrial Pretreatment Program in
approximately 1987, when the new Wastewater Treatment Facility (W WTF) was constructed. The
Program was developed in order to identify and regulate items in Industrial Waste that could create
treatment or regulatory problems for the City. Although we have made minor changes to the
permitting system since that time, we have not completed a thorough review and update.
Since the original program was developed:
• New pollutants have been identified that need to be regulated (phosphorus, molybdenum,
mercury, etc.)
• Existing industries have changed processes and materials that have effects ar- the WWTF
operations
• New industries have started or grown that may regttire additional regulation by the City.
• New technologies have been developed to help the city track and monitor areas of concern
We specifically have requested these services fmm Donohue in order to:
1. Review existing pretreatment forms and processes
2. Review current industries operations to identify pollutants of concem (PAC's)
3. Identify other sources within the City that may contribute pollutants of concern (PAC's)
4. Review and recommend revisions to the current City Ordinance
5. Modify the permitting to allow use of software tracking systems
6. Review plant operations, headwork loadings, and potential monitoring and control processes
r1
This is set up to be a time and materials contract, with snot-to-exceed figure of $42,000. These
services will improve the operations and efficiency of the WWTF, and is included in the 2005
budget. We recommend approving the Engineering Services Agreement with Donohue &
Associates for the Industrial Pretreatment Program Update.
prlnme ai neyclai,.~ .
~ (c~~
C~
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT
Project: Industrial Pretreatment Program Update (Project)
This Agreement is by and between:
City of Hutchinaon (Owner)
City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MAT 55350
and
Donohue & Associates, lnc. (Donahue)
3311 Weeden Creek Road
Sheboygan, WT 53081
Who agree as follows:
Owner hereby engages Donohue to perform the Services set forth in Part I for the compensation set forth
in Part III. Donohue will be authoriud [o commence the Services upon execution and receipt of this
Agreement from Owner. Owner and Donohue agree that this signature page, together with Parts T
through N attached, constitute the entire agreement for this Project.
APPROVED FOR OWNER
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
• bate:
APPRf]V F DONO
By; ~-
Priitt de~tdine: L E. Teunissen P.E.
Title: Presi e
Date: ~°
q Lam)
PARTI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF SERVICES/TIMING
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The primary goal of this project is to assist the Owner's staff with review and implementation of the
Industrial Pretreatment Program to more efficiently manage the program, utilizing the content
Owner's engineering staff in administering the program. thereby reducing hours needed for contract
consulting services.
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Basic Services to be provided by Donohue for this Project under this Agreement ate as fellows:
1. Meet with Owner's engineering staff, WWTF Director, and other Owner consultants to get
acquainted with the current Industrial Pretreatment Program.
2. Participate in Owner's pretreatment inspection of current pernutees.
3. Review the Industrial Pretreatment Program [o include the following:
a. Pretreatment inspection forms and process.
b. Existing permits, draft permit updates.
c. Permit application and renewal process.
d. City ordinances as related to Industrial Pretreatment Program.
e. Monitoring and sampling for Industrial Pretreatment Program.
f. Review permit and pretreatment fee structure.
4. Review top water/sewer users, local businesses, hospitals, utilities, etc., within the City of
Hutchinson and identify commercial users that would benefit the Owner by adding them to the
Owner's permitting and/or monitoring program.
5. Identify sources within the City of Hutchinson collection system that may contribute levels of the
following pollutants of concern (POC's):
a. Phosphorous.
b. Molybdenum.
c. Mercury.
d. Other pollutants of concern identified per effluent, biosolids regulations.
fi. Identify sampling locations for additional monitoring points, if needed.
7. Modify existing permit format to adapt to the Linko CTS Plus Software Program.
g. Assist with the establishment of electronic process to determine:
a. Maximum Allowable Headwork loadings, whereby a request for discharge into the collection
system can be easily identified as to the level of concern that needs the service of consulting
engineers vs. in-house engineering. Include a flow chart for determination of these needs.
b. Combined waste flow of industrial/commercial monitoring billing purposes.
Page 2 ~~~
L
• 4. Assist in the implementation of [he recommended changes to permits, ordinances, necessary
record keeping that will improve the pretreatment program. To include:
a. Existing and proposed permits.
t b. Application process.
c. Renewal process.
d. City ordinances.
e. Industriallcommercial inspections.
f. Sampling and monitoring plan.
g. Pee structure.
h. Record keeping.
i. Software.
C. PR0,IECT TIMING
Donohue shall 6e authorized to commence the Services set forth herein upon execution of this
Agreement. Donahue shall complete the Services within the calendar year of 2005.
PART II
OWNER RESPONSIBILITIES
A. In addition to other responsibilities of Owner set forth in this Agreement, Owner shall:
. 1. Identify a perspn authorized to act as the Owner's representative to respond to questions and
make decisions on behalf of Owner, accept completed documents, approve payments to Donohue,
and serve as liaison with Donohue as necessary for Donohue to complete its Services.
2. Furnish to Donohue copies of existing documents and data pertinent to Donohue's Scope of
Services, including but not limited to and where applicable: existing industrial permits,
pretreatment ordinances, and other pretreatment documents associated with the Industrial
Pretreatment Program
C~
Page 3
~~~~
PART TII
COMPENSATION, BILLING AND PAYtNENT
A. Compensation as defined in the Scope of Services (Part I) of this Agreement shall be in accardance
with Donohue's standard chargeout rates in effect at the time the Services are performed. Routine
expenses will be billed at cast. The cost far these basic Services will not exceed $42,000 without
written approval from Owner.
A. Donohue will bill Owner monthly, with net payment due in 3D days.
B. Donohue will notify Owner if Project scope changes require modifications to the above-stated
contract value. Services relative to scope changes will not be initiated without authorization from
Owner.
C~
Page 4 `
_ 1 ~~ J\
PART IV
STANAARA TERMS ANb CONAITIONS
C~
CJ
L
1. 57AMlARD OF CARE. Dmohue'f 5trvim that! be pMormed in xcordance wNh
the standard of professional pranicc ordinarily exercised by the appliw6le profession under
Similar cirwmsimm at the same lime and In me locality what the Services art perfamtad.
Profeasivml services ore not Subject m, and Donohue does mt pmvide, any wartanry ce
guarantee, ezPms ar implied. Any wamnlies M guaranteer ennmilxd in arty purdpse
orders, rcquisniors, or entices b prxeed ysued by porno are void old mt 6inding Ilpm
2. CHANGE OFSCOPE The Scope af5oviera set farthin Mu Agreemcru ishasedan
taco known store time o(ueeutim elmia Agrcemen4 including, ifapplirable, infamlalim
supplied by Owner. Far swneprojecy involving comepnul orpmassdevelopmrntBervice;
xope may not be fWly dcfinebk during inirial phem. As me project pmgrcase, Gds
disrovned may iwirnte that the swpe must 6e redefined. Domhue will promptly puovide
pwnetwim a writirn amrndmem m ih'ISAgrmnaM to te~agnisc such change, whichaMJl lx
drmud aacprcd if rqt objecad m within I S days of rcceiq by Owner.
3. HA7ARDOUS ENVIAONh97lTM CONDITIONS. Unkas exprtssly stated
omnwise in the Scope of Servim (Pan I) of mis Agrtemrn4 Panahue`s scope ofservke
dun nor ilwlude any services rt6dng ma Huardolw Envummrntel Cmdidon, including but
not limited m the presence et the Prajep me of ubeasos, PCBs, petroleum, harerdous
subsmises or any Yther pollutant oe rontamilur4, as mdse toms art deR.red In pcrtrlrnt
federal, state, and meal Gws. N me Cwenl Donollne or anY Omer parry erlcoumets s
Herardoua Envhonnlenul GOMitron, Dmohue may at it' spoor suspend pMmfsanx oC
servim until Owrer. eJ retains ~,pm~+ c coreulmny or nmtranas b idnu3ly and
rtmediale or remove the Hazerdvusa EnvuanmenW Cmldi[ion; sM b) walrwns tlrt me
Project airy is in full carrpliolte with all appliebk rovimmrcnW Invs.
A SAFETY. Unkas apcifiplly included v a service m be Provided under this
Agreemrn4 ^awhue specifically disclallw anywmoriry cercspmsbihry fargenaaljo6site
an(ety, ar the fafery ofpenors (atltc than Donahue rnlq.loyees) ce pmpnty.
7. DE[AYS. IC perfomwue N Donolrru:'e Services ie dekyed m.pfgh m Cult of
Donohuq Donohue shall be rnAAed m an uyrsinn of dme eaNW w flee delay end n
equiybk edjuemsent in mmpwwYOn
6. TL•RMINATION/SUSPFN$ION. Eimer PmY may termieste mis Agreement upon
30 days wdtknrwda to the orbs ppry.Owrua shall pay Iblwhue tars!! SaNlm, imhldtllg
profit relating thereto, rclukrtd print M teruftlutlot4 Plus anY upenxa of rnmisrllm.
IfE11hR p0rly dCfWdlf m ly abllgallp6 YndLTmlb AgtC11On (erduditlg QwnEr'aabllgalYl
m make required paymenic), arc rloo-dcfeWting party may, spar gg11vi1111g{ Bevan dayf vnSfim
mdse, suspend perfamlose wader mis AgrcernweL The rroo-deGYltm{pany may mt
suspend perfan+splce if the defaWtm{ Arty tonln+Grttf m cum such defwlt within Ilse
eevelt-day mice period and tomplams+um nee wimin a rwaonrble pedod oftime.
boriohae may termiprc mis Agrcrrrunt open !even d.ys wdtkn mane iE a) notrdoe
believes des Dalwhue U bring rcqueted by Owner to perform spvim ronlroy m Gw a
Donohue's responsibilities as s licensed proftasicelWi a 6) Dvlavhu<'s Snvicu ihr art
Project arc delayed, suspended, a inkrrupGed fns s pniadoCat least 9p days for reasarla Ilal
ertrihuublc m Donohue's performos<afSmicef; cec) Owncehu tailed mpnytogal1w144
doe and mv:ng mllorwhuc fcea~erivd ofat k.a! 60J.y>. Dolwlaue e1Wl have m Ilabdlryp
Ownernn seaport ofaudt serrnurtloru
7. OPIM ONS OF CDN STRUC170N COST. Arty opinion of tarlstnrttial coats prcprad
6t' Donohue u supplied for the general guidme Dime Owner only.5kce Dvrohuc has m
control over eompedlive bidding m mwket tolydltiouf, Domhm cannot Stwtae die
accuracy of such op:niors m corrpaled m contrast bids ar afros! tetra M Owner.
& REIATTONSHIPTO CONTRAGfpR3.DwnlaodWlserve as OwrKr'SprofeNiaW
reptesenuriva mr me Scmcea, old may make rem-----_'- --_ b Owrrw collCdldng
actions rcledog m Dwrur's tmtrectom. Ibmhue specifically disclaims any authority m
Jirett or yupervee me mpns,methods. kclml1'qquef, sseeqq~~mes ceprocedurts afamabtedlen
rtlected m usedby Oxmer's contrecsars. Donahueneitllerguarantm mcpMmrwlceaferry
conatrfsrim conaatmt nor efsumn reapwsbildy forory canvsetar's failure m pvformm
ar5ordnree wim Are co[ntrltcli0n Wntratr dtu:mlml~
9. CONS'IRUCTON REVIEW. For projecn invoving emslnecfiYq Owxr
ackmwledge dot urrder geryrelly aceeged pmfeesimel pracNte, intefprelatipu of
tomlrncdm dmununy b me field pe normal!)' required, od that perfomwse of
crostructim-related services by me deign pmCesalaml far the prajeet pmniy moo ce
omiseiore m be identified old torracted n rornparadvely low cwt. OwrlK agep b held
DonahYe hsmflau boor arty deima reaWtin{ Prom pesfomurux: of mostructiov~dakd
profeaiorul envicea by parwns vMn duo Donohue.
10. DJSURANCE. Donohue will mainmio Prafesknal Linbiflryry Commercial Gnserel
JJabiliry,Aumrrobile, Workei aCampeneyvn,and Employer's Liabilirymsvrwseosverage
in amouma in actordana wiM Icgal and Domhue's business reg9VUfeny. I)orwhls ehsll
provide b Owns mtipcate demmatrnting such coverage upon requet. Fa projects
involving cansmactim, Owner FpCes m prooect Ilorwhui s intereal5 throY{h appopriaae
property and liability inawame, old m requirt i4 cmanwCrion emleemf, ifory, m include
Domhm as an addidanel insured on Gmtrador'e policies relating w the Pra~ect DomMse'a
coverages rtferenceA above shall, in sorb woe, bealass overtontractorspnrrerynowage.
11. INDEMNffICATION. pamhue shall indermify old apvehemlwpwnv fiao od
sg6insl loss, Ilahiliry,claims, aid damages susuinedby Owen due to bodily injury adesm
tv pnsvns ar damage to mngible prapetty b dta pknt caused 6t' the wi11Gl mistatlduet ar
mgligelux o[Iromlute, its a{enu, or amp!%'xa
Tv the fulkm utem permitted 6t' law, Owner shell defend, indemnify and pve hamlkar
Domhue, iu steno, employee; sect rcprtsroWive tram pd ageimPloa, liability, c4ireq
end damages (mcludillg rcasowbk ptorneys' and rortsulmrNa' ffeeeeas) arising fimnartlWng
male PmjM in airy waY, exeep m me etml that each lose, liability, elaime ce damage R
caused 6t' the willful mlaconmrct a negligence ofDonohue, it' agent' ceempkyees.Owrler
also agrees m regnirc iu ronstruclim contractor, if any, to imlude DonohW u n:
e) indcmnitce under any illdemniNeetim obligetim m Owner, pfd 6) addidosW irtRecd
Indtf iu Commncial General Liability pdicry.
Tn me mllest extent pertained by law, Owen sbell indemnify. defelyd, end hold hoedes
Ibnahue, its cmploym, agrny, and rcpresentadves, and Doltohue's SubtansalWlts, Born
and against any Ivss, liability, claims and damage calsedby, arising outof,ce rcsWdlrgfiou
the preaerlce ra the Project site ofasbesnrs, PCBs, petrolewo, haxaldow aubamses, a ply
other pollutant orconuminen4 as those terms arc defilred in penmrnt (edersl, state, and kcal
laws, except m me enfant Aut the W.sti, liability, m damages art tweed wkly by the wI11G1
misumdwy u negligelux ofDmohto, its a{eau a emphsyses.
12. LIhgTAT1ONS OF LL4BILITI'. No mmH,sharchplder,printipal,employeeceagent
o(Domhue shall have ildividunl liability tvOwrur, od Owrurnwerenyod agree op m
sue oiy such individwl in ronnecdon with the Serritea under IFdt Agseement
Owner agrtes tha4 to the Itlllest exirnt permigedbylsw, PrasoMfe's foul liability la Owner
Poe any and all injuries, claims, loam, expeuu ce dorrege wMisoever arising out of a m
any way rtlwed w the Project or mis Agreerrlent fivm art)' pose Intl W)iag, bYtpd limited
to, Domhue's negligence erorrs, amassiens, strmt liabihry, a leech of cuntrxr, shall test
exceed the mtalromp,.-nutkn received by DanohuelusdermisAgremssnt IfUnterdwees
a limit of liabihry ~eala' than that provided abvvq Owner and Donohue shall tltcNede in
Pan N of this Agreement the amolw of such Nrrtit and dre addifiorul mtapouaNon b be
paid b Dpohue for assumpim of such addihaml risk
1N NO EVENT AND UNDER NO CDrCVMSTANCE3 SI[ALL DONOHYIE B&
LIABLE TD OWNER FOR CONSEQV&NFL11r INCmFNFAL, INDIRECT.
SPECIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAt;'6S,
l i. O W NE RSHIP AND AEl15E OF PROJECT DOC7RvS W'rIS. M'---- od Date
dclivnehles, k all media. prtpwed by n m behalf of Dorwhue m Comtxfion wIM ms
Agrennwlt are inftmKny ofservice, and 17ortahne shall hold mecvpyright b and YI Deno
ownership sM property inleRau k such imtllalreob of service. Owner shall rot teYSe airy
sack documrny or othcrdelivmbks pena~ning q meProjxt Caranypulpoaeomer dmmss
far which loch document' ce delivmbkY were origimllyprepued Oxr¢r eluu notnlaea
allow Ax .Ileradm of each docwtcrly ar deNverahlu wimoul writoe verifiudoe end
approvol by bor.ahue Poe the specific purposektealded, mdpry almrionby Umershallhe
n the Owner's wl<risk.Own~r agrees to defend, utdemdN and AWd Mmfkm Dondwa
from all claims, danuges, old expemn (imludilrg Ir stprrleys' and Wllplltaau'
feet), arising mt of such reuse a darstlm by Owner ce omen Krisry through Owirer.
14. ELECTRONIC MEDIA. Copies ofdocmterw Mat mayherciied upon byDwnvor
limied m printed espies Mal eK signed sad aeakd 6t' Donohue. Files or infottnulm in
electronic media oe furnished 6t' P[.aohua m Owns wkly fat trenverrkruz of Owrld. If
then is s diw'tpemy between electrook file ofd prnsed eopiea, the printed mpiea govam.
Repast data ataed in electonic Media format rn deteriaale of be srodifled, the Owner
agrees k perform acnpteme test' within li0dsys. Domhlle wiu ndhercspoulble mcwrtn
any errors ce far maimerlpKa ofdocfumny inekaronie meths Ibrrrlsl after Ale aaxpwp
p°rkd
15. AMENDMENT- This Ageenrrent, upon gteeutim hY 6dh perdu hereto, ms bs
emended Dory 6t' a m:np inatlumcnt slpred 6t' both pasties, exttp u pfevMad m
Pangraplt Z
Id. SUGCESSORS, BENEFICIARIES AND ASSIGNEES. Thor Apeemnet dWl 6e
bindieg open and imerc m me benefit of Are nursers, eduinietlemra, exewmn, surxsecea,
od Igal ttpfasenwivu of the Owner and Doltohlte.
The right' era obligations of M& Agreement plllyd be asigrled by either pasty widpnl~
wri rtes pamvv ion of the other party. This Agreement d W 16e birrding rpm aM war m the
benefit of any pemritted aesi{oeea
17. NO THIRD•PMTY HENEFICUUtY. Nomiog cornailkd nthis Apewrurll,mrtha
peAbmrame of meprutie hcreYlyder, is Intended m6eoefi4nor 6hJ1 irture m the benefit of,
arty mind poly, including pwtur'e wfrutnsfim conkacsora. if arty.
]& STATUTE OF LudifATION. Tv drc Mlkst ukx permined 6t' Gw, pertus agree
me4 except Car claims Pnr irdemnifieelion, the time period for bryn{illg oWms undrp Mies
Agreement dull spirt one yar aRn prajectmrpletion
19. DISPUTE RF,SOLLf170N. Owrer and Dmohae shAl proWde writtgt ltoyp of
dispute within a rcasanable time and after are event giving rise k tlrc displute. Owrtx pfd
Donohue agree m nrgodau any dispu4 between mom k good him for • peliodaC30 dey6
following such rwtite. Oumn a nd Dmohlae may epee b suborn any dlf pee k tlladla4m ar
6inding obitratim, ben dying fo sMll not hcrequnedar • pesequiwte b ildtiadn{ a kvawR
to mfaste Mu Aercemuft.
20. CONI'ROLLWO LAW. This ApxmNatugovenud 6t' the kwafiheadtemwhich
me Pmjed it lapsed.
21. NO WAIVER No weivn 6t' either paM1y of any de(eWt 6t' me other pony of Ma
performanp of Dry peniw to secdm of this Agrcemrnt ahd l toys! idau wt' ether eectim of
mis Agrurrtcm a operate as a waiver of any Gture defaWL whether like ar dilfnent in
Cherecur.
22. SEVERABILITY. The voimstems, proWsiam odmwatoryht+ein mnWnnd ahsu
6e deemed to be aeparey and severable, and the invalidity orunenfatnbilirysfpfyofthan
shell mt affect w impair ate validity or enfmcebiliry ofthc rcmavtdef.
23. AVCHOAITY. The persons signing mis Agreement wstrptl Met they hsv'e Iles
authority k sign ss, or m behalf of the pory [or whom May oe aig9mg.
24. St1RVIVAL.Allexpess rcprcsuudons, isxkrmdficpims pfd limiWiau vPliability
inelnded in Mu Agreemrnt will elevive in wmpkhm or tcrtnulaGCe for soy roam.
Onfe: August 2004
q ~~~
Hutehinson Ci Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55330.2322
320.587-SISIlFax 320.234.4240
C
M. E 1VI O R~ N D ~.) M
C~
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: john P. Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
RE: Consideration of Ordinance Revising Sewcr Rates related to BOD Surcharge
BATE: February 17, 2005
Attached is a letter proposed to be sent to TiTI regarding the BOD surcharge rates associated witlt
sanitary sewer service. This charge applies to larger industrial users in the community. Based on
concerns raised by li1T, we have reviewed our sanitary sewer rate structure, and agree that this
particular rate is out of line with other comparable communities. We are proposing to change this
rate as noted in the letter, which would require an Ordinance.
We recommend approving proceeding with the rate change, and the required Ordinance and
Public Hearing.
cc: Creryplotz-City Administrator
Kent Exner-City @ngintxr
Randy DeVries-Director of WatedWas[ewater
Flared oa recycled paper .
~c~)
C
C~
Heidi Swisher
Hutchinson Technology hlc.
40 West Highland Park
Hutchinson, MN 55350-9784
Hutchinson Cit Center
171 Hassan Strxt 56
HntcNnsow MN 55550.2522
320.587.5157/Fu 920.139-424(1
Re: City of Hutchinson BOD Surcharge hates
Dear Heidi:
We thank you for the opportunity to meet with you on February 14'" to discuss the BOD surcharge
issue.
Based on our review, we agree with you that the BOD surcharge rate of $0.43 per pound is higher
than the current BOD surcharge rates of many communities in the area, and it appears to create a
competitive disadvantage for development and expansion in Hutchinson. As we noted at our
meeting, we understand that our whole sewer service charge system is due for a major review and
needs to be updated. In the interest of providing a more competitive BOD surcharge rate in
Hutchinson, and providing a timely and affirmative commitment to HTI, the City is proposing to
revise the BOD surcharge to a maximum rate of $0.32/lb., pending approval by the City Council.
We will have the ordinance drafted to complete this change for the next Council meeting on February
22nd. This new rate would apply to all sewer users in the City, and is proposed to take affect on July
1, 2005. A Public Hearing and two readings of the ordinance would be required. We are hoping that
this proposal will address your desire for an immediate and specific response from the City, while
giving us time to look at our whole rate structure. Also attached for your information are the meeting
minutes that were prepared by Scott Xoung of EarthTech.
Please lct me know if this addresses your concerns. 1 can be reached at 583-8765 if you have any
questions or cornmellts.
Sin
i
P. dcberg, P.
Director of Public Works
Copy: 7o)m Yates,ll Cl
Dick Higgins, HTt
dory Plote, City of Hutchinson
Steve Cook, Mayor -City of Hutchinaan
Randy peVries, City of Hutchinson
• Mom Stbora, City of Humhinson
Scott Young, EalthTeeh
eiwasmrremluad ww oad,aye pem,~a-n-0s leaer m rrri tram c~ Re uoo surawvgaaoc
pdnled as rxycled war - `_
~.i
February 16, 2005
r
L
G
City of lutchinson
Iutchinson Municipal Airport -Sutler Field
Maintenance Operations
1400 Adams St SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234219 Fax (320) 234-6971
To: Honorable Mayor & City Council members
From: Chuck Brill, Acting Chair --Airport Commission
Subject: Private Hangar -Request by Mr. Tim Miller, Hutchinsot
MR. TIM MILLER'S 15S 1>.~E'.
Mr. Miller called on February 15, 2005 m complain about decisions made at the February 14,
2005 Airport Commission meeting.
He stated, that in his opinion, the Airport Conunission had granted him the first available private
hangar lot in July 2004. He stand that he had no knowledge he was required to submit
application for a conditional use permit. His understanding was that the City would apply for the
conditional use permit and that ha had 18 months firm July 2004 to complete construction of the
hangar. .
Upon hearing his complaint, City staff recommended that he appear before the City Council,
since they are the ruling authority. This issue was obviously a concern for Mr. Miller. I believe
his intent is to have an authoritative ruling on this matter.
AIRPORT MISSION I
bn July 2004 the Airport Commission granted preference to Mr. Miller aver RAM Builders of
Winsted, who had inquired first about building a private hangar, because of Mr. Miller's
affiliation with the airport. He has aircraft based on the field and occupies two enclosed hangars.
The Airport Commission wanted someone local to have the first preference of building a private
hangar, if at all possible.
City staff sent both RAM Builders and Mr. Miller information regardvtg the lease, a checklist of
actions/activities that were required and information about drainage and building placement.
TI{DA, the airport engineers, were consulted to determine proposed floor elevations for the first
two building spaces closest to the terminal.
Neither party contacted the City for specific instruction or information until December 2004. In
December 2004, Mr. Dooley asked about building a private hangar. Mr. Dooley was sent the
same information as Mr. Miller and RAM.
Subsequently, at the February 14, 2005 meeting a request was made by both Dooley and Miller to
be considered for a conditional use permit for construction. The Airport Commission considered
the earliest application first.
q cG)
February 17, 2005
F1L4T41sJLOF THIS ISSiJE:
. Over the past several years, the Airport Commission has discussed private hangar development. Funding for public
hangars had become increasingly difficult to get. The Commission's goal waste have hangar development at the
airport. In 2001, Commissioners received a request from Joe Dooley to consmuct a commercial-grade private hangar
that had office space, a bathroom and floor drains. There were several hurdles that needed ro be jurrWed to allow this
developmenf-
First, since this was a private building on public property, the perception was that there needed to be a franchise
agreement between Dooley and the City. The maximum length of a franchise is 20 yema.
This small time frame did not meet with Dooley's approval, so Airport Commissioners met with the Charter
Commission to have them consider extending the time of a franchise far private hangars beyond 20 years. In
subsequent research, the City Attorney discgvered a state statute that allows for the development of private hangars an
public airports with leases allowed up to 99 years.
In order For any buildings to be built, a conditional use permit was needed. So, because [he airport is City property, the
City applied far and received a conditional use pemdt for the area where commercial-grade hangars would be built.
The pemut was For athree-year term At that point, due to other issues, Joe Dooley withdrew his request to build a
corranercial-grade hangar.
Commissioners continued to discuss and plan fox private hangars, opening up two designated areas. One area, under the
existing C1IP, was fox commercial-grade hangars where busincsscs, oificca, reafroortl8, etc. would be allowed. A
second area was designated for general-aviation hangars, which would be for aircraft storage. No water and sewer
utilities would be allowed in general-aviation hangars. Lease documents were drafted and somt basic guidelines were
prepared regarding development in these areas.
In the aummcr aF 2004, RAM Builders, Winsted, who had built several private hangers at Winsted Airport, inquired
about canstmding ageneral-aviation hangar at the airport.
Subsequent to RAM 9u(lders inquiry and before the next Airport Commission meeting in July 2004, Tim Miller had
. also inquired about conshvcting ageneral-aviation private hangar at the airport. At the July 20 meeting, discussion was
held by Airport Commission. Because Mr. Miller had rrntal hangars and aircraft at Hutchinson, the Airport
Commission granted the first tat to Tim Miller under a motion made by Lux and seconded by Brill. The Airport
Commission understood that progress would be made toward construction after the 2004 constmdion season, as it was
understood Mr. Miller intended to use the services of a family member in the building industry.
Subsequent to the meeting, both Mr. Miller and RAM Builders were scot infrrmation by airport atatf; including the
Icasc document, a lease checklist, and information regarding the proposed grading and floor elevations of private
hangars. City staff had no contact with either RAM Builders or Mr. Miller until the February 2005 meeting. Airport
staff had reported that neither party had taken action at Airport Commission meetings after July.
]n December, Joe Dooley inquired regarding constmction of a general-aviation hangar at the airport. City staff was
directed to send Dooley appropriate information. At that time, Dooley was sent the same packet of information that
RAM and Miller had received in the summer.
On January 10, 2003, ]ce Dooley filed for a conditional use pemrit to conslmct his general-aviation hangar. l~ January
25, 2005, Tim Miller filed for a conditional use permit to construct his hangar. Both parties indicated construction an
the first lot, nearest the terminal building.
Oa February 14, 2003 the Airport Commission recogniud Ioe Dooley's application first, because he had applied for
the conditional use permit first and granted him authority to build on the first lot. Mcf3raw, second by Kephart, made
the motion. There was a roll call vtne with one dissenting vote.
The Chair of the Airport Commission then asked Mr. Miller whether he wanted action taken an his application. Mr.
Miller indicated he did want his application to be considered. Motion was made and unanimously approved. Mr.
Miller then inquired whether he would be able to build anywhere on the lot defined for construction of general aviation
private hangars.
Mr. Miller then initiated a discussion of whether he could occupy Ice Doaley's hangar upon his completion of a private
hanger. Past practice for oceupying the largest hangars included giving up two other hangers, which left either Tom
• Parker or Mr. Miller with the potential for Dooley's hanger. Mr. Parker indicated that be was not interested in
occupying Daoley's hangar.
9 ~~~
Alternative Downtown Streetsca a Pro osal
Background:
Currently there are four lights per block downtown. Problems with the lights and internal
wiring have been identified, However, while current underground wiring is somewhat old, there has
been no real history of problems with underground wiring,
The original streetscape proposal requires major sidewalk work to install a fifth light per block
and moving the existing lights so all are equally spaced, in addition to related work. This sidewalk
replacement would be done even though the vast majority of the existing sidewalk is in good condition.
The cost of the original project would place an estimated $1.3 million tax burden on the general
city taxpayers, in addition to assessments on Main Street property owners. At the same time this would
require the city to substantially exceed our annual bond debt target for 2005. Keep in mind that the
local cost of the Hwy 7 project is still unknown, but will be significant in 2006 and possibly 2007.
Alternative Proposal:
Replace the existing lights with the new style lights and refurbish the traffic signal poles. In the
future when Main Street is reconstructed, then the sidewalks can be replaced, the fifth light per block
can be added, and other associated work can be completed.
Advantages:
• Addresses the most pressing needs: replacing the current lights and increasing lighting in
downtown.
• Estimate 40% increase in lighting downtown since each pole will have two lights versus the
. current one light per pole (based on estimated 60% increase of original plan).
• Enhances downtown and adds to hometown character per downtown plan.
• More pedestrian friendly lighting.
• Less costly: Using previously estimated costs, this alternative would cost approximately
$400,000 versus $1.7 million for the original proposal.
• Less assessments on downtown property owners now.
• Less costly to general city taxpayers now.
• Annual bond debt target maintained better.
• No need to. replace perfectly good. sidewalk. - - - - -
• Less disruption to downtown businesses,
• Coordinates major disruptive activity with another major project in the future.
• Potentially frees up money for other downtown projects in the more immediate future.
• Since current underground wiring is in conduit, sections of bad wiring should be able to be
replaced without major sidewalk work, if necessary.
• MnDOT might share in cost of future streetlight work and sidewalk replacement.
• Helps to facilitate new decorations downtown.
• Work could be done before other events take place downtown this summer.
Proposal:
In addition to the original proposal, seek bids for replacing the existing lights with the proposed
acorn lights and refurbishing the traffic signals. This way the city council will have more information
to use when making their ultimate decision.
C~
~~a)
t
Hutchinson Cit Center
C
711 Hassan Sheet 3R
Hutchinaon,MN 55350-2322
320.587-315X/Fax 320.234.4240
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz ~[,ti~a~
DATE: February 18, 2005
SUBJECT: Establishing Monthly Council Workshop
The City has a number of topics that need discussion over the course of the next year. A few
examples of near-term communication needs include:
- Follow-up to 2005 Visioning Session
- Updates of water plant projects
- Updates of hospital privatization project
- Follow-up on liquor store project
- Follow-up on downtown lighting project
- Discussion of 2006 budget project
- Periodical reporting by directors
C~
One way to address these communication needs would be to set a monthly workshop date. 1
would suggest the first Tuesday of each month at 5:3D p.m. This would be an informational
discussion type format, with an agenda, taking place in the Council Chambers.
R;a~ao~i~~~-
~ [e)
FORM A.F. 4 -Notice to Clerk of Meeting of Board of Appeal - "Equellzetlon Miller/Davia Co., St. Paul, MN
OFFICE OF COUNN A55ESSOR
Tp THE CLERKOF THE OF 13u hi^s^^
COUNTY, MINNESDTA:
J
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the ". -:= ~ ~~ __ day of Mss , ~Q45
Year
at x:30 o'clocl~M., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Appeal
(Sulks Put Onal
in your C1ts fvr said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided 6y
Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.03, you are required to give notice of
said meeting by publication and posting, no later than tan days prior to the data of said meeting.
Given under my hand this. 31st day of Jannerv _ -, 2005-
. Year
County Assessor
County, Minnesota
"Applies only In Cities whose charters provide for a Board of Equellxetlon.
Filed in my office this
day of
Year
Clerk
1~J
WAgNIN~: UNAUTHpgIZEP CAPPING OF 11115 FORM PROH161iE~-ICiENl11NEAIw~ PflINTEO FOPS HAVE A BLUE eORpER)
1 C~
C
Hutchinson City Center
YYl naavan 8tnv:t SE
HuMhlnson, MN gg3g0.2522
320-587-5151/F'ax 320.2344240
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRAM: John P. Rodeherg, Director of Public Works
Dan Hattcn, Director of Police Services
)2E: Cvnsiderativu of Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Plans and
Specifications For Emergency Generator Upgrade (Letting No. 16/Project No. OS-18)
DATE: February 18, 2005
• The Police and );ngineering 1]epartments have prepared plans and specifications to allow for bidding
of the upgrade nl'the emergency generators for the Police Department Building and the Recreation
Center. This will include refurbishing the generator received from Hutchison Area Health Care and
installation at the Police Department Building, and relocating the existing Police generator to the
Recreation Center, which acts as the Emergency Congregate Care facility. This work is included in
the Ciiy's CIP and the 2005 budget.
We recommend approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertising for bids.
cc: GnryPlul~-CityAdministrntor
Kant Gxner - Cily Cngineer
DultMuon - nirector of PROF.
I•iiutcd nn mcyclM papcr-
I c(~~~
~~
C~
R55APPYRV CSV20000Vp CITY OFHUTCHINSON
By Check Num ber AP Payment Re islet with Voids
Check Date
_ 02115/2005 __
Gk Date GL Date Type Check # Vendor _ _
Name Amount
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127759 " 104022 EVEN-TEMP CONSTR
UC
TION 13,800.00
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK _
127760 102526 _
_
G & K SERVICES 1,523.31
_ 02/15/2005
-~ 02/15/2005 PK 127761 _ 113200
~ ~ GREAT NORTHERN BARK COM _
1,2$7.00
- ~ _
0215)2005 02%15%2005 PK _
127762 _ 102319 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH C _
35.00
0_2/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127763 _ 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 157,314.03
w..
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127764 102489~ MCLEOD GOUNTY GOURT ADM 340.00
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127765 119345~ MINNESOTA CHAMBER BUSIN 1,089.00_
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127766 102649' MPCA 240.00
02/15/2005 02!15/2005 PK 127767 102490 _
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 127.79
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127768 102052 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. 5,369.23
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 _
PK _
127769 _ 105266 RESERVE ACGOUNT_ _
~ W~ _ 1,666.00
02/15/2005 02/15%2005 PK 127770 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 10,797.29
02/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127771 1211
42 STACEY, NICK 440.00
~~~~~~p2/15/2005 02/15/2005 PK 127 ~
772 "~ _
120795
SUPER GROUP PAGKAGING & _
14,999.33
-~
209,027.98
Account N a#
209,027.98
~ v~r~,wvz~C~-P~ S a-1S-~S
r~
LJ
C~
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
02/22/2005
WATER/SEWER NIN DEPT OF REVENUE-USE TAX
GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE-SALES TAX
H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE-FUEL TAX
LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE-NOV SALES TX
$83D l .00
$436.00
$1846.20
$21322.00
r~
L J
C~
R55APPYRV CITY DF HUTCHINSON
8y Check Number AP Payment Re ister with Voids
Check Date 02/22/2005 -
Ck Datg Type Check # Vendor Name Amount
02/22/2005 PK 127773 ' 121152 3D SPECIALTIES 1,436.50
02/22/2005 PK 127774 120672 A.L. JORDAN INC. 189.42
02/22/2005 PK 127775 121153 AALDERKS, LINDA 24.00
02/22/2005 PK 127776 102202 A8D0, EICK & MEYERS 1,590.00
02/22/2005 PK 127777 102126 ACE HARDWARE 74.26
02/22/2005 PK 127778 102217 AEM MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC 582.60
02/22/2005 PK 127779 110188 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 3,690.98
02/22/2005 PK 127780 101943 ANALYTICAL PRODUCTS GROUP 143.00
02/22/2005 PK 127781 111041 ARROW TERMINAL LLC 14179
02/22/2005 PK 127782 102260 ASHBROOK 373.80
02/22/2005 PK 127783 102480 B. W. WELDING 630.49
02/22/2005 PK 127784 102969 BARKEIM, ELDEN 10.98
02/22/2005 PK 127785 101925 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 58.45
02/22/2005 PK 127786 102367 BELLBOY CORD 752.50
02122/2005 PK 127787 118505 RENNIN, BRADLEY 67.00
02!22/2005 PK 127786 101816 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 208.65
02/22/2005 PK 127789 120738 BERTELSON'S 321.18
02/22/2005 PK 127790 121144 BEST W ESTERN KELLY INN 313.60
02/22/2005 PK 127791 119212 BLOCK FARMS & TRUCKING 2,475.00
02122/2005 PK 127792 101987 BRANDON TIRE CO 215.67
02/22/2005 PK 127793 103349 BRAND? GARMET LETTERING 1,508.13
02(22/2005 PK 127794 113808 BROWN, JOHN 8.30
02/2212005 PK 127796 110184 BULLERT, DOROTHY 50.00
02/22/2005 PK 127796 121088 BUSHMAN, RAQUEL 127.00
02/22/2005 PK 127787 102136 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS 1,415.86
02/22/2005 PK 127798 102458 C & L DISTRIBUTING 21,390.20
02/22/2005 PK 127799 104512 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE 339.20
02/22/2005 PK 127800 104391 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 469.24
02/22/2005 PK 727801 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 251.81
02/22!2005 PK 127802 110865 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES INC 58.00
02122!2005 PK 127$03 120257 COLLIER TOW LE 7URELY MARTIN 7U 6,832.00
02/22/2005 PK 127804 121154 CORBY, SUE 24.00
02/22!2005 PK 127805 102484 CORPORATE EXPRESS 274.02
tl2l22/2005 PK 127808 103123 CRONATRON WELDING SYSTEMS INC 549.47
02/22/2005 PK 127807 102050 CROW RIVER AUTO 738.13
02/22/2005 PK 127808 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 75.00
02/22/2005 PK 127809 102220 CROW RIVER PRESS INC 152.18
02/22/2005 PK 127810 121037 CROW RIVER TITLE GUARANTY INC. 10,000.00
02/22/2005 PK 127811 102121 CROW RIVER VET CLINIC 370.82
02/22/2005 PK 127812 104884 CULLIGAN 26.50
02/22/2005 PK 727813 102186 CULLIGAN WATER COND 37.28
02/22/2005 PK 127814 104377 CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES 141.38
02/22/2005 PK 127815 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3,083.40
02/22/2005 PK 127816 119437 DEHN, PETER 60.00
02!22/2005 PK 127817 115025 DELANEY-SMITW, SHERYL 5.00
02/22/2005 PK 127816 113181 DROP-N-GO SHIPPING, INC 109.58
02/22/2005 PK 127819 121101 DS PERFORMANCE GROUP 375.00
02!22/2005 PK 127820 102647 DYNA SYSTEMS 1,751.44
Joid Amau
~~
02/22/2005 PK 127873 102208 JEFF'S ELECTRIC 133.85
02/22/2005 PK 127874 120695 JENSEN, BRIAN 140.00
02/22/2005 PK 127875 102558 JDES SPORT SHDP 141.92
02/22/2005 PK 127876 101938 JOHNSDN BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 18,249.63
02/22/2005 PK 127877 105436 JOHNSON, DIANE 5.00
02/22/2005 PK 127878 103697 JOHNSON, JEAN 12.00
02/22/2005 PK 127879 102346 JOHNSON, LEONARp G. 812.76
02/22!2005 PK 127680 110507 JUNGCLAUS IMPLEMENT INC 28$.50
02/22/2005 PK 127881 102555 JUUL CONTRACTING CO 816.00
02/22!2005 PK 127882 105154 KILIAN,ERIG 100.00
02/22/2005 PK 127883 102123 KRISHNAMOORTHI, CHITRA 8.78
02/22/2005 PK 127684 121134 KUHN, MATT 5.00
02/22/2005 PK 127885 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO 10,943.28
02/22/2005 PK 127886 101991 LAKES GAS CO. 544.14
02/22/2005 PK 127887 104259 LANG'S DLD FASHIONED MEAT MARK 166.46
02/22/2005 PK 127888 105525 LANG EpUIPMENT OF NORWpOD 444.05
02!22/2005 PK 127889 127102 LE CORDON BLEU 570.00
02/22/2005 PK 127890 102563 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 240.00
02/22/2005 PK 127891 121135 LEIBFRIED, DANA 5.00
02!22/2005 PK 127892 121138 LEIBFRIED, SHAWN 5.00
02/22/2005 PK 127893 101974 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC 3,440.25
02/22/2005 PK 127894 120903 LEXISNFXIS 110.00
02/22/2005 PK 127895 114894 LIVERMORE-COSTA, SUE 50.00
02/22/2005 PK 127886 118506 LJUNGREN, ALEX 60.00
02/22/2005 PK 127897 101984 LOGHER BROTHERS INC 15,544.17
02/22/2005 PK 127898 102564 LOGIS 132,587.49
02/22/2005 PK 127899 102571 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC 1,583.50
02/22/2005 PK 127900 102987 MAKI, CONNIE 10.70
02/22/2005 PK 127901 121137 MANDERSCHEID, ROD 5.00
02/22/2005 PK 127902 102093 MANKATO MACK SALES 110.91
02/22/2005 PK 127903 102573 MGLEOD CppP POWER 2,050.46
02/22/2005 PK 127904 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 519.00
02/22/2005 PK 127905 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 78.00
02/22/2005 PK 127906 103046 MCLEOb COUNTY RECORDER 19.50
02/22/2005 PK 127907 107831 MCLEOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 45.00
02/22!2005 PK 127908 1037$3 MCLEpD PUBLISHING INC 117.00
02!22/2005 PK 127909 116868 MDT 1,271.75
02/22/2005 PK 127910 1D56fifi MECA 270.00
02/22/2005 PK 127911 112400 MENARDS - HUTCHINSON 737.84
02/22/2005 PK 127912 121156 MICKA, DAVID 12.00
02/22/2005 PK 127913 103000 MID-MINNESOTA DEVELDPMENT COMM 1,532.88
02/22/2005 PK 127914 102425 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. 1,483.00
02/22/2005 PK 127915 119912 MIELKE, AARON 155.00
02122!2005 PK 127916 102318 MILLERBERND MANUFACTURING CO 395.54
02/22/2005 PK 127917 105274 MINNBLUE DIGITAL IMAGING 50.00
02/22!2005 PK 127918 119858 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY pF 761.78
02!22/2005 PK 127919 101947 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR &INDU 20.00
02122/2005 PK 127920 107947 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR &INDU 10.00
02/22/2005 PK 127921 101826 MINNESOTA pEPT OF NATURAL RE5O 237.00
02/22/2005 PK 127822 102582 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 93.11
02!22/2005 PK 127923 120800 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL 302.00
02/22/2005 PK 127924 101935 MINNESOTA SECTION AWWA 125.00
L..J
•
02/22/2005 PK 127925 105157 MINNESOTA SHREDDING 54.95
02/22/2005 PK 127926 120948 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 105.00
02/22/2005 PK 127927 102581 MINNESOTA U C FUND 1,109.77
02/22/2005 PK 127928 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA8 486.00
02/22/2005 PK 727929 121160 MN VAC 75.00
02/22/2005 PK 127930 104583 MOBILE VISION INC 96.30
02/22/2005 PK 127931 102655 MODERN MAZDA 106.50
02/22!2005 PK 127932 120788 MRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 55.00
02122/2005 PK 727933 104988 NAGEL, JOSEPH 100.00
02/22/2005 PK 127934 116854 NEMITZ, MARY 8.00
02/22/2005 PK 127935 102180 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 372.79
02/22/2005 PK 127936 702591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 768.06
02/22/2005 PK 127937 119452 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP 560.48
02/22/2005 PK 127838 103014 OFFICE 1 ONLINE 63.99
02/22/2005 PK 127939 102490 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 555.08
02/22/2005 PK 127940 102155 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO. 25.44
02!22/2005 PK 127941 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 282.90
02/22/2005 PK 127942 120790 ONE CALK CONCEPTS, INC 402.80
02/22/2005 PK 127943 115471 PAFFEL, MARIANNE 25.00
02/22/2005 PK 127944 101932 PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING 2,052.00
02/22/2005 PK 127945 101853 PHILLIPS W INE & SPIRITS 13,408.83
02/22/2005 PK 127946 102373 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 53.31
02/22/2005 PK 127947 105587 PLEAA 30.00
02/22/2005 PK 127948 105587 PLEAA 30.00
02/22/2005 PK 127949 102445 POSTMASTER 162.00
02/22/2005 PK 127950 119857 POWERPHONE, INC 567,00
02/22/2005 PK 127851 101882 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP CO 45.00
02/22/2005 PK 127952 102588 QUADE ELECTRIC 978.68
02/22/2005 PK 127953 108861 QUADE'S INC 1,480.00
02/22/2005 PK 127954 102212 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 3,735.19
02/22/2005 PK 127955 102052 QUALITY W INE & SPIRITS CO. 4,884.25
02!22/2005 PK 127956 117434 R & J TOURS 266.00
02/22/2005 PK 727957 102604 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 169.46
02/22/2005 PK 127958 121138 REBHOLZ, MICHELLE 5.OD
02/22/2005 PK 127959 102432 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 155.54
02/22/2005 PK 127960 103830 RELIABLE 26.55
02/22/2005 PK 127961 102358 RIDGEWATER COLLEGE 780.00
02/22/2005 PK 127962 104149 RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS 175.9fi
02/22/2005 PK 127863 101993 RMS 754.08
02/22/2005 PK 127964 112358 ROBERT MICHAEL'S & CROW RIVER 2,000.00
02/22/2005 PK 127965 121145 ROBERT MICHAELS & SIMMONS DRYW 829.26
02/22/2005 PK 127966 121146 ROBERT MICHAELS & WATER STREET 3,852.81
02/22/2005 PK 127987 120939 ROBERT MICHAELS HAIR SALON & R 1,085.00
02122/2005 PK 127968 120940 ROBERT MICHAELS HAIR SALON & S 2,509.94
02!22/2005 PK 127968 120941 ROBERT MICHAELS HAIR SALON & V 1,024.00
02/22/2005 PK 127970 120942 ROBERT MICHAELS HAIR SALON & W 980.00
02/22/2005 PK 127971 102225 RUNNING'S SUPPLY 43.46
02/22/2005 PK 127972 1 D5D87 RUTLEDGE, LENNY 67.07
02!22/2005 PK 127973 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 792.54
02/22/2005 PK 127974 121157 SCHIRO, JAMES 24.00
02/22/2005 PK 127975 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 173.80
02/22/2005 PK 127976 109801 5COTTSWINDOWS 42.60
C~
C~
r~
02/22/2005 PK 127977 120908 SEVEN COUNTY PROCESS SERVERS L 37.50
02/22/2005 PK 127978 102609 SHOPKp 126.98
02/22/2005 PK 127979 102610 SIMONSON LUMBER CO 1,369.37
02/22/2005 PK 127980 102106 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 214.00
02!22/2005 PK 127981 102611 SORENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS 30.89
02/22/2005 PK 127982 105424 SOURCE ONE SUPPLY INC 189.33
0222/2005 PK 127983 120410 SPECIALTY WINES 248.00
0222/2005 PK 127984 105084 SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL 6,248.59
02/22/2005 PK ~ 127885 102041 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO 1,217.30
02/22/2005 PK 127986 102747 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMEN7INC 257.81
0222/2005 PK 127987 102812 STANDARD PRINTING 525.27
02/22/2005 PK 1279$$ 102744 STATE OF MINNESOTA 100.00
02/22/2006 PK 127989 119799 STEVE'S OK SERVICES 2,433.50
02/22/2005 PK 127890 104829 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS CO 702.90
02/22/2005 PK 127891 105075 T.I.P. INC 510.00
02/22/2005 PK 127992 102859 TEK MECHANICAL 578.00
02/22/2005 PK 127883 102396 THECO INC. 5,624.52
02222005 PK 127994 121158 THOMAS MACHINE CO. 875.00
02!222005 PK 127995 113698 THUL, NATE 10.00
02/22/2005 PK 127998 119159 TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION 1$1.34
02/22/2005 PK 127997 103096 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEM 1,995.71
02/22/2005 PK 127998 102620 TRI CO WATER 87.52
02/22/2005 PK 127999 118214 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS I 11,948.93
0222/2005 PK 128000 102619 TVJO WAY COMM INC 889.88
02/22/2005 PK 128001 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 532.06
02/22/2005 PK 128002 102625 UNITED LABORATORIES 585.97
0222/2005 PK 128003 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 437.69
02/22/2005 PK 128004 102419 VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON 29.2$
02/22/2005 PK 128005 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 293.05
02/22/2005 PK 12$QOfi 101857 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 52.84
02/22/2005 PK 12$007 121147 VSS-VERTECH SOLUTIONS & SERVIC 63.85
02/22/2005 PK 128008 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 307.10
0222/2005 PK 128009 102165 WELCOME NEIGHBOR 60.00
02/22/2005 PK 128010 110738 WESTMOR INDUSTRIES, LLC 522.92
02/222005 PK 128011 105258 WILKENS INDUSTRIES 3,810.61
02222005 PK 128012 102452 WINE MERCHANTS INC 70.00
02/22/2005 PK 128013 110031 W ITTE, SARA 36.45
02/22/2005 PK 128014 119211 WORK CONNECTION, THE 4,209.6$
0222/2005 PK 128015 119724 W RIGHT COUNTY 16,000.00
02222005 PK 128018 102832 XEROX CORP 1,134.13
02/222005 PK 128017 103849 YORK INTERNATIONAL CORP 1,465.00
02222005 PK 128018 121139 YOUNG, JOYCE 55.00
02/22/2005 PK 128019 121140 YVARRA, ROBERT 5.OD
02222005 PK 128020 105571 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO 169.11
456,297.61
AccounT Nu
456,297.61
i