The URL can be used to link to this page

cp04-26-2005 cAGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION -Rev. Greg Nelson, Bethlehem United Methodist Church 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 12, 2005 (b) BID OPENING MINUTES OF APRIL 19, 2005 Action -Motion to approve as presented 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES FROM APRIL 5, 2005 2. HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD MINUTES FROM MARCH 15, 2005 . 3. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM MARCH 15, 2005 4. CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 5. CITY OF HUTCHINSON GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 6. CITY OF HUTCHINSON WATER/SEWER/COMPOST/RECYCING/REFUSEFINANCIAL REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 7. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. RESOLUTION NO. 12701 -RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12702 -RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (5000 PALLETS, CONCRETE CRUSHING AND BAG FILM) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 12703 -RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY (c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. CONSIDERATION OF A 20-LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS PARK MEADOWS AND A REZONING FROM R4 TO R3 LOCATED IN HUSKI ADDITION SUBMITTED BY SAND COMPANIES WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12692 AND WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING • AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. OS-0404 FOR MAY 10, 2005) 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION OF EASEMENTS TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -APRIL 26, 2005 • TEAHOUSE/GARDEN SHED OVER THE EASEMENT LINE LOCATED AT 1125 WEST SHORE DRIVE SW SUBMITTED BY LAVONNE HANSEN WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. OS-0405 FOR MAY 10, 2005) 3. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW DRIVE-THRU SERVICE WINDOWS IN THE C3 DISTRICT REQUESTED BY CHRISTIAN OCHSENDORF WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. OS-0403 FOR MAY 10, 2005) 4. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE SUBMITTED BY LOWELL WRIGHT LOCATED AT 1325 JEFFERSON STREET SE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12694) 5. CONSIDERATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 9 SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON (EXTENDING DENVER AVENUE) WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12695) 6. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT SUBMITTED BY TOM WIPRUD LOCATED AT 257 GAUGER STREET NW WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12697) (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TAXI CAB LICENSE RENEWAL FOR QUALITY TRANSPORTATION (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ON-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL FOR HUTCHINSON HUSKIES BASEBALL ASSOCIATION AT VMF PARK (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF MOTORIZED GOLF CART PERMIT FOR DONALD TONSBERG (g) LETTING NO. l 0, PROJECT N0.05-12 (PLAZA 15 PARKING LOT) -ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT, RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT (h) LETTING NO. 17, PROJECT NO. OS-19 (MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE) -ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT (i) LETTING NO. 10, PROJECT NO. 04-12 (AIRPORT - NAVAIDS SERVICE ROAD AND HANGAR APRON) -APPROVAL OF ESTIMATE NO. 2 (j) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING -RAILROAD REMOVALS AND TARTAN PARK ENTRANCE ROAD (k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OFMEMORANDUM OFUNDERSTANDING -GOLF COURSE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, PROPOSED EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS (LETTING NO. 8, PROJECT NO. OS-10) (1) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PURCHASING ENDOSCOPY EQUIPMENT AS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Action -Motion to approve consent agenda 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. -NONE •7. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -APRIL 26, 2005 (a) DISCUSSION OF SOLICITORS LICENSES AS REQUESTED BY BRUCE HUMPHREY Action - (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NASH FINCH AND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR EXPANSION OF LIQUOR STORE (TABLED FROM APRIL 26, 2005) Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (b) CONSIDERATION FORAPPROVAL OF RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH MIDWESTTAE KWON DO FOR RELOCATION FROM THE LIQUOR STORE EXPANSION SITE (TABLED FROM APRIL 26, 2005) Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ACCEPTING FIRE SAFETY HOUSE GRANT Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (b) PRESENTATION BY GARY PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, ON ADDITIONAL 2005 CITY COUNCIL OBJECTIVES (FROM 2005 VISIONING SESSIONS) . Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ADOPTING SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR HOSPITAL PRIVATIZATION TASK FORCE Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR MAY 24, 2005 Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve ]0. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS 12. ADJOURN • MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER'- 5:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION - Due to the absence of Rev. Greg Nelson, Bethlehem United Methodist Church, the invocation was dispensed. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 22, 2005 (b) BID OPENING MINUTES OF APRIL 8, 2005 Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. HUTCHINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 28, 2005 2. MOTOR VEHICLE MONTHLY REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2005 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 • 4. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2005 5. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH 2005 6. PARKS, RECREATION, COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 7 AND MARCH 7, 2005 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORINANCE NO. OS-0400 -ORDINANCE REVISING SEWER RATES RELATED TO BOD SURCHARGE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 2. ORDINANCE NO. OS-0401 - ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF MUNICIPALLY O WNED REAL PROPERTY TO THE SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 3. ORDINANCE NO.OS-0402 -ORDINANCE VACATING UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS IN LOTS 1 - 6 AND LOTS 13 - 20, BLOCK 2, BLOCK 4 AND BLOCK 5, SOUTHFORK RIDGE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 4. RESOLUTION NO. 12668 -RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS S WMF ADDITION SUBMITTED BY SOUTH WEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAYS 7 AND 15 5. RESOLUTION NO. 12681 - RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PLACING THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON WASTEWATER FACILITY ON THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND • 6. RESOLUTION NO. 12682 -RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (iJNLEADED GASOLINE) ~i~~ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-APRIL 12, 2005 7. RESOLUTION NO. 12690 -RESOLUTION APPROVING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM MIDCOUNTRY BANK 8. RESOLUTION NO. 12691 -RESOLUTION APPROVING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM HOME STATE BANK (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR THE COUNTRY STOP TO SELL PRODUCE IN THE RUNNINGS FLEET & FARM PARKING LOT (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY RECYCLING PERMIT FOR CAN MAN 2 (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVALS AND PERMITS FOR THE 62"d ANNUAL HUTCHINSON JAYCEE WATER CARNIVAL FOR JUNE 13 - 19, 2005 (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF APPOINTING JOHN LOFDAHL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNTIL MARCH 2010 (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH MARVIN WILLHITE (h) LETTING N0.16, PROJECT NO.OS-18 (EMERGENCY GENERATOR UPGRADE) -ACCEPTING BID & AWARDING CONTRACT (i) LETTING NO. 6, PROJECT NO. OS-20 (2005 AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS) (j) LETTING N0.6, PROJECT NO.O1-19 (ROLLING MEADOWS) - CONSIDERATION OF ESTIMATE NO.4 (k) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT N0.03-01 (DALE STREET & 2ND AVENUE SW) -CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 • (1) LETTING NO. 3, PROJECT NOS. 03-05, 03-06, 03-07, 03-08, 03-09, 03-11, 03-22 (2003 PAVING IMPROVEMENTS) -CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 AND ESTIMATE NO. 5 (m)LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO.03-12 (EDMONTON AVENUE) -CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 (n) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR HUTCHINSON FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2005, AT THE HUTCHINSON FIRE STATION (o) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR JOHN RODEBERG TO WASHINGTON D.C. FROM JUNE 7 - 9, 2005 (p) RETAIL ON-SALE, NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR (3.2 BEER) LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS ^ LITTLE CROW BOWLING LANES (HUTCH BOWL) ^ SKY VENTURES (PIZZA HUT) ^ MEADOWLINKS GOLF CLUB (q) RETAIL OFF-SALE, NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR (3.2 BEER) LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS ^ COBORN'S INC - CASHWISE ^ SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA ^ ERICKSON'S DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION (ECONO FOODS) ^ PHILLIPS 66 • ^ WALMART SUPERCENTER Items 5(b)1, 5(f), and 5(i) were pulled for further discussion. 2 y~~} CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -APRIL 12, 2005 .Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to approve consent agenda with the exception of Items 5(b)1, 5(f) and 5(i). Motion carried unanimously. • Item 5(b)1 was discussed further. John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, stated that an overall sanitary sewer rate study has been completed. This rate study has helped determine whether or not the proposed BOD surcharge rate is in line with the other rates. The consultant that conducted the study stated that it would be appropriate to make this rate change which was at the request of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated, a major industry in the city. Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve Item 5(b)1, second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. OS-0400. Motion carried unanimously. Item 5(f) was discussed further. Council Member Arndt asked for more information on John Lofdahl. Mayor Cook noted that Mr. Lofdahl is a general contractor who has lived in Hutchinson since 1989 and is highly involved with the Crow River Habitat for Humanity. Mayor Cook further noted that seven applicants applied for the open seat on the Planning Commission and he felt that a general contractor's expertise would be a great asset to the Planning Commrssion. Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen to approve ratification of Mayor's appointment of John Lofdahl to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Item 5(i) was discussed further. John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, stated that these airport improvements aze annual improvements. Because of jet fueling costs, staff is proposing that this project be divrded into two, with the jet fueling system being a sepazate project. This is being proposed due to the possibility of lack of funding for jet fueling and ensuring that the other improvements move forward. Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve Item 5(i), Letting No. 6, Project No. OS-20. Motion carried unanimously. ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. (a) LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. OS-07 & OS-08 (MICHIGAN AVENUE NE & SE AND RAILROAD CROSSING/STREET MAINTENANCE) -ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner explained that the first project, OS-07, is to rehabilitate Michigan Street, which will include milling the entire surface to a 2" thickness, removing and replacing severely deteriorated pavement to full depth of existing section; remove severely cracked and settled concrete and curb and gutter, mudjack moderately settled concrete curb and gutter, repair failed sanitary sewer pipe in two areas and overlay entire surface with 2" thick bituminous. The second project, OS-08, will entail removing railroad crossing and applying thin overlay. Discussion was held regarding the project timeline, the condition of the underlying structure and other projects that might cross Mrchrgan Street. The City will pay for 50% of the rehabilitation on Michigan Street, the sanitary sewer repairs, railroad crossing removals and thin overlay maintenance activities. Total estimated project cost is $266,500. Eric Knutson, Lynn Card Company, presented before the Council. Mr. Knutson asked about accessibility during the rehabilitation. Mr. Rodeberg stated that haulers and employers should not have problems accessing the building during the rehabilitation. Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to close public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Cook asked if there is a possibility of getting funding from the railroad for removing the tracks. John • Rodeberg stated that Dakota Rail had indicated at one time that reimbursement may be made for such a thing, but he wasn't necessarily confident that would occur. However, a meeting will be scheduled to discuss this matter. yi~~ CITY CO UNCIL MINUTES -APRIL 12, 2005 Motion by Stotts, second by Arndt, to approving Letting No. 7, Project No. OS-07 & OS-08, adopting Resolution Nos. 12688 & 12689. Motion carried unanimously. ~. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NASH FINCH AND TH&CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR EXPANSION OF LIQUOR STORE Miles Seppelt, EDA Director, stated that Nash Finch is drafting this agreement, however staff has not received the agreement yet. Because of this, Mr. Seppelt is requesting that this item and Item 9(b) be continued to the April 26, 2005, City Council meeting. Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to table action until April 26, 2005. Motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH MIDWEST TAE KWON DO FOR RELOCATION FROM THE LIQUOR STORE EXPANSION SITE Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to table action until Apri126, 2005. Motion carried unanimously. (c) DISCUSSION OF 2005 STREET PATCHING POLICY john Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg stated that the policy has changed in that more emphasis will be placed on maintaining streets in good condition and less emphasis on those streets that are in poor condition. This policy will help in addressing priorities. Streets in poor condition may be at a liability to the City because potholes may remain on the edges of streets. . Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve 2005 street sweeping policy. Motion carried unanimously. (d) DISCUSSION OF 2005 MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg explained that a representative from Clark Mosquito Control had presented at a Council workshop. Larvac~de briquettes have been placed by city staff and will have a major effect on mosquito control. In addition to the briquette application, spraying is very effective, however budgeting and other issues need to be considered. Ifthe City moves forth with the consideration of spraying, public meetings will be held. The cost is projected to be slightly over $2.00 per capita. Mr. Rodeberg reminded the public that the City cannot apply briquettes to private property. (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF APPROVING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SRF CONSULTING FOR FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR HIGHWAY 7 PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS AT SCHOOL ROAD John Rodeberg, Director ofPublic Works, stated that $1 million has been earmarked in federal dollazs. This intersection has been a safety hazard for years. It is requested that a consulting agreement be approved and authorized for SRF to determine the feasibility of an underpass at the intersection of Hwy 7 and School Road. Based on preliminary information it appeazs that funding will be received, however it may be a reduced figure. Mr. Rodeberg stated that ifthis project is incorporated into the Hwy 7 reconstruction project, he is hoping it will be at a lower cost. Motion by Amdt, second by Stotts, to approve engineering services agreement with SRF Consulting. Motion carried unanimously. • (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING A CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TO IDENTIFY CORE/ESSENTIAL SERVICES ~t~~ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-APRIL 12, 2005 Mayor Cook noted that this workshop should be scheduled to aid with the 2006 budgeting session. . Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve setting City Council Workshop for Apri127, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. - 12noon. Motion carried unanimously. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Cook noted that Mariachi Fiesta Restaurant had applied to renew its liquor license. All paperwork has been turned in as required. Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve renewing Mariachi Fiesta liquor license. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Cook noted that he would like to appoint Janet Vacek and John Paulson to the Hutchinson Public Library Board to Apri12008. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to ratify the Mayor's appointments to the Library Board. Motion carried unanimously. Marc Sebora -Mayor Cook noted that he has received a question asking if the sale of the hospital could be put to public vote. Marc Sebora stated that the City Charter does not authorize the sale of the hospital, however the City Charter could be changed via citizen petition. Mr. Sebora stated the various ways the Charter could be revised. General discussion was held regazding the process of privatizing the hospital. Council Member Stotts stated that there are several questions to be answered and this will be a slow-moving process. It was noted that the Privatization Task Force will set a town hall meeting in the near future Casey Stotts -Council Member Stotts asked Miles Seppelt on the status of State Theatre. Mr. Seppelt stated that it is progressing well and will open soon. The only items remaining are finishing work, such as seating, flooring, and the screens. Mr. Seppelt guessed it could possibly be opening in May. Mr. Seppelt stated that the Hutch Hotel could be opening m May as well. Ken Merrill - Mr. Merrill stated that last week a Senate Tax Committee approved increasing the City's LGA funding by $500,000. This bill will be presented later in the legislative session. John Rodeberg - Mr. Rodeberg noted that currently there is no funding for the dam reconstruction. However, staff is working with the federal government for funding and hope the project will coincide with the Hwy 7 project. An open house was held last week on the Hwy 7 protect and was attended well with several positive comments. Julie Wischnack - Ms. Wischnack stated that work is being done on the Harrington-Merrill House. Pieces ofthe house are being removed and a new foundation is being put in. Ms. Wischnack noted that the funding for this project is being acquired by Historic Hutchinson. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve claims, appropriations and contract payments. Motion carried unanimously. 12. ADJOURN Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to adjourn at 7:05 p.m. • ~-t ~0.~ MINUTES • BID OPENING LETTING NO. 17/PROJECT NO.OS-19 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE APRIL 19, 2005 1'~1 U • Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Dan Pellinen, Architect - Tushie Montgomery and Melissa Starke, Recorder Gary Plotz, City Administrator, called the bid opening to order at 2:02 p.m. Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of the Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 17, Project No. OS-19. Mr. Plotz noted that the City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and to waive any informalities and irregularities as signed by Gary D. Plotz. The following bids were opened and read: Dammann Construction Inc. Glencoe, Minnesota Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid $1,264,350.00 (15,500.00) $1,248,850.00 Ebert Construction Corcoran/Loretto, Minnesota Gopher State Contractors, Inc. Rice, Minnesota Greystone Construction Company Shakopee, Minnesota KUE Contractors Inc. Watkins, Minnesota Nelson Construction Company Willmar, Minnesota Shingobee Builders Inc. St. Cloud, Minnesota TDJ Construction Inc. Waconia, Minnesota Base Bid Amount Alternate #1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate # 1 Total Bid Base Bid Amount Alternate #1 Total Bid $1,264,046.00 (6,514.00) $1,257,532.00 $1,073,621.00 59,700.00 $1,133,321.00 $1,168,700.00 36,931.00 $1,205.631.00 $1,217,337.00 (38,500.00) $1,178,837.00 $1,274,500.00 18,500.00 $1 293.000.00 $1,092,933.00 38,275.00 $1,131,208.00 $1,310,850.00 (38,000.00) $1,272,850.00 ~,~ ycb~ • Weber Inc. Base Bid Amount $1,197,000.00 North St. Paul, Minnesota Alternate #1 47,000.00 Total Bid $1,244,000.00 Wilcon Construction Inc. Base Bid Amount $1,174,800.00 St. James, Minnesota Alternate #1 39,500.00 Total Bid $1,214,300.00 The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation. The bid opening adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Steven W. Cook, Mayor ATTEST: Gazy D. Plotz, City Administrator • r~ L ~~~~ ~~~ MINUTES BID OPENING LETTING NO. 17/PROJECT NO.OS-19 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE APRIL 19, 2005 Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Dan Pellinen, Architect - Tushie Montgomery and Melissa Starke, Recorder Gary Plotz, City Administrator, called the bid opening to order at 2:02 p.m. Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of the Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 17, Project No. OS-19. Mr. Plotz noted that the City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and to waive any informalities and irregularities as signed by Gary D. Plotz. The following bids were opened and read: Dammann Construction Ina Glencoe, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,264,350.00 Ebert Constnrction Corcoran/Loretto, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,264,046.00 • Gopher State Contractors, Ina Rice, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,073,621.00 Greystone Construction Company Shakopee, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,168,700.00 KUE Contractors Inc. Watkins, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,217,337.00 Nelson Construction Company Willmar, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,274,500.00 Shingobee Builders Inc. St. Cloud, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,092.933.00 TDJ Construction Inc. Waconia, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,310,850.00 Weber Inc. North St. Paul, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,197,000.00 Wilcon Construction Inc. St. James, Minnesota Base Bid Amount $1,174.800.00 C~L~~ The bids were refereed to staff for review and a recommendation. • The bid opening adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Steven W. Cook, Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator ~~~ HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES • The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on April 5, 2005, at the Hutchinson Police Department Emergency Operations Center. Present at the meeting were Barry Anderson, Donna Baysinger, Tom Schwartz, Human Resource Director Brenda Ewing, Chief Dan Hatten, and Lt. Dave Erlandson. The meeting was called to order. Chairperson Barry Anderson asked if there were any changes to the minutes from the last meeting. A motion was made by Tom Schwartz, seconded by Donna Baysinger, to accept the minutes as stated. Motion carried. Chief Hatten informed the commissioners that the eligibility roster had been exhausted. He stated that one individual had taken a job in Mankato; one turned down the offer and chose to stay where he was and the third individual had issues arise during the background phase. Chief Hatten stated he would like to advertise for the full-time officer position. Brenda Ewing handed out to each commissioner a copy of the packet used by human resources when a position is advertised She stated that an ad would be placed in the Hutchinson Leader, Minneapolis Starlfribune, placed on the city's web site as well as P.O.S.T., Work Force and League of Minnesota Cities. It was stated that the city normally advertises for a minimum of 10 days and this position would most likely run for 30 days. The advertisement would stated that the individuals would need to be eligible to be licensed by September 1, 2005. This allows for graduates to go through skills if needed • and take the licensing exam. A motion was made by Donna Baysinger, seconded by Tom Schwartz, to proceed with the advertising processes. Motion carried. The next item on the agenda was to discuss the testing of the applicants. As had been previously discussed the department needs to obtain a new entrance test for officers due to the fact the company previously used by the department had gone out of business. Chief Hatten stated that the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association reviewed different companies that offer entrance exams and have recommended Stanard & Associates. This company enables each department to choose their level of involvement in the testing process, from having the company do everything to the department doing everything. The level of involvement required of the company determines the cost of the test. A motion was made by Donna Baysinger, seconded by Tom Schwartz, to accept Stanard & Associates as the testing company used by the department. Motion carried. The commission was asked by Chief Hatten as to what dates they would like to schedule where they could discuss their roles and responsibilities as a commission. It was decided that they would meet the 3`d Wednesday of the month for the next three months with the first meeting being May 4~' at 5:30 p.m. (Since the date of this meeting it has been determined that the date chosen wil! not work -new tentative date is May 18~h.) Chief Hatten then updated the commission on several issues within the department. He stated the updating of the policy and procedure manual was still moving forward as well as • the emergency operation plan. The generator project -getting one from the hospital and 5(a~a Police Commission . January 4, 2005 Page 2 give the departments to the rec center -should be complete by late September, early October. The two new dispatchers have gone through training and are working on their own at this time. He stated that he understood the commissions desire to meet the new employees once they are hired and would work on accomplishing this task. He then showed the commissioners the different graphics the department is looking at for new squad cars with the scheme being black and white. Brenda Ewing then informed the commission that the city will be reviewing the comp plan that was developed five years ago and making any necessary adjustments to the plan. Tom Schwartz then asked about the schools and what they have in place for emergency plans in light of the shooting at Red Lake High School. Chief Hatten informed him that. the schools did have plans and that tabletop exercises have been done on days where the district has the two-hour late starts. Donna Baysinger asked how the department was planning on handling the Water Carnival Parade going down Main Street and the 150"' anniversary of the city. Chief Hatten stated that the department has been working closely with both groups and trying to anticipate the needs for the many events. With there being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Tom Schwartz, seconded by Donna Baysinger, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried. • Time.of adjournment was 7:55 a.m. Donna Baysinger • ~aJ ~ Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority Regular Board Meeting - • March 15, 2005 Minutes 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ian McDonald called the meeting to order. Members Present: Becky Felling, and Brig Knott. Staff Present: Jean Wazd, and Judy Flemming. 2. MINUTES OF THE HRA BOARD MEETING ON FEBRUARY I5, 2005 Becky Felling moved to approve the Minutes as written. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 3. FINANCIAL REPORTS Brig Knott moved to approve the Financials. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PARK TOWERS a. Jean Wazd reviewed with the Board the preliminary Resident Satisfaction Survey and Physical Inspection results. Jean will be getting an explanation on how the scores were calculated for the maintenance repair section of the survey. b. Jean Ward updated the Boazd on the Renovation Project. The Preconstruction meeting will be Thursday Mazch 17a'. • c. Becky Felling moved to approve the lowest bidder, B & H Seal Coating, to do the front pazking lot seal cote. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. ROLLING MEADOWS EAST UPDATE Becky Felling moved to approve HHPOP loans #8808 & #8809 on the condition the Loan Review Committee approves the files. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 6. FRANKLIN-GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT UPDATE a. Brig Knott moved to approve the Franklin-Grove Neighborhood SCDP Loan & City Revolving Rehab Loan #8680-21. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. b. Judy Flemming informed the Board that the homeowner at 606 Franklin Street requested to cancel his HRA aided rehab project. Becky Felling moved to cancel Franklin-Grove Neighborhood SCDP Loan & City Revolving Rehab Loan #8680-17. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Judy will send a letter of Cancellation to the homeowner. 7. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM UPDATE Jean Wazd told the Boazd that the owner of the Island View Heights lots agreed to prorate the taxes and the assessments. The Boazd agreed to set the closing date for Apri120, 2005 for the . purchase of the lots for the School Construction Program. ~S~~J~ 8. CONSIDERATION/REVIEW OF CITY COUNCIL MEMO FOR REALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO HRA DOWNPAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Becky Felling moved to submit the memo to the City Council. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 9. Jean Wazd reviewed with the.Board the 2004 Yeaz End Report. 10. HOMELESSNESS -SHELTER PLUS Jean Wazd was invited to a McLeod County Emergency Food & Shelter Program meeting about homelessness in out community. The Boazd discussed the issue and felt that the problem was not only in Hutchinson, but in the surrounding areas too. A needs assessment study was discussed. Jean will get more information a what is incorporated in a study and the costs. 11. MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL AT 8:30AM a. Ian McDonald reviewed the HRA 2004 Year End Report with the City Council. b. Jean Ward review with the City Council the Memo for Reallocation of funds to HRA Downpayment Assistance Program 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business, Chairman Ian McDonald declared the meeting adjourned. • Rec~rded by Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director Becky • 5 (~Ja MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 15, 2005 Hutchinson City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Brandon Fraser at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson, Mike Flaata, Farid Currimbhoy, Robert Hantge and Vice Chairman Fraser. Absent: Chairman Dean Kirchoff Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Planning Director, Kent Exner, City Engineer, Marc Sebora, City Attorney, John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works and Bonnie Baumetz, Planning Coordinator 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) Consideration of Minutes dated February 15, 2005 Ms. Otteson moved to approve the minutes of February 15, 2005 as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The minutes were approved unanimously. • 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MARVIN WILLHITE, 465 HIGH ST. N.E. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND DETACHED GARAGE OVER 1000 SO. FT. Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 5:35 p.m. with the reading of publication #7298 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on February 3, 2005. Ms. Wischnack commented on the request and explained a Variance was required for a second accessory garage and Conditional Use Permit was required because the new garage would be over 1000 sq. ft. She commented on the site and explained the home is a multi-family residence which has been inspected and approved by the Fire Chief. She stated staff consensus was to approve the Conditional Use Permit for a larger garage and deny the Variance for the second accessory building. She explained the staff would like to see the 16'X16' shed removed along with the 20' x 24' dilapidated garage. Ms. Wischnack noted that drainage is a problem in the area. She commented on the staff recommendations as follows: • Elevation drawings of the building are required. SCG.~3 Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 2 2. A copy of the first page of the abstract is required. • 3. The existing building and new building must meet fire safety codes (see recent inspection information from Fire). 4. Document proposed grades after structure is constructed. 5. Remove existing two detached garages prior to final inspection of the new structure. 6. Removal or relocation of services are at owner's expense. 7. A home occupation is not allowed exclusively in accessory building. 8. The garage must not exceed 16' in height. 9. The building may not be pole constructed. Ms. Wischnack reported the applicant has not provided elevation drawings but he states the building will look similar to the existing attached garage. Mr. Willhite, 465 High St. N.E., property owner, stated he agrees with removing the dilapidated 20' x 24' detached garage. He stated he uses the 16'x16' shed for his gardening business for storage of equipment. The new garage would be for vehicle parking. He would like to keep the 16'x16' storage shed. Ms. Otteson asked Mr. Willhite what materials the new garage would be constructed of and how the garage would look. Mr. Willhite stated very . similar to the existing attached garage. Vice Chairman Fraser asked if the gardening business could be incorporated into the new garage. Mr. Willhite stated all the equipment would not fit in the new building with the tenants vehicles parked in the garage. Mr. Willhite stated there is room on the lot for both buildings. He stated the new building will not exceed 16 feet in height. Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy. The hearing closed at 5:45 p.m. Mr. Hantge made a motion to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the Variance with staff recommendations changing number 5 to state remove the 20' x 24' garage and keep the 16' x 16' shed. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. Discussion followed with Ms. Otteson asking what staff would think about keeping the smaller building. Ms. Wischnack stated the 16' x16' building is too large to be called a utility shed and staff would be uncomfortable with moving an older building. Mr. Willhite stated the building is sturdy. Vice Chairman Fraser called for the motion. The motion carried with 4 ayes and 2 nays (Haugen and Flaata) . Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council regular agenda at their meeting held March 22, 2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. b) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY HERBERT KRIENKE, 456 PROSPECT ST N.E., TO REDUCE FRONT YARD • SETBACK FROM 25' TO 12' FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING NONCONFORMING PORCH ~~~ Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 3 Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 5:50 p.m. with the reading • of publication #7307 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on March 3, 2005. Ms. Wischnack introduced Ms. Crystal Foust, EDA intern, who will present the next item. Ms. Foust commented on the request and the hardship. She stated the house is being updated to be more energy efficient. The addition is to replace the existing porch and will not protrude closer to the front property line than it is presently. She stated the addition will not affect the character of the neighborhood. Ms. Foust commented on the following staff recommendations: 1. Any relocation of natural gas or electric lines or meters will be at the property owner's expense. 2. The structure may not extend closer than the original porch into the required setback. (12') 3. Verify location of water shut off. 4. Side yard drainage shall not be diverted to neighboring properties. 5. If any changes in dimensions of proposed structure change, further consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council is required. (Date received 2/10/05) • Ms. Otteson. made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Flaata the hearing closed at 5:55 p.m. Mr. Flaata made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations noting the hardship of the existing building was constructed before the setback ordinance was in place. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent agenda at their meeting held March 22, 2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY KENNETH BALLARD, 312 STONEY POINT RD., TO REDUCE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 30' TO 28' FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 16' X 20' FAMILY ROOM ADDITION Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 5:57 p. m. with the reading of publication #7308 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on March 3, 2005. Ms. Foust explained the request and the hardship of the unique shape of the lot. She stated the addition would take the place of the existing deck. She commented on the flat lot and poor drainage at the property line. She explained there is a private the along the property line which does enter the catch basin at the northwest comer of the lot. She commented on the staff recommendations as follows: • 1. Relocation of natural gas or electric lines or meters will be at the property owner's expense. ~~r Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 4 2. Verify the existing drainage and provide that the covered structure will not hinder the existing drainage system. (Additional fill to raise the elevation of the site is not allowed.) 3. If any changes in the dimensions of proposed structure change, further consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council is required. (Date received 11/9/04) Ms. Wischnack stated John Olson, Public Works Supt., verified the drainage to the catch basin. Mr. Exner addressed the drainage stating it is a flat lot and it does drain to the catch basin. Ms. Otteson commented on the odd shape of the lot. Ms. Wischnack commented on the construction being on piers and the Variance is for a short corner of the addition. Mr. Haugen made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Ms. Otteson the hearing closed at 6:02 p.m. Ms. Otteson made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations noting the hardship of the odd shaped lot. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be . placed on the City Council consent agenda at their meeting held March 22, 2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LOCATED AT 560 AND 570 HILLTOP DRIVE N.E. AND LOT SPLIT AT 560 HILLTOP DRIVE N.E. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN HOME Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 6:04 p.m. with the reading of publication #7310 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on March 3, 2005. Ms. Wischnack stated this is a familiar request which the Planning Commission has seen before. She reminded the Commissioners of the Jay Pettit request on Hilltop Drive which was the same as tonight's request. She stated Mr. Pettit's building is completed. She explained this request is to-vary the lot area and width in the Planned Development District and to split the lot for a twin home. She stated the garages are appropriated and commented on the following staff recommendations: 1. Each unit must have separate water and sewer service. 2. Parkland dedication is $135.00 per unit and SAC/WAC is $2,490 per unit to be collected at the time of building permit. 3. Garages must be 400 square feet or larger. ~c`J-~ Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 5 4. An additional utility easement must be dedicated to the City • along the eastern portion of lot 7 and the western portion along lot 8. 5. Specific consideration for proper drainage between the units is essential. The property owner will be required to complete appropriate drainage for the site prior to final landscaping and sodding. Mr. Flaata asked if the zoning allows the 6 foot setback. Ms. Wischnack stated a Planned Development District may allow the 6 foot setback and in this case it is allowed. She commented on the drainage problems that do arise with a lesser setback and the owners must be aware of providing proper drainage. Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Haugen the hearing closed at 6:08 p.m. Ms. Otteson made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations number 1-5. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent agenda at their meeting held March 22, 2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, VACATION OF EASEMENTS IN SOUTHFORK RIDGE AND 28 LOT FINAL PLAT OF SOUTHFORK • RIDGE THIRD ADDTIION LOCATED IN THE SOUTHFORK RIDGE PLAT Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 6:09 p.m. with the reading of publication #7311 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on March 3, 2005. Ms. Otteson stated she would abstain from voting. Ms. Wischnack commented on the request to replat. She explained the housing type and the market changes since the area was originally platted. She stated the proposal is to construct patio homes or cottage homes on smaller lots. She explained the housing style is a roving concept but different than the Greens. She commented on staff concerns with the backyard drainage along the south edge of the property. She stated the developer did add catch basins to the plan. Ms. Wischnack stated staff suggested 20' front setback to alleviate some of the drainage concerns. She noted the encroachment of the sidewalks into the easements on the side entry homes and commented on the following staff recommendations: 1. The maintenance agreements (homeowner's documents) be updated to add the conditions of sidewalks may be removed in the side entry units and replacement would be the • responsibility of the homeowner's association. (These ~~~~ Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 6 documents must be completed and executed before the City • will allow the plat to be filed.) 2. The legal descriptions on the homeowners documents shall be amended to reflect the new plat. 3. The setbacks for the units shall be as follows: Front: 25 feet (20 feet on 3-6, Block 1 and 1-4, Block 2) Side: 8 feet Rear: 10 feet 4. The drainage improvements must be verified with engineering staff prior to landscaping improvements. 5. An irrigation plan drawing shall be provided to the City, after construction. 6. The replatting of the property does not release the developer from previous commitments made during platting. Ms. Wischnack explained the term "as-builts". Mr. Charlie Levis, Farr Development, stated they are excited about the product and would answer any questions from the Commission. Mr. Haugen made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy the hearing closed at 6:15 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Flaata. The motion carried with Ms. Otteson abstaining. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City • Council consent agenda at their meeting held March 22, 2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. f) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS SWMF ADDTION SUBMITTED BY SOUTHWEST MN FOUNDATION LOCATED ON THE SW CORNER OF HWYS 7 AND 15 AND CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITED LAST MONTH Vice Chairman Fraser opened the hearing at 6:17 p. m. with the reading of publication #7312 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on March 3, 2005. Mr. Haugen stated he would be abstaining from the vote. Vice Chairman Fraser commented on the ordinance regarding the C5 District and stated discussion on the architectural design would be open for any public present who did not discuss the item earlier. Ms. Ristau, Southwest MN Foundation, commented on their meeting the seven recommendations and stated they have invested in the community with the purchase of this property. Mr. Lee Tollefson, Rafferty, Rafferty, Tollefson Architects, commented on . his new presentation for completeness. He stated they are still working with MNDOT to resolve some grading issues and will submit the MNDOT ~~~ Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 7 grade when they are available. He stated the sewer line will be relocated. • The forester is in agreement with the landscaping plan. He explained they are in the process of platting the property to one lot. He commented on the parking which will be 38 stalls with the acquisition of the railroad property from the City. He reported MNDOT would not allow the northern 4 spaces. Mr. Tollefson commented on the building exterior and the angled roof on the entry. He stated the windows on the roof of the building were to bring light into the building and for out of town visitors to locate the building. The windows will be high energy rated windows. Discussion followed on the setback of the building from Hwy 7 after the new construction of the road. Ms. Wischnack stated the plan shows a 26' setback and after the Hwy 7 project the setback could be 11' to 16'. Mr. Flaata questioned the landscaping and tree placement being the same as required for other businesses along 3r° Ave. Ms. Wischnack commented on the requirements for commercial and industrial businesses. She stated screening is reviewed on a case by case basis however the requirement is still one tree per 800 sq. ft. of area. She explained in this case the boulevard tree planting will be extended to 2007 because of the Hwy 7 construction. She explained the differences in screening between the I/C and C5 Districts. Discussion followed on public safety issues. • Mr. Hantge stated concern with the proximity to Hwy 7. Ms. Wischnack stated there was some discussion on snow removal. She stated the majority of the building will be away from the setback. Mr. Tollefson stated they adjusted the building from the north to the south and they are more comfortable with the adjustment. Ms. Otteson commented on the traffic at the intersection and the safety of the building being so close to the intersection. Mr. Tollefson stated 100 feet seems a safe distance. Mr. Steve Jensen stated they did meet with the engineers to discuss the safety issues. Mr. Rodeberg stated the building does meet the setbacks from the intersection from a engineering standpoint there doesn't seem to be a problem with the placement of the building. Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy the hearing closed at 6:36 p.m. Vice Chairman Fraser made a motion to recommend approval of the request for Preliminary and Final plat and Conditional Use Permit with staff recommendations removing recommendation number 6. Seconded by Mr. Currimbhoy. Te motion carried 4 ayes, 1 nay (Otteson) 1 abstained (Haugen). Ms. Wischnack • stated this item will be placed on the City Council regular agenda at their meeting held March 22,2005 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. 5C~J3 Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page S 4. NEW BUSINESS a) RECONFIRM PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONSIDERATION OF THE 102 LOT FINAL PLAT OF SUMMERSET THIRD ADDITION SUBMITTED BY ARNE ESTERBROOKS, DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY Ms. Wischnack commented on the request to plat and explained the preliminary plat was approved over six months ago (8-24-04) and would need to be reconfirmed. She commented on the staff recommendations as follows: C~ 1. A grading subdivision agreement has been signed and securities are in place. Prior to additional work (i.e. utilities) the subdivision agreement must updated to include the additional construction. 2. Securities for the development grading have been received. Additional escrows and securities will be required prior to construction of utilities. 3. Additional review comments from the City Engineer shall be followed. 4. A Trail Easement must be filed for the 10' bituminous trail extension from Edmonton Avenue. This Trail Easement will cover the Drainage & Utility Easement between Lots 9 & 10. 5. Provide an additional trail easement along Denver Avenue, to increase the separation for the street and the trail. Ms. Otteson made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Haugen the motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be forwarded to the City Council consent agenda for their meeting on March 22, 2005 at 5:30 p.m. b) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED 29 LOT FINAL PLAT OF BRIDGEWATER ESTATES THIRD ADDITION SUBMITTED BY GPS DICKINSON Ms. Wischnack commented on staff concerns on South Grade Road and explained that 9"' Ave. will extend to Honey Tree Rd. and Willow Street will not access South Grade Road. She explained Honey Tree will also not access South Grade Road in the future. She commented on the finalization by the City Council of a trail on the north side of South Grade Road. She commented on recommendation numbers 3,4,6 and 8 and follows: 3. There are continuing safety issues for people walking in the area. There are open discussion with the developer regarding a trail along the north side of South Grade Road up to the end of the lat in the next phase of construction. This item will be finalized prior to the City Council entering a subdivision agreement. `"` 0.\j • Minutes Planning Commission -March 15, 2005 Page 9 4. The revised plat does show revised 6 foot easements along the interior lot lines and they show 12 foot easements along the front and rear lot lines. The City only requires 10 foot easements in the front and rear. This had been changed, but the new drawings (dated February 11 indicate 5 feet again on the side yard drainage areas. This needs to be changed. 6. A subdivider's agreement must be executed and fees paid prior to construction. 8. Provide revised pad elevation and house types signed by new engineer. Ms. Wischnack stated the County Engineer does not want access of Willow or Honey Tree onto South Grade Road for safety reasons. Mr. Exner stated there is a hill on South Grade Road at the access from Honey Tree which is a serious safety problem. Discussion followed on the interior road connections and the proposed trail. Ms. Wischnack stated there is a trail from Roberts and Lakewood in the Subdivision Agreement. Vice Chairman Fraser made a motion to recommend approval of the plat with staff recommendations number 3, 4, 6, and 8. Seconded by Ms. Otteson the motion carried unanimously. 5. OLD BUSINESS None 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Ms. Wischnack reminded the Commissioners of the upcoming Land Use Workshops. She also commented on the Fall APA Conference in Alexandria. Ms. Wischnack stated the Year End Report is completed and she will distribute them shortly. Elections will be held in April. Discussion followed on the requirement of surveys. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 5~a~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 22-Apr-05 March 31, 2005 • Date Date Interest Of Of Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount US BANK Money Market . 1.43% 11/3/2004 11/19/2008 375,000.00 Smith Barney FHLMC med 4.00% 7/30/2004 7/27/2012 298,500.00 step up Smith Barney FHLB C 4.05% 1/712004 7/30/2009 300,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.375% 9/19/2001 4/11/2005 750,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.180% 9/25/2001 4/19/2005 270,000.00 Wachovia pool 336914 7.226% 12 31 96 02 01 2026 5,746.75 Expected life 6.2 years Smith Barney FHLM -C 4.650% 11/21/2001 5/21/2007 300,375.00 Wachovia pool 336399 7.270% 12 31 96 02 01 2026 4,390.78 Expected life 4.1 years Wachovia FHLB 5.00% 5/22/2003 5/22/2013 300,000.00 Wachovia FHLB 4.00% 6112/2003 6/12/2013 300,000.00 • Wachovia FHLB 1.190% 6/26/2003 06/26/13 400,000.00 Wachovia FHLB 3.000% 7116/2003 7/16/2013 200,000.00 Wachovia FHLB step 3.000% 2/9/2005 2/9/2007 625,000.00 step up Wachovia FHMA 3.000% 8/24/2004 2/25/2008 100,000.00 step up Home State Bank 3.000% 8113/2004 8/13!2005 200,000.00 First Minnesota 2.670% 11/16/04 12/15105 400,000.00 First Minnesota 2.380% 08/17/04 08118/05 750,000.00 Wells Fargo 2.210% 07/16/04 07121/05 750,000.00 Wells Fargo 2.390% 09/16/04 09/16105 750,000.00 First Minnesota 2.580% 11/15/04 11/17/05 750,000.00 ------------------------ $7,829,012.53 • 5~~~~ 200_5_ :.._ - --- March REVENUE REPORT • ,.,TAXES GENERAL LICENSES', ~ ' 2os3al 218 28 ~: _ _ _ ~PERMITSANDFEES 'I -- i _ _ ~~- 29498.16 15,928.39; (INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE i_ _ _ 3tz3ntj 1 _10,657.11 I, -CHARGES F_OR SERVICES _ z3asss a7~ _9_7 820 60 I :FINES&FORFEITS ! 839s 55' 5464.15 __ -SALES _ -251 811 '' _ _ INTERESTL I st35, _ 155.93 ~'. 10 218 108.18 1,482, REMAINING' USED 3,618,290.00 ; _ -_- 0.00°/a . 11 932.90 ' ---- --- 73.42%''.. 244 186.43 16 52%~.. 2,344,306.65 I_ _ - 1.06%!; 1,26408682._ 14.72% 58 517 08 __ 13 95% 0 00 0 00_% _ 54,560 93 ~ -36.45%' ` -r .REIMBURSEMENTS ~, - - -- aszaSTS -- - 9414.37 - - 29735.34 284,063.00 254,327.66 10.47% TRANSFERS i r 6057 a5 _-_ 792.25 4819.00 1,546,000.00 1,541,18100 ---- - 031% -- --- ---------- ~- - SURCHARGES BLDG PERMITS __._.__ 857 55 --__ (738 24) 37.71 ----- (37.71) -- 0 00% 'TOTAL --1 I, -. 378,66627 _ 139,712.84 354112.24 9745,48400 9,391,371.76' 3.63% 2D05~~'~, CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2005 ,March -I 2004, 2005 20051 2005 2005 March !EXPENSE REPORT-GENERAL March March YEAR TO'I ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE. i YTD ATE ACTUAL MONTH D BUDGET REMAINING USED _ 1 ~ i _ _ _ I ~ - - - - OUNCIL 1.001 MAYOR & CITY C 12,93883 5,103.17 13225.72 56,440.00 - 43,214.281 0 23.43/° 002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 61,576 55 ,.. 23,631 00 64 035.63 298,571 DO ~ 234,535 37 I ---- 21.45%~. ~003 ELECTIONS j 42 01 I -- 30.64 i 6,600 00~ _ 6569 36 - 0.46% _ _ j 004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ~ ~ _ 76,430 57 23,571 91 ~ 93 775.22 500,551 001 i 406,775 78 ~. __ 18.73%, j 005 MOTOR VEHICLE- 42,973.27 I _ 1 5,68314. 45,683.40 i 216,62600 ~ 17094280 2109%! . 006 ASSESSING _ _ . _ 46,000 00 46 000 00 ~ 0 00% 007 LEGAL ~ 26,271 56 14 896 51 49 771.98 164,446 00' 114 674.02 _ 30.27%: 008 PLANNING 37,09325 1201672 39963.36 172156.00 132,192.64 23.21°k ~. _ 009 INFORMATION SERVICES 27,229 36 ~ - 10 607 42 32 520.37 176 299 00 143 778.63 18.45%~. ' :110 POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 530,829.86 I 187,039.90 ~ .. 568,197.75 . - 2,595,114 00 _. 2,026 916.25 _ __ 21.89% , , i 115 EMERGENCY MANAGEME N T _ 2,001 81 ~ 953.70 , 966.86 j 12,000 00 11 033.14 8.06%. _ _ _ ~ 116 SAFETY COMMITTEE ~ 601.20 833.92 I 18,94700 _- 18,113.08 -_ 4.40%~ ._ __ - _ - _- '. 120 FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ - 53,177.42 - - -._ 21 408.69. .. 62 827.19 ~ 405,631 00 i 342,803 81 15.49%'. :. 130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 42,970.07 1 15 322.49 42,516.52 226,960 OOj _ 184,443 48 ! 18.73%'. ii 150 ENGINEERING _ _ 113.63 90 67632.46 151,200.05 549,137.00 39793695 ! 2753%, ' 152 STREETS & ALLEYS , 182,861.77 i _ 56 771.61 179,236.891 873,668 00~ 694,431 11 20.52%-. 160 CITY HALL BUILDING 25,313 86 _ 13,482.87 36,475.40 141,475 00 104,999.60 I 25.78% 201 PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTR 38,886 82 ~ 12,089.88 ' 40 756.85 185,712.OOJ I 144,955.15 ~. 21.95%'' .- _._ ,I I, 202 RECREATION -_- - 37,978.63 x - 13,196041- --- 37396.33 - 190,838.00 153,441.67' 19.60%. - '.. 203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER - _ 12,864.90 '. .__ 8,122.01 17,65 0.99 66,828 00 49 177.01 26.41%. -- 204 CIVIC ARENA I ~ -- 93,690.30 43,128 55 ;. _ 96,391 43 - -- 288,549.00 --- 192 157.57 _. '__- 33.41%. _ .- --- __ 205 PARK DEPART M E NT 147,885.83 56,482.74 186,973 95 ~ 879,866 001 692 892 OS '' 21.25%: __ _ _ 206 RECREATION BUILDING 8 POOI 29,963 24 12649 18 26,720.67 119,417 00~ _92 696 33 ~ 22 38%- -- 1 207 EVENTS CENTER 42,507.41 ~! ' 18 446.06 53 208.53 208,930 00~ _155,721 47 ~, 25 47%'. 208 EVERGREEN BUILDING - __ 3,117 00 1 934.13 3 347.30 ----- 14,250.00 10,902.70 '~i - 23.49%' ~ 250 LIBRARY i_ _ --'~, _.. 35,736 52 ----- ~ -- -- 4,100.49 9 289.43 _ _ 155,546.00 146,256.57 ''~ - 5.97%!. 301 CEMETERY _ 20,216.89 __ 7,153.04 ',, 22,926.17 138,442 DO 115 515.83 :_. 16.56% ° 310 DEBT SERVICE I j. 162,441.00 162441.00 000 /a _ 320 AIRPORT i 16,191 53 _ 7,435.81 i 18 706.20 107,494 00 68 787.80 17.40%'. i 350 UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPE 87,250.02 _ 50,049.90 : _ 97 072.04 766,550.001 _ 669,477 96 I 12 66% '. __~TOTAL I - 1,778,112.91 -703510.621 1991,700.79 ~ 9745,48400 7,753,78321 _ __.- 2044%' ' CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT, ' _ _ 2005!; _ 2004 _ 2005_ 2005 20051 2005 March. March March YEARTOI ADOPTED BALANCEjPERCENTAGE' ~~~~ '-. 2005. ',preliminary CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT ' ~ ' arc 2004 2005, 2005 2005 _ _ ~ REVENUE ~ REPORT-GENERAL _ ___ ACTUAL __ March, YEAR TO f ADOPTED _-_ BALANCE ~PERCENTAGEI _ - __ Year to Date, - MONTH'DATE ACTUAL. BUDGETi REMAINING USED I TAXES I ~ ~~ - - 0 00 0.00'. 0.00 3 618,_290 00 3,618 290 00 - 0 00°_/0 ~ LICENSES I ' 20 936.00 ~ 218.28 32 967.10 44,900 00 11 932.90 73 42%~ _ _ '. PERMITS AND FEES , _ 29,488.16 15,928.39 48 313.57 292,500 00 _ 244 186.43 16.52% 'INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 31,237.11 10,657.11 25,229.35 2,369,536.00 2,344,306.65 1.06%. :CHARGES FOR SERVICES 238,839 47 97 820 601, 218 108.18 ~ 1,462,195 00 1,264 086 82 14.72%' 'FINES & FORFEITS ~ 8,399 55 ! 5 464.15'. 9 482.92 68,000.00 5 8 517 08 13 95%. SALES ~, _ __ ._ (251 81 _ 0.00 ~ _ _ 0.00 000 . 0.00 - 0.00%' F _ -- .INTEREST ; __ ( 6,13500 _ 155.93 ~ (14,580.93) 40,00000 54580.93 -36.45%'~ I 49,.245 79_,___ _ 9,414 37. 29,735.34 284,063 00 254 327.66 ; 10.47%. I (TRANSFERS ii 6,057.45 ', 792.251 4,819.00 1,546,00000 1,541,181.00', 0.31% ..SURCHARGES-BLDG PERMITS ~ 85155 (73824)1 _ 37.71 _ 000 _ (37.71)' - 0.00%' ,_TOTAL i ____ _ ____ - -------- _t 378,66827 I _ -~---------- _ _139712.84',i_ _ _ -- 354 112.24 1 9,745,48400 _9_391371.76 363%. _ _ 2005 ~ - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ , ,March 1 2004 I ~~~~ i- 0 20051 ~ 2005 ~~- 2005. March EXPENSEREPORT-G ENERAL - _ ~ Marche _ Ma rch'1 YEAR TOI ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE, ___ - EDP _ _ ~ YTD MONTH DATE ACTUAL I BUDGET REMAINING USED'. .General Govt. _ - 309,869267 --- -118,99274.. 375,481.72 1,779,164.00 1,403682.28 - 2110% -,Public Safety __ -- ', 628,979 16~ 225,325.98, - 675,342.24 3,258 652.00 2 583 309.76 - 20 72°k Streets & Alleys ~ --- -- - 272,975 40 ~ - - - 124 404 07 -. 330,436.94 __. ~ 1,422 605 00 _~ 1,092 368.06 _ 23 22%. Parks & Recreation ' i 462,847 54 1 177 302 12~ 1 494,661.65 2,248,378.00 _ 1,753 716 35 22.00°h: _. . - _ ~ ~ iscel aneous r -_ 103,441 55 _~ 5 _ 115,778 24 1,036,485.00 920 706.76 11 17% _ _ TOTAL - __ 11,778,{12 91 1 _ _ 703 510 62,,, '- 1 991,700 79 1 _~ III 9,745 484.00 7,753 783 21 - 20 44% - ~ _ _I i_ J - t - J _ _ _.__- 4 1- --- _.. _ -- ~ - _._.. ____ ~ __-- --- ~ _. __ _ - . I __.. ___ i _ ---- ___ 1 -- - ~ __ _ _._. _.. -- --- r -. _. - • 5 ~~~` City of Hutchinson _ Income reports -Water Sewer Com ost Rec cling Refuse _ _ 03131105 - Prior Prior -- - Annual Current Year To Budget _ Percent Year Year To Percent _ ~~ Budget Month ___Date Remainin Used Bud et Date Used 404 REFUSE -RECYC _ __ LE - 4001 REVENUES 4100 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVEN UE 160,000.00 -- - 12,303.00 36,909.00 196,909.00 - _ 4450 TOTAL SALES 914,950.00 77,174.53 228,449.94 1,143,399.94 __ __ _ 4001 REVENUES - 1,074,950.00 89,477.53 265,358.94 1,340,308.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6001 EXPENDITURES 6105 TOTAL SALARIES 8 FRINGE BENEFIT 106,539.00 2,182.74 5,531.86 101,007.14 5.19% ___ 6200 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS & MAIN 140,450.00 1,394.71 36,669.38 103,780.62 26.11% 6300 TOTAL CONSULTING 18,500.00 1,201.60 1,254.85 17,245.15 6.78% CHARGES 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & 833,000.00 113,707.40 219,456.15 _ 613,543.85 26.35% _ _ _ 6900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ _ 6905 DEPRECATION 178,540.00 18,179.58 54,538.75 124,001.25 30.55°~ _ _ TOTAL EXPENDITURE 1.277,029.00 ___ 136 666.03 317,450.99 959,578.01 0.25 _ _ _ ~~~ NET INCOME LOSS) - 47,188.50) (52,092.05) _ - n;nt 5,366.00 _ _. other 1,194.15 Non income statement budget ~ Mpis 201,757.28 7000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00% _ _ 208 317.43 V ' ` r1 V • City of Hutchinson _ _ __ Income reports -Water Sewer Compost Recyclin Refuse 03/31/05 Prior Prior - - - Annual Budget Current Month Year To Date Bud et Remaininc - - Percent Used Year Budget Vear To _ Date Percent _Used _ 4005 COMPOST _ _ _ -- 4001 REVENUES _ _ - - 4100 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVEN 4250 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4450 TOTAL SALES UE 32,000.00 650,000.00 1,951,394.00 _ 0.00 _ 1,194.84 219,240.96 12,611.56 1,662.13 __ 347,617.07 _ 44,611.56 651,662.13 2,299,011.07 39.41% _. 0.00% 17.81% _ _ _, __ 4700_ TOTAL REIMBURSEM_ ENTS 4001 REVENUES - 25 000.00 1,976,394.00 0.00 220,435.80 56.40 361,947.16 25,056.40 2,324,067.47 0.23% 18.31% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ 6001 EXPENDITURES 6105 TOTAL SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFIT 6200 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS & MAIN 6300 TOTAL CONSULTING 589,035.00 152,800.00 190 000.00 43,698.70 28,220.84 269.78 10 - 129,907.84 48,853.76 28,120.63 459,127.16 103,946.24 161,879.37 22.05% 31.97°k 14.80% 0.00 _ _ _ , 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 6800 TOTAL COST OF SALES & INVENTORY ADJ , 387,250.00 769,000.00 , 37,274.35 145,636.80 91,833.66 200,842.38 295,416.34 568,157.62 .. 23.71 % 26.12°~ #REF! _ _ _ _,_ _ _ __ _ TAL MISCELLANEOUS _ 778 00 119 297.47 326.86 119,451.14 0.27°k 6900 TO __ 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE _ 6905 DEPRECATION _ . , 18,300.00 106,622.00 __ 252.92 12,860.55 517.13 38,581.66 17,782.87 68040.34 2.83% 36.19% _ _ - _ _ _ ___ __ _ TOTAL EXPENDITURE 2 332,785.00 278,511.41 538 983.92 1,793,801.08 0.23 _ _ _ _ NET INCOME(LOSS) __ _ _._ (58,075.61) (177,036.76) 530,266.39 Non income statement budget anyamai lnwnWry aal usimenl - - -- _.. _ 7000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 103,000.00 33_,346.23 60,2_48.63 42,751.37 __ 14.00°h itREF! _ _ __ _ _ _ 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 78,300.00 _ _ 0.00 63,170.53 15,129.47 80.68% - __ _. 2,435,785.00 311,857.64 599,232.55 1,836,552.45 _ V~ ~/ City of Hutchinson Water Sewer Com ost Rec clin Refuse Income reports - _ 03/31/05 Prior Prior _ Annual Current Year To Bud et Percent Year Year To Percent Bud et Month Date Remainin Used Bud et Date Used 406 WATER 4001 REVENUES - __ __ __ - 4250 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 20,000.00 1,650.00 4,950.00 24,950.00 0.00 4,950.00 0.00 4450 TOTAL SALES 1,572,000.00 106,157.04 311,324.79 1,883,324.79 19.80% 1,255,000.00 281,763.78 22.45 4700 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.90 7.40 7.40 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 _ _ 4001 REVENUES 1,592,000.00 107607.94 316,282.19 -1,275,717.81 19.87% 1,255,000.00 286,973.78 22.87 6001 EXPENDITURES --- 6105 TOTAL SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFIT 292,948.00 23,806.72 74,234.73 218,713.27 25.34% 318,375.00 62,222.3D - 19.54% _ 6200 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS & MAIN _ _ 101,735.00 2,230.08 17,822.99 83,912.01 17.52% 94,160.00 11,717.49 12.44% 6300 TOTAL CONSULTING 2 ,178,500.00 187,924.46 217,652.54 1,960,847.46 9.99% 467,900.00 2,823.76 0.60% 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & C H ARGES _ 228,775.00 28,836.20 57,942.34 170,832.66 25.33% 216,775.00 39,919.79 18.42°k _ _ 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE - 14,745.00 966.46 2,899.38 50,153.29 19.66°k 16,705.00 3,174.38 19.00% -- - 6700 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 60,D00.00 0.00% ~ 57,000.00 0.00 0.00% 6900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 10,400.00 237.50 1,831.12 8,568.88 17.61% . 24,900.00 1,018.50 __ 4.0_9% 6905 DEPRECATION 235,000.00 16,018.39 48,055.16 186,944.84 20.45°h 220,000.00 47,624.31 21.65% 6001 EXPENDITURES 3,122,103.00 260,019.81 420,438.26 2,739,972.41 0.13 1,415,815.00 168,500.53 _ _ NET INCOME LOSS) __ -152,211.87 -104,156.07 118,473.25 _ --- Non income statement budget _ 7000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 14,864,000.00 0.00 19,008.00 14,844,992.00 0.00 2,268,000.00 400.00 C~ City of Hutchinson __ ____ _ _ Income reports -Water Sewer Compost Rec clip Refuse _ _ 03/31/05 Prior Prior _ Annual Current Year To Budget Percent Year Year TO Percent Bud et Month Date Remaining _ Used Bud et Date Used 407 WASTEWATER 4000 REVENUE & EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES _ 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% _ 4450 TOTAL SALES 2,890,000.00 212,610.35 668,372.03 3,558,372.03 23.13% 2,502,000.00 621,313.34 24.83% 4700 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENTS 2,000.00 942.42 962.42 2,962.42 0.00 442.00 4001 REVENUES 2,892,000.00 213,552.77 669,334.45 3,561,334.45 23.14°h 2,502,000.00 622,375.34 24.88% 6001 EXPENDITURES _ _ 6105 TOTAL SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFIT 540,078.00 38,379.92 117,559.15 422,518.85 21.77°k 459,902.00 101,677.85 22.11% IRS & MAIN 6200 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPA 149,000.00 25,300.44 41,794.02 107,205.98 28.05% 181,750.00 69,780.02 38.39% _ 6300 TOTAL CONSl1LTING -- 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES 8 CHARGES 325,000.00 -- 466,850.00 29,077.52 82,996.73 42,824.82 - -- 131,915.64 282,175.18 334,934.36 13.18% 28.26% 349,000.00 444,040.00 39,395.14 174,444.14 11.29% 39.29% 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 162,772.00 12,224.58 _ 36,673.75 126,098.25 22.53% 209,243.00 42,874.20 20.49% _ ~ 6700 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00% 57,000.00 0.00 0.00% _ 6900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 98,000.00 _ 270.76 1,6_20.76 96,379.24 1.65% 23,600.00 6,258.64 26.52% ___ 6905 DEPRECATION 700,000.00 63,396.52 190,189.57 509,810.44 27.17% 700,000.00 184,770.30 26.40% 6001 F~(PENDITURES _ 2,501,700.00 251,646.48 562,577.71 1,939,122.29 2,424,535.00 619,200.29 25.54°h ___ _ NET INCOME (LOSS) ~ _ __ (38,093.71 106,756.74 3,175.05_ _ Non income statement budget _ _ 7000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 3,144,283.00 351 307.17 354,539.45 2,789,743.55 11.28 2,418,500.00 50,774.99 2.10 n~ ~- • • •4115/2005 12:49 PM Final HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Statement of Revenues and Expenses Month and Pedod Ended March 31.2005 CURRENT MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE Over Nnder) Budget Over (Under) Budget ~ VARIANCE Revenue Actual Budget Dollars Percent Acual Budget Dollars Percent March 2004 2005 vs 2004 1 In patient revenue - $3,610,146 $3,669,117 ($58,971) -1.6% $10,583,133 $10,961,707 ($378,574) -3.5% $8,761,969 20.8% 2 Out patlenl revenue 4,852;795 5,117,786 (264,991) -5.2% 13,886,652 15,163,621 (1,276,969) -8.4% 12,003,068 15.7% 3 Resident Revenue ~ 625,281 693,830 (68549) -9.9% 1,824,332 2,010,564 (186,232) -9.3% 1,898,921 -3.9% 4 Total patienVresident revenue $9,D88,222 $9,480.733 ($392,511) -4.1% $26,294,117 $28,135,892 ($1,841,775) -6.5% ~ $22,663,958 16.0% Dismounts 5 GovemmentalBPolicy Discount 4,349,491 4,760,337 (410,846) -. -8.6% 12,888,887 14,143,937 (1,275,050) -9.0% 11,062,365 16.3% 6 Free Care 2,184 6,250 (4,066) -65.1% 2,184 18,750 (16566) -88.4% 6,036 -63.8% 7 Total deducllon from revenue $4,351,675 $4,766,587 ($414.912) -8.7% $12,871,071 $14,162 687 ($1 291 616) -9.1% $11,068,401 16.3% 8 Net patienUresident revenue $4,736,547 $4,714,146 $22,401 0.5% $13,423,046 $13,973,205 ($550,159) -3.9% $11,595,557 15.8% 9 Other operating revenues 85,482 68,505 16,977 24.8% 231,513 209,907 21,606 10.3% 224,592 3.1 10 Nat operating revenue ~ $4,822,029 $4,782,651 $39,378 0.8% _ $13,654,559 $14,183,112 ($528 553) -3.7% $11,820,149 15.5% Expenses 11 Salaries $2,042,463 $1,984,129 $58,334 2.9% $6,040,649 $5,796,674 $243,975 4.2% $5,423,069 11.4% 12 Employee Benefits 595,902 468,237 127,665 27.3% 1,478,905 1,384,279 94,626 6.8% 1,277,140 15.8% 13 Professional and MedicabFees 635,895 652,012 (18,117) -2.5% 1,771,119 7,962,729 (191,610) -9.8% 1,359,951 30.2% 14 Utilities, Mtnce Contracts & Repairs _ 209,094 187,658 21,438 11.4% 635,324 566,321 69,003 12.2% 515,963 23.1% 15 Foad, Omgs&Supplies 672,735 660,851 11,884 1.8% - 7,922,717 1,971,348 (48,629) -2.5% 1,542,261 24.7% 16 Other expense - 166,569 156,565 10,004 6.4% 443,024 463,413 (20,389) -0.4% 391,753' 13.1% 17 Minnesota Care - 57,778 53,508 4,270 8.0% 170,337 160,525 9,812 6.1% 139,792 21.9% 18 Bad debt 58,872 88,507 (29,835) `• -33.5% 164,912 265,520 (100,608) -37.9% 116,753 41.2% 19 Interest 62,962 66,737 (3,775) -5.7% 178,792 200,947 (22,155) -11.0% 123,801 44.4% 20 Depreciation 207,325 225,357 (18,032) ~~:~. -8.0% ~ 597,265 656,625 (59,360) -9.0% 476,407 25.a% 21 Total expenses $4,709,595 $4,543,561 $166,034 3.7% $13,403,044 $13.428,379 ($25,335) -0.2% $11,366,884 17.9% Excess of net opemtingrevenue 22 over (under)operating expenses $112,434 $239,090 ($126,656) -53.0% $251,515 $754,733 ($503,218) -66.7% $453,265 -04.5% Ngnooereting Revenues 23 Investment income ($25,082) $17,271 ($42,353) -245.2% $15,794 $51,813 ($36,019) -69.5% $46,472 -66.0% 24 Other nonoperatng revenue (net) 19,276 19,713 (437) -2.2% 63,578 56,725 6,853 12.1% 51,778 22.8% 25 Plaza 151ncome/(Loss) __ _ 2230 2,735 (505) -18.5% 5,981 7,402 (1421) -19.2% 19,442 -69.2% 26 Total nonoperating revenue ($3,576) $39,719 ($43,295) -109.0% $85,353 $115,940 ($30,587) -26.4% $117,692 -27.5% 27 Net Income $108,858 $278,809 ($169,951) 411.0°h $336,868 $870,674 ~ ($533,806) -61.3% $570,957 -01.0% 28 Patient days 968 1,004 (36) -3.6% 2,928 3,029 (101) -3.3% 2,586 13.2% 29 Resident days 3,434 3,829 (195) -5.4% 10,109 10,517 (408) -3.9% 10,528 -0.0% 30 Percent occupancy - butlget beds -Hospital 52.0% 54.0 % -1.9% •3.6% 54.2% 56.1 % -1.9 % -3.3 % 47.4% 14.4 31 Percent omoupancy-budget beds -Nursing Home 90.1 % 95.2 % - -5.1 % •5.4% 91.3% 94.0% -2.6% -2.8 % 94.1 % -3.0 32 FTE's 496.0 491.0 5.0 1.0% 490.3 491.0 -0.7 -0.2% 463.3 5.8% 33 Admissions(adjusted)-Hospital only 650 650 (O) -0.1% 1,861 1,951 (90) -0.6% 1,597 16.5% 34 Expenses (net) per admission (adjusted) -Hospital only 6,129 5,909 220 3.7% 6,088 5,831 258 4.4% 5,849 4.1% 35 Revenue per admissbn(adjusted)-Hospital ony 12,940 13,440 (500) -3.7% 13,066 13,319 (254) -1.9% 12,942 1.0% 36 Net Revenue per atlmisslon (adjusted)-Hospital only 6,420 6,321 99 1.6% 6,324 8,268 58 0.9% 6,211 1.8% 37 Dismounts asa percent of revenues 47.9% 50.3% -2.4% -0.8% 49.0% 50.3% -1.4% -2.8% 48.8% 0.2% 38 FTE's per 100 admissions (adjusted) -Hospital only 4.8 4.6 0.2 3.7% 4.8 4.6 0.2 4.1 % 5.2 -7.1 % 39 Days in Nel Accounts Receivable (exclud(ng clinics) - 70.9 60.0 10.9 18.2 % 57.8 22.7 % FINSTMNT.xIs Pam Larson • , ~/2 5/0 PM Final HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Comparative Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2005 (A) (e) lA>-(B) MARCH FEBRUARY MARCH Change 2005 2005 2004 CY vs PY ASSETS ti., . Curent Assets 1 Cash and investments-Operations $6;676,461 $7,096,387 $10,719,162 (4,042,701) 2 Cash and inves(ments -Self-Insured ~ 1,682,61d 2 055,025 1,537,700 144,914 3 Subtotal cash &Investments $8,359,075 $9,151,412 $12,256,862 (3,897,787) 4 Pa[ienVResident receivables - 26,072,735 24,160,525 16,996,993 9,075,742 5 Allowances forbad debts. (5,477,278) (5,418,625) (4,337,637) (1,139,641) 6 Advances and coritraclual allovrbnces (10 014 835) (8 864 910) (5 297 958) (4,716,877) 7 Net palienUresNenl aBd lhiM-party 8 payor receivables ~ $10,580,622 $9,876,990 $7,361,398 3,219,224 9 ` 10 Other receivables net 278,179 292,734 260,119 18,060 11 . Invenlodes 1,031,184 1,013,187 725,529 305,855 12 Prepaid expenses ~ 356 171 372,907 244,328 111,843 13 Total Current Assets - - $20 605 231 $20 707 230 $20,848,236 (243,005) 14 Board Des'analed/Funded Deore tattoo investments $5 445 396 $5,433 Ofi6 $8.116,852, (2,871,456) 15 Investment In Joint Ventures $1 119 809 $1 071 125 5885,898: ' 453,911 Plant Assets 16 Land 17 Buildings 18 Accumulated depreciation 19 Buildings less depreciation 20 Equipment 21 Accumulated depreciation 22 Equipment less depreciatien 23 Cash-cansWction 8equipment 24 Constmctbn in progress 25 Total Plant Assets Other Assets 26 Defered financing vests 27 Total Funds r~\1 V -9933830.x1s Pam Larson $1,019,786 $1,019,788 $1,019,788 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Current Liabilities Cunent maludties of Lang term debt Acwun[s payable - bade Estimated wntractual sedlements-net Accrued axpenses- Salaries PTO Interest Self•Insured programs Other Deferred IIab110ies Deferred revenue Total Current Liabilities 34,609,112 34,407,686 27,122,091 7,487,021 (13 810 816) (13 963 906) (12,684,802) (1,126,014} Lon0-term Debt (less current $20,798,296 $20,443,780 $14,437;289 6,381,007 maturi8esl 16,710,756 18,858,267 16,146,036 564,732 (10,677,235) (13,308,192) (12,322,162) 1,844,927 $6,033,523 $5,550,075 $3,823,874 2,209,649 0 0 0 0 3 214 362 4 057,882 7 838,278 (4,623,916) $31,065 989 $31,071,525 $27 119,229 3,946,740 Fund balance $84 996 •$86 037 $98,124 (13,128) $58,321,401 $58,368,983 $56,848,339 1,473,062_ Total Funds (A) (B) (A)-(B) MARCHFEBRUARY MARCH Change 2005 2005 2004 CY vs PY $1,286,065 $1,249,543 $1,232,373 53,692 2,584,942 2,701,474 1,911,079 673,863 1,263,006 1,243,006 1,112,607 150,399 954,874 788,309 782,158 172,716 1,694,528 1,674,517 1,454,640 239,888 134,906 176,608 141,665 (6,759] 462,373 443,588 375,673 86,700 191,574 194,848 150,494 41,080 37,006 32,839 108,075 (71,069) 4 720 3 461 0 4,720 $8,613,994 $8,508,193 $7,268,764 1,345,230 $19 964 293 $20 226 539 $21 249,382 (1,285,089) $29 743 114 $29 634 251 $28 330.193 1 412,921 $58 321 401 $58 368 983 $56 848,339 1,473,062 • RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY Resolution No. 12701 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Services has accumulated various unclaimed items. AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70, Subdivision 2, Paragraph C for the appropriation and sale at auction of unclaimed property. AND WHEREAS, the unclaimed property has been in the possession of the police services for more than sixty (60) days; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of unclaimed items identified on "Attachment A." Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of April, 2005. Mayor City Administrator n U SC~~ I • • • Attachment A Case Nurnb~r Item Descri tion ' _ 04-3441 Hoo D Men's 20" Blue Bicycle 04-3441 Pulsar Women's 10 Speed Pink Bicycle OS-0133 Huffy Mohave BMX Bicycle ~~ OS-0241. Robinson SST Men's Bicycle OS-0273 Huffy Blades Bicycle OS-0273 ____._ Schwinn Mirada Blue Bicycle 04-3504 Murra 15 S eed Men's Pu le/Red Bic cle OS-0276 Huff Rocket Bike OS-0584 Huffy Lsca . c Men's Brawn Bicycle OS-0669 Huff Dura S ort 24 Inch Red Bic cle 04-3330 Blue Women's kitness Bicycle U4-3330 1-luff Scout 26" Men's Bic eel OS-0273 Schwinn Calente Pink Bic cle 04-3405 Schwinn Sidewinder Black Men's Bic cle 04-3404 Ma na Trouble Men's 20" Bicycle 04-3295 Huffy Scot Men's 26" Bic cle 04-3267 Women's 26" Ma na Glacier Bic cle 04-3216 Mon oose DXR 26" Men's Bic cle 04-3253 Huff Dura S ort Red 10 S eed Bic cle 04-3208 Flat S in Bo 'x 20" Bic cle 04-3201 Murra Trail Climber Bo 's 20" Bic cle 04-3165 Huffy Superia Aqua Bicycle 04-3136 Pacific Red/White/Blue Bic cle 04-3132 Roadmaster Mountain Climber 26" Bicycle 04-311$ Mon oos Outer Limits Ba 'x 20" Bicycle 04-3116 Huff Stone Mountain Woman's Bic cle 04-3093 Huff Kaibab 21 S eed Bic cle 04-1385 Schwinn Varsity Men's Bicycle ~h~ RESOLUTION NO. X2702 L~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Pallets -- 5000 19,750 Shipping Compost Yes Dave's Pallet Service Crushing -~- 36,600 Crushing -concrete Compost Yes Intex Corp Bag Film 41,645 Bag Product Compost Yes Primary Packaging ~'he following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM I COST I PURPOSE I DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR Date Approved: April 26,2005 ~otion Made By: Seconded By: Resolution submitted far Council action by: Kenneth B. Merrill Finance Director 5(~)a RESOLUTION NO. 12703 RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has accumulated surplus property. AND WHEREAS, The Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section r~ • 9 t .40, for the sale at auctian of surplus property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of surplus items identified on Attachment A. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of April, 2005 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Steven W. Cook Mayor ~~ • Diazit Blue Line Copier Machine Mode1611 Serial #104652 Asset #1264 • Exhibit A ~~~ RESOLUTION NO. 12b92 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE • KNOWN AS PARK MEADOWS SUBMITTED BY SAND COMPANIES, INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS The property owner has submitted an application fora 201ot preliminary plat to be known as Park Meadows with the following: Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Huski Addition, McLeod County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, and that part of vacated Louisiana Street NW that lies North of the Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 1 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values ofproperties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions: 1. Street width must be at least 36 feet. 2. Cul-de-sac must be at least 47 feet. 3. There must be a 6-inch water main. 4. A subdividers agreement would be executed at the time of final plat. 5. Document existing grading issues to check for positive drainage specifically to the North. Adapted by the City Council this Zb`h day of April, 2005 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • Steven W. Cook Mayor 5(x)1 • PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. OS-0404 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR A PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM R 4 TO R 3 LOCATED IN PARK MEADOWS THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: WHEREAS, the following described real property is hereby rezoned from R4 (High Density Residential) to R3 (Medium to High Density Residential) as requested by property owner: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Huski Addition, McLeod County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, and that part of vacated Louisiana Street NW that lies North of the Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 1 • r 1 LJ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission and City Council have considered the effects of rezoning this piece of property; WHEREAS, there are certain parameters that will make this rezoning appropriate for this area; THEREFORE; the City hereby officially rezones this property to R3 and it shall take effect upon publication of this ordinance; Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of May, 2005. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Steven W. Cook Mayor 5(~~ C DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Hutchinson City Council Hutchinson Cit~Center MEMORANDUM 111 Hassan Street 5E Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 320-587-5151/Fax 320-234-4240 Hutchinson Planning Commission CONSIDERATION OF A 20 LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS PARK MEADOWS AND REZONING FROM R4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R3 (MEDIUM TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTL4I,) FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Sections 153.036 and 154.168 of the Hutchinson Municipal Code the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for preliminary plat and rezoning. HISTORY The applicant has submitted a 201ot preliminary plat for a single family development located north of Texas Avenue and south of the Rolling Meadows development. The property was zoned R4 to allow for high density residential development. They are requesting to rezone the property to R3 to allow for single family development. There are two cul-de-sacs in the plat. Aone-stop-shop was held on March 1, 2005 with much discussion about the cul-de-sacs. A driveway plan was provided after that meeting. The easement area for Louisiana Street was vacated in June of 2004 and new drainage and utility easements will be platted in Park Meadows. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application and fees were submitted. 2 Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on April 7, 2005. .3. A predevelopment meeting was held on March 1, 2005. 4. There were no neighboring property owners present at the public hearing objecting to the request. 5. There was a review of the existing storm water pond. The hydrology calculations were appropriate for this type of development. In fact, the original pond was built to accommodate high density in the area. 6. There are a number of fees that will be charged to the development. The parkland contribution in the R3 district is $175.00 per unit. SAC/WAC charges in 2005 are $2490.00 per unit (note this fee increases every year). The above costs are collected with the building permit fees. (If there are assessments that are active on this property, this will be discussed with the property owner.)There is an additional escrow required for tree planting. The ordinance requires the equivalent of 2 trees per lot be escrowed with the City; this would be 40 trees or $7,200. 100% of the project improvement costs must be secured by a bond or letter of credit by the developer. Additionally a 7% engineering fee will be required for the City to monitor the private development construction. These fees are all collected prior to the development construction commencing and are documented in the subdividers agreement. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the prelittiiatary plat and rezoning with the following conditions: 1. Street width must be at least 36 feet. 2. Cul-de-sac must be at least 47 feet. 3. There must be a 6-inch water main.. 4. A subdividers agreement would be executed at the time of final plat. 5. Document existing grading issues to check for positive drainage specifically to the North. Respectfully submitted, • Dean Kirchoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Sand Properties Inc., 366 South Tenth Ave., F.n. Box 727 ~aite Paxk MN 56387-0727 Marty Campion, Otto Associates, 9 West Divis on ~t ~"I~ualoP~N 55313 ~~G ~' Apri120, 2005 DYRECTORS REPORT -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (m bold) From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, Jahn Webster, Michael Kumm, Jahn Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: Apri14, 2005 -Meeting Date: April 19, 2005 Applicant: Sand Properties, Tnc. Preliminary Plat and Rezoning -Park Meadows ~ Brief Description The applicant has submitted a 20 lot preliminary plat for a single family development located north of Texas Avenue and south of the Rolling Meadows development. The property was zoned R4 to allow for high density residential development. They are requesting to rezone the property to R3 to allow for single family development. There are two cul-de-sacs in the plat. Aone-stop- . shop was held on March 1, 2005 with much discussion about the cul-de-sacs. A driveway plan was provided after that meeting. The.easement area for Louisiana Street was vacated in June of 2004 and new drainage and utility easements will be platted in Park Meadows. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R4 (High Density Residential) Property Location: $$5 Texas Ave. N.E. in Huski Addition Lot Size: $.03 Acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: R3 and R3 PDD (Medium to High Density Residential) R4 (High Density Residential) and UC (Industrial Commercial) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Zoning History: Huski Addition was platted in 1995 and rezoned to R4 at that time. In 1996, a building permit was approved for the development of $-plex . units located south of this development. Applicable Regulations: Section 153.36 Municipal Code SC~~I Pr~f~mfna~ac- plat ~~~ ~+~~,~riin 'irk 1'~~a Pf~nni~ +f~nmmfss~~n -~ p~rrl ~ C~CMS. 'Tm°~ans'p~e`t~ntian "~:e~~s vea~~e l"~.~1V, Ipa~°4~n~s l A~~lsfs end ~a~ ~°[~rraaW n d attn~~ m lta~~a3 t'a~ntiunrtie~r~./~.at L~;y~wt +~,u~-de~s~e still. seem tea ~ ~ ca_anear~ra r~ith tae ~l~~~ain taf~'. :~aar~~r the caasensus is that these are shaxt a;uf-~+~-sees, hiel~ ~;xe xa~at a rx~~u a~f' ~ c~sna;~~n. ,Aditia~aca~lil, thy: str~:et ca~a~fi~'uuxa~inn was raa~t in,terad:ed taa~ t~°ave~ t~arc~a~~h this ~arr~e~ty. °~ _~e sts-et a~aust lac a rt~~~_m~~m:zr~~ of 6 feet end the eul-de~~~e 47 het, ~~~e wv~.tes ra~~i~m ti~st e 6", Tr~~ escrow wyfl b far 4d~ tra<ars, ~ifat trees will be glanced ara the sa~th side taf ~ex~s ~reua~ fax seree~in~ tai the d~rln~+rnet. t ~~- Preliminary plat and Rezoning Park Meadows Planning Commission - Apri119, 2005 . Page 3 The lots meet the required R3Loning width and depth requirements. The lots would be similar to the north, as the lots would be the same zoning district. Stormwater There was a review of the existing storm water pond. The hydrology . calculations were appropriate for this type of development. In fact, the original pond was built to accommodate high density in the area. Pees There are a number of fees that will be charged to the development. The a parkland contribution in the R3 district is $175.D0 per unit. SAC/WAC charges in 2005 are $24D0.00 per unit (note this fee increases every year). The above costs are collected with the building pemut fees. (If there are assessments that are active on this property, this will be discussed with the property owner.) There is an additional escrow required for tree planting. The ordinance requires the equivalent of 2 trees per lot be escrowed with the City; this would be 40 trees or $7,200. 100% of the project improvement costs must be secured by a bond or letter of credit by the developer. Additionally a 7% engineering fee will be required for the City to monitor the private development construction. These fees are all collected prior to the development construction commencing and are documented in the subdividers agreement. Planning Staff would recommend approval of the plat and rezoning with the following recommendations: 1. Street width must be at least 36 feet. 2. Cul~e-sac must be at least 47 Feet. 3. There must be a 6-inch water main. 4. A subdividers agreement would be executed at the time of final plat. Cc: Sand Properties lnc., 366 South Tenth Ave., P.O. Box 727, Waite Park MN 56387-0727 Marty Campion, Otto Associates, 9 West Aivision St., Buffalo MN 55313 U J~L"~ n I i RF~~ •-.. ~ • ;, o,#°'n,~ Wp ...:nr r.¢a~ i i L% r FN lif'.fiYJAf11d.AM van~w~rmlrafr ~ s~sas~ cusrr un f nc f C4GrrC 16 artm+s ~ s s mru .wrw - ew gates swo mrews flC. xa sww ,mn •+mc wa ewiR, w sciei IIILSFNi I(NNC . R~ MTM~ NfC . A] - . - CdOrFSlMI~. SflelC[ WE Y 941{3 RMIi - a' ec~ix Kj3(caeu n1 w~ •orR - 00 fFC! m fFFi (COwieR1 wromol- im f¢i ~~ ~~ r ~- /, /~ ',, y`a. ~~ ~~ e.: ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ --~ ~,~°°- nr~rcrxruon, urr w~~ 4 pue j O e~ 5a• I L9 l_~'~_5....,, _ _ ..~..~._J I q ~-; i.T_r i M ai U ~ I f ~ 77 I W lid, I I,l c,n• Rer. ai is ~:~ .i J ~ L.. _.. I • I .. _.. .[ I _ 1 :~ _1 L _J L _J 3 s Avs. ~ I c. I I ,...,.,,,,.,. I I ii I 3 ~ I rr+~mur+nmauT ~ zosasas vo. + of • ~+F~rs~° svxs ~, `~~ RC..,,.~ fdE:~,,:.5 f ~~'a J. I _r~\ U v' ~f E1 ~, 4 0 0 ~\ 2 1 ~ ~{ ~ }~ i i ~9q ~ F I a ~~ I I I__ 15 18 Ix ~ I I ~' + }4 ~, 17 I 1.; iii t2 i7 ~~' "~... ~------T~ ----~ I I 1iJ5N.; .,~w.~..~. I I ^^ "° I S/w CplXrgBlC 3 3 ~S S~ i8 ~o ~. E 19 3 ~ ~~ i j ~ iS 1 if ; xi :# ~ ,_- i ~ ~'s I ~ .. I PREL1RdMMYUTILRY P[AN-~ g{p1.0563 i_..- .._ __ _.._ in _..___ a ~./nn' ~l 1..~ r I7 /~' // is l! / ._: V 4 0 0 o ~, 3 ~ ~ 1_ m ;,;E;,7,,::> ~QR -~, Iq I ~fi'oi, 1pp5 I ~t a~i'°,>qs I raeon I I i6 ~,`. ~ 16 I . Iti 14 17 ~ %5[ 4J I} I 13 I 1B i9 ~ I 12 I 19 ~ c~ Q 11 20 ~ ~ ~S E Y r S 6 .C S < 14 __- - _,; ~ ~- ~ I I y ~'~...is TYPICAL STREET SECTION sum cowu»s s+c. MUfCHINSON. MN 1 ate ~~~ mmxmnR SECnan PRELIMINARY STREET a sTaRM sEwER Pun euccr Nn s nc 4 cu 2-09-05&3 ~ e ~ ~ rrusra .n = ; ,.»..`Y .,.,..,, .,.,.e, R'enn~r;-, „,,,. ~ a \.v'.f.S~~,! -nne.r ~_~ .,ac cab ~.~ , .,mb .,a.. _ .-c a~RSnn~un ~t~ler~aeNwrlrel '7.~ ..,r~ ~ I l \W 5 ~ ~.. \~~ ~ ---_ - _ ~ y ~ / ' ~„..W„ II Illlll 1~ .. '~ II jf ~ -.'y - J ~- -- # ~ VI .n ..., r ~ 4~ -~ ~_ -~~ ~ v ~ I IIII „..»t~ ~ ~ I ,, IIII ; ~S I _ _ c ..? ~~-„~- 19 ~~ -,.,:~. d 0 I~18 Ills I-.. L~~ ---- ~ _ fi -s ~rs..sx_„a.~ f / / _ oasoursmmww~prtlsewq + r ~\ ` .// ..~ // ~ ~ .n m I I rllr! \ OUTL ~ ~~ A ~~, ~lllll / ~\ I I ~".'~ I II ,~~, \\ I I j ///// h „`,~' .:.~ ~ .. r ///~~-ppp- ~ r..am ' }pp ROL1t CONSiRUCTON ENraANCE ® ~ 'n~]~1~,, Wt. OIAA I p ~- W.G .___ . ~_._ MAAf s ~~~s Pr _, mrr[NCC OSrAx -~s~-.-s-mmo., m.a s~~~ _ , ~ ^ ss • ve. ~ ~ ' _ :erg _ --ti-t-`r-I-- - ' 1 I I :~ I I = ,...~,,,,,~. ^ I ~ i I ~ ~ . p~' °'° .., . , ~ .~.o ...,. ,..a ,..i.o ..,....... w vemumo ° - PARK ME ADOW ra~mnw~avoaaonwa~w z awocaauwESSVC a+-osaa TI.UIUCI.U ....~~ .,r. . ,•~ ~••~•+~ n . MEETING NOTES PREDEVELOPMENT SAND COMPANIES March 1, 2005 Attcndecs: Jamie Thelen, Marty Campion, Jean Ward, Dick Nagy, John Olson, Kent Exner, Diane Sorenson, )3rucc Naustdal, Lee Steckman, Mark 5chnobrich, Lenny Rutledge, Dave Hunstad, john Rodcberg, Dolf Moon, Julie Wischnack and )3onnie Baumetz Julie Wischnack opened with introductions and conunented on the location of the request and surrounding developments. Marty Campion, Otto Assoc., stated Louisiana Ave. has been vacated and new easements will be platted in the new plat. He explained 20 lots are proposed to be on two cut-de-sacs. He stated the stockpiled material is iop soil to be used on the site. He commented on the existing lateral utility stubs to the property. He explained the existing pond on the west end of the property is expected to be sized for the entire property. He commented on the grading plan and concerns that the original Rolling Meadows development drains onto the property. Drainage will be maintained to the west and then south to the pond. The east portion of the property will drain to the north and into a Swale, then south onto Texas Ave.and into the pond. There is a catch basin in the back yards between lots 9 and 12. There will be a 2% grade to drain. Jamie Thelen, Sand Companies, explained the original plan for the area was a multifamily development. That type of development is not in demand and he would like to down zone to R3 for single family. Julie W. stated it is zoned R4 presently. The R3 zone lot width requirement is 60'. john Rodeberg stated he would rather they loop the road instead of cut-de-sacs. Marty C. stated the proposed development would allow for more lots. He commented a loop road would create lots accessing onto Texas Ave. john R. stated there are cost issues for the City with snow removal on cut-de-sacs. John Olson explained there are many driveways on cut-de-sacs and someone will end up with a snow covered driveway after snow plowing. Marty C. stated they could put in islands. John R. stated he has issues with the cut-de-sacs but he does like the proposal to single family with a trail on Texas Ave. Jamie T. explained a loop.road is inefficient use of the land. There is more green space and open . lots with the cut-de-sacs. ~`CJ 1 Predevelopment notes Sand Companies 3/t/05 Page 2 Dave H. stated telephone and cable are in the same trench as electric. He explained there must be platted easements and some electric boxes may end up in the middle of lots. Julie W. asked when the electric layout is done. Aave H. stated as soon as the digital drawing of the plat is complete. Lenny Rutledge commented on the flat land between lots 8 and 13. Marty C. stated he would look at the grade in that area. Jamie T. stated he was open to trees placed on the south side of Texas Ave. to buffer higher density residential. The consensus of the group was positive for placement of boulevazd trees on the south side of Texas Ave. Lee 5teckman stated cable is in with electric. Bruce Naustdal stated he likes the cut-de-sacs in the development and suggests catch basins as opposed to swales. Kent Exner has concerns with the cut-de-sacs. He stated drainage is not an issue. lde commented on the plat stating the easements should be changed to 6 feet and 10 feet on the rear . lot lines. John O. is concerned with islands in the cut-de-sac for snow removal. Marty C. in some areas the neighborhood works out the snow removal issues. John R. stated there is no boulevard to place the snow and there are many complaints where they have been allowed. Bruce N. asked if the entrance off the cut-de-sac could be an agieed smaller width for room to put snow. Jamie T. commented on the driveway locations. Dick Nagy voiced concern with the dead end water lines. He would rather see a looped line. Bach water service should be in a sepazate trench. John R. stated they could go to 6 inch water main. $onnie Eaumetz explained the planning commission process. Jamie T. stated this area is a good fit for single family. . Lenny R. asked about placement of fire hydrants. Marty C. explained hydrant locations. Dolf Moon stated pazkland contribution is $2l 5.OD per unit. ~C~~ 1 Predeaelopment notes Sand Companies 3/t/OS Page 3 Julie W. explained the fees are engineering escrow, SAC/WAC, tree escrow and pending assessments. John R. stated the engineering fees are spread per lot. Jamie T. stated they would proceed with the rezoning and plat and anticipate construction in the Spring. He stated Outlot A will be maintained by the association. Dave H. stated there are to be easements in the Outlot. John R. explained he would prefer the lots were plated through the Outlot. Julie W. stated the present depth of the pond should be checked. John R. stated the water main is PVC. • .~C~JI -a Brad Emans From: Jim Popp Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 2:20 PM To: Brad Emans Subject: Fire Flow Brad, Section 6105 MSFC appendix B 6105.1 : One and two-family dwellings.The minimum fire flow requirements for one and two- family dwellings having a fire area which does not exceed 3,600 sgft. shall be 1000 gallons per minute. Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3,600 sgft. shall not be less than specified in table 8105.1 Jim • r~ L 414/2005 1.- ~G~ I i .. '~ ~ ~ ~ 7. ` d p ~ -5, '. 1 hat .. ~ j q r ~F _ f tats r~ t ,~ y"'Y ~~yy ~ ~ CI ~~~ ~ `. ~~ r r } ~Y'~' 1 ~~ ti. s $~ ~' `1 ~ ~ ,~ ~ s - r .~ ~ 4 ~ , ` .: H4 ,t~ ~ ~ k ~sy k`rT~ ~ ~ 4 4 ~+ M ~ _ k~{ ~41 ~ I t ~ ~d h 'lU{' t ~ 4 ",y l ~~it~' r~fi" E ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ e r ~~ q ~ ~ . ,rst;~ v r f y~''>hr'2~~ '~."t"~`"r'~~~~f' ~~ p r rr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~~~^'~'~ Try' t ?. ~. 3 I~ CY,+Sk 7p~J ~.II4 ~' ~ n ~ ; ~ xZi r~, xr,y~~ W °' t ~ ~o-~>f k M ~~,~ f~,,, ~ C 5 ~ ;h ~15T~ r.. - f4 Z~,~ his '.e tY ~F-y {1 e Jql' 6 h' f4 k .~ ay, { y 34p~ t d'i~' C 'rr~~ h`~ ~„ r C '''re!u h d~i Qr ~ r ri ~ - .. . yti z f ntr~ n~ , r ~ ,< .,~ '- ~ ~y. r 9 1£ hk~p ~..fS IMF ~' `4~~`b ~F.~~ tr~~ ~, A r.' x ~ ~, t, ` I i..5 ~~ ~ r~, 6 ^~ ~ ~ "~ i ... .. ~ ~ ~ r 7 iii ,~! kJ~~ ~ ti ; .. ~ ~~ ~ - _ .. ;{t r,}' ,~ 1 ~ ,- c Fit ~ v9k /s''~ t~~ 'r ~ ~ r, "- ,x.,w, `.~r'S r i - M , .,. ~ ~ %.,,~ A 4, ; f ~:. ,,~, ~~'. < ,I~ t ~ t r, ~ w 4 T-1 x .', i, f ~.~ .r '+ ~~' ` ~ ~ ''4' kz i Jr ~ ,EF }v ~ 7 1 y y~.fl y i,', ' ~ ~. ,'d ~i r. - __ y ,~~~o ' ~, ~ ~ ~ ~i :,, ~ 4. ~ (,' .rC ~ c.S f1t ~" n s` - ~ ~~ ~~ ~,"0~' l arr s ~~r k~ H ~~ ~~ 55k' ~ ~~ k~ s ff y +,k~v J 3 y. .~y ~-i J y~ + ~ ~, ~~~ i f~ l y~ S ~1:L/ k ~ ~Y <,~ ~ ~'a ~i ~~ i ~'~' ~ ~,rj~,~ ~ 4 l ', ti j u a ,fir M f I ~, ,~Yi ~ktn ~ h ,~,}t, i Y ti ~~ s i t ,rsj~`t~~y ~. ~~ ~`.*`~ y~ -~ -,+ ~:F ~ F r~~.~' { , 7 xr~.. i }: ~ ti C. 7 x ~ .$ yf F ; u, 1 t J d I~?-11 ai ~~ ~- n ~ ~ ~ Nh ~i~~ ~~i 1 ~, ~w~ ~ ~ ~.~~-, t I 4 i k' .d'-' ~ Ef4~~rt y .;~ r C fT'1!~ k ~~ .. ,y, Fti ~,`tt~ ~"~'~w` ~'n'r j ~u' `r ,fit :~?-~~.: ~"~ _. ~a~ ~ti ~~t' `~ ~ C ~ 'i' dr~~ 5 ~~/ f ; afYtq ~~~, +r~;;~'~t~'S h ski t.' ~ ~ ,,~'r.+a ') a'. r , ` ~ A s r,k [ k j,. L; t hn, ` 7 i a , i ;, ,.} ,. q... ~. I .. ~ Cs rr ~ f. n .. 4 ' ;.y i PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. OS-0405 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA VACATING UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS IN LOT 12, BLOCK 3 ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interests of the City to vacate utility and drainage easements located in Lot 12, Block 3, Island View Heights First Addition for the purpose of constructing a teahouse/garden shed into the easement area. Section 2. That the utility and drainage easements to be vacated aze described as follows: Vacate that part of the drainage and utility easement in Lot 12, Block 3, Island View Heights First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as the West 25.00 feet of the East 190.00 feet of the South 25.00 feet of the North 31.00 feet of said Lot 12. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication . • Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of May, 2005. Steven W. Cook Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator ~~~J~ Hutchinson City Center C DATE: Apri120, 2005 TO: Hutchinson City Council MEMORANDUM 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 320.587.5151/Faz 320-234-0240 FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION OF EASEMENTS TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TEAHOUSE /GARDEN SHED OVER THE EASEMENT LINE LOCATED AT 1125 WEST SHORE DRIVE SW SUBMITTED BY LAVONNE HANSEN, PROPERTY OWNER Pursuant to Section 14.05 of the Hutchinson City Charter, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request. HISTORY: The applicant has submitted an application for a vacation of a portion of the drainage and utility easements located on Lot 12, Block 3, Island View Heights First Addition. The property owner would like to construct a 16 ` x 16' teahouse/gazden shed. The location of an easement requires vacation of a 25' X 25' portion of this easement. The actual building size is 12' X 16' with a 4' porch. f~ FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, Apri17, 2005. 2. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request. 3. The Planning Commission discussed the 90 foot drainage and utility easement and historically why that was platted with the property. When the development was originally platted, the 90 foot easement was supposed to be an easement for drainage and utilites, however, there is a Swale running down the back of the properties that mns from the back of the house out about 35 feet. This provides the drainage for the uphill lots, to the north, and does not encroach in the 90 foot easement. The actual drainage area is 30 feet west of the designated drainage and utility easement. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request for the vacation of drainage and utility easements with the following conditions: 1. Relocation of natural gas or electric lines or meters will be at the property owner's expense. 2. Verify the existing drainage and provide that the covered stmcture will not hinder the existing drainage system or promote siltation to the lake. (Additional fill to wise the elevation of the site is not allowed.) 3. Any shoreland alternation would require additional permitting. 4. If any changes in the dimensions of the proposed stmcture change or the proposed location, further consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council is required. (Date received March 16, 2005) Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirchoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Cc: Lavonne Hansen, 1125 West Shore Drive SW Printed on recycled paper - SC~~~ . u. DIRECTORS REPORT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Mceting (in bold): From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust, Jean Ward, .lohn Rodeherg, P.E., Kent Exner, John Webster, Michael ICumm, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jitn Popp, Dan Hatteu, Dick Nagy, Julie Wiscbaack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz bate: April 4, 2005--Meeting Date: Apri119, 2005 Applicant: Lavonne Hansen, property owner PARTIAL VACATION OF EASEMENT Brief Description: The applicant has submitted an application for a vacation of a portion of the drainage and • utility easements located on Lot 12, Block 3, Island View Heights First Addition. The properly owner would like to construct a 16 ` x 16' teahouse/garden shed. The location of an easement requires vacation of a 25' X 25' portion of this easement. The actual building size is,12' X 16' with a 4' porch. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: Rl (Single Family Residential) Property Location: 1125 West Shore Arive SW Lot Size: Approximately ] 20' X 272' Existing Land Use: Single family residential Adjacent Land Use and Zoning: Rl (Single Family Residential) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Zoning History: NIA `J~~~- ~urt~al V~c~~ia~ of as~r~~~~is 1,~vaaa~ ~~~se~ ~ t~2 a W~s~, Sure ~~°ive .'V". °l~nn~. ~a~~zmiss~aa~ ~ ~parl 1"~, 20~p Y"~~;e p~l~c~~i1e ~.a~a~lat~iun~ ~~tr~r~ 1~~ teli~r~~ lww'S~~a~c~p~l ~`;~.e °~'~~~~~sr~rtt~n~ 'G~Te~t ~i~~e .l~r~ve "', ~qr~ ~~nd +~ar~i~rae~~+~;ata~a tiff d:~euse ~ t~ "~~t ~~`~r~~e ~~a ut~lxt ea~~emet Barad hisc~ri~;~ly y that ~rv~ ~~atted atl~ t1~~e ~~-~apert~ ~'h~n the develera~eaat was ~a-~~ii7~ll ~a~atted, tie 34 f~~t eae,tnzent ~aac~sec~ t~ e n~e~s~~7~nt f~a~ dr~ia~a~.e ~aa aa~ilit+~s~ ha~rever, t,~ae~e ~~ sa~~ r~.a~a~~a~ d~~a tae tae cif the ~r~~ertz that ~aaaa roman th.e ~~c caf thy; 'h~axse gut abaut 5 feet. "~`hi a~~v~des tie dr~aaa~,e fir tae uph.~lfl lnt~, to tl'~e a~ucarth,, ~aad drae~ ~aeat rca°cr~ an tie ~ c~~at eser~aerat. The ~tu~ dr~arae yea ~ C? feet wept ~f ~1~~:si~na?~~•~~ dr:.iia;,~~e ~~t~d ~at~~it~ e~3st;r~et see saar~e~. ~' f w~ N ~~~ ~ q'~S ;~ '"~S. ~ ty ;,x ~.~ ~, ~ ~ ~, r,. ~ ~ . t r, }~ ~~ ~'`~ ~:. _ :~. " a. c ~ .. k c -rr ~~_ i ~4'', ~~ ~~,~' ~ ~ } C~ ' ~~~~ ~r7 ~t ~S r~ r ~, x ~ ~ . ,~ ~ ~~ 1 . ~ ~. ,~ ~ a,. ~ . ~. k j ~~ ~- ro~ ~ R r r ' ~ "'' °?N ~, ` ~ µ'~ C'r ;, vW~ r yip t :~~ ~~ ,.~~ ~ _ ,~ ,Ft ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~n ~f ~ ~~6n~~~ xS1 ' ~}. R ~ ~' ~ ~ v e .r r ~ ` ' ~ .~ y~ it ia.rr ~ ""Y ~* ~ n '. I 'I .!r•l .I~~:.i~''~ .'x'1'4 F.F Nr~.'A ~.~.. .. .vs"f is ~' ~~•., /i Partial Vacation of Easements Lavonne Hansen-1125 West Shore Drive S.W. Planning Commission - Apri119, 20115 Page 3 • The consensus of the staff is to recommend approval with the following recommendations: 1. Relocation of natural gas or electric lines or meters will be at the property owner's expense. 2. Verify the existing drainage and provide that the covered structure will not hinder the existing drainage system or promote siltation to the lake. (Additional fill to raise the elevation of the site is not allowed.) 3. Any shoreland alternation would require additional permitting. 4. If any changes in the dimensions of the proposed structure change or the proposed location, further consideration by the Planning Commission and the City Council is required. (Date received Mazch 16, 2005) . Cc: Lavonne Hansen, 1125 West Shore Drive SW • S~cJ~ SKETCH AND D SCRIPTION FOR LAVONNE ~iNSEN Proposed easement vacation in pars of Lot I2, Block 3, ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADD DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION Vacate T#ai part of the drainage and utility easement in Lot 12, Block 3, ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADD1TlON, according to the recorded pint thereof, described as The West 25.00 fleet of the EasT 190.00 feet of the South 25.00 feet of the North 31.00 feet of said Lot 12. ~~ ~ l ~~~ 'W 271 W a W 0 w O a N w 0 - - -, _ d tk ~'Druh°ge ° utlllry easement ,°~ ion of h easement to to ~ ~ ~~ - be vacated f ~ ~ < I ~- ~ ` I ~ ~ ~ ~ m~ d~ = ~`~ ~ ~ ` f Dlc 8 YlRliy Q95emBn ~ $ `11 `---m ----- --- 14114 I PFt 11NFN I ONt] Sl3RVEYING N89°48'52'W 271.90 HUTCHINSON MN i' j1 I i~ I 8 Y N Q J w o ~ _ ~ Z o D Thls is ro and desc provided ~(y i~ a~~~F i~ ~ (y, ~' !i S ~ Y f ~ 1 7{ ~k i,tir t ~ d. I ~ I:+ a r y.. Y ~L.. N s-~~ ./ r f _1 F tt ~ f ~4n11. f 1~ !1f L~ ~ 4 if'; ;~ V~,.~¢Ha 4 ` ~. f spy ~, ~ ~ / L' `fin. It' J 1l ~M1~J 1 !t 1 ~~ 2 - .. x tr 1 ~~i t 1 p ~~ ~~ :i4s .. L I W.v^'~1~7'y ~'s~r Y ~4 cN~ } S ~X~~ ~. ~Sy ~'~sf. j tF4 Fafi' 1 f r T AC' f r n 1 1 I ~ r ~ a ~ x f ni r ri 4y it'd si e ~r' .. - },~.~c }1 "' r r~ , s ~' ~ ~ . ,r 4 ~,a v° '~,~~ ;, b ~ 1, $i w '.,,~ ~~ -`r "1 J ~ i x ~r ~~~ ~i t t~"x.~. ~ x~~ ~~ ' Mn ,~ ,~ 2H 1 ('~ a 3 ~~ ft ~~ M ~, ~ ~- ; ~, 7 y f p ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ t F 1 ~. ~ ~ r4 ,,la; ~9~ .: ~; D S _ >,, , , , c ~ ~~ 4 3„p ~rl r s ~ . TEL ~~ 4 N k '! ~ . k ~ .: d - ~. +Y ~ ~: ~~r ~ ; II i'ri?~d r} ~r F.'1, '~tif .. r'. ~, t 4'~" r i . , ~!,° ". .r ;,,, Y + ~ .,- ,- F ~ +~ '` i .~% .. ~~; H -' r ~~n ,.. ~ "" Culw~ (wiaul ~~ south If n ~"~ Est back AFC Flg,~~ MqR 1 e;~, ~ Z~05 °~'fir. affil z',;,,~o„ &e v ~~ SLAKE ``` ~ 105 r 10~ 10fi2 ~ ~ `~ 1 OUP- ~ 58.1 ~ 5`7.5 ; 57.6` 59.3 61.0 ~ 62.7 ~, 6 .4 64.7'f / b5.6 FB Y LD ~ 7' Nf0 7' WO 7' WO 7' WO 7' WO ~ 7` WO 7' WO j O 3 5~, 0.6 ` 52.3 54.0 55.7 56.9°~.,~ .~ ,~---~5 .7 -°~~"'~58:8-°~-. ~ ~ ~ , ~"w~ _ ~ ~, ~-. •, _.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .sue ~..,. ...,.-- t ~ a_ , -- -- i ~~. °• ~ ..--_ ,z ~ "~ ~ r . .. ~._ ._ . . -r ~~. .. ....,. ~~ ~ -_ ~ ~ ...x..,.-. . .._.. .,, --- zss~,8sl~w-- N00' 11sDO E EAST LINE OF 5EC 1 C T 116 R 30 ~ ~, _ _ _ ~° ~ ~"" ~ i \ ~ ~ ~ CI9 I 1. _._ _ _~ -~~ .~, i ~~ ~ /~ ~ M cep ~. ,~ ~ ~~ r ~ ~~ ~ a . ,~ ~ ~. b -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t7C~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ d ~. ~ p~ ~ r ^~~ e, ~ ; ~~' ~~ ~ _ _~ .,~ ~; ~ ~"" M ~. ~..~ a ~~~"`"` ~ ~ ~ r ~, ~ ~: _ ~ . t. 3~ M ~~E ~: H Y` 77 r. ~ ~ ,~~ ,~ w ~ ,k ~ < } ~ i",_~~ `r , r~ . ~_ ~ .~" r i '? ,Y. ~~;Y~~ ,/ y}~y n i rf ~ - - ~ i ~,~ Iwo. ~ ~. N .~ ~ ~ 4 ~„~.s~ n -T- ~ N r ~.~__~ ~~ ~ a, ~ w ~ ~ ~~ a ~ .. ~ _..~~.__~~ N i ~ ~ ~ __._ a ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ p 'ctr "' .,,, m 'r` _. ~ , ~ ~ - r ~__ ____~-__ W ._ ~~_~ , ~ "~ ~~ ~- d ~i ~ I~ r• ~~ w Y Q w ~.. ~- ~. w3 Lavonne Hansen/CBS/HUT/HTI . ~IiJ ',1 U3/76/200508:77 AM .~(7 ~~ Dear Commission: C~ To Lavonne HansenlC85lHUT/HTI cc bcc Subject Vacation of easement MAR 1 6 2005 Crty of Hutcftin bQAt. of P. Z. $sBOn I am applying for a deviation to the variance that exists on my property in order to install a moveable teahouse/shed (see sketch). As an avid gardener, as I age, it has become more difficult to move all the gardening tools and supplies from the front of my house down to the gardens in the back each day. My thought was to build an attractive shed that looks like a Japanese tea house to store gardening tools and also provide a shaded area for sitting. We have large playsets/playhouse and a similar play house on two neighbor's lakeside properties that are closer to the water's edge than I planned, so I assumed there will be no problem when I applied for the building permit. It looks like the others didn't apply, because there is a 90' easement from the lake, not the traditional 50'. The planned building will be inside the 90' easement. There is no other place to put the shed. I can not move it back to the west because there is a Swale running down the back of the properties that runs from the back of our house out about 35'. I was told when the house was built, we could not restrict this in any way because it provides drainage to the uphill properties. IF 1 move back to the 90" level, I block this drainage. In heavy rains, there can be standing water in this Swale for a period of time Attached is a surveyor's drawing for the location of the building- It will be built in two sections of 8x12 ,bolted together. I would like a removable structure because when I am too old to garden, my son want it for his house. The surveyor indicated that I may not need the entire area because the building will be back about 10' more and is only 12x16 when assembled. Because the building is at a slant, his suggestion was to apply for an area big enough - just in case. Lavonne Hansen clavvnne.hansen@hti.htch.com~ Work : 8-5 Hutchinson Technology Inc. 40 West Highland Park Dr 320-587-14D5 Home 1125 West Shore Drive 32D-234-6633 Hutchinson MN 55350 SCc~~ PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. OS-0403 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 154/063 OF THE HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD LANGUAGE TO ALLOW DRIVE-THRU SERVICE WINDOWS BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE C3 (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT SECTION 154.063 C-3, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (C) Conditional Permitted Uses 8 (a) Drive-throuQlt windows (specific considerations oftraffic impact accessibility to appropriate roadwavs, site plan consideration and other relevant information would be part of the application review). EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect upon is adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this 10`" day of May, 2005. • Attest: Gary D. Plotz Steven W. Cook City Administrator Mayor • 5~~~3 Hutchinson City Center ui ~ i i~r C~ 711 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 5'a750.2522 320.587-S151Bax 320-234-4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: Apri120, 2005 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SI78dECT: CONSIDERATION pF AMENDMEN'T' TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CONDITIONALLY ALLOW DRIVE.-THRU SERVICE WINDOWS IN THE C3 DISTRICT Pursuant to Section 154.168 of the Municipal Codc, the Hutchinson Panning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for an amendment to the zoning ordinance. HISTORY An applicant has submitted an application to request a change ut the zoning ordinance to allow, by Conditional Use Permit, drive-through windows in the C3 District. The C4 and llC dishicts allow drive thin service windows by Conditional Use Pemtit. Drive-through banking facilities, postal centers and sirrtilar uses are permitted in the C2 District. ~INDIN FFACT I. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Apri17, 2005. 2. There was no one present at the meeting objecting to the request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the amendment to the ordinance as follows: Drive-theugh windows (specific consider tions of trail-ic im act accessibili to a ro riate roadwa s site lan c ideration and 9thex relevant information would be pa„rt of the application,r~viewl Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirchofi; Chairman Hutchinson Planning Comrrtission C7 F'nmed an ~ecyckd papw - ~` C~ 9, y~ DIRECTOR'S REPORTS J^PLANNCNG DEPARTMENT • To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Sfaff Meeting (in bold) Prepared Fay: Brad Emans, AoIF Moon, Dave Hunsiad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust, Jean Ward, John Rodeherg, P.F., Dent Exner, John Webster, Michael Kumm, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark 5chnobrich, Maze Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Metrill, Tim Popp, Aan Flatten, Dick Nagy, Julte Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: Apri14, 2005 -Meeting Date: April X9, 2005 An applicant has submitted an application to request a change in the caning ordinance to allow, by Conditional Use Permit, drive-through windows in the C"3 District. The C4 and llC districts allow drive thru service windows by Conditional Use Permit. Drive-through banking facilities, postal centers and similar uses are permitted in the C2 District. Below is an outline of the existing code: zy~a63 G3, C1~ITRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. (A) Purpose. The C-3 central commercial distrid is intended to provide an azea for the grouping of general retail sales establishments, offices and aerviceswhich servecityr+zsiderrts and the surraundin¢ area. The C-3 district provLaions and bwndaries are mended to pxnmote compatible ]~ use relationships among diverse types of uses and encourage well-planned develapme~ or expansion in accord wide khe approved Comprehensive Plan. Only Lhasa Haas which substantially imerfere with th~a Overall {unction of the general mR~ ~~: area x711 be ecchrded. On-site pazloing is not ~t~equired in this district. 03) Permitted uses. the following uses are permitted as tegttlaked herein, without special application requirements ar conditions attached. Similar uses may ba aIlowed upon the de[er~nittatien of the City t:.otincil. (t) Trade and services: anY retail stoke or personal service business subjecx to all negtdativns andpermils andlioenses asmayhe rpquiredbylaw, andfurtherprovidedthat the use is nut objectionable due to noise, fumes, smoke, odor w vibration, includingthefuIlowirig and ocher sirmlaz uses; (2) Cuhmal fac7ities; (~ Trade andbusiness schools; (4) ~~n$ es~bliahmeuts> (i] FanPluyment agenaes; (6) Game and asmtsem~t arcades; (7) Hotels and motels; (8) Interior deooratipg service and sales; • ~ ~ (g) Offices far wrporations andprofessionals; (ro)Publishirig,joh ptintiug and blueprinting: 5~~~ Conditional iJse Permit I#utst~e , , o e i Planq~p'' Co mi iqu- bru ry 2 (~ • 2 (xt)Post offices and other public service operations; (iz)Itestaurants; (13Y1'averns; (14)Theata s, L~$Knmmercial panting Iots; (x6)Pawnhrnker establishments; (t7)Massage service establ~shmants; and (x$)Lfipper legal apartment uxuta. (G') Conditiortut permitted uses. (x) t;au~=.>P.~~+atparkingrampsforpassengervehiclesvnly,pmvidedareservoirspaceis provided within xhe structure for holding cars awaiting.entrance, whichreserwirspaceshaA have a capacity of no less than two vehicles; {x) New or used auutomolsile sales; indoor display area only, (~ Motorfuelandservicestations,excludingtnajorrepairoperation. SeaAppendixllto • this chapter fica the o$ street parking schedtile; {4) A state licensed residential faty7ity serving firm seven through s6 pexsoxxs; [~ Group homes up to S,ooo square feet; [6) Alllicenseddaycaxefacikitieswhirharenotpennittadpriucipakusesunderstatekaw; {7) e-farrxily residences applying far additions, decks, garages, remodeling, orother sirxgle~family aced uses. {>]) ^~^^••^^-•~fiarresidentialfacdities,grouphomes,crisissheltersandlic~seddayaxre facaities shat] not he imposed which are more restrictive than those imposed on conditional uses or othermulti-fau,]ly residential propertyin the same distr]et, unless the additional c,~nditions are n~ecessaty to protect the health or tLe safety of the residents of the r+asideaxtial facility, and {q) the requirements of ~ >54.xs5 of this cede shall apply m the conditional uses described in this section. The city code could have added language such as: ~~ Ihiye-thourh windows (specific considerations of trafTe impact acegssibility to appropriate roadwa~s~plan consideration and other„relevant information would be part of the auplication review . M This would allow for the consideration to be made, yet allow for decision malting to be centered on specific site information and how it relates tv the traffic in the area. Cc: Christian Ochsendorf, 75090 State Ilwy 4, Hector MN 55342 r ~~`~~ RESOLUTION NO. 12694 VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY LOWELL WRIGHT LOCATED AT 1325 JEFFERSON STREET S.E. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lot. The reaz lot will be accessed by the shared driveway with the neighbor to the north. This will create anon-conforming lot width on the reaz lot of 33 feet which requires a variance. The new lot will have direct access to Jefferson Street. Future lot splits would require a plat. Twin home development would require rezoning the property to R2. Legal Description: That part of Lot 4 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116 North of Range 29 West, described in the 2 following described tracts, to-wit: PARCEL A Beginning at the Northwest Comer of said Lot 4; thence North 73 degrees 16 minutes East along the North line of said Lot 4, a distance of 170.00 feet; thence South 16 degrees 44 minutes East, a distance of 28.00 feet; thence North 75 degrees 07 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 355 feet, more or less to the bank of the Crow River; thence Southeasterly along the bank of the Crow River to a point in a line parallel with and 180.63 feet Northerly of the South line of said Lot 4; thence South 73 degrees 16 minutes West along said line pazallel with and 180.63 feet Northerly of said South line, a distance of 435 feet, more or less, to a point in a line parallel with and 168.09 feet Easterly of the West line of said Lot 4; thence North 20 degrees 04 minutes West, along said line parallel with and 168.09 feet Easterly of said West line, a distance of 120.00 • feet; thence North 74 degrees 42 minutes West, a distance of 37.01 feet; thence South 73 degees 16 minutes West, along a line parallel with and 33.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot 4, a distance of 138.37 feet to a point in said West line; thence North 20 degrees 04 minutes West, along the said West line, 33.06 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Lot 4; thence South 20 degrees 40 minutes East along the West line of said Lot 4, a distance of 33.06 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 73 degrees 16 minutes East, along a line parallel with and 33.00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot 4, a distance of 138.37 feet; thence South 74 degrees 42 minutes East, a distance of 37.01 feet to a point in a line parallel with and 168.09 feet Easterly of said W est line; thence South 20 degrees 40 minutes East along said line parallel with and 168.09 feet Easterly of said West line, a distance of 120.00 feet to a point in a line parallel with and 180.63 feet Northerly of the South line of said Lot 4; thence South 73 degrees 16 minutes West along said line parallel with and 180.63 feet Northerly of said South line, to a point in the West line of said Lot 4; thence North 20 degrees 04 minutes West along said West line to the point of beginning. SUGGESTED DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL B That part of Lot 4 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, according to the map on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of said Lot 4 with a line pazallel with and distant 180.63 feet northerly of the southerly line of said Lot 4; thence easterly, parallel with said southerly line of Lot 4 a distance of 168.39 feet to the intersection with a line pazallel with and distant 168.09 feet easterly of the westerly line of said Lot 4; thence northerly, parallel with said westerly line of Lot 4 a distance of 120.00 • feet thence northwesterly 38.06 feet to a point on a line 33.00 feet southerly of and parallel with, thence northerly line of said Lot 4, distant 138.37 feet easterly of said westerly line of Lot 4, as measured along said pazallel line; thence westerly, parallel with said northerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 138.37 feet to said westerly line of Lot 4; thence southerly, along said westerly line of Lot 4 to the point of beginning. ~C~~~ Resolution NO 12694 Lowell Wright Variance Apri126, 2005 Page 2 • PARCEL A SUBJECT TO DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (Book 125 of Misc on Page 627, McLeod County, Minnesota) Beginning at the Northwest comer of Lot 4 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 29 West; thence Northeasterly along the North line of said Lot 4, a distance of 170 feet; thence deflecting to the right 90 degrees, a distance of 28 feet; thence Southwesterly parallel to the North line to a point in the West line of Lot 4; thence Northwesterly along the West line to the point of beginning. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect oftheproposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants ofthe surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect onvalues of propemes in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the vaziance based on the issues of the properties when urbanized but approves the variance with the following conditions: 1. Relocation of utility service is at property owners expense. 2. Sepazate water and sewer service required. 3. Deeds documenting the change in property line need to be filed by the property owners. 4. Additional splitting of the lots would require a platting procedure. 5. Outstanding, deferred assessments, will be activated on the property will be recalculated and reassigned appropriately. Adopted by the City Council this 26'~ day of April, 2005. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • Steven W. Cook Mayor SC~~u Hutchinson City Center DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320-587-5151lFax 320.234.4240 MEMORANDUM AprII 20, 2005 Hutchinson City Council Hutchinson Planning Commission CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE SUBMITED BY LOWELL WRIGHT LOCATED AT 1325 JEFFERSON ST S Pursuant to Section 154.056 and 153.05, Hutchinson Municipal Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request fora variance and lot split. HISTORY The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lot. The rear lot will be accessed by the shared driveway with the neighbor to the north. This will create a non-conforming lot width on the reaz lot of 33 feet which requires a variance. The new lot will have duect access to Jefferson Street. Future lot splits would require a plat. Twin home development would require rezoning the property to R2. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The requred application and fee was submitted. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Apri17, 2(105. There were no neighboring property owners present at the public hearing objecting to the request. 4. It is appazent that there will be issues with the properties in this azea and resubdivision. Because of the urbanization of this area, resubdivision was expected. The lot line arrangement provides for the shazed driveway to be located on the lot owned by Mr. Wright. The new pazcel would have no infringement of the driveway. However, the existing drive would not be the required 5 feet from the proposed property line. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the V ariance and Lot Split with the hardship being the recent urbanizafion of the properties along Jefferson Street with the following conditions: 1. Relocation of utility service is at property owners expense. 2. Separate water and sewer service required. 3. Deeds documenting the change in property line need to be filed by the property owners. 4. Additional splitting of the lots would require a platting procedure. 5. Outstanding, deferred assessments, will be activated on the property will be recalculated and reassigned appropriately. Respectfully submitted, Dean K irchoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission ~cc: Lowell Wright, 1325 Jefferson St. S.E. Gary Hoffman, Edina Realty, 904 Hwy 15 S Primal on recycled paper - ~ ~~ G llIRECTOR'S REPORT To: Ilutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave 1Junstad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust, Jcan Ward, Bohn Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, John Webster, Michael Kumm, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Kett Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan .flatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AiCP, and Bonnie l3aumetz Date; April 4 , 2005 -- Mecting Date: Apri119, 2005 Applicant: Lowell Wright, Property Owner VARLANCE AND LOT SPLIT Brief Description: The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lot. The rear lot Will be accessed by the shared driveway with the neighbor to the north. This will create a non- conforming lot width on the rear lot of 33 feet which requires a variance. The new lot will have direct access to Jefferson Street. Future lot splits would require a plat. Twin home development would require rezoning the property to R2. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: Rl (Single Family Residential) Property Location: 1325 Jefferson Street S.E. Lot Size: 1.95 Acres Existing Land Use: Single family residential Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Single family residential Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Zoning History: The property was annexed to the City of Hutchinson in 2002. Applicable Regulations: Section 154.056 and 153.05, Municipal Code SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Jefferson Street S.E. Parking: N/A ~~CJ `1 LJ Variance and Lot Split Lowell Wright-1325 Jefferson St. S.E. Planning Commission- April 19, 2p05 Page 2 Analysis and Recommendation: It is apparent that there will be issues with the properties in this area and resubdivision. Because of the urbanization ofthis area,resubdivision was expected. The lot line arrangement provides for the shared driveway to be located on the lot owned by Mr. Wright. The new parcel would have no infringement of the driveway. However, the existing drive would not be the required 5 feet from the proposed property line. The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for a lot split and variance with the following recommendations: 1. Relocation of utility service is at property owners expense. 2. Separate water and sewer service required. 3. Deeds documenting the change in property line need tv be filed by the properly owners. 4. Additional splining of the lots would require a platting procedure. 5. Outstanding, deferred assessments, will be activated vn the properly will be recalculated and reassigned appropriately. r~ r_ Cc: Lowell Wright, 1325 Iefferson St. S.E. Gary Hoffman ~~5 ~~- CERTIFPLATE OF~VEY FOR LOWEl1 WRIGNT ~~;3 ~;:CI~O> 5 QCr pi ~~ a ~°' sz~ ( r~ ~ AYICFL d ~Y .~ ~ ~(g~b/ ' S~ is ~rT~ ~ Ria YFI. clmF'A i~rn ~° r... ,~ ~~ ~, .~ ~~11. vwm B y v" ~ ~ lore wra . s~ s. rr r - jti a*~ ~f" ,;~, ,..... a: .,,~: ;~ ~ ~ ~l ' lQt l+, rl' a ' r /^ ;~. Fm-r /~ ' wu 4crlYG 4oaen r~9 .s ~r~,~ ~ ••• ' .r ixiY /'r .r.,..,. tir r~r.+..+.. pie w~rrwx.anx «Y..r.nxn..nwe«..Y...r-..: NF ~ ~ / Gl ~ ~ .r. w.... v..xru..: w.rwn.v~ ~....e.~...nw....nx. iN...a m:.:'ram ..[.... / ew.......r..r.~..w..Nx]m e.[.n. w~.nw.«or..... aY.wra.. ~ ~. ~_ ~ i / `.°~.. sM..n a.nw+n.w.:~w~:..~.~.::.nwi`.~..ir:'.. s:...`..iwx.~:~::mrs°.~„~.:. rr .y...xr.r w. r Y.1W.. Y. NrY W... rYP rA G/.! xw. Ax .x Y w W r: il. Y. n.w M xl.np rwa lx. ..4 rM .. r... w. [4al r..i GY.p r ar W. W...... r GYm f..[ n.n. M1a r. rq..a .i wun .rx...N~. x f]Ni K ~.... f..w if ' /~ ..x`Yi'wwnnM r.q.Y nYfM.r9loilfw..trtlnlYWUr.[....4.w.N~%]]I.n n...... W.u. -1 , 94 W...Pwlrr nrl4xF .]SO[Pnnw. n.. .l ..n4 ,. GreYx Y4wwsaw4.Yx.rVA~..Y.A.r~..aV~Ye.i..~M.r M~.vwrre 4..4...uu~.1 ]fp M1n+n ~`, [.rMxw~.ir \'. l]Nw. xwMrGx F... YrWWNU. I.T(a 4n 9..r Nnww MNW4. 4. I~w.M %y W. w.].~%Nx.4 vr.r Hn.wr. N!]Oi •..MiY...~.r .M ~. IOW r.N lmY~ryY x1.N Yf. f.~%4....a r... lYl y~Yr..Y.r .~i. wwrYA Yn toi.A• • • iA[L M1x ~.. r... ~... Y.IYNYYw..•NY.M~.Ir..~a.. iXCYw1.4.i NxN... Or w..n. Y.1 ... RU ti~~Y. Y~~ ~~•1ti4 O r.W.1. ~..~ fIIRSRC ¢]arru ra r.4ns i..`.in:ri `M.r~ «wirr.s~~~•wrrs...ew~. ~.. +.. r..r+... n.~w N... wr ~ .~..MrM+xA~.x.W.r.w..ww.ti Y.s r[6.l YU ~YN~N«wvYw Y.x 4N.: _ r.y N.wlr rr....~.Naa%YNxw...4~r.w..N..~NM.n le w...ur rxr.x.n au~~u. yxaM [Mi r... l.Cxe ~M1.u r.rM1l rrl.xx~h lu Y4...Mw.MriYW M[Ya rrx..YwV MG1.n w.Mn rxiw r~ ~~n.Y rxw.Y . %N1.xYY}Y~Y..%rY.w.vM WrMN4.rr IflT Mn xrrr.I xY...FUYMlu 4.. .x.M rrY ~/ M..wc..a~r.l.Yri rar. ~..Nrwrr. Y... I..x rl fLfi Yn..N ....rrr nr Mrw Cn.u. rrMtr. Vly r Hu fp~Ir~ / u1 w..l w.~4Y.. ~rf...l n/rY fY w.~M"Yr1 w. f~MiL. inR. W2Cfb Mf.~llN1F1R r r.M1N ru~1sT rY. u.ff33f 9w Sf. a...+4r. w[w 4W. r. r1 nl`iiRL-r4.....~Yw 4•.ylFw..n.rYW MN~.N~~rrR Y.rr.iw...ixi..w nV. FY.a a~w....ml W9~h w+~a~. lr. r~nar[r~ iw w...~ rry4 ...~YnF.i~~Fnf~ i.n.[re Gw.. ~..Y ].M x.~..~. w. n.... ... r.ly Mr<.r Ypw. r ~^ F/ V s ..... - ~ ~ R. ~. ~,~ ,. Rio ,~ ~~ ~~' ^. fl r r. i ~t5 ! J` f}'({' e. ~t. ' ~ F'.,~. L. . ~ i ' 1 ~ .. 4 , ,M $ :,~ ~- . ~ - ., r ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~. r ~,; '+` F ~:~-. ~.: rt{.. h'AlF ~., ~ t t , .. ~. i~ RESOLUTION NO. 12695 RESOLUTION APPROVING RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 9 EXTENDING DENVER AVENUE TO THE EAST OF HIGHWAY 15 SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS • 1. The City of Hutchinson has submitted a Right of Way plat to extend Denver Avenue from Hwy 15 to the east with the following legal description Legal Description: The City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, is hereby designating the definite location of DENVER AVENUE in Lot 16, Lot 18 and Lot 20, all in the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, according to the map thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, McLeod County, Minnesota. The portion of said DENVER AVENUE as shown on this plat prepazed by the County Surveyor of McLeod County, Minnesota, is hereby certified as the Official Plat pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 505.1793. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding azea and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below aze met. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the Right of Way plat . Adopted by the City Council this 26~' day of April, 2005 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Steven W. Cook Mayor 5~~ ~ c r~ DATE: Apri120, 2005 TO: IIutcllillsuu City Cuuucil Hutchinson Cit Center 111 Hessen Seneet 5~ Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320.587.5151/Fax 320.234-02A0 MEMORANDUM FROM: Hutchinson Flannizlg Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RIGHT Ox WAY PLAT NO. 9 EXTENDING DENVER AVENUE TO THE EAST Pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a right of way plat. HISTORX This is the Right of Way plat extending Denver Avenue to the east. There will be development to the south of Denver Avenue. The Right of Way platting process is provided in the Minnesota State Statutes. It is a method for cities to identify a road alignment, prepare legal descriptions for the area, and in the end, acquire the property. FINDINGS OF PACT 1. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Apri17, 2005. 2. There were no neighboring property owners present at the public hearing objecting to the request. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the right of way plat. Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirchoff, Chairman . Hutchinson Planning Commission Primed on recycled paper - ~ (~~ CITY DF HUTCH~NSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY PEAT N4. 9' DENVER AVENUE r y ,° A~annvwev coav ~' - e` I scnxc .»»...~~• 1 . r I . ___. -__ '~:~ I I z , . SFp _r aEE 5 . a , i_bb~ ;C:~ s' ' ~ U l ~. ~~.:.~ - .iM'19'18 F Ii.IA- fF+ rr __ -f y ,, 7o~FY~S 1 R aL + 4 ' ~~~~ - ! wvv mr = a. .,y }. >oM ~ ` i_-. .'. Yi - a. _. _ I _ J.. vi ~ ] ' ~ a __ _ ` .. i E ~syixyy~ Sm0R5 im L~f L.v.s pl x.lwys. Ynsa~ls. n sr e~ nW trnsr s1 I6 nIR isgft ~i.i 16 ~r ^ s ~ N f i lI 61n ,.snw.~ s~ a. 1 u~T O SrsM RerN NRS~. m[wf~ rlw .m Tw.alu W ' ~ ~ t l C _ ww r I • • el n- s Fasss [sr q. rmm As W a N GBH.f. xcert ss w.s Vn e.qM q M GsM S l f L [ ' '-' 1 F• r.a®s reeq s y f eae asslu M ~ ~sars.'f <r.q ~ 4G m I On.n 14~ Ysr I. V ~,P ~- rryr ~. rr m.. ____ _ __ . )[ M.~f~.~si Itl~s _____ _~________ •.y sr.eJ :y es W~ grNT4 r y frt. ..z v.am w v.. a :r VSn ]u~~ir rNMYaa e'ri Lmnu a^ w nlW Csnlw • .k.~w Gnl Sa-.vfs~ s"^sic .~w.ar .u ~3Zf. Osseuw xr _________ ______ fmasi s.. _ ____. _ fwsgss ~ _ Ms a .. F.wr srryw el»C~; vs sa. nn ... SC_ _ . ___._ a ___ R w sa. ~vm¢ ~~ R [e~n~ nccla. ______ ________. [an•s issv. n. u4ssf Cw+f. nysarn I~~ RESOLUTION Nq. 12697 RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT Z57 GAUGER STREET N.E. SUBMITTED BY 1'OM WIPRUD, PROPERTY OWNER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lo[. This lot abuts a street in the front and tear. Ct is 295' x 88' or .60 acres. The lot is large enough to create a conforming, buildable second lot. Future splits for a twin home would require a platting process. Legal Description: PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR NORTHERLY PARCEL The Westerly 48.00 feet of Lot I1, Block 15 and Lot 10, Block I5, except the Westerly 88.00 feet of said Lot 1D, all in the NORTH HALF OP HUTCHINSON, according to the recorded plat thereof.Exceptingtharefromthe Northerly 33.00 feet of said Lot 10 and Lot 11 and also excepting therefrom the Southerly 120.00 feet of said Lot 10 and Lot 11. Subject to easements of record, if any. PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR SOUTHERLY PARCEL The Southerly 120.00 feet of the W esterly 48.00 feet of Lot 11, Block 15 and tht Southerly 120.00 feet of Lot 10, Block 15, excepting the Westerly 88.00 feet of said Lot 10, all in the NORTH HALF OF HUTCIIINSON, according to the recorded plat thereof. Subject to easements ofrecord, if any. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare ofthe occupants ofthe surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, andthe effect envalues of properttes in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the condmons, as outlined below are met. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the lot split with the Following conditions: 1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense. 2. All lots require separate sewer and water services. 3. Appropriate sewer and water access fees will be collected at the time of building permit. 4. Deeds documenting the change in property line need to be filed by the property owners. 5. There are outstanding assessments on the property. The City will diswss with the property owner, how they would like to spread the assessment. Adopted by the Ciry Council this 2fith day of April, 2005 ATTEST: 'Gary D. Plots . Ciry Admntistrator Steven W. Cask Mayor ~~~ C~ Hutchinson Ci Center C 11] Hassan Street 3E Hatchlnson, MN 33330.2522 320.587-5151lFax 320.2344240 MF.MORANDilM DATE: April 20, 2005 7'O: Ilutclunson City Council FROM: Ilutchinson Planting Commission SUI3dECT: CONSIDERATION OP I.OT SPLIT' LOCATED AT 257 GAUGER STREET N.W. SUBMITTED BX TOM WIPRUD Pursuant to Scetien 153.05, of the Ilutchinson Municipal Codc, the Hutchinson Plavltittg Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a lot split. HISTORY The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lot. This lot abuts a street in the front and rear. It is 295' x 88' or .60 acres. The lot is large enough to create a conforming, buildable second lot. Future splits for a twin home would require a platting process. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and Ote appropriate Fee paid. 2. The parcel is located in the R-3 zoning district. 3. There are no issues with this lot split in that it meets the ntitlittntm requirements for lot width, depth and size within the R3 zoning District. 4. There were nv neighboring property owners present objecting to the request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ]ot split with the following recommendations: 1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense. 2. AA lots requite separate sewer and water services. 3. Appropriate sewer and water access fees will be collected at the time of building pemlit. 4. Deeds documenting the change in property tine need to be filed by the property owners. 5. There are outstanding assessments on the property. The City will discuss with the property owner, haw they would like to spread the assesstt]tgt. Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirohoff, Chaimtan Hutchinson Planning Cotrunission '` cc: Tom Wiprud, 257 Gauger St. N.E Prinred nn recycled paper- S[~.~~ DIRECTORS REPORT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~ To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) From: Brad Emans, Dalf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Crystal Foust, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, John Webster, Michael Kumm, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: Apri14, 2005 -Meeting Date: Apri119, 2005 Applicant: Tom Wiprud, property owner LOT SPLIT Brief Description The property owner is requesting a lot split for future development of the lot. This lot abuts a street in the front and rear. It is 295' x 88' or .60 acres. The lot is large enough to create a conforming, buildable second lot. Future splits for a twin home would require a platting process. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R3 (Medium to High Density Residential) (iJ Minimum totareu and dimensions. {a) Requirements. =~ [T~e MirximtamT.ot ~' ~nirrxumlot `°:! , , lYli-ii~'lrtvti , Areac`ger w>!dth Depth .. Y;)rveilirt~~nrt ~ ' ~, Single-family residence y,2oa square feet 6o feet; corner, So i2o feet feet Two-family residence; 5,00o square feet 8o feet t2o feet maximum ground coverage 35% Three- fo eight-fam$y 4,2oa square few' Nana None building Nafee ;:. ~- ~ ~ x '))oes Hoot count areas~t asidefor snrlaoe waterpondin~ belowtheordinary7ngltwat markorwatlandproteetion areas. ~~G\( C~ Lot Split Tom Wiprnd - 257 Gauger St. N.E. Planning Commission- April 19, 2005 Page 2 Property Location: 257 Gauger St. N.E. Lot Size: .25 acres Existing Land Use: Residential Adjacent Land Use And 'coning: R3 (Medium to High Density Residential) C4 (Fringe Commercial) and UC (Industrial Commercial) Comprehensive band Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Zoning history: NA Applicable Regulations: Section 153.05, Hutchinson Municipal Code SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Gauger Street N.E. and Fourth Ave. N.E. Parking: N/A Analysis and Recommendation: The lot is very steep in this area. The grading for a home and drainage will need to be reviewed, in detail. The water service for the lot is indicated on the site plan. If an additional lot (for a twin home) is contemplated, a secondary separated service is required. The sewer stub is not indicated on the drawing. It is the consensus of staff to recommend approval of the lot split with the Following recommendations: 1. Any relocation of services will be at the owner's expense. 2. All lots require separate sewer and water services. 3. Appropriate sewer and water access fees will be collected at the time of building permit. 4. Deeds documenting the change in property line need to be Filed by the property owners. 5. There are outstanding assessments on the property. The City will discuss with the property owner, how they would like to spread the assessment. C~ Cc: Tom Wiprnd, 257 Gauger St. N.E. .~~~~ ~f(IjF9 ~ 17 7.9115 ~°~a. ~~T 9 ~, \ / . ~\ ,`~ .• ~Q G,p~ ti ~ ~., '? ~ ~~~ ~~ PROPOSED DESCRIPTIOit FOR SOl1THERLY PARCEL The Sarriherly 120.00 feel of the Wesierh 48.CO leer M Lor s I. Block 15 aM she SeutMrly 120.00 feet of Lar 10. Block !5. azceprlnq the Westerly 99,00 het of said Laf 10, all in the NORTH HAIf CF NIF€OHN90N, xcordlnq to the recorded plot thereof. Suhkcl to eosemehta o! recorE. A Ony. Nee 10743 Squore Feel J09 NO. 00031 • Denotes Von nurumenr fem,] o prnstes iron m,enumant srr I nrr rpY rent ltY that rota SR Vy, r'lee e RrPor tlrirn one too eyomee eer oY elic n~ dlre~ ,ep.r. L ene Bur wYOr ondar the lays o} the 8te~ Yl nnnom. Jrl1r~R ReYrrn V PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Trce Westerly 4E feet a} Lot II, Bloch f5, antl Lat I0. except the Westerly ~ feet (hereof, Block 15. Tovnsite of Hutchinson, North Holf. acwr&~ to she mop or pWr thereof an file DM of record in the Orfice of the NcLeod County Recortler. Also, excepting sherefrpm the Northerly 33 }eel of soitl Lois 10 on7 II. Suhfect ro eosernenrs for streets antl public utlltties of record, itrcludlnq. but not 6mttetl ro, a sewer easement resat•etl by Allen 6. Rmuntlsan artd Rurh E PmunCSOn. husband antl wlfe. their he'Vs otstl assigns. ~ N Note: AbsttaR or TrHe shore WartnMy Deed carcxYlnp mnherr} 33 leer a1 tm i0 m€ Lot I1 to rM Chy o} Hutahlnson rsr wrest plnposes in NowrrLer Ike. O PO 40 80 xal~t~r PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR NORTHERLY PARCEL The Westerly 49.00 }eet of Lot 1 L 9bck I S orW Lot 10, Block 15, except the Wesrerty 88.00 feet of sold Los 10. all in the NORTH HALF OF HUTC46RSON, ottortlltq ro rile recorded plot thereof. Exceptlrq Merefrom the Northerly 33.00 feet of saltl Lot 10 antl /~ Let t I and also ezoepiinq thereham the Southerly 120.00 fem a} sold Laf 10 and Lot 11. SuDyett fa eosemenls of retwrtl, H ony. Nee 36259 Square Faet CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TOM ~RUD 1 .. .; . l ~~ ~~ j. , s. ~', r , r ! j p~r,:-r: ~ , f ,4 'WV ~ L S~. y} ~ C f S~ ~` e~tifi~dl8- . ~4Y A t X ~ S 4 `~ t '~ ,1 r at' ~ ~ ~ 9 .. ,1 ~, ~ i .r:, ~ Yes ,. ;.~ .. } } .- ~ ~ - {c, 3 ~ ,~ '~ ~ a d ;:. ,: r ~. a, d .%, } t. ~ .. .- ,f r . ~., ~ _ ~. 7` ,, M1 .A .,: ~., 1 t .~ ~ f .. ,.. v .. . ~ r w ti ~ , ,~. ,. ,, . ~ .. ~-.era r yn r N a ~ ~ -~ ~ .. - ,~ ~, i x, E.. b ~ ~'~ , ~ - ,, a i ~ i .. i` ~ ` ,~ ~'+ l .~ e . 1 y p~ .. ~~ ~. - fn.: ,. -, s AI ;, _ ,, A:., ~., _ ,. ~ .M _~ ~~ . t~~ - r. i, ~ .... ~ ~. y '. u • ~~~ ~~~ 111 Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 (320)587-5151/Fax: (320)234-4240 ~.a~~ License Fee: $3.00 uer tazi Number of taxi(s): Operating Year: City of Hutchinson Application for Taxi Service License -S Business /N~ city cr Sf~ 7_ 78 7~ Phone Number ~ /~ n) ~S3 state zip The following items need to be completed and/or attached in order for the application to be processe . A schedule of proposed maximum rates to be charged for license year ^ yes ~ no~ A certificate signed by competent and experienced mechanic (ordinance 6.25 subd. 6) ~ yes ^ no Copy of insurance that meets or exceeds limits established in a ordinance: ~ ^ no Application fee paid in full (check or moneyorde~r)• yes ^ no Application completed in full and signed: dyes ^ no I hereby certify that I have completely filled out the entire above application and that the application is tme, correct, and accurate. I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Taxicabs Ordinance No. 6.25 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or by imprisonment for a period aot exceeding 90 days or both, pl}ts, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Date • NOTE: No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one week prior to the regular Council meeting, frlled out in completion, and fee payment is attached Internal Use Onl Building: ^ approved ^ Notes: Fire ^ approved ^ denied Notes: Police ^ approved ^ denied Notes: City Council ^ approved O denied Notes: H:/LicenseslApplicatiosvvTaxi doc 5~d~ ,,.~•^~. Minnesota Department of Public Safety .~ r'' II °° ' Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement g~' ~ ° 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133 -.~. ^~^^"` St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 `"c;.l ~_~ 651-296-6979 • TTY 651-282-6555 • Fax 651-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Cazd fee is received by MN Liquor Control Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code --+_ ~tJi`~1~'~ License Period Ending '+~~1l~NCh ~D# 1453E City/County where license approved. H!tt!.:h i.n>rn Licensee Name H i_t'I; t;~h i n s n n H i.t s k i. e s S Ei 5~ b a l i Trade Name !-! ~-t t ~_ t? i t <s n n H ~_t s l<: i. ~ s Licensed Location address VMF F'a.rk City, State, ZipCode 1~!t+~=hin>on, t4t~ 55.=5t~ Business Phane Ptlu't F~~and LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ t~° 2i~ On Sale $ 4lnt~° O~ Sunday $ ~° l~k'~ By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies [hat there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's simature on this renewal confirms the following• Failure to report any of the following will result in fines 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms [ha[ i[ has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five yeazs it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the pas[ five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details oo back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during [he past license year, a summons has no[ been issued under [he Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash o curities or $100,00D surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. ~ / Licensee Signa[ur Yt'I , ~ Date '7 "j 9' 0 (Signature certifies all above information to c c^t 'tense tas been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/Counry Auditor Signature 1\ J Date ~• ~ j- U5 (Signature certifies that rnewal of a liquor, wine club Iic a has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature Date County Board issued licenses only (Signatur^e~certi~ies licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff Signature t [~ Date ~/'- jgj (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the pas[ five years for any stateAocal liquor law violations (criminaVcivil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093-98 r L r 5re~ ~ rt~~l ~ y '~ ~'S 111 Hassan Strcct Southeast }iutchinsan,MN 55350 (320) 587-5151/Fax: (320) 234.4240 Fee: $5.00 per golf cart Application For One-Day Permit To Operate Motorized Golf Cart On Roadways Within City of Hutchinson All applications must be received at least 30 days before event in order to be considered Information Name: ~'~ First Middle Last ~ ~L Address City State tp Phone Number: ~ - l Daytime Eventng C~ Or aniaation Infor tian if a Ilcable Organization Name Fhoue Number Address Ci State Zi Event Information (Information in this section must be s ecific Date of event: / /2D[ld' ime Leaving: Number of i;olf carts: Location leaving from: Name Address Location arriving at: me Address Detailed description of route (once approved by police services, route cannot be changed): ~[ ~ ~ _ _ l~_ ~ ~ _ t ~ c j(f) One Day Golf Cart Application Page 2 • Miscellaneous Have the locations been booked? J(~~C ^~ YES ^ NO The city ordinance does not permit golf carts on public roadways '/: hour before sunset, have you made arrangements to ensure the golf carts are returned before this time? YES ^ NO Explain: The city ordinance requires that all persons driving a golf cart be 18 years of age or older and must have a valid Minnesota driver's license, does everyone driving golf carts meet these qualifications? YES ^ NO Have you ever been convicted of army crime, misdemeanor, or violation of any municipal ordinance? ^ YES NO Are the golf carts insured to be on a City of Hut on roadways? YES ^ NO I hereby certify that I have completely filled out the entire above application, together with the attached Release of Information Form, and that the application is true, correct, and accurate. I further certify that no golf cart operator or passenger shall possess an opened alcohol container. • Signature of Applicant Date Recommendation ^ Approved with no changes ^ Approved with modifications to route or time: ^ Denied: Action of City Council: • ~~~~ RESOLUTION NO. 12698 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 10 PROJECT NO. 05-12 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve: Plaza 15 Parking Lot -complete parking lot reconstruction and replacement of existing storm sewer and lighting by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete pavement, bituminous base, bituminous surtacing, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances. WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Public W orks for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of April 2005. • Mayor: Steven W. Cook City Administrator: Gary D. 5~~ n ~.J HUTCHINSON ENGINEERING~PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Hutchinson City Center / 1 t t Hassan Street SE / Hutchinson IvQV 55350-2522 / 320-2344209 / PAX 320-234-424b ENGINEERING REPORT AND FEASIBILITY STUDX' ' TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer DATE: April 21, 2005 SUBJEGT: Letting No. 10/Project No. 05-12 OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of reconstructing the Plaza 15 parking lot and constructing a bus entrance area in front of the Event Center. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PARKING LOT The reconstruction of the parking lot is being proposed due to the extensive deterioration of the pavement surface. The parking lot has aged to a point where preventive maintenance measures would not adequately restore the driving surface or be very cost-effective. . A dedicated bus entrance area in front of the Event Center would allow for the unloading and loading of buses to occur within a controlled area off of the main parking lot drive aisle. This entrance would be configured for the future installation of a canopy. UTILITIES The existing storm sewer's age, condition, sizing and location have been reviewed to determine if the system should be replaced, rehabilitated or left in place. Existing roof drains currently convey roof drainage directly onto the parking lot surface. Uue to the existing drainage utilities being undersized and not providing sufficient drainage relief of the pavement surface, it is recommended that this system be completely reconfigured. There is a relatively low level of lighting currently being provided throughout the parking out. Tha lighting will be reviewed to determine what type and amount of lighting is appropriate. ENVIRONMENTAI. CONSIDERATIONS There should not be any significant environmental impacts associated with this project. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The preliminary design of the following proposed Improvements are as listed below: PARKING LOT . Completely remove the existing pavement, aggregate base and concrete curbing. . Grade the parking to provide adequate drainage. . Construct a concrete bus entrance area. • Place a bituminous surface with new concrete curb and gutter. . • Provide appropriate landscaping features where possible. UTILITIE5 . Upgrade the existing storm sewer system. . Install adequate lighting. 5~g~ COST SUMMARY The following cost and funding estimates are based on previous experience with similar projects, current funding alternatives, and estimated construction costs. Final assessed costs would be based on final plans and actual bid prices. The estimated costs are expected to be conservative, so that final costs are not expected to exceed these estimates. However, these are not guaranteed amounts. ESTIMATED COST TOTAL Construction-Cost 5730,OD0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 Engineering/Administration/Fiscal $175,200.00 Consultagt 50.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL 5905,200.00 r~ L • ESTIMATED FUNDING TOTAL Assessable Cost $678,900.00 Deferred Assessable'Cbst SD.00 ~Ity gan~ded - 5226,300.00 City -, WAstewater iFund $D.DD Clty~ Water,Furtid SO.DD tylty,;-~,TIF , , $0.00 MSdr $D.oo Mn/DOT SO.DO ESTIMATED'TOTAL.. 5905,20D.OD SCHEDULE The following proposed schedule is subject to change depending on the project approval process, construction timing, and other factors: • April 26, 2005 -City Council receives Report and orders Public Hearing • May 10, 2005 -Public Hearing and Resolution Ordering Plans & Specifications • May 10, 2D05 -Resolution Approving Plans & Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids • June 7, 2005 -Receive Bids • June 14, 20D5 -Resolution for Hearing on Proposed Assessment • June 28, 20D5 -Assessment Hearing & Council Awards Bid July to September 2005 -Construction PROJECT FEASIBILITY I have studied the following projects and find that the proposed improvements are feasible and recommend they be constructed: Letting No. 10/Project No. D5-12 Plaza 15 Parking Lot -complete parking lot reconstruction and replacement of existing storm sewer and lighting by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete pavement, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances. ~~ RESOLUTION NO. 12699 • RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 10 PROJECT NO. 05-12 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted April 26th, 2005, the City Engineer has prepared a report with reference to the improvement of: Plaza 15 Parking Lot -complete parking lot reconstruction and replacement of existing storm sewer and lighting by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete pavement, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances; and said report was reviewed by the Council previously, and officially accepted by the Council on April 26th, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $905,200.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 10th day of May, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and • published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 26th day of April 2005. Mayor: Steven W. Cook City Administrator: Gary D. Plotz ~c~~ • PUBLICATION NO. 7330 NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 10 PROJECT NO.05-12 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at 6:00 PM on the 10th day of May 2005, to consider the making of an improvement of: Plaza 15 Parking Lot -complete parking lot reconstruction and replacement of existing storm sewer and lighting by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete pavement, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefited property, forwhich property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $226,300.00, with an Assessable Cost of $678,900.00, for the total estimated cost of $905,200.00. • Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvementwill be heard at this meeting. Dated: 04/26/2005 City Administrator PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHERYOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, APRIL 28TH, 2005 AND THURSDAY, MAY 5TH, 2005. 5~~ • MEMORANDUM • Date: Apri122, 2005 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From: Miles R. Seppelt, EDA Director RE: Project Budget We have received very good bids for our Liquor. Store project, coming in significantly below earlier estimates. A total of 10 bids were received, with the low bidder being Shingbobee Builders. Tushie Montgomery Architects in conjunction with Greystone Construction Company provided the original estimate of the building construction costs. Below is a summary of the project costs as estimated and as bid, with an explanation for the variance. Original Estimate As Bid Explanation Site acquisition Costs $228,050 $228,050 Relocation Costs $15,000. $20,000. Change in law Building Construction $1,140,650 $1,131,208 Shingbobee Builders Contingency (10%) $114;065 $56,560 5% for construction Genera] Contractor / CM $100,377 ---------- Included in bid amount Washington Ave. Imp. $30,000 ---------- Included in bid amount Coolers /security /phone, etc. $150,000 $100,000 Cooler included in bid Cash Wraps, etc. $50,000 --------- Included in bid amount Architectural & Engineering $104.342 $114.400 Includes ieimbursables TOTAL 4484 REDUCTION $282,266 (17.1% below estimate) As of this morning, we still do not have the purchase ageement from Nash Finch. We hope to receive it later today. - I am enclosing a signed letter of intent between the City and Nash Finch dated January 28`s agreeing to the general temps of the purchase agreement. 5~~) RESOLUTION NO. 12700 • RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT LETTING NO. 17 PROJECT NO. 05-19 Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the improvement of: Hutchinson Municipal Liquor Store -Renovation of and addition to the existing Municipal Liquor Store. The existing liquor store renovation work includes approximately 6,280 square feet. Approximately4,000 square feet of existing adjacent retail space will be renovated and added to the liquor store, and an additional 6,400 square feet of new building construction will be added to the liquor store. Site work for this project includes approximately 53,130 square feet (1.22 acres) of site area, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Amount Bid Shingobee Builders Inc of St Cloud MN $1,131,208.00 Gopher State Contractors Inc of Rice MN $1,133,321.00 KUE Contractors Inc of Watkins MN $1,178,837.00 Greystone Construction Company of Shakopee MN $1,205,631.00 Wilcon Construction Inc of St James MN $1,214,300.00 Weber Inc of North St Paul MN $1,244,000.00 Dammann Construction Inc of Glencoe MN $1,248,850.00 • Ebert Construction of Loretto MN TDJ Construction Inc of Waconia MN $1,257,532.00 $1,272,850.00 Nelson Construction Company of W illmar MN $1,293,000.00 and whereas, it appears that Shingobee Builders Inc of St Cloud MN is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Shingobee Builders Inc of St Cloud,MN, in the amount of $1,131,208.00 in the name ofthe Cityof Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the Director of Engineering. 2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the contract. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 26th day of April 2005. Mayor City Administrator 5~~) ~'~ . State of Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Aeronautics Airport Development Section • Construction Report and Cost Estimate State Project Number: 4304-19 Municipality: HUTCHINSON L/O/py! td' Project Description: Navaids Service Road and Hangaz Apron Contractor's Name: Duininck Brothers, Inc. G~ Agreement: 86753 Region: W FAA Proj Number: 3-27-0042-04 FY: 2004 Estimate Number: 2 Construction Costs Through: November 30, 2004 CERTIFICATION OF WORK PERFORMED I have examined the materials furnished and work performed by the Contractor on the above project. To the best of my knowledge the quantities are correct and in accordance with the plans and specifications. I recommend this estimate for payment. If a Statement of Engineering Services is attached, I certify the engineering costs shown aze correct. Dated:3/~5/GS Title: ! ro~~CT L~,ry}~yetr Engineer's ~ azure This is to certify that the quantities as shown herein are a fair estimate for the period covered by this Report. Dated: 7 ~ ~ Title: y ~G>° - ~QI r LfJC~ /,b~ ~~--- Duininck Brothers, Inc. CERTIFICATION BY AN OFFICIAL OF HUTCHINSON I hereby certify this report (and the attached Statement of Engineering Services) was approved for payment by the Municipal Council at the regulaz (special) meeting held on the Day of Title: HUTCHINSON Approval Mazch 04, 2005 sc.) n State Project Number: 43(?4-19 Municipality: HCTTCHINSON Project Desceiption: Navaids Service Road and Hangar Apron 5tate~nnesota Department of Transportation Office of Aeronautics Airport Development Section STAT~M~NT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK PERFORMED s Ageemend 86753 Region: W FAA Proj ltiumber: 3-27-0042-V4 FY: 2004 Estimate Number: 2 Construction Costs Through: November :iV,'LOU4 Previously Completed Completed Completed Item Construction Unit of Funding Rate Unit Carr~leted This Report Fa Daze to Date Number Item Measure FAA-ST -MUN Price Quantity Amount Quantity Quantity Quantity Amount V ti ~\ ~~ t Mobilization LS PR YH YH 13,162.00 1.UW t3,16Z.W t.WU u.uutt r.uw ,.i.,o~.,n, 2 Traffic Provisions LS 095 000 005 S,SOQ DO 1.000 S,SOD-OD 1.000 0.000 I.000 5,500.00 3 Haul Routes is 095 000 005 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.00 4 Contractor's Site L8 095 000 005 1.D6 1.000 1.OD 1.000 0.000 1.900 f .00 5 Private Utility Construction LS 095 000 005 1,000.00 1.000 1,000.00 1.000 0.000 1.000 1,000.00 6 Electrical Service Modifica[io LS 095 D00 DOS 18,400.00 1-000 18,400.00 1.000 OA00 1.000 18,400.00 6.1 Underground Entrance Siga IS 000 070 030 400.00 1.000 400.00 1.000 0.000 1.000 400.00 7 Clearing Tree 695 000 005 600.00 1.000 6D6.00 1.000 0.000 1.90D 600.00 8 Grubbing Tree 695 000 005 175.00 i.U00 175.00 1.000 0.000 1.000 175.00 9 Sawing Bit. Pavement LF 095 000 005 3.00 398.006 1,194.011 405-000 5-000 410.000 1,230.00 19 Remove Bit. Pavement SY 095 000 005 1.50 149.000 223.50 149-00[1 14.006 163.000 244.50 11 Comnan Excavaion CY 095 OOD 005 4.00 1,717.000 6,868.00 1,717.000 0.000 1,717-000 6,868.00 12 Suhgrade Excavation CY 095 000 005 4.OD 1,200.000 4,800-00 1,200.D00 6.000 1,206.000 4,800.00 13 Granular Material (CV) CY 095 000 005 9.27 1,760.000 16,315.20 I,760A00 0.000 1,760.D00 15,315.29 l4 Water MGAL 095 000 005 18.00 80.0013 1,440.00 24.000 24.000 432.00 i5 Calcium Chloride Solution GAL 095 OW 905 0.75 1,000.000 750.00 0.000 0.00 l6 Topsoil Replacuten[, 6" Thick SY 095 0[10 0115 0.75 2,000.000 1,500.00 2,000-000 0.000 2,000.000 1,500.00 l7 48" Class 3 RC Pipe LF 095 000 005 160.00 40-000 6,400.00 40.000 0.006 40.000 6,400.00 i8 C~" Class 3 RC Pipe LF 095 000 005 190.00 32.000 6,080.00 32.000 0.000 32.000 6,080.00 19 48" RC Pipe Apron EA 095 000 005 1,100.00 2.000 2,200.00 2.000 D.000 2.000 2,200.00 20 60" RC Pipe Apron EA 095 000 005 1,fi00.OD 2.000 3,200.00 2.000 0.000 2.000 3,200.00 21 Granulaz Material {CV} CY 095 ODO 005 9.27 100.000 927.00 100-000 0.000 100.000 927.00 22 Aggregate Bedding (CV} CY (195 000 065 15.00 100.000 1,500.00 100.0011 9.000 106.000 1,500.00 23 6' Perforated PVC Subdrain LF 095 000 005 8-00 230.000 1,840.90 239.000 0-000 230-000 1,840.00 24 6' Non•PerF'orazed PVC Pipe LF 095 000 005 8.00 50.000 400.00 50.000 0.000 50.000 400-00 25 6" PVC Inspection Tee EA 095 000 005 80.00 3.000 24-0.90 3.000 0-ODO 3.000 240.00 26 4' Aggregate Surface, CL i SY 095 006 005 2.00 5,361.000 10,722.00 5,361.OD0 O.D00 5.361.000 10,722.00 Mazch 04, 2005 Page: 1 State of Minnesota I?epartment of Transportation Office of Aeronautics Airport Development Section STATEMENT OF ONSTRUCTION WORK PERFORMED State Project Number: 4364-19 Municipality: HUTi:IIINSON Prnirrt rbcrrinHnn~ l•1dVdIdS Service Road and lfanpar Apron Agreement: 86753 Region: W FAA Praj Number: 3-27-0042-64 FY: 2064 Estimate Number: 2 = Construction Costs Through: November 30, 2004 Previously Completed Completed Completed Item Construction Unit of Funding Rate Unit Completed This Report to Date [° Date Number ]tem Measure FAA-ST-MUN Price Quanrity Amount Quantify Quantity quantity Amount ~m nnn 71 R57 RS 27 6" Aggregate Base SY u» tnlu w~ z.a~ a,~uv.uw <r,+».o~ o,w~.~. v.~~~ ~.--.._-- --. - 28 Filter Fabric SY 095 000 005 1.00 8,101.000 8,101.00 8,101.000 0.000 8,101.000 8,101.00 29 Wearing Course Mixture TN 645 000 005 37.11 2fA-000 9,648.60 296.080 0.000 296.080 10,987.53 30 Binder Course Mixture TN 095 000 005 37.11 260.000 9,648.50 313.370 10.556 323.920 12,020.67 31 Sit. Material for Mixture TON 095 000 005 D.OI 31.000 0.31 3 L000 31.000 0.31 32 Bituminous TackCoai GAL 095 000 005 1.50 275.000 412.50 275.000 -100.000 175.000 262.50 33 Bituminous Control Joint LF 095 000 005 2.80 481.000 1,346-80 48L000 0.000 481.000 1,346.80 34 Pavetr~nt Mazking {Reflect.) LS 095 000 005 1,895.60 1.000 1,895.00 1.000 0.000 1.000 1,895.00 35 Pavement Marking (Reflect.) SF 095 000 005 2-98 50.000 149.00 50.000 0.000 50.000 144.60 36 Reg. Sign Type R 1.1, 30'x30" EA 095 000 005 225.00 1.000 225.00 1-000 0.000 1.000 2~•~ 37 Reg Sign Type X4-4t., 12"x35" EA 095 ODO 005 175.00 4.000 700.00 4-tN10 0-000 4.000 700.00 38 Reg Sign Type X4-4R, 12"x3b" EA 095 000 005 175.00 4.000 700.00 4.000 0.000 4'000 706'00 39 Cfass i Seeding AC 445 000 005 700-00 1.000 700.06 -1•~ 1.000 7~'~ . , SY 095 000 005 3.00 1,300.000 3.900.00 1.620-000 1,620-000 4,860.00 40 Sodding MGAL 095 000 [105 32.50 80.000 2,500.00 13.500 13.500 438.75 4l Water LF 095 000 065 1.50 3,200.000 4,800.00 3,261.000 0.000 3,251.006 4,891.50 42 Silt Fence CY 695 OOD 005 70.00 30.006 2,100.06 30.000 0.000 30.000 2,100.00 43 Riprap, Class 2 Y 095 000 005 28 00 15.000 420.00 15.000 -5.000 10.000 280.00 44 Granular Filter C . Contract Totals: ; 174,939.36 Completed to Dace: 175,549.61 V T\ `~ Mazch 04, 2065 Page: 2 • Slate Project Number: 4304-19 Municipality: I IUTCHINSON o..,.:e,.. ne..,..~«.:..«• Navaide Swrvice Rnad and Haneai Avron State~Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Aeronautics Airport Development Section STATEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK PERFORMED Agreement: 86753 Region: W FAA Proj Number: 3-27-0042-04 FY: 2004 Estimate Number: 2 ....~ ...............r..,,... -._. _-__ __ __. Construction Costs Throu h: Novem er Previously Completed Completed Completed Item Construction Uni[ of Funding Ra[e Uni[ Completed This Report to Date to Date Number Item Measure FAA-ST -MUN Price Quantity Amount Quantity Quantity Quantity Amount V ' r~ Construction Prorates: A Previously Completed: Completed This Report: Completed to Dale: Retainage Computation for Payment to Total Completed to Date: Less 0 % Retainage: Sub Total Payment: Less Previous Payments: Contractors Payment This Estimate: TOTAL FEDERAL 94.7660 ~ 168,981.04 160,531.60 6,568.57 5,829.40 175,549.61 166,361.00 Duininck Brothers, Inc. 175,549.61 166,361.00 0.00 0.00 175,549.61 166,361.00 160,531.99 152.505.00 15,017.62 13,856.00 STATE LOCAL 0.1724 qo 5.0616 qo 0.00 8,449.44 302.69 436.48 302.69 8,885.92 302.69 8,885.92 0.00 0.00 302.69 8,885.92 0.00 8,026.99 302.69 858.93 March 04, 2005 Page: 3 V ~ /'\ ~~ HUTCH/NSON CITY CENTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 111 HASSAN STREET SE, HUTCINSON MN 55350 6121587-5151 FAX 6121234-4240 ESTIMATE FOR PAYMENT LETTING NO. 10/PROJECT NO. 04-12 TKDA COMMISSION N0.12535-02 FAA AIP NO.3-27-0042-04 STATE PROJECT NO.4304-19 AGREEMENT NO. 86753 Project No. 0412: Improvement of Hutchinson Municipal Airport by construction of NAVAID Service Road 8 ApronRaxilane Improvements by the construction of clearing & grubbing, common & subgrede excavation, granular material 8 gravel placement, storm sewer, bituminous base/binder/wear, signing & appurtenances ESTIMATE NO. 2 (FINAL) FOR THE MONTH OF: NOVEMBER 2004 Page 1 Of 2 CONTRACTOR: DUININCK BROS INC ESTIMATE DATE: 03/04/05 ADDRESS: 608 6TH ST, P O BOX 208 PREPARED BY: P. VANDER VEEN PRINSBURG MN 56281 CHECKED BY: J. OLSON PHONEIFAX: 320.978.8011 FAX 320-9781978 COMPLETION DATE: RECORD OF PREVIOUS. PAYMENTS MADE: FUND: FEDERAL AID/CITY CAPITAL FUND • AIRPORT ESTIMATE 1 $160,531.99 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $174,939.36 ESTIMATE 2 $0.00 CHANGE ORDER NO. $0.00 ESTIMATE 3 $0.00 CONTRACT RECONCILIATION ovedunder : $0.00 ESTIMATE 4 $0.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT: $174,939.36 ESTIMATE 5 $0.00 ESTIMATE 6 $0.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: $175,549.61 ESTIMATE 7 $0.00 TOTAL RETAINED: 5% $8,777.48 ESTIMATE 8 $0.00 TOTAL DUE CONTRACTOR: $166,772.13 ESTIMATE 9 $0.00 MATERIALS ON HAND $0.00 ESTIMATE 10 $0.00 ALL PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: $160,531.99 ESTIMATE 11 $0.00 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: $500/DAY x DAYS $0.00 ESTIMATE 12 $0.00 DUE ON THIS ESTIMATE: $6,240.14 ESTIMATE 13 $0.00 TOTAL: $160,531.99 AMOUNT REMAINING ON CONTRACT: $8,167.23 SEE ATTACHED "STATE OF MINNESOTA -CONSTRUCTION REPORT.AND COST ESTIMATE • ESTIMATE NUMBER 1":-PAGES 1 THRU 4 „ ITEM REF. BID BID BID ..ESTIMATE ESTIMATE NO. NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNI7 PRICE': TOTAL OUANTiTY PAYMENT 7 041 MOOIIVATION LUMP SUM 1 $73,162.00 $13,162.00 1.00 $13,162.00 2 2,2¢1 TRAFFIC PROVISIONS LUMP SUM 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 1.00 $5,500.00 3 2.211 HAUL ROUTES LUMP SUM 7 51.00 $1.00 1.00 $1.00 4 2.26-1 CONTRACTOR'S SITES LUMP SUM 1 $1.00 $1.00 1.00 $1.00 5 2.36J PRNATE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION LUMP SUM 1 $7,000.00 $1,000.00 1.00 $1,000.00 8 2.38K ELECTRICAL SERVICE MODIFICATIONS LUMP SUM 1 $18,600.00 $18,800.00 1.00 $18,800.00 7 41-3 CLEARING TREE i 3800.00 $600.00 1.00 $600.00 8 41.4 GRUBBING TREE 1 $175.00 $175.00 1.00 $175.00 V ' ~~ HUTCHIN50N CITY CENTER, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, 111 HASSAN 5TREET 5E, HUTCHIN50N, NIN 5ss5u LETTING N0. 10lPItOJECT N0. 04-12 TKDA COMMISSION NO. 12535-02 FAAAIP NO. 3.2T-0042-04 STATE PROJECT N0.4304-18 AGREEIJIENT NO. 86753 ESTIMATE NO. 2 (FINAL) FOR THE MONTH OF: NOVEMBER 2004 Page 2 aft ITEM NO. REF. NO. REM UNkT BID QUANTITY BID UNIT PRICE BID TOTAL ESTIMATE QUANTITY ESTIMATE PAYMENT 9 431 SANANG BRUMINOE/S PAVEMENT L1N FT 396 33.00 $1,194A0 070.00 $1,230.06 70 432 REMOTE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SO YG 149 57.50 $223.50 1fi3.00 $244-$0 17 72 13 51-1 51-2 51-4 COMMON EXCAVATION SVBGRADE EXCAVATION GRANULAR MATERIAL (CVI CU YD CU YD CU YD 1717 1200 17&7 $4.W 56.00 59.27 $6,668.00 $4,800.00 $16,315.20 77800 120000 1780-LO $6,868.00 54,800.00 $16,315.20 74 53-7 WATER M. GALLON ~ 518.00 $1,449.00 26.00 $432.00 75 515 CALCIUTA CHLORIDE SOLURON GALLON 1000 50.75 $756.00 0-00 50.00 78 51-9 TOPSOIL PLACEMENT, 6'THICK SO YD 2070 50.75 51,500A0 2000.00 51,506AD 77 62.1 48' CLASS 3 RC PIPE LIN FT 40 3160.00 $6,400.00 40.00 $6.400.00 1B fi2-2 60'CLA553RCPIPE LIN FT 32 5190.00 Es,oaO.no 32.00 $6.080.60 19 20 21 62-3 fi2i 62-5 48' RC PIPE PPRON 80' RC PIPE PPRON GRANVLAR MATERVJ [CV} EACH EACH CV YD 2 2 100 31,100.00 31,607A0 5917 E2,200.00 E3,2D0.00 E927.DD 2.00 2.00 100.00 52,200.90 53,200.00 5927.06 22 g2.6 AGGREGATE BEDDING {CV} CU YD 100 515.00 51,500.00 100.00 $1,500.00 23 66-1 fi'PERFORATEO PVC SVBORAIN LW FT 230 58.00 $1,840.00 230.00 $1,840.00 24 66-2 8' NON-PERFORATED PVC PIPE LIN FT 50 55.00 sbao.o0 sn.o0 $400.06 25 SG3 6' PVC INSPECTION TEE EACH 3 360.00 5240.00 3.00 5240.00 2b 72.1 4'AGGREGATE SURFACE, CLA561 SQ YO 5361 52.-00 $10,722.OD 5367.00 510,722.00 27 72-2 6'AGGREGATE 9ASf SO YO 6209 5265 $21,753-85 8209.00 $21,753.85 28 29 30 7&2 62-7 62_2 FILTER FABRIC YJEARING COURSE gV(TURE BINOERCWRSE IAVRURE SO YO TON TON 6701 260 260 51.00 537.11 537.11 $8,101-00 $9,fi48.60 $9,fi48.60 5107.00 296.05 323.92 $8,101.00 E10, 987-53 E72,020-67 31 525 BIfIJAlINOUS MATERIAL FOR MOTURE 70N S7 E0.01 $0.31 31.00 50.34 32 62b BITUMINOUS TACK COAT GALLON 275 51.50 $412.50 175.00 $262.$0 33 3! % 670-1 105-1 1D5J' BIRIMINOUS CONTROL JOINT PAVEMENT MARKING IREFLEDTOR2ED) PAVEMENT MARKING 1REFLECTORIZEDI LIN FT LUMP SUM SO FT 487 l 50 32.80 37,595.00 #-9B E1,346.8CI E1,895.00 5149.00 461 AO 1.00 50.00 $1,346.80 51,895.00 E149.00 36 109-1 REGULATORY SIGN TYPE RI-1.30'X30' EACH 1 5225.00 5225.00 1.00 $225.00 D 709-2 REGULATORY 53G3i TYPE X4~L, 12'X36" EACH 4 5175.00 $700-00 4.00 5700.00 38 39 40 47 109-3 111-1 511-2 1113 REGVLATORY SIGN TYPE)49-4R, 72'%36' SEEDING, CLA551 SODDING WATER EACH ACRE SO YD M. GALLON 4 1 1300 ~ St75.00 5700.00 33.00 532.50 5700.00 $700.00 $3,900.00 52,800.00 4.00 7.00 1620_W 13.50 5700-00 $700-OD 54,660.00 $438.75 42 1t2-1 57LT FENCE LIN F7 3200 37.50 54,800.00 326t.C0 54,891.50 43 1t39 RIPRAP, CLAS52 CU YD 30 87!1.00 32,100.00 30.00 E2.100.D0 44 153-2 GRANULAR FILTER CU YI7 15 528.00 34217.00 10.00 5280.00 TOTAL • LETT]RG RO. 701PROJC-C'T RO. 04-S2 ~ St74,939.36 5775,349.81 ~~,30 RA,E uNn au4wmY we-TarAL Reraaiwe rota ra[ruwu~ ToT~L FEDERAL FDND7NG PERCENTAGE %.765BP99i 5966,769 0.00!6 30. 3963,361.00 STATE FIRIDING PERCENTAGE D-7724220% 5572 0.00'k 87 557139 LOCAL FI1N0@M PERCENTAGE 5-081770046 SB,835. 0.00% 97- 53,385.92 100-OD00000% 5175,Si9.6t 0-W% SAO 5'175,5LA61 CbNSENT OF SURETY TO FINAL PAYMENT t11A Uocument 6707 (lnsttucrions un revecye side) OWNER ^ ARCHITECT ^ CrJN'fRACTOR ^ sueRTV u OTHER ^ TO OWN@R: City of Hutchinson Ivor„ir mrd ndrhTxy 111 Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 YBOJF.CT: Navaids Service Road & [Nor„r•rr„drrddr,-»~1 Hangar Apron Hutchinson Municipal Airport 2004 Airport Improvements ARCHITECTS PRpiF.CT NU.: SP 4304-1g FAA Proj Number 3-27-0042-04 Letting Na. 10/Project 04-12 CONTRACT PUK: Hutchinson Municipal Airport CONTRACT llA'1-IiD; May 5 , 200~j !n acarrtlanr:e with the provisions of the Contract between dle Chvna- and the Conu-acua- as indicated above, the (luaea'I tamer nett! nr(rlme~ nJ.llne(1'/ National Fire PO Hax 9322 Minneapolis, SURETY, nn bond of flnsvn rrnurx• r~rrd rrddrrs.. n( [:nun'uanrl Duininck Sroa PO Sox 208 Insurance Co. of Hartford MN 55440-9322 Inc. Prinshurg, MN 56281 . CONTRACTOR, betel))' approves of the final payment n+ the Conrraaor, xnd agrees that final payment to the C[mnxcnlr shall nnl rrlleve the Sw-eq' of any uF its ohllgations nl fLrnerr .rru.rr anrlnrlrlrv.. n('Orrrrrrl City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan St. S7a Hutchinson. MN 55350 OWNRR, C~ as set fonh in said Surrtv's bond. IN WITNESS WHF.RRCJF, Ihr Surrq' ban hrrrunul see its hand ern this [tare: {1P1"l ~ 14, Z~I)5 IbrxvY w a~r'irigy rhr• ruuu,l.;/rdlun~m! hr dre rnunrrir rlrert~ rare! nvn'.1 tvational f=ire Insurance Company of Hartford (nrcrx•fr/ f.1(Cnr trr •n(rnr,bru4xvhrpre•.arur!llrxq AnesC ~~ (Seal): [J'rl,rrrv/urr+rrrrrrrrl,ll/r,ROGER~HRENHuL1 Attorney-In-F~ct CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA document that has this caution printed in red. An 1 I original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. See Instruction Sheet for Limited License for Reproduction of this document. AIA DOCUMEHr G7W • CONSF.N'1' OF 5l IN?IY 1'q FINAI. PAYMF.N'I' • 1y9+ t[nl'rl[1N • 'AIA Q)1 N1 • lHF .4AUSIUCAN INti'll'I'1 ~ 1'li OF' AHCHIIT:CIti, r-.1~ NI V~ YUPK AVFNI'IS, NW, `x'AtiF4 i INCIT]N, D.C. 21Xxx.-52y2 • WARMING: Unllcenaed photocapying VIOInte9 LLS- spy laT~7•-y9 Q rlghl levee ann will 6~ulact 1118 vblatM to I~gal proeecWlon. ~y// ~` \ in/OOT TP-OB 099-09 (10-93) Q1NNE50'SA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Munk=Policy CITY OF HUTCHTN80N OFFICE OF AERONAUTICS '~B~%Aai^~~f~D ~O ra'~ / 222 EAST PLATO HOULEVARA state Project e[o. •_ 9304-19 _ SA1NT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551D7-1618 Pederal Project no. _ 3-27x0042-04___ EPHONE NUM$ER: (612) 296-8202 Agreement rvo. 86753 CERTIFICATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE CONTRACTOR Jhe undersigned contractor dens hereby certify chat he/she hse pertormed and oampleted ell work in connection with and pursuant to the :erms of the contract for the above referenced project, does hereby cerrlty the Llnal paymenr request ie true, correct, full, and :omple te, and does make claim far final payment in acwrdance with the terms of the contract. :onCrector OUTNINCK EAOTHERS A!/I. - ~ ~ ~ ' 4 , ~Stle ~ - r~ J'r rice _~-Le_:~'.I-r~JvK1 ate of Minnesota, County of QA2 4.L- on this ~7 ~ day of ~~~ / ~/ s5`lnp~^ ref ore me eraonall a eared to meaJlHl~l~rll~~~lbnl he arson who executed :he foregoing acceptance and acknowledged that rams ea (CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) . _. ` ~(~ A[~ executed Che act and dyed. and ~ /r14~'~"'~ ' '~~`~oAa personally known, rho, being each by me duly sworn, each did aay that Choy are re~prrectiveawl,''y the / ! C $- - / end ~-'~' ~ of the ~Vl~~''Y C°~ ~~ ~• CoYparation named in the ivregoing inatrummt, and that the seal as;ixad Co sold Snstrumenyy//t77is theJJ corporate seal of a~a~id` corporation by euChority of its I I'Q. L end eeld ~~ ~ - / /'Q.// LPlyy[, ~ ,~~~C.9'~-(,N-.f~dl// acknowledged said Snetrument tv be .he ee act and deed of said corporation. ~ ~n ~ - _ ,/ `'f ~ / 5;gnnture PHILIP G. EHFFNiEYEFl S My Commission ea Not94y Public Sn 14'b~~xf`~La~ ~- Notary Publlo-Mlnne6ofa ~, Cp~j~Jpg [-area Jan 31_10 County ezpiree_1^.~/ ~ ~ZOI D _ 19_ [t is hereby certified that a final exnminncicn hag been made for the above referenced contract, the Cpntrnee hoe been completed, the entire amount of work shown in the final payment request has been performed, and the total value of the work p<rfpYmed in accordance dth, and pursuant tv, the [erms of the ConCraor i^ ea fhown Sn Che final payment raqueat. Aunlcipal ity lAte CITY pF HUTCHINSDN Yuaeulting engineer/ArchiCect TK-A ENGINEERS Jars MARCH 7.Sr 2005 ay Title ey Title PROD T MANAGER (It will be the rasponaibility of each Municipality in execuCing Chia form to determine that ell pYOViaigna of their municipal charC<r ~r spplicehle state laws have been strictly followed.) OTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPDRTATION I hereby certify tq the completion of Che above referenced contract. I hereby recommend the above referenced contrgcC fox acceptance and final payment. 3e to Engineer [n accordance with the foregoing, she work is accepted, and the final payment request Ss hereby approved for paymenr. 7- ~ Aagletant PSrecCOr, OfElce of A¢YOneut ice ~~ ~.~ c M F~ M. ~_) 12 A.. 1'~I I.) LJ N1 TO: Sheldon Nies, Aakota Railroad Apthority FRAM: Kent Exner, City Engineer RE: Railroad Crossing Removals and Tartan Park Entrance Road RATE: April 14, 2005 This Memorandum of Understanding is to reiterate the following items that were discussed during our brief meeting on Wednesday, Apri16, 2005: Railroad Crossing Removals -The City plans to remove the nonfunctional railroad crossings at 181 Avenue SE, 2"d Avenue SE, 3'a Avenue SE, Stb Avenue SE (two), and Michigan Street SE (see attached drawing) during a street maintenance project this summer. . The intention ofthis work is to eliminate maintenance needs and improve the roadway ride at these crossing areas. The Historic llutchinson group has expressed an interest in having the removed rails brought to the depot site for investigation and possibly preservation. If rails are desired within the crossings near the existing depot location at a later date, the City would participate in a share of the cost to reinstall those particular rails. . Tartan Park Entrance Road -The City has developed a project to construct an entrance into Tartan Park off of 5`" Avenue SE through the existing Ontario Streetright-of--way (see attached drawing). The existing entrance into the park off of 4'b Avenue will be blocked and landscaped accordingly. The new entrance road will cross an existing railroad embattlmrent. The City proposes to only remove the embankment as necessary to install the entrance road and parallel trail. If extra fill material is generated by this project the contractor may place it on the sides of the embankment in an effort to smoothen the slopes. If you have any questions or concerns regarding any of the above listed items, please notify me at your earliest convenience. Unless otherwise notified, we will proceed with the railroad crossing removals and Tartan Park entrance road projects as stated in this memo. As discussed previously, we are committed to an agreement that benefits both your agency and the City. cc: Gary Plotz-City Administrator John Rodeberg - Dircetor of Public Works C~ 5 J~ Railroad X-ing Removal Map April 21, 2005 w \, h 1st AVE. X-4p \V y FIRSTAVE SE w Z 9M AVE. X-Inp O W r w SECOND AVM ~~ F y y w w a ~ 3NAVE. X-hp THIRD AVE. SE y ~ ~ ~ N ~ w~~= w O a: z O ~ bfatigan SL x-ing r 5TH AVE SE N W E s sin AVE. xdna z V • Y • ~ ~. u• '.' y I J I~ ~ '~ _ i W ' . fE ~ C0N4Ci wSN 4E Y 1R151WLLVp ..~ ~ ." RROVOUO rur Y\ia FY9i c \ c e\9 oYm \ N iw~ •. ~ rRnasfo co•-e• a v cuui . x ~ YRER .. _. _ ry .. ~ i r i11 /.~ ___ ]q - .4 T. ` ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ Y 1 H . iN4 SulllgY SYq =. \T YM .. ~ , __ __ ... ~ r _ u.m ~I:Z I ~ ~ ~ 3 n•R a Y CROSS CVi1ER XE ' ' ~ ~~~~~` ~~ ~ y I so T'- -. _. _ 1 ~ ~ _ __. _ _ ~_.. - dY ,: ' Si0.0Ei4 xSN M . -.- 1--~~.~- a ..~ .. - oW J. __. - ~-~ . 1 T 4 _ ._ _ LI ~ -, - VRro03E0 [OEE iep N Y VfY3 ` ~ __ _. .. <.C t ~ 35'R 1- "`~ ~~ - .1' _. ~.. RCYOYS CVi.40iiEL\-SiY i N .. CNYAFIF RN4YFNl \S NFNSSYI[,~. 10 NSi4l RFO q\YR (_ .~ I ~ O ~ .1 _ . ~ .l Bp[LL/ ~~t~~pN55 ~ f v' .P x5'R I ~~ ~ ~ .SiNW iin~NNEi~ ~ '~ NY-f ~W pl iR C ' ~~yy ~ a. EY 2 _ 't ' J _ ~ -. _ n_ LYNiJEWVf \ gfgllCF YCNKRE 13 KC[3]\IR i0 NSi1lL PE Rllf O D lC~ V ~ ~ x rrNr iRU CNKERYCi w CCMLCi mus,*i[ ~ i ~. ~ RCI CLUB S wrrw \ NFCE]]YIY +JR.+f WId fElii C \ E I E P , v + ~ i 1 I \ ~ i (t - \\ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~' I ~ ~ Y I z ~ $ J m . .r O R ~ I ~' NSi4l ~ qIV IiIM1K. w Wup ~ ' ~~ Sff YfCiK.SigK ONTARIO STREET SE ' © «.YE FYOf OR.N ~YF NiLLr _ .- - _ _ -- -.-_ - ~ ~ g` _ x - 1 _ 1055 _ - - - . = 8 -~ -7 ~ _ ~ __ _ --- _ ~ }}}--- _ ~_ _ ~ _ ~ I _ .}_ ..F__ _ _+ __._-__ 1055 1050 - - w _ 1--t _ i _ T _. s ~ H _ 8 r a-.._ - __ - 1050 _ _ ._ __ .. _ _ ~ .- _.. ._9 E.YLL*. ~ ~ ~R _ I ~ $ o -~ _ 1045 - __ - ... _. _ _ R _- l `OSF6 gR11~ xe ILL ~ qi sm ~ry ) sao ]s 35 { i ~ _ _ _ ~ . _._~ W g. J _. I_ _ 7045 - _. ____ _. . _ . ___$ _.. __ - ~ r p ¢ __ _._ . ~ ____u -9O. q t -JI-O.Jd__ .. __ __ _ __ .._ _ _~ ~ _. t~ u _ -~ ~ -_.. - _ 040 1040 ._ -- -_ _.,. _ _ ...._ - - ___ 30~ __~ ~_~ _ - __ i3xY- __. _- _ ____ ~ '_ ~ = . L... l 1035 .- ___ ___ __ _ _ ._ _ _ _ ______ Y ~ ... __. _ - -o ~ _. - ~ ~__ - __ _ _~ 1 _ - __._ ~ ~~ 1035 1030 ~.__ ___ ___ - _ _._ ____ _ _ _- -~.,_ _ __ _ ___II ~ ... _ ~ 1030 ~ ~- 1025 - ___ _ _ __ _ -.__ - __.. v svayxEauN ._. _._ ~ -__ _- _._ __ __ -_ -i ~ __... -yyl ~ -_~ A ~ ~ - i - - ~ ~ . _- -~ ' ~ _ 1 i ~ ~ 1025 1020 --- _ -- -- v __ -- :: - i _ _ .-_ _ 1020 1015 __ ._ -.1 -._ .. __ _ __ -- _ _ r _... 7 .._... { - r _. i .._ i _ I __. _ .., ... - 1015 O. W IM O . N ]M O I. N S.W 6W 0 l.W NxY+w ~ n w m ~ ' "" ' ss a r` r.s .u.u rN. ~: y„.mx.aue.s~ NOR TH CENIA PL iNUNK « n _ ucaom ~ N ~~ lK W n< m v.vrn9 vs . 9cv Y mw~u .ion ~ci~ss . ra nn a.mm r~i °a G 1i Nrew. >+sv SMIITPFY SEWER PIMI d PROFRE STiiEEi ~ .n W w 22 _ a.Y nNr]ssc m swa es N RIMM6r . i i> rN '~ ~ CONSTRUCTH)N u«rocR \r. S4_ w ~ "' o a nxss w•.WLLU u xvoos ss ~v i swm IMPROVEM EMS e.rc 32 asa icu \. Naas w„as ~ K r ,~ d v.ro c xR. ix.... w.YSi „ SEH rmav HUfCHINSON, MINNESOT/. G (\~ V " \/ ~~/~ ~/~/ T.FTrixc No. a/PROJECT os-lo • C 1Vl ~!: 1Vi 4~) i~ A Iy1 17- lU M TO: Bart Bradford, 905 Golf Course Road NW FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer RE: Golf Course Road Reconstruction Project Proposed Easements and Property Assessments DATE: April 14, 2005 This Memorandum of Understanding is to reiterate the following discussions and conclusions that were arrived at during our meeting on Monday, March 28, 2005: • Stormwater Treatment Pond -The proposed pond within the southeasterly corner of your property, 965 Golf Course Road NW, is necessary for the City to treat and control • stormwater runoff from the proposed reconstruction of Golf Course Road ?.nd adjacent boulevazds. This pond will be sized to only detain and treat roadway/boulevazdninoff. An adequate pond outflow pipe and structure will be installed at this time, allowing the pond capacity to be increased in the future to include stormwater runoff from potential future development of your property. • Drainage & Utility Easement- An easement covering the azea needed to construct and maintain the proposed pond will be dedicated to the City. The easement area accounts for approximately 0.50 acres and 230 lineal feet (LF) of frontage along Golf Course Road. This easement will be drafted by the City and presented to you for signatures. • Street & Storm Sewer Assessments -The 230 LF ofroad frontage adjacent to the pond easement will be deducted from the total property frontage of 700 LF to arrive at 470 LF of assessable frontage along Golf Course Road. At this time, the 470 LF of frontage will be assessed as if it were an internal development (one access point into the property), so 25% of this length will be assessed at a rate of $80 per LF. The total street and storm sewer assessment would equal $9,400 (470 LF x 25% x $80/LF). If this property is subdivided or developed in the future with multiple access points off of Golf Course Road, then the entire 470 LF of frontage would be assessed at the rate of $80/LF. • Utility Assessments -Assessments for sanitary sewer and water service will be deferred until connections aze made or any development of the property is initiated. The utility assessments have been calculated to be $4,180 for the sazutazy sewer and $4,400 for the water service. You should have recently received aright-of--entry form requesting your authorization to enter your property. This agreement is necessary to allow the contractor to construct the adjacent roadway 5C'`~ improvements while adequately transitioning the improvements into the existing grades within your property. Please return an executed copy of this form to the City. • If you have any questions or concerns regarding any of the above listed items, please notify me at your earliest convenience. We will proceed with the Golf Course Road reconstruction project in regards to your property as stated in this memo. As discussed previously, we aze committed to an agreement that benefits both you and the City. cr. Gary Plotz -City Administrator John Rodeberg - Llrector of Public Works • r1 L_J 5c~ Bu»isMa~aorNars+ngHome DcuselMedicalGenter . ~ 1095 Highway 15 South Hu[chinson, A1N 57370 (320) 234-5000 April 20, 2005 The Honorable Steve Cook and Hutchinson City Council Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Request for Approval of Capital Expenditure -Endoscopy System Dear Mayor Cook and City Council Members: At their regular board of directors meeting on April 19, 2005, the Hutchinson Area Health Care (HANG) Board of Directors considered a request from staff for purchase of an Olympus Endoscopy System, as reflected by the following excerpt from the minutes of that meeting: "Caoital Expenditure Reouest for Endoscooy Svstem: A request for purchase of an Olympus endoscopy system was presented and discussed. The hospital's current system is nine years old, with no back-up unit. Surgical Services now has three fiber optic scopes needing major repairs (totaling approximately $26,000) and we are currently using loaner scopes from Olympus. The rationale for the request to purchase was given that these procedures require state-of-the- arttechnology for visualization on diagnostic and procedural cases. The equipment provides improved features (e.g., full screen view, brighter light source, increased memory and dual scope disinfector) for improved efficiency and quality. The existing system will be retained for back-up. This item was not included in the 2005 capital budget; instead, some capitals planned for purchase will be rented as needed to provide funding for purchase of the endoscopy equipment. Capital lease or operating lease options are available, but at a higher cost than purchasing. Senior leadership believe that continuing to use the current system could pose patient safety problems if equipment broke down during a procedure and, therefore, recommend purchase of the new system through the hospitals group purchasing organization (Novation) at a proposed purchase price of $163,895. Following discussion: Motion was made by Knutson, seconded by Mueller, to forward a recommendation for approval of purchase of an Olympus Endoscopy System at the proposed purchase price of $163,895 to the Hutchinson City Council. All were in favor. Motion carried." Hutchinson Area' Health Care Hutchinson Community Hospital 5~ ~~ The Honorable Mayor Steve Cook and • Hutchinson City Council Members April 20, 2005 Page Two Thank you in advance for your consideration. Kay Peterson can answer any questions you may have regarding this request. Sincerely, INSOfV~A E EALTH CARE nt PGG:Ih xc: HAHC Board of Directors Jane Lien, Acute Care Programs and Services • • ~~~ J•h-I5-2d05 02:SApa Froa-HASH FINCH C11t1PANY • `J January 28, 2005 Mr. Timothy J. Vogel Real Estate Manager Nash Finch Company P,O. Box 355 Minneapolis, MN SSA40 - 0355 Dear Mr. Vogel: 1A52A441044 i-AAI P.AA2/A33 F-A53 As a follow-up to our recent conversations, it is the desire of the city of Hutchinson and its eoonamic development authority to acquire property for the expansion of fire city's municipal liquor store adjacent to the existing )rcono Foods grocery store. A formal agreement between the patties, if rrachtd, will contain [he following: • Provisions for rho acquisition of the pazcel immediately cast of she tureen[ liquor store, which is curren[ly housing "Midwes[ Tar Kwon Do"(approximately 3,961 square feet). At this point, the city would like to offer $50 per square foot far rhia property. • Provisions for the acquisition of parking lpt space immediawly to [he south a£ the existing building. At [his point, the city would like ro offer $5.00 per square foot for this property. In addition, the city will cover all costs related to tht condo platting of the property. • Provisions for the maintenance of any common arras. • Provisions to malign the south (Washington Avenue) entrance of the Econo Foods parking lot so as to align it to Jefferson Scree[.. • Provisions to modify a portion of [he existing pazking area so as to crease a "pocket parking ]a" between the new ettrance and tiu west side of the proposed new liquor store. • The parties agree to continue the discussion over the next three (3) months with the aim pf reaching agreement far the sale and purchase of the retail and parking spaces by ]~uaary 15, 2D05, p~'y • The parties agree that any transac[ion involving the arms and conditions of any proposed hansaction was be approved by their respective governing boards. While this loner of intent is not a contract, not an offer to contrec[, not an aaceptanca of any offer and is not intended to be binding on either pony; it >E an expression of interest by the ponies in negoriating the purchase of the real property contiguous with the Econo Foods stare here in Hutchinson. ~~a~ Feb-15-2005 02:53pm From-MASH FINCH C011PAMY Signed by \~ /~ IB523141D/4 T-831 P.OD3/009 F-B63 On behalf of: G%fY or ~IF/-tic, '~s~on - Signed by: ~~~ , ' On u u ~!w ~'~ ~~~~ MEMORANDUM • Date: Apri15, 2005 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council Marc Sebora, City Attorney From: Miles R. Seppelt, EDA Director Dan Wilson, Wilson Development Services RE: Negotiated Settlement with Midwest Tae Kwon Do In consultation with Mr. Dan Wilson, of Wilson Development Services (our relocation expert) we aze recommending a negotiated settlement in the amount of $20,000 for the relocation of Midwest Tae Kwon Do. Our reasoning: Midwest Tae Kwon Do is a displaced business under the Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act: As such, they are entitled to certain relocation rights and benefits. Displaced businesses have the right to choose between the Actual Cost Approach and the Fixed Payment Method of computing relocation claims. The displaced business has the right to choose the method in which they receive the greatest relocation benefits. The Fixed Payment Method has a maximum payment of $20,000. • Midwest Tae Kwon Do currently pays a significantly below-market-rate rent. They have negotiated a 10- yeaz tease with Nash Finch at a rate of approximately $3 per squaze foot initially, ramping up to $3.65 per square foot in Year 10. This is dramatically below market rates for downtown Hutchinson, which are typically in the range of $7 to $10 per square foot. Midwest Tae Kwon Do realistically will have to pay at least double their current rate of rent in order to lease space. In addition, Midwest Tae Kwon Do is limited in its ability to generate income. Currently the business has approximately 100 students who pay an_average of $45 per month for Tae Kwon Do lessons. This works out to a gross income of approximate]y $4,500 per month or $54,000 per yeaz. Any significant increases in the tuition rate will result in lower enrollment at the school, which will keep gross income at essentially its current level. Finally, the business is a strong asset to the Hutchinson community. Midwest Tae Kwon Do provides opportunities for young people to learn self-defense and self~iscipline, improve their physical fitness and build their self-esteem in a safe and supportive environment -all at a very reasonable cost. Considering all the less desirable alternatives available to young people today, it is clear that Midwest Tae Kwon Do satisfies an important need in our community. Naturally, we want to do everything possible to keep this business in operation. Far these reasons, we aze recommending a negotiated settlement in the amcunt of $20,000. This settlement will resolve any leasehold interests in the existing property, discharge all of our legal • obligations vis-a-vis the relocation of Midwest Tae Kwon Do and give them the best possible chance to relocate successfully and continue as a viable business. ~c~~ Memo To: .Mayor and City Council Frorrc Brad Emans, Fire Chief Date: 4/18/2005 Re: Fire Safety House Grant Several years ago the Meeker -McLeod fire chiefs formed an alliance and purchased a "Fire Safely House". The house was to be used by both counties in an effort to teach children some basic home safety, and fire prevention. Well, like all good things used by children, they wear out. After literally thousands of kids have gone through the Vailer it is was time to either do some major repairs on the old trailer or purchase a new • trailer. The Hutchinson FD saw this as an opportunity to update our own safety /prevention program with a more user-friendlier trailer. One that is handipp accessible, and adult friendly so we could expand the scope of uses for the trailer. HFD therefore applied for, and was awarded a grant through the "Assistance to Firefighters Grant - Fire Prevention and Safety Program" for $47,100.00 to purchase a new "Fire Safety House". The Hutchinson FD officers feel that we should still share the new trailer with our neighbors in McLeod and Meeker Counties. After all, we are all in the same business of saving lives and preventing fires. We will be extending an offer to the Meeker / McLeod County Chiefs Association to participate in the ownership of this new trailer 'rf they agree to pay the 10% match to the grant, agree to pay the insurance each year, and pay for all maintenance on the new trailer. The new trailer, just like the dd one, will continue to be housed in Hutchinson and all parties will continue. to make arrangements for it's use through our FD. This is truly awin-win for our fire department and for the fire departments in both counties. We need the city council action accepting the grant money from the Department of Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness and Response. As always, if you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 234-4211. • ~~0.) Hutchinson City Center • Ill Aassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 320.587.5151/Fax 320.234.4240 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Gary Plotz, City Administrator DATE: Apri122, 2005 SUBJECT: Consideration of Additional Visionary Short-Term Goals As a result of our annual visionary workshop, I will present the following additional goals at the Council meeting (also see attachments): • Coordinate the resources to the point of forming a facility committee for the establishment of a "transitional housing facility for victims of domestic abuse". • Solicit, define, and prioritize projects that improve local traffic flow and safety. • Identify and recommend opportunities for increased community awareness of facilities and events. C~ I request consideration and adoption of these objectives. Printed on recycledpaper - ~c~~ GOAL STATEMENT -Transitional Housing for Victims of Domestic Abuse r~ L Action Verb: Coordinate the resources to the point of forming a facility committee for the establishment of a "transitional housing facility for victims of domestic abuse." Measurement: 1 Number and diversity of participants you have involved in the process 2 Number and amount of financial resources identified 3 Timeframes you met or exceeded regarding the milestones (below) 4 Quality -Creativity in achieving the objective Key participants: County officials (including County Board, Health & Human Services, and Law Enforcement), City officials, Foundations, Churches, Other counties and cities, State Agencies, McLeod County Alliance on Domestic Abuse and other like agencies, and local citizens. Team Members: City Attorney, County Director of Health and Human Services, • Director of McLeod County Alliance for Domestic Abuse, and Fire Chief Team Leader: City Attorney Milestone: 1. Determine/Define the need for transitional housing, including the preliminary size of facility (July 1, 2005) 2. Research the financial resources, including federal/state grants, foundation money, federal/state/ local operating monies, potential local commitments for purchasing or construction and/or operating monies, and local fundraising (August 15, 2005) • Explore the option of having the School District involved in the construction of the facility, based on pass history of building a house 3. Research and recommend a specific fundraising process (September 15, 2005) 4. Establish a facility committee (December 1, 2005) • Deadline: December 1, 2005 a~~ GOAL STATEMENT -AWARENESS AND MARKETING OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES Subject: Community Awareness of Facilities and Events Action Verb: Identify and Recommend Opportunities for Increased Community Awareness of Facilities and Events Measurement: 1. Increase in Coordination Among Facilities and Number of Events 2. Quality of overall awareness and coordination • .Survey 3. Creativity in finding new and different methods to heighten awareness and coordination. Key Participants (stakeholders): Fair Board Association, Service . Clubs, Veteran Groups, Chamber of Commerce, Convention and Tourism Group, Schools, City, League of Cities, Other Cities, County, Church Groups, Art and Music Groups, Sports Groups, Media Groups, Private Industry, and Residents Team Members: Director of Parks Recreation and Community Education, Director of Information & Technology, and Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Team Leader: Director of Information & Technology Milestones: 1. Inventory current community awareness methods and marketing tools (July 1) 2. Solicit input on methods to increase community awareness and marketing of the community (August 1) 3. Analyze the opportunities to increase awareness and for coordination of facilities and events (October 1) • Analyze by cost benefit approach 9(~~ . 4. Prioritize and recommend changes that would increase both awareness and utilization of community facilities (November 1) Date Deadline: November 1, 2005 L~ qc~~ GOAL STATEMENT -LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW Subject: Local Traffic Flow and Safety Action Verb: Solicit, Define, and Prioritize Projects that Improve Local Traffic Flow and Safety Measurement: • Quality and accuracy of cost benefit analysis • Quality and clarity in identifying problem areas • Creativity in obtaining stakeholder participation Key Participants (stakeholders): Hutchinson Safety Committee, Director of Planning and Zoning, Director of Police and Emergency Services, Public Works Director, Assistant Public Works Director, City Street Employees, Mayor and Council, Chamber of Commerce -Transportation Committee, Local MN DOT, • General Public Team Members: Director of Police and Emergency Services, Director of Public Works, City Engineer Team Leader: City Engineer Milestones: 1. Solicit Input on Types of Traffic and Safety improvements (July 1) 2. Analyze the Cost and Benefits for Each Improvement (September 1) 3. Prioritize the Improvements (October 1) 4. Recommend Improvements to City Council (November i, 2005) Date Deadline: November 1, 2005 qc~~ Hutchinson Area Health Care Privatization Task Force Meeting Schedule City Council Chambers Hutchinson City Center 5:00 - 6:30 PM • Date T e A eoda 01/03/05 TF "Health Caze Trends and Privatization of Public Hospitals" (John Mitchell, Principal, Health Care Futures) 01/11/OS TF "Hospital Service Area/ Financial Challenges" (Phil Graves/ Pam Larson) 01/25/05 CC "PERA Enabling Legislation Request and City Council Action" (Tom Schroeder, Phil Graves) 02/08/05 CC "Glencoe Regional Health Services/ Moms Medical Center: The Case for Privatization and Integration with Physicians" (Jon Braband CEO /John Rau, CEO) 03/07/05 TF "Debt Financing Considerations" (Ehlers and Associates) Meeting at Emergency "Benefits im act to Ci entities b Privatization" Karen Holt, p ~' y ( operations Berkley Risk Service) Center 03/21/05 TF " PERA pension plan change" (John Paulson, PERA) "City of Hutchinson considerations" (Gary Plotz) "Hutchinson Medical Center's views" (Jim Lyons, Dr. David 04/04/05 TF Byron). 04/18/05 TF Review information, identify outstanding items, and consider developing a work plan and process for reconciling issues. 05/02/05 TF This date will not work for presentations from Willmaz and Montevideo. ~ An alternate date of 5/4 will work for Montevideo. "Rice Memorial Hospital Presentation" 05/16/05 TF "The revised tested model" (Tom Schroeder) ADM:U-I:\Privatization schedule 4-15-05 q (~~ U 05/23/05 TF Public Forum, Hutchinson Event Center, Plaza 15 Mall Hutchinson Event Center 06/20/05 TF Consider public feedback and work on outstanding issues. 07/4/05 TF Work on outstanding issues and review and critique draft "white paper" on privatization. 07/19/05 TF Preliminary report to the Hospital Board (Steve Snapp, Wayne Fortun) 07/26/05 CC Preliminary report to the City Council (Task Force Members) 08/01/05 TF Work on outstanding issues following reports and review and finalize "white paper" on privatization. 08/15/05 TF Consider outstanding issues and reconcile final recommendation to Hospital Board 08/16/05 TF Present final recommendation to Hospital Board (Task Force) 08/23/05 CC Present final recommendation to City Council (Task Force) TF =Task Force meeting CC =City Council meeting ADM:V-I:~Privatization schedule 4-] 5-OS ~~) ~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON MEMO Finance Department April 22, 2005 TO: MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WORKSHOP, 2005 BONDING MAY lO;PERFORMANCE BUDGETING MAY 24 We are in the process of preparing the 2005 bonding and would like to review the city's debt structure, tax impacts and other debt related issue during a workshop. The workshop we would review the city's current debt and other debt • related topics including city issued fees for housing bonds and tax increment issues. It will also be an opportunity for your questions to be answered. Steve Apfelbacher, Ehlers & Associates President, will be in attendance. REQUEST It would be requested to have a workshop beginning at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 10, 2005. The second meeting, May 24, would be for continuation of performance budgeting. H:\DOC \City council memo l.doc LI ~~d) • RESOLUTION NO. 12704 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING N0.4 PROJECT NOS. 05-04 & 05-OS WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifcations for the improvement of: 05-04 Main Street between 1st Avenue N and 4th Avenue S by construction of concrete sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal system revisions, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances, and 05-05 Washington Avenue West between Main Street S and Franklin Street SW by construction of concrete sidewalk, street lights, watermain, storm sewer, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, acopy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. • 2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 am on Friday, May 20th, 2005, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, June 14th, 2005 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount ouch bid. Adapted by the Hutchinson City Council this 26th day of 102005. Mayor: Steven W Cook City Administrator: Gary D Plotz ~b~~~ tt~e~ _ 11 I Hessen Street Southeast Hmchinson, h4N 55350 (320) 587-5 I S 1/Fex: (320) 234-0240 ~ }In.. mQliSa s~,r-C7 City of Hutchinson APPLICATION FOR PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS All applications muss be received at least 30 days before event in order to be considered Application Type (choose one) ^ Solicitors $100.00 ~ 1'ransientMerchant $)00.00 ^ Peddler $100.00 A licant Information 2" X 2"Picture Required Name: ~ ~`1- . ~Ct6 S Height: ~ ~ ro Weight: ~ t{ Q Eye Color: fp ~~ ~`i~ Driver's License Number State; ~_ Permanent Address: r ~ ~u~se1 MJ~I ~3~~-- - - Slate Zip Gry Permanent Telephone: '~i~D- ~.7 `.S~a~-8Q ~ _ Temporary Address: ~ $ S- N,, ~ - MAI ~535~ Clry State Zrp Temporary Telephone Access: _~~~ ~'ii~-1S5 z Have you been convicted of any crime, misdemeanor, or violation of any municipal ordinance, other than traffic violations? ^ yes _>~ no If yes, state the nature of offense and punishment or penalty assessed therefore: ~ ~~~~ City of Hu7cbinsan Appllca7lan for Peddlers, Solicltars, and 7ranalen7 Merclwrtts Page Z aJ3 • C, Lncatio?1 Name io c~ -~ ss - ~u~~,~~b~ M~ ~s3sb Localion Address City Slate Zip Business Information Describe relationship between applicant and employer: Describe nature of business and describe item(s) offered: erg ~ to - ~2l~ N n' a ~„~,~ vow ~~a0/r's - Describe method of delivery: 1`t Describe source of supply: _ (~a; 1~., i1U~rsc~ i r S Supp7ier Name Supplier Ad ~ess Supplier Nome r 13s- ~~-~ Nf. Po ~ 6 7y ~ F Gty ~~r•~ fbO.81-9'-8_ z~f 7~d -- Suppler Phane Number Slafe Zlp r~~-/ Suppler Pbona Number ~ ~-~ __ Supplier Address 6 ~ Sup ller Name .. .. City Suck Zlp BrOD-772- ~$SS Suppler Phone Number S lter Address C! Stafe Zi ,y Reference Provide two (2) property owners (preferably in McLeod County) for character references: CJ 32u-S`6 -5%30 `I Property Owner Phane Number vFs ~ ~1v~kd.ir,se~. _Mi~l ,SS35a Property Owner Address Ctry Srme Zlp roperry Owner Name Property Owner Phane Number ~. S t~~~~ Ciry of Hatchinson Application jor Peddlers, Solicitors, and Tmnaient Merchants Page 3 oj3 • r~ J List last (ufp''to three (3)) previous city(ies) where you car~xri~eldAAOn same activity: / t/ l~y~(~t.~tn/~ rV1/`I ~'~ ()L~ to 1~~01 Ciry State C' Datejs)ofActivity ~u, {c ~Crr 1C ~L~I l ~ to ~~ Ciry State Dale(s) of Activif^ I ,,~/ 1' lfi DI2 ~ ~ fe i ~ ~_ to / (~'/" -~ Ciry State Date(s) of Ac--[ivttyTT" Checklist The following items need to be completed andlor attached in order for the application to be processed: Application/Investigationfee paid in full (check or money order): '4~yes ^ no A licatioh com leted in full and si ned: es ^ no I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above application and that the application is true, correct, and accurate. I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants Ordinance No. 673 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $ 1,000.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Internal Use Onl Police ^ approved ^ denied Notes: City Council ^ approved ^ denied Notes: '2 ~ b5 D to H:/LiannlAppliuriorc/Peddly, Solicuor, Tnraientdoc ,oc~~ ~\ 'i»~RSSAPPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON By Check Number AP Payment Re ister with Voids Check Date 04/19/2005 - Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount 04!19/2005 PK 128864 ' 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 97.91 04/19/2005 PK 128865 103665 BP 9.64 04/19/2005 PK 128866 .102984 EBERT, DICK 485.64 04/19/2005 PK 128867 101875 GREAT W EST LIFE INS. CO. 300.00 04/19/2005 PK 128868 101872 H.R.L.A.P.R. 289.54 04/19/2005 PK 128869 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 14210.97 04/19/2005 PK 128870 102633 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 7288.79 04/19!2005 PK 128871 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 575.90 04/19!2005 PK 128872 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 3897.20 04/19!2005 PK 128873 101876 ING LIFE & ANN CO. 660.00 04/19/2005 PK 128874 115855 JEFF MEEHAN SALES INC. 882.22 04!19/2005 PK 128875 121343 KOHMAN, AARON 60.00 04/19/2005 PK 128876 102563 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 40.00 04/19/2005 PK 128877 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 215.00 04/19/2005 PK 128878 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 554.94 04/19/2005 PK 128879 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 50.00 04/19/2005 PK 128880 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 50.00 04/19/2005 PK 128881 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 50.00 04/19/2005 PK 128882 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 50.00 04/19/2005 PK 128883 102579 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE 149.00 04/19!2005 PK 128684 120697 NORTHLAND INN 108.41 04/19/2005 PK 128885 102096 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 04/19/2005 PK 128886 102052 QUALITY W INE & SPIRITS CO. 2110.28 04/19/2005 PK 128887 121344 RIGELMAN, AMY 60.00 04/19/2005 PK 128888 104047 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE 639.00 04/19/2005 PK 128889 121345 SCHLUETER, SKY 60.00 04/19/2005 PK 128890 121346 SCHLUETER, SUMMER 60.00 04/19/2005 PK 128891 118862 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT 2066.51 35252.95 Account # 35252.95 ~w~,i~c~c~fe ~ JS ~I I~l-~ Void Amou ___._~_ • ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS 4-26-OS WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE-USE TAX $9611.00 GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE-SALES TAX $838.00 H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE-FUEL TAX $718.60 LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE-MAR. SALES TX $25,089.00 • PAYROLL ACCOUNT -April 15, 2005 Period Ending: April 9, 2005 FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY -ELECTRONIC TRANSFER • TO STATE AND IRS DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE AMOUNT PEID ACCT# NAME DESCRIPTION $22,230.48 9995.2034 WITH. TAX Employee Contribution -Federal Tax ACCOUNT $12,450.64 9995.2240 Employee Contribution -Soc. Security $3,460.22 9995.2242 Employee Contribution -Medicare $38,141.34 Sub-Total -Employee Contribution $12,450.64 9995.2240 $3,460.22 9995.2242 $15,910.86 Sub-Total -Employer Contribution 54,052.20 Grand Total -Withholding Tax Account Employer Contribution -Social Security Employer Contribution -Medicare 510,049.51 9995.2035 MN DEPT OF REVENUE $11,572.20 102615 9995.2241 PERA Employee Contribution -Pension Plan $13,676.43 102615 9995.2241 Employer Contribution -Pension Plan $25,248.63 Sub-Total -PERA $15.86 102615 9995.2243 PERA-DCP ~ Employee Contribution -Pension Plan $15.86 102615 9995.2241 Employer Contribution • Pension Plan $31.72 Sub -Total -DCP $25,280.35 GRAND TOTAL -PERA a • Finance Director Approval • • C J 'iu~R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON By Check Number AP Payment Register with Voids Check Dates 04/26/2005 - Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount 04126!2005 PK 128892 ' 102271 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 263.49 04/26/2005 PK 128893 102126 ACE HARDWARE 786.85 04/26/2005 PK 128894 102260 ASHBROOK SIMON HARTLEY OPERATI 17.23 04/26/2005 PK 128895 102789 B & B SPORTS 109.18 04/26/2005 PK 128896 104077 B & C PLBG & HTG INC. 116.91 04/26/2005 PK 128897 121381 BARNAAL, DONNA 100.00 04/26/2005 PK 128898 102367 BELLBOY CORP 37.00 04/26/2005 PK 128899 101916 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 933.65 04/26/2005 PK 128900 121166 BERRY, AARON 5.85 04/26/2005 PK 128901 120738 BERTELSON'S 296.55 04/26/2005 PK 128902 119212 BLOCK FARMS & TRUCKING 14970.68 04/26/2005 PK 128903 101987 BRANDON TIRE CO 68.48 04/26/2005 PK 128904 103349 BRANDY GARMET LETTERING 777.11 04/26/2005 PK 128905 102136 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS 938.04 04/26!2005 PK 128906 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 36054.98 04/26/2005 PK 128907 104512 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE 154.80 04/26/2005 PK 128908 104391 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 202.71 04/26/2005 PK 128909 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 174.18 04!2612005 PK 128910 121364 CHICAGO TUBE & IRON 12837.12 04/26/2005 PK 128911 102863 CITY ENGINEERS ASSC OF MINNESO 60.00 04/26/2005 PK 128912 102484 CORPORATE EXPRESS 101.00 04/26/2005 PK 128913 103123 CRONATRON WELDING SYSTEMS INC 548.10 04/26/2005 PK 128914 102050 CROW RIVER AUTO 296.21 04/26/2005 PK 128915 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 75.00 04/26/2005 PK 128916 112958 CROWN INDUSTRIES INC. 1212.29 04/26/2005 PK 128917 104884 CULLIGAN 26.50 04/26/2005 PK 128918 120829 DAHLKE, BRIAN 121.76 04/26/2005 PK 128919 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 6466.53 04/26/2005 PK 128920 108852 DEAL, BOB 34.44 04/26/2005 PK 128921 121394 DENT BREAKAWAY INDUST., INC. 181.81 04/26/2005 PK 128922 102698 DEVRIES, RANDY 1155.44 04/26/2005 PK 128923 121382 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE 13446.00 04/26/2005 PK 128924 104084 DONOHUE & ASSOC 2460.00 04/26/2005 PK 128925 113181 DROP-N-GO SHIPPING, INC 69.27 04/26/2005 PK 128926 102236 DUININCK BROS INC. 6240.14 04/26!2005 PK 128927 102647 DYNA SYSTEMS 1644.81 04/26/2005 PK 128928 102324 EARL F. ANDERSEN, INC 3486.45 04/26/2005 PK 128929 104415 EARTH TECH 1512,50 04/26/2005 PK 128930 102726 ECOLAB PEST ELIM 151.76 04/26/2005 PK 128931 104131 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOC OF 25.00 04/26/2005 PK 128932 105555 EHLERS & ASSOC 1147.50 04/26/2005 PK 128933 104266 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE 510.75 04/26/2005 PK 128934 102648 ELVIN SAFETY INC 555.62 04/26/2005 PK 128935 104373 ERLANDSON, ANDY 100.00 04/26/2005 PK 128936 102223 FARM-RITE EQUIPMENT 534.78 04/26/2005 PK 128937 104137 FASTENAL COMPANY 327.22 04/26/2005 PK 128938 102094 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 474.80 04/26/2005 PK 128939 102526 G & K SERVICES 2015.68 Joid Amou u L_J • • r 1 U 04/26/2005 PK 128940 120284 GAVIN, OLSON & WINTERS, LTD 288.90 04/26/2005 PK 128941 121365 GEHRKE, TONY 60.00 04/26/2005 PK 128942 103972 GIFFERSON, TOM 60.00 04/26/2005 PK 128943 102524 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 300.00 04/26/2005 PK 128944 102087 GRAINGER PARTS OPERATIONS 540.52 04/26/2005 PK 128945 120218 GRAND VIEW LODGE 204.00 04/26/2005 PK 128946 105562 GRANIT BRONZ 107.78 04/26/2005 PK 128947 102020 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 116.69 04/26/2005 PK 128948 101874 GRIGGS & COOPER & CO 37425.66 04/26/2005 PK 128949 102529 HACH COMPANY 216.20 04/26/2005 PK 128950 102528 HAGER JEWELRY INC. 10.89 04/26/2005 PK 128951 121351 HAMPTON INN 238.70 04/26/2005 PK 128952 102451 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE 1023.10 04/26/2005 PK 128953 104797 HANTGE, MARSHA 100.00 04!26/2005 PK 128954 109799 HARRIS COMPANIES 5576.65 04/26/2005 PK 128955 121352 HAUER, FARGIONE, LOVE, LANDY & 300.00 - 04/26/2005 PK 128956 121366 HAWTHORNE INN 89.27 04/26/2005 PK 128957 121384 HEDGE & HERBERG,INC. 975.00 04/26/2005 PK 128958 102531 HENRYS FOODS INC 884.30 04/26/2005 PK 128959 101915 HERMELWHOLESALE 254.22 04/26/2005 PK 128960 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE/HUTCHINSON 807.84 04/26!2005 PK 128961 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 31249.42 04/26/2005 PK 128962 121293 HOTDOT GRAPHIC SOLUTIONS 120.00 04/26/2005 PK 128963 102534 HUTCH AUTO BODY 2064.32 04/26/2005 PK 128964 102139 HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COM 929.00 04/26/2005 PK 128965 121375 HUTCHINSON CITY DEPTS 50.00 04/26/2005 PK 128966 115652 HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER 129.19 04/26/2005 PK 128967 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO 1139.95 04/26!2005 PK 128968 121367 HUTCHINSON UNITED SOCCER ASSN. 1400.00 04/26/2005 PK 128969 102543 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE 2219.15 04/26/2005 PK 128970 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 168000.00 04/26/2005 PK 128971 102072 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 29220.50 04/26/2005 PK 128972 103099 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 2772.96 04/26!2005 PK 128973 121353 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 175.00 04/26/2005 PK 128974 102779 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #423 5497.26 04/26/2005 PK 128975 103520 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 189.41 04/26/2005 PK 128976 121309 INVENSYS SYSTEMS INC 3277.10 04/26/2005 PK 128977 102665 J-CRAFT 388.73 04/26/2005 PK 128978 102062 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 3848.54 04/26/2005 PK 128979 121385 JACOBSEN, MIKE 100.00 0 412 6/2 0 0 5 PK 128980 102208 JEFF'S ELECTRIC 3039.70 04/26/2005 PK 128981 104802 JENSEN, JULIE 11.85 04/26/2005 PK 128982 102556 JOES SPORT SHOP 87.86 04/26/2005 PK 128983 101938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 18189.00 04/26/2005 PK 128984 102346 JOHNSON; LEONARD G. 812.76 04/26/2005 PK 128985 102555 JUULCONTRACTING CO 70.88 04/26/2005 PK 128986 103906 KIESER, SUE 250.00 04/26/2005 PK 128987 102466 KKLN 1000.00 04/26/2005 PK 128988 104347 KOSEK, ANDREW 54.28 04/26/2005 PK 128989 121323 KOSEK, JEREMY-KOSEK TRUCKING 1339.00 04/26/2005 PK 128990 121386 KRISTICO, INC 237.00 04/26/2005 PK 128991 121368 KURTH, RYAN 46.01 • r~ • • • 04/26/2005 PK 128992 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO 973.25 04/26/2005 PK 128993 101946 LAB SAFETY SUPPLYING 159.63 04/26/2005 PK 128994 121349 LANSINK,LAURA 55.00 0 4/2 612 0 0 5 PK 128995 121350 LARSEN, RICHARD 100.00 0 4/2 612 0 0 5 PK 128996 101966 CARSON, QUENTIN 8.50 04/26/2005 PK 128997 102563 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 52.19 04/26/2005 PK 128998 104521 LEIDER, THERESA 15.13 04/26/2005 PK 128999 101974 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC 1369.00 04/26/2005 PK 129000 121186 LEONARD, STREET & DEINARD 1275.00 04/26/2005 PK 129001 120903 LEXISNEXIS 110.00 04/26/2005 PK 129002 101984 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 20278.35 04/26/2005 PK 129003 102145 M-R SIGN 379.90 04/26/2005 PK 129004 102093 MANKATO MACK SALES 177.65 0 412 6/2 0 0 5 PK 129005 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 2308.16 04/26/2005 PK 129006 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 39.00 0 4/2 612 0 0 5 PK 129007 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 39.00 04/26/2005 PK 129008 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 27.50 04/26/2005 PK 129009 102064 MCRAITH, JOHN 213.63 04/26/2005 PK 129010 116868 MDT 1365.00 04/26!2005 PK 129011 112400 MENARDS - HUTCHINSON 171.37 04/26/2005 PK 129012 102576 MERRILL, KENNETH B. 396.91 04/26/2005 PK 129013 102425 MIDWEST WIRELESSCOMM. 1991.24 04/26/2005 PK 129014 114439 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSN 35.15 04/26/2005 PK 129015 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VENICE 21.50 04/26/2005 PK 129016 102846 MINNESOTA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATI 1727.05 04/26/2005 PK 129017 102582 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 93.11 04/26/2005 PK 129018 102369 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE CERTIF 320.00 04/26/2005 PK 129019 117449 MINNESOTA GOLF COURSE SUPER AS 175.00 04/26/2005 PK 129020 102911 MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM 310.00 04/26/2005 PK 129021 104262 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A 1628.70 04/26/2005 PK 129022 121308 MINNESOTA REVENUE 5925.00 04/26/2005 PK 129023 105157 MINNESOTA SHREDDING 54.95 04/26/2005 PK 129024 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING lAB 3242.20 04/26/2005 PK 129025 115872 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1886.47 04/26/2005 PK 129026 102590 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. 6025.26 04/26/2005 PK 129027 102877 NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSC 215.00 04/26/2005 PK 129028 112124 NATIVITY OF MARY 70.00 04/26/2005 PK 129029 114919 NORTH SHORE ANALYTICAL INC 125.00 04/26/2005 PK 129030 102591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 28.76 04/26/2005 PK 129031 103014 OFFICE 1 ONLINE 30.83 04/26/2005 PK 129032 102490 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 619.01 04!26/2005 PK 129033 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 72.19 04/26/2005 PK 129034 120790 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC 43.20 04/26/2005 PK 129035 102483 OTTO ASSOCIATES 526.25 04/26/2005 PK 129036 102187 PAUSTIS & SONS W INE CO 1333.00 04/26/2005 PK 129037 119646 PETERSON FARMS 1838.00 04/26/2005 PK 129038 101853 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 7523.98 04/26/2005 PK 129039 102373 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 113.29 04/26/2005 PK 129040 102593 PLOTZ, GARY D. 387.37 04/26/2005 PK 129041 102445 POSTMASTER 162.00 04/26/2005 PK 129042 102493 PREMIER TECH PACKAGING 7382.31 04/26/2005 PK 129043 120474 PRIDE SOLUTIONS, INC 579.00 ~~ L_J • C~ r~ 04!26/2005 PK 129044 104378 PRIMROSE OIL CO 2575.33 04/26/2005 PK 129045 114391 PRO AUTO & TRANSMISSION REPAIR 648.54 04/26/2005 PK 129046 112264 PRO PRODUCTS LLC 138.79 04/26/2005 PK 129047 102598 QUADE ELECTRIC 233.76 04!26/2005 PK 129048 108861 OUADE'S INC 1833.50 04/2612005 PK 129049 102052 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. 7622.81 04/26/2005 PK 129050 117434 R & J TOURS 403.65 04/26/2005 PK 129051 102604 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 148.50 04/26/2005 PK 129052 102205 R.J.L. TRANSFER .1187.20 04/26/2005 PK 129053 121395 RADON.COM 25.00 04/26/2005 PK 129054 102432 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 353.50 04/26/2005 PK 129055 121176 REINER ENTERPRISES, INC 13216.60 04/26/2005 PK 129056 108702 RIVER CITY PACKAGING INC 502.35 04/26/2005 PK 129057 104149 RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS 123.65 04/26/2005 PK 129058 121396 ROCHESTER GRANITE CO. 300.00 04/26/2005 PK 129059 102021 RODEBERG, JOHN 287.67 04/26/2005 PK 129060 119208 RUNKE, DOREEN 200.00 04/26/2005 PK 129061 102225 RUNNING'S'SUPPLY 382.33 04/26/2005 PK 129062 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 337.05 04/26/2005 PK 129063 102101 SBC PAGING 32.14 04/26/2005 PK 129064 121369 SCHLUETER, TOM 90.36 04/26/2005 PK 129065 102606 SCHMELINGOILCO 438.06 04!26/2005 PK 129066 101940 SCHNOBRICH, MARK 82.13 04/26!2005 PK 129067 121370 SCHOW, DANA 10.00 04/26/2005 PK 129068 112355 SEBORA, MARC 42.73 04/26/2005 PK 129069 101892 SEH 56399.47 04/26/2005 PK 129070 102637 SEVEN WEST WASH R DRY 277.96 04/26/2005 PK 129071 102609 SHOPKO 74.48 04/26/2005 PK 129072 108768 SIGARMS INC 96.00 04/26/2005 PK 129073 107543 SIGN SHOP, THE 170.00 04/26/2005 PK 129074 102610 SIMONSON LUMBER CO 37.57 04/26/2005 PK 129075 101909 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 99.98 04/26/2005 PK 129076 102611 SORENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS 246.82 04/26/2005 PK 129077 120514 SPRINT 274.61 04/26/2005 PK 129078 102242 SRF CONSULTING GROUP 5299.16 04/26/2005 PK 129079 102612 STANDARD PRINTING 752.61 04/26/2005 PK 129080 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 27.95 04/26!2005 PK 129081 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 1510.16 04/26/2005 PK 129082 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 1177.76 04/26/2005 PK 129083 104534 STAYWELL 90.00 04/26/2005 PK 129084 119799 STEVE'S OK SERVICES 2635.00 04/26/2005 PK 129085 102671 STOTTS, CASEY 20.35 04!26/2005 PK 129086 102617 STRETCHERS 94.47 04/26!2005 PK 129087 103055 SUPERIOR FORD INC 21158.50 04/26/2005 PK 129088 121348 SWANSON FLO-SYSTEMS CO 1030.75 04/26/2005 PK 129089 121020 TAPS-LYLE SCHROEDER 20.00 04/26/2005 PK 129090 103285 TAYLOR, SUZETTE 92.00 04/26/2005 PK 129091 102659 TEK MECHANICAL 155.92 04!26/2005 PK 129092 102054 TELECKY,DAVE 25.01 04/26!2005 PK 129093 102396 THECO INC. 22957.47 04/26/2005 PK 129094 101843 TKDA 19818.12 04/26/2005 PK 129095 120242 TRIBUTE CAPITAL, LLC 3950.00 u LJ CJ • 04/26/2005 PK 129096 119214 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 1 54937.07 04/26/2005 PK 129097 102619 TWO WAY COMM INC 1574.12 04!26/2005 PK 129098 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 3210.15 04/26/2005 PK 129099 102627 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 180.00 04/26/2005 PK 129100 108568 URBAN COMMUNICATIONS 1485.68 04/26/2005 PK 129101 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 400.14 04/26/2005 PK 129102 102069 VESSCO INC .594.69 04/26/2005 PK 129103 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 406.30 04/26/2005 PK 129104 101857 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 75.13 04/26/2005 PK 129105 102631 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 548.37 04/26/2005 PK 129106 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 1020.83 04/26/2005 PK 129107 121387 WATSON, BRENDA 10.00 04/26/2005 PK 129108 121383 WELLE-FAHEY,JACKIE 145.00 04/26/2005 PK 129109 103452 WINE COMPANY, THE 1208.00 04/26/2005 PK 129110 102452 WINE MERCHANTS INC 606.15 04/26/2005 PK 129111 119211 WORK CONNECTION, THE 5003.00 04/26/2005 PK 129112 102632 XEROX CORP 2127.64 04/26/2005 PK 129113 103980 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS 115.39 04/26/2005 PK 129114 105571 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO 572.97 759242.15 Account Nu # 759242.15