Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp05-09-2007 c
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCffiNSON CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2007
.CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Gerhard Bode, Peace Lutheran Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
5. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 24, 2007
Action - Motion to approve as presented
6. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION BOARD MINUTES FROM MARCH 15,2007
2. HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD MINUTES FROM
MARCH 20, 2007
3. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR APRIL 2007
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
.
1. RESOLUTION NO. 13190 - RESOLUTION CONCURRING IN APPROVAL AND
AUTHORIZATION OF EXECUTION OF MINNESOTA MUNIClP AL GAS AGENCY AGREEMENT
2. RESOLUTION NO. 13191- RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (BIODIESEL) -
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SOLICITOR'S LICENSE FOR TONY JENSEN ON BEHALF
OF THE HUTCHINSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH TKDA &
ASSOCIATES FOR COMPREHENSIVE AIRPORT PLAN UPDATE
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PARADE PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION FOR
CHALLENGED CHILDREN ON MAY 19,2007
(f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZING THE HUTCHINSON EDA TO HIRE ZRT
ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN OF INDUSTRIAL SPEC BUILDING
Action - Motion to approve consent agenda
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. - NONE
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED GRANT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF
CUSTOMER ELATION
-
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
COMMUNICATIONS. REOUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) SUMMARY REVIEW OF HOSPITAL PRIVATIZATION PROCESS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 9, 2007
Action -
~SHED BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF 2008 BUDGET PROCESS
Action -
10. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERA TIONFOR APPROVAL OF CREATION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DEBT PLAN
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AWARDING PROPOSAL FOR INSURANCE SERVICES
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approval
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - LETTING NO.4, PROJECT NO. 07-04
Action - Motion to reject- Motion to approve
(d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MONTANA STREET NE
EXTENSION - LETTING NO. lA, PROJECT NO. 06-01A
.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
11. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
12. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
13. ADJOURN
.
2
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2007
.CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Steve Cook called the meeting to order. Members present were Bill Arndt, Jim Haugen, Casey Stotts and
Kay Peterson. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Kent Exner, City Engineer, and Marc
Sebora, City Attorney.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Jon Lindekugel, Christ the King Lutheran Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Dale Baker, 1373 Heritage Ave. NW, presented before the Council. Mr. Baker commented that property
valuations need to be adjusted due to imbalance. Mr. Baker also encouraged the Council to stay the course
with the budlleting for outcomes process. He feels that it would be a good process to follow to review what
the commuruty truly wishes to pay for. He expressed that he does not see any downside to the process.
Lena Mowlem, 1365 Westwood Road, presented before the Council. Ms. Mowlem explained that she had
been requested to be part of the Outcome-Based budgeting I?rocess and was disappointed to fmd out that the
City Council decided to put a hold on the project. She felt It would be very beneficial to the City and good
to include citizens. She encouraged .the Council to continue on with the process.
.
Roger Olson, VMF Park representative, presented before the Council. Mr. Olson commented that there has
been requests to place a helicopter in VMF Park. The reason for this is that the new mode of transportation
in the more current wars is via helicopter. Mr. 01son asked of the Council for their approval to proceed with
application to place a helicopter in the park. There will be no cost to the City.
There was discussion as to policies and procedures that should be followed as far as accepting items into
city-owned parks.
Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to authorize application procedure for the helicopter, contingent on the
design plans being approved and safety considerations being discussed. Motion carried unanimously.
5. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 10, 2007
Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unarJimously.
.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM MARCH 15,2007
2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2007
3. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MARCH 2007
4. CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR MARCH 2007
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 13184-- RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AGREEING TO ENTER INTO
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT OF SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR THE
EXPANDED FRANKLIN GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECT
AND APPROVAL TO EXECUTE SCDP GRANT AGREEMENT
2. RESULUTION NO. 13186 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (F350 PICK-UP AND UNLEADED
5(G\)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 2007
GASOLINE)
.
.
.
3. RESOLUTION NO. 13187 - RESOLUTION ALLOCATING EXCESS BOND FUNDS TO CERTAIN
PROJECTS
4. ORDINANCE NO. 07-0460 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM
ON CERTAIN LAND USE ACTIONS WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
5. ORDINANCE NO. 07-0462 - AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE AND ENACT TITLE 5, CHAPTER 54
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) AND APPROVAL OF SUMMARY
ORDINANCE FOR PUBLICATION
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
1. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF LOT SPLITS LOCATED ON OTTAWA AVENUE AS
REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 13172, 13173, 13174, 13175, 13176, 13177
AND 13178)
2. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS
FIRST ADDITION TO RA VENWOOD WEST SUBMITTED BY RA VENWOOD POND
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDA nON (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13179)
3_ CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW TWO DETACHED GARAGES
ON ONE LOT LOCATED AT 1410 JEFFERSON STREET SE WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13180)
4. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FIREWORKS
TENT SALES LOCATED IN WALMART PARKING LOT AT 1300 HWY 15 SOUTH WITH
FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
1318I)
5. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW A 19 FOOT CORNER SIDE
YARD SETBACK WHERE 25 FEE~IS REQUIRED FOR AN ADDITION TO A NON-
CONFORMING HOUSE AT 340 5 AVENUE SW WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13182)
6. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 07-0463 - AN ORDINANCE ADDING
LANGUAGE TO THE WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM (WAIVING FIRST READING
AND. SETTING SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR MAY 8, 2007)
( d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR DEAN SCHLUETER
TO OPERATE A TEMPORARY GREENHOUSE IN THE OLD CUB FOODS PARKING LOT
(e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PARADE PERMIT FOR MINNESOTA WINGS
MOTORCYCLE CLUB ON JULY 14,2007
(f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PARADE PERMIT FOR VFW POST 906 ON MAY 28, 2007
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO CITY POLICY NO. 3.27 -
SICK/V ACA TION LEAVE DONATION
(h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ASSESSMENT ROLL
(LETTING NO.1, PROJECT NO. 06-01)
2
'5(Q ')
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 2007
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR KENT EXNER TO
WASHINGTON D.C. FOR TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE FLY-IN
. G) CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REGARDING 2007 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT
(LETTING NO. 5/PROJECT NO. 07-05)
(k) RESOLUTION NO. I 3185-A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED
. GRANT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF CUSTOMER ELATION
(1) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ADOPTING 2008 BUDGET PARAMETERS
(m)CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD
Items 6(b)3, 6(c)2, 6(c)6, 6(k) and 6(m) were pulled for separate action.
Motion by Stotts second by Peterson, to approve the consent agenda with the exception of the items noted
above. Motion carried unarJimously.
Item 6(b)3 had further discussion. Mayor Cook suggested combining some of the items into one sentence.
The content of the Resolution will not change.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve Resolution No. 13187 with minor revisions. Motion
carried unanimously.
Item 6( c)2 had further discussion. Mayor Cook noted that part of this application includes plantings around
the pond area. Mayor Cook suggested requirirJg plantings around the pond as opposed to merely
encouraging plantin~s as the Planning Commission recommended. Rebecca Bowers,
PlannnglZoninglBuildmg Director, noted that staff and the Planninll Commission recommended planting
mainly because there is no set policy or standard in place identifying what type of plantings should be
incorporated. Kent Exner, City Engineer, noted that staff generally directs property owners to plant
Mn/DOT-type grasses that do not flood out easily. Council Member Peterson encouraged that staff develop a
policy or ordinance related to plantings around ponds.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to aPl?rove Resolution No. 13179, additionally directing staff to
develop a policy or ordinance related to plantmg around ponds. Motion carried unarJimously.
Item 6( c)6 had further discussion. Mayor Cook suggested staff researching a similar-type ordinance that was
adopted in Mason City, Iowa. The ordinance the mayor is referring to has additional language that is not
included in the proposed ordinance.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to table this item until a revised draft of the ordinance is presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
Item 6(k) had further discussion. Mayor Cook noted that the next Council meeting scheduled for May 8,
2007, may be rescheduled and noted that the public hearing date will need to be reset.
Motion by Stotts, second by Haugen, to set public hearing for May 9, 2007. Motion carried unarJimously.
Item .6(m) had further discussion. Mayor Cook recommended that Abby Dahlquist and Guy Stone be
appomted.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to ratifY the Library Board appointments. Motion carried
unanirnously.
. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. - NONE
8. COMMUNICATIONS. REOUESTS AND PETITIONS
3
.
5(c\}
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 2007
.
(a) EXPLANATION OF PROPERTY VALUATIONS AS PROVIDED BY SUE SCHULZ, MCLEOD
COUNTY ASSESSOR
Sue Schulz, Mcleod County Assessor, presented before the Council. Ms. Schulz noted that there were some
issues with commercial properties. Ms. Schulz explained that there are other avenues that can be explored in
assessing the values of commercial properties. Essentially all of the commercial property valuations will be
reverted to the 2006 valuation and a better process will be established moving forward. Commercial
property owners had seen very large increases in their valuation.
Council Member Stotts asked if the shift in commercial property valuations will increase residential
valuations. In addition, he asked if the State would shift things this summer. He also asked that
communications be improved between the Assessor's office and the City. Ms. Schulz noted that her office is
100king into using a consultant to assess property valuations and have them equitably placed where they
should be.
(b) UPDATE ON BUILDING PERMIT FEES FOR "DREAM SHEDS" PROPOSAL
Rebecca Bowers, Planning/ZoninglBuilding Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Bowers explained
that at the last Council meeting some information was presented regarding the City of Hutchinson' s building
permit fees that was inaccurate. Ms. Bowers presented information showing that Hutchinson is in the
median related to surrounding communities when it comes to building permit fees.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES ON ADVISORY PANEL FOR
HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY
.
.
Rebecca Bowers, Planning/ZoningIBuilding Director, presented before the Council. Ms. Bowers requested
that at least one Council Member sit on the advisory panel for the Hwy 7 Corridor Study. Other members
include Planning Commissioners, staff members, and an EDA board member.
Council Member Haugen volunteered to sit on the Hwy 7 Corridor Study advisory panel.
(b) DISCUSSION OF SUMP PUMP INSPECTION PROGRAM OPTIONS
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner explained the importance of a sump
pump inspection program to the Public Works department. Four proposals were presented to the Council to
administer the sump pump inspection program. One option is a full proposal by Bolton & Menk in the
amount of$31,000. A second option is a revised proposal from Bolton & Menk in the amount of$2I,000
(this revised proposal would include more staff contribution than the first proposal). The third proposal is to
hire a private contractor along with City staff support. There is some concern by staff that this proposal
would not be completed in the most timely manner. . The fourth proposal is that the inspection program is
completely conducted by City staff. Current staff loads do not make this the most viable option.
Council Member Peterson noted some liability concerns with hiring a private contractor. City Attorney,
Marc Sebora, noted that conditions could be placed on the contractor to have appropriate insurance in place.
Council Member Stotts suggested utilizing engineering interns to conduct the inspections. Kent Exner noted
some concerns on putting this type of responsibility on inexperienced individuals. Some of these inspections
4
5(0)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-APRIL 24,2007
could be adversarial situations. Kent Exner noted that the inspections will be administered and conducted by
engineering technicians and interns trained by Bolton & Menk.
.
Mayor Cook noted that after this major project is completed, he would prefer that staff carry out the
inspections in the future. .
Motion by Cook, second by Peterson to approve using the Bolton & Menk revised proposal at $21,000.
Motion carried unanimously.
( c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 15 COALITION ANNUAL DUES AND
DEVELOPMENTFUNDCON~UTION
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner reviewed the objections of the Hwy 15
Coalition. The coalition consists of municipalities between I-90 to Sauk Rapids. The Coalition will be
seeking a federal grant in the amount of$ I million to conduct a corridor study arid to preserve the corridor.
Staff is requesting the Council authorize $200 for the dues to the Coalition and contribute $5000 to the .
development fund. Mr. Exner explained that Hutchinson has much to gain from a preserved Hwy 15
corridor. Ultimately, the City will benefit from a comprehensive plan that will be developed by the
Coalition. The funds would be utilized from comprehensive planning fees that are collected.
Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve a paying armual dues in the amount of$200 and making a
development fund contribution in the amount of $5000 to the Hwy 15 Coalition. Motion carried
unanimously.
. (d) DISCUSSION OF MN/DOT TRUNK HIGHWAY 7/I 5/22 RECONSTRUCTION 2007 CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES, PHASING AND DETOURS
Kent Exner, City Engineer, presented before the Council. Mr. Exner reviewed the construction plan and
detour route for phase 2 of the Hwy 7 project. Construction plarJS to begin on April 30, 2007. The first part
of the project will begin from where the project left off last year to School Road NW. The detour route will
run from Water Street, along Golf Course Road, to School Road NW. The truck detour route will be the
same as last year: from the west the route will run from V ale Avenue to County Road 82 to School Road to
Airport Road; from the east the truck route will follow Hwy 22 to Airport Road linking back up to Hwy 7.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF RESETTING MAY 8, 2007, CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO MAY 9, 2007
Due to the absence of Council Member Bill Arndt, it has been requested that the next Council meeting date
be moved to May 9, 2007. Some topics that will be addressed at the next Council meeting deserve the full
Council's attention.
Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to approve resetting the May 8, 2007, City Council meeting to May 9,
2007. Motion carried unarJimously.
11. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
. Hutchinson Area Health Care Request
5
5(~)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 24, 2007
.
.
Mayor Cook noted that HAHC is requesting approval of a $2.7 million construction of a new
Orthopaedic/Rehabilitaiton Center.
Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to approve the request of Hutchinson Area Health Care. Motion
carried unarJimously.
Landform Contract
Rebecca Bowers requested that the contract with Landform, who will be conducting the Hwy 7 Corridor
study, be approved as distributed.
Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson to approve the proposed contract with Landform. Motion carried
unanimously.
Orville Moe, 18017 Common Street, presented before the Council. Mr. Moe noted that he has been involved
with renewable energy research and offered to hold a short seminar/presentation on renewable resources.
Mayor Cook suggested holding a workshop prior to the next Council meeting. Council Member Stotts
suggested settmg a presentation in the evening some time at the Event Center and invite the public and other
representatives to attend.
Marc Sebora - Mr. Sebora noted that the City's smoke-free workplace ordinance goes into effect June 1,
2007. Mr. Sebora will put on a presentation to business owners related to what the requirements are.
Discussion was held regarding the proposed acts in the state legislature.
Kay Peterson - Council Member Peterson suggested setting April 26lh from 9:30 a.m. ~ II :00 a.m. at the
Fairgrounds as a public meeting to attend the mock crash.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts to set as public meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
Gary Plotz - Mr. Plotz noted that Mcleod County is starting a pro~ related to e-waste. The e-waste
disposal site for Hutchinson is Creekside compost facility. A nommal fee will be charged. In addition,
another program is going to be offered at the Fairgrounds. More information will be forthcoming.
Kent Exner - Mr. Exner noted that a meeting of the Hwy 15 Coalition will be held on Friday April27lh from
10:00 a.m. - 12noon at the Event Center.
Mayor Cook - Mayor Cook asked John Olson, Public Works Manager, about the amount of potholes on the
streets. Mr. Olson noted that two-run days are bein~ scheduled which will allow for more repairs to be
made. He encouraged anyone with concerns or speCific areas to contact Public Works.
Kent Exner also noted that striping on Hwy 7/Hwy 15 will begin in the near future.
Mayor Cook also noted that City representatives met with Sen. Amy Klobuchar yesterday and it was a very
beneficial meeting spent with her.
Mayor Cook also noted that HUC is having a meeting on May 8, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. at the Utilities office to
consider joining a Minnesota municipal gas agency.
Motion by Cook, second by Peterson, to set May 8, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. at the Hutchinson Utilities
CommiSSIOn office as a public meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
12. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve claims, appropriations and contract payments. Motion
carried unanimously.
13. ADJOURN
.
Motion by Stotts, second by Cook, to adjourn at 7:25 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
6
SCu ')
.
.
.
City of Hutchinson - Public Arts Commission
March 15, 2007
4:30 PM, City Center
Regular Meeting Minutes
Members Present: Tom Wirt, Terry Kempfert, Joanne Wilmert, Mayor Steve Cook, Dolt
Moon
Tom Wirt called the meeting to order at 4:35.
Minutes from the February 15, 2007 meeting were approved. MPS Moon/Wilmert
Old Business:
. Asked for updates to the Inventory Spreadsheet.
. Updates on Polley and Procedure Categories:
o Rotating Art in public spaces - review draft LuAnn
o Gifting and Transfer of ownership process- Dolt/Rebecca - need
something "legal" from Marc Sebora
o Maintenance - Dolt/Rebecca
o Retiring/Obsolescense - Dolf/Rebecca
o Public Works input/responsibilities - Dolf/Rebecca
o Introduction/history - Tom
We should try to add in remaining parts by April meeting so we can have a "completed"
document to review.
New Business:
o Fiscal Management - if we are getting funds from fees, should it be
part of the cities budget vis be managed by a foundation? Start by
talking w/ Ken Merrill, Marc Sebora. & foundation. (Moon/Cook)
o Tom presented outline for Section 6 - Processes overview.
o Going forward, the Public Arts Commission will probably meet
quarterly and provide a yearly update to the city council.
o Need to create an informational brochure for prospective donors by
April (Tom)
o Turn In all remaining pieces to Tom by the first week in April.
Draft to be ready by 4119 for review.
Meeting adjourned. MPS WirtNVilmert
Next Meeting: Thursday, April 19, 4:30 pm at the city center.
LP (C\ ) \
.
. 6.
.
~n~
Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, March 20,2007, 7:00 AM
Minutes
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Casey Stotts called the meeting to order. Members Present: Becky
Felling, La V onne Hansen, Joel Kraft, and Ruth Kimball. Staff Present: Jean Ward and Judy Flemming.
2. MINUTES OF THE HRA BOARD MEETING ON FEBRUARY 20,2007
Ruth Kimball moved to approve the Minutes as written. LaVonne Hansen seconded and the motion
carried unanimously.
3. FINANCIAL REPORTS
LaVonne Hansen moved to approve the Financials Reports. Becky Felling seconded and the motion
carried unanirnously.
4. PARK TOWERS
a. Jean Ward updated the Board on the progress of the Center for Energy and Environment analysis of
Park Towers.
b. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the updated PHAS score for Park Towers
5. UPDATE ON THE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION HOUSE
a. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the RFP's received from Hometown Realty and Coldwell
Banker Advantage. Ruth Kimball moved to approve Coldwell Banker Advantage. Becky seconded
the motion. La V onne Hansen and Joel Kraft abstained from the vote. The motioned passed.
COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Casey Stotts reviewed with the Board the results from the focus groups outcome based
budgeting survey.
7. HOUSING AMERICA 2007, SAMPLE PROCLAMATION
Becky moved to approve the sample proclamation. Joel Kraft seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
8. YEAR END REPORT
Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the HRA Year End Report presentation in the Council Chambers.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other business, Chairman Casey Stotts declared the meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, lIRA Executive Director
~ l~g, Secretary/Treasurer
March 20, 2007 Minutes
Page 1 of 1
(p (U)2-
.
Memo
Hutchinson Fire
Department
To: Mayor and City Council Members
From: Brad Emans, Fire Chief
o.te: 05101/07
Re: Monthly Update on Activities of the Fire Department
Fire Deparbnent Response: The fire department responded to 37 general alarms in the month of
March.
Officer Only Response: An .officer only" responded to 15 calls in April, saving the fire district the cost
of a general alarm and more importantly, kept our firefighters on their full time job or at home with their
families!
Response Time (First Emergency Vehicle Out of the Door): April - 3 minutes 46 seconds
. Example of a few of the calls:
. The FD responded to a report of a small grass fire in the NE part of our fire district. Three hours later
and with the help of the Sliver Lake FD we had the fire under control. The fire was started from the
buming of garbage and an old Christmas tree.
. The FD responded to an attic fire in the NE part of the City of Hutchinson. Firefighters had to cut
ventilation holes in the roof and pull ceilings in the house to gain access to the fire. The cause of the fire
was due to construction/remodeling practices.
. The FD responded to a possible missing person on the Crow River when an unattended boat was found
fioating after witnesses sa!N a person in it Fortunately, the person was found later unharmed.
. The FD responded to a two vehicle accident in the southem part of our fire district where exbicalion was
needed to remove one victim.
. A fire officer responded to a report of heavy smoke blanketing the NW part of the City of Hutchinson. a
large controlled bum north of the city was in progress when the wind switched to the north blowing all of
the smoke into the city. The FD advised the party to back bum the slough to put it out
. A fire officer investigated an attempted arson fire in the SW part of the city. The siding on a utility building
was set on fire. The investigation continues.
.
1
(j (eI)"3
This is the breakdown of the calls for the month:
City:
~ Residential4 CommerciaVlndustrial7 Multi-family 1 SchoolO Carbon Monoxide 2
Hazardous Material 2 Vehicle 4 Rescue 1 Medical 0 Grass 3 Sky-Wam 0 Good Will 0
.
.
Mutual Aid 0
Structure Fires 2
Arson 1
Rural:
Rescue 2 Grass Type 4 Medical 4 Residential 0 Farm Building 0 Hazardous Material 0
Carbon Monoxide 1 Vehicle 2 Commercialllndustrial 0 Good Will 0 Mutual Aid
Structure Fires 0 Arson 0
Drills I Meetings I Other Infonnatlon
Training:
1. Medical Training - head and neck injuries (preparation for motorcycle season)
2. HTI - tour and pre-plan with our mutual aid partner Silver Lake FD
3. Auto extrication for our 11 new firefighters (classroomlhands--on)
4. Equipment check off for our 11 new firefighters
. We assisted the City Park Department with three native prairie grass restoration bums.
. We assisted Ufe-Unk Ambulance in the filming of a successful on-scene landing for the training of other
fire departments.
. We assisted Ridgewater College with the Wild Land firefighting training course held over two weekends
in Hutchinson.
Fire Prevention I Public Relations
.
We participated with the Hutchinson Police departmen~ Hutchinson Ambulance, and Ufe-Unk in a
"Mock-Crash" for the Hutchinson High School, Hutchinson Charter School, and Lester Prairie High
School in an effort to show the resuR of "driving while impaired". This demonstration was held prior to
Prom!
.
We participated in the annual JC's babysitter clinic. It was our part to teach emergency response actions.
The clinic was attended by over 100 young people.
.
We participated in the annual 'We Care About Our Kids" at the Hutch Mall.
.
We put on the program on "Storm Preparation" for the residence of Park Towers
. Page 2
(}(C\ )3
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 13190
RESOLUTION CONCURRING IN APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF
EXECUTION OF MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL GAS AGENCY AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Utilities Commission (hereinafter referred to as the
"Governing Body") has been empowered by law, city charter, or by resolution of the city
council (the "City Council") of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (the "City") to establish
and regulate rates and charges for the distribution of gas within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City, acting through the Governing Body, has by resolution approved
and authorized execution of an agreement to establish and make the City a member of
the Minnesota Municipal Gas Agency and appointed the Hutchinson Utilities
Commission Initial Representative to such Agency pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 453A.01 through 453A.12 (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that the aforementioned resolution of the Governing Body
will become adopted by the City only upon the concurrence of the City Council of the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council concurs in the resolution
passed by the Governing Body to approve and authorize execution of an agreement
entitled "Agency Agreement," with such other Municipal Gas Systems as are named
therein, such agreement to be effective as of the date when executed by all of the
Municipal Gas Systems named therein, for the purpose of [establishing and] becoming
a member of said Agency and the appointment of the Hutchinson Utilities Commission
Initial Representative as provided for therein.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
(Seal)
ATTEST:
By
By
Signature
Signature
By
Name (Printed)
[Mayorl
Title
(pCb) \
RESOLUTION NO. 13191
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
.
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
7,496 gal Biodiesel $I7,139 Use by MnDOT, Utilities HATS Yes Schmeling Oil Co
& City vehicles
.
e following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT. BUDGET
VENDOR
Motion Made By:
41teconded By:
Resolution submitted for Council action
Kenneth B. Merrill
by: Finance Director
Date Approved: May 9, 2007
Co C b }L
.
.
.
III Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(320) 587.5151/Fax: (320) 234-4240
City of Hutchinson
APPLICATION FOR PEDDLERS, SOLIOTORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS
All applications must be received at least 30 days before event in order to be considered
o Solicitors
o Transient Merchant
~ Peddler
~ql ftD'l. -to ~~,~
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
Name:
Height:
TON Y Jfj~1V
5' 811 Weight: :::2 00
() (\-f; Ie
Driver's License Number:
Permanent Address: Jn55"
JtV1L I:.l-1N5D1\}'
City
Eye Color: -BROl.t?LJ
Slate: rn Ilf
~ sr .S-V
m~ 55'350
State Zip
S87-~{
Permanent Telephone:
Temporary Address:
5-;(0
City
Stale
Zip
Temporary Telephone Access:
Have you been convictedvoy crime, misdemeanor, or violation of any municipal ordinance, other than
traffic violalions? 0 yes)lll. no
If yes, slate the nature of offense and punishment or penalty assessed therefore:
v( c )
.
.
.
City oj HlI.tchin.wn
Applicationfor Peddlers. Solicitors. and Transient Merchants
Page 2 of3
--.t!0lC trlt'\fOJ\J ~-Key
Location Name
\:J \.~.\L~ ~ lVI4-
Locatio'n -Address
~9XI~)
~\J)YWJ1A<oflJ
Ci
mtJ
State
s:<<?~()
7i
BuBil\t:#
Describe relalionship between applicant and employer:
V(jLlJ1\J)t~~
Describe nature of business and describe item(s) offered:
~~~ - WoVltE: ~II ~ JJ;Iri/ f-Sl~~.w-
.JIf'::m~ - .5:"EL-LI1\.Y:r- Ul-W)lJ ~1J2l5-R.. (::;;1-0-10 !Ab Il'J$Fc:r(CIM~
&-R t-l-i'3RtlCl b0';\ As If .Qm'r\ 'f?f1tst?-R.
Describe method of delivery:
.qWhL$1f >
~ ~\Q:.W
.
Describe source of supply:
&" ~
jt _-'
PR.C\)l(T~ .)
Supplier Na~
- - -'I' --.' '1 --
L~ C. / /'. _"'/ ,,)/,1_ ""<,
Supplu Pho~ Number
rc I'c) :; :;:.1;- -VI"}/-<:t 7. ":;It, tit :-1 de
Supplier Address
~. ..'"
#./' i '.
City
n,)}\"
Stare
9(';,.:,-
Zip
Dr
Supplier Nome
Suppler Phone Number
Suppl~r Address
City
State
Zip
Supplier Na~
Suppler Phone Numbu
S lier Address
Cirv
State
Zi
Provide two (2) property owners (preferably in McLeod County) for character references: ~?o'1
~ ~~Hm---f:te~. ~-::<.D .$l'- U3?-
Property Owner Name Property Owner Phone Number
(0:(0 ~15R.TS R~ S1.0
Property Owner Ailiiress
~itr0 ~~
Property Owner Name
{qq lc5 (J'AANtr-{; ftVP~
Pro e Owner AtkJ~ss
~
City
~5~O
Zip
yYJll.)
State
Property Owner Phont Numbt:r
rjUlCfh ~fJ\')
Ci
ml1) 55~O
State zj
(0 (G ')
.
.
-
City of Hrachinso71
ApplicatiOrtfor Peddkrs. Solicitors. and Transient Merchants
Pl1ge3of3
...!R~renae.lrif&n:1l!ti.oIiK~Ji\ili\J"
List last (up to three (3)) previous city(ies) where you carried on same activily:
NO~ to
City State Date(s) of Acti....ity
to
City State Date(s) of Activity
to
City State Date(s) of Activity
.c"~H
The following items need to be completed andlor attached in order for the application to be processed:
ApplicationJInvestigalion fee paid in full (check or money order): Il{yes 0 no
A lication co leled in full and si ned: 0 no
I hereby certify I have completely f1lled out the entire above application and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.
I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants Ordinance
No. 673 is guiliy of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fme not exceeding $1,000.00 or by
imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution.
4-Jt -cJ?
Date
Police 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
City Council 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
H:tt..JceIRIIAppllcII:lorts/Ped.d.ler,Soiic:ior,TrmsieDt.doc
w(e-)
.
.
.
City of Hutchinson
Public Works Department
Operations & Maintenance
1400 Adams St SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone (320) 234-4219 Fax (320) 234-6971
April 30, 2007
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council members
From:
John Olson, Public Works Manager
CC:
Kent Exner, City Engineer
Subject:
Proposed Contract with TKDA Engineers for new Airport Layout PIan (ALP)
I recommend entering into a contract with TKDA Engineers for $30,000 to update the City's
ALP, contingent upon receiving funding from the Federal Aviation Adminisiration (FAA) and/or
MnlDOT Aeronautics for this work. The ALP is expecied to funded at Ihe 95% ($28,500) level
from FAA, with the City being responsible for 5% ($1,500).
This document is used by us as the basis for planning improvements, and is used by the FAA and
by MnlDOT Aeronautics to evaluale our airport's needs and potential funding opportunities.
Our ALP has not been updated for more than 15 years. The last update was dated in December
1991. Aerial photography used in the ALP was taken in 1978, nearly 30 years ago. The proposal
from TKDA is to updaie the existing pen and ink drawings on Mylar drafting film and update
them to a fonnal compatible with the City's engineering and GIS syslems.
The FAA continues to add requiremenls 10 an ALP. The current generation of ALP's is used by
FAA to analyze airport needs and include several airport-specific design standards, airfield
geometry, wind analysis, activity forecasts and many other technical measures. Because of the
iechnical nature of the infonnation, I recommend this update be done by an experienced engineer.
Other airports are paying anywhere beiween $10,000 for minor updates to existing electronically-
based plans to as much as $70,000 creation of a substantially new layoul. Mn/DOT Aeronautics,
in their capital improvement infonnalion, suggests budgeting beiween $15,000 and $45,000 for
an ALP update. In a letter from TKDA, they inferred our project would require efforts beyond a
minor updaie, but would not require significant effort requiring the larger expendiiures.
Infonnation from other airports and Mn/DOT indicate the $30,000 amount for the update is
reasonable.
In the FAA Advisory Circular recommends using a cost plus fixed fee (Not-to-Exceed) contract
when the scope and/or cost of the project cannot be accurately detennined ahead of time. In the
case of an ALP update, the FAA Advisory Circular indicates it being preferable to negotiale a
lump sum contract because the scope of the project can be fully and clearly defmed at the time the
agreement is prepared.
& (d)
.
.
.
TKDA
444 Cedar Stroot. SUIte 1500
SUll Paul, MN 55101-2140
EOOHERS . AInIJECTS . PI.AIftRS
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.lkda.com
April 19, 2007
Mr. John 01son
Hutchinson Area Transportation Facility
I400 Adams Street SE
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Re: Hutchinson Municipal Airport
2007 FAA Capital Program
Airport Layout PlarJ
Dear Mr. Olson:
We have enclosed two copies of a proposed contract for a new Airport Layout PIan (ALP) for
Hutchinson Municipal Airport.
The existing ALP package for Hutchinson is large1y pen and ink drawings on Mylar drafting
fihn. Some of the drawir1gs are ACAD updates for specific projects, but other drawings date
back to 1978, 199I, and 1995.
In addition, the FAA keeps addirlg to the requirements of arJ ALP package. The current
generation of ALP's provides a great deaI of data on airport-specific design standards, airfield
geometry, wind analysis, activity forecasts, etc., so they are typically prepared by an
experienced airport consultant. A new electronic ALP package has therefore been included in
the City's CIP.
We are currently preparing ALPs for two other 10cations, one costing $70,000 and one costing
$10,000. The more costly of the two irlvolves altemative nmway options, land use, new
building area quadrant, utility record drawir1gs, and other local planning issues. The less
costly effort is a "tune-up" of a more recent electronic ALP to support specific improvements.
This effort for Hutchinson is between the two in terms of effort required and associated cost.
We are proposing a $30,000 lump sum contract. The lump sum is federallyallowable arid
appropriate when the scope of services can be accurately defined prior to beginning the work.With 95% federal funding, the 10cal cost will be $1500.
An EmpIoyeo Owned CIlmpany Promoting A_ AcIiOn and Equal 0pp0ItunIty
Co Cd)
.
.
.
Mr. John Olson
Hutchinson Area Transportation Facility
Hutchinson Municipal Airport
ApriI 19, 2007
Page 2 of2
If this proposal is acceptable, please execute both copies and return one for our files. We
appreciate the opportunity to again be of service to the City of Hutchinson. Please contact us
with any related questions or comments.
Sincerely,
f~~=
LWK:lw
Enclosures
Co Cd)
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AGREEMENT
Between
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
(OWNER)
and
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(CONSULTANT)
for
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this f? ;/.. day of ~~ . 2007,
by and between CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to a the OWNER, and
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED with a regular
place of business at 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2140, hereinafter referred
to as the CONSULTANT.
WITNESSETH:
.
That the OWNER and the CONSULTANT, for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE
The OWNER agrees to and hereby does retain and employ the CONSULTANT
and the CONSULTANT agrees to perform Architectural, Engineering, and/or other Professional
Services for the Project at Hutchinson Municipal Airport entitled: Airport Layout PIan, hereinafter
referred to as the Project.
The Project and those services to be performed hereunder are more particularly
described in A IT ACHMENT A, a part hereof, and may be financed in part by grant-in-aid programs of
the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Aeronautics (Mn/DOT), and/or the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) as described in Article 14.
ARTICLE 2.
PERIOD OF SERVICE
Compensation for the CONSULTANT'S services, as provided elsewhere in this
Agreement, has been agreed to in anticipation of an orderly and continuous progress of the
CONSULTANT'S services through completion.
.
-1-
(P etA ')
ARTICLE 3.
COMPENSATION TO THE CONSULTANT
A. Compensation to the CONSULTANT for services described in this
.Agreement shall be on a Lump Sum basis, Cost Reimbursement PIus Fixed Fee basis, and/or an Hourly
Rate basis as designated in the box below, and in ATTACHMENT B, and as hereinafter described.
L8J
o
.
.
1.
A Lump Sum method of payment for the CONSULTANT'S
services shall typically apply to all orparts of a work scope where
the CONSULTANT'S tasks can be readily defined and/or where
the level of effort required to accompIish such tasks can be
estimated with a reasonable degree of accuracy. The OWNER
shall make monthly payments to the CONSULTANT within 30
days of date of invoice based on an estimated percentage of
completion ofthe CONSULTANT'S services.
Reimbursement for Direct Expenses incurred in the performance of
the work shall be included in the Lump Sum amount, unless
otherwise set forth in ATTACHMENT A.
2.
A Cost Reimbursement PIus Fixed Fee method of payment for the
CONSULTANT'S services shall typically apply to all or parts ofa
work scope where the CONSULTANT'S tasks cannot be readily
defined and/or where the level of effort required to accomplish
such tasks cannot be established with any reasonable degree of
accuracy. Under a Cost Reimbursement Plus Fixed Fee method of
payment, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for the actual costs of
providing required services plus a fixed fee payment as defined in
FAA advisory Circular 150/5100-14C, dated February 16, 1994,
and as further defmed as follows:
a. Direct Salary Costs incurred by the CONSULTANT for
employees time directly chargeable to the Project, and in
accordance with the CONSULTANT'S SALARY
SCHEDULE included in ATTACHMENT B. Periodic
revisions to the schedule may be made and any such
revisions shall be submitted by the CONSULTANT to the
OWNER for approval.
b.
Overhead Costs including overhead on direct labor,
including, but not limited to, employment taxes, fringe
benefits, holidays, vacation, and sick leave, and all
allowable general and administrative overhead costs.
Overhead Costs shall be calculated as a percentage of
Direct Salary Costs, with such percentage based on the
CONSULTANT'S audited records. The Overhead Rate to
be applied to this Agreement and any special provisions
relating thereto shall be set forth in ATTACHMENT A.
-2-
wCc\)
.
.
o
.
c. Direct Non-Salary Expenses incurred by the
CONSULTANT for costs directly chargeable to the Project,
including, but not lirnited to:
1)
Travel and subsistence.
2) Outside professional and technical services.
3) Identifiable reproduction and reprographic charges.
4) Expendable field supplies and special field
equipment rental.
5) Other acceptable costs for such additional items and
services as may be required by the OWNER to
fulfill the terms of this Agreement.
d. Fixed Fee. In addition to the above reimbursement of costs,
the CONSULTANT shall be paid a fixed fee in the amount
set forth in A IT ACHMENT A. It is agreed that the fixed
fee will be subject to adjustment in case of a work scope
change, abandonment of the work prior to completion, or
deletion of specific tasks.
The OWNER shall make monthly. payments to the
CONSULTANT within 30 days of date of invoice based on
computations made in accordance with the above charges for
services provided and expenses incurred to date, including a
proportionate amount of the fixed fee. Invoices shall be
accompanied by supporting evidence as required.
3.
Ifno Federal funds are involved in this Agreement, an Hourly Rate
method of payment for the CONSULTANT'S services may be
utilized as an alternative to the Lump Sum or Cost Reimbursement
Plus Fixed Fee methods. Under an Hourly Rate method of
payment, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for the actual hours
worked on the Project by the CONSULTANT'S technical
personnel times an hourly billing rate established for each
employee. Hourly billing rates shall include compensation for all
salary costs, payroll burden, general and administrative overhead
and professional fee. A rate schedule shall be furnished by the
CONSULTANT to the OWNER upon request.
-3-
Lo (d)
In addition to the foregoing, the CONSULTANT shall be
reimbursed at cost for the following Direct Expenses when
incurred in the performance of the work:
.
a.
Travel and subsistence.
b. OWNER-approved outside professional and technical
services.
c. Identifiable reproduction and reprographic charges.
d. Expendable field supplies and special field equipment
rental.
e. Other acceptable costs for such additional items and
services as may be required by the OWNER to fulfill the
terms of this Agreement.
The OWNER shall make monthly payments to the
CONSULTANT within 30 days of date of invoice based on
computations made in accordance with the above charges for
services provided and expenses incurred to date, accompanied by
supporting evidence as required.
B. The OWNER, MnlDOT, FAA or their authorized representatives shall
.have access to the CONSULTANT'S records for the purpose of accounting and audit. The
CONSULTANT shall maintain all records relative to this Agreement for a period of not less than three
years, subsequent to the OWNER'S fmal payment to the CONSULTANT and until the Project is
financially closed-out by the FAA.
ARTICLE 4.
EXTRA WORK AND SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT
If the CONSULTANT is of the opinion that any services it has been directed to
perform are beyond the Scope of this Agreement, or that the level of effort required significantly
exceeds that estimated due to changed conditions and thereby constitutes Extra Work, it shall promptly
notify the OWNER of that fact. Extra work, additional compensation for same, and extension of time
for completion shall be covered by a Supplemental Agreement entered into by both parties and approved
by MnlDOT and FAA, prior to proceeding with any Extra Work or related expenditures.
ARTICLE 5.
ABANDONMENT, CHANGE OF PLAN AND TERMINATION
Either Party has the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven calendar days'
written notice. In addition, the OWNER may at any time, reduce the scope of this Agreement. Such
reduction in scope shall be set forth in a written notice from the OWNER to the CONSULTANT. In the
event of an unresolved dispute over change in scope or changed conditions, this Agreement may also be
terminated, upon seven calendar days' written notice as provided above.
.
-4-
(o(c\ ')
In the event of termination, all documents, fmished or unfinished, prepared by the
CONSULTANT under this Agreement, shall be made available by the CONSULTANT to the OWNER
pursuant to Article 7 herein, and there shall be no further obligation of the OWNER to the
CONSULTANT under this Agreement, except for payment of amounts due and owing for work
. performed and expenses incurred to the date and time of termination, computed in accordance with
Article 3 herein.
In the event ofa reduction in scope of the Project work, the CONSULTANT shall
be paid for the work performed and expenses incurred on the Project work thus reduced and for any
completed and abandoned work for which payment has not been made, computed in accordance with
Article 3 herein.
ARTICLE 6.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
In the event of an irreconcilable dispute under this Agreement, which cannot be
resolved through informal means, the Parties may, upon written agreement, submit to the resolution
process set out in this provision. Once the Parties have agreed to the resolution process, each Party shall
have seven (7) calendar days to designate one representative, who shall have authority to act on this
Agreement. If either Party fails within that time to inform the other Party in writing of its designation,
the other Party is free to pursue all other legal and equitable remedies. Within ten (10) calendar days of
designation of the representative, the representatives shall meet and shall entertain such presentation of
testimony and other evidence as the CONSULTANT and the OWNER may wish to present with respect
to the dispute. Within seven (7) calendar days after the close of such presentation, the representatives
shall resolve the dispute or either Party is free to pursue all other legal and equitable remedies. When
. the representatives resolve the dispute, their decision. shall be final and conclusive. Shouldthe
representatives be unable to agree on a resolution of the dispute, then the Parties are free to pursue all
other legal and equitable remedies. Each Party's costs for the dispute resolution shall be borne by the
respective Party.
If the Parties do not agree in writing to the resolution process set out above, either
Party is entitled to pursue any other legal or equitable remedies available.
ARTICLE 7.
DISPOSITION OF PLANS, REPORT AND OTHER DATA
At the time of completion or termination of the work, the CONSULTANT shall
make available to the OWNER, upon request, all maps, tracings, reports, resource materials and other
documents pertaining to the Project. All such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable
for reuse by the OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or to any other project. Any reuse
without written verification or adaptation by the CONSULTANT for the specific purpose intended will
be at OWNER'S sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. In this regard,
the OWNER will indemnify and hold harmless the CONSULTANT from any and all suits or claims of
third parties arising out of such reuse, which was not specifically verified, adapted, or authorized by the
CONSULTANT.
.
-5-
w(~)
In the event electronic copies of documents are made available to the OWNER
pursuant to the foregoing paragraph, the OWNER acknowledges that the usefullife of electronic media
such as magnetic tapes and/or floppy disks may be limited because of deterioration of the media or
eobsolescence of the computer hardware and/or software systems. Therefore, the CONSULT ANT makes
no representation that such media will be fully usable beyond 30 days from date of delivery to OWNER.
ARTICLE 8.
DOCUMENTS FORMING THE CONTRACT
The contract documents shall be deemed to include this Agreement with all
accompanying attachments a part hereof.
ARTICLE 9.
OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
A. To permit the CONSULTANT to perform the services required hereunder,
the OWNER shall supply, in proper time and sequence, the following at no expense to the
CONSULTANT:
1. Provide all necessary information regarding its requirements as
necessary for orderly progress of the work.
2.
Designate in writing, a person to act as OWNER'S representatives
with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement.
Such person shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive
instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S
policies with respect to the CONSULTANT'S services.
.
3. Furnish, as required for performance of the CONSULTANT'S
services (except to the extent provided otherwise in
ATTACHMENT A), data prepared by or services of others,
including without limitation, core borings, probings and subsurface
explorations, hydrographic and geohydrologic surveys, laboratory
tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment;
appropriate professional interpretations of all of the foregoing;
environmental assessment and impact statements; property,
boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys;
property descriptions; zoning, deed and other land use restriction;
and other special data not covered in ATTACHMENT A.
4. Provide access to, and make all provisions for, the CONSULTANT
to enter upon publicly or privately owned property as required to
perform their services.
5.
Act as liaison with other agencies to carry out necessary
coordination and negotiations; furnish approvals and permits from
all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project
and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary
for completion ofthe Project.
.
-6-
(pC J)
6.
.
.
.
Examine all reports, sketches, drawings, specifications and other
documents prepared and presented by the CONSULTANT, obtain
advice of an attorney, insurance counselor or others as OWNER
deems necessary for such examination and render in writing,
decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to
delay the services of the CONSULTANT.
7. Give prompt written notice to the CONSULTANT whenever
OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any
development that affects the scope or timing of the
CONSULTANT'S services or any defect in the work of
Construction Contractor(s), Consultants or the CONSULTANT.
8.
Initiate action, where appropriate, to identifY and investigate the
nature and extent of asbestos and/or pollution in the Project and to
abate and/or remove the same as may be required by federal, state
or local statute, ordinance, code, rule, or regulation now existing or
hereinafter enacted or amended. For purposes of these General
Provisions, "pollution" and "pollutant" shall mean any solid,
liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant, including smoke,
vapor, soot, alkalis, chemicals and hazardous or toxic waste.
Hazardous or toxic waste means any substance, waste, pollutant or
contaminant now or hereafter included within such terms under
any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, code, rule or
regulation now existing or hereinafter enacted or amended. Waste
further includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned or
reclaimed.
9. If the CONSULTANT encounters, or reasonably suspects that it
has encountered, asbestos or pollution in the Project area, the
CONSULTANT shall cease activity in the said area and promptly
notifY the OWNER who shall proceed as set forth above. Unless
otherwise specifically provided in ATTACHMENT A, the services
to be provided by the CONSULTANT do not include identification
of asbestos or pollution and the CONSULTANT has no duty to
identifY or attempt to identifY the same within the Project area.
10. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and
insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project,
such legal services as OWNER may require or the CONSULTANT
may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the
Project and such auditing service as OWNER may require to
ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the
moneys paid under the construction contract.
-7-
(PCJ)
11.
Provide such inspection services (except to the extent provided
otherwise in ATTACHMENT A) as OWNER may require to
ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule,
regulation, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing
and performing the work.
.
12. Provide "record" drawings and specifications for all existing
physical plants or facilities which are pertinent to the Project.
13. Provide written notice to the CONSULTANT when the Project has
been financially closed-out by FAA.
14. Provide other services, materials, or data as may be set forth in
ATTACHMENT A.
B. The CONSULTANT shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and
completeness of information furnished by the OWNER. If the CONSULTANT finds that any
information furnished by the OWNER is in error or is inadequate for its purpose, the CONSULTANT
shall promptly notify the OWNER.
ARTICLE 10.
OPINIONS OF COST
.
Opinions of probable project cost, construction cost, financial evaluations,
feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations
and maintenance costs prepared by the CONSULTANT in ATTACHMENT A, a part hereof, are to be
made on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S experience and qualifications, and represent the
CONSULTANT'S best judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized,
however, that the CONSULTANT does not have control over the cost of labor, material, equipment or
services furnished by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of determining their
prices, and that any evaluation of any facility to be constructed, or acquired, or work to be performed on
the basis of the CONSULTANT'S cost opinions, must of necessity, be speculative until completion of
construction or acquisition. Accordingly, the CONSULTANT does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual costs will not substantially vary from opinions, evaluations or studies submitted by the
CONSULTANT to OWNER hereunder.
ARTICLE 11.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
OWNER acknowledges that it is customary for the architect or engineer who is
responsible for the preparation and furnishing of Drawings and Specifications and other construction- .
related documents to be employed to provide professional services during the Bidding and Construction
Phases of the Project, (1) to interpret and clarify the documentation so furnished and to modify the same
as circumstances revealed during bidding and construction may dictate, (2) in connection with
acceptance of substitute or or-equal items of materials and equipment proposed by bidders and
Contractor(s), (3) in connection with approval of shop drawings and sample submittals, and (4) as a
result of and in response to the CONSULTANT'S detecting in advance of performance of affected work
.
-8-
loCJ)
inconsistencies or irregularities in such documentation. OWNER agrees that if the CONSULTANT is
not employed to provide such professional services during the Bidding (if the work is put out for bids)
and the Construction Phases of a Project described in this Agreement, the CONSULTANT will not be
~sponsible for, and OWNER shall indemnify and hold the CONSULTANT (and the CONSULTANT'S
professional associates and consultants) harmless from, all claims, damages, 10sses and expenses
including attorneys' fees arising out of, or resulting from, any interpretation, clarification, substitution
acceptance, shop drawing or sample approval or modification of such documentation issued or carried
out by OWNER or others. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed to release the
CONSULTANT (or the CONSULTANT'S professional associates or consultants) from liability for
failure to perform in accordance with professional standards any duty or responsibility which the
CONSULTANT has undertaken or assumed under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 12.
INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from
claims against it under workers' compensation acts, claims for damages because of bodily injury
including personal injury, sickness or disease or death. of any and all employees or of any person other
than such employees, and from claims against it for damages because of injury to or destruction of
property including 10ss of use resulting therefrom.
Subject to the provisions of Article I3 herein, the CONSULTANT shall also
procure and maintain professional liability insurance for protection from claims arising out of
performance or professional services caused by any negligent act, error, or omission for which the
CONSULTANT is legally liab1e.
.
Certificates of insurance will be provided to the OWNER upon request.
ARTICLE 13.
ASBESTOS/POLLUTION INDEMNIFICATION
The CONSULTANT hereby states, and the OWNER acknowledges, that the
CONSULTANT has no professionalliability (errors and omissions) or other insurance, and is unable to
reasonably obtain such insurance, for claims arising out of the performance or failure to perform
professional services, including, but not limited to, the preparation of reports, designs, drawings, and
specifications, related to the investigation, detection, abatement, replacement, modification, removal or
dispersal of(1) pollutants or of (2) products, materials, or processes containing asbestos. Accordingly,
the OWNER hereby agrees to bring no claim for negligence, breach of contract, indemnity or other
claim or cause of action against the CONSULTANT, its principals, employees, agents and consultants if
such claim in any way arises out of the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, release or
escape of pollutants, or the investigation of remedial work related to such pollutants or asbestos in the
Project. The OWNER further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the CONSULTANT and its
principals, employees, agents, and consultants harmless from any such pollutant or asbestos related
claim that may be brought by third parties as a result of the services provided by the CONSULTANT
pursuant to this Agreement.
.
-9-
(PCd')
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the OWNER shall not be prohibited from bringing
suit against the CONSULTANT for its alleged negligence, breach of contract; or other cause of action
arising out of its professional services rendered in connection with the design and construction of
APotable water systems, storm water systems and sewerage systems, including those receiving industrial
"waste pre-treated in accordance with EPA standards, nor is the OWNER required to indemnify and hold
harmless the CONSULTANT for claims and suits brought against it by third parties arising out of such
professional services.
OWNER further agrees that, in the event a court of competent jurisdiction
determines that the foregoing indemnification provision is unenforceable, the CONSULTANT'S total
liability to OWNER or third parties for pollution or asbestos related claims arising out of this Agreement
shall not exceed the total compensation paid by OWNER to the CONSULTANT for services rendered
under this Agreement or $25,000, whichever is less.
ARTICLE 14.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The CONSULTANT, in performance of work hereunder operates as an
independent contractor and covenants and agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with such status,
that it will neither hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of the OWNER by reason
hereof, and that it will not, by reason hereby, make any claim, demand or shall it apply for any right or
privilege applicable to an officer or employee of the OWNER, including, but not limited to, workmen's
compensation coverage, unemployment insurance benefits, social security coverage or retirement
membership or credit.
. ARTICLE 15.
FEDERAL AND STATE PARTICIPATION
Work performed under this Agreement may be financed in part by State and/or
Federal Funds. However, payments to CONSULTANT will be made by the OWNER.
The State of Minnesota and the United States are not parties to this Contract and
no reference herein to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Aeronautics and to the
Federal Aviation Administration or any representatives thereof makes the State of Mirmesota or the
United States a party to the Contract.
ARTICLE 16.
COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The CONSULT ANT warrants that no person or legal entity has been employed or
retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission,
percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee excepting bona-fide employees or bona-fide established
commercial or selling agencies maintained by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of securing business.
For breach or violation of this warranty, the OWNER shall have the right to armul this Agreement
without liability or in its discretion, to deduct from payment to the CONSULT ANT, the full amount of
each commission, percentages, brokerage or contingent fee.
.
-10-
[PC d)
ARTICLE 17.
STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES
.
If this Agreement is to be financed in party by Federal funds, the CONSULTANT
shall comply with those provisions of DOT Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 (attached
hereto as ATTACHMENT 1), which specifically relates to the furnishing and procurement of
professional services. The term "Contractor" in said ATTACHMENT I is to be construed as the
CONSULTANT.
ARTICLE 18.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCES
The CONSULTANT will comply with the provisions of applicable federal, state
and local statutes, ordinances and regulations pertaining to human rights and non-discrimination. In this
regard, if this Agreement is financed in part by Federal funds, the CONSULTANT shall comply with
Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity", as supplemented in Department
of Labor Regulations (41 CFR, Part 60), and shall have an Affirmative Action Plan which declares that
it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age, and with
specified goals and target dates to assure the implementation of that Plan.
ARTICLE 19.
ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement, being intended to secure the personal service of the individuals
employed by and through whom the CONSULTANT performs work hereunder, shall not be assigned,
sublet or transferred without the written consent of the OWNER.
.
ARTICLE 20.
NOTICES
All notices required by law or by this Agreement to be given to the
CONSULTANT must be written and may be given personally or by depositing the same in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the CONSULTANT at such premises and at the following
address:
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Incorporated
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-2140
All notices required or permitted to be given to the OWNER hereunder shall be
given by United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to:
Mr. John 01son
Hutchinson Area Transportation Facility
1400 Adams Street SE
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Notice shall be deemed given as of the date said notice is deposited in the mail or
. personally delivered.
-11-
loCi)
The Parties must notify each other promptly in the event of a change in name or
address.
. ARTICLE 21.
CONTROLLING LAW
This Agreement to be governed by the laws of the State ofMirmesota.
ARTICLE 22.
SPECIAL CONDmONS
Reserved.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
. (OWNER)
TOL TZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
(CONSULTANT)
By
By
Vincent T. Montgom
President
By
r9 / f
/li L
-fl/ Ii /'
By {/ .i-/~;f
Lyle W. KratzJse, P.E.
Project Man~er
ATTACHMENTS: ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
.
-12-
wel)
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK
.
FOR
AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN
HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The work at the Hutchinson Municipal Airport will consist of the following items to be accomplished
under a single construction contract. This Project includes major items of work as follows:
. Airport Layout PIan
II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONSULTANT
The CONSULTANT shall provide AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN as outlined below:
. A. Title Sheet and Location Plan
B. Vicinity Map and Airport Access
C. Airport Layout PIan
D. Building Area Plan
E. Imaginary Surfaces Plan
F. Runway 15 Approach and Profile
G. Runway 33 Approach and Profile
H. Land Inventory Plan
1. Land Inventory Descriptions
J. ALP Narrative Report
.
ATTA-l
Lo(J)
m. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
If authorized by you, we will furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed below
. which are not considered as basic services under this Agreement. Additional Services shall be billable
on a Cost Reimbursement Plus Fixed Fee basis as defined in Article 3.A.2 of the Agreement, and such
billings shall be over and above any maximum amounts set forth in this Agreement.
A. Registered land or right-of-way surveys, legal descriptions, or related services.
B. More than four trips to Hutchinson, Minnesota.
IV. OWNER'S RESPONSffiILITIES
The OWNER'S respOnsibilities shall be as set forth in Article 9 of this Agreement.
V. PERIOD OF SERVICE
TKDA would expect to start services promptly upon receipt of the OWNER'S acceptance of this
Agreement and to complete SECTION II services of this ATTACHMENT A in accordance with
established schedules.
VI. COMPENSATION
. Payment to the CONSULTANT for services described in this ATTACHMENT A shall be on a "Lump
Sum" basis as described in Agreement Article 3.A.l in the amount of $30,000.
Payment to the CONSULTANT for services described in this Attachment A, SECTION III
ADDITIONAL SERVICES authorized by the OWNER, shall be on a "Cost Reimbursement Plus Fixed
Fee" basis as described in Agreement Article 3.A.2. Payment for additional services shall be over and
above the Total Contract Ceilil'lg Amount set forth herein.
.
ATTA-2
toeJ)
ATTACHMENT B
.
SCHEDULE OF ACTUAL HOURLY SALARIES
Range of Actual
Classification Hourlv Salaries.
Senior Registered Engineer, Architect, or Plarmer $ 36.00 to $ 77.00
Engineering, Architectural, or Plarming Specialist II $ 33.00 to $ 56.00
Engineering, Architectural, or Planning Specialist I $ 22.00 to $ 45.00
Registered Engineer, Architect, Landscape Architect, $ 23.00 to $ 51.00
Plarmer, or Interior Designer
Gmduate Engineer, Architect, Landscape Architect, $ 17.00 to $ 38.00
Plarmer, or Interior Designer
Technician III $ 19.00 to $ 31.00 ..
Technician II $ 15.00 to $ 25.00 ..
Technician I $ 10.00 to $ 18.00 ..
. In addition to the hourly charges, TKDA shall be reimbursed at cost for the following direct
expenses when incurred in the performance of the work:
1. Travel and subsistence:
Vehicle Mileage: Current ~ Rate per mile.
Vehicle Allowance (Resident Construction Services Only) $10.00/ Day
Vehicle Allowance (Survey Crew Only) $14.00 / Day
2. Outside professional and technical services with costs defined as the amount billed
TKDA pIus 10%.
3. Identifiable reproduction and repro graphic costs.
· Rates effective until December 31, 2007.
** For hours worked over 40 hours per week individuals will be paid one and
one-half times the above rates.
Schedule Actual
.
ATTB-l
(iJ)
ATTACHMENT 1
CONTRACTOR CONTRACTUAL REOUIREMENTS
.
TITLE VI ASSURANCES
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest
(hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations. The contractor shall comply with the regulations relative to
nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter,
"DOT') Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time,
(hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part
of this contract.
2. Nondiscrimination. The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract,
shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color,or national origin in the selection and retention of
subcontractors, including either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 2 I.5 of
the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in
Appendix B of the Regulations.
.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materia Is and Equipment. In all
solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be
performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each
potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations
under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or
national origin.
4. Information and Reports. The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by
the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereof and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the sponsor or the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations,
orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession
of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the sponsor
or the FAA, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the
nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor shall impose such contract sanctions as it or
the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
a.
and/or
withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until he contractor complies;
b.
cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.
.
ATTl-l
lc>( ~ ')
6. Incorporation of Provisions. The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs 1 through
5 in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by
the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect
. to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or the FAA may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor
becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such
direction, the contractor may request the sponsor to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of
the sponsor and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to
protect the interests of the United States.
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DB E) ASSURANCES
1. Policy. It is the policy of the Department of Transportation (DOT) that disadvantaged business
enterprises as defmed in 49 CFR Part 26 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this Agreement.
Consequently, the DBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 apply to this Agreement.
2. DBE Obligation. The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensure that disadvantaged business
enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 26 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal fimds provided
under this Agreement. In this regard, all recipients or contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable
steps in accordance with 49 CFR 26 to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises have the
maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not
discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT-
assisted contracts.
.
.
A TTI-2
(p( d)
ATTACHMENT 2
.
CLAUSE TO BE INCLUDED IN ALL SOLICITATIONS, CONTRACTS, AND
SUBCONTRACTS RESULTING FROM PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER THE AIP
The contractor or subcontractor, by submission of an offer and/or execution of a contract, certifies that
it:
a. is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country included in
the list of countries that discriminate against U.s. firms published by the Office of the United States.
Trade Representative (USTR);
b. has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this project with a contractor that
is a citizen or national of a foreign country on said list, or is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by
one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on said list;
c. has not procured any product nor subcontracted for the supply of any product for use on the
project that is produced in a foreign country on said list.
Unless the restrictions of the clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49
CFR 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to a contractor or subcontractor who is unable to certify to the
above. If the contractor knowingly procures or subcontracts for the supply of any product or service of a
foreign country on the said list for use on the project, the Federal Aviation Administration may direct,
through the sponsor, cancellation of the contract at no cost to the Govermnent.
.
Further, the contractor agrees that if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation, it will
incorporate this provision for certification without modification in each contract and in alllower tier
subcontracts. The contractor may rely upon the certification of a prospective subcontractor unless it has
knowledge that the certification is erroneous.
The contractor shall provide immediate written notice to the sponsor if the contractor leams that its
certification or that of a subcontractor was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by
reason of changed circumstances. The subcontractor agrees to provide immediate written notice to the
contractor, if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making the
award. If it is later determined that the contractor or subcontractor knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, the Federal Aviation Administration may direct, through the sponsor, cancellation ofthe
contract or subcontract for default at no cost to the Govermnent.
Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in
order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge and
information ofthe contractor is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent
person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
.
A TTI-l
(o( d)
This certification concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States of Arnerica
and the making of a false, fictitious, or fraudulent certification may render the make subject to
prosecution under Title 18, United States Code, Section 100 I.
.
STANDARD CLAUSE FOR SOLICITATIONS, CONTRACTS, AND SUBCONTRACTS
REQUIRED FOR 49 CFR, PART 29
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion:
The bidder/offeror certifies, by submission of this proposal or acceptance of this contract, that
neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal
department or agency. It further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause
without modification in alllower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts, and
subcontracts. Where the bidder/ offeror/contractor or any 10wer tier participant is unable to
verify to this statement, it shall attach an explanation to this solicitation/proposal.
AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF I982, SECTION 520
GENERAL CIVIL RIGHTS PROVISIONS
(VERSION 2, 4/23/90)
.
The contractor/tenant!concessionairelIessee assures that it will comply with pertinent statutes, Executive
Orders, and such rules as are promulgated to assure that no persons shall, on the grounds of race, creed,
color, national original, sex, age, or handicap be excluded from participating in any activity conducted
with or benefiting from Federal assistance. This provision obligates the contractor/tenant!
concessionaire/ lessee or its transferee for the period during which Federal assistance is extended to the
airport program, except where Federal assistance is to provide, or is in the form of personal property or
real property or interest therein or structures or improvements thereon. In these cases, the provision
obligates the party or any transferee for the 10nger of the following periods: (a) the period during which
the property is used by the airport sponsor or any transferee for a purpose for which Federal assistance is
extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, or (b) the period
during which the airport sponsor or any transferee retains ownership or possession of the property. In
the case of contractors, this provision binds the contractors from the bid solicitation period through the
completion of the contract.
INSPECTION OF RECORDS - 49 CFR PART 18
(VERSION 1, 1/5/90)
The contractor shall maintain an acceptable cost accounting system. The sponsor, the FAA and the
Comptroller Genera} of the United States shall have access to any books, documents, paper, and records
of the contractor which are directly pertinent to the specific contract for the purposes of making an audit,
examination, excerpts, and transcriptions. The contractor shall maintain all required records for three
years after the sponsor makes final payment and all other pending matters are closed.
.
ATT2-2
[peel )
RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS - 49 CFR PART 18
(VERSION 1, 1/5/90)
.
All rights to inventions and materials generated under this contract are subject to regulations issued by
the FAA and the sponsor of the Federal grant under which this contract is executed. Information
regarding these rights is available from the FAA and the sponsor.
BREACH OF CONTRACT TERMS
SANCTIONS - 49 CFR PART 18
(VERSION 1,1/5/90)
Any violation or breach of the terms of this contract on the part of the contractor or subcontractor may
result in the suspension or termination of this contract or such other action which may be necessary to
enforce the rights of the parties of this agreement.
.
.
A TT2-3
[PC d)
TKDA
Project Fee Estimate
4/1612007
5 5 10
10 5 5 20
20 10 10 10 60
10 5 10 10 40
5 5 5 20
10 5 10 30
10 5 10 30
H Land Invento Ma 5 5 10 20
land Invento tions 10 20 10 10 50
J 10 20 10 40
Total Person Hours 45 105 40 45
Avera e DirecJ labor Rate $ 46 $ 33 $ 30 $ 26 $
Total-Oirect labor Cost $ 2,070 $ 3,465 $ 1,200 $ 1.170 $
IndirecJ Labor Cost 1.565 $ 3.240 $ 5,423 $ 1.878 $ 1.831 $
. f;5Qc:i:oO
$ 3,728.23
i]:'-'.30;08S)~
~'<30.000:1lO
.
Co Cd ')
.
.
.
Permit Fee: $25 (short term) ~ (
Date Received: 5 - \- en
111 Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson,MN 55350
(320) 587-5151IFax: (320) 234-4240
City of Hutchinson
APPLICA nON FOR PARADE PERMIT
All applications must be received at least 30 davs before event in order to be considered
Orllanization Information
Foundation For Challenged Children
Organization Name
320-234-0786 (Tina Vorli ek)
Phone Number
PO Box 186
Hutchinson
Cill'
MN
State
55350
Zip
Or~anization Address
AuJhorized Officer and Parade Chairman InfonnaJion
Charlie Ardolf
320-327-2431
Phone Number
Officer Name
634 Lake Ave N.
Silver Lake
MN
. State
55381
Zip
Residence Address
City
Glen Jorgensen
320-587-7499
Phone Number
MN 55350
State Zip
Pcuade Chairman Name
39 McLeod Ave NE
Residence Address
Hutchinson
Cill'
Parade Information
Parade DaJe: May 19, 2007 Assembly Time: 8 am - 10 am
Location and Description of Assembly Area: 1st Ave NW & Franklin St & Parking Lot behind DQ
Starting Time of Parade: 10 am Estimated Time of Parade: leave town at 10 am
Starting Point of Parade:
Route of Parade Travel:
Main Street & 1st Ave NW
Return to town at appx.
Main Street North - turning west onto North High Drive & out of town
We will return on Hwy.22 to 5th Ave SE to Michigan St to 2nd Ave to Hassan St.
Ending Point of Parade: Library Square
Approximate Number of Units, Animals, and Vehicles which will constiJule Parade: 250 to 400
Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles: Motorcycles & Classic Cars
Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units: None
Maximum Length of Parade: None
Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade: In town 30 mph or less
Portion of Street Width Traversed: 1/2 (one car lane)
MPH
:50 pm
~(e)
. ChecklisJ
The following items need to be completed and/or attached in order for the application to be processed:
Permit fee paid in full (check or money order): ri yes 0 no
Permil Aoolication comoleled io full and silmed: Ii ves 0 no
.
.
City of Hutchinson
Applicationfor Parade Permit
Page 2 of2
I declare that the information I have provided on this appJicalion is truthful, and I authorize the City of HuJchinson to
investigate the infonnation submitted,
May 1, 2007
Date
Signature 0 authorized officer of organization or parade chairman
Internal Use Onlv
Police 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
City Council 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
IJ (0')
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
Date:
May 3, 2007
To:
Honorable Mayor & City Council
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Miles R. Seppelt, EDA Director
EDA Spec Building - Engineers & ArcMects
From:
RE:
The EDA is seeking City Council approval to hire an engineering I architectural firm to do the
design work on a planned industrial spec building.
EDA obtain quotes from a number of firms and Zenk, Reak Trygstad Engineers I Architects of
Albert Lea provided the best quote at $55,000.
At their meeting of April 27"' the EDA Board of Directors authorized staff to hire the firm to do the
design work on a planned 30,000 industrial spec building, but we need City Coucnil approval as
well.
The fee is a not to exceed sum of $55,000 and will be paid out of the EDA operations budget.
The EDA's plan is to complete plans & specifications for the spec building and secure bids for the
project. At that point the EDA will be at a final "GO I NO GO. decision point on the project.
If bids are reasonable, then the EDA wili most likely proceed with the spec building project later
this summer.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call at 234-4223.
Thanks.
19(f)
MEMORANDUM
.
Date:
May 3, 2007
From:
Honorable Mayor & City Council
Gary Plotz, Crty Administrator
Miles R. Seppelt, EDA Director
Public Hearing on May ff'
To:
RE:
At our next City Council meeting we will hold a brief public hearing to solicit public feedback on a
proposed economic development project the EDA is working on.
The Hutchinson EDA has been in talks with a company called "Customer Elation" which is a call
center operation that is looking for a community in which to locate a new facility. They are
considering either Racine, Wisconsin or Hutchinson.
As part of our effort to get them into Hutchinson, we are applying to a state program called the
Minnesota Investment Fund for a grant in the amount of $500,000.
The state would make a grant to the City of Hutchinson, we in tum would loan the money to the
company for their expansion, and once the money is repaid, the city can add those dollars
permanently to our industrial park revolving loan fund.
. The company itself is looking at a 20,000 square foot call center facility that would employ
approximately 200 people - this would add more than $4 million in payroll to our community each
year.
One of the requirements of the grant application is that we hold a public hearing to obtain public
feedback on the project Topics covered (as required by the grant application) will be:
)> Project Background
)> Project Scope
)> Type of Activity
)> Project Schedule
)> Overall Cost & Proposed Financing
)> Funds benefiting LMI persons
)> Displacement I Relocation
)> Housing & Community Development
I hope to keep my presentation to about 10 minutes or so.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please give me a call at 234-4223 at
anytime.
Thanks.
.
1 (0,)
.
.
.
Resolution # 13192
Resolution Authorizing Grant Application to Minnesota Investment Fund and
Certifying Compliance with all Legal Requirements
Customer Elation Project
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson act as the legal sponsor for the project
contained in the Business and Community Development Application to be submitted on
or about May 10, 2007 and that Gary Plotz and Miles R. Seppelt are hereby authorized
to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of
this project on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson has the legal authority to apply
for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to
ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed
project for its design life.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson has not incurred any costs
and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson has not violated any Federal,
State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or
other unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon arrival of its application by the state, the City of
Hutchinson may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above
referenced project, and that the City of Hutchinson certifies that it will comply with all
applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements and described on
the Compliance Certification of the Business and Community Development Application.
AS APPLICABLE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson has
obtained credit reports and credit information on Customer Elation and Pete hainey, co-
owners of Customer Elation. Upon review by the City of Hutchinson and the city's
attomey, no adverse findings or concems regarding, but not limited to, tax liens,
judgments, court actions, and filings with state, federal and other regulatory agencies
were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse information could result in
revocation or other legal action.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Gary Plotz and Miles R. Seppelt, or their
successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and
amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the
applicant
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 9th day of May 2007.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
1lu.~
Appoint Minority of
Board of Directors
"
"
~
if?;
City of Hutchinson
City Council
-----------------,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
,
,,/' Springing Membership Rights
- proceeds after sale
- assets upon dissolution
- step-in rights in certain events
- amendment approval rights
- "end game" transaction approvals
--
New Nonprofit ~earthcare Provider
.
Board of
Directors
.
Health Care
Enterprise
Lease of Real Estate
Personal Property
and turn over other
operating assets
Annual rent
$160,000, plus
debt service
.
.
.
.
. CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MEMO
Finance Department
May 3, 2007
TO: MAYOR' CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: FINANCIAL MANAGEMNT DEBT PLAN
This past December as we set the tax levy for 2007, we looked at
the bond levies, and use of the excess bond fund with the
assistance of Ehlers & Associates Inc.
We discussed and implement the levy for 2007 with discussion of
Use by MnDOT, Utilities & City vehicles the City's future levies
and debt structure should be reviewed and discussion of a debt
plan.
Attached is proposal for creation of a Financial Management Debt
Plan by Ehlers & Associates Inc., the city's financial
consultant. The proposal as outlined has a not to exceed fee of
$6,500. The proposal has an estimated completion date of 4 weeks
after completion of City approval.
FUNDING
Funding for the proposal would come from the Finance Department
General operation, water and sewer general operations, and excess
bond fund.
Recommendation
It would be the recommendation to proceed with the study.
H:\DOC\City council memo I.doc
\ oC C\)
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Proposal For Services
Creation of a
Financial Management Debt Plan
Submitted by:
e
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Phone: (651) 697-8500
FAX: (651) 697-8555
December 7,2006
.
.
.
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Proposal for Services by Ehlers and Associates for:
Creation of a Financial Management Debt Plan
Dated December 7, 2006
OverviewlPurpose
The City of Hutchinson has older neighborhoods and a need to reconstruct its streets, storm water
and other public infrastructure. At the same time, the City is growing, and installing new
infrastructure to serve new development The City typically finances these public improvement
projects with general obligation bonds. In the past, an average of 45% of the debt has been paid
with assessments; the remaining 55% has been paid with a debt levy. Due to concerns that as the
cost and scope of projects increase the armual debt levy will also increase, the City wishes to review
its existing debt service funds to determine the following:
1) Will revenue collections be sufficient to retire existing debt issues?
2) Can any of the existing debt issues be retired early?
3) How should any future balance in the debt service funds be used?
4) Should future armuallevies be adjusted from the amounts certified to the County?
5) To what level will the projected overall future debt levy (The modified existing as a result of
this study and projected new) need to rise to before the City will not need to increase the
debt levy?
Proposal
To assist the City, Ehlers is proposing to create a Financial Management Debt PIan (FMDP) model
for Hutchinson. The model will:
1) Project the revenue collections (assessments and debt levies) for each outstanding tax levy
bond issue and the 1985 debt service fund
2) Project the annual cash balances remaining in each debt service fund.
3) Determine if there are potential shortfalls for any outstanding debt issue.
4) Project the impact on the City's future debt levy, using the same assumptions for future debt
that we have used in recent projections.
5) Determine if the existing levy plan needs to be adjusted
The Financial Management Debt Plan will be presented to the Council in a PowerPoint presentation
and written executive summary.
Background Materials
To undertake this effort, Ehlers will require the following items to be provided by the City:
}- Current Capital Improvement PIan information and breakdown of anticipated revenue
sources identified to fund projects
}- Outstanding assessments and their anticipated collection schedule for 2006 and forward for
each debt service fund
}- Year-end 2006 cash balance for each debt service fund
}- Pay 2007 actual debt levies
\ ()C~ )
. Project Cost and Completion Date
.
.
Estimated Time for Completion: 4 weeks after City approves and supplies Ehlers
Background Materials
Cost: Ehlers will perform the Financial Management Debt PIan for a not-to-exceed cost of$6,500.
The not-to-exceed contract amount will include the delivery of up to 10 copies each of a draft and
final report, presentation at one Council work session and one Council meeting, and all travel and
incidentals.
Possible Additional Cost: Questions may come up regarding future special assessments. If there is
a need to talk with the County about future special assessment collections, that time will be billed as
an additional cost. Before any discussion is held with the County, Ehlers will ask the Finance
Director to determine whether or not it is necessary for Ehlers to talk with the County about special
assessment questions. Additional work is billed at the following hourly rates:
Steve Apfelbacher
Jessica Cook
Elizabeth Diaz
Brian Shannon
$195.00
$180.00
$180.00
$I80.oo
The City will be invoiced monthly, as work is performed should there be an additional cost.
Project Staff
The Financial Management Debt Plan will be completed by Steve Apfelbacher, Jessica Cook,
Elizabeth Diaz, Brian Shannon and other Ehlers staff as needed and appropriate.
\ bC lA)
.
.
.
Hutchinson City Center
111 Busan Street SE
Hutd1lnooa, MN S5356-2!22
320-587.5151JFu 320-234--4240
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
DATE:
May 3, 2007
SUBJECT:
Recommendation for Insurance Services
The City Council previously authorized solicitation of Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for
insurance agent services. Members appointed to review and evaluate the proposals and
presentations were Ken Merrill, Casey Stotts and 1.
Proposals came in with the following three-year costs:
Insurance Plarmers
1st year - $21,500
2nd year - $22,150
3rd year - $22,815
T.C. Field & Company
1 st year - $21,000
2nd year - $21,000
3'd year - $21,000
Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc.
1 st year - $I2,500
2nd year - $I2,500
3'd year - $12,500
Interviews were held by the committee on the three proposals. Items considered were
account manager expertise, team experience and expertise, depth of experience in the
municipal sector, client services, cost and references.
After references were reviewed, it was the unanimous recommendation of the committee
to go with Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. at a fixed contract price
of$12,500 for each of the next three years in comparison to the City's current fee of
approximately $27,OOO/year.
It is noted that A.J. Gallagher was recently selected by the Hutchinson Utilities
Commission for insurance services after their review and consideration.
. Printed on recycled paper-
\b(b)
.
.
.
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
Randy DeVries, WaterlWastewater Manager
RE: Consideration of Award of Contract for Wastewater Treatment Facility
Improvements (Letting No. 41Project No. 07-04)
DATE: May 9,2007
Five (5) bids for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements project letting were received by the City and
opened on Tuesday, April I?''' (see attached Bid Tabulation). John T. Jones Construction Company of Fargo,
North Dakota, submitted the apparent low bid in the amount of$II,I00,OOO.OO. This bid is approximately
1.8% higher than the Engineer's Estimate of$1 0,900,000.00 for this project. The overall project costs remain
within original budget estimates.
The attached Letter of Recommendation prepared by Donohue & Associates, project design consultant, further
explains the project bid and award process. Based on Donohue's review, the bid by John T. Jones
Construction Co. appears to be complete and responsive.
The Resolution Accepting Bid & Awarding Contract is attached. Please note that this project's award is
conditional on the City's NPDES Wastewater Discharge Permit being approved by the MPCA and the Public
Facility Authority Loan being allocated to the City. Thus, the Notice of A ward provided to the Contractor will
contain these conditions.
City staffwill briefly discuss the overall project budget and schedule during the Council meeting.
We recommend approving the Resolntlon Accepting Bid & Awarding Contract.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
IOCc-)
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 13188
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO.4
PROJECT NO. 07-()4
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the
improvement of:
Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements project wlil consist of the expansion of and
modifications to the existing wastewater treatment facility Including the addition of a vortex grit
removal system, two new fine screening systems, screening compaction and handling equipment,
chemical phosphorus removal facilities, an ultraviolet disinfection facility to replace the existing
chlorination facility, two 5OO,000-gailon aeration basins, SCADA System, and a membrane blo-
reactor (MBR) system with associated air blowers, chemical feed system, buildings, power supply
and piping. Ultimately, the aeration and MBR system will operate In parallel with the existing
oxidation ditch systems;
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying w~h
the advertisement:
Bidder
John T Jones Construction Company of Fargo ND
Staab Construction Corporation of Marshfield WI
Madson Johnson Corporation of Hudson WI
Rice Lake Construction Group of Deerwood MN
Gridor Construction Inc of Buffalo MN
Total Bid
$11,100,000.00
$11,132,000.00
$11,398,600.00
$11,572,000.00
$11,644,200.00
and whereas, it appears that John T Jonas Construction Company of Fargo ND is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter Into a contract with John
T Jones Construction Company of Fargo ND in the amount of $11,100,000.00 in the name of the City of
Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and speciflClltions therefor approved by
the City Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer, contingent upon the following:
a) Approval by the MPCA of the City's NPDES Wastewater Discharge Perm~; and
b) Allocation to the City of the Public Facility Authority Loan.
2. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the depos~s
made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed, and the depos~ of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory
completion of the contract.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 8th day of May 2007.
Mayor
City Administrator
ID( d)
.
.
.
April 27, 2007
EHQN91-!~~~
www.donohue-assodates.com
Mr. Randy DeVries
WaU:rfWastewater Director
City Center
III Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
3311 WEEDEN CREEK ROAD
SHEBOYGAN. WI 53081
PHONE 920-208-0196
Re:
Letter of RecommendaJion-John T. Jones Construction Co.
City of Hulchinson Wastewater Treatment PlanJ Improvements Project
Hutchinson, Minnesota - Letting 4/Project No. 07-04
MPCA Project No. 279457-01
Donohue Project No. 11207
FAX 92(}-20lMl402
Dear Mr. DeVries,
Pursuanl to the Official Notice to Bidders, sealed bids for the above referenced project were received at
the City Center, III Hassan Streel SE, on Tuesday, April 17,2007, at 2 p.m.local time and then publicly
opened and read aloud in the City Center Council Chambers. We have reviewed all the Bids received for
the Work and have enclosed a copy of the Bid Tabulation and the low bid for your information and
reference.
Five sealed bids were received. The low bid was submitted by John T. Jones Construction Company, of
Fargo, North DakoJa, in the amount of $11,100,000. The second low bid was submitted by Siaab
Construction Corp., of Marshfield, Wisconsin, in the amount of $11,132,000. Our opinion of probable
construction cost for the Projecl was $10,900,000. The apparent low bid amount was approximalely 1.8
per cent above our estimale.
Please refer to the attached Bid Tabulation for information on the Bidders and the bid amounts. The bid
amounts ranged from a low of $11,100,000 10 a high of $1 1,644,200, which is a range of only $544,200.
This tighl range is an indication thai the bidding documents were similarly interpreted by all the bidders.
The Bid Tabulation includes a breakdown of the bidders, their individual bid amounts, supplemenJal unit
pricing, and acknowledgement of the addenda and bid form attachments.
John T. Jones Construction recently completed or is in the process of completing a number of similar
projects during the past three years. Attached is a list of project references and completed project work
that we asked John T. Jones Construction 10 provide. We have had deJailed discussions with four of the
references, and they have generally stated that John T. Jones Construction successfully completed their
proj ects and that they found them 10 be an accepJable contractor.
It is our opinion that the 10w bidder, John T. Jones Construction, submitted a responsive bid and is also
qualified and capable of performing the project work as specified. II is therefore recommended that the
Contract be condilionally awarded 10 John T. Jones Construction in the amounl of $11,100,000.
A condilional award of contract sbould be made, along with a subsequenl notification 10 John T. Jones
Construction, in order for the next step in the MBFJWBE solicilation procedure to occur. Receipl of the
City's award notification siarts a period during which the bidder musl provide documenJation, as required
in the projecl manual, regarding MBE and WBE solicitalion. A determination must be made lhal the low
t bC J)
.
.
.
April 27, 2007
Page 2
&~9N9ltH~~
bidder was "responsible" in meeting \he requirements of \he Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (pF A)
revolving fund loan reimbursemenl regarding positive efforts undertaken by \he bidder during \he bidding
process. lbis is a precedent to \he City receiving \he needed loan for \he project to proceed.
We respectfully present these reconnnendations to \he City of Hutchinson for review and consideration.
The Conditional Notice of Award can be made by City Resolution followed by official notification to \he
successful bidder with a Conditional Notice of Award. We can assist you in the notification to the
apparent low bidder. The Conditional Award of Contract Resolution should state that the Notice of
Award is Conditional pending approval and receipt of the Minnesota FPA loan funding.
Weare presenting this evaluation and reconnnendation for your review and consideration, and will be
pleased to answer any questions you have concerning \he information provided herein.
Sincerely
~~
"";'" ""'" M_.
tJoJi'hJ~
David Frob, PE
Construction Phase Manager
Enclosures:
Bid Tabulation
Copy of John T. Jones Construction Bid Documents
John T. Jones Construclion Project Reference Listing
\b(J
.
.
BID TABULATION
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON MN
111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350
LETTING NO. 4/PROJECT NO. 07-04
~PIMPROVEMENTS
BID DATE & TIME: 04117/2007 @2:00 PM
. John T Jones Staab Construction Corp Madson Johnson Corp Rice Lake Grldor Constructlor
Contractor Construction Co. Construction Group Inc
Famo NO Marshfleld WI Hudson WI Deerwood MN Buffalo MN
Lump Sum Bid Price $11,100,000.00 $11,132,000.00 $11,398,600.00 $11,572,000.00 $11,644,200.00
Alternates Deduct $53,000 Deduct $55,000 Deduct $56,000 Deduct $53,000 Deduct $53,000
Alternate No.1
.
Supplemental Unit Prices
Bituminous Concrete $81.00/cu yd $80.00/cu yd $85.00/cu yd $60.00/cu yd $4O.00/cu yd
Pavement
Portland Cement Concrete $34.00/sq yd $60.00/sq yd $45.00/sq yd $36.00/sq yd $50.00/sq yd
Sidewalk
Three Addenda Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Acknowledged
Certified Check or Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond Bid Bond
Base Bid Material & Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Equipment Schedules
List of Subcontractors Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
0'
t"""""-o.
~
---.-/
G:\ln1If'Ovement Pn:f!ds\2OO7\l04 - P07-04 - WWTF r'I'Ylo.e.I",,~\PROJECT DOCUMEN'fSIllId Tabulatlon\lJonchJe As&oc ProjI11003
.
.
.
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
RE: Consideration of Award of Contract for Montana Street NE Extension (Letting No.
lAlProjectNo.06-01J\)
DATE: May 9, 2007
Four (4) bids for the Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements project letting were received by the City
and opened on Tuesday, March 13th (see attached Bid Tabulation). R & R Excavating Inc. of Hutchinson,
MN, submitted the apparent low bid in the amount of$186, 194.16. This bid is approximately 9.1 % lower than
the Engineer's Estimate of $204,241.15 for this project. The overall project costs remain within original
budget estimates. Based on City staff's review, the bid by R & R Excavating Inc. appears to be complete and
responsive.
The Resolution Accepting Bid & Awarding Contract is attached. Please note thai this project's award is
conditional on the City's acquisition of all necessary property easements required to complete the proposed
improvements. Thus, the Notice of A ward provided to the Contractor will contain this condition.
City staff will briefly discuss the overall project budgel and schedule during the Council meeting.
We recommend approving the Resolution Accepting Bid & Awarding Contract.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
ID(J}
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 13189
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 1A
PROJECT NO. 06..Q1A
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the fumlshing of all labor and material for the
improvement of:
Montana Street NW south ofTH 7/3rd Avenue NW to Les Kouba Parkway NW, trunk and lateral
storm sewer and stormwater treatment improvements, trunk and lateral watermaln and services,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete median, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing, sidewalk, landscaping, restoration, traffic signals, lighting and appurtenances,
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with
the advertisement:
Bidder
R & R Excavating Inc of Hutchinson MN
Dulnlnck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MNI
Hjerpe CorporaUon of Hutchinson MN
Wm Mueller & Sons Inc of Hamburg MN
Total Bid
$186,194.16
$204,270.03
$208,170.30
$208,576.81
and whereas, It appears that R & R ExcavaUng Inc of Hutchinson MN Is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with R &
R Excavating Inc of Hutchinson MN in the amount of $186,194.16 in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the
improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council
and on file in the office of the City Engineer, contingent upon the following:
The CIty's acquisition of all necessary property easements required to complete the
proposed improvements. .
2. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the depos~s
made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed, and the depos~ of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory
completion of the contract
a)
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 8th day of May 2007.
Mayor
City Administrator
lbld)
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, 111 HASSAN S 1St:., HU I \.,;HINSUN MN OO;SOU bl ;':-;':~;':U::I
BID TAJLATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON LErlII'l'G NO.1AIPROJECT NO. 06-01A
BID OPENING: 03/13/2007 AT 9:00 AM ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $204,000.00
.
..... - . Ft&l<Efu..U.... lno ':llIIlrilnc~_,"" HJ""" COnWctrng Ine wm,IItM1!.i&'So'nslnc
~:8ihlli,P'6sO.i2llt
'HUiWY.22S<luti1 ., ,..... ~dnalM'g'MNH23N'2OJ' '82",'>M;"SS S3tPark;AV.
~N<lIN~ER'S EST1!MTI! HtJtctiII".""IIlUsn. ~20-1_l:t -J>OSo'~11 .. ,.' f':OBOx'2.4T
'. ' 32O-H1'1018 , 32O'-t78:.a78 HotiihlmlOn'MN ~6'l7 H,lmbUrg,UN '.663:W..u24'1
~ I -3>>681>;10:44 chif.d,Odu-I~pa;n'I.' 320:-2M-83'1HI 812467.2720-
!ii btf~~'hUtl,riM .. s.Oo" 32Oo'234-730li . 952-487~
..
~ ~ t: ,,,,,.-
fTEM D!;SCRIPT1QN % UHITPRICE ESnMAte 1l.ll>l'Ri<:e am-rllTA\. llIo l'RlCE BlDTOTAL SIDPRlCE "'" rOTAL BID PRICE BlD'TOTAL
"
DIViSION 1.S10rtM-SEWEltCONSTRUC1'lON ... ,.. ...
1 2104 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS UNFT 40 $7,00 $28aOO $8.00 $320.00 $10.00 $400.00 $5.00 $200.00 $10.00 $400.00
2 2501 12:' RCP APRON WTH TRASHGUARD EACH 2 $726IlO l1,oI5OCOO $766.00 $1,532.00 $6-4-4.00 $1,288.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $6-4-4.00 $1,288.00
3 2501 15" RCP APRON WTH TRASHGU.A.RD EACH 1 $BOO.oo $800.00, $850.00 $850.00 $719.00 $719.00 $850.00 $850.00 $719.00 $719.00
4 2501 18" RCP APRON WTH TRASHGUARD EACH 2 19OO.00I.. l1,SOO.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $796.00 $1,592.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $796.00 $1,592.00
5 2502 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN SDR 35, TOP HALF PERF 'MTH SOCK UNFT '55 $7.25 16:271.25' $8.50 $5,622.50 $4.SO $4,152.00 $6.50 $5,'22.50 $5.00 $04,325.00
6 2503 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM S~ EACH 1 $l.1lloOO $11100.00- $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $250.00 $250.00
7 2503 12" RC PIPE SEWER Cl V UNFT 00 $3.2.00 ~,aao'OO $30.00 $2,700.00 $28.30 $2,547.00 $28.00 $2,520.00 $28.30 '2,547.00
, 2503 15' RC PIPE 5E'NER Cl V '-"<FT 22 $35:PO $770.00 $35.00 $no.oo $31.80 $899.SO $45.00 $990.00 $31.80 $699.SO
9 2503 18" RC PIPE SEWER Cl V UNFT 521 $36.00 $1g-~198.oo $36.00 $18,756.00 $31.10 $16,203.10 $35.00 $18,235.00 $29.61 '15,.c2G.81
10 2508 CONSTRUCT CATCH MSlN DESIGN A EACH 2 $1,800.00 $3.GOO.oo '1,200.00 $2,0400.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $1,750.00 $3,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
11 2506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 46-4020, e; DEEP EACH 1 $2,300,00 $2.300.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 $2,210.00 $2,210.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,010.00 $2,010.00
12 2506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE DESIGN 72-4020, e DEEP EACH 1 $3,GOO.OO $3,009.00 $3,200.00 $3.2lXl.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $2,800.00 $2,GOO.oo
13 2508 CONSTRUCT OUTLET CONTROl STRUCTURE EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2.500.00 $2,0499.00 $2,499.00 $2,145.00 $2,145.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 '2,145.00 $2,145.00
14 2506 EXTRA DEPTH IN MANHOLE DESIGN o46-4C2O UNFT 2.' $175:00 WlJ;60 $135.00 $391.50 $146.00 $423.40 $160.00 $464.00 $146.00 $423.40
15 2511 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS II WfTYPE 1II FABRIC CUYD 16.3 $80.00 $97800 $85.00 $1.059.50 $80.00 $978.00 $60.00 $978.00 $80.00 $978.00
StJ8:..rQTAL.DIVISION I- STORM SEWER COHSTRUCT1ON $48,UoU6 $43,800;80 $31,0407.10 $4',359.11. U8,603.81
DMSI"ON II.SlREEt'CONSTRuCilOH-AND RESTORATIOH -:- .
16 2101 CLEARING ACRES 0.22 $5.000.00 1-' $,1,100.00 $1,000.00 $220.00 $3,500.00 $770.00 $3,500.00 $770.00 $2,750.00 $805.00
17 2101 GROOBlNG ACRES 0.22 $5,00000 '1,100])0 $1.000.00 $220.00 $3,500.00 $770.00 $3,500.00 $770.00 $2,750.00 $805.00
18 2103 ElUILDtNG REMOVAl LUMP su.l 1 ,",soo.oo $3,soo.oo $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,600.00 $1,800.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $,2,750.00 $2,750.00
19 2104 REMOVE CURB AND GlITTER '-"<FT 16 $10liO $16SJXl $5.00 $80.00 $10.00 $160.00 $5.00 $80.00 $10.00 $150.00
20 2104 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING 5QYD 5 $30:00 $160:00 $10.00 $SO.oo $20.00 $100.00 $10.00 $50.00 $20.00 $100.00
21 2104 SAVv1NG BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FUll.. DEPTH) UNFT 20 ---=-$8,00 $1SO.00 $8.00 $160.00 $5.00 $100.00 $5.00 $100.00 $4.00 $80.00
22 2104 REMOVE RAILROAD TIES AND RAILS LUMP SUM 1 $750.00 $750.00 $400.00 $400.00 $900.00 $900.00 $900.00 $900.00 $500.00 ssoo.oo
23 2104 REMOVE GATE AOO POSTS LUMPSlM 1 $1"".00 ,$,t50;OO $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $100.00 $100.00
24 2104 REMOVE MISCELWJEOUS DEBRIS LLHPSU100 1 ssoo.oo ssoo.oo ssoo.oo SSOO.OO $200.00 $200.00 ssoo.oo ssoo.oo $200.00 $200.00
25 2104 REMOVE AND REPI..ACE CHAIN UNK FENCE UNFT 50 $12,00 l6OO:oo $2'.00 $1,400.00 $0.01 $0.50 $5.00 $250.00 $15.00 $750.00
26 2104 REMOVE AM) SALVAGE STOP SIGN AI'.-J POSTS EACH 1 $125.00 ll2!:oo $SO.OO $SO.OO $SO.oo $SO.OO $SO.OO $50.00 $SO.oo $SO.OO
27 2105 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) (P) <::I 1580 $8.50 $10,270;00 $4.7' $7,552.<40 $O.SO $10,744.00 $7.SO $11,650.00 $7.50 $11,850.00
2' 2105 lJNClASSlAED EXCAVATlOI't(POtD) (EV) cv 2632 $6.SO $17;108.00 $08 $12,580.96 $6.30 $16,581.60 $7.00 $18,42-4.00 $7.50 $19,740.00
29 2105 TOPSOllBORRO'N (LV) <::I SO $18.00 $1,080.00 $12.00 '720.00 $19.00 $1,140.00 $10.00 $600.00 $25.00 $1,500.00
30 2112 SUBGRAOE J BASE PREPARATION ROAD STA U $335.00 $1,474.00 $150.00 $860.00 $400.00 $1,760.00 $450.00 $1,980.00 $200.00 $880.00
31 2211 &,GGREGATE BASE (CV) ClASS 5 (P) CUYD 520 $19.50 $10.1'10.00 '16.50 $8,580.00 $29.00 $15,080.00 $2-4.00 $12,0480.00 $19.80 $10,2ge.00
32 2211 SElECT GRANU.AR BORROW (CV) (P) CUYD 640 $13.60 $9.640.00 $12.00 $7.680.00 $21.00 $13,440.00 $21.00 $13,<<0.00 $15.50 $9,920.00
33 2357 BITlIMINOUS MATERIAl FOR TACK COAT GAl 120 $2. ,270!IO $2.00 $240.00 $3.00 $3SO.00 $2.25 $270.00 $3.00 $3SO.00
34 2360 TYPE SPWEA240B ~NG COURSE MIXTURE TON 235 $03.00 $104,S()5;OO $86.00 $15,510.00 $70.00 '18,450.00 $64.50 '15,157.50 $73.00 $17,155.00
35 2360 TYPE SPNWa:23OB NON \NEARING COURSE WXTURE TON 345 $58,00 $20,010,00 $64.00 $22,080.00 $80.00 $20,700.00 $60.50 $20,sn.5O $71.00 $2-4,4.95.00
~'mo, 405 $1a;50 $7,492...50 $28.00 $11,340.00 $20.25 $8,201.25 $22.50 $9,112.50 $35.00 $104,175.00
36 2360 a..ASS 5, (INCIDENTAl) (TRAIL) 5QYD
37 2511 GEOTEXTIlE FABRIC TYPE 5 5QYD 1820 $1'15 $3,300.00 $1.50 $2,880.00 $1.50 $2,880.00 $1.10 $2,112.00 $2.00 $3.840.00
36 2531 :lEDES-TRIAN CURB RAMP EACH 3 $.935:00 $2;505.00 $S5O.00 $1,650.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $800.00 $1,800.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00
39 2531 ETE CURB & GUTTER El616 Lom 7SO $11.50 ',$8,9IO~00 '11.60 $9,048.00 $10.50 $6.100.00 $11.50 $8.970.00 $11.00 $6.580.00
I,.J 40 2531 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 5QYD 51 :$53.00 $2. 03.00 $36.00 $1.93ll.00 $67.00 $3.0417.00 $40.00 $2.040.00 $82.00 $3,162.00
I:L .. 2531 .. DRIVEW^Y PAVEMENT 5QYD 51 $48. $2,448;00' $36.00 '1,938.00 $67.00 $3,417.00 $40.00 $2,o.w.OO $62.00 $3,162.00
42 2545 STREET UGHllNG EACH 2 . $Z,250.oo II;,(:@JlO' $2,300.00 $4,GOO.oo $2,300.00 $4,OCO.OO $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00
43 2564 ZEBRA CROSSWALK 'MfTE-EPOXY 50FT 108 .$2.Loo $Z.2liil;OO- $1200 $1,200.00 $20.66 $2.231.2, $21.25 $2.295.00 $20.75 $2,2041.00
.. 2571 DECl'DUOUS TREE 2" GAL B&8 EACH 37 $35QOO $12;Q50.00 $270.00 $9,990.00 $270.00 $9,990.00 $275.00 $10,175.00 $250.00 $9,250.00
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, 111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 612-234-4209
BID TAJLATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON LE"T"fIIfG NO. 1A1PROJECT NO. 06-01A
BID OPENING: 03/13/2007 AT 9:00 AM ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $204,000.00
.
, ..... ,...... ...>............:...:.>.- Oi,ilnlridrB(i:)ljlne-.-"--
- a".RI;x~inc ''''~:go~na;lne
4<Jlj....st,PQIlo.2# WniMuftMii'&SonsJnc
11.. HWy;"_ 10.4IHWy1SS f31P1rkAVt
eNGI~'sE8T1rt..TE, HutchJ~',IIN'_~ >~ff!'lSburg'AlN6lI~1;o208 . PQSox'S11 -j:JbSOx2A7
UM'fYQ11
'-211401_0 32<f'9t8-40ta Hoichlnaori'MN~17 Hlmrg'MN: W3a;.Q2.t7
~ ~ ;l2II./lSt,'0+4....'., c1tri"Ill<'""'""*"",",,ojlle 3~'3Wlll!I 8t2....,~2'r20
~ ...... "'"IWm~"'" '-20,2""'7~ "a~7~
, ,.. ........ . ... ., . - - i:'..,Com
~ e 0- ! ""\11",.,, ...
JTl;IHIEScRlPTION Z U~irPRJcE .ES'llIilATE .. llI!l!'ll:l!lE alQ'm-rA1- ')llbl'jjJce; elDtoTAL ..1!ill1.1!1\JCE !lIQTOTAL eID.PRlCE B1b>OlAL
, ::> "
.. .511 0E<XlU0US TREE 110 CONTAJI'.'ER EAa< 5 ... 'tl'!hoo '..$625.00. $128.00 $6<0.00 $128.00 $6<0.00 $130.00 $850.00 $80.00 $400.00
41 2571 E 125 CONTAINER EAa< . .$250:00 iloo $.250.00 S5OO.00 $250.00 3500.00 $255.00 $510.00 $200.00 $400.00
47 2571 EAa< 36 .... >$ , ' $118.00 $4,246.00 $118.00 $4,246.00 $120.00 $4,320.00 $33.00 $1,188.00
40 2573 IM...ET PROTECTION EAa< 4 $t25OO , $500;00: $125.00 S5OO.00 $m.oo $WO.oo $1'5.00 $WO.oo $450.00 $1,800.00
4' 2573 SA.. T FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SlICED UN FT 1000 It,&5 .$U5!l:l1O $1.65 $1,650.00 $1.65 $1,650.00 $1.65 $1,650.00 $3.00 $3,000.00
50 2575 SEEDING ACRES '-' $400.00 ','$+10.00 ' $200.00 $220.00 $200.00 $220.00 $200.00 $220.00 $995.00 $1,094.50
51 2575 SEED MIXTURE 250 WI EROSION CONTROL BlANKET CATEGORY 3 SQVO 1086 .-US $2,OO9,tO $1.50 $1.629.00 $1.50 $1,629.00 $1.50 $1,629.00 $1.15 $1,2.48.90
5. 2575 SEED MIXTURE 270 WI EROSIDN CONTROl BlANKET CATEGORY 3 SQVO 2391 $:l.10 :02-'Ll0- $1.60 $3,825.60 $1.60 $3,825.60 $1.60 $3,825.60 $1.20 $2,869.20
53 2575 SEED MIXTURE 310 WI EROS1ON CONTROl BlANKET CATEGORY 3 SQVO 165. $2,40 S'l".OO4,SO $1.75 $2,891.00 $1.75 $2..8:91.00 $1.75 $2,891.00 $1.30 $2,147.60
54 2575 COMMERCIAl FERTIlIZER A/IW.. YSiS 24-0-10 """'" 297 $0;70 m7.9O' $1.10 $329.70 $1.10 $326.70 $1.10 $326.70 $0.40 $118.60
SUBTOTAL - DlVISION'II-$TREET CONSmucTION AND RESTORA'T1ON ItSS;SOS;40 $"2,303." $11141t..93 1'02,010.SO l16tlrta-.OO
....
TOTAL LETTING NO. lAJt:lRbJECT NO, 08001A I $204.2~..11 $lBI;1Mj18 $204.210,03 $208 170.3<1 $208i-s7I.J1
0-
r--..
.5:L
~
..,
~
.""
A.......
<\ \ ~/ ;~~:-/ ,...
_L
· t' . ..
. ~
1...'1._11 __ hr*'l
N III 114
I I -- ..... 55_
....._""...LlI'II
.
May 3, 2007
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Gary,
The 65th Annual Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival will be held from June 11 th - 17th this year,
~ and the entire committee is working hard to prepare for it. We are requesting that approvals
. and pennits be issued for the 2007 Water Carnival as follows:
1. Close the appropriate streets and issue a Parade permit for the Grande Day Parade on Sunday, June
17"', from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM. We are working to have this year's parade route the same as last year's.
MN Dot has grantad approvel for the same route as last year.
2. Close or monitor intersections at all necessary points for Parade Route on Sunday, June 17"', from 10:00
AM to 4:00 PM.
3. Issue a permit to operate concession stands during Water Camivel on Friday, June 15"', Saturday, June
16"', and Sunday, June 17"' on 1st Avenue NE from Main Street to Hassan Street.
4. Issue a permit for a fireworks display on Sunday, June 17"' beginning at approximately 10:00 PM at the
McLeod County Fairgrounds. Fire Chief Brad Emans will be notifiad concerning the display of flTeworks.
The Water Camival committee will arrange to have Sheriff Department, Fire Department and Ambulance
support on hand.
5. We have contractad with Mini Bitt, Inc to provide portable lavatory services for the Grand Day Parade
route, Parade staging area, and Kids Inflatables and Concessions area.
6. Request permit for K & K Fun Times to have Inflatabtes available to the public Friday, June 15"' through
Sunday, June 17"'.
The Water Carnival is a non-profrt event, and the Jaycees would appreciate the waiver of any
fees or rentals during the duration of the Water Carnival to help defray expenses. We
appreciate the assistance received from the City of Hutchinson and its staff, and we could not
~ have a community celebration without this support.
.
Page 1 of 2
\!lv \
/
.
t
.
"'"
\1 I' ,-.~~~..-'
-
r , . . ,
c ,
- L~lI."'u''''rClnllnl
PI 1..12.
---........ HIlI
....rc..........
If you should have any questions or concerns, or would like additional information, please
contact me at the numbers shown below.
Thank you,
)~/ f'~
. Scott J Ziegler
Commodore, 2007 Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
(320) 234-4430 (work)
(320) 587-0778 (home)
(320) 420-3967 (mobile)
teedoff@hutchtel.net
cc:
S_ Cook, Mayor
Dan Hatten, Chief. HPD
Brad Emans. Fire Chief
Doll Moon. PRCE DIrector
.
Page 2 of 2
11(0) \
.
RESOLUTION NO. 13193
RESOLUTION APPROVING MN/DOT LIMITED USE
PERMIT NO. 4308002 FOR TH 7/22 & SCHOOL ROAD PEDESTRIAN
UNDERPASS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is proposing to construct, maintain and
supervise a pedestrian and bicycle crossing via a 14' x 10' box culvert (Bridge No.
43X04), adjacent retaining walls with rail system and trail; said project known as TH
7/22 School Road Pedestrian Underpass.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON
1) That the City of Hutchinson does hereby approve and enter into Limited Use
Permit No. 4308002 for the construction of said TH 7/22 & School Road Pedestrian
Underpass.
2) That Steven W Cook, Mayor, Gary D Plotz, City Administrator, and Kenton
Exner, City Engineer are hereby authorized to execute documents pertaining to said TH
7/22 & School Road Pedestrian Underpass.
.
Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of May, 2007
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
.
\\t~)~
.
.
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COUNTY OF MCLEOD
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ON THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A MODIFICATION TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.4 AND THE
PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
NO. 4-15 THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1. Public Hearinq. This Council shall meet on June 12, 2007, at approximately
6:00 P.M., to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of a Modification to the
Development Program for Development District No. 4 (the "Development Program
Modification"), the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4-15 ("TIF
District No. 4-15"), an economic development district, and the proposed adoption of a Tax
Increment Financing Plan (the ''TIF Plan") therefore (the Development Program Modification
and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Program Modification and TIF Plan"),
all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, and
Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the
development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City; and
Section 2. Notice of Public Hearina. Filinq of Prooram Modification and TIF Plan. City
staff is authorized and directed to wor1< with Ehlers & Associates, Inc., to prepare the Program
Modification and TIF Plan for TIF District No. 4-15 and to forward documents to the appropriate
taxing jurisdictions including McLeod County and Hutchinson Independent School District No.
423. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, together
w~h an appropriate map as required by law, to be published at least once in the official
newspaper of the City not later than 10, nor more than 30, days prior to June 12, 2007, and to
place a copy of the Program Modification and TIF Plan on file in the City Administrator's office at
City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public.
Dated: May 9, 2007
Adopted:
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
\\(cD3