No preview available
cp04-10-2007 c .. . . AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2007 CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. Action - Motion to approve as presented 6. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 15,2007 2. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH 2007 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MARCH 2007 4. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 15,2007 5. PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 26, 2007 6. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. RESOLUTION NO. 13164 - RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 2. RESOLUTION NO. 13165 - RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY 3. RESOLUTION NO. 13166 - RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12901 ESTABLISHING INCOME GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR SENIOR AND DISABLED CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND SENIOR AND DISABLED CITIZENS REDUCED REFUSE RATE 4. ~OLUTION NO. 13167 - RESOLUTION EST ABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAY (5 AVENUE SE FROM MICHIGAN STREET TO TH 22) 5. RESOLUTION NO. 13168 - RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF BALANCED CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION 6. RESOLUTION NO. 13169 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (F350 FORD PICK UP AND UNLEADED FUEL) (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR BURICH ARENA COOLING TOWER REPLACEMENT ( d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE TO VFW POST 906 ON APRIL 12, 2007 , AT THE HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO: 2- LETTING NO. 12, PROJECT NO. 06-14 (WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA-APRIL 10,2007 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING EXPANSION) . (f) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS AND AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING REAL PROPERTY CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARR ENGINEERING FOR THE HUTCHINSON DAM REPLACEMENT (h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR THE COUNTRY STOP LOCATED IN THE RUNNINGS FLEET & FARM PARKING LOT (i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY RECYCLING PERMIT FOR CAN MAN RECYCLING INC. LOCATED IN THE WALMART PARKING LOT (j) RETAIL ON-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS · HUTCHINSON HUSKIES BASEBALL ASSOCIATION · LITTLE CROW BOWLING LANES (HUTCH BOWL) · SKY VENTURES (PIZZA HUT) (k) RETAIL OFF -SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS · COBORN'S INC - CASHWISE · SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA · ERICKSON'S DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION (ECONO FOODS) · PHILLIPS 66 · WALMART SUPERCENTER . Action - Motion to approve consent agenda ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 07-0460 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN LAND USE ACTIONS WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 27, 2007) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (b) 2007 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (LETTING NO.5, PROJECT NO. 07-05) Action - (c) ORDINANCE NO. 07 -0462 - AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE AND ENACT TITLE 5, CHAPTER 54 OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 8. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) STEVE KNISLEY AND "DREAM SHEDS, LLC" PROPOSAL Action - 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS . (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPRQVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF CHRIS KOVACIC TO PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD UNTIL MARCH 2012 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -APRIL 10,2007 Action - .. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF A WARDING CONTRACT TO LANDFORM TO COMPLETE HWY7CORRIDORSTUDY/AREAPLAN Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (b) DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Action - 11. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS 12. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS 13. ADJOURN . . 3 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2007 . CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. Mayor Steve Cook called the meeting to order. Members present were Bill Arndt, Jim Haugen, and Casey Stotts. Member absent was Kay Peterson. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Kent Exner, City Engineer, and Marc Sehorn, City Attorney. 2. INVOCATION - Rev. Randy Adams, Riverside Assembly of God Church 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS 5. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 13, 2007 (b) BID OPENING MINUTES OF MARCH 13,2007 (MONTANA STREETNW) Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously. . 6. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 19, 2006, NOVEtvrnER 16, 2006, DECEMBER 21, 2006, JANUARY 18,2007, FEBRUARY 15,2007 2. HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES FROM JANUARY 16,2007, FEBRUARY 20, 2007 3. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 20, 2007 4. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 5. CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2007 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO EXCEPT PROCESSING SPRING AND SUMMER ORGANICS-RIESE FARMS 2. RESOLUTION NO. 13163 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE OF CRACK SEAL MATERIAL AND BIODIESEL FUEL (c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT SUBMITTED BY BRUCE NAUSTDAL LOCATED IN RA VENWOOD WEST WITH F A VORABL~ PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13155) . 2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN HOME LOCATED AT 560/564 HILLTOP DRIVE N.E. SUBMITTED BY CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY WITH 5C LA) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13156) . 3 . CONSIDERATION OF CONDmONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOBILE REPAIR FACILITY IN THE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 805 HWY 7 WEST WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13157) 4. CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF A FAMILY VIDEO STORE LOCATED AT 108 1 ST AVENUE N.E. SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROCKFORD CONSTRUCTION WITH FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13159) (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR AND CLUB LICENSES FOR 2007 (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR CROW RIVER CHAPTER OF MINNESOTA DEER HUNTERS ASSOCIATION FOR MARCH 31, 2007 (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR MCLEOD COUNTY PHEASANTS FOREVER ON APRIL 14,2007 (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANTS LICENSE FOR RANDALL HERRMAN (h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF LEASE AGREEMENT FOR OLD DASSEL MEDICAL CLINIC BUILDING . (i) CONSIDERATION FORAPPROV AL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO.1, WWTF SCADA SYSTEM (LETTING NO. 13, PROJECT NO. 06-15) (j) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, WWTF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING EXPANSION (LETTING NO. 12, PROJECT NO. 06-14) (k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO.2, HATS COLD STORAGE BUILDING (4ETTING NO. 14, PROJECT NO.06-16) (1) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ITEMS FOR 2007 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM (LETTING NO.5, PROJECT NO. 07-05) (m)CONSIDERA TION FOR APPROVAL OF HOUSING AMERICA 2007 PROCLAMATION (n) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF CHRIS KOVACIC TO PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD UNTIL MARCH 2012 (0 ) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE REQUEST FOR TECHNOLOGY PURCHASE FROM HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Items 6(c)2, 6(h), 6(k) and 6(n) were pulled for separate action. Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt, to approve consent agenda with the exception of the iteIns noted above. Motion carried unanimously. Item 6(c)2 had further discussion. Ms. Bowers commented on the on-site meeting with the neighbor to alleviate his drainage concerns. She stated drainage issues will be addressed through grading and drain tile. Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt, to approve item 6(c)2. Motion carried unanimously. . 2 5CCA) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 . Item 6(h) had further discussion. Jim Haugen raised questions on the contract and 10nll term disposition of the old clinic. Atty. Sebora commented on the terms and rental b~ a chiropractic chnic for one year. He stated the hospital board is not sure what will be done with the bUilding in the future. Motion by Haugen, . second by Arndt, to approve item 6(h). Motion carried unanimously. Item 6(k) had further discussion. Jim Haugen questioned the two differing amounts in the Change Order. Mr. Jolui Olson, Public Works Manager, and Mr. Exner explained there are two different items on the Change Order. . . Motion by Stotts, second by Arndt, to approve item 6(k). Motion carried unanimously. Item 6(n) had further discussion. Casey Stotts stated he has issues with the way appointments are made. He stated there were many applications. Mayor Cook explained how the appomtments are approached. He stated he looks at the makeup of the current board and looks at the background and experience of the individual. He explained he tries to tap into the Chamber Leadership program participants. Council Member Stotts stated he would also like to look at the applications. Atty. Sebora explained the Mayor makes the recommendation. He commented on the present application form and stated he will look at changing the form to add more background information. Motion by Stotts to delay the appoint to the April 1 0, 2007, meeting, second by Arndt the motion carried with Mayor Cook voting nay. . Role call vote: Haugen, aye; Arndt, aye; Stotts, aye; Cook, nay Mr. Kovicic commented on his experience and background. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS-6:00P.M. . (a) ORDINANCE NO. 07-0460 - AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN LAND USE ACTIONS WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA . Ms. Bowers explained the request and the changes along the H wy 7 corridor. She stated a study would help to clean up the zoning. She commented on the need for a temporary moratorium of the study area. She reported staff have drafted an ordinance to enact the moratorium. She stated the moratorium will help to prevent negative development. I1C and C5 are unusual districts that require conditional use permits for every change of use, ownership, etc. Ms. Bowers explained there have been concerns by the public regarding how a moratorium could affect the sale of a property. She stated the City Council can change the moratorium at any time. She explained this is good timing while the Hwy 7 project is under construction. Discussion followed on the reason for this study. There were questions if many developers were asking to develop in this area. Ms. Bowers stated there has not been a specific proposal. She explained we should try to protect the City before development requests happen. There was discussion on the Hwy 22 moratorium and what happened in that area. Ms. Bowers stated the moratorium is a safety measure. There was again discussion on the need for the moratorium. Ms. Bowers commented on the I1C and C5 zoning district problems and protection of the Hwy 7 and Hwy 15 intersection. She stated the study will be similar to the downtown plan to plan for the future. She explained that public input will be a part of the study. Jim Fahey, Edina Realty, 446 Main St S, stated real estate agencies in the community support the study. He warned the word moratorium scares the realtors in the community. He suggested the moratorium maybe should be placed on an area between Bluff Street and Water Street and not the entire study area. Greg Witt, Edina Realty, 125 Glen St NW, complimented the staff and officials on promoting business into the City. He agrees that the word moratorium is perceived by many as a difficult process. He also suggests a smaller specific area of concern for the moratonum as a better solution. . Discussion followed for staff to come back with a more compact area such as from Montana Street east to Bluff Street. Ms. Bowers explained the Council can do a 6 month moratorium with the option to expand the time period if necessary. She stated presently the RFP is for a period of 9 months to 1 year. 3 S{ CA) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 . Atty. Sebora suggested the Council table the item for further review. Motion by Arndt, second by Cook to keep the hearing open and table to April 10, 2007. Motion carried unanimously. . . Discussion continued regarding the use of City staff to complete a study as opposed to a consultant. Ms. Bowers stated we could scale down the RFP to possibly reduce the cost. She explained staffis reviewing the proposals and will brinlJ; them back to the Council on April 1 Olh. She informed the Council monies for the study have been set asIde in the budget since last year. 8. COMMUNICATIONS, REOUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) PRESENTATION OF HUTCHINSON POLICE SERVICES 2006 YEAR-END REPORT Police Chief Hatten commented on the 2006 activity statistics.. He reported on the 2006 objectives and commented on the staffmg, facility and equipment. He also reported on 2007 objectives. Discussion followed on an update of the new towing procedure. Chief Hatten slated he will review and re- evaluate the procedure annually. (h) DISCUSSION OF WATER BILL CHARGES AT 1320 SOUTH GRADE ROAD S.W. Atty. Sebora commented on his discussion with the property owner at 1320 South Grade Rd. S. W. regarding the water bill being assessed to taxes on the property. The property owner was not present. Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen to approve assessing the charges to taxes. Motion carried unanimously 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS _. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CITY POLICY NO. 3.18- SAFETY CLOTHING - REIMBURSEMENT Ms. Ewing commented on the amendment to the policy at the request of an employee, a member of the safety committee. She stated she surveyed surrounding communities and, based on the other cities, Hutchinson was significantly behind. She would request an increase in footwear and eyewear reimbursement. Motion by Stotts, second by Haugen, to approve amendment to City Policy No. 3.18 - safety clothing reimbursement. Motion carried unanimously (b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ARESOLUTIONNO.13l62 AMENDING THE METHOD OF DETERMINING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON Mr. Merrill explained the method of charging for the sanitary sewer service. He commented on the new billing system now in use. He stated there were problems in the January readings and would suggest a three month or 90 day average. Discussion followed on using multip'le months to calculate a 30 day usage. There was also discussion on using only January and February bIlls to average a 30 day usage. Mr. Merrill explained there is a way to credit accounts in the billing system. Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt, to approve Resolution No. 13162 amending the method of determining sanitary sewer service charges for the City of Hutchinson using January and February averages. Motion carried unanimously. . (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESETTING BUDGET WORK SESSION FROM MARCH 29, 2007 4 sC (A') CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 Mot,ion by Arndt, second by Stotts, to app~ove res~tting th~ budget work session from March 29,2007 to Apnl3, 2007,1:15 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Motion carned unanrmously. . . (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SUMP PUMP PROGRAM PROPOSALS Mr. Exner explained the process began in 2001. RFP's were distributed. There were two proposals received. (Bolton Menk and Bonestroo). Staff would recommend Bolton and Menk receive the bid. There are approximately 800 homes to be inspected. He explained we would begin in April. The fee proposed by Bolton and Menk is $31,000. Mr. Exner stated that equals approximately $40.00 per home. Discussion followed on the identification of the inspectors from Bolton and Menk. There was also discussion on the information from the last program. Mr. Exner stated the inspectors will be engineering interns. Discussion followed on City staff completing the inspections. Staff was directed to look at utilizing City staff for the inspections. . Motion by Stotts, second by Cook, to table to April 24, 2007, the sump pump program proposals. Motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ITEMS RELATED TO THE CROW RIVER DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT Mr. Exner commented on the item. He commented on the history of the past discussions regarding the dam. He identified deficiencies and safety issues. He explained the future dam capacity, aesthetic issues and ecosystem issues. Mr. Exneqlfesented the conceptual plan of the future dam. Mr. John Olson, Public Works Manager, commented the optIOns for funding the dam project. He explained the options to reduce costs. He reported on the potential funding sources. Mr. Olson stated we can do this with City funds since Federal funding is not available. Mr. Exner explained the lack of Federal funding. Discussion followed on rock available in the area. . Motion by Stotts, second by Cook, to approve items related to the Crow River Dam replacement project. Motion carried unanimously. . (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR MCLEOD COUNTY SOUTHWEST RING ROAD PROJECT (CSAH 115) This was a request from the County and was discussed at a recent workshop. Mr. Exner commented on the feedback from the affected property owners and the process initiated 10 years ago. Motion by Cook, second by Stotts, to approve the Resolution of support for McLeod County Southwest ring road project. There was a lengthy discussion on the need for a more southerly route. Mr. Exner stated there will be limited access on the proposed route. He explained needing a justification of building roads. Mr. Exner stated this is a County project. Motion carried with the following roll call vote. Haugen, aye; Arndt nay; Stotts aye and Cook aye. (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DISCUSSION OF MNIDOT OUTREACH MEETING ITEMS Mr. Exner commented on the invitation from MNIDOT to participate in the outreach meeting. He prepared the memo from the City Council addressing the questions from MNIDOT. Motion by Stotts, second by Haugen, to approve MNIDOT outreach meeting memo. Motion carried unanimously (h) CONSIDERATION FOR V ACTION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED BETWEEN 1209 AND 1205 LEWIS AVENUE S.W. REQUESTED BY STEVE WADSWORTH, PROPERTY OWNER WITH . FAVORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 13157) 5 6'{ Cc ) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 . Ms. Bowers commented on the request to combine two lots and vacate easements between the two lots. She commented on the shoreland district requirements. She commented on the northern third lot to the river. She reported on the Planning Commission discussions on the vacant lot to the north and the difficulty in combining that lot to the proposed two lots. Mr. Haugen stated he believes Mr. Wadsworth meets the 25% coverage requirement using the northern lot. He stated the intent is there. Discussion followed on the restrictions not to build on the third lot. Motion by Stotts, second by Haugen, to approve vacation of utility easements between 1205 and 1209 Lewis Avenue S. W. Discussion followed on the need for the third lot to meet the 25% requirement. Steve Wadsworth, 1209 Lewis, presented his calculations as follows: including the three lots are at 12.8% impervious surface. He explained the calculation using the two lots coverage is at 35%. He stated the deed states there can not be a structure constructed on the third northerly lot. Stotts moved to amend the motion adding the condition, "no permanent structures may be constructed on north lot", second by Haugen. Motion carried unanimously. (i) CONSIDERATION OF RFP FOR INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION, PROPERTY, COMP, AND LIABILITY INSURANCE Mr. Merrill explained the request and the proposal. Councilman Stotts will sit on the committee. . Motion by Arndt, second by Stotts, to approve RFP for Insurance Broker Services for Workers Compensation, Property, Camp and Liability insurance. Motion carried unanimously. (j) CONSIDERATION OF ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MARIACHI'S RESTAURANT, 101 MAIN STREET SOUTH Mr. Plotz explained the process and would recommend approval contingent on Mariachi's full- filling the binder for liquor liability and reporting sales tax on the STl form. He Slated the present license expires April 1,2007. Motion by Stotts, second by Arndt to approve the on-sale intoxicating liquor license contingent on full- filling the binder ofliquor lIability and reporting sales tax on the STl form. Motion carried unanimously. 11. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Arndt commented on Fire Chief Emans editorial on past fue chiefs and commended ChiefEmans for the article. He reminded the Council and public of the Luce Line trail meeting on Saturday, March 31st at the Silver Lake auditorium. Council Member Stotts commented on the railbed trail on the south end of town. . Mr. Plotz informed the Council of the opportunity to save rental money for leases on three tractors at Creek Side. He stated the City would be saving $39,000 for rest of year by not entering into the lease agreement. Motion by Arndt, second by Stotts not to enter into a rental agreement for the tractors. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Exner stated a Hwy 7 informational meeting will be held on Thursday, April5, 2007, from 4:30 - 6:30 at the Events Center. 6 5(0-) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 27, 2007 . Mr. Plotz reported on the hospital privatization meetings. He reported there will be a proposal to the City Council in the near future. . Mayor Cook commented on the appointment to Planning Commission. 12. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS Motion by Arndt, second by Stotts to approve claims, appropriations and contract payments. Motion carried unanimously. 13.ADJOURN There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. . . 7 5(0) . . . City of Hutchinson - Public Arts Commission February 15, 2007 4:30 PM, City Center Regular Meeting Minutes Members Present: Tom Wirt, Rebecca Bowers, and LuAnn Drazkowski Tom Wirt began the meeting to order at 4:35. Lacked a quorum to approve January Minutes. Old Business: . Reviewed the Policy and Procedure materials that were centralized of what have been submitted to date. Identified what informational gaps exist. . Assignments for City of Hutchinson Public Arts Polley and Procedures: 1. Fiscal Management - where should the funds be kept? 2. Processes flowed out (LuAnn/Joanne) 3. Gifting and Transfer of ownership process (DolflRebecca) 4. Maintenance (DoIf/Rebecca) 5. Public works input/responsibilities (Dolf/Rebecca) 6. Introduction/history (Tom) 7. Branding/name placard standards/guidelines (Do If/Rebecca) New Business: . Developed a timeline with these milestones: 1. Assemble remaining Policy and Procedure information by March 15 2. Commission review of Policy and Procedure, with edits by April 19 3. Finish draft of the Policy and Procedure by May 17 4. Submit draft to Marc S. in May 17 5. Receive Mark's feedback/recommendations by July 19 6. Draft ordinance, publish, hearings 7. Prepared to present to Council at September 11 meeting . Future tasks to considered are: }> Architecture guidelines }> Publicity, public awareness, and education plan }> Developing a long-term plan that reflects a collaborative input form other entities }> City owned Art Center Next Meeting: Thursday, March 15,4:30 pm . eo (C\) \ Clrry OF HU1'~fIINSON COlTN.T OF BlJILDL1\iGfP_LlTl\:tlJING.J1\IIECH'ANTC~~_L PERMITS IS.SUED AND ,\r.L\LlJArr.lON - Ilj";'" --~~~;;< March 2007 ~~<. ." *: -...,"""L.:.e._~ -.:.;r&;; Basement Finish Buildin _ s Demolished ~uildin sMoved Commercial Addition/Remodel Deck Fence Reshin Ie -.Residential 'Residential'AdditionIRe airlRemodel Reside - Residential Sin Ie' Family Tern orary PeIIilit Window Re lacement - Residential Fir~ S rinklin Mechanical Plumbing Si No.o'fPermits 1 2 1 6 3 3 8 5 1 1 ~ 4 -1 22 8 5 Valuation 21.0,0.00 68,800 1 O(i, 000 6,995 27,021 TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED ~J\.ND V.UUATION 73 418,816 {j (C'\)1- This Is the breakdown of the calls for the month: . City: Residential4 CommerciaVlndustrial 9 Multi-family 4 School 0 Carbon Monoxide 3 Hazardous Material 8 Vehicie 1 Rescue 2 Medical 3 Grass 1 Sky-Warn 0 Good Will 0 Mutual Aid 0 Structure Fires 2 Arson 1 Rural: Rescue 3 Grass Type 1 Medical 3 Residential 1 Farm Buiiding 0 Hazardous Material 1 Carbon Monoxide 1 Vehicle 0 CommerciaVlndustrial 1 Good Will 0 Structure Fires 0 Arson 0 Drills I Meetings I Other Infonnatlon . We conducted our "Oath of Office" for our 10 new fire recruits; they have all completed Firefighter I and 1" Responder. Each firefighter has approximately 160 hours of "donated" time in their training. Training: 1. Locate an address, set-up, and move water. 2. Map reading. . 3. Semi-Annual firefighter competency test of firefighting skills. 4. Minnesota pipeline awareness I for the pipes that run through our fire district. 5. Hazardous materials update/refresher. 6. New firefighter update on FD Soo's I Procedures. Fire Prevention I Public RelatIons . Escorted the Phoenix Drum Line out of town for their competition at the state contest . ePage2 (j(C\)3 . . . Page 1 of I Pioneerland Library System Meeting February 15,2007 Summary Notes Jack Sandberg 2/25/07 . 2007 PLS Budgc1 finalized. UnanticipaIed income from in1eresl Necessary to use some reserves to balance expenditures. . Library size criteria: new dollar 8IDOIIDlll in budget used to define Classes. (I-h...+ch,....son.s ~OO7 bucl!jer classiv >$415,875 IS.$31.f'1,'?5".3) class ill > $ 138,625 class ii > $ 55,450 class I up to $ 55,450 10.9 % increase over Iastyear HigbesI = Willmar $455,066 Lowest = Brownton $ 25,599 . Renville Head Librarian Positon Retiree not to be replaced According to PLS policy, the attempt will be made to combine Head Librarian positi<lns to cover Renville. The city ofRenville appealed the PLS decision, but PLS stands film, based on the lioct that one less bead hbrarian reduces the .rlministrative burden on the PLS director. Head Librarian time at Reoville was 30 hr. Will be 5.5 HoW's + 29.5 hr Assislant Level 3. Head LIbrarian time at other hbnuy will not be cbanged. . Information: SELCO will be undertaking a project to promoie h'bnuies statewide. Coniract with the city of C\arldield for hl:muy services in their area will be renewed . . SAMMIE, PLS, PCLS cooperation project Jan 6: final report with recommc:ndation from the consuI1ant team. Little was found for substmrtive change. Jan 22: Steering committee decides to pursue cooperative strategic planning MCUj n.>td PLS annual meeting and awards banque1 will be in ll.a:)""-' in April. . . PLS Executive meeting infonnation Aim 10 reduce the cost and time commi1men1 for PLS Board Keep developing colleclions policy . PLS working on developing a new Library Assislant Level 4 position for Libraries that have lit1lc Head Librarian prcseocc. Legisla1ive update Budget proposal from the Governor's office includes increase of $155,000 statewide. For PLS that would mean + $ 6,000 or so. New proposal from legislature includes increase oU 5,000,000. For PLS that would mean + $ 200,000 or so. . ~( iA)Y . . . Minutes Hutchinson Public Library February 26, 2007 Members present: Julie Jensen, Yvonne Johnson, John Hassinger, Janet Vacek, John Paulsen, Ann Vance, and Mary Henke, Ex-Officio Members absent: Kay Peterson President Jensen called the meeting to order. The January 22, '2D07 minutes were approved. Report: Mary read the report on the February 17, '2D07 Pioneer1and Library System (PLS) board meeting submitted by Jack Sandberg. (See enclosure) Old Business: 1. Rosetta Stone publicity developed by Mary-She has contacted home schoolers, community workers, the charter school. public schools, and parochial schools. Janet Vacek wm contact the Head Start programs. 2. Mary reported on potential new local library board members. 3. National Library Week, Aprir 16-21-Author Will Weaver will be our guest speaker. A cooperative agreement with Ridgewater Community College for his presentations in the community is being developed. A fee of $500 will be jointly paid by Ridgewater and the Friends of the Library. His visit will be Thursday, April 19, 2007. 4. Legislative Day will be on March 28 in Sf. Paul. Mary will attend. New Business: 1. PLS Hall of Fame Award-Miles Smart was nominated for the award. Miles is a long-time volunteer at the library whose special talent has been book repair. Motion was made by Janet Vacek and seconded by Ann Vance. Passed. Next meeting will be on March 26 at 4:30 p.m. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, John Hassinger, Co-Secretary ~l(A1cJ) l , , . '0 " " " " " " " " " '0 " , ,. " " '.' ~ " n , " .~.i ~':~i :1(\: 31)! ,- I;'! I~ , !,,; i' f'! t.7! "'I' 4~ "I :t-n ""I ~8-- S> .l,- ..:::..--' e- . C~ -"d - ASSETS __________n ____UTliJ.ILP.LANL.::..ALCOST----. __. _n___ LAND & LAND RIGHTS DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT rOTAI.- UUJ..lT_Y.PlA.l\1I_ B~CE SHEET FEBR~ 28, 2007 I.-ESS ACCUMUlATED DEPRECIATION _ __ TO.T1\l..AC.l;J!1'1UWlIED._D~!.Ot'L --------- CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS . ___.IIHAl.J:.Ol'lSI!WCllP1LIN PRQGRl'il.s___ TOTAl UTIlITY PlANT DEPREC VAlUE RESTRICTED FUNDS & ACCOUNTS FUTURE EXPANSION & DEVElOPMENT _YAYJiEtH__UUJ.EUJL IN\~:;;_ .__ MEDICAl.- INSURANCE RATE STABII.-IZATION FUND - ElECTRIC RATF "'TAlUl..lZAIli1NFJill1L_~..J,AiLn__ BONO & INTEREST PAYMENT 2003 CATASTROPHIC TOT1\L_RESTBJCTED__BJNIlS 1, ACCOUNT.!? _ CURRENT & ACCRUED ASSETS .. ______~CASI.LJ1LJllI{,I~ . ACCOUNTS RECEIVABlE INVENTORIES _f'BEf'.8111II'lS\JRlI.Nfl' .. PREPAID MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PREPAID GAS EXPENSE _ ..DEFERREILENERG.Y. CJ1SL=.l1UiQ ClEARING ACCOUNT SAlES TAX RECEIVABlE TOTAl .C\JRREI'IL!< !\C.CRU,fiP ASSE_TS DEFERRED CHARGE BOND_.Jl ISCQ\JNL .20Q3._ __ TOTAl DEFERRED CHARGE' TOTAl ASSETS __t. . * * * * TOTAL * * * * - -~--- -41179,-787.43------------------ 102,830. 596. 83 107.010,384.26 (33.558,963.82) (33, ~58,963. 82) - ------.- ------------.---- 299,446. 15 299.446. 1 ~ ----..-....------ 73,7~0.866. ~9 259, 772. 179,530. 100, 006. 289,258. 612.891: ----- 563~62-0. 1.000. 46 78 00 22 70 IS- 00 2,006,073.31 4.156.377.41 '4 :-39B;'"gef2-:-ii2'--- 1.391.939.80 99.295.00 76,569.2~ 4,599.80 77,215.80 ---------~-~.-----_._--- -- '1:3; 243.23'" .--,----~,._.~-- 49,433.18 10,267, ~96.39 559,212.65 -----5:59:-212.65- 86.583.748.94 . 3/21/2007 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION B.E SHEET FEBRUARY 28. 2007 PAGE " . 1 _~ _~_.~__~l"gT~,~,_!__*_ * * ,r- ,I I , MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES __ ___._ __._ ___l1UNI-r. TPAI EOU1D:'_,,_._____~.~__~_.~ MUNICIPAL EGUITY UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EAR~INGS .TOTAL_I1UNIJ: I PAL JOJ:l\.llTY __._ _.--- 'I . . . 54.008,489.95 1,006,086.81 ~~,014, 576. 76 " LONG TERM LIABILITIES-NET OF CURREI\lI_I'IATJ.iRlllES__---.~ . 2003 BONDS TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES - -----.2i~-805,OOO.OO--. . ---~------- --..--- 27.805,000.00 " " " CONSTR CONTRACTS & ACCTS PAY RETAIN ACCRUED EXPENSES - RETAINAGE _ ....IJ)'IIIL_GilJ'lSIR.Uil.lill'LII'-AJ::.l:.JJLEAY.--- -~ -. -- - 107,671. 74 " " 107. 67_~,.~_____ ] o CURRENT & ACCRUED LIABILITIES _M:COV1JTS_Ei\YI\13J...l':_ _ ------- --- ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - MISO INTEREST ACCRUED _______-AC.c.T~ PAYARt F TO CTTY---DE I:lVIG.J:l..ll.!S.Q.N______ ______u_____~_.________ ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE ACCRUED MEDICAL ~UND ____..1ICCRV.EDd ElE..EAYI'IEJ\!L_ __ __ ACCRUED SEVERANC& CUSTDMER DEPDSITS' _. _____~__...nnJER..L1 JRRFNT !c.AJ:_CBJlElLl_tAB.lU.IlfS~____ TOTAL CURRENT " ACCRUED LIAS 3.007,000.19 --- ~4-;71~f.-j9- - ---- - --- -- - . n - ---- 286,779_ 98 179. ~30. 78 "-~28;?32:-74 ----~- - - ---------- .------- (305, 021. 3~) _.__~!2f:1~,_E!~ 18.482.44- 133,41~. 00 4,079.45 3, 656, 500"'44-~- " " " ,. " " " " '0 _ __lOT AL.J'l\ii'l~U.EALJ:_(l,\iU~!.._k_Lll\.lt -- 86,583,748.94 " " -.--_._----~-----,--~-~~-- " . r " " '0 " " " " __ ___L_ _________._ .._ ._. "_0' ,_,_" _.._._._-~ '~ " " _~__L____ " " '0 ~)~_____ u __u_________ r;:-'I'L ~:j ~~~------ -~_..,._---~~_._-~~~ . STATEMENT OF INSiIIL& EXPENSES FEBRUARY ~007 PB"YIJ:ll.I.~CURRENT .._.___ ..BUQ.9E'IED.. YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE INCOME STATEMENT _. -DPERAI.1NG..REYENUE. ______ --... --.- .. --.--.- .--.- -- SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY SALES FOR RESALE . NEL INCOME_EROM OIH<:R.SOURCo.S SECURITY LIGHTS POLE RENTAL SALES_", GAS. ..---. --..-- NEW ULM TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION - ELECTRIC DIVISION TOTAL OE.ERATI NG REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES PRODUCTION OP<:RAT.10Ii.__ PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE PURCHASED POWER OTHER POWER SUPPLY TRANSMISSION OPERATION TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE ELECTB.IG....D1STR 1 B.\lIl ON OI'ERElTll1J'L. ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE GAS TRANSMISSIONJJPERATiON. GAS TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION GAS. D~STR I BUT l.D1i..MIl.lJlIIEW'II'oICE..._.- CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING & COLLECTIONS SALES EXPENSE ADMINISTRATIVE .1<.GENE8€\1.. EXPE.NilES DEPREC IATiON CONTRIBUTION TO CITY PAYMENT IN.. LIEU OF. IAXE5..JlL.r:.ll'L.____. ROADWAY LIGHTING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING INCOME OTHER INCOME OTHER - NET INTEREST INCOME MISCINCOI'jE. GAIN ON DISPOSAL - TOTAL OTHER INCOME GAS OTHER EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES INTEB~ST. E~PENSE. TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES 4,157.485.42 5,488.96 4}OI4.9.5.'(l.T. 1.812.00 933. 25 .;l,_4.~e1~9-" 109,609. 12 183,340.00 7, ""7,38.7. DEL_ 4, 530, 548. 84 234,729.52 __.4~,cJ.l3. "9_ 1.875. DO .00 ~~26,,242. ~ 118,282. 12 183,333.30 . 8, n.,"-, ~:25_ l3 ..__3.QS,Ioj,,~.I.L_ ____.~48,_1~9. 13 67.024.47 41,0.31.75 2,631.642.66 2/838,831.23 _.44.. 449. 57. _ _.~3':3_9L.9_Q 19. 18 381. 72 1,114.50 695.0.9 __.__ .~",.l~3Q.. ___~.~_105. 30.__.. ~2,654. 51 54.764.67 2.833,754. 17 2,831.505. 14 .IQ.4J9. Q6 __9. ~;3Q., ."-6 3,876,33 2,242.54 56,828. 03 61,~93. 46 ._______1.;).057. ;;c'L-___l!l.o.384. 84. 47.310.46 50..0.49.99 23,206. 00 11,720, 10 _~~~!_t7J. 2.9 3?1_,_Q~g:.J?4 50.7,984. DO. 490..301.84 170..762.50. .00 m_..._.m__. ...QQ 179,530..78 .0.0. .0.0. 7.147.677.44 7,60.5.641. 78 809,70.9.64 1. 133.883.35 13,759.42 19,348.47 224. 42 129,742.95 163,07~.26 14.817.15 39. 788. 03 L~!,_9_~~~2_ . DO. 73, 530. DO . ANNUAL - ilObGEff . ..PUQ.GH DEVIATION -"E' \: .-27;~b~: ~~~-~g-[: 200,000.00 s ..-15;(51)0.00-- . ;3, .000. 00 i:~ 12,283,271.00 l~ - ----~700, 000. 00 t:ll l..1pO, 000. 00 :: 42,892,819.40 HI -- .._----'- " m.-67:9DTo'/. 227,729,52 10.,673.66 --- (62~~50T (50.0..10.) 310..259.52 -~592-:!2" __m (36.70.) 616,993.61 4,462,647.75 7,0.00..0.0. 33,340..0.0 -2~'5(io. -50 5DD.lb 3,316,483. 17 -----06, 690. OO--~-_. 183,370. aD 81 122, ?~~_' '~,_ " " 351,D22.4~ (197,136.711 3,286,877.37 . 78, 432. 3~ --'--.3~400, 60 -------470,500. 00 ~I 2,733,189. 81 <10~, 641. 42) 17,082,436. 34 ~ 53,510.70 10,149.70 321,000.00;z. -----5.00-.--(06 -Tie, 38 ~ ----3,-006-:-00-- "t ,1,000.20 305. 11 6,000. 00 :~ ___.__~~_544. 4~__ 2.439. 14 333,200. 00 l~ 33.923.45 --..-(20,841. 22) 20.3,50.0.. DO. ~ 2, 635, 8~4. 07 (195,651. 07) 9,7.62.4:;22.48 : 13, 65~. 73 4,422.17 81,90.0..00." --- i: 584. 8s.. ~.342.-:11-. 4!i;-SOO:OIY.-' 68,310.99- 7,017.53 409.784.00: 23,588.05 5,203. 21 141. 50.0.. DO. ,. 53. 927. 4~f; 3.877. 46 .m__ -323, ~60. 00----.J ~8,978. 46 47,258.36 353,800.00: 40.8, ~38. 0.3 37.48~. 39 2,450.,738. DO. . .490.,.399 89- 98~ b~.2;.94i, 810.95 . .00 .00' .00 ~ 179. ~66. 68 3~. 90 1,077. 184. 6~ '" ----~ 21. 386'. -33------~21 ,.-386~- -----f28~29~r- '" 7.268.911. 00 (336.730.78) 39,422.946.14 . 4 8'3. :620'. 52- 280. 262. 83 -3,4.6"r; 87~. 26.- .4 4 --_.__.-~ 1, 66-9-.06--------- 33,340.,00 126,40.8.61 .. -- -.---..-.00 171.417.61 , . --- -3. 14ef.TI----. 70, 006. ()-~--!1 6,448.03 200.000.00: (107.483.79) 758,30.0..0.0. . ----.-60-. - . . 00. (97,887.61) 1,028,30.0.00 ~----~~-~..- ---------------..----.-.. 9.806.89 ___ J.]'3,_g(~. ~9._ . 203,082.09 11, 30.1. 34 _1_ 90!.......q?~.:__~1J 201.326. ~4 NON",OPERAT IN.G..l NJ;OME_.m__ __.____ _. __. ...tiQ., DOlt. e~.L___--,1."':z.J_96. 54) NET INCOME ~ s;' ..:;...7..- C- 769.702.81 1.006.086. B1 18,0.0.3.60. ~_~<?_' .q~~: 22 20.8.666.82 6,702.26 38. 02 6,740:--28 108,000.00 1, 140. 1~1. 26 j, 24S;nT:-2"6--.. _..J.;3/o.,649,.:2.!.c.. __ .._(~._I.~?_~~_ _(~5..!..~6.~__ 816.971. 31 189,115.50. ,: 3,250.,022 00 ---i ___._ ._..____~_.J --'-------......-...---.-----.. ---- . . . RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY Resolution No. 13164 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Services has accumulated various unclaimed items. AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70, Subdivision 2, Paragraph C for the appropriation and sale at auction of unclaimed property. AND WHEREAS, the unclaimed property, at the time of auction, will have been in the possession of the police services for more than sixty (60) days; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of unclaimed items identified on "Attachment A." Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of April, 2007. Mayor City Administrator Co(\?) \ Attachment A . Page 1 06-1253 06-1441 06-1451 06-1583 06-1596 06-1637 06-1679 06-1675 06-1721 06-1721 06-1721 06-1721 06-1801 06-1814 06-1841 06-1843 cle 06-1843 06-1848 . 06-1899 06-1913 06-1920 06-1952 06-1996 06-2000 06-2055 06-2094 06-2193 06-2202 06-2288 06-2287 06-2408 06-2408 06-2542 06-2550 06-2610 06-2636 06-2667 06-2722 07-0009 . 07-0073 (o(b) \ . . . Attachment A Page 2 'j"~':,~~)kffl~l~t j~'tC"~',: 26" Men's Black Roadmaster Mountain F Black KHS 500 Alite Bic cle (or b) \ . . . RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY Resolution No. 13165 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Department has accumulated surplus property. AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70, Subdivision 3, Paragraph C for the sale at auction of surplus property. AND WHEREAS, the police department has determined that it is in possession of surplus property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA. That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of surplus items identified on Attachment A. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of April, 2007. Mayor City Administrator (j) C b )1- . . . Attachment A Page 1 3 office chairs (p('o) 7- CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 13166 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12901 ESTABLISHING INCOME GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR SENIOR & DISABLED CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND SENIOR & DISABLED CITIZENS REDUCED REFUSE RATE WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes provide tax deferral for senior citizens; 65 years of age or older, or a person(s) on disability as defmed by the Social Security administration, for . whorn it would be a hardship to make payments, and WHEREAS, the horne owner can make application for deferred payment of special .essments on forms which can be obtained from the City Administrator's office, and WHEREAS, the home owner/renter can make application for reduced refuse rate on forms, which can be obtained frorn the City Administrator's office; NOW THEREFORE, the City Council has established the following income guidelines, asset limitations, and verification requirements for applications of deferred assessrnents and/or reduced refuse rates: 1. To be granted to person(s) with a low income of$23,000.00 per year for one person and $26,300.00 per year for a rnarried couple. 2. To be granted to person(s) with an asset limitation of not to exceed $30,000, excluding the hornestead and automobile. 3. Deferred assessment and/or reduced refuse requests may only be applied for if the following documents are submitted at the time of said application. . A. Federal Incorne Tax Form 1040, 1040A, 1040EZ; or t40) 3 Page 2, Resolution 13166 Senior Deferred Assessments 'niOT Citizens reduced Refuse Rate B. Minnesota Property Tax Refund Form M-1PR Every two years the city can request said information to continue reduced refuse charges; existing reduced refuse accounts shall submit the same documentation to continue the reduced charges. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of April 2007. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Steven W Cook Mayor . . o (b}3 . . . TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer RE: Consideration of Resolution Establishing Municipal State Aid Street DATE: Aprill0,2007 As previously discussed with the ColDlCil, City staff has proceeded with the Municipal State Aid Street (MSA) designation of 5" Avenue SE from Michigan Street SW to the termination at TH 22. Appropriate City Resolutions are required by MnlDOT State Aid Offices to complete this process. This State Aid designation accounts for about 0.99 miles of our 14.57 miles of potential MSA street mileage. The City currently has a balance of 0.44 miles ofundesignated mileage. We recommend that the proposed Resolution be approved. cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator toL bJY . . . RESOLUTION NO. 13167 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Hutchinson that the street hereinafter described should be designated as a Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson that.the road described as follows, to-wit: 5th Avenue SE from the intersection of Michigan Street SE, then East 5,225.36 feet (0.99 mi.) to the termination of TH 22, be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State AId Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator Is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration. and that upon his approval of the designation of said road or portion thereof, that . same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of . Hutchinson, to be numbered and known as 5th Avenue SE. ADOPTED April 10th, 2007 Steven W Cook, Mayor ATTEST: Gary D Plotz, City Administrator Lc(b )Y /' ~-- ~) ,~ ~ ~I\~~ ~C= ~ \---~ I f---< !--O,-- ___ f-- I ~~ 'I "''' ( v s --. 2/ ..J:-. '1 I II J. ClIyu"",unol ,- ~ ............. \ ~ ,l ~~ ~ '0 _In_ to be Added to hlSA I. &THAw. BE I ~'-"-.. .. ... .. ..(11" .n \ \ J . . . CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 13168 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1001 RESOLUTION OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF BALANCED CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION WHEREAS the Minnesota State Legislature recently passed Renewable Energy Standard (RES) legislation requiring 25% of utility companies generation portfolio to be produced by renewable generation by the year 2025, and WHEREAS the RES legislation would reduce the amount of additional C02 being emitted into the environment by Minnesota utilities, and WHEREAS the legislature is now considering major climate change legislation that could have significant impacts on achieving the recently adopted RES as well as on the ability of Minnesota utilities to meet the growing needs of the citizens of the State of Minnesota as well as neighboring states, and WHEREAS legislators are urged to consider the result of significantly more expensive power due to climate change legislation and the impact that would have on economic development throughout rural Minnesota, and WHEREAS the climate change legislation being considered could also compromise the reliability of the transmission grid in Minnesota and surrounding region to reliably deliver the additional electricity needed by Minnesota consumers, and WHEREAS any climate change legislation adopted by the State of Minnesota needs to consider the proper balance between reducing C02 emissions and meeting the growing energy needs of the citizens of the State of Minnesota to ensure the continued health and vitality of the Minnesota economy, and WHEREAS the currently proposed legislation only targets the utility sector and ignores the more significant C02 emissions from other sectors of the economy, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Hutchinson Utilities Commission urges the Minnesota Legislature to develop climate change legislation that will broadly consider the C02 emissions of all segments of the economy rather than only select segments of the economy, and (P(b ') ~ . . . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the legislature is urged to consider the technological feasibility of legislation being considered as well as the ability to meet the growing energy needs of the citizens of Minnesota under any climate ch'ange legislation being considered, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Hutchinson Utilities Commission supports a deliberative approach to the passage of climate change legislation by the State of Minnesota involving an in depth study of the economic, technological and environmental elements to be considered in any legislation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such a study be carried out in an environment that recognizes the adopted goals of the Minnesota RES but does not prohibit the electric utility segment from meeting the needs of the growing Minnesota economy. Adopted by the Hutchinson Utilities Commission this 6th day of April 2007. Donald Walser, President ATTEST: David Wetterling, Vice President lp l\3) S r ~" . RESOLUTION NO. 13167 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF BALANCED CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Legislature recently passed Renewable Energy Standard (RES) legislation requiring 25% of utility companies generation portfolio to be produced by renewable generation by the year 2025, and; WHEREAS, the RES legislation would reduce the amount of additional C02 being emitted into the environment by Minnesota utilities, and; WHEREAS, the legislature is now considering major climate change legislation that could have significant impacts on achieving the recently adopted RES as well as on the ability of Minnesota utilities to meet the growing needs of the citizens of the State of Minnesota as well as neighboring states, and; WHEREAS, legislators are urged to consider the result of significantly more expensive power due to climate change legislation and the impact that would have on economic development throughout rural Minnesota, and; . WHEREAS, the climate change legislation being considered could also compromise the reliability of the transmission grid in Minnesota and surrounding region to reliably deliver the additional electricity needed by Minnesota consumers, and; WHEREAS, any climate change legislation adopted by the State of Minnesota needs to consider the proper balance between reducing C02 emissions and meeting the growing energy needs of the citizens of the State of Minnesota to ensure the continued health and vitality of the Minnesota economy, and; WHEREAS, the currently proposed legislation only targets the utility sector and ignores the more significant C02 emissions from other sectors of the economy, . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson urges the Minnesota Legislature to develop climate change legislation that will broadly consider the C02 emissions of all segments of the economy rather than only select segments of the economy, and BE IT fURTHER RESOLVED that the legislature is urged to consider the technological feasibility of legislation being considered as well as the ability to meet the growing energy needs of the citizens of Minnesota under any climate change legislation being considered, and . ~w (0 (1)5 ~ . . . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson supports a deliberative approach to the passage of climate change legislation by the State of Minnesota involving an in depth study of the economic, technological and environmental elements to be considered in any legislation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such a study be carried out in an environment that recognizes the adopted goals of the Minnesota RES but does not prohibit the electric utility segment from meeting the needs of the growing Minnesota economy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson does not feel that House File 375, Section 5, has received the consideration and study contemplated by this resolution and the City of Hutchinson opposes the passage of this legislation at this time. Adopted by the City of Hutchinson this 10th day of April 2007. ATTEST: Steven W. Cook Mayor Gary D. Plotz City Administrator \Cwls.<d &(b~5 RESOLUTION NO. 13169 CITY OF HUTCHINSON . RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR F350 Ford Pick up 26,573 Wastewater replacement WWTP yes Jay Malone Motors .e following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR 8,500 gal Unleaded #19,669 Use by MnDOT, Utilities HATS YES Cenex Fuel & City vehicles _otion Made By: Seconded By: Resolution submitted for Council action Kenneth B Merrill by: Finance Director Date Approved: April 10, 2007 l.o(b) Lv . rv1emorandum Date: Re: Mayor and City Council Marv Haugen - PRCE Operations Manager Doff Moon - PRCE Director April 2, 2007 Burich Arena cooling tower replacement To: From:" . Money has been set aside in the capital improvement fund for replacement of the EAST and WEST rink cooling towers at Burich Arena. Staff has met with contractors, suppliers and rink staff from other cities to help us draft the appropriate plans and specifications. These plans and specifications include provisions to raise the units about 16 feet to improve airflow. The replacement evaporative condensers will be upsized to increase capacity and perfonnance. These evaporative condensers are located in an area that does not have the proper consistent air-flow required to assure peak performance. During cold weather, downdrafts off the roof make the released moisture return to the exposed fan blades, causing an accumulation of frost build-up, lowering refrigeration capacity. To remedy this, staff is forced to melt the frost with hot water, which causes ice build-up in the area. Additionally, over time, the water leakage from the units has increased, causing even more potentially unsafe conditions. Council action is required to advertise for bids. We would like to advertise as soon as practical, award the contract and have work commence this spring/summer. We have spoken with three contractors, one of which is based in Hutchinson, and we anticipate bids to be within the range approved by the council in the capital improvement fund of $115,000. We recommend that the City Council authorize staff to advertise for bids for the Burich Arena Cooling Tower Replacement Project. . (nee') . Minnesota Department of Public Safety LIQUOR CONTROL DMSION 444 Cedar St./Suite l00L St. Paul, MN 55101-2156 (612)296-6439 TDD (612)282-6555 @ APPLICA nON AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE -{vr area, Will the applicant contract for intoxicatinl! liquor . ?If so, give the name and address of the Liquor Iiccnae providing the aervice. ~ \j;CW ~llSI Cf - k <I will the applicanl carry liquor liability insuranoe? If so, the carrier' . name and amount of coverage. (NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory) APPROVAL APPUCA nON MUST BE APPROVED BY cm OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMTITING TO UQUOR CONTROL CITY/COUNTY ~l':k-h,,4I"" CITY FEE AMOUNT .g fJD, uD DATE FEE PAID j-;}3-o'l DATE APPROVED LICENSE DATES GNA TURE CITY cLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR NOTE: Do not ,epar.te these two parts, aend botb part, to the addre.. above and the original .Igned by tbls dld,1on "ill he returned .. tbe Ikenoe. Submlt to tbe Chy or County at Ieut 30 day' before the event. PS-09079(sml) lid} . . . TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer RE: Consideration of Improvement Project Change Orden DATE: April 10, 2007 As construction has proceeded on the below listed projects there have been additional work, project scope revisions and construction staging revisions. All of these items have been identified and deemed necessary to satisfactorily complete these projects. The following Cbange Orders are proposed to address these items: . Change Order No.2 - LeIting No. 12/Project No. 06-14 - WWTF Administration Building Expansion This Change Order addresses some relatively minor constroction revisions determined necessary by Wold Architects and Engineers. The summation o[ the Cosl increases and decreases results in a net increase 0[$2.342.84 /0 the original contract amount We re<ommend that the above Change Orders be approved in the amounts listed. cc: Gary Plot>: - City Administrator lP(e) . J-/;/ ib.,;1 c . . 'AIA Document G701~ - 2001 Change Order PROJECT (Nom< wu1 addrtJS): City of Rutcbinson - Wastewater Treatmenl Facility Administration BuiJdiDg Expansicu ]500 Adams Street RutchillS()ll, Minnesctl55350 TO CONTRACTOR (Name and address): Eben Construction 23350 Co\DIty Read ] 0 Lcmto. Minnescta 55357 CIlANGE ORDER NUMBER: Two (2) DATE: Man:h 20, = OWNER: 0 ARCHITECT: 0 CONTRACTOR: 0 FIElD: 0 OTHER: 0 ARClfTECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 062030 CONTRACT DATE: Octcb<r ]7. 2006 CONTRACT FOR: Ocneral CcnslrUcticn THE CONTRACT IS CIIAHGEO AS FOllOWS: (lnclwIe, when appliclJble, any uruiisp"ded amOlm' attributable to prtvimtsly UKUIed Con.jtruction Change Directivu) PR*7 PR#8 PRIIO CP*12 CP#8 PRI12 Rekx:ale 4. water line alcng grid D between grid. 3 snd 4 10 clear ~ waD Revise hardware group fer doors 34A snd 34B to group #6 Provide wall type 7 A lJII the """" waD of rooms 13 snd 14 Product substitution credit fal' alumiDum windows Provide OR doors to match exillling cpmings Provide dlscoonecls fer grinder lIDlI drill press Add Add Add Deduct Add Add $],259.21 $1,217.55 $ 679.11 ($3.]98.00) $1,560.56 $ 824.41 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO.2 ADD $2,342.114 The criginal Contract Sum WllS The net change by p<evicusly antherized Change Order> . The Contract Sum prier to this Change Older was . The Cootracl Sum will be increased by this Change Older in the 8Dlll\DIt of The new Cootract Sum including this Change Older will be The Contract TlIDC will be un<:banged by Zao ( 0 ) days. The date of Substantial Co~letilJll .. of the date of this Change Older _en: i. April 20. 2007 $ $ $ $ $ NOTE: This OUlnge Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum. Contract Tune or Qu.anmtec:d Maximum Price which have been authcrized by ConslrUctioo Change Directive until the cost snd time have been agreed upon by bcd1 the Owner snd Contractor, in which Case a Change Order is executed to supersede the Construction Qw1ge Directive. NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR AND OWNER. Wold Architects snd Engineers ARCIlTECT (Firm ruune) 305 SL Peter Street SL Paul, Minnesclll 55102 ~ ~ B igMtl4re) JlL11A Ml fJalllA.lJ~ (Typed Iltlm<) :31191 \01 Ebert ConsbUCtion CONTRACTOR (Firm ruune) City of Rutcbinson OWNER (Firm ruune) III Hassan Street South HUlChinsoo. Minnesota 53350 ADDRESS 1,106,200.00 2]2.02 1,106,412.02 2,342..84 1,108,754.86 BY (Signal.re) ....... St"~vpn W r~k (Typed """",) 04/10/2007 DATE ) 2>/ ~~ 1<.."1 DATE DATE AlA Docunent Q101.TlIII _ 2001. Copyright C 1979, 1987, 2COO and 2001 by The American InstIMe of AtchItects. AM rightI; reMI"Hd. WARNING: This AIA<jo Document Is protectet:l by U.S. Copyright Law and Interrnltionel Treelles. UnMllhorb:ed reproduction or di&lrlbution 01 thl. AlA"- Document, or any portion oj It, may result in severe civil and criminal pen31lies, and will be prosecuted to the maximum elltent possible under the Jaw; This document was produced by AJA software aI16:1.:4O on 03I19r'2007 LJI"Id8r 0rd8r No.1000282438_3 which e:qllres on 113O/2OOB, and Iii not fol' r8nle. U..,. NotH: (3671857315) 1 v(e'J . . . TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer John Paulson, Environmental Specialist RE: Consideration of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants and Affidavit Concerning Real Property Contaminated with Hazardous Substances DATE: April 10, 2007 As determined necessary by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), City staffbas worked with Bmun Intertec to prepare a Response Action Plan (RAP) addressing the on-going methane monitoring of the "old dump site" near the National Guard Armory. Per the approved RAP, the City must approve restrictions and covenants concerning the future uses of the "old dump site" property. The City is also in the process of completing the installation of the r<oquired methane moniloring wells and associated alarm equipment. Upon the completion of these installations, it is City staff's understanding that the requirements of the MPCA have been satisfied unless significant methane genemtion and discharge is noticed in the future. We recommend that the proposed Declaration be approved. ce: Gary Plotz - City Administrator wet) . . . DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS AND AFFlDA VIT CONCERNING REAL PROPERTY CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES THIS DECLARATION AND AFFIDAVIT is made by the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota. The facts stated herein are stated under oath by Steven W Cook on behalf of the City of Hutchinson, and are intended to fulfill the disclosure requirements of Minn, Stat. ~ 11.'5B.16, subd. 2 (2006). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is the fee owner of certain real property located in Mcleod County, Minnesota, as described herein (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Steven W Cook is the Mayor of the City of Hutchinson, and is stating the facts herein solely in hislher capacity as Mayor; and WHEREAS, a portion of the Property was the site of release(s) of certain hazardous substances or pollutants and contaminants; and WHEREAS. the Hulchinson City Dump property currently is owned by the City. The Property covers about 12 acres and includes: an office and vehicle maintenance facility occupied by municipal police and forestry departments, a storage building. two former single-family residential StruCIureS currently used as training facilities, a fIre training tower, a Minnesota National Guard Armory (MNGA) building, exterior material slorage areas, driveways. parking and landscaped areas, some perimeter fencing, and additional areas occupied by Ihe former dump. The Property is served by public and private ulililies including electric, lelephone, natural gas, and water supply and sewer services. Descriptions provided in previous environmental investigation reports of former land use at the Property document that waste disposal at the Property began in the 1950s and continued into the early 1970s. The wastes primarily consisted of household municipal refuse from the City, demolition debris, and industrial wastes derived from the local 3M facility. The dumpsite formerly was developed as an open cut gravel mine, ~(f) and waste disposed in the pitts) mighl be in coniact with shallow groundwater. The Property is bounded . by a fanner demolition debris dump of unknown size 10 the west, the South Fork of the Crow Wing River to the south with residential development farther south. the municipal waste water treatment plant to the east, and Couniy Highway 22 to the north, with commercial and agricultural properties farther north. The south end of the dump adjoined a former channel of the South Fork of the Crow Wing River that was cui off from surface waler flow of the main channel. However, subsequenl flood events redirected the river 10 the north. resulting in undercutting of waste that had been deposited allhe dump; and WHEREAS, the Minnesoia Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Voluniary Investigalion and Cleanup Program (VIC) requesled in a letter dated, December 15, 2005 thai the Ciiy of HUlchinson prepare a Response Action Plan (RAP) in support of the MPCA Draft guidance Iitled, "Moniloring for Landfill Gas At and Near Former Dumps", and the Ciiy of Hulchinson prepared the RAP in accordance with requirements provided in Ihal correspondence in general accordance with MPCA VIC Draft Guidelines and Protocol For Moniloring For Landfill Gas At and Near Former Dumps, and MPCA VIC . Guidance Document #18 - Response Section PlanlResponse Aclion Implemeniation Plan; and WHEREAS, previous environmental investigations of the dump document that solid waste and mineral fill at the Site overlay native soils ranging in lexture from clay 10 sand. The volume of solid waste al the site was estimated 10 be about 400,000 cubic yards based on the area of waste observed during the Phase IT ESA. The depth to groundwaler ranges from about 5 feet to 14.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Water levels measured in boreholes completed al the SiIe did nol allow the hydraulic gradient of shallow groundwater to be accurately determined. However, those measurements indicated thai groundwater generally flowed west, toward the river. Several organic and inorganic contaminants were detected in soil samples, sediment samples, waler samples, and groundwater samples collected at the Site. Exposed waste materials were observed along the cut bank of the adjoining river channel near the southwest portion of the dump. Vapor monitoring conducted at soil borings detected methane . 2 Lo(f) concentrations as high as 46.7 percent by volume at ihe Sileo However, meihane was not detected in ihe . lowest or basement levels of buildings located at ihe Site; and . WHEREAS, during a Phase II enviromnental site assessment that was conducted in 2002 and documented photo ionization detector (PID) screening' of soil and waste samples ranging from less than 1 parts per million vapor (ppmv) to 10 ppmv, methane monitoring of borehole vapor within the solid waste area ranging from 0 percent to 46.7 percent, carbon dioxide readings in the soil borings ranging from less than 0.1 percent to 0.4 percent above normal background levels, and oxygen levels in the soil borings ranging from 10.6 percent to 20.4 percent, and visual and olfactory observations of soil and waste material samples recovered from the soil borings; and WHEREAS, monitoring of methane concentrations in the waste area are being interior of each occupied structure on the Property, the ground surface of the Property is being monitored for erosion and repairs necessary to the surface of the dump area, engineering controls are installed at the Property to limit access to the Property; and WHEREAS, a Certificate of Completion dated has been prepared by the MPCA and received by the City of Hutchinson for realignment of the Crow River and repair of the river bank located along the south side of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has agreed to place a Restrictive Covenant on the Property for the purpose of protecting public health or welfare or the enviromnent. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hutchinson makes the following declarations as to limitations, restrictions and uses to which the Property may be put, and specifies that such 3 ~(f) declarations shall constitute covenants to run with the Property as provided by law and shall be . binding on the City of Hutchinson, its successors or assigns, all present or future owners of the Property, and all parties who now or hereafter have or hold any right, title or interest in the Property: 1. Defmitions. [a.] As used herein, "Owner" means the City of Hutchinson, which is the grantor of the rights and covenants created in this Declaration, and includes the City of Hutchinson's successors and assigns, and all present and future owners of the Property: [b.] As used herein, "Property" means the real property owned by the City of Hutchinson located 1100 Adams .Street SE in Hutchinson, Mcleod County, Minnesota, shown on Exhibit 1 hereto and legally described as follows: Lot 2 of Auditors Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29 [c.] As used herein, "Restricted Area(s)" means those areas of the Property depicted and identified on the General Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, as follows: The entire Property is restricted. . 2. Use Restrictions. Subject to the tefIns and conditions of this Declaration and the reservation and covenants contained herein, the City of Hutchinson hereby declares and imposes the following restrictions ("Restrictions") on the Property: No disturbance or alteration of any nature whatsoever, specifically including, but not limited to, grading, excavation, boring, drilling or construction, shall occur on, above, beneath or adjacent to the Property. . 4 (0(\2') Any activity on or alteration of the Property prohibited by the Restrictions shall not occur . without the prior written approval of the Commissioner of the MPCA or his successor (the "Commissioner"). The Commissioner's approval may include conditions which the Commissioner deeIns reasonable and necessary to protect public health or welfare or the environment, including submission to and approval by MPCA of a contingency plan for the activity or alteration, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Restrictions do not apply to, and no prior approval of the Commissioner shall be required for, activities including maintenance or repair of existing buildings; structures,. underground sewer, water, electrical or telephone services, or installation of fencing and signage, when such activities are not expected to or are not reasonably likely to result in disturbance of or intrusion into soil, ground water and/or surface waterS. . . Within 60 days after receipt of a written request for approval to engage in any activities subject to the Restrictions, the MPCA shall respond, in writing, by approving such request, disapproving such request, or requiring that additional information be provided. A lack of response from the Commissioner shall not constitute approval by default or authorization to proceed with the proposed activity. 3. Maintenance Requirements. The City of Hutchinson will maintain the Property, including engineering controls and site monitoring equipment to ensure an acceptable level of risk associated with Property ownership and on-site facility operations. Landfill gas monitoring wells, methane detection systeIns installed in occupied buildings, monitoring and repair of ground surfaces, and security fencing to prohibit access of unauthorized persons to the site, will be maintained and used as 5 cp({) . . . necessary to monitor site conditions and ensure the protection of public health, public welfare, and the envirorunent with regard to existing conditions of the historic dump area and landfill gases that might be associated with those Jandfilled materials at the Property. Those maintenance and monitoring activities will be conducted in accordance with the plan prepared by the City of Hutchinson and submitted and approved by the MPCA. 4. Covenants. The City of Hutchinson hereby covenants that the Property shall not be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, occupied, altered, or used in violation of the Restrictions set forth in Section 2 or the Maintenance Requirements of Section 3 of this Declaration. 5. Reservations. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall in any way prohibit, restrict or limit Owner, from fully conveying, transferring, occupying or using the Property for all purposes not inconsistent with the Restrictions or the Maintenance Requirements. 6. Duration; Amendment In accordance with Minn. Stat ~ 115B.17, subd. 15 and Minn. Stat. ~ 84C.02(c), this Declaration and the covenants, grants and Restrictions and Maintenance Requirements herein are unlimited in duration unless terminated, released and/or apiended with the written consent of the Commissioner or his successor, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Declaration and the covenants, grants and Restrictions set forth herein may be terminated, released and/or amended upon the occurrence and satisfaction of the following conditions: 6 lo(+) a. soil, ground water and/or surface water sampling is conducted on the . Property with prior written notice to and in accordance with a plan approved by the MPCA, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld; and b. based on such samples the MPCA determines that contaminants in the soil, ground water and surface waters located within the Property no longer pose a potential threat to human health or welfare or the environment This Declaration and the covenants, grants and Restrictions [and Maintenance Requirements] herein may be amended if the MPCA fmds that the conditions set forth in Section 2 or 3 of this Declaration are inadequate to protect public health or welfare or the environment If Owner and the Commissioner agree to amend this Declaration, or if the Commissioner decides to terminate or release this Declaration, the Commissioner shall, within 60 days after receipt of written request from the owner of the Property, execute and deliver to Owner an . instrument in recordable form, amending, terminating, or releasing this Declaration. 7. Grant and Conveyance to MPCA: Right of Entry. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Declaration, the City of Hutchinson grants and conveys to the MPCA and its successors such rights and interest in the Property as are necessary and convenient to enforce the Restrictions set forth in section 2 of this Declaration and Maintenance Requirements set forth in Section 3, including the right of the MPCA, its employees, its agents, contractors and subcontractors, upon reasonable notice to the then-current . owner and at reasonable times, to enter from time to time upon the Property to inspect the Property and verify compliance with the Restrictions and Maintenance Requirements. The Restrictions declared and the rights and interest granted under this Declaration of Restrictions shall run with the Property and bind the City of Hutchinson, its successors or assigns, all present 7 lo(f) or future owners of the Property, and all parties who now or hereafter have or hold any right, title . or interest in or to the Property. 8. Emergency Procedures. The City of Hutchinson covenants that the procedures set forth below shall be followed when an emergency requires immediate excavation of contaminated soil in the Property to repair utility lines or other infrastructure on the Property, or to respond to other types of emergencies (e.g., fIres, floods): a. notify the Minnesota Duty Officer immediately of obtaining knowledge of such emergency conditions; the current phone numbers for the Duty Officer are 1-800-422-0798 (Greater Minnesota only); (651) 649-5451 (Twin Cities Metro Area and outside Minnesota); fax (any location) (651) 296-2300 and TDD (651) 297-5353 or 800-627-3529. b. limit disturbance of contaminated media to the minimum reasonably necessary to adequately respond to the emergency; . c. undertake precautions to minimize exposure to workers, occupants and neighbors of the Property to contaminated media (e.g., provide appropriate types of protective clothing for workers conducting the excavation, and establish procedures for minimizing the dispersal of contaminated dust); and d. prepare and implement a plan to restore the Property to a level that protects public health and the environment. Submit to the MPCA a copy of such a plan for review and approval prior to implementation of the plan. Submit a follow-up report after the plan is implemented so that the MPCA can determine whether protection of the public health and the environment has been restored.] . 9. Disclosures. 8 lo(f) The Restrictions set forth in Section 2 and the Maintenance Requirements in . Section 3 of this Declaration shall be incorporated in full or by reference into all instruments conveying an interest in and/or a right to use the property (e.g., easements, mortgages, leases).] In Witness Whereof, this instrument has been executed on this 10th day of April 2007. CITY OF HUTCHINSON By Steven W Cook Mayor State of Minnesota ) ) 55. County of ) Steven W Cook , being duly sworn by me under oath, has signed and acknowledged . the foregoing instrument before me this 10th day of April, 2007, by Steven W Cook, Mayor, City of Hutchinson, on behalf of said City of Hutchinson. . Notary Public . 9 ~ \{-) . . . Accepted on behalf of . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~ lISB.17, sub<!. 15 By Michael Kanner Manager Superfund and Emergency Response Section Remediation Division Delegate of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency State of Minnesota ) )SS. County of Ramsey ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by Michael Kanner, under the authority of Brad Moore, Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, a Minnesota body politic, on behalf of the State of Minnesota. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFfED BY: John Paulson Environmental Specialist 111 Hassan Street S.E, Hutchinson, MN 55350 AG: 2022248,v. 01 10 lDt~) . . . -+- -.' 'I" .....:~:-.~.._/ I -.::..-,"," ~-_. -....... . ...: ","-- .-.......;.>.. .. ~......" ,_..., ... gY100t-l DRAWN BY GJR ~~ SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM Phase n Environmental Site Assessment Hutchinson City Dump Hutchinson, Minnesota 1" -1OOCI' STS Consultlintll Ud. Co...u\til1ll~ 1- FIGURE NO. J f I PIGfMIoW>OC .l9(f) . . . + LEGEND ~ a--. SORII/G . B-1 SAMPt..E LOCATION ~SURFAce S=TION N LOCA TION t + o 7S 150 "'- L.--J SCN..E .. FW' u i i ~ J1lm ~ II f~ ~ .. . CROSS-SECTION . HUTCBINSON :ONS RUTCHJNSO N. KIHNESOU - - -- --- ~ (f')- . . A WATER LEVELS RECORDED 5/06/2002 TO 5/08/2002 ..........--...... ....... ..~ ...... ;0. ....... ...~........ '- ;. :ci.......:.. . . . , . .' , .. --..~........, ........ ';"....'...:........ ':'....... ...'.....:. '.. : :; : 20: 40 ........,.. ...... ....... .~.........f.........r:....... .........!.,.....,F:~~~.... . . . . . . . .,,"" .... (SNIl1!>ClA't) . . .. . . ., ........ . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . , . .......ix):2Q !'?-"'"T'~"""" ...".... . - CHOO . ..1 ......;0:15 ~ 0: ~ " f- " i::!i ~ " " "" ~ , 10M:" .." " "00 :i ,,;= " jD2O:.. . 13'" 00 - ~~ I IH- Z! 1l A' I)fl) .,.... ~ . . -...~nJO - T 9...~~ . :. ........:.....". ...,..... .........:........~......... . : lWM:sau : : -~QJO) : : ........i........ ......... .........t........r........ ........110:10 ~ :: '- b ~ ~ ~~ m_ -- 97511XR 0411ROOUJWG ".- 4 . . . S cwo fU. WATER LEVELS RECORDED 5/06/2002 TO 5/08/2002 .. II : MUM:SOU :<-YOClA'I) :-----:-- .........~........~...... . :~t"J .lO<<l ~~t.~;.L~'r.:/~~~:'if{:'" /~'~ft;;J~'/ "'~4~~':t;t"'~' ..b;. ....4,..~tI:lOl5 t{f:<'= ........i.... ; ....................~ ~ 0 20: 40 I' III ,,' I I I ,I d :~ ~.....l~........ :50' : - . . . . . .. ....... - . . . . . . , . . . ; ......J"..... . . . . . .... ..~....... . .. ...... .~.. . . 'r" ~ ~ ......1.., ".. ................ ..................1........ .......,.)..... ..,......... ...... .......-.'1........ ... 0f00 l:)25;...... ~ o 0:.. ~~ ",0 I "''' o ,,~ oiS GO! ~~ l:l ~ .. ... I ~~.... .\. :z: o I lO<<l S' lO<<l .... . 'l'" .... ~:JDCJ5 ([~ 1030 ....... ~...,.... ~"JCIOO m_'" -- ... +78 97S11XR 0811ROO1.DWO AS SHOWN ~ ....,. b ~ 5 . TO: Mayor & City Couucll FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer RE: Consideration of Design and Construction Services Agreement with Barr Engineering for the Hutchinson Dam Replacement DATE: April 10, 2007 As discussed al the last City Council meeting, Barr Engineering has submitted a Change Order to the original Design and Construction Services Agreement for the Hutchinson Dam Replacement City stafIhas reviewed the revised agreement and it primarily accounts for the inflation increases (approximately 8%) over the last two years to perform these services. . Attached is the currently proposed agreemenl. Also, attached is the original agreement offered in July of 2005. We recommend that the proposed Agreement with Barr Engineering In the not-to-exceed amount.ofS119,75O.oo be approved. cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator . LP(5l (~ i . . . Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77th Street. Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952-832-2600 . Fax: 952-832-2601 . www.barr.com An EEO Employs, BARR Minneapolis, MN . Hibbing, MN . Duluth, MN . Ann Arbor, MI . Jefferson City, Me . March 30, 2007 Kent Exner Ciiy Eogineer Hutchinson Ciiy Center III Hassan Streel SE Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 Re: Change Order to July 19, 2005 Agreemant for Design and Construction Support for Hutchinson Dam Replacament Dear Mr. Exner: This letter sets forth cbanges to the Agreement dated July 19, 2005 between the Ciiy of Hutchinson and . Barr Engineering regarding engineering work associated with the replacement of the Hutchinson Dam. The scope of professional consulting services we will provide is described in Attachment B, and includes Final Design and Construction Support phases for the project. The authorized cost for the revised scope of services is increased by $119,750. This is an increase ofaboul 8% over the 2005 estimated fees for these same services. The increase is due primarily to inflation of salary and expenses over this two-year period. This Agreement will be effective for the duration of the services or until June I, 2008 whichever comes first unless earlier terminated by either you or us. We will commence work upon receipt of a copy of this letter signed by you. The estimated schedule for Ihe services is to complete Final Design by June 13, 2007, and to substantially complete project construction by December I, 2007. If this Change Order 10 our Agreement is satisfactory, please sign the enclosed copy in the space provided, and re1urn it 10 us. Sincerely, Accepted this _ day of ,2007 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY CITY OF HUTCHINSON By Vv'~ >>. F~ By Its Its Vice Presidenl Attachments AUachmenl B - Scope of Work and Fee W:\Bwmus Ul:liUl\ED\Proposal!~7\7009 HutchinJOD Dam\Hutchinloll Dam 2007 Lettu A&J'CCBXItll 01an1C Order Letter.doc March 1.2005 Ven)on Loe Cj ') ~ " . . . Attachment B - 2007 Scope of Work and Fee The Hutchinson Dam Replacement PrQjecl is generally defmed in the January 2006 Hutchinson Dam Replacemenl Study report. The SCQpe Qf work fQr this projecl is II' develop deiailed design fQr the project, and facilitale the pennitting, bidding, and cQnstructiQn Qf the project. The current prQjected budget for the project is $1.7 million. The City Qf Hutchinson (City) expects tosecure $1 million Qf this from the Minnesota State legislature, and $75,000 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1be remaining costs fQr the project WQuld be approximalely equally COOl shared by the City and the Minnesota DNR. The City has cQmpleted an Alternate Urban Area Review (AUAR) that includes the project area and a descriptiQn Qf the proposed dam replacement project It is assumed thai the AUAR and its descriptiQn and review Qf the dam replacement prQject is adequate to fQregQ the need fQr an Environmental Assessment WQrksheet (EA W). 1berefore, nQ EA W has been included in this scope. If an EA W Qr other environmental studies are necessary, we can modify the scope, schedule, and budgettQ include such WQrk. Prelimiuary Design was completed in January 2006, and included updated design laYQulto reflect the design fQr the new Highway 15 bridge. The ScQpe Qf Work fQr this modificatiQn t9 the agreement includes the fQllQwing work: Final Design Phase The Qbjective Qf this work is II' develQP detailed design and CQntract documents suitable fQr bidding and cQnstructing the project This includes develQpment Qf detailed engineering design, CQnstructiQn drawings (plans), technical specificatiQns, bidding documents, and constructiQn conlr6C1 documents. Also included is agency coordinatiQn, preparatiQn af pennits, and Qn-gaing agency coordinatiQn. Hydraulic Modeling - Detailed hydraulic modeling will be develaped in HEC-RAS ta model existing and proposed project canditians. It will be irnportantto model the channelflQw conditians so that the channel can .accammodate fish passage and water safety aspects, as well as delermining project imp6Cls far nQnna! and high waler flQW conditiQns 61 the Highway 15 bridge, Qn property surrounding Otter Lake, and property dawnstream Qf the project an the Sauth Fark Crow River. 1be hydraulic model will incorporate as-buill drawings from the Highway 15 bridge constructian, and will be provided tQ MoDOI' and MONR stafffQr reviey/ . Detailed Design Develapment - Detailed design will be developed far project cQmponents in sufficient detail far the projeclta be reviewed far pennitting, bid by prospective contraclars, and construction by the selected contractor. Dam Modificatians - The detailed design af dam modificatians includes permanent abandanment af existing slide gate and tainter gate features, modificatian af the averflQw spillway crest and right (south) abutment, and develapment af a new law-flaw syslem tQ provide maintenance drawdawn capability. Stane masonry camponents Qn the narth abutment will be preserved tQ maintain their historic and aesthetic values. Channel Design - A new channel will be designed tQ the sauth Qf the existing dam II' increase discharge capacity and pravide the Qpportunity fQr fish passage. A center island will be develaped II' establish high graund between the channel and the spillway. Landscaping and Trails - Site work, trails, and surraunding park area will be designed to provide safe and aesthetic access to the project area, including fishing and vista apportunities. Landscaping and traillaYQut will be develaped an the narth side af the river ta aVQid Qr minimize impacts ta historic features or culturally sensitive areas. Opiriian af Prabable CanstructiQn CQsts - A detailed engineer's QpiniQn af probable cost will be prepared II' provide a reasQnable basis fQr planning, budgeting, and evaluatiQn af constructian bids for the project work. The cost estimate will include all majar project camponents, with line items for items expected ta be greater than flve percent Qf the tatal cost City af Hutchinsan - Hutchinsan Dam Replacement Design Attachment B - 2007 Scope of Work (Marcb 30. 2(07) Page laf2 (P(5) ", . . . Meetings and Coordination - Up to four meetings are included in the Detailed Design phase for planning and coordination with the Ciiy and MDNR staff. We have assumed these meetings will be held in Hutchinson. Permit Applications - Based on the detailed design and on communications with Ciiy and agency staff during the Preliminary and Final Design phases, permit applications will be prepared for the projecl, to be signed and submittec:l by the Ciiy. Contract Documents - Contracl documents will be developed for the project based on the detailed design, in coordination with the City, using the City's standard bidding and construction agreement documents. Barr will be responsible for preparation of drawings and technical specifications, and for incorporating the City's bidding documents and construction contract agreement The completed Contract Documents will be suitable for contract bidding and execution of a construction contract for the project We have assumed thai the Oty' will make their standard bidding documents available by March 23 for use in coordinating the technical and no-technical contract documents. An alternative would be to use EJCDC-based documents prepared by Barr for bidding and construction agreemenl documents. Bid support - The City will be responsible for advertising the bidding, distributing bid documents, administering bid document fees or deposits, fielding administrative questions during bidding, issuing any necessary bid addendums, accepting bids, administering bid opening, identification of apparent low bidder, and awarding and contracts. Barr will be responsible for providing complete contract documents for distnbution, attendance at a pre-bid meeting, fielding technical questions during bidding, and preparing technical addenda if necessary for the Ciiy to distribute to bidders. , Deliverables - Deliverables for this task include up to 25 copies, of Contract Documents for the projecl, a detailed engineers estimate of construction costs, permit applications, and minutes from project meetings. Fee ~ The fee for the Phase IT work described herein will not exceed the lump sum of $71 ,300. Phase 111- Construction SUppl)rt The objective of this task is 10 provide administrative and engineering oversight for project construction. We have assumed that construction would tBke place in 2006, and that construction would last a maximum of 16 weeks. Actual construction duration will vary. The final scope and fee for Construction Snpport should be reviewed and adjusted If necessary after construction contract Is awarded. Construction Support work includes attendance at a pre-constructionmeeting, administration and review of contraclor's submittals, weekly progress meetings and review of construction, engineering office support during construction, final review and certification of construction, and record drawings represented completed work. Materials testing will be provided by the Ciiy under separale contract Deliverables - Deliverables for this task include meeting minutes, submittal register, copies of contraCtor , submittals, contract change orders and addenda, weekly construction summaries, pay request recommendations, record drawings, and construction certification letter. Fee - The estimated fee for the Phase ill work described herein is $48,450. City of Hutchinson - Hutchinson Dam Replacement Design Attachment B - 2007 Scope of Work (March 30, 2007) Page 2 of2 ci3) S" r-.. ~ C-/ . 2 3 . . 12 " ...,. ""3J Tl1tJ!>>I2oW7 - WedtJl:J.107 I Odsylr~6f13Kl7 .W.------1 ~ervieW,F".;;;Jiif,~ 8OedayI. edl!l13107i &n6ltm7 AdwfUlGfo,:jjc:ldIng ---.--t--'.-4wksJ Mon7l11Wti- &mt.'12J07 _Duo .___.__L. ...,,-' Sun'/1211"! """81'2/07 T """7 +..., I I KId<o!I Con1JIe lJpdated SIte lnIofmatIon Moo HydrwAc f.4odeIn9--- 6wkal i .. ...,. """."" -4113,ID7 1 Wed 7 """"" Dotaied 8O-P"",,", -- ~'" l~DOiIiiii~_ IH!I Bl<l.-n 2..... Monet13107 I ...,. ..... Ftl9f1107 I 14't11b Mon9fl 12/21.10 12/21107 ]----..---.--- 1[=- =~:-_ --ii'dQYS Fr112121~7 , I 4wMr - ,1Ale! ---.-.+ Man SmW08: I I -.OiiiYij- Fir"'....! , p;q;.;~. 7 <4113107 . 7 Wi ~ J .~ I '1{ I ' ~~iB s i i : ~ 1 Wed 5(1M)7 Wed ed "'..,,, Frl9l7107 '" Fri6f13108 -FrllVlMie HutchInson Dam Replacement Project Schedule . ,. ~ : :. . . . , Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 771h Street. Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952-832-2600 . Fax: 952-832-2601 . www.barr.com An EEO.Employ.r Minneapolis, MN . rlibbing, MN . Duluth, MN . Ann Arbor, MI . Jefferson City, Me BAReR July 19, 2005 John Rodeberg, PE Director of Public Works Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Streel SE . Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 Re: Agreement for Design and Construction Support for Hutchinson Dam Replacement Dear Mr. Rodeberg: Thank you for retaining us. We will do our best to justify your expression of confidence in us. This letter. together with our Standard Terms (attached) sets forth the Agreement between City of Hutchinson (City) and Barr Engineering Company (Barr) for engineering and construction support for replacement of the Hutchinson Dam. The project design includes a combination of modifications to the existing dam structure and construction of a new side channel to the south of the dam. Modifications to the existing dam will include removal of the existing gates and changes to the spillway crest and downstream channel area. Development of a new side channel will provide additional discharge capacity to replace the loss of the existing gates, as well as stepped rapids for fish passage. The scope of professional consulting services we will provide is described in Attachment A. This Agreement will be effective for the duration of the services or until December 3 I, 2006, whichever comes first unless earlier terminated by either you or us. We will commence work upon receipt of a copy of this letter signed by you. The estimated schedule for the services is to complete Final Design by November 30, 2005, and to complete project construction by December 31, 2006. We will inform you of our progress by regular commuoication via phone and e-mail, as well as monthly progress reports. For the services provided, you will pay us on a lump sum basis according to the attached Standard Terms. We will bill you every four weeks based on percentage of the work scope completed to date. The fee for our services is as described in Attachment A. We understand you have the authority to direct us. We will direct communications to you at the address on this letter. Direction should be provided to me at the letterhead address. During the term of this A~eement. we will maintain Ih.. following in.unnce coverageE: Worker Compensation Employer Liability Comprehensive General Liability Automobile Professional Liability Umbrella . P:\EDVJ3\PRP\S049 H~cbloson DaD1\HIICCJUasOll Dam Letter COIUnCI.OOc '. SlaWtnry $SOOk per claiml$500k aggregate $1 m p.er claiml$2m aggregate, combined single limit $1 m combined single limit $5m per claiml$IOm annual aggregate $10,000,000 aggregate Mardll.200.5 VCrtioll ciCj) . . . City of HUlChiDSOO.- Hutchinson Dam Replacement Study July 19. 200S Page 2 Except for professional liability, all policies will name you as additional insured for claims arising out of the service's we provide. No policy will be materially changed or cancelled without giving you 30 days prior notice. If this Agreement is satisfaclory, please sign the enclosed copy of this lener in the space provided, and return it to u's. This Agreement will be open for acceptance unlil September 1,2005, unless earlier withdrawn by us. Sincerely, BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY By v.i~ >>. f~ Irs Vice President Attachments Standard Terms-Professional Services Attachment A - Scope of Work and Fee P:\ED\03\PRP\S049 Hu~1ISOft Dall'l\HlJtClUaon Dalll Letter Contract.doc Accepted this _ day of .2005 CITY OF ffilTCHINSON By Irs Marcia 1,2005 Venion . toeS) . . . Attachment A - Scope of Work and Fee . TIle Hutchinson Dam Replacement Project is generalIy defined in the June 2003 Hutchinson Dam Replacement Study report. TIle scope of work for this project is to update and develop detailed design for the projecl, and facilitate the permitting, bidding, and construction of the proj<ict The current projected budget for the project is $1.7 million. The City of Hutchinson (City) expects to 5eCW'e $1 million of this frOl;n the MinneSota State legislature, and $75,000 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therernaining costs for the project would be approximately equally cost shared by the City and the Minnesota DNR. TIle City has completed an Alternate Urban Area Review (AUARj that includes the projecI area and a description of the proposed dam replacement project It is assumed that the AU AR and its description and review of the dam replacement project is adequate to forego the need for an Environmental Assessment Worlcsheet (EA W). Therefore, no EA W has been included in this scope. If an EA W or other environmental studies are necessary, we can modify the scope, schedule, and budget to include such work. TIle Scope of Work for this agreement includes the following phases, tasks and deliverables: Phase 1- Preliminary Deslgn TIle objective of this phase of the work is to review and update the previously developed concept design and advance the design to include greater detail (representing roughly 25-percent ctesign drawings). TIle updated . design will reflect changes either necessary or desirable based on input from City and coordination with state agencies (MnDOT and MDNR). TIle design developmenl will build from the plan developed for the June . 2003 "Hutchinson Dam Replacement Study" report. Field Work - Field work required for detailed design includes a site survey, upstream soundings in the vicinity of the dam and south shoreline, sediment sampling, and soil borings. Survey - Site survey work will include topographic and feature survey of the project area. The limits of . the projecl survey will extend from Third Avenue NW at the north end, 5O-feeteast of Maio Street (Highway 15) on the east, to Second AvenucNW on the south, to the shoreline ofOiter Lake 10 the west A base map will be developed from this survey in AutoCAD fonnal, suitable for developmenl of detailed design and construction drawings. Soundings - Soundings will be completed in the water upstream of the project to identify silt and solid ground elevations in the vicinity of the project TIle limits of the soundings will extend from 100 feet south of Secoud Avenue NW to 100 feet west of the existing dam and sPillway structures, and extend 100 . feet into the water from the dam or shoreline. Sediment Sampling and Testing - Sediment samples will be taken in the lake bottom in the vicinity of the project to charaCterize the sediment and lake bottom conditions that are likely to be affected by the project We have assumed that three samples will be collected and analyzed for physical and chemical composition. Sample locations, as well as guidelines for sampling, sample handling, and laboratory testing will also be developed in coordination with Agency staff (MDNR and MPCA). Soil Borings - Soil borings will be taken in the area south of the dam to characterize soil conditions in the area of the new channel feature. Up to three borings and associated laboratory testing are assumed. Phase I Cultural Resources Study - Ao hislorical and archaeological Phase I investigation will be completed in accordance with applicable state and federal standards to identify acmal or potential hi<trnic rewurocs, and -'WpC fwUIt'r Investigations or preventive or mitigative measures necessary. Additional work will be covered under an amended scope. Preliminary Design Tasks - The concept design developed in 2003 will be reviewed and updated hased on input from the City, MnDOT, and DNR. At a minimum, the concept design will be revised to incorporale the final MnDOT Highway 15 road and bridge a1ignmenl, a preliminary model of the channel hydraulics will be developed, and the channel layout will be updated. Other li1cely updates will include coordination of the trail City of Hutchinson - Hutchinson Dam Replacement Desig'n Attachment A- Scope ofWorl<: Page 1 00 ep(3) . . . and park layout considering current plans from the City and MDNR for surrounding park and trail plans. An updated concept-level cost estimate will be developed as part of this task. Meetings and Coordination - Up to three meetings are included in the Preliminary Design phase for planning and coordination with the City, state agencies, and other involved or inlerested partieS. We have assumed that one of these meetings would be held in St Paul at MnDOT offices, one meeting would be beld in Hutchinson, and third meeting could be in either location. Deliverables - Deliverables for Pbase I work will include an Pre1iminary Design Report. We have assumed thai up to 12 copies of this report would be provided to the City. This report will include a sile survey figure and electronic data, sediment sampling and testing report. geotechnical investigation report, archaeological survey report, preliminary design drawings, Ii concept-level cost estimate, and minutes from agency . coordination meetings. Fee - The fee for the Phase IT work described herein will not exceed the lump sum of $58,500. Phase II - Final DesIgn The objective of this phase is to develop contract documents suitable for bidding and consltUcting the project This includes development of detailed engineering design, consltUction drawings (plans), technical specifications, bidding documents, and construction contract documents. Also included is agency coordination, preparation of pennits, and on-going agency coordination. Hydraulic Modeling - Detailed hydraulic modeling will be developed in HEC-RAS to model existing and proposed project couditions. It will be important to model the channel flow conditions so that the channel can accommodate fish passage and water safety aspects, as well as determining project impacts for normal ail<! high water flow conditions on property sUrrounding Otter Lake and property downstream of the project on the South Fork Crow River. Detailed Design Development - Detailed design will be developed for projec1 components in sufficienl detail for the project to be reviewed for pennitting, bid by prospective contract!"", and construcIed. Dam Modifications - The detailed design of dam modifications includes pennanent abandonment of existing slide gale and tainter gate features, modification of the overflow spillway crest and righl (south) abutment, and development of a new low-flow system to provide maintenance<lrawdown capability. Stone masonry colt\jxlnents on the north abutment will be preserved to maintain their historic and aesthetic values. Channel Design - A new channel will be designed to the south of the existing dam to increase discharge capacity and provide the opportunity for fish passage. A center island will be developed to establish high, ground between the channel and the spillway. Landscaping and Trails - Site work, trails, and surrounding park area will be designed to provide safe and aesthetic access 10 the project area, inclUding fishing and vista opportunities. Landscaping and traillayoul will be developed on the north side of the river to avoid or minimize impacts to historic features or culturally sensitive areas. Cost Estimate - A detailed cost estimate will be prepared to provide a reasonable basis for planning, budgeting, and evaluation of conSb1Jction bids for the project work. The cost estimate will include all major project components, and line items for items expected to be greater than five percent of the total cost. Mooting. and Cwul.iuatiUII - Up to two meetmgs are included in the Detailed Design phase for planning and coordination with the City. We have assumed both meetings would be held in Hutchinson. Pennit Applications - Based on the detailed design and on communications with City and agency staff during the Preliminary and Final Design phases, pennit applications will he prepared for the project, to be signed and submitted by the City. City of Hutchinson - Hutchinson Dam Replacement Design. Attachment A - Scope of W orlc Page 20f3 ul3) . . . Contract Documents - Contract documents will be developed for the proje<:t based on the detailed design. in coordination with the City, using the City's slandard bidding and construction agreement documents. Barr will be responsible for preparntion of drawings and technical specifications, and for incorporating the City's bidding documents and construction contract agreement The compleled Contract Documents will be suitable for contract bidding ahd execution of a construction contract for the project Bid support - The City will be responsible for advertising the bidding, distributing bid documents, administering bid document fees or deposits, fielding administrative questions during bidding, issuing any necessary bid addendums, accepting bids, administering bid opening, identification of apparenllow bidder, and awarding and contracts. Barr will be resPonsible for providing complete contract docnments for distribution, attendance at a pre-bid meeting, fielding technical questions during bidding, and preparing technical addenda if necessary for the City to distribute io bidders. Deliverables - Deliverables for this task include up to 25 copies of Contract Documents for the project, a detailed engineers estimate of constniction costs, permit applications, and minutes from project meetings. Fee - The fee for the Phase II work described herein will not exceed the lump sum of $68,500. Phase III - Construction Support 1be objective of this task is to pro viae administrati ve and engineering oversight for project construction. We have assulned that construction would take place in 2006, and that construction would last a period of 16 weeks. Actual conslrucli(ln duration will vary, The final scope and fee for Phase IV Construction Support will be adjusted after FioaI DesIgn Is completed. Construction Support work includes attendance at a pre~nstruction meeting, administration and review of contractor's submittals, weekly progress meetings and review of construction, engineering office support during construction, finai review and certification of construction, and record drawings represented completed work. Materials testing will be provided by the City under separnte con1raCl Deliverables - Deliverables for this task include meeting minutes, submittal register, copies of contractor submittals, contract change orders and addenda, weekly construction summaries, pay request recommendations, record drawings, and coristruction certification letter. Fee -1be estimated fee for the Phase ill work described herein is $32,000. City of Hutchinson - Hutchinson Dam Replacement Design Attachment A - Scope of Wor!< Page 3 of3 Co (Cj) . BARR - -.-. ..". . . STANDARD TERMS-PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Our Agreement with you cons ISis of the accompanying letter or other authorization and these Standard Terms. . S&cUon 1: Our Responsibilities 1.1 We wiD provide the professional services described In our written agreement with you. In performing our services, we will USe that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under slmllar drcumslances by reputable members of our professlon pracliclng In the same Icx:alily. 1.2 We wil seled means, methods. techniques, sequences, or procedures used In prOviding our services. If you direct us to deviate from Our chosen protocols. l'OU agree to hold us harmless from al claims. damages. and expenses arising out 01 your d~ecIion. 1.3 We wil acquire all licenses applicable to our professional services and we will comply with appf'lCllble law. 1.4 Our duties do not Include supervising your contractors or commenting on, supervising. or providing the means and methods of their wort unless we accept those duties In wrttJng. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contradors to perfonn In accordance with their undertakings, end the providing of our services will not relieve others 0/ their responsiblDIles to you or to others. 1.5 We will provide a heellh and safety program for our employees, but we win not be responsible for contractor. job. or site health or safety unless we accept that duty in writing. 1.6 Our estimates of construction or other costs will be . based on the Information available to us and on our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are en exercise 01 our professional judgment end are not guaranteed or warranted. 1.7 Your confidential documenlsand Information provided to Us by you will be maintained In confidence except as required by law. Sectlon 2: Your Reeponslbllltiea 2.1 You win provide access \0 the project slte, and will arrange for access to other property as requlrBd for us to provide our services. 2.2 You agree to provide us with all your informa~on, plans and changes In plans. end new Information that may materlaBy affect tha deivery of our services. You agree to hold us .harmless from all ciaina, damages. losses. and related expenses involving information of which you hed knowledge but did not timely can \0 our atten~on or correctly show on plans furnished to us. 2.3 You agree to provide US with emergency procedure infonnaUon and to provide infonnation on hazardous substances/processes we may encounter In.the WOI1c. 2.4 This Agreement and the S9l'Vices we provide will not cause US to be an owner. operator. generator. transporter. treater, storer. or a disposal factlity within the meaning of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, as amended, or within the meaning of any other law govemlng the handling. traatmen~ storage, or disposal . Docunonl3 of hazardOus meterlals. You agree to hold us harmless and indemnify us from eny such claim or loss. 2.5 S~e remediation services may Involve risk of cross- contamination of previously uncontaminated eir, soil, and waler. If you are requesting thai we provide services that include this risk, you agree .10 hold us harmless and Indemnify us from cross-contamlnation claims and damages, unlass the loss Is caused by our negligence. 2.6 You agree to make disclosures required by law. If we are required by law or IagSI process to make such disclosures, you agree to hold US harmless and indemnify us from all relaled claims and costs. We will give such advance notice of legal compulsion lIS Is practical so tha.t l'OU may take steps to prolect your Interests. Section 3: Reports and RllCOrdS 3.1 We wil relaln analytical-data lor seven years and finsnclal dsta for three years relating to the services performed. 3.2 MonitOrIng walls are your property and you an! responsible for their permitting. maintenance and ebendonment unless we accept that duty In WTftlng. AU samples remaining efter tests are conducted end fleId and laboratory equipment that cannot be adequataly cleansed of contaminants are your property. They will be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 dsys of the report deta you give _en direction to store or transfer the materials, al your expense. 3.3 Our reports, noles, celcliations, and other written or electronic documen1s are InstnJments of our service to l'Ou. Our reports may be. used only for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not use or transfer OUr reports 10 othelll for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. which will not be unreasonably withheld. You egree to Indemnify us from loss caused by any other use of the documents. 3.4 If you do not pay ror our services as agreed, we may retain ell reporta and work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to 'us all our reports and other work in your possession or under your conlrol. Sectlon 4: Compen.aUon 4.1 You will pay for seIVicas as agreed.upon or according to our then ctXIllnt fee schedules If there Is no other written agreemenl as to price. An estimated cost Is not a fllTl1 ligure unless statad as such. 4.2 You agree to notily us of billing disputes within 15 days and 10 pay all undlsputad portions of involces'wrJhln 30 days of Invoice date. For balanC8l' not paid under these terms, you agree to pey Interest on unpaid balances beglnnlng 10 days after Invoice date at the rate of 1.5% per month, but not to exceed tile maximum rate allowed by law. Poge 1 Nov. 24, 2003 VIIll'1ion (pL~) . 4.3 If you direct us to Invoice another. we will do so. but you agree 10 be responsible tor Our compensation unless you provide us with that person's written acceptence ot an terms of our agreement and we agree to eldend credIt to that person. 4.4 You agree to compensate us for OUr reasonable fees and expenses n we are required to respond to legal process .arislng out of a proceeding to which we are no! a party. 4.5 It we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or n the project conditions or the scope or amount of won< change, or If the standards or methods Change, we will give you timely noUee and we will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation. . Section 5: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 5.1 Disputes other then conectionmatters will be submitted 10 Altematlve Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a condition precedenl to litigation. Each ot us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes through II mutuaRy acceptable ADR procedure. The law of tha slate In which tha project site Is located will govern all dispules. 5.2 We will not be .able for special, incidental. consequential, or punlllve damages, Including but not IIrrHted 10 those arising from delay, loss of use, loss of proflts or revenue, ioss of financing commitments or fees. ()( the cost of capital. None 01 our employees shall be personally liable to you. 5.3 We wll not be liable tor damages unlesa sull is commenced within two years 01 the date of Injury or loss or within two years 01 the dele of the complatlon of our serviaes.whlchever Is eartler. We will nol be liable unless you have notified us of the discovery of the claimed breach of contract, naglgent act or omlS31on within 30 days of the date of discovery and unless you have given us en opportunity to investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. 5.4 For you to obtain the beneflt of a fea which Includes a reasonable allowance tor risks. you agree that OUr eggregate liability will not exceed the fee paid lor our services or $50,000. whlcllever is grealer. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk. we will Increase our aggregate liability 10 $100.000 provided thet. within 10 days 01 the date of thlsagreament. you provide payment an an amount that will Increase our. fees by 10%. but not less then $500. to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased tee Is not the purchase of insurance. 5.5 If you fall to pay us withln?O days follolNlng Invoice date. we may consider the default a total breach of our Ag<eement and, at our option. we may terml""te all of our duties wlthoulllabl\ity 10 you or to others. . . Documont3 5.6 If we are Involved In legal actlon to collect our compensation, you agree to pay our colleclion expenses, Including reasonable atlomey tees. Secllon 6: Indemnification 6.1 We will indemnify and hold you' harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses caused by our negligent acts and omission., and breach of contract and those acts. omissions, and breaches of parson. for Whom we are legally rasponslble. You wlIIlndamnlly and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses caused by your negligent acts and omissions. or breach of contract and those acts, omissions. and breaches of the other parties contracting with you on the same projac1 and other persons' lor Whom you are legally responsible. 6.2 To the extent that may be necessary 10 Indemnify either of us under Section 6.1, you and we axp<essly waive. In favor of the other only, any immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any wori<er compensation law. Sactlon 7: Miscellaneous Provisions 7.1 We will provide a certificate of Insurance to you upon request 7.2 This Agreement Is our entire agreement and H supersedes all prior agreements. Only a writing signed by both of us making specific reference to the provision modified may modify II. 7.3 Neither 01 us will assign this Agreement without lh8 written aPPfovaJ of .the other. 7 A A wrtHng may terminate this A(jreemant We will raceive an equitable edJustment of our compensation If our work Is terminated pOor to completion as well as our lees and expanses on the basis agreed upon through the affective date 01 termination. 7.5 We will not discriminate agalnst any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, ancestry. national origin. sex, rallglon, age, marttal slatus. affecllonel. preference. disability. stalus with ragard to public assistance. memberShip or activity In a local hurnan-rights commission, or slatus as a specially disabled. Vietnam-era, or other eligible veteran. We will take effirmatlve action to ensure thai applicants are considered, and employees are treated during thalr employment. without ragald to those factors. OUr actions will Includa, but ara not limited to notifications. hiring, promotion or employmenl upgrading. demotion. transfer. recruitment or recruitment advertising. layoffs or ternnatlons, rates of pay and other foons of compensation, and' selection for training or apprenticeship. Pogo 2 NaY. 24. 2003 Vetaion (oCq) . . . 111 Hassan Street Soulheast Hutchinson, MN 55350 (320) 187-1111IFax: (320) 234-4240 City of Hutchinson APPLICATION FOR PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS AppliclItiOIlType (choOs~ one) o ......Solicitor Ill" Transient Merchant o Peddler DParade Peddler Date of Application it-.J -0 7 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $25.00 Date(s) of~ale ~ ~5- .5cpf 3rJ. ,lib] ApPl1Cllllllnformllti911 ..' . ...... .' . .. ...... ." 2" X 2" Picture Required Name: Ric1uJ Allol ,~EJ'EL (7JlL ~II""/o/ ~p; , Height: (, - ~ Weight: ,(Pf) Eye Color: .I1LUl> ,,; Driver's License Number: .~-I'I() -7.J6- tJ5'1- ",-y State: ,111\/ Pennanenl Address: P.O_ Bo X Filt glU--;( Iflol S{,;l r'r City . S/aU Zip Pennanent Telephone: ~ 7ft. - 7& 7 Temporary Address: City Stall! Zip Temporary Telephone Access: Have you been convicted ~ crime, misdemeanor, or violation of any municipal ordinance, other than traffic violations? 0 yes no If yes, stale the nature of offense and punishment or penalty assessed therefore: lo (\t\) City of Hutchinson Application/or Peddlers, Sollciters. and Transient Merchants Page 2 of 4 . Location Infonnation . . 1'15 s. -I- "" r"" Location Name J/",f. 15" Loca iOn Address SS350 Zi ~Lt-tl;"""... Ci ",,J Slale Business Infonnation Describe relationship between applicant and employer: tJwnEL Describe nature of business and describe item(s) offered: Rd<.; I <;.../u OF ;:;/1'/ Nest! ?Fokee. SWedl'1>fN; 171(~n~1 ,r"ra7r.>6< ~_rl'J~. , F Describe method of delivery: P.c..t-...., -nuLL Describe source of supply: ~4t d;munl ;:;;;~t/J COfYlIl1 .. ~ a../ Supplier Name Suppler Phone Number Slate. Zip Supplu Phone Number Slate Zip Supplu Phone Number State Zin Supplier Addres.s City SuppJte~ Name Supplter Address City Supplier Name Sunnlier Address City Reference Infonnation Provide two (2) property owners (preferably in Mcleod County) for character references: Se.>le.\ '"R+e....!oOI1 ~S:21 q:~r1-13I5 Property Owner Name P rly Owner Pirone Numbu fJe~ /.~,..,,, It^' s9'N City Slate Zip ~f:)7) ~ -.n>] Property Owner Phone Number IS7DO Av;tt} ~IOUJ DrIve , Properly Owner Addr~s H"lr",~ Property Owner Name 12..1..." , City $l,1t.3' ~ c.l./ 27l/s7 .,.; Slate E!lte./(,Sof/ PrODirtv Owner Address 19 (h) . . . City of Hutchinson Applioorlonfor Peddlers. Sollctlors. and Transient Merchants Page 3 of4 Reference Information (continued) List last (up to three (3)) previous ciiy(ies) where you carried on same activiiy: w;!lm4( Mill J-%I City Stale 'f7A1.~ (,..nil) ~AI 'P1']51 :..Lf-City State /Jc.lrl'<{- LefYC7 ~,./ p-,I- City . State ' 1,,2. 10 ~~O Date(s) of Activity /2- to J{. ~/.> Date(s) of Activity 12- to f?.ff:J Date(s) of Ac'ivity Checklist The following items need to be completed andlor attached in order for the application to be processed: Application/Investigation fee paid in full (check or money order): 0 yes 0 no Aoolication comoleted in full and silmed: 0 ves 0 no I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above application and that Ihe application is true, correct, and accurate. I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants Ordinance No. 673 is guiliy ofa misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding !Xl days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. fill ~._ '1-,2 -C/ 7 Date Internal Use Onlv Police 0 approved 0 denied Notes: Ciiy Council 0 approved 0 denied Notes: H:~Applle.liomJ1>cddler.SoOt::itor,TI'WIIie:Ill:.doc In lV\) . . . APPLICATION FORM FOR TEMPORARY RECYCLABLE MATERIAL COLLECTION NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER Ca", mtl" Rec...:JLJ"(l~ :t;,,( iJ/;C-r. D-i'~,.,-e..:1 3g~? /'ho':>,<...,Qv~ /vv..J Cl fI(\,.,l\b 'i 1-(, rh '" SS.? '0 ~ DRIVER'S LICENSE #: <;1,,'1 I <.;8 I J os f C, If, on-site operator is different than owner list names: o.''1f\~ (')\S~{'\ ~ 'It!t1.., d '''I (t\ -tv -:fete!:=- ~-e ~ 'Y\.. 0 (" I" '" l\.; -<.. +- h~.... 1\ T-Q", LOCATION PROPOSED FOR TEMPORARY RECYCLING SITE: u)q II'Y\C\ C -\- ~Clr.~,'i'~ 10+- ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ABOVE SITE: Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutdrlmon, MN ~~3~0-2S22 320-S87-~IS1lF8X 320-234-4240 WHICH DAY OF THE WEEK AND HOURS DO YOU ANTICIPATE OPERATING? i-t : DAY OF WEEK . '",., "''''' -3:o"fl'1\ HOURS SPECIFY HERE OR A IT ACH SCHEDULE OF DATES FOR A ONE YEAR PERIOD OR MORE: ~(': I "1 +hhJ -f.l.c V3 €Uf<~ S"1'T LIST HOUSEHOLD ITEMS YOU PLAN TO SOLICIT OR ACCEPT: ~ cJ (Y\ : ('\ ('0. '" S - Printed on recycled paper- ~l\) . . . SUMMARY OF REGULATIONS LIMITING THIS ACTIVITY ORDINANCE 154.113 COLLECTION ACTIVITIES MUST SPECIFY LOCATION, NO MORE THAN ONE DAY PER WEEK, AND MUST OCCUR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 A.M. AND 8:00 P.M (ORDINANCE 154.113) LIMITED TO ONE VEHICLE PER SITE (ORDINANCE 154.113) NO SHREDDING OF MA TERlAL SHALL OCCUR AT THE COLLECITON SITE (ORDINANCE 154.113) NO STOCKPILING IS PERMITTED (ORDINANCE 154.113) om Y A SCALE IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE RECYCLING VEHICLE (ORDINANCE 154.113) WEIGHT SCALES SHALL BE CERTIFIED (STATE REGULATION). A METAL SEPARATOR AND COMPACTOR MAY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF COLLECTION OF ALUMINUM MATERIAL BUT om Y IF THE EQUIPMENT IS TOTALLY CONTAJNED WITHIN A VEHICLE OR NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC (ORDINANCE 154.113) A COLLECTION VEHICLE MAYBE LOCATED ON SITE om Y IF IT OOES NOT IMPEDE ACCESS TO THE SITE, HINDER NORMAL VEHICULAR FLOW ON SITE OR USE EXCESSIVE PARKING AREA (ORDINANCE 154.113) NO COLLECTION WITHIN 200 FT. OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING OR 300 FT. OF RESIDENCE (ORDINANCE 154.113) ALL GARBAGE AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE AREA PRIOR TO DEPARTING (ORDINANCE 154.113) VEHCILES USED MUST BE CLEAN AND OTHERWISE COMPLY WITH ALL TRAFFIC REGULATIONS (ORDINANCE 154.113) NO SINAGE ALLOWED, EXCEPT ATIACHED TO COLLECTION VEHICLE (ORDINANCE 154.113) om Y HOUSEHOLD RECYCLABLES MAY BE COLLECTED (NEWSPAPERS, PLASTIC, GLASS AND METAL), (ORDINANCE 154.113) I hereby agree to abide by ordinance number 154.113 and all other applicable State and city of Hutchinson Municipal Codes and Regulations. Sl nature required owner/operator · Copies of ordinance(s) available upon request. &(i) . . . MEMORANDUM DATE: April3, 2007, for the Aprill0, 2007, City Council Meeting TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Rebecca Bowers, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Temporary Moratorium on Certain Land Use Actions for a Specified Area within the Highway 7 Corridor Study Area Reauested Action: Adoption of an interim ordinance establishing a temporary moratorium on certain land use actions within a specified area in the Highway 7 Corridor Study Area. Background: At the March 27,2007, City Council meeting, the Council discussed the proposed moratorium and took public comment. After discussing the study area, the Council expressed reservations that the moratorium covered too much property for too long a time period. Staffhas modified the ordinance accordingly to reduce the period frorn one year to six months. A revised map showing an alternative to reduce the moratorium area is also attached (Attachment A). Temporary Moratorium: The temporary moratorium is an important tool available to the City to protect the planning process and the study area from incompatible development during the planning process. This protection allows the City an opportunity to encourage high quality development and the "highest and best uses" while providing a vision for future redevelopment of key areas within the study area. As stated in the previous staff report, the proposed ordinance only restricts certain land use actions and would allow maintenance, additions, and improvements to existing businesses and homes. It would also allow CUPs for change of use in the VC and C-5 zoned properties. The attached map identifies the zoning districts within the proposed moratorium area and study area. The revised ordinance addresses the concerns raised by the Council, including reducing the area and the time period to 6 months. The moratorium could be revised or extended after a public hearing before the 6 months expires. Staff will be at the Council meeting to provide additional information and to answer questions on the proposed study area plan and temporary moratorium. Attachments: Revised Interim Ordinance 07-0460 Revised Map I CO,) ORDINANCE NO. 07- 0460 . AN INTERIM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN LAND USE ACTIONS FOR A SPECIFIED AREA WITHIN THE IDGBW AY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 462.355, SulXl. 4, authorizes a municipality that is considering adopting or amending official land use controls to adopt an interim ordinance restricting certain land uses for an initial period not to exceed 6 mot)ths; and WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson desires to conduct a study on existing and future land uses in the study area identified on Attachment B, in order to effectively address changing land uses and development plans along Highway 7; and WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson finds it is in the best long term interest of the City to delay certain land use actions and decisions in the area specified on Attachment A until the corridor study and plan are completed; and WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is desirous of adopting an interim ordinance as provided by Minnesota Statute 462.355, Subd. 4, for the purpose of prate cling the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens during the preparation and consideration of land use controls involving the subject area; NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN THAT: 1. The City of Hutchinson adopts an interim ordinance in accordance with Minnesota Statute 462.357 establishing a 6-month moratorium on certain land use actions within the area identified on Attachment A under the following terms: . a) The moratorium will apply to all zoning districts and property within the specified area, as identified on Attachment A, except as specifically exempted by this ordinance. b) The moratorium will apply to all land use actions in the study area that require City approval, including rezonings, preliminary and fmal plats, variances, site plans, lot splits, and conditional use pennits, except as specifically exempted by this ordinance. c) The moratorium does not apply 10 applications for condilional use permits required by the Zoning Ordinance due to change of ownership or change of use for conditionally permitted uses in the lIC (Industrial Commercial) or C-5 (Conditional Commercial) districts for existing buildings. d) The moratorium does not apply to the maintenance and improvement oflegally conforming uses, existing buildings, or additions to existing homes and businesses thai meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. e) The moralorium does not apply to land use approvals previously granted or in effect at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. f) This interim ordinance may be terminated or modified by motion of the City Council prior to its stated expiration date. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of April, 2007. ATTEST: . Mayor Steven W. Cook Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator 1(0-) . . . ATTACHMENT A i PBr:JI Ii ~ I ~ ri~! ,i ~llnrmrh I ~ m m; ffi, I 'TI-~' fI,' I rnmSS t:::l=j:Jm/ );j~ gn tmj~ t@ ~~ f$) I fl Em m ~~i ~ ,i:) v"',' i/ II ,-,II - bt:j~ll r!-'.{"/""'<<~ I I I'i-- I ~IIJ ~ -, ),1,.-.v > /c.:'! "'- I 1:7/ I-lj IL " I I i / <rr: '[---_ ~._!..../ /y ,/';Y:::::!.."'i-..__" "' 1!' ft--f-L;JJ--f.L.' <,-7 (::-/:: .~ 1./0,' --c,f . -~ Ii"' II "IN, '11','1'-...'1 ['" '-,-f,,~ ---.' .' ..J. r I f '- -. r ~ 1-.....1 '- '_/0--- '. r....., ".....f I , ~:i.. ! / / ,If:::"; t---..:j-..--.,I / 'J'1...":-/ /-..... ~---.)' /-': , '_./~' {,/<,,;-z:f)(j.~'f-~~i 1.._'-.",( . . . ~''-I Ll'fj---/;;J-:.. /rz':::,./ ;:':-;.:' .......~/j'/t_---..,'..... I~>'" "<-/.!,f-::7 ;<" :;".l-'::Z>: , ::-I / i'. -~~ 'kV , ~'. . OJ 'NY, I ,/-.../ 1. "<./"~ /'~""~~' ;../ / ,..... :",,4-.,,/ / .- r-~)f ';.....:.' ~ {--.i./ -)/ ~ii(4,,~ H....~ 7 ~-- ,.r-r'::;J /' "", Ar/:~'_ ,/ "".... '---.( /',/ /~'-.::z -,/ I .. '- ",./ I I l-,:-/ I I BiB 1 e", ...... '''. ~ - ,,/ !,/~ i;:::lJ J \ \ // '----.-.~-;;.>}~-..(.!~,~<,.~ I L I ~TL ....,""'-.....X','..// ~ II I, "1~:Ft3~~~~~-.( ---~- '=I Q...L 'i - - = ~~ L I ' I ----~~ I fj L~,.cL_m u; " !!! ~l] t1 ' , ! L___ ~~.~ /L I -s-s H 1-- EA enB r-I 0r m II , JlliYr-"'nYl~ @ I i--1 iIlb::I ~ LJ ~ "~tj gJ i . / '/ II I I I' ,TTR ~ : 1 I, mR I i=l ~ r~ il BB oca 8,R, I -,---~-~ I :---- ~ ') "--.. :~ C~>" . ~,!:::)~,%lG'- I ffitj ~f' ~ th<'~_\ --t I I =;--1 I ...--J:=l- ---' Proposed Moratorium \ \ 1\ '. I ~ I' < I I '. I I: ; 1 (C\) . . . ATTACHMENT B CITY OF HUTCHINSON HIGHWAY 7 CORRIDOR STUDY AREA mils 1Ca) . . . TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer John Olson, Public Works Manager RE: Consideration of Proceeding with 2007 Pavement Rehabilitation Projects (Letting No. 5/Project No. 07-05) DATE: Aprill0,2007 As previously discussed, the 2007 Pavement Rehabilitation projects includes reclaiming of specific streets, concrete repairs and general maintenance work (such as patching, seal coating, crack sealing and miscellaneous trail/sidewalk repairs) that will be included by administering several smaller contracts, each below $50,000. At this point, City staffhas completed the preliminary design of the street reclaim projects and concrete repairs. This work was reviewed at a Neighborhood Meeting last Tuesday, April 3"', with the residents that will incur property assessments. The feedback regarding the project was very positive, and City staff is confident that the neighborhood is accepting of the project and associated costs. A short presentation and discussion regarding this project will be held prior to opening the Public Hearing. Attached are the necessary Resolutions to proceed with the project City staff anticipates receiving bids for the project in late May and, hopefully, starting construction in mid June. We recommend the approval of the attached Resolutions. ce: Gary Plotz - City Administrator lCb) 200.PAVEMENT REHABI....ATION-RECLAIM PROteCTS t= IIIIII~/~~-l= 1= ~"-I\.~ \ ~ P-~~ J. ~/!!Jj)lj'(~ ~tt"- ~=~ ....' ~am _ ~ >--~ z:Jp,! ~ - I- P :..r-~ ..-----r B-J-u-i...-------'_ ""-.J _ L--~---j I.~ .-- v .1 ~,.-.. ~ En H= I-- ~ "'VI " R"- ~ I~ . ""=rl@.l tIU /=lL .::\ ~<-. '" - ~ ) /' ~ mil Mm l:m~ h'~ ~ ~\ - I ~ rr-YL -I - ~~ - E.-'nFU~71 u- '-- .~ f-illII~I~~ - tQ:d~DI~:t:s=~:tUJ~v ~ '" Jr11T11 FAT~1~ il' -~~I -::: I ~ ~ ~r~WI~!E tJhrn ~~ I' /I = =1 ~ I~I ~~~ m~~[lm~mL y~~" ~ ,":':':~ ~~ _ J[~EEJrnmlm[P:r::: )~~ A~ e- L III y~ 11'11,',: trtttrIill~:m:ffim.m.mmm:m:mmL- r- II",Jillrn :m1l11~IIIIIIH,-" ~-'::;; - ':';] ~ q= f=El~ t:U.l @n:IIIDIIIIIIIIIJIIIIII IW- ~ - - - 1= - - - f:: ~ 11= ~IFI= ~ 1-'>- n r- tr-n-rrm.lITIIIIIII t- t:: r -.- - - _ e- - _ f: r= 1= f- '-- LIJIII]] UIIIIII5::3 f-+- I- = _ e- ;= - ~ ~ ~ ; "- -~~fMWffiE_HMg~{ Hr-tj=~ ~e- ~~ ~ ~g ~ 1m f; mil //11/1 miliBtt: =~m== m.mt~'( l=1= N I bd &; -. -II I : ~ . I" - ~ ~ ... i.J ~w 1_ Reclaim I ~~ II -:/ "II I Y /,v ___, 'vt'v~\\--\"'\\\\ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING .2007 LETTING No. '5/PRoJEcrNo. 07 -05 2007 Pavement Rehabilitation I April 3, 2007.5:00 - 6:30 PM. City Council Chambers Proiect Scope Milwaukee Ave, Lewis Ave, Charles St, Roe Ave, Kay St, Lea Ave, Graham St & Clark St- Pavement reclamation, drainti1e with sump pump service installations, grading, subgrade correction, aggregate base, minimal concrete curb and gutter replacements, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing (4" total thickness), and seeding w/turf establishment blanket. Alley blw 3n1 Ave NW & 4th Ave NW from Glen St to James St (South of Taco John's) - Pavement removal/milling, grading, aggregate base, bituminous base, and bituminous surfacing (3"thickness). Estimated Proiect Costs & Financine: Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Expenses Estimated Total Project Cost . Trunk Sanitary Sewer Fund Trunk Watermain Fund City Bonding Assessments (Residential Streets) Assessments (Allev) Estimated Financing $ 591,000 $ 141.900 $ 732,900 .$ 0 $ 27,000 $ 412,700 $ 289,200 $ 4.000 $ 732,900 City PayS For . Residential Streets - 50% of pavement rehabilitation and draintile installation costs · Alleys - 20% of pavement rehabilitation costs · Sanitary Sewer & Water Distribution System Improvements - 100% Property Owner PayS For . Residential Streets - 50% of pavement rehabilitation and draintile installation costs . Alleys - 20% of pavement rehabilitation costs . Total Estimated Assessments - Residential Street = $35 - $45/Frontage Foot Alleys = $10 - $ 14/Frontage Foot . Residential Streets ($40.001FF) o Estimated typical 66' wide lot o Estimated typical 100' wide lot o Estimated typical 150' wide lot . Alleys ($12.00!FF) o Estimated typical 66' wide lot o Estimated typical 100' wide lot o Estimated typical 150' wide lot $2,640 $4,000 $6,000 . $792 $1 ,200 $1,800 . NOTE: 1. Methods and amounts of estimated assessments are subject to change. 2. Assessments allocated to properties over a 5-year term. 1Cb) .;. MEETING ATTENDANCE REcORD PROJECT: 7~~~~ETING: ~~~ LOCATION: ~ft/J - DATE: ..1J 3/~- TIME: 5~~ . FlL&' 1:\FORMSWooting (expanded torm),doc , It< t. il 3'-1'5 /. 0, ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - L I } _6 u d c:::. h~~/...-..... ~ ( ) . ( )/ - ( )1 - ~ j)A.L till ff'~1 .Jh'-/' " ( ) - ( ) - ( )"" 'Z< ~ IZA/ OJ I f/P~ -:I::7f'/ ~ 1t/3' S If....,: fr, / ( ) - ( ~ - ( ) -\ I ~~-tLe.tM-"NWlJ l{.-l/- L/ 1<:.1'\\ ~ I ( ( ) - ( )'\ - ( ) / 0, 'A J lA, .J!/'.Af2...1 SS 1.) (rf!a, A ,S:f- ~ ( ) - ( ) \- ( )/. I ~.jOA ' ~ S <1-4 COYt2 / I!. TI ) ( ) - ( ) I ( r - 'J,.vl ^ ~ ,-^ r: /~ 1// 7 Le~ ./L S U/ / ( ) - ( ) J- ( ~ - 'C"'ff'-"I/~ Gs h'--~I~~ IDa'1 L..<;'UJI ~ ^v'<" "- ( ) - ( )( - ( ) "" ~~ , (11...1;",' :1.:10 (:' !<11.J(1J.1-1 ,\,: ~ ( ) - ( ) '" - ( ) -\ @; ~- )'_/};1~.A;) 5;), ,OY<r h-r....,\ 5:fr--- ( ) - , ( ) ~ ( ) -J ft.' \) "' 1/011 ~ (Ll4.- / ( ) - ( ) - ( ) / :\ j fP.> /1, ~~_ '71 L'7? IC,1 L( L..;.. ~^ ~ ( ( ) - ( ) -J ( ) I - /J /, Il. k ./1 . "'0 -; ..):j./o 'S-f. "" ( ) . ( ) f ( ) " -K"" Al ' c: J7 .;:' ~ A <:.--1 '\ ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - ~. ,~/,J '-d/ '/61J7)j;,,/J/J 4^"~~, I ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - ,:rv~./~ /-1 ,PJ f-!/I,-;),b. c;;- / ( ) - ( ) \- ( ) -/ -ThIfVl ItL.Wtq>V)" [' L.-~hlS . ( ( ) ( ) -'\., ( ) f 101-1 - ~HfA(...e J/~)ol- jolL / .p,_ , . r ~ ( ) . ( ) -; ( ) v ~,' ( ) . ( ) /' ( ) \ ---i c- ~ \ ,--.... 0 --........ . . . RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS LETTING NO.5 PROJECT NO. 07~5 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 27th day of March 2007, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the following Improvements: Cherles Street SW, Roe Avenue SE, Clark Street NE, Kay Street SW, Lea Avenue SW In their entirety and Graham Street SW from Roberts Road SW to Milwaukee Avenue SW, Milwaukee Avenue SW from 150' West of Goebel Street SW to Graham Street SW, Lewis Avenue SW from Lake Street SW to Larson Street SW, Denver Avenue SW Median work at County Fair Marketplace entrance, School Road SW & Roberts Road SW Intersection, and Alley between 3rd Avenue NW & 4th Avenue NW from Glen Street NW to James St NW - roadway rehabilitation and utility infrastructure installations by construction of lateral storm sewer and treatment improvements, lateral watermain, surface reclamation, grading, aggregate base, concrete median, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, seal coat, crack sealing and patching, trails, landscaping, restoration and appurtenances. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such Improvement Is hereby ordered as proposed In the resolution adopted the 27th day of March 2007. 2. Kent Exner Is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shail prepare plans and specif1cations for the making of such Improvement. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of April 2007. Mayor City Administrator 1(0) . ,""'t.,', DATE: April 4, 2007, for the April 1 0, City Council Meeting TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer John Paulson, Environmental Specialist SUBJECT: Stormwater Ordinance Requested Action: Adoption of an ordinance to create and enact Title 5, Chapter 54 of the City of Hutchinson . Code of Ordinances, relating to Storm Water Management. BackQround: The City of Hutchinson currently does not have an ordinance relating to Storm Water Management. As a requirement of the Minnesota National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (recently submitted MS4 Permit), the City of Hutchinson must develop and implement an ordinance that addresses storm water management issues. In order to address concerns regarding storm water management, staff drafted an ordinance to protect water quality. The proposed draft ordinance also included language to clarify multiple definitions relating to storm water. Storm Water ManaQement: Storm water management is needed to prevent, reduce and eliminate pollutants that would' otherwise contaminate our waters. Some items of concern that are addressed by this ordinance are: A. Illicit discharges or dumping of toxic chemicals on surfaces that would allow them to be conveyed to the storm water system. . B. Construction site erosion and sediment controls and all necessary best . management practices must be implemented prior to and during construction to reduce the potential for pollution. ,CG) . . . C. Construction site waste control is needed to prevent litter, trash or debris from leaving the site and reaching local waters. D. Post construction storm water management practices that allow for continued proper operation of storm water controls such as storm sewers and ponds. E. Stormwater management plan application, review and approval standards. The proposed Ordinance has been provided to local builders and contractors for comments, thoughts andlor concerns. The Ordinance was also discussed with the builders and contractors at the annual Contractors Meeting last month. Limited feedback was provided, thus City staff believes that the construction community understands the expectations and consequences of the proposed Ordinance. Staff will be at the Council meeting to provide additional information and to answer questions on the proposed ordinance. Attachments: Storm Water Management Ordinance ,Ce} . ORDINANCE NO. 07- 0462 AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE AND ENACT TITLE 5, CHAPTER 54 OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO STORM WATER MANAGEMENT . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that ~ would be in the best interes.ts of the City to create and enact nle 5, Chapter 54 of the City of Hutchinson Code of Ordinances, relating to Storm Water Management. SECTION 2. Chapter 54 of Tnle 5: Storm Water Management is hereby enacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 64 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Section Genersl ProvIsIons. 54.01 Purpose 54.02 Defin~ions 54.03 Scope 54.04 Management of S~e Vegetation Storm Wster Mansgement Plsn . Appllcstlon snd Review. 54.10. Application and Content 54.11 Review Process 54.12 Duration 54.13 Cond~lons . Storm Wster Mansgement Plen - Approvsl Standsrds. 54.20 General 54.21 Minnesota Storm water Manual 54.22 ModelslMethodologieslComputations 54.23 Storm Water Management Criteria for Permanent Facil~les 54.24 Operation, Maintenance and Inspection 54.25 Easements 54.26 Plan Appllcabll~y 54.27 Plan Amendments NPDES Pennlt. 54.30 NPDES Perm~ 54.31 Construction Plans and Specifications 54.32 Construction Activ~ies SuspensIons, Revocstlons snd Stop Work Orders. 54.40 Storm Water Violations and Reporting 54.41 Emergency Suspension 54.42 Non-Emergency Revocation of a Plan 54.43 No@cation . Enforcement, Pensltles snd Noncompllsnce Fee. 54.50 Enforcement, Pena~y and Noncompliance Fees 54.51 Cost of Damage 54.52 City Attorney's Fees and Costs 54.53 Falsifying Information 54.54 Penalties 54.55 Severability Page 1 1 (C) . . . GENERAL PROVISIONS S 54.01 PURPOSE. This chapter sets forth uniform requirements for storm water management systems within the City of Hutchinson. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this chapter or other regulations adopted by the City of Hutchinson, McLeod County, State or Federal author~ies, the more restrictive standard prevails. The objectives of this chapter are as follows: A. To promote, preserve, and enhance the natural resources within the City of Hutchinson from adverse or undesirable impacts occasioned by development or other activ~ies. B. To protect and promote the health, safety, and we~are of the people and property through effective storm water quantity and quality management practices. C. To regulate land development activity, land disturbing activity, or other activ~ies that may have an adverse and/or potentially Irreversible impact on storm water quantity, water qual~y and/or environmentally sensitive lands and to encourage compatibility between such uses. D. To establish detailed review standards and procedures for land development activ~ies throughout the City of Hutchinson, thereby achieving a balance between urban growth and development and the protection of water quality. E. To provide for adequate storm water system analysis and design as necessary to protect public and private property, water qual~y and existing natural resources. This Chapter applies In the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota and to persons outside the City who are, by contract or agreement with the City, users of the C~y storm water management system. Except as otherwise provided herein, the City Engineer shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of this Chapter. S 54.02 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this chapter, the following terms, phrases, and words, and their derivatives, shall have the meaning as stated in this section. When Inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense Include the future tense. Words in plural number Include the singular number, and words In the singular number include the plural number. The word 'shall' Is always mandatory and the word 'may' Is always permissive. APPLICANT. Any person or group that applies for a building perm~, subdivision approval, zoning change, approach, excavation or special use permit, storm water plan approval, or any other permit which allows land disturbing activities. Applicant also means that person's agents, employees, and others acting under this person's or group's direction. The term 'applicant' also refers to the permit holder or holders and the permit holder's agents, employees, and others acting under this person's or group's direction. BASE FLOOD or REGIONAL FLOOD or 100-YEAR FLOOD. The flood having a one percent chance or probability of being equaled exceeded in any given year (I.e., 100-year flood) - also referred to as the regional flood or 100-year flood. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP). Erosion and sediment control and water quality management practices that are the most effective and practicable means of controlling, preventing, and minimizing the degradation of surface water, Including; construction-phasing, minimizing the length of time soli areas are exposed, prohibitions, and other management practices published by federal, state, or designated area-wide planning agencies. BMP's. Measures designed to 1) prevent poliutants from leaving a specific area; 2) reduce/eliminate the introduction of pollutants; 3) protect sensitive areas or 4) prevent the Interaction between preclp~atlon and pollutants. A protective vegetated zone located adjacent to a natural resource, such as a water of the state that is subject to direct or indirect human alteration. Such a buffer strip is an integral part of protecting an aquatic ecosystem through trapping sheet erosion, filtering poliutants, reducing channel erosion and providing adjacent habitat. Page 2 .1(cy . BUFFER. The buffer strip begins at the "ordinary high water mark" for wetlands and the top of the bank of the channel for rivers and streams. This start point corresponds to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' definition of a "shoreline" in Minnesota Rules 6115.0030 (e.g. a stream 30 feet In width between banks with 100 foot buffer strips has a total protected width of 230 feet.) CITY. The City of Hutchinson or the City Council of the City of Hutchinson. CITY ENGINEER. The City Engineer of the City of Hutchinson or authorized agent. The City Engineer may require a third party Engineer's service at the applicant's expense. . COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE. A contiguous area where muitiple separate and distinct land disturbing activities may be taking place at different times, or on different schedules, but under one proposed plan. This Item is broadly defined to Include design, permit application, advertisement or physical demarcation indicating that land disturbing activities may occur. CONTROL MEASURE. A practice or combination of practices to control erosion and attendant pollution, see also Best Management Practices. COUNCIL. The City Council of the City of Hutchinson. DETENTION FACILITY. A natural or manmade structure, including wetlands, used for the temporary storage of runoff and which may contain a permanent pool of water, or may be dry during times of no runoff. DEVELOPMENT. Any land disturbance activity that changes the site's runoff characteristics In conjunction with residential, commercial, industrial or Institutional construction or aiteration. DEVELOPER. A person, firm, corporation, sole proprietorship, partnership, federal or state agency, or political subdivision thereof engaged in a land disturbance and/or land development activity. . DISCHARGE. The release, conveyance, channeling, runoff, or drainage, of storm water, Including snowmeit. DRAINAGE EASEMENT. A right to use the land of another for a specnlc purpose, such as a right-of-way for the movement of water across or under the land surface or the storage of water. EROSION. Removing the surface of the land by the action of water, wind, Ice, or gravity. Erosion can be accelerated by the activities of man and nature. EROSION CONTROL. Refers to methods employed to prevent erosion. Examples include soil stabilization practices, horizontal slope grading, temporary or permanent cover, and construction phasing. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN (E&S CONTROL PLAN). A written description and/or plan indicating the number, locations, sizes, and other pertinent information about best management practice methods designed to reduce erosion of the land surface and the deposition of sediment within a waterway. An E&S Control Plan Is required as part of a Storm Water Management Plan. Both the Storm Water Management Plan and E&S Control Plans are used in developing the State mandated Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). An E&S Control Plan may be required for certain projects not requiring a full Storm Water Management Plan, as outlined in this ordinance or determined necessary by the City Engineer. EXPOSED SOIL AREAS. Ail areas of the construction site where the vegetation (trees, shrubs, brush, grasses, etc.) or impervious surface has been removed, thus rendering the soil more prone to erosion. This includes topsoil stockpile areas, borrow areas and disposal areas within the construction site. It does not include temporary stockpiles or surcharge areas of clean sand, gravel, concrete or bituminous, which have less stringent protection. Once soil is exposed, it is considered "exposed soil," until it meets the definition of "fInal stabilization." . FINAL STABILIZATION. Means that all soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed, and that a uniform (evenly distributed, e.g., without large bare areas) perennial vegetative cover with a density of seventy (70) percent of the cover for unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures. has been established, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures have been employed. Simply sowing grass seed is Page 3 1CC} not considered final stabilization. Where agricultural land is involved, such as when pipelines are built on crop or rangeland, final stabilization constitutes returning the land to its preconstruction agricultural use. . HYDRIC SOILS. Soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil profile. HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION. Macrophytlc (large enough to be observed by the naked eye) plant Ine growing in water, soil, or on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. IMPERVIOUS AREA. A constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil, and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than existed prior to deveiopment. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios. driveways, parking lots, storage areas; and concrete, asphalt, or gravel parking lots and roads. LAND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY. The act of subdivision or platting properties for personal use, adding value or for the purposes of resale. This includes the construction and/or demolition of buildings, structures, roads, parking lots, paved storage areas, and similar facilities. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. Any land change that may result in soil erosi.on from water or wind and the movement of sediments into or upon waters or lands within the CIty's jurisdiction, including construction, clearing & grubbing, grading, excavating, transporting and filling of land. Within the context of this ordinance, iand disturbance activity does not mean: 1. Minor land disturbance activities such as home gardens and an individual's home landscaping, repairs, and maintenance work, which will not result in sediments entering the stonn water system. 2. Additions or modnicatlons to existing single family structures that result in creating under five thousand (5,000) square feet of exposed soil or Impervious surface and will not result in sediments entering the stonn water system. . . 3. Construction, installation, and maintenance of trees, fences, signs, posts, pOles, and electric, telephone, cable television, utility lines or individual service connections to these utilities, which result in creating under five thousand (5,000) square feet of exposed soil or impervious surface and will not result In sediments entering the stonn water system. 4. Tilling, planting, or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural, or silvlcultural (forestry) crops. 5. Emergency work to protect me, 11mb, or property and emergency repairs, unless the land disturbing activity would have otherwise required an approved erosion and sediment control plan, except for the emergency. If such a plan would have been required, then the disturbed land area shall be shaped and stabilized in accordance with the City's requirements as soon as possible. LANDOWNER. Any person holding title to or having a divided or undivided interest in land. LOCAL DETENTION. Detention intended to serve only the developing area in question and no areas outside of the development boundaries. As such it Is under the control of one owner or group of owners. This is also known as on-site detention. LOCAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. The stonn drainage system which transports the minor and major stonn water runoff to the major stann water system serving only the property within the development boundaries, under the control of one owner or group of owners. This is also known as the on-site drainage system. MANAGEMENT PRACTICE. A practice or combination of practices to control erosion and water quality degradation. . NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STORMWATER PERMIT. Any pennit or requirement enforced pursuant to the Clean Water Act as amended for the purposes of regulating Stonn Water discharge. Page 4 leG) NATURAL WATER. A river, stream, pond, channel or ditch. NONCOMPLIANCE FEE. The administrative penalty, or fee, for re-inspectlon of a property which may be assessed to a Permittee, Land Owner, Developer or their Contractor(s) for noncompliance with the provisions and/or conditions of an approved storm water plan and/or permit or the violation of any other provisions contained In this storm water ordinance. . NA TIONWIDE URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM (NURP). An urban runoff study by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. ON-SITE DETENTION. a.k.a Local Detention System. ON-SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. a.k.a Local Drainage System. OUTLET. Any discharge point, including storm sewers, into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake or other body of surface water or groundwater. OWNER OR OCCUPANT. Any person owning or using a lot, parcel of land, or premises connected to and discharging Storm Water into the storm water system of the City, and who pays for and is legally responsible for .the payment of storm water rates or charges made against the lot, parcel of land, building or premises, if connected to the Storm Water system or who would pay or be legally responsible for such payment. PERMANENT COVER. Means 'final stabilization." Examples include grass, gravel, asphait, and concrete. See also the definition of "final stabilization.' Any buildings, structures, landscaping and related features as part of a development project approved for construction or constructed prior to the passage of this ordinance. PERMANENT CONSTRUCTED DEVELOPMENT PERMANENT FACILITIES. Those features of a storm water management plan which are part of any natural or constructed storm water system that requires periodic maintenance to retain their operational capabilities. This includes but is not limited to storm sewers, Infiltration areas, detention areas, channels, streets, etc. . PERMIT. .With In the context of this rule a 'permit" Is a written warrant or license granted for construction, subdivision approval, or to ailow land disturbing activities. PERMITTEE. Any person who applies for and receives approval of a storm water plan and/or parmit from the City and/or State. PERSON. Any developer, individual, firm, corporation, partnership, franchise, association, owner, occupant of property, or agency, either public or private. PROHIBITED DISCHARGE. A non-storm water discharge into the storm water syStem or a natural water, Including but not i1mited to: 1. Debris or other materials such as grass clippings, vegetative materials, tree branches, earth fill, rocks, concrete chunks, metal, other demolition or construction materials, or structures. 2. The disposai or misuse of chemicals or any other materials that would degrade the quality of waters within the system, including, but not limited to chemicals (fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, etc.) or petroleum based products (gasoline, oil, fuels, solvents, paints. etc.). 3. Erosion and sediment originating from a property and deposited onto City streets, private properties or into the storm water conveyance system, including those areas not specifically covered under an approved Storm Water Management Plan or Storm Water Permit. 4. Failure to remove sediments transported or tracked onto City streets by vehicles or construction traffic within 24 hours of it being deposited on the street. . 5. For the purposes of this ordinance, Prohibited Discharges do not Include the following, unless information Is available to indicate otherwise: Page 5 l(6) . A. Water line flushing; B. Landscape irrigation; C. Diverted stream flows; D. Rising ground water; E. Uncontaminated ground water infiltration; F. Uncontaminated pumped ground water; G. Discharges from potable water sources; H. Foundation drains; I. Air conditioning condensate; J. Irrigation water; K. Springs; L. Water from crawl space pumps; M. Footing drains; N. Lawn watering; O. Individual residential car washing; P. Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands; a. De-chlorinated swimming pool discharges and R. Street wash water PUBLIC STORM SEWER. A storm sewer located entirely within publicly owned land or easements. REGIONAL DETENTION. Detention facilities provided to serve an area outside the development boundaries. A regional detention site generally receives runoff from multiple storm water sources and serves an area of approximately one quarter section. REGIONAL FLOOD. a.k.a. Base Flood or 1 Oo-year flood RETENTION FACILITY. A natural or man made structure that provides for the storage of all or a portion of storm water runoff. . RUNOFF. The rainfall, snowmelt, dewatering, or Irrigation water flowing over the grounds surface and into open channels, underground storm sewers, and detention or retention ponds. SEDIMENT. Solid material or organic material that, In suspension, is being transported or has been moved by air, water, gravity, or ice, and deposited at another location.. SEDIMENT CONTROL The methods employed to prevent sediment from leaving the development site. Examples of sediment control practices include, but are not limited to silt fences, sediment traps, earth dikes, drainage swales, check dams, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, storm drain inlet protection, and temporary or permanent sedimentation basins. SIGNIFICANT REDEVELOPMENT. Alterations of a property that changes the "footprint' of a site or building in such a way that results in the disturbance of over one (1) acre of land. This term is not Intended to Include activities, which would not be expected to cause adverse storm water quality impacts and offer no new opportunity for storm water controls, such as exterior remodeling. SITE. The entire area included in the legal description of the parcel or other land division on which the land development or land disturbing activity is proposed in the storm water plan or permit application. STABILIZE. To make the site steadfast or firm, minimizing soli movement by mulching and seeding, sodding, landscaping, placing concrete, gravel,. or other measures. STABILIZED. The exposed ground surface after It has been covered by sod, erosion control blanket, riprap, pavement or other material that prevents erosion. Simply sowing grass seed is not considered stabilization. Ground surfaces may be temporarily or permanentiy stabilized (also see Final Stabilization). STATE. The State of Minnesota. . STORM SEWER. A pipe or conduit for carrying storm waters, surface runoff, and drainage, excluding sewage and industrial wastes. Page 6 1 (C) . . . STORM WATER. Means precipitation runoff, storm water runoff, snow melt runoff, and any other surface runoff and drainage. Storm water does not include construction site dewatering. STORMWATER DEPRESSED DETENTION. Temporary storage of storm water runoff in ponds, parking lots, grassy areas, rooftops, buried underground tanks, etc., for future or controlled release. Used to delay and attenuate flow. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT. The planned set of public policies and activities undertaken to regulate runoff and reduce erosion, and maintain or improve water quality under various spec~ied conditions within various portions of the drainage system. It may establish criteria for controlling peak flows and/or runoff volumes, for runoff detention and retention, or for pollution control, and may specify criteria for the relative elevations among various elements of the drainage system. Storm water management is primarily concemed with limiting future flood damages and environmental impacts due to development, whereas flood control alms at reducing the extent of flooding that occurs under current conditions. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA. Spec~ic guidance provided to the engineerldeslgner to carry out drainage and storm water management policies. An example might be the specnlcatlon of local design hydrology and use of the design storm. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. A document containing the requirements Iden@ed by the City In the Storm Water Management Plan Application and Review section of this Chapter, that when implemented will provide solutions to storm water management problems that may occur as a result of the proposed development or land disturbing activity. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Physical facilities that collect, store, convey, and treat storm water runoff in urban areas. These facilities normally Include detention and retention facilities, streets, storm sewers, inlets, open channels, and special.structures, such as Inlets, manholes, and energy dissipaters. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). A joint storm water and erosion and sediment control plan that is written as a prerequisite to obtaining an NPDES Storm Water Permit for Construction Activity, that when implemented will decrease soli erosion on a parcel of land and off-site non-point pollution. II involves both temporary and permanent controls. The SWPPP, which draws Its information from a Storm Water Management Plan and Is typically condensed, must be incorporated Into the construction grading plans for the project. STORM WATER RETENTION STRUCTURE. Storage designed to eliminate or reduce the frequency of subsequent surface discharge. Wet ponds are the most common type of retention storage (though wet ponds may also be used for detention storage). Anything manufactured, constructed, or erected which is normally attached to or positioned on land, Including portable structures, earthen structures, roads, parking lots, and paved storage areas. SUBDIVISION. Any tract of land divided Into building lots for private, public, commercial, Induslrial, etc. development for the purpose of sale, rent, or lease, including planned unit development." SYSTEM CHARGE OR ASSESSMENT. A charge for connecting an outlet to a regional storm water management facility, typically a pond. The charge Is normally assessed to recover the proportional cost of constructing a regional pond or storm water treatment facility. TEMPORARY PROTECTION. Short-term methods employed to prevent erosion. Examples of such protection are straw, mulch, erosion control blankets, wood chips, and erosion netting. UNDEVELOPED LAND. Land that in Its current state has not been impacted by slgn~icant land disturbance activitieS, annexed into the City or subdivided Into multiple ownership lots and is typically zoned agricultural. URBAN AREA. Land associated with, or part of, a defined city or town. This title of the City Code applies to urban or urbanizing, rather than rural areas. USER. Any person who discharges, causes, or permits the discharge of storm water into the City's Storm Water management system. Page 7 lee) VIOLA TlON. The wllllul or negligent act 01 noncompliance with the conditions attached to an approved storm water plan and/or permit, or any other provisions contained In this ordinance, subject to enlorcement and penalty or noncompliance lees. . WATERS OF THE STATE. All streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs, reservoirs, aquilers, irrigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations 01 water, surface or underground, natural or armicial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through, or border upon the state or any portion thereof. WATERCOURSE. The natural path lor the flow 01 water where there is sufficient natural and accustomed runoff to lorm and maintain a distinct and dellned channel or an open channellacility that has been constructed lor such purpose. This shall include any easements obtained lor the purposes 01 runoff conveyance. WET POND A.K.A. WET DETENTION FACILITY. A Retention Facility which Includes a permanent pool 01 water used lor the purposes 01 providing lor the treatment 01 storm water runoff. WATERSHED MASTER PLAN. A plan that an engineer/designer lormulates to manage urban storm water runoff lor a particular project or drainage area., It typically addresses such subjects as characterization 01 the existing and luture site development, land use, and grading plan, peak rates 01 runoff, IIow duration, runoff volumes lor various return Irequencies, locations, criteria and sizes 01 detention or retention ponds and conveyances; runoff controlleatures; land parcels, easement locations, opinions 01 probable costs, measures to enhance runoff quality, salient regulations, and how the plan addresses them, and consistency with secondary objectives such as public recreation, aesthetics, public salety, and groundwater recharge. It may be submitted to regulatory officials lor their review lor adoption. WETLANDS. Lands that transition between terrestrial and aquatic systems (excluding drainage ditch bottoms) where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land Is covered by shallow water. For purposes 01 this definition, wetiands must have the lollowing three attributes: 1. A predominance 01 hydric soils; . 2. Are Inundated or saturated by the surface or groundwater at a Irequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence 01 hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted lor life in saturated soil conditions; and 3. Under normal circumstances support the prevalence 01 such vegetation. i 54.03 SCOPE. A. Prohibited Discharges. It shall be considered an offense lor any person to cause or allow a Prohibited Discharge into Waters 01 the State, including the City storm water system, or any natural water. B. Land Disturbing Activity Requiring A Storm Water Management Plan. Any person, IIrm, sole proprietorship, partnership, corpOration, state agency, or political subdivision proposing subdivision or plat approval, a building permit at any land disturbance activity greater than 1 acre within the City must submit a State issued NPDES permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to the City Engineer unless a waiver is provided in accordance with this Section. No subdivision approval, plat approval or building permit shall be issued until a State NPDES permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan or a waiver of the approval requirements has been approved by the City Engineer in strict conlormance with the provisions 01 this chapter. No land shall be disturbed until the permit is approved by the City Engineer and conlorms to the standards set lorth herein. A Storm Water Management Plan may also be required in some situations as determined by the City Engineer, [i.e., development within an existing subdivision with documented Ilooding problems associated with storm water runoff]. Exemptions to the Storm Water Management Plan requirements 01 this section Include: . Any part 01 a subdivision that Is included in a plat that has been approved by the City Council and recorded with the Register 01 Deeds on or balore the effective date 01 this chapter. A Storm Water Permit lor land disturbing activities on such properties may stili be required, as determined by the City Engineer, and such activities are still subject to other compliance requirements In accordance with this chapter. Page 8 1 (C) . 1. A Storm Water Management Plan is generally not required for individual lots or properties located within a subdivision or plat for which a Storm Water Management Plan has already been approved. This exemption is subject to the City Engineer's consideration and approval; 2. A parcel for which a building permit has been approved on and/or before the effective date of this chapter and an NPDES/SDS Permit was not required; 3. Any land disturbance activity not associated with building construction that will affect less than 1 acre of undeveloped land. 4. Emergency work to protect I~e, 11mb, or property. C. Land disturbing activity Involving the construction of a single-family or two-family dwelling. Construction of single family or two family dwellings must comply with in piace approved BMPs and any existing permitted SWPPP for the subdivision, including NPDES/SDS Permit requirements and Subdivision Agreement. Compliance with the Single Family Residential Construction Erosion/Sediment Control Standards Is required. D. Instailation and repair of utility service lines. 1. At project sites that require permit coverage where a utility contractor is not the site owner or operator, each utility contractor must comply with the provisions of the storm water pollution prevention pian (SWPPP) for the project their construction activities will Impact. Each utiilty contractor must ensure that their activities do not render ineffective, the erosion prevention and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) for the site. Should a utility contractor damage or render ineffective any BMPs for the site, the owner must ensure such BMPs are repaired or replaced within seven (7) days of completion of utility installation on the site. . 2. At project sites where a utility contractor is the site owner or operator, and the utility company disturbs one or more acres of soli for the purpose of installation of utility service lines, Including but not limited to residential electric, gas, telephone and cable lines, the utility company must apply for permit coverage from the state prior to commencement of construction. 3. Utility contractors working In a street right-of-way to repair existing or Install new utilities and disturbing less than one acre are required to provide appropriate inlet protection and sediment control during the course of the work so as to ensure the storm sewer system is protected from pollution. The utility contractor Is also required to provide street sweeping as necessary to Insure that sediments resuningfrom their activity do not enter the storm water system following construction. The street shall be swept within (1) working day of completion of utility installation on the site. All disturbed vegetation shall be replaced with seed or sod within seven (7) days of completion of utility installation on the site. The City will provide guidance regarding acceptable temporary protection BMPs for inlets and methods to stabilize the exposed soil areas until they meet the definition of final stabilization. E. Waivers. The City Engineer may waive any requirement of this chapter upon making a finding that compliance with the requirement will involve an unnecessary hardship, and the waiver of such requirement is not contrary to the objectives in this section. The City Engineer may require as a condition of the waiver, such dedication or construction, or agreement to dedicate or construct, as may be necessary to adequately meet the said standards and requirements. !i 54.04 MANAGEMENT OF SITE VEGETATION. Any Landowner shall provide for the installation and maintenance of vegetation on their property in accordance with the following criteria, regardless as to whether or not a Storm Water Management Plan has been approved or is necessary under this Chapter: A. Use of Impervious Surfaces. No person shail apply items included in the definition of "Prohibited Discharge' on impervious surfaces or within storm water drainage systems with impervious liners or conduits. . Page 9 lee) B. Unimproved Land Areas. Except for driveways, sidewalks, patios, areas occupied by structures, landscaped areas, or areas that have been otherwise Improved, all areas shall be covered by plants or vegetative growth. c. Use of Pervious Surfaces. No person shall deposit grass clippings, leaves, or other vegetative materials, with the exception of normal mowing or weed control, within natural or man made Watercourses, Wetlands, or within Wetland Buffer areas. No person shall deposit items Included in the definition of "Prohibited Discharge' except as noted above. . Failure to comply with this section of the Chapter shall constitute a violation and subject the Landowner to the enforcement provisions, penalties and noncompliance fees outlined in the Suspensions, Revocations, and Stop Work Orders section of this Chapter. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN -APPLICATION AND REVIEW Ii 54.10 APPLICATION AND CONTENT A written Storm Water Management Plan shall be filed with the City Engineer as required by this Chapter. The Storm Water Management Plan shall Include a statement indicating the grounds upon which the approval is requested. that the proposed use is permitted in the underlying zoning district, and adequate evidence showing the proposed use will conform to the standards set forth In this chapter and the Minnesota Stormwater Manual (hereinafter referred to as the Manual). Prior to seeking approval of a Storm Water Management Plan, it Is recommended that the Storm Water Management Plan be reviewed by any affected public agencies. Two sets of legible copies of the drawings and required information shall be submitted to the City Engineer at the time of plat approval or when applying for a building permit. Plans shall be prepared to a scale appropriate to the site of the project and suitable for performing the review. . At a minimum, the Storm Water Management Plan shall contain the following information. A written Storm Water Management Report discussing the pre and post development hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, erosion and sedimentation control during and after construction, protective measures for proposed and existing structures, and water quality concems shall also be provided. For additional information refer to the Storm Water Management Plan Approval Standards section of this Chapter. Ii 64.11 REVIEW PROCESS A Storm Water Management Plan meeting the requirements of this Section shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and to determine its compliance with the standards as outlined In the Storm Water Management Plan Approval Standards section of this Chapter. The City Engineer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Storm Water Management Plan. If a particular storm water management plan involves a complex application or has the potential for significant controversy, the City Engineer may bring the proposed Storm Water Management Plan before the City Council for consideration and public comment. The City Engineer may also require that the proposed Storm Water Management Plan be reviewed by a third party Engineer at the applicanfs expense. Ii 64.12 DURATION Approval of any plan submitted under the provisions of this Chapter shall expire one year after the date of approval unless construction has commenced in accordance with the plan. However, II prior to the expiration of approval, the applicant makes a written request to the City Engineer for an extension of time to commence construction setting forth the reasons for the requested extension, the City Engineer may grant one extension of not greater than one year. The City Engineer shall acknowledge receipt of any request for an extension and shall make a decision on the extension within thirty (30) days of receipt. Any expired and/or revised plan may be resubmitted following the same procedure for an original approval. Any denied or expired plan may be resubmitted with additional information addressing the concems contained within the denial. The resubmitted application shall be subject to the applicable review time lines. . Page 10 iCG) t 54.13 CONDITIONS . A Storm Water Management Plan may be approved subject to compliance with cond~lons reasonable and necessary to ensure that the requirements contained in this chapter are met. Such cond~ions may, among other matters, limit the size, kind or character of the proposed development, require the construction of structures, drainage facilities, storage basins and other facilITies, require replacement of vegetation, establish required monitoring procedures, stage the work over time, require a~eration of the s~e design to ensure proper buffering, require the acquis~ion or dedication of certain lands or easements, and require the conveyance to the City of Hutchinson or other public entity of certain lands or interests therein for storm water system facil~les. The City Engineer may specity special requirements or cond~ions for specific major or minor watersheds w~hin the City and ~s extraterritorial jurisdiction. The nature of these requirements will be subject to the unique environmental and natural resource envlronrrnlnt of each sub watershed. Approval of a plan shall bind the applicant to perform and comply with all the requirements and conditions of the plan prior to commencing or concurrent with any land disturbing activities. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. APPROVAL STANDARDS t 54.20 GENERAL This section describes the approval standards used to evaluate a proposed Storm Water Management Plan. The City Engineer shall not approve a Storm Water Management Plan, which fails to meet these standards. Other applicable standards, such as state and federal standards, shail also apply. If the standards of different agencies conflict, the more restrictive standards shall apply. . It shall be the Applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permits from other governmental agencies having any jurisdictional authority over the work to be performed. Typlcaily, such agencies include, but are not limited to McLeod County, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Poilution Control Agency, the State Historical Preservation Office, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and others. The C~y may choose to obtain some of the required perm~s. The applicarit Will be nomied which perm~s are to be obtained by the City. t 54.21 MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL The Minnesota Storm Water Manual, contains the principal standards and design criteria for developing an effective and acceptable. Storm Water Management Plan. The Manual contains an overview of Minnesota Storm Water Management Policy and design objectives as weil as a detailed discussion of the required contents for Storm Water Management Plans submitted to the State for approval. The Manual contains detailed criteria for hydrologic evaluations, the design of storm water management system facility components, water quality protection standards, instructions for the development of an erosion and sedimentation control plan. The Manual also contains a discussion of operation and maintenance requirements, standard forms to be used, and standard construction details approved by the State. t 54.22 MODELSlMETHODOLOGIESlCOMPUTATIONS Other than those outlined in the Manual, any hydrologic models and/or design methodologies used to determine runoff cond~ions and to analyze storm water management structures and facil~les, shall be approved in advance by the City Engineer. All Storm' Water Management Plans, drawings, spec~lcations, and computations for storm water management facil~ies submitted for review shail contain a validated seal and shail be signed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. t 54.23 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA FOR PERMANENT FACILITIES Storm water control facil~ies included as part of the final design for a Permanent Development; shall be addressed in the Storm Water Management Plan and shail meet the following criteria: . A. Pre Versus Post Hydrological Response of S~e. An appilcant shail install or construct, on or for the. proposed land disturbing activity or development activity,. all storm water management facilities necessary to manage runoff such that increases inflow under the design cond~lons will not occur that could exceed the capacity of the Outlet, or the Storm Water Management System, Into which the s~e Page 11 1(C} . B. c. . . discharges or that would cause the Storm Water Management System to be overloaded or accelerate channel erosion as a resu~ of the proposed land disturbing activity or development activity. Under no circumstances shall the 2, 1 a, or 1 ao-year developed peak flow exceed the 2, 1 a, or 1 DO-year existing peak flow without prior written approval by the City Engineer. For Regional Detention or Storm Water Management System, the City Engineer shall recommend a proposed System Charge or Assessment to be approved by the City Council based upon an approved Watershed Master Plan and an analysis of required drainage systems, projected costs and flood protection beneltls provided to those properties directly or indirectly impacted by the Regional Detention or Storm Water Management System. Natural Features of the S~e. The applicant shall give consideration to reducing the need for Storm Water Management System facilities by incorporating the use of natural topography and land cover such as wetlands, ponds, natural swales and depressions as they exist before development to the degree that they can accommodate the add~ional water flow without compromising the integrity or quality of these natural features. Storm Water Management Strategies. The following Storm Water Management practices shall be investigated when developing a Storm Water Management Plan in accordance with this chapter and with chapter 53.129 of the City of Hutchinson City Code of Ordinances: 1; Natural infiltration of precipitation and runoff on-site, if suitable soli profiles can be created during site grading. The purpose of this strategy is to encourage the development of a Storm Water Management Plan that encourages natural Infiltration. This Includes, providing as much natural or vegetated area on the site as possible, minimizing impervious surfaces. and directing runoff to vegetated areas rather than onto adjoining streets, storm sewers and d~ches; 2. Flow attenuation by use of open vegetated swales and natural depressions; 3. Storm Water Detention facilities; and 4. Storm Water Retention facilities (on a case by case basis). 5. Other facil~ies requested by the City Engineer. A combination of successive practices may be used to achieve the applicable minimum control. requirements specified. Justification shall be provided by the applicant for the method selected. D. Adequacy of Outlets. The adequacy of any Outlet used as a discharge point for proposed Storm Water Management System must be assessed and documented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. To the extent practicable, hydraulic capacities of downstream natural channels, storm sewer systems, or streets shall be evaluated to determine if they have sufficient conveyance capacity to receive and accommodate post-development runoff discharges and volumes without causing increased property damages or any Increase in the established base flood elevation. If a flood plain or floodway has not been established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the applicant shall provide a documented analysis and estimate of the base flood elevation as certified by a Professional Engineer registered In the State of Minnesota. In addition, projected veloc~ies in downstream natural or manmade channels shall not exceed that which is reasonably anticipated to cause erosion unless protective measures acceptable to the City Engineer are approved and Installed as part of the Storm Water Management Plan. The assessment of Outlet adequacy shall be included in the Storm Water Management Plan. Storm Water Detention/Retention Facilities. Storm Water Detention or Retention facil~les proposed to be constructed in the Storm Water Management Plan shall be designed according to the most current practices as reflected In the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program study. E. ! 54.24 OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION All Storm Water Management Systems shall be designed to minimize .the need for maintenance, to provide easy vehicle (typically eight (8) feet or wider) and personnel access for maintenance purposes, and to be structurally sound. All Storm Water Management Systems shall have a plan of operation and maintenance that assures continued effective removal of pollutants carried in Storm Water Runoff. The City Engineer may Inspect all public and private Storm Water Management Systems at any time. Inspection records will be kept on file at the City Engineer's Office. It shall be the responsibil~y of the applicant to obtain any necessary easements or Page 12 IlG) . . . other property Interests to allow access to the Storm Water Management System for inspection and maintenance purposes. The City Engineer shall retain enforcement powers for assuring adequa,te operation and maintenance activities through permit conditions, penalties, noncompliance orders and fees. ! 54.25 EASEMENTS Easements may be required as conditions to the issuance of a Storm Water Management Plan approval. If a Storm Water Management Plan involves directing some or all of the site's runoff to a drainage easement, the applicant or his designated representative shall obtain from the property owners any necessary easements or other property interests concerning the flowing of such water. ! 54.26 PLAN APPLICABILITY A Storm Water Management Plan approval issued under this chapter runs with the land and Is a condition of plat or development approval. Any Landowner or subsequent Landowner of any parcel within the plat or development area must comply with the plan or any approval, condition, revision or mod~lcation of the Plan. The Landowner must also comply with all applicable State Subdivision Registration, Permit Transfer/Modificatlon and Notice of Termination Permits and provide a copy of the permit applications to the City for approval. Failure to comply with this Plan shall constitute a violation and subject the Permittee, Developer, . and/or Landowner to the enforcement provisions, pen allies and noncompliance fees. ! 54.27 PLAN AMENDMENT Storm Water Management Plans may be amended only by a written request submitted to the City Engineer. This request shall contain the reason for the change and documentation related to any addllional change in projected impacts, which may resull from amendment approval. Amendment requests submitted prior to final approval of a plan application shall be considered part of the original submittal. Amendment requests filed after Plan approval shall be considered following the same procedures as ~ it were a new application and subject to applicable review periods. NPDES PERMIT ! 54.30 NPDES PERMITS It is unlawful to initiate any land development activity, land disturbing activity, or other activities which may resullln an increase In storm water quantities, degradation of storm water quality, orrestrlction of flow in any storm sewer system, open ditch or natural channel, storm water easement, water body, or wetland outlet within the jurisdiction of the City, without having first complied with the terms of this chapter. Other activities include those outlined in ! 54.03. A. Perm II. All persons subject to meeting the requirements and needing to obtain a NPDES permll shall apply for coverage and file a copy with the Clly Engineer. The permit will be accompanied by a Storm Water Management Plan as prescribed under the Storm Water Management Plan Application and Review section of this chapter, if such a plan has not been previously approved. Permit applications may be denied ~ the applicant Is not in compliance with the NPDES permit currently in effect. Commencing earthwork on a project prior to plan or perm II approval is considered a violation of this chapter. B. Permit Delays. The Clly Engineer may withhold granting approval of a Permll until all issues associated with the site are resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Perm lis may be conditioned with delays such that work cannot begin until a specified date or until after the site Is inspected. C. Permit Amendments. NPDES Permits may be amended (by applicant) only by a written request submitted by the Permittee to the State. This request shall contain the reason for the change and documentation related to any additional impacts, which may resull from amendment approval. A copy of the request will be submitted to the City Engineer within seven days of the submittal to the State. The State approved amended permit will also be submitted to the City Engineer within seven days of receipt. Page 13 llC~ . E. . . D. Permit Transfer. A NPDES permit runs with the property it covers, until the permitted activities are completed, and is transferable to new Landowners in its entirety or by parcel, with each parcel being subject to the permit and any conditions, which apply to that parcel. Land transfers ml,lst be reported to the City Engineer prior to Issuing of permits. Inspection. The City Engineer may inspect the Storm Water Management System of any Permittee to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter. The applicant shall promptly allow the City and their authorized representatives, upon presentation of credentials to: 1. Enter upon the permitted site for the purpose of obtaining information, examination of records, conducting investigations, Inspections or surveys. 2. Bring such equipment upon the permitted site as is necessary to conduct such inspections, surveys and investigations. 3. Examine and copy any books, papers, records, or memoranda pertaining to activities or records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permitted site. 4. Inspect the storm water pollution control measures. 5. Sample and monitor any items or activities pertaining to storm water pollution control measures. Any applicant or perm Ittee shall provide safe and easy access for inspections. F. Inspections of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan's Measures. At a minimum, such inspections shall be done weekly by the Permittee (general contractor, deveioper or the developer's designated representative), and within twenty-four (24) hours after every storm or snow melt event large enough to result in runoff from the site (0.5 inches or more In twenty-four (24) hours). At a minimum, these inspections shall be done during active construction (the MPCA and city have inspection forms available upon request). ~ 54.31 CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The plans and spec~ications prepared for the construction of the Storm Water Management System must be: . 1. Consistent with the Storm Water Management Plan approved by the City Engineer, including any special provisions or conditions. 2. In conformance with the requirements of the City of Hutchinson's Municipal Specifications, and any other necessary permits required and issued by other governmental agencies. 3. Sealed and signed by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota 4. Submitted to the City Engineer for approval. 5. Approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. The construction grading and erosion/sediment control plans, in a format acceptable to the City Engineer, shall contain a drawing or drawings delineating the features incorporated into the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including details of perimeter protection, construction phasing, storm drain inlet protection, erosion control measures, temporary and final stabilization measures, including all BMP's. In addition the construction specifications shall contain technical provisions describing erosion, sedimentation, and water control measures to be utilized during and after construction as well as to define the entities responsible for the installation and maintenance of the BMP's. The project SWPPP must be incorporated into the construction spec~ication documents. Page 14 leG) ~ 54.32 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Construction operations must at a minimum comply with any applicable federal or state permit and SWPPP in addition to the following Best Management Practices: . A. Site Dewatering. Water pumped from the site shall be treated by temporary sedimel'ltation basins, grit chambers, sand filters, upflow chambers, hydrcx:yclones, soil concentrators or other appropriate controls as deemed necessary. Water may not be discharged in a manner that causes erosion, sedimentation, or flooding on the site, on downstream properties, in the receiving channels, or in any wetland. B. Waste and Material Disposal. All waste and unused building materials (including garbage, debris, cleaning wastes, wastewater, petroleum based products, paints, toxic materials, or other hazardous materials) shall be property disposed of off-site and shall not be allowed to be carried by Runoff Into a receiving channel, storm sewer system, or Wetland. C. Tracking Management. Each site shall have roads, access drives and parking areas of sufficient width, length and surfacing to minimize sediment from being tracked onto public or private roadways. Any material deposited by vehicles or other construction equipment onto a public or private road shall be removed (not by flushing) before the end of each day's work. D. Water Quality Protection. The construction contractor, including the general contractor and all subcontractors, shall be required to control oil and fuel spills and chemical discharges to prevent such spills or discharges from entering any watercourse, sump, sewer system, water body, or wetland. E. Site Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction operations must include erosion and sedimentation control measures meeting accepted design criteria, standards and spectllcations contained in the Minnesota Storm Water Manual or other standards determined by the City Engineer. F. Water Quantity. The construction contractor, including the general contractor and all subcontractors, shall be required to minimize the volume of surface water runoff which flows from any specific site during development. This volume is not to exceed the pre-development hydrologic regime to the maximum extent practicable. . SUSPENSIONS, REVOCATIONS AND STOP WORK ORDERS ~ 54.40 STORM WATER VIOLATIONS AND REPORTING Storm Water Management ~Ian, NPDES Permit and non-permit related Storm Water violations include, but are not 11m ited to: 1. Commencing site grading or preparation work without first having obtained approval from the City Engineer of all applicable permits. 2. Noncompliance with the requirements or conditions attached to an approved SWPPP of an NPDES/SDS Storm Water Permit For Construction Activity, Storm Water Management Plan or other standards established by the City Engineer, under authority of the City. 3. The causing or allowing of a Prohibited Discharge in the City storm water system, a natural watercourse, storm water easement, stream or river. 4. Failure to remove sediments transported or tracked onto City streets by vehicles or construction traffic within 24 hours of it being deposited on the street. . 5. Failure to install and maintain the erosion control measures (BMP's) on a construction site as outlined in the approved SWPPP and Its amendments or other standards established by the City Engineer, under authority of the City. ; 6. Other violations or issues as noted or described throughout this chapter. Page 15 1C~) . . . 7. The City Engineer shall document the reporting of a violation in writing. ~ 54.41 EMERGENCY SUSPENSION The City Engineer may for cause order the suspension of a Storm Water Management Plan when the City Engineer determines that an actual or threatened discharge presents or may present an imminent or substantial danger to the heaith or welfare of persons downstream, or substantial danger to the environment. If such a suspension occurs, all work in the area covered by the plan shall cease immediately. If any person is notified of such suspension and then fails to comply voluntarily with the suspension order, the City shall commence whatever .steps are nece.ssary to obtain compliance. The City Engineer may reinstate the Storm Water Management Plan upon proof of compiiance with ali plans or permit conditions. The City Engineer may also order the immediate suspension of all work if a person or entity is conducting an activity for which a permit is needed without first obtaining the appropriate permit. The suspension shail remain in effect until the required permit(s) are obtained. Whenever the City Engineer orders the suspension of a plan and/or orders all work to stop pursuant to the emergency provisions of this section, the City Engineer shall serve notice on the Landowner and/or Permittee personally, or by registered or certified mail. ~ 54.42 NON-EMERGENCY REVOCATION OF A PLAN A Storm Water Management Pian may be revoked following notice. The City Engineer may revoke a plan or permit for cause, including but not limited to: 1. Violation of any terms or conditions of the applicable plan or permit; 2. Faise statements on any required reports and applications; 3. Obtaining a pian or permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; or 4. Any other violation of this chapter or related ordinance. The City Engineer may revoke a Storm Water Management Plan and order a work stoppage to bring a project into compliance. Notice of such an order shall be given in accordance with ~ 54.43. Under a revoked plan no additional permit approvals (i.e., building, excavation, etc.) shall be Issued for any properties within the area included within the plan or permit boundaries until approved by the City Engineer. In addition the City may deny new permits (i.e., building, excavation, etc.) to the Permittee or Landowner in violation for projects In other locations until current permits are brought into compliance. ~ 64.43 NOTIFICATION Whenever the City Engineer finds that any person has violated or is violating this chapter, the City Engineer shall serve upon such person a written notice stating the nature of the violation. A plan satisfactory to the Engineer for correction thereof must be submitted to the City Engineer within an approved time frame. If a satisfactory plan is not submitted or the terms of such plan are not followed, the City Engineer may order all work in the affected area to cease. The City Engineer reserves the right to have the required work to be completed by others at the owner's expense. If any person commences any land disturbing activities which resuit in increased Storm Water quantity or Storm Water quality degradation Into the City's Storm Water Management System contrary to the provisions of this chapter, federal or state requirements or any order of the City Engineer, the City Attorney may, commence action for appropriate legal and/or equitable relief including administrative or criminal penalties. ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES AND NONCOMPLIANCE FEES ~ 54.50 ENFORCEMENT, PENAL TV AND NONCOMPLIANCE FEES Any person who is found to have violated an order of the City Engineer made In accordance with this chapter, or who has failed to comply with any provision of this chapter and the orders, rules, regulations and permits issued hereunder, is guilty of an offense. Each day on which a violation occurs or continues to exist shall Page 16 ,(G) . . . be deemed a separate and distinct offense. All land use and building perm~s may be suspended until the applicant has corrected the violation. One re.lnspectlon of a s~e will be allowed before any re.inspectlon fees will be applied. Reasonable noncompliance and re-inspection fees may be Imposed for violation of this chapter. ti 54.51 COSTS OF DAMAGE Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter or who in~iates a acUvlty which causes a depos~, obstruction, or damage or other impairment to the C~y's Storm Water Management System is liable to the City for any expense, loss, or damage caused by the violation or the discharge. The City may bill the person violating this chapter the costs for any cleaning, repair or replacement work caused by the violation of storm water discharge, and if unpaid w~hin ninety (90) days may resu~ In assessment of such costs against the violator's property. - ti 54.52 CITY ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS In addition to the civil pena~ies provided herein, the City may recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, court reporter's fees, and other expenses of I~igatlon by appropriate action against the person found to have violated this chapter or the orders, rules, regulations and perm~s issued hereunder. ti 54.53 FALSIFYING INFORMATION Any person who knowingly makes any false statements, representations, or certification In any applicable record, report, plan, perm~ or other document filed or required to be maintained pursuant to this chapter. or who knowingly falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any mon~oring devices or method required under this chapter, shall be guilty of an offense. ti 54.54 PENALTIES Any person violating any provision of this chapter, In add~ion to other sanctions set forth above, may be charged w~h a criminal misdemeanor, and if convicted may be penalized in accordance w~h the provisions of Section !l10.99 of the Code, or alternatively, may be charged w~h an administrative violation pursuant to Section !l1 0.98 of this Code. ti 54.55 SEVERABILITY If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstrtutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication in accordance with the Hutchinson City Charter. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson this 24th day of April, 2007. ATTEST: Gary Plotz, C~y Administrator Steve Cook, Mayor First Consideration: 0411 0/2007 04/2412007 Second Consideration: Date of Publication: Page 17 ICe) . . . TITLE AND SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 07-100 The following Ordinance is hereby published by t~le and summary: 1. Title of Ordinance: Stormwater Management Ordinance 2. An Ordinance to Create and Enact Title 5, Chapter 54 of the City of Hutchinson Code of Ordinances, Relating to Storm Water Management Summary of Ordinance: This ordinance creates and enacts TITle 5, Chapter 54 of the Hutchinson C~y Code, which chapter sets forth uniform requirements for storm water management systems w~hln the City of Hutchinson. This Chapter applies in the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota and to persons outside the City who are, by contract or agreement w~h the City, users of the City storm water management system. Except as otherwise provided herein, the City Engineer shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of this Chapter. This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication in accordance with the Hutchinson City Charter. 3. Availability of Ordinance: A complete, printed copy of this Ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular business hours in the office of the City Clerk, This Ordinance was passed by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson on the 24th day of April, 2007. ATTEST: Gary Plotz, City Administrator Steve Cook, Mayor Date of Publication: Page 18 1(u) , ~6.~,_ 1 r ,~,'T.-, -IIS._~-"",~ ',:'" 'I' - " '~IL... "J~~.!.illI~_~ ~iJ1';liffiI.l.,. --.... - " ~',< j :11 ~... "~ ~i:ujiH~~~~ ~ :-...- I ~ ,- ~!IDIWY~'~fJt ~~~W 7~) 1 . MEMORANDl.JM DATE: April 5, 2007, for the March 27, 2007, City Council Meeting TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Rebecca Bowers, AICP, Planning Director Kent Exner, PE, City Engineer SUBJECT: Steve Knisley and "Dream Sheds, LLC" Proposal . Mr. Knisley would like to address the City Council regarding his concerns over engineering requirements and fees. Based upon discussion with Mr. Knisley, we believe his concerns are primarily related to the cost of improvements necessary to meet City standards for utilities and road construction. Staff have met with Mr. Knisley several times, held a one-stop shop, and spoken with two Engineers hired for the project in order to make sure City requirements and standards were communicated clearly. Please note that Mr. Knisley's proposal is being held to the City's residential street standards similar to other developments containing "private" streets in the past. The status of his application for preliminary plat and PDD (Planned Development District) is incomplete and it has not yet been scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission. After the missing items are submitted, the applications will be scheduled for public hearing and consideration by the Planning Commission and Council. Staff will be at the meeting to answer questions from the Council. . ~(o,:) . MEMORANDUM DATE: AprilS, 2007, for the April 10, 2007, City Council Meeting TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Rebecca Bowers, AlCP, Planning Director SUBJECT: Planning Consultant for the Highway 7 Corridor Study Area and Plan Proposals for Highwav 7 Corridor Studv and Plan A request for proposals (RFP) was initiated by City staff to obtain consulting services necessary to complete the proposed Highway 7 Corridor Study and Plan. The following proposals were submitted: Firm Price Notes Landform $62.555 Plus estimated reimbursables of $3,000 SRF/Cunningham $67,546 Estimated reimbursables included SEH $74,940 Includes $3,000 estimated reimbursables Bonestroo $89.200 Estimate expenses included . The proposal includes the services necessary to complete the Highway 7 corridor study including conducting a land use inventory and analysis, establishing a community vision for the corridor, developing a land use strategy including conducting a market analysis, 2-3 redevelopment concepts for the Highway 7/15 intersection, recommendations for zoning changes, design guidelines, and identifYing potential impacts on utilities and transportation. The process would include several public open houses, advisory panel meetings, and opportunities for public involvement. The end product would be a land use study and corridor plan that would communicate the vision for the corridor and a strategy for achieving the vision. A copy of the proposal is attached. Cost Reduction Ootions Based upon the discussion at the last Council meeting, staffhas spoken with Landform about options to reduce costs on the project. A savings of approximately $2,000 could be accomplished by combining Tasks 2 & 3 (eliminating time and meetings). Cost could also be saved by reducing the scope of the market study as follows: Combine Tasks 2 & 3 Price $ 62 55 -2.000 60 555 . Reduce Scope of Market Study to brief overview of attributes of sites appropriate for different uses. General information provided. Utilize previous growth trends. No detailed recommendations or site anal is tt{~ . April 10.2007 Highway 7 Corridor Study Planning Consultant Page Two Combining Tasks 2 & 3 and reducing the scope of the market study would also allow the study to be completed at an earlier date. The City has the option of doing a brief market study with the project and expanding the market assessment later at a higher total cost. This would save money initially, but the total costs for the study would be greater as a result of adding the expanded study afterwards. The expanded analysis provides a more detailed commercial/retail analysis looking at specific sites and providing competitive market information in addition to detailed recommendations and supportable levels of development and uses appropriate to specific sites. Staff recommends that if the City desires a detailed level of market analysis that it be completed with the study, as it was included in the original proposal. Staff will present additional information on the benefits ofthe study and various options at the meeting. Funding for Studv There are adequate funds in the comprehensive planning/engineering fees account to complete the study. This account was established for comprehensive planning and engineering studies and funds have been set aside for purposes of the corridor study. . Requested Action: Staffis requesting Council authorize moving forward with the study, including authorizing staff to prepare a consulting contract with Landform. Based upon direction from the Council, a contract will be prepared for either the full scope of services recommended or the reduced scope as noted. The final contract would be brought to the Council for final approval after City Attorney review. Attachments: Landform Proposal . \ri~) . . . . 0 " - " " < - . " 0 - . . 0 " < . . . . . " - - . - u . - 0 - . w u . > . w . \t)(CA 1 ;. Highway 7 Corridor Study Hutchinson Table of Proposal Contents Landform Firm Profile Project Team Project Understanding & Public Process Project Approach & Work Plan References Project Schedule, Fee, Expenses and Billing Rates Project Schedule-Fee Matrix Attachments Tea-m Member Resumes Relevant Experience - Project Sheets Work Product Samples: (induded separately) Big Lake Framework Plan Robbinsdale TOD Plan, Bottineau Blvd. N.W. Corridor Hugo Design Guidelines A I 2 3-4 5 6-9 10 11 12 ...II..A..LI.......... LANDFORM . Firm Profile Relevant Proiects: Downtown and Small Area Plans and Design Guidelines, Corcoran, MN Downtown Framework & Highway 10 Conidor Plan, Big Lake, MN Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines, Hugo, MN North Lyndale Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Plan, Minneapolis, MN AllcoIlet Avenue Corridor 'velopment Plan, Minneapolis, MN Mound Harbor Renaissance, Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Mound, MN Village in Mendota Helghts, Plan and Design Guidelines Mendota Heights, MN Small Area Plan & DesIgn Guidelines ShepardlDavem, Saint Paul, MN West Broadway Transit Oriented Development (TOO) Plan, Minneapolis, MN Robbinsdale TOO Plan, Robbinsdale, MN ~ Paul Gateway and West. 7th St Conidor, St. Paul, MN Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I Landform Landform is a multl-disclplinary consulting firm committed to client service, design quality, principles of sustainablllty, and an innovative approach to site development. Over the past 12 years, Landform has grown to over 60 persons providing a full range of land planning, design and engineering services. Our professional services Include: . planning . urban design . sustainable design . environmental coordination . landscape architecture . civil engineering . survey . project management Our experience in an extensive range of project types has taught us the Importance of using an Integrated, interdisciplinary design and process, which helps us to exceed our clients' expectations on every project. Our team offers you: . committed team members you know and have worked with before, who are familiar with your community and who will give this project the attention It requires; . our reputation for creative, sustainable approaches to design, blending development and market realities with the best principals of new urbanism, traditional neighborhood planning and sustainable design practices. . demonstrated success in keeping projects moving forward while maintaining a high level of community Involvement. " " < o " . Consultants ~ Maxfield Research Is a full services real estate research company with over 20 : years of experience in real estate market feasibility consulting. The hallmark of 0 Maxfield Research Inc.'s approach to all projects Includes the appropriate blending : of primary (field) research with secondary research. Primary research Includes . surveys of existing commercial properties, one~m-one Interviews with developers, ~ Realtors, commercial brokers, city and govemment agency staff, and others familiar . with real estate Issues and market conditions. Secondary research Includes data . obtained from reliable published sources Including the Census Bureau, Claritas, Inc. ; (a national demographics firm), etc. Secondary published data is always reviewed ~ carefully in light of other local factors revealed through the primary research that ~ may have an impact on the analysis. The result is a custom analysis that provides ~ the Client with information that Is timely and locally pertinent. 0 . . u . > . w . LANDFORM 2 .,.........Lt........,. " . Consulting Team . Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I Maxfield Research will be providing market consulting and analysis services on this project. Maxfield Research provided market studies related to the Hutchinson Community Planning process in 2001 and updated In 2004, so they understand this area very well. Maxfield Research has worked with Landform on at least a dozen projects over the past 7 years. They will work closely with the planners so that the design and planning concepts are Informed by the market analysis. They will also review and provide input into the planning concepts and recommendations for land use, zoning changes and design standards. Mary Bujold, Project Principal, Maritet Analysis Responsible for. quality of the market analysis methodology and work product, achievement of City goals, and market team performance. Matt Mullins, Project Manager, Martl:et Analyst Responsible for. managing and coordinating the market research, methodology and analysis, maintaining communications with the team, and production of the market study dellverables. Detailed resumes with project experienca for each team member are included In the Attachments. 0 " " " < - . " 0 . w 0 " < . . . . . " - . u . . 0 . w A u > . . LANDFORM . .,.......L1..'....lll: 4 . Project Understanding Public Process . Our team Is well qualffled to facilitate public participation and communication for this project. We value our community-based planning approach and we: . facilitate open CXJfTJ17lUIily dialogue . fJflCX)(Jfag9 an ix;Iusive, grass roots approach . underIiiand how to encour- age input without skJN/ng dcMf1 progress on a project . Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I We have walked the study area, reviewed The CIty's past planning documents, including the Hutchinson Community Plan, the 2002 Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown Master Plan and we are excited about the next step In planning for this vital commercial corridor. We understand that the City has been moving forward with Infrastructure improvements, Including the upgrading and widening of Highway 7, and that this effort should build on that worK. We understand the Vision the community has for downtown Hutchinson and we know that this plan should support that vision. While there will be major intersection improvements Installed at the intersection of Highway 7 and Highway 15, it is critical that additional development on these comers act as a gateway into downtown. This planning effort offers an opportunity to look at several options for redevelopment and gain community Input We understand that the City wants a planning process that Involves the community in identifying and developing an overall vision for the Highway 7 corridor. We will worK closely with the CIty of Hutchinson staff to lead a process which encourages community Input We recommend that the City seek publiC participation in several different formats, including two public Open Houses and by establishing an AdvIsory Panel. The Advisory Panel would which would meet with the Planning team at speclflc points in the planning process to provide more in-depth input on the vision, goals, and overell plan. Ideally, this Panel would Include representatives from a broad range of stakeholders such as the Planning Commission, City Council, Community Development Commission, and Chamber of Commerce, as well as major businesses 0 or property owners in the corridor. : " At. the project klck-off meeting we will collaborate with staff to establish AP meeting : dates and a date for the first Open House. We will establish a communications plan . to keep the public Informed about the planning process and to encourage participation . In the public meetings. ~ Our worK plan identifies two public Open Houses and four Advisory panel meetings : during the 8 months required to produce the study. The format of these meetings D will vary based on the content to be addressed, but a variety of techniques will be : used to involve the public and draw out comments and useful input : , At the end of the planning process, there will be additional public presentations , to the Planning Commission and City Council. We will also meet with City staff at . regular intervals to track the progress of the worK and assure that the City's goals : for this effort are being met. : . u . D A LANDFORM . w u > . . . .,.....'.L........... 5 " . Task 2) Land Use Development Strategy . Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I g) Prepare presentation materials for a Community Open House, including sign-In, comment or survey sheets or other Input tools. h) Conduct a Community Open House for the purpose of gathering public input. This willlndude presentation of the initial mapping and SWOT analysis with an opportunity to provide input on priorities, visual survey, and Interviews about visions of the Mure of the study corridor. Step 2: Deflne a Vision for the Study Area (est 4 weeks) a) Define Goals and Objectives for the Corridor Study, Identifying needs and priorities, based on the community input. b) Prepare a Vision Statement and Guiding Planning Concepts. c) Document the Visioning Process. d) Meet with City staff (two teleconference meetings in addition to meetings Identified above) to review the work progress and deliverables for Task 1. Step 1: Conduct a market study/analysis of the study area (est 8 weeks) a) Maxfield Research (Maxfield) will provide research and consulting services to assess the market potential for development/redevelopment along the Highway 7 Corridor Study Area. The primary objective Is to provide the City with a market-based analysis to support future land uses changes and redevelopment opportunities along the corridor. b) This analysis will provide the following: 1) demand calculations for various real estate types; 2) types of businesses that would be attracted to and supported within the development along with appropriate building types, lease rates, and space requirements; 3) projected development timeframe; and 4) synergies among various types of development within the Study Area. c) Maxfield will participate in the kick-off meeting with staff, the study area Inventory, the AP Visioning meeting and the Community Open House to gather Information about constraints, unmet needs, market history, etc. d) Maxfield will review past studies, demographic and community information available from the City for the study area and the immediate region. The work approach will combine detailed market, economic and land use analysis with substantial Information and Input from field work, market Interviews and other planning and statistical work. e) Maxfield will draft a technical memo presenting the market study area, study methodology, and identifying potential market Influences on land uses, Including the potential for new development or redevelopment. f) Maxfield will present their work at a meeting with the Advisory Panel (AP), and answer questions about the study. They will make necessary revisions or corrections to the Draft and issue a Final Market Analysis Technical Memo. . " " " < . " " . . 0 " < . . . . w " - . u . 0 . . u > . w . 7 Step 2: Based on the Inventory, Identify Opportunity Sites (est 3 weeks) a) Based on the inventory and visioning tasks, identify potential locations and opportunities for infill, new development or redevelopment. b) Suggest potential uses and building types for these sites and review with A LANDFORM .1......"~LI.."..IIIIJl . Task 4) Presenting the Plan . Deliverables . Hutchinson I Highway 7 Corridor Study c) Lead an AP meeting to review the Infrastructure, Transportation and Connectivity recommendations and obtain feedback. d) Meet with City staff (teleconference meeting, in addition to the meetings Identified above) to review the work progress and deliverables for Task 3. Step 1: Document and Communicate the Plan (est 4-5 weeks) a) Develop a written and graphical document to communicate: the Vision for the study area; the Market Analysis; the recommendations for land uses, standards and zoning changes; the identified infrastructure and transportation plan Impacts; and the Intersection Redevelopment Concepts. b) Prepare the graphics needed to communicate the Plan, and format for presentation boards, for inclusion in the Study Report and for web-site posting. c) Provide a draft Report to City staff for preliminary review and comment prior to any publication of report or graphics. Step 2: Present the Vision and Plan to the Public (est 2 weeks) a) Prepare presentation materials for a Community Open House, Including sign-in, comment or survey sheets or other input tools. b) Conduct a Community Open House for the purpose of providing public Information, building consensus and providing an opportunity for public input This will Include a summary of the planning process and presentation of the Vision and Plan for the Study Corridor. c) Meet with City staff (teleconference meeting, in addition to those meetings identified above) to review dellverables for Task 4 and make revisions if needed prior to final presentations to public officlals. Step 3: Present Plan to Planning Commission and City Council (est 2 weeks) a) Provide staff with meeting package materials. b) Attend Planning Commission and City Council meetings and make a presentation including summary of the planning process and presentation of the Vision and Plan for the Study Corridor. 0 " " " < - . " . . w 0 " < . . . . . " - . u . 0 . . u > . . . 9 Provide progress dellverables as noted In the Tasks above, Including: . Draft Report (for staff and Planning Commission review) . Renderings and graphics in sketch/draft form prior to final drafts Provide Final Dellverables, Including: . Executive Summary . Final Report (PDF format) - 10 bound color copies - one unbound copy - digital copy (2-CD ROM) . Presentation Boards with Plan - graphically highlighting key elements A LANDFORM .11I.1I..".L1......... . Project Schedule Fees, Expenses and Billing Rates FIrm Bllllna Rates: ($Jhr) "cipaJ _socIate project Designer Designer III Designer II Designer I Project Planner Planner III Planner II Planner I Administrative or Tech Support $160 $120 $ 115 $80 $ 75 $65 $115 $80 $ 75 $65 $50 Reimbursable ExDenSIl8: Reprographics $0251sq.fl plotting on bond $7.00/sq fl color plotting $2.00/color print 8.5x11 $3.00/0001' prinl11 x17 _neage $0.4851mlle Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I The schedule which follows shows the tasks, meetings, milestones, and the timeframe anticlpated to complete the worK plan we have proposed. The hours estimated for each task are shown along with the billing rates to detennlne the fee. Our team will be checking in with City staff (by conference call) at regular intervals to be sure the project stays on schedule. One schedule concem we do have is that the worK Is concluding at the end of the year when scheduling public meetings can be challenging. The final public open house and presentations to the Planning Commission and City Councll may need to be moved Into January-February to avoid holiday season conflicts. Our wOrKplan matrix shows the tasks and the estimated staff hours required for this worK. The worK will be perfonned on an hourly, not to exceed price basis. We have estimated the task hours and meetings based on the Infonnation provided In the RFP and our past experience. The tasks are listed as In the worK program, and using standard hourly rates (listed below) we have generated fees for each task. We have also Included an estimate of reimbursable expenses. Summary of Proposed Fees and Expenses: EstImated Fees: $62,555 Task 1: Community VISion $16,910 Task 2: Land Use Strategy $ 21,985 hcIudes Marl<et Study $ 14,000 Task 3: Infrastructure AnaIysls $ 5,705 Task 4: The Plan $17,955 . " " " EstImated Expenses: $3,000 < - Mileage (staff on(y, not principals) $690 Reprographics Open Houses $1,600 " FITSt Draft 160 0 RnaI Draft ~ . . 0 $ 2,310 " < . . . If our plan does not meet your expectations or goals In tenns of scope, worK . program, process, schedule or fee, we will to work with you to make the ~ adjustments needed to tailor our proposal to meet your needs. ~ u . 0 . w . u > . . LANDFORM . ....IA'.LI..,..._IS 11 'f.. Hutchinson Highway 7 Corridor Study I . Attachments Team Member Resumes Relevant Experience - Project Sheets . LANDFORM 0 " - " " < - . " . - . . 0 " < . . . . . " - - . - u . - 0 - . . u - > . w . 1: . A ......................111 lember i October I i I i l I I , I I i , , i ask I: Establish Commun Vision Gather and Review Past Plans, Existing Comp Plan, Zoning, and Ordinances; up background maps, etc K1ck-off Meeting with Staff - wOrkplan, schedule AP mtgs, pUblic open house Conduct Physical-Visual Survey (walk, photo, map), Land Use Inventory Kick-off and VIsioning Meeting with AdvIsory Panel Prepare presentation of Analysis - physical, visual, land use, needa, Issues Prepare for Open House - algrHn sheets, comment-survay materials Conduct Public Open House wMsual and priorities aurvay, intervlaws Define Goals.()bjectlves, Needs and Pr10ritles Prepare VIsion Statemant - document Vlslon Process and Guiding Concepts Add'l Ravlew Meetings with Staff - teleconference? (2) Staff to Update COC, Planning Commission and City Council ask 2: Land Use Develo mant S Conduct Market Analysis - Focus on Feaslblllty/Strategles for Achieving Vision Based on Inventory - Identity Opportunltles for DevelopmentJRedavelopment Review Market Analysis and Opportunltles with Advisory Panel Organize Land Use Plan based on VIsion and Market Analysis . Develop recommendations for Design Guidelines, Improvement, Zoning changes Develop Concepts (2-3) for Hwy 7 and 15 Intersection redevelopment Review Redevelopment Concepts, DO Recommendations with Advisory Panal Review Meetings with Staff - teleconference? (2) Staff to Update COC, Planning Commission and City Council Taak 3: Evaluation of Trans rtatlon &: Utilities Infraatructure Identity Potentiallrnpacts on ExlstIng UtIlItles Identity Potential Transportallon Issues-Needs Make Recommendations for Incorporeting Policy, reo Hwy Access Rights Recommend Improvements: Safety, Traffic, Connect- PedestrianIBlke/Transij RevIew Transportation-Utllltles Recommendations with Advisory Panel Review Meetings with Staff - teleconference Staff to Update COC, Plannlng Commission and City Council 88k 4: PrHent the Plan Document and Communicate the VIsion and Recommendations Prepare Graphics and Maps (Boards, Plan Document and dlgltal Web-ready) Publish Draft with Graphics for Staff Preliminary Review Prepare materials for PublIc Open House Conduct Public Open House Make Plan Revisions (one round, text primarIy) Review Meetings with Staff - teleconference? (2) Present Plan to COClPlannlng Commission and City Council I . I +---.g 1 ..~ I I elAP-.g I I ... I I 1!t!L I I I JllfPubllc Open __ I '''~i ! 1 I r.. I I : 01 0 I I I i I I November! December ! I i $/HR $160 JenuI ". . .,. . . . .I.~ I .... r eAP.-Ing I I 1".1 , I II ..+.... . . I" · · ~ -, ! 1 ~ e AP.-tng I " I 1> ! I 1 2 2 1 1 $160 $115 $80 6 19 38 28 3 2 4 8 2 5 4 4 8 2 5 2 2 8 2 2 3 6 6 2 4 2 2 8 2 2 2 19 31 28 1 1 2 4 8 2 5 4 4 8 2 8 4 4 2 8 2 5 2 2 13 11 17 2 1 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 4 2 8 2 5 1 1 3 4 1 11 13 61 17 .i... i I 2 2 30 6 '''+, ! 2 2 + r Draft Plan I 2 2 . ~ - 2 2 I p.mu:, Open -- 3 3 5 5 , .... 8 4 p** 2 2 4 4 4 10 23 84 141 90 $49,555 . Resume Kendra Lindahl, AICP Principal Planner Professional History Education Registration . Experience Skills Affiliations . Ms. Lindahl is a Principal with Landform and is Planning Deparbnent Manager. Ms. Lindahl's experience with both public and private sector clients has provided her with an understanding of the big picture concepts and the expertise to ensure that the details are addressed. This GHent mix keeps her on the cutting edge of the private sector market. which allows her to be creative and successful In managing the Increasingly complex approval process. Ms. Lindahl brings a complete understanding of the review and permitting process and Is a valuable addition to your development team. In addition to solid writing skills, her strengths include effective presentation skills at public hearings and meetings. Master of Arts In Public Administration. Hamllne University Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota, Morris Americen Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Commercial I RetalVResidential . Andover Clocldower Commons, Andover, Minnesota . Hardwood Creek, L1no Lakes. Minnesota . Lakevllle Crossings, Lakevllle, Minnesota . StoneBay. Orono. Minnesota . Bridgewater Farms, Dundas, MN Public I Municipal . Landform,.ProJect Planner 2001-present . City of Hugo, Consulting Planner 2002-present . City of Corcoran, Consulting Planner 2003-2007 . City of Plymouth, Senior Planner 1996-2001 Prepare updates to city ordinances, codes and comprehensive plans Prepare Environmental Review documents Organize and facilitate neighborhood, task force and public meetings Respond effectively to public Inquiries about development projects and procedures Understand and interpret govemment regulations and procedures Americen Planning Association Minnesota Chapter of Americen Planning Association Sensible Land Use Coalition Economic Development Association of Minnesota ~ . . , . . " LANDFORM .1........'........,,, . Resume Carolyn L. Krall, AlA Principal Urban Designer Professional History Educatlon Registration Experience . Awards . Volunteer Ms. Krall leads the Urban Design Works Studio offering expanded design and planning services. She has earned a national reputation for leading edge design based on expertise that combines an understanding of the realities of development with an ability to work successfully with stakeholders on publlc-prlvate partnership projects. Her process establishes an overall planning framework promoting Informed decision-making and emphasizing implementation strategies. Ms. Krall has over 20 years of experience, InclUding working in Los Angeles, New York, and Minneapolis. She is on the adjunct faculty of the University of Minnesota College of Architectura and Landscepe Architecture. Bachelor Science, Architecture, California Polytechnic State University University of Maryland, Architecture Architecture - States of California, Arizona, Minnesota Certificate - National Council of Architectural Registration Boards Urban Redevelopment . . 66th & Portland Land Use Plan, Richfield, Minnesota . Downtown Design Guidelines, Hugo, Minnesota . Hardwood Creek Village, Lino Lakes, Minnesota . Big Lake Downtown Framework Plan, Big .Lake, Minnesota . Gateway Area Redevelopment Plan, Bumsville, Minnesota . Nlcollet Ave Development Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota . Norlh Lyndale Improvement & Redevelopment Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota . Robblnsdale Transit Oriented Development Framework, Robbinsdale, Minnesota . St Paul Gateway & west Seventh Street Urban DesIgn, St Paul, Minnesota . West Lake Street Mixed Use Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota Livable Communities Projects . Jeffers Waterfront, Prior Lake, Minnesota . Mound Harbor Renaissance Plan, Mound, Minnesota . Mississippi Crossings Redevelopment, Champlin, Minnesota . Hugo Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Hugo, Minnesota . Mendota Heights Town Center, Mandota Heights, Minnesota . The Grainbelt Brewery Area Redevelopment Plan, Minneapolis, Minnesota . Urban Village on the Midtown Greenway, Minneapolis, Minnesota . Village Plan, Lino Lakes Town Center Master Plan, Uno Lakes, Minnesota Citation for Excellence In Urban Design, American Institute of Architects, 1990 First Prize, Competition for the Westside New York Waterfront, New York, NY Commendation for Excellence, Jacob's Pillow Dance Theatre Plan, Lee, MA First Place, Railey Motors Design Competition, Long Island, NY AlA Search for Shelter Charrette Participant ~ w . , . w . LANDFORM .,........".......,. . . . Resume Jennifer L. Zierke, AICP Project Planner Ms. Zierke has had the opportunity to work for local and state governments for almost a decade. She has served as a Planner for several cities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, working with their Planning Commissions and City Council members on a number of residential, commercial and Industrial developments throughout this region. In addition to Minnesota, she has managed over 80 potential new commercial development projects throughout the United States with a national retailer. Jennifer's strong commitment to the well-being of society and community development clearly makes her an outstanding individual to work with. She Is a great addition to our team. Master of City Planning, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba Bachelor of Environmental Design University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Commercial/Retail . Best Buy Stores. Various Locations throughout the United States. . Current Lea VIsta. Orlando, Florida . The Foundry, South Strabane Township, Pennsylvania Public / Municipal . Zoning Ordinance Updates, Arden Hills, Long Lake and Orono, Minnesota" . Comprehensive Plan Updetes, Arden Hills and Long Lake. Minnesota. . MnDOT Access Request to Metro Area State Highways Facilitation. Minnesota. American Planning Association Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association w . ~ . . w . Professional History Education Registration Experience Affiliations Individual o.,..orlet lCO goInod at prior aosodotlon. LANDFORM .,..."'.U.......... . Resume ~ ~:'~; Ellen C. Stewart, RLA Designer III/Landscape Architect Professional History Education Registration . Experience Affiliations . If>. i{"::" "'. Ms. Stewart Is a registered Landscape Architect who joins Landform with over seven years of professional experience In Master Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture. Her project experlence ranges from parks master planning, development of design guidelines for municipalities, feasibility studies and site-specific design with a variety of clients, including both public and private sector. Ms. Stewart's primary responsibilities Include design, visualization, construction document preparation and project management. Ms. Stewart's Innovation and professional experience allow her to enhance and create environments that are functional and engaging, and tailored to the specific desires of the Client. Bachelor of Arts in PsychologylSoclology, Earlham College Masters of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota Licensed Landscape Architect, State of Minnesota #43677 Public / Institutional / Environmental Improvement . CSAH 8 Landscape Plan, Hugo, Minnesota . Novus Commercial Development, Eagan, Minnesota . Trinity School Campus, Eagan, Minnesota . Design Guidelines for Downtown Redevelopment, Centervllle, Minnesota" . Design Guidelines, Brooklyn Canter, Minnesota" . DNR Facility, Thief River Falls, Minnesota>> . Hubert H. Humphrey Terminal, Minneapolis, Minnesota" . City Parks Master Plan, Otsego, Minnesota" Corporate / Commercial/Campus / Residential . StoneBay Residential Development, Orono, Minnesota . Target Financial Services Headquarters, Minneapolis, Minnesota" . Guldant Ampitheater, Shoreview, Minnesota" . Herltage Park, Minneapolis, Minnesota" . Bearpath Country Club, Eden Prairie, Minnesota" . 314 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Minnesota" . American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) . President Elect Minnesota Chapter ASLA ~ LANDFORM w . , . w . Individual expelIenc8 gained at prior 88SOCIatIon. .'..U..~'.......'" . . Matt L. Mullins Senior Research Analyst Mr. Mullins joined Maxfield Research in 2003. Matt has over nine years of experience In real estate research and consulting. Matt specializes in assessing market demand for proposed and existing , real estate projects, conducting feasibility studies, and real estate marKet analysis. Matt is a highly motivated individual with experience in real estate consulting in both private and governmental sectors. He has conducted real estate marKet research on behalf of a wide variety of clients within the tollowing industries: housing, tourism, entertainment, gaming, lodging, government and financial institutions. Matt has completed redevelopment analyses for the Cities of Eagan, Rosemount, East Bethel, Hugo, and St. Paul where he analyzed the market potential for housing, office, retail, and other potential land uses and synergies. Matt authors Sitelines, a publication distributed by Maxfield Research emphasizing current trends in real estate development. Prior to joining Maxfield Research, Matt served as an Associate of Real Estate and Hospitality at KPMG LLP, where his responsibilities included performing real estate feasibility studies, economic impact analysis, financial analysis and financial modeling. Matt is a graduate of St. Cloud State University with a degree in Urban Studies and Geography. Matt is also a licensed Real Estate Broker in the State of Minnesota. Matt has completed the Mini-Masters of Real Estate Development and Mini-Masters of Real Estate Investment from the University of St. Thomas. Matt Is a member of the Urban Land Institute (ULI), Sensible Land Use Coalition (SLUC), National Association of Realtors (NAR), Minnesota Association of Realtors (MAR), and the Minneapolis Association of Realtors (MAAR). . . Mary C. Bujold, CRE PresidenVDirector of Research Mary joined the firm in 1984 shortly after Maxfield Research was established. Working initially with multifamily residential developments, Mary rapidly expanded her expertise to include financial institution studies and retail analyses. She is considered a market expert in the field of residential real estate and in market analysis for financial institutions. As Director of Research, she is responsible for overseeing and directing all research projects for the firm. In addition, she also heads project assignments for large-scale land use and downtown redevelopment studies for private developers and municipalities in the Twin Cities and in the Upper Midwest. Mary has worked with a wide array of public and private sector clients including institutional clients. She has worked directly with private developers and colleges and universities on their short-term and long-term student housing needs. A graduate of Marquette University in Business Administration, Mary also holds an M.B.A. Degree from the University of Minnesota. She is a licensed real estate broker in the State of Minnesota, and holds the Counselors of Real Estate (CRE) designation. I I :. I I I I I I I I I I I :. I I I I . . . . . . . . . . . ;\'laxlield Resl'arch Inc. (i)~ Hrsl A.H'. :\E. S~IVitl' 4011 ; :\hnnclIpnlls, M\ 5~413 I' l': (,12.33IUIO 12 -- - Maxfield Researcb Inc. is a full service real estate research company that provides comprehensive real estate market information. We have more than 20 years of experience in real estate market feasibility and consult on a variety of real estate related market issues. Our expertise enables us to offer solutions to the many challenges that developers and communities face. The relationship we develop with our clients is a critical component to the success of our research approach and serves as a source of direction and information during the development and planning stages. Our thorough knowledge of market trends in the real estate industry allows us to support our clients with valuable information that affects planning and development. We are able to determine viable solutions to the issues inherent in planning for groWth. We provide research for "smart" development and support the real estate research needs of a wide range of clients including: ~ Real Estate Developers ~ Marketing and Management Companies ~ City and County Government Agencies ~ Local and Regional Housing Authorities ~ Financiallnstitutions ~ Health Care Organizations ~ Investors and Lenders ~ Architects and Law Firms ~ Rental ~ Student Housing ~ Condominium ~ Financial Services Market Feasibility Studies for all types of development, with particular expertise in multifamily rentals, for-sale, multifamily, and senior housing. Market feasibility studies provide our clients with the information they need to determine the likelihood of successful implementation of the project they are evaluating. Market Assessments provide clients with relevant information to make site selection decisions, gain additional knowledge about current and evolving markets, or reposition existing properties to take advantage of changing markets or competitive conditions. I I I .e . I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I I . .. . . . Comprehensive Housing Studies help cities and/or counties anticipate housing needs, direct housing policies, and understand key issues/conditions in the housing market. Senior Housing Studies provide developers with an analysis of the factors involved in senior housing feasibility. We maintain a proprietary database tracking all of the determinants of senior housing's success. Affordable Housing Studies determine need that cities and counties can evaluate to determine development issues and allocation of funds. Commercial Analyses determine the market potential for the development of office and retail space, banks, recreational facilities, hospitality projects, and industrial space. Land Use Planning enables clients to redefme and reposition downtown areas, redevelop older neighborhoods, explore the highest and best uses of land and evaluate the capabilities of diverse land uses. Consulting Services are customized to meet individual client needs, and may include a variety of services tailored to the individual project. Financial Studies determine need for additional fmancial institutions in a market area by evaluating current fmancial/deposit data of a given market. Student Housing Studies identify current market conditions for student rental housing and determine the market for reallocating on-campus student housing. Rental Housing Studies determines the need for general occupancy in a multi-family housing concept. Condominium Studies provide developers with an analysis of potential feasibility and marketability of condominium projects in an area. Economic Impact Studies provide developers with an analysis of the local economy and the impact that local businesses have on the community. Big Lake Downtown Big Lake, Minnesota 2003 Completion C'llent: The City of Big Lake & Big Lake Design Team Sp.ecial Feat:ures: . Plan for new d:evelopment and redevelopment of the downtown area to reclaim historic character . Create pedestrian friendly streetscapes, improved traffic flow, access to businesses and linkages to the lakefrontfrom downtown · Preliminary desii'9ln guidelines to encourage consistant quality and d1esign concepts, for civic-public amenities . LANDFORM .. 1i.1" ,-ou. ..... I..! 1II % < ..,,' ~ x n:- o 3: III' :;: < c: :: 3t o =: :: o a W :.: .ot l.:) Nicollet Avenue Minneapolis, Minne,sota 20,02 Co,mple,tion Client: BKY Group Special Features: · Community workshops held with the three impacted neighborhoods · Reconnection of urban :fabric with 15th Street redesigned as lori,ng P'arkway . Dead-end streets reclaimed for civic sp,ace or future developm.ent . Identification of over 20 opportunity si'tesJ and concept development pl1ans for 13 sites . Solicited input and market interest with Developers Round Table and Open House '. iI ,.~ ~. . "OIl 110 . eI,,;s i \l~~:t:)rJl.IJ' ~. . . ';':.:" ~o-.n~'" it'll t .~.t t.l ~-1:t1 . fl1.u 0 :,L ~~,:-7~~:~"~- ~cw~_ J~lI' - N..- 26TH STREET CONNEcnN G EAT STREET TO TIiE NEW AVENUE OF A.crr5 Vl/ITH lOFTS, GJU.l.ER1ES AND THEATRE VENUES -;-... - t -~. \_. \1-!~ ~ ~ ...... -~-l ti ~;J I~'~ 'L -, l I~ ~~I'I . - ~~ ~. .~..~ fill j.-L ~~ r_ 1 i Nicollet Avenue which has undergone a revitalization as EAT STREETt has been the subject' of many planning s'tudies, but no major redevelopment projects. With proposals to reopen the Avenue at Lake Street becoming viable, the three neighborhoods to the. north hoped to attract and shape future devetopment Our team worked with the Nicollet Avenue Business Association to jdentffy over 20 opportunity sites for redevelopment. We then went on to develop market feasible development concepts for 13 specific sites. ~-:-- \ -~ . " \ \ . , -... \.. Ii; '.'. \ .\ '!ii; " - '- EXPJIJ'-4SJo." OF CURRENT SHERMAN PROPOSAL FOR A MIXED USE P'ROJECT\Ym-l HOUSING ABOVE RetAIL ON THE AVENUE. vvtTH FOR-SALE URBA.N ROWr-;oUSES PRO?OSAL ON THE SfQESTREETS % <:: ...J ~ :c: e- o 1V/~ ;> c LORING PARKWAY WITH NEW CIV1C SPACE ALONG NlCOLLET AVENUE rlOTEL AND ENTERTNNME NT USES ENViSIONED UJ :J z I..!J :;> <: I- UJ A ~ LANDFORM o u z ........ "!f...i*. ...., _";II; North Lyndale Avenue 1.----- .- .' ..',..... 'I' ..... i':"... ,..11'" " .. ,',' . ~ I , ..", . '" "~.: .~. . ~~ Medium OenSly Reslden~al . Hi'gh Density ResldentIm . NeiahJ;Jomood. . . '._ Commflltdal ..~ . tmlce I R~dential II!! Ughllndustria1 r!JOpenSpace The Lind~Bohanon N'eighborhood in North Minneapolis is home to the shortest commercial corridor in the city. We are working closely with the Lind-Bohanon Nleighborhood Association. business association and residents in the surrounding neIghborhoods to identify opportunities and strategiies for im,proving the. character, viability and future of this area. 3 POTENTfAl DEVELOPMENT SCENARI 0 SHOWING HOUSING ADDmo.~s. GREENSPACE I.MPROVEME~'TS ArolD MlXEO-USE 'NFILL OPPORTUNffiES A ~ LANDFORM Minneapolis, MN 2003 Completion Client: Lind-Bohanon Neighborhood AS.soclation Special Fea,tures: · Lead community me'etings and task force charettes, and facilitate comm,unication bet\veen organizations and stakeholders -~~ · Thorough analysis of land Use. - Zoning. Market Conditions and Physical Qualities to . determilne the best "fit" and mix of uses for the neighborhood · Develop phased strategies t.o improve and enhance the physical ch.aracter and economic vitaliITy of the corridor . Provi.de the neighbohood with a "road mapD to guide future actions and efforts in revitaliz.ing Lyndale Avenue Acting as facilitators for a series of community and business association meetings, we identified what the neighborhood feels are its shortcomings and what assets it has to build upon. Taking what we learned from these meetings and combining it with research of land us.e patterns, market viability, current gro\Yth patterns and connections to surrounding amenities. we identified short, middle and long term goats for the ne:ighbarhood. The process now turns to creating a marKeting strategy, connecting with po!tential developers and utilizing existing funds for immediate improvements. po- ::z ~ c.. C ...: CJI ~ o c ~ w ;::, z t,:,J :> < < o 7- )- ~ Hugo r"'f . !I' ..~~ HUGO STUOY AREA ~~>>_:'~~ '~.,':J' r~!~~~-j~~=~ ~:.iC.,_;,..,~.,::..T,:,~,~..', -~.tIii "~",,;. .....,." 1: ~~:~~l,:.;l f:-; .,.~.1,.,."WI':~~~~~ ~t;';~C~~ ,- .;.'. '. ,~j . E C .' ~I';:' ~\~I . ~.~\:. _l~~-'.:JIfrI~ ~.~{ ?-- · " _.!~ ,ba, I . i ; ~~~- -. I' " ( _~..J ~ _ - - - ~ - _j t - . I " - _r~ g . lIY ~ -R I2l _ - ~ . 0." ~ ~- ~ :? ;. -:.~ .;~'.1 - , ;~I D~ ~ ~" C1 ~ '.,' ". , n ~ = .~. ~.' ,t: ~- .- - ',.'_.,'{ .~;:j".. ,~~ ~ ! ~ ~,r"t -. [:l ." """, !!.' '-:-~ i - ~~:;.' =q::'l, 0 ?,C: ~ oJ " .. ,,'u ,,~~I_= [lDL-b5!' l.~ I..' ~ _ " .::l~. _<1 ~c. ~ '_ c; c ",. , _ . ' .~~~4e~~1~,~~ I i- ,- -1 ~~",. .,.~,.'. .,; I, '-- '".' ;~~ ':1 ' ! ,,'\ ~~~, - i ~~'~~i:a__ "i\ ~. .. .' ,.____ ' , ~\'V ......T~I'li~-..- ~~HJ~~~~ '~i( :.: ~:x~'v~~ .~~~~.t~--- '-'1IJj~t~1~: , - .' J.-:' iWAW" ~~ ie ' ""., .: ~~ ,~~ ~_. . -,'.. a\\'~:-'~~~~~-~ ~~: ~ 6'W-~\1!~' . r'-~'~~ r' I , '1 r~~ ''{~I~ - , ~;: 'J~~~i.~., ~~.; .":.!~_'~ " t~-l ~~~~~--~~J'- ;:"; r'~ i/,':II ~-~:~~=. ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ "; j . I: II ~ \I - . . I,,:::: ::-: -:.. -~ i _ , . t' ! -.-r,~ "",,1 ~,~ II1II r +... ~_.A. IJ 1 > - 11 '. -, j - "'~~-- :" JJ i ... c;;; . -1 ~. '-' :;'j! ~ !~~ .~; I .. '-~-:I~ ,Iii J~C) L'C= ~ ~~'Ys-:_~" A ~ LANDFORM .1...&,......III.~....I. Hugo, Minnesota 2004 Completion Cli!ent: The City of Hugo Special Features: · Plan for the redevelopment of the downtown area with a new County Road 8aUgnment tha.t will change the traffic flow through Hugo · Determine retaU and commercial opportunities to attract new businesses to downtown . Create trail IinkagesJ pede'strian frIendly streetscapes 1 improve:d traffic flow, access to existing businesses and linkages to the lakefront from downtown This project is the recipient of a Livable Communities Opp,ortunity Grant T>>E FEEOMlLt IS A lOCAl HSTORJC lANDMARK z < 2 ~ o t- Z 3: o c LOCATED AT THE OPPOSITE ENO OF THE STUDY CORRIDOR FROM CITY HALL. THE CHURCH HELPS BALANCE THE PLACEMENT OF CIVIC uses. o ~ ::;J :% City of Corcoran Corcora,n, Mininesota 2003 Completion Client: Th.e City of Corcoran Special Features: . The Downtown and Area ptans were created as part of the implementation 'tools prescribed by the City's Comprehensi:ve Plan. · Th.e Area Plans directglrowth while preserving natural re,sources and Corcoran's rural character. "T ;'- . The Downtown Plan focuses on a walkable town center which includes a mixture of commercial, residential an civic. uses. . · r c./ .:.r:-' -.: 1 · The Design ,Guidelines provide both 'general Goncepts and specific reco.mmendations for new development. NORT"riEAST D1STRlCl' . III I SOUTt.IEAST OlS"fR~CT "'..U 44ir'l~r -a.. I I DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN r; .. _.- (-. It", { ~ t -1. ~r ~ >> L ~ \ .0;:: W 0::: od; :z < A.. W/a LANDFORM' West Seventh Str~~~:~F~ep~v~lppm~nt 'c.t.~ ~ ~ .' -,:- - .--.-" -... - - --. . ~ ' St Paul, Minnesota 2006 St.udy Completed Client: Wingfield Corporation Special Features: -Created a new vision for redeve,lopment o.n the south side of West Seventh Avenue · Planned uses included higher- density residential, ground-..floor commercial, senior housing and a hotel with waterpark . Illustrated potentia,1 for integrating mixed-use and higher...density residential wtthexisting storefronts to support Jively retail and entertainment in this historlca:1 distri ct J-. :z IoU <2 o ...t III :> c:I o I:;! E:: ... CI ~ IX ... m ~ ... :: UI :> UI U) A LANDFORM ~ ~ UJ :.t ........".L1.. 'M....U Mississippi Crossings GATEiNA'Y AREA A mil LANDFORM .UUIIU..-OU" ..,..... Champlin, Minnesota 2007 Estimated Completion Client: SpringPoln,t,e Developme.nt Sp,ecial Features: · ,Downtown Redevelopment Plan features mixed-use housi:ng and -commercial options for revitalizing the historic center of Champlin . New marina and traUs improve public areas to the Miss issippi River · h:nplementation Plan allows for phased redevelopm,ent as roadway and otherimprovem,ents proceed Received a Livable Communities Opportunity grant for planning services G) o :z !D2 ., o c: u It. El;. Ul v.J V) :z <"/~'i~kin Riverside It tI ._~.' .. iii ist..9r~~c t~totneh a d.~ / Rf"JER OVERlOOK ..... ~ (;" .g. -'P ;I' t... ~ "'P Tnis park merges Anoka's cul\ural and geological history [0 highlight i'lS connection to the Rum River. By establishing a pathway system which moves visitors through a cultural and geologica:1 timefine, the park provides a cf:ear understanding . its unique toea lion in a riparian environment Anoka, Minnesota 2003 Completion Client: City of Anoka Special Feat;ures: . Historical community park along Rum River regional trail . Design highlights events in AnokaJs history as well as gieolo,gic change over time . Plantings re'flecting s:e,asonal interest · Picnic structures for large gath.erings as well as smaller venues . Improved pedestrian connections to surroundin:9 communityluses . Designed and located interpretive signage ..I I ~ .- 1. CO~MUN[T'Y CELE8RATfON .~'''''-i(,~ . "'.'" -- ,,' '\.-":1 ~... " .--._~--...."......-.~~ 110 fI" ..... -.. ....... <Ill '!,It ~~A~ .. ,","-.,jII ~~. ; '''-,;'';':h ~ ~~~;'!!~ ._~~ .1 ::t~.~., . '. . -.~:.~ ~:' 1:\' .~.:~l <# . . -- - ~.iiI \, :~';".'... .,t."-.. ..' ......,..4. .m......., rBi.... . ...-;ii. .iII\.~,< · " ~,..r:~ .... ,/ .,/"- . '\ .. '..'. \,~ ~'l~. · . .J.". ": '~,~\c~p; . ~~M~~t, '. ';J~:l~~~ ."~-~~~ '4l ~; L-~I. \~~.'JO'.'~. &' . - .. I _ ~. · 'A""" - fl ~ w o 4{ :i o c:: ~ u c: o PERSEVERANCE CiRClE c:) I River Square A wnI LANDFORM .Ct.Ii&..~" .,...... An1oka, Minnesota 2005 Completion Client: TOLD Deve.lopment Special Features: · Master planning for a mixed-use redevelopment to expand downtown Anoka to the north along the Mississi.ppi River . . Proposed Plans include ground lev,al retail with h,ousing above, new senior housing and a connection to the historic Feed Mill north of downtown . The redevelopment connects d,owntown to the river. creating active pedestrian space and enhancing the river IS park area ..., . ~ .... ~- THE H1STORlC FeeD MILL A VACANT lOT NORTH OF VAN BuREN STREET ~ o The Village at MeDpqta Yi~eig'hts SJTE PLAN Mendota Heights, Minnesota 2004 Completion Client: City of Mendota Heights Special Features: . Redevelopment of 21 acres on the site of the original histori'c Mendata Town Hall . Trail system connects to e,xistingBig Rivers Regional Trail and Mississippi R,iver . Mix of Jifecycle housing, including townhomes, condominiums and senior units . Formal and inform,al green space woven throughout site includ'in'g trails, w,etland gardens and interpretive ellements . Mixed-use village! with. retail s'erviceand other space providing daily conveniences and specialty uses · \1endota Heights Town Center, at Dodd Road and H:ighway 110, ,; set on the site of the original historic Mendola Town Halt The Town Center wiH provide 8 civic place for the citizens of Mendota Heights to caU their own. The VUJage is a mix of retail, office alnd residential usesJ centered around a new Town Square. A winding viUage green finks the Town Square shopping area with the three new neighborhoo.ds. offering a wide rang1e of Ufe-cycle housing. Trails through the s'ite connect' cY9Iists and pedestrians to local and regjona~ traUs. . - --......., -- .... .\.- ~ , · ~:. .-;:. .... _ ~ '. , , .~. ...i "1 . ./ c....... - ~~~....~';; "'>f!~~:,'~- .~~ . .~- ... .~~.....- j;........ r , ~. -. . .:"~,~. ..... 1.~ ...... . .. ....".. A LANDFORM 1111........... I 11'111".':11 :r u w :L < t- o C :it W t- < lit CI c:: ...J SiRO's ,EYE PE~SPECTIVE RENDER1NG > % ... West Broadway B~r71Stati()r. ~~$a Plan Minneapolis., Minnesota 2006 Study Completed Client: Hennepin County Special Features: · Created a new v,ision fo'r transit~ oriented deve',lopment at the intersection o,f West Broa.dway and Penn Avenues - · Integrated stations and pedestrian connections to the Bottineau Boulevard Corridor BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) · Provided reco:mmendations f,or immediate improvements and a pJan for long-termgroiwth for this unique West Broadway ne:ighborhood . lead s,eries of Community Workshops to create a Masterpla.n and Design Guidelines for future development · Illustrated potential for renovating existing storefronts to support lively retail and entertainment us,es · Planned for centra,fJ shared parkway which would support transit, retaU and future uses ~~-- ~ - ! - -.'"""""'-1 ,'".,i; . ",-- - :....:... l~.. )- ~.""'-: "'-y\)j! 'iI. ~\ . - -. u -~... ~ - '~-":'--~ ":'~- Q.~ A LANDFORM .~llI.U"'U.t.+ "...".11: )... < ~ c <: o p -,- ~ TRANSIT~ORIENTEO OEVELOPMENT AT PENN AVENUE BRT STATION en ... ~ UJ 3: :t <: ..l c.. < ~ cz: < % o I- 0(; ~ ~ .... cr: *= " . . . 7& )iR~"" .l; ~ · Public Works Group ENGINEERING OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE WATER & WASTEWATER , Organization .. Englneenng . Devek~ment RevleYo . PfojoectEngin88rlig . Asset infonmtiolllT\.3l"l.398menl Kent Emer,CI:'I Er>;Jroor '" Operations & Malrrteoaoce JohnOoon, PLtlWksMg, . Streels&AJle\'3 .,l.jrpxt . Cemeler,' . W3terOlstrli;l(JtIonS.,."lern . Wastewater/$tormwaler Colloction S)'Stem . Central Garage . HATSFadlity .. Water & Wastewater . WaIJ2rTrealmeri\Plar~ . '1V<lSlewaterTrootmelll Facil~y R<lro:ly [leV/las, wrww MJr ~,_.'_C"~ . Recent Accomplishments "OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE . Neighborhood maintenance concept . Snow removal study . Cooperative SrlQW removal with Creekside . Staffing changes -1 51 in a string of expected retirements . Equipment improvements ~.~,.. Department Reorganization .. In November, John Rodeberg, Dir. of Public Works, left the City's employ. .. SignifICant amount of exper~ce . Contacts throughout the industry .. Reorganization using existing staff . City Engineer . Public Works Manager + additional operator . WaterNVastewater Manager . use of APWA P,Jb!ic Weds Managemel1t Practices ManLJaI ~........,. Recent Accomplishments " ENGINEERING >> Limited Staff - Chad Muchow's tour in Iraq was extended . Improvement in Specifications/Project Documents . Water Treatment Plant improvements . Planning wastewater treatment facility improvements ~ Recent Accomplishments "WATER & WASTEWATER . Meeting pennitted requirements . Construction of Water Treatment Plant . Planning wastewater treatment plant improvements under tight timeline. . Securing low interest loans and grant funding for treatment plant improvements /?J(Z) 1 , . . . Recent Projects .. Phase I ofTrunk Highway 7122 Reconstruction/Improvements .. Water. wastewater tltilities .. Street lighting .. Light traffic improvements t. Denver Ave SE .. East of TH 15 South ... Neighborhood Maintenance .. Ta.rgeted main1enaflCe in Shady Ridge nSlghbort1Ood. Summary " ~es~lt statem,ents from recent public input highlight Public Works' involvement in the community .. Environment .. Mobility .. Healthy Citizens ... "!Va do this by attempting to continually Improv~ our plan~ing, managing, building, prot~ting,. ~peratlng and maintaining of quality facllltles and infrastructure. Proposed Projects ~ Phase II of Trunk Highway 7/22 Reconstruction/Improvements . Waler, wastev.tater, IiQhbng, ligJltraffic " Montana St NW . Link Les Kouba PI<:wi to Tl-l 7/22 '" School Rd Underpass . Coordinate witr TH Un. i~ro\iements . Lighl traffic irrproverrent "" NE Trunk Storm Sewer . Con(lnue storm sewer if11)fovements .. Crow River Dam . Repjacement .. Neighborhood Maintenance . Targeted mainlenance in 51. Anasta~a neighborhood 2 . . . ....- If - . R55APPYRV CSV20000VO CITY OF HUTCHINSON . By Check Number AP Payment Reqister with Voids Check Dates 0410412007 - Ck Date GL Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount 0410412007 0410412007 PK 141881 . 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 184.71 0410412007 04104/2007 PK 141882 109203 AWWA-MINNESOTA SECTION 180.00 04/0412007 04/04/2007 PK 141883 121036 CNH CAPITAL AMERICA LLC 41,518.92 04/0412007 04/0412007 PK 141884 101872 H.R.LAPR 428.67 04/0412007 04/04/2007 PK 141885 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 791.18 04/04/2007 04/04/2007 PK 141886 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4,216.92 04/04/2007 04/0412007 PK 141887 101876 ING LIFE & ANN CO. 1,420.00 04104/2007 0410412007 PK 141888 124036 KALENBERG ENTERPRISE 2,190.26 0410412007 0410412007 PK 141889 105154 KILIAN, ERIC 30.00 04/0412007 0410412007 PK 141890 121386 KRISTICO, INC 425.00 04/04/2007 04/04/2007 PK 141891 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT AOMINISTRi 350.00 0410412007 04/0412007 PK 141892 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 299.00 04/0412007 04/04/2007 PK 141893 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYME~ 271. 34 04/0412007 04/04/2007 PK 141894 120800 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL 400.00 04/0412007 04/04/2007 PK 141895 101875 ORCHARO TRUST COMPANY, LLC 300.00 04/0412007 0410412007 PK 141896 123569 OSTLUND SUPPLY 1,100.00 04/04/2007 04104/2007 PK 141897 102096 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 04104/2007 0410412007 PK 141898 121176 REINER ENTERPRISES, INC 7.981.27 0410412007 04104/2007 PK 141899 104047 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE 336.54 0410412007 04104/2007 PK 141900 104047 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE 391.92 04104/2007 0410412007 PK 141901 104047 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE 336.54 0410412007 04/0412007 PK 141902 120231 THORSON TRUCKING 400.00 0410412007 04/04/2007 PK 141903 124019 USPS 234.00 63.816.27 Account Num # 63,816.27 . . . R55APPYRV ICSV20000VO CITY OF HUTCHINSON By Check Number AP Payment Reaister with Voids Check Dates 0411012007 - Ck Dale Gl Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount 04110/2007 04/10f2007 PK 141904 . 102759 AARP 360 .00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141905 102126 ACE HARDWARE 61.51 04/1 012007 04/10/2007 PK 141906 104995 ADAMEK, JUNE 48.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141907 122030 ALPHA WIRELESS 53.25 04/1012007 04110/2007 PK 141908 102430 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL 319.28 04/10/2007 04f10/2007 PK 141909 105204 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE INC 67.90 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141910 102260 ASHBROOK SIMON HARTLEY OPERAT 805.78 04f1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141911 103032 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 11.01 0411012007 04/1012007 PK 141912 104077 B & C PLBG & HTG INC 24.92 04110/2007 0411012007 PK 141913 102870 BAERTSCHI. PAUL 115.00 04/10/2007 04110/2007 PK 141914 123535 BAKKE, JEREMY 112.99 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141915 121462 BARN YARD, THE 2.078.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141916 102367 BELLBOY CORP 368.74 04110/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141917 105044 BERRY. DAWN 2.000.00 04110/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141918 120738 BERTELSON'S 507.30 0411012007 04/1012007 PK 141919 124194 BFG SUPPLY COMPANY 4,250.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141920 122927 BOB AHLGREN ELECTRIC, INC. 4,250.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141921 123404 BOWERS, REBECCA 23.28 04/1 0/2007 04/1012007 PK 141922 102752 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP 2,473.50 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141923 121089 BUSHMAN.RAQUEL 194.86 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141924 102136 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS 1.180.55 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 141925 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 30.441.35 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141926 104512 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLlE 289.77 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141927 102092 CARR FLOWERS 31.95 04110/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141928 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 78.33 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141929 105423 CINDY'S HOUSE OF FLORAL DESIGN 82.54 04f10/2007 0411012007 PK 141930 102863 CITY ENGINEERS ASSC OF MINNESO 60.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141931 124199 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 8.400.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141932 102741 CO BORN'S INCORPORATED 1.410.05 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141933 111636 COFFEE COMPANY, THE 41.80 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141934 121268 COOPER, BECCA 47.53 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141935 102484 CORPORATE EXPRESS 3,918.58 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141936 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 74.12 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141937 102220 CROW RIVER PRESS INC . 482.31 04/1012007 0411012007 PK 141938 122796 DASSEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 100.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141939 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1.872.30 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141940 102698 DEVRIES. RANDY 90.02 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141941 102710 DOMINO'S PIZZA 89.42 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141942 104084 DONOHUE & ASSOC 3.825.42 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 141943 102776 DORSEY & WHITNEY 4,760.70 04110/2007 04/1012007 PK 141944 102450 DOSTAL ELECTRONIC'S CENTER 1,193,64 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141945 102275 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 560.18 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141946 113181 DROP-N-GO SHIPPING. INC 34.83 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141947 102847 DYNA SYSTEMS 427.59 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141948 104415 EARTH TECH 53,472.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141949 102726 ECOLAB PEST ELlM 118.22 04/1 012007 04/10/2007 PK 141950 102354 ECONO FOODS . 236.59 04/10/2007 04110/2007 PK 141951 102356 ELECTRO WATCHMAN 1,365.54 Void Amou 04110/2007 04f10/2007 PK 141952 124196 ELLENSON, RYAN 20.00 04110/2007 04/1012007 PK 141953 121232 ENTER. HOLLY 198.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141954 111010 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 133.07 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141955 110034 EXTREME BEVERAGE 270.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141956 105671 FARLEY, JENNIFER 736.25 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141957 104137 FASTENAL COMPANY 271.03 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141958 122555 FIRE SAFETY USA, INC 400.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141959 102094 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 271.17 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 141960 121436 FOSTER'S INC. 1,760.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141961 120264 GAVIN, OLSON & WINTERS. L TO 3,090.00 04/10/2007 04f1012oo7 PK 141962 103340 GEB ELECTRICAL INC 365.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141963 103029 GLENCOE ENTERPRISE 64.00 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141964 123363 GMS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES INC 12.68 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141965 122907 GRIDOR CONSTRUCTION 162.976.00 0411012007 04/1012007 PK 141966 101874 GRIGGS & COOPER & CO . . 7,232.80 04110/2007 04/10f2oo7 PK 141967 108668 GRUFRUFF DESIGN 1,653.10 O4f10/2007 04/10f2oo7 PK 141968 102528 HAGER JEWELRY INC. 33.19 04/10/2007 04/10f2D07 PK 141969 102730 HAll-BRITE INC 181.67 04/10/2007 04/10f2007 PK 141970 102451 HANSEN DlST OF SLEEPY EYE 442.00 04/10/2007 04/10f2007 PK 141971 102089 HANSEN GRAVEL 1,422.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141972 104363 HAUGEN, JIM 35.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141973 103240 HEMMAH, KATHY 21.56 04/10/2007 04110/2007 PK 141974 102701 HENRY'S WATERWORKS INC 653.06 04I10f2007 04/10/2007 PK 141975 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CAREfHUTCHINSON 658.63 04/10f2007 04I101ZOO7 PK 141976 105080 HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER 89.54 04/10f2007 04/1012007 PK 141977 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 754.76 0411012007 04/10/2007 PK 141978 111066 HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MINNESOTA 66.82 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141979 117918 HUTCH AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 85.20 04110/2007 04/1012007 PK 141980 102544 HUTCH CAFE 103.95 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141981 102139 HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF CO 50.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141982 123174 HUTCHINSON CHAMBER OF COMMER 69.00 04/10/2007 04/1 0/2007 PK 141983 102530 HUTCHINSON CO-OP 24,330.99 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141964 102537 HUTCHINSON LEADER 8.122.81 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141985 102540 HUTCHINSON PLUMBING & HEATING 1,796.00 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141986 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO 8.440.55 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141987 102543 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE 23.83 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141988 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 200,000.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141989 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 7,01216 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141990 103246 HUTCHI NSON, CITY OF 11,181.31 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141991 105160 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 15,597.68 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141992 119359 INTERSTATE POWER COMPANIES. I 106.95 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141993 102062 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 260.33 04f10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141994 115855 JEFF MEEHAN SALES INC. 354.64 ~/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 141995 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 1778 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 141996 119782 JESCO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES. INC 299.45 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141997 101938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 13.894.72 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 141998 102555 JUUL CONTRACTING CO 6.938.92 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 141999 124036 KALENBERG ENTERPRISE 1.930.51 04110/2007 04/1012007 PK 142000 122213 KDT EXPRESS, INC. 450.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142001 102466 KKLN 1,064.00 04/1012007 04/101Z007 PK 142002 105697 KQIC-Q102 396.25 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142003 121386 KRISTICO, INC 1,125.00 . . . t . . 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142004 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO 133.54 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142005 1019M LARSON, Q(J~i<JTIN 118.19 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142006 102563 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 20.00 04/1 012007 04/101'2007 PK 142007 122766 L1EPKES WALLCOVERING 1,169.00 04110/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142008 102222 LIQUOR HUTCH 39.66 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142009 124177 LITTLE COUNTRY STORE 1,169.00 04/10/2007 O4ItOI2001 PK 142010 104499 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES 69.63 04/1012007 D4/10/2oo7 PK 142011 101984 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 27,602.90 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142012 102564 LOGIS 26,577.35 04/1012007 0411012007 PK 142013 102145 M-R SIGN 700.93 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142014 124176 MAHER. MIKE 40.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142015 104533 MCCORMICK'S FAMILY RESTAURANT 101.12 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142016 124190 MCLEOD COUNTY AGRICULTURAL AS 150.00 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142017 116072 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 396.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142018 121018 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 175.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142019 123024 MEHR. BRIAN 790 .27 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142020 124197 MEIER SALES AND ENGINEERING, I 365.30 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142021 112400 ME NARDS - HUTCHINSON 1,740.56 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142022 123014 MICRO BIOLOGICS, INC 269.08 04/10/2007 04110/2007 PK 142023 122975 MID AMERICAN SPECIALTIES 508.55 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142024 107547 MIES. MIKE 64.02 04110/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142025 102575 MINI BIFF 73.20 04/1012007 04/10/1007 PK 142026 114439 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY ASS 60.71 04/1012DO? 04/10/2007 PK 142027 101947 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR & INDU 795.16 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 142026 102705 MINNESOTA ICE ARENA MANAGERS A 350.00 04/1 D/200? 04/10/2007 PK 142029 104262 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A 2,075.44 04/10/ZOO? 04/10/2007 PK 142030 104262 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A 53.25 04/1 D/200? D4f1D12007 PK 142031 120600 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL 2,250.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142032 113962 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 900.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142033 106381 MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 390.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142034 102563 '"VOID VOID VOID VOID VOID" 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142035 102563 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB 7.641.75 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142036 102840 MN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE 409.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142037 122279 MORAN USA, LLC 308.60 04/10/2007 04110/2007 PK 142038 118643 NAPA AUTO PARTS 126.11 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142039 123717 NORDPAL CORP. 10,475.16 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142040 103014 NORTHERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS 327.61 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142041 102591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 386.30 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142042 119452 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP 97.63 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142043 123402 O'FALLON, SUSAN 41.02 04110/2007 04/1012007 PK 142044 122214 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 43.74 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142045 119358 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 149.63 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142046 123775 OLDCASTLE LAWN & GARDEN SOUTH 3.926.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142047 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 7.46 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142048 103773 OLSON. JOHN 115.00 0411012007 04/10/2007 PK 142049 106859 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC 59.40 0411012007 04/10/2007 PK 142050 101932 PELLlNEN LAND SURVEYING 830.00 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 142051 101853 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 6,443.30 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142052 101903 POPP. JIM 235.08 04/1012007 04110/2007 PK 142053 124189 POST BOARD 90.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142054 102445 POSTMASTER 1,280.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142055 102493 PREMIER TECH PACKAGING 1,985.60 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142056 114436 PRINCE CORP 1.250.00 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142057 112264 PRO PRODUCTS LLC 279.62 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142058 103221 PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUBLlCATI 299.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142059 102598 QUADE ELECTRIC 56.28 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142060 102052 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. 2,397.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142061 117434 R & J TOURS, INC. 714.16 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142062 102604 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 113.80 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142063 102218 RASKE BLDG SYSTEMS 2,323.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142064 102384 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 10,678.01 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142065 102432 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 421.47 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142066 121608 ROLFE. DELAINE 1.500.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142067 105193 RUNKE, JOLEEN 25.23 04/1012007 0411012007 PK 142068 102600 RUTZ PLUMBING & HEATING 30.50 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142069 120907 SAL TMAN llC 242.29 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142070 102436 SARA lEE COFFEE & TEA 127.81 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142071 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 42.85 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142072 101940 SCHNOBRICH, MARK 60.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142073 120700 SCHOOL DIST # 423 10,673.82 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142074 101892 SEH 1,666.22 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142075 123333 SEIFERT. RANDY 20.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142076 110997 SELLNER, L YNNAE 1,227.91 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142077 115821 SEPPEL T, MilES 228.63 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142078 102637 SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY 154.96 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142079 102719 SHAW, KAREN 80.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142080 102609 SHOPKO 114.48 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142081 124198 SHOTGUN NEWS 18.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142082 119913 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CO 8,179.55 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142083 102611 SORENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS 183.35 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142084 102857 SOUTHWEST CHAPTER MSPE 50.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142085 103949 ST PAUL, CITY OF 100.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142086 102612 STANDARO PRINTING 44.73 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142087 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 32.37 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142088 121713 STATE OF MINNESOTA 390.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142089 118862 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT 694.48 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142090 102617 STREICHERS 1.494.87 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142091 104854 STURGES, STEVE 3,349.65 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142092 102659 TEK MECHANICAL 173.97 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142093 101843 TKDA 3.800.00 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142094 119159 TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION 16.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142095 120205 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY APPAREL 72.97 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142096 102458 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 417.36 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142097 102619 TWO WAY COMM INC 536.82 04/1012007 04/1012007 PK 142098 123085 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST 112.32 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142099 102627 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 180.00 04/1012007 04110/2007 PK 142100 119701 UNUM LIFE INS COMPANY OF AMERI 3,303.96 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142101 105003 US COMPOSTING COUNCil 250.00 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142102 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 323.19 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142103 124019 USPS 1,855.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142104 101974 VIKING BEER 3,154.10 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142105 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 21.13 04/1012007 04/10/2007 PK 142106 102630 VIKING SIGNS 85.20 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142107 104306 VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL 10.857.49 J~ . . . . . . 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142108 102037 WALL STREET JOURNAL 298.00 04/10/2007 0411012007 PK 142109 1051~2 WASTE MANAG~M~NT 104.316.69 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142110 122357 WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE 9,081.03 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142111 120852 WASTE MANAGEMENT-TC WEST 1,117.53 04/10/2007 04/10/'lOO7 PK 142112 101913 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED 102.00 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142113 102639 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR 531.46 04/10/2007 04/10/2007 PK 142114 102960 WICHTERMAN, KEN 100.00 0411012007 04/10/2007 PK 142115 102452 WINE MERCHANTS INC 965.50 04/10/2007 04/1012007 PK 142116 102632 XEROX CORP 799.21 916.159.85 Account Num # 916,159.85 . PAYROLL DATE: Period Ending Date: March 30, 2007 March 24, 2007 .& FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY - ELECTRONIC TRANSFER . TO STATE AND IRS DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE AMOU NT ACCT# NAME DESCRIPTION $24,353.81 9995.2034 WITH. TAX Employee Contribution - Federal Tax ACCOUNT 9995.2240 Employee Contribution - Soc. Security $12,478.99 $3,580.14 9995.2242 Employee Contribution - Medicare $40,412.94 Sub-Total- Employee Contribution $12,478.99 9995.2240 Employer Contribution - Social Security $3,580.14 9995.2242 Employer Contribution - Medicare Per Journal Entries Difference Fica $ 24,957.98 $16,059.13 Sub-Total- Employer Contribution Medicare $ 7,160.28 Withholding $ 24,353.81 $56,472.07 Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account Total $ 56,472.07 $0.00 e,333.97 9995.2035 MN DEPT OF REVENUE State Tax $ 10,333.97 $0.00 $15,271.26 9995.2241 PERA Employee Contribution - Pension Plan $18,288.27 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan $33,559.53 Sub-Total- PERA $15.86 9995.2243 PERA-DCP Employee Contribution - Pension Plan $15.86 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan Pera $ 33,575.39 $31.72 Sub - Total - DCP DCP $ 15.86 $33,591.25 GRAND TOTAL - PERA Total $ 33,591.25 $0.00 Finance Director Approval .