cp06-24-25ISM
HUTCHINSON
A CITY ON PURPOSE.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MCLEOD COUNTY
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF A SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
Tuesday. June 24, 2025
4:00 p.m.
Council Chambers — Hutchinson City Center
Notice is hereby given that the Hutchinson City Council has called a special workshop meeting
for Tuesday, June 24, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Hutchinson City Center,
111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, Minnesota for the following purpose:
■ REVIEW CITY CENTER SPACE NEEDS STUDY REPORT
Matthew tau i, City Admit r
DATED: June 20, 2025
POSTED: City Center
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, DUNE 24, 2025
CITY CENTER — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by city staff, committees and boards. Many
decisions regarding agenda items are based upon this information as well as: Citypolicy andpractices, inputfrom constituents,
and other questions or information that has not yet been presented or discussed regarding an agenda item)
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M.
(a) Approve the Council agenda and any agenda additions and/or corrections
2. INVOCATION — Church of Latter Day Saints
(The invocation is a voluntary expression of the private citizen, to and for the City Council, and is not intended to ailiate the
City Council with, or express the City Council's preference for, any religiouslspiritual organization. The views or beliefs
expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Council or staff)
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. RECOGNITION OF GIFTS, DONATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE TO THE CITY
(a) Resolution No. 15878 — Resolution Accepting $1500.00 Donation from Hutchinson Rotary
Foundation to the Parks Department for Future Playground Expenses
PUBLIC COMMENTS
(This is an opportunity or members (?f the public to address the City Council. If the topic you would like to discuss is on the
agenda, please ask the Mayor ifhe will be acceptingpublic comments during the agenda item ifnot apublic hearing. Ifyou have
a question, concern or comment, please ask to be recognized by the mayor — state your name and address for the record. Please
keep comments under 5 minutes. Individuals wishing to speakfor more than five minutes should ask to be included on the agenda
in advance of the meeting. All comments are appreciated, but please refrain from personal or derogatory attacks on individuals)
5. CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(a) Regular Meeting of June 10, 2025
CONSENT AGENDA
(The items iste or consi eration will be enacted by one motion unless the Mayor, a member of the City Council or
a city staff member requests an item to be removed. Traditionally items are not discussed)
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA I
(a) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15875 - Resolution to Dispose of Street
Department Surplus Property
(b) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15876 - Resolution to Approve Traffic Control
(Radar Speed Sign at Boulder Street SW and School Road SW)
(c) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register A
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA II
(a) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register B
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA —June 24, 2025
PUBLIC HEARINGS — 6:00 P.M.
9. PROPOSED USE OF REVOLVING SCDP FUNDS FOR THE HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN
HOUSING REHABILITATION PRORAM
(a) Approve/Deny Resolution No. 15879
purpose oj'th is portion o the agenda is to provide the ounci with information necessary to craft wise policy.
ides items like monthly or annual reports and communications from other entities.)
10. UPDATE FROM HUTCHINSON PICKLEBALL ASSOCIATION
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
11. APPROVE/DENY STORMWATER, WASTEWATER AND COMMUNITY RESILIENCY
PROJECT FINAL REPORT
12. APPROVE/DENY FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 25-856 — AN ORDINANCE FOR
THE SALE OF MUNICIPALLY -OWNED PROPERTY TO BONNEVILLE LAND AND
CATTLE, LLC
13. APPROVE/DENY RESOLUTION NO. 15877 — RESOLUTION REVISING 2025 FEE
SCHEDULE
14. APPROVE/DENY SETTING CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION FOR JULY
22, 2025, AT 4:00 P.M.
GOVERNANCE
(The purpose of this portion of the agenda is to deal with organizational development issues, including policies,
performances, and other matters that manage the logistics of the organization. May include monitoring reports,
policy development and governance process items)
15. MINUTES/REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS
(a) City of Hutchinson Financial Report and Investment Report for May 2025
MISCELLANEOUS
16. STAFF UPDATES
17. COUNCIL/MAYOR UPDATE
ADJOURNMENT
2
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 15878
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is generally authorized to accept donations of real and
personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens,
and is specifically authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefit of recreational services
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17; and
WHEREAS, the following persons or entities have offered to contribute the cash amounts
set forth below to the city:
Name of Donor
Amount Donation Date
Hutchinson Rotary Foundation $1,500.00 6/16/2025
WHEREAS, such donations have been contributed to the City of Hutchinson Parks
Department towards future playground expenses.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation offered.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
THAT, the donation described above is hereby accepted by the City of Hutchinson.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June 2025.
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
APPROVED:
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING NHNUTES
TUESDAY, DUNE 10, 2025
CITY CENTER — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by city staff, committees and boards. Many
decisions regarding agenda items are based upon this information as well as: Citypolicy andpractices, inputfrom constituents,
and other questions or information that has not yet been presented or discussed regarding an agenda item)
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Gary Forcier called the meeting to order. Members present were Tim Burley, Pat May and Chad
Czmowski. Member absent was Dave Sebesta. Also present were Matt Jaunich, City Administrator and
Marc Sebora, City Attorney.
(a) Approve the Council agenda and any agenda additions and/or corrections
Motion by May, second by Burley, to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. INVOCATION — Oak Heights Covenant Church
(The invocation is a voluntary expression oftheprivate citizen, to andfor the City Council, and is not intended to ajiliate the
City Council with, or express the City Council's preference for, any religious/spiritual organization. The views or beliefs
expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Council or staff)
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. RECOGNITION OF GIFTS, DONATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE TO THE CITY
(a) Proclamation — "Ecumen Oaks and Pines Day"
Mayor Forcier proclaimed June 24, 2025, as Ecumen Oaks and Pines Day.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
is is an opportunity or members of the public to address the City Council. If the topic you would like to discuss is on the
agenda, please ask the Mayor ifhe will be acceptingpublic comments during the agenda item ifnot apublic hearing. Ifyou have
a question, concern or comment, please ask to e recognized by the mayor — state your name and address for the record. Please
keep comments under 5 minutes. Individuals wishing to speakfor more than five minutes should ask to be included on the agenda
in advance of the meeting. All comments are appreciated, but please refrain from personal or derogatory attacks on individuals)
5. CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(a) Regular Meeting of May 27, 2025
(b) Budget Workshop of May 27, 2025
(c) Joint Meeting with EDA and HUC of June 4, 2025
Motion by Czmowski, second by May, to approve minutes as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA
e items listedjor consideration will be enacted by one motion unless the Mayor, a member of the City Council or
a city staff member requests an item to be removed. Traditionally items are not discussed)
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA I
(a) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15871 - Resolution Authorizing Disposal of Water
Department Surplus Property
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —June 10, 2025
(b) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15872 — Resolution Authorizing 2026 Capital
Budget Request for Lakes Restoration Phase II
(c) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15873 — Resolution Approving Termination of
Railroad Right of Way Easement
(d) Consideration for Approval of Resolution No. 15874 - Resolution Approving Plans and
Specifications and Ordering an Advertisement for Quotes for Roberts Park Complex Lighting
Proj ect
(e) Consideration for Approval of Contract Amendment to Rice Lake Construction for Wastewater
Treatment Facility Biosolids Improvements
(f) Consideration for Approval of FAA Entitlement Transfers from the City of Hutchinson to the
City of Litchfield
(g) Consideration for Approval of Issuing Temporary Liquor License to Riversong Music Festival
on July 11 & 12, 2025
(h) Consideration for Approval of Issuing Temporary Liquor License to McLeod County
Agriculture Association on August 14-17, 2025, for McLeod County Fair
(i) Consideration for Approval of Premises Permit Application for Crow River Sno Pros at Little
Crow Bowling Lanes Located at 1150 Hwy 7 West
0) Consideration for Approval of Creekside Bagging Line Improvements
(k) Consideration for Approval of Setting Public Hearing for June 24, 2025, to Discuss Use of City
Revolving SCDP Funds for Downtown Housing Rehabilitation
(1) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register A
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator, requested that Item 7(e) be pulled for separate discussion.
Motion by Czmowski, second by May, with the exception of Item 7(e), to approve Consent
Agenda L Motion carried unanimously.
Item 7(e) had further discussion. Mike Stifter, Public Works Director, presented before the
Council. Mr. Stifter noted that an amendment has been made to the contract, specifically item 1
in the description of the contract has been amended to mirror the language in state statute.
General discussion was held on potential funding options for this project.
Motion by Burley, second by Czmowski, to approve Item 7(e). Motion carried unanimously.
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA II
(a) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register B
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —June 10, 2025
Motion by Czmowski, second by May, with Forcier abstaining, to approve Consent Agenda II.
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS — NONE
purpose o t is portion o t e agenda is to provide the ounci with information necessary to craft wise policy.
ides items like monthly or annual reports and communications from other entities.)
9. PRESENTATION OF CITY OF HUTCHINSON 2024 YEAR END REPORT
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator, presented before the Council. Mr. Jaunich explained that the 2024
comprehensive annual report has been completed which includes staff reports from each
department. This report contains a multitude of data and information from 2024 activities. Council
Member May suggested that the departments that have a staffed board/commission include board
members' information and terms in their report.
10. DISCUSSION ON UPDATING THE FEE SCHEDULE TO ACCOUNT FOR CHICKEN AND
CANNABIS LICENSES
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator, presented before the Council. Mr. Jaunich noted that with the
recent adoption of the chicken ordinance, the Council needs to set a fee for licenses if that is the
desire. Secondly, the State will soon be issuing cannabis licenses which will be followed by cities
issuing cannabis registrations. The City can implement registration fees for most cannabis
businesses should the Council desire.
Council Member May suggested an initial fee of $50.00 for a chicken license and an annual renewal
fee of $25.00. Other council members agreed.
Mr. Jaunich noted that staff is suggesting a $500.00 registration fee for cannabis registrations as
state
law allows for cities to charge $500 or half the state license fee, whichever is less. State law allows
for a $1000 renewal registration fee which staff is recommending as well.
Action will be taken at the next Council meeting formally setting these fees
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
11. APPROVE/DENY SETTING COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR JUNE 24, 2025, AT 4:00 P.M. TO
REVIEW CITY CENTER SPACE NEEDS STUDY REPORT
Motion by May, second by Czmowski, to approve setting Council workshop for June 24, 2025, at
4:00 p.m. to review City Center space needs study report. Motion carried unanimously.
GOVERNANCE
(The purpose of this portion of the agenda is to deal with organizational development issues, including policies,
performances, and other matters that manage the logistics of the organization. May include monitoring reports,
policy development and governance process items)
12. MINUTES/REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —June 10, 2025
NHSCELLANEOUS
13. STAFF UPDATES
Mike Stifter — Mr. Stifter noted that I" Avenue SE was reclaimed today and Stoney Point Road and
Dale Street projects have begun. Mr. Stifter also spoke about a microsurfacing process that is being
used in areas of the city such as Roberts Park parking lot and a couple sections of roadway.
Marc Sebora — Mr. Sebora spoke about board/commission term limits to two terms. Mr. Sebora noted
that some boards/commissions have trouble filling vacancies, therefore he is suggesting that perhaps
the ordinance be revised to eliminate the two terms cap. Mr. Sebora noted he will bring this before the
Council for a more formal discussion later this year.
Matt Jaunich — Mr. Jaunich noted that he distributed information on an open house being held regarding
the high voltage transmission line project that will be running through Hutchinson. The open house is
June 19, 2025, from 11:00am-1:00 pm and 4:00pm-6:00 pm at the McLeod County Fairgrounds. He
also noted that City offices will be closed on June 19'h in honor of Juneteenth. Mr. Jaunich also noted
that a dedication is being held on Saturday June 14, 2025, for the new VMF baseball stadium. Lastly,
Mr. Jaunich shared some changes to the aquatic center. Open swim is from 12:00-8:00 pm (formerly
12:00-7:30 pm); lap swim is from 8:00-9:00 pm (formerly 7:30-9:00 pm); and the zip line is no longer
in operation.
Motion by Burley, second by Burley, to set public meeting for June 14, 2025, at 1:45 p.m. for council
members to attend VMF baseball stadium dedication. Motion carried unanimously.
14. COUNCIL/MAYOR UPDATE
Pat May — Council Member May provided an update on the Sculpture Stroll.
Tim Burley — Council Member Burley noted that he has been contacted several times by residents
about
conducting formal protests. He noted that he is advising them to contact the police department and/or
City personnel about the locations or other regulations. Mr. Sebora noted that the City does not
regulate
protests/demonstrations specifically but noted that they can be held on public property as long as they
are not impeding pedestrian/road traffic or being bothersome to other public property users.
Gary Forcier — Mayor Forcier spoke about the various community events recently held as well as the
Water Carnival kickoff that occurred last night at Library Square.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by May, second by Czmowski, to adjourn at 6:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
.19
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTC HIN SON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN KJAPOSE.
Disposal of Surplus Property
Agenda Item:
Department: Public Works
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Mike Stifter
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Mike Stifter
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes):
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: No 0
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
We are seeking to dispose of plow truck number 613, VIN:1 M2P288COXM028613, a 1999 Mack.
The replacement unit arrived over the winter and is in service. The truck will be placed on the
govdeals auction site in August.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Resolution
Fiscal Impact: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: New Bu
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
RESOLUTION NO. 15875
RESOLUTION APPROVING DISPOSAL OF STREET DEPARTMENT SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Streets Department has equipment that is no longer needed for municipal
operations, AND
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code Section 91, Subdivision 3, Paragraph C provides for the sale at
auction of surplus equipment, AND
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA,
That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of the surplus property identified
herein.
Item to be sold at auction through GovDeals.com:
1. 1999 Mack Plow Truck 613 (VIN 1M2P288COXM028613)
Proceeds from the sale of items shall be deposited into the Equipment Replacement Fund
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 2025
Gary Forcier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
V
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTCHINSON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN PLJAPOSE.
Radar speed sign at Boulder St SW and School Rd SW
Agenda Item:
Department: PW
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Mike Stifter
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Mike Stifter
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes): 1
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: No 0
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
Public works staff in conjunction with residents have located a potential spot to place a radar
speed sign along this stretch of School Rd SW per the included photo. Traffic is frequently
above posted speeds in the area which is evident especially in the winter when motorists fail to
drive with due care. The sign would be placed on a light pole with access to power which is a
less expensive option than a solar powered option.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Resolution
Fiscal Impact: $ 2,500.00 Funding Source: Sign Repair Materials
FTE Impact: Budget Change: New Bu
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost: $ 2,500.00
Total City Cost: $ 2,500.00 Funding Source: Sign Repair Materials
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
RESOLUTION NO. 15876
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
1. WHEREAS, the Police Chief and Public Works Director agree that the following areas have
traffic control concerns which warrant installation and/or removal of traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locations as points where
traffic control devices shall be installed and/or removed, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1
of the Hutchinson City Code, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes the following traffic control devices shall be erected:
1. Adding a radar speed sign at Boulder St SW and School Rd SW
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 2025.
Gary Forcier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator
-?F NA
A
Jon �.a:k
1F�li -
'-.
,0
t
s
IPA,
CHECK REGISTER A FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATES 6/11/25 - 6/24/25
Check Date
Check#
Name
Description
Amount
6/11/2025
301847
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
TOURNAMENT CASH - REC
800.00
6/13/2025
EFT
EFTPS
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
81,606.30
6/13/2025
EFT
MN Dept of Revenue
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
16,164.91
6/13/2025
EFT
MNDCP
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
325.00
6/13/2025
EFT
Child Support
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
856.01
6/13/2025
EFT
UNUM Voluntary Insurance
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
322.86
6/13/2025
EFT
PERA
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
66,822.97
6/13/2025
EFT
Further HSA
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
18,253.07
6/13/2025
EFT
Mission Square
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
5,061.32
6/13/2025
EFT
VOYA
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
250.00
6/13/2025
301848
Manual Employee Check
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
240.04
6/13/2025
301849
VOIDED PR CHECK
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
-
6/13/2025
301850
VOIDED PR CHECK
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
-
6/13/2025
301851
HART
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
521.53
6/13/2025
301852
NCPERS
Payroll Report 5/25/25 - 6/7/25
192.00
6/24/2025
301853
BARRY, BECCA
UB REFUND
45.43
6/24/2025
301854
CLABO, TOM
UB REFUND
73.82
6/24/2025
301855
FINNELL, RYAN & HEATHER
UB REFUND
65.43
6/24/2025
301856
GOLDSCHMIDT, KELCI
UB REFUND
249.00
6/24/2025
301857
JOHNSTON, DAVID & PAMELA
UB REFUND
42.00
6/24/2025
301858
NEHRING, BRIAN
UB REFUND
22.64
6/24/2025
301859
PAULSON, PHYLLIS
UB REFUND
46.67
6/24/2025
301860
SCHUFT, WARREN
UB REFUND
104.67
6/24/2025
301861
A R ENGH HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING
WATER HEATER, AIR COND REPAIR- FIRE
292.00
6/24/2025
301862
ACE HARDWARE - 1315
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
775.91
6/24/2025
301863
ACE HARDWARE - 1790
PARTS, CLEANING SUPPLIES, PROPS, KEY CHAIN - FIRE
204.22
6/24/2025
301864
ACE HARDWARE - 1825
HWH SELF DRILL, PARTS
16.78
6/24/2025
301865
ACE HARDWARE - 6762
KEY STEM 4WAY 1/4-11/32" FOR GARDEN PLOT" - CREEKSIDE
16.02
6/24/2025
301866
ALL-AMERICAN ARENA PRODUCTS
ICE PAINTING -ARENA
4,476.38
6/24/2025
301867
ALNESS, JOSHUA
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - STREETS
155.99
6/24/2025
301868
AMENT, ADAM
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - POLICE
130.59
6/24/2025
301869
AMERICAN BOTTLING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
400.12
6/24/2025
301870
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ON CROW RIVER
ANIMAL IMPOUNDS - POLICE
458.00
6/24/2025
301871
APEX ENGINEERING GROUP INC
ENVIRONMENTAL POSITION TRANSITION - PW
2,054.00
6/24/2025
301872
ARLYN'S PHOTOS
AQUATIC CENTER STAFF PHOTO 2025
98.00
6/24/2025
301873
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
702.60
6/24/2025
301874
AUTO VALUE - GLENCOE
PIPES, FITTINGS - HATS
155.42
6/24/2025
301875
AUTO-CHLOR SYSTEM
DISH MACHINE CONTRACT- SR DINING
93.71
6/24/2025
301876
B & C PLUMBING & HEATING INC
PLUMBING REPAIR - ARENA
477.36
6/24/2025
301877
BB MURALS
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301878
BEACON ATHLETICS
REPLACEMENT PORTABLE FENCE POSTS - PARKS
702.00
6/24/2025
301879
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
3,056.03
6/24/2025
301880
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC
COBRA ADMIN FEES
22.50
6/24/2025
301881
BENNETT MATERIAL HANDLING INC
FORKLIFT REPAIR/ STOPPED RUNNING - WWTP
272.81
6/24/2025
301882
BERNICK'S
ROBERTS PARK CONCESSIONS, LIQUOR COGS
2,118.07
6/24/2025
301883
BERTRAM ASPHALT COMPANY INC
2025 STREET PATCHING REPAIRS
36,971.00
6/24/2025
301884
BOBBING BOBBER BREWING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
366.85
6/24/2025
301885
BOLTON & MENK INC
CLEAR ZONE ACQUISITION - AIRPORT
900.00
6/24/2025
301886
BRADLEY SECURITY & ELECTRIC LLC
MAINT, REPAIRS- MULTIPLE DEPTS
255.00
6/24/2025
301887
BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
42,971.72
6/24/2025
301888
C & L DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
51,598.65
6/24/2025
301889
CARS ON PATROL SHOP LLC
TOW/IMPOUNDS, PARTS & REPAIRS - MULTIPLE DEPTS
1,495.55
6/24/2025
301890
CENTRAL HYDRAULICS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
764.97
6/24/2025
301891
CENTRAL MCGOWAN
GAS CYLINDER RENTAL FEE, WELDING SUPPLIES- MULTIPLE DEPTS
243.69
6/24/2025
301892
CINTASCORPORATION
SUPPLIES&SERVICE- MULTIPLEDEPTS
480.95
6/24/2025
301893
CLARKE ENVIRONMENTAL MOSQUITO MGMT
MOSQUITO CONTROL - STREETS
2,250.00
6/24/2025
301894
CLEANRIVER RECYCLING SOLUTIONS
WASTE RECEPTACLES- MULTIPLE DEPTS
3,250.00
6/24/2025
301895
COLDSPRING
NICHEPLAQUE- CEMETERY
366.00
6/24/2025
301896
COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGIES
CIT VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROPOSAL
2,500.00
6/24/2025
301897
CORE & MAIN LP
2 C2 REGISTER TWIN OAKS GH - WATER
516.50
6/24/2025
301898
CORNER POST EROSION CONTROL
LANDSCAPE REPAIR - ENG
2,001.00
6/24/2025
301899
CRESTED RIVER
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
450.00
6/24/2025
301901
CROW RIVER WINERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
259.20
6/24/2025
301902
CZECH, ERIKA
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - PARKS
135.00
6/24/2025
301903
DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
66,040.26
6/24/2025
301904
DELEGARD TOOL CO
O-RINGS - HATS
64.30
6/24/2025
301905
DEMENGE DETAILING INC
SQUAD DETAILING - POLICE
1,230.00
6/24/2025
301906
DUENOW,MIKAYLA
REIMB: TRAINING - POLICE
20.77
6/24/2025
301907
EG RUD & SONS INC
SURVEY - HOLTZ PROPERTY - ENG
3,345.00
6/24/2025
301908
ELECTRIC FUSION.COM
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
2,000.00
6/24/2025
301909
FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC
2025 CRACK SEAL AND MASTIC - STREETS
109,893.00
6/24/2025
301910
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT
MS592T GLASS DOOR & SEAL, FILTERS, CAPS, FLUID - STREETS
925.00
6/24/2025
301911
FASTENAL COMPANY
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
406.32
6/24/2025
301912
FENSKE'S STUMP REMOVAL
ASH TREE REMOVALS - STREETS
11,425.00
6/24/2025
1301913
FIRSTADVANTAGE LNSOCC HEALTH SOLU
DRUG TESTING
260.88
CHECK REGISTER A FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATES 6/11/25 - 6/24/25
Check Date
Check#
Name
Description
Amount
6/24/2025
301914
FLOW MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL
MAIN LIFT STATION VFD START UP ON NEW DRIVES - WWTP
1,937.00
6/24/2025
301915
FUZE LOGISTICS SERVICES USA INC
CREEKSIDE BAGGED FREIGHT
2,700.00
6/24/2025
301916
GALLS LLC
TACTICAL PLATE SIDE AND GAP PANEL CARRIER - POLICE
1,485.55
6/24/2025
301917
GRAINGER
REPAIR&MAINTSUPPLIES - MULTIPLEDEPTS
634.26
6/24/2025
301918
GREAT PLAINS FIRE INC
ENGINE 2 LIGHT BEZELS - FIRE
237.75
6/24/2025
301919
GREEN EARTH LAWN CARE INC
INCUBATOR LAWN CARE- EDA
288.00
6/24/2025
301920
HAGER J EWELRY I NC
WATER CARNIVAL GIFTS
168.00
6/24/2025
301921
HALL, MARK V
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301922
HANSEN GRAVEL INC
GRANITE SAND - STREETS
64.00
6/24/2025
301923
HAWKINS INC
CHLORINE, CHEMICALS- MULTIPLE DEPTS
3,513.50
6/24/2025
301924
HEALTHPARTNERS INC
MEDICAL INSURANCE
150,728.98
6/24/2025
301925
HILLYARD / HUTCHINSON
CLEANING SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
1,306.06
6/24/2025
301926
HJERPE CONTRACTING
VARIOUS INSPECTS, INSTALLS, REPAIRS - WATER
10,914.00
6/24/2025
301927
HOFF, RANDY
FLOWERS - POLICE
40.00
6/24/2025
301928
HOLT MOTORS INC
WA426R 1ST ROW WEATH, MUDFLAP KIT- WATER
207.70
6/24/2025
301929
HOLT-PETERSON BUS
HOLT BUS- JULY 2025 SENIOR TOUR
905.00
6/24/2025
301930
HOME CITY ICE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
692.89
6/24/2025
301931
HOMETOWN SPORTS & APPAREL
OPERATING SUPPLIES - REC
2,168.40
6/24/2025
301932
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
POOL SUPPLIES
125.76
6/24/2025
301933
HUTCHINSON CO-OP
FUELS & SUPPLIES- MULTIPLE DEPTS
33,260.58
6/24/2025
301934
HUTCHINSON HEALTH
PREEMPLOY PHYSICALS- MULTIPLE DEPTS
674.00
6/24/2025
301935
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
MAY UTILITIES
76,923.71
6/24/2025
301936
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
HASSAN ST LIGHTS
12,765.85
6/24/2025
301937
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE #1550
PGB PI BLOC - ALL MOWERS - STREETS
101.88
6/24/2025
301938
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE #1552
OIL DRY FOR SHOP - PARKS
43.47
6/24/2025
301939
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE #2520
SMALL ENGINES FILTERS/OIL - FIRE
91.96
6/24/2025
301940
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
WATER BILLS
7,898.12
6/24/2025
301941
IDEAL SERVICE INC
MAIN LIFTSTATION VFD 3&4 STARTUP - WWTP
1,432.50
6/24/2025
301942
INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES
911 PS/ALI SERVICE - POLICE
10.77
6/24/2025
301943
JAUNICH, MATT
REIMB: QTR ADMIN MTG, COMPASS PEER GROUP MTG - ADMIN
77.00
6/24/2025
301944
JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC
FLIR THERMAL CAMERA, FOAM - FIRE
4,106.55
6/24/2025
301945
JIXXIE INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
86.00
6/24/2025
301946
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
18,957.61
6/24/2025
301947
JUUL UNDERGROUND LLC
BANK STABILIZATION -THE LANDING PROJECT
54,556.00
6/24/2025
301948
K & A CONTRACTING LLC
595 JUERGENS SIDEWALK PATCH - STREETS
1,687.00
6/24/2025
301949
KAMRATH, JONATHAN MATTHEW
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301950
KERI'S CLEANING & HANDYMAN SERVICES
CONTRACTED JANITORIAL- MULTIPLE DEPTS
2,290.00
6/24/2025
301951
KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION
ROCK FOR UNDERSIDE OF VMF GRANDSTAND
95.20
6/24/2025
301952
KOHLS SWEEPING SERVICE
STRIPING GUN RANGE, PILING CONCRETE - MULTIPLE DEPTS
770.00
6/24/2025
301953
KRANZ LAWN & POWER
EQUIPMENT PARTS - MULTIPLE DEPTS
610.87
6/24/2025
301954
KURTH WELDING & REPAIR LLC
AUGER WELD - WWTP
400.00
6/24/2025
301955
L & P SUPPLY OF HUTCHINSON INC
MANTIS TILLER REPAIRS, WEEDWHIP - PARKS
44.71
6/24/2025
301956
LAND EQUIPMENT OF NORWOOD
MS017T ACTUATOR - CEMETERY
814.65
6/24/2025
301957
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
WASHERS/SCREWS/NUTS - HATS
265.29
6/24/2025
301958
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES -INS TRUST
WC AUDIT ADJUSTMENT, Q3 WC PREMIUMS
61,715.00
6/24/2025
301959
LITCHFIELD BUILDING CENTER
TRAINING SITE BURN CONTAINERS - FIRE
49.09
6/24/2025
301960
LOGIS
LOGIS CONSULTING
1,369.17
6/24/2025
301961
MACQUEEN
HOSE/TAIL/PIRANHA, FIRE BOOTS - MULTIPLE DEPTS
5,581.95
6/24/2025
301962
MAPET
MAPET CONFERENCE - POLICE
225.00
6/24/2025
301963
MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
PRINTING CONTRACT- MULTIPLEDEPTS
2,424.79
6/24/2025
301964
MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC NW 7128
PRINTING CONTRACT- MULTIPLE DEPTS
489.71
6/24/2025
301965
MARTIN-MCALLISTER
PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT - POLICE
650.00
6/24/2025
301966
MATHEWS, GRIFFEN
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - STREETS
114.99
6/24/2025
301967
MAY, MATTHEW
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - PARKS
69.99
6/24/2025
301968
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
RECORDING - P/Z
138.00
6/24/2025
301969
MEI TOTAL ELEVATOR SOLUTIONS
ELEVATOR CONTRACT- LIBRARY
236.42
6/24/2025
301970
MENARDS HUTCHINSON
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
1,494.47
6/24/2025
301971
MID-AMERICAN RESEARCH CHEMICAL
HATS SHOP SUPPLIES
741.02
6/24/2025
301972
MIN, SUNG-HEE
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301973
MINI BIFF
PORTA TOILETS - PARKS
906.78
6/24/2025
301974
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
LAB SAMPLE TESTING - MULTIPLEDEPTS
2,023.60
6/24/2025
301975
MOUNTAIN WEST LLC
CEDAR MULCH BULK - CREEKSIDE
4,565.00
6/24/2025
301976
NAC MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES
ALARM SYSTEM UPGRADE - ARENA
10,719.00
6/24/2025
301977
NELSON, JUDD
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301978
NEWMAN SIGNS INC
SIGNS - STREETS
160.23
6/24/2025
301979
NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY
WA426R CONTROL MODULE - WATER
202.51
6/24/2025
301980
NUVERA
PHONE SERVICES
5,436.89
6/24/2025
301981
NYANHONGO, GEDION
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301982
OFFICE DEPOT
CORRECTION TAPE - STREETS
24.99
6/24/2025
301983
OLSON CHEVROLET
2017 FORD INTERCEPTOR REPAIR- FIRE
1,455.79
6/24/2025
301984
ORIGINAL WATERMEN INC
AQUATIC CENTER - UNIFORMS
448.32
6/24/2025
301986
PAGEL, NICK
REIMB: SAFETY FOOTWEAR - STREETS
159.43
6/24/2025
301987
PEDERSEN, JAMES
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
301988
PEDERSEN, RYAN
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
1301989
PEOPLEREADY INC
CREEKSIDE TEMP STAFFING
2,373.84
CHECK REGISTER A FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATES 6/11/25 - 6/24/25
Check Date
Check#
Name
Description
Amount
6/24/2025
301990
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
28,312.33
6/24/2025
301991
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
2ND QTR FUNDING REQUEST - LIBRARY
52,202.00
6/24/2025
301992
PLUMBING & HEATING BY CRAIG
PARTS, REPAIRS- PARKS
5,464.89
6/24/2025
301993
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE - UB BILLING
1,930.00
6/24/2025
301994
PREMIUM WATERS
SERVICE FEE FOR WATER SERVICE - PARKS
10.99
6/24/2025
301995
PRO AUTO MN INC
OIL CHANGES, REPAIRS - MULTIPLE DEPTS
930.49
6/24/2025
301996
PROSOURCE SPECIALTIES LLC
PENCILS - POLICE
327.15
6/24/2025
301997
QUALITY FORKLIFT SALES & SERV INC
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ON UNICARRIERS FORKLIFT- CREEKSIDE
354.70
6/24/2025
301998
RAHN PAINTING & CONTRACTING LLC
SPRING CLEANUP - MULTIPLE DEPTS
1,295.00
6/24/2025
301999
RAMSTAD TECHNOLOGIES LLC
FIBER SPLICING
1,756.00
6/24/2025
302000
RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
REGIONAL FIRE SCHOOL - AUSTIN
480.00
6/24/2025
302001
ROSE TRUCKING INC
DOT ANNUAL INSPECTION PARK UNITS
352.13
6/24/2025
302002
ROULEAU, VICTOR
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
302003
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
780.97
6/24/2025
302004
S&STRUCKING LLC
FLATBED TRUCKING FOR BAGGED PRODUCTS - CREEKSIDE
4,000.00
6/24/2025
302005
SAFETY & SECURITY CONSULTATION SPECIALIS
REGION 10 TRAINING EVENT - FIRE
1,200.00
6/24/2025
302006
SAM'S TIRE SERVICE
REPLACED TIRE ON ROLLOFF TRUCK 514 - CREEKSIDE
772.45
6/24/2025
302007
SCHAUFLER, JENNIFER
REFUND: COACHING- REC
30.00
6/24/2025
302008
SCHERER & SONS TRUCKING INC
FLATBED TRUCKING FOR BAGGED PRODUCTS - CREEKSIDE
4,125.00
6/24/2025
302009
SCHWICKERT'S TECTA AMERICA LLC
ROOF REPAIR - HATS
1,663.06
6/24/2025
302010
SEPPELT, MILES
REIMB: EDCCONF- EDA
146.00
6/24/2025
302011
SHARE CORPORATION
HATS RATCHETING PIPE WRENCH, SUPPLIES
1,431.90
6/24/2025
302012
SHAW, KAREN
PI LATES/ YOGA INSTRUCTION - SR CTR
210.00
6/24/2025
302013
SHORT- ELLIOT-HENDRICKSON INC
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CITY & VARIOUS PROJECTS
33,489.70
6/24/2025
302014
SHRED-N-GO446138
SHREDDING - MULTIPLEDEPTS
70.00
6/24/2025
302015
SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER AND IRRIGATION - PARKS
1,361.47
6/24/2025
302016
SMALL LOT WI NE AND SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
1,719.68
6/24/2025
302017
SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
22,669.55
6/24/2025
302018
STANDARD PRINTING-N-MAILING
OFFICE SUPPLIES, POSTAGE - MULTIPLE DEPTS
54.98
6/24/2025
302019
STAPLES ADVANTAGE
PAPER & SANI WIPES, CLEANER - MULTIPLE DEPTS
409.52
6/24/2025
302020
STOUFER, DANY
PUBLICARTS COMMISSION - BROCHURE FOR SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
469.83
6/24/2025
302021
STREICH TRUCKING
BULK FREIGHT FOR TRAVERSE - CREEKSIDE
550.00
6/24/2025
302022
SUMMER LAKES BEVERAGE LLC
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
907.50
6/24/2025
302023
SUNCOAST GARDEN PRODUCTS INC
2CUFTFLORIDACYPRESS -CREEKSIDE
5,097.88
6/24/2025
302024
SYSCO WESTERN MN
CONCESSIONS - REC
1,678.27
6/24/2025
302025
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
HATS SHOP SUPPLIES
686.61
6/24/2025
302026
THE ENGRAVING SHOPPE INC
ARENA LOCKER ROOM REMODEL
349.60
6/24/2025
302027
THE FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
COMPOST BAGS PICKUP
500.00
6/24/2025
302028
THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
OPERATING SUPPLIES - MULTIPLE DEPTS
1,625.47
6/24/2025
302029
TRI COUNTY WATER
RENTAL WATER COOLER, SALT - MULTIPLE DEPTS
75.90
6/24/2025
302030
TRUE BRANDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
473.80
6/24/2025
302031
ULINE
CONCESSIONS, LOCKER ROOM REMODEL
786.06
6/24/2025
302032
UNITED PACKAGING & DESIGN
SLIP SHEETS - CREEKSIDE
10,400.00
6/24/2025
302033
USA BLUE BOOK
NITRATE TNT VIALS - WWTP
800.33
6/24/2025
302034
VACEK, LINDSEY
REFUND: CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS - REC
55.00
6/24/2025
302035
VALLEY RICH CO INC
EQUIPMENT FOR 8TH & DALE - WATER
11,025.98
6/24/2025
302036
VESSCO INC
WATSON MARLOW TUBING - WATER
496.02
6/24/2025
302037
VIDEO SERVICES INC
NEW POLICE FACILITY VIDEO SERVICES
55,384.05
6/24/2025
302038
VI KING BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
19,307.50
6/24/2025
302039
VI KING COCA COLA
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
774.15
6/24/2025
302040
VIKING SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC
FIELD SPONSORSHIP SIGN - REC
575.00
6/24/2025
302041
VINOCOPIA INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
3,224.00
6/24/2025
302042
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN
REFUSE TAKEN TO LANDFILL
9,811.59
6/24/2025
302043
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
ADVERTISING - LIQUOR HUTCH
60.00
6/24/2025
302044
WEST CENTRAL SANITATION INC
RESIDENTIAL REFUSE
59,453.58
6/24/2025
302045
WINE MERCHANTS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD - LIQUOR HUTCH
1,264.58
6/24/2025
302046
WM MUELLER & SONS
1/4 VIRGIN SAND BLACKTOP - STREETS
724.36
6/24/2025
302047
YEPEZ, VICTOR
SCULPTURE STROLL 2025
1,000.00
6/24/2025
302048
ZEP SALES AND SERVICE
ZEP SHOP SUPPLIES - HATS
1,399.47
Total - Check Register A:
$ 1,417,493.83
Department Purchasing Card Activity - May 2025
Date
Department
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
5/4/2025
ADMIN
FREDDY'S
Matt Lunch - MCMA Conference
14.57
5/22/2025
ADMIN
41MPRINT INC
City Logo Table Throw for City Events
220.88
5/2/2025
CREEKSIDE
Mailchimp
Email marketing, monthly newsletter
33.00
5/6/2025
CREEKSIDE
SPS COMMERCE
Apr 2025 SPS fees; UH
210.74
5/9/2025
CREEKSIDE
APPLE.COM/BILL
iCloud storage; Akosek
0.99
5/23/2025
CREEKSIDE
QUEST CONSTRUCTION DATA
QuestCDN membership
90.00
5/25/2025
CREEKSIDE
QUEST CONSTRUCTION DATA
QuestCDN membership
639.20
5/29/2025
CREEKSIDE
AMAZON
Adjustable easels
95.00
5/29/2025
CREEKSIDE
AMAZON
Adjustable easels
94.99
5/1/2025
EDA
AMERICINN
Southwest MN Workforce Conference
110.32
5/1/2025
EDA
PERKINS RESTAURANT
Breakfast/SW MN Workforce conference
20.26
5/6/2025
EDA
JIMMY JOHNS
Lunch for EDA committee meeting
55.79
5/12/2025
EDA
Formstack LLC
Annual FormStack subscription fee
482.09
5/14/2025
EDA
KFC
Dinner at Mid -America EDC Best Practices Conf
12.54
5/16/2025
EDA
APPLEBEES
Dinner at Mid -America EDC Best Practices Conf
30.20
5/16/2025
EDA
DENNY'S
Bkfst at Best Practices conference
27.00
5/18/2025
EDA
LORA HOTEL
Lodging at Best Practices conference
577.72
5/22/2025
EDA
JIMMY JOHNS
Lunch for Finance Team meeting
123.00
5/28/2025
EDA
ALL STAR TROPHY AND AWARD
Plaque for retiring EDA Board member
26.91
5/30/2025
EDA
JIMMYS PIZZA HUTCHINSON
Lunch for EDA Board meeting
101.89
5/2/2025
FINANCE
AMAZON
DMV - 2 desk calculators
117.98
5/8/2025
FINANCE
AMAZON
Wastewater- business card holder
8.50
5/11/2025
FINANCE
WM SUPERCENTER
City Center- soda for vending
94.62
5/28/2025
FINANCE
AMAZON
DMV - ball point pens
5.29
5/30/2025
FINANCE
EZBUSINESS FEE
Credit Card monthly service fee
15.00
5/1/2025
FIRE
CASH WISE FOODS
Region 10training event water -reimb
58.34
5/4/2025
FIRE
CASH WISE FOODS
Region 10training event food -reimb
449.82
5/8/2025
FIRE
WM SUPERCENTER
Nemitz Funding - gym project - Wall TV
707.42
5/11/2025
FIRE
ROGUE
NemitzFunding- gymproject- weights
1,874.26
5/14/2025
FIRE
WAL-MART
NemitzFunding- gymproject- soundbar
399.00
5/21/2025
FIRE
Torque Fitness
NemitzFunding- gymproject- weights
2,760.20
5/25/2025
FIRE
CASH WISE FOODS
Drinking water & flowers for front entry
87.42
5/28/2025
FIRE
TRUEWERK
Summer uniform pants
316.00
5/29/2025
FIRE
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC
Drip torch & repair parts
183.27
5/29/2025
FIRE
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC
Drip torch & repair parts
183.27
5/13/2025
IT
NETWORKSOLUTIONS
Mail Forward Public Arts
2.25
5/13/2025
IT
AMAZON
POE Injector
20.79
5/14/2025
IT
MENARDS HUTCHINSON MN
Tapcon to mount camera
15.26
5/16/2025
IT
NETWORKSOLUTIONS
Web Address Renewal
872.40
5/22/2025
IT
AMAZON
WiFi Adapter
19.00
5/22/2025
IT
AMAZON
Phone Case for Kylie
9.49
5/28/2025
IT
AMAZON
Lock for network cabinet
5.47
5/1/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
FACEBOOK
Easter marketing
4.22
5/2/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
City Hive Inc
Online ordering and website monthly fee
99.07
5/2/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
HUTCHINSON ACE
Drill bit for shelf repair
15.99
5/4/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Replacement wheel for cart
32.35
5/5/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
MENARDS HUTCHINSON MN
Flowers for outside planter
19.80
5/8/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Adding machine tape
14.01
5/8/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Shelf label price holders
10.78
5/13/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Bathroom tissue
47.97
5/14/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Paper towels and soap dispensers
187.56
5/14/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Magnetic shelf tag holders for coolers
14.01
5/15/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Replacement wheel for cart and wet floor signs
52.83
5/15/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
MENARDS HUTCHINSON MN
Cleaning supplies
26.90
5/16/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
RITE
CloudRetailer POS system monthly fee
268.44
5/16/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
HUTCHINSON ACE
Screws for cooler shelf repairs
5.79
5/18/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
MENARDS HUTCHINSON MN
Event tables and misc screws for repairs
153.52
5/21/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Packingtape
10.78
5/22/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
AMAZON
Cleaning and office supplies
40.37
5/25/2025
LIQUOR HUTCH
HUTCHINSON ACE
Painting supplies employee restroom
12.88
5/1/2025
PARK & REC
POOLWEB COM
Tubes for the Aquatic Center
999.80
5/2/2025
PARK & REC
WHEN I WORK INC
Staff Scheduling Software
160.00
5/4/2025
PARK & REC
WHEN I WORK INC
Staff Scheduling Software
38.72
5/4/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Keyboard for Rec Center Computer in Hallway
29.99
5/4/2025
PARK &REC
MINNESOTAASA
Tournament Sanction Fees
160.00
5/4/2025
PARK & REC
WHEN I WORK INC
Staff Scheduling Software
58.06
5/4/2025
PARK & REC
WHEN I WORK INC
Staff Scheduling Software
135.48
5/4/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Coffee Pods, Greeting Cards, Bean Bags for Senior Programming
319.27
5/6/2025
PARK & REC
WAL-MART
Folders
3.70
5/7/2025
PARK & REC
CDT - BOX OFFICE
Senior Trips - Tickets for Chanhassen Dinner Theater
3,001.53
5/8/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Sunscreen
18.57
5/8/2025
1 PARK & REC
AMAZON
Sunscreen
13.40
Department Purchasing Card Activity - May 2025
Date
Department
Vendor Name
Description
Amount
5/4/2025
ADMIN
FREDDY'S
Matt Lunch - MCMA Conference
14.57
5/9/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Concession Supplies - measuring jar, fly traps
27.33
5/9/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Lifeguard Supplies - cooling towels
45.98
5/9/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Program Equipment - tennis balls, bucket with lid
89.84
5/9/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Roberts Concessions - candy, sunflower seeds, freezes
533.92
5/11/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Shelter Rental Tag Holders
16.29
5/14/2025
PARK & REC
CANVA
Canva Annual Subscription
119.99
5/14/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Repair parts for Oddfellows Toilet
32.13
5/14/2025
PARK & REC
S&S WORLDWIDE INC
Pickleballs
188.59
5/15/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Graffitti Remover Wipes
32.35
5/16/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Boys Locker Room Project Supplies
9.99
5/16/2025
PARK & REC
WM SUPERCENTER
Lifeguard Office Supplies
61.82
5/18/2025
PARK & REC
WHEN I WORK INC
Staff Scheduling Software
10.32
5/19/2025
PARK & REC
KIEFER AQUATICS
Safety Tube
88.29
5/20/2025
PARK & REC
WAL-MART
Lifeguard Office Supplies
67.66
5/20/2025
PARK & REC
CASH WISE FOODS
Senior Center Activities Supplies
40.47
5/21/2025
PARK & REC
4TE* FAST PARTITIONS
Boys Locker Room Partitions
1,000.00
5/21/2025
PARK & REC
4TE*FAST PARTITIONS
Boys Locker Room Partitions
306.34
5/21/2025
PARK & REC
DAYTRIPPERSTHEATRELLC
Senior Trips - Tickers for DayTrippers Theater
1,250.00
5/21/2025
PARK & REC
ACTIVE SPORTS
Cooler Stand for Lifeguards
601.23
5/22/2025
PARK & REC
Prime Video
Senior Activities -Movie Rental "The Fire Inside"
4.30
5/22/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Faucet Head
29.30
5/22/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Faucet Head
36.31
5/27/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Graffitti Remover Wipes
21.65
5/28/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Pool Heater Igniters
66.48
5/28/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Chips for Concession Stand
189.45
5/29/2025
PARK & REC
THE WEBSTAURANT STORE INC
Roaster Oven for Concession Stand
139.98
5/30/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Slushy Mix
119.95
5/30/2025
PARK & REC
AMAZON
Concession Supplies - Sour Patch Kids
74.52
5/7/2025
PLANNING
SOSMETAL PRODUCTS
Metal cleaner
60.80
5/14/2025
PLANNING
AMAZON
Vacuum bags
24.69
5/15/2025
PLANNING
AMAZON
Bathroom receptacle
49.98
5/18/2025
PLANNING
HJ-PUBLISHING
Newspaper subscription
69.00
5/23/2025
PLANNING
SOLARTOWN
Skylight for city center
1,398.06
5/1/2025
POLICE
PEPPERBALL
Training
549.00
5/4/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Flash drives and wipes
68.55
5/8/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Nar Can
55.28
5/14/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Frame
7.29
5/21/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Magnets
24.89
5/22/2025
POLICE
WAL-MART
Training snacks
61.94
5/25/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Mop kits and pads
74.36
5/29/2025
POLICE
AMAZON
Bike lights
138.32
5/29/2025
POLICE
POST BOARD LICENSING
Post Renewals
1,080.00
5/1/2025
PUBLICWORKS
ADASIGN DEPOT
Sidewalk Non -Slip ADA Tiles
756.20
5/1/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
STANDARD ELECTRIC SUPPLY
Security Switch for Reservoir Hatch
74.19
5/2/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
GREEN PAPER PRD
Compostable Paper Plates
50.16
5/7/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
CUSTOMER ELATION
Monthly Dispatch Services
85.00
5/7/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
CUSTOMER ELATION
Monthly Dispatch Services
85.00
5/8/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Removal of Air from Jet Fuel Line
22.50
5/8/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Removal of Air from Jet Fuel Line
12.87
5/14/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
AMAZON
Safety Gear Hearing Protection & Communication
44.22
5/14/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
ISA
Arborist Recertification - DS
185.00
5/16/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
APWA-MN PW CERT
APWA Certificate Program - DS
729.66
5/16/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
DUNHAMS
Kayak Equipment
32.33
5/23/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
POS Testing at Airport
0.50
5/23/2025
PUBLIC WORKS
HUTCHSTATION
Station Newspaper Subscription
6.99
TotaIP-Cards:
$ 28,079.19
CHECK REGISTER B FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATES 6/11/25 - 6/24/25
Check Date
Check#
Name
Description
Amount
6/24/2025
301900
CROW RIVER SIGNS
BUS CARDS, NEW ARENA MESSAGE BOARD, VMF PLAQUE - MULTIPLE DEPTS
59,065.09
6/24/2025
301985
OUTDOOR MOTION
BIKE TUNE-UP ANDREPAIRS- POLICE
608.00
Total - Check Register B:
$ 59,673.09
6/18/2025
Proposed Use of
Revolving SCDP Funds for the
Hutchinson Downtown Housing
Rehabilitation Program
Public Hearing
June 24, 2025
The following will be discussed:
Citizen input on identifying community development and housing needs of
the community; including the needs of very low and low income persons;
The proposed Revolving SCDP Funds activities and the benefiting
location(s);
The overall costs and project financing;
The implementation schedule;
• The past performance of staff proposed to carry out the project; and
• Discuss compliance with historic requirements.
Hutchinson Housing Needs
2022 Comprehensive Housing Needs
Assessment by Maxfield Research &
Consulting states there is a need for 1,500
new housing units through 2030. m•----° --
➢ All housing types are needed.
As of Oct/Nov 2024 survey, the Market
Rate General occupancy vacancy rate is --
3.82% (recommended goal of 5% to allow
for unit turnover and consumer choice)
6/18/2025
Hutchinson Housing Needs
• Maxfield: Because NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing) provides
the vast majority of affordable housing to renters; we recommend a
proactive approach to maintaining affordability within the existing housing
stock. Dollar for dollar, preservation of NOAH units yields a much higher
number of affordable units vs. new construction under the LIHTC program.
• 2024 Hutchinson Downtown Plan: Downtown Hutchinson could support a
significant portion of the the city's high -density residential demand.
Community engagement events showed that affordable housing options
are wanted in downtown.
• Owner Occupied Rehab: It is important for a community to maintain
existing home values. Promote building improvements programs that add
to home equity.
Recommendation for the Downtown Housing Rehab
Project
• The City received repayment funds from previous SCDP •,-_
projects in excess of $35,000. City has to use the revolving -
SCDP funds in accordance with the approved 2019 Re -use
Plan. ..�....... .
• Following the recommendations ofthe 2022 Maxfield• ----'"--
Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment and in support of
the 2024 Hutchinson Downtown Plan —the HHRA is ..
recommending the Downtown Housing Rehabilitation Project. ,
➢ Phase I Rental Rehabilitation _�•
➢ Phase II Owner Occupied Rehabilitation.
• Most of the apartments in the downtown are NOAH with
unsubsidized affordable rents, and is important to preserve for
the Hutchinson rental inventory.
• The Owner Occupied Homes in this area are the oldest in town.
Proposed SCDP Activity — Phase I Rental
Rehabilitation March 2025
72 letters sent to rental
property owners of 4
units or less:
• 7 property owners
returned interest
• 1 property
preliminarily met all
qualifications
2
6/18/2025
51% of the units must be occupied by an income
qualified household whose rents are at or below
the rent limits for McLeod County.
2025 Tenant ncome Limits
80%AMI H51 H52 H53 H54 H55 H56 HS] H58
$61,000 $69,]00 $]8,400 $8],300 $94,100 $101,050 $108,050 $115,000
2025 Rent Limits
®®®®®
$]48 $762 $933 $1,198 $1,567
During the five-year compliance period rents should not be increased.
SCDP Deferred Loan Structure
SCDP deferred loan is up to 70% of the rehab costs with a
maximum SCDP loan of $12,500/unit. 20% will be forgiven each
year after meeting affordability criteria for the 5 years.
30% of the rehab cost is an owner match.
Example: Rehabilitation costs for a 4-unit rehabilitation project
_ $71,500. The deferred loan would cover $50,000 (70% of
costs, up to $12,500/unit); and the property owner contributes
the remaining $21,500 (30% of construction costs plus overage).
Proposed SCDP Activity — Phase II Owner
Occupied Rehabilitation
After Phasel
Letters will be sent to property owners in
-
target area.
Homeowner incomelimitis thesame as
Renta1809sAMI.
SCDP Deferred Loan Structure: 70% of
rehab costs up to $24,999. Example: A
Total Rehab project cost of$36,000 would
have a Financing Breakdown of$24,999
1 --
SCDP&$11,001 wouldbe the.-
-responsibility.
SCDP Deferred Loan: 0% Interest, Deferred
Loan forgiven after 10 years. h10%will be
forgiven each full yearin the home after
- - -
rehab.
3
6/18/2025
The Overall Costs and Project Financing
ne a c,,� "
m o4axi.e/o®i:/pmge� roan
mez
s
e�w
cuss:
Pk
�Sva�c c
(F)w�^fadf'ismra
kh
�rM(��Mdbs"mtr
oral.
x�erdea
rl�
12500
soo
car
IXe
-ad1m-, 1
a
96azs
ss�sr
nimble SCDP Proposed improvements:
• Roof
• Window Replacement
• Siding/Stucco repair
• HVAC/Mechanical Sy.e
• Misc. Interior Health&Safety Issues
Implementation Schedule
1. June 2025
Public Hearing
2. July 2025
Complete DEED's start up checklist, complete federal
requirements and Environmental Review/Clearance
3. July 2025
Start Phase I: Send out Tenant Surveys & General Notices,
Inspections/Scopes of Work/Bid documents
4. July/August 2025
Bidding begins/Project Funding Finalized (Phaseff Mail
Interest letters to Homeowners in Target Area)
5. Aug/Sept 2025
Pre -Construction Meeting, Loan Closing, Notice to Proceed,
Construction/Rehab start
6. Oct 2025
Completion of Phase 1
7, Dec 2025/January 2026
Mid -grant public hearing & Phase 11 Update
8. December 2026
Project Close out
Agency & Staff Experience
Primary Implementation Agency: The Hutchinson HRA has over 26 years experience in
administering home improvements in the community, which include several SCDP
grants, variety of MHFA programs and Greater Minnesota Housing Fund programs.
Environmental Coordinator, Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity Coordinator,
Rehabilitation Coordinator, Labor Standards Coordinator, Income Verification
Coordinator, and Rent Limit and Rental Notice Coordinator: Judy Flemming has been
working with the SCDP for twenty six years and has attended multiple SCDP, MHFA and
NAHRO trainings throughout the yearsto stay current on regulations.
Property Inspector. Provide information on all inspectors if multiple activities and
inspectors would be used: City Building Department has been doing inspections for
HRA rehab programs since 2005.
M
6/18/2025
Compliance with Historic Requirements
During the Environmental Review process the State
and McLeod County Historical Society will review the
properties in the target area for historical significance.
If any are identified, we will follow the federal
regulations governing the protection of historical
properties.
Questions/Comments????
Citizen Comments, Ideas for Community Development
or Housing Needs?
Request for Approval to Use Revolving SCDP
funds for Downtown Housing Rehabilitation
Program
Request City Council approval of Resolution to use Revolving
SCDP funds for Downtown Housing Rehabilitation Program
5
RESOLUTION NO. 15879
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
IN SUPPORT OF THE USE OF REVOLVING SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM FUNDS FOR
THE HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City of Hutchinson has Revolving SCDP funds and is in support
of using the funds for the Hutchinson Downtown Housing Rehabilitation Program to foster
rehabilitation of housing for low and moderate income residents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Hutchinson has the institutional, managerial, and
financial capacity to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the
proposed project for its design life.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson has not violated any Federal, State, or
local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other
unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson certifies that it will comply with all
applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements with the State of Minnesota.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Administrator, or their
successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments thereto, as
are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson
on the of 12025.
SIGNED: WITNESSED:
Mayor of Hutchinson
Hutchinson City Administrator
Hutchinson City Clerk
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTC HIN SON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN KJAPOSE.
Stormwater, Wastewater, and Community Resiliency Project Report - South
Agenda Item:
Department: PW/Eng
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Mike Stifter
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Mike Stifter/Emily Jennings
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 10
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
The City received grant funding through the MPCA for Stormwater, Wastewater, and Community
(SWC) Resilience in 2024 to conduct a stormwater study for the south part of the city. The scope
of work identified in the grant was recently completed and a Final Project Report has been
reviewed by staff, updated and revised, and finalized for consideration.
An Open House was conducted just prior to tonight's Council meeting that completes the public
notification part that remained. The second is submitting the Final Project Report to the MPCA
for project closeout, which will occur after tonight's meeting.
The grant was used to complete a hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) modeling of the City storm
sewer system. The modeling identified parts of the system that have adequate drainage
capacity as well as those that do not. The information will be used to prioritize drainage
improvements and to inform us of future system needs due to changes in precipitation intensity
and duration.
City staff along with Emily Jennings from SEH will be available to provide a project summary
overview and to answer any questions that you may have at the meeting.
We recommend approval of the Final Project Report for submittal to the MPCA.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval to finalize and submit project report to the MPCA.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: New Bu
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
-A.
SEH
Building a Better World
for All of Us®
Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists
A.
SEH
Building a Better World
for All of Us®
June 17, 2025
Mr. Mike Stifter
Public Works Director
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Stifter:
RE: Stormwater Resiliency Assessment &
Action Plan (South)
Hutchinson, Minnesota
SEH No. HUTCHINSON 179199 5.50
Enclosed is our final report for the City of Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Assessment & Action Plan
(South). This final report incorporates comments provided by City staff and residents, and summarizes
the analysis process, existing conditions, and proposed implementation projects to increase stormwater
resilience in the City and surrounding area. Also included in this report are modeling results, figures,
opinion of estimated costs, recommendations for future work, and relevant reference materials.
This final report is one of the identified obligations in our workplan for the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) Small Communities Planning Grants for Stormwater, Wastewater and Community
Resilience. The submittal of this report is intended to satisfy this obligation
Sincerely,
Emily Jennings, PE
Project Manager
(Lic. MN)
cw/rm
x:\fj\h\hutch\179199\5-final-dsg n\50-final-dsg n\50-hydro\_report\h utch i nson_south_resi liency_assessment&action_plan.docx
Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-3507
651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 888.908.8166 fax I sehinc.com
SEH is 100% employee -owned I Affirmative Action —Equal Opportunity Employer
Stormwater Resiliency Assessment &Action Plan (South)
Hutchinson, Minnesota
SEH No. HUTCH 179199
May 14, 2025
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Emily Jennings, PE
Date: June 17, 2025 License No
56622
Reviewed By: Riley Mondloch Date: June 17, 2025
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St. Paul, MN 55110-3507
651.490.2000
SEH
Executive Summary
The City of Hutchinson covers approximately 9.5 square miles consisting mostly of residential areas with some
industrial and commercial areas and agricultural land. The City, located within McLeod County, Minnesota, has a
population of approximately 14,600. The City is bisected by the South Fork Crow River running west to east through
the City. Campbell Lake runs along the west boundary of the City. This stormwater project focuses on the portion of
the City south of the South Fork Crow River. A separate study was completed in 2024 with a focus on the north part
of the City.
The City has experienced numerous significant localized flooding events in recent years where street and residential
flooding occurred in several areas. Storms large enough to cause problematic flooding occurred in 1993, 1997, 2002,
2010, 2013, 2014, and numerous other years.
New infrastructure planning should make use of improved baselines that take into consideration climate change and
its associated evolving risks, as well as social and environmental factors that focus on identifying areas of
vulnerability and target projects that aim to increase infrastructure and community resilience.
This resiliency assessment and action plan includes an assessment and analysis of multiple environmental
parameters such as land use, floodplains, existing infrastructure, and aims to provide the City with a clear and
detailed prioritization framework that incorporates social vulnerability, environmental justice, and critical services into
the community -wide scale study.
A detailed rain -on -grid XPSWMM hydrologic/hydraulic model was created for the portion of the City of Hutchinson
south of the river. To provide a better understanding on how climatic changes impact local communities, county
specific precipitation projections developed by the University of Minnesota (U of M) Climate Adaptation Partnership
were evaluated and analyzed along with existing infrastructure and potential improvement opportunities.
The integration of climate mitigation and adaptation requires rethinking the interplay between the urban environment
and nature; the primary focus of this evaluation of potential projects is flood damage reduction, with the understanding
that with the implementation of best management practices and green infrastructure projects, other benefits will be
achieved including water quality improvements, habitat enhancements and community engagement and stewardship.
An important aspect in fulfilling planning and implementation projects is in building community consensus. The public
open house held and community input map developed as part of this plan was a valuable tool in understanding the
needs of the community and gaining support for future projects.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH) HUTCHINSON 179199
ES-1
Contents
Letter of Transmittal
Certification Page
Executive Summary
Contents
1 Background & Project Goals.......................................1
2 Data Collection, Review, & Development (Task 1) .... 2
2.1 Review of Previous Studies....................................................................2
2.2 Review of Available Stormwater Data and Field Data Collection ............ 3
3 Outreach and Community Input (Task 6) ...................3
4 Existing Stormwater System Resilience Assessment
(Task 2 & 3).................................................................3
4.1
Existing Conditions XPSWMM Model Development...............................3
4.2
XPSWMM Model Calibration..................................................................4
4.3
Stormwater Infrastructure Inadequacy Mapping.....................................5
4.4
Impact of Climate Change on Localized Flooding..................................6
4.5
Existing Stormwater Management Vulnerability Assessment.................7
4.6
Existing Stormwater Management Critical Infrastructure and Damage
Potential Assessment.............................................................................7
5 Identified Stormwater Projects to Lesson Impacts of
Localized Flooding due to Climate Change (Task 4) .8
5.1 Development and Evaluation of Stormwater Management
Improvements.........................................................................................8
5.2 Estimation of Project Implementation Costs.........................................10
6 Proposed Stormwater Management System
Resiliency and Vulnerability Evaluation (Task 5) .....11
6.1 Improvement Concept System Risk Assessment.................................1'
7 Summary of Recommendations & Action Plan ........16
7.2 Supplemental Data...............................................................................17
SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH) HUTCHINSON 179199
Contents (continued)
List of Tables
Table 4-1 — Rainfall Depths used to Simulate Climate Change..................................7
Table 5-1 — Projected Budgets................................................................................. 11
Table 7-1 — Project Priority Recommendation.......................................................... 16
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Study Area
Figure 2 — Existing Storm Infrastructure
Figure 3 — Community Comments
Figure 4.1 —Watersheds
Figure 4.2 — Existing Conditions 2-year Storm Results
Figure 4.3 — Existing Conditions 10-year Storm Results
Figure 4.4 — Existing Conditions 100-year Storm Results
Figure 4.5 — 10-year Storm Existing Pipe Capacity
Figure 4.6 — Existing Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.7 — Existing Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.8 — Existing Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.9 — MPCA Vulnerability Mapping
Figure 4.10 — Key Infrastructure with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.11 — Key Infrastructure with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.12 — Damage Potential with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.13 — Damage Potential with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 5.1 —
Proposed Concept Layouts
Figure 5.2 —
Project 1 Layout
Figure 5.3 —
Project 2 Layout
Figure 5.4 —
Project 3 Layout
Figure 5.5 — Project 4 Layout
Figure 5.6 — Project 5 Layout
Figure 5.7 — Project 6 Layout
Figure 5.8 — Project 7 Layout
Figure 5.9 — Project 8 Layout
Figure 6.1 — Proposed Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.2 — Proposed Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.3 — Proposed Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.4 — Project 1 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.5 — Project 2 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH) HUTCHINSON 179199
Contents (continued)
Figure 6.6 —
Project 3 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.7 —
Project 4 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.8 —
Project 5 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.9 —
Project 6 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.10
—Project 7 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.11
—Project 8 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
List of Appendices
Appendix A SWC Resilience Grant Application and Agreement
Appendix B
Public Comments Summary
Appendix C
Web Soil Survey Data
Appendix D
Flooding Photos
Appendix E
Project Cost Estimates
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH) HUTCHINSON 179199
Stormwater Resiliency Assessment & Action
Plan (South)
Prepared for City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Background & Project Goals
The City of Hutchinson (City) secured funding through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) Planning Grants for Stormwater, Wastewater, and Community Resiliency to study and
address localized flooding issues and effects on vulnerable populations within the City. This plan
evaluates the current and future stormwater related vulnerabilities to the Hutchinson community
and populations, including a focused evaluation of the entire southern portion of the City.
The southern portion of the City of Hutchinson covers approximately 5.4 square miles consisting
mostly of residential areas with industrial and commercial areas and agricultural land. The City,
located within McLeod County, Minnesota, has a population of approximately 14,600. The
topography within the southern part of the City generally slopes to the north, towards the South
Fork Crow River.
The receiving waters for the south part of the City include South Fork Crow River to the north and
east, Otter Lake to the west, and McCuen Creek to the south. All drainage ultimately discharges
to the South Fork Crow River, which is impaired for pollutants that affect aquatic consumption, life
and recreation. The existing storm sewer is made up of many individual systems with separate
outlets to the receiving waters. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) regulatory flood maps, the 100-year floodplain though this section of the South Fork
Crow River is mostly confined within a river valley that is much lower than the majority of the City.
The City has experienced numerous significant localized flooding events in recent years. Climate
change projections for Minnesota show the frequency of these intense rainfall events increasing
in the future, thereby increasing the potential for future flooding within communities like
Hutchinson.
Based on environmental justice mapping available through the MPCA, the City Hutchinson is no
longer considered an Environmental Justice area. Under the previous extents the City was fully
within an area indicated to have at least 35% of people reporting income less than 200% of the
federal poverty level. Mapping was based on the U.S. Census Bureau's five-year 2017-2021
American Community Survey data and tribal areas derived from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2023
Cartographic Boundary File and Minnesota Department of Transportation's Tribal Government in
Minnesota. Following the grant pursuit the MPCA modified the EJ area mapping to margin of
error considerations. With this change, the City of Hutchinson is no longer mapped as an EJ
area. The figures in this plan show the previously mapped areas that were considered during the
time of grant pursuit.
This document is a new Stormwater Resiliency Assessment & Action Plan (Plan) that can be
used by City staff, McLeod County, developers, and residents of Hutchinson to increase the
HUTCHINSON 179199
Page 1
2
2.1
stormwater resiliency of the community. The City of Hutchinson aimed to achieve the following
goals through this planning process:
1. Identify locations within the study area that are most prone to localized flooding by
developing an XPSWMM model of the stormwater management infrastructure,
2. Identify feasible stormwater improvement projects that minimize localized flooding within the
study area and develop corresponding implementation cost estimates,
3. Estimate the impacts of climate change on existing stormwater infrastructure, and
considering the proposed improvements,
4. Conduct a vulnerability assessment to identify locations where localized flooding impacts
vulnerable populations for existing and proposed conditions,
5. Conduct a damage potential assessment to identify areas of greatest flood damage potential
within the study area for existing and proposed conditions,
6. Conduct a critical infrastructure assessment to identify locations within the study area where
critical infrastructure is at risk of flooding for existing and proposed conditions,
7. Engage the public to obtain input and share information throughout the planning process, and
8. Produce an actionable plan that clearly identifies feasible stormwater improvement projects,
prioritizes projects for implementation, and provides corresponding implementation costs.
Appendix A includes the grant application and agreement submitted by the City. Figure 1 shows
a map of the City, study area, and other key features.
Data Collection, Review, &Development
(Task 1)
Review of Previous Studies
The City has not previously completed a comprehensive stormwater study covering the south
portion of the community. However, smaller drainage studies have been completed in certain
areas. Most notably, the Fairgrounds Ditch Closure study evaluated alternatives for closing the
ditch from Market Street at Denver Avenue to the wetland south of the future Edmonton Avenue
extension to allow for future development. The study explored options to replace the ditch with
storm sewer infrastructure while minimizing impacts to the wetland and managing peak flows.
Alternatives considered included constructing a pond west of the wetland to provide storage and
reduce peak flows to Airport Road, as well as varying amounts and locations of compensatory
storage. The study ultimately recommended a combination of storage alternatives to mitigate
impacts on the upstream drainage system.
The pond at Linden Park was expanded as a result of the South Central Drainage Improvement
study. This project was constructed after lidar was flown, so the construction plans were used to
modify the surface to reflect the new pond in the modeling for this study.
In 2024, a Stormwater Resiliency Assessment & Action Plan was completed for the north portion
of the City of Hutchinson.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 2
HUTCHINSON 179199
2.2 Review of Available Stormwater Data and Field Data Collection
The City provided a GIS shapefile database containing pipe and structure data. Short Elliott
Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) conducted an analysis of the completeness of existing City infrastructure
GIS data for use in model development, specifically focusing on catch basins, manholes, outfalls,
and storm pipes. The data was relatively complete in terms of pipe sizes and invert data,
however there were also some missing data points. SEH identified the most critical missing data
points, which were primarily invert and pipe size data for larger trunk line pipes and created a
dataset marking those locations. City staff surveyed the missing data and updated the GIS
database. Figure 2 shows the updated existing storm infrastructure map developed based on the
survey data for this study.
The City also provided critical infrastructure locations. This data was used in the infrastructure
adequacy and risk assessments discussed in following sections.
GIS data for the previous vulnerable populations was obtained from the MPCA Environmental
Justice Screening and Mapping Tool. This tool provides many GIS layers related to
environmental justice, but the specific layers used for this project was the layer showing previous
areas of income below a percentage of the federal poverty level.
Surface data was obtained from McLeod County. The surface data used was the 1-meter
resolution raster derived from LiDAR.
3 Outreach and Community Input (Task 6)
To supplement the City's knowledge and to help guide the project direction, initial public outreach
was initiated in 2024. This outreach was primarily led by City staff. Additionally, SEH created a
GIS based community web map to solicit information on past flooding.
The community input map included an interactive web map of the study area to allows residents
and City staff to add digital markups to identify areas of observed flooding or other stormwater
related concerns within the City. This map was used as part of the modeling calibration process
to verify that the model was producing results similar to flooding observed. Figure 3 shows the
community and City input points. Appendix B includes the text comments provided at individual
points from Figure 3. The community input map was hosted from December 2024 through spring
2025.
In addition to general public feedback, specific engagement occurred with City staff. This
included meeting with staff to discuss scope of the project and identified additional areas of
concern from the stakeholders.
4 Existing Stormwater System Resilience
Assessment (Task 2 & 3)
4.1 Existing Conditions XSPWMM Model Development
A 1 D-2D XPSWMM model was developed for the project study area using XPSWMM version
2024. A 1 D-2D model solves for flow in pipes separately with 1 D equations, but flow on the
surface is modeled in 2D allowing for accurate ponding and flooding representation and a more
complete understanding of any complex flow patterns that may be present. Flow can exit the
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 3
HUTCHINSON 179199
4.2
underground storm sewer system by surcharging and flows can pass from the surface to the
storm sewer through inlets if pipe capacity is available.
Three storm return periods were run in the model, including the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year,
24-hour rainfall events. These design storms use rainfall depth data from the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 data for McLeod County, and assume the
rainfall matches the MSE3 distribution commonly used for modeling design storm events. These
storms were later adjusted to be more intense to account for climate change. Note that the
10-year storm has a 1 in 10 or 10% chance of occurring in a given year, and the 100-year has a 1
in 100 or 1 % chance of occurring in a given year.
Soil and land use data is required to inform the hydrologic model how much water can infiltrate
the ground during a rain event. For example, sandy soils will allow much more water to soak into
the soil during a storm, and areas where the land is predominantly paved will result in higher
rainfall runoff than areas that are covered by natural material like grass or forest. Soil data was
obtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Soil Survey Geographic Database
(SSURGO) database. The hydrologic soil group data from the SSURGO is included as Appendix
C. Within GIS, a land use shapefile was created based on aerial photography to indicate areas
that are impervious, grass, or agriculture. The land use and soil data shapefiles are then used in
conjunction to calculate the amount of rainfall that can't soak into the soil and instead runs off
during a storm.
Storm inlet structures within the City are a mix of various types. Inlet rating curves can be
developed based on weir and orifice calculations using the open area and opening perimeter
numbers. However, this model assumed that catch basins had unlimited capacity; this practice is
used in the model so that the flooding results depend on the capacity of the storm sewer pipes.
Storm sewer pipe sizes are usually the limiting factor and are the critical piece of information
when it comes to cost estimating and planning proposed projects. The amount of catch basins
needed is better determined during final design so this was not completed as part of this planning
level stormwater study.
The model was developed at a scale that provides as much detail as possible while still having
manageable computation times. Rain -on -grid modeling was used for the majority of the modeled
area. Rain -on -grid modeling refers to a model where rainfall and flooding is simulated by applying
rainfall uniformly over the model surface, the model then solves for water flows off the watershed
and ponds within low areas. This results in a realistic representation of movement of water across
the ground and peak depth of flooding for a given storm. Larger watersheds outside the
residential area of the City utilized Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number hydrologic
methodology (TR-55) instead of rain -on -grid in order to reduce the model computation time.
These watersheds represented flow input from the agricultural lands to the north and east of the
City as well as a couple of smaller watersheds from the agricultural lands west of Island View
Heights on the west end of the City. Figure 4.1 shows the watersheds delineated and rain on grid
area. Watersheds were delineated for the entire project area as shown but were only utilized for
the model outside the rain -on -grid area.
XPSWMM Model Calibration
Numerous rainfall events large enough to cause problematic flooding have occurred in
Hutchinson in recent years. The calibration was completed in part by discussing the initial model
results with City staff to compare the inundation shown by the model to what has been observed
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 4
HUTCHINSON 179199
4.3
in the past when a similar rainfall event occurred. The initial hydrologic input parameters used for
the model were estimated based on land use, soils data, and topography. City staff provided
feedback that the model was producing results that showed more inundation than what they
would expect for a given rainfall depth. The public comments map notes a number of areas
where flooding occurs, and the model is producing flooding in these locations consistent with the
comments.
To improve the alignment between the modeled results and observed conditions, several
adjustments were tested during the calibration process. These included lowering the Manning's n
values assigned to the pipes to reduce flow resistance. Infiltration rates and initial abstraction
were increased in an effort to better represent the amount of rainfall absorbed by the ground
before contributing to runoff. In some cases, catch basin top -of -casting elevations were lowered
where they appeared high and were preventing water from entering the system. Inlet capacities
were also increased to reflect more realistic flow capture at the surface. Additionally, the
Manning's n values assigned to different land use categories were adjusted to slow down the
water and allow for more infiltration across various areas.
Even after applying these calibration changes, the model still appeared to overestimate surface
inundation. However, based on the available calibration data, the results were considered
acceptable. Most importantly, the model did not appear to underrepresent flooding. Therefore, no
additional changes to the hydrologic parameters were made following calibration.
Stormwater Infrastructure Inadequacy Mapping
Figures 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4 show the peak inundation extents and depth of flooding results from
the XPSWMM model for the 2, 10, and 100-year, 24-hour storm with Atlas 14 rainfall totals and
the MSE3 rainfall distribution, respectively. These results reflect the flooding that can be
expected under existing conditions using the current rainfall data. Figure 4.6 shows the Atlas 14
10-year inundation depth results and the modeled pipe flow vs the capacity of the pipe during this
event, demonstrating the pipes that are the most undersized. Note that pipe capacity typically
refers to the flow rate a pipe can convey at a given size and slope without being pressurized,
meaning the peak water elevation is below the top of pipe. Pipe flow can exceed this capacity by
being pressurized, meaning that the actual water elevation would be higher than the top of pipe if
an open structure existed. The higher the water elevation is above the top of pipe, the higher the
pressure is and the more flow is forced through the pipe. Flow in storm pipes will become
pressurized once the design capacity is exceeded, however this doesn't necessarily correlate to
flooding. Some pressure flow can occur before water begins to surcharge onto the surface. The
deeper the pipe, the more flow can be forced through a pipe before water starts to surcharge on
to the ground surface out of the manholes and catch basins.
It should be noted that the flow through the pipes is dependent on both the capacity of the pipe
itself, and on other pipes upstream and downstream. For example, if the pipes upstream are
made larger and have a higher capacity, a pipe downstream from that location may show as
more inadequate due the additional flow that can be routed to it from the upstream pipe.
However, the various storm systems in Hutchinson are relatively separate from each other, which
reduces this effect.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 5
HUTCHINSON 179199
4.4 Impact of Climate Change on Localized Flooding
There are number of climate projection sources, and new climate projections are continuously
being developed. It's generally agreed that rainfall amounts and intensities are expected to
increase in Minnesota. Two sources were considered for climate change for this study.
• U of M Atlas 14 replication tables based on Minnesota 10km dynamically downscaled
climate projections.
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness
Tool (CREAT) Climate Scenarios Projection Map
These climate change models are only projections, but they will serve the purpose of
representing an increase in flood risk that can be used to identify areas that are most susceptible
to increases in rainfall depth or intensity. The projections are best thought of as a guideline for
choosing a factor of safety to add resiliency to any proposed designs, but it is ultimately up to the
community and consultants to decide how to adjust for climate change for a specific study within
the range of projection values available.
4.4.1 U of M Atlas 14 Replication Tables
The University of Minnesota (U of M) replication tables provide application of NOAA's Atlas 14
methods to dynamically down -scaled climate change projections. The authors state in the data
description that this is intended as proof of concept at this time. The projections are provided for
each county, so the McLeod County data was used. Projections are presented for different times
in the future and with different emission scenarios. The 2080 to 2097 high emissions scenario
was referenced for this project as it is the most conservative. The 24-hour rainfall totals from this
source are shown in Table 4-1.
4.4.2 EPA CREAT
The EPA CREAT tool was created to assist water sector utilities in assessing climate -related
risks to assets and operations. It provides projections in several categories including both
precipitation and intensity. The precipitation increases are less applicable to the modeling
approach in this case as they are annual rainfall totals. The storm intensity increases would be
more relevant to the shorter (24-hour) duration storms used for this project. They present a
"Stormy" and "Not as Stormy" scenario for 2060 for the 100-year storm. McLeod County is
showing a 6.1 % increase for the "Not as Stormy" scenario, and a 29.6% increase in intensity for
the "Stormy" scenario. The average 2060 projected increase in intensity from this source is
17.9%. The rainfall adjustments made based on these values are included in Table 4-1.
4.4.3 Climate Data Used for Analysis
Both sources listed above were used to develop the climate projection rainfall totals to use in this
study. The U of M rainfall totals for the 2-year and 10-year increase by 1.4 and 14 percent
respectively compared to the Atlas 14 values. While it may be true that the intensity of smaller
storms won't increase by as much, the purpose of this study is to incorporate additional resilience
into the design event.
For the purposes of this study, the design event was developed using the 10-year climate
adjusted storm. To ensure the 10-year rainfall total is adjusted by enough to be able to
accommodate larger storms and account for the high uncertainty of potential increases in rainfall
intensity, the 10-year rainfall total was instead adjusted by the average EPA CREAT value
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 6
HUTCHINSON 179199
M
4.5
(17.9%) rather than the smaller percent increase indicated by the U of M data. Similarly, the
adjusted 2-year rainfall total modeled to represent climate change was also derived by multiplying
the Atlas 14 total by 17.9%. The 100-year storm climate adjusted storm modeled used the higher
increase shown in the U of M data.
Table 4-1 shows the rainfall depths used for climate change scenarios.
Table 4-1 — Rainfall Depths used to Simulate Climate Change
NOAA Atlas 14 24-hour Rainfall Total
2.76
4.08
6.89
(in)
U of M Precipitation Depth Estimates
2.8
4.65
8.46
(24-hour) (in)
(1.4%)
(14.0%)
(22.8%)
EPA CREAT Precipitation Depth
3.25
4.81
8.12
Estimates (24-hour) (in)
(17.9%)
(17.9%)
(17.9%)
Final Rainfall Total Used
3.26
4.81
8.46
Resiliency of Existing Stormwater System to Climate Change
The existing conditions model was run with the projected climate change rainfall depths,
described above, with the MSE3 distribution for the 2, 10, and 100-year events. The depth results
of the climate change scenarios are shown in Figure 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8, respectively.
Existing Stormwater Management Vulnerability Assessment
Figure 4.9 shows the MPCA's previous mapping for environmental justice areas. This figure
demonstrates that the nearly the entire city and modeled area are within an area previously
classified as having at least 35% of people with reported income less than 200% of the federal
poverty level.
Impacts to residents could be both in the form of affecting their own property or community
infrastructure that they rely on. The existing mapping should provide benefits in the form of
knowing risks that property owners may or may not be aware of.
Existing Stormwater Management Critical Infrastructure and
Damage Potential Assessment
The City provided input identifying critical infrastructure locations. Critical infrastructure is defined
as facilities that must be able to remain open or accessible during flooding or other emergencies
based on public safety, such as a fire station or hospital. A building footprint shapefile was also
developed as part of the GIS database to more easily identify when structures are indicated as
being exposed to flooding during one of the modeled events.
Figures 4.10 and 4.11 respectively show the flood extents and depth results for the 10 and 100-
year events (adjusted for climate change) with critical infrastructure identified. Figures 4.12 and
4.13 show the flood extents and depth results for the 10 and 100-year events (adjusted for
climate change) with inundated buildings and building values identified. The buildings are
symbolized to indicate the approximate average depth of flooding at the building locations. These
figures can be used as a tool to show which properties and structures are most likely to
experience flooding increases in the modeled climate change scenario. Assessing monetary
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 7
HUTCHINSON 179199
impact of these increases would require more detail specific to the site such as the elevation of
structures within the property.
5 Identified Stormwater Projects to Lesson Impacts
of Localized Flooding due to Climate Change
(Task 4)
Understanding the stormwater needs is a critical piece of this study, as is identifying potential
future steps to ensure that adequate investment is made into the infrastructure to best serve the
public needs. Below follows a series of potential projects for consideration. Results and
recommendations follow in Section 6 of this report.
5.1 Development and Evaluation of Stormwater Management
Improvements
The stormwater management improvements modeled were identified using the mapping data
above combined with the City's knowledge of areas with historical complaints or flooding history.
The public feedback and future reconstruction plans were also considered in the development of
the potential improvements. Figure 6.1 shows the improvement concept areas, the number IDs
correspond to the more detailed descriptions below. The proposed changes discussed below
have only been developed to a conceptual level at this time. Additional design will be needed for
each selected project to confirm the best routing, pipes to replace, location and size of ponds,
and location of catch basins, as applicable. These conceptual level model results demonstrate
the magnitude of improvement that can be expected and the size of trunk line pipe that will be
needed to achieve these results. Estimated quantities are included in the cost estimate section of
this report.
5.1.1 Project 1: Increase Pipe Capacity on Main Street South of 5th Avenue SE
Project 1 aims to reduce storm sewer surcharging along Main Street just south of 5th Avenue SE.
This project involves increasing storm sewer capacity at Milwaukee Avenue SW on Main Street S
to Hasan Street SE on 5th Avenue SE. The goal is to better convey stormwater during large
rainfall events and minimize surface flooding and roadway impacts. It's likely additional inlets will
be needed along with the larger pipe, but this will be determined during final design. Figure 6.2
shows the layout for this concept. The path shown follows the existing pipe alignment.
5.1.2 Project 2: Expand Existing Pond on Echo Drive SE
This project involves expanding the existing pond located on Echo Drive SE to provide additional
stormwater storage and reduce flooding on the adjacent roadway. The proposed pond expansion
would increase the total storage footprint to approximately 0.5 acres. This concept also includes
connecting the pond to the storm sewer with an 18" pipe. This will allow the expanded pond to
function as a surge basin, where water can back up into the pond when the pipe under the road
is over capacity. Figure 6.3 shows the layout for this concept.
Further design will be needed to confirm the pond grading, outlet configuration, and final pipe
sizing. Land acquisition may also need to be evaluated if the expansion footprint extends beyond
existing right-of-way or drainage easements.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 8
HUTCHINSON 179199
5.1.3 Project 3: Expand Ponding Southwest of Century Avenue SE and
Sherwood Street SE and Increase Storm Sewer Capacity to the Outfall
This project involves expanding ponding southwest of the intersection of Century Avenue SE and
Sherwood Street SE, as well as increasing the capacity of the storm sewer from the pond area to
the outfall at the river. The ponding expansion maintains the original pond footprints but
increases storage by deepening the ponds and adjacent baseball field area. The pipes on
Bradford Street SE and Sherwood Street SE were also upsized to target additional inundation
areas. The outfall location remains the same as the existing condition, discharging directly to the
river. Figure 6.4 shows the layout for this concept.
Additional design will be needed to finalize pond grading, depth, and outlet structure sizing, as
well as to confirm the required pipe diameters along the alignment.
5.1.4 Project 4: Add Storage South of Ridgewater College Parking Lot
This project involves constructing a new ditch and pond south of the Ridgewater College parking
lot to provide temporary stormwater storage and better control the location of inundation
downstream. This scenario was modeled to test if a proposed ditch could convey runoff into the
new pond area and detain it before releasing flows to the downstream storm sewer system
running north on Montreal Street. Figure 6.6 shows the layout for this concept.
Further design will be required to determine the optimal pond configuration, ditch grading, outlet
structure, and the potential need for easements depending on the final footprint of the
improvements.
5.1.5 Project 5: Fairgrounds Ditch Closure
This project incorporates a recommended solution from the prior Fairgrounds Ditch Closure
study. The project consists of filling the existing ditch and installing approximately 1,200 feet of
60-inch storm sewer pipe to replace the open channel. Compensatory storage would be provided
by constructing a pond parallel to the ditch closure and on the downstream side of the ditch
closure to mitigate lost storage volume. Along with providing compensatory storage for the ditch
closure, the downstream pond also allows the new pipe alignment to bypass the wetland due to
elevation concerns with the new outlet elevation. The downstream pond will also need to be
connected to the adjacent wetland to maintain wetland hydrology. This hydrologic connection
method is to be finalized during design. As indicated in the Fairgrounds Ditch Closure study, 13.6
ac-ft of storage was modeled for the intermediate compensatory storage and 1.1 ac-ft of storage
was modeled for the downstream pond. Figure 6.6 shows the layout for this concept.
Additional design will be required to determine the alignment, outlet structure, and connection
details to the wetland, along with any necessary land acquisition.
5.1.6 Project 6: Increase Pipe Capacity from Glenda Lane SW to the River
This potential project scenario aims to increase storm sewer capacity from Glenda Lane SW to
the river to reduce localized flooding along Glenda Lane SW and surrounding homes. Because
this area has limited vertical cover, any larger -diameter pipe will require careful design to account
for cover constraints and the condition that the FEMA Base Flood Elevation (BFE) is 1045 feet
(NAVD88) compared to the low point elevation of 1042.8. Incorporating a backflow preventer is
recommended for any future storm pipe in this area to reduce the risk of river water flowing
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 9
HUTCHINSON 179199
5.1.7
5.1.8
5.2
backwards through the storm system during a major flood on the South Fork Crow River. Due to
cover limitations, this scenario uses two separate outfall alignments to allow the use of smaller
diameter pipes and maintain cover along the pipe routes. Figure 6.7 shows the layout for this
concept.
Project 7: Ditch Cleanout to Airport Road SW to Restore Normal Water
Level in Ravenwood Pond
This project involves regrading the ditch from Ravenwood Pond to Airport Road SW to restore
the normal water level (NWL) of Ravenwood Pond and improve conveyance. In addition to the
ditch regrading, this project includes deepening Ravenwood Pond to increase storage capacity
while maintaining the existing pond footprint. Figure 6.8 shows the layout for this concept. The
City stated that the ditch was overgrown and could be reducing conveyance out of the pond.
Further design will be required to determine the optimal pond dredging, ditch grading, and the
potential need for easements due to the ditch being privately owned.
Project 8: Increase Pipe Capacity to Summerset Pond
This project involves increasing storm sewer capacity both upstream of the Summerset Ponds
and from Jefferson Street SE to the outfall at the river. The goal is to eliminate the street
inundation on Summerset Lane SE and reduce inundation in the low-lying area downstream of
the ponds by improving both upstream and downstream conveyance. Figure 6.9 shows the
layout for this concept.
Estimation of Project Implementation Costs
Project implementation costs were estimated for each project identified above. With the limited
information available, cost estimates should be considered budgetary assuming implementation
within the next year and should be refined and inflated as necessary based as the project
progresses and based on the potential schedule of construction.
Cost estimating was completed with the expectation that the storm sewer infrastructure will
require a reconstruction of the associated surface roadway improvements. While it is likely that
additional work may take place as part of the same construction project, such as sanitary sewer
and potable water system replacement, these costs are not included at this time. A summary of
projected budgets for each project is shown in the table below. Note that these costs do include a
30 percent contingency. The costs do not include engineering fees or potential right-of-way/
easement or other cost associated with land acquisition.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 10
HUTCHINSON 179199
X
1%
Table 5-1 — Projected Budgets
Project Name JAW& Budget
Project 1 $995,000
Project 2
$230,000
Project 3
$3,035,000
Project 4
$1,250,000
Project 5
$1,810,000
Project 6
$885,000
Project 7
$425,000
Project 8
$1,075,000
sum
$9,690,000
An overall summary of the budget assigned to each project is listed in the table below. Further
details can be seen in Appendix E.
Proposed Stormwater Management System
Resiliency and Vulnerability Evaluation (Task 5)
Improvement Concept System Risk Assessment
Figures 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 respectively show the model results for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-
year climate adjusted storm events with all the improvement concepts added to the model as
described in section 5 of this report. These figures also include approximate average flood depth
around buildings with the proposed concepts in place. The building flood depth results can be
compared to those in the existing conditions results in Figures 4.12 and 4.13 to visualize the
flood risk reduction for numerous structures by adding the proposed improvement concepts.
It's important to note that while these projects can provide significant improvements in the worst
flooding areas, larger storms above the design event may still overwhelm even an improved
storm system. The concepts developed for this study focus on reducing the most severe flooding.
Improving smaller nuisance flood areas may be possible through the implementation of green
stormwater infrastructure (GSI) concepts within the city and depending on the extents of a given
project and should be reviewed closer during final design stages.
Project 1 Results
Peak Flooding Analysis
With project concept 1 in place the model shows a significant reduction in flood depths and
extents on Main Street S in the vicinity of 5th Avenue SW. The larger storm sewer lowered the
flood elevations in the flooding areas by up to 0.25 feet. Project 1 could significantly reduce street
flooding for the 10-year climate adjusted design event as shown in Figure 6.4.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 11
HUTCHINSON 179199
6.1.1.2 � Recommendations
Project 1 is an effective solution to flooding on Main Street S and it is recommended to pursue
this project further to acquire funding and move towards a final design. This project may make
the most sense to incorporate into a larger street project if this area is due for reconstruction in
the near future.
6.1.2 Project 2 Results
6.1.2.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Project 2 is effective at reducing street flooding during the design event. With Project 2 in place
the peak depth of flooding on the Echo Drive SE was reduced by approximately 0.7 feet during
the 10-year climate adjusted design event. Peak flooding depths in the lot west of the proposed
pond expansion are shown as being lowered by approximately 0.5 feet. While these depth
reductions are not massive, they would be enough to reduce or remove flooding on the street and
allow passage of vehicles.
Figure 6.6 shows the 10-year climate adjusted storm results with Project 2 completed.
6.1.2.2 Recommendations
It is recommended to pursue further funding for this project. The project concept as shown in the
figures conveys a significant volume of water from the street into the new proposed pond.
Additional analysis could be done to determine if inundation could be reduced further with a
different outlet control system or improved pipe capacity near the proposed pond.
6.1.3 Project 3 Results
6.1.3.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Model results show that Project 3 significantly reduces peak flooding depths and extents in
several of the largest, deepest flood -prone areas, including Century Avenue SE, Bradford Street
SE, and Sherwood Street SE, for the 10-year climate -adjusted design event. The flooding depths
were reduced by up to 1.6 feet on Century Avenue SE, 1.3 feet on Bradford Street SE, and 1.2
feet on Sherwood Street SE due to the project improvements. A reduction in flood risk can be
noted for 6 structures as well. It should be noted that SEH also modeled this proposed project
with exclusively storage improvements, which subsequently resulted in a small benefit for the
inundation on Sherwood Street SE only. This demonstrates that while the pond expansion does
have some very minor benefit on its own, the increased pipe capacity has a far greater impact
than the pond expansion and could be constructed without the pond expansion and still result in
a similar flood reduction.
Figure 6.6 shows the 10-year climate adjusted storm results with Project 3 completed.
6.1.3.2 Recommendations
Project 3 is the largest project that was studied and is shown to have the most benefit in terms of
total reduction of the inundation extent areas. With the large decrease in inundation, it is
recommended to pursue this project further to acquire funding and move towards a final design.
The pipe capacity improvements are the proposed change responsible for the improvement
shown and should be prioritized over any storage improvements in this area. If there are any
roadway projects in this area it would be recommended to pair this project with that.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 12
HUTCHINSON 179199
6.1.4 Project 4 Results
6.1.4.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Figure 6.7 shows the 10-year climate adjusted storm results with Project 4 completed. The
proposed ditch and pond collect surface inundation from the greenspace south of the buildings
and parking lots. However, this proposed scenario was modeled to determine if it could provide
any reduction in flooding in the storm sewer system downstream (running north along Montreal
Street) from the greenspace area. The model results show that while local water can be collected
in the pond, doing so does not appear to provide any reduction in flooding in the downstream
storm sewer system on Montreal Street.
6.1.4.2 Recommendations
It is not recommended to pursue Project 4 as shown in Figure 6.7 further at this time. While it can
collect water from an existing ponding area with poor drainage, there do not appear to be any
benefits to flooding outside the immediate area, which makes it difficult to justify the potential cost
from a flood reduction perspective.
However, if there is desire to improve drainage in the immediate greenspace area of the
Ridgewater college campus, this may be better achieved by creating an engineered filtration
pond designed to filtrate water prior to discharge to existing storm pipe on one of the adjacent
roads. Such a pond could be designed to treat additional runoff from the parking lots to the north
and improve water quality while also reducing the potential for standing water in the area. This
design should be undertaken with a focus on drainage and water quality rather than flood
reduction, which would allow for a much smaller footprint than the pond shown in Figure 6.7.
6.1.5 Project 5 Results
6.1.5.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Figure 6.8 shows the 10-year climate adjusted storm results with Project 5 completed. This
project alternative follows the recommendations from the Fairgrounds Ditch Closure study. The
purposes of that study were to fill in the ditch without causing any increase to inundation
upstream of the ditch. As can be seen on the figure, there is a "no rise" condition with this ditch
closure project, even with some reduction in the inundation upstream of this ditch closure.
Potential indirect wetland impacts could result from changing the wetland hydrology by rerouting
runoff around the wetland, so the final design should include some form of hydrologic connection
between the wetland and proposed stormwater pond. This will help ensure some amount of water
continues to flow into and through the wetland, similar to existing conditions.
6.1.5.2 Recommendation
This project would be recommended if the City decides to close the ditch. If one large
intermediate pond providing compensatory storage was not preferred, this could also be split into
multiple ponds that have the same amount of compensatory storage.
Should a final design of this project occur, it is anticipated that work will be necessary within or
near wetlands which will require additional evaluation and regulatory approvals. Wetland impacts
can be a result of filling, excavation, or the alteration of hydrology. For this reason, a wetland
delineation will likely be required as part of detailed design of the proposed improvements. Once
the design has been completed, a wetland permit application will be required to obtain permission
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 13
HUTCHINSON 179199
to complete the proposed work. This process may take several months depending on the extent
and type of wetland impacts.
6.1.6 Project 6 Results
6.1.6.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Figure 6.9 shows the 10-year climate adjusted storm results with Project 6 completed. This
project reduces flooding around Darrel Drive SW. There is a reduction in peak flood depths of up
to 0.4 feet on Darrel Drive SW. There also is a large reduction in buildings showing inundation
from the existing to proposed conditions. The 10-year rainfall shows a reduction from 14 to 4
structures having inundation. There are also 8 structures that show a reduction for the 100-year
rainfall.
The modeling completed for this analysis looks at a condition where rainfall has occurred on the
local watershed, but there is no significant flooding on the South Fork Crow River. The FEMA
regulatory flood maps show that when flooding is occurring on the South Fork Crow River, the
river elevations will be higher than the road and structure elevations in this part of Darrel Drive
SW. Increasing pipe capacity will not provide benefit when the water elevation on the South Fork
Crow River is causing the flooding in this area.
6.1.6.2 Recommendation
Project 6 does show a reduction in flooding on Darrel Drive SW but is not as significant as
desired. Flood depths are still shown to be 1.9 feet in some areas but with the cover and grade
issues there are limitations to how much flooding can be improved by just increasing pipe
capacity. These pipes are recommended to be upsized by as much as cover allows if a storm
pipe replacement project in this area is ever completed.
However, given the cover issues and low elevations of this area relative to the South Fork Crow
River, it's recommended that alternative measures be considered further prior to any storm sewer
improvements. Given that the structures in this area appear to be manufactured homes, it may be
significantly more cost effective to consider property acquisitions for any repeatedly flooded
structures in this area instead of infrastructure improvements.
6.1.7 Project 7 Results
6.1.7.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Project 7 involves regrading the ditch from Ravenwood Pond to Airport Road SW and deepening
Ravenwood Pond to increase storage capacity while maintaining the existing pond footprint. The
model results show that the project reduces the normal water level (NWL) of Ravenwood Pond
by approximately 1.6 feet, improving storage and conveyance from the pond to Airport Road SW.
The improved ditch grading enhances outflow from the pond, while the increased storage volume
helps lower water surface elevations during storm events. Figure 6.10 shows the 10-year climate
adjusted storm results with Project 7 completed.
6.1.7.2 Recommendation
Project 7 demonstrates clear benefits by reducing the NWL of Ravenwood Pond and improving
conveyance between the pond and Airport Road SW. It is recommended to advance this project
toward final design and pursue funding opportunities. Additional design considerations should
include evaluating the ditch slope, erosion protection measures, and any necessary coordination
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 14
HUTCHINSON 179199
with regulatory agencies to address potential permitting requirements. The ditch is also privately
owned and would require either an easement or land acquisition.
6.1.8 Project 8 Results
6.1.8.1 Peak Flooding Analysis
Project 8 involves increasing storm sewer capacity both upstream of the Summerset Ponds and
downstream from Jefferson Street SE to the river outfall. The model results show that the
increased pipe capacity upstream of the Summerset Ponds leads to a significant reduction in
street inundation on Summerset Lane SE, with flood depths reduced by approximately 1.2 feet
during the 10-year climate adjusted design event. However, the downstream pipe capacity
improvements from Jefferson Street SE to the river provide minimal additional reduction in
flooding in the low-lying area downstream of the ponds. Figure 6.11 shows the 10-year climate
adjusted storm results with Project 8 completed.
6.1.8.2 Recommendation
It is recommended to advance the upstream pipe capacity improvements as part of Project 8, as
they provide a significant reduction in flooding along Summerset Lane SE. A number of
structures have a reduced flood risk due to the increase in pipe capacity. The downstream pipe
capacity improvements from Jefferson Street SE to the river outfall are not recommended to be
pursued further due to the limited benefit observed in the model results. Further design work is
needed to refine the upstream improvements and evaluate any necessary modifications to the
pond outlets to optimize system performance.
6.1.9 Community Comment Areas
In addition to the modeled project areas, community members identified several other locations of
concern throughout the city. These areas were not included in the hydraulic modeling but are
worth noting for future planning efforts. One issue mentioned was frequent backyard flooding
during heavy rain events. There are numerous back yards with small depressional areas that
may not be drained well and won't benefit from storm sewer on the adjacent roads as there's
currently no drainage. These types of areas can typically be improved by adding an area drain
with small 8-12-inch diameter pipe connecting out to the storm pipe under the road. Some areas
may also be able to be improved with minor grading to direct water away from homes and
towards the road.
Some residents noted winter drainage issues, such as a high point near a driveway that leads to
recurring ice dams. While this type of issue is more likely to be addressed through a future street
reconstruction project, improvements to curb lines or inlet placement may help mitigate the
problem in the long term.
Along the southwest bank of the river, residents observed erosion that began after the river was
rerouted approximately 20 to 25 years ago. Continued monitoring and a future slope stabilization
project may be warranted in this area if erosion continues to impact adjacent land.
Lastly, concerns were raised about an area in Island View Heights on the west end of town that
tends to flood after multiple inches of rainfall, with additional water flowing in from agricultural
land west of the city limits. In this case, adding ponding or detention features may help slow
runoff and reduce the impact of peak flows.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 15
HUTCHINSON 179199
7
While these locations were not analyzed in detail as part of this study, they highlight areas where
smaller -scale or future improvements may be beneficial. These comments can help inform
updates to the City's stormwater model and be incorporated into future capital planning or
development review processes.
Summary of Recommendations & Action Plan
This report is intended to provide a guide as the City and other affected stakeholders plan for
future stormwater projects based on benefits provided and future capital improvement planning
(CIP). The model and results presented are intended to serve as a tool to utilize in the
prioritization of future projects that may benefit vulnerable residents and parts of the city. The
XPSWMM model files can serve as a starting point in the final design for the improvement
concepts listed or other stormwater related projects within the study area.
A project priority recommendation is provided below based on our review of the benefits of each
project shown by the hydraulic model. It's expected that numerous outside factors such as
roadway construction plans, property acquisition timelines, and overall cost will also impact the
phasing of projects.
Projects will be planned using Priority level but may be expedited when there is an opportunity for
pairing with other planned City projects. Other factors such as private development adjacent to a
priority area and grant funding may also affect order of implementation.
Table 7-1 — Project Priority Recommendation
Project
Project 1
P���
Medium
Justification
This project can provide moderate flood reduction benefits
on a residential street near priority corridors.
Project 2
Medium
This project can result in moderate flood reduction benefits
on a priority corridor.
Project 3
High
This is a larger project, but the model results show
significant flood reduction benefits on higher traffic volume
roads that are classified as priority corridors.
Project 4
Low
This project does not provide much benefit other than
improving the drainage in the greenspace.
Project 5
Low
This project is not a higher priority as it does not provide
significant flood reduction benefits. The implementation of
this project may be timed based on the City's plans for ditch
closure in this area.
Project 6
Medium
This project reduces flooding on Darrel Drive SW but not as
significantly as desired due to cover and grade constraints.
Consider alternatives such as property acquisition.
Project 7
Medium
This project can lower the normal water level and increase
pond storage capacity, providing improved flood reduction.
Project 8
Medium
This project provides significant flood reduction upstream of
the Summerset Ponds, particularly for street flooding on
Summerset Lane SE. However, downstream pipe capacity
improvements show minimal benefit and are not
recommended unless coordinated with other infrastructure
projects.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 16
HUTCHINSON 179199
7.1.2 Summary of Recommendations
• Projects 1, 2, and 8 are relatively small-scale projects that should be possible to
complete as part of a roadway reconstruction or improvement project with the majority of
project area within City of right-of-way. The MPCA implementation grants or other grant
programs may be a source of funding for the stormwater components of the projects. The
flooding in these areas is primarily within the roadway for the climate adjusted 10-year
storm, so the recommended improvements in these areas could wait until the opportune
time.
• Project 3 demonstrates the largest overall reduction in flooding based on the hydraulic
model results and benefits a broad area including multiple roadways and residential
structures. This project is recommended as a high priority for further evaluation,
refinement, and potential grant funding application.
• Project 4 does not show much benefit to the storm sewer system downstream. The
location would have more benefit for a stormwater quality project.
• Projects 5 and 7 provide targeted benefits to specific problem areas and may require
more detailed design work to optimize storage and conveyance improvements. These
projects may be advanced independently or coordinated with adjacent improvements
depending on available funding and design constraints.
• Project 6 shows a lot of benefits and potential for a project location. Multiple alternatives
could be considered and there is design constraints related to cover and grade that might
limit what improvements are possible.
• Pond footprints and volumes shown are approximate and intended as conceptual only at
this time. Pond sizes, layouts, and outlet structures will need to be revised during final
design accounting for safety, land availability and other considerations that may not have
been considered at this time. Final footprints may vary significantly from some of the
sizes shown in the preliminary planning level model results developed for this study.
• Including green stormwater infrastructure may be possible with the projects involving
ponds or roadway reconstruction.
• It is important to note that inspecting and maintaining the City's existing stormwater
infrastructure will help in the current response to stormwater runoff events. It is
recommended that an inspection program be set up and a long-term maintenance plan
be developed to ensure catch basins and storm sewer lines remain clear of debris,
sediment, and other obstructions.
• It is recommended that the City consider adjusting their stormwater utility rates to set
aside additional financial resources necessary to provide for project implementation,
maintenance, and other needs.
7.2 Supplemental Data
In addition to the figures shown in this report, a full dataset of GIS and other results data was
developed. SEH will retain a copy of these files in project records to be made available to the City
for use in the future as requested.
• Depth and water surface elevation results for the models for existing, climate change
projection, and proposed scenarios. Water surface elevation results can be useful to
compare to building elevations should field surveys be completed to assess flood risk.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 17
HUTCHINSON 179199
• Storm sewer sizing shapefile showing the approximate 10-year climate adjusted design
size for storm sewer discussed in the project concepts in section 5. Note that this sizing
is intended to be a guide for cost estimating and planning and should be refined/checked
during final design.
• Shapefile with public comments.
• Updated shapefiles for the City storm sewer and culverts developed for the model. Note
that some invert data was interpolated or assumed if it was not field surveyed. This is the
case for most catch basin inverts.
• Soils data was obtained from the USGS and is not provided with the data.
• XPSWMM model files compiled for each of the models developed. SEH will retain copies
of the model that can be referenced or updated in the future as deemed necessary.
cw/rm
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 18
HUTCHINSON 179199
Figures
Figure 1 -Study Area
Figure 2 - Existing Storm Infrastructure
Figure 3 - Community Comments
Figure 4.1 - Watersheds
Figure 4.2 - Existing Conditions 2-year Storm Results
Figure 4.3 - Existing Conditions 10-year Storm Results
Figure 4.4 - Existing Conditions 100-year Storm Results
Figure 4.5 -10-year Storm Existing Pipe Capacity
Figure 4.6 - Existing Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.7 - Existing Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.8 - Existing Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.9 - MPCA Vulnerability Mapping
Figure 4.10 - Key Infrastructure with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.11 - Key Infrastructure with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.12 - Damage Potential with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.13 - Damage Potential with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 5.1 - Proposed Concept Layouts
Figure 5.2 - Project 1 Layout
Figure 5.3 - Project 2 Layout
Figure 5.4 - Project 3 Layout
Figure 5.5 - Project 4 Layout
Figure 5.6 - Project 5 Layout
Figure 5.7 - Project 6 Layout
Figure 5.8 - Project 7 Layout
Figure 5.9 - Project 8 Layout
Figure 6.1 - Proposed Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.2 - Proposed Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.3 - Proposed Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.4 - Project 1 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.5 - Project 2 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.6 - Project 3 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.7 - Project 4 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.8 - Project 5 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.9 - Project 6 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.10 - Project 7 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.11 - Project 8 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Appendix A
Pending Grants for SWC Resilience Application
Appendix B
Public Comments Summary
Appendix C
Web Soil Survey Data
Appendix D
Flooding Photos
Appendix E
Project Cost Estimates
Building a Better World for All of K
Sustainable buildings, sound infrastructure, safe transportation systems, clean water,
renewable energy, and a balanced environment. Building a Better World for All of Us
communicates a company -wide commitment to act in the best interests of our clients
and the world around us.
We're confident in our ability to balance these requirements_
JOIN OUR SOCIAL COMMUNITIES
00009
7.1.2 Summary of Recommendations
• Projects 1, 2, and 8 are relatively small-scale projects that should be possible to
complete as part of a roadway reconstruction or improvement project with the majority of
project area within City of right-of-way. The MPCA implementation grants or other grant
programs may be a source of funding for the stormwater components of the projects. The
flooding in these areas is primarily within the roadway for the climate adjusted 10-year
storm, so the recommended improvements in these areas could wait until the opportune
time.
• Project 3 demonstrates the largest overall reduction in flooding based on the hydraulic
model results and benefits a broad area including multiple roadways and residential
structures. This project is recommended as a high priority for further evaluation,
refinement, and potential grant funding application.
• Project 4 does not show much benefit to the storm sewer system downstream. The
location would have more benefit for a stormwater quality project.
• Projects 5 and 7 provide targeted benefits to specific problem areas and may require
more detailed design work to optimize storage and conveyance improvements. These
projects may be advanced independently or coordinated with adjacent improvements
depending on available funding and design constraints.
• Project 6 shows a lot of benefits and potential for a project location. Multiple alternatives
could be considered and there is design constraints related to cover and grade that might
limit what improvements are possible.
• Pond footprints and volumes shown are approximate and intended as conceptual only at
this time. Pond sizes, layouts, and outlet structures will need to be revised during final
design accounting for safety, land availability and other considerations that may not have
been considered at this time. Final footprints may vary significantly from some of the
sizes shown in the preliminary planning level model results developed for this study.
• Including green stormwater infrastructure may be possible with the projects involving
ponds or roadway reconstruction.
• It is important to note that inspecting and maintaining the City's existing stormwater
infrastructure will help in the current response to stormwater runoff events. It is
recommended that an inspection program be set up and a long-term maintenance plan
be developed to ensure catch basins and storm sewer lines remain clear of debris,
sediment, and other obstructions.
• It is recommended that the City consider adjusting their stormwater utility rates to set
aside additional financial resources necessary to provide for project implementation,
maintenance, and other needs.
7.2 Supplemental Data
In addition to the figures shown in this report, a full dataset of GIS and other results data was
developed. SEH will retain a copy of these files in project records to be made available to the City
for use in the future as requested.
• Depth and water surface elevation results for the models for existing, climate change
projection, and proposed scenarios. Water surface elevation results can be useful to
compare to building elevations should field surveys be completed to assess flood risk.
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 17
HUTCHINSON 179199
• Storm sewer sizing shapefile showing the approximate 10-year climate adjusted design
size for storm sewer discussed in the project concepts in section 5. Note that this sizing
is intended to be a guide for cost estimating and planning and should be refined/checked
during final design.
• Shapefile with public comments.
• Updated shapefiles for the City storm sewer and culverts developed for the model. Note
that some invert data was interpolated or assumed if it was not field surveyed. This is the
case for most catch basin inverts.
• Soils data was obtained from the USGS and is not provided with the data.
• XPSWMM model files compiled for each of the models developed. SEH will retain copies
of the model that can be referenced or updated in the future as deemed necessary.
cw/rm
STORMWATER RESILIENCY ASSESSMENT & ACTION PLAN (SOUTH)
Page 18
HUTCHINSON 179199
Figures
Figure 1 -Study Area
Figure 2 - Existing Storm Infrastructure
Figure 3 - Community Comments
Figure 4.1 - Watersheds
Figure 4.2 - Existing Conditions 2-year Storm Results
Figure 4.3 - Existing Conditions 10-year Storm Results
Figure 4.4 - Existing Conditions 100-year Storm Results
Figure 4.5 -10-year Storm Existing Pipe Capacity
Figure 4.6 - Existing Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.7 - Existing Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.8 - Existing Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.9 - MPCA Vulnerability Mapping
Figure 4.10 - Key Infrastructure with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.11 - Key Infrastructure with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.12 - Damage Potential with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 4.13 - Damage Potential with 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 5.1 - Proposed Concept Layouts
Figure 5.2 - Project 1 Layout
Figure 5.3 - Project 2 Layout
Figure 5.4 - Project 3 Layout
Figure 5.5 - Project 4 Layout
Figure 5.6 - Project 5 Layout
Figure 5.7 - Project 6 Layout
Figure 5.8 - Project 7 Layout
Figure 5.9 - Project 8 Layout
Figure 6.1 - Proposed Conditions 2-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.2 - Proposed Conditions 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.3 - Proposed Conditions 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm Results
Figure 6.4 - Project 1 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.5 - Project 2 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.6 - Project 3 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.7 - Project 4 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.8 - Project 5 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.9 - Project 6 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.10 - Project 7 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
Figure 6.11 - Project 8 Results with 10-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm
o
t III I I I I I I
y� 3Jj IT-
]g[h St 200th St- —r!� I Crow River Golf Mealflks T ' N High DrINE . 200[M1 St
I i A • Club Gott,rse
+ WI _
Carh&llLegend
af
�Lle i 5th Ave NWCity Lirnite
f IIF 1.—Study Area
Zm !
High.ay]E
3m High. ay]Eo
Highway ] W' 1
30ih St 190th S[ I •' Fi 11IC I11HSOH t - ^ - - - Hi
/ I
Y+
' 2nd Ave SW 2rdAve SE
Lewis Ave SW
I OffBY Lake Ath Ave SE
w w Ave SE I� • 5t'Ave�SE "ry
Q v Roberts Rd SW m w - T _ -�_ _Y I ;
d i McDenaid Dr Sw
m
SOth St - 180th St S Grade Rtl SW S Grade Rd SWm ; y o Nohm
m i Century Ave SE
Century Ave SW � _1]]th St 1]]tM1 St--lF�
Q!! - ,,Or,,,, jr�r EScon[on Ave SE
Airport Rd - Arrp �`� 170tI, St
y� e`t Rtl R
oi� o f Y
r ' �• _ 'f
` • - T Ad'
d ,�
t 3 y
I som sr .v...W:`s5ri{.,,..,.. h[s,-,li,: .,�.. et�iNl� 'xy1g11L Basle ��s`5°d,
-- 16ath .1 xassa N.Va ley. -1 gat
1 6y }
Fi r
JL
. Y_ � 4�•.,— - l ,�. _ '000 1,000 0 2,000
t - r
dk.
T 1 }
Legend
Study Area ti-
i City Limits y t
.- J 5 year ACS summary, 35% of people below 200% of the poverty level I Op
Pr d H—H 179199
J/ °a1e-1-. Previous Environmental Justice Area in Project Area
/�^•^^.,M^M� Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project
SEH a Hutchinson, MN
Figure
4.9
r
i 1
J_
SEH
s '
M4 NIT
�r�� 1• � � P� r 1 � � � r J
1; YtFi I •] a ..., �,a�i � � � ro p
Ak
a R
Legend
Study Area
City Limits
— Storm Pipes
• Churches
• Sd—ls
• Municipal Facilities
• Public Buildings and Places
Priority Routes and Corridors
Buildings -
Inundation Depth - 100yr CC
Depth (ft)
0 0.25
0.25 - 0.5
0.5 1.0
1.0 2.0
2.0 3.0
= 3.0 - 4.0
4.0 5.0
5.0 +
1.
Proj 1:H°TCH 179199
P^^'°a'e 611— Critical Infrastructure - 100-year (Climate Adjusted) Storm with Existing Storm Sewer
Hutchinson Storrnwater Resiliency Project
Hutchinson, MN
Figure
4.11
U
Ll
_ 4Vv
-
eptr.
5th Ave S 5t Av SE
4 M #
d
y
drn
+ i
Miwauke *
IL 6thrA a SE
• _ u}nin, C Iec nlctc�.IL� Ir; , V'XT f
rrn -'r
t.
L
ftSureaw,
U�L)A,
`. a p?j_
190 95 0 190
Fee
IS *42kkuf 'so
Legend
#I• _ is y
Buildings
x Proposed Pipes
* I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
- r
Proposed Ditches
Storm Pipes
7171
��' �
ar, Microsoft, r IV
sri
mi afeGrap. I E:TIlN�.-
410—
Pmjeci_ HUTCH 1]9199
J, P° N e35 R� NML F Project 2 Concept Overview Figure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project
5.3
SEH Hutchinson, MN
I% � , .
«
' ■ �- �� \`� �. lk
\
}�
_ CD
\ � � ■ s f . %
. o �
� �
� y ` �
�.�- -- t
C.-tn �
A -
l-�
_ a i ■�
/\ cn } § 0
. ) .-
~ `co =
L _ - ■ I Ia
Q
.� oe ar ves\
I�
t 300 150 0 300
IL it
i
}
J �4 Legend
* 4 Buildings
.� Proposed Pipes
Diameter
' - — 1.5
—2.5
ti- 'Vie
-3
— 4
— 4.5
4
t + � � M Proposed Ponds
Proposed Ditches
* { F Storm Pipes
Ilia
I
4M OdLw�. f
�+er 16W4 -
.
Pmjeci_ HUTCH 1]9199
J, P° N D.t.e5M=5
NMLF Project 4 Concept Overview Figure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project
SEH Hutchinson, MN 5.5
i(.
ID
00 150 0 300 Feel
O
Ll5th Ave S 5t Av SE
+ r.
cn - _r 0 P.
m
'
Miwaukee *
� 6thrA a SE
y Wl uar, ' t L •R )Val l.ti:Rfr^ • n
• _ u}nin, - n C Iec nlctc .I Ir; , G,eLM f
rrn
t.
L
*s
w
'forri furry,
Bureau, U iL)A,
JSF�iY5
will of 'so -
190 95 0 190
Fee
� Legend
i � y • Buildings
Proposed Pipes
* I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
- r
Proposed Ditches
Storm Pipes
y � w
:
w
ar, Microsoft, r .Es ri
mi afeGrap. I E:TIlN� .
P.J." HUTCH 179199
J, P° e35 'nW NML F Project 2 Concept Overview Figure
N
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project g
SEH Hutchinson, MN 5.3
w Om
P # y }
cn w o , it j t o •� •r I
-a G` w p f' 4 3 iNMI
7 1�
OO _ N * N T t' ir
3 oh N
s sF a�
4i
O �
Ce_nfuryAAve-SE ' Cen
Al �� �� ■
y
y * L !"
P 0 r.
m ` m
• #_ co
;;N W.
. • Orchard Ave SE � . h�- _ � _ —9w, -m—mr! �.
96
pdd
00 150 0 300 Feel
cn
s 'i
U
zffll
wYa I L
{ � -L 6
f
a �A � } ,
71.
a
Sth Ave S 5t Av SL-L
-ems
3 3
7
:» - -
{
M
ttty��� i
Miwaukee * SV - "
IL 6th.A a SE
.. • _ ■ I � '� - �u}nin, • : � ��y, C� Ie-clnlctc:�.I� Ir;�, G,aL�I� f -
# rrn A
t.
77
L
ft' 'forri furrl,
Sureaw, U iL)A,
u p?ji
L6"_
190 95 0 190
� Legend
i � y • Buildings
Proposed Pipes
* * I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
Proposed Ditches
r F
Storm Pipes
will
ON —
.I
� � ar, Microsoft, r t,-Esri
mi afeGrap. I E:TIlN.,.
$re
J
P.J. t HUTCH 179199 , P° N e35 R� NMLF Project 2 Concept Overview Figure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project
SEH Hutchinson, MN 5.3
I% � , .
«
' ■ �- �� \`� �. lk
\
}�
_ CD
\ � � ■ s f . %
. o �
� �
� y ` �
�.�- —- �
C.—tn n� �
_- _
$.i
.yk-
�
.
< ? k .
~ s /rcfi®
i \ /
e
.
-
i(.
00 150 0 300 Feel
— . n n WA
11 -ulv,
JtL'jtg[oE44
O
wYa a 5 k
16
zffll
f
._
l Iva_
Sth Ave S 5t Av SE
_ �L
bir-
JA F I 1 A -
1 �
7
:» - -
{
M
ttty��� i
MiWaukee * SV - "
w _
Rk
IL 6th.A a SE
Mauar, MlIg4�Lcm ," t1ac n
• _ u}nin, C lec nlcl...1 , Inc, u,a�4
•• ~ uN `F
m
t.
77
L
ftSureaw,
USDA,
JSPW
190 95 0 190
Fee
IS *26kof 2
Legend
#I• _ is y
Buildings
x Proposed Pipes
* * I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
Proposed Ditches
- r
Storm Pipes
.10
.I
� fir:
• � � 1
ar, Microsoft, r r ti,-Esri
G�rmi afeGrap
�s 4 !.
I
$re
J
P.I..t HUTCH 1]9199 , P° N B35 R� NMLF Project 2 Concept Overview Fi ure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project g
SEH Hutchinson, MN 5.3
I A
-IC 4 lk
cn
to
CD
1�
°o
3 ph N
s sF a�
O
=&LOnfuryIAve.SE n
! ^ a r
#- Y
to '�
OL
r.
_ m
Y-
u� O
Orchard Ave
00 150 0 300 Feel
i(.
O
U
Ll
4 _
� �i'FTZiS' t
Legend
Study A�
City Li.its
=Proposed Ditches
Proposed Pipes
Diameter
1.25
f 6 5 F
"+fin
A
-- ,•;�
_ �- _
Sth Ave S 5t Av SE
_ �L
bir-
l'CD
-ems
7
:»
,m—
- cNn
{{ L I
M
ttty��� i
Miwaukee * SV - "
� 6th.A a SE
}� + 44L
Mauar,
• _ du}nin,
•• ~ uN `F
m
t.
77
L
ftSureaw,
USDA,
JSPW
190 95 0 190
Fee
IS *26kof 2
Legend
#I• _ is y
Buildings
x Proposed Pipes
* * I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
Proposed Ditches
- r
Storm Pipes
1
.I
`10
w s t
I � � ar, Microsoft, r f, Es,i T
mi afeGrap. I E:TIlN�._ BuP
J
Pmjeci_ HUTCH 179199 , P° N e35 R� NMLF Project 2 Concept Overview Figure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project
5.3
SEH Hutchinson, MN
I% � , .
«
' ■ �- �� \`� �. lk
\
}�
_ CD
\ � � ■ s f . %
. o �
� �
� y ` �
�.�- -- �
C.-tn n� �
_- _
$.i
-
� .
to a4v-
. � il
< ? k .
/ � .
~ s /rcfi®
i \ /
a e
.
-
00 150 0 300 Feel
4t,,C,./?
L 0/., 11
I A
-IC 4 lk
cn
to
CD
1�
°o
3 ph N
s sF a�
4i
O �
Ce_nfuryAAve SE ' C.
1�^�I
i
to
P 0 r.
m ` to
t�
• Orch r Ave
i(.
ID
00 150 0 300 Feel
O
Sth Ave S 5t Av SL-L
-ems
3 3
7
:» - -
{
M
ttty��� i
Miwaukee * SV - "
IL 6th.A a SE
.. • _ ■ I � '� - �u}nin, • : � ��y, C� Ie-clnlctc:�.I� Ir;�, G,aL�I� f -
# rrn A
t.
77
L
ft' 'forri furrl,
Sureaw, U iL)A,
u p?ji
L6"_
190 95 0 190
Fee
IS *26kof 2
Legend
#I• _ is y
Buildings
x Proposed Pipes
* * I Diameter
* — 1.5
*M Proposed Ponds
Proposed Ditches
- r
Storm Pipes
.10
.I
• � � 1
ar, Microsoft, r r ti,-Esri
GBrmi afeGrap I TI(N.. _
I
$re
J
Pmjed HUTCH 179199 , P° N B35 ' NML F Project 2 Concept Overview Fi ure
Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Project g
SEH Hutchinson, MN 5.3
ice. � ti• •
5 � a
111:1
5thfAve SW .5th�Ave SE _
+� rLegend
Storm Pipes
'r
r � _Proposed
Depth ,,■, , ,
ti 0 0
�.
�- - -
4.
■ }M
5. i
2
AL
01 3 �..�7 m ... Pipes
Pipes IL O Existing
tn
cn
- U) N 7 'k to N
Inundation Extents
'rn M Inundation Extents
of L
%16 �• .. r
■ Milw�uke_BiAV{ SW �� ■
+ # - ■
■�� 'i 6th Ave)SE
■.
■ r W U r, �tll jr �i[ �: • � lad
�= nrlOrl, lu �r�+r 1f r�?Fu • prU I I bureau, J:r
t •� I r N a ■16
1 v m - b'
kf v ti t
a■' �; - M
As
�4-
_I ..{..
r���enturYAve SEA - f �� Century■Ave SE
r 1
!
_ ■ # lb
•� :.
1 1
w■�7 IS I
O 1
Elk=D,r_SE�ti
0 1` cn
-o ti
y o
cn
AGO— 4
Orchard A-ve SE
� � F ■ r 1 r ice_ ■ •�
:Orchard Ave,SE Ems. --:1��Ei qp N •�= ■
# s�
r k
1 1i•-� � + + � � � -S a r1�� - - r,��::fer-^ � L• ^ raur ` k�'�;'.rruusri�uur- • - "� - _�� - l�Ilcrr;;i}' - �C]r ^ rry r
Ad
s �!1 � *. � - rrOri, �:ii�Gr•1�Fl�C��C�?r7r^ • - '���CUI`!�" �:.�1: �= .,:i a]� "J.�.,;r
—T: Atlanta Ave
Baltimore Ave SW
Ce uryAv SE - C:z 1
Jq dL
Legend
I Storm Pipes
Proposed Flood
ilk. Depth (ft)
0-0.25
0.25 - 0.5 IT
c
0.5 - 1.0 ILC
% M 1.0 - 2.0
M 2.0 - 3.0
Oq k M 3.0 - 4.0
4.0 - 5.0
5.0 +
Proposed Pipes
Proposed Pipes
I owl Existing Flood
Inundation Extents
M Inundation Extents
C --,
lit 1AA
Aror A
)enve
AenverrAve SE
N Direzi
pf�, -CeLfre j:-�, Jr. EP, , PS, US CarjFuz -- u, USD,�,
I — JaMs
IF ISM I
Jim
Cinema y �a
hildrens' Barn Y
Commer.cial
uiB'� g g
f jj alm
Fin its Sho`Sup r
4-H Building ,,
- rM�Leod County
• Fairgrounds••
, Equin*e R ding
rena AI
� pe
P It
If
i J
-40D'
2- w
,f
F 9'Oo
t r5 f�
- r
+ 46L
600
Fee
Fgend
Storm Pipes
oposed Flood
,7 4.0
4.0 0
P
Regional Eye
Proposed Pipes
zens ank enter
�d Trust'Proposed Pipes
�ti� - 1
Aµ T�Existing Flood
R illy utInundation Extents
ar s
M Inundation Extents
i .r.
a^:
M ed 'a
i-SW t¢ -Airport RolAp`0r1
s
4 jr 'k w
0
a � �
a
00 150 0 300
Feet
Legen
— Storr
L
berts;Rd SW �-
�Ii#i1t
�. _%
b
�+ + • , y
Zw
. of
. 3f ,.
_ �, co
L
.i 1
1bl c r, d�I r rar L:vu
m
rn m • 40 . v.
r rnrrwr,h!y fvkry3 r ar ?i Derr £ra �rFa� G/ l�rui rtirl f rrif �rry 1
o•
riLruJ ,
�-
- _' `
Summers t�LPW'SEV4*46
r ,
r- dF
4k..y.�' f
Tr
Denver
ve SE a
rl • 1
4 i
Wi • `
410J
IWO
to}L
`m
r .
,Ni•
t
*�
4Eilmonton Ave SE -
1� Po_ Ottawa Ave E
• •7�
a�o�, t
1� r
� Nf, + • .
4 N��` ni ■'w 11 1 • 11 I
r i
.1 ,
y •
o
pY� GtM 4 ' 1 1
rs F
f � � • 1 1
N • -
-
N }- . ••.
Souttifork Dr. SE
4. �F Ob
•,
�'■� y dry+ Y
do
1 10 0-11
�Edmonton`Ave SE ti �e • - " Kr-F
• '� •4' -
Mir
•" r,
� 111iGJ! J.SCfJ}f�..�[P[f ' %kJ�3 �.J71L'If1VJLCJf:, �.1 Jp��! • /�° " "
_ rc ' 5 5�i6 f}� �rlw PYl-VUN 15 LSZ;I' '�, AK, B,.Jr2au, FaJ:L
� � O'ttra-wa#te F. :LL
7 i S 1 ti
— il`._ _ . —AL
Appendix A
Pending Grants for SWC Resilience Application
MINNESOTA POLLUTION
CONTROL AGENCY
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Planning Grants for Stormwater,
Wastewater, and Community Resilience
Application
FY 2024
Doc Type: Grant Application
Instructions: Read the complete Request for Proposal (RFP) and other associated documents before submitting this
application.
Check the SWIFT Supplier Portal and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Planning Grants for SWC Resilience
webpage for the most recent updates.
Applications are due no later than 4:00 p.m. Central Time (CT) on Thursday, December 14, 2023.
Submit application, workplan and budget (as Microsoft Word and Excel documents) per the instructions listed in Section
7 and 8 of the RFP.
1. Project information
Organization name: City of Hutchinson
Organization address: 111 Hassan Street SE
City: Hutchinson State: MN Zip code: 55350 County: McLeod
Contact name: John Paulson
Title: Project/Environmental/Regulatory Manager
Phone: 320-234-5682 Email address: jpaulson@hutchinsommn.gov
Organization type: ❑ Tribal government ❑X Local/Regional government (plus select one below)
❑X City
❑ County
❑ Town/Township
❑ Soil and Water Conservation District
❑ Watershed Management Organization
❑ Watershed District
❑ Regional Development Commission
❑ Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities
Region
Project focus area (choose ❑X Stormwater Resilience Planning
one):
❑ Community Resilience Planning ❑ Wastewater Resilience Planning
Grant requested: $ 81,200 + Matching funds: $ 53,844
= Total project cost: $ 135,044
1
1. Is applicant the sole source of matching funds for this project?
Yes No
// ■
If no, is supporting documentation of commitment for cash or in -kind matching funds from outside ❑ ❑
organizations involved in the project attached?
If no, explain:
2. Is applicant in compliance with Minnesota's tax and environmental regulatory requirements? ® ❑
If no, explain:
Project Title: City of Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Plan — South
2. Project Details
1. What is the purpose of this project and with whom will you share the results (limit of 250 words):
The purpose of this project is to complete a comprehensive stormwater model (XP-SWMM) and a stormwater
resiliency plan for the South Study Area shown on the figure below. The South Study Area is south and west of the
South Fork Crow River located within the City of Hutchinson. The City currently has several locations within the South
Study Area that are prone to flooding and anticipated changes in rainfall intensity and frequency due to climate
change are expected to make this flooding worse and more frequent. The City will use the modeling to assess current
system capacity, determine flood elevations, and local flooding limits. The modeling results will be used to develop a
resiliency plan that will provide direction to first responders in training for flood events, provide direction to elected
officials and the public to areas prone to flooding, and provide recommendations for capital investments that can be
made to mitigate flooding risks to health, safety and reduce potential recurring damages to public and private
property from floods. The modeling results will also be shared with property owners within the South Study Area, the
majority of which includes areas of environmental justice as defined by the MPCA. The City currently has no
stormwater modeling for the area of study in place to evaluate the storm sewer system deficiencies or to evaluate
flood occurrences and options to mitigate flooding within the study area.
2. What is the need forth is project, and how will the planning that is proposed make a meaningful difference to the
community in preparing for Minnesota's changing climate, including human health impacts (limit of 500 words):
The City has experienced localized flooding within the South Study Area that has resulted in damage to private
property and municipal infrastructure, economic impacts from property loss and road closures, and increased risks to
public health and safety caused by slower emergency response times and storm water inundation in residential and
commercial areas. The impacts are symptomatic of high intensity storms that overwhelm parts of City drainage
infrastructure at least annually, and in some instances multiple times a year. The City has made multiple large regional
drainage improvements to the three most impacted areas of town over the last 16 years. Available funding has
limited the number of these projects that can be constructed which has led to additional City investments in
temporary improvements. Doing so has limited the City's ability to make the necessary large-scale investments
needed to provide adequate drainage for the higher intensity storms being experienced across Minnesota in recent
years. The City also anticipates development infill within parts of the South Study Area that could exacerbate existing
localized flooding.
This project will assist in identifying areas with the greatest need for drainage improvements as well as how extensive
the drainage improvements should be to address existing and anticipated climate impacts. The City's aging
stormwater infrastructure and occurrences of frequent flooding create a need for a comprehensive stormwater
resiliency plan. The plan will identify specific locations with inadequate stormwater infrastructure and the
resulting high risk of localized flooding, based on both current and expected climate change scenarios. With these
specific locations identified, an improvement and resiliency plan will be created to guide decision making on
improvements to the stormwater system to minimize potential adverse impacts such as increased flooding and
deteriorating water quality, impacting human health, property, and public infrastructure.
Although the City of Hutchinson is only required to provide a 10% match, the City is providing matching funds (cash +
in -kind) that mount to approximately 40% of the overall project cost to demonstrate the City's commitment to this
project and increasing stormwater resiliency within the community.
Backyard flooding - 844 Church St SW Street flooding - 964 Merrill St SW
Street Flooding — Neal and Sunset St SW Ag runoff into City/Backyard Flooding — Island View
3. How will information about current Minnesota climate trends and projections of future climate conditions affecting
the general location of the project be used in the methodology of this planning project (limit of 250 words):
The project will include the development of an XPSWMM model that will be used to simulate the effects of rainfall
events in the study area. Current climate change projections will be included in the model to further demonstrate the
effects of future rainfall depth and intensities using data published by the University of Minnesota and other sources.
The stormwater model will be used to evaluate the sensitivity of the City's stormwater system to increases in storm
intensities and rainfall depths and furthermore, during the planning process of future projects in and contributing to
the study area.
Flood inundation results from the stormwater model will be used to conduct a vulnerability assessment for areas of
environmental justice and to conduct an assessment for damage potential and critical infrastructure to identify areas
with the highest risk for flooding. This data will be used to assist the elected city officials and staff on determining
capital investments to improve the resiliency in the city's storm water infrastructure.
The City anticipates that the stormwater resiliency plan will include many potential action items for consideration,
including local changes to policy and permits, coordination of infrastructure improvements with various stakeholders,
increasing flood storage capacity and building community resiliency through reducing the risk of flooding. These are
the primary outcomes that the City will consider in the stormwater resiliency plan however additional benefits are
also anticipated such as; identifying wildlife habitat restoration and improvement areas and the nurturing of
partnerships with community organizations.
4. Using the MPCA's criteria and interactive mapping tool (recently updated on the MPCA website with data from a five-
year 2016-2020 summary of the American Community Survey), will the geographic area specifically addressed by the
proposed planning project include one or more MPCA identified environmental justice (EJ) areas of concern, or an
environmental justice area? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes:
a. Will the planning to be undertaken by this project yield benefits for communities within these EJ areas of
concern? ® Yes ❑ No
i. If yes, describe these communities and how they will benefit:
An estimated 90% of the South Study Area is located in an EJ area of concern (at least 40% of
people reported income less than 185% of the federal poverty level). Much of the developed
land in the study area predates stormwater rate control and water quality treatment
requirements. The study area will be modeled to identify areas of impact that are currently
prone to flooding as well as anticipated area of impact using projected climate change
scenarios. Areas of concern will be prioritized within the City's existing stormwater capital
planning process so solutions to reduce localized flooding can be implemented. Areas impacted
by localized flooding may be improved by reducing the rate and volume of stormwater to the
impacted area, as well as the duration of inundation within affected areas. Over the last 16
years the City has implemented 3 regional stormwater systems in areas that were the most
greatly impacted by localized flooding. These projects have effectively eliminated localized
flooding impacts and similar results would be anticipated for the study area included in this
planning project.
If yes, describe how the planning completed for this project will address concerns about
equitable resilience for these communities compared with others within the geographic area
covered by the project:
One of the aforementioned regional stormwater systems built in the last 16 years was located
in the study area. This system was designed using, at that time, current rainfall data without
projected climate scenarios. To date, the areas of concern were identified using post storm
assessments of impacted areas after large precipitation events. The City has prioritized
stormwater system improvements using a reactionary process without consideration to where
it is located, only the need for improvement. This modeling will not only help solidify identifying
areas of concern that exist today but will also help to anticipate areas of concern for future high
intensity or extreme duration events. The EJ area in the City is comprised mostly of properties
that were not required to provide rate or water quality controls and the necessary utilities were
not included due to efforts to keep costs down for affordability. Some areas in the EJ area have
already been improved but efforts to expand these benefits to other impacted areas not
currently served by the regional systems will be identified. Preserving the function of these past
investments by anticipating climate projections is also an important part of this planning
project.
b. Will these communities be provided the opportunity to have a voice indecision -making through substantive
engagement as part of the planning completed for this project? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe specifically how this will be done; if no, explain why not:
Throughout the course of the planning effort, direct community engagement and outreach will occur through
the use of mailings, Facebook posts, the local newspaper, City website and City Council workshop will be
used to solicit input from the people that live, work or play in the study area. An interactive online mapping
tool will be developed and used as a platform to solicit problem areas and compile community input.
5. What are the potential barriers or challenges for this planning project, and how will they be addressed:
Potential barriers and challenges that may be encountered in the project include a lack of or missing information for
existing stormwater infrastructure, public concerns, and model abnormalities. If missing information on the existing
stormwater infrastructure becomes an issue, City records can be investigated, and site visits can be used to gather
missing information to create a more accurate model and resiliency plan.
Public concerns regarding the creation of the stormwater resiliency plan and the results will be accommodated
through public outreach, education, and meetings. Results from the resiliency plan will be discussed with concerned
and affected residents and landowners. The resiliency plan may show new areas that are anticipated to be impacted
by flooding because of climate change trends in rainfall distributions and intensities. The city will work to manage
these potential areas of flooding through communication, and capital planning to reduce the impact of climate change
induced flooding. Online tools that allow for the collection of data from affected residents and owners will provide
firsthand accounts of areas impacted by localized flooding.
6. How will this planning project result in assignment of responsibility for follow-up action(s) to increase local resilience:
The stormwater resiliency plan will include a model of the existing stormwater infrastructure identifying current areas
of concern including inadequate stormwater infrastructure and areas of flooding. The model will also include future
climate change scenarios and development which may show additional areas of concern within the existing system.
These existing and potential areas of concern can be graded on their severity and their impact to property and human
health. Once graded, the areas of concern can be evaluated for capital improvement to reduce flood severity and
protect human health, property, and public infrastructure.
7. How will this project position a tribal/local government to pursue funding as needed to do follow-up implementation
of the resilience project(s) for which planning was completed:
The stormwater resiliency plan or management plan is required for most stormwater-based grants. This plan, when
adopted by the City Council, will determine areas of crucial need and will assist in creating an improvement plan and
schedule. The capital improvement plan and schedule can be used to begin researching funding opportunities for
future projects. Due to the current reoccurring flooding and the anticipated increases in flooding due to climate
changes the City anticipates possible funding sources as the MDNR Flood Mitigation Grant or the FEMA Building
Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Grant as possible sources to assist in the implementation of the
capital improvement plan. The City may choose to set aside utility funds to meet the required local match of these
grant programs. The City will evaluate annually funding assistance that may come available to assist in expediting this
climate resiliency plan. The City may also use existing stormwater utility rates revenues to finance, through General
Obligation Bonds, the necessary investments needed to make improvements.
I Experience and qualifications
1. Describe applicant's experience and qualifications related to the applicant's role in the proposed planning project:
The City of Hutchinson has professional city staff to lead and manage the stormwater resiliency plan. Both the
City Public Works Manager and the City Project/Environmental/Regulatory Manager will lead the development of
the stormwater resiliency plan. The City also anticipates hiring outside professional experts to assist in the
development of the XP-SWMM model and recommendations for climate scenarios and climate sensitivity
analysis. This team of internal and external experts have the experience and qualifications necessary to complete
this plan.
2. Will anyone outside your organization be responsible for work performed? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, provide name of organization(s) and contact information, experience, and qualifications related to the
proposed project, and describe the role of the outside organization(s) in the project:
The City is proposing to use SEH to provide the XPSWMM modeling and assist in the resiliency plan development.
The primary contact for SEH will be Emily Jennings. Emily will be supported by Riley Mondloch and Carson Webb.
Contact information is provided below and experience and qualifications are provided with the response of the
following question.
Emily Jennings, PE
Sr. Water Resources Engineer / Project Manager
ejennings@sehinc.com
Riley Mondloch, PE, CFM
Water Resources Engineer / Modeling Lead & QC Manager
rmondloch@sehinc.com
Carson Webb, EIT
Water Resources Engineer / Primary Modeler
cwebb@sehinc.com
3. Provide detailed information about the qualifications and experience — including with similar projects — of the
specific people who will work on this project, both within the applicant organization and from outside
organization(s):
The City of Hutchinson will have the following staff working on the Stormwater Resiliency Plan:
John Olson
John is the City of Hutchinson, Public Works Manager and has worked for City for 26 years. He routinely oversees
the planning, design, operation and construction of the City's utility infrastructure. His role will be to oversee the
contract and deliverables for this project. His engineering team will also provide the record plans, as-builts and
field investigations to collect the necessary data to the develop the XP-SWMM model for the stormwater
resiliency plan.
John Paulson
John is the City of Hutchinson, City Project/Environmental/Regulatory Manager and has worked for the City for 17
years. He oversees the City's stormwater compliance, policy development and planning activities. He will work
with John to oversee the contract, grant, and deliverables for the Stormwater Resiliency Plan. John routinely
manages City projects, programs and manages consultant contracts.
Brandon Fitzpatrick
Brandon is the City of Hutchinson, Engineering Technician and has worked for the City in this capacity for the last
8 years. He is responsible for collecting, maintaining, and utilization of City infrastructure GIS data. He will work
with the project team to produce applicable City GIS data necessary for modeling inputs, perform field
verification of needed storm sewer system attributes, and generate map outputs for the final plan.
Emily Jennings, PE
Emily will serve as the Project Manager for SEH. Emily is a senior professional engineer with more than 9 years of
experience specializing in municipal, industrial and construction stormwater permitting, hydraulic and
hydrological analysis, permanent stormwater management facility design and stormwater conveyance modeling
and design, including roadways and ditches. Emily's project experience includes stormwater related feasibility
studies, planning, analysis, final design, and construction. Emily has extensive experience in assisting clients with
maintaining compliance with stormwater regulation, policy, and infrastructure. Emily's similar project experience
includes:
• SWMP Update and City-wide XPSWMM Model Development for City of Red Wing, MN
• North Scheuneman Road SWMP and 2D XPSWMM Model for Gem Lake, MN
• Several urban drainage analysis and design projects in metro and southeast MN
• General Engineering Services for Vadnais Lake Area Water Management Organization (VLAWMO), MN
Riley Mondloch, PE, CFM
Riley will serve as the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling lead and primary quality control reviewer. Riley is a
Professional Engineer and Certified Floodplain Manager with SEH with 6 years of experience. Riley has
experience with various modeling techniques. His project experience includes leading storm sewer analysis and
design tasks and supporting a number of other water resources tasks. He has worked on several projects creating
urban and rural hydrologic/hydraulic models for community stormwater management systems. He has worked on
software including ArcGIS, HEC-RAS, HEC-GeoRAS, XPSWMM, HydroCAD, AutoCAD and Microsoft Office Suite.
Riley has extensive 2D modeling experience using XPSWMM, HEC-RAS and SRH-2D. Riley's similar project
experience includes:
• Minnesota River Flood Resiliency Projects for MnDOT in southern MN: US 169, TH 101, TH 41, TH 19,
TH93, and Sibley CSAH 6.
• East Arm Little Calumet River Flood Risk Mitigation Plan in Lake County, IN
• Northeast Drainage Study & Alternatives Analysis in Olivia, MN
• Several Flood Mitigation Plans for Watersheds in Lowell, IN
• Flood Mitigation Plan for Military Base in rural WI
Carson Webb, EIT
Carson is an Engineer in Training with SEH with 3 years of experience. Carson will be the primary modeler for
this Plan, working closely with Riley to develop the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for the study area. Carson
has experience in XPSWMM 1D and 2D model development. Carson's similar project experience includes:
• Stormwater Resiliency Assessment and Action Plan for Cloquet, MN
• Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling & Alternatives Analysis in Rice Lake, WI
• Comprehensive Stormwater Planning in Lowell, IN
• Hydraulic Modeling for Bridge Replacement in Waseca County, MN
MINNESOTA POLLUTION
CONTROL AGENCY
Grant Contract
State of Minnesota
SWIFT Contract No.: 247533
Al: 123750
Activity ID: PR020240001
This grant contract is between the state of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 ("MPCA" or "State") and the City of Hutchinson,
111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350 ("Grantee").
Recitals
1. Under Minn. Stat. § 116.03, subd.2, the State is empowered to enter into this grant.
2. The State is in need of the City of Hutchinson Stormwater Resiliency Plan — South Project (project).
3. Grantee will comply with required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minn.Stat.§16B.97,
subd. 4 (a) (1).
4. The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to
the satisfaction of the State. Pursuant to Minn.Stat.§16B.98, subd.1, the Grantee agrees to minimize administrative
costs as a condition of this grant.
Grant Contract
1. Term of Grant Contract
1.1 Effective Date. May 13, 2024, Per Minn. Stat.§16B.98, Subd. 5, the Grantee must not begin work until this grant
contract is fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the Grantee that work may
commence. Per Minn.Stat.§16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant contract is
fully executed.
1.2 Expiration Date. June 30, 2025, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: Liability; State
Audits; Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; Publicity and Endorsement; Governing Law, Jurisdiction,
and Venue; and Data Disclosure.
2. Grantee's Duties
The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will perform the duties specified in Attachment A which is attached and
incorporated into this grant contract.
3. Time
The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this
grant contract, time is of the essence.
4. Consideration and Payment
4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows:
(a) Compensation. The Grantee will be paid according to the breakdown of costs contained in Attachment A, which
is attached and incorporated into this grant contract. Grantee certifies they will provide no less than 10% (ten
percent) of the total grant amount as cash match or in -kind services.
(b) Travel Expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily
incurred by the Grantee as a result of this grant contract will not exceed the total amount set forth
in the travel expense items of the detailed budget section of Attachment A, which is attached and
incorporated into this grant contract; provided that the Grantee will be reimbursed for travel and
subsistence expenses in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current
"Commissioner's Plan" promulgated by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget
(MMB). The Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside
Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written approval for out of state travel. Minnesota
will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out of state.
(c) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the
Grantee under this grant contract will not exceed $81,200.00 (Eighty One Thousand Two Hundred
Dollars and Zero Cents).
4.2 Payment
(a) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for
the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced
services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule:
Invoices for expenses incurred to -date may be submitted as frequently as monthly. First invoice is
required no later than 6 (six) months or midway through the project, whichever comes first. Email
updates about the status of the project are required to be provided to the State's Authorized
Representative whenever an invoice is submitted to MPCA Accounts Payable. The State's Authorized
Representative will not approve an invoice through the state system without this project update. A
final invoice for payment of remaining grant funds expended by the project is required to be
submitted at the completion of the project after a Grant Project Final Report, in a format provided
to the Grantee by the MPCA, has been submitted to the State's Authorized Representative and
approved. Payment of the final 10% (ten percent) of grant funds will be held back until the project is
completed satisfactorily and all deliverables have been submitted and approved.
Invoices must be emailed to mpca.ap@state.mn.us, cc'd to the State's Authorized Representative,
and contain the following information:
• Name of Grantee
• Grantee's Authorized Representative
• State's Authorized Representative
• SWIFT Contract No.
• Total amount requested for this invoicing period
• Invoice number
• Invoice date
• Invoicing period (actual working period covered by the invoice)
• Cumulative amount of grant expended to date
• Amount of match expended this invoicing period
• Cumulative amount of match expended to date
• Time and material breakdown for invoicing period:
o Itemization by each task worked on that period and for each position that worked
on it showing actual hourly rates, hours worked and total dollar amounts (divided
into grant -funded and match); consultant invoices may be requested
o Receipts for supplies and any other itemized materials costs to be reimbursed with
grant funds or counted as match
o Itemized per diem expenses, stipends or similar; receipts may be requested to be
submitted with invoice
• Other items as requested
If there is a problem with submitting an invoice electronically, please contact the Accounts Payable
Unit at 651-757-2491.
The Grantee shall submit an invoice for the final payment within 15 (fifteen) days of the original or
amended end date of this grant contract. The State reserves the right to review submitted invoices
after 15 (fifteen) days and make a determination as to payment.
(b) Unexpended Funds. The Grantee must promptly return to the State any unexpended funds that
have not been accounted for annually in a financial report to the State due at grant closeout.
4.3 Contracting and Bidding Requirements
Per Minn. Stat. §471.345, grantees that are municipalities as defined in Subd. 1 must follow the law.
(a) For projects that include construction work and have a total project cost of $25,000 or more,
prevailing wage rules apply per Minn. Stat. §§177.41 through 177.44. These rules require that the
wages of laborers and workers should be comparable to wages paid for similar work in the
community as a whole.
(b) The grantee must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred in MN:
https://mn.gov/admin/osp/government/suspended-debarred/.
5. Conditions of Payment
All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the State's satisfaction,
as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive
payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local
law.
6. Authorized Representative
The State's Authorized Representative is Liz Wiese, 7678 College Road, Ste 105, Baxter, MN 56425, 651-757-
5072, liz.wiese@state.mn.us or successor and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance
and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory,
the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance of each invoice submitted for payment.
The Grantee's Authorized Representative is John Paulson, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350,
320-234-5682, jpaulson@hutchinsommn.gov, or successor. If the Grantee's Authorized Representative
changes at any time during this grant contract, the Grantee must immediately notify the State.
7. Assignment, Amendments, Change Orders, Waiver, and Grant Contract Complete
7.1 Assignment. The Grantee shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant
contract without the prior written consent of the State, approved by the same parties who executed and
approved this grant contract, or their successors in office.
7.2 Amendments. Any amendments to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it
has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant
contract, or their successors in office.
7.3 Change Orders. If the State's Authorized Representative or the Grantee's Authorized Representative
identifies a change needed in the workplan and/or budget, either party may initiate a Change Order
using the Change Order Form provided by the MPCA. Change Orders may not delay or jeopardize the
success of the Project, alter the overall scope of the Project, increase or decrease the overall amount of
the Contract, or cause an extension of the term of this Contract. Major changes require an Amendment
rather than a Change Order. A Change Order also is required to name a successor if the State's
Authorized Representative or the Grantee's Authorized Representative is no longer available to fulfill
that role.
The Change Order Form must be approved and signed by the State's Authorized Representative and the
Grantee's Authorized Representative in advance of doing the work included in the Change Order.
Documented changes will then become an integral and enforceable part of the Contract. The MPCA has
the sole discretion on the determination of whether a requested change is a Change Order or an
Amendment. The state reserves the right to refuse any Change Order requests.
7.4 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does not waive the
provision or the State's right to enforce it.
7.5 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and contracts between the State
and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be
used to bind either party.
8. Liability
The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims
or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this
grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar
any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant
contract.
9. State Audits
Under Minn. Stat. § 1613.98, subd.8, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures
and practices of the Grantee or other party relevant to this grant contract or transaction are subject to
examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of
six years from the end of this grant contract, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period
of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later.
10. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property
10.1 Government Data Practices
The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat.
Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all
data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this
grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in
this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data
referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the
Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is
released. The Grantee's response to the request shall comply with applicable law.
10.2 Intellectual property rights
(a) Intellectual property rights. The State owns all rights, title and interest in all of the intellectual
property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the
Works and Documents created and paid for under this grant agreement. Works means all
inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer
programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings specifications,
materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by the Grantee,
its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the
performance of this grant agreement. Works includes "Documents." Documents are the originals
of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes studies, photographs, negatives, designs,
drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or
electronic forms, prepared by the Grantee, its employees, agents, or subcontractors, in the
performance of this grant agreement. The Documents shall be the exclusive property of the State
and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the State by the Grantee, at the
Grantee's expense, upon the written request of the State, or upon completion, termination, or
cancellation of this grant agreement. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright
protection under the United States' Copyright Act will be deemed to be "works made for hire."
The Grantee assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to
the State. The Grantee must, at the request of the State, execute all papers and perform all other
acts necessary to transfer or record the State's ownership interest in the Works and Documents.
(b) Obligations.
(1) Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not
patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to
practice by the Grantee, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of
this grant agreement, the Grantee shall immediately give the State's Authorized
Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized
Representative with complete information and/or disclosure therein.
(2) Representation. The Grantee must perform all acts and take all steps necessary to ensure that
all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the State,
and that neither Grantee nor its employees, agents, or subcontractors retain any interest in
and to the Works and Documents. The Grantee represents and warrants that the Works and
Documents do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons
or entities. Notwithstanding Clause Liability, the Grantee shall indemnify, defend, to the
extent permitted by the Attorney General, and hold harmless the State, at the Grantee's
expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to the extent that it is based on a
claim that all or part of the Works or Documents infringe upon the intellectual property rights
of others. The Grantee will be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands,
obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages, including, but not limited to, attorney fees. If such
a claim or action arises or in Grantee's or the State's opinion is likely to arise, the Grantee
must, at the State's discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to use the
intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing Works or
Documents as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of
the State will be in addition to and not exclusive of other remedies provided by law.
(3) License. The State hereby grants a limited, no -fee, noncommercial license to the Grantee to
enable the Grantee's employees engaged in research and scholarly pursuits to make, have
made, reproduce, modify, distribute, perform, and otherwise use the Works, including
Documents, for research activities or to publish in scholarly or professional journals, provided
that any existing or future intellectual property rights in the Works or Documents (including
patents, licenses, trade or service marks, trade secrets, or copyrights) are not prejudiced or
infringed upon, that the Minnesota Data Practices Act is complied with, and that individual
rights to privacy are not violated. The Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the State for
any claim or action based on the Grantee's use of the Works or Documents under the
provisions of Clause 10.2(b)(2). Said license is subject to the State's publicity and
acknowledgement requirements set forth in this grant agreement. The Grantee may
reproduce and retain a copy of the Documents for research and academic use. The Grantee is
responsible for security of the Grantee's copy of the Documents. A copy of any articles,
materials or documents produced by the Grantee's employees, in any form, using or derived
from the subject matter of this license, shall be promptly delivered without cost to the State.
11. Workers' Compensation
The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. §176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers'
compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State
employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these
employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
these employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility.
12. Publicity and Endorsement
12.1 Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as
the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's
Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational
pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the
Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program,
publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. All projects primarily funded by
state grant appropriations must publicly credit the State of Minnesota, including on the grantee's
website when practicable.
12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services.
13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue
Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal
proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with
competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
14. Termination
14.1 Termination by the State. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract with or without
cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to
payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed.
14.2 Termination for Cause. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if the State finds that
there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress
has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not
be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the
refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already
disbursed.
14.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if:
(a) It does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature.
(b) Or, if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services
covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not
obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination.
However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services
satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any
penalty if the contract is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or
other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the
lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice.
15. Data Disclosure
Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its
social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification
number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the
payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and
state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent
state tax liabilities, if any.
To protect Grantee's personal data, Grantee is strongly encouraged to obtain and use a Minnesota tax
identification number.
16. Reporting Requirements
Final Report. By the date specified in the project workplan and in a format provided by the MPCA, the
Grantee shall submit a final report to the MPCA, plus all project deliverables identified in the workplan.
If the States Authorized Representative determines that the information submitted in the Final Report
and/or Project Deliverables is inadequate, the Grantee shall prepare and submit additional / corrected
information reasonably requested by the State's Authorized Representative. The Final Report and Project
Deliverables shall not be approved by the State's Authorized Representative and final payment shall not be
disbursed unless the Report and Deliverables contains the specified information to the satisfaction of the
State's Authorized Representative.
Signatures
Title Name Signature Date
Admin ID
Appendix B
Public Comments Summary
Appendix B — Community Comments
Number
Comment
1
Frequent backyard flooding during heavy rain events
2
Major pooling! Affects the brown house on Lynn and retaining wall of 515 2nd.
High point at the end of this driveway causes ice dam in winter. Ice dam can get high enough to bottom
3
out a sedan.
Ever since river was 'rerouted' along this northeast boundary about 20 to 25 years ago (old river channel
filled in and stones placed on northeast bank), the southwest bank of the river has been eroded due to
4
new meander scar activity
Water Pools (forms a lake/river) in this area after heavy rains. Flooding usually occurs after multiple
inches of rain. Also, when there is enough rain, the field to the west (which is out of city limits) drains
5
into this area which intensifies the issue.
Appendix C
Web Soil Survey Data
386M
a - s'� 2s' N
4-51'27N
383700 3B7000 38B700 3B90W 390D00 391000 392900
3
- Map Scale: 1:51,900 if pnnted on A landsope (11" x 8.5') sheet.
Meters
N
0 50D 100D 2DDD 3000
Feet
0 250D 500D 10000 15000
Map projection: Web Mercator GDmercoordlnate5: WGS84 Edge bcs: U-M Zone 15N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Hydrologic Soil Group —McLeod County, Minnesota
38M 3BRM 389000 39000D 391000 392900 330DO 39M 39M 396M
4/18/2024
Page 1 of 6
Hydrologic Soil Group —McLeod County, Minnesota
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest
(AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating
Polygons
0
A
0
A/D
0
B
0
B/D
o
C
0
C/D
0
D
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
y
A
�y
A/D
ry
B
+.y
B/D
y
C
.y
C/D
,y
D
r r
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
A
A/D
IN
B
B/D
MAP INFORMATION
0 C
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:20, 000.
0 C/D
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
■ D
measurements.
0 Not rated or not available
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Water Features
Web Soil Survey URL:
— Streams and Canals
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Transportation
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
♦..�y Rails
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Interstate Highways
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
ry US Routes
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
r_ Major Roads
of the version date(s) listed below.
Local Roads
Soil Survey Area: McLeod County, Minnesota
Background
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 10, 2023
. Aerial Photography
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 29, 2023—Sep
13, 2023
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
U,i).A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 6
Hydrologic Soil Group -McLeod County, Minnesota
Hydrologic Soil Group
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
27B
Dickinson fine sandy
A
6.4
0.1 %
loam, 1 to 6 percent
slopes
39B
Wadena loam, 2 to 6
B
37.4
0.4%
percent slopes
41A
Estherville loam, 0 to 2
A
353.5
3.5%
percent slopes
41 B
Estherville sandy loam,
A
74.6
0.7%
2 to 6 percent slopes
86
Canisteo clay loam, 0 to
C/D
9.0
0.1 %
2 percent slopes
94B
Terril loam, 2 to 6
B
2.5
0.0%
percent slopes
102B
Clarion loam, 2 to 6
C
356.0
3.5%
percent slopes
109
Cordova clay loam, 0 to
C/D
89.9
0.9%
2 percent slopes
112
Harps clay loam, 0 to 2
C/D
118.1
1.2%
percent slopes
118
Crippin loam, 1 to 3
B/D
146.5
1.4%
percent slopes
239
Le Sueur loam, 1 to 3
C/D
118.9
1.2%
percent slopes
247
Linder loam
B/D
17.0
0.2%
255
Mayer loam, 0 to 2
B/D
123.4
1.2%
percent slopes
269
Millington clay loam,
B/D
40.4
0.4%
occasionally flooded
336
Delft clay loam, 0 to 2
C/D
10.51
0.1 %
percent slopes
362
Millington loam,
B/D
107.3
1.0%
frequently flooded
386
Okoboji mucky silty clay
C/D
25.0
0.2%
loam
392
Biscay clay loam, 0 to 2
C/D
86.1
0.8%
percent slopes
414
Hamel loam, 0 to 2
C/D
31.2
0.3%
percent slopes
525
Muskego soils, 0 to 1
C/D
12.2
0.1 %
percent slopes
887B
Clarion-Swanlake
C
626.6
6.1 %
complex, 2 to 6
percent slopes
0sDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 6
Hydrologic Soil Group -McLeod County, Minnesota
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
920C2
Clarion-Storden-Pilot
B
2.4
0.0%
Grove complex, 6 to
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
921 C2
Clarion-Storden
B
222.6
2.2%
complex, 6 to 10
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
960D2
Omsrud-Storden
B
221.9
2.2%
complex, 10 to 16
percent slopes,
moderately eroded
960F
Belview-Omsrud
B
33.4
0.3%
complex, 22 to 40
percent slopes
978
Cordova -Rolfe complex,
C/D
7.6
0.1 %
0 to 2 percent slopes
1016
Udorthents, loamy
A
153.6
1.5%
1030
Udorthents-Pits, gravel
A
73.7
0.7%
complex
1075
Klossner and Muskego
C/D
205.3
2.0%
soils, ponded, 0 to 1
percent slopes
1080
Klossner, Okoboji and
C/D
74.4
0.7%
Glencoe soils,
ponded, 0 to 1
percent slopes
1092
Harps -Glencoe complex
B/D
475.0
4.6%
1213C
Cokato-Storden
B
443.7
4.3%
complex, 6 to 12
percent slopes,
eroded
1229B
Cokato-Storden-
B
12.5
0.1 %
Estherville complex, 2
to 6 percent slopes
1834
Coland clay loam, 0 to 2
C/D
121.8
1.2%
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
L13A
Klossner muck, 0 to 1
C/D
175.9
1.7%
percent slopes
L83A
Webster clay loam, 0 to
C/D
34.2
0.3%
2 percent slopes
L84A
Glencoe clay loam, 0 to
C/D
31.7
0.3%
1 percent slopes
L85A
Nicollet clay loam, 1 to 3
C/D
348.8
3.4%
percent slopes
L107A
Canisteo-Glencoe
C/D
2,912.8
28.5%
complex, 0 to 2
percent slopes
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 6
Hydrologic Soil Group —McLeod County, Minnesota
Map unit symbol
Map unit name Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
L113B
Reedslake-Le Sueur C
1,398.0
13.70,
complex, 1 to 6
percent slopes
L1207B
Le Sueur-Reedslake- C/D
239.0
2.30,
Cordova complex, 0
to 5 percent slopes
W Water
646.0
6.30,
Totals for Area of Interest
10,227.6
100.00)
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 6
Hydrologic Soil Group —McLeod County, Minnesota
Tie -break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/18/2024
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 6 of 6
Appendix D
Flooding Photos
1997 Storm Water Damage Areas
The following is an incomplete list of storm water problem areas identified after the storms the spring
and summer of 1997. Most of these areas also had some problems during the storms of 1993. Areas by
noted by quadrant, with a brief description of issues and actions to date.
NW Area
5th Avenue NW/James Avenue
Area has flooding in large rainfalls due to farm and county tile lines, and unknown quality and
location of pipe. Major reconstruction of lines proposed in conjunction with TH 7/22 reconstruction.
Work was originally proposed for 1998 but has been delayed due to the project being substantially
delayed. No major work foreseen for 4-5 years.
California Street
Due to significant, uncontrolled flow through the farmed area to the east of California Street, a
portion of California Street at the low point is frequently inundated. The long-term solution is to
construct a regional pond just east of California Street to handle large storm events. A short term
solution may be to construct a berm along the east plat line, however this will require property
acquisition and will create crop damage of adjoining property. It is essential that properties on
California Street be protected to higher elevations!
School Road
Some of the low areas on School Road get inundated during large rain, causing localized flooding.
This is due to the lack of storm sewer storage facilities in the area. There are very few alternatives
for reducing flood damage, outside of the development of ponding areas. Since no area is readily
available for this use, purchase of developed land or pond construction in Millerps Woods would be
the most likely candidates.
Shady Ridge Circle
This is one the few rural road areas left in the City. It was brought into the City after being
essentially developed as a rural site. It has previously existing culverts and drainage systems that
have some inadequacies. In addition, at the south end of the Circle, a private, previously existing
storm sewer system has had some capacity issues. There are also problems due to at least two homes
being located below the level of the street. It is proposed to correct most of these deficiencies when
the street is reconstructed in the next couple of years.
NE Area
Northwoods/Maple/Maplewood Academy and Burns Manor
This area has insufficient storm sewer, and is proposed to be served from an extension of the NE
storm sewer system which extends north on Bluff Street. This line is proposed to be extended west
from its current end at Northwoods Avenue and Hillcrest Road to a point just west of TH 15 (Main
Street) at 9th Avenue NE. This would take a load off the existing system, and allow reconstruction
of the undersized system. The north portion of this area is currently served only by a small, County
the line. This has created some problems for the Burns Manor area, which also has problems due to
poor design issues. City and HAHC staff are working on a short term solution for the Burns Manor
site, however the long-term solution is based on completion of an extensive and expensive storm
sewer and ponding system.
SE Area
Hassan/Jorgenson Street
The problems noted appear related to some homes directly hooking up house perimeter tile to a
private tile line. When the storm sewer system was surcharged during the high -rainfall events, this
system backed up into some of the adjoining homes. It is our recommendation that these homes
disconnect their direct connection to the system and install a sump pump system. There is also an
issue regarding an artesian well in the area, and its effect on the ground water.
SW Area
Park Island Drive
The west side of Park Island Drive has problems due to runoff and ground water. The City
constructed tile lines in the rear yards and under the curb, but problems are still occurring. It is
apparent that the rear yard grading does not provide adequate protection for the homes, and that
regrading of the yards may be the most prudent action to improve the situation.
SW Storm Sewer
South Grade Road/Sunset Street/Clinton Avenue and Echo Drive Areas
This area is served by the SW Storm Sewer. This storm sewer empties from an 84" diameter outlet
into Otter Lake off School Road. It is 60" in diameter when it reaches Linden Avenue and Merrill
Street. This line serves and area bordered by School Road on the west, South Grade Road (and some
areas to the south) on the south, and the Plaza 15/Echo Drive/TH 15 South area. The majority of the
Hutch Mall area has been diverted to the south. The upper end of this system (noted above) has had
flooding problems during high flows. The majority of this problem is due almost a complete lack of
storage facilities for large events. There are also several areas with buildings at improper elevations
and poorly drained sites. Correcting these deficiencies will require a comprehensive review of the
facilities. It is also assumed that it will require the acquisition of property for storage basins, and/or
an extremely expensive storm sewer system upgrade. We will budget funding for consulting services
to complete this review next year. We will concentrate the remainder of this year on completing our
record drawings for the area.
Floods 2002
sanimh
- Sani calls.shp
Citylimits.shp
Flooding.shp
- Storm calls.shp
= Floods.shp
City of Hutcl
Centerline
January,
20
f
Page 1 of 1
MONTHLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY for APR. 2014
NAME: Hutchinson High School CITY: Hutchinson STATE: MN
ELEV: 1130 ft LAT: 44° 53' 05" N LONG: 94° 23' 36" W
TEMPERATURE (°F), RAIN (in), WIND SPEED (mph)
HEAT COOL AVG
MEAN DEC DEC WIND DOM
DAY TEMP HIGH TIME LOW TIME DAYS DAYS RAIN SPEED HIGH TIME DIR
1 25.8 33.2 1:12a 19.0 7:39a 39.2 0.0 0.00 9.2 27.0 3:02a WNW
2 30.6 41.3 4:01p 19.8 6:09a 34.4 0.0 0.00 4.7 18.0 1:51p ENE
3 32.9 36.4 4:11a 27.2 11:15p 32.1 0.0 0.11 4.4 19.0 9:22a ENE
4 32.2 41.2 4:05p 26.2 3:57a 32.8 0.0 0.15 4.0 24.0 9:38a WNW
5 34.7 46.1 6:15p 20.8 6:51a 30.3 0.0 0.00 2.8 21.0 3:17p S
6 47.1 61.1 5:13p 34.9 6:59a 17.9 0.0 0.00 3.7 15.0 3:23a S
7 48.4 58.5 2:18p 39.0 7:23a 16.6 0.0 0.00 3.6 21.0 4:25p NW
8 42.2 51.4 5:32p 33.8 7:07a 22.8 0.0 0.00 4.3 19.0 9:40a NW
9 52.4 70.8 4:35p 33.4 2:49a 13.4 0.8 0.00 7.1 24.0 1:20p SSW
10 51.0 59.6 12:01a 40.9 7:26a 14.0 0.0 0.00 5.5 27.0 2:51p WNW
11 51.2 62.7 3:53p 39.1 12:59a 13.8 0.0 0.00 2.2 15.0 9:26a E
12 51.0 58.7 4:10p 45.0 6:15a 14.0 0.0 0.01 6.9 24.0 9:35a ENE
13 38.7 45.8 12:01a 31.9 11:58p 26.3 0.0 0.00 8.9 30.0 11:22p N
14 29.9 36.9 2:50p 23.0 11:58p 35.1 0.0 0.00 9.2 29.0 1:41a N
15 27.4 37.2 6:28p 16.1 6:42a 37.6 0.0 0.00 3.4 15.0 10:52p NW
16 31.4 34.7 9:00a 28.1 11:53p 33.6 0.0 0.13 8.9 24.0 7:52a E
17 31.1 39.0 6:36p 25.2 6:10a 33.9 0.0 0.00 4.7 19.0 12:32a N
18 38.9 50.6 5:46p 25.0 3:51a 26.1 0.0 0.00 4.7 26.0 5:59p SE
19 53.0 67.7 1:58p 43.3 7:08a 12.1 0.1 0.00 5.1 25.0 12:01p SE
20 59.8 74.3 3:43p 39.9 6:35a 7.6 2.4 0.00 1.9 11.0 1:30p ENE
21 56.8 62.7 10:53a 44.6 12:00. 8.2 0.0 0.22 5.1 23.0 1:46p NW
22 48.7 58.1 5:43p 38.4 6:36a 16.3 0.0 0.00 2.8 14.0 1:09p N
23 42.7 47.7 12:01a 39.6 11:59a 22.3 0.0 0.24 6.6 24.0 6:02p ESE
24 42.9 49.9 6:46p 39.0 11:59p 22.1 0.0 0.14 3.5 16.0 5:55a ESE
25 50.1 65.2 5:32p 37.7 6:38a 14.9 0.0 0.00 4.0 20.0 2:58p WNW
26 45.3 53.7 4:45p 36.6 6:27a 19.9 0. 7.6 25.0 10:20p ENE
21 41.1 46.6 12: 05a 37.9 10:06a 23.9 0. 1.1 32.0 5:57a E
28 48.9 43.4 6:42p 40.7 12:10a 23.1 0.0 10.1 35.0 6:SSp ENE
29 38.2 41.6 12:01a 35.4 8:09a 26.8 0.0 0.3 11.3 33.0 6:24p NE
30 40.1 44.6 4:49p 36.2 6:45a 24.9 0.0 0.08 7.3 22.0 12:32a N
41.9 74.3 20 16.1 15 695.8 3.3 2.98 5.8 35.0 28 ENE
Max >= 90.0: 0
Max <- 32. 0: 0
Min <= 32.0: 11
Min <= 0.0: 0
Max Rain: 0.89 ON 04/28/14
Days of Rain: 10 (>.0
1 in) 9 (>.1 in) 0 (>1 in)
Beat Base: 65.0 Cool Base: 65.0 Method: Integration
http://www.hutch.k l 2.rnn.us/weathePN0AAPRM0.TXT 5/27/2014
Page 1 of 1
MONTHLY CLIMATOLOGICAL SUMMARY for MAY. 2014
NAME: Hutchinson High School CITY: Hutchinson STATE: MN
ELEV: 1130 ft LAT: 44° 53' 05" N LONG: 94° 23' 36" W
TEMPERATURE (°F), RAIN (in), WIND SPEED (mph)
HEAT COOL AVG
MEAN DEG DEG WIND DOM
DAY TEMP HIGH TIME LOW TIME DAYS DAYS RAIN SPEED HIGH TIME DIR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 42.3 40.4 5:04p 37.6 6:19a 22.7 0.0 0.07 4.9 19.0 12:51a N
2 46.3 59.3 4:30p 37.7 5:42a 16.7 0.0 0.00 5.2 23.0 1:19p WNW
3 46.9 58.2 3:23p 39.1 6:05a 16.1 0.0 0.00 4.6 22.0 11:56a WNW
4 46.1 55.6 5:01p 35.6 6:19a 18.9 0.0 0.00 4.3 17.0 12:01a N
5 56.4 65.0 5:03p 47.9 6:48a 8.6 0.0 0.00 3.0 14.0 5:59p ENE
6 56.5 64.5 2:35p 46.3 6:26a 8.5 0.0 0.00 6.1 26.0 2:58p E
7 57.9 63.3 2:30p 51.7 6:57a 7.1 0.0 0.00 7.2 22.0 12:18p ENE
8 55.5 60.8 12:59p 50.1 6:56a 9.5 0.0 1.00 5.2 27.0 8:Dlp ENE
9 49.9 56.8 12:33a 43.4 11:58p 15.1 0.0 0.00 8.1 27.0 2:03p W
10 13.9 69.6 2:56p 38.0 5:07a 11.4 0.3 3.B 22.0 1:03p SE
11 57.3 65.1 6:51p 4].3 5:13a 7.7 0. 2.8 19.0 11:08p NE
12 51.0 56.6 12:03a 46.3 10:1]p 14.0 0.. 4.8 20.0 12:41a N
13 47.1 53.8 4:30p 42.2 11:52p 1].9 0.0 6.5 25.0 4:SBp WNW
14 47.1 58.0 1:15p 37.4 6:27a 17.9 0.0 0.00 4.0 18.0 8: 04p N
15 42.7 46.1 5:53p 38.6 2:52a 22.1 0.0 0.00 6.2 22.0 10:13a N
16 46.4 54.3 3:38p 38.6 4:36a 18.6 0.0 0.00 2.1 13.0 1:SSp N
17 54.4 60.4 5:50p 3B.0 6.19a 11.1 0.5 0.00 3.1 18.0 B: 51a WSW
18 61.6 73.8 3:23p 47.4 5:46a 5.6 2.4 0.00 5.4 25.0 12:01p SSW
19 55.4 61.0 12:2Ba 51.7 9:38a 9.6 0.0 1.28 5.8 24.0 B: 07a BE
20 62.8 78.2 4:29p 52.2 3:46a 5.5 3.3 0.01 1.3 12.0 4:29p S
21 58.4 64.5 2:55p 50.0 6:24a 6.6 0.0 0.00 3.8 19.0 1:24p NW
22 19.3 72.5 4:56p 47.4 5:47a 7.2 1.5 0.00 1.9 13 .0 5:50p NNE
23 66.0 79.9 4:40p 48.4 S:SSa 4.5 5.5 0.00 1.7 12.0 10:2Ba ESE
24 71.3 84 .0 3:36p 58.0 6:23a 1.2 7.5 0.00 1.9 20.0 4:0 S
25 69.9 79.2 12:20p 56.3 6:19a 1.5 6.4 1.8 18.0 10:54a S
26 70.5 83.0 1:53p 62.6 6:14a 0.2 5.8 .$d, 2.3 18.0 2:30p S
27 66.2 70.6 12:22p 64 .4 5:16a 0.1 0.7 I.
12.0 11:2Is NNE
28
29
30
31
55.7 84.0 24 35.6 9 286.3 33.9 5.53 4.1 27.0 8 N
Max >= 90.0: 0
Max <= 32.0: 0
Min <= 320: 0
Min <- 0.. 0: 0
Max Rain: 1.40 ON OS/26/14
Days of Rain: 8 (-01 in) 7 (,.1 in) 2 (,1 in)
Heat Base: 65.0 Cool Has e: 65.0 Method: Integration
http://w.huteh.k12.=.us/weather/NOAAMO.TXT 5/27/2014
City of Hutchinson f - I Legend
Centerline Map I pr��afe_aoaas
th-map
June, 2016 _! — oth.,la,uea>
' N ' out of service
I_
----------�
it
i
I
I
—• 1
I _
I
1
Appendix E
Project Cost Estimates
A4peadix E
COST SUMMARY
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
SUMMARY
SUMMARY - OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
5/12/2025
PROPOSED CONCEPT
CONSTRUCTION
SUB -TOTAL
COST
CONTINGENCY
COST
CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL COST
PROPOSED CONCEPT 1
$763 810
$229 143
$992 953
PROPOSED CONCEPT 2
$174 665
$52 400
$227 065
PROPOSED CONCEPT 3
$2 333 645
$700 094
$3 033 739
PROPOSED CONCEPT 4
$959 000
$287 700
$1 246 700
PROPOSED CONCEPT 5
$1 389 700
$416 910
1,806,6101
PROPOSED CONCEPT 6
$679 685
$203 906
$883 591
PROPOSED CONCEPT 7
$324 400
$97 320
$421 720
PROPOSED CONCEPT 8
1 $826,9801
$248,0941
$1 075 074
IOIALCUSIS $/,451,885 $2,235,566 $9,68/,451
NOTES:
THE PROPOSED CONCEPTS NOT LISTED IN THIS SUMMARY HAVE BEEN RULED OUT FOR REASONS OTHER THAN COST, AND THEREFORE, COST ESTIMATES WERE
NOT PREPARED.
APORM E
COST -PROJECT 1
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 1
PROPOSED CONCEPT 7 - OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
5/1212025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIT OF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$36,000
$36000
2
18" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
160.00
$95
$15 200
3
30" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
1,12000
$200
$224 000
4
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G OR H
EACH
2.00
$1 965
$3 930
5
ICONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020
EACH
1.00
$4 600
$4 600
6
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020
EACH
5.00
$10 750
$53 750
7
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
4.00
$1 550
$6 200
8
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
SY
2,150
$190
$408,500
9
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$9,400
$9,400
10
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$2,230
$2,230
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL= $763,810
CONTINGENCY(30%) = $229,143
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $992,953
NOTES-
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION-
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
AtYW]d x E
COST -PROJECT 2
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 2
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$8,300
$8 300
2
18" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
45.00
$95.00
$4 275
3
18" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$1 090
$1 090
4
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020
EACH
1.00
$4 600
$4 600
5
ICOMMON EXCAVATION
I CY
1 14,200
$10
$142,000
6
JEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
I LS
1 1.001
$8,6001
$8,600
7
IRESTORATION
I LS
11.001
$5,8001
$5,800
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL = $174,665
CONTINGENCY(30%a) _ $52y400
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $227,065
NOTES:
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
COST -PROJECT 3
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 3
PROPOSED CONCEPT 3 - OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$111,000
$111000
2
15" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
100.00
$120
$12 000
3
18" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
370.00
$95.00
$35 150
4
24" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
180.00
$100.00
$18 000
5
30" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
400.00
$200.00
$80 000
6
36" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
850.00
$200.00
$170 000
7
66" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
460.00
$738.00
$339 480
8
72" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
910.00
$600.00
$546 000
9
72" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$5 450.00
$5 450
10
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G OR H
EACH
1.00
$1 965
$1 965
11
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020
EACH
1.00
$4 600
$4 600
12
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020
EACH
5.00
$10,750
$53,750
13
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 84-4020
EACH
1.00
$18 500
$18 500
14
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 96-4020
EACH
4.00
$25 000
$100 000
15
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
7.00
$1 550.00
$10 850
16
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
SY
4,280
$190.00
$813,200
17
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$11,400
$11,400
18
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$2,300
$2,300
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL= $2,333,645
CONTINGENCY(30%) = $700,094
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $3,033,739
NOTES-
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION-
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
COST -PROJECT 4
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 4
I�:Zdl•����Zdd�[d�iilQd�l�l[d�N]��:Z•]-7_1-7��dd�F��:i�L�3�[d�[d•���
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$45,000
$45 000
2
COMMON EXCAVATION
CY
90,000
$10
$900,000
3
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$9,500
$9,500
4
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$4,500
$4,500
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL = $959,000
CONTINGENCY(30%a) _ $287,700
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $1 y246y700
NOTES:
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
A p"I Ax E
COST -PROJECT 5
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 19199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 6
PROPOSED CONCEPT 5 - OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$66,000
$66 000
2
36" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
290.00
$200.00
$58 000
3
48" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
100.00
$260.00
$26 000
4
60" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
1,22000
$430.00
$524 600
3
36" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
2.00
$2 230.00
$4 460
4
48" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
2.00
$2 920.00
$5 840
5
60" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$4 850.00
$4 850
6
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
1.00
$1 550.00
$1 550
7
COMMON EXCAVATION
CY
60,000
$10
$600,000
8
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$23,400
$23,400
9
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$75,000
$75,000
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL= $1,3895700
CONTINGENCY(30%) _ $4165910
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $158065610
NOTES-
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION-
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
6ppfdlax E
COST -PROJECT 6
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 6
=4DZoidLl193:42a,-IId;jILl1[01Ll[d;A;Jz1ollil-14=I1oidLl&tift Lo30[dLl[oielcti
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$32,500
$32 500
2
15" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
340.00
$120.00
$40 800
3
24" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
620.00
$100.00
$62 000
4
30" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
530.00
$200.00
$106 000
5
36" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
850.00
$200.00
$170 000
6
30" RC PIPE APRON
LIN FT
1.00
$1 630.00
$1 630
7
36" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$2 230.00
$2 230
8
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G OR H
EACH
5.00
$1 965.00
$9 825
9
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020
EACH
5.00
$4 600.00
$23 000
10
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020
EACH
2.00
$10 750
$21 500
11
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
SY
980
$190
$186,200
F12
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$15,000
$15,000
13
IRESTORATION
LS
11-001
$9,0001
$9,000
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL= $679,685
C0NTINGENCY(30%) _ $2035906
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $8835591
NOTES-
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION-
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
3 ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE-
4 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
Apii xE
COST -PROJECT 7
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 7
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$113,250
$15 000
2
COMMON EXCAVATION
CY
25,000
$10
$250,000
3
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$37,400
$37,400
4
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$22,000
$22,000
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL = $324,400
CONTINGENCY(30%a) _ $97,320
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $421 ,720
NOTES:
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.
REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
Apeendi!x E
COST -PROJECT 8
HUTCHINSON STORMWATER RESILIENCE & FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
HUTCHINSON, MN
SEH NO. HUTCH 179199
PROPOSED CONCEPT 8
[i►]181-1=4Dx0iolLl191:4if-II►];jILlIIs] LlU];m;j[i►]1-11-14=110iolLl&ti[i4o3dP]Ll[oisicti
5/12/2025
ITEM
NO
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITOF
MEASUREMENT
TOTAL
QUANTITY
UNIT PRICE
COST
1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1.00
$39,400
$39 400
2
18" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
50.00
$95.00
$4 750
3
30" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
170.00
$100.00
$17 000
4
36" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
300.00
$200.00
$60 000
5
42" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
350.00
$340.00
$119 000
6
48" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
520.00
$260.00
$135 200
7
54" RC PIPE SEWER
LIN FT
390.00
$440.00
$171 600
8
42" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$3 100.00
$3 100
9
48" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$2 920.00
$2 920
10
54" RC PIPE APRON
EACH
1.00
$3 230.00
$3 230
11
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G OR H
EACH
2.00
$1 965.00
$3 930
12
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 604020
EACH
2.00
$10 750
$21 500
13
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 844020
EACH
1.00
$18,500
$18,500
14
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
EACH
1.00
$1 550.00
$1 550
15
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
SY
1,090
$190
$207,100
16
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
LS
1.00
$14,400
$14,400
17
RESTORATION
LS
1.00
$3,800
$3,800
CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL= $826,980
CONTINGENCY(30%) _ $2485094
OPINON OF TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS = $150755074
NOTES-
1 COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION-
2 REMOVALS AND OTHER GENERAL CIVIL ITEMS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
ENGINEERING FEES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ESTIMATE.
COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS TO SANITARY SEWER OR WATER MAIN SYSTEMS
Building a Better World for All of K
Sustainable buildings, sound infrastructure, safe transportation systems, clean water,
renewable energy, and a balanced environment. Building a Better World for All of Us
communicates a company -wide commitment to act in the best interests of our clients
and the world around us.
We're confident in our ability to balance these requirements_
JOIN OUR SOCIAL COMMUNITIES
00009
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTC HIN SON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN KJAPOSE.
Approve/Deny First Reading of Ordinance 25-856 - An Ordinance for the Sale of
Agenda Item: Municipally Owned Property to Bonneville Land and Cattle, LLC
Department: Administration
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Matt Jaunich
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Matt Jaunich
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
For past year or so now the City has been in conversation with Gus Wurdell on the sale of
city -owned land that is behind the former Sorenson Rental facility (2 parcels). Previously the City
agreed to sell the properties to Gus for $17,000 (map of properties is attached).
Through the process, the City realized it was in need of a 50-foot utility easement with the power
lines that are directly above this property. With 50 feet of the land essentially not being available
to the buyer, we negotiated a new price for consideration by the Council at $10,000. The utility
easement is noted in pink in the attached map of the properties that are being sold.
Attached is a copy of the proposed purchase agreement. Per City Charter, city property must be
sold through an ordinance. Attached for your consideration is a first reading of an ordinance to
sell this property to Bonneville Land and Cattle, LLC (Gus) for $10,000.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the First Reading of Ordinance 25-856 - An Ordinance for the Sale of Municipally Owned
Property
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: New Bu
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
PARK
246 �ST
2
tiF
7 194
S
68'
250
9
F/0 7 1
�r
305 2 '-
3s24 v//��!
�26 1
205 O
257
7p
�Q, 207
7,
��� �2
Cl`
72S
400
428
S
26�8,
41
72632 Sig 7 400
>g
8g 240
V
18
7
.92.
�2s
3
�>63
�
ss
7
0
h00
�0
5l41&nd
2
Layer
Proposed Exception
lS�
17
Parcels
O
9
'1�1
REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Parties. This Purchase Agreement is made and effective on the last date executed below by and between Bonneville Land and
Cattle, LLC, a limited liability corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, "Buyer", and the City of Hutchinson, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, "Seller".
Offer/Acceptance. Seller agrees to convey real property (the "Property") in McLeod County, Minnesota, as indicated by the
legal description described hereto:
PARCEL 1
That part of Block 18, Townsite of Hutchinson, North Half, lying between lines parallel with and distant 25 feet
Northeasterly and 75 feet Southwesterly, measured at right angles and radially, from the center of the main track of
the former Minneapolis Industrial Railway Company, as said main track is now located.
AND
PARCEL 2
A triangular parcel of land off of Lots 1 and 2 in Block 17 in the North Half, City of Hutchinson described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot 1, 300 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 2, thence
Northwesterly on the North line of said Lots 1, and 2, to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2, thence South on the West
line of said Lot 2, 75 feet, thence Easterly to the point of beginning: said parcel being a portion of the same premises
described in that certain Contract for Deed dated April 29, 1913, between F.S. Kalich and wife, and the former Electric
Short Line Railway Company, filed for Record in the Register of Deed's office for McLeod County, May 17, 1913, in
Book "O" of Miscellaneous on Page 29,
Reservation of easement. The seller reserves for itself easement areas for recreational and utility purposes above, over and
below the following described property:
PARCEL 1 — UTILITY EASEMENT
The Southerly 50 feet of the property described as Parcel 41 and triangular piece of land beginning at the Southwest
corner of Lot 6 Block 18 thence Southeasterly 64.9 feet to a point located 42.7 feet East and Perpendicular to the right of
way of Adams Street NE and 50 feet North of the Southerly boundary line of Parcel # 1 Property Line.
PARCEL 1 — RECREATION EASEMENT
The Southerly 12 feet of the property described as Parcel 41.
PARCEL 2 — UTILITY EASEMENT
The Southerly 20 feet of Parcel 2 as described above.
Purchase Price and Terms. The purchase price for the property shall be Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) which the
Buyer agrees to pay in cash or by certified check or bank draft on the date of the closing and upon delivery of the deed as
hereinafter provided.
Closing Date and Contingencies. For a period of up to 30 days following the execution of this purchase agreement, Buyer shall
have an opportunity to conduct investigations of the property as described below. The obligation of the Buyer to complete the
transaction contemplated under this purchase agreement is specifically contingent on and the Buyer satisfying itself that there
are no significant environmental or other problems affecting the property. The Buyer shall be the sole judge of the fitness of the
condition of the property. The closing of this transaction shall take place within 30 days of the end of the contingency period
and, in no event later than on or before September 30t1i, 2025or as otherwise mutually agreed by and between the parties.
Deed. At closing, Seller shall execute and deliver a Quit Claim Deed conveying title of record, subject to building and zoning
laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations, exceptions to title which constitute encumbrances, restrictions or easements of
record.
Easement. At closing, Seller shall execute an easement reserving for itself easements over the above -described parcels of land
for recreational and utility purposes.
Assessments. Seller shall pay on the date of closing any deferred real estate taxes (including "green acres" taxes) under
Minnesota Statute §273.1.11 or special assessments payment of which is required as a result of the closing of this sale. Real
estate taxes due and payable in the year in which this transaction is closed shall be prorated between the Buyer and Seller.
Buyer shall pay real estate taxes due and payable in the year following closing and thereafter. Seller makes no representation
concerning the amount of future real estate taxes or of future special assessments.
Seller's Lien Warrants. Seller warrants that there have been no labor or material furnished to the property for which
payment has not been made.
Condition of Property. Seller shall remove all debris and all personal property not included in this sale from the property
before possession date. Seller has not received any notice from any governmental authority as to the existence of any
Dutch elm disease, oak wilt, or other disease of any trees on the property.
Upon execution of this purchase agreement, and upon the request of the Buyer, Seller will deliver to the Buyer true
and correct copies of all records effecting the property and its ownership, condition and use including, without
limitation, copies of all surveys, soil tests, environmental studies and reports, market studies, appraisals, tax
records, governmental permits and correspondence either in the Seller's possession or immediately available to
Seller.
Seller knows of no hazardous substances or petroleum products having been placed, stored, or released from or on the
property by any person in violation of any law, nor of any underground storage tanks having been located on the property
at any time.
Notwithstanding Buyer's environmental investigations of the property, Seller does not warrant and represent to Buyer
that there have been no acts or occurrences upon the property that have caused or could cause hazardous substances or
petroleum products to be released or discharged into the subsoil or ground water of the property or other property in the
area. Seller does not represent and warrant to Buyer that the property is free of hazardous substances and is not
subject to any "superfund" type liens or claims by governmental regulatory agencies or third parties arising from the
release or threatened release of hazardous substances in, on, or about the property.
Seller knows of no wetlands affecting the property. Portions of the property are located in the 500-year floodplain.
Seller's warranties and representations contained in this section shall survive the delivery of the deed provided that any
notice of a defect or claim of breach of warranty must be in writing. Any such notice with respect to matters referred to
in this section must be given by the Buyer to the Seller within one year of the date of closing or they will be deemed
waived. The conditions of the conveyance of this property set forth in the Price and Terms section of this
agreement shall also survive the delivery of the deeds.
Buyer shall have the right to have inspections of the property conducted prior to closing. Unless required by local
ordinance or lending regulations, Seller does not plan to have the property inspected. Other than the representations
made in this paragraph, and by any contingencies, the property is being sold "AS IS" with no express or implied
representations or warranties by the Seller as to physical conditions or fitness for any particular purpose.
Disclosure of Notices. Seller has not received any notice from any governmental authority as to violation of any law,
ordinance or regulation. If the property is subject to restrictive covenants, Seller has not received any notice from any
person as to a breach of the covenants. Seller has not received any notice from any governmental authority concerning
any eminent domain, condemnation, special taxing district, or rezoning proceedings. Should Seller receive notice of
annexation proceedings, Seller agrees to cooperate with Buyer to annex the above -described land into the City of
Hutchinson.
Access Prior to Closing. By this purchase agreement, Buyer does not acquire any right of possession of the property,
license, or easement. However, during the period from the date of the Purchase Agreement to the Closing Date, Buyer
and its agents shall have access to the Property for completing such tests, studies, evaluations and other investigations
as Buyer deems necessary. This right of entry shall also include the Buyer's agents, surveyors, engineers, and site
evaluators for the purposes of testing, measuring and evaluating the condition of the parcel.
Buyer shall indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any and all liens, claims, liabilities or charges incurred or caused
by Buyer's contracts with surveyors, engineers, and site evaluators, which indemnity shall include any costs and
disbursements incurred by Seller in any defense thereof.
Possession. Seller shall deliver possession of the property not later than September 30th, 2025 the date of closing; or
such earlier time as the Seller is capable of executing the deed.
Closing Costs and Prorations. Seller shall pay any state deed tax due and payable with respect to the Warranty Deed
conveying the property. Real estate taxes, if any, due and payable for the Property the year in which the Closing occurs shall
be prorated between Seller and Buyer as of the Closing Date. Buyer shall pay the costs of recording the conveyance
instruments and the premium for any policy of title insurance which Buyer elects to purchase. All other costs and expenses
with respect to the property shall be prorated between the Seller and Buyer as is customary as of the closing date. Each party
shall pay its respective attorney's fees and professional costs with respect to the negotiation and closing of the purchase.
Seller shall pay any commission or fee payable to Seller's broker or agent if any.
Records. Upon the execution of the Purchase Agreement, Seller will deliver to Buyer true and correct copies of all records
(the "Records") affecting the Property and their ownership, condition and use including, without limitation, copies of all
surveys, soil tests, environmental studies and reports, market studies, appraisals, tax records, governmental permits and
correspondence either in Seller's possession or immediately available to Seller.
Minnesota Law. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Well Disclosure. Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any wells on the property.
Closing. Closing shall take place through Avenue Title, LLC 1300 6th St S, Winsted, Minnesota. At closing,
Seller and Buyer shall disclose their Federal Tax Identification numbers for the purposes of completing
state and federal tax forms.
Breach of Contract. The parties herein agree that the ordinary remedies available for breach of contract, including but not
limited to rights of specific performance, shall apply to this transaction, notwithstanding the payment of any earnest
money by Buyer.
Grant of License. Seller hereby grants Buyer an exclusive revocable license to store construction
material, supplies and equipment on the property not including those areas reserved for easement
purposes up to the date of the closing of this transaction. Should the transaction not be closed by
September 30, 2025, the license shall be deemed to be revoked as of that date.
Miscellaneous.
Hutchinson.
SELLER
This agreement is subject to terms and requirements of the City Charter of the City of
BUYER
CITY OF HUTCHINSON Bonneville Land and Cattle, LLC
Gary T. Forcier, Mayor
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
M.
,
Its:
ORDINANCE NO. 25-856
PUBLICATION NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF
MUNICIPALLY OWNED REAL PROPERTY
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the municipally owned real property legally described as follows:
PARCEL 1
That part of Block 18, Townsite of Hutchinson, North Half, lying between lines parallel with and distant
25 feet Northeasterly and 75 feet Southwesterly, measured at right angles and radially, from the center of
the main track of the former Minneapolis Industrial Railway Company, as said main track is now located.
AND
PARCEL 2
A triangular parcel of land off of Lots 1 and 2 in Block 17 in the North Half, City of Hutchinson
described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot 1, 300 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said
Lot 2, thence Northwesterly on the North line of said Lots 1, and 2, to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2,
thence South on the West line of said Lot 2, 75 feet, thence Easterly to the point of beginning: said parcel
being a portion of the same premises described in that certain Contract for Deed dated April 29, 1913,
between F.S. Kalich and wife, and the former Electric
Short Line Railway Company, filed for Record in the Register of Deed's office for McLeod County, May
17, 1913, in Book "O" of Miscellaneous on Page 29,
Reservation of easement. The seller reserves for itself easement areas for recreational and utility purposes
above, over and below the following described property:
PARCEL 1 —UTILITY EASEMENT
The Southerly 50 feet of the property described as Parcel #1 and triangular piece of land beginning at the
Southwest corner of Lot 6 Block 18 thence Southeasterly 64.9 feet to a point located 42.7 feet East and
Perpendicular to the right of way of Adams Street NE and 50 feet North of the Southerly boundary line
of Parcel #1 Property Line.
PARCEL 1 — RECREATION EASEMENT
The Southerly 12 feet of the property described as Parcel 91.
PARCEL 2 — UTILITY EASEMENT
The Southerly 20 feet of Parcel 2 as described above.
for good and valuable consideration is hereby transferred and conveyed to Bonneville Land and Cattle,
LLC or its successors or assigns as agreed upon in the purchase agreement
Section 2. The City Administrator, Matthew Jaunich, or his designee is authorized to sign any
and all documents on behalf of the City to effectuate the closing of this transaction.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 8tn day of July, 2025.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTEST:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTC HIN SON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN KJAPOSE.
Approve/Deny Resolution 15877 Amending the 2025 Fee Schedule
Agenda Item:
Department: Administration
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Matt Jaunich
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Matt Jaunich
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 2
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
Please find attached a resolution approving a few changes to the 2025 fee scheduled. These
changes were discussed at the last council meeting. The changes are actually additions to the
fee schedule.
Those additions are as follows:
Chicken License -- This is to comply with our recently approved backyard chicken ordinance.
The fees being adopted are a $50 initial fee and a $25 annual renewal fee.
Cannabis License -- This is to prepare the City for cannabis registrations once the State starts
issuing licenses. The fees being adopted are a $500 registration fee and $1,000 renewal fee.
These fees are the maximum amount allowed by State Law.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve/Deny the resolution which would update our current 2025 fee schedule.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: Yes
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
RESOLUTION NO. 15877
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2025 FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is empowered by previously passed ordinances to impose
fees for services; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 Fee Scheduled was adopted in December of 2024 with Resolution 15805;
and
WHEREAS, since the adoption of the 2025 Fee Schedule there has been a need to amend
portions of the fee schedule to consider needed additions to the Schedule; and
WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of costs for providing these services for various
city departments;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves
additions to the 2025 Fee Schedule as was previously established by Resolution 15805. Those
additional fees are as follows:
Chicken License: $50 initial fee and $25 renewal fee
Cannabis Registration Fee: $500 initial fee and $1,000 renewal fee
Adopted this 241h day of June, 2025
Gary T. Forcier, Mayor
Attest:
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
KA
FRO HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTCHINSON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN KJAPOSE.
Calling our Next Strategic Planning Session for 4 p.m. on July 22
Agenda Item:
Department: Administration
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Matt Jaunich
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Matt Jaunich
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 1
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: No 0
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
Staff is looking to set our next strategic planning session prior to our July 22 City Council
meeting. This session will focus on finalizing our plan based off of our our strategic planning
session discussions that were held throughout 2024.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of calling our next strategic planning session workshop for Tuesday, July 22 at 4 p.m.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No 0
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
c: HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTCHINSON Request for Board Action
A CITY ON PURPOSE
IIIIIIII
Request for variance of weekend noise hours for construction activities (Dale St).
Agenda Item:
Department: PW/Eng
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Mike Stifter
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Mike Stifter
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business 0
Time Requested (Minutes): 1
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
City staff recently received a request from the general contractor for the City's Dale Street SW
project (Letting No. 1/Project No. 25-01) for a variance to the weekend noise requirements. A
request has been made to allow Saturday work and hours starting at 7.00 am similar to
weekdays, for all remaining weekends this summer. Please note that this project is scheduled to
be completed by August 15, 2025.
City staff believes that this is a reasonable request and feels that the extended working hours
will hopefully ensure that the City specified construction completion dates are achieved by the
contractor. The request is being made due to the unusual amount of rain received in recent
weeks as well as anticipated.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Variance to Noise Hours
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: New Bu
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
V
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
HUTCHINSON Request for Board Action
A UTY DN PLJAPOSE.
May 2025 Financial and Investment Reports
Agenda Item:
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 6/24/2025
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑�
Governance
Time Requested (Minutes): 0
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OFAGENDA ITEM:
For Council review, attached are the May Financial Reports for the general
fund and enterprise
funds. Also attached is the May Investment Report.
Feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: Govern;
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source: N/A
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source: N/A
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT for CITY of HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING MAY 31, 2025
2025
2024
2025 ACTUALS
2025
AVAILABLE
% BDGT
2024 YTD
2024
% BDGT
MAY
YTD
BUDGET
BALANCE
USED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
USED
General Fund
Taxes
-
-
6,741,034
6,741,034
-
-
6,370,436
-
Other Taxes
37,462
72,482
320,000
247,518
22.7
77,123
330,000
23.4
Licenses & Permits
37,894
147,028
415,725
268,697
35.4
214,861
392,100
54.8
Intergovernmental Revenue
53
324,562
2,166,525
1,841,963
15.0
30,041
2,028,194
1.5
Charges for Services
224,460
967,080
2,816,417
1,849,337
34.3
973,258
2,547,142
38.2
Miscellaneous Revenues
18,121
117,099
382,400
265,301
30.6
113,903
353,900
32.2
Transfers -In
-
971,314
2,812,628
1,841,314
34.5
971,314
2,812,628
34.5
Fines & Forfeitures
6,488
19,435
55,000
35,565
35.3
22,664
55,000
41.2
TOTAL REVENUES 324,478 2,618,999 15,709,729 13,090,730 16.7 2,403,164 14,889,400 16.1
Wages & Benefits
1,084,318 3,798,841 10,542,600 6,743,759 36.0
3,691,369 10,050,414 36.7
Supplies
93,880 418,226 1,218,850 800,624 34.3
560,408 1,072,833 52.2
Services & Charges
164,636 1,190,359 3,022,832 1,832,473 39.4
1,091,777 2,867,722 38.1
Miscellaneous Expenses
23,852 146,308 379,905 233,597 38.5
131,236 381,400 34.4
Transfers -Out
- 60,271 545,542 485,271 11.0
58,516 517,031 11.3
Capital Outlay
- 29,391 - (29,391) -
838 - -
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
1,366,686 5,643,396 15,709,729 10,066,333 35.9
5,534,145 14,889,400 37.2
NETREVENUE
(1,042,209) (3,024,397) - 3,024,397
(3,130,981) -
Comments
Licenses & Permits
Building Permit revenue is lagging behind last year by $58,402, through May.
Intergovernmental Revenue
The State provided a one-time early LGA payment of $291,788. This is not additional
LGA but just an partial advance of what we'd
normally receive in July and December. This won't happen in future years unless there is a change in the law.
Services & Charges
Contracted Repair & Maintenance is running higher this year due to critical repairs to the refrigeration system at the Civic Arena.
General Fund Expense by 2025 2024
Department: 2025 YTD 2025 AVAILABLE % BDGT 2024 YTD 2024 % BDGT
MAY ACTUAL BUDGET BALANCE USED ACTUAL BUDGET USED
Mayor & City Council
4,253
14,631
47,488
32,857
30.8
15,004
47,477
31.6
City Administrator
57,635
214,254
544,862
330,608
39.3
212,101
519,041
40.9
Elections
-
-
-
-
-
9,691
29,850
32.5
Finance Department
40,417
205,887
448,831
242,944
45.9
211,642
427,823
49.5
Motor Vehicle
45,284
168,008
398,892
230,884
42.1
140,682
338,131
41.6
Assessing
-
-
-
-
-
-
61,499
-
Legal
32,642
127,718
348,219
220,501
36.7
120,592
329,055
36.6
Planning
20,263
73,360
187,488
114,128
39.1
72,094
181,040
39.8
Information Services
54,986
250,651
723,131
472,480
34.7
194,096
619,744
31.3
City Hall Building
21,351
77,710
213,097
135,387
36.5
77,833
202,295
38.5
Police Department
463,848
1,744,141
4,405,365
2,661,224
39.6
1,647,700
4,210,713
39.1
Emergency Management
140
3,074
13,500
10,426
22.8
15,784
13,500
116.9
Safety Committee
-
11,405
14,335
2,930
79.6
10,807
13,950
77.5
Fire Department
27,986
168,049
556,153
388,104
30.2
144,019
447,485
32.2
Protective Inspections
56,413
170,632
414,616
243,984
41.2
177,637
397,864
44.6
Engineering
55,898
208,232
547,217
338,985
38.1
174,076
479,881
36.3
Streets & Alleys
120,703
616,937
1,717,314
1,100,377
35.9
723,946
1,777,633
40.7
Park/Recreation Administration
40,393
124,507
299,036
174,529
41.6
109,025
280,458
38.9
Recreation
34,442
78,389
237,115
158,726
33.1
68,544
225,861
30.3
Senior Citizen Center
5,749
33,167
83,426
50,259
39.8
32,879
79,564
41.3
Civic Arena
24,129
203,966
445,718
241,752
45.8
158,545
413,137
38.4
Park Department
126,061
429,461
1,230,328
800,867
34.9
432,997
1,187,993
36.4
Recreation Building
24,595
132,313
324,132
191,819
40.8
105,883
280,335
37.8
Events Center
14,964
63,972
158,993
95,021
40.2
64,707
151,082
42.8
Evergreen Building
1,727
12,025
36,080
24,055
33.3
12,273
35,080
35.0
Library
2,469
67,318
257,808
190,490
26.1
114,292
247,865
46.1
Waterpark
39,355
62,008
473,834
411,826
13.1
73,166
467,082
15.7
Cemetery
18,253
57,354
157,200
99,846
36.5
65,069
153,077
42.5
Airport
10,059
110,470
248,888
138,418
44.4
150,867
129,260
116.7
Unallocated General Expense
22,670
213,753
1,176,663
962,910
18.2
198,191
1,141,625
17.4
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
1,366,686
5,643,396
15,709,729
10,066,333
35.9
5,534,145
14,889,400
37.2
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT for CITY of HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING MAY 31, 2025
2025
2024
2025 ACTUALS
2025
AVAILABLE
% BDGT
2024 YTD
2024
% BDGT
MAY
YTD
BUDGET
BALANCE
USED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
USED
Water Fund
Sales
103,297
505,778
1,550,000
1,044,222
32.6
511,613
1,675,000
30.5
Sales - Other
71,144
402,682
1,051,000
648,318
38.3
418,753
1,006,000
41.6
Local Sales Tax
64,268
224,719
990,000
765,281
22.7
264,614
1,057,000
25.0
Charges for Services
2,645
59,316
100,000
40,684
59.3
58,483
88,668
66.0
Miscellaneous Revenues
15,958
51,842
162,500
110,658
31.9
64,373
114,500
56.2
TOTAL REVENUES
257,313
1,244,337
3,853,500
2,609,163
32.3
1,317,836
3,941,168
33.4
Wages & Benefits
70,302
249,543
702,663
453,120
35.5
255,389
631,441
40.4
Supplies
18,031
83,215
253,900
170,685
32.8
54,994
244,225
22.5
Services & Charges
68,190
196,724
556,490
359,766
35.4
178,741
599,400
29.8
Miscellaneous Expenses
-
8,990
15,500
6,510
58.0
11,105
13,500
82.3
Transfers -Out
-
-
90,000
90,000
-
-
90,000
-
Capital Outlay
58,716
88,136
1,388,812
1,300,676
6.3
72,633
982,310
7.4
Depreciation Expense
-
-
1,120,000
1,120,000
-
-
1,120,000
-
Debt Service
-
302,079
1,150,228
848,149
26.3
148,780
1,366,550
10.9
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
215,240
928,687
5,277,593
4,348,906
17.6
721,642
5,047,426
14.3
NET of REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
42,073
315,650
(1,424,093)
(1,739,743)
596,195
(1,106,258)
Year to Date Water Sales
Comments
2025
2024
Change
Water Sales Revenue:
Residential
334,806
335,525
-0.2%
Commercial
94,958
96,379
-1.5%
Industrial
76,014
79,710
-4.6%
Water Sales
505,778
511,613
-1.1%
Base Charge
345,228
343,751
0.4%
Water Connection Charge
5,250
25,340
-79.3%
Other
52,205
49,662
5.1 %
Other Sales
402,682
418,753
-3.8%
Wastewater Fund
Sales
225,112
1,065,182
2,810,000
1,744,818
37.9
1,111,660
2,875,000
38.7
Sales - Other
88,758
435,412
1,086,800
651,388
40.1
458,762
1,031,500
44.5
Local Sales Tax
64,268
224,719
990,000
765,281
22.7
203,729
815,000
25.0
Licenses & Permits
-
5,600
6,000
400
93.3
5,600
6,000
93.3
Charges for Services
640
4,110
5,000
890
82.2
4,403
7,500
58.7
Miscellaneous Revenues
29,499
78,554
226,000
147,446
34.8
91,462
176,000
52.0
TOTAL REVENUES 408,277 1,813,576 5,123,800 3,310,224 35.4 1,875,616 4,911,000 38.2
Wages & Benefits
96,482
340,266
990,321
650,055
34.4
322,136
892,971
36.1
Supplies
19,756
79,905
289,400
209,495
27.6
113,826
297,600
38.2
Services & Charges
84,359
457,867
895,390
437,523
51.1
356,598
840,650
42.4
Miscellaneous Expenses
226
1,184
33,000
31,816
3.6
15,720
36,000
43.7
Transfers -Out
-
-
110,000
110,000
-
-
110,000
-
Capital Outlay
29,443
3,721,629
3,692,186
0.8
149,743
2,410,249
6.2
Depreciation Expense
-
1,200,000
1,200,000
-
-
1,200,000
-
Debt Service
-
642,651
1,614,347
971,696
39.8
636,790
1,609,355
39.6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
200,823
1,551,316
8,854,087
7,302,771
17.5
1,594,813
7,396,825
21.6
NET of REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
207,454
262,260
(3,730,287)
(3,992,547)
280,803
(2,485,825)
Year to Date Sewer Sales
Comments
2025
2024
Change
Wastewater Sales Revenue:
Residential
627,938
631,510
-0.6%
Commercial
191,419
188,613
1.5%
Industrial - Flow
166,765
154,841
7.7%
Industrial - Violation
Surcharges
79,059
136,696
-42.2%
Sewer Sales
1,065,182
1,111,660
-4.2%
Base Charge
378,246
376,371
0.5%
Sewer Connection Charge
6,900
33,304
-79.3%
Other
50,266
49,087
2.4%
Other Sales
435,412
458,762
-5.1%
Liquor Fund
Sales
Miscellaneous Revenues
TOTAL REVENUES
Cost of Sales
Wages & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Miscellaneous Expenses
Transfers -Out
Capital Outlay
Depreciation Expense
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET REVENUE
Comments
Liquor Sales Revenue
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT for CITY of HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING MAY 31, 2025
2025 ACTUALS
MAY
YTD
2025 2024
2025 AVAILABLE % BDGT 2024 YTD 2024 % BDGT
BUDGET BALANCE USED ACTUAL BUDGET USED
714,537 2,819,151 7,899,000 5,079,849 35.7 2,855,987 7,708,000 37.1
88 1,210 10,500 9,290 11.5 1,092 10,500 10.4
714,625 2,820,360 7,909,500 5,089,140 35.7 2,857,078 7,718,500 37.0
530,028
2,099,750
5,983,000
3,883,250
35.1
2,158,791
5,852,000
36.9
107,363
374,941
936,298
561,357
40.0
361,764
924,229
39.1
1,621
7,935
25,500
17,565
31.1
7,524
25,500
29.5
22,155
108,621
312,270
203,649
34.8
100,559
308,150
32.6
5,700
5,705
6,500
795
87.8
-
6,500
-
-
-
550,000
550,000
-
-
550,000
-
42,607
45,000
2,393
94.7
74,787
100,000
74.8
-
-
58,000
58,000
-
-
58,000
-
666,867
2,639,559
7,916,568
5,277,009
33.3
2,703,426
7,824,379
34.6
47,758 180,801 (7,068) (187,869) 153,652 (105,879)
Liquor
Beer
Wine
THC Products
Other
Total Sales
Gross Profit
Gross Margin on Sales
Customer Count
Average Sale per Customer
Labor to Sales Ratio
Year to Date Sales
May Sales
2025
2024
Change
2025
2024
Change
1,094,189
1,094,380
0.0%
267,087
261,516
2.1%
1,220,664
1,279,948
-4.6%
334,102
348,965
-4.3%
351,869
368,191
-4.4%
73,484
78,055
-5.9%
79,342
42,994
84.5%
19,559
12,431
57.3%
73,086
70,473
3.7%
20,305
19,125
6.2%
2,819,151
2,855,987
-1.3%
714,537
720,093
-0.8%
$719,401
$697,195
$184,509
$183,455
25.5%
24.4%
1.1%
25.8%
25.5%
0.3%
92,894
93,920
-1.1 %
22,574
22,732
-0.7%
$30.35
$30.41
-0.2%
$31.65
$31.68
-0.1%
13.3%
12.7%
0.6%
15.0%
14.4%
0.6%
Capital Outlay We installed new flooring in the wine section along with new wine racks.
Refuse Fund
Sales
122,887
604,545
1,461,000
856,455
41.4
566,474
1,352,000
41.9
Sales - Other
5,492
20,808
46,700
25,892
44.6
19,502
46,100
42.3
Intergovernmental Revenue
1,082
4,782
4,500
(282)
106.3
8,916
21,500
41.5
Miscellaneous Revenues
2,960
8,617
50,000
41,383
17.2
17,755
30,000
59.2
TOTAL REVENUES 132,421 638,752 1,562,200 923,448 40.9 612,647 1,449,600 42.3
Wages & Benefits
43,160
126,643
349,221
222,578
36.3
133,915
337,416
39.7
Supplies
1,142
16,090
45,000
28,910
35.8
27,325
60,750
45.0
Services & Charges
77,203
354,821
1,032,135
677,314
34.4
339,174
969,000
35.0
Miscellaneous Expenses
33
339
2,500
2,161
13.6
535
1,150
46.5
Transfers -Out
-
-
105,000
105,000
-
-
55,000
-
Capital Outlay
35,000
35,000
119,130
817,500
14.6
Depreciation Expense
-
-
172,000
172,000
-
-
172,000
-
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
121,538
497,893
1,740,856
1,242,963
28.6
620,079
2,412,816
25.7
NET of REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
10,883
140,859
(178,656)
(319,515)
(7,431)
(963,216)
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT for CITY of HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING MAY 31, 2025
2025
2024
2025 ACTUALS
2025
AVAILABLE
% BDGT
2024 YTD
2024
% BDGT
MAY
YTD
BUDGET
BALANCE
USED
ACTUAL
BUDGET
USED
Compost Fund
Sales
524,919
1,805,099
2,372,500
567,401
76.1
1,844,164
2,620,300
70.4
Charges for Services
35
45
107,000
106,955
0.0
403
95,500
0.4
Miscellaneous Revenues
7,813
19,685
72,000
52,315
27.3
20,019
52,000
38.5
TOTAL REVENUES
532,767
1,824,829
2,551,500
726,671
71.5
1,864,586
2,767,800
67.4
Cost of Sales
320,997
1,112,714
1,591,200
478,486
69.9
1,197,402
1,759,400
68.1
Inventory Cost Adjustment
(79,549)
(276,552)
(703,250)
(426,698)
39.3
(172,961)
(703,528)
24.6
Wages & Benefits
93,971
340,065
897,840
557,775
37.9
324,180
888,535
36.5
Supplies
5,001
37,700
126,850
89,150
29.7
49,323
149,500
33.0
Services & Charges
17,869
73,130
308,390
235,260
23.7
68,061
287,500
23.7
Miscellaneous Expenses
279
2,315
13,500
11,185
17.1
4,145
13,500
30.7
Transfers -Out
-
-
120,000
120,000
-
-
120,000
-
Capital Outlay
121,762
305,000
183,238
39.9
44,982
197,000
22.8
Depreciation Expense
-
290,000
290,000
-
-
290,000
-
Debt Service
-
73,808
73,808
(0)
100.0
73,808
73,808
100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
358,568
1,484,943
3,023,338
1,538,395
49.1
1,588,939
3,075,715
51.7
NET of REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
174,199
339,886
(471,838)
(811,724)
275,647
(307,915)
Year to Date Sales
Comments
2025
2024
Change
Compost Sales
Bagged
1,607,282
1,590,336
1.1%
Bulk
94,719
130,653
-27.5%
Other (Freight)
103,099
123,175
-16.3%
Total Sales
1,805,099
1,844,164
-2.1%
Gross Profit
692,385
646,762
Gross Margin
38.4%
35.1%
Capital Outlay
Capital Outlay for 2025 includes $112,090 to enclose Creekside's blending building.
Storm Water Utility
Sales
100,072
491,639
1,185,000
693,361
41.5
457,798
1,097,000
41.7
Sales - Other
990
2,533
7,000
4,467
36.2
2,613
3,500
74.7
Intergovernmental Revenue
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Licenses & Permits
185
1,075
6,000
4,925
17.9
2,195
5,500
39.9
Miscellaneous Revenues
4,836
12,648
26,800
14,152
47.2
13,683
26,300
52.0
Transfer In
-
-
50,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
TOTAL REVENUES 106,083 507,896 1,274,800 766,904 39.8 476,289 1,132,300 42.1
Wages & Benefits
21,718
86,325
313,368
227,043
27.5
120,772
311,298
38.8
Supplies
958
7,404
48,350
40,946
15.3
3,275
51,350
6.4
Services & Charges
4,921
79,597
256,020
176,423
31.1
78,239
223,375
35.0
Miscellaneous Expenses
5,102
10,303
6,000
(4,303)
171.7
1,467
6,000
24.5
Capital Outlay
220,000
357,330
558,818
201,488
63.9
-
467,145
-
Depreciation Expense
-
-
255,000
255,000
-
-
255,000
-
Debt Service
-
174,465
186,180
11,715
93.7
172,565
187,480
92.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
252,699
715,425
1,623,736
908,311
44.1
376,317
1,501,648
25.1
NET of REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
(146,616)
(207,529)
(348,936)
(141,407)
99,971
(369,348)
Comments
Capital Outlay This category includes the $220,000 land acquisition for a future storm water pond that will serve the Michigan Street area. A new
leaf vaccum was purchased for $137,330. The Refuse fund will contribute $50,000 towards the leaf vacuum at year-end.
City of Hutchinson - Investment Report
For the Month Ended May 31, 2025
Trade
Fixed or
Par
Purchase
Premium
Current
Unrealized
Annual
Date
Maturity
Coupon
Callable
Value
Amount
-Discount
Value
Gain/ -Loss
Earnings
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT:
Forbright Bank
08/31/2022
09/16/2025
3.500%
Fixed
$245,000
$245,000
$0
$244,346
-$654
$8,575
First Citizens Bk & Tr Co Raleigh
10/26/2022
10/25/2025
4.700%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
244,268
268
11,468
Regions Bank Birmingham AL
10/28/2019
10/31/2025
2.000%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
242,621
-2,379
4,900
Flushing Bank Primary
10/26/2022
11/04/2025
4.700%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
245,385
385
11,515
Ally Bk Sandy Utah
11/02/2022
11/10/2025
4.800%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
244,393
393
11,712
Toyota Financial Sgs Bk
07/14/2021
07/22/2026
0.950%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
235,957
-9,043
2,328
Vantage West Credit Union
09/05/2024
09/14/2026
4.100%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
248,512
-488
10,209
Synchrony Bank
09/01/2022
09/09/2027
3.500%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
241,460
-3,540
8,575
Discover Bank DE
11/16/2022
11/30/2027
4.900%
Fixed
242,000
242,000
0
246,269
4,269
11,858
Morgan Stanley Bank NA
03/10/2023
03/16/2028
4.800%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
248,011
4,011
11,712
Affinity Bank
03/15/2023
03/17/2028
4.900%
Fixed
195,000
195,000
0
198,834
3,834
9,555
Customers Bank
06/07/2023
06/14/2028
4.500%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
246,320
2,320
10,980
Thread Bank Rogers TN
06/07/2023
06/16/2028
4.400%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
251,980
6,980
10,780
Univest Bank & Trust Co
06/02/2023
06/21/2028
4.500%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
247,386
2,386
11,025
CIBC Bk USA
06/16/2023
06/30/2028
4.450%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
250,503
6,503
10,858
Providence Bk Rocky Mt INC:
08/03/2023
08/21/2028
4.400%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
250,673
1,673
10,956
United Roosevelt Savings
09/06/2023
09/12/2028
4.500%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
255,419
6,419
11,205
Central Fe S&L/Cicero IL
09/06/2023
09/14/2028
4.500%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
251,418
2,418
11,205
Community Bk & Tr Waco TX
11/01/2023
11/10/2028
5.050%
Fixed
243,000
243,000
0
249,476
6,476
12,272
Liberty First Credit Union
01/23/2024
01/30/2029
4.150%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
248,425
-575
10,334
Morgan Stanley Private Bank
02/28/2024
03/06/2029
4.350%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
244,905
905
10,614
Carter Bank & Trust
03/08/2024
03/20/2029
4.300%
Fixed
245,000
245,000
0
245,566
566
10,535
MizrahiTefahot Bank/LA
03/26/2024
03/07/2030
4.500%
Fixed
244,000
244,000
0
246,557
2,557
10,980
CBC Federal Credit Union
05/03/2024
05/14/2031
4.650%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
254,837
5,837
11,579
Celtic Bank
12/11/2024
12/20/2032
4.150%
Fixed
249,000
249,000
0
248,076
-924
10,334
Total CDs $6,091,000 $6,091,000 $0 $6,131,597 $40,597 $256,064
MUNICIPAL BONDS:
Miami -Dade Cnty FL Transit Sales
11/19/2021
07/01/2025
0.900%
Fixed
$375,000
$373,013
-$1,988
$373,928
$915
$3,375
Austin TX Cmnty CIg
04/27/2022
08/01/2025
0.992%
Fixed
245,000
229,482
-15,518
243,611
14,129
2,430
Jobs Ohio Beverage Sys Stwd
04/27/2022
01/01/2026
2.034%
Fixed
310,000
298,815
-11,185
305,933
2,778
6,305
Oklahoma City OK Econ Dev Trust
02/08/2022
03/01/2026
1.118%
Fixed
300,000
292,833
-7,167
293,127
294
3,354
New York St Urban Dev Dorp
08/26/2022
03/15/2026
3.170%
Fixed
190,000
187,925
-2,075
188,267
342
6,023
Anchor Bay MI School Dist
07/01/2020
05/01/2026
1.250%
Fixed
500,000
503,630
3,630
487,045
-16,585
6,250
Phoenix Az Civic Impt Corp
12/10/2021
07/01/2026
1.157%
Fixed
135,000
134,150
-851
130,488
-3,661
1,562
San Juan CA Unif Sch Dist
11/09/2021
08/01/2026
1.201%
Fixed
140,000
140,000
0
135,045
-4,955
1,681
District of Columbia Rev
01/18/2023
06/01/2027
4.232%
Callable
350,000
349,734
-266
350,000
266
14,812
District of Columbia Rev
02/14/2023
06/01/2027
4.232%
Callable
400,000
397,684
-2,316
400,000
2,316
16,928
Phoenix Az Civic Impt Corp
03/30/2022
07/01/2027
1.257%
Fixed
175,000
161,088
-13,913
164,980
3,892
2,200
Indiana St Fin Authority Rev
01/27/2023
07/15/2027
4.109%
Fixed
1,000,000
1,000,000
0
999,560
-440
41,090
NY Personal Income Tax
12/09/2022
09/15/2027
5.051%
Fixed
300,000
308,277
8,277
304,440
-3,837
15,153
Pima County AZ Revenue
11/09/2022
12/01/2027
5.382%
Fixed
1,000,000
1,014,580
14,580
1,021,280
6,700
53,820
Wisconsin St Gen Fund Rev
02/21/2023
05/01/2028
4.330%
Fixed
500,000
497,905
-2,095
501,615
3,710
21,650
Pima County AZ Revenue
11/22/2023
12/01/2028
5.961%
Fixed
175,000
183,171
8,171
183,085
-86
10,432
New York NY City Transitional
07/05/2023
02/01/2029
4.750%
Callable
385,000
385,920
920
375,218
-10,703
18,288
New York NY City Transitional
02/14/2024
02/01/2029
4.430%
Callable
375,000
375,000
0
389,420
14,420
16,613
Wisconsin St Gen Fund Rev
03/13/2024
05/01/2029
4.346%
Fixed
500,000
497,905
-2,095
501,340
3,435
21,730
Albertville AL
01/19/2024
06/01/2029
4.900%
Fixed
235,000
241,103
6,103
239,538
-1,565
11,515
Middlesex County NJ
09/13/2023
08/15/2029
4.603%
Fixed
250,000
248,115
-1,885
252,588
4,473
11,508
California St
10/24/2023
10/01/2029
5.100%
Fixed
200,000
199,788
-212
205,740
5,952
10,200
New York NY City Transitional
12/05/2023
11/01/2029
5.050%
Callable
300,000
308,451
8,451
307,122
-1,329
15,150
Palm Beach Cnty Fla
12/15/2023
12/01/2029
4.150%
Fixed
265,000
263,614
-1,386
264,642
1,028
10,998
Palm Beach Cnty Fla
10/25/2024
12/01/2029
4.150%
Fixed
500,000
499,300
-700
499,325
25
20,750
Andalusia AL
03/20/2025
05/01/2030
4.250%
Fixed
140,000
140,000
0
139,661
-339
5,950
Connecticut State
04/12/2024
05/15/2030
4.657%
Fixed
140,000
140,000
0
141,179
1,179
6,520
Las Cruces NM Gross Recpts Tax
02/20/2025
06/01/2030
4.850%
Fixed
150,000
152,775
2,775
152,577
-198
7,275
Palm Beach Cnty Fla
06/28/2024
06/01/2030
4.500%
Fixed
740,000
740,000
0
748,754
8,754
33,300
Apache Junction AZ
08/15/2024
07/01/2030
4.281%
Fixed
825,000
830,973
5,973
814,127
-16,846
35,318
Virginia Sts Pub Bldg
05/24/2024
08/01/2030
4.830%
Fixed
340,000
343,196
3,196
349,476
6,280
16,422
Corpus Christi TX ISD
12/30/2024
08/15/2030
4.450%
Fixed
500,000
499,485
-515
499,980
495
22,250
New York City Transitional
02/07/2025
02/01/2031
4.560%
Fixed
500,000
500,000
0
498,580
-1,420
22,800
Las Cruces NM Gross Recpts Tax
02/20/2025
06/01/2030
4.880%
Fixed
145,000
147,577
2,577
147,134
-442
7,076
Portland OR Revenue
01/03/2025
06/01/2031
4.450%
Fixed
470,000
468,684
-1,316
470,902
2,218
20,915
Santa Clara Valley CA
07/11/2024
06/01/2031
4.400%
Fixed
300,000
299,103
-897
295,128
-3,975
13,200
San Francisco City & Cty CA
09/12/2024
09/01/2031
3.918%
Fixed
460,000
460,000
0
440,662
-19,338
18,023
San Diego CA Public Fac
08/22/2024
10/15/2031
3.980%
Callable
500,000
499,360
-640
481,700
-17,660
19,900
Oregon St Dept of Admin Svcs
02/05/2025
04/01/2032
4.353%
Fixed
170,000
169,505
-495
166,983
-2,523
7,400
Spotsylvania County VA Econ Dev
09/05/2024
06/01/2032
4.200%
Fixed
295,000
299,838
4,838
286,345
-13,493
12,390
Waterloo IA
01/16/2025
06/15/2032
4.160%
Fixed
395,000
398,622
3,622
400,976
2,354
16,432
Connecticut State
08/27/2024
06/15/2032
4.160%
Fixed
100,000
100,000
0
96,458
-3,542
4,160
Los Angeles CA
12/13/2024
09/01/2032
4.400%
Fixed
275,000
275,000
0
268,774
-6,226
12,100
Total Municipal Bonds $15,550,000 $15,555,600 $5,600 $15,516,731-$43,209 $625,248
May 31, 2025
FEDERAL BONDS:
Federal Home Loan Bank
Total Federal Bonds
MONEY MARKET FUNDS:
Money Market - Citizens Bank
Money Market - Oppenheimer
Total Money Market Funds
GRAND TOTALS
Trade Fixed or Par
Purchase Premium
Current
Unrealized
Annual
Date Maturity Coupon Callable Value
Amount -Discount
Value
Gain/ -Loss
Earnings
09/28/2021 10/26/2026 1.180% Callable $500,000
$500,000 $0
$480,020
-$19,980
S5.900
$500,000
$500,000 $0
$480,020
-$19,980
$5,900
Current Rate: 3.710% N/A $10,648,459 $10,648,459 $0 $10,648,459 $0 $395,058
Current Rate: 4.191% N/A 378,780 378,780 0 378,780 0 15,875
$11,027,239 $11,027,239 $0 $11,027,239 $0 $410,933
$33,168,239 $33,173,839 $5,600 $33,155,587-$22,592 $1,298,145
CITY PORTFOLIO BY PRODUCT TYPE
CITY MATURITY SCHEDULE
Par Value Current
Average
Municipal
Federalo
a
o of
Average
Total % of Total Value
Coupon
Year
CD's
Bonds
Bonds
Par Value
Total
Coupon
2025
$1,223,000
$620,000
$0
$1,843,000
8.3%
2.9%
CDs $6,091,000 18.4% $6,131,597 4.2%
Municipal Bonds $15,550,000 46.9% $15,516,731
4.0%
2026
$494,000
$1,575,000
$500,000
$2,569,000
11.6%
1.7%
Federal Bonds $500,000 1.5% $480,020
1.2%
2027
$487,000
$3,225,000
$0
$3,712,000
16.8%
4.4%
Subtotal $22,141,000 $22,128,348
4.0%
2028
$2,407,000
$675,000
$0
$3,082,000
13.9%
4.6%
Money Market $11,027,239 33.2% $11,027,239
2029
$738,000
$3,010,000
$0
$3,748,000
16.9%
4.5%
Total $33,168,239 100.0% $33,155,587
2030
$244,000
$2,835,000
$0
$3,079,000
13.9%
4.5%
Unrealized Gain / -Loss-$22,592
2031
$249,000
$2,375,000
$0
$2,624,000
11.9%
4.3%
Prior Year Unrealized Gain I -Loss -$195,379
2032
$249,000
$1,235,000
$0
$1,484,000
6.7%
4.4%
Investment Gain / -Loss for 2025 $172,787
Totals
$6,091,000
$15,550,000
$500,000
$22,141,000
100.0%
4.0%
$4,000,000
Money Market
000110
$3,000 000
$3,082,000
0
33.2%
$2,569,000
$1,843,000
$2,000,000
Municipal Bonds
$1,484,000
46.9%
$1,000,000
-
=ederal Bonds
1.5%
$0
2025 2026 2027
2028
2029 2030
2031
2032
FINANCIAL INDICES: One -Year Comparison
Treasury Yield Curve
5/31/2025 5/31/2024
Change
City'sAverage Coupon Rate 4.02% 3.47%
0.55%
6.00%
Average Yield to Maturity 4.32% 5.15910
-0.83%
(excluding Money Market funds)
5.00%
4.00
Federal Lending Rate 4.50% 5.50%
A.00%
Prime Rate 7.50% 8.50%
-1.00%
3.00%
Treasury Rates: 1-Year 4.11% 5.18%
-1.07%
2.00%
2-Year 3.89% 4.89%
-1.00%
1.00%
3-Year 3.87% 4.69%
-0.82%
5-Year 3.96% 4.52%
-0.56%
0.00%
10-Year 4.41% 4.51%
-0.10%
1-Year
2-Year
3-Year
5-Year 10-yv
I.,
20-Year 4.93% 4.73%
0.20%
t5/31/2025 t5/31/202,