Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp02-26-85 cHUTCH INSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
Fcbruary 24 T O March 2 1
1985'
WEDNESDAY
-27-
10:00 - 11:00 A.M. -
Meeting of Directors at
City Hall
SUNDAY
-24-
THURSDAY
-2s-
4 :30 P.M. - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
6 :00 P.M. - City Council Review
of Directors' Year -
End Reports (Meeting
at Fire Station Con-
ference Room)
MONDAY
-25-
Noon - Safety Council Meeting
at Fire Hall
1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commissi
Meeting at Utilities
Office
TUODAY
-26-
5:30 P.M. - .Special City Council 7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at City Hall to Meeting at City
Review Proposals for 11all
Sewage Treatment Plant
FRIDAY
-1-
VACATION:
MARLOW PRIEBE - Back in Office
April 1
RALPH NEUMANN - February 24 -
March 4
SATURDAY
I
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1985
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Reverend Manley SKarthout
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 12, 1985
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - January 1985
2. Library Board Minutes dated January 23 and 25, 1985
3. Nursing Home Board Minutes dated January 24, 1985
4. Planning Commission Minutes dated January 15, 1985
Action - Order report and minutes to be filed
5. Public Hearing - 8 :00 P.M.
(a) F & T Joint Venture (Frank Fay Hotel Project)
1. Industrial Revenue Bond
2. Tax Increment Financing
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to continue hearing -
Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(b) Assessment Roll No. 202 - Projects No. 85- 01 -27, 85- 01 -28,
85- 01 -29, 85- 01 -30, and 85 -01 -31
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to
approve assessment roll
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Consideration of Heating System Problem In Fire Station
Action -
(b) Presentation by Korngiebel Architects On Final Specifications
for Recreation Facility
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve specifictaions and
advertise for bids
COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 26, 1985
•
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 7997 - Resolution for Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(b) Ordinance No. 3/85 - Ordinance Authorizing Sale of Municipally
Owned Real Property Legally Described As: Lot 12, Block 3, Selchow-
Jorgenson Subdivision of the City of Hutchinson
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and
adopt
(c) Ordinance No. 4/85 - An Ordinance Providing for Sewer Rate
Adjustments
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and
adopt
(d) Resolution No. 7998 - Resolution Requesting Authorization from
Minnesota Department of Transportation To Install Temporary Traffic
Signal Light At Intersection of Highway 7 Kest And School Road And
Complete A Turning Movement Study •
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(e) Resolution No. 7999 - Resolution Requesting Reduction of Speed
Limit In the City of Hutchinson
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Discussion On Preparing Specifications for New Sewage Treatment
Facility (DEFERRED FEBRUARY 129 1985)
Action -
(b) Consideration of Take Home Vehicles In Police Department
(Requested by Aldermen Carls, Torgerson and Mlinar)
(DEFERRED FEBRUARY 12, 1985)
Action -
(c) Clarification of Status of City Administrator's Car Allowance
(Requested by Aldermen Carls, Torgerson and Mlinar)
(DEFERRED FEBRUARY 12, 1985)
Action - •
2 - --
COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 26, 1985
to(d) Clarification of Merit Pay Increase for Employees Not Listed In
Previous Memorandum (Requested by Aldermen Carls, Torgerson and
Mlinar) (DEFERRED FEBRUARY 129 1985)
Action -
(e) Consideration of Aerial Photography by Markhurd Corp.
Action -
(f) Consideration of Awarding Bids for Lettings No. 1, 29 3 and 5
(DEFERRED DECEMBER 10 AND 21, 1984)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bids -
Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 7992, 7993,
7994, 7995 and 7996
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion
to authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids
On Letting No. 99 Project No. 85 -01 -36
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifi-
cations and advertise for bids March 28, 1985 at 2 :00 P.M. - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7989
(c) Consideration of Plans and Specifications and Advertising for Bids
On Letting No. 79 Project No. 85 -01 -24
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifica-
tions and advertise for bids March 28, 1985 at 2:00 P.M. - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7990
(d) Consideration of Rezoning Request (C -2) Submitted by Robert Hornick
with unfavorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration of Rezoning Request (IC -1) Submitted by Robert
Hornick with unfavorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
• (f) Consideration of Variance As Requested by Robert McGee with favor-
able recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 7988
3
COUNCIL AGENDA
FEBRUARY 26, 1985
(g) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit As Requested By Farid
Currimbhoy (Montessori School /Day Care Center with favorable
recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 7987
(h) Consideration of Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance No. 466,
Section 24.25 with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(i) Consideration of Parking Lot Surfacing and Drainage At Civic Arena
And New Recreation Facility
Action -
(j) Consideration of American Society of Composers, Authors, and
Publishers Contract (Requested by City Attorney)
Action -
(k) Consideration of Settlement of Parking Appeals (Requested by City
Attorney)
Action -
(1) Consideration of Compensation Time (Requested by Alderman Pat
Mikulecky)
Action -
(m) Consideration of Engineer's Report and Setting Hearing On
Improvement Project No. 85 -01 -38
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve engineering report
and set hearing March 26, 1985 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive
reading and adopt Resolutions No. 7985 and No. 7986
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
u
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 129 1985
1. The meeting was called to order by Vice -Mayor Carls at 7:30 P.M. The
following were present: Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Marlin Torgerson,
Alderman Pat Mikulecky, and Vice -Mayor Mike Carls. Absent: Mayor Robert
H. Stearns. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and City At-
torney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Harold Kelm.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of January 22, 1985 and the bid open-
ings of January 29, 1985 and February 6, 1985 were approved as distri-
buted.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
0 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - JANUARY 1985
Vice -Mayor Carls ordered the report to be filed.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8 :00 P.M.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ISSUING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND TO
DOCTORS THOMAS LYKE AND JOHN GILLARD
The public hearing was called to order at 8 :00 P.M. Following a
brief discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to
close the hearing at 8 :02 P.M. The motion was seconded by Alder-
man Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
It was moved by Alderman Torgerson to give preliminary approval to
the project and industrial revenue bond financing and to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 7978. Alderman Mlinar seconded
the motion, and it carried unanimously.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY LARRY AND SHERRY BEEHKE FOR INDUSTRIAL
REVENUE BOND
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alterman Torgerson,
seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to approve setting a public hearing
for March 12, 1985 at 8 :00 P.M. and to waive reading and adopt
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 129 1985
Resolution No. 7980. The motion unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FIRE MARSHAL TO ATTEND FIRE SAFETY
EDUCATION CONFERENCE
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve the request.
Alderman Mikulecky seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
(c) PRESENTATION BY RCM ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL
A lengthy presentation was given by RCM representatives concerning
their firm's proposal for the Hutchinson wastewater treatment plant,
Phase II.
(d) PRESENTATION BY CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVISION, DONOHUE, ON
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL
Four representatives from Consulting Engineers Division presented
an extensive proposal on the Hutchinson wastewater treatment plant,
Phase II.
It was the consensus of the Council that both firms were to prepare .
a contract proposal for the February 26, 1985 Council meeting, to
be submitted by February 21, 1985 at 4 :00 P.M., which addressed the
following items: engineering design fee with cost not to be ex-
ceeded, and included the costs for survey, soil borings, applica-
tion fee, value engineering, possible legal fees, the figure of
subtraction or deletion if filter is not necessary, and a bond of
guarantee for a December 1985 completion date.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY MICHAEL AND LOANN WILHELMSON FOR
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to ap-
prove setting a public hearing for March 12, 1985 at 8 :00 P.M. and
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7982. Alderman Torgerson
seconded the motion, and it unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 2/85 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE STREET
It was moved by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 710. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 3/85 - ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SALE OF MUNICIPALLY
OWNED REAL PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 12, BLOCK 3, SELCHOW-
JORGENSON SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
2
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 129 1985
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to waive the first reading
of Ordinance No. 3/85 and set the second reading for February 26,
1985. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
(c) ORDINANCE NO. 4/85 - AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR SEWER RATE
ADJUSTMENTS
It was moved by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 4/85 and set the second
reading for February 26, 1985. Motion unanimously carried.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 7979 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBSTITUTION OF
SECURITIES TO CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7979. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 7981 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Alderman Torgerson moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
7981. The motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
(f) RESOLUTION NO. 7983 - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO RUSS MANCL
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 7983. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion,
and it carried unanimously.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR PROJECT 85 -01 -25 (DEFERRED JANUARY 220
1985)
City Engineer Priebe requested this item be deferred. The motion
was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to de-
fer action. Motion unanimously carried.
(b) DISCUSSION ON PREPARING SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW SEWAGE TREATMENT
FACILITY (DEFERRED JANUARY 22, 1985)
It was moved by Alderman Torgerson to defer action. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
. (c) UPDATE ON EASEMENT FOR NEMITZ PARKING LOT
City Attorney Schaefer reported on the status of the easement for
the Nemitz parking lot. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson
3
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 129 1985
moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the necessary docu-
ments to activate the full parking assessment. The motion was sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND CONTOUR
MAPPING (DEFERRED JANUARY 29, 1985)
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson made the motion to accept
the Markhurd Corp. bid of $63,873 (Choice A), contingent upon that
being a concrete bid for the entire project and for the approval of
services in 1985 of the aerial photography, aerotriangulation,
stereoscopic models, and contour mapping for the total of $24,305.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously car-
ried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR POLICE PATROL CARS
(DEFERRED FEBRUARY 6, 1985)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky to
reject all three bids from Plowman's and Wigen Chevrolet and to de-
fer purchase of police vehicles until 1986. Alderman Torgerson
seconded the motion, and it failed three to one, with Aldermen
Mlinar, Torgerson and Carls voting nay and Alderman Mikulecky vot-
ing aye.
Alderman Torgerson moved to award the bid to the low bidder, Plow-
man's, for the purchase of three new police patrol cars and two
trade -in vehicles, with the city retaining the 1982 Chevrolet Mali-
bu. The motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried three
to one, with Aldermen Mlinar, Torgerson and Carls voting aye and
Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF TAKE HOME VEHICLES IN POLICE DEPARTMENT
(REQUESTED BY ALDERMEN CARLS, MLINAR AND TORGERSON)
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Tor -
gerson, to defer to the February 26, 1985 Council meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING MILEAGE RATE OF 20.5 CENTS
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Mlinar to set the mile-
age rate of 20.5 cents. The motion was seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING JOHN MCRAITH AS ACTING DIRECTOR OF
PARKS AND RECREATION
4
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson made the motion to approve
the appointment of John McRaith as Acting Director of Parks and
Recreation. The motion carried unanimously after second by Alderman
Mlinar.
(d) CLARIFICATION OF STATUS OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S CAR ALLOWANCE
(REQUESTED BY ALDERMEN CARLS, MLINAR, AND TORGERSON)
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to defer action. Alderman
Torgerson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
(e) CLARIFICATION OF MERIT PAY INCREASE FOR EMPLOYEES NOT LISTED IN
PREVIOUS MEMORANDUM (REQUESTED BY ALDERMEN CARLS, MLINAR AND
TORGERSON)
Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Torgerson, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to defer this item until the February 26, 1985
Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF FORMALIZING PROCEDURE ON CONSIDERATION OF MERIT
REVIEW AND MARKET ADJUSTMENT (REQUESTED BY ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS)
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to accomplish formalizing
the procedure of merit review and market adjustment by: 1) deter-
mining the source of the Consumer Price Index figure used; 2) have
a memo listing annual salaries of year concluding and percent raise
for the next year; 3) the Derformance appraisal process would be
completed by the first meeting in December, including the City
Council's performance appraisal of the City Administrator; 4) have
a list of possible recipients of merit pay adjustments, with justi-
fication for the merit adjustments; and 5) the City Council would
independently make a decision on the merit pay for the City Admin-
istrator. The motion was seconded by Alderman Torgerson and car-
ried unanimously.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz had nothing to bring before the Council.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM GEORGE RUNKE
Mr. George Bunke represented the Civil Air Patrol to request ap-
proval for a June fly -in barbeque at the Hutchinson Municipal Air-
port.
Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Mikulecky, to approve the use of the airport for a Civil
Air Patrol activity in June. Motion unanimously carried.
5
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM FRANK FAY
Mr. Frank Fay reported the public hearing notice on his proposed
project under the Municipal Housing Programs Act required publica-
tion 30 days prior to the hearing. Therefore, it would be neces-
sary to change the hearing date from February 26, 1985 to March 26,
1985 to meet this requirement.
It was moved by Alderman Torgerson to set the public hearing date
for March 26, 1985 at 8;00 P.M. and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 7984. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion, and it
carried unanimously.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Schaefer reported a seminar would be held on March 8
regarding the Cable TV Act. He suggested that members of the newly
formed Cable TV Advisory Committee might be interested in attend-
ing.
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to not-
ify the Cable TV Committee of the seminar, and the City would pay
for two registrations at $35 each. The motion was seconded by Ald-
erman Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky reported the cable TV company had been charging
an extra $2 for three additional channels that require a convertor
box..
It was moved by Alderman Mikulecky to inform the cable TV company
to comply with their contract and delete the convertor fee of $2.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
Alderman Mikulecky requested at the next Council meeting a discus-
sion on compensation time for salaried employees. It was suggested
that a monthly report on accumulated compensation time be given to
the City Administrator.
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson inquired about the status of the public access
request onto Highway 15 South for the Mister Donut property. City
Administrator Plotz stated the request had been denied by MN /DOT
for four reasons. The matter had been turned over to an attorney •
for further negotiations with the State.
It was reported the fire station has experienced a problem with its
furnace since it was installed. There is a lack of make up air in
N
0
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
the furance room. The Fire Department requests to be on the Feb-
ruary 26, 1985 Council agenda to discuss who is liable for the ad-
ditional costs incurred.
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar made reference to the memorandum received from the
Finance Director regarding the treatment plant.
Mr. Mlinar suggested clarification of the time deadline for receiv-
ing bids and the bid opening time stated on the publication notice.
(h) COMMUNICATIONS FROM VICE -MAYOR MIKE CARLS
Vice -Mayor Carls suggested the Council hold a special meeting to
review and discuss the proposals on the sewage treatment facility.
Alderman Mlinar moved to hold a special meeting on February 25,
starting at 5:30 P.M. at City Hall for the purpose of studying and
reviewing the sewage treatment plant situation. The motion was
seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman
Mlinar, to approve the claims and authorize payment from the ap-
propriate funds. Motion unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1 :02 A.M.
7
JANUARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1985 JANUARY
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
JANUARY
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
0.06
MONTH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
•
0.09
ELECTIONS
0.00
0.00
TAXES
18544.83
18544.83
1233985.00
1215440.17
0.02
LICENSES
85.00
85.00
17000.00
16915.00
0.00
PERMITS AND FEES
1400.48
1400.48
45700.00
44299.52
0.03
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
7117.50
7117.50
903321.00
896203.50
0.01
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
17773.91
17773.91
374345.00
356571.09
0.05
FINES & FORFEITS
0.00
0.00
23000.00
23000.00
0.00
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
11490.78
11490.78
182384.00
170893.22
0.06
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
0.00
0.00
479000.00
479000.00
0.00
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
71.78
71.78
300.00
228.22
0.24
TOTAL
56484.28
56484.28
3259035.00
3202550.72
0.02
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
1658.42
1658.42
27960.00
26301.58
0.06
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
10621.35
10621.35
113827.00
103205.65
0.09
ELECTIONS
0.00
0.00
9346.00
9346.00
0.00
FINANCE
15203.79
15203.79
179404.00
164200.21
0.08
MOTOR VEHICLE
5639.22
5639.22
62394.00
56754.78
0.09
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
19672.00
19672.00
0.00
LEGAL
3353.64
3353.64
41618.00
38264.36
0.08
PLANNING
182.79
182.79
26475.00
26292.21
0.01
CITY HALL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
3894.79
53491.43
3894.79
53491.43
40503.00
674104.00
36608.21
620612.57
0.10
0.08
FIRE DEPARTMENT
10016.60
10016.60
109938.00
99921.40
0.09
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
3074.07
3074.07
32485.00
29410.93
0.09
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
6674.91
6674.91
70054.00
63379.09
0.10
CIVIL DEFENSE
100.85
100.85
1175.00
1074.15
0.09
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
FIRE MARSHALL
3187.83
3187.83
38118.00
34930.17
0.08
ENGINEERING
19491.83
19491.83
162424.00
142932.17
0.12
STREETS & ALLEYS
20845.31
20845.31
345215.00
324369.69
0.06
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
5620.77
5620.77
68825.00
63204.23
0.08
LIBRARY
14370.89
14370.89
62314.00
47943.11
0.23
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
4062.34
4062.34
36052.00
31989.66
0.11
PARR /REC. ADMIN.
5766.86
5766.86
71260.00
65493.14
0.08
RECREATION
7730.90
7730.90
91763.00
84032.10
0.08
CIVIC ARENA
15346.33
15346.33
108007.00
92660.67
0.14
PARK DEPARTMENT
27565.46
27565.46
330500.00
302934.54
0.08
RECREATION BUILDING
0.00
0.00
13728.00
13728.00
0.00
CEMETERY
2260.12
2260.12
39994.00
37733.88
0.06
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2847.00
2847.00
32550.00
29703.00
0.09
LAWCON
53400.00
53400.00
17125.00
- 36275.00
3.12
DEBT SERVICE
13550.00
13550.00
45946.00
32396.00
0.29
AIRPORT
895.63
895.63
60925.00
60029.37
0.01
TRANSIT
7034.68
7034.68
78684.00
71649.32
0.09
UNALLOCATED
2120.74
2120.74
246500.00
244379.26
0.01
•
TOTAL
320008.55
320008.55
3259035.00
2925298.45
0.10
JANUARY
•REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1985 JANUARY
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
JANUARY DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
LIQUOR SALES
28882.35
28882.35
4!0000.00
381117.65
0.07
WINE SALES
8004.59
8001.59
125000.00
116995.41
0.06
BEER SALES
35996.51
35996.51
590000.00
554003.49
0.06
BEER DEPOSITS
- 116.60
- 116.60
0.00
116.60
0.08
MISC. SALES
1206.08
1206.08
0.00
- 1206.08
0.07
INTEREST
341.60
341.60
6300.00
5784.95
0.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
-96.62
-96.62
0.00
96.62
0.00
TOTAL
74217.91
74217.91
1125000.00
1050782.09
0.07
EXPENSE REPORT
37.00
37.00
2500.00
2463.00
0.01
LIQUOR FUND
95258.18
95258.18
1354800.00
1259541.82
0.07
PERSONEL SERVICES
9893.44
9893.44
125344.00
115450.56
0.08
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
503.86
503.86
4700.00
4196.14
0.11
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
170.93
170.93
29000.00
28829.07
0.01
MISCELLANEOUS
273.00
273.00
9050.00
8777.00
0.03
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
0.00
13700.00
13700.00
0.00
DEBT SERVICE
0.00
0.00
5110.00
5110.00
0.00
TRANSFERS
0.00
0.00
110000.00
110000.00
0.00
COST OF SALES
100815.49
100815.49
831050.00
730234.51
0.12
WTHER
0.00
0.00
16300.00
16300.00
0.00
TOTAL
111656.72
111656.72
1144254.00
1032597.28
0.10
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
834.00
834.00
0.00
- 834.00
0.00
WATER SALES
32167.66
32167.66
460000.00
427832.34
0.07
WATER METER SALES
140.00
140.00
5000.00
4860.00
0.03
REFUSE SERVICES
18456.78
18456.78
236000.00
217543.22
0.08
SEWER SERVICES
43107.69
43107.69
615000.00
571892.31
0.07
PENALTY CHARGES
515.05
515.05
6300.00
5784.95
0.00
INTEREST EARNED
0.00
0.00
28000.00
28000.00
0.00
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
0.00
2000.00
2000.00
0.00
OTHER
37.00
37.00
2500.00
2463.00
0.01
TOTAL
95258.18
95258.18
1354800.00
1259541.82
0.07
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
OPERATIONS
21269.25
21269.25
238000.00
216730.75
0.09
13216.63
13216.63
1072128.00
1058911.37
0.01
10WATER
SEWER
20982.27
20982.27
620142.00
599159.73
0.03
TOTAL
55468.15
55468.15
1930270.00
1874801.85
0.03
i
January 23. 1485
:z:e ibre.ry ward mot on January 23, 06% with the following members
pr'esento Ralph Bergstrom, John Horrccli:s, 'Paul Ackland, Kathj McGraw,
Sue O'Brian, Albert Linde, Mar? Henke,
'rhe minutes of tht previous Beating were read and Approved.
T'-.e a.rpoae of tt,e meeting was to develop guide line.: for furnishings
re -ar, ng the following:
1. °eriodicel and reading area:
Lounge furniture - different reactions from everyone.
Chairs for tables - a, -.reed and favored mediu:^ or - ol�e:t oak
(not ' .iatural' ligat or dark)
Back issue shelvingG - (Bud Prieve estimate of $2,500.00 with
oak ends was favored)
Current issue shelving - wood or metal? (8" wood)
Book shelving - agreed to use existing fiction shelving.
A.V. room - (outlet right in table and should match upper level.)
2. Adult Area
Book shelving - metal
Desks and chairs - golden oak
Lounge furniture - same (up and down)
Index counter - stools not necessary (4) - prefer stand up area.
A.:. and Computer counter - (Wendt chairs?)
3. C�,ildren's Area
Seating for 24 (chairs and tables)
Area to be carpeted - ves
(Norita noted that there was no place for children's coats &
no bulletin for s1mrner reading)
fiorita a; -so sugre,te' re- :,ovio? vie stud,- carrels and replacing
with 5 table- (4 at each; and to use the soathwest corner for
reading.) chairs
4. Conference Room
Board agreed to refinish the 16 chairs we have (E;illbur Johnson
will strip and refinish for $40.00 ggr rhairl_
5. Uor: Room - Mary Henke and Rolf - will check with architect.
:.
Libra-.-i3 -t office - new desk needed
7. Equipment additions desired are not the responsibility of the
architect and the $$$ needed for equipment must come out of
• the project.
Secretary, K. M. McGraw
/km
January 25, 1935
'he library board met on January 25, 1985 with the following members
present: Ralph Bergstrom, John Horrocks, Paul Ackland, Kathy McGraw,
Albert Linde, rarb Whittenberg, Merry Franke, Norits Levy,
(Donn Kor ,-iebcl anal Rolf.
The ^..i:wt� rF ,• . a i proved:
The Board i:eat over the details of the decisiols made on
Wednesday, January 23, 1555, regarding the lounge furniture and the
wood color preferfed for the tables, chairs, etc. Samples were looked
at again for the uphcistery on the c'Dairs, with the biggest problem
tieing the laainated ends for the metal book shelves.
After further discussion and questions unsolved, the board
decided to go to the Ridgedale Library and the Golden Valley Library
on the following Thursday, January 81st. (Kathy McGraw, Sue O'Brian,
Paul Ackland, Albert Linde, Mary Henke and Norita Levy spent the day
at the two libraries and also went to Contract Source, inc. to see some
of the different styles of chairs, tables, lounge furniture, etc. that
John K. and Rolf have suggested.)
The Board will meet the week after the city libraries' tour.
- ecretary , K.M. McGraw
11
—t�• (;Z)
BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME BOARD MEETING
DATE: JANUARY 24,
1985 4:30 P.M.
THURSDAY
BOARD MEETING AGENDA:
A. Call to order:
1. Roll Call:
MEMBERS:
Les Linder
Rev.
K. Duehn
Gloria Dansereau
Larry
Graf
Mike Carls
Mavis
Geier
Eldred Miller
David
Jensen
Esther Kuehl
B. Recommended Actions:
1. Routine Matters:
a. Approval of Minutes:
Action: Motion to approve: 2nd: Carried:
Motion to approve as amended: 2nd: Carried
b. Approval of Bills:
Action: Motion to approve: 2nd Carried:
Additional bills not included with Accounts Payable:
Authorize payments: 2nd:
C. Financial Report:
2. OLD BUSINESS:
Carri=
Gift certificates for the employees that did not attend the Christmas
party because they were working. $7.50 per certificate.
ACTION: Motion to purchase gift certificates for the
employees that worked when the Christmas party was held.
Van: Our insurance carrier stated that Burns Manor van should not
be used for anyone that is not a resident at Burns Manor.
The van should not be driven by any one but Burns Manor personnel.
ACTION: Motion to adhere to the advice of the insurance
agent; Burns Manor van be used for Burns Manor business
only.
Abuse: Most of the employees on the nite shift have been questioned
by Helene Haapala concerning Tom Hinde. Other employees that
did not get along with Barb Bullert have been questioned.
BOARD MEETING AGENDA CONTINUED:
3. NEW BUSINESS
Gloria, Eldred and Larry report on the meeting with the Governor.
Material is in your packet as to the welfare rates from
1978 to 1984. A copy has been sent to Mayor Stearns.
Thank you letters to be sent to the Governor and Ancher Nelsen.
Gloria will repond to the suggestion.
Meals expense that the members occured while on Burns Manor
business. Ancher Nelsen should be repaid also. Is $5.20
the correct amount?
ACTION: Motion to allow $5.20 meal expense to the people
that attended the meeting with the Governor.
Esther report on the Task force for the Elderly meeting 1- 18 -85.
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 1985
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to
order by Chairman Larry Romo at 7:30 p.m., with the following members
present: Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young, Roland Ebent, Shu -Mei Hwang,
Thomas Lyke and Chairman Romo. Members absent: Don Erickson. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering Marlow
V. Priebe and City Attorney James H. Schaefer.
2. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, December 18, 1984,
were approved as presented on a motion by Mr. Torgerson. Seconded by Mrs.
Young, the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BY DR. TOM
LYKE
(Dr. Lyke asked to relinquish his seat on the Planning Commission for
the duration of this hearing and recommendation.)
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3359 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a 461 by 70' woodframe dental
office building (with some rental space), to be located on Echo
Drive, in an R -3 zone.
Dr. Lyke stated that the request was the same as was presented at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 18, 1984.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
close the hearing at 7:34 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Ebent, the motion
carried unanimously. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to
City Council approval of the conditional use permit as requested.
Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF PETITION TO VACATE EASEMENT KNOWN AS PARK LANE
AS SUBMITTED BY PATRICK SPAUDE AND BRUCE DRAHOS
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3360 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 3 and Tuesday, January , 1$ y75. The petition asks
that the City vacate the 20.14' by 1301 easement referred to as "Park
Lane" located on 7th Ave. N.W.
iCity Administrator Plotz explained that the easement was
originally granted to allow a walkway from a proposed
development to a park so that residents would not have to cross
privately owned property to reach the park. The developer has
1
- - -�.r4_
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85
since changed his plans for the area so the walkway is no longer
necessary. Upon vacation of the easement, the 20.14, would be
divided equally and would become part of the lots on either side of
the easements. Mr. Spaude and Mr. Drahos were present to state that
as neither have built on the property it would give them more
building options.
Mr. Ebent asked about retaining a utility easement. Director Priebe
replied that a utitlity easement (6' on either side of resulting
property line) should be retained.
After discussion, Mrs. Young made a motion to close the hearing at
7:38 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council vacation of
the easement as requested, with the stipulation that the utility
easement be retained as recommended by staff. Seconded by Mr. Ebent,
the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BY FARID
AND NAHEED CURRIMBHOY /HUTCH ABC MONTESSORI SCHOOL
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3362 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a two level duplex for the pur-
pose of operating the Hutch ABC Montessori School /Day Care Center on
the lower level and living facilities on the upper level.
City Administrator Plotz explained a similar request (nursery school
in an R -2 zone) had been granted to the Learning Hutch; however,
their operation was in an existing church as opposed to a new
structure. When staff reviewed the plans, it was determined that a
total of 7 parking spaces would be required, based on the number of
classrooms proposed. It was also determined that a variance would be
necessary for the structure as proposed to allow a 25' frontyard
setback on the School Road side of the the building.
Mr. Currimbhoy was present to explain the request. He stated
that the Minnesota Department of Human Services had approved
their operation for 32 students. At the present time, they
serve 18 students. They would like to have a larger facility
to serve more students. The children range in age from 2 112
to 6. School hours run from 8 a.m. to 11 :30 a.m. Day Care
Service is then provided to those parents who desire it from
11:30 until 5 p.m. Mr. Currimbhoy stated that there would be a
very minimal increase in traffic, and that they have had no
problems with traffic congestion at their present site.
He also noted that the house would look like a house from the .
outside, and would look as nice as the houses around it.
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85
During discussion it was noted that the parking area as shown
would have to be moved to be 15' off Mc Donald's Drive. Mr.
Richard Larson, builder, stated there would be enough room to
meet the 15' setback required, bu moving the house back.
Attorney Barry Anderson was present representing Richard and Linda
Martin, neighboring property owners. He presented a petition
signed by neighborhood residents stating their objection to the
conditional use permit and asking that the request be denied. He
further stated that the neighbors objected to the proposal for the
following reasons: 1) Traffic - It would increase substantially. 2)
Safety - Traffic is fast - many young drivers - not safe for those
already living there and those bringing their small children; also
may cause visibility problem on the corner of McDonald Drive and
School Road. 3) Decreased Property Values - A development like this
is essentially a commerical establishment in a residential area -
This would generally change the character of the residential
neighborhood and depress property values.
Mr. Jim Waldron of 530 School Road explained that when he built his
house on school he was required to set it back much farther than the
request by the Currimbhoys. Mr. Waldron stated that he felt that as
proposed, the house would stick out as an eyesore. He was also
concerned about the safety issue. He stated he couldn't count on
both hands the number of cars that have ended up in that lot. (Chair-
man Romo noted that Mr. Waldron was addressing the variance issue
which would be addressed in the next hearing.)
Mr. Rich Martin of 1235 McDonald Drive expressed his concern about
safety. He felt that a driveway would have to be provided that would
allow the parents to drive in, drop their children off and then drive
out, off the street.
Rufus Alexander of 510 School Road spoke to verify the comments
of the neighbors in regard to traffic. He also stated that he
would have preferred to have a larger backyard, but the large
front yards were required to allow for the frontyard setback.
Mr. Bruce Bjerklund, 535 Lakeview Lane, commented that he
objected to the "concrete front yard" that would be required for the
proposal to meet the parking requirements. Mrs. Linda Martin, 1235
McDonald Drive, also stated her concern about the parking area having
to expand if the school enrollment were to expand. Administrator
Plotz responded that the parking is based on number of classrooms -
not number of children and would only have to be increased if the
number of classrooms were increased. The parking provided is for the
workers, not the children.
. Discussion followed regarding a required "buffer zone" between
parking area and residential area. City Administrator Plotz
explained that generally refers to a buffer between commercial and
residential and that this request was being handled as a conditional
3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85
use in a residential - not a commercial request. 0
Reverend Tim Maland of 855 Spruce St. commented that as a
parent with a child in the Montessori School, he felt he would
like to see it able to expand in order to serve more people.
The neighborhood residents stated that they had no objection to
the school itself, just to the location.
Dr. Lyke stated that he would like to see a plan that meets the
requirements before making a recommendation. Mr. Hwang stated
that he was generally in favor of the conditional use permit as
he felt property values depended upon the buyer and the seller
- and as the area developed, the traffic safety might improve.
He noted, however, that he was not in favor from the variance
standpoint. He noted that he didn't think you could build on
the lot and meet setback requirements. Mr. Ebent felt that the
day care operation was prohibited under prohibited home
occupations and that as the petition was signed by entire neighbor-
hood, he would not be in favor of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Torgerson commented that as the request might increase the traffic hazai
be in favor of the conditional use permit in this location, but
recommended that other site alternatives be considered. Mrs.
Young also felt that the traffic and safety issues are a real
concern, but also felt that as the others on school road had to
meet the setback, it would not be fair to them. She also sited
the idea of a "parking lot next door" as "not exactly what I
would call a picturesque scene." She felt there should be a
more appropriate setting for a school of this type. Chairman
Romo stated that his major concern was with the parking area
and that it does change the area. He stated he would not be in
favor of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing at 8 :42 p.m.
Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council that the
request be rejected. Seconded by Mr. Ebent, the motion
carried, with Mr. Ebent, Mrs. Young, Dr. Lyke, Mr. Torgerson
and Chairman Romo voting "aye" and Mr. Hwang voting "nay."
(d) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AS REQUESTED BY FARID AND NAHEED
CURRIMBHOY /HUTCH ABC MONTESSORI SCHOOL
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 8 :45 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3365 as published in the Hutchinson
Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985. the request is for a
variance to allow the reduction of the frontyard setback on
property located at the corner of School Road and McDonald
Drive, on the School Road side.
Note: As this request is related to the former request for a •
conditional use permit, much of the discussion was done during
M
W
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85
the public hearing for the conditional use permit.
Mr. Dave Dressel, 540 Lakeview Lane, questioned whether the
playground area would meet State requirements if the house were
moved back to provide adequate setback from McDonald's Drive.
Mr. Martin commented that plans submitted should show where
other houses sit. Mrs. Martin restated her concerns about
traffic. Mr. Anderson stated that in addition to safety and
fairness, he feels this would be an attempt put more on this
lot than it will accomodate.
Mrs. Young made a motion to close the hearing at 8 :53 p.m.
Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. Mrs.
Young made a motion to recommend to City Council that the
variance be denied. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion
carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AS REQUESTED BY LARRY BETHKE
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 8 :55 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3363 as published in the Hutchinson
Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is for a
conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 70 -unit
planned development of townhouses and appurtenances on property
located on 8th Ave. N.W. and School Road.
City Administrator Plotz explained that the proposal was
detailed in the plans submitted by Mr. Bethke. Director Priebe
had prepared a memo outlining the improvements that would be
required in 1985 to serve the 1985 phase of the project. The
Fire Marshal's recommendation for a hydrant system and a
maintenance agreement for hydrants was also noted.
Mr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing at 9 :00 p.m.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously. Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval
of the conditional use permit as requested. Seconded by Mrs.
Young, the motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT HORNICK (C -2)
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. with the
reading of publication 113361 as published in the Hutchinson
Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is to rezone
a portion of the lot located at 402 Main Street and the lot
located at 29 4th Ave. N. W. from R -2 to C -2 for the purpose of
providing a parking lot to the adjacent Gas Hutch, which is
azoned C -2. Chairman Romo noted that correspondence had been
received from the D.O.T., Mr. Daniel Wink and Mr. Wayne Ka31ch
5
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85 0
and summarized the contents of that correspondence. The D.O.T.
stated they had no objection, but wanted to make it clear that
any changes of access from the highways would be at the expense
of the owner. Mr. Wink and Mr. Kasich stated their objection
to the C -2 zoning.
Mr. Roger Gilmer was present representing Mr. Hornick. He
stated that he would like to table the hearing on the west
property (35 4th Ave. N.W. to IC -1). He further stated that
Mr. Hornick's purchase agreement on 29 4th Ave. N.W. expired at
midnight and wasn't prepared to pursue that request at this
time. He did however, want to address the rezoning of the
southerly 112 of the George Zeleny property (402 South Main
Street) to C -2. An attorney representing Mrs. Helen Zeleny,
owner of the property adjoining Mr. George Zeleny's stated that
Mrs. Zeleny objected to the rezoning. Mr. Elton Leek restated
his objection (had appeared at former hearing).
Mr. Torgerson stated that it was his understanding that at the
former hearing it had been the consensus of the Planning
Commission that the whole property (that formerly requested
plus the property on which the Gas Hutch is now located) should
be rezoned to IC -1.
Mr. Gilmer stated that Mr. Hornick was willing to correct the
problems about which the neighbors had complained. He also noted
that the City has other ways to enforce, for example, a weed
problem. His stated that Mr. Hornick's objection to zoning IC-
1 was the control that the neighbors or City might impose upon
him.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to continue this
hearing until the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on February 199 1985. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the
motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING AS REQUESTED BY ROBER HORNICK (IC -1)
Chairman Romo opened the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3364 as published in the Hutchinson
Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is to rezone
property located at 35 4th Ave. N.W. from R -2 to IC -1.
As it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that they
would prefer to consider both requests at the same time, Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to continue the hearing until the next
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 19,
1985. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 466 SECTION 4.25
2
0
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/15/85
City Attorney Schaefer explained that the City's subdivision
Ordinance requires a plat to be filed with the County Recorder
within 90 days of City Council approval. If the 90 day
deadline is not met, the County Recorder returns the plat
which has to be reconsidered by the Planning Commission and the
City Council. In several cases, developers were having trouble
paying current taxes on the property within the 90 days -
another requirement that must be met before the plat can be
recorded. City Attorney Schaefer recommended a one year
period, noting that the other language would remain the same.
During discussion it was brought out that perhaps the
developers should have some input as to the time frame before a
specific deadline was considered.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to set the public hearing on the
amendment to the subdivision ordinance for the regular meeting
of the Planning Commission on February 19, 1985 at 7:30 p.m.
Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION OF SITE PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR REZONING
City Administrator Plotz asked if the Planning Commission would
be interested in bringing in someone with experience on this
subject to speak to the Planning Commission. He noted that Ann
Perry or Gunnar Isberg might be available to speak and that
either has experience with the topic. After discussion, it was
the consenus of the Planning Commission that this might be
helpful for making a decision regarding site plans and zoning.
5. NEW BUSINESS
It was noted that the Government Training Service is planning a
workshop to be held in Hutchinson on Tuesday, February 19, the date
of the next Planning Commission meeting, from 2 :30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m..
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission, that if the
workshop were offered, that the Planning Commission date be changed to
Monday, February 18, at 7:30 p.m., in order to allow those who wish
to attend to do so.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Mr. Ebent, the motion carried
unanimously and the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
7
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1985
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1985
PUBLICATION N0. 3374
0
0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL
D"UOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA
CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED
A PROPOSED
INDUSTRIAL
STATUTES,
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the governing body of the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota (the "City"), will meet on February 26, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. at
the City offices in Hutchinson, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public
hearing on a proposal that the City issue its revenue bonds under the Municipal
Tndustrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended, in order
to finance the cost of a project. The proposed project will consist of acquiring land
and renovating a building thereon for use as a 15,000 square foot (net rentable
space) commercial rental facility. The Project is located at 4 Main South in the
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, which is legally described as: Lot 1, North 18 feet
of Lot 2, Block 8, South half of the City of Hutchinson, County of McCloud. The
current use of the property is the Hutchinson Hotel. The proposed project will be
owned by F do T Joint Venture, a Minnesota general partnership, for use in their
business. The estimated total amount of the proposed issue is $500,000. The bonds
shall be a limited obligation of the City and the bonds and interest thereon shall be
payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof, except that such
bonds may be secured by a mortgage and other encumbrance on the project. No
holder of any such bond shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the
taxing power of the City of Hutchinson to pay the bonds, or the interest thereon,
nor to enforce payment against any property of the City except the project.
A draft copy of the proposed application to the Minnesota Energy and
Economic Development Authority for approval of the project, together with all
attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the City
offices.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set
forth above.
Dated: January 23, 1985
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By Z
City Administrtt or
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 1985
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1985
PUBLICATION NO. 3376
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE
ek MODIFICATION OF THE EXISTING TAX INCRMEENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #4
PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS
273.71 TO 273.78 CL
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the governing body of the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota (the "City), will meet on February 26, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. at
the City offices in Hutchinson, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public
hearing on a proposal to modify the existing Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Development District #4 in accordance with the Minnesota Tax Increment
Financing Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78 inclusive. The
governing body will consider the modification of the tax increment financing plan
to provide for the acquisition of the following parcel:
Lot 1, North 18 feet of Lot 2, Block 8, South half of the City of
Hutchinson, County of McCloud.
The Plan is also modified for the purpose of allowing for $285,000 additional
bonded indebtedness.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set
forth above.
Dated: January 24 1985
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By AC, a "�
Cit% Ad t trator
(612) 587 -5151
7CH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
V, 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE 'WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 22, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------ - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Frank Fay's Hotel Redevelopment Project
------------------------ - - - - --
Please be advised that Frank Fay has requested a continuation of the
public hearing on industrial revenue bonds and tax increment assistance
until the March 26 City Council meeting.
Several items have yet to be completed. They include responses from the
City Auditor regarding financial statements, a proposed development agree-
ment including the assistance and guarantee of the City of Hutchinson, and
Resolution of off - street parking location.
/ms
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 339 -8291 !AREA CODE 812%
0
February 26, 1985
Mayor and City Council
City of Hutchinson
City Hall
Hutchinson, Minnesota
RE: Tax Increment Amendment for Rehabilitation of Hutchinson Hotel
Attached is the amendment to the tax increment program to accomplish the
rehabilitation of the Hutchinson Hotel.
I recommend the City Council hear evidence and testimony on February 26, 1985
and continue the Hearing to March 26, 1985. At that time, the Council will
hold hearings on the Housing Bonds and the Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds. It is my opinion the City Council should consider the tax increment
issue only after full and complete representations on Housing and IDB bonds
• are made.
The City has shown its willingness to participate in the project and therefore
need not take any further action until after the Housing and IDB bond matters
have been decided.
If the project receives favorable consideration in March, the Council will
take action on findings and the amendment to the Tax Increment Plan and
Program.
Very truly yours,
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
it ° 11lliam E. Fah y
First Vice President
WEF:nel
• P
LY
r
AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
Section 1. Recitals. The Hutchinson City Council,
by resolution adopted October 14, 1980, designated a development
district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A and
a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.71 through 273.78. Both the development
district and the tax increment financing district have been
designated Development District No. 4 (the District). The
Hutchinson City Council has previously approved a Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the District (the Original Plan). By
Resolution No. 7140, adopted by the Hutchinson City Council
on May-25, 1982, the Hutchinson City Council approved an
amendment to the Plan (the 1982 Amendment). The Original
Plan, as amended by the 1982 Amendment is hereinafter referred
to as the Plan.
Located within the District at the southwest corner
of Main Street and Washington Avenue is the Hutchinson Hotel
(the Hutchinson Hotel). It has been proposed that the Plan
be amended to provide for the acquisition of the Hutchinson
Hotel by the City and the sale thereof to a developer designated
• by the City at a reduced cost pursuant to a development agreement
under which the developer agrees to renovate and rehabilitate
the Hutchinson Hotel for commercial and residential use (the
Project).
The City's cost of the Project is estimated to
be as follows:
Land Acquisition $ 117,000
Cost of Issuance and
Administrative Costs 10,500
Capitalized Interest 20,000
Bond Discount 2 500
TOTAL
150,000
The proposal provides that the City shall issue tax increment
bonds in the approximate amount of $ 150,000 to finance
the City's cost of the Project. '
Section 2. Findings and Amendment of Plan. After
a public hearing duly noticed and held in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, subd. 4, it is hereby
determined to amend the Plan to the extent necessary in order
to undertake the Project and finance the Project through
. the issuance of tax increment bonds. The Project as proposed
is an economically feasible use of the Hutchinson Hotel and
comes within the framework of the Land Use and Program Objectives
stated in the Development Program for Development District
No. 4. The Project will result in the enhancing of the overall
retail, commercial and office use of the downtown area of
the City and provide rental housing for residents of the
City and the surrounding area.
3. Findings. In connection with the Project and
the amendment of the Plan approved in Section 2 hereof (the
Plan, as amended) it is found and determined as follows:
A. The Project will not occur through
private investment in the reasonably
forseeable future and therefore the use
of tax increment financing is deemed
necessary.
B. The Plan, as amended, conforms
to the general plan of redevelopment
of the City as a whole.
C. The Plan, as amended, will afford
maximum opportunity, consistent with
the sound needs of the City as a whole
for the redevelopment of the District
by private enterprise.
9
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 5TH9 1985.
• NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PUBLICATION NO. 3373
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 202
Project No. 85- 01 -27, 85- 01 -289 85- 01 -299 85 -01 -30 & 85 -01 -31
Hutchinson, Minnesota
January 23rd, 1985
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given, that the Council will meet at 8 :00 P.M. on the
26th day of February, 1985, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at
Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Campbell Lane in Clark's 2nd Addition, Carolina Avenue in
Helland's 5th & 6th Additions, Waller Drive in Waller's Subdivision & Waller's
2nd Subdivision, Sibley Avenue and Tyler Street in Fourth Addition to Lakewood
Terrace and Bradford Street in Orchard Park 1st Addition, by the construction
of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Lift Station, Grading, Gravel Sub-
base and Appurtenances.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office.
. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council
may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment
at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as
it deems advisable.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected
property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing
or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in
its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has
been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed
property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted
under it, may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to
the City Clerk for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this
special assessment on his property.
0 The total cost of the improvement is $311,177.12.
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Hutchinson, Minnesota
II
1
Compiled
Bys Marlow V. Priebe
LETTING N0.
COST PER UNIT a
Sheet 1 of 9
$12,198.02/$5,658.911 1 2.
Computed
By: Marlow V. Priebe
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -27
SERVICE LEAD t
Checked
Byt Cal Rice
SANITARY SEWER, WATERKAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
NO. YRS. SPREAD t
10
GRAVEL SUB -BASE b AREA LIPT STATION A APPURTENANCES
UNTT NSF) .
D... Dn..n....v .... a -- ....
Total Deferred....
- - -- _ Grand Totals.... 1<
tAKr=L.L
LANs: IN CLARK'S 2ND ADDITION
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 8 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
NO. NO.
1 2895 -000
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
DEFERRED
ASSESSMENT
John E. A Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
5- 117 -30 -09 -0280
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clarke 2nd Add.
6
2
5,658.91
2 z 96-000
5,658.91
John E. A Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
35- 117 -30 -09 -0290
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clark's 2nd Add.
7
2
5 658.91
3 2 97 -000
5,658.91
John E. A Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
35- 117 -30 -09 -0300
-2899
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clark's 2nd Add.
8
2
5,658.91
j
-000
5 658.91
John E. b Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
35-117-30-09-0310
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clark's 2nd Add.
9
2
5 656.91
5 2899-000
5 658.91
John E. A Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
35 -117- 30 -09 -0320
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clark's 2nd Add.
10
2
5 658.91
2900 -000
5,658.91
John E. 8 Sedona Miller
336 Main St. So.
35- 117 -30 -09 -0330
Hutchinson MN 55350
Clark's 2nd Add.
1
3
18 972.05
7 2815 -000
18 972.05
Floyd 6 Helen McClure
Rt. 3
N480' of Lot 3 E% E268`,
5- 117 -30 -09 -0010
Hutchinson MN 55350
Sec. 35-117-30
1121198.02
112,198.02
DEPERRED
Total Deferred....
- - -- _ Grand Totals.... 1<
Compiled By: _Marlow V. Prlebe
LETTING N0.
COST PER UNIT
Sheet 2 of 9
12 198. 021 5 650. 91/$18, 972.0
Computed By: Marlow V. Priebe
PROJECT No. 85 -01_27
SERVICE LEAD
SERVICE
LEAD COST
Checked By: Cal Rice _
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
s
NO. IRS. SPREAD
10
5100' of Lot 3 EX E4951 b
GRAVEL SUB -BASE A AREA LIFT STATION 6 APPURTENANCES
UNIT USED
Per
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 202
rluooc„
s
Property or Per Lot
ACCT. PARCEL
N0. N0.
8 2818_000
NAME S ADDRESS
OF OWNER
- cnY l,VY1,1V1,
ADDITION OR
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
SERVICE
LEAD COST
DEFERRED
TOTAL
ASSRSSHM T
Leroy 8 Ruth Klammer
5100' of Lot 3 EX E4951 b
35- 117 -30- 16_0010
Star Route
Walker MN 56484
N315' of Lot 4 EX E4951
See. 35- 117 -30
NOTE: - --- --
- - - - - --
To 0.11 Propertlen
i.tsted In Project 85- 01 -27: Deferred Assessment of $555.00 per
charged at time building permit
accrued interest. Estimated number
lift station is 73. Lift Station
dwelling
is issued
of
- W.515.00.
unit for lift
for each dwelling
dwelling unite to
station.
unit, plus
be served
To be
by
$40,515.GO
DEFERRED
oral assessed.... $47,266.00
otal Deterred.... *52.713.02
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 6 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
Sheet 3 of 9
Compiled
By: Marlow V. Priebe
LETTING N0. 6
COST PER UNIT 2
4883.49/41,93 2.20/$T,629.98
Computed
By: Marlow V. Priebe
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -28
SERVICE LEAD
BLOCK
Checked
By: Cal Rice
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
NO. YRS. SPREAD t
10
9 2979 -000
GRAVEL SUB -BASE 6 APPURTENANCES
UNIT USED t
Per Lot
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 6 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
NO. NO.
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
9 2979 -000
N. A. Holland
36 -117- 30_06 -0040
S icer MN 56288
Holland's 5th Add.
1
1
$1,932.20
1 2.20
10 29 0 -000
W. A. Holland
6 -117_ 30_06 -0050
s icer MN 56288
Holland's 5th Add.
2
1
41,932.20
4 1,932.20
11 2981_000
_
Tyrone A Suzanne Helland
Rt. 1, Box 192
36- 117 -30 -06 -0060
New London MN 56273
Holland's 5th Add.
3
1
883.49
1 883-49
17 4069 -0oo
W. A. Holland
36_lt7_30 -06 -0070
Spicer, MN 56288
Holland's 6th Add.
1
1
$7.629.98
7,629-9B
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
0
Compiled By: Marlow V. Priebe
Computed By: Marlow V. Priebe
Checked By: Cal Rice
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 202
PROJECT NO. 85_01 -29
SANITARY SEWER, STORM 3 EWE R, GRADING,
GRAVEL BASE 6 APPURTENANCES
M FUTAMI JBIIKH t
WATER SERVICE
STORM SEWER e
GRADE i GRAVEL t
Yfl_ yaS_ SGarAn .
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME A ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
NO. N0. _
13 - "'
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
REDITS
ASSRS3MRVT
111fi_p00
Mdrk C. Guggemos
62b Waller Drive
31- 117 -29 -09 -0080
-
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's Subd.
8
1
80.22
896.06
GRADE i GRAVEL
896.06
14 1115 -020
Mark's TV Service
147 Main St.
527.5' of Lot 7,
31_ 117 -29 -09 -0071
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's Subd.
1
27.5
307.18
GRADE A GRAVEL
4 307.18
15 1115 -010
Harvey Kemper
637 Bluff St.
Part of Lot 7,
31- 117 -29 -09 -0072
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's Subd.
1
27.48
4 306.95
GRADE : GRAVEL
4 306.95
16 11 13.610
Ethel Klima Hendrickson
637 Bluff St.
Portion of Lot 7 Lying E'ly
31- 117 -29 -09 -0130
Hutchinson MN 55350
of Lot 5 Waller's Subd.
54.98
614.13
GRADE A GRAVEL
614.1
17 1122 -000
Larry 6 Nona K. Anderson
80.42' x 109.40' Of Lot A 8
667 Bluff St.
Lot 3, Blk. 2,
31- 117 -29 -09 -0130
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's Subd.
80.42
4 898.29
GRADE i GRAVEL
898.29
18 1115 -000
Donald A Leona Janke
657 Bluff St.
N'ly Portion of Lot 7,
31- 117 -29 -09 -00'10
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's Subd.
1
97.89
*1,093.43
GRADE i GRAVEL
1,093-43
19 1124_000
$1,366.54
SANITARY SEWER
Hookite Silo
$ 541.68
WATER SERVICE
Hwy. 7 East
923.52
STORM SEWER
31- 117 -29- 09_0141_
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's 2nd Subd.
1
1
96.10
:1,072 .48
CRUDE 6 GRAVEL
$ 3,904.22
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals -
Compiled By: Marlow V
Computed By: Marlow V
Checked By: Cal Rice
lCCCCCU CUm
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -29
SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
GRAVEL BASE A APPURTENANCES
M MIAMI JEWER i1,30D.54
WATER SERVICE $ 541.68
STORM SEWER : $ 923.52
GRADE 6 GRAVEL $ 11.17 _
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 8 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL,
NO. NO.
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST ICREDITS
ASSoaSMEw'e
20 1124_010
$1,366.54
SANITARY SEWER
Rockite Silo
$ 541.68
WATER SERVICE
Hwy. 7 East
$ 923.52
STORM SEWER
1- 117 -29 -09 -0142
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's 2nd Subd.
2
1
96.10
$1,072.48
GRADE b GRAVEL
904.22
21 1124 -020
$1,366.54
SANITARY SEWER
Rockite Silo
$ 541.68
WATER SERVICE
Hwy. 7 East
$ 923.52
STORM SEWER
31- 117 -29 -09 -0143
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's 2nd Subd.
3
1
96.10
$1,072.48,
GRADE 6 GRAVEL
4 3,904.22
22 1124 -030
Rockite Silo
Hwy. 7 East
31- 117 -29 -09 -0144
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's 2nd Subd.
4
1
96.10
$1,072.48
GRADE A GRAY EL
1,072.48
23 1124_040
Rockite Silo
Hwy. 7 East
$ 541.68
WATER SERVICE
31 -117- 29_09 -0145
Hutchinson MN 55350
Waller's 2nd Subd.
5
1
96.10
A1,072.48
GRADE 8 GRAVEL
i 1,614.16
CITY COST
22,07T.78
0 - - - -- _ Grand Totals 0 $40
AJJtsJMLNl MULL Nu. 2U[ SIBLEY AVE.
A TYLER ST. IN 4TH ADD. TO LAKEWOOD
TERRACE
Sheet 6 of 9
Compf led
Bye MarlowV. Priebe
LETTING N0. 6
COST PER UNIT : / 5 /
Computed
By: Marlow V. Priebe
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -30
SERVICE LEAD s
Checked
By: Cal Rice
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
NO. YRS. SPREAD s 10
LOT
BLOCK
GRAVEL BASE 8 APPURTENANCES
UNIT USED s P" LOT
AJJtsJMLNl MULL Nu. 2U[ SIBLEY AVE.
A TYLER ST. IN 4TH ADD. TO LAKEWOOD
TERRACE
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 6 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
NO. N0.
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
A3SPS.9l131T
24
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greene Lane
02- 116 -30 -10 -0020
-25 --
Hutchinson MN 55350
-
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
1
1
$4,352.06
4,352.06
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116_30_10_0030
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
2
1
$4,352.06
4,352.06
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02- 116_30_10_0040
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
3
$4,352.06
4,352.06
27
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greene Lane
02_116_30- 10_0050
Hutchinson MH 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
4
1
$5,370.29
#.51370.2
2 V-
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02- 116_30 -10 -0060
- --
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
5
1
$5,370.29
4 5,370.29
29
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02- 116_30 -10 -0070
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
6
1
$5,370.29
5,370.29
30
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02 -116- 30_10 -0080
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
1
2
$4,885.95
4,885.95
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals...... 0
Compiled By: Ma_r
Computed By: Mar
Checked By: Cal
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 202
PROJECT 90. 85 -01 -30
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
GRAVEL BASE A APPURTENANCES
SIBLEY AVE. A TYLER ST. IN 4TH ADD. TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE
COST PER UNIT i ;4,352.06/35,370.29 /;4,685.95
SERVICE LEAD s
NO. YRS. SPREAD 10
UNIT USED s PER LOT
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 8 ADDRESS
ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
NO. N0,
OF OWNER
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
31
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116_30_10 -0090
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
2
2
$4,885-95
4,885.95
32
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116_30 -11 -0400
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
3
2
$4,885.95
4 4,885.95
33
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116 -30 -11 -0410
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
4
2
$4,885.95
; 4,885.95
34
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greene Lane
02- 116_30_11 -0420
Hutchinson MI 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
5
2
$4.885.95
4.885.95
35
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116 -30 -10 -0100
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
1
3
#4,885.95
4,88 . 5
3
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02- 116 -30 -10 -0110
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
2
3
#4,885.95
4,885.95
37
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
02_116_30 -10 -0120
Hutchinson MI 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
3
3
$4,885.95
4,45-95
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
0
Compiled
By:
Marlow V. Priebe
LETT ING N0. 6
COST PER UNIT
Sheet 8 of 9
52.0 / 5 70.29/ 5.9
Computed
By:
Marlow V. Priebe
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -30
SERVICE LEAD i
tarry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson let 55350
I.arry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
Checked
By:
Cal Rice
SANITARY SEWER, NATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
NO. YRS. SPREAD i
10
AS54]ti SIA FINT PiJ 1
Mn ;1 nJ
GRAVEL BASE 6 APPURTENANCES
UNIT USED z
PER LOT
ACCT. PARCEL
NO NU•
NAME; A ADDRESS
OF OWNER
n avv. av L
ADDITION OR
SUBDIVISION
&n v
LOT
16nnA{L
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
SERVICE
LEAD 0037
CREDIT3
TOTAL
A33=1+
02_ltti_30- 10_oljo
39
02- 116 -3o -10 -0140
tarry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson let 55350
I.arry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
4th Add. to Lakewood Terrace
4
5
3
3
4 885.95
$4.885-95
4,885.95
A1,885.95
LOUT rrinclpal...
Total Interest....
-- -- - - - - - - -- - - -- _ —_ Grand Totals *T8,026.55
Compiled By: Marlow
Computed By: Marlow
Checked By: Cal Ri
LETTING NO. 6
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -31
SANITARY SEWER, NATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, GRADING,
GRAVEL BASE 8 APPURTENANCES
WATCNMAIN : ;11.02 /FRONT FOOT
SANITARY SEWER _ *24.32 /FRONT FOOT
STORM SEWER : $22. 0 /FRONT FOOT
GRADE A GRAVEL A8_14 /FRnwT PMT
- --
ACCT. PARCEI.
oeeur
NAME A ADDRESS
vnu ainnni In DnuMAND rAKK 1Sf ADDITI
N
NO. YRS.
SPREAD
: 10
NO. NO. _
40
_ OF OWNER
ADDITION OR
SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
SERVICE
LEAD COST
TOTAL
A35P3S1�1T
55.46
644.45
$ 0.00
WATERMAIN
Richard Schmidtbauer
52.74
$1,282.64
$ 0.00
SAN. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0140
120 Century Avenue
Hutchinson MN 55350
Orchard Park let Addition
1
1
30.64
68.46
$ 686.34
557.26
$ 0.00
ST11. SEWER
41
0.00
GRD. A GVL.
3,170.69
282.83
$3,286.48
$ 896.70
WATERMAIN
Richard Schmidtbauer
282.83
$6,878.43
$ 396.50
SAN. SEWER
120 Century Avenue
282.83
$6,335.39
$ 0.00
STM. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0150
Hutchinson MN 55350
Orchard Park let Addition
2
1
282.83
$2.302.24
# 0.00
CAD. A GVL.
$20,095-74
42
2.72
$ 31.61
$ 0.00
WATERMAIN
Richard
-0-
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
SAN. SEWER
120 Century Avenue
Century Avenue
-0-
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
STM. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0160
Hutchinson MN 55350
Orchard Park 13t Addition
1
2
15.72
127.96
0.00
GAD. A GVL.
159.57
43
137.33
$1,595.77
$ 562.42
WATERMAIN
Richard Schmidtbauer
137.33
$3,339.87
$ 361.12
SAN. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0170
120 Century Avenue
Hutchinson MN 55350
Orchard Park 1st Addition
2
2
115.05
$2,577.12
$ 0.00
STM. SEWER
44
137-33
1 117.87
$ 0.00
GRD. b GVL.
4 9,554.17
133.22
$1,548.02
$ 562.42
WATERMAIN
Richard Schmidtbauer
133.22
$3,239.91
$ 361.12
SAN. SEWER
120 Century Avenue
133.22
$2,984.13
$ 0.00
STM. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0180
Hutchinson MN 55350
Orchard Park let Addition
37
2
133.22
$1,084.41
0.00
GRD. A GVL.
9,780.01
45
83.30
$ 967.95
$ 0.00
WATERMAIN
Richard Schmidtbauer
83.30
$2,025.86
$ 0.00
SAN. SEWER
120 Century Avenue
83.30
$1,865.92
$ 0.00
STM. SEWER
07- 116 -29 -06 -0110
Hutchinson MN 55350
Part of Tract A R.L.S. No. 3
83.30
678.06
1 0.00
GRD. 8 GYL.
5 537.79
10tal Asseeeaoie.. 44tl,227.97
total City Cost... 141.974.61
LJ
RESOLUTION NO. 7997
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Water Meter
5502.90
Meter Sale & Replacement
Water
Yes
Water Products Co.
Paint
2205.80
Street & Park
St /Par
Yes
Patco - Thomas Co.
80 Octane Aviation
2,118.0
Resale
Airport
Yes
Bjerke Oil Co.
Fuel
3 Motorola Mobiles
7828.00
Car Radio
Police
Yes
Motorola Comm.
2 Motorola Portables
2094.00
Additional Units
Police
Yes
Motorola Comm.
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
Date Approved: February 26, 1985 Resolution submitted for Council action
0 Motion made by:
Seconded by:
by:
0i2DI -1.4 :CS iiO. 3__?5
:A:.E CF i:k t:ICIPALLY O 3 E'. REAL
PP.OPE�T`_7 TLEGALLY DESC7.TBED AS: LOT 12,
5ELCHO ;.:- J0RGZ1.SOr. STLTsi VIJIO. TO T12 CITY OF
==SON
TIC CITY OF t-:ifPCI- VSC" DCES
SEC_°IM.- 1. That "he munic_paliv o,_med real property lecally
described as i;Ot 12, Block 3, Selcho.:- Jorgenson. Subdivision to the
City of Hutchinson, for good and valuable consideration, to ;rit: the
sum of $10,CCO to be in hand paid, is hereby sold, conveyed and
•;arm anted to .:eivin and Kerrietta ''ent::orth, h,�sba,d and 1-ife,_ as
.;oint tenants and not te':ants in cor-nor., C.ogetzez :ith all ;;ereditamerts
and appurtenances belonginq thereto.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COU'aL THIS DAY OF 1905.
QTY OF HL?TCI- :2:2SOI
Ey!
.oAer` 1' Stearns, a:or
Gar-•, -:, Plot -, Cit`, Clerk
Go:
i
0
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7998
RESOLUTION REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION FROM
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO INSTALL
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT AT INTERSECTION
OF HIGHWAY 7 WEST AND SCHOOL ROAD
AND COMPLETE A TURNING MOVEMENT STUDY
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council adopted Resolutions No. 7760
June 11, 1984 concerning improvements on a portion of State Highway 1 and
22, and_ Resolution No. 7935 on December 11, 1984 concerning the install.
tion of a temporary traffic signal at School Road and Trunk Highway 7 -and
22, and Resolution No. 7963 on January 8, 1985, and
WHEREAS, the City Council feels there is still an eais,ting traffic and
safety problem in this area,
.BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Council of the City of Hutchinson hereby petitions the '
Minnesota Department of Transportation for installation of a temporary signal
light at the intersection of Highway 7 West and School'Road and to complete
a turning movement study during the 1984 /1985 winter season to determine the
justification of a signal.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of February,, 1985.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plot2
City Clerk
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
7 -�
a
RESOLUTION NO. 7999
RESOLUTION REQUESTING REDUCTION OF SPEED LIMIT
IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council is concerned about the safety of
the traveling public on T.H. 7 in the City of Hutchinson, and
WHEREAS, this concern is directed at the area of T.H. 7 that has a posted
speed limit of 50 MPH, within the city limits, both east and west areas.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the Minnesota Department of Trans-
portation study the traffic speed on T.H. 7 in both areas for the purpose of
reducing the speed limit on all or part of each area. Said study to be com-
pleted and the results reported to the City Council.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of February, 1985.
-i
ATTEST:
ry D. P1otz
City Clerk
E
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
OONESCr4
OF TPp' .
February
Nlinnesota
Department of Transportation
Box 768
2SO5 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
WILLMAR. MINNESOTA 54201
4, 1985
Mr. Marlow Priebe, City Engineer
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Speed Study on T.H. 7
Dear Mr. Priebe:
(612) 231 -5499
We have your letter of January 29 wherein the City of Hutchinson, by
resolution, has requested that a speed study be made along T.H. 7
within the community of Hutchinson.
I have turned this request over to our Traffic Engineer for con-
sideration. Department findings will be transmitted as soon as they
are available.
Sincerely,
qF, "4_"
J. Y. Nibbe
Asst. District Engineer
cc: K. Madole
B. Holzemer
(ADJN826)
An Equal Opportunity Employer
0
Q
(612) 587 -5151
JW71374,ASt�,�,�',,G:-C,%Av'ENUEWF-QT CITY OF HUTCHINSON
TCHlN'SON, ,v11�N X5350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 21, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------ - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Items Requested by Council of RCM and CED
------------------------ - - - - --
I have contacted Chuck Barger (RCM) and Mike Hoff (CED) and advised them
of the items requested by 4:00 P.M., February 21, 1985. Specifically, I
read them the Council motion, as shown in the attached proposed minutes.
Hopefully, all parties are fully and equally informed.
/ms
Attachment
n
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
Resolution No. 7980. The motion unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FIRE MARSHAL TO ATTEND FIRE SAFETY
EDUCATION CONFERENCE
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve the request.
Alderman Mikulecky seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
(c) PRESENTATION BY RCM ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL
A lengthy presentation was given by RCM representatives concerning
their firm's proposal for the Hutchinson wastewater treatment plant,
Phase II.
(d) PRESENTATION BY CONSULTING ENGINEERS DIVISION, DONOHUE, ON
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROPOSAL
Four representatives from Consulting Engineers Division presented
an extensive proposal on the Hutchinson wastewater treatment plant,
Phase II.
It was the consensus of the Council that both firms were to prepare
a contract proposal for the February 26, 1985 Council meeting, to
be submitted by February 21, 1985 at 4:00 P.M., which addressed the
following items: engineering design fee with cost not to be ex-
ceeded, and included the costs for survey, soil borings, applica-
tion fee, value engineering, possible legal fees, the figure of
subtraction or deletion if filter is not necessary, and a bond of
guarantee for a December 1985 completion date.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY MICHAEL AND LOANN WILHELMSON FOR
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to ap-
prove setting a public hearing for March 12, 1985 at 8 :00 P.M. and
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7982. Alderman Torgerson
seconded the motion, and it unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE N0. 2/85 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE STREET
It was moved by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 710. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 3/85 - ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SALE OF MUT41CIPALLY
OWNED REAL PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS: LOT 12, BLOCK 3, SELCHOW-
JORGENSON SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
2
(612) 587 -5151
MIMI, CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 21, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------ - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Car Allowance
------------------------ - - - - --
The current car allowance for the City Administrator is $150 per month.
Several questions have arisen.
1. Is payment of car allowance legal? The State Statutes
provide for this benefit under 471.665, Subsection 2.
The League of Cities reported this likewise in a recent .
issue of their magazine.
2. Is the car allowance a common practice in city government?
Yes. See attached survey. The range is $10.0- 355/mo.
3. Is a 24 hour car or car allowance common on a local level?
Yes.
Hutch Utilities
Hutch Hospital
School Supt.
City Administrator
24 hour car
24 hour car, incl. gas
Car Allowance
Car Allowance
4. Is car allowance to be included in one's salary? Policy says
no.
SECTION 7 - PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL (p. 4)
"Any wage or salary so established is the total remuneration
for employment, but shall not be considered as reimbursement
for official travel or other expenses which may be allowed for
the conduct in business."
For these reasons I request the car allowance to remain as is (approxi-
mately 5% benefit beyond my salary).
P�!l
SKILL LEVEL IV - Top administrator In Iknlclralltvt County er related
"Vermont unit.
Trial Titles: Wolff ADMINISTRATOR
CITY mobrITR
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DESCRIPTION - Carries out the Policies established by the bard. Council ar Commission for the efficient
a.4inislratim of the business of the government mrisdirlion. Duties Include c"rdi,aliM
the administration of all departments of the goverreent Jurisdiction, d"elopine the are.ial
budget, preparing for aril atlendmi board or council oeetlnisr Providing infetoalim to the
Public concerning governor"( badness, supervising the asir.tenaer of records, and Wing to-
commendations rot Ste iserovrment of efficient administration or the affairs or the govern -
mrnlal unit.
NOTE - The *ran annual salary rot 27 of the City Managers with 1906 role% Is 151.0. Man In Parenlhnnl)
at bottom of Fife is not considered meaningful due to wide variation In the glee of government units a.d
hr,Ke in the duties of Positions reported.
1 Subject to 0" Films Pay
All tales %voted annually.
$still Slott$ 11111111111 Ito It littttttt1111ttltt to l still lilt 11111t11 lots 1131111 Its It1111tt It11t1ltlolttttttll$ tlttl111tIt11ttltlt11111ttt1ttttl11tt11I1tt11ti1111t111t11t It 111t ll t /IIt1111tItt111tlllltllt11 fill
Mo,of Mean 21 24 27 JD 33 36 31 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 61 72 Coll Ira.seorlasim
Jurisdiction Espl Salary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Des. 0/T Title -- Allwaml
btu$logo l t tntl#if llltt11111I11 I t t I ItoIts$ lilts$ l I l It llslllsl l If 11
Metro Airports Cumin. 1 63.0 1 Ececullvt lirtctor 24 -hr car
Metro Waste Comm. (Position Vacant) Chief Ade inislrator
MEAN: 67.0
----- - ------ -------- - --- - ---- ---------- ------ " ------
.__ ..-.��_-'_'_' '-- -'------ ---- -- -- ------ --- --- '-
Hennepin County 1 71.7 t 15 County Administrator 13/"
Ramsey County 1 6011 1 MA Executive Director 150 /00
Minneapolis 1 6115 l M City Coordinator 24 -hr car
MEAN: 65.4
------------- -- -------------------- ____ --------------------- " --- - --- - --'- ' -_ -__ __...._____ - --- _--.-^'-^ --- - ----------------- - ------- - ----- - - -----
---' ---
Anoks C"tv 1 56.7 1 MA Canty Administrator 24 -hr ur/
Scott County 1 11.1 1 County Administrator 250/"
MEAN: 31.3
---------------- ^.- _ ---- - --- -'- --- ------------------ - -"-'-. ----- - ------
'^_"___�_��__��»�_�._- -°
Il this ingtm 1 63.0 1 LLD City Manager 14 -hr car
Edina 1 60.0 1 MPA City Manager 24-hr car
IrW vn Park 1 57.2 1 MPA City Manager 250/"
St. Louis Fork 1 5710 1 MPA City Manager 24-hr car
Minnetonka 1 56.0 1 THO City Manager 24-hr car
Richfield 1 5110 1 WA City Manager 24 -hr car
Coon �apids 1 54.5 1 IA City Manager 250/"
Wniville 1 5110 1 WA City Manager 250/" j
Roseville 1 55.0 1 MPA City Manger 250 /50
Plymouth 1 62.1 1 MA City Manager 24 -hr car
Iroollvn Center 1 57.4 1 MPA City Manager 24 -hr car
Fridley 1 57.9 1 MS City Manager 230/"
Ilairw 1 45.7 1 MPA City Manager 150 /" j
Maplewood 1 5215 1 (IPA City Managet 225/40
Crystal 1 56.0 1 AA City Manager 24-hr car /
New Prithlon 1 44.0 1 MPA City Manalre 251/" ✓
New Noce 1 41.6 7/ APA City Manager 24 -hr car
Maple Valley 1 4110 ' r 1 M City Administrator /Cierk-Trtawrer 175/"
While Inn Lake 1 41.1 1 MA City Manager 295/" .�
Eaton 1 41.1 1C,'!CC 1 MA City Administrator 355/"
Muir Grove 1 47.4 1 WA City Administrator 24-hr car
South St. Paul 11914 AdJusteent Peilini) City Coordinator
Columbia "rights (1914 Adjustment Pending) City Manager
Cottage orirva I 1411 1 M Clerk /Ada inislralor 24-hr car
most St. Paul 1 16.2 1 IA City 11"Irr
Shoreview 1 44.1 ,rli 1 MA City Manager 24 -M car
Inver Grove Heights 1 49.0 - 1, t :IPA City Administrator/City Clerk 2501"
Eden Prairie 1 50.0 - Ib,tyl 1 PS City Manager 24 -hr car
Anoka 41994 M.i,slaent Periling) City Manager
Hopkins 11981 AdJustaent Pending) City Manager
Lakeville 1 40.7 1 NA City Administrator 24 -hr car
Robbinsdale 55.1 - joy �/ j 1 1 "PA City Manager 300 /" J
Hastings 37.0 1 PS City Adainislralor /Clerk 15 /0$
Mounds View 1 36.4 I MA Clerk- Administrator 100/"
Oakdale 1 3G.9 1 IS City Administrator 150 /" V
(612) 587 -5151
Hurry' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 21, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------- - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Aerial Photography by Markhurd Corp.
------------------------ - - - - --
At our last City Council meeting there was a question on whether or not
the total of bid price was firm over a three year period.
The bid dated January 28, 1985 is valid for a period of 12 months. There-
fore, activity during calendar year 1985 and work activity authorized be-
fore January 28, 1986 could cover a two year period. However, the third
year of the program would be affected by the language in the contract shown
on page 6 of the attached bid, specifically the cost to be based on the
U.S. Department of Labor Price Index.
If you want to proceed, we will need to vote on this item again.
Attachment
/ms
0
COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
moved to authorize the City Attorney to prepare the necessary docu-
ments to activate the full parking assessment. The motion was sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND CONTOUR
MAPPING (DEFERRED JANUARY 29, 1985)
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson made the motion to accept
the Markhurd Corp. bid of ;63,873 (Choice A), contingent upon that
being a concrete bid for the entire project and for the approval of
services in 1985 of the aerial photography, aerotriangulation,
stereoscopic models, and contour mapping for the total of #24,305.
The motion was seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously car-
ried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR POLICE PATROL CARS
(DEFERRED FEBRUARY 6, 1985)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky to
reject all three bids from Plowman's and Wigen Chevrolet and to de-
fer purchase of police vehicles until 1986. Alderman Torgerson
seconded the motion, and it failed three to one, with Aldermen
Mlinar, Torgerson and Carls voting nay and Alderman Mikulecky vot-
ing aye.
Alderman Torgerson moved to award the bid to the low bidder, Plow-
man's, for the purchase of three new police patrol cars and two
trade -in vehicles, with the city retaining the 1982 Chevrolet Mali-
bu. The motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried three
to one, with Aldermen Mlinar, Torgerson and Carls voting aye and
Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF TAKE HOME VEHICLES IN POLICE DEPARTMENT
(REQUESTED BY ALDERMEN CARLS, MLINAR AND TORGERSON)
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Tor-
gerson, to defer to the February 26, 1985 Council meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING MILEAGE RATE OF 20.5 CENTS
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Mlinar to set the mile-
age rate of 20.5 cents. The motion was seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky and unanimously carried. 0
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING JOHN MCRAITH AS ACTING DIRECTOR OF
PARKS AND RECREATION
4
AWQKNURD
CORPORATION
345 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55426
TELEX 290 -474 MARKHURO GOVY • TELEPHONE [612) 545 -2583
IN REPLY REFER T0. E -2010 January 28, 1985
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to your request for quotation of January 4, 1985.
Accordingly, we are pleased to present our proposal for aerial
photographic services in Hutchinson, Minnesota. Details of our
proposal are described below.
The mapping program we suggest will first consist of aerial photog-
raphy, a network of basic horizontal and vertical control, and office
aerotriangulation. After this initial part of the mapping program is
completed, topographic mapping can be ordered, with a minimum of
additional vertical picture point control required.
iThis mapping program will assure that all future mapping in
Hutchinson will be on the same horizontal and vertical datums or
reference systems, and will continue the common sheet format and
uniform sheet size and layout you now have. With this program, the
City can order mapping where, and as, needs arise, whether based on
one - eighth section sheets or portions thereof. Our prices are based
on mapping the one - eighth section or portions within.
AREA
The area covered by this proposal consists of the City of Hutchinson
and vicinity, comprising approximately 10,880 acres. For convenient
reference we have indicated our understanding of the area in yellow
on the attached map. Please examine these limits carefully, and
unless changes are indicated on the map returned with the acceptance
copy of this proposal, we will understand that the limits are
correct.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
We will obtain aerial photography suitable for preparation of
two -foot contour mapping as described below. Delivery will consist
0
CORPORATION
City of Hutchinson - January 28, 1985 - page 2 r
of one set of contact prints providing stereoscopic coverage and a
photo index.
BASIC HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORK
It is understood that the City of Hutchinson will provide for the
necessary ground control for mapping.
Our horizontal control requirements will consist of approximately
eight photo identifiable points, for which we will require positions.
These points will be around the perimeter of the City, in the
approximate locations indicated on the attached map with red
triangles.
We will provide a set of aerial photographs indicating the location
and description of the points for which we require horizontal
position. We strongly suggest that all closures be Third Order,
Class I or better.
We suggest the vertical control consist of a network of benchmarks,
established and monumented for future reference. These benchmarks
should be established along roads as needed, and spaced so no point
within the City will be more than approximately one mile away from's
benchmark. Delivery should include a tabulation of all existing
government benchmarks used, new benchmarks, descriptions and
elevations.
Elevations should be based on Mean Sea Level datum (NGVD- 1929), and
all closures should be Third Order or better.
GROUND TARGETS
Prior to our obtaining aerial photography, we suggest you place
targets on the land net corners indicated by us. You may also target
other section corners and existing control monuments for additional
reference points which we will accurately plot on the maps.
We suggest a cross target as follows: each leg will be two feet wide
and five feet long, to yield an overall size of twelve feet across
the target. The target should be white in color and of a material
such as cheesecloth, plastic or wood panels. Hard surface roadways
may be painted with a white cross of the same dimensions.
MARKHUIRD
COPPOAATION
City of Hutchinson - January 28, 1985 - Page 3
BASIC HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL NETWORK AND GROUND TARGETS
OPTION
As an option, MARKHURD can provide this service as described
immediately above.
AEROTRIANGUTATION
The aerial photography and horizontal ground control will be used in
conjunction with aerotriangulation technique to establish a consis-
tent horizontal datum through the City for subsequent topographic
mapping.
VERTICAL PICTURE CONTROL
When topographic mapping of an area is ordered, we will require
vertical picture control. This control will consist of establishing
vertical elevations of approximately four or five photo identifiable
points per half - section. These elevations would be established
from, and tied to the benchmark network described above. Upon each
order, we will furnish a set of aerial photographs indicating the
location and description of the points for which we will require
elevations.
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING AT 1 "-100' SCALE
We will provide topographic maps at a scale of 1" -100' showing
contours at intervals of two feet. In addition to contours, the
maps will show other details to the extent that they are visible and
identifiable on the photography. These details will include roads,
trails, buildings, pipelines, railroads, major fences, drainage
courses, shorelines, swamps, bridges, culverts, driveways, public
sidewalks, utility poles, and individual large trees. Also shown
will be spot elevations, grid lines at 500 -foot intervals repre-
senting the selected coordinate system, survey monuments used in
controlling the maps, as well as feature names for general
orientation. Indications of the public land survey system will be
added if the information is known to us.
Delivery will consist of reproducible positives on stable base
material made from the scribe plotted manuscripts. Sheets will be
laid out to cover eighth- section areas, with a small overlap between
sheets. Unless furnished with specific requirements, we will use
our own judgment in title and border information. Each sheet will
be 18" x 32" in overall size.
•
MARKHURD
CORPORATION
City of Hutchinson - January 28, 1985 - Page 4
MAP ACCURACY AND LIABILITY
By accepting this proposal, you agree the work described herein will
meet your intended purpose. The use of this map for a purpose other
than that which is originally contemplated may render the map
unreliable.
Except where the ground may be obscured, map accuracy will comply
with National Map Accuracy Standards. Briefly, these state that 90%
of all well defined features shall be correct within 1/30 inch, and
90% of all elevations correct within 1/2- contour interval. If areas
are obscured, contours will be dashed to indicate they are
approximate. The accuracy standards should be applied only to the
basic scale and contour interval (1 "=100' with two -foot C.I.) for
which the maps were designed.
MARKHURD's liability, in the production or use of these maps, for any
inaccuracies that may be found in these maps, shall be limited to the
correction of such inaccuracies, and shall not exceed the contract
value of the maps. No representations or warranties are made other
than those stated herein.
PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
It is our understanding the mapping program
separate phases, as follows:
1. Aerial photography and aerotriangulation
the basic horizontal and vertical ground
2. Topographic mapping, in conjunction with
points (with a minimum area per order of
,rill be ordered in
(in conjunction with
control)
vertical picture
one-eighth section).
Delivery times of the materials related to each phase will depend, to
some extent, upon our work load when notice to proceed is received.
However, as a guideline, we estimate that performance and delivery
can be made as follows:
Aerial photography will be obtained during the spring of
1985, as soon as weather and ground conditions permit.
Delivery of contact prints will be made within 30 -45 days
after completion.
Basic horizontal and vertical control network requirements
within 30 days after photography. •
LWARKHURD
CORPORATION
Ah City of Hutchinson - January 28, 1985 - page 5
Vertical picture control requirements within 10 days after
receipt of an order for mapping.
Topographic mapping - delivery on a progressive basis
commencing within 30 days of each order, and upon
completion of both basic and picture control, and final
delivery within 45 -60 days, depending upon size of the
area ordered.
We suggest that a mutually satisfactory delivery schedule be
established for delivery of mapping at the time that an order is
placed.
PAYMENT
Our charge for the services described above will be as follows:
1. Aerial photography $ 700.00 Lump Sum
2. Basic horizontal 6 vertical control (Supplied by City)
3. Basic horizontal and vertical control
and ground targets by MARKHURD 4,000.00 lump sum
4. Aerotriangulation 2,485.00 Lump Sum
5. Vertical picture points (Supplied by City)
6. Topographic mapping
a. Fixed cost per stereoscopic model:
approximately 34 stereoscopic models
$160.00 per model 5,440.00
b. Variable cost per acre based on
1/8- section minimum order:
(1) urban areas $7.20 per acre
approximately 1,520 acres
(land) 10,944.00
(2) rural areas $3.90 per acre
approximately 8;8W acres
. (land) // 3- 4,320.00
CORPORATION
City of Hutchinson - January 28, 1985 - page 6
Unit prices are fixed. The quantity of units is estimated. After
the aerial photography is obtained, we will indicate the urban and
rural areas on the photography.
We will invoice periodically upon completion of the above individual
items. Payment of our invoices will be due within 30 days.
When using ground control supplied by other than our own field
forces, it is our policy to invoice for excess plotter time, if any,
due to erroneous field information. Our charge for this item will
be $30.00 per hour.
Prices quoted herein are valid for a period of 12 months from the
date of this proposal. Prices for services not ordered within this
12 -month period will be subject to review with respect to prevailing
costs effective at that time. This cost will be has nn hP n c,
Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for January 1985.
We appreciate the opportunity of presenting this proposal, and look
forward to being of further service. Your signature on the enclosed
acceptance copy of this proposal will serve as our contract. If you
have any questions, please do not hesita a j,ru ntact us.
ere
Daryl D. Sather
Technical Representative
DDS:PAF
enc.
Proposal accepted for the City of Hutchinson by:
Signature
Title
Date
Items Accept
0
/ (612) 567-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M 0
DATE: February 14th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Letting No. 1, 2, 3 and 5
I recommend awarding the following contracts:
Letting No. 1 - Juul Contracting Company
for Projects 85- 01 -01, 85- 01 -029 85 -01 -04 and 85 -01 -32
in the amount of $101,467.90
Letting No. 2 - Wm. Mueller and Sons
• for Projects 85- 01 -07, 85- 01 -099 85- 01 -11, 85- 01 -122
85- 01 -13, 85 -01 -14 and 85 -01 -15
in the amount of $182,469.25
Letting No. 3 - Atkinson Blacktop, Inc.,
for Projects 85- 01 -16, 85- 01 -17, 85 -01 -18 & 85 -01 -19
in the amount of $216,232.50
Letting No. 3 - Wm. Mueller & Sons
for Project 85 -01 -20
in the amount of $78,442.30
Letting No. 5 - J. W. Hanson Construction Co.
for Projects 85 -01 -26 & 85 -01 -28
in the amount of $18,018.75
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP /pv
• attachments
cc: Cal Rice
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 1
CITY PROJECT NO. 85- 01 -01, 85- 01 -029 85- 01 -04, 85 -01 -32
Resolution No. 7992
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Hassan Street and Hutch Technology Site by the construction of Watermain and
Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the
advertisement:
H B H Construction $222,948.50
Mechanical Division, Inc. =174,143.00
Burschville Construction, Inc. ;165,830.10
Latour, Inc. $154,291.30
Gaub, Inc. $137,373.00
S.J. Louis Construction Company $126,402.00
Juul Contracting Company $101,467.90
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson,
Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson, Minnesota
in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of Hassan Street
and Hutch Technology Site by the construction of Watermain and Sanitary Sewer
and Appurtenances, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved
by the city council and on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Mayor
0
0
City Clerk 0
G
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 2
CITY PROJECT N0. 85- 01 -079 85- 01 -09, 85- 01 -11, 85- 01 -12, 85- 01 -137 85- 01 -14,
85 -01 -15
Resolution No. 7993
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of 6th
Avenue S.E., 7th Avenue S.E., Franklin Street, Glen Street, 3rd Avenue S.W.,
Kouwe Street and Harrington Street by the construction of Grading, Gravel
Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing Surface and Appurtenances, bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
Hardrives, Inc. $218,994.00
Duininck Bros. & Gilchrist $207,972.50
Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. $198,250.50
Wm. Mueller & Sons $182,469.25
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Wm. Mueller & Sons of Hamburg, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with Wm. Mueller and Sons of Hamburg, Minnesota in the
name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of 6th Avenue S.E., 7th
Avenue S.E., Franklin Street, Glen Street, 3rd Avenue S.W., Kouwe Street and
Harrington Street by the construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous
Base, Bituminous Wearing Surface and Appurtenances, according to the plans and
specifications therefor approved by the city council and on file in the office
of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this 26th day of February, 1985.
City Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 3
CITY PROJECT N0. 85- 01 -16, 85- 01 -179 85- 01 -18, 85 -01 -19
Resolution No. 7994
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of 7th
Avenue N.W., Rolling Oaks Lane, Oakwood Lane and School Road by the
construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing
Surface and Appurtenances, bids were received, opened and tabulated according
to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Hardrives, Inc. $245,120.90
Duininck Bros. & Gilchrist $2393215.80
Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. $228,518.25
Wm. Mueller 8 Sons $216,292.00
Atkinson Blacktop, Inc. $216,232.50
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Atkinson Blacktop, Inc. of Litchfield,
Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with Atkinson Blacktop, Inc. of Litchfield, Minnesota in
the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of 7th Avenue N.W.,
Rolling Oaks Lane, Oakwood Lane and School Road by the construction of
Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing Surface and
Appurtenances, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by
the city council and on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Mayor
City Clerk
0
�1
U
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 3
• CITY PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -20
Resolution No. 7995
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of 5th
Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Adams Street by the construction of Grading,
Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing Surface and Appurtenances,
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following
bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Duininck Bros. & Gilchrist $85,581.80
Hardrives, Inc. $84,053.60
Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. ;78,945.00
Wm. Mueller A Sons $78,442.30
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Wm. Mueller & Sons of Hamburg, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with Wm. Mueller & Sons of Hamburg, Minnesota in the
Sname of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of 5th Avenue S.E. from
Main Street to Adams Street by the construction of Grading, Gravel Base,
Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing Surface and Appurtenances, according to
the plans and specifications therefor approved by the city council and on file
in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this 26th day of February, 1985.
City Clerk
is
Mayor
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 5 .
CITY PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -26 & 85 -01 -28
Resolution No. 7996
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
McDonald Drive in Clouse Addition and School Road in Helland's Fifth Addition
and Walnut Street and Hillcrest Road in +tae's Bluff Addition by the
construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wearing
Surface and Appurtenances, bids were received, opened and tabulated according
to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Hardrives, Inc. $37,438.00
Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. #28,898.20
J. W. Hanson Construction Company $27,893.75
AND WHEREAS, it appears that J. W. Hanson Construction Company of
Hutchinson, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with J. W. Hanson Construction Company of Hutchinson,
Minnesota in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of
McDonald Drive in Clouse Addition and School Road in Helland's Fifth Addition
by the construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous
Wearing Surface and Appurtenances, according to the plans and specifications
therefor approved by the city council and on file in the office of the city
clerk. Project 85- 01 -34, Walnut Street and Hillcrest Road in Mae's Bluff
Addition has been deleted, as per Council action at the Assessment Hearing on
January 22nd, 1985, which decreases the bid amount to $18,018.75.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Mayor
City Clerk
0
i 6721 ! 27L' -2?"
_•,` 3,' WASHINGTON AVENUE WELT
NUTCHINSON, MINN- 55350
Ni E N1 0 R A N D U M
DATE: February.• =6, 1985
T0: Mavor $ City Council _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FROM: Water Billing Technician _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
SUBJcCT: Delinquent [Dater Accounts _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _
A list of delinquent t:atcr accqunts foilow<z. recommend
water service be discontinued on Monday, Mar- 4, 1985
at 12:00 Noon.
0
3 -870- 0400 -071
Debbie Holmquist
400 Shady Ridge Road
Hutchinson, MN 55350
69.51 (continu--_1
r
3- 015 - 0421 -081
John Marvan-
421 First Ave.
Hutchinson MN
421 First Ave.
68.36
3 -130- 0136 -041
Miles Willhite
136 11th Ave.
Hutchinson Mn
136 11th Ave.
97.58
3- 040 - 0271 -082
Ole Olson
S.E. 1016 Oakland Ave.
55350 Albert Lea MN 56007
SE 271 Third Ave. NW
101.91
3- 210 - 0346 -031
William Lueck
NE 346 Adams Street
55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
NE 346 Adams Street
103.29
3 -250- 0607 -081
Ronnie Telecky
607 Bluff Street
Hutchinson Mn 55350
607 Bluff Street
100.85
3- 535 -0215 -091
Don Kramer
215 Huron St. S.
Hutchinson MN
215 Huron St. S.
66.36
3- 320- 0555 -061
B. Dobberstein
555 Clark St.
Hutchinson MN 55350
555 Clark St.
78.84
promises to pay 3/1/85
3- 680 - 0441 -082
Wally Teich
Box 605
55350 Hutchinson Mn 55350
441 Main St. North
50.78
cc: Ron McGraw
Citizens Bank Bldg.
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 735 - 0510 -091
Roger Voss
510 Monroe Street
Hutchinson Mn 55350
510 Monroe Street
67.07
3- 775 - 1204 -091
Al Klammer
1204 Oakwood Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
1204 Oakwood Lane
31.28
3- 735 - 0566 -021
Lynette Miller
566 Monroe Street
Hutchinson MN 55350
566 Monroe Street
56.62
Promises to pay 2/28/85
3- 800 -0575 -012
Rodney Markgraf
575 Peterson Circle
Hutchinson MN 55350
575 Peterson Circle
105.72
3 -045 -0425 -081
Richard Sturges
425 Third Ave. SE •
Hutchinson MN 55350
425 Third Ave.
68.29
cc: Knutson Mtg. Fin. Corp
17 Washington Ave. N.
Mpls. MN 55401
3- 210 -0506 -092
Darol Wylie
506 Adams Street
Hutchinson MN 55350
506 Adams Street South
94.02
Promises to pay 3/1/85
420
Hut
420
40- 0420 -051
I.
etj,oa Street
55350'
eticut reet
3- 680 -0480-
War n Eks
480 M t
j� 00 tch on
0 ain t
North
Mn 55350
North r p i
3- 735 - 0590 -021
Gerald Elliot
590 Monroe Street
Hutchinson Mn 55350
590 Monroe Street
98.86
3- 870 -0355 -023
Mike Goede
355 Shady Ridge Road
Hutchinson MN 55350
355 Shady Ridge Road
48.41
0'
(61 Z) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M 0
DATE: February 14th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Project 85 -01 -36
Plans and specifications have been completed for the above - referenced project
on Carlisle Street. I recommend approval and calling for bids as per the
attached resolutions.
0
MVP /pv
attachments
cc: Cal Rice
0
7AI, �i.,�
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 9
CITY PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -36
Resolution No. 7989
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on January 22nd,
1985, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of Carlisle Street by the construction of Grading, Gravel Base and
Appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the council
for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at •
2 :00 P.M. on March 28th, 1985, in the council chambers of the city hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of Februay, 1985.
Mayor
Clerk
0
612) 587 -5151 - - - -- - _ - -- -
i
tivrcH ;' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
✓r �.NrNG TON .a �n :_.,ti
MAN
M E M 0
DATE: February 14th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Letting No. 7
Project 85 -01 -24
Plans and specifications have been completed for the above - referenced project,
overlay improvement. I recommend approval and calling for bids as per the
attached resolutions.
0
MVP /pv
attachments
cc: Cal Rice
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 7
CITY PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -24
Resolution No. 7990
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on December 11th,
1984, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of Peterson Circle, Ash St., Spruce St., Northwoods Ave., Maple
St., Oak St., 10th Ave. N.E., Alan St., Circle Drive, Harrington St.,
Milwaukee Ave., Water St., 9th Ave. N.E., Lea Ave., Lewis Ave., Bradford St. &
Lyndale Ave. by the construction of Bituminous Wearing Surface and
Appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the council
for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The .
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at
2 :00 P.M. on March 28th, 1985, in the council chambers of the city hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashiers check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of Februay, 1985.
Mayor
Clerk
0
1110)9 y
MINUTES 1110)9 41014? 1AiFO
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION �Y A,�
. MONDAY, FEBRUARY 189 1985 '' /WI/O
N
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to
order by Chairman Larry Homo at 7:30 p.m., with the following members
present: Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young, Roland Ebent, Don Erickson, Tom
Lyke, Shu -Mei Hwang and Chairman Romo. Members absent: None. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Building Official Homer
Pittman, Fire Marshal George Field and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting, dated Tuesday, January 15, 1985,
were approved as presented upon a motion by Mr. Torgerson. Seconded by
Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONTINUATION OF REZONING REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY ROBERT HORNICK
(C -2)
Chairman Romo reconvened the hearing at 7:30 p.m. with the reading
of publication 43361 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is to rezone property
located at 29 4th Ave. N.W. and a portion of the lot located at 402
Main St. North, from R -2 to C -2 for the purpose of providing a
parking lot to the adjoining Gas Hutch. Mr. Hornick also proposes
some upgrading and expansion of the present station.
There was no one present regarding the request. As there had been
no change from an earlier request which the Planning Commission had
recommended be rejected, it was the consensus of the Commission to
proceed. Dr. Lyke made a motion to close the public hearing at 7:32
p.m. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City Council that the
rezoning as requested be rejected. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the
motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONTINUATION OF REZONING REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY ROBERT HORNICK
(IC -1)
Chairman Romo reconvened the hearing at 7:32 p.m. with the reading
of publication 43364 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 3, 1985. The request is to rezone property
lcoated at 35 4th Ave. N.W. from R -2 to IC -1.
There was no one present regarding the request. In discussion at
the previous hearing, it was determined that zoning this one lot
IC -1 would be spot zoning, and the Planning Commission would prefer
to consider IC -1 zoning for both areas. Mr. Torgerson made a
motion to close the hearing at 7:35 p.m. Seconded by Mrs. Young,
q- d- - /,//
the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend to City Council that the request be rejected. Seconded
by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT MCGEE •
Chairman Romo opened the hearing at 7 :35 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3378 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, February 7, 1985. The request is for a 7.81 variance to
allow the construction of a proposed upper level onto an existing
basement foundation, with an attached 18' by 25' garage and a
front porch, 8' from the frontyard property line, on property
located at 173 5th Ave. N.E. It was determined that the average
frontyard setback for that area is 15.81.
City Administrator Plotz stated that the Planning Commission had
previously approved a sideyard variance for the same structure. At
the time of that request, the survey did not show the garage
extending to the front or the front porch. When staff was made
aware of those plans, it was determined another variance is
required.
Mr. Robert McGee was present to explain the request. He raised a
question about the necessity of the variance. There was discussion
about whether or not the "street line" was to be used or the
"property line ". Building Official Pittman maintained that the
variance was necessary because of the the average setbacks of the
surrounding homes. It was also noted that there was an unusually
long boulevard in this area - 22'. Mr. Ebent raised a question 0
about adequate parking. It was decided parking was available.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing
at 7:44 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried
unanimously. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the variance as requested. Seconded by Mr.
Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BY FARID
CURRIMBHOY (MONTESSORI SCHOOL /DAY CARE CENTER)
Chairman Romo opened the heairng at 7:45 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3379 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, February 7, 1985. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the operation of a Montessori School /Day Care
Center in the lower level of a proposed duplex on property located
at 504 East Highland Drive in an R -2 zone.
City Administrator Plotz explained that this was similar to the
request considered at the January meeting, but was for a different
location. He also noted that the new plan had one less classroom
so less parking was required.
Mr. Farid Currimbhoy was present to state that 'e had spoke^ to the
neighboring property owners and their only request was for a "slow" •
traffic sign to be erected to protect neighborhood children as well
2
as those who might be attending the school. He further explained
that after the project received City approval, it must still be
approved by the Department of Human Services.
Mrs. Lyle Emme, 524 Highland Park Drive, stated that as neighbors,
they would have no objection to the proposed school /day care
operation.
Mr. Ebent asked about the difference between a nursery school and a
day care center regarding "home occupation" and what is allowed by
our ordinance. City Attorney Schaefer responded that "home
occupation" is defined as something that is "incidental to the
residence and occupies a certain percentage (25x)." He further
stated that as this proposal is for the lower level to be occupied
as a nursery school and the upper level a home, it was not
incidental to the residence. Nursery schools and day care
operations are required to meet the same safety requirements by the
State. A difference is that the nursery school may require more
certified personnel.
After discussion, Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing
at 7: 50 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried
unanimously. Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the conditional use permit as requested.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE #4669 SECTION
4.25
Chairman Romo opened the hearing at 7:55 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3380 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, February 79 1985. The proposal is to amend Subdivision
Ordinance 41466 Section 4.259 to increase the numbers of days al-
lowed before a final plat must be filed with the register of deeds
after it has been approved by City Council.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing at 7 :57
p.m. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of
changing the 90 days to 270 days as proposed. Seconded by Mr.
Ebent, the motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) REVIEW OF SITE PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR REZONING REQUESTS
Mr. Gunnar Isberg, Planning Consultant from Northfield Minnesota,
presented alternative approaches for requiring site plans as part
of the development process as it relates to rezoning. He
supplemented his presentation with written handouts detailing the
alternatives and answered questions of those in attendance.
After the discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission that
they would like to study the alternatives as presented before
making a recommendation to the City Council.
3
5.
6.
NEW BUSINESS
(a) ELECTION OF OFFICERS 40
Chairman Larry Romo nominated Mr. Roland Ebent as Chairman,
Mr. Shu -Mei Hwang as Vice- Chairman and Mrs. Elsa Young as Secretary
of the Planning Commission for 1985. Dr. Lyke made a motion that
nominations be closed. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried
unanimously. Dr. Lyke made a motion that the board cast a
unanimous vote for the ballot as presented. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Erickson, and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "HASSAN HEIGHTS"
(Within two mile radius of City)
City Administrator Plotz explained that as requested by the
Director of Engineering, the City had recently been requiring
official word from the Town Board where the proposed plat is
located before taking any action. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
continue this request until the next regular meeting of the
Planning Commission. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to adjourn
the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried
unanimously.
4
11
(612) 587 -5151
!HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: February 19, 1985
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning as Submitted by Robert Hornick (C -2)
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C49 of Zoning Ordinance No. 4649 the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning.
HISTORY
On December 30, 1984, Mr. Robert Hornick submitted a request to rezone
the W 112 of Lot 11 in Block 12, N 112 City, and of a portion of Lot 12
in Block 12 N 1129 City, from R -2 (Multiple Family Residence District)
to C-2 (Automotive Service District). A public hearing was held at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1985.
Attorney Roger Gilmer, representing Mr. Hornick was present to request
that the hearing be continued. There being no objection, the Planning
Commission continued the hearing until February 18. At the continued
hearing, there was no one present regarding the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the request has not
changed from a former request made by Mr. Hornick that had been
recommended to be rejected, based upon neighborhood residents' objections.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
requested be rejected.
Respectfully -- sub --itted,
rf
rry Romo, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
N fD. f tl 01f
2
AU ITOR'S P AT OF BL CK "�•
16 Iy ;
146 r4
13 r fa+a
lat
7
►, sus
N as
o .W
Thy
x Ld
a u ..
f-
h 2,•E �i
eu
Im 7 y 4 N 3441
CD
6 1 •n, %o a Y y Z 0 fn 4 w i Q 7 3 12 1 2
,, V
. won
'• - '
iFi T • � ��'�.J z
$22 Z-
S
10 9 D `
SAY Air sr r 49,
NORTHWEST
1]
0
LJ
q� ,I,, ci� E
(612) 587 -5151
HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
- HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: February 19, 1985
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning as Submitted by Robert Hornick (IC -1)
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C49 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning.
HISTORY
On December 30, 1984, Mr. Robert Hornick submitted a request to rezone the E
112 of Lot 10 in Block 12, N 112 City, from $- -2 (Multiple Family Residence District) to
Ah IC- 1(Industrial Commercial District} A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1985. Attorney
Roger Gilmer, representing Mr. Hornick was present to request that the hearing
be continued. There being no objection, the Planning Commission continued the
hearing until February 18. At the continued hearing, there was no one present
regarding the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1985.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that zoning just the
one lot would be spot zoning, and would not be appopriate as requested.
RECO,kLMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
requested be rejected.
Respectfully subm -itted,
✓ rry /Romo, Chairnan
Hutchinson Planning Commission
(612) 587 -5151
JWJ37 ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Variance as Requested by Robert McGee
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 4649 the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
HISTORY
On January 30, 1985, Mr. Robert McGee submitted application for a 7.8'
variance to allow the construction of a house with an attached garage and
front porch that are proposed to be 8' from the front yard property line, on
property located at 173 5th Ave. N.E. It was determined that the variance is
necessary because the average front yard setback for this area is 15.81.
A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
Monday, February 18, 1985, at which time there was no one present who objected
to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, February 79 1985.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned request for a variance be granted.
Respectful }y submitted,
/ arry Romo, Chair=!..
�Alutchinson Planni ^g :� =isson
•
!� s
7 N-
V �
Q i°
I rV
,e
Py o
v
h�oQ Q4
o Denotes iron monument
I y
n, 2 r M1
Z2 N p�V,
Ty
4y-O Fw_
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ROBERT MCGE£
I herepy certify that in.$ earvq, plan or report was prepared by me or Yoder
my direct supervision and that 1 am o duly Ucensed Lord Surveyor under
the lows of the Slats of Minnssolo.
ppt� October 25, 1984 License ho. 9626
*I
LOT 5, BRIGGS ADDITION
Scale 1" ' 2820 File No. 184t76
Book NTPO 26 Page 35
Honsen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
Lone Surveyors •Consuw nq Enq,neen-Slre Planners .
HUTC4INSON, MN. Tel. 587.4789
RESOLUTION NO. 7988
. RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE UNDER SECTION 6.05, B.3 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ATTACHED DOUBLE GARAGE AND A FRONT PORCH 8' FROM THE FRONTYARD PROPERTY LINE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Robert McGee of Hutchinson has applied for a variance from
Section 7.07 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 for a variance of 7.8' to
allow the construction of an attached 18' by 25' garage and a front
porch, 8' from the frontyard line on the property located at 173 Fifth
Avenue N.E., with the following legal description:
Lot 5, Briggs Addition, City of Hutchinson
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a
variance and has recommended to the City Council that the application be
granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the
Spublic safety, and the values of property in the surrounding area and the
effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
•
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adja-
cent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to
the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply
generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is
located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demon-
strable hardship or difficulty.
9- F
RESOLUTION No. 7986
Page 2
CONCLUSION
The application for variance for the purpose designated is granted based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of February, 1985.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
0
E
(612) 587 -5151
HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Farid Currimbhoy
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
HISTORY
On January 30, 1985, Mr. Farid Currimbhoy submitted an application for a
conditional use permit to allow the operation of a Montessori School /Day Care
Center in the lower level of a proposed duplex on property located on East
Highland Drive. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission on Monday, February-18, 1985, at which time there was no
one present who stated their objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, February 7, 1985.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned request for a conditional use permit be granted.
Respectfully'submitted,
harry '__Romo, Chairman
Hutchinson °_arming Commissoa
i
q- Q_'
RESOLUTION NO. 7987
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER .
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MONTESSORI SCHOOL /DAY CARE CENTER IN THE
LOWER LEVEL OF A PROPOSED DUPLEX ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN AN R -2 ZONE
HE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Farid Currimbhoy of Hutchinson has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.03 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 464 to allow the operation of a Montessori School /Day Care Center in
the lower level of a proposed duplex on property located in an R -2 zone
on East Highland Drive, with the following legal description:
Lot One (14), except the South 22' thereof, of Ahrens' Highland Park
Subdivision, City of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and
welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding
area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detri-
mental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it
cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the gener-
al purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is
granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
•
7
idr
0
Sr,tr1G6 og;vG
0
0
t
W
6VI
FEW
(612) 587 -5151
JWJHUTCHINSON, CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance #466 Section 4.25
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C1, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for an amendment to the
Subdivision Ordinance.
HISTORY
During the course of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
January 15, 1985, City Attorney Schaefer proposed increasing the number of
days allowed between the approval of a final plat and when it has to be
recorded with the Register of Deeds. A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Monday, February 189 1985, at which time
there was no one present who objected to the request. Staff recommended the
that "90" days be increased to "270" days.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the subdivision ordinance
have been comp Lied with.
2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, February 7,
1985.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned request for an amendment to the subdivision ordinance be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
Larry Romo, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
0
G- N�
� ! (612) 587 -5151
Har�H i CITY OF HUTCHINSON
? 4SN1NGTON a VENUE rVEST
MAN 55350
M E M 0
DATE: February 20th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Building Official /Zoning Enforcement Officer
RE: Parking Lot Surfacing and Drainage at Civic Arena and
New Recreation Building
According to City Ordinance, Section 10.01, Off Street Parking and Loading
Facilities, Subsection I. Parking lots are required to have all weather
surfacing and be designed as specified, also showing drainage and interior
catch basins, or an alternate design approved by the City Engineer. This
approval must be done prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
At the present time, we have no plans showing what is to be done with the
surfacing and the interior drainage.
My question is, what is going to be done with the parking lot? This problem
will have to be resolved before a permit can be issued.
HP /pv
cc: John McRaith
Acting Parks & Rec. Director
0
i
Homer Pittman
Bldg. Official /Zoning Enforcement
Officer
(612) 587 -5151
HUICH CITY Y OF HUTCHINSON
i 37 WASMNG SON' A, vENU� W L T
,'4UTC, I41NSON, ^V"NN_ 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 21, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------ - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Overtime and Compensation Time
------------------------ - - - - --
As per your request at the February 12 Council meeting, I provide the
following information.
The policy on compensatory time is in Section 9 of the Employee Handbook,
Personnel Policy. See the attached section.
HOURLY EMPLOYEES
The maximum banking of overtime is 80 hours, rather than receiving over-
time pay. Compensatory time must be used within 12 months from the time
it is earned. This is established by time sheets.
SALARIED EMPLOYEES
The policy on salaried employees is: "Earned time off shall accrue for
not more than 12 months and shall be used in blocks of 40 hours."
The various Councils, going back to D. J. Black's term as Mayor, have relied
upon the individual honesty of the employee on whether or not the employee
is taking proper comp. time.
/ms
Attachment
9- _P4_J
SEC. 6. RECORDS AMD PROMOTIONS. ADEQUATE PERSONNAL AND
SERVICE RECORDS SWILL BE KEPT FOR EVERY EMPLOYEE IN ORDER THAT
RECORDED DATA MAY SERVE AS A BASIS FOR THE APPRAISAL OF
MERIT AND EFFICIENCY. PROMOTIONS WILL BE MADE ON THE BASIS
OF MERIT AND EFFICIENCY, IT IS THE POLICY OF THE CITY TO
PROMOTE EXISTING QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES WHERE POSSIBLE IN
ORDER TO FILL VACANCIES.
SEC. 7. COMPENSATION. ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY SHALL
BE COMPENSATED ACCORDING TO TIME POSITION CLASSIFICATION AND
PAY PLAN ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT
AFTER RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEPARTMENT HEAD AND CITY
ADMINISTRATOR, THE COUNCIL MAY CHANGE OR MODIFY ANY WAGES
OR SALARY OF ANY EMPLOYEE AT ANY TIME THAT IT DEEMS IT
NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF GOOD PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION.
THE COUNCIL SHALL CAUSE TO BE MADE PERIODIC EVALUATIONS
OF SALARY SCALES AND FRINGE BENEFITS TO ASSURE EQUITABLE
COMPENSATION.
ANY WAGE OR SALARY SO ESTABLISHED IS THE TOTAL REMUNERATION
FOR EMPLOYMENT, BUT SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS REIMBURSEMENT
FOR OFFICIAL TRAVEL OR OTHER EXPENSES WHICH MAY BE ALLOWED
FOR THE CONDUCT OF OFFICIAL BUSINESS. UNLESS APPROVED BY
THE COUNCIL, NO EMPLOYEE SHALL RECEIVE PAY FROM THE CITY
IN ADDITION TO THE SALARY AUTHORIZED FOR THE POSITION TO
WHICH HE HAS BEEN APPOINTED. THIS SHALL NOT OPERATE TO
PREVENT EMPLOYEES FROM WORKING IN MORE THAN ONE POSITION
WHEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COUNCIL.
SEC. S. HOURS OF WORK, THE WORK WEEK AND WORK DAY FOR
ALL CITY EMPLOYEES SHALL BE AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT
HEAD AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. THE WORK SCHEDULE SHALL
FAIRLY REFLECT THE DEMANDS AND APPORTION THE WORK OF EACH
DEPARTMENT OR ACTIVITY. THE REGULAR WORK SCHEDULE SHALL
-4-
CON ORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE MINNESOTA FAIR LABOR STANDARDS
ACT. THE NORMAL WORK YEAR CONSISTS OF 2080 HOURS FOR FULLTIME
EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING ALL AUTHORIZED ABSENCES,
I,
i SEC. 9. OVERTIME, EMPLOYEES TO WHOM THE MINNESOTA FAIR
i LABOR STANDARDS ACT (MFSLA) APPLIES SHALL BE COMPENSATED AT A
RATE OF TIME- AND-ONE-HALF AFTER 48 HOURS IN ONE WEEK OR AFTER
* 80 HOURS IN A TWO WEEK PAY PERIOD. IN THE CASE OF FULL TIME
CITY EMPLOYEES WHO ALSO SERVE ON A PART TIME BASIS IN THE POLICE
OR FIRE DEPARTMENTS, THE HOURS WORKED IN THE PART LIME POSITIONS
SHALL BE PAID AT THE RATE ASSIGNED TO SUCH POSITIONS. OVERTIME
i
RATES SHALL NOT APPLY TO THIS PART TIME POLICE OR FIRE DEPARTMENT
SERVICE. AS AGREEABLE WITH THE MFSLA.
EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE MFSLA AND PAID ON AN HOURLY BASIS
I SHALL BE PERMITTED THE OPTION OF BANKING OVERTIME HOURS UP TO
A MAXIMUM OF k HOURS, RATHER THAN RECEIVING OVERTIME PAY.
COMPENSATORY TIME FOR THESE EMPLOYEES MUST BE USED NO MORE THAN
TWELVE MONTHS FROM THE TIME IT IS EARNED. EMPLOYEES SHALL GIVE
ADVANCE NOTICE TO THE DEPARTMENT HEAD OF DESIRED DATES FOR USE
OF COMPENSATORY TIME, AND THE DEPARTMENT HEAD SHALL DETERMINE
WHETHER REQUESTED DATES ALLOW FOR REASONABLE SCHEDULING OF WORK
WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT. COMPENSATORY TIME MAY BE USED TO BRING
TOTAL PAID HOURS ONLY UP TO SO IN A PAY PERIOD.
SALARIED EMPLOYEES EXEMPT FROM THE MFSLA SHALL ARRANGE THEIR
WORK SCHEDULES ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
POSITIONS; FLEXIBLE WORK HOURS ARE ALLOWED. EARNED TIME OFF SHALL
1r ACCRUE FOR NOT MORE THAN TWELVE MONTHS AND SHALL CE USED IN
BLOCKS NOT TO EXCEED 40 FOURS,
i
SEC. 10. PAY DAY 4. PAY PERIODS SHALL END 81- WEEKLY
ON SATURDAYS. PAY DAYS SHALL BE BIWEEKLY ON FRIDAYS FOLLOWING
THE END OF THE PAY PERIOD. WHEN A PAY DAY FALLS ON A HOLIDAY,
EMPLOYEES SHALL RECEIVE THEIR PAY THE PRECEDING WORK DAY.
-5-
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: —August 301 1979 — — —
TO: —Salaried Employees
— ---------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Time Sheets and Compensatory Time
As a result of discussions of compensatory time at the Council /Department
Head meeting of August 23, 1979, Mayor Black has informed Hazel Sitz and
me of the following City Council desires.
Salaried employees will be on a "honor" system.of taking compensatory time.
There no longer will be a recording of compensatory time on pay checks and
no longer a need for turning in time sheets.
An employee, if he or she desires, may keep track of his /her own time on a
voluntary basis.
/ms
40
0
0
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Vb
c
M E M 0
DATE: February 14th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Project 85 -01 -38
To provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service to Larry Bethke's PUD
and grade and gravel School Road and Eighth Avenue N.W. to one of the
entrances to his PUD, I have completed the Engineer's Cost Estimate, a copy of
which is attached.
To proceed with this work, the following resolutions will have to be approved:
Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report on the Improvement
Resolution Receiving Report and Calling Hearing on the Improvement
MVP /pv
attachments
cc: Cal Rice
i
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
�y
f E
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -38
Resolution No. 7985
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve School Road from Carolina Avenue to
Eighth Avenue and Eighth Avenue from School Road to 250' West by the
construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading and Gravel
Base and Appurtenances and to assess the benefited property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 1429,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred to Marlow V. Priebe for study
and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed
advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed
improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed
or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the
improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Mayor
Clerk
0
0
0
9
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
DATE: February 13th, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading and Gravel Base
Improvement Project
Gentlemen:
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is
feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a
hearing be held on the 26th day of March, 1985.
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -38 - Improvement of School Road from Carolina Avenue to
Eighth Avenue and Eighth Avenue from School Road to 250' West by Sanitary
Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading and Gravel Base.
Construction Cost
iEngineering
Fiscal and Miscellaneous
Land Acquisition
Capitalized Interest
TOTAL---------- --- - --- --
Assessable Cost
Deferred Assessable Cost
City Cost
0
MVP /pv
48,100.00
3p283-00
3,283.00
.00
3,752.00
-- - - - - - 58,418.00
58,418.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL-------------------------- - - - - -- 58,418.00
Respectfully submitted,
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -38
RESOLUTION NO. 7986
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted February 26th,
1985, a report has been prepared by Marlow V. Priebe with reference to the
improvement of School Road from Carolina Avenue to Eighth Avenue and Eighth
Avenue from School Road to 2501 West by the construction of Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading and Gravel Base and Appurtenances, and this
report was received by the council on February 26th, 1985.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in
accordance with the report and the assessment of benefited property for all or
a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $58,418.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the
26th day of March, 1985, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8 :00 P.M.
and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and
improvement as required by law.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of February, 1985.
Mayor
Clerk
11
0
r]
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5th, 1985, and on
Tuesday, March 12th, 1985.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -38
PUBLICATION NO. 3386
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8 :00 P.H. on the 26th
day of March, 1985, to consider the making of an improvement on School Road
from Carolina Avenue to Eighth Avenue and Eighth Avenue from School Road to
2501 West by the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer,
Grading and Appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to
429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the
benefited property. The estimated cost of such improvement is $58,418.00.
. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement
will be heard at this meeting.
•
City Clerk
Dated: February 27th, 1985
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
µ
0
0
•
It
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WATER & SEWER FUND
*Hutchinson Telephone
*State Treasurer
*Commissioner of Revenue
Hughie Jerry
Kaman Bearing
Mn. Pollution Control Agency
Continental Safety Equipment
Lakeland Equipment
Crow Chemical
Cash Drawer $4
Curtin Scientific
Firemans Fund Schools Ins.
Juul Contracting
Logis
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
Mn. Valley Testing
Nalco Chemical Co.
Oxford Chemicals
Quades
St. Treasurer
U.S. Postmaster
Water Products Co.
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*State Treasurer
AMI Prod. Corp.
Glencoe Motors
Jerrys Transmision Service
Kelsby Roberts
Snap on Tools Corp.
Firemans Fund Schools Ins.
Jims Auto Salvage
LaHass Mfg. $ Sales
MTI Dist.
Mn. Mutual Ins.
Thomas Patco Co.
St. Treasurer
Town F Country Tire
Wigen Chev. Co.
phone service
Soc. Security
sales tax for January
%steel toed shoes
supplies
registration fee
supplies
parts
chemicals
cash expenses
chemicals
Feb. LTD ins.
water line repairs
computer charges
March life ins.
testing
chemicals
chemicals
repairs
PERA
14� STAMPS
meter parts
soc. security
repairs & supplies
parts
repairs
parts
equipment
Feb. LTD ins.
parts
parts
parts
March life ins.
supplies
PERA
repairs
parts
February 26, 1985
$151.34
732.49
695.90
21.97
361.84
45.00
103.50
136.87
90.00
4.86
20.24
47.68
515.50
386.29
44.33
274.60
7533.00
86.64
743.68
237.82
42.00
20.32
$12,345.87
$ 117.08
294.59
51.00
877.77
107.00
725.00
6.60
20.00
59.11
10.29
6.20
198.14
35.91
26.00
61.92
$ 2,596.52
// - 6t,
J
Y '
1
-2
GENERAL FUND
*Government Training Service
registration fees
$140.00
*Mn. State Treasurer
snowmobile reg. fees
145.00
*Mn. State Treasurer
boat registration fees
104.00
*Hutchinson Telephone Co.
phone service
2086.83
*State Treasurer
social security
6141.44
*Mn. State Treasurer
registration fees
72.00
*Commissioner of Revenue
arena sales tax
512.00
Communication Auditors
repairs $ supplies
115.70
Stewart Sandwiches
supplies
31.70
Clarence Schmidt
refund of permit fee
40.00
Anderson Interiors
supplies
43.49
B & F Investments
library rental
1200.00
Carols Cafe
prisoner board
41.95
Gunnar Isberg $ Associates
work task reviews
320.00
Federal Signal Corp.
equipment
39.80
Fire Engineering
subscription
14.95
Liberty Systems Inc.
copy paper
147.27
Mid Central FIre Inc.
parts
378.83
Midland Lines INc.
%freight $ tickets
8.20
Metropolitan Fire Equipment
equipment
43.22
National Police Supply
supplies
20.00
Specialty Screening
emblems
126.50
Marks TV Service
repairs
20.00
E =Z Sharp Inc.
parts
37.48
Old Log Theatre
tickets
92.00
GP Technologies
repair
7.95
Jim Weckman
-element
%gas pumped
10.52
Fire Marshals Assn of Mn.
dues
10.00
Fire Marshals Assn of Mn.
reservation fee
8.00
Elsie Mae Jensen
organ music
30.00
Amoco Oil Co.
gasoline
18.15
Brads Body Shop
repairs
107.70
Cash Drawer #4
cash expenses
44.93
Coast to Coast
supplies
25.43
Copy Equipment
supplies
33.80
Crow River Glass Co.
alum.plates
100.00
Erickson & Templin
snow removal
1657.00
Firemans Fund Schools Inc.
Feb. LTD ins.
605.26
Floor Care Supply
repairs $ supplies
148.69
GTC Auto parts
supplies
15.88
Fitzloff Hardware
supplies
22.99
Gopher Sign Co.
signs
122.33
Hutch Cennex
gasoline
543.24
Hutch Drug
supplies
15.92
Hutch Wholesale
supplies
52.82
HUTCH Fire $ Safety
supplies
89.50
ICMA Retirement
empoyer contribution
148.37
School Dist. 423
custodial fee
449.55
•Ind.
Joes Sport Shop
trophies
503.00
K Mart
calculator
49.97
Logis
computer charges
3021.43
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
March life ins.
461.81
Marco Business Products
typewriter repair
60.88
-3-
Morton Salt
chemicals
$691.36
Mikes Pro Shop
jackets
128.00
Pitney Bowes
tape
27.30
Peterson Bus Service
coach rental
180.00
Quades
repairs & supplies
529.02
R & R Specialties
equipment repairs
49.90
State Treasurer
PERA
3753.26
James Schaefer
last half Feb.comp.
962.50
James Schaefer
legal services
690.00
United Bldg. Centers
supplies
66.75
U. of Mn.
registration fees
80.00
U. of Mn.
registration fees
40.00
n
LJ
$ 27,395.57
BOND FUNDS
1981 Parking Bonds
Bennie Carlson contract payment $669.30
BOnds of 1976
Ronald Hansen refund of assessments pd. $1948.96
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
Ed Phillips $ Sons
wine & liquor
$4329.28
Griggs Cooper & Co.
wine $ liquor
2549.20
Quality Wine $ Spirits
wine $ liquor
2371.53
Twin City Wine Co.
wine $ liquor
2773.51
Twin City Wine Co.
wine & liquor
2453.69
Quality Wine $ Spirits
wine $ liquor
354.78
Griggs Cooper $ Co.
wine & liquor
2167.33
Ed Phillips $ Sons
wine $ liquor
1539.88
Hutch Leader
ads
214.00
Chamber of Commerce
dues
273.00
Mn. Police Chief
advertising
100.00
Service Sales Corp.
labels
242.10
Triple G
beer
6613.70
City of Hutchinson
payroll
4208.05
State Treasurer
pera
172.78
State Treasurer
social security
542.55
Hutch Utilities
electric & gas
848.93
Henrys Candy Co.
cigarettes
320.71
Hutch Leader
help wanted
8.80
Junker Sanitation
refuse charges
97.50
Commission of Revenue
sales tax
6249.34
State Treasurer
pera
163.36
$ 38,594.02
- C. F. Ne mitz' Sons
Manufacturers of Pure Paint
Paint Wallpaper Glass
Telephone (612) 587 -2555
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 ,1611 ts��0����
FEBI?v -4R y I I9S
J FFa leas Cq
�
C 17-Y o f flv%zE//N 2
SOw -- b
s�£2l 1606
7'714e,e
M IS vNAF-RS7A1lAI.oVG 8Y 7Wr
O F %// -F A GR,r t MA&7` I IA Dt 4
Y "R AGD 9E64R,O I;V6 XppeOY
fo 9L o�
771,E P1R ieiv,
r n�
AR
I'P K 6 ss
rNCLvA1�16
� y P
P �GP,�eTy,gvd
Pia
Tw E
�ZOC, KS rn/ PJACZ vV114Rt 7-//4 c,
WevLb 5774tRW/09& 114 V PvTA C411tB
CA 7- Y CYAR(5,F 72o &9) _77it cl rr P;b
77W
F
G. F. Ne mitz' So'
0 6!
k
Manufacturers of Pure Paint /*/O
Paint Wallpaper Glass RAA
Telephone (612) 587 -2555 /9� /OA'
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 ''YY
'610 R T rh(2r¢ IF 'T_Wr A P.9,p ,r,7-
%01-1<9 AND ovRS,&.L vzg Woe,L p
Na 7 i FY 77fE P L i cz off' 77/,t '4ir,e,v�
1VVM BAR S AND T?'P,p or V,49-ht %c1� vvyo
�l �L • H,1 V& No M,t 7- F/P,4,E
PhR lNG off/ %fYz p//?
WAS POAIX-
ro $AE a. e.
V jE FxT�4 PARKIN6 3B46e
G 114S 7WO Pv84i<�, THE Fx7-1?4
SP rolZ FfSl' e,
rA ARKI;v.
AU .4 Fa4kS S Pol<Flv 7o� W",e
P4'gAsr"D m7-11 -r# is
•
F
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Board of Directors Meeting
February 7, 1985
Minutes
Directors Present:
Ron McCraw, Chairman
Buzz Burich
Glenn Matejka
Chad Piehl
Art Cooper
Don Glas
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Others Present:
John Bernhagen, Executive Director
Mark Myers, Chamber Vice President
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Dave Bagne, King Motel
Dennis'Schroeder, 7 -Hi Motel
Betty Beightol, Hutch Motel
Jack Bonniwell
The meeting was called to order by Chairman McGraw at 7:00 a.m.
Minutes of the January 17, 1985, meeting were approved.
Presentation of subcommittee report of Criteria for Issuance of
Industrial Revenue Bonds was discussed.
Presentations were given by Mike Wilhelmson and his consultants
regarding an addition to the Americ -Inn in Hutchinson. He formally
is requesting $500,000.00 in Industrial Revenue Bonds.
Larry Bethke and his consultants made a presentation for a new
Victorian Inn. The project total cost is $2,000,000.00. He formally
requested $1,400,000.00 of Industrial Revenue Bonds.
The Board will take action on these two requests at a special
Board meeting on Monday, February 11.
Further consideration was given for requirements and criteria
for the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds. A motion was made, seconded,
and carried that the following is a requirement for the issuance of
Industrial Revenue Bonds.
"A letter from a financial institution and /or bond house
giving indication or opinion of the financial feasability
and /or saleability of the bonds is a requirement for public
hearing. This letter would be due 5 days prior to the
public hearing of the city council or the public hearing
will be continued until the letter is received ".
Motion was made, seconded, and carried to have the following 9
points as guideline criteria for the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds.
1. The use of IRBs does not place this project in a
financial advantage to another like business within
this community without community benefit.
2. At the time of application, the property on which the
project is to be located is properly zoned for the
proposed use.
3. Proceeds of the proposed issue will be used to
rehabilitate an existing structure.
4. employment practices will be non - discriminatory.
9CDC Board Meeting
Feb. 7, 1985
page 2
go
5. The use of IRB financing on existing property makes
the project financially feasible.
6. The number of jobs to be created by the project described
in the application is at least two full -time equivalent
jobs for each $100,000 of issuance authority requested
for the project.
7. Promotes other employment in the community other than
on site or enhances the marketability of other goods
and services in the community.
8. The IRB issue does not exceed the cost or 80% of the
appraised value of the improvement as determined by a
Member of the American Institute (MAT) or American
Society of Appraisers (ASA). .
9. Without the use of IRB financing, the project would
otherwise not locate in our community.
Motion was made, seconded, and carried to set the salary for the
executive director for 1985 at $18,000.00 per year.
Meeting adjourned at 9:30 a.m.
Next meeting will be Monday, February 11, at 12:00 noon in the
library of McGraw Law Office. Agenda will be to take formal action on
the Americ -Inn and Victorian Inn projects. 10
•
THE HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The Hutchinson Safety Council met January 28, 1985 at 12 :00 Noon at the Fire Hall.
There were 16 members and no guests present.
President Gale Boelter opened the meeting with a moment of silent prayer.
0e December minutes were approved by motion with a notation that the annual election of
officers takes place in January not December.
Les Smith reported that he had written to the State Safety Council regarding wood chunks
creating road hazzardd. He had received a recommended newsrelease that would be made
available to the local media. He informed council members that if wood chunks or other
debris fall from an individual's vehicle they are responsible for any damage done and could
be fined. The extent of the penalty is up to the judge handling the case. Gale Boelter
asked Jim Haasl if there are any restrictions on covering loads and keeping them safe on
the highways. Jim at present was unaware of any, but would check into it in the future.
Gale suggested that the utility bills could be stuffed next fall with informational brochure:
regarding the potential problems of hauling wood.
Larry Wendorff reported that the intersection of Main Street and 5th Avenue coming to the
stop sign on 5th Avenue from the west was very slippery. In addition, Ralph Neumann
reported some problems on Bluff Street regarding improper snow removal. Both areas of
these city streets are county roads and are the county's responsibility. Ralph reported
that the county has had some recent supervisory turnover, and hopefully, these problems will
be better in the future with that resolved. Myron Johnson reported that the intersection
of Lake Street and Roberts Road is very slippery, and Ralph said he would check into sanding
it more heavily and frequently.
Myron Johnson asked if anyone was considering attending the State Safety Council's annual
meeting on January 31, 1985 at the St. Paul Athletic Club. President Boelter reviewed the
topics for presentation at the meeting and asked if anyone was interested in attending. In
addition, he reviewed the informational brochure regarding the Occupational Safety
Conference at the University of Minnesota on 1/15/85, 2/13/85. 3/12/85 and 4/17/85, and
encouraged anyone interested to pick up a brochure.
dValph Neumann referred to several storage tanks he had noticed at Pure Culture Products
marked nitrogen, and wondered if the fire department was aware of them. George Field said
that the department was aware of them and was prepared to deal accordingly should a leak
occur. Les Smith questioned whether the Agri -Tech site had been inspected recently, and
George informed him that it hadn't and he would check into it.
Problems with motor vehicles driving on the river were reported. Jim Haasl of the police
department reported that the drivers can be ticketed for reckless driving, and if they are
drunk they can be given a DWI.
Les Smith reported that a new Minnesota law passed recently would allow drivers over the age
of 65 to be eligible for a 56 auto insurance premium discount if they take and pass a
defensive driving course. The State has not provided final particulars on the program at
this time, however, when they become available a classroom course could be offered in
Hutchinson.
President Boelter scheduled an executive board meeting for 12 :00 Noon on February 11, 1985
at the Fire Hall in order to facilitate 1985 meeting plans. The February meeting of the
Safety Council was scheduled for Monday, February 25, 1985 at 12 :00 Noon at the Fire Hall.
Submitted by: Gale Boelter, President
Carol Haukos, Secretary/Treasurer
TREASURER's REPORT: Balance on Hand as of 1/1/85: $ 72.84
Deposits: annual City Contribution 150.00
Disbursements: J. Rix, postage 7.67
Balance on Hand as of 1/31/85: $215.17
Savings Account Balance as of .
1/31/85: $147.97
FOR YOUR IORMATION
=7=2=- l9ps_�
54-i -72
R,0,0,0
e 3,: t ?S7�p
3917
/7
7e 1? 17.-
L 7,
!7 /7-7,3
I hY'l- I I - - — :
-;7
4t- �Al
J,2ee
7.2 -
/d l7 '?SO - )76.zz
M
7I 4 37 7�, - 1 .. 797- .
54 i�.:3
j72- --I, f
11 Jae
j,7 "764'. /,:778
/p - L
13 7T
A'7
119.7 21 )179
1, 79' - -
90'
3i 1 No
tt
*?Th /.2101.
7� J
4
4-7
All
- zff
-IJ
7 .4
31 -'7 ffj- mro l
wr /.Q m I 1, .22684,- 1 2, 4' of, - �l 710?71 1 1 t II
Dy
-;7 7-r 727b -
71 #44- 1'4�-
=In
IMISIMMEM
MY OF HUTC JDWN
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
NAME
John Peterson
DATE January 31, 1985
ADDRESS
JOB TITLE Part Time Liquor Store Clerk
605 Lynn Road, Hutchinson
SUPERVISED BY Chuck Nelson
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE OTHER:
FULL TIME X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
PAY RATE Grade I
COMMENTS Replacing a part time employee who has resigned.
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
C/zc�j y /11 - L
DEPARTMENT HEAD
PERSONNEL ttORDINATOR
G� 1•7L•.VL1. L' 1, ��C��.
CITY AD INIS RATOR
0
9
m • �vv�o <iS _ _ TAP {��/�+/E� - _._ . ___
o? -off I 4's,
small'towns, mayPb�hi�';hardest' by "ruling
By Dennis Cassano
�sald Don Slater, director 'ot the., Peter Berg9t o n. the lawyer for the '
for, tlie"Minnesota Department of
K6k f}Writer Fl
League of Minnesota Cftleti.; 's. r Assoclatlon of Minnesota Counties
.
Employee Relations, Bald the court
,. .
! �., Bald, !'I donTsee It as having a major
decision "is not going to require any
When the U.S. Supreme Court decid•
this week that Congress can tell
All Minnesota governmental again... impact" except on the counties that
• cla the minimum;; time.
big change In the way.wl; _Oqb_"Jnea
§take legblalares sad,efty eoudCib
pay more use compensation
wage and nor,lesstthaa flare and e`4 r
here" But his. department also is
reviewing the'excempt classifica-
,•hQy much to pay their enfapioyeas
: halt for overtime, but some smell All c4untidpay overtime after ;40
dons among state employees.
and how to pay for overtime, It
the that typically fol-
'cities do not t! m¢ t OULafter hours; but ,they use different corn-
48 hours �" �rrehy '
raised question
of wor a eompow penffl6n4ine formulas, he said.. In I
Of the 35,300 employees In the exec -
ibws major decbiaix
a off. '• , every em the formula b the prod- `
utive branch, he estimated that
•
i�hat else does n mean?
" "' �" uct of coltyctive bargalaing, Berg- II
al etan�a�d•nlgver• etrom ea1d; Some employees say
10,000 to 12,0 00 are In exempted
closslticatlons
40 hours a waelt end does .time oTf b more valuable to them
Is Congress , about' to become the
t compensatory time unless p than money, ' he said.
Ltaken
'Me labor relations officials said that
Lreet City Council in Washington?
'In the sarhe pay period',
ertime It-worked. he mid. ` l'e' 1leMepld County, CbLHas Sprafka
one of the problems they are facing
•ii innesota ohiciab sad law school
+ of.1the rsonnel de pnrtrneot said the
b that the .federal labor department
has not written any go
professors said Thursday that the
.dia, no doubt that the state, county and
Kr: . �i .,
l guidelines are followed gen•
In Minneapolis, City AtWoey Robert
eretng the Implementation of the
Implementation o e
::CW%overnments will have to adjust
Alfton said the city follows the feder -'
eho ..,
I s
employees. lsw for government
thetr compensation systems,
al labor standards, so he does not
of employees. and It will
`..have to be certain that the classifies-
•
The decision that the San Antonio
expect any changes. • : f , . ,
t T01; tYf >''t,
tlone • that are exempted from the
U the fedet f department decides to
transit authority must pay its split.
.�.
4
The Metropolitan TratWlt Comml�,
state ,labor law. also fit Into federal
t
�' he said.
write a new,set of rules, they won't
be put Into effect for a year or two.
AIA bus driven overtime at time
and a half under the federal Fatr
sion does not know If the San Mto-%
No decision will i rtnake tang differ-i.
,ax"
' ••' '• .. " `•" -•
n the 70deffil,and state laws
In addltlon, the state and local offs-
Labor'Standards Act may have the
.,,greatest Impact 'on the small towns
ence here, said spokamon 'Robert 4
LaShomb. He sold that overtime Is
governing
I .publlq employees Pmenlly exempt
firefighters, '
clots may have to sift through admin-
istrstive Interpretation of the federal
of Minnesota.
paid for split shifts that- cannot be o'
poi offlars, profess i
rules made bY- dletrict offices of the
decision ''means bad stuff" nd
completed In 12 boon, bet that the
completed
' staff hasn't found out yet whethers
supervisory and,•managerial 'I
enrnpMrjiees
Y
labor department-in Order to deter-
mine how Minnesota le affected.:
ha9•"potentlaily vast ramifications"
that exceeds the federal standardls, r ;
Jsuaee'. Lee, manager
Lee said the state Is starting to' bar-
+„
;compensatlon
gain with unlom for two-year, con-'
trw t. that will start July I.,
Pay continued on page' 148 •
104
0
C
T
O
O
i
0
Continued fm g3 z ay: "5• r+ e.
the Supreme Court decision this to regulate a private Industry in
week overrules a 1976 decision that soIDe !ray. the states and the indus-
stopped Congress from imposing the ' 49 would lobby their own senators
federal labor act on state,and local and representative and the entire
goveromeats �, w',.',
'
This week's decision restorers the He and colleague Dan'arbeY; said
federaistate relationship to what K. Congress any imposes its will 6*
was then, Said two University of We- the states by using sera tarroft as
tarieft pow aress for obtalaft
aesota Taw School processom
won grant's, "and such aftcks
Philip Fricliey, echoing the ma** as ,threatening to withhold federal
opinion In the 544.4 decision, Maid sway money antes the minlmum
the combination of direct repreleO- drinking age Is raised to 21 Or the
ration in Congress and the lobbying speed limit Is lowered to 55 m. ph, _
of special interest groups will protect
the states from too much regu>attoo Farber said the federal
by the federal governmer►t. •L may lactaowledge &loci
ERwoftbu
` N's VMF
.For Instance, he said, U Congres so muchinore appealing to Just pass
i
were to consider- requiring the States a law" dire" foci action a" it
_ is to tease the an into eomphance,
�
7
Honi Sold the 604 important Inaiiid
of the decision W that It prevented
the 1976 decision from being broad-
I
ened to stop all federal impasitlons
on the states. They said they feared
a 50 -year reversal to the days before
the New Deal when The Supreme
Court prevented federal social re-
forms.
i
neee ....a.+....a
0
